FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Bangability
Bangability
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By *emini ManMan
over a year ago
There and to the left a bit |
Never thought about it in those terms and not sure I'd even like to - if I find someone attractive I find them attractive, nothing else really matters.
If you forced my arm though I'd say it's probably less than 5% and when you then factor in those that feel the same way about me, then it's probably 5% of 5% |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Never thought about it in those terms and not sure I'd even like to - if I find someone attractive I find them attractive, nothing else really matters.
If you forced my arm though I'd say it's probably less than 5% and when you then factor in those that feel the same way about me, then it's probably 5% of 5% "
Not including those who want to bang you back, we're gonna assume they do, so just those you could put your willy in.
P |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Never really thought about it.. But I think my figure is lower than your's
How much lower? I'm conducting a very important survey
P
1 in 500 tbh"
That's quite high. Would you say you have extremely high boxes that need ticking to make you feel that way or you simply just don't find that many women attractive?
P |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *emini ManMan
over a year ago
There and to the left a bit |
"Never thought about it in those terms and not sure I'd even like to - if I find someone attractive I find them attractive, nothing else really matters.
If you forced my arm though I'd say it's probably less than 5% and when you then factor in those that feel the same way about me, then it's probably 5% of 5%
Not including those who want to bang you back, we're gonna assume they do, so just those you could put your willy in.
P"
As I said less than 5% probably - but it's not a scientific calculation  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
" About 1:3500 for me and about 1:35000 finds me fuckable."
See I'm all freaked out coz I've been told for a bloke 1 in 5 means he has high standards.
P |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
" About 1:3500 for me and about 1:35000 finds me fuckable.
See I'm all freaked out coz I've been told for a bloke 1 in 5 means he has high standards.
P"
Nah my standards are way above that  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
" About 1:3500 for me and about 1:35000 finds me fuckable.
See I'm all freaked out coz I've been told for a bloke 1 in 5 means he has high standards.
P
Nah my standards are way above that "
Would you say someone that found 1 in 5 women fuckable was deluding themselves by classing themselves as having high standards?
P |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Never really thought about it.. But I think my figure is lower than your's
How much lower? I'm conducting a very important survey
P
1 in 500 tbh
That's quite high. Would you say you have extremely high boxes that need ticking to make you feel that way or you simply just don't find that many women attractive?
P"
Neither, I'm not really driven by looks, its character that attracts me, so I need to get to know the person.. My figure is high for that reason alone |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Absolutely depends on where I am in my cycle  
Snap. And how many wines I've had "
Fair. I'd say I may give someone fuckability points if my axe wound is throbbing, but then I know I'll regret it the next day so don't bother and go to bed
P |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Absolutely depends on where I am in my cycle
Snap. And how many wines I've had
Fair. I'd say I may give someone fuckability points if my axe wound is throbbing, but then I know I'll regret it the next day so don't bother and go to bed
P"
So your figure would fluctuate.. Bit difficult to base reliable intel on that fact. Lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *reya73Woman
over a year ago
Whitley Bay |
"Absolutely depends on where I am in my cycle
Snap. And how many wines I've had
Fair. I'd say I may give someone fuckability points if my axe wound is throbbing, but then I know I'll regret it the next day so don't bother and go to bed
P"
When I'm ovulating in spring I could easily take home the whole queue at the till   |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
" About 1:3500 for me and about 1:35000 finds me fuckable.
See I'm all freaked out coz I've been told for a bloke 1 in 5 means he has high standards.
P
Nah my standards are way above that
Would you say someone that found 1 in 5 women fuckable was deluding themselves by classing themselves as having high standards?
P"
yes. Tart |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Absolutely depends on where I am in my cycle
Snap. And how many wines I've had
Fair. I'd say I may give someone fuckability points if my axe wound is throbbing, but then I know I'll regret it the next day so don't bother and go to bed
P
When I'm ovulating in spring I could easily take home the whole queue at the till "
Remind me in spring where I need to queue |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ornLordMan
over a year ago
Wiltshire and London |
"Absolutely depends on where I am in my cycle
Snap. And how many wines I've had
Fair. I'd say I may give someone fuckability points if my axe wound is throbbing, but then I know I'll regret it the next day so don't bother and go to bed
P
When I'm ovulating in spring I could easily take home the whole queue at the till "
I must arrange to be in a queue in Whitley Bay in spring! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Absolutely depends on where I am in my cycle
Snap. And how many wines I've had
Fair. I'd say I may give someone fuckability points if my axe wound is throbbing, but then I know I'll regret it the next day so don't bother and go to bed
P
So your figure would fluctuate.. Bit difficult to base reliable intel on that fact. Lol "
It would fluctuate based on the fact I know it's my vagina and alcohol talking rather than my brain. Luckily I don't drink very often.
P |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"The average male would bite your hand off for 6 or 7 in 10. That 60 or 70 in 100
Yeah so what's that in thicko maths. 1 in what?
P
6 or 7 in 10 or 60/70% "
That's a lot of fuckability
P |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
" About 1:3500 for me and about 1:35000 finds me fuckable.
See I'm all freaked out coz I've been told for a bloke 1 in 5 means he has high standards.
P
Nah my standards are way above that
Would you say someone that found 1 in 5 women fuckable was deluding themselves by classing themselves as having high standards?
P yes. Tart"
I'm truly astounded by it.
I know I don't find many people fuckable coz my fanny has forgotten it's supposed to want the penis, but 1 in 5. I'm flabbergasted
P |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *reya73Woman
over a year ago
Whitley Bay |
"1 in 2. Starting with Freya.
Mmmwah
How is your cycle today, gorgeous?"
Well in around 9 days the queue will be a good place to be!
Maybe all the women should update their statuses with their cycle information? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *reya73Woman
over a year ago
Whitley Bay |
"1 in 2. Starting with Freya.
Mmmwah
How is your cycle today, gorgeous?"
Slowly ramping up ..
in around 7 days the queue will be a good place to be!
Maybe all the women should update their statuses with their cycle information? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"1 in 2. Starting with Freya.
Mmmwah
How is your cycle today, gorgeous?
Slowly ramping up ..
in around 7 days the queue will be a good place to be!
Maybe all the women should update their statuses with their cycle information? "
Spring in 7 day's? If only!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"1 in 2. Starting with Freya.
Mmmwah
How is your cycle today, gorgeous?
Slowly ramping up ..
in around 7 days the queue will be a good place to be!
Maybe all the women should update their statuses with their cycle information? "
And which supermarket they shop into |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *reya73Woman
over a year ago
Whitley Bay |
"1 in 2. Starting with Freya.
Mmmwah
How is your cycle today, gorgeous?
Slowly ramping up ..
in around 7 days the queue will be a good place to be!
Maybe all the women should update their statuses with their cycle information?
And which supermarket they shop into"
That would be telling .. I prefer imagining men sniffing around the shops in Whitley Bay!
Reminds me of an early Prince song .. Scarlett Pussy. Google it..I think youll like it msr Sin |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Source of this question...P and I were chatting tonight and among other things it came up that most men on average have less perceived standards than women when it comes to sexual partners. Women are much more selective/fussy.
Yet women on average have lower standards than men when it comes to who they'd form a relationship with? Men are much fussier than women in this regard.
So she was interested to know what proportion of women I would find fuckable, as you do. My reply was that it would generally vary depending on the mood and setting, but at it's "most frequent" if you like would probably occur in a swinging club, say Chams on a saturday which we've attended together on occasions. I've reasoned to myself since amongst other things there were more arousing factors present to "sexually charge" me to start with, such as what was going on, the states of undress and dressing provocatively and of course the fact she was with me too and it would be a mood booster others finding her sexually attractive of course which they so often do.
Under those circumstances I'd figured I'd probably find 1 in 5 women attractive in this way and reasoned that was probably actually more selective than the average man there if I was honest. She didn't seem to think it would be, reasoning that the average man in a swinging club would be far more selective.
I imagined that a fair amount of women would be more selective yes, but not the "average guy" and didn't find that ratio of mine particularly anything to be ashamed of.
I also said that with my traditional method of long built up messages over time on here to form a connection with others who had messaged me who I found appealing, traditionally my usual method of meeting before we got together, which is where the ratios of women I found appealing to meet up and have sex with were the lower end of "fuckability proportions" the ratio probably stretched to it's maximum of 1 in 20.
I've pondered the reasons for this since, and have came to the conclusion that obviously you get to know a person far better over that extended discourse and can assess far better their intellect for example, also their appetite for kinks and just that mental connection to establish? So as such there's many factors not immediately apparent in a swinging club that could feasibly put you off them?
Incidentally those couples and ladies using their message boxes to weigh up what proportion of men they find attractive; I'm afraid that won't yield accurate results whatsoever because of the way men message. As the Neanderthals and inconsiderate fuckwits invariably blanket bomb every female/couple within a certain radius, meaning that this 15% of dickheads on site will in fact represent well over half the messages in the average inbox. Also the top 15% of men on here in terms of success hardly message anyone, because they don't need to. So basing your judgement on merely the messages you receive will make it seem like you hardly find anyone attractive at all and whilst your standards may be high, they are only exaggerated massively by this.
B |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Source of this question...P and I were chatting tonight and among other things it came up that most men on average have less perceived standards than women when it comes to sexual partners. Women are much more selective/fussy.
Yet women on average have lower standards than men when it comes to who they'd form a relationship with? Men are much fussier than women in this regard.
So she was interested to know what proportion of women I would find fuckable, as you do. My reply was that it would generally vary depending on the mood and setting, but at it's "most frequent" if you like would probably occur in a swinging club, say Chams on a saturday which we've attended together on occasions. I've reasoned to myself since amongst other things there were more arousing factors present to "sexually charge" me to start with, such as what was going on, the states of undress and dressing provocatively and of course the fact she was with me too and it would be a mood booster others finding her sexually attractive of course which they so often do.
Under those circumstances I'd figured I'd probably find 1 in 5 women attractive in this way and reasoned that was probably actually more selective than the average man there if I was honest. She didn't seem to think it would be, reasoning that the average man in a swinging club would be far more selective.
I imagined that a fair amount of women would be more selective yes, but not the "average guy" and didn't find that ratio of mine particularly anything to be ashamed of.
I also said that with my traditional method of long built up messages over time on here to form a connection with others who had messaged me who I found appealing, traditionally my usual method of meeting before we got together, which is where the ratios of women I found appealing to meet up and have sex with were the lower end of "fuckability proportions" the ratio probably stretched to it's maximum of 1 in 20.
I've pondered the reasons for this since, and have came to the conclusion that obviously you get to know a person far better over that extended discourse and can assess far better their intellect for example, also their appetite for kinks and just that mental connection to establish? So as such there's many factors not immediately apparent in a swinging club that could feasibly put you off them?
Incidentally those couples and ladies using their message boxes to weigh up what proportion of men they find attractive; I'm afraid that won't yield accurate results whatsoever because of the way men message. As the Neanderthals and inconsiderate fuckwits invariably blanket bomb every female/couple within a certain radius, meaning that this 15% of dickheads on site will in fact represent well over half the messages in the average inbox. Also the top 15% of men on here in terms of success hardly message anyone, because they don't need to. So basing your judgement on merely the messages you receive will make it seem like you hardly find anyone attractive at all and whilst your standards may be high, they are only exaggerated massively by this.
B"
In a club, I'd say my numbers are slashed drastically then. I'd put it at about 1 in 300 at least considering I have been to clubs multiple times and come home with a dry fanny and not so much as a clit twitch. There are obviously less men than women there on couples nights as single men aren't allowed whereas single women are so of course you have a wider range of women there than men.
P
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Source of this question...P and I were chatting tonight and among other things it came up that most men on average have less perceived standards than women when it comes to sexual partners. Women are much more selective/fussy.
Yet women on average have lower standards than men when it comes to who they'd form a relationship with? Men are much fussier than women in this regard.
So she was interested to know what proportion of women I would find fuckable, as you do. My reply was that it would generally vary depending on the mood and setting, but at it's "most frequent" if you like would probably occur in a swinging club, say Chams on a saturday which we've attended together on occasions. I've reasoned to myself since amongst other things there were more arousing factors present to "sexually charge" me to start with, such as what was going on, the states of undress and dressing provocatively and of course the fact she was with me too and it would be a mood booster others finding her sexually attractive of course which they so often do.
Under those circumstances I'd figured I'd probably find 1 in 5 women attractive in this way and reasoned that was probably actually more selective than the average man there if I was honest. She didn't seem to think it would be, reasoning that the average man in a swinging club would be far more selective.
I imagined that a fair amount of women would be more selective yes, but not the "average guy" and didn't find that ratio of mine particularly anything to be ashamed of.
I also said that with my traditional method of long built up messages over time on here to form a connection with others who had messaged me who I found appealing, traditionally my usual method of meeting before we got together, which is where the ratios of women I found appealing to meet up and have sex with were the lower end of "fuckability proportions" the ratio probably stretched to it's maximum of 1 in 20.
I've pondered the reasons for this since, and have came to the conclusion that obviously you get to know a person far better over that extended discourse and can assess far better their intellect for example, also their appetite for kinks and just that mental connection to establish? So as such there's many factors not immediately apparent in a swinging club that could feasibly put you off them?
Incidentally those couples and ladies using their message boxes to weigh up what proportion of men they find attractive; I'm afraid that won't yield accurate results whatsoever because of the way men message. As the Neanderthals and inconsiderate fuckwits invariably blanket bomb every female/couple within a certain radius, meaning that this 15% of dickheads on site will in fact represent well over half the messages in the average inbox. Also the top 15% of men on here in terms of success hardly message anyone, because they don't need to. So basing your judgement on merely the messages you receive will make it seem like you hardly find anyone attractive at all and whilst your standards may be high, they are only exaggerated massively by this.
B"
I fucking LOVE your posts!!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"What do you reckon your ratio is of people you find fuckable?
I'd say mine is about 1 in 100 or more.
Over to you
P"
On here, 1 in every 1,000 messages.
Clubs 1 in 100 just because like B said, it's a heightened sexual situation.
Out and about, depends on location. Sometimes 1 in 10, sometimes 0 in 10,000. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Source of this question...P and I were chatting tonight and among other things it came up that most men on average have less perceived standards than women when it comes to sexual partners. Women are much more selective/fussy.
Yet women on average have lower standards than men when it comes to who they'd form a relationship with? Men are much fussier than women in this regard.
So she was interested to know what proportion of women I would find fuckable, as you do. My reply was that it would generally vary depending on the mood and setting, but at it's "most frequent" if you like would probably occur in a swinging club, say Chams on a saturday which we've attended together on occasions. I've reasoned to myself since amongst other things there were more arousing factors present to "sexually charge" me to start with, such as what was going on, the states of undress and dressing provocatively and of course the fact she was with me too and it would be a mood booster others finding her sexually attractive of course which they so often do.
Under those circumstances I'd figured I'd probably find 1 in 5 women attractive in this way and reasoned that was probably actually more selective than the average man there if I was honest. She didn't seem to think it would be, reasoning that the average man in a swinging club would be far more selective.
I imagined that a fair amount of women would be more selective yes, but not the "average guy" and didn't find that ratio of mine particularly anything to be ashamed of.
I also said that with my traditional method of long built up messages over time on here to form a connection with others who had messaged me who I found appealing, traditionally my usual method of meeting before we got together, which is where the ratios of women I found appealing to meet up and have sex with were the lower end of "fuckability proportions" the ratio probably stretched to it's maximum of 1 in 20.
I've pondered the reasons for this since, and have came to the conclusion that obviously you get to know a person far better over that extended discourse and can assess far better their intellect for example, also their appetite for kinks and just that mental connection to establish? So as such there's many factors not immediately apparent in a swinging club that could feasibly put you off them?
Incidentally those couples and ladies using their message boxes to weigh up what proportion of men they find attractive; I'm afraid that won't yield accurate results whatsoever because of the way men message. As the Neanderthals and inconsiderate fuckwits invariably blanket bomb every female/couple within a certain radius, meaning that this 15% of dickheads on site will in fact represent well over half the messages in the average inbox. Also the top 15% of men on here in terms of success hardly message anyone, because they don't need to. So basing your judgement on merely the messages you receive will make it seem like you hardly find anyone attractive at all and whilst your standards may be high, they are only exaggerated massively by this.
B
I fucking LOVE your posts!!! "
Aw, cheers Mave!
Wait till I drop the "Why I believe the difference exists and Men will Fuck a Walrus whilst a Woman will consider Mick Philpot good Marriage material" bomb...
B |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Source of this question...P and I were chatting tonight and among other things it came up that most men on average have less perceived standards than women when it comes to sexual partners. Women are much more selective/fussy.
Yet women on average have lower standards than men when it comes to who they'd form a relationship with? Men are much fussier than women in this regard.
So she was interested to know what proportion of women I would find fuckable, as you do. My reply was that it would generally vary depending on the mood and setting, but at it's "most frequent" if you like would probably occur in a swinging club, say Chams on a saturday which we've attended together on occasions. I've reasoned to myself since amongst other things there were more arousing factors present to "sexually charge" me to start with, such as what was going on, the states of undress and dressing provocatively and of course the fact she was with me too and it would be a mood booster others finding her sexually attractive of course which they so often do.
Under those circumstances I'd figured I'd probably find 1 in 5 women attractive in this way and reasoned that was probably actually more selective than the average man there if I was honest. She didn't seem to think it would be, reasoning that the average man in a swinging club would be far more selective.
I imagined that a fair amount of women would be more selective yes, but not the "average guy" and didn't find that ratio of mine particularly anything to be ashamed of.
I also said that with my traditional method of long built up messages over time on here to form a connection with others who had messaged me who I found appealing, traditionally my usual method of meeting before we got together, which is where the ratios of women I found appealing to meet up and have sex with were the lower end of "fuckability proportions" the ratio probably stretched to it's maximum of 1 in 20.
I've pondered the reasons for this since, and have came to the conclusion that obviously you get to know a person far better over that extended discourse and can assess far better their intellect for example, also their appetite for kinks and just that mental connection to establish? So as such there's many factors not immediately apparent in a swinging club that could feasibly put you off them?
Incidentally those couples and ladies using their message boxes to weigh up what proportion of men they find attractive; I'm afraid that won't yield accurate results whatsoever because of the way men message. As the Neanderthals and inconsiderate fuckwits invariably blanket bomb every female/couple within a certain radius, meaning that this 15% of dickheads on site will in fact represent well over half the messages in the average inbox. Also the top 15% of men on here in terms of success hardly message anyone, because they don't need to. So basing your judgement on merely the messages you receive will make it seem like you hardly find anyone attractive at all and whilst your standards may be high, they are only exaggerated massively by this.
B
I fucking LOVE your posts!!!
Aw, cheers Mave!
Wait till I drop the "Why I believe the difference exists and Men will Fuck a Walrus whilst a Woman will consider Mick Philpot good Marriage material" bomb...
B"
I look forward to it.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Fook knows, I'll go 1 in 25 but then those 25 could be a bus full of cheerleaders or a bus full of OAPs so I'd say my number varies greatly depending on my location  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Source of this question...P and I were chatting tonight and among other things it came up that most men on average have less perceived standards than women when it comes to sexual partners. Women are much more selective/fussy.
Yet women on average have lower standards than men when it comes to who they'd form a relationship with? Men are much fussier than women in this regard.
So she was interested to know what proportion of women I would find fuckable, as you do. My reply was that it would generally vary depending on the mood and setting, but at it's "most frequent" if you like would probably occur in a swinging club, say Chams on a saturday which we've attended together on occasions. I've reasoned to myself since amongst other things there were more arousing factors present to "sexually charge" me to start with, such as what was going on, the states of undress and dressing provocatively and of course the fact she was with me too and it would be a mood booster others finding her sexually attractive of course which they so often do.
Under those circumstances I'd figured I'd probably find 1 in 5 women attractive in this way and reasoned that was probably actually more selective than the average man there if I was honest. She didn't seem to think it would be, reasoning that the average man in a swinging club would be far more selective.
I imagined that a fair amount of women would be more selective yes, but not the "average guy" and didn't find that ratio of mine particularly anything to be ashamed of.
I also said that with my traditional method of long built up messages over time on here to form a connection with others who had messaged me who I found appealing, traditionally my usual method of meeting before we got together, which is where the ratios of women I found appealing to meet up and have sex with were the lower end of "fuckability proportions" the ratio probably stretched to it's maximum of 1 in 20.
I've pondered the reasons for this since, and have came to the conclusion that obviously you get to know a person far better over that extended discourse and can assess far better their intellect for example, also their appetite for kinks and just that mental connection to establish? So as such there's many factors not immediately apparent in a swinging club that could feasibly put you off them?
Incidentally those couples and ladies using their message boxes to weigh up what proportion of men they find attractive; I'm afraid that won't yield accurate results whatsoever because of the way men message. As the Neanderthals and inconsiderate fuckwits invariably blanket bomb every female/couple within a certain radius, meaning that this 15% of dickheads on site will in fact represent well over half the messages in the average inbox. Also the top 15% of men on here in terms of success hardly message anyone, because they don't need to. So basing your judgement on merely the messages you receive will make it seem like you hardly find anyone attractive at all and whilst your standards may be high, they are only exaggerated massively by this.
B
I fucking LOVE your posts!!!
Aw, cheers Mave!
Wait till I drop the "Why I believe the difference exists and Men will Fuck a Walrus whilst a Woman will consider Mick Philpot good Marriage material" bomb...
B
I look forward to it. "
I've started it on it's own thread...Just my somewhat eclectic musings and obviously tongue in cheek to an extent at least...
B |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
