FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Migrant tragedy
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy." Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didnt know how to headline this. 4 drowned..a couple of kids too. Usual noises from the gmnt who are still planning to stick them on an island in the middle of the atlantic The anti migrant rhetoric has without a doubt being ramped up in recent years and there seems little opposition to Patel's schemes." I do not think that any country in the world tolerates illegal immigration. If provision is made for people who have a genuine refugee status , any responsible government in any country throughout the world has an obligation to stop illegal immigration. As Pritis parents were immigrants she is in an excellent position to understand the issues involved and take action to resolve them . A good starting point might be to remove funding for some of the left wing lawyers who are determined to milk the system | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didnt know how to headline this. 4 drowned..a couple of kids too. Usual noises from the gmnt who are still planning to stick them on an island in the middle of the atlantic The anti migrant rhetoric has without a doubt being ramped up in recent years and there seems little opposition to Patel's schemes. I do not think that any country in the world tolerates illegal immigration. If provision is made for people who have a genuine refugee status , any responsible government in any country throughout the world has an obligation to stop illegal immigration. As Pritis parents were immigrants she is in an excellent position to understand the issues involved and take action to resolve them . A good starting point might be to remove funding for some of the left wing lawyers who are determined to milk the system " Can you really be so indoctrinated? I'll just leave this link here. "More than 800 former judges and legal professionals have signed a letter accusing Boris Johnson and Priti Patel of "hostility" towards lawyers representing migrants seeking asylum." https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-54687081 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didnt know how to headline this. 4 drowned..a couple of kids too. Usual noises from the gmnt who are still planning to stick them on an island in the middle of the atlantic The anti migrant rhetoric has without a doubt being ramped up in recent years and there seems little opposition to Patel's schemes." Which island is that then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didnt know how to headline this. 4 drowned..a couple of kids too. Usual noises from the gmnt who are still planning to stick them on an island in the middle of the atlantic The anti migrant rhetoric has without a doubt being ramped up in recent years and there seems little opposition to Patel's schemes. Which island is that then? " There is no plan to send them to an island and there never was Some people seem to be obsessed with being on the side of the 'underdog' to the detriment of thinking about the problem rationally | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didnt know how to headline this. 4 drowned..a couple of kids too. Usual noises from the gmnt who are still planning to stick them on an island in the middle of the atlantic The anti migrant rhetoric has without a doubt being ramped up in recent years and there seems little opposition to Patel's schemes. I do not think that any country in the world tolerates illegal immigration. If provision is made for people who have a genuine refugee status , any responsible government in any country throughout the world has an obligation to stop illegal immigration. As Pritis parents were immigrants she is in an excellent position to understand the issues involved and take action to resolve them . A good starting point might be to remove funding for some of the left wing lawyers who are determined to milk the system " Unbelievable. Well and truly unbelievable | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didnt know how to headline this. 4 drowned..a couple of kids too. Usual noises from the gmnt who are still planning to stick them on an island in the middle of the atlantic The anti migrant rhetoric has without a doubt being ramped up in recent years and there seems little opposition to Patel's schemes. Which island is that then? There is no plan to send them to an island and there never was Some people seem to be obsessed with being on the side of the 'underdog' to the detriment of thinking about the problem rationally " https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/sep/30/revealed-no-10-explores-sending-asylum-seekers-to-moldova-morocco-and-papua-new-guinea | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didnt know how to headline this. 4 drowned..a couple of kids too. Usual noises from the gmnt who are still planning to stick them on an island in the middle of the atlantic The anti migrant rhetoric has without a doubt being ramped up in recent years and there seems little opposition to Patel's schemes. Which island is that then? There is no plan to send them to an island and there never was Some people seem to be obsessed with being on the side of the 'underdog' to the detriment of thinking about the problem rationally https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/sep/30/revealed-no-10-explores-sending-asylum-seekers-to-moldova-morocco-and-papua-new-guinea" So the government EXPLORED all the options then. That's what a government should do | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didnt know how to headline this. 4 drowned..a couple of kids too. Usual noises from the gmnt who are still planning to stick them on an island in the middle of the atlantic The anti migrant rhetoric has without a doubt being ramped up in recent years and there seems little opposition to Patel's schemes. Which island is that then? There is no plan to send them to an island and there never was Some people seem to be obsessed with being on the side of the 'underdog' to the detriment of thinking about the problem rationally https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/sep/30/revealed-no-10-explores-sending-asylum-seekers-to-moldova-morocco-and-papua-new-guinea So the government EXPLORED all the options then. That's what a government should do " There is no plan to send these to an island | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didnt know how to headline this. 4 drowned..a couple of kids too. Usual noises from the gmnt who are still planning to stick them on an island in the middle of the atlantic The anti migrant rhetoric has without a doubt being ramped up in recent years and there seems little opposition to Patel's schemes. Which island is that then? There is no plan to send them to an island and there never was Some people seem to be obsessed with being on the side of the 'underdog' to the detriment of thinking about the problem rationally https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/sep/30/revealed-no-10-explores-sending-asylum-seekers-to-moldova-morocco-and-papua-new-guinea So the government EXPLORED all the options then. That's what a government should do There is no plan to send these to an island" I'll hear almost any argument against a Tory government but constantly chasing shadows helps no one | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didnt know how to headline this. 4 drowned..a couple of kids too. Usual noises from the gmnt who are still planning to stick them on an island in the middle of the atlantic The anti migrant rhetoric has without a doubt being ramped up in recent years and there seems little opposition to Patel's schemes. Which island is that then? There is no plan to send them to an island and there never was Some people seem to be obsessed with being on the side of the 'underdog' to the detriment of thinking about the problem rationally https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/sep/30/revealed-no-10-explores-sending-asylum-seekers-to-moldova-morocco-and-papua-new-guinea So the government EXPLORED all the options then. That's what a government should do There is no plan to send these to an island I'll hear almost any argument against a Tory government but constantly chasing shadows helps no one" When you are wrong about something, dont keep on digging. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didnt know how to headline this. 4 drowned..a couple of kids too. Usual noises from the gmnt who are still planning to stick them on an island in the middle of the atlantic The anti migrant rhetoric has without a doubt being ramped up in recent years and there seems little opposition to Patel's schemes. I do not think that any country in the world tolerates illegal immigration. If provision is made for people who have a genuine refugee status , any responsible government in any country throughout the world has an obligation to stop illegal immigration. As Pritis parents were immigrants she is in an excellent position to understand the issues involved and take action to resolve them . A good starting point might be to remove funding for some of the left wing lawyers who are determined to milk the system " Are you for real Pat? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Didnt know how to headline this. 4 drowned..a couple of kids too. Usual noises from the gmnt who are still planning to stick them on an island in the middle of the atlantic The anti migrant rhetoric has without a doubt being ramped up in recent years and there seems little opposition to Patel's schemes. I do not think that any country in the world tolerates illegal immigration. If provision is made for people who have a genuine refugee status , any responsible government in any country throughout the world has an obligation to stop illegal immigration. As Pritis parents were immigrants she is in an excellent position to understand the issues involved and take action to resolve them . A good starting point might be to remove funding for some of the left wing lawyers who are determined to milk the system Are you for real Pat? " He cant be. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?" Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk." There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now ." No mate you are, this is a disaster it is not political its very sad but to try to use it as a stick to beat the government get a grip man. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now .No mate you are, this is a disaster it is not political its very sad but to try to use it as a stick to beat the government get a grip man." Read. The. Link. Patel has blasted the lawyers reprepresenting the migrants They have written to complain. And you accuse me of use it as a stick to beat the gmnt? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Very sad. Will only get worse from here on out with the conditions in the channel over winter. I should imagine there will be a rush to try and get over before Brexit. " There was a human rights lawyer on 5 live last night. Apparently until recently, when they got to Calais they could apply for status and it could be processed over here. That's stopped now which is why so many are risking the crossing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is it with brexiters here using the word ‘man! In every other sentence? Is it a code between enlightened people? " Maybe they are all hippies? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now .No mate you are, this is a disaster it is not political its very sad but to try to use it as a stick to beat the government get a grip man. Read. The. Link. Patel has blasted the lawyers reprepresenting the migrants They have written to complain. And you accuse me of use it as a stick to beat the gmnt? " Why start a topic on migrants dying instead of patel blasting lawyers? you knew what you were doing your not thick. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now .No mate you are, this is a disaster it is not political its very sad but to try to use it as a stick to beat the government get a grip man. Read. The. Link. Patel has blasted the lawyers reprepresenting the migrants They have written to complain. And you accuse me of use it as a stick to beat the gmnt? Why start a topic on migrants dying instead of patel blasting lawyers? you knew what you were doing your not thick." The migrants are coming here. Lawyers are representing them Can you not see the link? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now .No mate you are, this is a disaster it is not political its very sad but to try to use it as a stick to beat the government get a grip man. Read. The. Link. Patel has blasted the lawyers reprepresenting the migrants They have written to complain. And you accuse me of use it as a stick to beat the gmnt? Why start a topic on migrants dying instead of patel blasting lawyers? you knew what you were doing your not thick. The migrants are coming here. Lawyers are representing them Can you not see the link?" yes i can that is not the point and you know it,i can see what you were trying to imply along with no doubt others too.In my book your political bias has sank to new levels. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now .No mate you are, this is a disaster it is not political its very sad but to try to use it as a stick to beat the government get a grip man. Read. The. Link. Patel has blasted the lawyers reprepresenting the migrants They have written to complain. And you accuse me of use it as a stick to beat the gmnt? Why start a topic on migrants dying instead of patel blasting lawyers? you knew what you were doing your not thick. The migrants are coming here. Lawyers are representing them Can you not see the link?yes i can that is not the point and you know it,i can see what you were trying to imply along with no doubt others too.In my book your political bias has sank to new levels." You are not taking this being called our for being wrong thing,not too well are you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now .No mate you are, this is a disaster it is not political its very sad but to try to use it as a stick to beat the government get a grip man. Read. The. Link. Patel has blasted the lawyers reprepresenting the migrants They have written to complain. And you accuse me of use it as a stick to beat the gmnt? Why start a topic on migrants dying instead of patel blasting lawyers? you knew what you were doing your not thick. The migrants are coming here. Lawyers are representing them Can you not see the link?yes i can that is not the point and you know it,i can see what you were trying to imply along with no doubt others too.In my book your political bias has sank to new levels." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now .No mate you are, this is a disaster it is not political its very sad but to try to use it as a stick to beat the government get a grip man. Read. The. Link. Patel has blasted the lawyers reprepresenting the migrants They have written to complain. And you accuse me of use it as a stick to beat the gmnt? Why start a topic on migrants dying instead of patel blasting lawyers? you knew what you were doing your not thick. The migrants are coming here. Lawyers are representing them Can you not see the link?yes i can that is not the point and you know it,i can see what you were trying to imply along with no doubt others too.In my book your political bias has sank to new levels. You are not taking this being called our for being wrong thing,not too well are you?" Deflect all you like I think its admirable that a good socialist like yourself is worried about lawyers.The very people who earn thousands just by dither and delay hanging everything out for as long as possible so they can charge an extra £75 for sending another letter. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now .No mate you are, this is a disaster it is not political its very sad but to try to use it as a stick to beat the government get a grip man. Read. The. Link. Patel has blasted the lawyers reprepresenting the migrants They have written to complain. And you accuse me of use it as a stick to beat the gmnt? Why start a topic on migrants dying instead of patel blasting lawyers? you knew what you were doing your not thick. The migrants are coming here. Lawyers are representing them Can you not see the link?yes i can that is not the point and you know it,i can see what you were trying to imply along with no doubt others too.In my book your political bias has sank to new levels. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now .No mate you are, this is a disaster it is not political its very sad but to try to use it as a stick to beat the government get a grip man. Read. The. Link. Patel has blasted the lawyers reprepresenting the migrants They have written to complain. And you accuse me of use it as a stick to beat the gmnt? Why start a topic on migrants dying instead of patel blasting lawyers? you knew what you were doing your not thick. The migrants are coming here. Lawyers are representing them Can you not see the link?yes i can that is not the point and you know it,i can see what you were trying to imply along with no doubt others too.In my book your political bias has sank to new levels. You are not taking this being called our for being wrong thing,not too well are you?Deflect all you like I think its admirable that a good socialist like yourself is worried about lawyers.The very people who earn thousands just by dither and delay hanging everything out for as long as possible so they can charge an extra £75 for sending another letter. " Can you post a link on how much they earn? Cheers. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now .No mate you are, this is a disaster it is not political its very sad but to try to use it as a stick to beat the government get a grip man. Read. The. Link. Patel has blasted the lawyers reprepresenting the migrants They have written to complain. And you accuse me of use it as a stick to beat the gmnt? Why start a topic on migrants dying instead of patel blasting lawyers? you knew what you were doing your not thick. The migrants are coming here. Lawyers are representing them Can you not see the link?yes i can that is not the point and you know it,i can see what you were trying to imply along with no doubt others too.In my book your political bias has sank to new levels. " **************************************** Well said, I must say. He never stops, day after day after day. One wonders if he actually pays taxes........?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now .No mate you are, this is a disaster it is not political its very sad but to try to use it as a stick to beat the government get a grip man. Read. The. Link. Patel has blasted the lawyers reprepresenting the migrants They have written to complain. And you accuse me of use it as a stick to beat the gmnt? Why start a topic on migrants dying instead of patel blasting lawyers? you knew what you were doing your not thick. The migrants are coming here. Lawyers are representing them Can you not see the link?yes i can that is not the point and you know it,i can see what you were trying to imply along with no doubt others too.In my book your political bias has sank to new levels. **************************************** Well said, I must say. He never stops, day after day after day. One wonders if he actually pays taxes........??" And that is your business how? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm accused of distracting yet its moved from migrants drowning to a rather bizarre question of if I pay taxes. Presumably if I didnt,I wouldn't be allowed to have an opinion." to be fair lionel you said 4drowned two of them kids and that was it on that subject the rest was about the government | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm accused of distracting yet its moved from migrants drowning to a rather bizarre question of if I pay taxes. Presumably if I didnt,I wouldn't be allowed to have an opinion. to be fair lionel you said 4drowned two of them kids and that was it on that subject the rest was about the government " And the connection with me paying taxes is? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm accused of distracting yet its moved from migrants drowning to a rather bizarre question of if I pay taxes. Presumably if I didnt,I wouldn't be allowed to have an opinion. to be fair lionel you said 4drowned two of them kids and that was it on that subject the rest was about the government And the connection with me paying taxes is?" i never mentioned you paying taxes that’s nothing to do with me mate | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm accused of distracting yet its moved from migrants drowning to a rather bizarre question of if I pay taxes. Presumably if I didnt,I wouldn't be allowed to have an opinion. to be fair lionel you said 4drowned two of them kids and that was it on that subject the rest was about the government And the connection with me paying taxes is?i never mentioned you paying taxes that’s nothing to do with me mate " I didn't say you It was questioned if I pay taxes I'm waiting for an answer, as to both the relevance and the business. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As for the link with the gmnt The migrants drowned tried to reach here The gmnt put out a statement saying how sorry they are This is the same gmnt who are demonising lawyers protecting these migrants. If you cant see the link..you are choosing not too." you could aim some of yr anger at France it’ was just of the coast of Dunkirk that’s where the migrants are leaving from in the boats owned by criminals if the french wanted to save there lives I’m sure they could it can’t be that hard to stop. Two little kids drowned it’s shocking my heart goes out to them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As for the link with the gmnt The migrants drowned tried to reach here The gmnt put out a statement saying how sorry they are This is the same gmnt who are demonising lawyers protecting these migrants. If you cant see the link..you are choosing not too.you could aim some of yr anger at France it’ was just of the coast of Dunkirk that’s where the migrants are leaving from in the boats owned by criminals if the french wanted to save there lives I’m sure they could it can’t be that hard to stop. Two little kids drowned it’s shocking my heart goes out to them " Look at what I posted about what the human rights lawyer said | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As for the link with the gmnt The migrants drowned tried to reach here The gmnt put out a statement saying how sorry they are This is the same gmnt who are demonising lawyers protecting these migrants. If you cant see the link..you are choosing not too.you could aim some of yr anger at France it’ was just of the coast of Dunkirk that’s where the migrants are leaving from in the boats owned by criminals if the french wanted to save there lives I’m sure they could it can’t be that hard to stop. Two little kids drowned it’s shocking my heart goes out to them Look at what I posted about what the human rights lawyer said " france don’t let them apply for asylum there now and don’t make much of an effort to stop them loading on to boats to come here yet you point the finger at our government and not the French yet this happened of there coast in french waters | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As for the link with the gmnt The migrants drowned tried to reach here The gmnt put out a statement saying how sorry they are This is the same gmnt who are demonising lawyers protecting these migrants. If you cant see the link..you are choosing not too.you could aim some of yr anger at France it’ was just of the coast of Dunkirk that’s where the migrants are leaving from in the boats owned by criminals if the french wanted to save there lives I’m sure they could it can’t be that hard to stop. Two little kids drowned it’s shocking my heart goes out to them Look at what I posted about what the human rights lawyer said france don’t let them apply for asylum there now and don’t make much of an effort to stop them loading on to boats to come here yet you point the finger at our government and not the French yet this happened of there coast in french waters " I was pointing out the contradiction in a gmnt expressing sympathy whilst looking at way they can ship them off to an island. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As for the link with the gmnt The migrants drowned tried to reach here The gmnt put out a statement saying how sorry they are This is the same gmnt who are demonising lawyers protecting these migrants. If you cant see the link..you are choosing not too.you could aim some of yr anger at France it’ was just of the coast of Dunkirk that’s where the migrants are leaving from in the boats owned by criminals if the french wanted to save there lives I’m sure they could it can’t be that hard to stop. Two little kids drowned it’s shocking my heart goes out to them Look at what I posted about what the human rights lawyer said france don’t let them apply for asylum there now and don’t make much of an effort to stop them loading on to boats to come here yet you point the finger at our government and not the French yet this happened of there coast in french waters I was pointing out the contradiction in a gmnt expressing sympathy whilst looking at way they can ship them off to an island." bit like the french expressing sympathy whilst allowing this tragedy to happen | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lionel I have a fair and honest question to ask you. Do you think anyone and everyone should be able to come to the UK to live whenever they feel like it?" I think if they have a come from a difficult background or a dangerous situation, then we have a duty of care to take them in. Obviously if someone comes looking for work. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As for the link with the gmnt The migrants drowned tried to reach here The gmnt put out a statement saying how sorry they are This is the same gmnt who are demonising lawyers protecting these migrants. If you cant see the link..you are choosing not too.you could aim some of yr anger at France it’ was just of the coast of Dunkirk that’s where the migrants are leaving from in the boats owned by criminals if the french wanted to save there lives I’m sure they could it can’t be that hard to stop. Two little kids drowned it’s shocking my heart goes out to them Look at what I posted about what the human rights lawyer said france don’t let them apply for asylum there now and don’t make much of an effort to stop them loading on to boats to come here yet you point the finger at our government and not the French yet this happened of there coast in french waters I was pointing out the contradiction in a gmnt expressing sympathy whilst looking at way they can ship them off to an island.bit like the french expressing sympathy whilst allowing this tragedy to happen " They were not heading to France | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lionel I have a fair and honest question to ask you. Do you think anyone and everyone should be able to come to the UK to live whenever they feel like it? I think if they have a come from a difficult background or a dangerous situation, then we have a duty of care to take them in. Obviously if someone comes looking for work." You didn't really answer the question but I'm not surprised. However you say a duty of care therefore why do France or any other EU countries the migrants travel through carry out the duty of care? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As for the link with the gmnt The migrants drowned tried to reach here The gmnt put out a statement saying how sorry they are This is the same gmnt who are demonising lawyers protecting these migrants. If you cant see the link..you are choosing not too.you could aim some of yr anger at France it’ was just of the coast of Dunkirk that’s where the migrants are leaving from in the boats owned by criminals if the french wanted to save there lives I’m sure they could it can’t be that hard to stop. Two little kids drowned it’s shocking my heart goes out to them Look at what I posted about what the human rights lawyer said france don’t let them apply for asylum there now and don’t make much of an effort to stop them loading on to boats to come here yet you point the finger at our government and not the French yet this happened of there coast in french waters I was pointing out the contradiction in a gmnt expressing sympathy whilst looking at way they can ship them off to an island.bit like the french expressing sympathy whilst allowing this tragedy to happen They were not heading to France " because France won’t allow them asylum but they were in France then loaded onto a boat in France then in french water do you not think France owe them a duty of care then ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As for the link with the gmnt The migrants drowned tried to reach here The gmnt put out a statement saying how sorry they are This is the same gmnt who are demonising lawyers protecting these migrants. If you cant see the link..you are choosing not too.you could aim some of yr anger at France it’ was just of the coast of Dunkirk that’s where the migrants are leaving from in the boats owned by criminals if the french wanted to save there lives I’m sure they could it can’t be that hard to stop. Two little kids drowned it’s shocking my heart goes out to them Look at what I posted about what the human rights lawyer said france don’t let them apply for asylum there now and don’t make much of an effort to stop them loading on to boats to come here yet you point the finger at our government and not the French yet this happened of there coast in french waters I was pointing out the contradiction in a gmnt expressing sympathy whilst looking at way they can ship them off to an island.bit like the french expressing sympathy whilst allowing this tragedy to happen They were not heading to France " I think France has a duty of care to not allow this to happen in their waters. It seems very much they are prepared to let people take extreme risks in order for it to becomes someone else’s problem. They should be shutting down these criminal gangs but unfortunately it seems they don’t regard the human cost as an issue. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As for the link with the gmnt The migrants drowned tried to reach here The gmnt put out a statement saying how sorry they are This is the same gmnt who are demonising lawyers protecting these migrants. If you cant see the link..you are choosing not too.you could aim some of yr anger at France it’ was just of the coast of Dunkirk that’s where the migrants are leaving from in the boats owned by criminals if the french wanted to save there lives I’m sure they could it can’t be that hard to stop. Two little kids drowned it’s shocking my heart goes out to them Look at what I posted about what the human rights lawyer said france don’t let them apply for asylum there now and don’t make much of an effort to stop them loading on to boats to come here yet you point the finger at our government and not the French yet this happened of there coast in french waters I was pointing out the contradiction in a gmnt expressing sympathy whilst looking at way they can ship them off to an island.bit like the french expressing sympathy whilst allowing this tragedy to happen They were not heading to France I think France has a duty of care to not allow this to happen in their waters. It seems very much they are prepared to let people take extreme risks in order for it to becomes someone else’s problem. They should be shutting down these criminal gangs but unfortunately it seems they don’t regard the human cost as an issue. " exactly that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lionel I have a fair and honest question to ask you. Do you think anyone and everyone should be able to come to the UK to live whenever they feel like it? I think if they have a come from a difficult background or a dangerous situation, then we have a duty of care to take them in. Obviously if someone comes looking for work. You didn't really answer the question but I'm not surprised. However you say a duty of care therefore why do France or any other EU countries the migrants travel through carry out the duty of care?" How didn't I answer the question? If they are fleeing turmoil at home,we have a duty of care of care to take them in,under the human rights act. If they are not ,their situation will be assessed one case by case basis. As it stands we deport about 2 thousands migrants each year. I obviously dont know the miniatue of each case. Should we accept every single person who comes here? I don't know..its a tough one .obviously at some point you would have to look at stuff like housing etc. There have been stories for years about us being overrun but it has never happened. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They came from france, A safe country,no wars or that going on, Ask yourself why they want to come here, Doesn't take much working out does it." Well tell me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"My duty of care ends with me looking after my family,end off" Standard. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They came from france, A safe country,no wars or that going on, Ask yourself why they want to come here, Doesn't take much working out does it. Well tell me" for the benefits lionel | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As for the link with the gmnt The migrants drowned tried to reach here The gmnt put out a statement saying how sorry they are This is the same gmnt who are demonising lawyers protecting these migrants. If you cant see the link..you are choosing not too.you could aim some of yr anger at France it’ was just of the coast of Dunkirk that’s where the migrants are leaving from in the boats owned by criminals if the french wanted to save there lives I’m sure they could it can’t be that hard to stop. Two little kids drowned it’s shocking my heart goes out to them Look at what I posted about what the human rights lawyer said france don’t let them apply for asylum there now and don’t make much of an effort to stop them loading on to boats to come here yet you point the finger at our government and not the French yet this happened of there coast in french waters I was pointing out the contradiction in a gmnt expressing sympathy whilst looking at way they can ship them off to an island.bit like the french expressing sympathy whilst allowing this tragedy to happen They were not heading to France because France won’t allow them asylum but they were in France then loaded onto a boat in France then in french water do you not think France owe them a duty of care then ?" France took on 330,547 asylum seekers in 2017 So where are you getting your info from? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They came from france, A safe country,no wars or that going on, Ask yourself why they want to come here, Doesn't take much working out does it. Well tell me for the benefits lionel" Well obviously So they can live a life of luxury. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As for the link with the gmnt The migrants drowned tried to reach here The gmnt put out a statement saying how sorry they are This is the same gmnt who are demonising lawyers protecting these migrants. If you cant see the link..you are choosing not too.you could aim some of yr anger at France it’ was just of the coast of Dunkirk that’s where the migrants are leaving from in the boats owned by criminals if the french wanted to save there lives I’m sure they could it can’t be that hard to stop. Two little kids drowned it’s shocking my heart goes out to them Look at what I posted about what the human rights lawyer said france don’t let them apply for asylum there now and don’t make much of an effort to stop them loading on to boats to come here yet you point the finger at our government and not the French yet this happened of there coast in french waters I was pointing out the contradiction in a gmnt expressing sympathy whilst looking at way they can ship them off to an island.bit like the french expressing sympathy whilst allowing this tragedy to happen They were not heading to France I think France has a duty of care to not allow this to happen in their waters. It seems very much they are prepared to let people take extreme risks in order for it to becomes someone else’s problem. They should be shutting down these criminal gangs but unfortunately it seems they don’t regard the human cost as an issue. " And we have no responsibility? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As for the link with the gmnt The migrants drowned tried to reach here The gmnt put out a statement saying how sorry they are This is the same gmnt who are demonising lawyers protecting these migrants. If you cant see the link..you are choosing not too.you could aim some of yr anger at France it’ was just of the coast of Dunkirk that’s where the migrants are leaving from in the boats owned by criminals if the french wanted to save there lives I’m sure they could it can’t be that hard to stop. Two little kids drowned it’s shocking my heart goes out to them Look at what I posted about what the human rights lawyer said france don’t let them apply for asylum there now and don’t make much of an effort to stop them loading on to boats to come here yet you point the finger at our government and not the French yet this happened of there coast in french waters I was pointing out the contradiction in a gmnt expressing sympathy whilst looking at way they can ship them off to an island.bit like the french expressing sympathy whilst allowing this tragedy to happen They were not heading to France I think France has a duty of care to not allow this to happen in their waters. It seems very much they are prepared to let people take extreme risks in order for it to becomes someone else’s problem. They should be shutting down these criminal gangs but unfortunately it seems they don’t regard the human cost as an issue. And we have no responsibility?" We don’t have a responsibility for physically stopping the criminal gangs in France no. That lies with them so no more lives should be lost. We should stop the people traffickers in this sordid trade this side of the channel. Yes very much so. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now ." Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lionel I have a fair and honest question to ask you. Do you think anyone and everyone should be able to come to the UK to live whenever they feel like it? I think if they have a come from a difficult background or a dangerous situation, then we have a duty of care to take them in. Obviously if someone comes looking for work. You didn't really answer the question but I'm not surprised. However you say a duty of care therefore why do France or any other EU countries the migrants travel through carry out the duty of care? How didn't I answer the question? If they are fleeing turmoil at home,we have a duty of care of care to take them in,under the human rights act. If they are not ,their situation will be assessed one case by case basis. As it stands we deport about 2 thousands migrants each year. I obviously dont know the miniatue of each case. Should we accept every single person who comes here? I don't know..its a tough one .obviously at some point you would have to look at stuff like housing etc. There have been stories for years about us being overrun but it has never happened." I thought the duty of care was the first safe country they land in you can’t claim asylum for a country yr not in | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. " People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration " No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. " It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"" But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration ." People seeking asylum aren't illegal. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal." that is not what you said this is. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. " Ah the old looking after our own argument. From a gmnt willing to let kids go hungry. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal." If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyhow. Anyone who thinks that all their problems are caused by a small group of poor people. And don't question those in power, and who have all the money... Is likely to be so indoctrinated that any discourse on the matter isn't likely to be fruitful. I regret joining the discussion. Have a good day everyone. " Doesnt take much Blame all our problems on a group of people. Preferably disadvantaged Few headlines in the mail Hey Presto | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. " You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. " we all know why they want to come to the U.K. even Lionel knows I would want to come here if I was in there shoes don’t think I’d want it badly enough to risk my kids lives tho but I can understand why but it’s the french who are to blame for letting this happen on there beach’s and shores | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us?" would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. we all know why they want to come to the U.K. even Lionel knows I would want to come here if I was in there shoes don’t think I’d want it badly enough to risk my kids lives tho but I can understand why but it’s the french who are to blame for letting this happen on there beach’s and shores " Explain this to me A migrant family lands on France Where are you heading?(in french) We want to Go England What can the French do to stop this exactly? Lock them up Like I said before there used to be an agreement where Tory would stay there,and we would process their application. That has now gone. How is that the French,'fault. There should be communication between the 2 countries. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not " You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this " Selling drugs is illegal, I'm sure the majority of us want it curbed.. Murder is illegal, I'm sure none of us want to be murdered.. Theft is illegal, anyone who has suffered theft will agree.. So why is it so difficult to understand that stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into the UK, who incidentally, are economic migrants and not political ones, needs to be stopped. If you have a legitimate reason to claim asylum then do so through legitimate means. If you have some skill you can offer to benefit the UK, apply legitimately. If you want to live somewhere where you can work illegally for better pay than you could earn in your home country while having access to free medical care, then sorry, you are not welcome. Illegal immigrants don t turn up at the nearest council or immigration office to register they are here, they disappear, working cash in hand doing labouring work or waiters in restaurants, earning less than minimum wage. The people who employ them have no interest in paying the taxes they should. So everything about it is illegal. They are an additional cost and a burden on our society. They have no legitimate reason to be in the UK, they choose to come here because it's more beneficial to be in the UK than any other EU state. Most legitimate refugees wouldn't travel thousands of miles across safe countries if there wasn't a good financial reason to do so. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this Selling drugs is illegal, I'm sure the majority of us want it curbed.. Murder is illegal, I'm sure none of us want to be murdered.. Theft is illegal, anyone who has suffered theft will agree.. So why is it so difficult to understand that stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into the UK, who incidentally, are economic migrants and not political ones, needs to be stopped. If you have a legitimate reason to claim asylum then do so through legitimate means. If you have some skill you can offer to benefit the UK, apply legitimately. If you want to live somewhere where you can work illegally for better pay than you could earn in your home country while having access to free medical care, then sorry, you are not welcome. Illegal immigrants don t turn up at the nearest council or immigration office to register they are here, they disappear, working cash in hand doing labouring work or waiters in restaurants, earning less than minimum wage. The people who employ them have no interest in paying the taxes they should. So everything about it is illegal. They are an additional cost and a burden on our society. They have no legitimate reason to be in the UK, they choose to come here because it's more beneficial to be in the UK than any other EU state. Most legitimate refugees wouldn't travel thousands of miles across safe countries if there wasn't a good financial reason to do so. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this " on the radio this morning that the french have stopped accepting them as asylum seekers I’m sure if the french were offering them the same as the U.K. they wouldn’t want to risk there lives to come here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this Selling drugs is illegal, I'm sure the majority of us want it curbed.. Murder is illegal, I'm sure none of us want to be murdered.. Theft is illegal, anyone who has suffered theft will agree.. So why is it so difficult to understand that stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into the UK, who incidentally, are economic migrants and not political ones, needs to be stopped. If you have a legitimate reason to claim asylum then do so through legitimate means. If you have some skill you can offer to benefit the UK, apply legitimately. If you want to live somewhere where you can work illegally for better pay than you could earn in your home country while having access to free medical care, then sorry, you are not welcome. Illegal immigrants don t turn up at the nearest council or immigration office to register they are here, they disappear, working cash in hand doing labouring work or waiters in restaurants, earning less than minimum wage. The people who employ them have no interest in paying the taxes they should. So everything about it is illegal. They are an additional cost and a burden on our society. They have no legitimate reason to be in the UK, they choose to come here because it's more beneficial to be in the UK than any other EU state. Most legitimate refugees wouldn't travel thousands of miles across safe countries if there wasn't a good financial reason to do so. " What happens to illegal immigrants when caught? So you are saying most people who come here..are looking for illegal work? Not feeling persecution or a country we have bombed the shit out of, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this on the radio this morning that the french have stopped accepting them as asylum seekers I’m sure if the french were offering them the same as the U.K. they wouldn’t want to risk there lives to come here " There is nothing in the news about this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this Selling drugs is illegal, I'm sure the majority of us want it curbed.. Murder is illegal, I'm sure none of us want to be murdered.. Theft is illegal, anyone who has suffered theft will agree.. So why is it so difficult to understand that stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into the UK, who incidentally, are economic migrants and not political ones, needs to be stopped. If you have a legitimate reason to claim asylum then do so through legitimate means. If you have some skill you can offer to benefit the UK, apply legitimately. If you want to live somewhere where you can work illegally for better pay than you could earn in your home country while having access to free medical care, then sorry, you are not welcome. Illegal immigrants don t turn up at the nearest council or immigration office to register they are here, they disappear, working cash in hand doing labouring work or waiters in restaurants, earning less than minimum wage. The people who employ them have no interest in paying the taxes they should. So everything about it is illegal. They are an additional cost and a burden on our society. They have no legitimate reason to be in the UK, they choose to come here because it's more beneficial to be in the UK than any other EU state. Most legitimate refugees wouldn't travel thousands of miles across safe countries if there wasn't a good financial reason to do so. " Do you have a source for this? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this on the radio this morning that the french have stopped accepting them as asylum seekers I’m sure if the french were offering them the same as the U.K. they wouldn’t want to risk there lives to come here There is nothing in the news about this " well the guy maybe wrong I’m sure you can find out Lionel he said France have stopped accepting there asylum and if it’s not for economic reasons that they want to come here can you give me the reason why then and why don’t they want to stay in France ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this Selling drugs is illegal, I'm sure the majority of us want it curbed.. Murder is illegal, I'm sure none of us want to be murdered.. Theft is illegal, anyone who has suffered theft will agree.. So why is it so difficult to understand that stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into the UK, who incidentally, are economic migrants and not political ones, needs to be stopped. If you have a legitimate reason to claim asylum then do so through legitimate means. If you have some skill you can offer to benefit the UK, apply legitimately. If you want to live somewhere where you can work illegally for better pay than you could earn in your home country while having access to free medical care, then sorry, you are not welcome. Illegal immigrants don t turn up at the nearest council or immigration office to register they are here, they disappear, working cash in hand doing labouring work or waiters in restaurants, earning less than minimum wage. The people who employ them have no interest in paying the taxes they should. So everything about it is illegal. They are an additional cost and a burden on our society. They have no legitimate reason to be in the UK, they choose to come here because it's more beneficial to be in the UK than any other EU state. Most legitimate refugees wouldn't travel thousands of miles across safe countries if there wasn't a good financial reason to do so. Do you have a source for this?" Not everything has a source.Its common knowledge. News reports from refugee camps are always interviewing people.Asked where they want to live the answer is always the UK.(the reports ive seen , cant say all the same ) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this on the radio this morning that the french have stopped accepting them as asylum seekers I’m sure if the french were offering them the same as the U.K. they wouldn’t want to risk there lives to come here There is nothing in the news about this well the guy maybe wrong I’m sure you can find out Lionel he said France have stopped accepting there asylum and if it’s not for economic reasons that they want to come here can you give me the reason why then and why don’t they want to stay in France ?" I'm fairly sure if france has suddenly decided to take in asylum seekers, it would make the news? So as a guess the guy is chatting shite. In 2020 France gave over 20,00 asylum seekers permanent status. As previously stated Turkey and Germany take in more than us. You really should believe this daily mail rhetoric that every single ayslum seeker is intent on coming here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this Selling drugs is illegal, I'm sure the majority of us want it curbed.. Murder is illegal, I'm sure none of us want to be murdered.. Theft is illegal, anyone who has suffered theft will agree.. So why is it so difficult to understand that stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into the UK, who incidentally, are economic migrants and not political ones, needs to be stopped. If you have a legitimate reason to claim asylum then do so through legitimate means. If you have some skill you can offer to benefit the UK, apply legitimately. If you want to live somewhere where you can work illegally for better pay than you could earn in your home country while having access to free medical care, then sorry, you are not welcome. Illegal immigrants don t turn up at the nearest council or immigration office to register they are here, they disappear, working cash in hand doing labouring work or waiters in restaurants, earning less than minimum wage. The people who employ them have no interest in paying the taxes they should. So everything about it is illegal. They are an additional cost and a burden on our society. They have no legitimate reason to be in the UK, they choose to come here because it's more beneficial to be in the UK than any other EU state. Most legitimate refugees wouldn't travel thousands of miles across safe countries if there wasn't a good financial reason to do so. Do you have a source for this? Not everything has a source.Its common knowledge. News reports from refugee camps are always interviewing people.Asked where they want to live the answer is always the UK.(the reports ive seen , cant say all the same )" What common knowledge? You cant just pluck 'facts'out of thin air and claim its coming knowledge. Ok a question. If they all want to come here why do more settle in Germany and Turkey? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this Selling drugs is illegal, I'm sure the majority of us want it curbed.. Murder is illegal, I'm sure none of us want to be murdered.. Theft is illegal, anyone who has suffered theft will agree.. So why is it so difficult to understand that stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into the UK, who incidentally, are economic migrants and not political ones, needs to be stopped. If you have a legitimate reason to claim asylum then do so through legitimate means. If you have some skill you can offer to benefit the UK, apply legitimately. If you want to live somewhere where you can work illegally for better pay than you could earn in your home country while having access to free medical care, then sorry, you are not welcome. Illegal immigrants don t turn up at the nearest council or immigration office to register they are here, they disappear, working cash in hand doing labouring work or waiters in restaurants, earning less than minimum wage. The people who employ them have no interest in paying the taxes they should. So everything about it is illegal. They are an additional cost and a burden on our society. They have no legitimate reason to be in the UK, they choose to come here because it's more beneficial to be in the UK than any other EU state. Most legitimate refugees wouldn't travel thousands of miles across safe countries if there wasn't a good financial reason to do so. Do you have a source for this? Not everything has a source.Its common knowledge. News reports from refugee camps are always interviewing people.Asked where they want to live the answer is always the UK.(the reports ive seen , cant say all the same ) What common knowledge? You cant just pluck 'facts'out of thin air and claim its coming knowledge. Ok a question. If they all want to come here why do more settle in Germany and Turkey?" I said reports ive watched ...open your mind and think about it instead of asking the questions. Do some research. I dont know the answers ...but i am giving you my opinion which is what the forums are for. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this on the radio this morning that the french have stopped accepting them as asylum seekers I’m sure if the french were offering them the same as the U.K. they wouldn’t want to risk there lives to come here There is nothing in the news about this well the guy maybe wrong I’m sure you can find out Lionel he said France have stopped accepting there asylum and if it’s not for economic reasons that they want to come here can you give me the reason why then and why don’t they want to stay in France ? I'm fairly sure if france has suddenly decided to take in asylum seekers, it would make the news? So as a guess the guy is chatting shite. In 2020 France gave over 20,00 asylum seekers permanent status. As previously stated Turkey and Germany take in more than us. You really should believe this daily mail rhetoric that every single ayslum seeker is intent on coming here." he was a guy on radio I was driving mate he runs a charity he was talking about his aid workers in France who are upset woth this tragedy asked why they want to come here he said maybe they have family here or English is there second language and that France arnt accepting there asylum radio tees it was about 9 ish | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this on the radio this morning that the french have stopped accepting them as asylum seekers I’m sure if the french were offering them the same as the U.K. they wouldn’t want to risk there lives to come here There is nothing in the news about this well the guy maybe wrong I’m sure you can find out Lionel he said France have stopped accepting there asylum and if it’s not for economic reasons that they want to come here can you give me the reason why then and why don’t they want to stay in France ? I'm fairly sure if france has suddenly decided to take in asylum seekers, it would make the news? So as a guess the guy is chatting shite. In 2020 France gave over 20,00 asylum seekers permanent status. As previously stated Turkey and Germany take in more than us. You really should believe this daily mail rhetoric that every single ayslum seeker is intent on coming here.he was a guy on radio I was driving mate he runs a charity he was talking about his aid workers in France who are upset woth this tragedy asked why they want to come here he said maybe they have family here or English is there second language and that France arnt accepting there asylum radio tees it was about 9 ish " We he has his facts wrong as there is absolutely nothing on any site about it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this on the radio this morning that the french have stopped accepting them as asylum seekers I’m sure if the french were offering them the same as the U.K. they wouldn’t want to risk there lives to come here There is nothing in the news about this well the guy maybe wrong I’m sure you can find out Lionel he said France have stopped accepting there asylum and if it’s not for economic reasons that they want to come here can you give me the reason why then and why don’t they want to stay in France ? I'm fairly sure if france has suddenly decided to take in asylum seekers, it would make the news? So as a guess the guy is chatting shite. In 2020 France gave over 20,00 asylum seekers permanent status. As previously stated Turkey and Germany take in more than us. You really should believe this daily mail rhetoric that every single ayslum seeker is intent on coming here.he was a guy on radio I was driving mate he runs a charity he was talking about his aid workers in France who are upset woth this tragedy asked why they want to come here he said maybe they have family here or English is there second language and that France arnt accepting there asylum radio tees it was about 9 ish We he has his facts wrong as there is absolutely nothing on any site about it." Just because you havent heard about it or have no knowledge of the subject doesnt make it not true.You are so dismissive of people it's not nice to read . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this on the radio this morning that the french have stopped accepting them as asylum seekers I’m sure if the french were offering them the same as the U.K. they wouldn’t want to risk there lives to come here There is nothing in the news about this well the guy maybe wrong I’m sure you can find out Lionel he said France have stopped accepting there asylum and if it’s not for economic reasons that they want to come here can you give me the reason why then and why don’t they want to stay in France ? I'm fairly sure if france has suddenly decided to take in asylum seekers, it would make the news? So as a guess the guy is chatting shite. In 2020 France gave over 20,00 asylum seekers permanent status. As previously stated Turkey and Germany take in more than us. You really should believe this daily mail rhetoric that every single ayslum seeker is intent on coming here.he was a guy on radio I was driving mate he runs a charity he was talking about his aid workers in France who are upset woth this tragedy asked why they want to come here he said maybe they have family here or English is there second language and that France arnt accepting there asylum radio tees it was about 9 ish We he has his facts wrong as there is absolutely nothing on any site about it. Just because you havent heard about it or have no knowledge of the subject doesnt make it not true.You are so dismissive of people it's not nice to read ." That's exactly the same argument I use when talking about my invisible friend Todo the farting dragon. And he's real! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this on the radio this morning that the french have stopped accepting them as asylum seekers I’m sure if the french were offering them the same as the U.K. they wouldn’t want to risk there lives to come here There is nothing in the news about this well the guy maybe wrong I’m sure you can find out Lionel he said France have stopped accepting there asylum and if it’s not for economic reasons that they want to come here can you give me the reason why then and why don’t they want to stay in France ? I'm fairly sure if france has suddenly decided to take in asylum seekers, it would make the news? So as a guess the guy is chatting shite. In 2020 France gave over 20,00 asylum seekers permanent status. As previously stated Turkey and Germany take in more than us. You really should believe this daily mail rhetoric that every single ayslum seeker is intent on coming here.he was a guy on radio I was driving mate he runs a charity he was talking about his aid workers in France who are upset woth this tragedy asked why they want to come here he said maybe they have family here or English is there second language and that France arnt accepting there asylum radio tees it was about 9 ish We he has his facts wrong as there is absolutely nothing on any site about it. Just because you havent heard about it or have no knowledge of the subject doesnt make it not true.You are so dismissive of people it's not nice to read ." Because you simply cant make up stuff like that and say it's common knowledge. People come here for a variety of reasons..some have family here,some are fleeing persecution, poverty or war. The assertion that most come here to work illegally.. unless it can be backed up by actual facts..is wrong. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this on the radio this morning that the french have stopped accepting them as asylum seekers I’m sure if the french were offering them the same as the U.K. they wouldn’t want to risk there lives to come here There is nothing in the news about this well the guy maybe wrong I’m sure you can find out Lionel he said France have stopped accepting there asylum and if it’s not for economic reasons that they want to come here can you give me the reason why then and why don’t they want to stay in France ? I'm fairly sure if france has suddenly decided to take in asylum seekers, it would make the news? So as a guess the guy is chatting shite. In 2020 France gave over 20,00 asylum seekers permanent status. As previously stated Turkey and Germany take in more than us. You really should believe this daily mail rhetoric that every single ayslum seeker is intent on coming here.he was a guy on radio I was driving mate he runs a charity he was talking about his aid workers in France who are upset woth this tragedy asked why they want to come here he said maybe they have family here or English is there second language and that France arnt accepting there asylum radio tees it was about 9 ish We he has his facts wrong as there is absolutely nothing on any site about it. Just because you havent heard about it or have no knowledge of the subject doesnt make it not true.You are so dismissive of people it's not nice to read . Because you simply cant make up stuff like that and say it's common knowledge. People come here for a variety of reasons..some have family here,some are fleeing persecution, poverty or war. The assertion that most come here to work illegally.. unless it can be backed up by actual facts..is wrong." So you post true facts 100% of the time ... I'm trying to join in a discussion but yet again you bash me ...thanks for that ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this on the radio this morning that the french have stopped accepting them as asylum seekers I’m sure if the french were offering them the same as the U.K. they wouldn’t want to risk there lives to come here There is nothing in the news about this well the guy maybe wrong I’m sure you can find out Lionel he said France have stopped accepting there asylum and if it’s not for economic reasons that they want to come here can you give me the reason why then and why don’t they want to stay in France ? I'm fairly sure if france has suddenly decided to take in asylum seekers, it would make the news? So as a guess the guy is chatting shite. In 2020 France gave over 20,00 asylum seekers permanent status. As previously stated Turkey and Germany take in more than us. You really should believe this daily mail rhetoric that every single ayslum seeker is intent on coming here.he was a guy on radio I was driving mate he runs a charity he was talking about his aid workers in France who are upset woth this tragedy asked why they want to come here he said maybe they have family here or English is there second language and that France arnt accepting there asylum radio tees it was about 9 ish We he has his facts wrong as there is absolutely nothing on any site about it. Just because you havent heard about it or have no knowledge of the subject doesnt make it not true.You are so dismissive of people it's not nice to read . Because you simply cant make up stuff like that and say it's common knowledge. People come here for a variety of reasons..some have family here,some are fleeing persecution, poverty or war. The assertion that most come here to work illegally.. unless it can be backed up by actual facts..is wrong. So you post true facts 100% of the time ... I'm trying to join in a discussion but yet again you bash me ...thanks for that !" Pretty sure he's just asking for actual proof. No reason to get angry about that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"They came from france, A safe country,no wars or that going on, Ask yourself why they want to come here, Doesn't take much working out does it. Well tell me for the benefits lionel" When asylum seekers or refugees loom to move to a country they usually go to a country where their second language is spoken . So a lot of Africans go to France and Middle East come to UK . They see this as a better chance to make a future. Benefits are just as generous in France. How desperate must someone be to risk ten journey in ten first place. The bastards that sold them the boat want shooting. The families need our help. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this on the radio this morning that the french have stopped accepting them as asylum seekers I’m sure if the french were offering them the same as the U.K. they wouldn’t want to risk there lives to come here There is nothing in the news about this well the guy maybe wrong I’m sure you can find out Lionel he said France have stopped accepting there asylum and if it’s not for economic reasons that they want to come here can you give me the reason why then and why don’t they want to stay in France ? I'm fairly sure if france has suddenly decided to take in asylum seekers, it would make the news? So as a guess the guy is chatting shite. In 2020 France gave over 20,00 asylum seekers permanent status. As previously stated Turkey and Germany take in more than us. You really should believe this daily mail rhetoric that every single ayslum seeker is intent on coming here.he was a guy on radio I was driving mate he runs a charity he was talking about his aid workers in France who are upset woth this tragedy asked why they want to come here he said maybe they have family here or English is there second language and that France arnt accepting there asylum radio tees it was about 9 ish We he has his facts wrong as there is absolutely nothing on any site about it. Just because you havent heard about it or have no knowledge of the subject doesnt make it not true.You are so dismissive of people it's not nice to read . Because you simply cant make up stuff like that and say it's common knowledge. People come here for a variety of reasons..some have family here,some are fleeing persecution, poverty or war. The assertion that most come here to work illegally.. unless it can be backed up by actual facts..is wrong. So you post true facts 100% of the time ... I'm trying to join in a discussion but yet again you bash me ...thanks for that !" You asked me to back up with opinion which I did I said nothing about you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sorry you meant the ayslum thing? If France has suddenly said..its not taking in any more ayslum seekers..I'm fairly sure it would be on The news." I don’t know how suddenly it was I’m just saying about a guy who as aid workers in France and runs the charity I’d of thought he would know what he’s talking about but if he’s wrong fair enough you asked for my source | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sorry you meant the ayslum thing? If France has suddenly said..its not taking in any more ayslum seekers..I'm fairly sure it would be on The news." https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.ft.com/content/ae546d22-ffe6-11e9-be59-e49b2a136b8d 'Take back control' sounds like a catchy phase.! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sorry you meant the ayslum thing? If France has suddenly said..its not taking in any more ayslum seekers..I'm fairly sure it would be on The news. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.ft.com/content/ae546d22-ffe6-11e9-be59-e49b2a136b8d 'Take back control' sounds like a catchy phase.!" Its behind a firewall | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sorry you meant the ayslum thing? If France has suddenly said..its not taking in any more ayslum seekers..I'm fairly sure it would be on The news. https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.ft.com/content/ae546d22-ffe6-11e9-be59-e49b2a136b8d 'Take back control' sounds like a catchy phase.! Its behind a firewall" It works fine Lionel. Maybe it's your settings on whatever you are using. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this Selling drugs is illegal, I'm sure the majority of us want it curbed.. Murder is illegal, I'm sure none of us want to be murdered.. Theft is illegal, anyone who has suffered theft will agree.. So why is it so difficult to understand that stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into the UK, who incidentally, are economic migrants and not political ones, needs to be stopped. If you have a legitimate reason to claim asylum then do so through legitimate means. If you have some skill you can offer to benefit the UK, apply legitimately. If you want to live somewhere where you can work illegally for better pay than you could earn in your home country while having access to free medical care, then sorry, you are not welcome. Illegal immigrants don t turn up at the nearest council or immigration office to register they are here, they disappear, working cash in hand doing labouring work or waiters in restaurants, earning less than minimum wage. The people who employ them have no interest in paying the taxes they should. So everything about it is illegal. They are an additional cost and a burden on our society. They have no legitimate reason to be in the UK, they choose to come here because it's more beneficial to be in the UK than any other EU state. Most legitimate refugees wouldn't travel thousands of miles across safe countries if there wasn't a good financial reason to do so. What happens to illegal immigrants when caught? So you are saying most people who come here..are looking for illegal work? Not feeling persecution or a country we have bombed the shit out of," "We" didn't bomb the shit out them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this Selling drugs is illegal, I'm sure the majority of us want it curbed.. Murder is illegal, I'm sure none of us want to be murdered.. Theft is illegal, anyone who has suffered theft will agree.. So why is it so difficult to understand that stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into the UK, who incidentally, are economic migrants and not political ones, needs to be stopped. If you have a legitimate reason to claim asylum then do so through legitimate means. If you have some skill you can offer to benefit the UK, apply legitimately. If you want to live somewhere where you can work illegally for better pay than you could earn in your home country while having access to free medical care, then sorry, you are not welcome. Illegal immigrants don t turn up at the nearest council or immigration office to register they are here, they disappear, working cash in hand doing labouring work or waiters in restaurants, earning less than minimum wage. The people who employ them have no interest in paying the taxes they should. So everything about it is illegal. They are an additional cost and a burden on our society. They have no legitimate reason to be in the UK, they choose to come here because it's more beneficial to be in the UK than any other EU state. Most legitimate refugees wouldn't travel thousands of miles across safe countries if there wasn't a good financial reason to do so. What happens to illegal immigrants when caught? So you are saying most people who come here..are looking for illegal work? Not feeling persecution or a country we have bombed the shit out of, "We" didn't bomb the shit out them. " No? What were we doing in Iraq (twice)and Afghanistan? Playing hide and seek, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this Selling drugs is illegal, I'm sure the majority of us want it curbed.. Murder is illegal, I'm sure none of us want to be murdered.. Theft is illegal, anyone who has suffered theft will agree.. So why is it so difficult to understand that stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into the UK, who incidentally, are economic migrants and not political ones, needs to be stopped. If you have a legitimate reason to claim asylum then do so through legitimate means. If you have some skill you can offer to benefit the UK, apply legitimately. If you want to live somewhere where you can work illegally for better pay than you could earn in your home country while having access to free medical care, then sorry, you are not welcome. Illegal immigrants don t turn up at the nearest council or immigration office to register they are here, they disappear, working cash in hand doing labouring work or waiters in restaurants, earning less than minimum wage. The people who employ them have no interest in paying the taxes they should. So everything about it is illegal. They are an additional cost and a burden on our society. They have no legitimate reason to be in the UK, they choose to come here because it's more beneficial to be in the UK than any other EU state. Most legitimate refugees wouldn't travel thousands of miles across safe countries if there wasn't a good financial reason to do so. What happens to illegal immigrants when caught? So you are saying most people who come here..are looking for illegal work? Not feeling persecution or a country we have bombed the shit out of, "We" didn't bomb the shit out them. No? What were we doing in Iraq (twice)and Afghanistan? Playing hide and seek," Ironically, your interlocutor is called ‘worldwarrior’. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this Selling drugs is illegal, I'm sure the majority of us want it curbed.. Murder is illegal, I'm sure none of us want to be murdered.. Theft is illegal, anyone who has suffered theft will agree.. So why is it so difficult to understand that stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into the UK, who incidentally, are economic migrants and not political ones, needs to be stopped. If you have a legitimate reason to claim asylum then do so through legitimate means. If you have some skill you can offer to benefit the UK, apply legitimately. If you want to live somewhere where you can work illegally for better pay than you could earn in your home country while having access to free medical care, then sorry, you are not welcome. Illegal immigrants don t turn up at the nearest council or immigration office to register they are here, they disappear, working cash in hand doing labouring work or waiters in restaurants, earning less than minimum wage. The people who employ them have no interest in paying the taxes they should. So everything about it is illegal. They are an additional cost and a burden on our society. They have no legitimate reason to be in the UK, they choose to come here because it's more beneficial to be in the UK than any other EU state. Most legitimate refugees wouldn't travel thousands of miles across safe countries if there wasn't a good financial reason to do so. What happens to illegal immigrants when caught? So you are saying most people who come here..are looking for illegal work? Not feeling persecution or a country we have bombed the shit out of, "We" didn't bomb the shit out them. No? What were we doing in Iraq (twice)and Afghanistan? Playing hide and seek, Ironically, your interlocutor is called ‘worldwarrior’. " Lol yea so was the Green peace vessel. Is this you going back to your "true aggressor" comparison. You failed the last time we had this argument. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this on the radio this morning that the french have stopped accepting them as asylum seekers I’m sure if the french were offering them the same as the U.K. they wouldn’t want to risk there lives to come here There is nothing in the news about this well the guy maybe wrong I’m sure you can find out Lionel he said France have stopped accepting there asylum and if it’s not for economic reasons that they want to come here can you give me the reason why then and why don’t they want to stay in France ? I'm fairly sure if france has suddenly decided to take in asylum seekers, it would make the news? So as a guess the guy is chatting shite. In 2020 France gave over 20,00 asylum seekers permanent status. As previously stated Turkey and Germany take in more than us. You really should believe this daily mail rhetoric that every single ayslum seeker is intent on coming here.he was a guy on radio I was driving mate he runs a charity he was talking about his aid workers in France who are upset woth this tragedy asked why they want to come here he said maybe they have family here or English is there second language and that France arnt accepting there asylum radio tees it was about 9 ish We he has his facts wrong as there is absolutely nothing on any site about it. Just because you havent heard about it or have no knowledge of the subject doesnt make it not true.You are so dismissive of people it's not nice to read . Because you simply cant make up stuff like that and say it's common knowledge. People come here for a variety of reasons..some have family here,some are fleeing persecution, poverty or war. The assertion that most come here to work illegally.. unless it can be backed up by actual facts..is wrong." Overwhelmingly young males though? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this on the radio this morning that the french have stopped accepting them as asylum seekers I’m sure if the french were offering them the same as the U.K. they wouldn’t want to risk there lives to come here There is nothing in the news about this well the guy maybe wrong I’m sure you can find out Lionel he said France have stopped accepting there asylum and if it’s not for economic reasons that they want to come here can you give me the reason why then and why don’t they want to stay in France ? I'm fairly sure if france has suddenly decided to take in asylum seekers, it would make the news? So as a guess the guy is chatting shite. In 2020 France gave over 20,00 asylum seekers permanent status. As previously stated Turkey and Germany take in more than us. You really should believe this daily mail rhetoric that every single ayslum seeker is intent on coming here.he was a guy on radio I was driving mate he runs a charity he was talking about his aid workers in France who are upset woth this tragedy asked why they want to come here he said maybe they have family here or English is there second language and that France arnt accepting there asylum radio tees it was about 9 ish We he has his facts wrong as there is absolutely nothing on any site about it. Just because you havent heard about it or have no knowledge of the subject doesnt make it not true.You are so dismissive of people it's not nice to read . Because you simply cant make up stuff like that and say it's common knowledge. People come here for a variety of reasons..some have family here,some are fleeing persecution, poverty or war. The assertion that most come here to work illegally.. unless it can be backed up by actual facts..is wrong. Overwhelmingly young males though?" Link? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this on the radio this morning that the french have stopped accepting them as asylum seekers I’m sure if the french were offering them the same as the U.K. they wouldn’t want to risk there lives to come here There is nothing in the news about this well the guy maybe wrong I’m sure you can find out Lionel he said France have stopped accepting there asylum and if it’s not for economic reasons that they want to come here can you give me the reason why then and why don’t they want to stay in France ? I'm fairly sure if france has suddenly decided to take in asylum seekers, it would make the news? So as a guess the guy is chatting shite. In 2020 France gave over 20,00 asylum seekers permanent status. As previously stated Turkey and Germany take in more than us. You really should believe this daily mail rhetoric that every single ayslum seeker is intent on coming here.he was a guy on radio I was driving mate he runs a charity he was talking about his aid workers in France who are upset woth this tragedy asked why they want to come here he said maybe they have family here or English is there second language and that France arnt accepting there asylum radio tees it was about 9 ish We he has his facts wrong as there is absolutely nothing on any site about it. Just because you havent heard about it or have no knowledge of the subject doesnt make it not true.You are so dismissive of people it's not nice to read . Because you simply cant make up stuff like that and say it's common knowledge. People come here for a variety of reasons..some have family here,some are fleeing persecution, poverty or war. The assertion that most come here to work illegally.. unless it can be backed up by actual facts..is wrong. Overwhelmingly young males though? Link?" Suggests more likely economic migrants than asylum seekers fleeing persecution. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this Selling drugs is illegal, I'm sure the majority of us want it curbed.. Murder is illegal, I'm sure none of us want to be murdered.. Theft is illegal, anyone who has suffered theft will agree.. So why is it so difficult to understand that stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into the UK, who incidentally, are economic migrants and not political ones, needs to be stopped. If you have a legitimate reason to claim asylum then do so through legitimate means. If you have some skill you can offer to benefit the UK, apply legitimately. If you want to live somewhere where you can work illegally for better pay than you could earn in your home country while having access to free medical care, then sorry, you are not welcome. Illegal immigrants don t turn up at the nearest council or immigration office to register they are here, they disappear, working cash in hand doing labouring work or waiters in restaurants, earning less than minimum wage. The people who employ them have no interest in paying the taxes they should. So everything about it is illegal. They are an additional cost and a burden on our society. They have no legitimate reason to be in the UK, they choose to come here because it's more beneficial to be in the UK than any other EU state. Most legitimate refugees wouldn't travel thousands of miles across safe countries if there wasn't a good financial reason to do so. What happens to illegal immigrants when caught? So you are saying most people who come here..are looking for illegal work? Not feeling persecution or a country we have bombed the shit out of, "We" didn't bomb the shit out them. No? What were we doing in Iraq (twice)and Afghanistan? Playing hide and seek, Ironically, your interlocutor is called ‘worldwarrior’. Lol yea so was the Green peace vessel. Is this you going back to your "true aggressor" comparison. You failed the last time we had this argument. " You must be getting the wrong person. Can’t remember this at all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this Selling drugs is illegal, I'm sure the majority of us want it curbed.. Murder is illegal, I'm sure none of us want to be murdered.. Theft is illegal, anyone who has suffered theft will agree.. So why is it so difficult to understand that stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into the UK, who incidentally, are economic migrants and not political ones, needs to be stopped. If you have a legitimate reason to claim asylum then do so through legitimate means. If you have some skill you can offer to benefit the UK, apply legitimately. If you want to live somewhere where you can work illegally for better pay than you could earn in your home country while having access to free medical care, then sorry, you are not welcome. Illegal immigrants don t turn up at the nearest council or immigration office to register they are here, they disappear, working cash in hand doing labouring work or waiters in restaurants, earning less than minimum wage. The people who employ them have no interest in paying the taxes they should. So everything about it is illegal. They are an additional cost and a burden on our society. They have no legitimate reason to be in the UK, they choose to come here because it's more beneficial to be in the UK than any other EU state. Most legitimate refugees wouldn't travel thousands of miles across safe countries if there wasn't a good financial reason to do so. What happens to illegal immigrants when caught? So you are saying most people who come here..are looking for illegal work? Not feeling persecution or a country we have bombed the shit out of, "We" didn't bomb the shit out them. No? What were we doing in Iraq (twice)and Afghanistan? Playing hide and seek, Ironically, your interlocutor is called ‘worldwarrior’. Lol yea so was the Green peace vessel. Is this you going back to your "true aggressor" comparison. You failed the last time we had this argument. You must be getting the wrong person. Can’t remember this at all. " Of course you don't | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this on the radio this morning that the french have stopped accepting them as asylum seekers I’m sure if the french were offering them the same as the U.K. they wouldn’t want to risk there lives to come here There is nothing in the news about this well the guy maybe wrong I’m sure you can find out Lionel he said France have stopped accepting there asylum and if it’s not for economic reasons that they want to come here can you give me the reason why then and why don’t they want to stay in France ? I'm fairly sure if france has suddenly decided to take in asylum seekers, it would make the news? So as a guess the guy is chatting shite. In 2020 France gave over 20,00 asylum seekers permanent status. As previously stated Turkey and Germany take in more than us. You really should believe this daily mail rhetoric that every single ayslum seeker is intent on coming here.he was a guy on radio I was driving mate he runs a charity he was talking about his aid workers in France who are upset woth this tragedy asked why they want to come here he said maybe they have family here or English is there second language and that France arnt accepting there asylum radio tees it was about 9 ish We he has his facts wrong as there is absolutely nothing on any site about it. Just because you havent heard about it or have no knowledge of the subject doesnt make it not true.You are so dismissive of people it's not nice to read . Because you simply cant make up stuff like that and say it's common knowledge. People come here for a variety of reasons..some have family here,some are fleeing persecution, poverty or war. The assertion that most come here to work illegally.. unless it can be backed up by actual facts..is wrong. Overwhelmingly young males though? Link? Suggests more likely economic migrants than asylum seekers fleeing persecution." Because men are not persecuted? I don't know if overwhelmingly young men as we have seen no evidence. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this on the radio this morning that the french have stopped accepting them as asylum seekers I’m sure if the french were offering them the same as the U.K. they wouldn’t want to risk there lives to come here There is nothing in the news about this well the guy maybe wrong I’m sure you can find out Lionel he said France have stopped accepting there asylum and if it’s not for economic reasons that they want to come here can you give me the reason why then and why don’t they want to stay in France ? I'm fairly sure if france has suddenly decided to take in asylum seekers, it would make the news? So as a guess the guy is chatting shite. In 2020 France gave over 20,00 asylum seekers permanent status. As previously stated Turkey and Germany take in more than us. You really should believe this daily mail rhetoric that every single ayslum seeker is intent on coming here.he was a guy on radio I was driving mate he runs a charity he was talking about his aid workers in France who are upset woth this tragedy asked why they want to come here he said maybe they have family here or English is there second language and that France arnt accepting there asylum radio tees it was about 9 ish We he has his facts wrong as there is absolutely nothing on any site about it. Just because you havent heard about it or have no knowledge of the subject doesnt make it not true.You are so dismissive of people it's not nice to read . Because you simply cant make up stuff like that and say it's common knowledge. People come here for a variety of reasons..some have family here,some are fleeing persecution, poverty or war. The assertion that most come here to work illegally.. unless it can be backed up by actual facts..is wrong. Overwhelmingly young males though? Link? Suggests more likely economic migrants than asylum seekers fleeing persecution. Because men are not persecuted? I don't know if overwhelmingly young men as we have seen no evidence. " Personal observation over many years at Calais. and through southern Italy. Plus what we tend to see on the news reports. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this on the radio this morning that the french have stopped accepting them as asylum seekers I’m sure if the french were offering them the same as the U.K. they wouldn’t want to risk there lives to come here There is nothing in the news about this well the guy maybe wrong I’m sure you can find out Lionel he said France have stopped accepting there asylum and if it’s not for economic reasons that they want to come here can you give me the reason why then and why don’t they want to stay in France ? I'm fairly sure if france has suddenly decided to take in asylum seekers, it would make the news? So as a guess the guy is chatting shite. In 2020 France gave over 20,00 asylum seekers permanent status. As previously stated Turkey and Germany take in more than us. You really should believe this daily mail rhetoric that every single ayslum seeker is intent on coming here.he was a guy on radio I was driving mate he runs a charity he was talking about his aid workers in France who are upset woth this tragedy asked why they want to come here he said maybe they have family here or English is there second language and that France arnt accepting there asylum radio tees it was about 9 ish We he has his facts wrong as there is absolutely nothing on any site about it. Just because you havent heard about it or have no knowledge of the subject doesnt make it not true.You are so dismissive of people it's not nice to read . Because you simply cant make up stuff like that and say it's common knowledge. People come here for a variety of reasons..some have family here,some are fleeing persecution, poverty or war. The assertion that most come here to work illegally.. unless it can be backed up by actual facts..is wrong. Overwhelmingly young males though? Link? Suggests more likely economic migrants than asylum seekers fleeing persecution. Because men are not persecuted? I don't know if overwhelmingly young men as we have seen no evidence. Personal observation over many years at Calais. and through southern Italy. Plus what we tend to see on the news reports. " There is a lot misinformation and bullshit out there. Without a doubt the media and gmnt have created a situation where migrants are now met with open hostility, and we have got to the stage where a home secretary can serous suggest we stick them all on an island. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong." Murdoch. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong." Working class toryism | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now .No mate you are, this is a disaster it is not political its very sad but to try to use it as a stick to beat the government get a grip man. Read. The. Link. Patel has blasted the lawyers reprepresenting the migrants They have written to complain. And you accuse me of use it as a stick to beat the gmnt? Why start a topic on migrants dying instead of patel blasting lawyers? you knew what you were doing your not thick. The migrants are coming here. Lawyers are representing them Can you not see the link?yes i can that is not the point and you know it,i can see what you were trying to imply along with no doubt others too.In my book your political bias has sank to new levels. **************************************** Well said, I must say. He never stops, day after day after day. One wonders if he actually pays taxes........?? And that is your business how?" Taps fingers | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong." horrendous attitudes have I missed something ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this Selling drugs is illegal, I'm sure the majority of us want it curbed.. Murder is illegal, I'm sure none of us want to be murdered.. Theft is illegal, anyone who has suffered theft will agree.. So why is it so difficult to understand that stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into the UK, who incidentally, are economic migrants and not political ones, needs to be stopped. If you have a legitimate reason to claim asylum then do so through legitimate means. If you have some skill you can offer to benefit the UK, apply legitimately. If you want to live somewhere where you can work illegally for better pay than you could earn in your home country while having access to free medical care, then sorry, you are not welcome. Illegal immigrants don t turn up at the nearest council or immigration office to register they are here, they disappear, working cash in hand doing labouring work or waiters in restaurants, earning less than minimum wage. The people who employ them have no interest in paying the taxes they should. So everything about it is illegal. They are an additional cost and a burden on our society. They have no legitimate reason to be in the UK, they choose to come here because it's more beneficial to be in the UK than any other EU state. Most legitimate refugees wouldn't travel thousands of miles across safe countries if there wasn't a good financial reason to do so. What happens to illegal immigrants when caught? So you are saying most people who come here..are looking for illegal work? Not feeling persecution or a country we have bombed the shit out of, "We" didn't bomb the shit out them. No? What were we doing in Iraq (twice)and Afghanistan? Playing hide and seek, Ironically, your interlocutor is called ‘worldwarrior’. Lol yea so was the Green peace vessel. Is this you going back to your "true aggressor" comparison. You failed the last time we had this argument. You must be getting the wrong person. Can’t remember this at all. Of course you don't " Maybe because you’re easily forgettable. Don’t think I’ve ever seen your profile before today but not the end of the world is it... There are a few like you here. You’re probably interchangeable. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong." Unfortunately that's the reality. Like Lionel has said we have a duty of care for the vulnerable that reach our shores. Clearly the lure of a life in the UK, far outweighs the risk of death during the crossing. This will continue to happen and the death toll will continue to rise. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"”My thoughts are with the loved ones of those who tragically lost their lives in the Channel today. We have offered the French authorities every support as they investigate this terrible incident and will do all we can to crack down on the ruthless criminal gangs who prey on vulnerable people by facilitating these dangerous journeys.” - PM statement on this tragedy. Are they still labelling lawyers who represent migrants as 'activists?Fuck me lionel is there no depths you will sink to.The government didnt put these people in the boat, maybe have a look at your eu friends not doing enough for these people then maybe they would not take such drastic measures to get to the uk. There is no depths I wont sink too? Have you actually read that link above? Seriously..you are just embarrassing yourself now . Question.. How many "safe" countries do the migrants cross to get to the UK? Another question.. Those poor souls who died in the container recently trying to get from Vietnam to the UK, why did they pay more to be transported by criminals than the cost for a flight? There is a bigger fundamental issue that needs addressing. Most are economic migrants with nothing to offer the UK, hence why they cannot legitimately apply to come to the UK. As unfortunate as it may seem, the UK has its own issue with people living in poverty without adding unnecessarily to the issue. People living in poverty here is nothing whatever to do with immigration No, but they are a problem that needs to be resolved. Surely the problems already here are far more important than the plight of someone with no legal rights to be here? Just put yourself in the position of a UK citizen who is living in poverty, you would resent those who are arriving in the UK as economic or illegal immigrants who then cost the taxpayer to deal with. Surely that money could be better spent on helping our own citizens to a better way of life. Millions are lost into a legal system where the fates of those immigrants is decided. The current system needs to be overhauled to make it more efficient and better value for the taxpayer. It's amazing to see the results of anti immigrant propaganda in action. Firstly immigration is a net positive effect on the UK economy. And secondly is the £37:75 per week than an asylum seeker gets really as much of a drain as say. Not collecting taxes from the tax dodgers, or the £100 mil the Tories paid their mates for PPE that was defective? It's the classic tactic "the reason you're poor is those other poor people over there, don't worry about all this other stuff happening, nothing to see here, keep looking at those lads on a small dinghy in the sea"But its not anti immigration is it? its anti ILLEGAL immigration . People seeking asylum aren't illegal. If it asylum they are after they can do that in the first, second, third, fourth or even fifth EU country they enter before getting on board a dingy to cross the English Channel. You realise turkey and Germany take in much more immigrants than us? would France take them in if they were on our beach’s and getting into boats I think not You said before French didnt take ayslum seekers. I gave you stats which disproved this Selling drugs is illegal, I'm sure the majority of us want it curbed.. Murder is illegal, I'm sure none of us want to be murdered.. Theft is illegal, anyone who has suffered theft will agree.. So why is it so difficult to understand that stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into the UK, who incidentally, are economic migrants and not political ones, needs to be stopped. If you have a legitimate reason to claim asylum then do so through legitimate means. If you have some skill you can offer to benefit the UK, apply legitimately. If you want to live somewhere where you can work illegally for better pay than you could earn in your home country while having access to free medical care, then sorry, you are not welcome. Illegal immigrants don t turn up at the nearest council or immigration office to register they are here, they disappear, working cash in hand doing labouring work or waiters in restaurants, earning less than minimum wage. The people who employ them have no interest in paying the taxes they should. So everything about it is illegal. They are an additional cost and a burden on our society. They have no legitimate reason to be in the UK, they choose to come here because it's more beneficial to be in the UK than any other EU state. Most legitimate refugees wouldn't travel thousands of miles across safe countries if there wasn't a good financial reason to do so. What happens to illegal immigrants when caught? So you are saying most people who come here..are looking for illegal work? Not feeling persecution or a country we have bombed the shit out of, "We" didn't bomb the shit out them. No? What were we doing in Iraq (twice)and Afghanistan? Playing hide and seek, Ironically, your interlocutor is called ‘worldwarrior’. Lol yea so was the Green peace vessel. Is this you going back to your "true aggressor" comparison. You failed the last time we had this argument. You must be getting the wrong person. Can’t remember this at all. Of course you don't Maybe because you’re easily forgettable. Don’t think I’ve ever seen your profile before today but not the end of the world is it... There are a few like you here. You’re probably interchangeable. " Your absolutely right. It's not the end of the world. Surprised you haven't blamed Boris yet. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong." So true | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I havent been on here for a while but it is astonishing how some people on here are still twisting facts to suit their xenophobic narrative. It makes you wonder if empathy is dead?" So what can be done to change the xenophobic attitude of those people? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong. Unfortunately that's the reality. Like Lionel has said we have a duty of care for the vulnerable that reach our shores. Clearly the lure of a life in the UK, far outweighs the risk of death during the crossing. This will continue to happen and the death toll will continue to rise. " has anyone actually said we don’t have a duty of care to the ones that reach our shores Lionel has been blaming our government for the poor sods that drowned near dunkirk but surely it’s the fault of the french government | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong. Unfortunately that's the reality. Like Lionel has said we have a duty of care for the vulnerable that reach our shores. Clearly the lure of a life in the UK, far outweighs the risk of death during the crossing. This will continue to happen and the death toll will continue to rise. has anyone actually said we don’t have a duty of care to the ones that reach our shores Lionel has been blaming our government for the poor sods that drowned near dunkirk but surely it’s the fault of the french government " Please point out where I said..its the gmnts fault they drowned | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong. Unfortunately that's the reality. Like Lionel has said we have a duty of care for the vulnerable that reach our shores. Clearly the lure of a life in the UK, far outweighs the risk of death during the crossing. This will continue to happen and the death toll will continue to rise. has anyone actually said we don’t have a duty of care to the ones that reach our shores Lionel has been blaming our government for the poor sods that drowned near dunkirk but surely it’s the fault of the french government Please point out where I said..its the gmnts fault they drowned " yr forst post you made 4ppl drowned 2of them kids then straight into the government not a mention of yr heart going out to the poor buggers why didn’t you mention the french government who are allowing this shit to happen it’s on there beaches that they gather to get into criminals boats | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong. Unfortunately that's the reality. Like Lionel has said we have a duty of care for the vulnerable that reach our shores. Clearly the lure of a life in the UK, far outweighs the risk of death during the crossing. This will continue to happen and the death toll will continue to rise. has anyone actually said we don’t have a duty of care to the ones that reach our shores Lionel has been blaming our government for the poor sods that drowned near dunkirk but surely it’s the fault of the french government Please point out where I said..its the gmnts fault they drowned " I will vouch for him, he didn't. Its not entirely the French governments fault either. Look at the root cause and what caused the mass migration. It was an opening in the European borders driven by the atrocities in Sira that allowed for free movement for anyone seeking asylum. Correctly thought out but poorly executed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong. Unfortunately that's the reality. Like Lionel has said we have a duty of care for the vulnerable that reach our shores. Clearly the lure of a life in the UK, far outweighs the risk of death during the crossing. This will continue to happen and the death toll will continue to rise. has anyone actually said we don’t have a duty of care to the ones that reach our shores Lionel has been blaming our government for the poor sods that drowned near dunkirk but surely it’s the fault of the french government Please point out where I said..its the gmnts fault they drowned I will vouch for him, he didn't. Its not entirely the French governments fault either. Look at the root cause and what caused the mass migration. It was an opening in the European borders driven by the atrocities in Sira that allowed for free movement for anyone seeking asylum. Correctly thought out but poorly executed. " i just don’t know how you could start this thread with a rant about our government over 4poor sods drowning of the french coast his anger should be aimed at the french government for allowing this to happen time and time again | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I havent been on here for a while but it is astonishing how some people on here are still twisting facts to suit their xenophobic narrative. It makes you wonder if empathy is dead? So what can be done to change the xenophobic attitude of those people?" I doubt very much can be done to modify their xenophobic points of view because they appear to be happier with received wisdom and common knowledge rather than facts. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I havent been on here for a while but it is astonishing how some people on here are still twisting facts to suit their xenophobic narrative. It makes you wonder if empathy is dead? So what can be done to change the xenophobic attitude of those people? I doubt very much can be done to modify their xenophobic points of view because they appear to be happier with received wisdom and common knowledge rather than facts." who’s posts have been xenophobic iv not read them all ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong. Unfortunately that's the reality. Like Lionel has said we have a duty of care for the vulnerable that reach our shores. Clearly the lure of a life in the UK, far outweighs the risk of death during the crossing. This will continue to happen and the death toll will continue to rise. has anyone actually said we don’t have a duty of care to the ones that reach our shores Lionel has been blaming our government for the poor sods that drowned near dunkirk but surely it’s the fault of the french government Please point out where I said..its the gmnts fault they drowned I will vouch for him, he didn't. Its not entirely the French governments fault either. Look at the root cause and what caused the mass migration. It was an opening in the European borders driven by the atrocities in Sira that allowed for free movement for anyone seeking asylum. Correctly thought out but poorly executed. i just don’t know how you could start this thread with a rant about our government over 4poor sods drowning of the french coast his anger should be aimed at the french government for allowing this to happen time and time again " Read my op | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I havent been on here for a while but it is astonishing how some people on here are still twisting facts to suit their xenophobic narrative. It makes you wonder if empathy is dead? So what can be done to change the xenophobic attitude of those people? I doubt very much can be done to modify their xenophobic points of view because they appear to be happier with received wisdom and common knowledge rather than facts. who’s posts have been xenophobic iv not read them all ?" Well I have read them and it’s self evident that a number of posters have but past experience tells me that naming and shaming gets you barred so I dont think I will play that particular game thanks | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong. Unfortunately that's the reality. Like Lionel has said we have a duty of care for the vulnerable that reach our shores. Clearly the lure of a life in the UK, far outweighs the risk of death during the crossing. This will continue to happen and the death toll will continue to rise. has anyone actually said we don’t have a duty of care to the ones that reach our shores Lionel has been blaming our government for the poor sods that drowned near dunkirk but surely it’s the fault of the french government Please point out where I said..its the gmnts fault they drowned I will vouch for him, he didn't. Its not entirely the French governments fault either. Look at the root cause and what caused the mass migration. It was an opening in the European borders driven by the atrocities in Sira that allowed for free movement for anyone seeking asylum. Correctly thought out but poorly executed. i just don’t know how you could start this thread with a rant about our government over 4poor sods drowning of the french coast his anger should be aimed at the french government for allowing this to happen time and time again " It wouldn't stop migrants getting on dinghies and attempting to make it accross. As someone said above I've served in war zones and I don't blame wanting to get the fuck out of there. I also work in countries that are deemed third word, and again I don't blame anyone for wanting to leave for a glimpse of a better life. If it was me in that situation, I would be doing exactly the same. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong. Unfortunately that's the reality. Like Lionel has said we have a duty of care for the vulnerable that reach our shores. Clearly the lure of a life in the UK, far outweighs the risk of death during the crossing. This will continue to happen and the death toll will continue to rise. has anyone actually said we don’t have a duty of care to the ones that reach our shores Lionel has been blaming our government for the poor sods that drowned near dunkirk but surely it’s the fault of the french government Please point out where I said..its the gmnts fault they drowned I will vouch for him, he didn't. Its not entirely the French governments fault either. Look at the root cause and what caused the mass migration. It was an opening in the European borders driven by the atrocities in Sira that allowed for free movement for anyone seeking asylum. Correctly thought out but poorly executed. i just don’t know how you could start this thread with a rant about our government over 4poor sods drowning of the french coast his anger should be aimed at the french government for allowing this to happen time and time again Read my op" i have there’s a post on here saying it makes you wonder we’re ppls empathy is where’s yr on yr opening post not a mention of sorrow or empathy for the poor buggers yr first thought was a rant about the government | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong. Unfortunately that's the reality. Like Lionel has said we have a duty of care for the vulnerable that reach our shores. Clearly the lure of a life in the UK, far outweighs the risk of death during the crossing. This will continue to happen and the death toll will continue to rise. has anyone actually said we don’t have a duty of care to the ones that reach our shores Lionel has been blaming our government for the poor sods that drowned near dunkirk but surely it’s the fault of the french government Please point out where I said..its the gmnts fault they drowned I will vouch for him, he didn't. Its not entirely the French governments fault either. Look at the root cause and what caused the mass migration. It was an opening in the European borders driven by the atrocities in Sira that allowed for free movement for anyone seeking asylum. Correctly thought out but poorly executed. i just don’t know how you could start this thread with a rant about our government over 4poor sods drowning of the french coast his anger should be aimed at the french government for allowing this to happen time and time again Read my opi have there’s a post on here saying it makes you wonder we’re ppls empathy is where’s yr on yr opening post not a mention of sorrow or empathy for the poor buggers yr first thought was a rant about the government " You accused me of blaming the gmnt for the tragedy What I actually said was the past few years have seen anti migrant rhetoric been amped up by the press and the gmnt and migrants are now treated with outright hostility. I also said the sympathy shown by the gmnt is in stark contrast to patel demonising the lawyers representing them and her crackpot idea about putting them on an island. I think my point has been proven by several contributors to this thread. As for blame, you seem quite intent on blaming the French, yet I asked you a while ago,if a family aee intent on coming here,what can the french to do stop them? I'm still waiting for an answer. If we want to play the blame game,the traffickers have caused it,but both countries share a responsibility in letting it happen. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong. Unfortunately that's the reality. Like Lionel has said we have a duty of care for the vulnerable that reach our shores. Clearly the lure of a life in the UK, far outweighs the risk of death during the crossing. This will continue to happen and the death toll will continue to rise. has anyone actually said we don’t have a duty of care to the ones that reach our shores Lionel has been blaming our government for the poor sods that drowned near dunkirk but surely it’s the fault of the french government Please point out where I said..its the gmnts fault they drowned I will vouch for him, he didn't. Its not entirely the French governments fault either. Look at the root cause and what caused the mass migration. It was an opening in the European borders driven by the atrocities in Sira that allowed for free movement for anyone seeking asylum. Correctly thought out but poorly executed. i just don’t know how you could start this thread with a rant about our government over 4poor sods drowning of the french coast his anger should be aimed at the french government for allowing this to happen time and time again Read my opi have there’s a post on here saying it makes you wonder we’re ppls empathy is where’s yr on yr opening post not a mention of sorrow or empathy for the poor buggers yr first thought was a rant about the government " What is "YR" an acronym for? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong. Unfortunately that's the reality. Like Lionel has said we have a duty of care for the vulnerable that reach our shores. Clearly the lure of a life in the UK, far outweighs the risk of death during the crossing. This will continue to happen and the death toll will continue to rise. has anyone actually said we don’t have a duty of care to the ones that reach our shores Lionel has been blaming our government for the poor sods that drowned near dunkirk but surely it’s the fault of the french government Please point out where I said..its the gmnts fault they drowned I will vouch for him, he didn't. Its not entirely the French governments fault either. Look at the root cause and what caused the mass migration. It was an opening in the European borders driven by the atrocities in Sira that allowed for free movement for anyone seeking asylum. Correctly thought out but poorly executed. i just don’t know how you could start this thread with a rant about our government over 4poor sods drowning of the french coast his anger should be aimed at the french government for allowing this to happen time and time again Read my opi have there’s a post on here saying it makes you wonder we’re ppls empathy is where’s yr on yr opening post not a mention of sorrow or empathy for the poor buggers yr first thought was a rant about the government You accused me of blaming the gmnt for the tragedy What I actually said was the past few years have seen anti migrant rhetoric been amped up by the press and the gmnt and migrants are now treated with outright hostility. I also said the sympathy shown by the gmnt is in stark contrast to patel demonising the lawyers representing them and her crackpot idea about putting them on an island. I think my point has been proven by several contributors to this thread. As for blame, you seem quite intent on blaming the French, yet I asked you a while ago,if a family aee intent on coming here,what can the french to do stop them? I'm still waiting for an answer. If we want to play the blame game,the traffickers have caused it,but both countries share a responsibility in letting it happen." What has the UK “let happen “? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong. Unfortunately that's the reality. Like Lionel has said we have a duty of care for the vulnerable that reach our shores. Clearly the lure of a life in the UK, far outweighs the risk of death during the crossing. This will continue to happen and the death toll will continue to rise. has anyone actually said we don’t have a duty of care to the ones that reach our shores Lionel has been blaming our government for the poor sods that drowned near dunkirk but surely it’s the fault of the french government Please point out where I said..its the gmnts fault they drowned I will vouch for him, he didn't. Its not entirely the French governments fault either. Look at the root cause and what caused the mass migration. It was an opening in the European borders driven by the atrocities in Sira that allowed for free movement for anyone seeking asylum. Correctly thought out but poorly executed. i just don’t know how you could start this thread with a rant about our government over 4poor sods drowning of the french coast his anger should be aimed at the french government for allowing this to happen time and time again Read my opi have there’s a post on here saying it makes you wonder we’re ppls empathy is where’s yr on yr opening post not a mention of sorrow or empathy for the poor buggers yr first thought was a rant about the government What is "YR" an acronym for?" your | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong. Unfortunately that's the reality. Like Lionel has said we have a duty of care for the vulnerable that reach our shores. Clearly the lure of a life in the UK, far outweighs the risk of death during the crossing. This will continue to happen and the death toll will continue to rise. has anyone actually said we don’t have a duty of care to the ones that reach our shores Lionel has been blaming our government for the poor sods that drowned near dunkirk but surely it’s the fault of the french government Please point out where I said..its the gmnts fault they drowned I will vouch for him, he didn't. Its not entirely the French governments fault either. Look at the root cause and what caused the mass migration. It was an opening in the European borders driven by the atrocities in Sira that allowed for free movement for anyone seeking asylum. Correctly thought out but poorly executed. i just don’t know how you could start this thread with a rant about our government over 4poor sods drowning of the french coast his anger should be aimed at the french government for allowing this to happen time and time again Read my opi have there’s a post on here saying it makes you wonder we’re ppls empathy is where’s yr on yr opening post not a mention of sorrow or empathy for the poor buggers yr first thought was a rant about the government What is "YR" an acronym for?your " Thank you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is depressing as fuck. Watching people twist and turn and trying to use semantics to justify their horrendous attitudes to human beings makes me wonder where this country went to badly wrong. Unfortunately that's the reality. Like Lionel has said we have a duty of care for the vulnerable that reach our shores. Clearly the lure of a life in the UK, far outweighs the risk of death during the crossing. This will continue to happen and the death toll will continue to rise. has anyone actually said we don’t have a duty of care to the ones that reach our shores Lionel has been blaming our government for the poor sods that drowned near dunkirk but surely it’s the fault of the french government Please point out where I said..its the gmnts fault they drowned I will vouch for him, he didn't. Its not entirely the French governments fault either. Look at the root cause and what caused the mass migration. It was an opening in the European borders driven by the atrocities in Sira that allowed for free movement for anyone seeking asylum. Correctly thought out but poorly executed. i just don’t know how you could start this thread with a rant about our government over 4poor sods drowning of the french coast his anger should be aimed at the french government for allowing this to happen time and time again Read my opi have there’s a post on here saying it makes you wonder we’re ppls empathy is where’s yr on yr opening post not a mention of sorrow or empathy for the poor buggers yr first thought was a rant about the government What is "YR" an acronym for?your Thank you " incase you don’t know what gmnt is its government Lionel posts them but I’m sure you know that lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shocking some comments on here saying a family are risking their children’s lives for benefits!! What would possess any parent to do such a thingif they weren’t bloody desperate. They are looking for a better life or to escape a shit life whether through war or deprivation. Where the fuck are people morals? We live well in the U.K. and our poverty is relative. We don’t get bombed daily or random executions with no possible hope of a future in their devastated homelands. A lot caused by Bush and Blair ( remember the Mail and Sun saying go get em boys ! ) We all supported those attacks. Yes a few were anti ! No regard for the mess afterwards. Sorry to repeat myself but after the end of the first stage of fighting in Iraq the only building the US protected from looters was the Oil ministry. They let the rest of that society crumble. So yes of course young lads come here to work and get a better life but they risk that life to do so. When did you last risk your life to go to work?? Did you ever risk your life to do anything? We are a bunch of privileged twats and I include myself in that so don’t start getting shitty. We are kids who don’t want to share our toys opportunities. They don’t have any and a lot of that is due to our bombs! If you don’t like them coming then work to fix their homelands ! " they have already escaped war or a shit life as you say there in France no war there it’s as safe as the U.K. iv said myself I don’t blame them for trying to get here I’d do same myself but I doubt I’d risk my kids lives in them tiny boats if I was a single lad yes but with young kids no I’d stick France out that’s my opinion it’s nit racist but I’m sure some on here will think so as in every thread that talks about immigration it always ends up the same it will never change until we can atleast talk about it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shocking some comments on here saying a family are risking their children’s lives for benefits!! What would possess any parent to do such a thingif they weren’t bloody desperate. They are looking for a better life or to escape a shit life whether through war or deprivation. Where the fuck are people morals? We live well in the U.K. and our poverty is relative. We don’t get bombed daily or random executions with no possible hope of a future in their devastated homelands. A lot caused by Bush and Blair ( remember the Mail and Sun saying go get em boys ! ) We all supported those attacks. Yes a few were anti ! No regard for the mess afterwards. Sorry to repeat myself but after the end of the first stage of fighting in Iraq the only building the US protected from looters was the Oil ministry. They let the rest of that society crumble. So yes of course young lads come here to work and get a better life but they risk that life to do so. When did you last risk your life to go to work?? Did you ever risk your life to do anything? We are a bunch of privileged twats and I include myself in that so don’t start getting shitty. We are kids who don’t want to share our toys opportunities. They don’t have any and a lot of that is due to our bombs! If you don’t like them coming then work to fix their homelands ! they have already escaped war or a shit life as you say there in France no war there it’s as safe as the U.K. iv said myself I don’t blame them for trying to get here I’d do same myself but I doubt I’d risk my kids lives in them tiny boats if I was a single lad yes but with young kids no I’d stick France out that’s my opinion it’s nit racist but I’m sure some on here will think so as in every thread that talks about immigration it always ends up the same it will never change until we can atleast talk about it " We need to support them were they live . They don’t plan to die they plan to come here for whatever reason. Language, beliefs I have no idea why they are so desperate to take the chance. It’s just so very very sad . To make it about whose to blame. We all are in reality to blame. We keep our wealth to ourselves and the elite even more so. We need to look at what we can do to help not what we can fo to avoid involvement. We let 800k people come here every year without question ( not workers ) but these desperate people get all the abuse. We are a selfish society . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes I can see the wrong were should be where to the spelling police ! " says a lot about someone who cares more about the spelling than the ppl fucking great ain’t it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes I can see the wrong were should be where to the spelling police ! says a lot about someone who cares more about the spelling than the ppl fucking great ain’t it " Sad but true | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Very sad. Will only get worse from here on out with the conditions in the channel over winter. I should imagine there will be a rush to try and get over before Brexit. " Please explain your Brexit logic, illegals in dinghies coming over from France, we try to meet them once in our waters & help them to shore. What makes you think anything will change post Brexit? S | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shocking some comments on here saying a family are risking their children’s lives for benefits!! What would possess any parent to do such a thingif they weren’t bloody desperate. They are looking for a better life or to escape a shit life whether through war or deprivation. Where the fuck are people morals? We live well in the U.K. and our poverty is relative. We don’t get bombed daily or random executions with no possible hope of a future in their devastated homelands. A lot caused by Bush and Blair ( remember the Mail and Sun saying go get em boys ! ) We all supported those attacks. Yes a few were anti ! No regard for the mess afterwards. Sorry to repeat myself but after the end of the first stage of fighting in Iraq the only building the US protected from looters was the Oil ministry. They let the rest of that society crumble. So yes of course young lads come here to work and get a better life but they risk that life to do so. When did you last risk your life to go to work?? Did you ever risk your life to do anything? We are a bunch of privileged twats and I include myself in that so don’t start getting shitty. We are kids who don’t want to share our toys opportunities. They don’t have any and a lot of that is due to our bombs! If you don’t like them coming then work to fix their homelands ! they have already escaped war or a shit life as you say there in France no war there it’s as safe as the U.K. iv said myself I don’t blame them for trying to get here I’d do same myself but I doubt I’d risk my kids lives in them tiny boats if I was a single lad yes but with young kids no I’d stick France out that’s my opinion it’s nit racist but I’m sure some on here will think so as in every thread that talks about immigration it always ends up the same it will never change until we can atleast talk about it " Did you deliberately miss the bit where I said France had the most asylum applications in all of europe? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know that some people here struggle with English but the reason these people come here instead of France is because they can speak English and not French. How would you find a job in a country where you can’t communicate? Those coming from ex French colonies don’t bother coming to the U.K and stay in France..but as always, some people never bother scratching the surface and are happy with their simple arguments. " if I didn’t struggle with my spelling mate you would have no one to pull up on here and look down your nose at it’s me who makes you feel good about yourself | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If this happened to migrants trying to get to France from Briton and overturned of the British coast would that also be our responsibility? If the rules state they should claim asylum in the first safe country then why don't they. I don't recall the rules saying claim asylum in the first country you know the language" Who cares as it is not the case. Asylum seekers and illegal immigrants do what they think is best for them. If they feel that it’ll be easier for they to find a job in the UK because they can speak English or because it is easier to live without official,documents in the Uk, they will come here. In France, you must have an ID with you at all times so it’s not an easy place to be illegal. In the UK we don’t have ID cards and the right wingers don’t want them. It makes this country more attractive to come to. Lower unemployment too. As for the law, I’ll remind you that our rockstar PM doesn’t give a toss about the rule of law so why do you think we should complain about these poor people doing the same thing and doing what is best for them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shocking some comments on here saying a family are risking their children’s lives for benefits!! What would possess any parent to do such a thingif they weren’t bloody desperate. They are looking for a better life or to escape a shit life whether through war or deprivation. Where the fuck are people morals? We live well in the U.K. and our poverty is relative. We don’t get bombed daily or random executions with no possible hope of a future in their devastated homelands. A lot caused by Bush and Blair ( remember the Mail and Sun saying go get em boys ! ) We all supported those attacks. Yes a few were anti ! No regard for the mess afterwards. Sorry to repeat myself but after the end of the first stage of fighting in Iraq the only building the US protected from looters was the Oil ministry. They let the rest of that society crumble. So yes of course young lads come here to work and get a better life but they risk that life to do so. When did you last risk your life to go to work?? Did you ever risk your life to do anything? We are a bunch of privileged twats and I include myself in that so don’t start getting shitty. We are kids who don’t want to share our toys opportunities. They don’t have any and a lot of that is due to our bombs! If you don’t like them coming then work to fix their homelands ! " Tbf you have to admire the sheer audacity of setting the middle east on fire and then complaining about them seeking sanctuary here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shocking some comments on here saying a family are risking their children’s lives for benefits!! What would possess any parent to do such a thingif they weren’t bloody desperate. They are looking for a better life or to escape a shit life whether through war or deprivation. Where the fuck are people morals? We live well in the U.K. and our poverty is relative. We don’t get bombed daily or random executions with no possible hope of a future in their devastated homelands. A lot caused by Bush and Blair ( remember the Mail and Sun saying go get em boys ! ) We all supported those attacks. Yes a few were anti ! No regard for the mess afterwards. Sorry to repeat myself but after the end of the first stage of fighting in Iraq the only building the US protected from looters was the Oil ministry. They let the rest of that society crumble. So yes of course young lads come here to work and get a better life but they risk that life to do so. When did you last risk your life to go to work?? Did you ever risk your life to do anything? We are a bunch of privileged twats and I include myself in that so don’t start getting shitty. We are kids who don’t want to share our toys opportunities. They don’t have any and a lot of that is due to our bombs! If you don’t like them coming then work to fix their homelands ! Tbf you have to admire the sheer audacity of setting the middle east on fire and then complaining about them seeking sanctuary here" yep Lionel it’s all the U.K. fault always is we don’t do any good we don’t spend 14.6 billion a yr helping the poor overseas we just destroy other countries every bad thing in the world is our fault | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If this happened to migrants trying to get to France from Briton and overturned of the British coast would that also be our responsibility? If the rules state they should claim asylum in the first safe country then why don't they. I don't recall the rules saying claim asylum in the first country you know the language Who cares as it is not the case. Asylum seekers and illegal immigrants do what they think is best for them. If they feel that it’ll be easier for they to find a job in the UK because they can speak English or because it is easier to live without official,documents in the Uk, they will come here. In France, you must have an ID with you at all times so it’s not an easy place to be illegal. In the UK we don’t have ID cards and the right wingers don’t want them. It makes this country more attractive to come to. Lower unemployment too. As for the law, I’ll remind you that our rockstar PM doesn’t give a toss about the rule of law so why do you think we should complain about these poor people doing the same thing and doing what is best for them. " I see so if its the other way around its who cares. The rule is to claim in the first safe country it does not say first safe country you know the language or where you think it will be easier. If your escaping war the language is the least of your worries. Do all the migrants that arrive here speak English? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shocking some comments on here saying a family are risking their children’s lives for benefits!! What would possess any parent to do such a thingif they weren’t bloody desperate. They are looking for a better life or to escape a shit life whether through war or deprivation. Where the fuck are people morals? We live well in the U.K. and our poverty is relative. We don’t get bombed daily or random executions with no possible hope of a future in their devastated homelands. A lot caused by Bush and Blair ( remember the Mail and Sun saying go get em boys ! ) We all supported those attacks. Yes a few were anti ! No regard for the mess afterwards. Sorry to repeat myself but after the end of the first stage of fighting in Iraq the only building the US protected from looters was the Oil ministry. They let the rest of that society crumble. So yes of course young lads come here to work and get a better life but they risk that life to do so. When did you last risk your life to go to work?? Did you ever risk your life to do anything? We are a bunch of privileged twats and I include myself in that so don’t start getting shitty. We are kids who don’t want to share our toys opportunities. They don’t have any and a lot of that is due to our bombs! If you don’t like them coming then work to fix their homelands ! Tbf you have to admire the sheer audacity of setting the middle east on fire and then complaining about them seeking sanctuary hereyep Lionel it’s all the U.K. fault always is we don’t do any good we don’t spend 14.6 billion a yr helping the poor overseas we just destroy other countries every bad thing in the world is our fault " Are you actually aware of our involvement in iraq and Afghanistan? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shocking some comments on here saying a family are risking their children’s lives for benefits!! What would possess any parent to do such a thingif they weren’t bloody desperate. They are looking for a better life or to escape a shit life whether through war or deprivation. Where the fuck are people morals? We live well in the U.K. and our poverty is relative. We don’t get bombed daily or random executions with no possible hope of a future in their devastated homelands. A lot caused by Bush and Blair ( remember the Mail and Sun saying go get em boys ! ) We all supported those attacks. Yes a few were anti ! No regard for the mess afterwards. Sorry to repeat myself but after the end of the first stage of fighting in Iraq the only building the US protected from looters was the Oil ministry. They let the rest of that society crumble. So yes of course young lads come here to work and get a better life but they risk that life to do so. When did you last risk your life to go to work?? Did you ever risk your life to do anything? We are a bunch of privileged twats and I include myself in that so don’t start getting shitty. We are kids who don’t want to share our toys opportunities. They don’t have any and a lot of that is due to our bombs! If you don’t like them coming then work to fix their homelands ! Tbf you have to admire the sheer audacity of setting the middle east on fire and then complaining about them seeking sanctuary here" If you are intent on blaming people let's not forget the Labour party were in government at the time.! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If this happened to migrants trying to get to France from Briton and overturned of the British coast would that also be our responsibility? If the rules state they should claim asylum in the first safe country then why don't they. I don't recall the rules saying claim asylum in the first country you know the language Who cares as it is not the case. Asylum seekers and illegal immigrants do what they think is best for them. If they feel that it’ll be easier for they to find a job in the UK because they can speak English or because it is easier to live without official,documents in the Uk, they will come here. In France, you must have an ID with you at all times so it’s not an easy place to be illegal. In the UK we don’t have ID cards and the right wingers don’t want them. It makes this country more attractive to come to. Lower unemployment too. As for the law, I’ll remind you that our rockstar PM doesn’t give a toss about the rule of law so why do you think we should complain about these poor people doing the same thing and doing what is best for them. I see so if its the other way around its who cares. The rule is to claim in the first safe country it does not say first safe country you know the language or where you think it will be easier. If your escaping war the language is the least of your worries. Do all the migrants that arrive here speak English?" We are 5th in europe not even the world. The myth that every single migrant wants to come here is just that.. a myth. Fuck knows why they wanna come here. It must be our endearing hospitality and liberalism. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shocking some comments on here saying a family are risking their children’s lives for benefits!! What would possess any parent to do such a thingif they weren’t bloody desperate. They are looking for a better life or to escape a shit life whether through war or deprivation. Where the fuck are people morals? We live well in the U.K. and our poverty is relative. We don’t get bombed daily or random executions with no possible hope of a future in their devastated homelands. A lot caused by Bush and Blair ( remember the Mail and Sun saying go get em boys ! ) We all supported those attacks. Yes a few were anti ! No regard for the mess afterwards. Sorry to repeat myself but after the end of the first stage of fighting in Iraq the only building the US protected from looters was the Oil ministry. They let the rest of that society crumble. So yes of course young lads come here to work and get a better life but they risk that life to do so. When did you last risk your life to go to work?? Did you ever risk your life to do anything? We are a bunch of privileged twats and I include myself in that so don’t start getting shitty. We are kids who don’t want to share our toys opportunities. They don’t have any and a lot of that is due to our bombs! If you don’t like them coming then work to fix their homelands ! Tbf you have to admire the sheer audacity of setting the middle east on fire and then complaining about them seeking sanctuary here If you are intent on blaming people let's not forget the Labour party were in government at the time.!" And? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shocking some comments on here saying a family are risking their children’s lives for benefits!! What would possess any parent to do such a thingif they weren’t bloody desperate. They are looking for a better life or to escape a shit life whether through war or deprivation. Where the fuck are people morals? We live well in the U.K. and our poverty is relative. We don’t get bombed daily or random executions with no possible hope of a future in their devastated homelands. A lot caused by Bush and Blair ( remember the Mail and Sun saying go get em boys ! ) We all supported those attacks. Yes a few were anti ! No regard for the mess afterwards. Sorry to repeat myself but after the end of the first stage of fighting in Iraq the only building the US protected from looters was the Oil ministry. They let the rest of that society crumble. So yes of course young lads come here to work and get a better life but they risk that life to do so. When did you last risk your life to go to work?? Did you ever risk your life to do anything? We are a bunch of privileged twats and I include myself in that so don’t start getting shitty. We are kids who don’t want to share our toys opportunities. They don’t have any and a lot of that is due to our bombs! If you don’t like them coming then work to fix their homelands ! Tbf you have to admire the sheer audacity of setting the middle east on fire and then complaining about them seeking sanctuary here If you are intent on blaming people let's not forget the Labour party were in government at the time.!" Are you saying we take mo responsibility for events in the middle east? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shocking some comments on here saying a family are risking their children’s lives for benefits!! What would possess any parent to do such a thingif they weren’t bloody desperate. They are looking for a better life or to escape a shit life whether through war or deprivation. Where the fuck are people morals? We live well in the U.K. and our poverty is relative. We don’t get bombed daily or random executions with no possible hope of a future in their devastated homelands. A lot caused by Bush and Blair ( remember the Mail and Sun saying go get em boys ! ) We all supported those attacks. Yes a few were anti ! No regard for the mess afterwards. Sorry to repeat myself but after the end of the first stage of fighting in Iraq the only building the US protected from looters was the Oil ministry. They let the rest of that society crumble. So yes of course young lads come here to work and get a better life but they risk that life to do so. When did you last risk your life to go to work?? Did you ever risk your life to do anything? We are a bunch of privileged twats and I include myself in that so don’t start getting shitty. We are kids who don’t want to share our toys opportunities. They don’t have any and a lot of that is due to our bombs! If you don’t like them coming then work to fix their homelands ! Tbf you have to admire the sheer audacity of setting the middle east on fire and then complaining about them seeking sanctuary hereyep Lionel it’s all the U.K. fault always is we don’t do any good we don’t spend 14.6 billion a yr helping the poor overseas we just destroy other countries every bad thing in the world is our fault " Hey if we didn’t bomb the shit out of them the Saudi’s wouldn’t be our friends S | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shocking some comments on here saying a family are risking their children’s lives for benefits!! What would possess any parent to do such a thingif they weren’t bloody desperate. They are looking for a better life or to escape a shit life whether through war or deprivation. Where the fuck are people morals? We live well in the U.K. and our poverty is relative. We don’t get bombed daily or random executions with no possible hope of a future in their devastated homelands. A lot caused by Bush and Blair ( remember the Mail and Sun saying go get em boys ! ) We all supported those attacks. Yes a few were anti ! No regard for the mess afterwards. Sorry to repeat myself but after the end of the first stage of fighting in Iraq the only building the US protected from looters was the Oil ministry. They let the rest of that society crumble. So yes of course young lads come here to work and get a better life but they risk that life to do so. When did you last risk your life to go to work?? Did you ever risk your life to do anything? We are a bunch of privileged twats and I include myself in that so don’t start getting shitty. We are kids who don’t want to share our toys opportunities. They don’t have any and a lot of that is due to our bombs! If you don’t like them coming then work to fix their homelands ! Tbf you have to admire the sheer audacity of setting the middle east on fire and then complaining about them seeking sanctuary here If you are intent on blaming people let's not forget the Labour party were in government at the time.!" ffs don’t tell Lionel that he will top his self he’s a wealth of knowledge about everything apart from anything negative about labour | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Shocking some comments on here saying a family are risking their children’s lives for benefits!! What would possess any parent to do such a thingif they weren’t bloody desperate. They are looking for a better life or to escape a shit life whether through war or deprivation. Where the fuck are people morals? We live well in the U.K. and our poverty is relative. We don’t get bombed daily or random executions with no possible hope of a future in their devastated homelands. A lot caused by Bush and Blair ( remember the Mail and Sun saying go get em boys ! ) We all supported those attacks. Yes a few were anti ! No regard for the mess afterwards. Sorry to repeat myself but after the end of the first stage of fighting in Iraq the only building the US protected from looters was the Oil ministry. They let the rest of that society crumble. So yes of course young lads come here to work and get a better life but they risk that life to do so. When did you last risk your life to go to work?? Did you ever risk your life to do anything? We are a bunch of privileged twats and I include myself in that so don’t start getting shitty. We are kids who don’t want to share our toys opportunities. They don’t have any and a lot of that is due to our bombs! If you don’t like them coming then work to fix their homelands ! Tbf you have to admire the sheer audacity of setting the middle east on fire and then complaining about them seeking sanctuary hereyep Lionel it’s all the U.K. fault always is we don’t do any good we don’t spend 14.6 billion a yr helping the poor overseas we just destroy other countries every bad thing in the world is our fault " Attacking Iraq was mostly the U.K. and the USA because Bush wanted to make a show of revenge for 9/11. Blair was sucking up to Bush. Iraq had nothing to do with it FFS it was Saudi and Afghanistan. The resultant carnage caused the nightmare in the Middle East. So yes a lot of the refugee issue was created by us. But you’re right not all the worlds problems so we can proud of that eh. Like all western countries we give 0.7% of our budget to aid other countries and to support work by the UN and the IMF 36% is for global projects . The rest individual countries. Rich countries should help poorer countries. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If this happened to migrants trying to get to France from Briton and overturned of the British coast would that also be our responsibility? If the rules state they should claim asylum in the first safe country then why don't they. I don't recall the rules saying claim asylum in the first country you know the language Who cares as it is not the case. Asylum seekers and illegal immigrants do what they think is best for them. If they feel that it’ll be easier for they to find a job in the UK because they can speak English or because it is easier to live without official,documents in the Uk, they will come here. In France, you must have an ID with you at all times so it’s not an easy place to be illegal. In the UK we don’t have ID cards and the right wingers don’t want them. It makes this country more attractive to come to. Lower unemployment too. As for the law, I’ll remind you that our rockstar PM doesn’t give a toss about the rule of law so why do you think we should complain about these poor people doing the same thing and doing what is best for them. I see so if its the other way around its who cares. The rule is to claim in the first safe country it does not say first safe country you know the language or where you think it will be easier. If your escaping war the language is the least of your worries. Do all the migrants that arrive here speak English? We are 5th in europe not even the world. The myth that every single migrant wants to come here is just that.. a myth. Fuck knows why they wanna come here. It must be our endearing hospitality and liberalism." I did not say every migrant wants to come here I said the rules are they should claim in the first safe country which they clearly do not. I see excuses like they want to be here as they speak the language which again clearly does not apply to many of them who can't speak a word. Regardless of what language they speak the rule is claim in the first safe country not pick what country you want to claim in | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |