 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The press and public will no doubt form their opinion based on their own thirst for scandal and opinions of royals, with facts not being relevant!
I think hes an arse, but who knows other than supposition? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *amissCouple
over a year ago
chelmsford |
"The guy is remedial at best his best avenue is to claim he is gullible and too stupid to realise what he has said. At least that will be believed by most as its true. "
He maybe obnoxious, arrogant, but remedial? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *uryWhipMan
over a year ago
Harringay |
He's a twat and digging himslef into a deeper hole every time he opens his mouth. No idea why did that ill conceived interview the other day but was difficult to watch. I dont see him as being in the wrong place at the wrong time, unless it was Pizza Express. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The guy is remedial at best his best avenue is to claim he is gullible and too stupid to realise what he has said. At least that will be believed by most as its true.
He maybe obnoxious, arrogant, but remedial?"
He is below average intelligence but so is Charles and with all the educational advantages they had too. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The guy is remedial at best his best avenue is to claim he is gullible and too stupid to realise what he has said. At least that will be believed by most as its true.
He maybe obnoxious, arrogant, but remedial?
He is below average intelligence but so is Charles and with all the educational advantages they had too. "
This is true they were both low achievers at school as was most of the Royal family. Perhaps remedial is a tad harsh. How about inbreeds  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *amissCouple
over a year ago
chelmsford |
"The guy is remedial at best his best avenue is to claim he is gullible and too stupid to realise what he has said. At least that will be believed by most as its true.
He maybe obnoxious, arrogant, but remedial?
He is below average intelligence but so is Charles and with all the educational advantages they had too. "
Remedial suggests he has learning difficulties, I wouldn't have thought he was that bad. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *amissCouple
over a year ago
chelmsford |
"He is below average intelligence but so is Charles and with all the educational advantages they had too.
They cant be below average intelligence they're both pilots, amongst other things. "
 . Good point. I have no idea how you can judge the intelligence of someone by one stupid tv interview. I would say he was ill advised and out of touch with how he thought the public would react. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *iss SJWoman
over a year ago
Hull |
"He is below average intelligence but so is Charles and with all the educational advantages they had too.
They cant be below average intelligence they're both pilots, amongst other things.
. Good point. I have no idea how you can judge the intelligence of someone by one stupid tv interview. I would say he was ill advised and out of touch with how he thought the public would react."
I think he’s totally ignored all the advice he’s been given, let’s face it he’s surrounded by advisers that have been looking after the royals for years and years. I think he’s an arrogant prig |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *amissCouple
over a year ago
chelmsford |
"He is below average intelligence but so is Charles and with all the educational advantages they had too.
They cant be below average intelligence they're both pilots, amongst other things.
. Good point. I have no idea how you can judge the intelligence of someone by one stupid tv interview. I would say he was ill advised and out of touch with how he thought the public would react.
I think he’s totally ignored all the advice he’s been given, let’s face it he’s surrounded by advisers that have been looking after the royals for years and years. I think he’s an arrogant prig "
He's shot himself in the foot, somewhat. Charities are disassociating themselves from him. His financial backers are pulling out of his projects. Silly move on his part. No one gained anything from the interview. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"He is below average intelligence but so is Charles and with all the educational advantages they had too.
They cant be below average intelligence they're both pilots, amongst other things. "
That doesn't make them intelligent! Neither would have passed without a lot of extra help and the military were desperate to give both the best title available. Many people limited intelligence learn to do repetitive manual skills it don't mean they are intelligent enough to make sound judgement decisions or know when to shut their mouth.
The royal family in general are not intelligent people and partners coming into it have generally been far more intelligent than the queen or her offspring. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"The guy is remedial at best his best avenue is to claim he is gullible and too stupid to realise what he has said. At least that will be believed by most as its true.
He maybe obnoxious, arrogant, but remedial?
He is below average intelligence but so is Charles and with all the educational advantages they had too.
This is true they were both low achievers at school as was most of the Royal family. Perhaps remedial is a tad harsh. How about inbreeds "
Low achievers at school?
I bet they were panicking about getting a place at university, and finding a job afterwards...
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *amissCouple
over a year ago
chelmsford |
"He is below average intelligence but so is Charles and with all the educational advantages they had too.
They cant be below average intelligence they're both pilots, amongst other things.
That doesn't make them intelligent! Neither would have passed without a lot of extra help and the military were desperate to give both the best title available. Many people limited intelligence learn to do repetitive manual skills it don't mean they are intelligent enough to make sound judgement decisions or know when to shut their mouth.
The royal family in general are not intelligent people and partners coming into it have generally been far more intelligent than the queen or her offspring. "
How do you know how intelligent the Royal Family members are, what are you basing your facts on? I still think you have to have some intelligence or aptitude to fly a helicopter |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The guy is remedial at best his best avenue is to claim he is gullible and too stupid to realise what he has said. At least that will be believed by most as its true.
He maybe obnoxious, arrogant, but remedial?
He is below average intelligence but so is Charles and with all the educational advantages they had too. "
How are we quantifying these comments? Some objectivity wouldn't go amiss!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *amissCouple
over a year ago
chelmsford |
"The guy is remedial at best his best avenue is to claim he is gullible and too stupid to realise what he has said. At least that will be believed by most as its true.
He maybe obnoxious, arrogant, but remedial?
He is below average intelligence but so is Charles and with all the educational advantages they had too.
How are we quantifying these comments? Some objectivity wouldn't go amiss! "
I don't know how people know how intelligent or not they are. Slightly off topic, apparently Princess Anne and Prince Charles, both did over 500 royal engagements last year |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"He is below average intelligence but so is Charles and with all the educational advantages they had too.
They cant be below average intelligence they're both pilots, amongst other things.
That doesn't make them intelligent! Neither would have passed without a lot of extra help and the military were desperate to give both the best title available. Many people limited intelligence learn to do repetitive manual skills it don't mean they are intelligent enough to make sound judgement decisions or know when to shut their mouth.
The royal family in general are not intelligent people and partners coming into it have generally been far more intelligent than the queen or her offspring.
How do you know how intelligent the Royal Family members are, what are you basing your facts on? I still think you have to have some intelligence or aptitude to fly a helicopter "
The two main things you need for a helicopter licence are lots of money and lots of free time. There's no long-term pass or fail - individual elements can redone over and over until you get them right once. Again, lots of money and lots of free time. Also, free access to a suitable training helicopter helps. The written exams are not beyond anybody with basic intelligence, and you can use a calculator for the maths stuff.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *amissCouple
over a year ago
chelmsford |
"He is below average intelligence but so is Charles and with all the educational advantages they had too.
They cant be below average intelligence they're both pilots, amongst other things.
That doesn't make them intelligent! Neither would have passed without a lot of extra help and the military were desperate to give both the best title available. Many people limited intelligence learn to do repetitive manual skills it don't mean they are intelligent enough to make sound judgement decisions or know when to shut their mouth.
The royal family in general are not intelligent people and partners coming into it have generally been far more intelligent than the queen or her offspring.
How do you know how intelligent the Royal Family members are, what are you basing your facts on? I still think you have to have some intelligence or aptitude to fly a helicopter
The two main things you need for a helicopter licence are lots of money and lots of free time. There's no long-term pass or fail - individual elements can redone over and over until you get them right once. Again, lots of money and lots of free time. Also, free access to a suitable training helicopter helps. The written exams are not beyond anybody with basic intelligence, and you can use a calculator for the maths stuff. "
So we'll accept they have basic intelligence, rather than they are remedial, as another poster suggested |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The guy is remedial at best his best avenue is to claim he is gullible and too stupid to realise what he has said. At least that will be believed by most as its true. "
Ha ha nail on the head there lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The guy is remedial at best his best avenue is to claim he is gullible and too stupid to realise what he has said. At least that will be believed by most as its true.
He maybe obnoxious, arrogant, but remedial?
He is below average intelligence but so is Charles and with all the educational advantages they had too.
How are we quantifying these comments? Some objectivity wouldn't go amiss!
I don't know how people know how intelligent or not they are. Slightly off topic, apparently Princess Anne and Prince Charles, both did over 500 royal engagements last year "
I wouldn't like to be a royal. Job you hate but you can never quit.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Is he bang to rights? Or wrong place at the wrong time? "
I wonder who suggested he should do the interview. Someone who wanted to bring him down perhaps. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Is he bang to rights? Or wrong place at the wrong time? "
I think he is like pooh Bear. Little brain, but no excuse for his attitude and actions. I feel things may go downhill for him. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *amissCouple
over a year ago
chelmsford |
"The guy is remedial at best his best avenue is to claim he is gullible and too stupid to realise what he has said. At least that will be believed by most as its true.
He maybe obnoxious, arrogant, but remedial?
He is below average intelligence but so is Charles and with all the educational advantages they had too.
How are we quantifying these comments? Some objectivity wouldn't go amiss!
I don't know how people know how intelligent or not they are. Slightly off topic, apparently Princess Anne and Prince Charles, both did over 500 royal engagements last year
I wouldn't like to be a royal. Job you hate but you can never quit. "
Who said they hated it? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
