FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Fabswingers.com ratio
Fabswingers.com ratio
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I would think so hence all the moany men using that as an excuse for not meeting anyone."
not being moany personally it just seems to be fact. Unless a surveys done
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"How you gonna use this information OP?"
Dont know probably ask my MP to discuss this in parliament. Might as well as they do fuckall with the tax payers money. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"How you gonna use this information OP?
Dont know probably ask my MP to discuss this in parliament. Might as well as they do fuckall with the tax payers money. "
Why do a survey when you can just PEEK at the site STATS......... ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *VineMan
over a year ago
The right place |
"How you gonna use this information OP?
Dont know probably ask my MP to discuss this in parliament. Might as well as they do fuckall with the tax payers money.
Why do a survey when you can just PEEK at the site STATS......... ?"
Where are they? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I remember a while ago that there was a thread where people used their 'who's near' and various other methods to work out ratios.
It came out as an average of 10/1 men/women & couples"
Dayyum |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *VineMan
over a year ago
The right place |
"I remember a while ago that there was a thread where people used their 'who's near' and various other methods to work out ratios.
It came out as an average of 10/1 men/women & couples"
I thought it was higher than that. Probably double. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ea monkeyMan
over a year ago
Manchester (he/him) |
"I remember a while ago that there was a thread where people used their 'who's near' and various other methods to work out ratios.
It came out as an average of 10/1 men/women & couples
I thought it was higher than that. Probably double. "
Nope, some areas were a little higher but the average worked out as that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Massively true
P"
And anyone who answers "False" is a bit of a weapon really.
Unless they're doing it in an ironic humourous way of course (G-Crumps, we mean you!) 
B |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I remember a while ago that there was a thread where people used their 'who's near' and various other methods to work out ratios.
It came out as an average of 10/1 men/women & couples
I thought it was higher than that. Probably double.
Nope, some areas were a little higher but the average worked out as that. "
Depends when it was done and what areas. It's been done several times over the years and I won't have born witness to all of them, but the most recent I remember, the ratio was 12 to 1? With in theory the actual figure being anything up to 15 to 1, due to the amount of fake single female profiles.
B |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Our of curiosity, I just checked my 'who's near'
Men 31
Women 3
Couples 11
TV/TS 2
So 31 v 3, roughly is a 10:1 ratio
There’s not a single woman on my who’s near! "
Considering where I live, I was quite surprised only 2 TV/TS! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Our of curiosity, I just checked my 'who's near'
Men 31
Women 3
Couples 11
TV/TS 2
So 31 v 3, roughly is a 10:1 ratio "
See I just got 41 blokes, 6 couples, 2 Tv/TS and not a single woman?? Which would pit the ratio at 42 or more guys to every woman which is bollocks.
The thing with 'who's near' is that it picks the nearby folk at random.
For a more accurate answer, use the old fashioned search, ut within as small a radius as you can. Only downside is when amounts reach 300+ in more populated areas, but in theory you could just take a certain age group to bring them under.
B |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Our of curiosity, I just checked my 'who's near'
Men 31
Women 3
Couples 11
TV/TS 2
So 31 v 3, roughly is a 10:1 ratio
See I just got 41 blokes, 6 couples, 2 Tv/TS and not a single woman?? Which would pit the ratio at 42 or more guys to every woman which is bollocks.
The thing with 'who's near' is that it picks the nearby folk at random.
For a more accurate answer, use the old fashioned search, ut within as small a radius as you can. Only downside is when amounts reach 300+ in more populated areas, but in theory you could just take a certain age group to bring them under.
B"
Ah OK! Didn't realise it was random.
Assumed it showed everyone online within a certain radius.
You know I'm a geek when it comes to facts & figures.
I will have to do more research |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"See that's more accurate. Using Fab users aged 30 ONLY, search returns 16 women, 206 guys within 5 miles?
B"
Check for 31 year olds and it's 18 women, 196 guys.
B |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I would think so hence all the moany men using that as an excuse for not meeting anyone.
It's not an excuse if it's true  "
It is an excuse when most of the moaners aren't being proactive enough or even taking steps to try and mitigate for the imbalance.
B |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I would think so hence all the moany men using that as an excuse for not meeting anyone.
It's not an excuse if it's true
It is an excuse when most of the moaners aren't being proactive enough or even taking steps to try and mitigate for the imbalance.
B"
At least once a week there's a couple complaining that they can't find a woman for an FFM threesome. It's not a male exclusive problem nor is it from a lack of effort. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Surely those figures assume the profile is accurate?
Accurate in what way ?"
In that it says female and is actually a wonan. Or says couple and is actually a couple. It's very clear that in both instances a lot of times it's just a bloke with some pictures. If we're talking about profiles then 10-1 is right but if we're talking actual women and couples I'd think it's more like 50-1 or even more. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Surely those figures assume the profile is accurate?
Accurate in what way ?
In that it says female and is actually a wonan. Or says couple and is actually a couple. It's very clear that in both instances a lot of times it's just a bloke with some pictures. If we're talking about profiles then 10-1 is right but if we're talking actual women and couples I'd think it's more like 50-1 or even more. "
Nice tits on you |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Surely those figures assume the profile is accurate?
Accurate in what way ?
In that it says female and is actually a wonan. Or says couple and is actually a couple. It's very clear that in both instances a lot of times it's just a bloke with some pictures. If we're talking about profiles then 10-1 is right but if we're talking actual women and couples I'd think it's more like 50-1 or even more.
Nice tits on you "
You think you're cute, right? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I would think so hence all the moany men using that as an excuse for not meeting anyone.
It's not an excuse if it's true
It is an excuse when most of the moaners aren't being proactive enough or even taking steps to try and mitigate for the imbalance.
B
At least once a week there's a couple complaining that they can't find a woman for an FFM threesome. It's not a male exclusive problem nor is it from a lack of effort."
I never said moaning about getting meets was exclusive to males. Couples will moan too. There's even the female equivalent who moan constantly that they can't find the right kind of meets as their inboxes are drowned in a sea of shite?
Though most predominant moans about getting meets will be the men, simply because there's more of them.
The thing is the ratios create their own problems for each demographic. But there's things every demographic can do to improve their chances if the gripe is a big enough one. And those who moan the loudest or most often are frequently the ones who are doing sod all proactive.
Using men just as an example for a man to pop on the forum and say "Hi, I don't seem to be doing too well on here. Can anyone give me some advice in my approach or profile that might stand me in better stead?" is all well and good. He's being proactive merely by asking for that help as he wants some opinions about how he might go about changing things.
However for a man to come on kicking off with something along the lines of "This site is bullshit, I've messaged 100 women in the last couple of days and they're all up their own arses. Does anyone meet on here?" IS precisely a meaner as he's NOT being proactive, he's just having a gripe because ladies aren't falling into his lap.
B |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Worked with a dating agency, ie long term exclusive relationships, and I had to filter out the married/partnered guys.
The ratio was about 5/1 women to men  "
Yep. Most men's biological urges are pre-programmed to seek out sex with many partners at the very least on some subliminal level. Most women's biological urges are pre-programmed to seek out a monogamous relationship.
Which is why the ratios of each are so skewed. A lot of men seeking relationships are like most women on here, they don't need to join dating sites or be proactive in any way. Why would they? They can instead just sit back while the women put in the groundwork for them as they know sooner or later a woman who they consider suitable will come along and a relationship will fall right into their lap, so to speak.
B
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
