FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Labour

Labour

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Get in!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Get in!! "

In Newcastle? A ferret could wear a red rosette and get elected in Newcastle.

Don't know why I bother voting in Gateshead as it's been red since the 70s.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Get in!!

In Newcastle? A ferret could wear a red rosette and get elected in Newcastle.

Don't know why I bother voting in Gateshead as it's been red since the 70s."

I mean country wide!

All the other non elected government have changed is their mind/promises. Scum both of them.

Well done today Labour

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Get in!!

In Newcastle? A ferret could wear a red rosette and get elected in Newcastle.

Don't know why I bother voting in Gateshead as it's been red since the 70s.

I mean country wide!

All the other non elected government have changed is their mind/promises. Scum both of them.

Well done today Labour "

They've only won back seats they lost four years ago. The Tories held onto to traditional Tory seats and most of Labour's gains have been from NOC constituencies. The Libs are the ones who should start wearing Pampers and they're going to get wiped out at the next Gen election.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *emima_puddlefuckCouple  over a year ago

hexham


"Get in!!

In Newcastle? A ferret could wear a red rosette and get elected in Newcastle.

Don't know why I bother voting in Gateshead as it's been red since the 70s.

I mean country wide!

All the other non elected government have changed is their mind/promises. Scum both of them.

Well done today Labour "

trying to find ut the Carlisle result, you dont know it do you?

(Carlisle is quite a good bell weather consituence for the swing vote...yes im married to a psephologist )

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

At least they have won them back, yea Lib dems are ruined and quite rightly so.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 04/05/12 11:08:23]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

trying to find ut the Carlisle result, you dont know it do you?

(Carlisle is quite a good bell weather consituence for the swing vote...yes im married to a psephologist )"

Labour gain from No Overall Control.

Labour: 27 (+4)

Con: 20 (-2)

LD: 2 (-2)

Oth: 2

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ovedupstillCouple  over a year ago

mullinwire

tbh i would have been more worried for labour if they HADNT gained seats, as you could put up a sunburnt ginger for election in the current climate, and they would have gotten voted in.

mid term blues.

a protest vote.

doesnt mean labour are winning hearts, just means people are sick of the cuts, so are showing their distain.

wont be the same come teh general election.

people dont trust red Ed.

anyone that stabs their brother in the back isnt trustworthy.

he should of allowed David to stand forward, being the senior politician, and been there to jump in when/if he failed.

just like the last election when the tories couldnt lose, this wasnt for labour to win, it was theirs to lose

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"people dont trust red Ed.

anyone that stabs their brother in the back isnt trustworthy.

he should of allowed David to stand forward, being the senior politician, and been there to jump in when/if he failed."

and people don't trust him for how he did it - by getting so in hock to the Unions that I really do despair if Labour ever get back into power with Ed the Red in bed at No.10.

That's the day I'll start looking at Australia a bit more closely I think.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *emima_puddlefuckCouple  over a year ago

hexham


"

trying to find ut the Carlisle result, you dont know it do you?

(Carlisle is quite a good bell weather consituence for the swing vote...yes im married to a psephologist )

Labour gain from No Overall Control.

Labour: 27 (+4)

Con: 20 (-2)

LD: 2 (-2)

Oth: 2"

ty

will text kev...romantic eh, got a text not to say i love u but whats the Carlisle result

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *am sampsonMan  over a year ago

cwmbran


"tbh i would have been more worried for labour if they HADNT gained seats, as you could put up a sunburnt ginger for election in the current climate, and they would have gotten voted in.

mid term blues.

a protest vote.

doesnt mean labour are winning hearts, just means people are sick of the cuts, so are showing their distain.

wont be the same come teh general election.

people dont trust red Ed.

anyone that stabs their brother in the back isnt trustworthy.

he should of allowed David to stand forward, being the senior politician, and been there to jump in when/if he failed.

just like the last election when the tories couldnt lose, this wasnt for labour to win, it was theirs to lose"

What are people protesting against though according to Dave we are all in it together and the public at large support them - or are they protesting againt Roy hodgeson becoming england Manager

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Personally I don't think the right leader is Ed, it should have been David.

I'm sure the anger in the people will last the next 3yrs as the government only seem interested in their own type of people once elected.

Being Scottish and having been shit upon by Tories for (ever) years i'll be labour til I die. That's unless anyone better comes along but doubt that very much.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Labour, Conservative, Lib Dem, whats the difference. There agendas are the same.

On important things like Afghanistan, immigration, the EU, taxes etc there policies are almost identical. Plus with the EU there are things that we can no longer control.

It's a further insult when those middle to upper class politicians try and relate to the working class and tell us they understand how we feel.

I look at the place i live (Bradford) and it's a prime example of the failures of the previous governments.

I shall never vote for Lab, Con or Lib Dem for as long as i live.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Personally I don't think the right leader is Ed, it should have been David.

I'm sure the anger in the people will last the next 3yrs as the government only seem interested in their own type of people once elected.

Being Scottish and having been shit upon by Tories for (ever) years i'll be labour til I die. That's unless anyone better comes along but doubt that very much. "

With a bit of luck Scotland will vote for independence and Labour's safe seats north of the border will be gone.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Personally I don't think the right leader is Ed, it should have been David.

I'm sure the anger in the people will last the next 3yrs as the government only seem interested in their own type of people once elected.

Being Scottish and having been shit upon by Tories for (ever) years i'll be labour til I die. That's unless anyone better comes along but doubt that very much.

With a bit of luck Scotland will vote for independence and Labour's safe seats north of the border will be gone."

well I would love them to get it. And good on the SNP for trying.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

MY island results are rolling in....no major suprises as very few candidates nail their colours to the mast....mainly all parading as independent candidates...on a positive note though, that does mean no labour council here, so our cash reserve should remain fairly intact.. a very high turnout though which is always encouraging

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I look at the place i live (Bradford) and it's a prime example of the failures of the previous governments.

"

Labour couldn't even win in Bradford where Galloway's Respect party unseated the Labour council leader. I think that speaks volumes about how the electorate feel about Milliband & Labour.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

My opnion is goverment are corrupt end of

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Get in!!

In Newcastle? A ferret could wear a red rosette and get elected in Newcastle.

Don't know why I bother voting in Gateshead as it's been red since the 70s.

I mean country wide!

All the other non elected government have changed is their mind/promises. Scum both of them.

Well done today Labour

trying to find ut the Carlisle result, you dont know it do you?

(Carlisle is quite a good bell weather consituence for the swing vote...yes im married to a psephologist )"

LABOUR WON IN CARLISLE

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Wow labour took the west mids by storm

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Wow labour took the west mids by storm"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The funny thing about elections is that in no other sphere of working life does one person actively seek to dump another person out of a job and take his place. It's almost like job theft.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Wow labour took the west mids by storm"

joy

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Get in!! "

Why.. why actually would we want them back in... I think they got back in here.. which is a disaster as far as I am concerned.

I certainly did not vote them in.

Cali

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"The funny thing about elections is that in no other sphere of working life does one person actively seek to dump another person out of a job and take his place. It's almost like job theft."

It's really more like a spring clean, things you purchased last year that you thought would he handy, then to find out they're really quite useless. Throw them out and make space for more useful objects.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The funny thing about elections is that in no other sphere of working life does one person actively seek to dump another person out of a job and take his place. It's almost like job theft.

It's really more like a spring clean, things you purchased last year that you thought would he handy, then to find out they're really quite useless. Throw them out and make space for more useful objects. "

But someone loses their livelihood at the expense of another. Surely there should be an employment law that prevents that?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *am sampsonMan  over a year ago

cwmbran


"The funny thing about elections is that in no other sphere of working life does one person actively seek to dump another person out of a job and take his place. It's almost like job theft.

It's really more like a spring clean, things you purchased last year that you thought would he handy, then to find out they're really quite useless. Throw them out and make space for more useful objects.

But someone loses their livelihood at the expense of another. Surely there should be an employment law that prevents that?"

Councillors in the main don't get paid a salery - they get an allowance and expenses

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Labour....No ime not gonna bite ... lying fiddling cheating smarmy slimy pension robbing incompetent media arse licking murdering ....(if theres owt ime missing here please feel free to continue) bunch of foooking arse klunt wankers .....wankers wankers .....time for my tourettes medication ...arses bastard knobs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Get in!!

Why.. why actually would we want them back in... I think they got back in here.. which is a disaster as far as I am concerned.

I certainly did not vote them in.

Cali "

True. Personally I don't want to live under the leftist PC flag again.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *emmefataleWoman  over a year ago

dirtybigbadsgirlville

Great!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The funny thing about elections is that in no other sphere of working life does one person actively seek to dump another person out of a job and take his place. It's almost like job theft.

It's really more like a spring clean, things you purchased last year that you thought would he handy, then to find out they're really quite useless. Throw them out and make space for more useful objects.

But someone loses their livelihood at the expense of another. Surely there should be an employment law that prevents that?

Councillors in the main don't get paid a salery - they get an allowance and expenses"

if they dont get paid ....whats an allowance then ? regarding exspenses the amounts they fiddled well they dont need a salary /allowance ide pay em same as people on benefits then again there not even worth that.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Councillors in the main don't get paid a salery - they get an allowance and expenses"

Not when they're dumped out of office they don't, and I think everyone is well aware that Allowances & Expenses are wages & salaries by another name.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The funny thing about elections is that in no other sphere of working life does one person actively seek to dump another person out of a job and take his place. It's almost like job theft.

It's really more like a spring clean, things you purchased last year that you thought would he handy, then to find out they're really quite useless. Throw them out and make space for more useful objects.

But someone loses their livelihood at the expense of another. Surely there should be an employment law that prevents that?

Councillors in the main don't get paid a salery - they get an allowance and expenses"

can you justify why some heads of councils are on 100 to 200k salaries er sorry allowances please cos ile be buggered if i can find any justification for that

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Labour, Conservative, Lib Dem, whats the difference. There agendas are the same.

On important things like Afghanistan, immigration, the EU, taxes etc there policies are almost identical. Plus with the EU there are things that we can no longer control.

It's a further insult when those middle to upper class politicians try and relate to the working class and tell us they understand how we feel.

I look at the place i live (Bradford) and it's a prime example of the failures of the previous governments.

I shall never vote for Lab, Con or Lib Dem for as long as i live.

"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *am sampsonMan  over a year ago

cwmbran


"The funny thing about elections is that in no other sphere of working life does one person actively seek to dump another person out of a job and take his place. It's almost like job theft.

It's really more like a spring clean, things you purchased last year that you thought would he handy, then to find out they're really quite useless. Throw them out and make space for more useful objects.

But someone loses their livelihood at the expense of another. Surely there should be an employment law that prevents that?

Councillors in the main don't get paid a salery - they get an allowance and expenses if they dont get paid ....whats an allowance then ? regarding exspenses the amounts they fiddled well they dont need a salary /allowance ide pay em same as people on benefits then again there not even worth that. "

Think you are getting councillors mixed up with MPs regarding expenses - Councillors get paid for attending meetings - but much of the work they do like visiting constituents they won't get anything for

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The funny thing about elections is that in no other sphere of working life does one person actively seek to dump another person out of a job and take his place. It's almost like job theft.

It's really more like a spring clean, things you purchased last year that you thought would he handy, then to find out they're really quite useless. Throw them out and make space for more useful objects.

But someone loses their livelihood at the expense of another. Surely there should be an employment law that prevents that?"

In tonys blairs case wouldnt that be the hauge where he would get offered rent free accomodation along with that x serbian leader

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *am sampsonMan  over a year ago

cwmbran


"The funny thing about elections is that in no other sphere of working life does one person actively seek to dump another person out of a job and take his place. It's almost like job theft.

It's really more like a spring clean, things you purchased last year that you thought would he handy, then to find out they're really quite useless. Throw them out and make space for more useful objects.

But someone loses their livelihood at the expense of another. Surely there should be an employment law that prevents that?

Councillors in the main don't get paid a salery - they get an allowance and expenses

can you justify why some heads of councils are on 100 to 200k salaries er sorry allowances please cos ile be buggered if i can find any justification for that "

Really can you quote any that are "paid" that much- the leader of a council usually gets paid I believe

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The funny thing about elections is that in no other sphere of working life does one person actively seek to dump another person out of a job and take his place. It's almost like job theft.

It's really more like a spring clean, things you purchased last year that you thought would he handy, then to find out they're really quite useless. Throw them out and make space for more useful objects.

But someone loses their livelihood at the expense of another. Surely there should be an employment law that prevents that?

Councillors in the main don't get paid a salery - they get an allowance and expenses if they dont get paid ....whats an allowance then ? regarding exspenses the amounts they fiddled well they dont need a salary /allowance ide pay em same as people on benefits then again there not even worth that.

Think you are getting councillors mixed up with MPs regarding expenses - Councillors get paid for attending meetings - but much of the work they do like visiting constituents they won't get anything for"

hazel blears she was a councillor then an mp now she been booted out along with labour...mps councillors call them what you want but to the people on the street ..there all simply one and the same.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *am sampsonMan  over a year ago

cwmbran


"The funny thing about elections is that in no other sphere of working life does one person actively seek to dump another person out of a job and take his place. It's almost like job theft.

It's really more like a spring clean, things you purchased last year that you thought would he handy, then to find out they're really quite useless. Throw them out and make space for more useful objects.

But someone loses their livelihood at the expense of another. Surely there should be an employment law that prevents that?

Councillors in the main don't get paid a salery - they get an allowance and expenses if they dont get paid ....whats an allowance then ? regarding exspenses the amounts they fiddled well they dont need a salary /allowance ide pay em same as people on benefits then again there not even worth that.

Think you are getting councillors mixed up with MPs regarding expenses - Councillors get paid for attending meetings - but much of the work they do like visiting constituents they won't get anything for

hazel blears she was a councillor then an mp now she been booted out along with labour...mps councillors call them what you want but to the people on the street ..there all simply one and the same. "

Maybe to you but I think most people realise they are different - they may think the same about all politicians granted

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The funny thing about elections is that in no other sphere of working life does one person actively seek to dump another person out of a job and take his place. It's almost like job theft.

It's really more like a spring clean, things you purchased last year that you thought would he handy, then to find out they're really quite useless. Throw them out and make space for more useful objects.

But someone loses their livelihood at the expense of another. Surely there should be an employment law that prevents that?

Councillors in the main don't get paid a salery - they get an allowance and expenses

can you justify why some heads of councils are on 100 to 200k salaries er sorry allowances please cos ile be buggered if i can find any justification for that

Really can you quote any that are "paid" that much- the leader of a council usually gets paid I believe "

soz to have hit a nerve there ..in terms of googling it for you i cant be bothered m8 but i thought a man of yr staure would on occassion read the odd newspapers or watch the odd bit of news.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The funny thing about elections is that in no other sphere of working life does one person actively seek to dump another person out of a job and take his place. It's almost like job theft.

It's really more like a spring clean, things you purchased last year that you thought would he handy, then to find out they're really quite useless. Throw them out and make space for more useful objects.

But someone loses their livelihood at the expense of another. Surely there should be an employment law that prevents that?

Councillors in the main don't get paid a salery - they get an allowance and expenses if they dont get paid ....whats an allowance then ? regarding exspenses the amounts they fiddled well they dont need a salary /allowance ide pay em same as people on benefits then again there not even worth that.

Think you are getting councillors mixed up with MPs regarding expenses - Councillors get paid for attending meetings - but much of the work they do like visiting constituents they won't get anything for

hazel blears she was a councillor then an mp now she been booted out along with labour...mps councillors call them what you want but to the people on the street ..there all simply one and the same.

Maybe to you but I think most people realise they are different - they may think the same about all politicians granted"

and i thought i could ramble

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Never knew you were a rambler

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *am sampsonMan  over a year ago

cwmbran

Issac you do seem to be showing you have very little knowledge of politics - you don't know the difference between a councillor and an MP and all you can do is quote meaningless facts that you read in newspaper

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Issac you do seem to be showing you have very little knowledge of politics - you don't know the difference between a councillor and an MP and all you can do is quote meaningless facts that you read in newspaper"

In a rambling fashion

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ixson-BallsMan  over a year ago

Blackpool

does Labour gaining more councils mean that your bins will be emptied every week instead of a fortnight now??...

will the people really notice a difference in their overall living standards now that labours won so many??....

won't thinks plod on as normal really not

affecting the majority of the populace??

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Get in!!

In Newcastle? A ferret could wear a red rosette and get elected in Newcastle.

Don't know why I bother voting in Gateshead as it's been red since the 70s.

I mean country wide!

All the other non elected government have changed is their mind/promises. Scum both of them.

Well done today Labour

trying to find ut the Carlisle result, you dont know it do you?

(Carlisle is quite a good bell weather consituence for the swing vote...yes im married to a psephologist )"

Libs are out and labour now control Carlisle first time since 1999

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"does Labour gaining more councils mean that your bins will be emptied every week instead of a fortnight now??...

will the people really notice a difference in their overall living standards now that labours won so many??....

won't thinks plod on as normal really not

affecting the majority of the populace??"

I disagree. Personally I think they do more at local level when elected than country wide

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *acreadCouple  over a year ago

central scotland

[Removed by poster at 04/05/12 13:18:26]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *acreadCouple  over a year ago

central scotland


"Personally I don't think the right leader is Ed, it should have been David.

I'm sure the anger in the people will last the next 3yrs as the government only seem interested in their own type of people once elected.

Being Scottish and having been shit upon by Tories for (ever) years i'll be labour til I die. That's unless anyone better comes along but doubt that very much.

With a bit of luck Scotland will vote for independence and Labour's safe seats north of the border will be gone."

And with a lot of luck you will stick by your promise to go to Australia or is it just a politicians promise.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"[Removed by poster at 04/05/12 13:18:26]"

What did you remove exactly? That lil red number?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ixson-BallsMan  over a year ago

Blackpool


"does Labour gaining more councils mean that your bins will be emptied every week instead of a fortnight now??...

will the people really notice a difference in their overall living standards now that labours won so many??....

won't thinks plod on as normal really not

affecting the majority of the populace??

I disagree. Personally I think they do more at local level when elected than country wide"

disagree by all means,....but correct me if i'm wrong, but you've never lived someplace where there is a tory run council...so who knows if it'd be run/or affected you differently?....

we've had labour and lib dems and both bollox things up from time to time...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

tory run council?

My deepest sympathies.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *acreadCouple  over a year ago

central scotland

The problem with New Labour is they lost sight of their roots and the fact that they were a party born to fight for the working man we now have a Tory party and a wee lapdog Tory party = (lib/dems) and a slightly left wing Tory party = Labour.

We realy do need another workers party and not one that only seems to pander to the well off.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *acreadCouple  over a year ago

central scotland


"[Removed by poster at 04/05/12 13:18:26]

What did you remove exactly? That lil red number? "

Yes on Tuesday night

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ucky_LadsCouple (MM)  over a year ago

Kidderminster+ surrounding areas.

will tory & lib dems now change strategy?,and more importantly will labour keep to the promises they msade to get elected?.NAH!.

SNAFU

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

tbh i hate the lot of them they are just liars and cheats and government policies are not worth the paper they are written on .the lib dems are being slaughtered and rightly so .clegg will only be remembered for being the worst leader of a party in living memory.labour would probably do a lot better with a strong leader red ed is boring ,dull and completely the wrong man for the job

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Issac you do seem to be showing you have very little knowledge of politics - you don't know the difference between a councillor and an MP and all you can do is quote meaningless facts that you read in newspaper"

I know enough to know i dont want to know much about politics i know enough to know there all self serving gansters in suits with there own agendas rather than one that is to serve the people.

I also know that councillors are wanna be mps as i said earlier hazel blears was a labour councillor for my constituency and then labour were in power and she got to be elected a labour mp. labour got booted out so now shes back to being a labour councillor.

So call me stoopid if you want but in the majority of the peoples eyes councillors and mps are one of the same thing and cut from the same cloth.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Personally I don't think the right leader is Ed, it should have been David.

I'm sure the anger in the people will last the next 3yrs as the government only seem interested in their own type of people once elected.

Being Scottish and having been shit upon by Tories for (ever) years i'll be labour til I die. That's unless anyone better comes along but doubt that very much.

With a bit of luck Scotland will vote for independence and Labour's safe seats north of the border will be gone.

And with a lot of luck you will stick by your promise to go to Australia or is it just a politicians promise."

Thinking about it, if I go to Australia I'll probably bump into more Jocks then if I stayed here.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"tory run council?

My deepest sympathies. "

they have ran trafford for years m8 lower council tax better housing bins emptied etc etc pity the same could never have been said for all the other manchester boroughs ran by labour.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"does Labour gaining more councils mean that your bins will be emptied every week instead of a fortnight now??..."

Gateshead is a Red till Dead constituency and our bins are now fortnightly. Labour councils don't do much more than Tory councils anyway and it's all about upstaging the national party in power with Labour councils across the country making the cuts they are told to make but they make them on front line services where it has more impact.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"does Labour gaining more councils mean that your bins will be emptied every week instead of a fortnight now??...

Gateshead is a Red till Dead constituency and our bins are now fortnightly. Labour councils don't do much more than Tory councils anyway and it's all about upstaging the national party in power with Labour councils across the country making the cuts they are told to make but they make them on front line services where it has more impact."

come across the water. Once a week here

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

reasons to never vote for labour.

they break most of there manifesto promises.

multiculturism minus any border control whatsover think the word was social enginnering one of tonies pet projects

lied to us on wmds leading to war and the ensuing death and destruction of both troops and civillians.

getting us into europe and paying the lions share with fuck all in return.

incompetent economic mismanagement eg selling of our gold reserves at a ridicoulously low price.

Giving peerages for favours.

allowing the banks to do what the fook they want by tranferring such power to the bank of england ...leading us to the mess were in at the moment

tessa jowel paying for porn with tax payers money .bloody outrageous...tories aint perfect by a long chalk but least there the lesser of two tossers ...if i ever did vote only ones ide prob consider would be ukip along the lines of charity begins at home ..but well there politicians to so pretty obvious they would break manifesto promises to once they gained power.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"reasons to never vote for labour.

1)they break most of there manifesto promises.

2)multiculturism minus any border control whatsover think the word was social enginnering one of tonies pet projects

3)lied to us on wmds leading to war and the ensuing death and destruction of both troops and civillians.

4)getting us into europe and paying the lions share with fuck all in return.

5)incompetent economic mismanagement eg selling of our gold reserves at a ridicoulously low price.

6)Giving peerages for favours.

7)allowing the banks to do what the fook they want by tranferring such power to the bank of england ...leading us to the mess were in at the moment

8)tessa jowel paying for porn with tax payers money .bloody outrageous...tories aint perfect by a long chalk but least there the lesser of two tossers

...if i ever did vote only ones ide prob consider would be ukip along the lines of charity begins at home ..but well there politicians to so pretty obvious they would break manifesto promises to once they gained power.

"

1) which party doesnt? The lib dems and tories are both doing a pretty good job of breaking almost all of theres.

2) Again its not got any better has it?

3) supported by most political parties, except the lib dems

4) Thats rubbish, we dont pay the largest amount and we get a lot out of it, we get agricultural subsidies, Cornwall gets funding as one of the poorest areas of the EU, we benefit from the trade tariffs.

5) Lots of countries sold gold at that time, the trend in macroeconomics was to move from basing currencies on gold to basing them on foreign currency holdings.

6) Has been done for centuries, not saying it is right but they weren't the only party. Most peers are still created for "services to the government" ie favours.

7) see point 5, they actually but more stops and checks in place than the tories wanted, we would have been in a bigger mess then.

8) Her husband put them on a bill for a hotel room which she was staying at on government business, she didnt check the receipt. Unlike a lot of the tory MPs who claimed for moat cleaning, floating duck islands and many many other things.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Kinda forgetting that we all are responsible for having ourselves a half assed undecided Conservative/Lib Dem government, and thats us, the population voting that created that.

One party would be progress.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"people dont trust red Ed.

anyone that stabs their brother in the back isnt trustworthy.

he should of allowed David to stand forward, being the senior politician, and been there to jump in when/if he failed.

and people don't trust him for how he did it - by getting so in hock to the Unions that I really do despair if Labour ever get back into power with Ed the Red in bed at No.10.

That's the day I'll start looking at Australia a bit more closely I think."

Ed the Red? If you think any leader of the Labour Party is a 'red' then you really are in need of some lessons in basic political philosophy. The Labour Party were never more than dark pink!

By all means call someone who is anti-capitalist 'red' but not someone who just grovels to the capitalists ever so slightly less than David Cameron does.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Kinda forgetting that we all are responsible for having ourselves a half assed undecided Conservative/Lib Dem government, and thats us, the population voting that created that.

One party would be progress."

ime not i didnt vote so didnt the majority thats why we got a hung parliment and a coalition ie ..an unelected government.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"reasons to never vote for labour.

they break most of there manifesto promises.

multiculturism minus any border control whatsover think the word was social enginnering one of tonies pet projects

lied to us on wmds leading to war and the ensuing death and destruction of both troops and civillians.

getting us into europe and paying the lions share with fuck all in return.

incompetent economic mismanagement eg selling of our gold reserves at a ridicoulously low price.

Giving peerages for favours.

allowing the banks to do what the fook they want by tranferring such power to the bank of england ...leading us to the mess were in at the moment

tessa jowel paying for porn with tax payers money .bloody outrageous...tories aint perfect by a long chalk but least there the lesser of two tossers ...if i ever did vote only ones ide prob consider would be ukip along the lines of charity begins at home ..but well there politicians to so pretty obvious they would break manifesto promises to once they gained power.

"

Well you need some basic lessons in recent History. It wasn't Labour who took us into 'Europe' as you put it, it was the Conservative Party under Edward Heath, and quite rightly so.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The problem with New Labour is they lost sight of their roots and the fact that they were a party born to fight for the working man we now have a Tory party and a wee lapdog Tory party = (lib/dems) and a slightly left wing Tory party = Labour.

We realy do need another workers party and not one that only seems to pander to the well off."

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"reasons to never vote for labour.

1)they break most of there manifesto promises.

2)multiculturism minus any border control whatsover think the word was social enginnering one of tonies pet projects

3)lied to us on wmds leading to war and the ensuing death and destruction of both troops and civillians.

4)getting us into europe and paying the lions share with fuck all in return.

5)incompetent economic mismanagement eg selling of our gold reserves at a ridicoulously low price.

6)Giving peerages for favours.

7)allowing the banks to do what the fook they want by tranferring such power to the bank of england ...leading us to the mess were in at the moment

8)tessa jowel paying for porn with tax payers money .bloody outrageous...tories aint perfect by a long chalk but least there the lesser of two tossers

...if i ever did vote only ones ide prob consider would be ukip along the lines of charity begins at home ..but well there politicians to so pretty obvious they would break manifesto promises to once they gained power.

1) which party doesnt? The lib dems and tories are both doing a pretty good job of breaking almost all of theres.

2) Again its not got any better has it?

3) supported by most political parties, except the lib dems

4) Thats rubbish, we dont pay the largest amount and we get a lot out of it, we get agricultural subsidies, Cornwall gets funding as one of the poorest areas of the EU, we benefit from the trade tariffs.

5) Lots of countries sold gold at that time, the trend in macroeconomics was to move from basing currencies on gold to basing them on foreign currency holdings.

6) Has been done for centuries, not saying it is right but they weren't the only party. Most peers are still created for "services to the government" ie favours.

7) see point 5, they actually but more stops and checks in place than the tories wanted, we would have been in a bigger mess then.

8) Her husband put them on a bill for a hotel room which she was staying at on government business, she didnt check the receipt. Unlike a lot of the tory MPs who claimed for moat cleaning, floating duck islands and many many other things."

in reply to number 3 yes supported by other parties who believed tony blair and his fellow labourites spoon fed blatant lies because thay didnt know any better. .wmds and the invasion wasnt supported by the united nations or the arms inspectors. it wasnt even supported by members of your own party such as robin cook and claire short.

In reply to the rest i could reply i just cant be bothered. no offence intended ..what next labour are not responsible for the economic mess were in now? even at the time time of the hand over of power the labour treasurer left a note for the incoming tory treasure making a joke of how they had bankrupt the country ???? Nice to see labours true colours such as there only concern being to regain back power rather than any guilt or apology whatsover for turning the country into a virtual bankrupt one.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"reasons to never vote for labour.

1)they break most of there manifesto promises.

2)multiculturism minus any border control whatsover think the word was social enginnering one of tonies pet projects

3)lied to us on wmds leading to war and the ensuing death and destruction of both troops and civillians.

4)getting us into europe and paying the lions share with fuck all in return.

5)incompetent economic mismanagement eg selling of our gold reserves at a ridicoulously low price.

6)Giving peerages for favours.

7)allowing the banks to do what the fook they want by tranferring such power to the bank of england ...leading us to the mess were in at the moment

8)tessa jowel paying for porn with tax payers money .bloody outrageous...tories aint perfect by a long chalk but least there the lesser of two tossers

...if i ever did vote only ones ide prob consider would be ukip along the lines of charity begins at home ..but well there politicians to so pretty obvious they would break manifesto promises to once they gained power.

1) which party doesnt? The lib dems and tories are both doing a pretty good job of breaking almost all of theres.

2) Again its not got any better has it?

3) supported by most political parties, except the lib dems

4) Thats rubbish, we dont pay the largest amount and we get a lot out of it, we get agricultural subsidies, Cornwall gets funding as one of the poorest areas of the EU, we benefit from the trade tariffs.

5) Lots of countries sold gold at that time, the trend in macroeconomics was to move from basing currencies on gold to basing them on foreign currency holdings.

6) Has been done for centuries, not saying it is right but they weren't the only party. Most peers are still created for "services to the government" ie favours.

7) see point 5, they actually but more stops and checks in place than the tories wanted, we would have been in a bigger mess then.

8) Her husband put them on a bill for a hotel room which she was staying at on government business, she didnt check the receipt. Unlike a lot of the tory MPs who claimed for moat cleaning, floating duck islands and many many other things.

in reply to number 3 yes supported by other parties who believed tony blair and his fellow labourites spoon fed blatant lies because thay didnt know any better. .wmds and the invasion wasnt supported by the united nations or the arms inspectors. it wasnt even supported by members of your own party such as robin cook and claire short.

In reply to the rest i could reply i just cant be bothered. no offence intended ..what next labour are not responsible for the economic mess were in now? even at the time time of the hand over of power the labour treasurer left a note for the incoming tory treasure making a joke of how they had bankrupt the country ???? Nice to see labours true colours such as there only concern being to regain back power rather than any guilt or apology whatsover for turning the country into a virtual bankrupt one. "

True, blair lied through his teeth to get his war, and a lot of those who backed him are on the backbenches now.

No they arent, reckless lending by american mortgage firms to poor americans and the repackaging of those loans into AAA rated securities by the same firms now downgrading banks and governments. The country is not bankrupt we'd need debts a lot higher and a far weaker economy before that was even a brief worry.

Ministers do that all the time, they always leave jokey letters to there successors.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"reasons to never vote for labour.

they break most of there manifesto promises.

multiculturism minus any border control whatsover think the word was social enginnering one of tonies pet projects

lied to us on wmds leading to war and the ensuing death and destruction of both troops and civillians.

getting us into europe and paying the lions share with fuck all in return.

incompetent economic mismanagement eg selling of our gold reserves at a ridicoulously low price.

Giving peerages for favours.

allowing the banks to do what the fook they want by tranferring such power to the bank of england ...leading us to the mess were in at the moment

tessa jowel paying for porn with tax payers money .bloody outrageous...tories aint perfect by a long chalk but least there the lesser of two tossers ...if i ever did vote only ones ide prob consider would be ukip along the lines of charity begins at home ..but well there politicians to so pretty obvious they would break manifesto promises to once they gained power.

Well you need some basic lessons in recent History. It wasn't Labour who took us into 'Europe' as you put it, it was the Conservative Party under Edward Heath, and quite rightly so. "

Nope think your mistaking the eec which the tories took us into with the european union.

the first one ie the eec which the tories took into was simply an international treaty based on trading manufacturing and goods.

The second one ie the european union which tony blair and labour signed us up to ...without giving us a referendum was to sign over hand over most of our sovereign rights such as our laws our policy decisions etc to the european union in brussells.

Why is it that labour supporters always try to pull this baloney .. oh i its to try to cover up there own parties abject surrender to europe..which was.probably for seats in brussells after there stint as a labour mp came to an end.

My grandad like many others grandads thought in the war putting his life on the line to uphold this countries freedoms values and beliefs from the nazis... only for some smarmy snake eyed politician in a polyester suit goin by the name of tony blair to sign away such freedoms to govern ourselves with the stroke of a pen on the promise of being the uber alles of europe.

How he is now a middle east peace envoy bearing in mind his lil white lie over weapons of mass destruction and the needless deaths that ensued beggars belief.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 04/05/12 15:53:58]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"reasons to never vote for labour.

they break most of there manifesto promises.

multiculturism minus any border control whatsover think the word was social enginnering one of tonies pet projects

lied to us on wmds leading to war and the ensuing death and destruction of both troops and civillians.

getting us into europe and paying the lions share with fuck all in return.

incompetent economic mismanagement eg selling of our gold reserves at a ridicoulously low price.

Giving peerages for favours.

allowing the banks to do what the fook they want by tranferring such power to the bank of england ...leading us to the mess were in at the moment

tessa jowel paying for porn with tax payers money .bloody outrageous...tories aint perfect by a long chalk but least there the lesser of two tossers ...if i ever did vote only ones ide prob consider would be ukip along the lines of charity begins at home ..but well there politicians to so pretty obvious they would break manifesto promises to once they gained power.

Well you need some basic lessons in recent History. It wasn't Labour who took us into 'Europe' as you put it, it was the Conservative Party under Edward Heath, and quite rightly so.

Nope think your mistaking the eec which the tories took us into with the european union.

the first one ie the eec which the tories took into was simply an international treaty based on trading manufacturing and goods.

The second one ie the european union which tony blair and labour signed us up to ...without giving us a referendum was to sign over hand over most of our sovereign rights such as our laws our policy decisions etc to the european union in brussells.

Why is it that labour supporters always try to pull this baloney .. oh i its to try to cover up there own parties abject surrender to europe..which was.probably for seats in brussells after there stint as a labour mp came to an end.

My grandad like many others grandads thought in the war putting his life on the line to uphold this countries freedoms values and beliefs from the nazis... only for some smarmy snake eyed politician in a polyester suit goin by the name of tony blair to sign away such freedoms to govern ourselves with the stroke of a pen on the promise of being the uber alles of europe.

How he is now a middle east peace envoy bearing in mind his lil white lie over weapons of mass destruction and the needless deaths that ensued beggars belief.

"

Your ignorance has just blinded me. The EU was created by the Maastricht treaty signed in 1992/1993 under the government of John Major a tory. The EEC was subsumed into the EU which was its replacement.

Dont bring the war into it, almost everyone grandparents fought in it. The EEC/EU was created to bring about European integration to avoid future European war.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"reasons to never vote for labour.

they break most of there manifesto promises.

multiculturism minus any border control whatsover think the word was social enginnering one of tonies pet projects

lied to us on wmds leading to war and the ensuing death and destruction of both troops and civillians.

getting us into europe and paying the lions share with fuck all in return.

incompetent economic mismanagement eg selling of our gold reserves at a ridicoulously low price.

Giving peerages for favours.

allowing the banks to do what the fook they want by tranferring such power to the bank of england ...leading us to the mess were in at the moment

tessa jowel paying for porn with tax payers money .bloody outrageous...tories aint perfect by a long chalk but least there the lesser of two tossers ...if i ever did vote only ones ide prob consider would be ukip along the lines of charity begins at home ..but well there politicians to so pretty obvious they would break manifesto promises to once they gained power.

Well you need some basic lessons in recent History. It wasn't Labour who took us into 'Europe' as you put it, it was the Conservative Party under Edward Heath, and quite rightly so.

Nope think your mistaking the eec which the tories took us into with the european union.

the first one ie the eec which the tories took into was simply an international treaty based on trading manufacturing and goods.

The second one ie the european union which tony blair and labour signed us up to ...without giving us a referendum was to sign over hand over most of our sovereign rights such as our laws our policy decisions etc to the european union in brussells.

Why is it that labour supporters always try to pull this baloney .. oh i its to try to cover up there own parties abject surrender to europe..which was.probably for seats in brussells after there stint as a labour mp came to an end.

My grandad like many others grandads thought in the war putting his life on the line to uphold this countries freedoms values and beliefs from the nazis... only for some smarmy snake eyed politician in a polyester suit goin by the name of tony blair to sign away such freedoms to govern ourselves with the stroke of a pen on the promise of being the uber alles of europe.

How he is now a middle east peace envoy bearing in mind his lil white lie over weapons of mass destruction and the needless deaths that ensued beggars belief.

Your ignorance has just blinded me. The EU was created by the Maastricht treaty signed in 1992/1993 under the government of John Major a tory. The EEC was subsumed into the EU which was its replacement.

Dont bring the war into it, almost everyone grandparents fought in it. The EEC/EU was created to bring about European integration to avoid future European war."

You can google all you want on dates and times the fact is the eec the european economic community (EEC) and the European Union (EU) are not nor have they ever been the same treaty

With regards to not bringing the war into it..why not ? ...its still relativley a free country thanks to mine and others grandads who protected us from the nazis or would you rather we all forgot about there sacrifices ?? The 2nd world wasr was us defending our way of life our country ....The Iraqi war was an invasion based on lies by tony blair and his spin doctor to secure oil contracts with the americans

where you call me ignorant well yr welcome to your opinion of me...its a free country therfore a free chat room given to you by the bravery and blood of our forefathers.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"reasons to never vote for labour.

they break most of there manifesto promises.

multiculturism minus any border control whatsover think the word was social enginnering one of tonies pet projects

lied to us on wmds leading to war and the ensuing death and destruction of both troops and civillians.

getting us into europe and paying the lions share with fuck all in return.

incompetent economic mismanagement eg selling of our gold reserves at a ridicoulously low price.

Giving peerages for favours.

allowing the banks to do what the fook they want by tranferring such power to the bank of england ...leading us to the mess were in at the moment

tessa jowel paying for porn with tax payers money .bloody outrageous...tories aint perfect by a long chalk but least there the lesser of two tossers ...if i ever did vote only ones ide prob consider would be ukip along the lines of charity begins at home ..but well there politicians to so pretty obvious they would break manifesto promises to once they gained power.

Well you need some basic lessons in recent History. It wasn't Labour who took us into 'Europe' as you put it, it was the Conservative Party under Edward Heath, and quite rightly so.

Nope think your mistaking the eec which the tories took us into with the european union.

the first one ie the eec which the tories took into was simply an international treaty based on trading manufacturing and goods.

The second one ie the european union which tony blair and labour signed us up to ...without giving us a referendum was to sign over hand over most of our sovereign rights such as our laws our policy decisions etc to the european union in brussells.

Why is it that labour supporters always try to pull this baloney .. oh i its to try to cover up there own parties abject surrender to europe..which was.probably for seats in brussells after there stint as a labour mp came to an end.

My grandad like many others grandads thought in the war putting his life on the line to uphold this countries freedoms values and beliefs from the nazis... only for some smarmy snake eyed politician in a polyester suit goin by the name of tony blair to sign away such freedoms to govern ourselves with the stroke of a pen on the promise of being the uber alles of europe.

How he is now a middle east peace envoy bearing in mind his lil white lie over weapons of mass destruction and the needless deaths that ensued beggars belief.

Your ignorance has just blinded me. The EU was created by the Maastricht treaty signed in 1992/1993 under the government of John Major a tory. The EEC was subsumed into the EU which was its replacement.

Dont bring the war into it, almost everyone grandparents fought in it. The EEC/EU was created to bring about European integration to avoid future European war."

cutting to the chase ..it wasnt a tory who signed away our sovereign right to govern ourselves now was it ...it was tony blair ..then further parts of our countries rights were signed away by david milliband under the premiership of gordon brown

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"reasons to never vote for labour.

they break most of there manifesto promises.

multiculturism minus any border control whatsover think the word was social enginnering one of tonies pet projects

lied to us on wmds leading to war and the ensuing death and destruction of both troops and civillians.

getting us into europe and paying the lions share with fuck all in return.

incompetent economic mismanagement eg selling of our gold reserves at a ridicoulously low price.

Giving peerages for favours.

allowing the banks to do what the fook they want by tranferring such power to the bank of england ...leading us to the mess were in at the moment

tessa jowel paying for porn with tax payers money .bloody outrageous...tories aint perfect by a long chalk but least there the lesser of two tossers ...if i ever did vote only ones ide prob consider would be ukip along the lines of charity begins at home ..but well there politicians to so pretty obvious they would break manifesto promises to once they gained power.

Well you need some basic lessons in recent History. It wasn't Labour who took us into 'Europe' as you put it, it was the Conservative Party under Edward Heath, and quite rightly so.

Nope think your mistaking the eec which the tories took us into with the european union.

the first one ie the eec which the tories took into was simply an international treaty based on trading manufacturing and goods.

The second one ie the european union which tony blair and labour signed us up to ...without giving us a referendum was to sign over hand over most of our sovereign rights such as our laws our policy decisions etc to the european union in brussells.

Why is it that labour supporters always try to pull this baloney .. oh i its to try to cover up there own parties abject surrender to europe..which was.probably for seats in brussells after there stint as a labour mp came to an end.

My grandad like many others grandads thought in the war putting his life on the line to uphold this countries freedoms values and beliefs from the nazis... only for some smarmy snake eyed politician in a polyester suit goin by the name of tony blair to sign away such freedoms to govern ourselves with the stroke of a pen on the promise of being the uber alles of europe.

How he is now a middle east peace envoy bearing in mind his lil white lie over weapons of mass destruction and the needless deaths that ensued beggars belief.

Your ignorance has just blinded me. The EU was created by the Maastricht treaty signed in 1992/1993 under the government of John Major a tory. The EEC was subsumed into the EU which was its replacement.

Dont bring the war into it, almost everyone grandparents fought in it. The EEC/EU was created to bring about European integration to avoid future European war.

cutting to the chase ..it wasnt a tory who signed away our sovereign right to govern ourselves now was it ...it was tony blair ..then further parts of our countries rights were signed away by david milliband under the premiership of gordon brown "

Proof that it was tony blair?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

pssst.. when you click 'Quote' you can highlight the first 50 paragraphs and get rid of them leaving only the last post that you actually want to reply to. It's quite tedious scrolling down through repost after repost of the same information trying to work out who said what.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Dont get why most people only eva vote one of the 3, non of the others eva get any news coverage.

Why everyone is voting lab again, they made things worse in the first place, and now the con/lib just made it even worse.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 04/05/12 16:42:16]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ucky_LadsCouple (MM)  over a year ago

Kidderminster+ surrounding areas.

[Removed by poster at 04/05/12 16:39:02]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"reasons to never vote for labour.

they break most of there manifesto promises.

multiculturism minus any border control whatsover think the word was social enginnering one of tonies pet projects

lied to us on wmds leading to war and the ensuing death and destruction of both troops and civillians.

getting us into europe and paying the lions share with fuck all in return.

incompetent economic mismanagement eg selling of our gold reserves at a ridicoulously low price.

Giving peerages for favours.

allowing the banks to do what the fook they want by tranferring such power to the bank of england ...leading us to the mess were in at the moment

tessa jowel paying for porn with tax payers money .bloody outrageous...tories aint perfect by a long chalk but least there the lesser of two tossers ...if i ever did vote only ones ide prob consider would be ukip along the lines of charity begins at home ..but well there politicians to so pretty obvious they would break manifesto promises to once they gained power.

Well you need some basic lessons in recent History. It wasn't Labour who took us into 'Europe' as you put it, it was the Conservative Party under Edward Heath, and quite rightly so.

Nope think your mistaking the eec which the tories took us into with the european union.

the first one ie the eec which the tories took into was simply an international treaty based on trading manufacturing and goods.

The second one ie the european union which tony blair and labour signed us up to ...without giving us a referendum was to sign over hand over most of our sovereign rights such as our laws our policy decisions etc to the european union in brussells.

Why is it that labour supporters always try to pull this baloney .. oh i its to try to cover up there own parties abject surrender to europe..which was.probably for seats in brussells after there stint as a labour mp came to an end.

My grandad like many others grandads thought in the war putting his life on the line to uphold this countries freedoms values and beliefs from the nazis... only for some smarmy snake eyed politician in a polyester suit goin by the name of tony blair to sign away such freedoms to govern ourselves with the stroke of a pen on the promise of being the uber alles of europe.

How he is now a middle east peace envoy bearing in mind his lil white lie over weapons of mass destruction and the needless deaths that ensued beggars belief.

Your ignorance has just blinded me. The EU was created by the Maastricht treaty signed in 1992/1993 under the government of John Major a tory. The EEC was subsumed into the EU which was its replacement.

Dont bring the war into it, almost everyone grandparents fought in it. The EEC/EU was created to bring about European integration to avoid future European war.

cutting to the chase ..it wasnt a tory who signed away our sovereign right to govern ourselves now was it ...it was tony blair ..then further parts of our countries rights were signed away by david milliband under the premiership of gordon brown

Proof that it was tony blair?"

you like your google so much u find it ...its not hard to find at all. kinda get the feeling though that even seeing him sign it yrself.. yd still think it was some elaborate tory plot ...them using cgi technology to create an image of him signing it. ...btw no need for any apologies over the ignorant jibe if i cared what people thought of me ide be doin take a look at my profile posts

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ucky_LadsCouple (MM)  over a year ago

Kidderminster+ surrounding areas.


"[Removed by poster at 04/05/12 16:39:02]"

maybe labour have learned something from the mistakes they made in the 10+years in government and now want to put it right for us the voters?.

oops!,did i just see a pig flying over head?.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

You can google all you want on dates and times the fact is the eec the european economic community (EEC) and the European Union (EU) are not nor have they ever been the same treaty

With regards to not bringing the war into it..why not ? ...its still relativley a free country thanks to mine and others grandads who protected us from the nazis or would you rather we all forgot about there sacrifices ?? The 2nd world wasr was us defending our way of life our country ....The Iraqi war was an invasion based on lies by tony blair and his spin doctor to secure oil contracts with the americans

where you call me ignorant well yr welcome to your opinion of me...its a free country therfore a free chat room given to you by the bravery and blood of our forefathers. "

No they arent the same treaty, the Masstricht treaty was a successor to the treaty of rome the EU replaced the EEC when the EEC became the European commission before the treaty of lisbon.

I never said forget there sacrifices but its disingenuous to bring WW2 into a discussion about the EU and Labour, Churchill was a proponent of European integration. To use the sacrifices of millions to say we should all turn our back on each other because it will give us more freedom is rubbish. EU laws on data security and rights are the only things stopping the governments attacks on civil liberties.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Proof that it was tony blair? you like your google so much u find it ...its not hard to find at all. kinda get the feeling though that even seeing him sign it yrself.. yd still think it was some elaborate tory plot ...them using cgi technology to create an image of him signing it. ...btw no need for any apologies over the ignorant jibe if i cared what people thought of me ide be doin take a look at my profile posts "

See thats the trouble, i cant find it. The treaty of lisbon i can find on google, but that "didnt take us into the EU" it reformed the EU

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

You can google all you want on dates and times the fact is the eec the european economic community (EEC) and the European Union (EU) are not nor have they ever been the same treaty

With regards to not bringing the war into it..why not ? ...its still relativley a free country thanks to mine and others grandads who protected us from the nazis or would you rather we all forgot about there sacrifices ?? The 2nd world wasr was us defending our way of life our country ....The Iraqi war was an invasion based on lies by tony blair and his spin doctor to secure oil contracts with the americans

where you call me ignorant well yr welcome to your opinion of me...its a free country therfore a free chat room given to you by the bravery and blood of our forefathers.

No they arent the same treaty, the Masstricht treaty was a successor to the treaty of rome the EU replaced the EEC when the EEC became the European commission before the treaty of lisbon.

I never said forget there sacrifices but its disingenuous to bring WW2 into a discussion about the EU and Labour, Churchill was a proponent of European integration. To use the sacrifices of millions to say we should all turn our back on each other because it will give us more freedom is rubbish. EU laws on data security and rights are the only things stopping the governments attacks on civil liberties."

to quote a phrase ...you can take a horse to water but you cant make it drink it ...or remove its blinkers i guess.. btw ime only of underclass origin i dont understand fancy words i do know when ime being taken for a mug though ...its why i no longer vote

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

You can google all you want on dates and times the fact is the eec the european economic community (EEC) and the European Union (EU) are not nor have they ever been the same treaty

With regards to not bringing the war into it..why not ? ...its still relativley a free country thanks to mine and others grandads who protected us from the nazis or would you rather we all forgot about there sacrifices ?? The 2nd world wasr was us defending our way of life our country ....The Iraqi war was an invasion based on lies by tony blair and his spin doctor to secure oil contracts with the americans

where you call me ignorant well yr welcome to your opinion of me...its a free country therfore a free chat room given to you by the bravery and blood of our forefathers.

No they arent the same treaty, the Masstricht treaty was a successor to the treaty of rome the EU replaced the EEC when the EEC became the European commission before the treaty of lisbon.

I never said forget there sacrifices but its disingenuous to bring WW2 into a discussion about the EU and Labour, Churchill was a proponent of European integration. To use the sacrifices of millions to say we should all turn our back on each other because it will give us more freedom is rubbish. EU laws on data security and rights are the only things stopping the governments attacks on civil liberties.

to quote a phrase ...you can take a horse to water but you cant make it drink it ...or remove its blinkers i guess.. btw ime only of underclass origin i dont understand fancy words i do know when ime being taken for a mug though ...its why i no longer vote "

if you dont vote why are you slating tony blair you gave up your right to winge about any goverment the day you decided you no longer want to vote

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Only when it is written in the history books that Labour destroyed this country,will Labour supporters wake up and realise they helped these traitors make a fine mess of a once great country.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

You can google all you want on dates and times the fact is the eec the european economic community (EEC) and the European Union (EU) are not nor have they ever been the same treaty

With regards to not bringing the war into it..why not ? ...its still relativley a free country thanks to mine and others grandads who protected us from the nazis or would you rather we all forgot about there sacrifices ?? The 2nd world wasr was us defending our way of life our country ....The Iraqi war was an invasion based on lies by tony blair and his spin doctor to secure oil contracts with the americans

where you call me ignorant well yr welcome to your opinion of me...its a free country therfore a free chat room given to you by the bravery and blood of our forefathers.

No they arent the same treaty, the Masstricht treaty was a successor to the treaty of rome the EU replaced the EEC when the EEC became the European commission before the treaty of lisbon.

I never said forget there sacrifices but its disingenuous to bring WW2 into a discussion about the EU and Labour, Churchill was a proponent of European integration. To use the sacrifices of millions to say we should all turn our back on each other because it will give us more freedom is rubbish. EU laws on data security and rights are the only things stopping the governments attacks on civil liberties.

to quote a phrase ...you can take a horse to water but you cant make it drink it ...or remove its blinkers i guess.. btw ime only of underclass origin i dont understand fancy words i do know when ime being taken for a mug though ...its why i no longer vote

if you dont vote why are you slating tony blair you gave up your right to winge about any goverment the day you decided you no longer want to vote "

probably ..In the misguided hope that i may stop anybody who is thinking of voting labour ever again ...from not doing.

i see ime now winging when all ime doin is recalling the facts as they happened ..i call it ....stating it at is or as it was.

Tony blair is the sole reason why i will never ever trust any politicians words ever again.

Please explain to me how by choosing to abstain from voting ime no entitled to vote in the future should i choose to do ?? ..

and here was me thinking it was my democratic right "to choose" ..not to vote...although i have heard that there thinking of making it law that you have to vote with threats of fines and imprisonment if you dont...wheres the democracy to that still at least on the plus side there would be a mad rush to build more prisons to imprison over half the population of non voters. ...maybe that way more pedos would get longer sentances rather than slaps on the wrist.....ime goin of on a tangent again here arnt i

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *am sampsonMan  over a year ago

cwmbran


" Only when it is written in the history books that Labour destroyed this country,will Labour supporters wake up and realise they helped these traitors make a fine mess of a once great country."

It will never be written in the history books because it never happened

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

You can google all you want on dates and times the fact is the eec the european economic community (EEC) and the European Union (EU) are not nor have they ever been the same treaty

With regards to not bringing the war into it..why not ? ...its still relativley a free country thanks to mine and others grandads who protected us from the nazis or would you rather we all forgot about there sacrifices ?? The 2nd world wasr was us defending our way of life our country ....The Iraqi war was an invasion based on lies by tony blair and his spin doctor to secure oil contracts with the americans

where you call me ignorant well yr welcome to your opinion of me...its a free country therfore a free chat room given to you by the bravery and blood of our forefathers.

No they arent the same treaty, the Masstricht treaty was a successor to the treaty of rome the EU replaced the EEC when the EEC became the European commission before the treaty of lisbon.

I never said forget there sacrifices but its disingenuous to bring WW2 into a discussion about the EU and Labour, Churchill was a proponent of European integration. To use the sacrifices of millions to say we should all turn our back on each other because it will give us more freedom is rubbish. EU laws on data security and rights are the only things stopping the governments attacks on civil liberties.

to quote a phrase ...you can take a horse to water but you cant make it drink it ...or remove its blinkers i guess.. btw ime only of underclass origin i dont understand fancy words i do know when ime being taken for a mug though ...its why i no longer vote

if you dont vote why are you slating tony blair you gave up your right to winge about any goverment the day you decided you no longer want to vote

probably ..In the misguided hope that i may stop anybody who is thinking of voting labour ever again ...from not doing.

i see ime now winging when all ime doin is recalling the facts as they happened ..i call it ....stating it at is or as it was.

Tony blair is the sole reason why i will never ever trust any politicians words ever again.

Please explain to me how by choosing to abstain from voting ime no entitled to vote in the future should i choose to do ?? ..

and here was me thinking it was my democratic right "to choose" ..not to vote...although i have heard that there thinking of making it law that you have to vote with threats of fines and imprisonment if you dont...wheres the democracy to that still at least on the plus side there would be a mad rush to build more prisons to imprison over half the population of non voters. ...maybe that way more pedos would get longer sentances rather than slaps on the wrist.....ime goin of on a tangent again here arnt i "

You still havent answered when Labour "sold us" to the EU

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *icketysplitsWoman  over a year ago

Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound

I have enjoyed all the party politics on here these last few weeks. I do worry that many of those that post seem have little real knowledge of how our democracy is run. Comments that you don't like any of them so won't vote ensures that the majority do not get the decision they want. One area in these elections had a turn out of 10% and the average has been around 35%. Apathy is rife - more vote for BGT and X-Factor than in elections to decide who and how the areas we live in the country we live in is run.

I am cynic (it doesn't matter who you vote for you always get the government) but I always vote. People fought and died for my right to vote. Not all men could vote and it took even longer for women to be given that right and we repay them by not being bothered to even apply for a postal vote

I would like to see a 'none of the above' box on the ballot form so that those not happy with any party are represented.

Apologies for going on a bit further with this lecture but onto payments and 'job theft':

1. Councillors are paid expenses for attending council meetings. Unless they are part of a cabinet arrangement where there is a local elected mayor where they receive a salary. The practice of paying for attendance at meetings has led to council chambers continuing debate long into the night in order to get the enhanced expenses. Not helpful to any of us but it is how many of them pay for the time spent on local constituency matters.

MPs are paid a salary. Cabinet members get more. When they lose their seats they are protected by employment law in as much as they receive a severance payment to help their transition. Some are left in financial hardship after this others have worked out their exit strategy plans. Their local parties raise funds to support their consituency work.

The hours they put in are not conducive to a good family life and lead to many women not ever fully participating in politics at this level.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ovedupstillCouple  over a year ago

mullinwire

personally, in local elections, as long as everyone is happy with the local council, they should spoil the paper.

these should also be published, and THAT would be more of a message t all the parties rather than voting for someone you dont want, simply to show the party you are unhappy about a lesson.

personally, no matter what the government are doing, if cons were doing a decent job locally, they would get my vote.

unfortunately, we are labour where i live also

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Dont get why most people only eva vote one of the 3, non of the others eva get any news coverage.

Why everyone is voting lab again, they made things worse in the first place, and now the con/lib just made it even worse. "

True. You never see the party spokesman for NOC on the telly either.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS  over a year ago

Central


"Get in!!

In Newcastle? A ferret could wear a red rosette and get elected in Newcastle.

Don't know why I bother voting in Gateshead as it's been red since the 70s.

I mean country wide!

All the other non elected government have changed is their mind/promises. Scum both of them.

Well done today Labour "

Nice one!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Only when it is written in the history books that Labour destroyed this country,will Labour supporters wake up and realise they helped these traitors make a fine mess of a once great country.

It will never be written in the history books because it never happened"

Then you must of been living in a cave for the last ten years..where was you when Tony Blair was importing voters..ie immigrants in their millions.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

To understand the Europe we have today you have to go all the way back to 1957/58 and The Treaty of Rome and the Common Agriculture Policy. They are both weighed very heavily in France's favour and had the wonderful Mrs Thatcher not argued relentlessly for the UK's rebate we would be paying a helluva lot more into Europe than we get out of it. France gets 13% more than we do yet we are one of the largest contributors to it. It was worked out on the amount of land each country has available for growing crops and as France has a land mass double the size of the UK it gets more from the EU. That doesn't mean to say that France employs all the land it could to produce crops though, and I'm convinced that France actively seeks to keep a good portion of it's land fallow so that the money it receives from the EU is pure profit. Just my opinion though.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


" Only when it is written in the history books that Labour destroyed this country,will Labour supporters wake up and realise they helped these traitors make a fine mess of a once great country.

It will never be written in the history books because it never happened Then you must of been living in a cave for the last ten years..where was you when Tony Blair was importing voters..ie immigrants in their millions."

most of them immigrants are needed here as doctors etc. well done Tony! Bring him back anyday.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *am sampsonMan  over a year ago

cwmbran


" Only when it is written in the history books that Labour destroyed this country,will Labour supporters wake up and realise they helped these traitors make a fine mess of a once great country.

It will never be written in the history books because it never happened Then you must of been living in a cave for the last ten years..where was you when Tony Blair was importing voters..ie immigrants in their millions."

Well you be sure to tell me when you see it written in a history book won't you

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Only when it is written in the history books that Labour destroyed this country,will Labour supporters wake up and realise they helped these traitors make a fine mess of a once great country.

It will never be written in the history books because it never happened Then you must of been living in a cave for the last ten years..where was you when Tony Blair was importing voters..ie immigrants in their millions. most of them immigrants are needed here as doctors etc. well done Tony! Bring him back anyday. "

Three million doctors..????

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Then you must of been living in a cave for the last ten years..where was you when Tony Blair was importing voters..ie immigrants in their millions."

What he did with our border controls to allow swathes of immigrant Labour voters in should be classed as criminal and he and Brown should be put on trial for it!!

Assholes, the both of them!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Only when it is written in the history books that Labour destroyed this country,will Labour supporters wake up and realise they helped these traitors make a fine mess of a once great country.

It will never be written in the history books because it never happened Then you must of been living in a cave for the last ten years..where was you when Tony Blair was importing voters..ie immigrants in their millions.

most of them immigrants are needed here as doctors etc. well done Tony! Bring him back anyday.

Three million doctors..????"

That made me chuckle.

Labour supporters will never admit to the disastrous immigration policies of their party. Never in a million years.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ovedupstillCouple  over a year ago

mullinwire


" Then you must of been living in a cave for the last ten years..where was you when Tony Blair was importing voters..ie immigrants in their millions. most of them immigrants are needed here as doctors etc. well done Tony! Bring him back anyday. "

o dear, even i couldnt possibly sit back and allow that to be, Baz lol.

even though they MAY be qualified to be doctors in their home countries, they ALL certainly didnt come here to do professional jobs, otherwise every factory floor, every toilet and coffee shop and every shelf in the land is being filled and worked on by a qualified doctor.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Only when it is written in the history books that Labour destroyed this country,will Labour supporters wake up and realise they helped these traitors make a fine mess of a once great country.

It will never be written in the history books because it never happened Then you must of been living in a cave for the last ten years..where was you when Tony Blair was importing voters..ie immigrants in their millions. most of them immigrants are needed here as doctors etc. well done Tony! Bring him back anyday. "

wot we talking here spin doctors

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *obsrocketMan  over a year ago

Loughborough


"

You can google all you want on dates and times the fact is the eec the european economic community (EEC) and the European Union (EU) are not nor have they ever been the same treaty

With regards to not bringing the war into it..why not ? ...its still relativley a free country thanks to mine and others grandads who protected us from the nazis or would you rather we all forgot about there sacrifices ?? The 2nd world wasr was us defending our way of life our country ....The Iraqi war was an invasion based on lies by tony blair and his spin doctor to secure oil contracts with the americans

where you call me ignorant well yr welcome to your opinion of me...its a free country therfore a free chat room given to you by the bravery and blood of our forefathers.

No they arent the same treaty, the Masstricht treaty was a successor to the treaty of rome the EU replaced the EEC when the EEC became the European commission before the treaty of lisbon.

I never said forget there sacrifices but its disingenuous to bring WW2 into a discussion about the EU and Labour, Churchill was a proponent of European integration. To use the sacrifices of millions to say we should all turn our back on each other because it will give us more freedom is rubbish. EU laws on data security and rights are the only things stopping the governments attacks on civil liberties.

to quote a phrase ...you can take a horse to water but you cant make it drink it ...or remove its blinkers i guess.. btw ime only of underclass origin i dont understand fancy words i do know when ime being taken for a mug though ...its why i no longer vote

if you dont vote why are you slating tony blair you gave up your right to winge about any goverment the day you decided you no longer want to vote "

totally agree if you cant be arsed to vote dont whinge when you dont like who is running the country, local council, district council or whoever. Maybe its the cant be arsed to vote people who are really responsible for the mess we are all in now. I often wonder how different results would be if more than 40% could be bothered to vote.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Only when it is written in the history books that Labour destroyed this country,will Labour supporters wake up and realise they helped these traitors make a fine mess of a once great country.

It will never be written in the history books because it never happened Then you must of been living in a cave for the last ten years..where was you when Tony Blair was importing voters..ie immigrants in their millions.

Well you be sure to tell me when you see it written in a history book won't you "

What you after sam ..a peerage should labour ever regain power?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *am sampsonMan  over a year ago

cwmbran


" Only when it is written in the history books that Labour destroyed this country,will Labour supporters wake up and realise they helped these traitors make a fine mess of a once great country.

It will never be written in the history books because it never happened Then you must of been living in a cave for the last ten years..where was you when Tony Blair was importing voters..ie immigrants in their millions.

Well you be sure to tell me when you see it written in a history book won't you

What you after sam ..a peerage should labour ever regain power? "

I'm already a Lord - so you can call me Sir not Sam

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

You can google all you want on dates and times the fact is the eec the european economic community (EEC) and the European Union (EU) are not nor have they ever been the same treaty

With regards to not bringing the war into it..why not ? ...its still relativley a free country thanks to mine and others grandads who protected us from the nazis or would you rather we all forgot about there sacrifices ?? The 2nd world wasr was us defending our way of life our country ....The Iraqi war was an invasion based on lies by tony blair and his spin doctor to secure oil contracts with the americans

where you call me ignorant well yr welcome to your opinion of me...its a free country therfore a free chat room given to you by the bravery and blood of our forefathers.

No they arent the same treaty, the Masstricht treaty was a successor to the treaty of rome the EU replaced the EEC when the EEC became the European commission before the treaty of lisbon.

I never said forget there sacrifices but its disingenuous to bring WW2 into a discussion about the EU and Labour, Churchill was a proponent of European integration. To use the sacrifices of millions to say we should all turn our back on each other because it will give us more freedom is rubbish. EU laws on data security and rights are the only things stopping the governments attacks on civil liberties.

to quote a phrase ...you can take a horse to water but you cant make it drink it ...or remove its blinkers i guess.. btw ime only of underclass origin i dont understand fancy words i do know when ime being taken for a mug though ...its why i no longer vote

if you dont vote why are you slating tony blair you gave up your right to winge about any goverment the day you decided you no longer want to vote

totally agree if you cant be arsed to vote dont whinge when you dont like who is running the country, local council, district council or whoever. Maybe its the cant be arsed to vote people who are really responsible for the mess we are all in now. I often wonder how different results would be if more than 40% could be bothered to vote."

any one for some poppycock ? washed down with a lashing of twaddle i can say what i like same as you can were all entitled to an opinion its a free country but only on fridays these days

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Then you must of been living in a cave for the last ten years..where was you when Tony Blair was importing voters..ie immigrants in their millions.

What he did with our border controls to allow swathes of immigrant Labour voters in should be classed as criminal and he and Brown should be put on trial for it!!

Assholes, the both of them!! "

speaking with experience of being a straigh asshole ime totally offended with your statemnt wishy...how dare you compare me to tony blair and gordon brown i dont let any foreign objects enter on mass without proper inspection and some semblance of border control ...assholes have feelings to you know

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ovedupstillCouple  over a year ago

mullinwire


"any one for some poppycock ? washed down with a lashing of twaddle i can say what i like same as you can were all entitled to an opinion its a free country but only on fridays these days "

i actually agre with the sentiment that if you dont vote for what you stand for/believe in, then you really havent the right to moan about those that did actually get in.

IF it came down to 1 vote, and it was yours that would have made the difference between your representatives and the ones you didnt want, then you would be looking prety stupid right now for the fact you cba.

so yes, you have opinions, and the right o express them, but no, you dont have the right to moan about past or present governments because you havent expressed your view in the proper format.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"any one for some poppycock ? washed down with a lashing of twaddle i can say what i like same as you can were all entitled to an opinion its a free country but only on fridays these days

i actually agre with the sentiment that if you dont vote for what you stand for/believe in, then you really havent the right to moan about those that did actually get in.

IF it came down to 1 vote, and it was yours that would have made the difference between your representatives and the ones you didnt want, then you would be looking prety stupid right now for the fact you cba.

so yes, you have opinions, and the right o express them, but no, you dont have the right to moan about past or present governments because you havent expressed your view in the proper format."

I didnt vote because the truth is tories are labour and labour are tories in my opinion there so alike all bullshit and spin and no substance.so that one vote wouldnt have made a blind bit of difference.

Theres simply was no voting alternative at the time ...ime not alone over half the country chose to abstain from voting. you say i moan as ve said its my democratic right to moan/ give my opinion should i choose to do ..

typical labour having to bring things down to a personal level to cover up there parties failures shortcomings over the years its cool i dont mind ime not gonna bring myself down to labour level and lie.. deliberatly to hoodwink the public into getting what i want.

wheres the harm in as you say aving a moan it doesnt kill anyone does it unlike lying to the masses over weapons of mass destruction.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The day they bring in compulsory voting is the day I'll abstain in protest.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


" Then you must of been living in a cave for the last ten years..where was you when Tony Blair was importing voters..ie immigrants in their millions. most of them immigrants are needed here as doctors etc. well done Tony! Bring him back anyday.

o dear, even i couldnt possibly sit back and allow that to be, Baz lol.

even though they MAY be qualified to be doctors in their home countries, they ALL certainly didnt come here to do professional jobs, otherwise every factory floor, every toilet and coffee shop and every shelf in the land is being filled and worked on by a qualified doctor."

And Loads of them actually are. I won't respond to any further racial or bnp style views here.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ovedupstillCouple  over a year ago

mullinwire


"

typical labour having to bring things down to a personal level to cover up there parties failures shortcomings over the years its cool i dont mind ime not gonna bring myself down to labour level and lie.. deliberatly to hoodwink the public into getting what i want.

wheres the harm in as you say aving a moan it doesnt kill anyone does it unlike lying to the masses over weapons of mass destruction. "

erm.. is this the ONLY time you have read a post of mine?

where the hell have i EVER stuck up for labour?

you REALLY need to check who you are insulting before you do

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ovedupstillCouple  over a year ago

mullinwire


" Then you must of been living in a cave for the last ten years..where was you when Tony Blair was importing voters..ie immigrants in their millions. most of them immigrants are needed here as doctors etc. well done Tony! Bring him back anyday.

o dear, even i couldnt possibly sit back and allow that to be, Baz lol.

even though they MAY be qualified to be doctors in their home countries, they ALL certainly didnt come here to do professional jobs, otherwise every factory floor, every toilet and coffee shop and every shelf in the land is being filled and worked on by a qualified doctor.

And Loads of them actually are. I won't respond to any further racial or bnp style views here. "

and just like the labour government of the day, you bring a point of view on immigration and call someone a racist.

do you REALLY believe anyone that questions mass immigration is a racist?

if so you are very small minded and are exactly what they are looking for

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Then you must of been living in a cave for the last ten years..where was you when Tony Blair was importing voters..ie immigrants in their millions. most of them immigrants are needed here as doctors etc. well done Tony! Bring him back anyday.

o dear, even i couldnt possibly sit back and allow that to be, Baz lol.

even though they MAY be qualified to be doctors in their home countries, they ALL certainly didnt come here to do professional jobs, otherwise every factory floor, every toilet and coffee shop and every shelf in the land is being filled and worked on by a qualified doctor.

And Loads of them actually are. I won't respond to any further racial or bnp style views here. "

Baz am i missing something there m8 ? i dont see how the post yv replied to is racist etc.

Why is it that whenever anybody dare raise the toppic of multiculturism immigration etc there instantly condemmed as racist. Yes some immigrants are qualifed proffessionals some are not. and no ime not a racist either and do not condone anybody that is i just grew up to be a debaser

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Then you must of been living in a cave for the last ten years..where was you when Tony Blair was importing voters..ie immigrants in their millions. most of them immigrants are needed here as doctors etc. well done Tony! Bring him back anyday.

o dear, even i couldnt possibly sit back and allow that to be, Baz lol.

even though they MAY be qualified to be doctors in their home countries, they ALL certainly didnt come here to do professional jobs, otherwise every factory floor, every toilet and coffee shop and every shelf in the land is being filled and worked on by a qualified doctor.

And Loads of them actually are. I won't respond to any further racial or bnp style views here.

and just like the labour government of the day, you bring a point of view on immigration and call someone a racist.

do you REALLY believe anyone that questions mass immigration is a racist?

if so you are very small minded and are exactly what they are looking for"

spot on....

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

typical labour having to bring things down to a personal level to cover up there parties failures shortcomings over the years its cool i dont mind ime not gonna bring myself down to labour level and lie.. deliberatly to hoodwink the public into getting what i want.

wheres the harm in as you say aving a moan it doesnt kill anyone does it unlike lying to the masses over weapons of mass destruction.

erm.. is this the ONLY time you have read a post of mine?

where the hell have i EVER stuck up for labour?

you REALLY need to check who you are insulting before you do"

and where please tell have i insulted you ?????????????????????????

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"any one for some poppycock ? washed down with a lashing of twaddle i can say what i like same as you can were all entitled to an opinion its a free country but only on fridays these days

i actually agre with the sentiment that if you dont vote for what you stand for/believe in, then you really havent the right to moan about those that did actually get in.

IF it came down to 1 vote, and it was yours that would have made the difference between your representatives and the ones you didnt want, then you would be looking prety stupid right now for the fact you cba.

so yes, you have opinions, and the right o express them, but no, you dont have the right to moan about past or present governments because you havent expressed your view in the proper format."

well said

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"any one for some poppycock ? washed down with a lashing of twaddle i can say what i like same as you can were all entitled to an opinion its a free country but only on fridays these days

i actually agre with the sentiment that if you dont vote for what you stand for/believe in, then you really havent the right to moan about those that did actually get in.

IF it came down to 1 vote, and it was yours that would have made the difference between your representatives and the ones you didnt want, then you would be looking prety stupid right now for the fact you cba.

so yes, you have opinions, and the right o express them, but no, you dont have the right to moan about past or present governments because you havent expressed your view in the proper format.well said "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Then you must of been living in a cave for the last ten years..where was you when Tony Blair was importing voters..ie immigrants in their millions. most of them immigrants are needed here as doctors etc. well done Tony! Bring him back anyday.

o dear, even i couldnt possibly sit back and allow that to be, Baz lol.

even though they MAY be qualified to be doctors in their home countries, they ALL certainly didnt come here to do professional jobs, otherwise every factory floor, every toilet and coffee shop and every shelf in the land is being filled and worked on by a qualified doctor.

And Loads of them actually are. I won't respond to any further racial or bnp style views here. "

Now that is a vintage Blair/Brown Little Britainesque style attack to defend a despicable policy of allowing immigrants into the UK without any form of border checks at all, and they did it to secure votes.

Has anyone noticed how quiet it has become these days when immigration policies are questioned and nobody is labelled a racist. Apart from on here.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ovedupstillCouple  over a year ago

mullinwire


"

typical labour having to bring things down to a personal level to cover up there parties failures shortcomings over the years its cool i dont mind ime not gonna bring myself down to labour level and lie.. deliberatly to hoodwink the public into getting what i want.

wheres the harm in as you say aving a moan it doesnt kill anyone does it unlike lying to the masses over weapons of mass destruction.

erm.. is this the ONLY time you have read a post of mine?

where the hell have i EVER stuck up for labour?

you REALLY need to check who you are insulting before you do

and where please tell have i insulted you ?????????????????????????"

by saying anything i have posted on this, or any other forum for that matter, is 'typical labour'!

you may as well call my mum a whore! lol

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"any one for some poppycock ? washed down with a lashing of twaddle i can say what i like same as you can were all entitled to an opinion its a free country but only on fridays these days

i actually agre with the sentiment that if you dont vote for what you stand for/believe in, then you really havent the right to moan about those that did actually get in.

IF it came down to 1 vote, and it was yours that would have made the difference between your representatives and the ones you didnt want, then you would be looking prety stupid right now for the fact you cba.

so yes, you have opinions, and the right o express them, but no, you dont have the right to moan about past or present governments because you havent expressed your view in the proper format.well said "

I keep forgetting ...we use to live in a country that encouraged free speech and allowed people to express there views in whatever format thay wanted rather than repress it? i insulted no one. I get insulted and just ignore it and move on and the insulter makes bogus claim i insulted them ....oooopss get a load of me moaning agin...its my democratic right should i wish to... express it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ovedupstillCouple  over a year ago

mullinwire


"any one for some poppycock ? washed down with a lashing of twaddle i can say what i like same as you can were all entitled to an opinion its a free country but only on fridays these days

i actually agre with the sentiment that if you dont vote for what you stand for/believe in, then you really havent the right to moan about those that did actually get in.

IF it came down to 1 vote, and it was yours that would have made the difference between your representatives and the ones you didnt want, then you would be looking prety stupid right now for the fact you cba.

so yes, you have opinions, and the right o express them, but no, you dont have the right to moan about past or present governments because you havent expressed your view in the proper format.well said

I keep forgetting ...we use to live in a country that encouraged free speech and allowed people to express there views in whatever format thay wanted rather than repress it? i insulted no one. I get insulted and just ignore it and move on and the insulter makes bogus claim i insulted them ....oooopss get a load of me moaning agin...its my democratic right should i wish to... express it. "

see, there you go again, completely passing over what i said.

you DID NOT vote for labour.

yet

you DID NOT vote against

so clearly you are indifferent as to who is and isnt in power.

so why are you moaning?

you said i was typical labour, yet i have NOT stuck up for labour once, ever, on this thread, or any other.

please dont lael everyone that doesnt lick your ass as a labour supporter cuz it wont get you very far

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *waymanMan  over a year ago

newcastle


"The funny thing about elections is that in no other sphere of working life does one person actively seek to dump another person out of a job and take his place. It's almost like job theft.

It's really more like a spring clean, things you purchased last year that you thought would he handy, then to find out they're really quite useless. Throw them out and make space for more useful objects.

But someone loses their livelihood at the expense of another. Surely there should be an employment law that prevents that?"

It would be a good point if councillors were employed. They're not.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Get in!! "
short memory mate..or did u support blair.and the unelected scot for selling this country to the highest bidders.at least they shot gaddafi..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

As the president said in Mars Attacks " why can;t we all get on?"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *waymanMan  over a year ago

newcastle


"I have enjoyed all the party politics on here these last few weeks. I do worry that many of those that post seem have little real knowledge of how our democracy is run. Comments that you don't like any of them so won't vote ensures that the majority do not get the decision they want. One area in these elections had a turn out of 10% and the average has been around 35%. Apathy is rife - more vote for BGT and X-Factor than in elections to decide who and how the areas we live in the country we live in is run.

I am cynic (it doesn't matter who you vote for you always get the government) but I always vote. People fought and died for my right to vote. Not all men could vote and it took even longer for women to be given that right and we repay them by not being bothered to even apply for a postal vote

I would like to see a 'none of the above' box on the ballot form so that those not happy with any party are represented.

Apologies for going on a bit further with this lecture but onto payments and 'job theft':

1. Councillors are paid expenses for attending council meetings. Unless they are part of a cabinet arrangement where there is a local elected mayor where they receive a salary. The practice of paying for attendance at meetings has led to council chambers continuing debate long into the night in order to get the enhanced expenses. Not helpful to any of us but it is how many of them pay for the time spent on local constituency matters.

MPs are paid a salary. Cabinet members get more. When they lose their seats they are protected by employment law in as much as they receive a severance payment to help their transition. Some are left in financial hardship after this others have worked out their exit strategy plans. Their local parties raise funds to support their consituency work.

The hours they put in are not conducive to a good family life and lead to many women not ever fully participating in politics at this level.

"

Wrong on just about every point; the claim about councillors prolonging meetings to get allowances is about twenty years out of date.

You're wrong about MPs and employment law as well...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *am sampsonMan  over a year ago

cwmbran


"Get in!! short memory mate..or did u support blair.and the unelected scot for selling this country to the highest bidders.at least they shot gaddafi.."

Oh dear the unelected scot was elected if you're going to comment get your facts right

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


" Then you must of been living in a cave for the last ten years..where was you when Tony Blair was importing voters..ie immigrants in their millions. most of them immigrants are needed here as doctors etc. well done Tony! Bring him back anyday.

o dear, even i couldnt possibly sit back and allow that to be, Baz lol.

even though they MAY be qualified to be doctors in their home countries, they ALL certainly didnt come here to do professional jobs, otherwise every factory floor, every toilet and coffee shop and every shelf in the land is being filled and worked on by a qualified doctor.

And Loads of them actually are. I won't respond to any further racial or bnp style views here.

Now that is a vintage Blair/Brown Little Britainesque style attack to defend a despicable policy of allowing immigrants into the UK without any form of border checks at all, and they did it to secure votes.

Has anyone noticed how quiet it has become these days when immigration policies are questioned and nobody is labelled a racist. Apart from on here."

Ok ok what you are saying is nonsense, our Nhs system is one of the best in the world, if no immigrants it would collapse! 4 young afghan lads work in my local car wash , why? Because its beneath most of the Brit lads to do such a job. Most of these guys are contributing and not just sitting in their arses claiming. Here to make a better life and good for them

Our real problem is europeans who just walk in with hand out waiting for cash.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Then you must of been living in a cave for the last ten years..where was you when Tony Blair was importing voters..ie immigrants in their millions. most of them immigrants are needed here as doctors etc. well done Tony! Bring him back anyday.

o dear, even i couldnt possibly sit back and allow that to be, Baz lol.

even though they MAY be qualified to be doctors in their home countries, they ALL certainly didnt come here to do professional jobs, otherwise every factory floor, every toilet and coffee shop and every shelf in the land is being filled and worked on by a qualified doctor.

And Loads of them actually are. I won't respond to any further racial or bnp style views here.

Now that is a vintage Blair/Brown Little Britainesque style attack to defend a despicable policy of allowing immigrants into the UK without any form of border checks at all, and they did it to secure votes.

Has anyone noticed how quiet it has become these days when immigration policies are questioned and nobody is labelled a racist. Apart from on here.

Ok ok what you are saying is nonsense, our Nhs system is one of the best in the world, if no immigrants it would collapse! 4 young afghan lads work in my local car wash , why? Because its beneath most of the Brit lads to do such a job. Most of these guys are contributing and not just sitting in their arses claiming. Here to make a better life and good for them

Our real problem is europeans who just walk in with hand out waiting for cash. "

we had a polish builder move in with his family across the road from us 5 years ago after 2 years hard graft he lost his job did he sign on or go back to poland NO he retrained and is now a Fireman

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

well dont edd ,labour, lets kick cameron and ozzy and all there Eton boys into touch with reality

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

well i support labour,they might have done a lot wrong but ,but as for trust ,mm let me think i would rather support blair and that unelected scot, or ,let me think some tin pot dictator ,rather tham that smugg public school boy and his ritch kids club

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Get in!! short memory mate..or did u support blair.and the unelected scot for selling this country to the highest bidders.at least they shot gaddafi.."

I did support Blair actually. And would welcome him back in a flash.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

wow this thread looks like it will last longer than they did in power at this rate

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ok ok what you are saying is nonsense, our Nhs system is one of the best in the world, if no immigrants it would collapse! 4 young afghan lads work in my local car wash , why? Because its beneath most of the Brit lads to do such a job. Most of these guys are contributing and not just sitting in their arses claiming. Here to make a better life and good for them

Our real problem is europeans who just walk in with hand out waiting for cash. "

Just so we understand... are you denying that there was an active culture by the Labour Govt of shouting down anyone who opposed immigration and labelling them as racists?

I can recall many many occasions where Labour ministers blatantly called any opposition to immigration as having a Little Britain mentality.

I'm not opposed to immigration to this country but it has to be controlled and each applicant vetted as to his/her means of support and profession they intend to do once they get here. The Labour Govt ordered Border Control to relax those checks and allow immigrants to flood in without any questions asked at all. And now we're stuck with people like Abu Qatada who we can't get rid of unless Brussels says it's ok.

Please don't insult our intelligence by denying any of that didn't happen, and who allowed it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Ok ok what you are saying is nonsense, our Nhs system is one of the best in the world, if no immigrants it would collapse! 4 young afghan lads work in my local car wash , why? Because its beneath most of the Brit lads to do such a job. Most of these guys are contributing and not just sitting in their arses claiming. Here to make a better life and good for them

Our real problem is europeans who just walk in with hand out waiting for cash.

Just so we understand... are you denying that there was an active culture by the Labour Govt of shouting down anyone who opposed immigration and labelling them as racists?

I can recall many many occasions where Labour ministers blatantly called any opposition to immigration as having a Little Britain mentality.

I'm not opposed to immigration to this country but it has to be controlled and each applicant vetted as to his/her means of support and profession they intend to do once they get here. The Labour Govt ordered Border Control to relax those checks and allow immigrants to flood in without any questions asked at all. And now we're stuck with people like Abu Qatada who we can't get rid of unless Brussels says it's ok.

Please don't insult our intelligence by denying any of that didn't happen, and who allowed it. "

I will not insult your intelligence, however I will question it. My current Partner (fully qualified surgeon) did not have an easy task of getting into the country at all, in fact quite the opposite even though the NHS were begging UK Bordrer Agency to grant him a visa, the system he had to go through and the cost for a working Visa here was atrocious. That was under Labour Gov.

Maybe we should just ship them all back out, you are obv a tory supporter? Good luck with that.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"any one for some poppycock ? washed down with a lashing of twaddle i can say what i like same as you can were all entitled to an opinion its a free country but only on fridays these days

i actually agre with the sentiment that if you dont vote for what you stand for/believe in, then you really havent the right to moan about those that did actually get in.

IF it came down to 1 vote, and it was yours that would have made the difference between your representatives and the ones you didnt want, then you would be looking prety stupid right now for the fact you cba.

so yes, you have opinions, and the right o express them, but no, you dont have the right to moan about past or present governments because you havent expressed your view in the proper format.well said

I keep forgetting ...we use to live in a country that encouraged free speech and allowed people to express there views in whatever format thay wanted rather than repress it? i insulted no one. I get insulted and just ignore it and move on and the insulter makes bogus claim i insulted them ....oooopss get a load of me moaning agin...its my democratic right should i wish to... express it.

see, there you go again, completely passing over what i said.

you DID NOT vote for labour.

yet

you DID NOT vote against

so clearly you are indifferent as to who is and isnt in power.

so why are you moaning?

you said i was typical labour, yet i have NOT stuck up for labour once, ever, on this thread, or any other.

please dont lael everyone that doesnt lick your ass as a labour supporter cuz it wont get you very far"

i called you a labour supporter ?? your right ime totally ashamed of myself my deepest apologies ....ime now gonna go find someone with a serated tongue to go lick me arse whilst thoroughly washing my dirty disgusting mouth out with soap

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

As I said I have experienced border agency firsst hand, you probably read about it in the paper (Sun or NOTW) when they were supporting tory scum.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ok ok what you are saying is nonsense, our Nhs system is one of the best in the world, if no immigrants it would collapse! 4 young afghan lads work in my local car wash , why? Because its beneath most of the Brit lads to do such a job. Most of these guys are contributing and not just sitting in their arses claiming. Here to make a better life and good for them

Our real problem is europeans who just walk in with hand out waiting for cash.

Just so we understand... are you denying that there was an active culture by the Labour Govt of shouting down anyone who opposed immigration and labelling them as racists?

I can recall many many occasions where Labour ministers blatantly called any opposition to immigration as having a Little Britain mentality.

I'm not opposed to immigration to this country but it has to be controlled and each applicant vetted as to his/her means of support and profession they intend to do once they get here. The Labour Govt ordered Border Control to relax those checks and allow immigrants to flood in without any questions asked at all. And now we're stuck with people like Abu Qatada who we can't get rid of unless Brussels says it's ok.

Please don't insult our intelligence by denying any of that didn't happen, and who allowed it. "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"tory run council?

My deepest sympathies. "

My sympathies are with the labour run councils. My council is the fourth highest placed in the education tables and that is totally down to it being a Conservative council. It is also the top placed in the whole of the north west.

What do your Labour councils do that's so amazing? I've provided a great example of the work my conservative council does.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"tory run council?

My deepest sympathies.

My sympathies are with the labour run councils. My council is the fourth highest placed in the education tables and that is totally down to it being a Conservative council. It is also the top placed in the whole of the north west.

What do your Labour councils do that's so amazing? I've provided a great example of the work my conservative council does.

Ime fully aware of trafford i lived there ..now i live other side of old trafford over the irwell my councils labour ..as ime neither labour or tory ..i couldnt agree more with you.

"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *aucy3Couple  over a year ago

glasgow

this is a bit like the home team winning 1-0,at half time,in the first leg of a two leg tie.

ed miliband has not won the votes, by proving himself a worthy leader,who is capable of winning the argument,and winning over the voters.

the coalition has lost the votes,due to it's incompetence,this will not last,they'll be a much tighter unit by the next election.

plus the first 2 years in govt,are always all about taking,the next 2 years are all about giving.

ed miliband is not a leader,i'm just hoping these results dont give a false sense of security,giving the impression he is a leader,and could win a general election hmmmmm.

if david miliband is not the leader,coming into the next general election,labour will lose,conservatives will win,lib dems will be no more(nobody likes a bunch of grovelling,power greedy,principal free pricks)

i almost said,in my opinion,but why would i give somebody else's opinion,i'm not a lib dem.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ewels74Woman  over a year ago

Dundee/Angus/Blackpool

sorry but to me its been Labours fault that got us in this mess that we are in and by the way i worked for a company that brought over Polish workers, they were trained to learn hgv/lgv driving and once they had there english classes on top of it they were sent down to Newcastle i believe to work..

Anyways i digress, the fault has been Labour, cant stand them, and we can all complain about the Conservatives but they are undoing all the bad stuff to get the money back in the pot that the previous government sold off.

Gets off her stool, but many folk seem to have short term memory loss about the Labour government at times

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"sorry but to me its been Labours fault that got us in this mess that we are in and by the way i worked for a company that brought over Polish workers, they were trained to learn hgv/lgv driving and once they had there english classes on top of it they were sent down to Newcastle i believe to work..

Anyways i digress, the fault has been Labour, cant stand them, and we can all complain about the Conservatives but they are undoing all the bad stuff to get the money back in the pot that the previous government sold off.

Gets off her stool, but many folk seem to have short term memory loss about the Labour government at times"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"sorry but to me its been Labours fault that got us in this mess that we are in and by the way i worked for a company that brought over Polish workers, they were trained to learn hgv/lgv driving and once they had there english classes on top of it they were sent down to Newcastle i believe to work..

Anyways i digress, the fault has been Labour, cant stand them, and we can all complain about the Conservatives but they are undoing all the bad stuff to get the money back in the pot that the previous government sold off.

Gets off her stool, but many folk seem to have short term memory loss about the Labour government at times "

Labour has done more good to the country than the tories ever have or ever will. Yes people unfortunately have short memories, I don't.

They're doing the lords work I'd say.

I do agree that Ed is the wrong leader but that will change. Tory for the upper class rich (not that we have a class system) and that's all. Actually their new budget made me financially better off, but I don't really need it as much as the poorer or the elderly need it. They have it all wrong! Line they're own pockets time and time again. SCUM!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *am sampsonMan  over a year ago

cwmbran


"sorry but to me its been Labours fault that got us in this mess that we are in and by the way i worked for a company that brought over Polish workers, they were trained to learn hgv/lgv driving and once they had there english classes on top of it they were sent down to Newcastle i believe to work..

Anyways i digress, the fault has been Labour, cant stand them, and we can all complain about the Conservatives but they are undoing all the bad stuff to get the money back in the pot that the previous government sold off.

Gets off her stool, but many folk seem to have short term memory loss about the Labour government at times"

Sorry, but it's because most of us can remember the damage which tory governments have done to the country, and that's why we support labour

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"sorry but to me its been Labours fault that got us in this mess that we are in and by the way i worked for a company that brought over Polish workers, they were trained to learn hgv/lgv driving and once they had there english classes on top of it they were sent down to Newcastle i believe to work..

Anyways i digress, the fault has been Labour, cant stand them, and we can all complain about the Conservatives but they are undoing all the bad stuff to get the money back in the pot that the previous government sold off.

Gets off her stool, but many folk seem to have short term memory loss about the Labour government at times

Sorry, but it's because most of us can remember the damage which tory governments have done to the country, and that's why we support labour"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"sorry but to me its been Labours fault that got us in this mess that we are in and by the way i worked for a company that brought over Polish workers, they were trained to learn hgv/lgv driving and once they had there english classes on top of it they were sent down to Newcastle i believe to work..

Anyways i digress, the fault has been Labour, cant stand them, and we can all complain about the Conservatives but they are undoing all the bad stuff to get the money back in the pot that the previous government sold off.

Gets off her stool, but many folk seem to have short term memory loss about the Labour government at times

Sorry, but it's because most of us can remember the damage which tory governments have done to the country, and that's why we support labour"

How do you work that one out in 1997 the tories under john major left the incoming labour party with a thriving economy. Thirteen years of new labour later the labour treasurer left the incoming tory treasurer with a note saying Ha Ha Ha we have literally bankrupted the country enjoy yr term in office the cupboards are bare...i think you have a condition known as selective memmory loss

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *am sampsonMan  over a year ago

cwmbran


"sorry but to me its been Labours fault that got us in this mess that we are in and by the way i worked for a company that brought over Polish workers, they were trained to learn hgv/lgv driving and once they had there english classes on top of it they were sent down to Newcastle i believe to work..

Anyways i digress, the fault has been Labour, cant stand them, and we can all complain about the Conservatives but they are undoing all the bad stuff to get the money back in the pot that the previous government sold off.

Gets off her stool, but many folk seem to have short term memory loss about the Labour government at times

Sorry, but it's because most of us can remember the damage which tory governments have done to the country, and that's why we support labour

How do you work that one out in 1997 the tories under john major left the incoming labour party with a thriving economy. Thirteen years of new labour later the labour treasurer left the incoming tory treasurer with a note saying Ha Ha Ha we have literally bankrupted the country enjoy yr term in office the cupboards are bare...i think you have a condition known as selective memmory loss "

We seem to disagree on this as do a lot of people - you live with your memories and I'll live with mine which is perfectly good actually

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"sorry but to me its been Labours fault that got us in this mess that we are in and by the way i worked for a company that brought over Polish workers, they were trained to learn hgv/lgv driving and once they had there english classes on top of it they were sent down to Newcastle i believe to work..

Anyways i digress, the fault has been Labour, cant stand them, and we can all complain about the Conservatives but they are undoing all the bad stuff to get the money back in the pot that the previous government sold off.

Gets off her stool, but many folk seem to have short term memory loss about the Labour government at times

Labour has done more good to the country than the tories ever have or ever will. Yes people unfortunately have short memories, I don't.

They're doing the lords work I'd say.

I do agree that Ed is the wrong leader but that will change. Tory for the upper class rich (not that we have a class system) and that's all. Actually their new budget made me financially better off, but I don't really need it as much as the poorer or the elderly need it. They have it all wrong! Line they're own pockets time and time again. SCUM! "

and your telling me your beloved champagne socialist tony blair only had the good interests of the people at heart

i dont see him using any of his many luxurious houses he owns being used to home the homeless ..Now thats not very socialist is it.

Properties probably paid for with blood money by securing oil contracts with the americans over the illegal invasion of iraq cos he sure as fook couldnt afford such properties on his pms salary.

How anyone can still support such a lying tainted party with a war criminal as its x leader defies belief. You refer to the tories as scum a bit strong but the labour party proved when it comes to scum there top of the league.

Oh an by the way ime working class and was brought up to support labour and i voted for them in 97... ile never vote for them again. As for ed milliband how can you trust a man who didnt hesitate in stabbing his own brother in the back to get to be leader of the opposition.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"sorry but to me its been Labours fault that got us in this mess that we are in and by the way i worked for a company that brought over Polish workers, they were trained to learn hgv/lgv driving and once they had there english classes on top of it they were sent down to Newcastle i believe to work..

Anyways i digress, the fault has been Labour, cant stand them, and we can all complain about the Conservatives but they are undoing all the bad stuff to get the money back in the pot that the previous government sold off.

Gets off her stool, but many folk seem to have short term memory loss about the Labour government at times

Labour has done more good to the country than the tories ever have or ever will. Yes people unfortunately have short memories, I don't.

They're doing the lords work I'd say.

I do agree that Ed is the wrong leader but that will change. Tory for the upper class rich (not that we have a class system) and that's all. Actually their new budget made me financially better off, but I don't really need it as much as the poorer or the elderly need it. They have it all wrong! Line they're own pockets time and time again. SCUM!

and your telling me your beloved champagne socialist tony blair only had the good interests of the people at heart

i dont see him using any of his many luxurious houses he owns being used to home the homeless ..Now thats not very socialist is it.

Properties probably paid for with blood money by securing oil contracts with the americans over the illegal invasion of iraq cos he sure as fook couldnt afford such properties on his pms salary.

How anyone can still support such a lying tainted party with a war criminal as its x leader defies belief. You refer to the tories as scum a bit strong but the labour party proved when it comes to scum there top of the league.

Oh an by the way ime working class and was brought up to support labour and i voted for them in 97... ile never vote for them again. As for ed milliband how can you trust a man who didnt hesitate in stabbing his own brother in the back to get to be leader of the opposition.

"

I do agree with you regarding Ed. draw the line there I'm afraid. You keep supporting Tories or whoever. It's your choice after all. I'll go with my conscience to Labour anyday.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Labour has done more good to the country than the tories ever have or ever will. Yes people unfortunately have short memories, I don't.

They're doing the lords work I'd say.

I do agree that Ed is the wrong leader but that will change. Tory for the upper class rich (not that we have a class system) and that's all. Actually their new budget made me financially better off, but I don't really need it as much as the poorer or the elderly need it. They have it all wrong! Line they're own pockets time and time again. SCUM! "

What is this "good" you speak of?

"Line they're own pockets" ?? Slanderous accusation there.

Do you know what state the country was in before Thatcher? We would've been left in the dust if it wasn't for her. Like I've said before, historians in 100 years time will be confused as to why she was hated so much when they compare the state of the country before her and after her.

You think unions are amazing? Causing chaos because they believe they deserve more money than what the market suggests. Artificially high wages result in inflation as a result. Union bosses earning 6 figure salaries paid by the tax payers to organise disruption to their lives. It is absolutely disgraceful!

You think a massive public sector is a good thing? Just look at Greece. All it causes is more debt.

I've seen an awful lot of Tory bashing and referring to the Tories as scum etc. on here, yet in those same posts I see no examples of policies which labour enacted that we're good and I have yet to see an example of what the Tories did that was so bad. I'll help you out a little and accept the Poll tax was a bit of a disaster, the reasoning behind it wasn't terrible but the planning and implementation was a disaster. But it was by no means a long term economy crippling problem.

I've noticed a lot over the years that Tories seem to argue points while the labour supporters are in general very clueless and ignorant. Their best responses are "The tories are for rich people" (A myth since about 1918) and most other responses are just abuse. Case in point the recent vitriol aimed at Louise Mensch.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

What is this "good" you speak of?

"Line they're own pockets" ?? Slanderous accusation there.

Do you know what state the country was in before Thatcher? We would've been left in the dust if it wasn't for her. Like I've said before, historians in 100 years time will be confused as to why she was hated so much when they compare the state of the country before her and after her.

You think unions are amazing? Causing chaos because they believe they deserve more money than what the market suggests. Artificially high wages result in inflation as a result. Union bosses earning 6 figure salaries paid by the tax payers to organise disruption to their lives. It is absolutely disgraceful!

You think a massive public sector is a good thing? Just look at Greece. All it causes is more debt.

I've seen an awful lot of Tory bashing and referring to the Tories as scum etc. on here, yet in those same posts I see no examples of policies which labour enacted that we're good and I have yet to see an example of what the Tories did that was so bad. I'll help you out a little and accept the Poll tax was a bit of a disaster, the reasoning behind it wasn't terrible but the planning and implementation was a disaster. But it was by no means a long term economy crippling problem.

I've noticed a lot over the years that Tories seem to argue points while the labour supporters are in general very clueless and ignorant. Their best responses are "The tories are for rich people" (A myth since about 1918) and most other responses are just abuse. Case in point the recent vitriol aimed at Louise Mensch."

The minimum wage, that is something good that Labour and the unions have done and something opposed bitterly by Tories.

Yes i like unions, i think they do alot of good. This idea that "the market will pay" is rubbish. The market drives down wages, especially where large corporations are concerned as there are limited ways for people to demand a fair wage for there work and competition is limited. Union bosses salarys are not paid for out of tax, they are paid for out of union dues and are set in part by the membership.

Its not public sectors that produce debt, its services provided by the government. There provision has to be paid for out of taxes whether it is carried out by the public sector or a private contractor. Greece was a difficult situation, there collapse was caused by the banking and financial crises not by government spending although difficulty collecting taxes and a narrowly based economy exacerbated things.

The idea that labour supporters are clueless is slander, ive seen alot of labour people above arguing very good points and ive seen Tory supporters spouting rubbish so it goes both ways. Thatcher tried to take away free school milk for kids, there's a bad policy. She privatised pretty much everything she could get her hands on and its hardly made rail travel cheaper or better.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

How could I forget

child tax credits

Increased NHS spending

Increased education spending

Extra money for science

Civil partnerships (should have been marriage)

To name but a few

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

What is this "good" you speak of?

"Line they're own pockets" ?? Slanderous accusation there.

Do you know what state the country was in before Thatcher? We would've been left in the dust if it wasn't for her. Like I've said before, historians in 100 years time will be confused as to why she was hated so much when they compare the state of the country before her and after her.

You think unions are amazing? Causing chaos because they believe they deserve more money than what the market suggests. Artificially high wages result in inflation as a result. Union bosses earning 6 figure salaries paid by the tax payers to organise disruption to their lives. It is absolutely disgraceful!

You think a massive public sector is a good thing? Just look at Greece. All it causes is more debt.

I've seen an awful lot of Tory bashing and referring to the Tories as scum etc. on here, yet in those same posts I see no examples of policies which labour enacted that we're good and I have yet to see an example of what the Tories did that was so bad. I'll help you out a little and accept the Poll tax was a bit of a disaster, the reasoning behind it wasn't terrible but the planning and implementation was a disaster. But it was by no means a long term economy crippling problem.

I've noticed a lot over the years that Tories seem to argue points while the labour supporters are in general very clueless and ignorant. Their best responses are "The tories are for rich people" (A myth since about 1918) and most other responses are just abuse. Case in point the recent vitriol aimed at Louise Mensch.

The minimum wage, that is something good that Labour and the unions have done and something opposed bitterly by Tories.

Yes i like unions, i think they do alot of good. This idea that "the market will pay" is rubbish. The market drives down wages, especially where large corporations are concerned as there are limited ways for people to demand a fair wage for there work and competition is limited. Union bosses salarys are not paid for out of tax, they are paid for out of union dues and are set in part by the membership.

Its not public sectors that produce debt, its services provided by the government. There provision has to be paid for out of taxes whether it is carried out by the public sector or a private contractor. Greece was a difficult situation, there collapse was caused by the banking and financial crises not by government spending although difficulty collecting taxes and a narrowly based economy exacerbated things.

The idea that labour supporters are clueless is slander, ive seen alot of labour people above arguing very good points and ive seen Tory supporters spouting rubbish so it goes both ways. Thatcher tried to take away free school milk for kids, there's a bad policy. She privatised pretty much everything she could get her hands on and its hardly made rail travel cheaper or better.

How could I forget

child tax credits

Increased NHS spending

Increased education spending

Extra money for science

Civil partnerships

"

I'll go through your little ones at the end first quickly before tackling the big fish.

Child tax credits - As far as I know their implementation wasn't opposed at the time and the only reason they have to be scaled back now is because of the damage caused to the economy by labour. I do admit they are a good thing though and should have been kept on as they were.

Increased nhs and education spending - all that spending and the services have gotten so much worse. Any government would increase spending but the tories are also calling for reform because simply spending hasn't worked. You didn't really make a point here.

Extra money for science - Again the conservatives didn't oppose this and if we could afford it no doubt would spend even more on science too. Not really a point either.

civil partnerships - you agree is should have been marriage, the conservatives are actually trying to implement this and would have done so by now if it wasn't for religious opposition and public opinion. Remember it is the public they are here to serve, not simply what they themselves believe is right or wrong.

Big fish-

1. Minimum wage

I can't draw graphs on here but basically to pay for the increased salaries companies hire less workers. As far as I'm aware No Nobel prize winning economist supports it.

2.Trade Unions

You admit the market drives down salaries. Now you do realise this means the costs to the firms hiring these workers is lower, which means the finished goods/services will cost less. So on these lower salaries people are not going to be worse off.

the artificially increased salaries from trade unions and the minimum wage cause inflation, which is why the price of things has gone up so much under labour! It is unfair on those not in trade unions.

The biggest problem with arguing for trade unions is that you can't explain why the very large amount of people who aren't in trade unions aren't starving, being paid pennies or constantly complaining.

you do know trade unions are just supply side monopolies. And I know your intelligent enough to know that monopolies are bad..

It was proven in the house of commons that labour spent millions earned through tax to pay for union boss salaries. (do a simple google search)

Also the main point is that a lot of unions represent public sector workers, whose salaries are paid by taxpayers. It is from that taxpayer money that they pay their union fees. This is known as an indirect Subsidy.

We pay them to cause chaos to our lives!

3.Public sector

you say the public sector doesn't procure debt?

You think taxation covers all the public sector costs?

I'm obviously not saying we shouldn't have police officers and teachers but there is also an awful lot of waste.

You say we would be paying even if there were private contracts. well the difference there would be that the contractors would have to compete for contracts and therefore are almost certain to be more efficient and therefore cheaper.

4. "clueless labour supporters"

I said in general, and my point was that a lot of people vote labour because of the perceived view that the Tories are for rich people. Grammar schools helping those who can't afford a public school education is definitely not a rich person policy. The right to buy your own council home, is definitely not a rich person policy. Both opposed by labour!

5. free milk

Such a bad policy that the affects will be felt for generations to come. That's the best you've got? My generation never had free milk and we're alive and well.

I didn't see labour bring it back either.

6. Privatisation

Economics tells us that the private sector is more efficient than the public sector for too many reasons to list. Why should public money be spent on british airways?

The money from the sales was used to improve the country and some of the prosperity the country enjoyed after Thatcher was to do with the money gained from privatising.

Apart from the railway, which I'm about to come on to, which privatisation has caused you grief?

Now regarding the railways, it is a massively complex situation which, although impossible without typing a thousands of words, I will try to explain.

The railway is still massively subsidised by the government and isn't really privatised. If it was truly privatised there would be hardly any services because railways by their nature are extremely inefficient. There is no national railway system I know of which isn't subsidised or owned by the government.

I can't compare to a time before privatisation but I use rail services very frequently and I don't think the odd train being a couple of minutes late is that awful. It's a cliche to bash the rail system.

Train tickets being more expensive can partly be put down to inflation. Some of the causes of which are your beloved minimum wage and trade unionism.

Now it can be argued that tickets would be cheaper if British rail wasn't privatised and I agree that would probably be the case. But, and it's a massive but, the price would be subsidised by taxpayers, so indirectly you would be paying anyway. And not only would you be paying but also the millions and millions of people who don't use the railway would also be paying, which is very unreasonable.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

MancHarry ... Brilliant response. Well done you.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I'll go through your little ones at the end first quickly before tackling the big fish.

Child tax credits - As far as I know their implementation wasn't opposed at the time and the only reason they have to be scaled back now is because of the damage caused to the economy by labour. I do admit they are a good thing though and should have been kept on as they were.

Increased nhs and education spending - all that spending and the services have gotten so much worse. Any government would increase spending but the tories are also calling for reform because simply spending hasn't worked. You didn't really make a point here.

Extra money for science - Again the conservatives didn't oppose this and if we could afford it no doubt would spend even more on science too. Not really a point either.

civil partnerships - you agree is should have been marriage, the conservatives are actually trying to implement this and would have done so by now if it wasn't for religious opposition and public opinion. Remember it is the public they are here to serve, not simply what they themselves believe is right or wrong.

Big fish-

1. Minimum wage

I can't draw graphs on here but basically to pay for the increased salaries companies hire less workers. As far as I'm aware No Nobel prize winning economist supports it.

2.Trade Unions

You admit the market drives down salaries. Now you do realise this means the costs to the firms hiring these workers is lower, which means the finished goods/services will cost less. So on these lower salaries people are not going to be worse off.

the artificially increased salaries from trade unions and the minimum wage cause inflation, which is why the price of things has gone up so much under labour! It is unfair on those not in trade unions.

The biggest problem with arguing for trade unions is that you can't explain why the very large amount of people who aren't in trade unions aren't starving, being paid pennies or constantly complaining.

you do know trade unions are just supply side monopolies. And I know your intelligent enough to know that monopolies are bad..

It was proven in the house of commons that labour spent millions earned through tax to pay for union boss salaries. (do a simple google search)

Also the main point is that a lot of unions represent public sector workers, whose salaries are paid by taxpayers. It is from that taxpayer money that they pay their union fees. This is known as an indirect Subsidy.

We pay them to cause chaos to our lives!

3.Public sector

you say the public sector doesn't procure debt?

You think taxation covers all the public sector costs?

I'm obviously not saying we shouldn't have police officers and teachers but there is also an awful lot of waste.

You say we would be paying even if there were private contracts. well the difference there would be that the contractors would have to compete for contracts and therefore are almost certain to be more efficient and therefore cheaper.

4. "clueless labour supporters"

I said in general, and my point was that a lot of people vote labour because of the perceived view that the Tories are for rich people. Grammar schools helping those who can't afford a public school education is definitely not a rich person policy. The right to buy your own council home, is definitely not a rich person policy. Both opposed by labour!

5. free milk

Such a bad policy that the affects will be felt for generations to come. That's the best you've got? My generation never had free milk and we're alive and well.

I didn't see labour bring it back either.

6. Privatisation

Economics tells us that the private sector is more efficient than the public sector for too many reasons to list. Why should public money be spent on british airways?

The money from the sales was used to improve the country and some of the prosperity the country enjoyed after Thatcher was to do with the money gained from privatising.

Apart from the railway, which I'm about to come on to, which privatisation has caused you grief?

Now regarding the railways, it is a massively complex situation which, although impossible without typing a thousands of words, I will try to explain.

The railway is still massively subsidised by the government and isn't really privatised. If it was truly privatised there would be hardly any services because railways by their nature are extremely inefficient. There is no national railway system I know of which isn't subsidised or owned by the government.

I can't compare to a time before privatisation but I use rail services very frequently and I don't think the odd train being a couple of minutes late is that awful. It's a cliche to bash the rail system.

Train tickets being more expensive can partly be put down to inflation. Some of the causes of which are your beloved minimum wage and trade unionism.

Now it can be argued that tickets would be cheaper if British rail wasn't privatised and I agree that would probably be the case. But, and it's a massive but, the price would be subsidised by taxpayers, so indirectly you would be paying anyway. And not only would you be paying but also the millions and millions of people who don't use the railway would also be paying, which is very unreasonable.

"

The Tories opposed child tax credits.

No they havent, every report ive read recently have shown increased productivity in the NHS and improving health outcomes, waiting lists were down and even cancer survival rates were starting to increase dramatically so i dispute that they have gotten worse. The current reforms arent about efficiency savings programs for that have existed for the past 3 or 4 years they are ideological in nature to increase competition.

Civil partnerships, lots of Tories opposed them they also opposed lots of other legislation around gay rights, age of consent etc.

1) Minimum wage, Paul Krugman is a nobel laureate (quick google search). Inflation was historically low under Labour. Lots of large scale studies in the US have shown minimum wage increases have minimal effects on employment levels and pump more money into local economies.

2) Trade unions, before the rise of trade unions lots of people were hungry and paid a pittance, there was a culture change around the middle of the last century. Ideas like social welfare are products of early labour policy and trade unions, that is why a lot of people aren't starving and yes lots of people complain. They really dont pay union boss salarys, do you have a link to the article because i cant find anything. Chaos, how many strikes can you remember?

3) Public sector, no im not saying the public sector doesnt procure debt what i am saying is that it isnt who provides the service it is the service itself that costs money.

There is always waste, look at large companies they also have waste. Its funny how people that talk about public spending waste can never name it.

Private contractors aren't more efficient, there are studies about that too, with the way contracts are procured it drives down service levels but does little to save the government money.

4) Why do lots of people vote Tory every time? its an ideological thing. Labour oppose grammar schools because they introduce elitism into the state school system.

5) Tongue in cheek, its what i remember from school. She didnt get rid of school milk in the end.

6) Lots of economists argue that governments are perfectly capable of providing public services and that private companies are often motivated by profits and not service.

British airways was a vanity project, every government has/had an airline.

You dont need to patronise me im perfectly capable of understanding how the railway system works and the network of franchises. It is still subsidised the money is supposed to be used for modernisation and running late night and rural services.

our railways are 30% more expensive that European equivalents, staff wages have broadly comparable etc etc however the train companies make massive massive massive profits out of public money.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

No they havent, every report ive read recently have shown increased productivity in the NHS and improving health outcomes, waiting lists were down and even cancer survival rates were starting to increase dramatically so I dispute that they have gotten worse. The current reforms arent about efficiency savings programs for that have existed for the past 3 or 4 years they are ideological in nature to increase competition.

Civil partnerships, lots of Tories opposed them they also opposed lots of other legislation around gay rights, age of consent etc.

1) Minimum wage, Paul Krugman is a nobel laureate (quick google search). Inflation was historically low under Labour. Lots of large scale studies in the US have shown minimum wage increases have minimal effects on employment levels and pump more money into local economies.

2) Trade unions, before the rise of trade unions lots of people were hungry and paid a pittance, there was a culture change around the middle of the last century. Ideas like social welfare are products of early labour policy and trade unions, that is why a lot of people aren't starving and yes lots of people complain. They really dont pay union boss salarys, do you have a link to the article because i cant find anything. Chaos, how many strikes can you remember?

3) Public sector, no im not saying the public sector doesnt procure debt what i am saying is that it isnt who provides the service it is the service itself that costs money.

There is always waste, look at large companies they also have waste. Its funny how people that talk about public spending waste can never name it.

Private contractors aren't more efficient, there are studies about that too, with the way contracts are procured it drives down service levels but does little to save the government money.

4) Why do lots of people vote Tory every time? its an ideological thing. Labour oppose grammar schools because they introduce elitism into the state school system.

5) Tongue in cheek, its what i remember from school. She didnt get rid of school milk in the end.

6) Lots of economists argue that governments are perfectly capable of providing public services and that private companies are often motivated by profits and not service.

British airways was a vanity project, every government has/had an airline.

You dont need to patronise me im perfectly capable of understanding how the railway system works and the network of franchises. It is still subsidised the money is supposed to be used for modernisation and running late night and rural services.

our railways are 30% more expensive that European equivalents, staff wages have broadly comparable etc etc however the train companies make massive massive massive profits out of public money."

Cancer survival rates are up due to breakthroughs in science not as a result of increased spending on the NHS.

I can't believe you argue that competition doesn't bring about more efficiency. This is basic economics, obviously there are exceptions to the rule, but if you have to side you choose the situation which is more efficient 99% of the time.

There are also people opposing gay marriage in the labour camp. This is why we live in a democracy. You can't deny that it is TOry party policy to implement gay marriage.

1. Minimum wage - Even if you can prove that in the USA (Not the UK) that the minimum wage has minimal effect on employment levels, all this means is that rather than sacking some employees to pay for the higher wages, they just charge more for the goods and services. Still a very bad thing and still causes inflation.

By the way Krugman was an advisor to enron, loses a bit of credibility as a result.

2. Trade unions - This is not the 19th century or early 20th century. You can't use the situation a hundred years ago to defend something which isn't needed now. Like I said there's plenty of people who aren't in unions and they are not starving or complaining. Our legal system is much much stronger know and there are many laws to protect workers, we don't need unions for it.

I described how they are indirectly subsidised by the tax payer, you surely can't deny that? It's against forum rules to post links.

3. Public sector - there is always waste so we shouldn't try to eradicate as much as possible? Can't name public sector waste? you never asked me to, but you can start with all the pointless QUANGOS set up by Labour.

Private contractors are more efficient by their nature. Yes you may have found A study but you can also find studies proving the opposite. What you can't argue against is that economic theory and the more widely believed consensus says they are more efficient.

4. Grammar schools - And what is wrong with a meritocracy. Also, surely it's better to have an education system where it can be tailored to your mental ability to get the best out of you. What is the point in someone intelligent having to sit and listen to something being explained a hundred times when he doesn't need it to be. Why drag intelligent people down just to make others feel better about themselves. This also means those who are best placed to get places at uni are those that have been lucky enough to go to public schools.

6. privatisation - Lots of economists may argue against it, but the most famous of those theories was implemented by your socialist friends in the USSR. I don't think you need reminding how that turned out.

You can't compare our railway systems to other european ones because we require more modernising as it is older and we are much much more busier than nearly all European railways except Germany. Therefore costs are higher. Germany benefits from having a stronger economy and therefore can afford to subsidise the railway more. Almost everything in The UK is more expensive die to our strong currency.

Also Don't accuse me of patronising you, it's not common knowledge on how the rail system works and I'm not psychic. It was also required to describe it for my explanation. And by the way youre not the only person reading this thread.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ovedupstillCouple  over a year ago

mullinwire

minimum wage was a terriblr idea.

before its implimentation you could almost name your wage, now they tell you its all you are getting.

instead of it being about a minimum amount for an income, it has now become a yardstick to beat unskilled labour with.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *waymanMan  over a year ago

newcastle


"tory run council?

My deepest sympathies.

My sympathies are with the labour run councils. My council is the fourth highest placed in the education tables and that is totally down to it being a Conservative council. It is also the top placed in the whole of the north west.

What do your Labour councils do that's so amazing? I've provided a great example of the work my conservative council does.

"

Go away and google value added educatinal performance - it might make your local stats a little more comprehensible.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It's the council, so any useful gains in productivity and savings will now be lost for the next term

Stand by for large council tax bills 2013...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *waymanMan  over a year ago

newcastle


"

No they havent, every report ive read recently have shown increased productivity in the NHS and improving health outcomes, waiting lists were down and even cancer survival rates were starting to increase dramatically so I dispute that they have gotten worse. The current reforms arent about efficiency savings programs for that have existed for the past 3 or 4 years they are ideological in nature to increase competition.

Civil partnerships, lots of Tories opposed them they also opposed lots of other legislation around gay rights, age of consent etc.

1) Minimum wage, Paul Krugman is a nobel laureate (quick google search). Inflation was historically low under Labour. Lots of large scale studies in the US have shown minimum wage increases have minimal effects on employment levels and pump more money into local economies.

2) Trade unions, before the rise of trade unions lots of people were hungry and paid a pittance, there was a culture change around the middle of the last century. Ideas like social welfare are products of early labour policy and trade unions, that is why a lot of people aren't starving and yes lots of people complain. They really dont pay union boss salarys, do you have a link to the article because i cant find anything. Chaos, how many strikes can you remember?

3) Public sector, no im not saying the public sector doesnt procure debt what i am saying is that it isnt who provides the service it is the service itself that costs money.

There is always waste, look at large companies they also have waste. Its funny how people that talk about public spending waste can never name it.

Private contractors aren't more efficient, there are studies about that too, with the way contracts are procured it drives down service levels but does little to save the government money.

4) Why do lots of people vote Tory every time? its an ideological thing. Labour oppose grammar schools because they introduce elitism into the state school system.

5) Tongue in cheek, its what i remember from school. She didnt get rid of school milk in the end.

6) Lots of economists argue that governments are perfectly capable of providing public services and that private companies are often motivated by profits and not service.

British airways was a vanity project, every government has/had an airline.

You dont need to patronise me im perfectly capable of understanding how the railway system works and the network of franchises. It is still subsidised the money is supposed to be used for modernisation and running late night and rural services.

our railways are 30% more expensive that European equivalents, staff wages have broadly comparable etc etc however the train companies make massive massive massive profits out of public money.

Cancer survival rates are up due to breakthroughs in science not as a result of increased spending on the NHS.

I can't believe you argue that competition doesn't bring about more efficiency. This is basic economics, obviously there are exceptions to the rule, but if you have to side you choose the situation which is more efficient 99% of the time.

There are also people opposing gay marriage in the labour camp. This is why we live in a democracy. You can't deny that it is TOry party policy to implement gay marriage.

1. Minimum wage - Even if you can prove that in the USA (Not the UK) that the minimum wage has minimal effect on employment levels, all this means is that rather than sacking some employees to pay for the higher wages, they just charge more for the goods and services. Still a very bad thing and still causes inflation.

By the way Krugman was an advisor to enron, loses a bit of credibility as a result.

2. Trade unions - This is not the 19th century or early 20th century. You can't use the situation a hundred years ago to defend something which isn't needed now. Like I said there's plenty of people who aren't in unions and they are not starving or complaining. Our legal system is much much stronger know and there are many laws to protect workers, we don't need unions for it.

I described how they are indirectly subsidised by the tax payer, you surely can't deny that? It's against forum rules to post links.

3. Public sector - there is always waste so we shouldn't try to eradicate as much as possible? Can't name public sector waste? you never asked me to, but you can start with all the pointless QUANGOS set up by Labour.

Private contractors are more efficient by their nature. Yes you may have found A study but you can also find studies proving the opposite. What you can't argue against is that economic theory and the more widely believed consensus says they are more efficient.

4. Grammar schools - And what is wrong with a meritocracy. Also, surely it's better to have an education system where it can be tailored to your mental ability to get the best out of you. What is the point in someone intelligent having to sit and listen to something being explained a hundred times when he doesn't need it to be. Why drag intelligent people down just to make others feel better about themselves. This also means those who are best placed to get places at uni are those that have been lucky enough to go to public schools.

6. privatisation - Lots of economists may argue against it, but the most famous of those theories was implemented by your socialist friends in the USSR. I don't think you need reminding how that turned out.

You can't compare our railway systems to other european ones because we require more modernising as it is older and we are much much more busier than nearly all European railways except Germany. Therefore costs are higher. Germany benefits from having a stronger economy and therefore can afford to subsidise the railway more. Almost everything in The UK is more expensive die to our strong currency.

Also Don't accuse me of patronising you, it's not common knowledge on how the rail system works and I'm not psychic. It was also required to describe it for my explanation. And by the way youre not the only person reading this thread.

"

Christ knows why you bother, but the smearing of Paul Krugman is spectacularly embarassing for you. Here's what Paul Krugman has said about his time 'advising' Enron.

"To make it easier for anyone who is still interested in this story to get the facts right, here are some frequently asked questions about my role on the Enron advisory board, with answers.

1. What did I do? In early 1999 I was asked to serve on a panel that offered Enron executives briefings on economic and political issues. As far as I knew at the time, they genuinely wanted to learn something. I resigned from that board in the fall of 1999, when I accepted an offer to write for the New York Times.

2. What was I paid? It turns out that I was actually paid $37,500 - the last quarterly payment did not take place, because of my early resignation from the board.

3. Was this exorbitant? It didn't seem so at the time. In 1998-1999 my normal fee for a one-hour business speech in Boston or New York was $20,000 - more if the speech involved long-distance travel. The Enron board required that I spend 4 days in Houston. So the sum they offered didn't seem out of line - if anything it seemed rather low compared with my usual rates.

4. Was I being paid off because I was a journalist? That Enron board, when I was on it, did not strike me as a board of pundits. It included Larry Lindsey and Bob Zoellick - future Bush administration officials, though I had no way of knowing that, but certainly not journalists. It also included Pankaj Ghemawat, a strategy professor at Harvard, and Irwin Stelzer, an economist at the American Enterprise Institute. (Stelzer had a column in the London Times, but I didn't know that) The only person there I thought of as a journalist was William Kristol - I thought he was there to regale us with Washington gossip. And I regarded myself as being in the same category as Ghemawat - an academic expert, who was there because of his expertise."

So he wasn't in any way involved with what went wrong with Enron, and your willingness to smear him min the way you have must throw into doubt everything else you've said.

Why do you bother? This isn't a political site - the rubbish you've written isn't going to persuade anyone, and I don't think anyone will think you're better in bed because you've cut and pasted some rubbish from lunatic fringe websites...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

After reading the thread, wish I understood politics, then I could work out who is lying the least and vote for them as I've not bothered for the past 3 years

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ucsparkMan  over a year ago

dudley


"After reading the thread, wish I understood politics, then I could work out who is lying the least and vote for them as I've not bothered for the past 3 years"

Just read your post, I say you got a pretty good grasp on it. They all bend the truth as soon as they gain power, be great if they had no option but to do as they promised.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Christ knows why you bother, but the smearing of Paul Krugman is spectacularly embarassing for you. Here's what Paul Krugman has said about his time 'advising' Enron.

"To make it easier for anyone who is still interested in this story to get the facts right, here are some frequently asked questions about my role on the Enron advisory board, with answers.

1. What did I do? In early 1999 I was asked to serve on a panel that offered Enron executives briefings on economic and political issues. As far as I knew at the time, they genuinely wanted to learn something. I resigned from that board in the fall of 1999, when I accepted an offer to write for the New York Times.

2. What was I paid? It turns out that I was actually paid $37,500 - the last quarterly payment did not take place, because of my early resignation from the board.

3. Was this exorbitant? It didn't seem so at the time. In 1998-1999 my normal fee for a one-hour business speech in Boston or New York was $20,000 - more if the speech involved long-distance travel. The Enron board required that I spend 4 days in Houston. So the sum they offered didn't seem out of line - if anything it seemed rather low compared with my usual rates.

4. Was I being paid off because I was a journalist? That Enron board, when I was on it, did not strike me as a board of pundits. It included Larry Lindsey and Bob Zoellick - future Bush administration officials, though I had no way of knowing that, but certainly not journalists. It also included Pankaj Ghemawat, a strategy professor at Harvard, and Irwin Stelzer, an economist at the American Enterprise Institute. (Stelzer had a column in the London Times, but I didn't know that) The only person there I thought of as a journalist was William Kristol - I thought he was there to regale us with Washington gossip. And I regarded myself as being in the same category as Ghemawat - an academic expert, who was there because of his expertise."

So he wasn't in any way involved with what went wrong with Enron, and your willingness to smear him min the way you have must throw into doubt everything else you've said.

Why do you bother? This isn't a political site - the rubbish you've written isn't going to persuade anyone, and I don't think anyone will think you're better in bed because you've cut and pasted some rubbish from lunatic fringe websites..."

I never said he was involved with what went wrong.

Nothing of what I typed was copy and pasted, whereas most of what you typed was. Your hypocrisy has made me chuckle to say the least. It was there to be seen in the local elections thread too.

I'm not aware of any lunatic fringe websites and the views I expressed were by no means outlandish or extreme.

You think by trying to make out that I'm attempting to impress people so they sleep with me, that my points suddenly become invalid? Or do you think you succeed in trying to make me look stupid? My motives for the record have nothing to do with that, but simply because I enjoy debating.

I get the impression your a very intelligent person armed with plenty of facts but the manner in which you go about responding to others is in my opinion quite petulant.

Also I don't need you to suggest I stop expressing my political opinions because they don't conform to yours, Stalin.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *waymanMan  over a year ago

newcastle


"does Labour gaining more councils mean that your bins will be emptied every week instead of a fortnight now??...

will the people really notice a difference in their overall living standards now that labours won so many??....

won't thinks plod on as normal really not

affecting the majority of the populace??"

Why should bins be emptied every week?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

can only repeat

I really do not think there is a Labour movement anymore. Certainly not in the party.

"People have been browbeaten into an everyone for themselves survival mode. So sad how people have used all the good post war developments as steps up, eg education, health and are now willing to stand by and see them dismanted cos they are "alright" or just downright apathetic. "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *iss_tressWoman  over a year ago

London


"I have enjoyed all the party politics on here these last few weeks. I do worry that many of those that post seem have little real knowledge of how our democracy is run. Comments that you don't like any of them so won't vote ensures that the majority do not get the decision they want. One area in these elections had a turn out of 10% and the average has been around 35%. Apathy is rife - more vote for BGT and X-Factor than in elections to decide who and how the areas we live in the country we live in is run.

I am cynic (it doesn't matter who you vote for you always get the government) but I always vote. People fought and died for my right to vote. Not all men could vote and it took even longer for women to be given that right and we repay them by not being bothered to even apply for a postal vote

I would like to see a 'none of the above' box on the ballot form so that those not happy with any party are represented.

Apologies for going on a bit further with this lecture but onto payments and 'job theft':

1. Councillors are paid expenses for attending council meetings. Unless they are part of a cabinet arrangement where there is a local elected mayor where they receive a salary. The practice of paying for attendance at meetings has led to council chambers continuing debate long into the night in order to get the enhanced expenses. Not helpful to any of us but it is how many of them pay for the time spent on local constituency matters.

MPs are paid a salary. Cabinet members get more. When they lose their seats they are protected by employment law in as much as they receive a severance payment to help their transition. Some are left in financial hardship after this others have worked out their exit strategy plans. Their local parties raise funds to support their consituency work.

The hours they put in are not conducive to a good family life and lead to many women not ever fully participating in politics at this level.

"

I wasn't going to vote as I'd become apathetic, even though I work for a trade union. I to wish there was a "none of the above" box.

My 20 year old daughter gave me a lecture encompassing the points you've made in your post...points I've made to her over the years.

The mother became the child, shamed into taking part in the democratic process many fought for. She even walked me to the polling station, lecturing all the way and advising me not to fold the ballot paper.

I take some pride in her attitude, but it's down to her as my other daughter, raised with the same message in the same household rolled her eyes and didn't vote.

One thing is clear from this thread, my 20 year old daughter has a clearer understanding of politics and political history as highlighted by some of the shite being spouted on here.

Some people really should remember it's better to keep silent and let others think you're a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Some people really should remember it's better to keep silent and let others think you're a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt! "

You were doing well until you posted the above sentence, and then I saw that and completely ignored the rest of your post. It's a very condescending thing to say.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"does Labour gaining more councils mean that your bins will be emptied every week instead of a fortnight now??...

will the people really notice a difference in their overall living standards now that labours won so many??....

won't thinks plod on as normal really not

affecting the majority of the populace??

Why should bins be emptied every week?"

Because they get full every week.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Some people really should remember it's better to keep silent and let others think you're a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt!

You were doing well until you posted the above sentence, and then I saw that and completely ignored the rest of your post. It's a very condescending thing to say. "

not only condescending but belittling and discouraging and surely everyone should be encouraged to join the political debate. The only way to learn and progress is to participate after all.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"After reading the thread, wish I understood politics, then I could work out who is lying the least and vote for them as I've not bothered for the past 3 years"

Well which party lied to us and tried to terrorise us in order to gain our support to invade another country in order to steal its oil.

Which party signed us up to europe gave away our sovereign right to govern ourselves and make our own laws and allow mass immigration into our country..stating at the time it would give its people the choice only later to lye by not giving its people a choice such as in a referendum.

On a local front i remember when they were shutting down the maternity ward at my local hospital.

there were people protesting then labour mp /coincillor Hazel blears turned up to throw in her support.

A protester reminded her that it was her own party the labour party who were shutting down the maternity ward to which ms blears suddenly shielded her face from photographers in case she was seen protesting against her own parties policies ...very unlike ms Blears to miss a publicity photo. She later went on to condescend her own constituents when she got caught with her hand in the till stealing taxpayers money through the exspense system.

She was let of with simply a grovelling public apology at the time when the likes of you and me would have been thrown in jail and qute rightly.

Which politician was seen on tv assuating a member of the public because they threw an egg at him and was not even charged with assualt.

The same politician above being in charge of the council tax. passing law to jail people for non payment of the council tax. Whilst at the same time casually forgetting to pay his own council tax then making a joke of it ?

I rhink you will find it was the leader of the labour party tony blair ..hazel blears labour mp and john prescott..labour mp

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"After reading the thread, wish I understood politics, then I could work out who is lying the least and vote for them as I've not bothered for the past 3 years

Well which party lied to us and tried to terrorise us in order to gain our support to invade another country in order to steal its oil.

Which party signed us up to europe gave away our sovereign right to govern ourselves and make our own laws and allow mass immigration into our country..stating at the time it would give its people the choice only later to lye by not giving its people a choice such as in a referendum.

On a local front i remember when they were shutting down the maternity ward at my local hospital.

there were people protesting then labour mp /coincillor Hazel blears turned up to throw in her support.

A protester reminded her that it was her own party the labour party who were shutting down the maternity ward to which ms blears suddenly shielded her face from photographers in case she was seen protesting against her own parties policies ...very unlike ms Blears to miss a publicity photo. She later went on to condescend her own constituents when she got caught with her hand in the till stealing taxpayers money through the exspense system.

She was let of with simply a grovelling public apology at the time when the likes of you and me would have been thrown in jail and qute rightly.

Which politician was seen on tv assuating a member of the public because they threw an egg at him and was not even charged with assualt.

The same politician above being in charge of the council tax. passing law to jail people for non payment of the council tax. Whilst at the same time casually forgetting to pay his own council tax then making a joke of it ?

I rhink you will find it was the leader of the labour party tony blair ..hazel blears labour mp and john prescott..labour mp

"

They did not deliberately go into war for oil. Mr Blair acted on information supplied to him, ok the info turned out not to be accurate. What if it was accurate and he didn't Sorry cant take your call right now, please try later. I'm sure he never expected to be popular with his decision. Still rid the country of a monster ruler.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"After reading the thread, wish I understood politics, then I could work out who is lying the least and vote for them as I've not bothered for the past 3 years

Well which party lied to us and tried to terrorise us in order to gain our support to invade another country in order to steal its oil.

Which party signed us up to europe gave away our sovereign right to govern ourselves and make our own laws and allow mass immigration into our country..stating at the time it would give its people the choice only later to lye by not giving its people a choice such as in a referendum.

On a local front i remember when they were shutting down the maternity ward at my local hospital.

there were people protesting then labour mp /coincillor Hazel blears turned up to throw in her support.

A protester reminded her that it was her own party the labour party who were shutting down the maternity ward to which ms blears suddenly shielded her face from photographers in case she was seen protesting against her own parties policies ...very unlike ms Blears to miss a publicity photo. She later went on to condescend her own constituents when she got caught with her hand in the till stealing taxpayers money through the exspense system.

She was let of with simply a grovelling public apology at the time when the likes of you and me would have been thrown in jail and qute rightly.

Which politician was seen on tv assuating a member of the public because they threw an egg at him and was not even charged with assualt.

The same politician above being in charge of the council tax. passing law to jail people for non payment of the council tax. Whilst at the same time casually forgetting to pay his own council tax then making a joke of it ?

I rhink you will find it was the leader of the labour party tony blair ..hazel blears labour mp and john prescott..labour mp

They did not deliberately go into war for oil. Mr Blair acted on information supplied to him, ok the info turned out not to be accurate. What if it was accurate and he didn't Sorry cant take your call right now, please try later. I'm sure he never expected to be popular with his decision. Still rid the country of a monster ruler. "

Can not remember seeing dear tony lining the streets of Wooton Bassett..???

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Some people really should remember it's better to keep silent and let others think you're a fool than open your mouth and remove all doubt!

You were doing well until you posted the above sentence, and then I saw that and completely ignored the rest of your post. It's a very condescending thing to say.

not only condescending but belittling and discouraging and surely everyone should be encouraged to join the political debate. The only way to learn and progress is to participate after all."

totally agree its just that when some have no facts to back up there arguments all they have left is to give abuse. ime neither a labour or tory supporter i think all politicians are the same animal but i am finding since this threads creation that tories argue with facts labour respond with policies from the dark ages and abuse ...i guess there just following there own parties politicians lead from ed milliband ....

wish someone would tell me what eds policies are other than to keep bangin on about his party wasnt responsible for the economic mess were currently in even though everybody knows his party are solely responsible ..cept for those with selective amnesia and apologising and stating to change his parties values even though he is an ex blair crony himself.

I would check out labours manifesto but history tells me theres no point as soon as there in there pledges are broken and dont mean shit.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

  

By *ovedupstillCouple  over a year ago

mullinwire


"After reading the thread, wish I understood politics, then I could work out who is lying the least and vote for them as I've not bothered for the past 3 years

Well which party lied to us and tried to terrorise us in order to gain our support to invade another country in order to steal its oil.

Which party signed us up to europe gave away our sovereign right to govern ourselves and make our own laws and allow mass immigration into our country..stating at the time it would give its people the choice only later to lye by not giving its people a choice such as in a referendum.

On a local front i remember when they were shutting down the maternity ward at my local hospital.

there were people protesting then labour mp /coincillor Hazel blears turned up to throw in her support.

A protester reminded her that it was her own party the labour party who were shutting down the maternity ward to which ms blears suddenly shielded her face from photographers in case she was seen protesting against her own parties policies ...very unlike ms Blears to miss a publicity photo. She later went on to condescend her own constituents when she got caught with her hand in the till stealing taxpayers money through the exspense system.

She was let of with simply a grovelling public apology at the time when the likes of you and me would have been thrown in jail and qute rightly.

Which politician was seen on tv assuating a member of the public because they threw an egg at him and was not even charged with assualt.

The same politician above being in charge of the council tax. passing law to jail people for non payment of the council tax. Whilst at the same time casually forgetting to pay his own council tax then making a joke of it ?

I rhink you will find it was the leader of the labour party tony blair ..hazel blears labour mp and john prescott..labour mp

They did not deliberately go into war for oil. Mr Blair acted on information supplied to him, ok the info turned out not to be accurate. What if it was accurate and he didn't Sorry cant take your call right now, please try later. I'm sure he never expected to be popular with his decision. Still rid the country of a monster ruler. "

yep, forget the legality of the war in Iraq, the outcome was the best for the country, and ou wont find many of the general populous in the country that will wish we hadnt bothered.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

0.2969

0