FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Biden Ukraine scandal
Biden Ukraine scandal
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
"Emails Show Leveraging Connections With Joe Biden to Boost Burisma Pay Isn't it crazy how the people screaming about trump Ukraine were actually trying to hide the real truth Biden - Ukraine The bombshell report is being censored by Facebook as well as leftist media so you know its true. The Harris campaign aint gonna be too happy with old joe. He has been dodging the court packing question but he won't be able to avoid this one. Yet more corruption at the highest level from the past Obama administration. C'mom man " Are you American? | |||
"Emails Show Leveraging Connections With Joe Biden to Boost Burisma Pay Isn't it crazy how the people screaming about trump Ukraine were actually trying to hide the real truth Biden - Ukraine The bombshell report is being censored by Facebook as well as leftist media so you know its true. The Harris campaign aint gonna be too happy with old joe. He has been dodging the court packing question but he won't be able to avoid this one. Yet more corruption at the highest level from the past Obama administration. C'mom man " If indeed it is being censored by Facebook, it's because it's an utter load of fabricated bollocks, just like the rest of the guff you post. Trump and his cohorts are getting desperate now, but this shit isn't going to hurt Biden as much as it does Trump, because he's only got his braindead base left now and everyone else can see through the lies and bullshit.  | |||
| |||
"Emails Show Leveraging Connections With Joe Biden to Boost Burisma Pay Isn't it crazy how the people screaming about trump Ukraine were actually trying to hide the real truth Biden - Ukraine The bombshell report is being censored by Facebook as well as leftist media so you know its true. The Harris campaign aint gonna be too happy with old joe. He has been dodging the court packing question but he won't be able to avoid this one. Yet more corruption at the highest level from the past Obama administration. C'mom man If indeed it is being censored by Facebook, it's because it's an utter load of fabricated bollocks, just like the rest of the guff you post. Trump and his cohorts are getting desperate now, but this shit isn't going to hurt Biden as much as it does Trump, because he's only got his braindead base left now and everyone else can see through the lies and bullshit. "Wow , that one triggered you didn't it ? Bless your heart | |||
| |||
| |||
"Looks like Twitter are also blocking the story. Editor of The New York Post unable to tweet it. " Yep , its being censored as "contains harmful material" Lol | |||
"Emails Show Leveraging Connections With Joe Biden to Boost Burisma Pay Isn't it crazy how the people screaming about trump Ukraine were actually trying to hide the real truth Biden - Ukraine The bombshell report is being censored by Facebook as well as leftist media so you know its true. The Harris campaign aint gonna be too happy with old joe. He has been dodging the court packing question but he won't be able to avoid this one. Yet more corruption at the highest level from the past Obama administration. C'mom man If indeed it is being censored by Facebook, it's because it's an utter load of fabricated bollocks, just like the rest of the guff you post. Trump and his cohorts are getting desperate now, but this shit isn't going to hurt Biden as much as it does Trump, because he's only got his braindead base left now and everyone else can see through the lies and bullshit.
Wow , that one triggered you didn't it ?
Bless your heart "I'm triggered? Lol, that's rich coming from you. The most triggered person on fab. Ooh look! there's a lefty rioting, lolol. As I've already stated,this will not hurt Biden now, even if the story does prove to have a grain of truth about it. Trump is behind in the polls because people have had enough of the lies and mayhem that go hand in hand with his administration. It's going to take a helluva lot more than this convenient little story from the Washington Post to get him out of the shit. In the meantime, I'd suggest therapy for your irrational hatred of the left  | |||
| |||
 | |||
| |||
"Trump was impeached for something Biden actually done lol "Trump was impeached for something he did. He only got away with it because he has the GOP in his pocket. Time is running out for him though, because those evil Marxists plan on stealing the election.  | |||
| |||
 thanks for playing!!!!! | |||
"is this the one thats been debunked by the washington post.... thanks for playing!!!!! "https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/09/27/quick-guide-trumps-false-claims-about-ukraine-bidens/ | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Maybe it’s BS reporting or A made up email or whatever, but the video of Biden bragging about threatening to withhold funding as the sitting VP if a certain prosecutor wasn’t fired is as real as it gets. Abuse of power has taken place and his son is the one who benefited from that. Joe grows more and more defensive and abrasive, even getting ugly with female reporters in one on one interviews now. I wish he would have raised his voice to Cardi B, The guy, or one of his other trusted political allies. And how about Crazy Nancy getting so angry with Wolff Blitzer over a conversation and questions as to why she refuses to operate on partisan terms. The Democratic Party is a disgrace, cares nothing about people, and has the lowest talent pool that exists. " This is nonsense as well. | |||
"is this the one thats been debunked by the washington post.... thanks for playing!!!!! "Washington Post HAHAHA You been using Bidens pipe? | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"Imagine this.. Trump gets caught red handed with a trail of evidence/ emails exposing wrong doing and "someone" came out like the above and said; "Sorry heres a link with the NY Post debunking it" Do you think for one minute that these bad actors will say "ahh ok, no prob, I get it now - orange man good" NO - You wouldn't You would have screaming, screeching and demands that a full investigation takes place, and I mean a FULL investigation aka the muller investigation. In this investigation the muller team would spend hundreds or thousands of hours interviewing people, accessing emails, literally turning orange man life inside out. And all along the normal people see right from the start that it's a total sham and fake investigation. It was more of a "show me the man and I will find you the crime" Now imagine during this time there were bad actors all around , pushing conspiracy theory's , race baiting, 24 hour news cycles of "evil bad white supremacist" as well as pumping out fake crime stats just to divide further instead of the actual facts And in the end of this sham and after 40 million spent.. 2 files appear with all the corruption and wrong doing Now imagine one of these is discarded immediately (and this one was the one that really was the meat and potatoes of the crime) and other said.... Orange man bad, orange man tweeted that it was a scam and a which hunt, we didn't like orange man doing this , even though orange man was clearly right as evidenced in file 1. Then after all this insanity, conspiracy and division these bad actors had caused dividing everyone on race / political ideology / sex and other they then listen to a phone call that is released by orange man And even though the phone call is released to the public a whistle-blower, then 2 whistle blowers then 3 come forward and say I was close to the guy who was close to the phone call and I think this orange man said this ... And then the bad actors went into a 24/7 conspiracy etc etc EVEN THOUGH THE EVIDENCE WAS IN THE CALL So then impeachment... To listen to people giving their opinions on the said phone call (the released to the public one) So on top of a 2 year 40 million investigation involving 100's of agents and investigators over a story created by insidious people who hated orange man A full impeachment process based on a released phone call and people's "feelings" Then back to them naughty taxes (people not interested) and now to covid (where said corrupt man Biden called orange man xenophobic for even considering shutting travel down to the main infection zone) And here's my point. .. All the above happened because of bad actors for absolutely no reason.. Then Biden actually does have evidence to suggest that this is something worthy of maybe the above investigation but disingenuous people say "Nope sorry, that has been discredited on a tweet from the WP, game over" Oh ok , that's OK then. Thanks for clearing that up. See how it works? " To get the full effect of this post, it's best to shout it all in one breath as loud as possible. | |||
"Emails Show Leveraging Connections With Joe Biden to Boost Burisma Pay Isn't it crazy how the people screaming about trump Ukraine were actually trying to hide the real truth Biden - Ukraine The bombshell report is being censored by Facebook as well as leftist media so you know its true. The Harris campaign aint gonna be too happy with old joe. He has been dodging the court packing question but he won't be able to avoid this one. Yet more corruption at the highest level from the past Obama administration. C'mom man " I've no idea what goes on in American politics and frankly I really don't care but if you want people to take what you say seriously then you really need to have a bit more than just "Facebook are censoring it" and a crap link to a YouTube user who's only aim in life is getting views for cash.   | |||
" To get the full effect of this post, it's best to shout it all in one breath as loud as possible." I can make it a lot lot longer if you pinky promise to do it in one breath and not stop until its done? Let me know gorgeous  | |||
" To get the full effect of this post, it's best to shout it all in one breath as loud as possible. I can make it a lot lot longer if you pinky promise to do it in one breath and not stop until its done? Let me know gorgeous "Deal. Make it even longer and even madder. | |||
| |||
"For those interested , a nice little breakdown ?? https://youtu.be/EB0gVgxTQOs " Serious source of news | |||
"That crack pipe picture of biden junior is hilarious Ice ice baby de dee de de der de der derrr" Are you ok? I mean, are you really ok ? | |||
"For those interested , a nice little breakdown ?? https://youtu.be/EB0gVgxTQOs Serious source of news "They should be banned from posting these crappy links | |||
| |||
"For those interested , a nice little breakdown ?? https://youtu.be/EB0gVgxTQOs " Yeah get a better source than Tim Pool. The guy doesn't cite any references, his Patreon and donation accounts were also digitally investigated and it was found he was getting monthly standardised donations from GOP media wings back in 2016-2018. They guys a hack, whose YouTube channel is based around Piers Morgan's skill set. Talk about controversy, get clicks. | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"I'm left wing but absolutely abhor the sexualising of children in Cuties, the film should be banned. Left wing establishment, The Young Turks, have defended Cuties and the attempt to normalise paedophilia." Wrong thread? | |||
"I'm left wing but absolutely abhor the sexualising of children in Cuties, the film should be banned. Left wing establishment, The Young Turks, have defended Cuties and the attempt to normalise paedophilia. Wrong thread?" Cuties was being discussed on here but a lot of posts have been removed. | |||
| |||
"And what about seal team 6" It's another ridiculous conspiracy theory that has already been disproven by one of the members of the team. Guess what? He's still alive and he's not happy. | |||
| |||
"It gets even better..... apparently computer experts are looking into the metadata behind the emails..... discovering they were only created 3 month’s before they were given to Rudy, rather than the actual time stamp .... also saw what time they were created... 5am eastern.... which would have been noon Moscow time...... Do you think someone has been duped here.... but are too proud to admit they have been had "Where do you think the Crack Pipe photos have come from? Whilst imo I don’t think it’s right to bring family members into this race to the bottom. Someone has done some serious dirty work. | |||
"It gets even better..... apparently computer experts are looking into the metadata behind the emails..... discovering they were only created 3 month’s before they were given to Rudy, rather than the actual time stamp .... also saw what time they were created... 5am eastern.... which would have been noon Moscow time...... Do you think someone has been duped here.... but are too proud to admit they have been had
Where do you think the Crack Pipe photos have come from?
Whilst imo I don’t think it’s right to bring family members into this race to the bottom. Someone has done some serious dirty work. "Was it Professor Plum with the mad conspiracy theory in the library? | |||
"It gets even better..... apparently computer experts are looking into the metadata behind the emails..... discovering they were only created 3 month’s before they were given to Rudy, rather than the actual time stamp .... also saw what time they were created... 5am eastern.... which would have been noon Moscow time...... Do you think someone has been duped here.... but are too proud to admit they have been had
Where do you think the Crack Pipe photos have come from?
Whilst imo I don’t think it’s right to bring family members into this race to the bottom. Someone has done some serious dirty work.
Was it Professor Plum with the mad conspiracy theory in the library?"Be good to have a real opinion on it? | |||
"It gets even better..... apparently computer experts are looking into the metadata behind the emails..... discovering they were only created 3 month’s before they were given to Rudy, rather than the actual time stamp .... also saw what time they were created... 5am eastern.... which would have been noon Moscow time...... Do you think someone has been duped here.... but are too proud to admit they have been had
Where do you think the Crack Pipe photos have come from?
Whilst imo I don’t think it’s right to bring family members into this race to the bottom. Someone has done some serious dirty work.
Was it Professor Plum with the mad conspiracy theory in the library?
Be good to have a real opinion on it? "So many conspiracy theories have been spouted, I've lost track. What are you asking about? | |||
"It gets even better..... apparently computer experts are looking into the metadata behind the emails..... discovering they were only created 3 month’s before they were given to Rudy, rather than the actual time stamp .... also saw what time they were created... 5am eastern.... which would have been noon Moscow time...... Do you think someone has been duped here.... but are too proud to admit they have been had
Where do you think the Crack Pipe photos have come from?
Whilst imo I don’t think it’s right to bring family members into this race to the bottom. Someone has done some serious dirty work.
Was it Professor Plum with the mad conspiracy theory in the library?
Be good to have a real opinion on it?
So many conspiracy theories have been spouted, I've lost track. What are you asking about?"Do you think it’s real? | |||
"It gets even better..... apparently computer experts are looking into the metadata behind the emails..... discovering they were only created 3 month’s before they were given to Rudy, rather than the actual time stamp .... also saw what time they were created... 5am eastern.... which would have been noon Moscow time...... Do you think someone has been duped here.... but are too proud to admit they have been had
Where do you think the Crack Pipe photos have come from?
Whilst imo I don’t think it’s right to bring family members into this race to the bottom. Someone has done some serious dirty work.
Was it Professor Plum with the mad conspiracy theory in the library?
Be good to have a real opinion on it?
So many conspiracy theories have been spouted, I've lost track. What are you asking about?
Do you think it’s real?
"Do I think what's real? | |||
"It gets even better..... apparently computer experts are looking into the metadata behind the emails..... discovering they were only created 3 month’s before they were given to Rudy, rather than the actual time stamp .... also saw what time they were created... 5am eastern.... which would have been noon Moscow time...... Do you think someone has been duped here.... but are too proud to admit they have been had
Where do you think the Crack Pipe photos have come from?
Whilst imo I don’t think it’s right to bring family members into this race to the bottom. Someone has done some serious dirty work.
Was it Professor Plum with the mad conspiracy theory in the library?
Be good to have a real opinion on it?
So many conspiracy theories have been spouted, I've lost track. What are you asking about?
Do you think it’s real?
Do I think what's real?"The strategically timed Hunter Biden leaks. | |||
"It gets even better..... apparently computer experts are looking into the metadata behind the emails..... discovering they were only created 3 month’s before they were given to Rudy, rather than the actual time stamp .... also saw what time they were created... 5am eastern.... which would have been noon Moscow time...... Do you think someone has been duped here.... but are too proud to admit they have been had
Where do you think the Crack Pipe photos have come from?
Whilst imo I don’t think it’s right to bring family members into this race to the bottom. Someone has done some serious dirty work.
Was it Professor Plum with the mad conspiracy theory in the library?
Be good to have a real opinion on it?
So many conspiracy theories have been spouted, I've lost track. What are you asking about?
Do you think it’s real?
Do I think what's real?
The strategically timed Hunter Biden leaks. "No idea. Can you provide a reputable source? | |||
"It gets even better..... apparently computer experts are looking into the metadata behind the emails..... discovering they were only created 3 month’s before they were given to Rudy, rather than the actual time stamp .... also saw what time they were created... 5am eastern.... which would have been noon Moscow time...... Do you think someone has been duped here.... but are too proud to admit they have been had
Where do you think the Crack Pipe photos have come from?
Whilst imo I don’t think it’s right to bring family members into this race to the bottom. Someone has done some serious dirty work.
Was it Professor Plum with the mad conspiracy theory in the library?
Be good to have a real opinion on it?
So many conspiracy theories have been spouted, I've lost track. What are you asking about?
Do you think it’s real?
Do I think what's real?
The strategically timed Hunter Biden leaks.
No idea. Can you provide a reputable source?"I don’t have anything I have read it in the Guardian. I’m off to the murky parts of the internet to have a look see. | |||
"It gets even better..... apparently computer experts are looking into the metadata behind the emails..... discovering they were only created 3 month’s before they were given to Rudy, rather than the actual time stamp .... also saw what time they were created... 5am eastern.... which would have been noon Moscow time...... Do you think someone has been duped here.... but are too proud to admit they have been had
Where do you think the Crack Pipe photos have come from?
Whilst imo I don’t think it’s right to bring family members into this race to the bottom. Someone has done some serious dirty work.
Was it Professor Plum with the mad conspiracy theory in the library?
Be good to have a real opinion on it?
So many conspiracy theories have been spouted, I've lost track. What are you asking about?
Do you think it’s real?
Do I think what's real?
The strategically timed Hunter Biden leaks.
No idea. Can you provide a reputable source?
I don’t have anything I have read it in the Guardian.
I’m off to the murky parts of the internet to have a look see. "Ugh don't go there. I doubt anything you dig up there would be trustworthy anyway. | |||
"It gets even better..... apparently computer experts are looking into the metadata behind the emails..... discovering they were only created 3 month’s before they were given to Rudy, rather than the actual time stamp .... also saw what time they were created... 5am eastern.... which would have been noon Moscow time...... Do you think someone has been duped here.... but are too proud to admit they have been had
Where do you think the Crack Pipe photos have come from?
Whilst imo I don’t think it’s right to bring family members into this race to the bottom. Someone has done some serious dirty work.
Was it Professor Plum with the mad conspiracy theory in the library?
Be good to have a real opinion on it?
So many conspiracy theories have been spouted, I've lost track. What are you asking about?
Do you think it’s real?
Do I think what's real?
The strategically timed Hunter Biden leaks. "The emails are almost certainly fake. The crack pipe pic, who knows, but Joe Biden has been open about Hunters substance abuse, so it's nothing the public don't know anyway. It's not going to hurt him, but it may backfire on Giuliani. | |||
| |||
| |||
" I don't like Trump but he isn't as dishonest as Joe " | |||
"They are all at it over here its just dirty fucking politics I don't like Trump but he isn't as dishonest as Joe politics just stink right now. " Hahahahahahahaha Here's a datanase in the Washington Post about Trump's lies. He passed 20,000 false or misleading claims back in July. https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/trump-claims-database/?utm_term=.27babcd5e58c&itid=lk_inline_manual_2&itid=lk_inline_manual_2 | |||
| |||
"Emails Show Leveraging Connections With Joe Biden to Boost Burisma Pay Isn't it crazy how the people screaming about trump Ukraine were actually trying to hide the real truth Biden - Ukraine The bombshell report is being censored by Facebook as well as leftist media so you know its true. The Harris campaign aint gonna be too happy with old joe. He has been dodging the court packing question but he won't be able to avoid this one. Yet more corruption at the highest level from the past Obama administration. C'mom man " Just seen that cruz and lindsay graham have issued the ceo of twitter a surpena to come before a committee next week and explain himself why he has been blanket banning this story from new york post coming out on his platform when the implications of the emails are very serious if true. | |||
| |||
"Emails Show Leveraging Connections With Joe Biden to Boost Burisma Pay Isn't it crazy how the people screaming about trump Ukraine were actually trying to hide the real truth Biden - Ukraine The bombshell report is being censored by Facebook as well as leftist media so you know its true. The Harris campaign aint gonna be too happy with old joe. He has been dodging the court packing question but he won't be able to avoid this one. Yet more corruption at the highest level from the past Obama administration. C'mom man " Yeah Biden is a devious old tosser. | |||
| |||
"Hey all, sorry for my "absence" Sadly this will be my last post in the politics forum as I am no longer allowed to participate and give my honest opinion. I may be allowed to come back on election night to laugh if President Trump gets in or even more so if Harris wins. Either way it isn't a bad thing as I am happy and would like to remain so. I will use fab for what it should be used for. Take care all. " You can still participate if you want. That's what the forum's all about. If you really are leaving, though, be well. It's been... entertaining. | |||
| |||
"I cant see biden win with after what they have got on him of what he have done in the past, trump will win." Biden is a horrendous human being. But would be a huge upgrade on what they have right now. | |||
"I cant see biden win with after what they have got on him of what he have done in the past, trump will win. Biden is a horrendous human being. But would be a huge upgrade on what they have right now." I wouldnt think so, it would be the opposite, would they really want a president with his history? | |||
"I cant see biden win with after what they have got on him of what he have done in the past, trump will win." what do they have on him? | |||
"I cant see biden win with after what they have got on him of what he have done in the past, trump will win. Biden is a horrendous human being. But would be a huge upgrade on what they have right now.I wouldnt think so, it would be the opposite, would they really want a president with his history?" Trump is worse, has worse policies, and is less competent. | |||
| |||
"It's not looking good for the Biden crime family." Ok Dave | |||
"I cant see biden win with after what they have got on him of what he have done in the past, trump will win. what do they have on him?" It is very perverse things not suitable to mention here. | |||
"I cant see biden win with after what they have got on him of what he have done in the past, trump will win. Biden is a horrendous human being. But would be a huge upgrade on what they have right now.I wouldnt think so, it would be the opposite, would they really want a president with his history? Trump is worse, has worse policies, and is less competent. " We have to agree to disagree on that. | |||
"I cant see biden win with after what they have got on him of what he have done in the past, trump will win. what do they have on him?It is very perverse things not suitable to mention here." how convenient. | |||
"I cant see biden win with after what they have got on him of what he have done in the past, trump will win. Biden is a horrendous human being. But would be a huge upgrade on what they have right now.I wouldnt think so, it would be the opposite, would they really want a president with his history? Trump is worse, has worse policies, and is less competent. We have to agree to disagree on that." We don't have to disagree. You can give me an example of Trump not being self serving, having any good policies and/or being competent. I'm always open to changing my mind. | |||
"I cant see biden win with after what they have got on him of what he have done in the past, trump will win. what do they have on him?It is very perverse things not suitable to mention here." Worse than Trump's long history or sexual assault, grabbing women by the pussy, not paying his taxes, habitually breaking the law etc etc? | |||
"I cant see biden win with after what they have got on him of what he have done in the past, trump will win. Biden is a horrendous human being. But would be a huge upgrade on what they have right now." Its nice you pretend you have a clue but you clearly don't. | |||
"I cant see biden win with after what they have got on him of what he have done in the past, trump will win. what do they have on him?It is very perverse things not suitable to mention here." A swingers site? | |||
"I cant see biden win with after what they have got on him of what he have done in the past, trump will win. Biden is a horrendous human being. But would be a huge upgrade on what they have right now. Its nice you pretend you have a clue but you clearly don't. " I'm open to information, my opinion isn't fixed. If there is anything positive about Trump, I'm all ears. | |||
"I cant see biden win with after what they have got on him of what he have done in the past, trump will win. what do they have on him?It is very perverse things not suitable to mention here. Worse than Trump's long history or sexual assault, grabbing women by the pussy, not paying his taxes, habitually breaking the law etc etc?" Yes I would say it is alot worse than that, it was reported on the new york post about what was found on his hard drive amongst other things, after the stories about it was released, it was censored on social media as well. | |||
| |||
"I cant see biden win with after what they have got on him of what he have done in the past, trump will win. what do they have on him?It is very perverse things not suitable to mention here. Worse than Trump's long history or sexual assault, grabbing women by the pussy, not paying his taxes, habitually breaking the law etc etc?Yes I would say it is alot worse than that, it was reported on the new york post about what was found on his hard drive amongst other things, after the stories about it was released, it was censored on social media as well." have you been under a rock for the last few days? | |||
"I cant see biden win with after what they have got on him of what he have done in the past, trump will win. what do they have on him?It is very perverse things not suitable to mention here. Worse than Trump's long history or sexual assault, grabbing women by the pussy, not paying his taxes, habitually breaking the law etc etc?Yes I would say it is alot worse than that, it was reported on the new york post about what was found on his hard drive amongst other things, after the stories about it was released, it was censored on social media as well." So how do you know about it? | |||
"I cant see biden win with after what they have got on him of what he have done in the past, trump will win. what do they have on him?It is very perverse things not suitable to mention here. Worse than Trump's long history or sexual assault, grabbing women by the pussy, not paying his taxes, habitually breaking the law etc etc?Yes I would say it is alot worse than that, it was reported on the new york post about what was found on his hard drive amongst other things, after the stories about it was released, it was censored on social media as well." Oh I see. This all comes from Steve Bannon. And it complete bullshit. Carry on. | |||
"I cant see biden win with after what they have got on him of what he have done in the past, trump will win. what do they have on him?It is very perverse things not suitable to mention here. Worse than Trump's long history or sexual assault, grabbing women by the pussy, not paying his taxes, habitually breaking the law etc etc?Yes I would say it is alot worse than that, it was reported on the new york post about what was found on his hard drive amongst other things, after the stories about it was released, it was censored on social media as well. Oh I see. This all comes from Steve Bannon. And it complete bullshit. Carry on." Others have reported on it is well. | |||
| |||
| |||
"I dug into the recent Hunter Biden thing a bit. A few facts: The "story" was initially run in a Murdoch tabloid. The writer didn't even use his byline as he was concerned about the story's authenticity. And the 2 sources named in the "story" were Bannon (former adviser to Trump, now facing federal fraud charges) and Giuliani (Trump’s personal lawyer and loon). I mean... there still might be truth to the story. But based on the provenance, there's ample reason to think it's bollocks." Wishful thinking its false but we have had a lot of press on it here and its looking more and more like there is a lot of truth in it. | |||
"I dug into the recent Hunter Biden thing a bit. A few facts: The "story" was initially run in a Murdoch tabloid. The writer didn't even use his byline as he was concerned about the story's authenticity. And the 2 sources named in the "story" were Bannon (former adviser to Trump, now facing federal fraud charges) and Giuliani (Trump’s personal lawyer and loon). I mean... there still might be truth to the story. But based on the provenance, there's ample reason to think it's bollocks. Wishful thinking its false but we have had a lot of press on it here and its looking more and more like there is a lot of truth in it." What is the story even being reported as? Sounds like more incoherent and mad mudslinging on this side of the pond so far. | |||
"I dug into the recent Hunter Biden thing a bit. A few facts: The "story" was initially run in a Murdoch tabloid. The writer didn't even use his byline as he was concerned about the story's authenticity. And the 2 sources named in the "story" were Bannon (former adviser to Trump, now facing federal fraud charges) and Giuliani (Trump’s personal lawyer and loon). I mean... there still might be truth to the story. But based on the provenance, there's ample reason to think it's bollocks. Wishful thinking its false but we have had a lot of press on it here and its looking more and more like there is a lot of truth in it. What is the story even being reported as? Sounds like more incoherent and mad mudslinging on this side of the pond so far." Its had a lot of press but even the media sympathetic to Biden are trying to play it down rather than make out its fake. Our press isn't as bad as yours on stories its not perfect but they do investigate before making thongs up. | |||
"I dug into the recent Hunter Biden thing a bit. A few facts: The "story" was initially run in a Murdoch tabloid. The writer didn't even use his byline as he was concerned about the story's authenticity. And the 2 sources named in the "story" were Bannon (former adviser to Trump, now facing federal fraud charges) and Giuliani (Trump’s personal lawyer and loon). I mean... there still might be truth to the story. But based on the provenance, there's ample reason to think it's bollocks. Wishful thinking its false but we have had a lot of press on it here and its looking more and more like there is a lot of truth in it. What is the story even being reported as? Sounds like more incoherent and mad mudslinging on this side of the pond so far. Its had a lot of press but even the media sympathetic to Biden are trying to play it down rather than make out its fake. Our press isn't as bad as yours on stories its not perfect but they do investigate before making thongs up. " Oh a lot of our press is rubbish. No argument there. But what is the key story supposed to be? | |||
"I dug into the recent Hunter Biden thing a bit. A few facts: The "story" was initially run in a Murdoch tabloid. The writer didn't even use his byline as he was concerned about the story's authenticity. And the 2 sources named in the "story" were Bannon (former adviser to Trump, now facing federal fraud charges) and Giuliani (Trump’s personal lawyer and loon). I mean... there still might be truth to the story. But based on the provenance, there's ample reason to think it's bollocks. Wishful thinking its false but we have had a lot of press on it here and its looking more and more like there is a lot of truth in it." Really? I suppose that if you follow the right wing media, then they are going to be pushing it as hard as they can, but I follow a lot of the news in the US, and from what I see, it's mostly being treated as another fabrication from Bannon and Giuliani. Whatever. It doesn't appear to be hurting Biden, anymore than Trump tweeting "Biden will follow the science" has. | |||
"I dug into the recent Hunter Biden thing a bit. A few facts: The "story" was initially run in a Murdoch tabloid. The writer didn't even use his byline as he was concerned about the story's authenticity. And the 2 sources named in the "story" were Bannon (former adviser to Trump, now facing federal fraud charges) and Giuliani (Trump’s personal lawyer and loon). I mean... there still might be truth to the story. But based on the provenance, there's ample reason to think it's bollocks. Wishful thinking its false but we have had a lot of press on it here and its looking more and more like there is a lot of truth in it. What is the story even being reported as? Sounds like more incoherent and mad mudslinging on this side of the pond so far. Its had a lot of press but even the media sympathetic to Biden are trying to play it down rather than make out its fake. Our press isn't as bad as yours on stories its not perfect but they do investigate before making thongs up. Oh a lot of our press is rubbish. No argument there. But what is the key story supposed to be?" Honestly its all cracking my skull but the bottom line is we have 2 old white rich men neither will make me happy. It may all come down to who people will think will stop the rioting and looting best as its been really bad in places and many sleep with a gun besides the bed. | |||
"I dug into the recent Hunter Biden thing a bit. A few facts: The "story" was initially run in a Murdoch tabloid. The writer didn't even use his byline as he was concerned about the story's authenticity. And the 2 sources named in the "story" were Bannon (former adviser to Trump, now facing federal fraud charges) and Giuliani (Trump’s personal lawyer and loon). I mean... there still might be truth to the story. But based on the provenance, there's ample reason to think it's bollocks. Wishful thinking its false but we have had a lot of press on it here and its looking more and more like there is a lot of truth in it. What is the story even being reported as? Sounds like more incoherent and mad mudslinging on this side of the pond so far. Its had a lot of press but even the media sympathetic to Biden are trying to play it down rather than make out its fake. Our press isn't as bad as yours on stories its not perfect but they do investigate before making thongs up. Oh a lot of our press is rubbish. No argument there. But what is the key story supposed to be? Honestly its all cracking my skull but the bottom line is we have 2 old white rich men neither will make me happy. It may all come down to who people will think will stop the rioting and looting best as its been really bad in places and many sleep with a gun besides the bed. " If that's the logic. One of the two old rich white men is currently in charge and you have lots of looting and rioting. So there can definitely be more. Or maybe it will stop with a change. | |||
"I dug into the recent Hunter Biden thing a bit. A few facts: The "story" was initially run in a Murdoch tabloid. The writer didn't even use his byline as he was concerned about the story's authenticity. And the 2 sources named in the "story" were Bannon (former adviser to Trump, now facing federal fraud charges) and Giuliani (Trump’s personal lawyer and loon). I mean... there still might be truth to the story. But based on the provenance, there's ample reason to think it's bollocks. Wishful thinking its false but we have had a lot of press on it here and its looking more and more like there is a lot of truth in it. What is the story even being reported as? Sounds like more incoherent and mad mudslinging on this side of the pond so far. Its had a lot of press but even the media sympathetic to Biden are trying to play it down rather than make out its fake. Our press isn't as bad as yours on stories its not perfect but they do investigate before making thongs up. Oh a lot of our press is rubbish. No argument there. But what is the key story supposed to be? Honestly its all cracking my skull but the bottom line is we have 2 old white rich men neither will make me happy. It may all come down to who people will think will stop the rioting and looting best as its been really bad in places and many sleep with a gun besides the bed. If that's the logic. One of the two old rich white men is currently in charge and you have lots of looting and rioting. So there can definitely be more. Or maybe it will stop with a change." This. Pretty much. Trump and his lot are trying a desperate bit of contorted logic: All these riots are terrible! We need Trump re-elected because the other guy will cause loads more riots like the ones going on under Trump's watch! Eh? | |||
| |||
"Do American electors care about manifestos, ideas, projects etc...? Just wondering as it looks like this election is just about insults and kicking your opponent. I’ve always thought the US was a pretty pathetic and repugnant country but it’s getting worse by the minute. The fact that a clown like Trump can even be in contention tells you everything you need to know about this depraved and immoral country. What amuses even more is that they keep referring to ( and using) God for everything they do. Please give God a break. If there is one, he deserves better than this pathetic election. " We are heading that way. Look at the embarrassing scenes before the last election. | |||
"Do American electors care about manifestos, ideas, projects etc...? Just wondering as it looks like this election is just about insults and kicking your opponent. I’ve always thought the US was a pretty pathetic and repugnant country but it’s getting worse by the minute. The fact that a clown like Trump can even be in contention tells you everything you need to know about this depraved and immoral country. What amuses even more is that they keep referring to ( and using) God for everything they do. Please give God a break. If there is one, he deserves better than this pathetic election. " That's a bit strong. I think people anywhere in the world are basically the same and want similar things. Safety, security, happiness. And we can't really thow any stones at the USA, given the fact we have Brexit and Johnson over here. | |||
"Do American electors care about manifestos, ideas, projects etc...? Just wondering as it looks like this election is just about insults and kicking your opponent. I’ve always thought the US was a pretty pathetic and repugnant country but it’s getting worse by the minute. The fact that a clown like Trump can even be in contention tells you everything you need to know about this depraved and immoral country. What amuses even more is that they keep referring to ( and using) God for everything they do. Please give God a break. If there is one, he deserves better than this pathetic election. " Oh the irony there sorry but the first two paragraphs are farcical after your third with the vitriol in it. Do as I say you should do but not as I do. | |||
"Do American electors care about manifestos, ideas, projects etc...? Just wondering as it looks like this election is just about insults and kicking your opponent. I’ve always thought the US was a pretty pathetic and repugnant country but it’s getting worse by the minute. The fact that a clown like Trump can even be in contention tells you everything you need to know about this depraved and immoral country. What amuses even more is that they keep referring to ( and using) God for everything they do. Please give God a break. If there is one, he deserves better than this pathetic election. We are heading that way. Look at the embarrassing scenes before the last election. " Of course. We’re just five / ten years behind. Every stupid thing they do, we copy.,It’s probably why we constantly report what’s going on the US! Just to make sure we don’t to forget to copy their pathetic ideas and trends. I mean, do we need we could go away with 95% of the US news and coverage we get. It feels like an indigestion. Are we living in Western Europe or have we become another American state?  | |||
"Do American electors care about manifestos, ideas, projects etc...? Just wondering as it looks like this election is just about insults and kicking your opponent. I’ve always thought the US was a pretty pathetic and repugnant country but it’s getting worse by the minute. The fact that a clown like Trump can even be in contention tells you everything you need to know about this depraved and immoral country. What amuses even more is that they keep referring to ( and using) God for everything they do. Please give God a break. If there is one, he deserves better than this pathetic election. Oh the irony there sorry but the first two paragraphs are farcical after your third with the vitriol in it. Do as I say you should do but not as I do. " Thank you for comparing my post on a swingers site to the American election. You clearly have a good sense of measure.... | |||
"Do American electors care about manifestos, ideas, projects etc...? Just wondering as it looks like this election is just about insults and kicking your opponent. I’ve always thought the US was a pretty pathetic and repugnant country but it’s getting worse by the minute. The fact that a clown like Trump can even be in contention tells you everything you need to know about this depraved and immoral country. What amuses even more is that they keep referring to ( and using) God for everything they do. Please give God a break. If there is one, he deserves better than this pathetic election. We are heading that way. Look at the embarrassing scenes before the last election. Of course. We’re just five / ten years behind. Every stupid thing they do, we copy.,It’s probably why we constantly report what’s going on the US! Just to make sure we don’t to forget to copy their pathetic ideas and trends. I mean, do we need we could go away with 95% of the US news and coverage we get. It feels like an indigestion. Are we living in Western Europe or have we become another American state? "It's probably due to Murdoch. He has a lot of power and influence here and in the USA. So he peddles his toxic influence on both of us. But he has v little influence on the EU. | |||
| |||
"Do American electors care about manifestos, ideas, projects etc...? Just wondering as it looks like this election is just about insults and kicking your opponent. I’ve always thought the US was a pretty pathetic and repugnant country but it’s getting worse by the minute. The fact that a clown like Trump can even be in contention tells you everything you need to know about this depraved and immoral country. What amuses even more is that they keep referring to ( and using) God for everything they do. Please give God a break. If there is one, he deserves better than this pathetic election. That's a bit strong. I think people anywhere in the world are basically the same and want similar things. Safety, security, happiness. And we can't really thow any stones at the USA, given the fact we have Brexit and Johnson over here." But as Johnson is a mini Trump and Brexit is the result of populist and demagogic politicians, my point does make sense. | |||
"Do American electors care about manifestos, ideas, projects etc...? Just wondering as it looks like this election is just about insults and kicking your opponent. I’ve always thought the US was a pretty pathetic and repugnant country but it’s getting worse by the minute. The fact that a clown like Trump can even be in contention tells you everything you need to know about this depraved and immoral country. What amuses even more is that they keep referring to ( and using) God for everything they do. Please give God a break. If there is one, he deserves better than this pathetic election. Oh the irony there sorry but the first two paragraphs are farcical after your third with the vitriol in it. Do as I say you should do but not as I do. Thank you for comparing my post on a swingers site to the American election. You clearly have a good sense of measure.... "Google irony it will explain. | |||
"Do American electors care about manifestos, ideas, projects etc...? Just wondering as it looks like this election is just about insults and kicking your opponent. I’ve always thought the US was a pretty pathetic and repugnant country but it’s getting worse by the minute. The fact that a clown like Trump can even be in contention tells you everything you need to know about this depraved and immoral country. What amuses even more is that they keep referring to ( and using) God for everything they do. Please give God a break. If there is one, he deserves better than this pathetic election. Oh the irony there sorry but the first two paragraphs are farcical after your third with the vitriol in it. Do as I say you should do but not as I do. Thank you for comparing my post on a swingers site to the American election. You clearly have a good sense of measure....
Google irony it will explain. "I don’t need to google the word ‘irony’ to see that your point is silly. I have just posted a harsh post on America. Comparing it with the Punch and Judy shit-show that we’ve witnessed for years over there takes some doing. However, your post stating that my post is farcical illustrates perfectly what irony is. | |||
| |||
"I dug into the recent Hunter Biden thing a bit. A few facts: The "story" was initially run in a Murdoch tabloid. The writer didn't even use his byline as he was concerned about the story's authenticity. And the 2 sources named in the "story" were Bannon (former adviser to Trump, now facing federal fraud charges) and Giuliani (Trump’s personal lawyer and loon). I mean... there still might be truth to the story. But based on the provenance, there's ample reason to think it's bollocks. Wishful thinking its false but we have had a lot of press on it here and its looking more and more like there is a lot of truth in it. What is the story even being reported as? Sounds like more incoherent and mad mudslinging on this side of the pond so far. Its had a lot of press but even the media sympathetic to Biden are trying to play it down rather than make out its fake. Our press isn't as bad as yours on stories its not perfect but they do investigate before making thongs up. " Yes and you are right there too the press are making it out as fake news too to hope biden will win but I dont think he will do that, trump to win | |||
"Where is the Biden response to any of it? ....and no, the Biden response shouldn’t start with “but Trump.....”" Because there is no response as he knows it is true too. | |||
"Where is the Biden response to any of it? ....and no, the Biden response shouldn’t start with “but Trump.....”Because there is no response as he knows it is true too." Apparently its all been verified and is true and in the next week or two theres going to be quite a few bombshells. Somthing thats not verified yet is that some of those 25,000 images on the lap top involve some really bad stuff. Will be a interesting couple weeks in the run up to the election. | |||
"Where is the Biden response to any of it? ....and no, the Biden response shouldn’t start with “but Trump.....”Because there is no response as he knows it is true too. Apparently its all been verified and is true and in the next week or two theres going to be quite a few bombshells. Somthing thats not verified yet is that some of those 25,000 images on the lap top involve some really bad stuff. Will be a interesting couple weeks in the run up to the election. " We are seeing how the media works in real time. "Apparently" is enough to convince some people not to vote for him. | |||
| |||
"American authorities DNI have confirmed there is no Russian interference involved in this case. The Bidens are in deep trouble." DNI? | |||
"American authorities DNI have confirmed there is no Russian interference involved in this case. The Bidens are in deep trouble. DNI?" DNI are run by John Ratcliffe. A Republican. | |||
"American authorities DNI have confirmed there is no Russian interference involved in this case. The Bidens are in deep trouble. DNI? DNI are run by John Ratcliffe. A Republican." Finally! They must have the smoking gun! I've still yet to really be told what the Biden scandal actually is, in factual terms. But it's apparently awful and the worst thing in the history of mankind. It'd have to be for Biden to outdo Trump in the scandal game. | |||
"Where is the Biden response to any of it? ....and no, the Biden response shouldn’t start with “but Trump.....”Because there is no response as he knows it is true too." Good job you’re here to enlighten us. | |||
"Where is the Biden response to any of it? ....and no, the Biden response shouldn’t start with “but Trump.....”Because there is no response as he knows it is true too." Hoping it's true doesn't make it so, and as it's provenance is highly dubious to say the least, this story isn't going to fool anyone but the gullible and Trumpies base, which is basically the same thing. Bannon and Giuliani? I wouldn't trust either of them as far as I could chuck them. Bannon has always been a c@nt, but it's genuinely surprising how much Rudi is prepared to trash his reputation just to keep his head up Trumps ass. | |||
"American authorities DNI have confirmed there is no Russian interference involved in this case. The Bidens are in deep trouble." There is a lot of evidence of Obama and the FBI chiefs in conclusion and shredding the fake news dossier but non of us will never know I guess we can only speculate depending on things based on your left wing or right wing views lol. Well there is so little unbiased comments on here. | |||
"Where is the Biden response to any of it? ....and no, the Biden response shouldn’t start with “but Trump.....”Because there is no response as he knows it is true too. Apparently its all been verified and is true and in the next week or two theres going to be quite a few bombshells. Somthing thats not verified yet is that some of those 25,000 images on the lap top involve some really bad stuff. Will be a interesting couple weeks in the run up to the election. " You are right there, it will be dynamite for the election as more and more is comming to the surface about him, it will be interesting to see how it will go too | |||
"American authorities DNI have confirmed there is no Russian interference involved in this case. The Bidens are in deep trouble. There is a lot of evidence of Obama and the FBI chiefs in conclusion and shredding the fake news dossier but non of us will never know I guess we can only speculate depending on things based on your left wing or right wing views lol. Well there is so little unbiased comments on here. "It shouldn't depend on your left or right wing view I'm left wing and want to see justice done to criminal politicians and leaders no matter if they are republican/democrat/tory/labour. | |||
"American authorities DNI have confirmed there is no Russian interference involved in this case. The Bidens are in deep trouble. There is a lot of evidence of Obama and the FBI chiefs in conclusion and shredding the fake news dossier but non of us will never know I guess we can only speculate depending on things based on your left wing or right wing views lol. Well there is so little unbiased comments on here.
It shouldn't depend on your left or right wing view
I'm left wing and want to see justice done to criminal politicians and leaders no matter if they are republican/democrat/tory/labour."In that case you should be hoping for Trumps demise. Biden is hardly the greatest, but he's got nothing on Donny when it come to criminality. | |||
"American authorities DNI have confirmed there is no Russian interference involved in this case. The Bidens are in deep trouble. There is a lot of evidence of Obama and the FBI chiefs in conclusion and shredding the fake news dossier but non of us will never know I guess we can only speculate depending on things based on your left wing or right wing views lol. Well there is so little unbiased comments on here.
It shouldn't depend on your left or right wing view
I'm left wing and want to see justice done to criminal politicians and leaders no matter if they are republican/democrat/tory/labour.
In that case you should be hoping for Trumps demise. Biden is hardly the greatest, but he's got nothing on Donny when it come to criminality."This. It is bizarre to see certain people hopping around, screaming for justice when it comes to Biden. And yet Trump, with a very dodgy history, is fine to sit in the Whitehouse. | |||
| |||
"Very telling with hiden Biden not coming out of his basement for days or any of his camp denying these allegations." Are you at all bothered by anything Trump has done? Or is Biden the only bad guy, in your eyes? | |||
"Very telling with hiden Biden not coming out of his basement for days or any of his camp denying these allegations. Are you at all bothered by anything Trump has done? Or is Biden the only bad guy, in your eyes?" There's a clue in the title of the thread "Biden Ukraine scandal" that its about Biden not trump. Read it a few times till you understand it. | |||
| |||
"The ndi, fbi and doj are all saying that the laptop is not russian interference. Hunter Biden's 2 jailed business partners are confirming the email chain with one of them turning over his email account as proof. They have also confirmed that "the big guy" that "h"(hunter) was holding money for is Joe Biden. There are pictures of Joe Biden with hunters business associates which disproves Joe's lies that he had no knowlege of hunters business dealings, infact hunter and Joe travelled together on air force 2 on trips where hunter was doing personal 'business' with the regimes Joe was officiating with in his capacity as VP. Hunter Biden's lawyer has attempted to get the laptop back further confirming that this laptop does infact belong to hunter. Hunters business partner had gone on record to disassociate himself and his company from Hunters actions as even he could see the crookedness of it all. This is just a brief overview of events so far, all proven true with more to come and not one denial from the Biden's. Of course their followers will try to deny it but its going to get harder and harder to keep up tbat cognitive dissonance as more details are brought to the fore. " Can you please provide links to verify these facts, as I am unable to find any online evidence that either confirms or denies your story. I'm willing to be persuaded, but I want reputable sources. Not the New York Post, or John Radcliffe. Both of whom are highly partisan. | |||
"Very telling with hiden Biden not coming out of his basement for days or any of his camp denying these allegations. Are you at all bothered by anything Trump has done? Or is Biden the only bad guy, in your eyes? There's a clue in the title of the thread "Biden Ukraine scandal" that its about Biden not trump. Read it a few times till you understand it." Got it. You're not bothered by Trump's documented wrongdoings at all. You're far more interested in a likely smear. | |||
"Very telling with hiden Biden not coming out of his basement for days or any of his camp denying these allegations." Nope.... in normal times it’s called “debate prep” which I thought trump would be doing after his shambles in debate 1......... | |||
| |||
"Very telling with hiden Biden not coming out of his basement for days or any of his camp denying these allegations. Are you at all bothered by anything Trump has done? Or is Biden the only bad guy, in your eyes? There's a clue in the title of the thread "Biden Ukraine scandal" that its about Biden not trump. Read it a few times till you understand it. Got it. You're not bothered by Trump's documented wrongdoings at all. You're far more interested in a likely smear." No you haven't got it, read the thread title one more time "Biden Ukraine scandal" Let's do this slowly for you. The first word of the title is B-I-D-E-N. That spells Biden, there isn't a T or a R or an U or a M or a P in that word. Then take the 2nd and 3rd words, Ukraine and scandal. Neither of those words spell Trump either. Do you now understand that this thread title is about Biden and not Trump or are you still confused? | |||
"The ndi, fbi and doj are all saying that the laptop is not russian interference. Hunter Biden's 2 jailed business partners are confirming the email chain with one of them turning over his email account as proof. They have also confirmed that "the big guy" that "h"(hunter) was holding money for is Joe Biden. There are pictures of Joe Biden with hunters business associates which disproves Joe's lies that he had no knowlege of hunters business dealings, infact hunter and Joe travelled together on air force 2 on trips where hunter was doing personal 'business' with the regimes Joe was officiating with in his capacity as VP. Hunter Biden's lawyer has attempted to get the laptop back further confirming that this laptop does infact belong to hunter. Hunters business partner had gone on record to disassociate himself and his company from Hunters actions as even he could see the crookedness of it all. This is just a brief overview of events so far, all proven true with more to come and not one denial from the Biden's. Of course their followers will try to deny it but its going to get harder and harder to keep up tbat cognitive dissonance as more details are brought to the fore. " Very well written and all proven true | |||
"Very telling with hiden Biden not coming out of his basement for days or any of his camp denying these allegations. Are you at all bothered by anything Trump has done? Or is Biden the only bad guy, in your eyes? There's a clue in the title of the thread "Biden Ukraine scandal" that its about Biden not trump. Read it a few times till you understand it. Got it. You're not bothered by Trump's documented wrongdoings at all. You're far more interested in a likely smear. No you haven't got it, read the thread title one more time "Biden Ukraine scandal" Let's do this slowly for you. The first word of the title is B-I-D-E-N. That spells Biden, there isn't a T or a R or an U or a M or a P in that word. Then take the 2nd and 3rd words, Ukraine and scandal. Neither of those words spell Trump either. Do you now understand that this thread title is about Biden and not Trump or are you still confused? " Still unwilling to answer the question, eh? I'm not surprised. Trump is indefensible. And I did address the topic of Biden earlier on. I'll repost it here: A few facts: The "story" was initially run in a Murdoch tabloid. The writer didn't even use his byline as he was concerned about the story's authenticity. And the 2 sources named in the "story" were Bannon (former adviser to Trump, now facing federal fraud charges) and Giuliani (Trump’s personal lawyer and loon). | |||
"The ndi, fbi and doj are all saying that the laptop is not russian interference. Hunter Biden's 2 jailed business partners are confirming the email chain with one of them turning over his email account as proof. They have also confirmed that "the big guy" that "h"(hunter) was holding money for is Joe Biden. There are pictures of Joe Biden with hunters business associates which disproves Joe's lies that he had no knowlege of hunters business dealings, infact hunter and Joe travelled together on air force 2 on trips where hunter was doing personal 'business' with the regimes Joe was officiating with in his capacity as VP. Hunter Biden's lawyer has attempted to get the laptop back further confirming that this laptop does infact belong to hunter. Hunters business partner had gone on record to disassociate himself and his company from Hunters actions as even he could see the crookedness of it all. This is just a brief overview of events so far, all proven true with more to come and not one denial from the Biden's. Of course their followers will try to deny it but its going to get harder and harder to keep up tbat cognitive dissonance as more details are brought to the fore. Can you please provide links to verify these facts, as I am unable to find any online evidence that either confirms or denies your story. I'm willing to be persuaded, but I want reputable sources. Not the New York Post, or John Radcliffe. Both of whom are highly partisan." I'm also not interested in articles from the Daily Mail, or YouTube videos either. I know that Biden has had some problems with the truth in the past, but this story just absolutely reeks of a set-up, and until I see some actual proof that it's true, rather than right wing hearsay, then I am going to remain skeptical. I'm not sure it matters much either way tbh, because the majority of people seem to be voting for Biden, not because they like him, but simply because he isn't Trump. | |||
| |||
"The ndi, fbi and doj are all saying that the laptop is not russian interference. Hunter Biden's 2 jailed business partners are confirming the email chain with one of them turning over his email account as proof. They have also confirmed that "the big guy" that "h"(hunter) was holding money for is Joe Biden. There are pictures of Joe Biden with hunters business associates which disproves Joe's lies that he had no knowlege of hunters business dealings, infact hunter and Joe travelled together on air force 2 on trips where hunter was doing personal 'business' with the regimes Joe was officiating with in his capacity as VP. Hunter Biden's lawyer has attempted to get the laptop back further confirming that this laptop does infact belong to hunter. Hunters business partner had gone on record to disassociate himself and his company from Hunters actions as even he could see the crookedness of it all. This is just a brief overview of events so far, all proven true with more to come and not one denial from the Biden's. Of course their followers will try to deny it but its going to get harder and harder to keep up tbat cognitive dissonance as more details are brought to the fore. Very well written and all proven true "If you take the word of right wing tabloids, an alt right fraudster and a man proven to have ties to Russia, as the truth, then i suppose it can't be wrong, though personally I prefer my decisions to be based on something a little less biased. The head of the DOJ is William Barr, a Republican and known Trump ally. John Ratcliffe is hardly neutral either. Here's a snippet from Wikipedia: "President Donald Trump announced on July 28, 2019, that he intended to nominate Ratcliffe to replace Dan Coats as Director of National Intelligence.[7][8] Ratcliffe withdrew after Republican senators raised concerns about him, former intelligence officials said he might politicize intelligence, and media revealed Ratcliffe's embellishments regarding his prosecutorial experience in terrorism and immigration cases" Hardly a glowing endorsement is it.
Contrary to what has been stated above, the FBI have neither confirmed nor denied the allegations and in all likelihood, will not do so before the upcoming election.
I think that the truth, to many people on here, is exactly what they want it to be. | |||
| |||
". I think that the truth, to many people on here, is exactly what they want it to be. "Funny that you say this after picking and choosing what you want to believe or not. John ratcliffe is the director of national intelligence and has publicly and outright said the laptop is not Russian misinformation. He is not the only one, if you want to find excuses to disbelieve it feel free but realise that you are just the mirror image of those you are accusing of bias. | |||
". I think that the truth, to many people on here, is exactly what they want it to be.
Funny that you say this after picking and choosing what you want to believe or not.
John ratcliffe is the director of national intelligence and has publicly and outright said the laptop is not Russian misinformation.
He is not the only one, if you want to find excuses to disbelieve it feel free but realise that you are just the mirror image of those you are accusing of bias."John Ratcliffe is a Republican who was originally rejected for the post by other Republicans because they didn't feel he would be a reliable candidate. From Wikipedia, not from me. I've already stated in a previous post that I am open to having my mind changed about Biden if you can provide non partisan evidence of his guilt. That your response is to once again quote the words of an untrustworthy Republican, and attempt to turn my words against me, is proof to me that you cannot supply said evidence and are engaging in whataboutary in an attempt to mask that fact. I repeat, I am open to having my mind changed if provided with evidence from a non partisan, reliable source. You, on the other hand, have already decided that Biden is guilty, on the flimsiest of evidence, because it fits your viewpoint, and I think you would still believe it if Biden was proven to be innocent. My comment about the truth holds firm against both you, and Telford Dave, who also hasn't produced any believable evidence of Bidens guilt. Your mind is closed, whilst mine is still open. | |||
". I think that the truth, to many people on here, is exactly what they want it to be.
Funny that you say this after picking and choosing what you want to believe or not.
John ratcliffe is the director of national intelligence and has publicly and outright said the laptop is not Russian misinformation.
He is not the only one, if you want to find excuses to disbelieve it feel free but realise that you are just the mirror image of those you are accusing of bias.
John Ratcliffe is a Republican who was originally rejected for the post by other Republicans because they didn't feel he would be a reliable candidate. From Wikipedia, not from me.
I've already stated in a previous post that I am open to having my mind changed about Biden if you can provide non partisan evidence of his guilt. That your response is to once again quote the words of an untrustworthy Republican, and attempt to turn my words against me, is proof to me that you cannot supply said evidence and are engaging in whataboutary in an attempt to mask that fact.
I repeat, I am open to having my mind changed if provided with evidence from a non partisan, reliable source. You, on the other hand, have already decided that Biden is guilty, on the flimsiest of evidence, because it fits your viewpoint, and I think you would still believe it if Biden was proven to be innocent. My comment about the truth holds firm against both you, and Telford Dave, who also hasn't produced any believable evidence of Bidens guilt. Your mind is closed, whilst mine is still open.
"Like i said, believe what you like. I'm not here to change minds. I will just point out that you have stated no truth, only assumptions and accusations based on your own bias. Where is your proof that this is a fabrication or russian propaganda? | |||
". I think that the truth, to many people on here, is exactly what they want it to be.
Funny that you say this after picking and choosing what you want to believe or not.
John ratcliffe is the director of national intelligence and has publicly and outright said the laptop is not Russian misinformation.
He is not the only one, if you want to find excuses to disbelieve it feel free but realise that you are just the mirror image of those you are accusing of bias.
John Ratcliffe is a Republican who was originally rejected for the post by other Republicans because they didn't feel he would be a reliable candidate. From Wikipedia, not from me.
I've already stated in a previous post that I am open to having my mind changed about Biden if you can provide non partisan evidence of his guilt. That your response is to once again quote the words of an untrustworthy Republican, and attempt to turn my words against me, is proof to me that you cannot supply said evidence and are engaging in whataboutary in an attempt to mask that fact.
I repeat, I am open to having my mind changed if provided with evidence from a non partisan, reliable source. You, on the other hand, have already decided that Biden is guilty, on the flimsiest of evidence, because it fits your viewpoint, and I think you would still believe it if Biden was proven to be innocent. My comment about the truth holds firm against both you, and Telford Dave, who also hasn't produced any believable evidence of Bidens guilt. Your mind is closed, whilst mine is still open.
Like i said, believe what you like. I'm not here to change minds.
I will just point out that you have stated no truth, only assumptions and accusations based on your own bias. Where is your proof that this is a fabrication or russian propaganda?"the burden of proof lies with the accuser. | |||
". I think that the truth, to many people on here, is exactly what they want it to be.
Funny that you say this after picking and choosing what you want to believe or not.
John ratcliffe is the director of national intelligence and has publicly and outright said the laptop is not Russian misinformation.
He is not the only one, if you want to find excuses to disbelieve it feel free but realise that you are just the mirror image of those you are accusing of bias.
John Ratcliffe is a Republican who was originally rejected for the post by other Republicans because they didn't feel he would be a reliable candidate. From Wikipedia, not from me.
I've already stated in a previous post that I am open to having my mind changed about Biden if you can provide non partisan evidence of his guilt. That your response is to once again quote the words of an untrustworthy Republican, and attempt to turn my words against me, is proof to me that you cannot supply said evidence and are engaging in whataboutary in an attempt to mask that fact.
I repeat, I am open to having my mind changed if provided with evidence from a non partisan, reliable source. You, on the other hand, have already decided that Biden is guilty, on the flimsiest of evidence, because it fits your viewpoint, and I think you would still believe it if Biden was proven to be innocent. My comment about the truth holds firm against both you, and Telford Dave, who also hasn't produced any believable evidence of Bidens guilt. Your mind is closed, whilst mine is still open.
Like i said, believe what you like. I'm not here to change minds.
I will just point out that you have stated no truth, only assumptions and accusations based on your own bias. Where is your proof that this is a fabrication or russian propaganda?"Lol, nice try at whataboutary again, however it's not my place to prove anything as you are the one making the accusations. I'm only asking for some proof, which thus far you have been unable to provide. I also love the irony when you talk about bias, as I've said numerous times that I am willing to be convinced of Bidens guilt whilst you are convinced that the story is true, despite having no real evidence other than that of unreliable partisan witnesses. You do understand what partisan means, don't you? I guess I'm just going to have to conclude that your original post was all simply hot air and no substance, and wait for some some real proof ...either way ... from a reliable source, and that clearly isn't going to be you.  | |||
| |||
"lets not forget the source,Giuliani. and his idiocy of being duped by 'Borat' lol" | |||
". I think that the truth, to many people on here, is exactly what they want it to be.
Funny that you say this after picking and choosing what you want to believe or not.
John ratcliffe is the director of national intelligence and has publicly and outright said the laptop is not Russian misinformation.
He is not the only one, if you want to find excuses to disbelieve it feel free but realise that you are just the mirror image of those you are accusing of bias.
John Ratcliffe is a Republican who was originally rejected for the post by other Republicans because they didn't feel he would be a reliable candidate. From Wikipedia, not from me.
I've already stated in a previous post that I am open to having my mind changed about Biden if you can provide non partisan evidence of his guilt. That your response is to once again quote the words of an untrustworthy Republican, and attempt to turn my words against me, is proof to me that you cannot supply said evidence and are engaging in whataboutary in an attempt to mask that fact.
I repeat, I am open to having my mind changed if provided with evidence from a non partisan, reliable source. You, on the other hand, have already decided that Biden is guilty, on the flimsiest of evidence, because it fits your viewpoint, and I think you would still believe it if Biden was proven to be innocent. My comment about the truth holds firm against both you, and Telford Dave, who also hasn't produced any believable evidence of Bidens guilt. Your mind is closed, whilst mine is still open.
Like i said, believe what you like. I'm not here to change minds.
I will just point out that you have stated no truth, only assumptions and accusations based on your own bias. Where is your proof that this is a fabrication or russian propaganda?
Lol, nice try at whataboutary again, however it's not my place to prove anything as you are the one making the accusations. I'm only asking for some proof, which thus far you have been unable to provide. I also love the irony when you talk about bias, as I've said numerous times that I am willing to be convinced of Bidens guilt whilst you are convinced that the story is true, despite having no real evidence other than that of unreliable partisan witnesses.
You do understand what partisan means, don't you?
I guess I'm just going to have to conclude that your original post was all simply hot air and no substance, and wait for some some real proof ...either way ... from a reliable source, and that clearly isn't going to be you. "Whataboutery? Your whole replies to me are nothing but whataboutery, a long winded spiel avoiding the subject with irrelevent interjections. Your open mind? So open that you trawl wikipedia (of all places) to confirm your bias. Hot air? You're full of it. I refer you to my first sentence and your lengthly speil. Real evidence? Like i said, im not here to change your mind. It is of no relevance or concern to me and i have no interest in wasting my time going round in circles with you. I'll just look forward to the conclusion to this and the election. | |||
| |||
"It's really ironic somebody called mellow fellow struggles so much to be mellow. It'd be hilarious if somebody made a profile called mellower fellow and actually acted mellow to show how it's done." Ah, gaslighting. What a surprise. | |||
"It's really ironic somebody called mellow fellow struggles so much to be mellow. It'd be hilarious if somebody made a profile called mellower fellow and actually acted mellow to show how it's done. Ah, gaslighting. What a surprise. " It was just a joke, my friend. I've nothing against you. Be well. | |||
"lets not forget the source,Giuliani. and his idiocy of being duped by 'Borat' lol" | |||
". I think that the truth, to many people on here, is exactly what they want it to be.
Funny that you say this after picking and choosing what you want to believe or not.
John ratcliffe is the director of national intelligence and has publicly and outright said the laptop is not Russian misinformation.
He is not the only one, if you want to find excuses to disbelieve it feel free but realise that you are just the mirror image of those you are accusing of bias.
John Ratcliffe is a Republican who was originally rejected for the post by other Republicans because they didn't feel he would be a reliable candidate. From Wikipedia, not from me.
I've already stated in a previous post that I am open to having my mind changed about Biden if you can provide non partisan evidence of his guilt. That your response is to once again quote the words of an untrustworthy Republican, and attempt to turn my words against me, is proof to me that you cannot supply said evidence and are engaging in whataboutary in an attempt to mask that fact.
I repeat, I am open to having my mind changed if provided with evidence from a non partisan, reliable source. You, on the other hand, have already decided that Biden is guilty, on the flimsiest of evidence, because it fits your viewpoint, and I think you would still believe it if Biden was proven to be innocent. My comment about the truth holds firm against both you, and Telford Dave, who also hasn't produced any believable evidence of Bidens guilt. Your mind is closed, whilst mine is still open.
Like i said, believe what you like. I'm not here to change minds.
I will just point out that you have stated no truth, only assumptions and accusations based on your own bias. Where is your proof that this is a fabrication or russian propaganda?
Lol, nice try at whataboutary again, however it's not my place to prove anything as you are the one making the accusations. I'm only asking for some proof, which thus far you have been unable to provide. I also love the irony when you talk about bias, as I've said numerous times that I am willing to be convinced of Bidens guilt whilst you are convinced that the story is true, despite having no real evidence other than that of unreliable partisan witnesses.
You do understand what partisan means, don't you?
I guess I'm just going to have to conclude that your original post was all simply hot air and no substance, and wait for some some real proof ...either way ... from a reliable source, and that clearly isn't going to be you.
Whataboutery? Your whole replies to me are nothing but whataboutery, a long winded spiel avoiding the subject with irrelevent interjections.
Your open mind? So open that you trawl wikipedia (of all places) to confirm your bias.
Hot air? You're full of it. I refer you to my first sentence and your lengthly speil.
Real evidence? Like i said, im not here to change your mind. It is of no relevance or concern to me and i have no interest in wasting my time going round in circles with you.
I'll just look forward to the conclusion to this and the election."All this indignation because I asked for some proof? Oh dear. For someone who appears to be reasonably intelligent, you've certainly backed yourself into a corner over this issue.
Like I said previously, I'll wait for some genuine proof to come from a non-partisan source before I make up my mind about Biden, and if something credible turns up that proves his guilt, then so be it. It has however, been a while now since Hunters laptop turned up and I'm fairly sure that if the Republicans had any real proof then they'd have released it before the debate last night.
I'll keep an open mind for now. Unlike some.
Have a nice day. | |||
". I think that the truth, to many people on here, is exactly what they want it to be.
Funny that you say this after picking and choosing what you want to believe or not.
John ratcliffe is the director of national intelligence and has publicly and outright said the laptop is not Russian misinformation.
He is not the only one, if you want to find excuses to disbelieve it feel free but realise that you are just the mirror image of those you are accusing of bias.
John Ratcliffe is a Republican who was originally rejected for the post by other Republicans because they didn't feel he would be a reliable candidate. From Wikipedia, not from me.
I've already stated in a previous post that I am open to having my mind changed about Biden if you can provide non partisan evidence of his guilt. That your response is to once again quote the words of an untrustworthy Republican, and attempt to turn my words against me, is proof to me that you cannot supply said evidence and are engaging in whataboutary in an attempt to mask that fact.
I repeat, I am open to having my mind changed if provided with evidence from a non partisan, reliable source. You, on the other hand, have already decided that Biden is guilty, on the flimsiest of evidence, because it fits your viewpoint, and I think you would still believe it if Biden was proven to be innocent. My comment about the truth holds firm against both you, and Telford Dave, who also hasn't produced any believable evidence of Bidens guilt. Your mind is closed, whilst mine is still open.
Like i said, believe what you like. I'm not here to change minds.
I will just point out that you have stated no truth, only assumptions and accusations based on your own bias. Where is your proof that this is a fabrication or russian propaganda?
Lol, nice try at whataboutary again, however it's not my place to prove anything as you are the one making the accusations. I'm only asking for some proof, which thus far you have been unable to provide. I also love the irony when you talk about bias, as I've said numerous times that I am willing to be convinced of Bidens guilt whilst you are convinced that the story is true, despite having no real evidence other than that of unreliable partisan witnesses.
You do understand what partisan means, don't you?
I guess I'm just going to have to conclude that your original post was all simply hot air and no substance, and wait for some some real proof ...either way ... from a reliable source, and that clearly isn't going to be you.
Whataboutery? Your whole replies to me are nothing but whataboutery, a long winded spiel avoiding the subject with irrelevent interjections.
Your open mind? So open that you trawl wikipedia (of all places) to confirm your bias.
Hot air? You're full of it. I refer you to my first sentence and your lengthly speil.
Real evidence? Like i said, im not here to change your mind. It is of no relevance or concern to me and i have no interest in wasting my time going round in circles with you.
I'll just look forward to the conclusion to this and the election.
All this indignation because I asked for some proof? Oh dear. For someone who appears to be reasonably intelligent, you've certainly backed yourself into a corner over this issue.
Like I said previously, I'll wait for some genuine proof to come from a non-partisan source before I make up my mind about Biden, and if something credible turns up that proves his guilt, then so be it. It has however, been a while now since Hunters laptop turned up and I'm fairly sure that if the Republicans had any real proof then they'd have released it before the debate last night.
I'll keep an open mind for now. Unlike some.
Have a nice day. "You really are a mirror of your own accusations. Psychologists call it projection. | |||
"Where is the Biden response to any of it? ....and no, the Biden response shouldn’t start with “but Trump.....”Because there is no response as he knows it is true too. Hoping it's true doesn't make it so, and as it's provenance is highly dubious to say the least, this story isn't going to fool anyone but the gullible and Trumpies base, which is basically the same thing. Bannon and Giuliani? I wouldn't trust either of them as far as I could chuck them. Bannon has always been a c@nt, but it's genuinely surprising how much Rudi is prepared to trash his reputation just to keep his head up Trumps ass." Actually, it was bidens own fault, he handed in his pc to the shop to get it fixed and forgot about it and forgot to collect it, the guy who fixed it looked at the pc and discovered over 30000 inappropriate sex pics, he handed it over to the fbi but they didnt want to deal with it, he then gave it to trumps side and that is how it all started and lets see what will happen, it will be interesting to see as well. | |||
". I think that the truth, to many people on here, is exactly what they want it to be.
Funny that you say this after picking and choosing what you want to believe or not.
John ratcliffe is the director of national intelligence and has publicly and outright said the laptop is not Russian misinformation.
He is not the only one, if you want to find excuses to disbelieve it feel free but realise that you are just the mirror image of those you are accusing of bias.
John Ratcliffe is a Republican who was originally rejected for the post by other Republicans because they didn't feel he would be a reliable candidate. From Wikipedia, not from me.
I've already stated in a previous post that I am open to having my mind changed about Biden if you can provide non partisan evidence of his guilt. That your response is to once again quote the words of an untrustworthy Republican, and attempt to turn my words against me, is proof to me that you cannot supply said evidence and are engaging in whataboutary in an attempt to mask that fact.
I repeat, I am open to having my mind changed if provided with evidence from a non partisan, reliable source. You, on the other hand, have already decided that Biden is guilty, on the flimsiest of evidence, because it fits your viewpoint, and I think you would still believe it if Biden was proven to be innocent. My comment about the truth holds firm against both you, and Telford Dave, who also hasn't produced any believable evidence of Bidens guilt. Your mind is closed, whilst mine is still open.
Like i said, believe what you like. I'm not here to change minds.
I will just point out that you have stated no truth, only assumptions and accusations based on your own bias. Where is your proof that this is a fabrication or russian propaganda?
Lol, nice try at whataboutary again, however it's not my place to prove anything as you are the one making the accusations. I'm only asking for some proof, which thus far you have been unable to provide. I also love the irony when you talk about bias, as I've said numerous times that I am willing to be convinced of Bidens guilt whilst you are convinced that the story is true, despite having no real evidence other than that of unreliable partisan witnesses.
You do understand what partisan means, don't you?
I guess I'm just going to have to conclude that your original post was all simply hot air and no substance, and wait for some some real proof ...either way ... from a reliable source, and that clearly isn't going to be you.
Whataboutery? Your whole replies to me are nothing but whataboutery, a long winded spiel avoiding the subject with irrelevent interjections.
Your open mind? So open that you trawl wikipedia (of all places) to confirm your bias.
Hot air? You're full of it. I refer you to my first sentence and your lengthly speil.
Real evidence? Like i said, im not here to change your mind. It is of no relevance or concern to me and i have no interest in wasting my time going round in circles with you.
I'll just look forward to the conclusion to this and the election.
All this indignation because I asked for some proof? Oh dear. For someone who appears to be reasonably intelligent, you've certainly backed yourself into a corner over this issue.
Like I said previously, I'll wait for some genuine proof to come from a non-partisan source before I make up my mind about Biden, and if something credible turns up that proves his guilt, then so be it. It has however, been a while now since Hunters laptop turned up and I'm fairly sure that if the Republicans had any real proof then they'd have released it before the debate last night.
I'll keep an open mind for now. Unlike some.
Have a nice day.
You really are a mirror of your own accusations. Psychologists call it projection.
"Haha, the irony of you talking about accusations after your contribution on this thread. You couldn't make it up, lol. Though actually, you probably could. After all, you made everything else up. | |||
". I think that the truth, to many people on here, is exactly what they want it to be.
Funny that you say this after picking and choosing what you want to believe or not.
John ratcliffe is the director of national intelligence and has publicly and outright said the laptop is not Russian misinformation.
He is not the only one, if you want to find excuses to disbelieve it feel free but realise that you are just the mirror image of those you are accusing of bias.
John Ratcliffe is a Republican who was originally rejected for the post by other Republicans because they didn't feel he would be a reliable candidate. From Wikipedia, not from me.
I've already stated in a previous post that I am open to having my mind changed about Biden if you can provide non partisan evidence of his guilt. That your response is to once again quote the words of an untrustworthy Republican, and attempt to turn my words against me, is proof to me that you cannot supply said evidence and are engaging in whataboutary in an attempt to mask that fact.
I repeat, I am open to having my mind changed if provided with evidence from a non partisan, reliable source. You, on the other hand, have already decided that Biden is guilty, on the flimsiest of evidence, because it fits your viewpoint, and I think you would still believe it if Biden was proven to be innocent. My comment about the truth holds firm against both you, and Telford Dave, who also hasn't produced any believable evidence of Bidens guilt. Your mind is closed, whilst mine is still open.
Like i said, believe what you like. I'm not here to change minds.
I will just point out that you have stated no truth, only assumptions and accusations based on your own bias. Where is your proof that this is a fabrication or russian propaganda?
Lol, nice try at whataboutary again, however it's not my place to prove anything as you are the one making the accusations. I'm only asking for some proof, which thus far you have been unable to provide. I also love the irony when you talk about bias, as I've said numerous times that I am willing to be convinced of Bidens guilt whilst you are convinced that the story is true, despite having no real evidence other than that of unreliable partisan witnesses.
You do understand what partisan means, don't you?
I guess I'm just going to have to conclude that your original post was all simply hot air and no substance, and wait for some some real proof ...either way ... from a reliable source, and that clearly isn't going to be you.
Whataboutery? Your whole replies to me are nothing but whataboutery, a long winded spiel avoiding the subject with irrelevent interjections.
Your open mind? So open that you trawl wikipedia (of all places) to confirm your bias.
Hot air? You're full of it. I refer you to my first sentence and your lengthly speil.
Real evidence? Like i said, im not here to change your mind. It is of no relevance or concern to me and i have no interest in wasting my time going round in circles with you.
I'll just look forward to the conclusion to this and the election.
All this indignation because I asked for some proof? Oh dear. For someone who appears to be reasonably intelligent, you've certainly backed yourself into a corner over this issue.
Like I said previously, I'll wait for some genuine proof to come from a non-partisan source before I make up my mind about Biden, and if something credible turns up that proves his guilt, then so be it. It has however, been a while now since Hunters laptop turned up and I'm fairly sure that if the Republicans had any real proof then they'd have released it before the debate last night.
I'll keep an open mind for now. Unlike some.
Have a nice day.
You really are a mirror of your own accusations. Psychologists call it projection.
Haha, the irony of you talking about accusations after your contribution on this thread. You couldn't make it up, lol.
Though actually, you probably could. After all, you made everything else up. "What have i made up? Nothing, but you just made that accusation up. Like i said, you are a mirror of your own accusations. | |||
