FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill
Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill
Jump to: Newest in thread
"There doesn't seem to be much on the mainstream news about this new law.
Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill
This the one a few labour front benches have resigned over?"
... as the leader whipped the MPs to abstain... however they defied him and voted against the Bill. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Surprised it didnt get more coverage
Some worrying stuff in there from what I've read..basically letting spooks do what they want
Surprising the opposition didn't oppose it "
It is.
He has got a bit of criticism but it's gone under the radar |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Surprised it didnt get more coverage
Some worrying stuff in there from what I've read..basically letting spooks do what they want
Surprising the opposition didn't oppose it "
Why do you think they didn't oppose it? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It’s essentially legitimising the tactics they have been using for years. If anything it means they are a little more accountable and actually record it.
"
Is that the sane for soldiers accuser of crimes? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It’s essentially legitimising the tactics they have been using for years. If anything it means they are a little more accountable and actually record it.
Is that the sane for soldiers accuser of crimes?"
Not sure what you mean? Do you mean as part of the same bill? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It’s essentially legitimising the tactics they have been using for years. If anything it means they are a little more accountable and actually record it.
Is that the sane for soldiers accuser of crimes?
Not sure what you mean? Do you mean as part of the same bill? "
Is that not part of it or am I getting mixed up with something else?
I read there was one which meant if a soldier was accused of something it wouldnt go to court?
Actually thinking about it..that may be the human.m rights one. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
