FabSwingers.com > Forums > Politics > Fuckwits
Fuckwits
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ostensibly in town to protect statues but got caught pissing up Pc Keith Palmers memorial. Let’s hope they catch up with the idiots. " They will do. They are too thick to even hide their faces. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Up in arms last week because the protest went violent have spent the day having violent clashes with the police. Also doing nazi salutes by the cenotaph. Half of them havent ven got their faces covered so expect a few doors going in the next few weeks. Still I'm sure the likes of boris and Farage will be swift in their condemnation." The mask has fully come off, these peddlers of hate and intolerance have proved they are the greater threat to stability of this country then anything else. Hutz, I like the sarcastic statement at the end ,but I am certain it will go over the head of certain individuals. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Boris has come out in condemnation. "There is a certain irony in boris using ww2 rhetoric in a debate over the eu then slating the halfwits who take him at his word. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The true face of the far right with its vile use of nazi salutes as they 'defend Englishness'.. Churchill would be spinning in his grave.. " Yep. These types really don't understand their history at all. Nor, I suspect, do they want to. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The true face of the far right with its vile use of nazi salutes as they 'defend Englishness'.. Churchill would be spinning in his grave.. " You couldnt make it up could you? The other side have played it right and just let the world see what a group of fucktards they are. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The true face of the far right with its vile use of nazi salutes as they 'defend Englishness'.. Churchill would be spinning in his grave.. You couldnt make it up could you? The other side have played it right and just let the world see what a group of fucktards they are." So intent on defending monuments that they forgot to look online and see that the anti racism match was going nowhere near Parliament.. Could have stayed home but then again they would have missed the chance to vent their bile.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ironic, the people who allegedly love this country start punching the police in the face. How wonderful they make us look." They are not the brightest. See the fella saying churchill killed Hitler? I'm not sure being fat,ugly and thick means you are the master race. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ironic, the people who allegedly love this country start punching the police in the face. How wonderful they make us look. They are not the brightest. See the fella saying churchill killed Hitler? I'm not sure being fat,ugly and thick means you are the master race." We are looking more stupid by the minute to the rest of the world. Great Britain 2020.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Video going round of some protester (white)getting volleyed everywhere by a group of black lads. This isnt going to end well." Allegedly had his throat cut in the tussle. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Video going round of some protester (white)getting volleyed everywhere by a group of black lads. This isnt going to end well. Allegedly had his throat cut in the tussle. " That should make all of you on this thread very happy then. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Video going round of some protester (white)getting volleyed everywhere by a group of black lads. This isnt going to end well. Allegedly had his throat cut in the tussle. That should make all of you on this thread very happy then." Are you d*unk or sick? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ironic, the people who allegedly love this country start punching the police in the face. How wonderful they make us look. They are not the brightest. See the fella saying churchill killed Hitler? I'm not sure being fat,ugly and thick means you are the master race." Lol like it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The true face of the far right with its vile use of nazi salutes as they 'defend Englishness'.. Churchill would be spinning in his grave.. " Er, no he wouldn't. Many of the 1930s upper class in Britain admired the National Socialist movement in Germany. Google the Mitford sisters. There is also a wonderful video on youtube where you can see the little girl Lillibet (H.R.H. QE2), her mother (the future Queen Elizabeth, wife of George VI) and her Uncle, The Prince of Wales (and future monarch Edward VIII) all giving the Germanised Roman salute. Sieg Heil old chap! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"According to the bbc, 2 police have been hurt in the violent demonstration today compared to the 27 police injured in the peaceful demonstration last week." The BBC didn't show the footage that Sky showed earlier today either - where the fellows attending at the memorial, were collecting up any litter that had been dropped and imploring the press not to misrepresent them (as they have been known many times to do). The BBC is a disgrace these days - it really, really is. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"According to the bbc, 2 police have been hurt in the violent demonstration today compared to the 27 police injured in the peaceful demonstration last week. The BBC didn't show the footage that Sky showed earlier today either - where the fellows attending at the memorial, were collecting up any litter that had been dropped and imploring the press not to misrepresent them (as they have been known many times to do). The BBC is a disgrace these days - it really, really is." Some no doubt where there with peaceful intent but a lot were not and as with the ones last weekend they deserve what they get if they were nicked.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"According to the bbc, 2 police have been hurt in the violent demonstration today compared to the 27 police injured in the peaceful demonstration last week. The BBC didn't show the footage that Sky showed earlier today either - where the fellows attending at the memorial, were collecting up any litter that had been dropped and imploring the press not to misrepresent them (as they have been known many times to do). The BBC is a disgrace these days - it really, really is. Some no doubt where there with peaceful intent but a lot were not and as with the ones last weekend they deserve what they get if they were nicked.. " I'm sure you meant that a lot were there with peaceful intent but some were not, same as last week but you are missing the point, the beeb claimed that last weeks protesting was peaceful- the injury list proves it wasnt. Even the bbc has an agenda and cannot be trusted anymore, you need to read from both left and right news sources to get the real news nowadays. Impartially is out of the window nowadays with the national disgrace bbc. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"According to the bbc, 2 police have been hurt in the violent demonstration today compared to the 27 police injured in the peaceful demonstration last week. The BBC didn't show the footage that Sky showed earlier today either - where the fellows attending at the memorial, were collecting up any litter that had been dropped and imploring the press not to misrepresent them (as they have been known many times to do). The BBC is a disgrace these days - it really, really is. Some no doubt where there with peaceful intent but a lot were not and as with the ones last weekend they deserve what they get if they were nicked.. I'm sure you meant that a lot were there with peaceful intent but some were not, same as last week but you are missing the point, the beeb claimed that last weeks protesting was peaceful- the injury list proves it wasnt. Even the bbc has an agenda and cannot be trusted anymore, you need to read from both left and right news sources to get the real news nowadays. Impartially is out of the window nowadays with the national disgrace bbc." BBC reported the injuries last week... so you're talking crap https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-london-52954899 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The true face of the far right with its vile use of nazi salutes as they 'defend Englishness'.. Churchill would be spinning in his grave.. Er, no he wouldn't. Many of the 1930s upper class in Britain admired the National Socialist movement in Germany. Google the Mitford sisters. There is also a wonderful video on youtube where you can see the little girl Lillibet (H.R.H. QE2), her mother (the future Queen Elizabeth, wife of George VI) and her Uncle, The Prince of Wales (and future monarch Edward VIII) all giving the Germanised Roman salute. Sieg Heil old chap!" King George V replaced the historic name of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, so we might have had german blood in the royal family at one point  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"According to the bbc, 2 police have been hurt in the violent demonstration today compared to the 27 police injured in the peaceful demonstration last week. The BBC didn't show the footage that Sky showed earlier today either - where the fellows attending at the memorial, were collecting up any litter that had been dropped and imploring the press not to misrepresent them (as they have been known many times to do). The BBC is a disgrace these days - it really, really is. Some no doubt where there with peaceful intent but a lot were not and as with the ones last weekend they deserve what they get if they were nicked.. I'm sure you meant that a lot were there with peaceful intent but some were not, same as last week but you are missing the point, the beeb claimed that last weeks protesting was peaceful- the injury list proves it wasnt. Even the bbc has an agenda and cannot be trusted anymore, you need to read from both left and right news sources to get the real news nowadays. Impartially is out of the window nowadays with the national disgrace bbc. BBC reported the injuries last week... so you're talking crap https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-london-52954899" I never said they didnt but thank you for trying. They reported 27 injured police at the PEACEFUL demonstration. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"According to the bbc, 2 police have been hurt in the violent demonstration today compared to the 27 police injured in the peaceful demonstration last week. The BBC didn't show the footage that Sky showed earlier today either - where the fellows attending at the memorial, were collecting up any litter that had been dropped and imploring the press not to misrepresent them (as they have been known many times to do). The BBC is a disgrace these days - it really, really is. Some no doubt where there with peaceful intent but a lot were not and as with the ones last weekend they deserve what they get if they were nicked.. I'm sure you meant that a lot were there with peaceful intent but some were not, same as last week but you are missing the point, the beeb claimed that last weeks protesting was peaceful- the injury list proves it wasnt. Even the bbc has an agenda and cannot be trusted anymore, you need to read from both left and right news sources to get the real news nowadays. Impartially is out of the window nowadays with the national disgrace bbc. BBC reported the injuries last week... so you're talking crap https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-london-52954899 I never said they didnt but thank you for trying. They reported 27 injured police at the PEACEFUL demonstration." Haha - I think you'll find they reported the majority of protesting was peaceful, but trouble flared later in the day. Or did you think they'd say 27 police officers got injured by accident?  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The true face of the far right with its vile use of nazi salutes as they 'defend Englishness'.. Churchill would be spinning in his grave.. Er, no he wouldn't. Many of the 1930s upper class in Britain admired the National Socialist movement in Germany. Google the Mitford sisters. There is also a wonderful video on youtube where you can see the little girl Lillibet (H.R.H. QE2), her mother (the future Queen Elizabeth, wife of George VI) and her Uncle, The Prince of Wales (and future monarch Edward VIII) all giving the Germanised Roman salute. Sieg Heil old chap! King George V replaced the historic name of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, so we might have had german blood in the royal family at one point "It was because Imperial Germany was bombing London with 'Gotha' aircraft during the Great War (1914-1918), and German lined British Royal Family wanted to distance themselves from it - clever eh? Remember when Diana Princess of Wales was being slated by the gutter press for driving a BMW? She said she might as well drive a German car as she was married to one! Her family is an OLD English line - a part of the Howards I think. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"According to the bbc, 2 police have been hurt in the violent demonstration today compared to the 27 police injured in the peaceful demonstration last week. The BBC didn't show the footage that Sky showed earlier today either - where the fellows attending at the memorial, were collecting up any litter that had been dropped and imploring the press not to misrepresent them (as they have been known many times to do). The BBC is a disgrace these days - it really, really is. Some no doubt where there with peaceful intent but a lot were not and as with the ones last weekend they deserve what they get if they were nicked.. I'm sure you meant that a lot were there with peaceful intent but some were not, same as last week but you are missing the point, the beeb claimed that last weeks protesting was peaceful- the injury list proves it wasnt. Even the bbc has an agenda and cannot be trusted anymore, you need to read from both left and right news sources to get the real news nowadays. Impartially is out of the window nowadays with the national disgrace bbc. BBC reported the injuries last week... so you're talking crap https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-london-52954899 I never said they didnt but thank you for trying. They reported 27 injured police at the PEACEFUL demonstration. Haha - I think you'll find they reported the majority of protesting was peaceful, but trouble flared later in the day. Or did you think they'd say 27 police officers got injured by accident? "Haha - I think you'll find they called it a peaceful protest while mentioning the injured police in the same report. I can see the bbc is just the way you like it. - myself,I'd prefer them to be impartial. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"According to the bbc, 2 police have been hurt in the violent demonstration today compared to the 27 police injured in the peaceful demonstration last week. The BBC didn't show the footage that Sky showed earlier today either - where the fellows attending at the memorial, were collecting up any litter that had been dropped and imploring the press not to misrepresent them (as they have been known many times to do). The BBC is a disgrace these days - it really, really is. Some no doubt where there with peaceful intent but a lot were not and as with the ones last weekend they deserve what they get if they were nicked.. I'm sure you meant that a lot were there with peaceful intent but some were not, same as last week but you are missing the point, the beeb claimed that last weeks protesting was peaceful- the injury list proves it wasnt. Even the bbc has an agenda and cannot be trusted anymore, you need to read from both left and right news sources to get the real news nowadays. Impartially is out of the window nowadays with the national disgrace bbc. BBC reported the injuries last week... so you're talking crap https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-london-52954899 I never said they didnt but thank you for trying. They reported 27 injured police at the PEACEFUL demonstration. Haha - I think you'll find they reported the majority of protesting was peaceful, but trouble flared later in the day. Or did you think they'd say 27 police officers got injured by accident?
Haha - I think you'll find they called it a peaceful protest while mentioning the injured police in the same report. I can see the bbc is just the way you like it. - myself,I'd prefer them to be impartial. "It sounds like you're seeing what you want to see. I linked you to a BBC report which literally proves you're talking out your arse but hey, go enjoy your "impartial" sources! Haha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"According to the bbc, 2 police have been hurt in the violent demonstration today compared to the 27 police injured in the peaceful demonstration last week. The BBC didn't show the footage that Sky showed earlier today either - where the fellows attending at the memorial, were collecting up any litter that had been dropped and imploring the press not to misrepresent them (as they have been known many times to do). The BBC is a disgrace these days - it really, really is. Some no doubt where there with peaceful intent but a lot were not and as with the ones last weekend they deserve what they get if they were nicked.. I'm sure you meant that a lot were there with peaceful intent but some were not, same as last week but you are missing the point, the beeb claimed that last weeks protesting was peaceful- the injury list proves it wasnt. Even the bbc has an agenda and cannot be trusted anymore, you need to read from both left and right news sources to get the real news nowadays. Impartially is out of the window nowadays with the national disgrace bbc. BBC reported the injuries last week... so you're talking crap https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-london-52954899 I never said they didnt but thank you for trying. They reported 27 injured police at the PEACEFUL demonstration. Haha - I think you'll find they reported the majority of protesting was peaceful, but trouble flared later in the day. Or did you think they'd say 27 police officers got injured by accident?
Haha - I think you'll find they called it a peaceful protest while mentioning the injured police in the same report. I can see the bbc is just the way you like it. - myself,I'd prefer them to be impartial.
It sounds like you're seeing what you want to see. I linked you to a BBC report which literally proves you're talking out your arse but hey, go enjoy your "impartial" sources! Haha "https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8398095/amp/BBC-blasted-Black-Lives-Matter-protests-largely-peaceful-headline-despite-27-officers-injured.html https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/08/bbc-denies-softening-black-lives-matter-protest-picture/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwivoZSf5__pAhV5UhUIHZ0YD48QFjALegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw15yOD9TsiIyTGZPoRYXiNQ&cf=1 https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11811735/fury-bbc-hypocritical-coverage-violent-protests/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwiZ7req5__pAhUtURUIHVMtC4k4ChAWMAV6BAgCEAE&usg=AOvVaw0yL06NWsynA6cDRu1X8zWD https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://amp.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/nick-ferrari/bbc-cropping-out-weapon-black-lives-matter-protest/&ved=2ahUKEwiZ7req5__pAhUtURUIHVMtC4k4ChAWMAh6BAgEEAE&usg=AOvVaw0PI-kW6BB_BfEC_rTvWClX https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://internewscast.com/bbc-blasted-for-black-lives-matter-protests-largely-peaceful-headline-despite-27-officers-injured/&ved=2ahUKEwjL_fzS5__pAhXwSxUIHTE0Blw4FBAWMAJ6BAgDEAE&usg=AOvVaw1IaDaORj7a7DR-maTsJ-VB Shall I continue or are you that person who only believes the huff post? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"According to the bbc, 2 police have been hurt in the violent demonstration today compared to the 27 police injured in the peaceful demonstration last week. The BBC didn't show the footage that Sky showed earlier today either - where the fellows attending at the memorial, were collecting up any litter that had been dropped and imploring the press not to misrepresent them (as they have been known many times to do). The BBC is a disgrace these days - it really, really is. Some no doubt where there with peaceful intent but a lot were not and as with the ones last weekend they deserve what they get if they were nicked.. I'm sure you meant that a lot were there with peaceful intent but some were not, same as last week but you are missing the point, the beeb claimed that last weeks protesting was peaceful- the injury list proves it wasnt. Even the bbc has an agenda and cannot be trusted anymore, you need to read from both left and right news sources to get the real news nowadays. Impartially is out of the window nowadays with the national disgrace bbc. BBC reported the injuries last week... so you're talking crap https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-london-52954899 I never said they didnt but thank you for trying. They reported 27 injured police at the PEACEFUL demonstration. Haha - I think you'll find they reported the majority of protesting was peaceful, but trouble flared later in the day. Or did you think they'd say 27 police officers got injured by accident?
Haha - I think you'll find they called it a peaceful protest while mentioning the injured police in the same report. I can see the bbc is just the way you like it. - myself,I'd prefer them to be impartial.
It sounds like you're seeing what you want to see. I linked you to a BBC report which literally proves you're talking out your arse but hey, go enjoy your "impartial" sources! Haha
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8398095/amp/BBC-blasted-Black-Lives-Matter-protests-largely-peaceful-headline-despite-27-officers-injured.html
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/08/bbc-denies-softening-black-lives-matter-protest-picture/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwivoZSf5__pAhV5UhUIHZ0YD48QFjALegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw15yOD9TsiIyTGZPoRYXiNQ&cf=1
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11811735/fury-bbc-hypocritical-coverage-violent-protests/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwiZ7req5__pAhUtURUIHVMtC4k4ChAWMAV6BAgCEAE&usg=AOvVaw0yL06NWsynA6cDRu1X8zWD
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://amp.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/nick-ferrari/bbc-cropping-out-weapon-black-lives-matter-protest/&ved=2ahUKEwiZ7req5__pAhUtURUIHVMtC4k4ChAWMAh6BAgEEAE&usg=AOvVaw0PI-kW6BB_BfEC_rTvWClX
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://internewscast.com/bbc-blasted-for-black-lives-matter-protests-largely-peaceful-headline-despite-27-officers-injured/&ved=2ahUKEwjL_fzS5__pAhXwSxUIHTE0Blw4FBAWMAJ6BAgDEAE&usg=AOvVaw1IaDaORj7a7DR-maTsJ-VB
Shall I continue or are you that person who only believes the huff post?"The Daily Mail... Telegraph... Sun... Nick Ferrari... etc. you're claiming these are impartial?! Hahaha - now that's really funny. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Haha - I think you'll find they called it a peaceful protest while mentioning the injured police in the same report. I can see the bbc is just the way you like it. - myself,I'd prefer them to be impartial. " I am afraid you will wait a bloody long time to enjoy your preference. A few years back when we were commemorating 70 years since the end of The Second World War (or WW2 as yankophiles call it). I watched the coverage and they actually got away with mentioning the U.S.S.R.(that's Russia folks) only once! In line with their brief to get us all to hate Russia they disrespectfully ignored the sacrifices of the 27 million folk who gave their lives smashing The Third Reich for us. Un-fucking believable! While The British Empire and it's U.S. ally sat on their hands saying "shall we? Shant we? about D-Day, the Red Army was fighting to the death with implacable opponents at Stalingrad and Kursk (who in Britain even knows these names today?).I can never take a word the BBC say seriously since then. State propaganda outlet. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"According to the bbc, 2 police have been hurt in the violent demonstration today compared to the 27 police injured in the peaceful demonstration last week. The BBC didn't show the footage that Sky showed earlier today either - where the fellows attending at the memorial, were collecting up any litter that had been dropped and imploring the press not to misrepresent them (as they have been known many times to do). The BBC is a disgrace these days - it really, really is. Some no doubt where there with peaceful intent but a lot were not and as with the ones last weekend they deserve what they get if they were nicked.. I'm sure you meant that a lot were there with peaceful intent but some were not, same as last week but you are missing the point, the beeb claimed that last weeks protesting was peaceful- the injury list proves it wasnt. Even the bbc has an agenda and cannot be trusted anymore, you need to read from both left and right news sources to get the real news nowadays. Impartially is out of the window nowadays with the national disgrace bbc. BBC reported the injuries last week... so you're talking crap https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-london-52954899 I never said they didnt but thank you for trying. They reported 27 injured police at the PEACEFUL demonstration. Haha - I think you'll find they reported the majority of protesting was peaceful, but trouble flared later in the day. Or did you think they'd say 27 police officers got injured by accident?
Haha - I think you'll find they called it a peaceful protest while mentioning the injured police in the same report. I can see the bbc is just the way you like it. - myself,I'd prefer them to be impartial.
It sounds like you're seeing what you want to see. I linked you to a BBC report which literally proves you're talking out your arse but hey, go enjoy your "impartial" sources! Haha
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8398095/amp/BBC-blasted-Black-Lives-Matter-protests-largely-peaceful-headline-despite-27-officers-injured.html
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/08/bbc-denies-softening-black-lives-matter-protest-picture/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwivoZSf5__pAhV5UhUIHZ0YD48QFjALegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw15yOD9TsiIyTGZPoRYXiNQ&cf=1
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11811735/fury-bbc-hypocritical-coverage-violent-protests/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwiZ7req5__pAhUtURUIHVMtC4k4ChAWMAV6BAgCEAE&usg=AOvVaw0yL06NWsynA6cDRu1X8zWD
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://amp.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/nick-ferrari/bbc-cropping-out-weapon-black-lives-matter-protest/&ved=2ahUKEwiZ7req5__pAhUtURUIHVMtC4k4ChAWMAh6BAgEEAE&usg=AOvVaw0PI-kW6BB_BfEC_rTvWClX
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://internewscast.com/bbc-blasted-for-black-lives-matter-protests-largely-peaceful-headline-despite-27-officers-injured/&ved=2ahUKEwjL_fzS5__pAhXwSxUIHTE0Blw4FBAWMAJ6BAgDEAE&usg=AOvVaw1IaDaORj7a7DR-maTsJ-VB
Shall I continue or are you that person who only believes the huff post?
The Daily Mail... Telegraph... Sun... Nick Ferrari... etc. you're claiming these are impartial?! Hahaha - now that's really funny. "Lol! I've just posted more than one source that saw the same headlines I complained about but it's the wrong sources for your delicate little mind. I'm out. I've met people like you before, nothing will dent your delusion - you will always have excuses as to why you think you are right. Continue reading the huff post, it's right up your street. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"According to the bbc, 2 police have been hurt in the violent demonstration today compared to the 27 police injured in the peaceful demonstration last week. The BBC didn't show the footage that Sky showed earlier today either - where the fellows attending at the memorial, were collecting up any litter that had been dropped and imploring the press not to misrepresent them (as they have been known many times to do). The BBC is a disgrace these days - it really, really is. Some no doubt where there with peaceful intent but a lot were not and as with the ones last weekend they deserve what they get if they were nicked.. I'm sure you meant that a lot were there with peaceful intent but some were not, same as last week but you are missing the point, the beeb claimed that last weeks protesting was peaceful- the injury list proves it wasnt. Even the bbc has an agenda and cannot be trusted anymore, you need to read from both left and right news sources to get the real news nowadays. Impartially is out of the window nowadays with the national disgrace bbc. BBC reported the injuries last week... so you're talking crap https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-london-52954899 I never said they didnt but thank you for trying. They reported 27 injured police at the PEACEFUL demonstration. Haha - I think you'll find they reported the majority of protesting was peaceful, but trouble flared later in the day. Or did you think they'd say 27 police officers got injured by accident?
Haha - I think you'll find they called it a peaceful protest while mentioning the injured police in the same report. I can see the bbc is just the way you like it. - myself,I'd prefer them to be impartial.
It sounds like you're seeing what you want to see. I linked you to a BBC report which literally proves you're talking out your arse but hey, go enjoy your "impartial" sources! Haha
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8398095/amp/BBC-blasted-Black-Lives-Matter-protests-largely-peaceful-headline-despite-27-officers-injured.html
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/08/bbc-denies-softening-black-lives-matter-protest-picture/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwivoZSf5__pAhV5UhUIHZ0YD48QFjALegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw15yOD9TsiIyTGZPoRYXiNQ&cf=1
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11811735/fury-bbc-hypocritical-coverage-violent-protests/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwiZ7req5__pAhUtURUIHVMtC4k4ChAWMAV6BAgCEAE&usg=AOvVaw0yL06NWsynA6cDRu1X8zWD
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://amp.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/nick-ferrari/bbc-cropping-out-weapon-black-lives-matter-protest/&ved=2ahUKEwiZ7req5__pAhUtURUIHVMtC4k4ChAWMAh6BAgEEAE&usg=AOvVaw0PI-kW6BB_BfEC_rTvWClX
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://internewscast.com/bbc-blasted-for-black-lives-matter-protests-largely-peaceful-headline-despite-27-officers-injured/&ved=2ahUKEwjL_fzS5__pAhXwSxUIHTE0Blw4FBAWMAJ6BAgDEAE&usg=AOvVaw1IaDaORj7a7DR-maTsJ-VB
Shall I continue or are you that person who only believes the huff post?
The Daily Mail... Telegraph... Sun... Nick Ferrari... etc. you're claiming these are impartial?! Hahaha - now that's really funny.
Lol! I've just posted more than one source that saw the same headlines I complained about but it's the wrong sources for your delicate little mind. I'm out. I've met people like you before, nothing will dent your delusion - you will always have excuses as to why you think you are right.
Continue reading the huff post, it's right up your street."I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and suggest you read this, maybe it'll help you understand both the BBC and the criticism it receives: http://www.sussex.ac.uk/broadcast/read/31631 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"According to the bbc, 2 police have been hurt in the violent demonstration today compared to the 27 police injured in the peaceful demonstration last week. The BBC didn't show the footage that Sky showed earlier today either - where the fellows attending at the memorial, were collecting up any litter that had been dropped and imploring the press not to misrepresent them (as they have been known many times to do). The BBC is a disgrace these days - it really, really is. Some no doubt where there with peaceful intent but a lot were not and as with the ones last weekend they deserve what they get if they were nicked.. I'm sure you meant that a lot were there with peaceful intent but some were not, same as last week but you are missing the point, the beeb claimed that last weeks protesting was peaceful- the injury list proves it wasnt. Even the bbc has an agenda and cannot be trusted anymore, you need to read from both left and right news sources to get the real news nowadays. Impartially is out of the window nowadays with the national disgrace bbc. BBC reported the injuries last week... so you're talking crap https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-london-52954899 I never said they didnt but thank you for trying. They reported 27 injured police at the PEACEFUL demonstration. Haha - I think you'll find they reported the majority of protesting was peaceful, but trouble flared later in the day. Or did you think they'd say 27 police officers got injured by accident?
Haha - I think you'll find they called it a peaceful protest while mentioning the injured police in the same report. I can see the bbc is just the way you like it. - myself,I'd prefer them to be impartial.
It sounds like you're seeing what you want to see. I linked you to a BBC report which literally proves you're talking out your arse but hey, go enjoy your "impartial" sources! Haha
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8398095/amp/BBC-blasted-Black-Lives-Matter-protests-largely-peaceful-headline-despite-27-officers-injured.html
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/08/bbc-denies-softening-black-lives-matter-protest-picture/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwivoZSf5__pAhV5UhUIHZ0YD48QFjALegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw15yOD9TsiIyTGZPoRYXiNQ&cf=1
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11811735/fury-bbc-hypocritical-coverage-violent-protests/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwiZ7req5__pAhUtURUIHVMtC4k4ChAWMAV6BAgCEAE&usg=AOvVaw0yL06NWsynA6cDRu1X8zWD
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://amp.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/nick-ferrari/bbc-cropping-out-weapon-black-lives-matter-protest/&ved=2ahUKEwiZ7req5__pAhUtURUIHVMtC4k4ChAWMAh6BAgEEAE&usg=AOvVaw0PI-kW6BB_BfEC_rTvWClX
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://internewscast.com/bbc-blasted-for-black-lives-matter-protests-largely-peaceful-headline-despite-27-officers-injured/&ved=2ahUKEwjL_fzS5__pAhXwSxUIHTE0Blw4FBAWMAJ6BAgDEAE&usg=AOvVaw1IaDaORj7a7DR-maTsJ-VB
Shall I continue or are you that person who only believes the huff post?
The Daily Mail... Telegraph... Sun... Nick Ferrari... etc. you're claiming these are impartial?! Hahaha - now that's really funny.
Lol! I've just posted more than one source that saw the same headlines I complained about but it's the wrong sources for your delicate little mind. I'm out. I've met people like you before, nothing will dent your delusion - you will always have excuses as to why you think you are right.
Continue reading the huff post, it's right up your street.
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and suggest you read this, maybe it'll help you understand both the BBC and the criticism it receives:
http://www.sussex.ac.uk/broadcast/read/31631
"I'll read it when you've read the links I posted. Thanks. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The true face of the far right with its vile use of nazi salutes as they 'defend Englishness'.. Churchill would be spinning in his grave.. Er, no he wouldn't. Many of the 1930s upper class in Britain admired the National Socialist movement in Germany. Google the Mitford sisters. There is also a wonderful video on youtube where you can see the little girl Lillibet (H.R.H. QE2), her mother (the future Queen Elizabeth, wife of George VI) and her Uncle, The Prince of Wales (and future monarch Edward VIII) all giving the Germanised Roman salute. Sieg Heil old chap!" Is this a good thing? Churchill wasn't one of them. Lord Halifax was and he could well have been Prime Minister. He wasn't as much by luck as judgement. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"According to the bbc, 2 police have been hurt in the violent demonstration today compared to the 27 police injured in the peaceful demonstration last week." Is that alright then? What was the ratio of protestors to injuries if that is the measure of if one is "worse" than another? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"According to the bbc, 2 police have been hurt in the violent demonstration today compared to the 27 police injured in the peaceful demonstration last week. The BBC didn't show the footage that Sky showed earlier today either - where the fellows attending at the memorial, were collecting up any litter that had been dropped and imploring the press not to misrepresent them (as they have been known many times to do). The BBC is a disgrace these days - it really, really is. Some no doubt where there with peaceful intent but a lot were not and as with the ones last weekend they deserve what they get if they were nicked.. I'm sure you meant that a lot were there with peaceful intent but some were not, same as last week but you are missing the point, the beeb claimed that last weeks protesting was peaceful- the injury list proves it wasnt. Even the bbc has an agenda and cannot be trusted anymore, you need to read from both left and right news sources to get the real news nowadays. Impartially is out of the window nowadays with the national disgrace bbc. BBC reported the injuries last week... so you're talking crap https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-england-london-52954899 I never said they didnt but thank you for trying. They reported 27 injured police at the PEACEFUL demonstration. Haha - I think you'll find they reported the majority of protesting was peaceful, but trouble flared later in the day. Or did you think they'd say 27 police officers got injured by accident?
Haha - I think you'll find they called it a peaceful protest while mentioning the injured police in the same report. I can see the bbc is just the way you like it. - myself,I'd prefer them to be impartial.
It sounds like you're seeing what you want to see. I linked you to a BBC report which literally proves you're talking out your arse but hey, go enjoy your "impartial" sources! Haha
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8398095/amp/BBC-blasted-Black-Lives-Matter-protests-largely-peaceful-headline-despite-27-officers-injured.html
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/08/bbc-denies-softening-black-lives-matter-protest-picture/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwivoZSf5__pAhV5UhUIHZ0YD48QFjALegQIARAB&usg=AOvVaw15yOD9TsiIyTGZPoRYXiNQ&cf=1
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11811735/fury-bbc-hypocritical-coverage-violent-protests/amp/&ved=2ahUKEwiZ7req5__pAhUtURUIHVMtC4k4ChAWMAV6BAgCEAE&usg=AOvVaw0yL06NWsynA6cDRu1X8zWD
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://amp.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/nick-ferrari/bbc-cropping-out-weapon-black-lives-matter-protest/&ved=2ahUKEwiZ7req5__pAhUtURUIHVMtC4k4ChAWMAh6BAgEEAE&usg=AOvVaw0PI-kW6BB_BfEC_rTvWClX
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://internewscast.com/bbc-blasted-for-black-lives-matter-protests-largely-peaceful-headline-despite-27-officers-injured/&ved=2ahUKEwjL_fzS5__pAhXwSxUIHTE0Blw4FBAWMAJ6BAgDEAE&usg=AOvVaw1IaDaORj7a7DR-maTsJ-VB
Shall I continue or are you that person who only believes the huff post?
The Daily Mail... Telegraph... Sun... Nick Ferrari... etc. you're claiming these are impartial?! Hahaha - now that's really funny.
Lol! I've just posted more than one source that saw the same headlines I complained about but it's the wrong sources for your delicate little mind. I'm out. I've met people like you before, nothing will dent your delusion - you will always have excuses as to why you think you are right.
Continue reading the huff post, it's right up your street.
I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and suggest you read this, maybe it'll help you understand both the BBC and the criticism it receives:
http://www.sussex.ac.uk/broadcast/read/31631
I'll read it when you've read the links I posted. Thanks."I've read plenty of arguments attacking the BBC. I've agreed with them on occasion, but cool. Read it or not, I don't really care. I just prefer people to have open minds. Fill your boots either way. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The true face of the far right with its vile use of nazi salutes as they 'defend Englishness'.. Churchill would be spinning in his grave.. Er, no he wouldn't. Many of the 1930s upper class in Britain admired the National Socialist movement in Germany. Google the Mitford sisters. There is also a wonderful video on youtube where you can see the little girl Lillibet (H.R.H. QE2), her mother (the future Queen Elizabeth, wife of George VI) and her Uncle, The Prince of Wales (and future monarch Edward VIII) all giving the Germanised Roman salute. Sieg Heil old chap! Is this a good thing? Churchill wasn't one of them. Lord Halifax was and he could well have been Prime Minister. He wasn't as much by luck as judgement." You are quite right he wasn't. Though he didn't fall over himself in giving any kind of support or succour to The Spanish Republic - non of them toffs did (well they wouldn't would they). Churchill was (and is) revered by my parents and grandparents generation though, and, whilst no fan of his myself, I object strongly to people seeking to protect his memorial from desecration being portrayed by our 'media' as nothing more than mindless dolts. Our history is our history and if folk dont like it there are ferries and planes enough for them all. No -one will stop 'em going. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The true face of the far right with its vile use of nazi salutes as they 'defend Englishness'.. Churchill would be spinning in his grave.. Er, no he wouldn't. Many of the 1930s upper class in Britain admired the National Socialist movement in Germany. Google the Mitford sisters. There is also a wonderful video on youtube where you can see the little girl Lillibet (H.R.H. QE2), her mother (the future Queen Elizabeth, wife of George VI) and her Uncle, The Prince of Wales (and future monarch Edward VIII) all giving the Germanised Roman salute. Sieg Heil old chap! Is this a good thing? Churchill wasn't one of them. Lord Halifax was and he could well have been Prime Minister. He wasn't as much by luck as judgement. You are quite right he wasn't. Though he didn't fall over himself in giving any kind of support or succour to The Spanish Republic - non of them toffs did (well they wouldn't would they). Churchill was (and is) revered by my parents and grandparents generation though, and, whilst no fan of his myself, I object strongly to people seeking to protect his memorial from desecration being portrayed by our 'media' as nothing more than mindless dolts. Our history is our history and if folk dont like it there are ferries and planes enough for them all. No -one will stop 'em going." There were different groups of people there. The media is not portraying those there peacefully as "mindless dolts" anymore or less than the BLM protestors. Should they not show those people behaving badly in the same way as those at the BLM protest who behaved badly? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The true face of the far right with its vile use of nazi salutes as they 'defend Englishness'.. Churchill would be spinning in his grave.. Er, no he wouldn't. Many of the 1930s upper class in Britain admired the National Socialist movement in Germany. Google the Mitford sisters. There is also a wonderful video on youtube where you can see the little girl Lillibet (H.R.H. QE2), her mother (the future Queen Elizabeth, wife of George VI) and her Uncle, The Prince of Wales (and future monarch Edward VIII) all giving the Germanised Roman salute. Sieg Heil old chap! Is this a good thing? Churchill wasn't one of them. Lord Halifax was and he could well have been Prime Minister. He wasn't as much by luck as judgement. You are quite right he wasn't. Though he didn't fall over himself in giving any kind of support or succour to The Spanish Republic - non of them toffs did (well they wouldn't would they). Churchill was (and is) revered by my parents and grandparents generation though, and, whilst no fan of his myself, I object strongly to people seeking to protect his memorial from desecration being portrayed by our 'media' as nothing more than mindless dolts. Our history is our history and if folk dont like it there are ferries and planes enough for them all. No -one will stop 'em going." The only problem with your analysis is that they clearly are mindless dullards. Historically illiterate d*unks attacking the police whilst pretending to defend a statue from people who arent even there isnt rational or clever. Theyre thugs and morons | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"yea i see tge rabble this week just as bad as the bellends from last week who were being arseholes.like ive always said pricks in all walks of life.i usually judge peeps on wether there a cunt or not regardless of religion colour or sexuality but was called racist earlier in the week by one of my younger cousins because i told her not to lecture me go figure eh" so true, anybody that doesn't judge someone on the content of their character is a prick. Every race has them. Idiots from last week met by their own kind of people this week. They should all be quarantined. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ok....I am an football fan and do know a few people that went to various locations today. That is there choice. Anyway here are my thoughts. Last weekend was a shit show by the police, they should have steamed in to and arrested anyone that was graffiti statues tearing them down etc....there needs be due process to get statues removed etc like planning permission For me Churchill regardless of his potentially racist views led this country through the darkest times. If it wasn't for him, then we would all be white aryan and speaking German To set fire to flags is totally disrespectful especially as it is our nations flag, and to set fire it to on the cenotaph is despicable. Thousands lost their lives both black white and Asian Now our glorious inept mayor should have come out with a stronger statement and so should the police from last week. What happened was the right had enough and turned up in force. Let me make this clear these are not England fans though there probably was a few there. On my England forums there is general shock at the behaviour. I have friends and family that both support blm, and support looking after monuments London is a powder keg waiting to explode. Where do I sit - peaceful protest should be allowed on both sides when it stops being peaceful then the police should robustly police " Not England fans? Must have been why they were chanting England so much. Pretty obvious it was the usual hooligans. Deprived of football, their usual paper thin excuse for a fight, they came out to "protect the statues" in the hope of a tear up with BLM protestors. When deprived of that, they went for a tear up with the police. Base thuggery and ugly tribalism in action. It's a toxic "us v them" mindset which traditionally was reserved for rival teams but has been co-opted by the hard right to encompass leftys, Muslims, remainers, and anyone else the dog whistling populist politicians and media decide to demonise. Sad. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The true face of the far right with its vile use of nazi salutes as they 'defend Englishness'.. Churchill would be spinning in his grave.. Er, no he wouldn't. Many of the 1930s upper class in Britain admired the National Socialist movement in Germany. Google the Mitford sisters. There is also a wonderful video on youtube where you can see the little girl Lillibet (H.R.H. QE2), her mother (the future Queen Elizabeth, wife of George VI) and her Uncle, The Prince of Wales (and future monarch Edward VIII) all giving the Germanised Roman salute. Sieg Heil old chap!" Upto The late 1930s churchill was a big fan of Mussolini and saw bolshevism as a greater threat than facism. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"According to the bbc, 2 police have been hurt in the violent demonstration today compared to the 27 police injured in the peaceful demonstration last week." And? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"According to the bbc, 2 police have been hurt in the violent demonstration today compared to the 27 police injured in the peaceful demonstration last week. The BBC didn't show the footage that Sky showed earlier today either - where the fellows attending at the memorial, were collecting up any litter that had been dropped and imploring the press not to misrepresent them (as they have been known many times to do). The BBC is a disgrace these days - it really, really is." Sky were instructed to not call them far right protesters. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ok....I am an football fan and do know a few people that went to various locations today. That is there choice. Anyway here are my thoughts. Last weekend was a shit show by the police, they should have steamed in to and arrested anyone that was graffiti statues tearing them down etc....there needs be due process to get statues removed etc like planning permission For me Churchill regardless of his potentially racist views led this country through the darkest times. If it wasn't for him, then we would all be white aryan and speaking German To set fire to flags is totally disrespectful especially as it is our nations flag, and to set fire it to on the cenotaph is despicable. Thousands lost their lives both black white and Asian Now our glorious inept mayor should have come out with a stronger statement and so should the police from last week. What happened was the right had enough and turned up in force. Let me make this clear these are not England fans though there probably was a few there. On my England forums there is general shock at the behaviour. I have friends and family that both support blm, and support looking after monuments London is a powder keg waiting to explode. Where do I sit - peaceful protest should be allowed on both sides when it stops being peaceful then the police should robustly police " Churchill must have had some powers to defeat the nazis all on his own. We wouldn't have been speaking German at all. Not england fans but chanting 'ingerlund'? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"According to the bbc, 2 police have been hurt in the violent demonstration today compared to the 27 police injured in the peaceful demonstration last week. Is that alright then? What was the ratio of protestors to injuries if that is the measure of if one is "worse" than another?" The worse kind of 'whatabouttery' They were fuming last week cos the police were attacked and protested by...attacking the police. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The mail. What has happened to our tolerant country? You couldn't make it up." You couldn't make it up part 2.... Boris condemning racism, few months ago calling Muslim women 'letterboxes' and 'bank robbers'... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The mail. What has happened to our tolerant country? You couldn't make it up. You couldn't make it up part 2.... Boris condemning racism, few months ago calling Muslim women 'letterboxes' and 'bank robbers'..." Empty words. Said yesterday him and the likes of Farage have kicked up the entire Hornets nest and now condemn it. The ironic thing is the empty heads marching around london yesterday actually think the elite could give a flying fuck about them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Like attracts like. There are fuck wits in every race. Some only ever intended to cause trouble. On both sides! You get what you attract. All life's matter. BLM = The blind leading the blind. https://youtu.be/tm86QPhCwFc" One side was protesting against celebrating slavery and institutional racism. The other was giving Hitler salutes and was out and out racist. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Like attracts like. There are fuck wits in every race. Some only ever intended to cause trouble. On both sides! You get what you attract. All life's matter. BLM = The blind leading the blind. https://youtu.be/tm86QPhCwFc" Yes, all lives matter. Lovely sentiment, but it just isn't the case in reality. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Like attracts like. There are fuck wits in every race. Some only ever intended to cause trouble. On both sides! You get what you attract. All life's matter. BLM = The blind leading the blind. https://youtu.be/tm86QPhCwFc One side was protesting against celebrating slavery and institutional racism. The other was giving Hitler salutes and was out and out racist." By putting everyone's life at risk just so they could gob off, and the attack to our culture, history and police officers the provoked a reflection of their selves from the other side. You can't hit out at people and expect to be excused? Everyone going to that march knew there was going to be trouble but they went anyway. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. " 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! " Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them." If someone protested in London last weekend how is that putting my life in danger? The amount of police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? " Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? " No, I've been saying all week this will just cause division and hate. Not because of the cause even though it's nonsence and I will not make excuses for anyone's individual behaviour based on the colour of their skin. No good will come of any of it. It's the fact that they couldn't care less about all our efforts over the last few months protecting each other. That's what's pissing people off. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? No, I've been saying all week this will just cause division and hate. Not because of the cause even though it's nonsence and I will not make excuses for anyone's individual behaviour based on the colour of their skin. No good will come of any of it. It's the fact that they couldn't care less about all our efforts over the last few months protecting each other. That's what's pissing people off. " Why is the cause ‘nonsense’ ? Are you suggesting the BLM protests shouldn’t have gone ahead because it might cause division and hate amongst a group of far right racists? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? " Significantly more than 20,000 people attended the BLM demonstration last week in London. What was the intent of these people? To highlight the inequality in society for one specific minority group. Do you think that there is an issue that needs addressing or not? Clearly a tiny proportion were violent and criminal otherwise the damage would have been phenomenal but still 27 officers hurt, a similar number of arrests. This week several hundred "protestors". What was the intent of these people? To "protect" hoarded monuments with a Police guard? Drinking, shouting racist abuse. Was it only a minority doing this? Then violence. 6 officers hurt from only a few hundred protesters. 100 arrests. Again, if your chosen measure for condemning a protest is Police officers hurt then you have to account for howany police are hurt relative to the number of protestors? Can the Police control 20,000 plus people if they are not largely peaceful? Just say that you think that right wing protests who are d*unk and violent are okay with you. Don't construct some elaborate justification for it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them. If someone protested in London last weekend how is that putting my life in danger? The amount of police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre" That's how they are putting your life at risk, where have you been the last3 months? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/uk-coronavirus-death-toll-nears-50000-latest-official-figures-show police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre. I know how silly of me to compare a peaceful protest resulting in 27 police officers hurt, vandalism and looting of last week to the shameful demonstration we saw yesterday. Acting like hooligans for no apparent reason. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Like attracts like. There are fuck wits in every race. Some only ever intended to cause trouble. On both sides! You get what you attract. All life's matter. BLM = The blind leading the blind. https://youtu.be/tm86QPhCwFc One side was protesting against celebrating slavery and institutional racism. The other was giving Hitler salutes and was out and out racist. By putting everyone's life at risk just so they could gob off, and the attack to our culture, history and police officers the provoked a reflection of their selves from the other side. You can't hit out at people and expect to be excused? Everyone going to that march knew there was going to be trouble but they went anyway. " Think about what you just wrote and how that indicates how you think. "THEY could gob off and the attack to OUR culture" Capitals are not shouting it is underlining. THEY are US. That is what they are protesting about. That this does not seem to be the case. None of the violence was justified but you are writing as if yesterday's violence was in some way acceptable and understandable but not that of the previous week. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them." i don't think that "all lives" actually matter to you... I think the "status quo" is what actually matters...... and you don't see/think there anything wrong at the moment... we were protesting before the pandemic... then "apparently" was not the right time.... we were protesteting during the pandemic, "apparently" now is not the time.... so just when is the time to protest? I'll mark it in my calander especially!!!  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them." I understand this point. Mass gatherings during a protest are a terrible idea. They were not doing it for a jolly though. I guess they must feel incredibly strongly about it. How else do they show that? Change hasn't come for decades. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them. If someone protested in London last weekend how is that putting my life in danger? The amount of police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre That's how they are putting your life at risk, where have you been the last3 months? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/uk-coronavirus-death-toll-nears-50000-latest-official-figures-show police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre. I know how silly of me to compare a peaceful protest resulting in 27 police officers hurt, vandalism and looting of last week to the shameful demonstration we saw yesterday. Acting like hooligans for no apparent reason." What looting? Last week: 20,000+ protestors A hundred violet and criminal maybe? This week: 200 protesters. A hundred violent and criminal maybe? Which was largely peaceful and which one largely violent by percentage? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them. If someone protested in London last weekend how is that putting my life in danger? The amount of police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre That's how they are putting your life at risk, where have you been the last3 months? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/uk-coronavirus-death-toll-nears-50000-latest-official-figures-show police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre. I know how silly of me to compare a peaceful protest resulting in 27 police officers hurt, vandalism and looting of last week to the shameful demonstration we saw yesterday. Acting like hooligans for no apparent reason." I think a lot of the issue was the Policing style. Last week they were slow to act and Officers were not in riot gear and tried to Police in a different style. Priti Patel then Intervened and you saw the difference | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? No, I've been saying all week this will just cause division and hate. Not because of the cause even though it's nonsence and I will not make excuses for anyone's individual behaviour based on the colour of their skin. No good will come of any of it. It's the fact that they couldn't care less about all our efforts over the last few months protecting each other. That's what's pissing people off. Why is the cause ‘nonsense’ ? Are you suggesting the BLM protests shouldn’t have gone ahead because it might cause division and hate amongst a group of far right racists? " We already heard the one sided argument, we've now heard the facts. Let people have their voice , say what they want. There's a big enough platform on social media to do that without going out in a pandemic and giving a big fuck you to all the people who have suffered and stood together keeping to the rules for everyone's safety . How many turned out last weekend? And when the rest of us are only just allowed 6 in the garden. We are just starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel and can take steps to come out of this together. But hey black lives matter more. Yet London was most heavily hit by the virus and black people are at a lower survival rate. If I was a nurse already being through losing hunders of lives daily, colleges and patients , scared for my own safety, scared I take it home to my family. Worried my children would be left without a parent . Can you imagine the sacrifices these people have made? I would walk out if there's another spike in covid after seeing the respect they have shown. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. " Did They actually say only black lives matter? The BLM 'invited' them?really? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. Did They actually say only black lives matter? The BLM 'invited' them?really?" Yes please look at news feeds | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. " "When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter" Really? Where did you see or read this? Did someone tell you that this happened? Were they there or did they hear it from someone else? How many times did this happen? What are you actually reporting here? Something that is objectively true? Something that sounds true? Something that you want to be true? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. Did They actually say only black lives matter? The BLM 'invited' them?really?Yes please look at news feeds " So the blame are to blame for that yesterday? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them. If someone protested in London last weekend how is that putting my life in danger? The amount of police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre That's how they are putting your life at risk, where have you been the last3 months? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/uk-coronavirus-death-toll-nears-50000-latest-official-figures-show police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre. I know how silly of me to compare a peaceful protest resulting in 27 police officers hurt, vandalism and looting of last week to the shameful demonstration we saw yesterday. Acting like hooligans for no apparent reason." You seem to be excusing what went on yday with the "both as bad as each other 'argument | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them. If someone protested in London last weekend how is that putting my life in danger? The amount of police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre That's how they are putting your life at risk, where have you been the last3 months? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/uk-coronavirus-death-toll-nears-50000-latest-official-figures-show police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre. I know how silly of me to compare a peaceful protest resulting in 27 police officers hurt, vandalism and looting of last week to the shameful demonstration we saw yesterday. Acting like hooligans for no apparent reason. What looting? Last week: 20,000+ protestors A hundred violet and criminal maybe? This week: 200 protesters. A hundred violent and criminal maybe? Which was largely peaceful and which one largely violent by percentage?" My apologies, there was no looting . After 5pm curfew there were still 1300 people there. A little more than 200. But then we don't know the difference between 8 and 27! Anyone who went yesterday knew what was going to happen especially nearing and after the curfew https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8416897/London-braces-chaos-hooligans-far-right-thugs-threaten-clashes-BLM-protesters.html Anyone that was hurt yesterday have only got themselves to blame, I have no sympathy of with side. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them. If someone protested in London last weekend how is that putting my life in danger? The amount of police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre That's how they are putting your life at risk, where have you been the last3 months? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/uk-coronavirus-death-toll-nears-50000-latest-official-figures-show police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre. I know how silly of me to compare a peaceful protest resulting in 27 police officers hurt, vandalism and looting of last week to the shameful demonstration we saw yesterday. Acting like hooligans for no apparent reason. You seem to be excusing what went on yday with the "both as bad as each other 'argument" Are they not? But BLM protester's threw the first stone | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them. If someone protested in London last weekend how is that putting my life in danger? The amount of police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre That's how they are putting your life at risk, where have you been the last3 months? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/uk-coronavirus-death-toll-nears-50000-latest-official-figures-show police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre. I know how silly of me to compare a peaceful protest resulting in 27 police officers hurt, vandalism and looting of last week to the shameful demonstration we saw yesterday. Acting like hooligans for no apparent reason. You seem to be excusing what went on yday with the "both as bad as each other 'argument Are they not? But BLM protester's threw the first stone " Like I said earlier. The protests last week were essentially anti racist.However they turned violent and there were examples of vandalism.However there were an estimated 20,000 people there and other protests passed off peacefully. Yesterdays protests were based around racial hatred.They attacked The police,who last week they were in sympathy with and there is widespread evidence of racial gestures and actions. . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them. If someone protested in London last weekend how is that putting my life in danger? The amount of police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre That's how they are putting your life at risk, where have you been the last3 months? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/uk-coronavirus-death-toll-nears-50000-latest-official-figures-show police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre. I know how silly of me to compare a peaceful protest resulting in 27 police officers hurt, vandalism and looting of last week to the shameful demonstration we saw yesterday. Acting like hooligans for no apparent reason. What looting? Last week: 20,000+ protestors A hundred violet and criminal maybe? This week: 200 protesters. A hundred violent and criminal maybe? Which was largely peaceful and which one largely violent by percentage? My apologies, there was no looting . After 5pm curfew there were still 1300 people there. A little more than 200. But then we don't know the difference between 8 and 27! Anyone who went yesterday knew what was going to happen especially nearing and after the curfew https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8416897/London-braces-chaos-hooligans-far-right-thugs-threaten-clashes-BLM-protesters.html Anyone that was hurt yesterday have only got themselves to blame, I have no sympathy of with side. " So the ratio of 20,000+ to 27 vs 1300 to 6 Which protest was largely peaceful and by what margin? Assuming that is the only measure for you. What was the purpose of last week's protest and what was the purpose of this week's? In your opinion? Why should this week's protest and violence require defending? You keep insisting that you aren't, and then you do. You can see that, right? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. "When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter" Really? Where did you see or read this? Did someone tell you that this happened? Were they there or did they hear it from someone else? How many times did this happen? What are you actually reporting here? Something that is objectively true? Something that sounds true? Something that you want to be true?" So you didn't see or hear them saying it so they never said it,it's remarks like that is why we are in this mess. Please show one time they have said all lives matter? If white protesters took to the streets saying white life's matter that ok. Not rasist at all???? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them. If someone protested in London last weekend how is that putting my life in danger? The amount of police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre That's how they are putting your life at risk, where have you been the last3 months? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/uk-coronavirus-death-toll-nears-50000-latest-official-figures-show police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre. I know how silly of me to compare a peaceful protest resulting in 27 police officers hurt, vandalism and looting of last week to the shameful demonstration we saw yesterday. Acting like hooligans for no apparent reason. You seem to be excusing what went on yday with the "both as bad as each other 'argument Are they not? But BLM protester's threw the first stone " Did they? This weekend? Was that also true last week? Possibly, possibly not. I don't know for sure. Do you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. " BLM, pulled out of yesterday's protest in London. These bellends turned up to 'protect' the cenotaph by sieg heiling, punching the police and urinating on their memorials. Please, just look and wonder how you have found yourself defending people making nazi salutes at the cenotaph... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. "When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter" Really? Where did you see or read this? Did someone tell you that this happened? Were they there or did they hear it from someone else? How many times did this happen? What are you actually reporting here? Something that is objectively true? Something that sounds true? Something that you want to be true?So you didn't see or hear them saying it so they never said it,it's remarks like that is why we are in this mess. Please show one time they have said all lives matter? If white protesters took to the streets saying white life's matter that ok. Not rasist at all????" You made a statement. I did not. I'm asking where that information came from and how confident you are in it. Not very it would seem. All lives do matter. Do black lives matter as much as other lives? Yes/no? If the answer is yes but they remain at a significant disadvantage in achieving that aim should something be done about it? Of nothing is done can they point that out or not? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. " no one has said "only black lives matter" people are saying "Black lives matter AS WELL/AS MUCH!" thats a gross misunderstanding of the message!!!... and the people who want the "status quo" to remain as it is to corrupt the message.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. BLM, pulled out of yesterday's protest in London. These bellends turned up to 'protect' the cenotaph by sieg heiling, punching the police and urinating on their memorials. Please, just look and wonder how you have found yourself defending people making nazi salutes at the cenotaph..." You have a funny look on things? I wasn't defending any one, both sides are rasist but not shown that way? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. BLM, pulled out of yesterday's protest in London. These bellends turned up to 'protect' the cenotaph by sieg heiling, punching the police and urinating on their memorials. Please, just look and wonder how you have found yourself defending people making nazi salutes at the cenotaph...You have a funny look on things? I wasn't defending any one, both sides are rasist but not shown that way?" Yeah, but couldn't quite bring yourself to condemn the Nazi salutes yesterday... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. BLM, pulled out of yesterday's protest in London. These bellends turned up to 'protect' the cenotaph by sieg heiling, punching the police and urinating on their memorials. Please, just look and wonder how you have found yourself defending people making nazi salutes at the cenotaph...You have a funny look on things? I wasn't defending any one, both sides are rasist but not shown that way?" Was everyone at the protests last weekend black? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. BLM, pulled out of yesterday's protest in London. These bellends turned up to 'protect' the cenotaph by sieg heiling, punching the police and urinating on their memorials. Please, just look and wonder how you have found yourself defending people making nazi salutes at the cenotaph...You have a funny look on things? I wasn't defending any one, both sides are rasist but not shown that way? Was everyone at the protests last weekend black?" This is what I can't get my head around. White and black marched last weekend. Were the white people there saying 'hey, I think my life should mean less than the black people here'? I'm sure they weren't. I'm sure it was more like 'hey, equality'.....why is this so ridiculously hard for people to comprehend? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. BLM, pulled out of yesterday's protest in London. These bellends turned up to 'protect' the cenotaph by sieg heiling, punching the police and urinating on their memorials. Please, just look and wonder how you have found yourself defending people making nazi salutes at the cenotaph...You have a funny look on things? I wasn't defending any one, both sides are rasist but not shown that way? Was everyone at the protests last weekend black? This is what I can't get my head around. White and black marched last weekend. Were the white people there saying 'hey, I think my life should mean less than the black people here'? I'm sure they weren't. I'm sure it was more like 'hey, equality'.....why is this so ridiculously hard for people to comprehend?" I'm very curious to find out how a white anti racist is in fact..racist. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them. If someone protested in London last weekend how is that putting my life in danger? The amount of police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre That's how they are putting your life at risk, where have you been the last3 months? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/uk-coronavirus-death-toll-nears-50000-latest-official-figures-show police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre. I know how silly of me to compare a peaceful protest resulting in 27 police officers hurt, vandalism and looting of last week to the shameful demonstration we saw yesterday. Acting like hooligans for no apparent reason. You seem to be excusing what went on yday with the "both as bad as each other 'argument Are they not? But BLM protester's threw the first stone Like I said earlier. The protests last week were essentially anti racist.However they turned violent and there were examples of vandalism.However there were an estimated 20,000 people there and other protests passed off peacefully. Yesterdays protests were based around racial hatred.They attacked The police,who last week they were in sympathy with and there is widespread evidence of racial gestures and actions. ." But can you understand that by putting their cause before others safety, by attacking our culture our country our ancestors memory, burning the union jack. That this is an attack of the British people. When this country has been nothing but accepting of change and embracing other cultures. People that weren't racist before are now. Their teaching that to their children just like BLM are teaching their children to be bitter at white people with white privilege. What was once peaceful and moving in a positive direction isn't now. BLM have caused this. There will be people , I am one of them , that know it's a minority that follow this just as it's a minority that went out yesterday to protect our statues from further attack. But if we let this go on, how long will it be till someone is killed over it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them. If someone protested in London last weekend how is that putting my life in danger? The amount of police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre That's how they are putting your life at risk, where have you been the last3 months? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/uk-coronavirus-death-toll-nears-50000-latest-official-figures-show police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre. I know how silly of me to compare a peaceful protest resulting in 27 police officers hurt, vandalism and looting of last week to the shameful demonstration we saw yesterday. Acting like hooligans for no apparent reason. You seem to be excusing what went on yday with the "both as bad as each other 'argument Are they not? But BLM protester's threw the first stone Like I said earlier. The protests last week were essentially anti racist.However they turned violent and there were examples of vandalism.However there were an estimated 20,000 people there and other protests passed off peacefully. Yesterdays protests were based around racial hatred.They attacked The police,who last week they were in sympathy with and there is widespread evidence of racial gestures and actions. . But can you understand that by putting their cause before others safety, by attacking our culture our country our ancestors memory, burning the union jack. That this is an attack of the British people. When this country has been nothing but accepting of change and embracing other cultures. People that weren't racist before are now. Their teaching that to their children just like BLM are teaching their children to be bitter at white people with white privilege. What was once peaceful and moving in a positive direction isn't now. BLM have caused this. There will be people , I am one of them , that know it's a minority that follow this just as it's a minority that went out yesterday to protect our statues from further attack. But if we let this go on, how long will it be till someone is killed over it? " Hey, imagine how you'd of felt of generations of your people had been enslaved? A flag burnt and a couple of statues sprayed might seem not much really... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. BLM, pulled out of yesterday's protest in London. These bellends turned up to 'protect' the cenotaph by sieg heiling, punching the police and urinating on their memorials. Please, just look and wonder how you have found yourself defending people making nazi salutes at the cenotaph...You have a funny look on things? I wasn't defending any one, both sides are rasist but not shown that way? Was everyone at the protests last weekend black? This is what I can't get my head around. White and black marched last weekend. Were the white people there saying 'hey, I think my life should mean less than the black people here'? I'm sure they weren't. I'm sure it was more like 'hey, equality'.....why is this so ridiculously hard for people to comprehend? I'm very curious to find out how a white anti racist is in fact..racist." Why am I racist ? Cause I don't believe this drivel. Because I will not stand up for a black criminal that was killed by the police in America. When white people are killed by the police. There can't be one rule for you and another for me. That does not make me racist. I treat everyone as I find them, if your cunt, I'll treat you like one. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them. If someone protested in London last weekend how is that putting my life in danger? The amount of police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre That's how they are putting your life at risk, where have you been the last3 months? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/uk-coronavirus-death-toll-nears-50000-latest-official-figures-show police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre. I know how silly of me to compare a peaceful protest resulting in 27 police officers hurt, vandalism and looting of last week to the shameful demonstration we saw yesterday. Acting like hooligans for no apparent reason. You seem to be excusing what went on yday with the "both as bad as each other 'argument Are they not? But BLM protester's threw the first stone Like I said earlier. The protests last week were essentially anti racist.However they turned violent and there were examples of vandalism.However there were an estimated 20,000 people there and other protests passed off peacefully. Yesterdays protests were based around racial hatred.They attacked The police,who last week they were in sympathy with and there is widespread evidence of racial gestures and actions. . But can you understand that by putting their cause before others safety, by attacking our culture our country our ancestors memory, burning the union jack. That this is an attack of the British people. When this country has been nothing but accepting of change and embracing other cultures. People that weren't racist before are now. Their teaching that to their children just like BLM are teaching their children to be bitter at white people with white privilege. What was once peaceful and moving in a positive direction isn't now. BLM have caused this. There will be people , I am one of them , that know it's a minority that follow this just as it's a minority that went out yesterday to protect our statues from further attack. But if we let this go on, how long will it be till someone is killed over it? " What culture were they attacking?slavery? I'm not condoning the violence but what they have done is stir up a debate which should have happened years ago.Why do we have statues up celebrating slave traders?why do you we ignore the horrendous things we have done in the past?and as for the 'it's in the past it should be forgotten argument,I find that hysterical considering our obsession and glorification with ww2 and Germany. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them. If someone protested in London last weekend how is that putting my life in danger? The amount of police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre That's how they are putting your life at risk, where have you been the last3 months? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/uk-coronavirus-death-toll-nears-50000-latest-official-figures-show police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre. I know how silly of me to compare a peaceful protest resulting in 27 police officers hurt, vandalism and looting of last week to the shameful demonstration we saw yesterday. Acting like hooligans for no apparent reason. You seem to be excusing what went on yday with the "both as bad as each other 'argument Are they not? But BLM protester's threw the first stone Like I said earlier. The protests last week were essentially anti racist.However they turned violent and there were examples of vandalism.However there were an estimated 20,000 people there and other protests passed off peacefully. Yesterdays protests were based around racial hatred.They attacked The police,who last week they were in sympathy with and there is widespread evidence of racial gestures and actions. . But can you understand that by putting their cause before others safety, by attacking our culture our country our ancestors memory, burning the union jack. That this is an attack of the British people. When this country has been nothing but accepting of change and embracing other cultures. People that weren't racist before are now. Their teaching that to their children just like BLM are teaching their children to be bitter at white people with white privilege. What was once peaceful and moving in a positive direction isn't now. BLM have caused this. There will be people , I am one of them , that know it's a minority that follow this just as it's a minority that went out yesterday to protect our statues from further attack. But if we let this go on, how long will it be till someone is killed over it? Hey, imagine how you'd of felt of generations of your people had been enslaved? A flag burnt and a couple of statues sprayed might seem not much really..." Go take that up with your ancestors own people who caught them, took their freedom away and sold them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. BLM, pulled out of yesterday's protest in London. These bellends turned up to 'protect' the cenotaph by sieg heiling, punching the police and urinating on their memorials. Please, just look and wonder how you have found yourself defending people making nazi salutes at the cenotaph...You have a funny look on things? I wasn't defending any one, both sides are rasist but not shown that way? Was everyone at the protests last weekend black? This is what I can't get my head around. White and black marched last weekend. Were the white people there saying 'hey, I think my life should mean less than the black people here'? I'm sure they weren't. I'm sure it was more like 'hey, equality'.....why is this so ridiculously hard for people to comprehend? I'm very curious to find out how a white anti racist is in fact..racist. Why am I racist ? Cause I don't believe this drivel. Because I will not stand up for a black criminal that was killed by the police in America. When white people are killed by the police. There can't be one rule for you and another for me. That does not make me racist. I treat everyone as I find them, if your cunt, I'll treat you like one. " No..I didnt say you were racist. You said both protests were racist.I said at the protests last week there were white people there..how exactly are they racist? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? " The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them. If someone protested in London last weekend how is that putting my life in danger? The amount of police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre That's how they are putting your life at risk, where have you been the last3 months? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/uk-coronavirus-death-toll-nears-50000-latest-official-figures-show police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre. I know how silly of me to compare a peaceful protest resulting in 27 police officers hurt, vandalism and looting of last week to the shameful demonstration we saw yesterday. Acting like hooligans for no apparent reason. You seem to be excusing what went on yday with the "both as bad as each other 'argument Are they not? But BLM protester's threw the first stone Like I said earlier. The protests last week were essentially anti racist.However they turned violent and there were examples of vandalism.However there were an estimated 20,000 people there and other protests passed off peacefully. Yesterdays protests were based around racial hatred.They attacked The police,who last week they were in sympathy with and there is widespread evidence of racial gestures and actions. . But can you understand that by putting their cause before others safety, by attacking our culture our country our ancestors memory, burning the union jack. That this is an attack of the British people. When this country has been nothing but accepting of change and embracing other cultures. People that weren't racist before are now. Their teaching that to their children just like BLM are teaching their children to be bitter at white people with white privilege. What was once peaceful and moving in a positive direction isn't now. BLM have caused this. There will be people , I am one of them , that know it's a minority that follow this just as it's a minority that went out yesterday to protect our statues from further attack. But if we let this go on, how long will it be till someone is killed over it? Hey, imagine how you'd of felt of generations of your people had been enslaved? A flag burnt and a couple of statues sprayed might seem not much really... Go take that up with your ancestors own people who caught them, took their freedom away and sold them. " Just makes me laugh. 'attack on the British people....grrr...but how dare those black people get pissed off about their people being enslaved'. It's almost as funny as those who portray us as under some EU superstate. 'ooh, they tell us what to do' but again, don't let those black people get miffed about racism in everyday life. I hate to say it but 'snowflake' comes to kind  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them. If someone protested in London last weekend how is that putting my life in danger? The amount of police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre That's how they are putting your life at risk, where have you been the last3 months? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/uk-coronavirus-death-toll-nears-50000-latest-official-figures-show police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre. I know how silly of me to compare a peaceful protest resulting in 27 police officers hurt, vandalism and looting of last week to the shameful demonstration we saw yesterday. Acting like hooligans for no apparent reason. You seem to be excusing what went on yday with the "both as bad as each other 'argument Are they not? But BLM protester's threw the first stone Like I said earlier. The protests last week were essentially anti racist.However they turned violent and there were examples of vandalism.However there were an estimated 20,000 people there and other protests passed off peacefully. Yesterdays protests were based around racial hatred.They attacked The police,who last week they were in sympathy with and there is widespread evidence of racial gestures and actions. . But can you understand that by putting their cause before others safety, by attacking our culture our country our ancestors memory, burning the union jack. That this is an attack of the British people. When this country has been nothing but accepting of change and embracing other cultures. People that weren't racist before are now. Their teaching that to their children just like BLM are teaching their children to be bitter at white people with white privilege. What was once peaceful and moving in a positive direction isn't now. BLM have caused this. There will be people , I am one of them , that know it's a minority that follow this just as it's a minority that went out yesterday to protect our statues from further attack. But if we let this go on, how long will it be till someone is killed over it? What culture were they attacking?slavery? I'm not condoning the violence but what they have done is stir up a debate which should have happened years ago.Why do we have statues up celebrating slave traders?why do you we ignore the horrendous things we have done in the past?and as for the 'it's in the past it should be forgotten argument,I find that hysterical considering our obsession and glorification with ww2 and Germany." Some people today still remember ww2. Captain Tom Moore . Who fought for our country then. Do you think you will still be here if Hitler won the war? That same Captain Tom Moore that at 100 years old fought to raise money for the NHS to save lives. Can you not see how disrespectful these protests are? Wrong time for this especially if your trying to unite people. It's disgraceful. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. " So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. " Is everybody that marched extreme left?? I'd not say all this on the other side were far right. I can see why people don't want monuments defaced by a few people. The slaver statue that was tossed in the river, well their had been efforts for years to just put a plaque up describing the guys horrific crimes. I think it's called context, surely everyone should be in favour of context and recognition. Stop letting the Daily Mail make you angry. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them. If someone protested in London last weekend how is that putting my life in danger? The amount of police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre That's how they are putting your life at risk, where have you been the last3 months? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/uk-coronavirus-death-toll-nears-50000-latest-official-figures-show police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre. I know how silly of me to compare a peaceful protest resulting in 27 police officers hurt, vandalism and looting of last week to the shameful demonstration we saw yesterday. Acting like hooligans for no apparent reason. You seem to be excusing what went on yday with the "both as bad as each other 'argument Are they not? But BLM protester's threw the first stone Like I said earlier. The protests last week were essentially anti racist.However they turned violent and there were examples of vandalism.However there were an estimated 20,000 people there and other protests passed off peacefully. Yesterdays protests were based around racial hatred.They attacked The police,who last week they were in sympathy with and there is widespread evidence of racial gestures and actions. . But can you understand that by putting their cause before others safety, by attacking our culture our country our ancestors memory, burning the union jack. That this is an attack of the British people. When this country has been nothing but accepting of change and embracing other cultures. People that weren't racist before are now. Their teaching that to their children just like BLM are teaching their children to be bitter at white people with white privilege. What was once peaceful and moving in a positive direction isn't now. BLM have caused this. There will be people , I am one of them , that know it's a minority that follow this just as it's a minority that went out yesterday to protect our statues from further attack. But if we let this go on, how long will it be till someone is killed over it? What culture were they attacking?slavery? I'm not condoning the violence but what they have done is stir up a debate which should have happened years ago.Why do we have statues up celebrating slave traders?why do you we ignore the horrendous things we have done in the past?and as for the 'it's in the past it should be forgotten argument,I find that hysterical considering our obsession and glorification with ww2 and Germany. Some people today still remember ww2. Captain Tom Moore . Who fought for our country then. Do you think you will still be here if Hitler won the war? That same Captain Tom Moore that at 100 years old fought to raise money for the NHS to save lives. Can you not see how disrespectful these protests are? Wrong time for this especially if your trying to unite people. It's disgraceful. " And how would Tom feel seeing white,British citizens Sieg heiling at the cenotaph?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"The “on both sides” moral equivalency argument again.. wow that’s new! Last weeks March was about equality... yesterday’s March was about white superiority! So well done for taking the trump Charlottesville position! Putting their protest before all our life's . We are in a pandemic! All lives matter to me but the protesters show that no life's matter to them. If someone protested in London last weekend how is that putting my life in danger? The amount of police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre That's how they are putting your life at risk, where have you been the last3 months? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/uk-coronavirus-death-toll-nears-50000-latest-official-figures-show police officers hurt argument is a bit bizarre. I know how silly of me to compare a peaceful protest resulting in 27 police officers hurt, vandalism and looting of last week to the shameful demonstration we saw yesterday. Acting like hooligans for no apparent reason. You seem to be excusing what went on yday with the "both as bad as each other 'argument Are they not? But BLM protester's threw the first stone Like I said earlier. The protests last week were essentially anti racist.However they turned violent and there were examples of vandalism.However there were an estimated 20,000 people there and other protests passed off peacefully. Yesterdays protests were based around racial hatred.They attacked The police,who last week they were in sympathy with and there is widespread evidence of racial gestures and actions. . But can you understand that by putting their cause before others safety, by attacking our culture our country our ancestors memory, burning the union jack. That this is an attack of the British people. When this country has been nothing but accepting of change and embracing other cultures. People that weren't racist before are now. Their teaching that to their children just like BLM are teaching their children to be bitter at white people with white privilege. What was once peaceful and moving in a positive direction isn't now. BLM have caused this. There will be people , I am one of them , that know it's a minority that follow this just as it's a minority that went out yesterday to protect our statues from further attack. But if we let this go on, how long will it be till someone is killed over it? What culture were they attacking?slavery? I'm not condoning the violence but what they have done is stir up a debate which should have happened years ago.Why do we have statues up celebrating slave traders?why do you we ignore the horrendous things we have done in the past?and as for the 'it's in the past it should be forgotten argument,I find that hysterical considering our obsession and glorification with ww2 and Germany. Some people today still remember ww2. Captain Tom Moore . Who fought for our country then. Do you think you will still be here if Hitler won the war? That same Captain Tom Moore that at 100 years old fought to raise money for the NHS to save lives. Can you not see how disrespectful these protests are? Wrong time for this especially if your trying to unite people. It's disgraceful. " I'm sorry.You have completely lost me. What does tom Moore have to do with anti racist protests. The party line is that we fought against racism in 1939.Those bellends yday were doing nazi salutes yet you are more upset about the previous weeks protests. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. BLM, pulled out of yesterday's protest in London. These bellends turned up to 'protect' the cenotaph by sieg heiling, punching the police and urinating on their memorials. Please, just look and wonder how you have found yourself defending people making nazi salutes at the cenotaph...You have a funny look on things? I wasn't defending any one, both sides are rasist but not shown that way? Was everyone at the protests last weekend black? This is what I can't get my head around. White and black marched last weekend. Were the white people there saying 'hey, I think my life should mean less than the black people here'? I'm sure they weren't. I'm sure it was more like 'hey, equality'.....why is this so ridiculously hard for people to comprehend? I'm very curious to find out how a white anti racist is in fact..racist. Why am I racist ? Cause I don't believe this drivel. Because I will not stand up for a black criminal that was killed by the police in America. When white people are killed by the police. There can't be one rule for you and another for me. That does not make me racist. I treat everyone as I find them, if your cunt, I'll treat you like one. No..I didnt say you were racist. You said both protests were racist.I said at the protests last week there were white people there..how exactly are they racist?" There are stupid people in all races. That's why you can't be racist , you need to judge people on their character. Anyone that went to the protests this week or last week are all as bad as each other | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. BLM, pulled out of yesterday's protest in London. These bellends turned up to 'protect' the cenotaph by sieg heiling, punching the police and urinating on their memorials. Please, just look and wonder how you have found yourself defending people making nazi salutes at the cenotaph...You have a funny look on things? I wasn't defending any one, both sides are rasist but not shown that way? Was everyone at the protests last weekend black? This is what I can't get my head around. White and black marched last weekend. Were the white people there saying 'hey, I think my life should mean less than the black people here'? I'm sure they weren't. I'm sure it was more like 'hey, equality'.....why is this so ridiculously hard for people to comprehend? I'm very curious to find out how a white anti racist is in fact..racist. Why am I racist ? Cause I don't believe this drivel. Because I will not stand up for a black criminal that was killed by the police in America. When white people are killed by the police. There can't be one rule for you and another for me. That does not make me racist. I treat everyone as I find them, if your cunt, I'll treat you like one. No..I didnt say you were racist. You said both protests were racist.I said at the protests last week there were white people there..how exactly are they racist? There are stupid people in all races. That's why you can't be racist , you need to judge people on their character. Anyone that went to the protests this week or last week are all as bad as each other" But how can marching for equality between races be wrong? Surely Tom fought against Hitler for such aims?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. BLM, pulled out of yesterday's protest in London. These bellends turned up to 'protect' the cenotaph by sieg heiling, punching the police and urinating on their memorials. Please, just look and wonder how you have found yourself defending people making nazi salutes at the cenotaph...You have a funny look on things? I wasn't defending any one, both sides are rasist but not shown that way? Was everyone at the protests last weekend black? This is what I can't get my head around. White and black marched last weekend. Were the white people there saying 'hey, I think my life should mean less than the black people here'? I'm sure they weren't. I'm sure it was more like 'hey, equality'.....why is this so ridiculously hard for people to comprehend? I'm very curious to find out how a white anti racist is in fact..racist. Why am I racist ? Cause I don't believe this drivel. Because I will not stand up for a black criminal that was killed by the police in America. When white people are killed by the police. There can't be one rule for you and another for me. That does not make me racist. I treat everyone as I find them, if your cunt, I'll treat you like one. No..I didnt say you were racist. You said both protests were racist.I said at the protests last week there were white people there..how exactly are they racist? There are stupid people in all races. That's why you can't be racist , you need to judge people on their character. Anyone that went to the protests this week or last week are all as bad as each other" They really arent. There is a picture on Twitter of this old white fella,must be in his 80s.He was on The anti racism march and is sat with a young punky type looking girl.They are both just talking. They are as bad as the pond life in london yesterday.? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing." Most people are in support of equal rights . We have a law against discrimination. So white or black . Attending that protest way wrong. Simple as that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing." Anarchists. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Most people are in support of equal rights . We have a law against discrimination. So white or black . Attending that protest way wrong. Simple as that. " In regards to the pandemic, yes, I see that. But for the cause, no. The laws clearly are not working | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. BLM, pulled out of yesterday's protest in London. These bellends turned up to 'protect' the cenotaph by sieg heiling, punching the police and urinating on their memorials. Please, just look and wonder how you have found yourself defending people making nazi salutes at the cenotaph...You have a funny look on things? I wasn't defending any one, both sides are rasist but not shown that way? Was everyone at the protests last weekend black? This is what I can't get my head around. White and black marched last weekend. Were the white people there saying 'hey, I think my life should mean less than the black people here'? I'm sure they weren't. I'm sure it was more like 'hey, equality'.....why is this so ridiculously hard for people to comprehend? I'm very curious to find out how a white anti racist is in fact..racist. Why am I racist ? Cause I don't believe this drivel. Because I will not stand up for a black criminal that was killed by the police in America. When white people are killed by the police. There can't be one rule for you and another for me. That does not make me racist. I treat everyone as I find them, if your cunt, I'll treat you like one. No..I didnt say you were racist. You said both protests were racist.I said at the protests last week there were white people there..how exactly are they racist? There are stupid people in all races. That's why you can't be racist , you need to judge people on their character. Anyone that went to the protests this week or last week are all as bad as each other They really arent. There is a picture on Twitter of this old white fella,must be in his 80s.He was on The anti racism march and is sat with a young punky type looking girl.They are both just talking. They are as bad as the pond life in london yesterday.?" Are you calling the veterans of all races in London yesterday, "pondlife"? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists." So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. BLM, pulled out of yesterday's protest in London. These bellends turned up to 'protect' the cenotaph by sieg heiling, punching the police and urinating on their memorials. Please, just look and wonder how you have found yourself defending people making nazi salutes at the cenotaph...You have a funny look on things? I wasn't defending any one, both sides are rasist but not shown that way? Was everyone at the protests last weekend black? This is what I can't get my head around. White and black marched last weekend. Were the white people there saying 'hey, I think my life should mean less than the black people here'? I'm sure they weren't. I'm sure it was more like 'hey, equality'.....why is this so ridiculously hard for people to comprehend? I'm very curious to find out how a white anti racist is in fact..racist. Why am I racist ? Cause I don't believe this drivel. Because I will not stand up for a black criminal that was killed by the police in America. When white people are killed by the police. There can't be one rule for you and another for me. That does not make me racist. I treat everyone as I find them, if your cunt, I'll treat you like one. No..I didnt say you were racist. You said both protests were racist.I said at the protests last week there were white people there..how exactly are they racist? There are stupid people in all races. That's why you can't be racist , you need to judge people on their character. Anyone that went to the protests this week or last week are all as bad as each other They really arent. There is a picture on Twitter of this old white fella,must be in his 80s.He was on The anti racism march and is sat with a young punky type looking girl.They are both just talking. They are as bad as the pond life in london yesterday.? Are you calling the veterans of all races in London yesterday, "pondlife"?" What veterans of all races? I was generally referring to the gobshites seig heilang,chanting ingergund and fronting the plod. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Most people are in support of equal rights . We have a law against discrimination. So white or black . Attending that protest way wrong. Simple as that. " Is it the protest or the lockdown thing? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. BLM, pulled out of yesterday's protest in London. These bellends turned up to 'protect' the cenotaph by sieg heiling, punching the police and urinating on their memorials. Please, just look and wonder how you have found yourself defending people making nazi salutes at the cenotaph...You have a funny look on things? I wasn't defending any one, both sides are rasist but not shown that way? Was everyone at the protests last weekend black? This is what I can't get my head around. White and black marched last weekend. Were the white people there saying 'hey, I think my life should mean less than the black people here'? I'm sure they weren't. I'm sure it was more like 'hey, equality'.....why is this so ridiculously hard for people to comprehend? I'm very curious to find out how a white anti racist is in fact..racist. Why am I racist ? Cause I don't believe this drivel. Because I will not stand up for a black criminal that was killed by the police in America. When white people are killed by the police. There can't be one rule for you and another for me. That does not make me racist. I treat everyone as I find them, if your cunt, I'll treat you like one. No..I didnt say you were racist. You said both protests were racist.I said at the protests last week there were white people there..how exactly are they racist? There are stupid people in all races. That's why you can't be racist , you need to judge people on their character. Anyone that went to the protests this week or last week are all as bad as each other They really arent. There is a picture on Twitter of this old white fella,must be in his 80s.He was on The anti racism march and is sat with a young punky type looking girl.They are both just talking. They are as bad as the pond life in london yesterday.? Are you calling the veterans of all races in London yesterday, "pondlife"? What veterans of all races? I was generally referring to the gobshites seig heilang,chanting ingergund and fronting the plod." It's like you've refused to educate yourself on who actually attended away from the camera phones. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. BLM, pulled out of yesterday's protest in London. These bellends turned up to 'protect' the cenotaph by sieg heiling, punching the police and urinating on their memorials. Please, just look and wonder how you have found yourself defending people making nazi salutes at the cenotaph...You have a funny look on things? I wasn't defending any one, both sides are rasist but not shown that way? Was everyone at the protests last weekend black? This is what I can't get my head around. White and black marched last weekend. Were the white people there saying 'hey, I think my life should mean less than the black people here'? I'm sure they weren't. I'm sure it was more like 'hey, equality'.....why is this so ridiculously hard for people to comprehend? I'm very curious to find out how a white anti racist is in fact..racist. Why am I racist ? Cause I don't believe this drivel. Because I will not stand up for a black criminal that was killed by the police in America. When white people are killed by the police. There can't be one rule for you and another for me. That does not make me racist. I treat everyone as I find them, if your cunt, I'll treat you like one. No..I didnt say you were racist. You said both protests were racist.I said at the protests last week there were white people there..how exactly are they racist? There are stupid people in all races. That's why you can't be racist , you need to judge people on their character. Anyone that went to the protests this week or last week are all as bad as each other They really arent. There is a picture on Twitter of this old white fella,must be in his 80s.He was on The anti racism march and is sat with a young punky type looking girl.They are both just talking. They are as bad as the pond life in london yesterday.? Are you calling the veterans of all races in London yesterday, "pondlife"? What veterans of all races? I was generally referring to the gobshites seig heilang,chanting ingergund and fronting the plod. It's like you've refused to educate yourself on who actually attended away from the camera phones. " Who like? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. BLM, pulled out of yesterday's protest in London. These bellends turned up to 'protect' the cenotaph by sieg heiling, punching the police and urinating on their memorials. Please, just look and wonder how you have found yourself defending people making nazi salutes at the cenotaph...You have a funny look on things? I wasn't defending any one, both sides are rasist but not shown that way? Was everyone at the protests last weekend black? This is what I can't get my head around. White and black marched last weekend. Were the white people there saying 'hey, I think my life should mean less than the black people here'? I'm sure they weren't. I'm sure it was more like 'hey, equality'.....why is this so ridiculously hard for people to comprehend? I'm very curious to find out how a white anti racist is in fact..racist. Why am I racist ? Cause I don't believe this drivel. Because I will not stand up for a black criminal that was killed by the police in America. When white people are killed by the police. There can't be one rule for you and another for me. That does not make me racist. I treat everyone as I find them, if your cunt, I'll treat you like one. No..I didnt say you were racist. You said both protests were racist.I said at the protests last week there were white people there..how exactly are they racist? There are stupid people in all races. That's why you can't be racist , you need to judge people on their character. Anyone that went to the protests this week or last week are all as bad as each other They really arent. There is a picture on Twitter of this old white fella,must be in his 80s.He was on The anti racism march and is sat with a young punky type looking girl.They are both just talking. They are as bad as the pond life in london yesterday.?" Were they social distancing ? The old guy is high risk but as I've said thoughtlessness isn't just one race, gender or age. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"So why did the right wing get a foot hold in all this: Simple really the BLM invited them. When anyone said to the BLM supporter's all lives matter they shot them down saying no only Black Lives Matter, if your going to shout rasist remarks then thats an invite to the other side. But no one pulls BLM up on that I wonder why. BLM, pulled out of yesterday's protest in London. These bellends turned up to 'protect' the cenotaph by sieg heiling, punching the police and urinating on their memorials. Please, just look and wonder how you have found yourself defending people making nazi salutes at the cenotaph...You have a funny look on things? I wasn't defending any one, both sides are rasist but not shown that way? Was everyone at the protests last weekend black? This is what I can't get my head around. White and black marched last weekend. Were the white people there saying 'hey, I think my life should mean less than the black people here'? I'm sure they weren't. I'm sure it was more like 'hey, equality'.....why is this so ridiculously hard for people to comprehend? I'm very curious to find out how a white anti racist is in fact..racist. Why am I racist ? Cause I don't believe this drivel. Because I will not stand up for a black criminal that was killed by the police in America. When white people are killed by the police. There can't be one rule for you and another for me. That does not make me racist. I treat everyone as I find them, if your cunt, I'll treat you like one. No..I didnt say you were racist. You said both protests were racist.I said at the protests last week there were white people there..how exactly are they racist? There are stupid people in all races. That's why you can't be racist , you need to judge people on their character. Anyone that went to the protests this week or last week are all as bad as each other They really arent. There is a picture on Twitter of this old white fella,must be in his 80s.He was on The anti racism march and is sat with a young punky type looking girl.They are both just talking. They are as bad as the pond life in london yesterday.? Were they social distancing ? The old guy is high risk but as I've said thoughtlessness isn't just one race, gender or age. " In the picture they are not right on top of each other. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Most people are in support of equal rights . We have a law against discrimination. So white or black . Attending that protest way wrong. Simple as that. Is it the protest or the lockdown thing?" It's the fact that they are protesting during a pandemic. So that's what's annoyed me the most. I've been sticking to the rules for three months, we are just starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel. If it spikes again we could be in another 3 months. 50,000 people in the UK have already lost their lives. If anyone thinks this is acceptable they are not right in the head as far as I'm concerned. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Most people are in support of equal rights . We have a law against discrimination. So white or black . Attending that protest way wrong. Simple as that. Is it the protest or the lockdown thing? It's the fact that they are protesting during a pandemic. So that's what's annoyed me the most. I've been sticking to the rules for three months, we are just starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel. If it spikes again we could be in another 3 months. 50,000 people in the UK have already lost their lives. If anyone thinks this is acceptable they are not right in the head as far as I'm concerned. " I agree with you there..protesting in large groups isnt the brightest thing in the world to do right now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying " Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. " You are comparing blm to nazism? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism?" It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Most people are in support of equal rights . We have a law against discrimination. So white or black . Attending that protest way wrong. Simple as that. Is it the protest or the lockdown thing? It's the fact that they are protesting during a pandemic. So that's what's annoyed me the most. I've been sticking to the rules for three months, we are just starting to see the light at the end of the tunnel. If it spikes again we could be in another 3 months. 50,000 people in the UK have already lost their lives. If anyone thinks this is acceptable they are not right in the head as far as I'm concerned. I agree with you there..protesting in large groups isnt the brightest thing in the world to do right now." My patience are thin at the moment as I expect alot of people's are. Starting this at this time is sparking anger on both sides, people that wouldn't normally back an eye are taking it as offensive. Never mind the nut jobs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. " On what grounds exactly? Are the blm planning to invade Poland? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. " I have to agree, it is a bit. It's like the Scottish national party in Scotland. Still going on about William Wallace demanding freedom. But they have a good hold over Scotland now, luckily not enough to win the vote and it doesn't matter what they do , they are followed by the people that think their going to get more money in their universal credits. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. I have to agree, it is a bit. It's like the Scottish national party in Scotland. Still going on about William Wallace demanding freedom. But they have a good hold over Scotland now, luckily not enough to win the vote and it doesn't matter what they do , they are followed by the people that think their going to get more money in their universal credits. " Ok let's compare. The nazi party was an aggressive,populist party who had designs on european if not world hegemony.They had full control of the media,and one of the best equipped military and airforce in the world.They believed in the superiority of the aryan race and that all inferior races,Jews,gypsy,,slavic should be eradicated. They provoked a world war which resulted in millions dead and systematicaly murdered over 6 million people. Blm are a pressure group pushing for equal rights.They have a few radical proposals and last week pulled down a statue and graffitied a monument. Like 2 peas in a pod really. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. On what grounds exactly? Are the blm planning to invade Poland?" Doubtful. Why are Jewish people the only minority group that the BLM don't mention? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. On what grounds exactly? Are the blm planning to invade Poland? Doubtful. Why are Jewish people the only minority group that the BLM don't mention?" Did they say hindu?Sikh?catholic? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. I have to agree, it is a bit. It's like the Scottish national party in Scotland. Still going on about William Wallace demanding freedom. But they have a good hold over Scotland now, luckily not enough to win the vote and it doesn't matter what they do , they are followed by the people that think their going to get more money in their universal credits. Ok let's compare. The nazi party was an aggressive,populist party who had designs on european if not world hegemony.They had full control of the media,and one of the best equipped military and airforce in the world.They believed in the superiority of the aryan race and that all inferior races,Jews,gypsy,,slavic should be eradicated. They provoked a world war which resulted in millions dead and systematicaly murdered over 6 million people. Blm are a pressure group pushing for equal rights.They have a few radical proposals and last week pulled down a statue and graffitied a monument. Like 2 peas in a pod really." Don't be so naive. We've only just got to the 1920's. Baby steps.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. I have to agree, it is a bit. It's like the Scottish national party in Scotland. Still going on about William Wallace demanding freedom. But they have a good hold over Scotland now, luckily not enough to win the vote and it doesn't matter what they do , they are followed by the people that think their going to get more money in their universal credits. Ok let's compare. The nazi party was an aggressive,populist party who had designs on european if not world hegemony.They had full control of the media,and one of the best equipped military and airforce in the world.They believed in the superiority of the aryan race and that all inferior races,Jews,gypsy,,slavic should be eradicated. They provoked a world war which resulted in millions dead and systematicaly murdered over 6 million people. Blm are a pressure group pushing for equal rights.They have a few radical proposals and last week pulled down a statue and graffitied a monument. Like 2 peas in a pod really." They never started off that way. Every fanatical group group has to start somewhere | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. I have to agree, it is a bit. It's like the Scottish national party in Scotland. Still going on about William Wallace demanding freedom. But they have a good hold over Scotland now, luckily not enough to win the vote and it doesn't matter what they do , they are followed by the people that think their going to get more money in their universal credits. Ok let's compare. The nazi party was an aggressive,populist party who had designs on european if not world hegemony.They had full control of the media,and one of the best equipped military and airforce in the world.They believed in the superiority of the aryan race and that all inferior races,Jews,gypsy,,slavic should be eradicated. They provoked a world war which resulted in millions dead and systematicaly murdered over 6 million people. Blm are a pressure group pushing for equal rights.They have a few radical proposals and last week pulled down a statue and graffitied a monument. Like 2 peas in a pod really. They never started off that way. Every fanatical group group has to start somewhere" From the beginning the nazis laid out there plans (mein kampf) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. On what grounds exactly? Are the blm planning to invade Poland? Doubtful. Why are Jewish people the only minority group that the BLM don't mention? Did they say hindu?Sikh?catholic?" They did say Muslim. Hardly a minority group, globally at least. It does seem with burgeoning extreme political groups that it's all about what they don't say. Although, it's been fun watching people clamering all over the "Abolish the police" statement saying "it's not really what they want". I guess a community self policing with its own militia could be a great idea. They could every wear nice brown shirts. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. I have to agree, it is a bit. It's like the Scottish national party in Scotland. Still going on about William Wallace demanding freedom. But they have a good hold over Scotland now, luckily not enough to win the vote and it doesn't matter what they do , they are followed by the people that think their going to get more money in their universal credits. Ok let's compare. The nazi party was an aggressive,populist party who had designs on european if not world hegemony.They had full control of the media,and one of the best equipped military and airforce in the world.They believed in the superiority of the aryan race and that all inferior races,Jews,gypsy,,slavic should be eradicated. They provoked a world war which resulted in millions dead and systematicaly murdered over 6 million people. Blm are a pressure group pushing for equal rights.They have a few radical proposals and last week pulled down a statue and graffitied a monument. Like 2 peas in a pod really. They never started off that way. Every fanatical group group has to start somewhere From the beginning the nazis laid out there plans (mein kampf)" Where was Hitler when he wrote, Mein kampf? And why was he there? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. I have to agree, it is a bit. It's like the Scottish national party in Scotland. Still going on about William Wallace demanding freedom. But they have a good hold over Scotland now, luckily not enough to win the vote and it doesn't matter what they do , they are followed by the people that think their going to get more money in their universal credits. Ok let's compare. The nazi party was an aggressive,populist party who had designs on european if not world hegemony.They had full control of the media,and one of the best equipped military and airforce in the world.They believed in the superiority of the aryan race and that all inferior races,Jews,gypsy,,slavic should be eradicated. They provoked a world war which resulted in millions dead and systematicaly murdered over 6 million people. Blm are a pressure group pushing for equal rights.They have a few radical proposals and last week pulled down a statue and graffitied a monument. Like 2 peas in a pod really. They never started off that way. Every fanatical group group has to start somewhere From the beginning the nazis laid out there plans (mein kampf)" Maybe comparing it to Isis would be more fitting | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. On what grounds exactly? Are the blm planning to invade Poland? Doubtful. Why are Jewish people the only minority group that the BLM don't mention? Did they say hindu?Sikh?catholic? They did say Muslim. Hardly a minority group, globally at least. It does seem with burgeoning extreme political groups that it's all about what they don't say. Although, it's been fun watching people clamering all over the "Abolish the police" statement saying "it's not really what they want". I guess a community self policing with its own militia could be a great idea. They could every wear nice brown shirts. " But They didnt say the others? Despite saying 'all other groups'becasuse they didnt say Jewish they want to replicate the holocaust? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. I have to agree, it is a bit. It's like the Scottish national party in Scotland. Still going on about William Wallace demanding freedom. But they have a good hold over Scotland now, luckily not enough to win the vote and it doesn't matter what they do , they are followed by the people that think their going to get more money in their universal credits. Ok let's compare. The nazi party was an aggressive,populist party who had designs on european if not world hegemony.They had full control of the media,and one of the best equipped military and airforce in the world.They believed in the superiority of the aryan race and that all inferior races,Jews,gypsy,,slavic should be eradicated. They provoked a world war which resulted in millions dead and systematicaly murdered over 6 million people. Blm are a pressure group pushing for equal rights.They have a few radical proposals and last week pulled down a statue and graffitied a monument. Like 2 peas in a pod really. They never started off that way. Every fanatical group group has to start somewhere From the beginning the nazis laid out there plans (mein kampf) Maybe comparing it to Isis would be more fitting" ISIS are religious extremists whose origins lay in being funded by the west to fight communism. I dont see it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. On what grounds exactly? Are the blm planning to invade Poland? Doubtful. Why are Jewish people the only minority group that the BLM don't mention? Did they say hindu?Sikh?catholic? They did say Muslim. Hardly a minority group, globally at least. It does seem with burgeoning extreme political groups that it's all about what they don't say. Although, it's been fun watching people clamering all over the "Abolish the police" statement saying "it's not really what they want". I guess a community self policing with its own militia could be a great idea. They could every wear nice brown shirts. But They didnt say the others? Despite saying 'all other groups'becasuse they didnt say Jewish they want to replicate the holocaust?" The anti semitism would certainly fall inline with today's "momentum " style labour party supporter. Also of note, the three other religious groups you mention don't really get on with Islamic ideas do they... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. I have to agree, it is a bit. It's like the Scottish national party in Scotland. Still going on about William Wallace demanding freedom. But they have a good hold over Scotland now, luckily not enough to win the vote and it doesn't matter what they do , they are followed by the people that think their going to get more money in their universal credits. Ok let's compare. The nazi party was an aggressive,populist party who had designs on european if not world hegemony.They had full control of the media,and one of the best equipped military and airforce in the world.They believed in the superiority of the aryan race and that all inferior races,Jews,gypsy,,slavic should be eradicated. They provoked a world war which resulted in millions dead and systematicaly murdered over 6 million people. Blm are a pressure group pushing for equal rights.They have a few radical proposals and last week pulled down a statue and graffitied a monument. Like 2 peas in a pod really. They never started off that way. Every fanatical group group has to start somewhere From the beginning the nazis laid out there plans (mein kampf) " Where was Hitler when he wrote, Mein kampf? And why was he there? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. On what grounds exactly? Are the blm planning to invade Poland? Doubtful. Why are Jewish people the only minority group that the BLM don't mention? Did they say hindu?Sikh?catholic? They did say Muslim. Hardly a minority group, globally at least. It does seem with burgeoning extreme political groups that it's all about what they don't say. Although, it's been fun watching people clamering all over the "Abolish the police" statement saying "it's not really what they want". I guess a community self policing with its own militia could be a great idea. They could every wear nice brown shirts. But They didnt say the others? Despite saying 'all other groups'becasuse they didnt say Jewish they want to replicate the holocaust?" They are racist against the whites. Nobody mentions , the black us cop who shot white Justin Damon. Or the black people that kill each other. It's only if a white man kills a black man it's an issue. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. " What does "including but not limited to" mean? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. What does "including but not limited to" mean?" It's rather a "big hitter" not to mention isn't it. I mean they took time to mention "undocumented", but not anti-semitism...  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. On what grounds exactly? Are the blm planning to invade Poland? Doubtful. Why are Jewish people the only minority group that the BLM don't mention? Did they say hindu?Sikh?catholic? They did say Muslim. Hardly a minority group, globally at least. It does seem with burgeoning extreme political groups that it's all about what they don't say. Although, it's been fun watching people clamering all over the "Abolish the police" statement saying "it's not really what they want". I guess a community self policing with its own militia could be a great idea. They could every wear nice brown shirts. But They didnt say the others? Despite saying 'all other groups'becasuse they didnt say Jewish they want to replicate the holocaust? They are racist against the whites. Nobody mentions , the black us cop who shot white Justin Damon. Or the black people that kill each other. It's only if a white man kills a black man it's an issue. " That's not exactly true, you must have seen the protests in central London against continued "black on black" violence? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. On what grounds exactly? Are the blm planning to invade Poland? Doubtful. Why are Jewish people the only minority group that the BLM don't mention? Did they say hindu?Sikh?catholic? They did say Muslim. Hardly a minority group, globally at least. It does seem with burgeoning extreme political groups that it's all about what they don't say. Although, it's been fun watching people clamering all over the "Abolish the police" statement saying "it's not really what they want". I guess a community self policing with its own militia could be a great idea. They could every wear nice brown shirts. But They didnt say the others? Despite saying 'all other groups'becasuse they didnt say Jewish they want to replicate the holocaust? They are racist against the whites. Nobody mentions , the black us cop who shot white Justin Damon. Or the black people that kill each other. It's only if a white man kills a black man it's an issue. " I'll ask again How can a white Blm member be racist? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. What does "including but not limited to" mean? It's rather a "big hitter" not to mention isn't it. I mean they took time to mention "undocumented", but not anti-semitism... "What does "including but not limited to" mean? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. I have to agree, it is a bit. It's like the Scottish national party in Scotland. Still going on about William Wallace demanding freedom. But they have a good hold over Scotland now, luckily not enough to win the vote and it doesn't matter what they do , they are followed by the people that think their going to get more money in their universal credits. Ok let's compare. The nazi party was an aggressive,populist party who had designs on european if not world hegemony.They had full control of the media,and one of the best equipped military and airforce in the world.They believed in the superiority of the aryan race and that all inferior races,Jews,gypsy,,slavic should be eradicated. They provoked a world war which resulted in millions dead and systematicaly murdered over 6 million people. Blm are a pressure group pushing for equal rights.They have a few radical proposals and last week pulled down a statue and graffitied a monument. Like 2 peas in a pod really. They never started off that way. Every fanatical group group has to start somewhere From the beginning the nazis laid out there plans (mein kampf) " Where was Hitler when he wrote, Mein kampf? And why was he there? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. I have to agree, it is a bit. It's like the Scottish national party in Scotland. Still going on about William Wallace demanding freedom. But they have a good hold over Scotland now, luckily not enough to win the vote and it doesn't matter what they do , they are followed by the people that think their going to get more money in their universal credits. Ok let's compare. The nazi party was an aggressive,populist party who had designs on european if not world hegemony.They had full control of the media,and one of the best equipped military and airforce in the world.They believed in the superiority of the aryan race and that all inferior races,Jews,gypsy,,slavic should be eradicated. They provoked a world war which resulted in millions dead and systematicaly murdered over 6 million people. Blm are a pressure group pushing for equal rights.They have a few radical proposals and last week pulled down a statue and graffitied a monument. Like 2 peas in a pod really. They never started off that way. Every fanatical group group has to start somewhere From the beginning the nazis laid out there plans (mein kampf) Where was Hitler when he wrote, Mein kampf? And why was he there?" He was in nick wasnt he? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. I have to agree, it is a bit. It's like the Scottish national party in Scotland. Still going on about William Wallace demanding freedom. But they have a good hold over Scotland now, luckily not enough to win the vote and it doesn't matter what they do , they are followed by the people that think their going to get more money in their universal credits. Ok let's compare. The nazi party was an aggressive,populist party who had designs on european if not world hegemony.They had full control of the media,and one of the best equipped military and airforce in the world.They believed in the superiority of the aryan race and that all inferior races,Jews,gypsy,,slavic should be eradicated. They provoked a world war which resulted in millions dead and systematicaly murdered over 6 million people. Blm are a pressure group pushing for equal rights.They have a few radical proposals and last week pulled down a statue and graffitied a monument. Like 2 peas in a pod really. They never started off that way. Every fanatical group group has to start somewhere From the beginning the nazis laid out there plans (mein kampf) Where was Hitler when he wrote, Mein kampf? And why was he there? He was in nick wasnt he?" Answer the rest of the question... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I suggest you Google "is blm anti semitic". " Lots of stuff about blm supporting Palestine. Which in today's world means if you dont like israelie soldiers killing innocent kids you are a huge racist | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. I have to agree, it is a bit. It's like the Scottish national party in Scotland. Still going on about William Wallace demanding freedom. But they have a good hold over Scotland now, luckily not enough to win the vote and it doesn't matter what they do , they are followed by the people that think their going to get more money in their universal credits. Ok let's compare. The nazi party was an aggressive,populist party who had designs on european if not world hegemony.They had full control of the media,and one of the best equipped military and airforce in the world.They believed in the superiority of the aryan race and that all inferior races,Jews,gypsy,,slavic should be eradicated. They provoked a world war which resulted in millions dead and systematicaly murdered over 6 million people. Blm are a pressure group pushing for equal rights.They have a few radical proposals and last week pulled down a statue and graffitied a monument. Like 2 peas in a pod really. They never started off that way. Every fanatical group group has to start somewhere From the beginning the nazis laid out there plans (mein kampf) Where was Hitler when he wrote, Mein kampf? And why was he there? He was in nick wasnt he? Answer the rest of the question..." He attempted a pusch | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I suggest you Google "is blm anti semitic". Lots of stuff about blm supporting Palestine. Which in today's world means if you dont like israelie soldiers killing innocent kids you are a huge racist" Also ending "Jewish privilege". Now, why was Hitler in prison Mr "From the beginning the nazis laid out there plans (mein kampf)" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. I have to agree, it is a bit. It's like the Scottish national party in Scotland. Still going on about William Wallace demanding freedom. But they have a good hold over Scotland now, luckily not enough to win the vote and it doesn't matter what they do , they are followed by the people that think their going to get more money in their universal credits. Ok let's compare. The nazi party was an aggressive,populist party who had designs on european if not world hegemony.They had full control of the media,and one of the best equipped military and airforce in the world.They believed in the superiority of the aryan race and that all inferior races,Jews,gypsy,,slavic should be eradicated. They provoked a world war which resulted in millions dead and systematicaly murdered over 6 million people. Blm are a pressure group pushing for equal rights.They have a few radical proposals and last week pulled down a statue and graffitied a monument. Like 2 peas in a pod really. They never started off that way. Every fanatical group group has to start somewhere From the beginning the nazis laid out there plans (mein kampf) Where was Hitler when he wrote, Mein kampf? And why was he there? He was in nick wasnt he? Answer the rest of the question... He attempted a pusch" On his own? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. I have to agree, it is a bit. It's like the Scottish national party in Scotland. Still going on about William Wallace demanding freedom. But they have a good hold over Scotland now, luckily not enough to win the vote and it doesn't matter what they do , they are followed by the people that think their going to get more money in their universal credits. Ok let's compare. The nazi party was an aggressive,populist party who had designs on european if not world hegemony.They had full control of the media,and one of the best equipped military and airforce in the world.They believed in the superiority of the aryan race and that all inferior races,Jews,gypsy,,slavic should be eradicated. They provoked a world war which resulted in millions dead and systematicaly murdered over 6 million people. Blm are a pressure group pushing for equal rights.They have a few radical proposals and last week pulled down a statue and graffitied a monument. Like 2 peas in a pod really. They never started off that way. Every fanatical group group has to start somewhere From the beginning the nazis laid out there plans (mein kampf) Where was Hitler when he wrote, Mein kampf? And why was he there? He was in nick wasnt he? Answer the rest of the question... He attempted a pusch On his own?" With his pals. I'm spectacularly not seeing your point here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. On what grounds exactly? Are the blm planning to invade Poland? Doubtful. Why are Jewish people the only minority group that the BLM don't mention? Did they say hindu?Sikh?catholic? They did say Muslim. Hardly a minority group, globally at least. It does seem with burgeoning extreme political groups that it's all about what they don't say. Although, it's been fun watching people clamering all over the "Abolish the police" statement saying "it's not really what they want". I guess a community self policing with its own militia could be a great idea. They could every wear nice brown shirts. But They didnt say the others? Despite saying 'all other groups'becasuse they didnt say Jewish they want to replicate the holocaust? They are racist against the whites. Nobody mentions , the black us cop who shot white Justin Damon. Or the black people that kill each other. It's only if a white man kills a black man it's an issue. I'll ask again How can a white Blm member be racist?" How can they not? How can I like black people but be racist? I've been told on here I'm racist and don't even know it! Nothing could be further from the truth. It's filling young black people head with an unfair representation of the UK as a whole. Not the odd racist / bully you come across from time to time, that's just life. If you're trying to stop that it will never happen and especially not now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. On what grounds exactly? Are the blm planning to invade Poland? Doubtful. Why are Jewish people the only minority group that the BLM don't mention? Did they say hindu?Sikh?catholic? They did say Muslim. Hardly a minority group, globally at least. It does seem with burgeoning extreme political groups that it's all about what they don't say. Although, it's been fun watching people clamering all over the "Abolish the police" statement saying "it's not really what they want". I guess a community self policing with its own militia could be a great idea. They could every wear nice brown shirts. But They didnt say the others? Despite saying 'all other groups'becasuse they didnt say Jewish they want to replicate the holocaust? They are racist against the whites. Nobody mentions , the black us cop who shot white Justin Damon. Or the black people that kill each other. It's only if a white man kills a black man it's an issue. I'll ask again How can a white Blm member be racist? How can they not? How can I like black people but be racist? I've been told on here I'm racist and don't even know it! Nothing could be further from the truth. It's filling young black people head with an unfair representation of the UK as a whole. Not the odd racist / bully you come across from time to time, that's just life. If you're trying to stop that it will never happen and especially not now. " How can a white anti racist be racist?I don't get it. I think it's the institutional racism they are trying to stem and the celebration of slavery. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. On what grounds exactly? Are the blm planning to invade Poland? Doubtful. Why are Jewish people the only minority group that the BLM don't mention? Did they say hindu?Sikh?catholic? They did say Muslim. Hardly a minority group, globally at least. It does seem with burgeoning extreme political groups that it's all about what they don't say. Although, it's been fun watching people clamering all over the "Abolish the police" statement saying "it's not really what they want". I guess a community self policing with its own militia could be a great idea. They could every wear nice brown shirts. But They didnt say the others? Despite saying 'all other groups'becasuse they didnt say Jewish they want to replicate the holocaust? They are racist against the whites. Nobody mentions , the black us cop who shot white Justin Damon. Or the black people that kill each other. It's only if a white man kills a black man it's an issue. I'll ask again How can a white Blm member be racist? How can they not? How can I like black people but be racist? I've been told on here I'm racist and don't even know it! Nothing could be further from the truth. It's filling young black people head with an unfair representation of the UK as a whole. Not the odd racist / bully you come across from time to time, that's just life. If you're trying to stop that it will never happen and especially not now. " Anyone of any colour/race can be racist. It's not a white only thing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. I have to agree, it is a bit. It's like the Scottish national party in Scotland. Still going on about William Wallace demanding freedom. But they have a good hold over Scotland now, luckily not enough to win the vote and it doesn't matter what they do , they are followed by the people that think their going to get more money in their universal credits. Ok let's compare. The nazi party was an aggressive,populist party who had designs on european if not world hegemony.They had full control of the media,and one of the best equipped military and airforce in the world.They believed in the superiority of the aryan race and that all inferior races,Jews,gypsy,,slavic should be eradicated. They provoked a world war which resulted in millions dead and systematicaly murdered over 6 million people. Blm are a pressure group pushing for equal rights.They have a few radical proposals and last week pulled down a statue and graffitied a monument. Like 2 peas in a pod really. They never started off that way. Every fanatical group group has to start somewhere From the beginning the nazis laid out there plans (mein kampf) Where was Hitler when he wrote, Mein kampf? And why was he there? He was in nick wasnt he? Answer the rest of the question... He attempted a pusch On his own? With his pals. I'm spectacularly not seeing your point here." You're ignoring the fact that you're wrong again. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. On what grounds exactly? Are the blm planning to invade Poland? Doubtful. Why are Jewish people the only minority group that the BLM don't mention? Did they say hindu?Sikh?catholic? They did say Muslim. Hardly a minority group, globally at least. It does seem with burgeoning extreme political groups that it's all about what they don't say. Although, it's been fun watching people clamering all over the "Abolish the police" statement saying "it's not really what they want". I guess a community self policing with its own militia could be a great idea. They could every wear nice brown shirts. But They didnt say the others? Despite saying 'all other groups'becasuse they didnt say Jewish they want to replicate the holocaust? They are racist against the whites. Nobody mentions , the black us cop who shot white Justin Damon. Or the black people that kill each other. It's only if a white man kills a black man it's an issue. I'll ask again How can a white Blm member be racist? How can they not? How can I like black people but be racist? I've been told on here I'm racist and don't even know it! Nothing could be further from the truth. It's filling young black people head with an unfair representation of the UK as a whole. Not the odd racist / bully you come across from time to time, that's just life. If you're trying to stop that it will never happen and especially not now. How can a white anti racist be racist?I don't get it. I think it's the institutional racism they are trying to stem and the celebration of slavery." I expect some are. But the movement is political, it's this which is attracting the white anarchists. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. I have to agree, it is a bit. It's like the Scottish national party in Scotland. Still going on about William Wallace demanding freedom. But they have a good hold over Scotland now, luckily not enough to win the vote and it doesn't matter what they do , they are followed by the people that think their going to get more money in their universal credits. Ok let's compare. The nazi party was an aggressive,populist party who had designs on european if not world hegemony.They had full control of the media,and one of the best equipped military and airforce in the world.They believed in the superiority of the aryan race and that all inferior races,Jews,gypsy,,slavic should be eradicated. They provoked a world war which resulted in millions dead and systematicaly murdered over 6 million people. Blm are a pressure group pushing for equal rights.They have a few radical proposals and last week pulled down a statue and graffitied a monument. Like 2 peas in a pod really. They never started off that way. Every fanatical group group has to start somewhere From the beginning the nazis laid out there plans (mein kampf) Where was Hitler when he wrote, Mein kampf? And why was he there? He was in nick wasnt he? Answer the rest of the question... He attempted a pusch On his own? With his pals. I'm spectacularly not seeing your point here. You're ignoring the fact that you're wrong again. "
Wrong about what?
I'm just completely missing your point | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Bottom line, and you cannot ignore it...white people losing their shit over black people asking for equality. It really is that simple." And deflected from and defended on here and other social medial platforms by people who quite frankly have views that are vile.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. On what grounds exactly? Are the blm planning to invade Poland? Doubtful. Why are Jewish people the only minority group that the BLM don't mention? Did they say hindu?Sikh?catholic? They did say Muslim. Hardly a minority group, globally at least. It does seem with burgeoning extreme political groups that it's all about what they don't say. Although, it's been fun watching people clamering all over the "Abolish the police" statement saying "it's not really what they want". I guess a community self policing with its own militia could be a great idea. They could every wear nice brown shirts. But They didnt say the others? Despite saying 'all other groups'becasuse they didnt say Jewish they want to replicate the holocaust? They are racist against the whites. Nobody mentions , the black us cop who shot white Justin Damon. Or the black people that kill each other. It's only if a white man kills a black man it's an issue. I'll ask again How can a white Blm member be racist? How can they not? How can I like black people but be racist? I've been told on here I'm racist and don't even know it! Nothing could be further from the truth. It's filling young black people head with an unfair representation of the UK as a whole. Not the odd racist / bully you come across from time to time, that's just life. If you're trying to stop that it will never happen and especially not now. How can a white anti racist be racist?I don't get it. I think it's the institutional racism they are trying to stem and the celebration of slavery. I expect some are. But the movement is political, it's this which is attracting the white anarchists." White person who doesnt think we should celebrate slavery=anarchist | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I saw no “good” side yesterday. The so called cause of protecting statues was blown out the window. Monkey gestures Nazi salutes attacking Police. Fuck that. I saw plenty of good last weekend. And this weekend even the DailyMail has mentioned the thousands of peaceful Anti Racist demos passing without incident yesterday. 27 police hurt last week, 6 this week but last week was peaceful? Are you mentally challenged? I no mathematician but I know 27 is more than 6. And of that six were all of the police hurt by the same side? Or were they hurt because both sides came for a fight? Mentally challenged comments aside. Where did I say it was peaceful? Perhaps read my post again 27 Police were hurt last week in shameful scenes. You are correct. But ultimately the BLM is a cause for good and I saw Good in the majority of the protest. I can also condemn the violence that later went on. Can you honestly say yesterday you saw anything positive going on? The world needs as an anti racism message. But it doesn't need the BLM's, which has become an extreme left wing political organisation. A catch all, for every anti-establishment, pro communist, black supremacist, "antifa" nut job in a hoodie. So they are white racist left wing communist radicals? That must be quite confusing. Anarchists. So what were yesterday's mob? Again, another one unconcerned about Nazi salutes. Very worrying Undoubtedly some "neo-nazi" nut jobs out for violence. If you think im not concerned about the salutes you're wrong. I find it abhorrent. I also see the similarities between BLM's aims and that of national socialism. Both groups taking advantage of the down trodden for political gain. It should be no surprise that BLM's message would attract extremists of all races. The UKBLM say this: "Our commitment to all black lives means that we lift up the experiences of the most marginalised in our communities, including but not limited to working class queer, trans, undocumented, disabled, Muslim, sex workers, women/non-binary, HIV+ people." They don't mention anti-semitism. You are comparing blm to nazism? It's not a difficult comparison to be honest. Like comparing oranges with grapefruit. I have to agree, it is a bit. It's like the Scottish national party in Scotland. Still going on about William Wallace demanding freedom. But they have a good hold over Scotland now, luckily not enough to win the vote and it doesn't matter what they do , they are followed by the people that think their going to get more money in their universal credits. Ok let's compare. The nazi party was an aggressive,populist party who had designs on european if not world hegemony.They had full control of the media,and one of the best equipped military and airforce in the world.They believed in the superiority of the aryan race and that all inferior races,Jews,gypsy,,slavic should be eradicated. They provoked a world war which resulted in millions dead and systematicaly murdered over 6 million people. Blm are a pressure group pushing for equal rights.They have a few radical proposals and last week pulled down a statue and graffitied a monument. Like 2 peas in a pod really. They never started off that way. Every fanatical group group has to start somewhere From the beginning the nazis laid out there plans (mein kampf) Where was Hitler when he wrote, Mein kampf? And why was he there? He was in nick wasnt he? Answer the rest of the question... He attempted a pusch On his own? With his pals. I'm spectacularly not seeing your point here." Who were "his pals" which organisation was he a member off? You're saying that mein kampf was the foundation of national socialism. But it existed before that. It's not difficult to see how UKBLM could move to a more extreme path. At the moment no one is reading the small print, and they should. A lot of people think that the British should "give back" northern Ireland, that doesn't mean they support the IRA. But if they gave monetary support to sinn fein, that's exactly what they were doing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
