FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Does size really matter
Does size really matter
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... " That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”  | |||
"I’m a size king. I don’t want any of those salad dodgers anywhere near my todger " WTF ha ha ha ha thats so funny | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... " I would class average as 6 inch and yes your right it is a broad range what would you class as big?? | |||
"Now am not saying am small am quite the opposite to be honest but been told after a one night stand that I was way too big ( This supposedly by a size queen ) makes you think do some women just boast there size queens or do some women not judge correctly the size of a penis? And what is the preference big or average or in some cases below average??" I can't answer your question....im to busy monster perving | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5” "So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not "I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me.... | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me...."I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony. | |||
| |||
| |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony. "I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it! | |||
"I think if you search the plethora if does size matter threads that crop up almost daily, the conclusion is.... It matters far more to men than women. Women *generally* only enjoy a monster wang if the guy it's attached to doesn't just plough away. That shit hurts. The owners of vageeeens are more interested in the person than the penis. The penis should be an extension to the man, not the description of the man. P " This certainly isn't the case for us, or several of our couple friends. I think your blanket statement that "owners of vageeeens" is more a reflection of your own prefences. I'm not stating our preferences are necessarily a reflection of others, I just think this is more down to each individual. | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... " That sounds ideal to me. I seem to encounter a disproportionate number of above average! | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!"I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is  | |||
"I think if you search the plethora if does size matter threads that crop up almost daily, the conclusion is.... It matters far more to men than women. Women *generally* only enjoy a monster wang if the guy it's attached to doesn't just plough away. That shit hurts. The owners of vageeeens are more interested in the person than the penis. The penis should be an extension to the man, not the description of the man. P " Perfect! | |||
"I think if you search the plethora if does size matter threads that crop up almost daily, the conclusion is.... It matters far more to men than women. Women *generally* only enjoy a monster wang if the guy it's attached to doesn't just plough away. That shit hurts. The owners of vageeeens are more interested in the person than the penis. The penis should be an extension to the man, not the description of the man. P " Would it not be more of the case that size actually matters more to women because of this? The difference is (some) men care out of worry/ego/pride. Is mine big or small etc Size matters obviously but the limits of size matters based on the individuals involved. | |||
"I think if you search the plethora if does size matter threads that crop up almost daily, the conclusion is.... It matters far more to men than women. Women *generally* only enjoy a monster wang if the guy it's attached to doesn't just plough away. That shit hurts. The owners of vageeeens are more interested in the person than the penis. The penis should be an extension to the man, not the description of the man. P " Absolutely  | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is "What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!? | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?"Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did. Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey? Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes? And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident? | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?"Men have literally told me they want to tear me open. And no, they don’t want it to be the accident. And the men who did it to me, one of them being my husband, felt bloody awful about it. | |||
"I think if you search the plethora if does size matter threads that crop up almost daily, the conclusion is.... It matters far more to men than women. Women *generally* only enjoy a monster wang if the guy it's attached to doesn't just plough away. That shit hurts. The owners of vageeeens are more interested in the person than the penis. The penis should be an extension to the man, not the description of the man. P This certainly isn't the case for us, or several of our couple friends. I think your blanket statement that "owners of vageeeens" is more a reflection of your own prefences. I'm not stating our preferences are necessarily a reflection of others, I just think this is more down to each individual." I did use *generally* earlier on. P | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?"People have different turn ones and opinions about things just because it dosent match the way you think dosent mean it's not normal, that's the thing about sex everybody's different just because one thing doesn't turn me on that does not mean it wont turn someone else on each to there own I say! | |||
| |||
| |||
"I think if you search the plethora if does size matter threads that crop up almost daily, the conclusion is.... It matters far more to men than women. Women *generally* only enjoy a monster wang if the guy it's attached to doesn't just plough away. That shit hurts. The owners of vageeeens are more interested in the person than the penis. The penis should be an extension to the man, not the description of the man. P This certainly isn't the case for us, or several of our couple friends. I think your blanket statement that "owners of vageeeens" is more a reflection of your own prefences. I'm not stating our preferences are necessarily a reflection of others, I just think this is more down to each individual. I did use *generally* earlier on. P" Exactly - i think it's personal not general | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?"Some ladies may like it, yes. But they are specifically talking about men saying they like it. Since its men messaging saying its a turn on. From that, a man getting turned on by actual none consensual pain and damage caused to a woman, intentional or accident goes beyond just accepting preferences. | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?"People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it. For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was. | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... I would class average as 6 inch and yes your right it is a broad range what would you class as big??" Average is actually around 5.2 inch based on data from various studies. | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People have different turn ones and opinions about things just because it dosent match the way you think dosent mean it's not normal, that's the thing about sex everybody's different just because one thing doesn't turn me on that does not mean it wont turn someone else on each to there own I say! "Yes exactly! We are all different | |||
"Why is it usually guys with big cocks that ask this question? " “Hey everyone, look at my cock!” | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... " Is there an average size fanny? | |||
"I think if you search the plethora if does size matter threads that crop up almost daily, the conclusion is.... It matters far more to men than women. Women *generally* only enjoy a monster wang if the guy it's attached to doesn't just plough away. That shit hurts. The owners of vageeeens are more interested in the person than the penis. The penis should be an extension to the man, not the description of the man. P This certainly isn't the case for us, or several of our couple friends. I think your blanket statement that "owners of vageeeens" is more a reflection of your own prefences. I'm not stating our preferences are necessarily a reflection of others, I just think this is more down to each individual." It may not be. That's why my OH included the word "generally" highlighted in her post higher up, indicating that was a generalisation. Which is given to mean that substancially more women will be attracted to a guy upon looks, body, personality, skills in the bedroom, all put together; indeed every other element he possesses first before the size of his cock? As it is true that some women will think if he has a big cock then he's got the green light, fuck what the rest of him is like as it doesn't matter. A guy overlooked by others due to him being considered crass and obnoxious, lacking in humour, hugely out of shape, generally thought of as ugly, having poor hygene and without much sexual knowledge at all by the majority of women, doesn't mean he will be by ALL women. As if he possesses all of these typically considered negative traits, but does come equipped with a big cock, some women WILL consider him highly attractive, such as you guys and your friends. Neither of these selection methods is right or wrong may we add, as what is appealing to one person (personality, looks, physical condition, attitude, sexual skills, etc) won't matter to someone else who just wants a massive cock? As so often on Fab, it's entirely down to each person as it's THEIR preferences. B | |||
| |||
" From that, a man getting turned on by actual none consensual pain and damage caused to a woman, intentional or accident goes beyond just accepting preferences. " This!!! I have friends who enjoy having needles stuck in their genitals for christ sake. I'm far from the sort to judge people for What they do with their own genitals and I'm personally aroused by pain in different contexts. However if someone tells a story of sustaining an injury they did not want or enjoy it is not appropriate to message them in a way that sexualizes that experience! | |||
| |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was. "If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way. You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you. Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this? If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush. | |||
"I think if you search the plethora if does size matter threads that crop up almost daily, the conclusion is.... It matters far more to men than women. Women *generally* only enjoy a monster wang if the guy it's attached to doesn't just plough away. That shit hurts. The owners of vageeeens are more interested in the person than the penis. The penis should be an extension to the man, not the description of the man. P This certainly isn't the case for us, or several of our couple friends. I think your blanket statement that "owners of vageeeens" is more a reflection of your own prefences. I'm not stating our preferences are necessarily a reflection of others, I just think this is more down to each individual. It may not be. That's why my OH included the word "generally" highlighted in her post higher up, indicating that was a generalisation. Which is given to mean that substancially more women will be attracted to a guy upon looks, body, personality, skills in the bedroom, all put together; indeed every other element he possesses first before the size of his cock? As it is true that some women will think if he has a big cock then he's got the green light, fuck what the rest of him is like as it doesn't matter. A guy overlooked by others due to him being considered crass and obnoxious, lacking in humour, hugely out of shape, generally thought of as ugly, having poor hygene and without much sexual knowledge at all by the majority of women, doesn't mean he will be by ALL women. As if he possesses all of these typically considered negative traits, but does come equipped with a big cock, some women WILL consider him highly attractive, such as you guys and your friends. Neither of these selection methods is right or wrong may we add, as what is appealing to one person (personality, looks, physical condition, attitude, sexual skills, etc) won't matter to someone else who just wants a massive cock? As so often on Fab, it's entirely down to each person as it's THEIR preferences. B" I just meant in general I believe most look for someone with a cock rather than someone who IS a cock. But yeah, that works 
P | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
"I think you need to reread what has been said, because you have clearly misread (or intentionally trying to twist) what has been said. | |||
"I think if you search the plethora if does size matter threads that crop up almost daily, the conclusion is.... It matters far more to men than women. Women *generally* only enjoy a monster wang if the guy it's attached to doesn't just plough away. That shit hurts. The owners of vageeeens are more interested in the person than the penis. The penis should be an extension to the man, not the description of the man. P This certainly isn't the case for us, or several of our couple friends. I think your blanket statement that "owners of vageeeens" is more a reflection of your own prefences. I'm not stating our preferences are necessarily a reflection of others, I just think this is more down to each individual. It may not be. That's why my OH included the word "generally" highlighted in her post higher up, indicating that was a generalisation. Which is given to mean that substancially more women will be attracted to a guy upon looks, body, personality, skills in the bedroom, all put together; indeed every other element he possesses first before the size of his cock? As it is true that some women will think if he has a big cock then he's got the green light, fuck what the rest of him is like as it doesn't matter. A guy overlooked by others due to him being considered crass and obnoxious, lacking in humour, hugely out of shape, generally thought of as ugly, having poor hygene and without much sexual knowledge at all by the majority of women, doesn't mean he will be by ALL women. As if he possesses all of these typically considered negative traits, but does come equipped with a big cock, some women WILL consider him highly attractive, such as you guys and your friends. Neither of these selection methods is right or wrong may we add, as what is appealing to one person (personality, looks, physical condition, attitude, sexual skills, etc) won't matter to someone else who just wants a massive cock? As so often on Fab, it's entirely down to each person as it's THEIR preferences. B" Yes you used the word "generally" I don't think it is "general" it's a personal choice The rest I agree with - no right or wrong, just down to individual. | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
"My goodness  | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
I think you need to reread what has been said, because you have clearly misread (or intentionally trying to twist) what has been said. " | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
I think you need to reread what has been said, because you have clearly misread (or intentionally trying to twist) what has been said. "I think you do lol Which points my friend - I love open discourse, I'll happily explain? | |||
| |||
" Is there an average size fanny?" No. And other factors affect things. Shape. Lips. Etc. Every one is different (and lovely in their own way). | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
My goodness "Who me? No your mistaken I'm not your goodness If you would like to discuss please do | |||
| |||
"Definitely Thursday..."  | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
My goodness
Who me? No your mistaken I'm not your goodness
If you would like to discuss please do "I have done. I’d just be repeating myself | |||
| |||
"Group hug?" And pizza? | |||
"Group hug? And pizza?" I think I’ve seen this film... | |||
"Group hug? And pizza?" sounds like a plan | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
My goodness
Who me? No your mistaken I'm not your goodness
If you would like to discuss please do
I have done. I’d just be repeating myself "Erm... the "encounters" have been messages sent to their inbox off the back of threads just like this one where it has been stated that QL has been previously torn. At no point did she say it was an enjoyable experience, yet lurkers who read the forums but don't post have then messaged directly saying they'd like to tear her. How is that picking the wrong kind of meet? P | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
My goodness
Who me? No your mistaken I'm not your goodness
If you would like to discuss please do
I have done. I’d just be repeating myself
Erm... the "encounters" have been messages sent to their inbox off the back of threads just like this one where it has been stated that QL has been previously torn. At no point did she say it was an enjoyable experience, yet lurkers who read the forums but don't post have then messaged directly saying they'd like to tear her.
How is that picking the wrong kind of meet?
P" | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
"If you read the comments she said she posted on the forums about experiencing a tear and received messages in response saying it was a turn on so it was far from unintentional. I literally said I have experienced it once . So how do I keep picking overzealous men who like to hurt me from one experience?
The only other comment I have made in regard to this is that I seem to encounter above average size cocks more often. As I don't tend to know the size of a person's cock until we get into bed I don't really see how this is my fault. It's simply chance. A few of my ex partners have been well endowed but while that is not my preference, we have made it work because we liked each other.
I haven't tarred fab guys with any brush. The only guys I have made any comment towards is the men who have messaged Queen Leviosa saying they are aroused by her experience that for her was negative and painful. I have no idea what you're talking about otherwise. | |||
"I think you need to reread what has been said, because you have clearly misread (or intentionally trying to twist) what has been said. I think you do lol Which points my friend - I love open discourse, I'll happily explain?" Lacey just has, quite well in fact so I won't bother. | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
If you read the comments she said she posted on the forums about experiencing a tear and received messages in response saying it was a turn on so it was far from unintentional.
I literally said I have experienced it once . So how do I keep picking overzealous men who like to hurt me from one experience?
The only other comment I have made in regard to this is that I seem to encounter above average size cocks more often. As I don't tend to know the size of a person's cock until we get into bed I don't really see how this is my fault. It's simply chance. A few of my ex partners have been well endowed but while that is not my preference, we have made it work because we liked each other.
I haven't tarred fab guys with any brush. The only guys I have made any comment towards is the men who have messaged Queen Leviosa saying they are aroused by her experience that for her was negative and painful. I have no idea what you're talking about otherwise." | |||
"I think if you search the plethora if does size matter threads that crop up almost daily, the conclusion is.... It matters far more to men than women. Women *generally* only enjoy a monster wang if the guy it's attached to doesn't just plough away. That shit hurts. The owners of vageeeens are more interested in the person than the penis. The penis should be an extension to the man, not the description of the man. P This certainly isn't the case for us, or several of our couple friends. I think your blanket statement that "owners of vageeeens" is more a reflection of your own prefences. I'm not stating our preferences are necessarily a reflection of others, I just think this is more down to each individual. It may not be. That's why my OH included the word "generally" highlighted in her post higher up, indicating that was a generalisation. Which is given to mean that substancially more women will be attracted to a guy upon looks, body, personality, skills in the bedroom, all put together; indeed every other element he possesses first before the size of his cock? As it is true that some women will think if he has a big cock then he's got the green light, fuck what the rest of him is like as it doesn't matter. A guy overlooked by others due to him being considered crass and obnoxious, lacking in humour, hugely out of shape, generally thought of as ugly, having poor hygene and without much sexual knowledge at all by the majority of women, doesn't mean he will be by ALL women. As if he possesses all of these typically considered negative traits, but does come equipped with a big cock, some women WILL consider him highly attractive, such as you guys and your friends. Neither of these selection methods is right or wrong may we add, as what is appealing to one person (personality, looks, physical condition, attitude, sexual skills, etc) won't matter to someone else who just wants a massive cock? As so often on Fab, it's entirely down to each person as it's THEIR preferences. B Yes you used the word "generally" I don't think it is "general" it's a personal choice The rest I agree with - no right or wrong, just down to individual." Generally means "by the vast majority of" as we believe it to be a selection process reached by the hugely overwhelming majority of women, not all so the word is grammatically correct? To test it's validity, we'll have a quick poll on here to see how many follow the selection process we described (would have to be the vast majority to back up our use of the word that you have issue with) if ladies can respond please? ; Man A possesses chiselled good looks, is a toned adonis, is highly reliable as he has his own transport and doesn't like wasting others time, has a sense of humour that usually means others adore being in his company, is kind and considerate of everyone, thoughtful in his behaviour, yet possesses a naughty streak a mile wide in the bedroom, adoring mental connections as well as physical acts that he is extremely well accomplished to, knowing every nerve in the female body and how to stimulate each at the right time to cause her to be an absolute pleasure shaking wreck. Oh and his penis size is about average, really. Man B physically resembles the Elephant Man facially, Bernard Manning in body type, is often late for everything due to his complete disorganization coupled with not being arsed, has a huge chip on his shoulder at the world, sense of humour is non-existent, has a bad BO problem that is exacerbated by him not having bathed in a week or two and couldn't give a fuck about learning about women's minds or bodies tbf as all he wants to do is have them bounce in his cock till he shoots his head. He's not the brightest either, bless him. But he does possess a 9 1/2 inch wang so it's not all bad. Now WE prefer the sound of Man A. As you objected hugely to these preferences being assumed as those of yours, it's clear you prefer Man B. Can we have a quick vote on who the other ladies on here prefer please to back up our use of the word "generally" to mean "by the overwhelming majority but not quite all" like it actually does, please? B | |||
| |||
" Is there an average size fanny? No. And other factors affect things. Shape. Lips. Etc. Every one is different (and lovely in their own way)." Average size vag... various studies suggestion anything. From 3.77 inches to 7 inches....of I remember correctly being turned on elongates it as well making space... Bottom line there is no one size fits all. We are all different and like different things. It would be a very dull world if we were all the same
God would love a pizza | |||
" Is there an average size fanny? No. And other factors affect things. Shape. Lips. Etc. Every one is different (and lovely in their own way). Average size vag... various studies suggestion anything. From 3.77 inches to 7 inches....of I remember correctly being turned on elongates it as well making space... Bottom line there is no one size fits all. We are all different and like different things. It would be a very dull world if we were all the same
God would love a pizza "I had a wide on large enough to fit a fucking X-wing fighter in yesterday, turned on doesn't even come close! Thought I was gonna lose my innards when I stood up 
P | |||
" Is there an average size fanny? No. And other factors affect things. Shape. Lips. Etc. Every one is different (and lovely in their own way). Average size vag... various studies suggestion anything. From 3.77 inches to 7 inches....of I remember correctly being turned on elongates it as well making space... Bottom line there is no one size fits all. We are all different and like different things. It would be a very dull world if we were all the same
God would love a pizza "Just to clarify we are talking depth here people!! | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
My goodness
Who me? No your mistaken I'm not your goodness
If you would like to discuss please do
I have done. I’d just be repeating myself
Erm... the "encounters" have been messages sent to their inbox off the back of threads just like this one where it has been stated that QL has been previously torn. At no point did she say it was an enjoyable experience, yet lurkers who read the forums but don't post have then messaged directly saying they'd like to tear her.
How is that picking the wrong kind of meet?
P"QL? I was replying to Lacey Red Re read my friend - or you will keep making these mistakes Lacey referred to physical encounters as well - which I was addressing Don't let emotion rule your responses, just read thoroughly and reply rationally. Listen I'm not trying to be a dick, all I have said is everyone has different tastes - to which i thought you agreed? | |||
" Is there an average size fanny? No. And other factors affect things. Shape. Lips. Etc. Every one is different (and lovely in their own way). Average size vag... various studies suggestion anything. From 3.77 inches to 7 inches....of I remember correctly being turned on elongates it as well making space... Bottom line there is no one size fits all. We are all different and like different things. It would be a very dull world if we were all the same
God would love a pizza
I had a wide on large enough to fit a fucking X-wing fighter in yesterday, turned on doesn't even come close! Thought I was gonna lose my innards when I stood up
P"Omg  | |||
"Now am not saying am small am quite the opposite to be honest but been told after a one night stand that I was way too big ( This supposedly by a size queen ) makes you think do some women just boast there size queens or do some women not judge correctly the size of a penis? And what is the preference big or average or in some cases below average??" actually sometimes size does matter like I would not want a 12 inch that is only thing with me what I do not like is a cock that cannot hold its hardness and flops because you are either too tired or had too much alcohol that to me is about the size of it ha ha ha! | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
My goodness
Who me? No your mistaken I'm not your goodness
If you would like to discuss please do
I have done. I’d just be repeating myself
Erm... the "encounters" have been messages sent to their inbox off the back of threads just like this one where it has been stated that QL has been previously torn. At no point did she say it was an enjoyable experience, yet lurkers who read the forums but don't post have then messaged directly saying they'd like to tear her.
How is that picking the wrong kind of meet?
P
QL?
I was replying to Lacey Red
Re read my friend - or you will keep making these mistakes
Lacey referred to physical encounters as well - which I was addressing
Don't let emotion rule your responses, just read thoroughly and reply rationally.
Listen I'm not trying to be a dick, all I have said is everyone has different tastes - to which i thought you agreed?"I think it is you who need to re read as you seem to keep making references to things I have never said. | |||
| |||
"Now am not saying am small am quite the opposite to be honest but been told after a one night stand that I was way too big ( This supposedly by a size queen ) makes you think do some women just boast there size queens or do some women not judge correctly the size of a penis? And what is the preference big or average or in some cases below average?? actually sometimes size does matter like I would not want a 12 inch that is only thing with me what I do not like is a cock that cannot hold its hardness and flops because you are either too tired or had too much alcohol that to me is about the size of it ha ha ha!" Size also bears no reflection on if you know how to use it either | |||
"I think if you search the plethora if does size matter threads that crop up almost daily, the conclusion is.... It matters far more to men than women. Women *generally* only enjoy a monster wang if the guy it's attached to doesn't just plough away. That shit hurts. The owners of vageeeens are more interested in the person than the penis. The penis should be an extension to the man, not the description of the man. P This certainly isn't the case for us, or several of our couple friends. I think your blanket statement that "owners of vageeeens" is more a reflection of your own prefences. I'm not stating our preferences are necessarily a reflection of others, I just think this is more down to each individual. It may not be. That's why my OH included the word "generally" highlighted in her post higher up, indicating that was a generalisation. Which is given to mean that substancially more women will be attracted to a guy upon looks, body, personality, skills in the bedroom, all put together; indeed every other element he possesses first before the size of his cock? As it is true that some women will think if he has a big cock then he's got the green light, fuck what the rest of him is like as it doesn't matter. A guy overlooked by others due to him being considered crass and obnoxious, lacking in humour, hugely out of shape, generally thought of as ugly, having poor hygene and without much sexual knowledge at all by the majority of women, doesn't mean he will be by ALL women. As if he possesses all of these typically considered negative traits, but does come equipped with a big cock, some women WILL consider him highly attractive, such as you guys and your friends. Neither of these selection methods is right or wrong may we add, as what is appealing to one person (personality, looks, physical condition, attitude, sexual skills, etc) won't matter to someone else who just wants a massive cock? As so often on Fab, it's entirely down to each person as it's THEIR preferences. B Yes you used the word "generally" I don't think it is "general" it's a personal choice The rest I agree with - no right or wrong, just down to individual. Generally means "by the vast majority of" as we believe it to be a selection process reached by the hugely overwhelming majority of women, not all so the word is grammatically correct? To test it's validity, we'll have a quick poll on here to see how many follow the selection process we described (would have to be the vast majority to back up our use of the word that you have issue with) if ladies can respond please? ; Man A possesses chiselled good looks, is a toned adonis, is highly reliable as he has his own transport and doesn't like wasting others time, has a sense of humour that usually means others adore being in his company, is kind and considerate of everyone, thoughtful in his behaviour, yet possesses a naughty streak a mile wide in the bedroom, adoring mental connections as well as physical acts that he is extremely well accomplished to, knowing every nerve in the female body and how to stimulate each at the right time to cause her to be an absolute pleasure shaking wreck. Oh and his penis size is about average, really. Man B physically resembles the Elephant Man facially, Bernard Manning in body type, is often late for everything due to his complete disorganization coupled with not being arsed, has a huge chip on his shoulder at the world, sense of humour is non-existent, has a bad BO problem that is exacerbated by him not having bathed in a week or two and couldn't give a fuck about learning about women's minds or bodies tbf as all he wants to do is have them bounce in his cock till he shoots his head. He's not the brightest either, bless him. But he does possess a 9 1/2 inch wang so it's not all bad. Now WE prefer the sound of Man A. As you objected hugely to these preferences being assumed as those of yours, it's clear you prefer Man B. Can we have a quick vote on who the other ladies on here prefer please to back up our use of the word "generally" to mean "by the overwhelming majority but not quite all" like it actually does, please? B" It was always "grammatically" correct, just "contextually" incorrect - a big difference Since you don't recognise that, then I'm not sure you will be able to follow my posts correctly. So I don't think replying to you is going to go anywhere | |||
" Is there an average size fanny? No. And other factors affect things. Shape. Lips. Etc. Every one is different (and lovely in their own way). Average size vag... various studies suggestion anything. From 3.77 inches to 7 inches....of I remember correctly being turned on elongates it as well making space... a " Yes, how aroused I am makes a lot difference to what feels good. I would imagine everyone has a range within which they are comfortable. I have been cut by someone who was very careful, just too damn big. And I have experienced the opposite, where not enough was, well, just not enough. Each to his own, luckily, we are all different. | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
My goodness
Who me? No your mistaken I'm not your goodness
If you would like to discuss please do
I have done. I’d just be repeating myself
Erm... the "encounters" have been messages sent to their inbox off the back of threads just like this one where it has been stated that QL has been previously torn. At no point did she say it was an enjoyable experience, yet lurkers who read the forums but don't post have then messaged directly saying they'd like to tear her.
How is that picking the wrong kind of meet?
P
QL?
I was replying to Lacey Red
Re read my friend - or you will keep making these mistakes
Lacey referred to physical encounters as well - which I was addressing
Don't let emotion rule your responses, just read thoroughly and reply rationally.
Listen I'm not trying to be a dick, all I have said is everyone has different tastes - to which i thought you agreed?
I think it is you who need to re read as you seem to keep making references to things I have never said. "Which part Lacey? I'll happily change my opinion if I have made a mistake Point out which parts? | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
My goodness
Who me? No your mistaken I'm not your goodness
If you would like to discuss please do
I have done. I’d just be repeating myself
Erm... the "encounters" have been messages sent to their inbox off the back of threads just like this one where it has been stated that QL has been previously torn. At no point did she say it was an enjoyable experience, yet lurkers who read the forums but don't post have then messaged directly saying they'd like to tear her.
How is that picking the wrong kind of meet?
P
QL?
I was replying to Lacey Red
Re read my friend - or you will keep making these mistakes
Lacey referred to physical encounters as well - which I was addressing
Don't let emotion rule your responses, just read thoroughly and reply rationally.
Listen I'm not trying to be a dick, all I have said is everyone has different tastes - to which i thought you agreed?
I think it is you who need to re read as you seem to keep making references to things I have never said.
Which part Lacey? I'll happily change my opinion if I have made a mistake
Point out which parts?"I did further up. | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
My goodness
Who me? No your mistaken I'm not your goodness
If you would like to discuss please do
I have done. I’d just be repeating myself
Erm... the "encounters" have been messages sent to their inbox off the back of threads just like this one where it has been stated that QL has been previously torn. At no point did she say it was an enjoyable experience, yet lurkers who read the forums but don't post have then messaged directly saying they'd like to tear her.
How is that picking the wrong kind of meet?
P
QL?
I was replying to Lacey Red
Re read my friend - or you will keep making these mistakes
Lacey referred to physical encounters as well - which I was addressing
Don't let emotion rule your responses, just read thoroughly and reply rationally.
Listen I'm not trying to be a dick, all I have said is everyone has different tastes - to which i thought you agreed?
I think it is you who need to re read as you seem to keep making references to things I have never said.
Which part Lacey? I'll happily change my opinion if I have made a mistake
Point out which parts?
I did further up."Can't you just state? I couldn't see | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
My goodness
Who me? No your mistaken I'm not your goodness
If you would like to discuss please do
I have done. I’d just be repeating myself
Erm... the "encounters" have been messages sent to their inbox off the back of threads just like this one where it has been stated that QL has been previously torn. At no point did she say it was an enjoyable experience, yet lurkers who read the forums but don't post have then messaged directly saying they'd like to tear her.
How is that picking the wrong kind of meet?
P
QL?
I was replying to Lacey Red
Re read my friend - or you will keep making these mistakes
Lacey referred to physical encounters as well - which I was addressing
Don't let emotion rule your responses, just read thoroughly and reply rationally.
Listen I'm not trying to be a dick, all I have said is everyone has different tastes - to which i thought you agreed?
I think it is you who need to re read as you seem to keep making references to things I have never said.
Which part Lacey? I'll happily change my opinion if I have made a mistake
Point out which parts?
I did further up.
Can't you just state? I couldn't see ""If you read the comments she said she posted on the forums about experiencing a tear and received messages in response saying it was a turn on so it was far from unintentional. I literally said I have experienced it once . So how do I keep picking overzealous men who like to hurt me from one experience?
The only other comment I have made in regard to this is that I seem to encounter above average size cocks more often. As I don't tend to know the size of a person's cock until we get into bed I don't really see how this is my fault. It's simply chance. A few of my ex partners have been well endowed but while that is not my preference, we have made it work because we liked each other.
I haven't tarred fab guys with any brush. The only guys I have made any comment towards is the men who have messaged Queen Leviosa saying they are aroused by her experience that for her was negative and painful. I have no idea what you're talking about otherwise."
Here. | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
My goodness
Who me? No your mistaken I'm not your goodness
If you would like to discuss please do
I have done. I’d just be repeating myself
Erm... the "encounters" have been messages sent to their inbox off the back of threads just like this one where it has been stated that QL has been previously torn. At no point did she say it was an enjoyable experience, yet lurkers who read the forums but don't post have then messaged directly saying they'd like to tear her.
How is that picking the wrong kind of meet?
P
QL?
I was replying to Lacey Red
Re read my friend - or you will keep making these mistakes
Lacey referred to physical encounters as well - which I was addressing
Don't let emotion rule your responses, just read thoroughly and reply rationally.
Listen I'm not trying to be a dick, all I have said is everyone has different tastes - to which i thought you agreed?"Herein could lie the issue, if you read back, I was quoting QL, where she said "I have done, I'd just be repeating myself" If they have BOTH had these kind of messages based on threads just like this one where they have mentioned being torn, then it will apply to both. Neither of which have said they welcomed or encouraged messages referring to having their fanjo ripped. In fact they have both said how painful it has been and how they never want it to happen again. It really isn't too difficult. P | |||
"For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experinces." Here's your words - this is what I was referring to, regarding your physical encounter - I responded to what you said Let me guess...you didn't say that? | |||
"For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experinces. Here's your words - this is what I was referring to, regarding your physical encounter - I responded to what you said Let me guess...you didn't say that?" AN overzealous man. One man. Also my original comment to Queen Leviosa said "I was torn once". So please tell me again how I keep choosing overzealous men who like to hurt me or how I have tarred fab men with any brush by making reference to one personal experience of mine that did not even involve a guy from fab? I would love to know the answer to both of those questions. | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
My goodness
Who me? No your mistaken I'm not your goodness
If you would like to discuss please do
I have done. I’d just be repeating myself
Erm... the "encounters" have been messages sent to their inbox off the back of threads just like this one where it has been stated that QL has been previously torn. At no point did she say it was an enjoyable experience, yet lurkers who read the forums but don't post have then messaged directly saying they'd like to tear her.
How is that picking the wrong kind of meet?
P
QL?
I was replying to Lacey Red
Re read my friend - or you will keep making these mistakes
Lacey referred to physical encounters as well - which I was addressing
Don't let emotion rule your responses, just read thoroughly and reply rationally.
Listen I'm not trying to be a dick, all I have said is everyone has different tastes - to which i thought you agreed?
Herein could lie the issue, if you read back, I was quoting QL, where she said "I have done, I'd just be repeating myself"
If they have BOTH had these kind of messages based on threads just like this one where they have mentioned being torn, then it will apply to both. Neither of which have said they welcomed or encouraged messages referring to having their fanjo ripped. In fact they have both said how painful it has been and how they never want it to happen again. It really isn't too difficult.
P"Yes you a 100% correct, I was talking about Lacey Red, you then started quoting QL - and I pointed out I was referring to LR. It really isn't difficult is it? You conflated the two, not me - they are both different individuals | |||
| |||
"For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experinces. Here's your words - this is what I was referring to, regarding your physical encounter - I responded to what you said Let me guess...you didn't say that? AN overzealous man. One man. Also my original comment to Queen Leviosa said "I was torn once". So please tell me again how I keep choosing overzealous men who like to hurt me or how I have tarred fab men with any brush by making reference to one personal experience of mine that did not even involve a guy from fab? I would love to know the answer to both of those questions." When you said you receive messages on Fab off the back of these type of threads..... they were from Non-Fab guys? Or did you mean fab guys? | |||
"All in all Yes OP, size matters to some. It may be that size matters because it doesn’t matter. And it may be that size matters because it does matter. " Your best post! Ding Ding Ding Winner! | |||
"I think if you search the plethora if does size matter threads that crop up almost daily, the conclusion is.... It matters far more to men than women. Women *generally* only enjoy a monster wang if the guy it's attached to doesn't just plough away. That shit hurts. The owners of vageeeens are more interested in the person than the penis. The penis should be an extension to the man, not the description of the man. P This certainly isn't the case for us, or several of our couple friends. I think your blanket statement that "owners of vageeeens" is more a reflection of your own prefences. I'm not stating our preferences are necessarily a reflection of others, I just think this is more down to each individual. It may not be. That's why my OH included the word "generally" highlighted in her post higher up, indicating that was a generalisation. Which is given to mean that substancially more women will be attracted to a guy upon looks, body, personality, skills in the bedroom, all put together; indeed every other element he possesses first before the size of his cock? As it is true that some women will think if he has a big cock then he's got the green light, fuck what the rest of him is like as it doesn't matter. A guy overlooked by others due to him being considered crass and obnoxious, lacking in humour, hugely out of shape, generally thought of as ugly, having poor hygene and without much sexual knowledge at all by the majority of women, doesn't mean he will be by ALL women. As if he possesses all of these typically considered negative traits, but does come equipped with a big cock, some women WILL consider him highly attractive, such as you guys and your friends. Neither of these selection methods is right or wrong may we add, as what is appealing to one person (personality, looks, physical condition, attitude, sexual skills, etc) won't matter to someone else who just wants a massive cock? As so often on Fab, it's entirely down to each person as it's THEIR preferences. B Yes you used the word "generally" I don't think it is "general" it's a personal choice The rest I agree with - no right or wrong, just down to individual. Generally means "by the vast majority of" as we believe it to be a selection process reached by the hugely overwhelming majority of women, not all so the word is grammatically correct? To test it's validity, we'll have a quick poll on here to see how many follow the selection process we described (would have to be the vast majority to back up our use of the word that you have issue with) if ladies can respond please? ; Man A possesses chiselled good looks, is a toned adonis, is highly reliable as he has his own transport and doesn't like wasting others time, has a sense of humour that usually means others adore being in his company, is kind and considerate of everyone, thoughtful in his behaviour, yet possesses a naughty streak a mile wide in the bedroom, adoring mental connections as well as physical acts that he is extremely well accomplished to, knowing every nerve in the female body and how to stimulate each at the right time to cause her to be an absolute pleasure shaking wreck. Oh and his penis size is about average, really. Man B physically resembles the Elephant Man facially, Bernard Manning in body type, is often late for everything due to his complete disorganization coupled with not being arsed, has a huge chip on his shoulder at the world, sense of humour is non-existent, has a bad BO problem that is exacerbated by him not having bathed in a week or two and couldn't give a fuck about learning about women's minds or bodies tbf as all he wants to do is have them bounce in his cock till he shoots his head. He's not the brightest either, bless him. But he does possess a 9 1/2 inch wang so it's not all bad. Now WE prefer the sound of Man A. As you objected hugely to these preferences being assumed as those of yours, it's clear you prefer Man B. Can we have a quick vote on who the other ladies on here prefer please to back up our use of the word "generally" to mean "by the overwhelming majority but not quite all" like it actually does, please? B It was always "grammatically" correct, just "contextually" incorrect - a big difference Since you don't recognise that, then I'm not sure you will be able to follow my posts correctly. So I don't think replying to you is going to go anywhere" Nope, it's contextually correct too I'm afraid. If the vast, hugely overwhelming majority of women would prefer a man who had all the other attributes favourable with an average penis to a wart hog of a man in temperament, knowledge, smell and appearance with a big dick then it can be "generally" thought of to be the case, with only a few notable exceptions (AND they WILL be very few in number amongst the thousands on here believe me), such as you guys who welcome guys who are typically considered hideous, smell repugnant and are absolute twats personality wise, so long as they have a big schlong? The only way it isn't contextually correct to be "generally" thought of as a preference would be if the group who share these preferences of yours were in any way sizable in number? Which reminds me, your friends aren't coming forward very quickly to declare their lust for Man B. But I digress. If the only thing you can actually come up with to try and argue our points (which seems like either an argument for argument's sake or one picked after you got the wrong end of the stick originally tbf) after the evidence we've given to prove otherwise is a supposed difference in "grammatically" and "contextually" when the pair of these definitions for use of vocabulary are true, oh and a weak parting shot excusing your replying after your point will undoubtably be shot down in flames by us yet again, then I believe you realise this. Whether you choose to admit it in an open forum is of course another matter. B | |||
"For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experinces. Here's your words - this is what I was referring to, regarding your physical encounter - I responded to what you said Let me guess...you didn't say that? AN overzealous man. One man. Also my original comment to Queen Leviosa said "I was torn once". So please tell me again how I keep choosing overzealous men who like to hurt me or how I have tarred fab men with any brush by making reference to one personal experience of mine that did not even involve a guy from fab? I would love to know the answer to both of those questions. When you said you receive messages on Fab off the back of these type of threads..... they were from Non-Fab guys? Or did you mean fab guys?" It was Queen Leviosa who received the messages, not me! | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... That’s what I’m classing as average. I’ve had lots of fun with a man who was 4.5”
So in your case size dosent really matter then I just wondered that's all because you get alot of this bigger the better but then when it comes to it obviously not
I literally explained in my first post that size does matter to me....
I have a very small/tight vagina and I won’t fuck anyone who has a huge cock. 8” is the absolute maximum, and even then it would really depend on the man, the circumstances etc. I don’t want torn and/or to be in absolute agony.
I was torn once. It's not fun at all. I still cringe thinking about it!
I have as well. Yet when I say that on the forums, I have men messaging me saying what a turn on it is
What the fuck! How is an overzealous man injuring your vagina a turn on!?!?
Maybe some women like that? I had an ex who did.
Are those ladies prefences and like invalid Lacey?
Is it not fairer to say everyone has different tastes?
And why did you assume the cause of the problem to be an "overzealous man"? Could it not have been an accident?
People are free to enjoy what they like. However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it.
For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experiences I'm pretty sure that I know what the cause was.
If they don't know you have experienced it then their messages are unintentionally inappropriate - like many of the messages we and other get on here! It's not people trying to be inappropriate, just ending up that way.
You have stated you seem to encounter a lot of these guys for some reason - maybe you need to be more careful about your meet selection, seems like you keep picking these overzealous too well endowed guys that enjoy hurting you.
Since you control your meets, shouldn't you be able to avoid this?
If your experiences are away from Fab, then it seems silly to tar fab guys with this brush.
My goodness
Who me? No your mistaken I'm not your goodness
If you would like to discuss please do
I have done. I’d just be repeating myself
Erm... the "encounters" have been messages sent to their inbox off the back of threads just like this one where it has been stated that QL has been previously torn. At no point did she say it was an enjoyable experience, yet lurkers who read the forums but don't post have then messaged directly saying they'd like to tear her.
How is that picking the wrong kind of meet?
P
QL?
I was replying to Lacey Red
Re read my friend - or you will keep making these mistakes
Lacey referred to physical encounters as well - which I was addressing
Don't let emotion rule your responses, just read thoroughly and reply rationally.
Listen I'm not trying to be a dick, all I have said is everyone has different tastes - to which i thought you agreed?
Herein could lie the issue, if you read back, I was quoting QL, where she said "I have done, I'd just be repeating myself"
If they have BOTH had these kind of messages based on threads just like this one where they have mentioned being torn, then it will apply to both. Neither of which have said they welcomed or encouraged messages referring to having their fanjo ripped. In fact they have both said how painful it has been and how they never want it to happen again. It really isn't too difficult.
P
Yes you a 100% correct, I was talking about Lacey Red, you then started quoting QL - and I pointed out I was referring to LR.
It really isn't difficult is it?
You conflated the two, not me - they are both different individuals
"Oh the irony is strong here. | |||
"For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experinces. Here's your words - this is what I was referring to, regarding your physical encounter - I responded to what you said Let me guess...you didn't say that? AN overzealous man. One man. Also my original comment to Queen Leviosa said "I was torn once". So please tell me again how I keep choosing overzealous men who like to hurt me or how I have tarred fab men with any brush by making reference to one personal experience of mine that did not even involve a guy from fab? I would love to know the answer to both of those questions. When you said you receive messages on Fab off the back of these type of threads..... they were from Non-Fab guys? Or did you mean fab guys? It was Queen Leviosa who received the messages, not me!" Yes and I replied to YOUR comment about it Or didn't you make that comment? | |||
"For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experinces. Here's your words - this is what I was referring to, regarding your physical encounter - I responded to what you said Let me guess...you didn't say that? AN overzealous man. One man. Also my original comment to Queen Leviosa said "I was torn once". So please tell me again how I keep choosing overzealous men who like to hurt me or how I have tarred fab men with any brush by making reference to one personal experience of mine that did not even involve a guy from fab? I would love to know the answer to both of those questions. When you said you receive messages on Fab off the back of these type of threads..... they were from Non-Fab guys? Or did you mean fab guys? It was Queen Leviosa who received the messages, not me! Yes and I replied to YOUR comment about it Or didn't you make that comment?" I have at no point said I have received messages on fab off the back of these types of threads. I'm pretty sure this is actually the first time I have commented about being torn in the past so that may be why. That is why I was so shocked that Queen Leviosa had received the messages she referred to. | |||
| |||
"Well... This has been an entertaining lunch time read Oh, and Man A please " *takes a bow* | |||
"For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experinces. Here's your words - this is what I was referring to, regarding your physical encounter - I responded to what you said Let me guess...you didn't say that? AN overzealous man. One man. Also my original comment to Queen Leviosa said "I was torn once". So please tell me again how I keep choosing overzealous men who like to hurt me or how I have tarred fab men with any brush by making reference to one personal experience of mine that did not even involve a guy from fab? I would love to know the answer to both of those questions. When you said you receive messages on Fab off the back of these type of threads..... they were from Non-Fab guys? Or did you mean fab guys? It was Queen Leviosa who received the messages, not me! Yes and I replied to YOUR comment about it Or didn't you make that comment? I have at no point said I have received messages on fab off the back of these types of threads. I'm pretty sure this is actually the first time I have commented about being torn in the past so that may be why. That is why I was so shocked that Queen Leviosa had received the messages she referred to." My apologies regarding the messages - I've just scanned up the thread and it was actually another poster that said BOTH you and QL where receiving these messages and I thought that was the case - he/she was trying to fight your corner - and i assumed his facts were correct and they were not - my mistake entirely! Like i have said many times - I'm happy to change my opinion if that is what fact,logic and reason dictate
| |||
| |||
"For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experinces. Here's your words - this is what I was referring to, regarding your physical encounter - I responded to what you said Let me guess...you didn't say that? AN overzealous man. One man. Also my original comment to Queen Leviosa said "I was torn once". So please tell me again how I keep choosing overzealous men who like to hurt me or how I have tarred fab men with any brush by making reference to one personal experience of mine that did not even involve a guy from fab? I would love to know the answer to both of those questions. When you said you receive messages on Fab off the back of these type of threads..... they were from Non-Fab guys? Or did you mean fab guys? It was Queen Leviosa who received the messages, not me! Yes and I replied to YOUR comment about it Or didn't you make that comment? I have at no point said I have received messages on fab off the back of these types of threads. I'm pretty sure this is actually the first time I have commented about being torn in the past so that may be why. That is why I was so shocked that Queen Leviosa had received the messages she referred to. My apologies regarding the messages - I've just scanned up the thread and it was actually another poster that said BOTH you and QL where receiving these messages and I thought that was the case - he/she was trying to fight your corner - and i assumed his facts were correct and they were not - my mistake entirely! Like i have said many times - I'm happy to change my opinion if that is what fact,logic and reason dictate
"That point alone doesn't really explain the other rather insulting claims you made about me but *shrugs* I can't be bothered with this anymore. | |||
"My apologies regarding the messages - I've just scanned up the thread and it was actually another poster that said BOTH you and QL where receiving these messages and I thought that was the case - he/she was trying to fight your corner - and i assumed his facts were correct and they were not - my mistake entirely! Like i have said many times - I'm happy to change my opinion if that is what fact,logic and reason dictate
"That would be me, and I didn't state lacey was messaged. What I said was "Some ladies may like it, yes. But they are specifically talking about men saying they like it. Since its men messaging saying its a turn on." I did not say they were both messaged, but that it was men messaging that they were discussing, and nothing to do with the preferences of other women. | |||
"My apologies regarding the messages - I've just scanned up the thread and it was actually another poster that said BOTH you and QL where receiving these messages and I thought that was the case - he/she was trying to fight your corner - and i assumed his facts were correct and they were not - my mistake entirely! Like i have said many times - I'm happy to change my opinion if that is what fact,logic and reason dictate
That would be me, and I didn't state lacey was messaged. What I said was
"Some ladies may like it, yes. But they are specifically talking about men saying they like it. Since its men messaging saying its a turn on."
I did not say they were both messaged, but that it was men messaging that they were discussing, and nothing to do with the preferences of other women."No not you bud, another poster | |||
| |||
"My apologies regarding the messages - I've just scanned up the thread and it was actually another poster that said BOTH you and QL where receiving these messages and I thought that was the case - he/she was trying to fight your corner - and i assumed his facts were correct and they were not - my mistake entirely! Like i have said many times - I'm happy to change my opinion if that is what fact,logic and reason dictate
That would be me, and I didn't state lacey was messaged. What I said was
"Some ladies may like it, yes. But they are specifically talking about men saying they like it. Since its men messaging saying its a turn on."
I did not say they were both messaged, but that it was men messaging that they were discussing, and nothing to do with the preferences of other women.
No not you bud, another poster "Ah, okay | |||
"For myself it most certainly was an overzealous man and a lack of foreplay and as I am speaking of my own experinces. Here's your words - this is what I was referring to, regarding your physical encounter - I responded to what you said Let me guess...you didn't say that? AN overzealous man. One man. Also my original comment to Queen Leviosa said "I was torn once". So please tell me again how I keep choosing overzealous men who like to hurt me or how I have tarred fab men with any brush by making reference to one personal experience of mine that did not even involve a guy from fab? I would love to know the answer to both of those questions. When you said you receive messages on Fab off the back of these type of threads..... they were from Non-Fab guys? Or did you mean fab guys? It was Queen Leviosa who received the messages, not me! Yes and I replied to YOUR comment about it Or didn't you make that comment? I have at no point said I have received messages on fab off the back of these types of threads. I'm pretty sure this is actually the first time I have commented about being torn in the past so that may be why. That is why I was so shocked that Queen Leviosa had received the messages she referred to. My apologies regarding the messages - I've just scanned up the thread and it was actually another poster that said BOTH you and QL where receiving these messages and I thought that was the case - he/she was trying to fight your corner - and i assumed his facts were correct and they were not - my mistake entirely! Like i have said many times - I'm happy to change my opinion if that is what fact,logic and reason dictate
That point alone doesn't really explain the other rather insulting claims you made about me but *shrugs* I can't be bothered with this anymore."Not sure where i insulted you? I'm apologising about my comments regarding messages you received - since you didn't receive any - Nothing more | |||
"So much obsession over cock size. While undoubtedly everyone will have their preferences, and barring extremes, the majority of men will be adequate size for the majority of women. The most important factor is the person its attached to and how it will be used in the multi-sensory, multi stimulatory activity that is sex "And there speaketh Mr Adequate. | |||
| |||
| |||
" However both myself and Queen Leviosa have said we do NOT enjoy having our vaginas torn and therefore it is inappropriate for men to message us to say that they find it a turn on that we have experienced it." This quote from you Lacey Red also gave me the impression that you had been messaged regarding this I'm sure you will agree, the wording is misleading (I'm sure entirely unintentionally on you part) | |||
| |||
| |||
"I'm confused do we like big dicks or not? "I think you can only answer for yourself. | |||
| |||
| |||
"I'm confused do we like big dicks or not? "No idea... But i'll happily settle for an average dick attached to a nice person | |||
"(Ie Lacey and QL I am the perpetrator)" No, you are not. | |||
"What do you classify as average? This is really where people have different views. But statistics suggest average is an erect cock between 4.3 and 6.3 inches.... " You learn something new everyday and now I can go around with a smug look on my face | |||
But as stated above, I pick the man, not the penis. | |||
 So general consensus is its who its attached to the main thing, thanks for the replys people | |||
"(Ie Lacey and QL I am the perpetrator)" Definitely were not but nice try | |||
"(Ie Lacey and QL I am the perpetrator) No, you are not. " Knew you'd bite | |||
"(Ie Lacey and QL I am the perpetrator) No, you are not. Knew you'd bite "It’s the only biting I’d do with you | |||
"(Ie Lacey and QL I am the perpetrator) No, you are not. Knew you'd bite
It’s the only biting I’d do with you "Stop flirting x | |||
"(Ie Lacey and QL I am the perpetrator) Definitely were not but nice try "Stunner x | |||
"(Ie Lacey and QL I am the perpetrator) No, you are not. Knew you'd bite
It’s the only biting I’d do with you
Stop flirting x" I think you're actually my favourite troll | |||
"(Ie Lacey and QL I am the perpetrator) No, you are not. Knew you'd bite
It’s the only biting I’d do with you
Stop flirting x
I think you're actually my favourite troll "I ain't trolling you are stunning babes x | |||
"Group hug? And pizza?" How big is it? | |||
 | |||
| |||
"If we're talking about thighs, then yeah, size matters " | |||
"If we're talking about thighs, then yeah, size matters
"I agree Thick thighs are a winner! | |||
"If we're talking about thighs, then yeah, size matters
"Excuse me | |||
| |||
"I prefer average if it's too big it's uncomfortable having anal x" Average were perfect for each other if that's what you're into x | |||
