FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Smacking kids is it criminal 2
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In my opinion, we tell our children not to hit their friends when they annoy them. So it's hypocrisy to then do the same to them. And saying it never did me any harm isn't a reasonable response, that's the kind of excuses people who beat children use when justifying the bruises their children have, been there. So it's doesn't help children who are in those awful situations. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think one thread was enough plenty of opinions on first thread" Though I understand your viewpoint, it's such an emotive subject. Just seeing the first post title brought back memories. And I felt I needed to express my opinion instead of bottling it up. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think one thread was enough plenty of opinions on first thread Though I understand your viewpoint, it's such an emotive subject. Just seeing the first post title brought back memories. And I felt I needed to express my opinion instead of bottling it up. " Yes I agree. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Unfortunately it's all in the definition of the wording used. It's migrated from beating, to spanking to smacking to touching. As with most things the initial reasoning behind it has been clouded by misinterpretation and by those with a particular agenda and by those who were abused in the name of discipline. Much like religion, apparently it causes wars, hatred, child abuse, societal abuse just to quote a few misquotes of very misguided people. No it doesn't, people do and they hid behind the name of religion. " A good point well made | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hell no. I got a good few smacks in my day and never did me any harm. Health and safety and all that shite is killing all the fun we used to have " It’s fun to smack kids? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hell no. I got a good few smacks in my day and never did me any harm. Health and safety and all that shite is killing all the fun we used to have " Another cracking point! Ffs!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hell no. I got a good few smacks in my day and never did me any harm. Health and safety and all that shite is killing all the fun we used to have " It created the wonderful person you are | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hell no. I got a good few smacks in my day and never did me any harm. Health and safety and all that shite is killing all the fun we used to have It’s fun to smack kids?" It's fun to smack adults in school uniforms | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hell no. I got a good few smacks in my day and never did me any harm. Health and safety and all that shite is killing all the fun we used to have It’s fun to smack kids? It's fun to smack adults in school uniforms " Massive difference is that that occurs between two consenting adults. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think one thread was enough plenty of opinions on first thread" no i disagree | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The world is grey and everyone wants black or white it seems..... " And that comment my lovely epitomises fab for me. Tis why I (mostly!) avoid the more serious threads now and have less trips to the naughty step | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t really understand why any parent would choose to put their hands on their children. Yes it’s difficult and very frustrating at times but you should always do your best by your kids, and losing control isn’t an option. Thankfully it’s not something you see much these days. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The world is grey and everyone wants black or white it seems..... And that comment my lovely epitomises fab for me. Tis why I (mostly!) avoid the more serious threads now and have less trips to the naughty step " You are not a true forumite without a trip to the naughty step. Erm ... a friend told me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The world is grey and everyone wants black or white it seems..... And that comment my lovely epitomises fab for me. Tis why I (mostly!) avoid the more serious threads now and have less trips to the naughty step " I’m trying so hard to do this too... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The world is grey and everyone wants black or white it seems..... And that comment my lovely epitomises fab for me. Tis why I (mostly!) avoid the more serious threads now and have less trips to the naughty step You are not a true forumite without a trip to the naughty step. Erm ... a friend told me " My old me did my time there . Then I realised it’s best to keep my opinions to myself and the real world. Fab really is a different kettle of fish! Not worth the grief! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The world is grey and everyone wants black or white it seems..... And that comment my lovely epitomises fab for me. Tis why I (mostly!) avoid the more serious threads now and have less trips to the naughty step I’m trying so hard to do this too... " I do slip sometimes. It’s been a long process! . I don’t allow myself to even look at the politics thread! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Or should it be?" Yes it is! no need! stern words/mini lecture works for me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hitting sends out the wrong message. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The world is grey and everyone wants black or white it seems..... And that comment my lovely epitomises fab for me. Tis why I (mostly!) avoid the more serious threads now and have less trips to the naughty step I’m trying so hard to do this too... I do slip sometimes. It’s been a long process! . I don’t allow myself to even look at the politics thread! " I have no willpower | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The world is grey and everyone wants black or white it seems..... And that comment my lovely epitomises fab for me. Tis why I (mostly!) avoid the more serious threads now and have less trips to the naughty step I’m trying so hard to do this too... I do slip sometimes. It’s been a long process! . I don’t allow myself to even look at the politics thread! I have no willpower " What’s that? Ffs. Another word I have to google!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I was disciplined as a child with being smacked and no it didn't do me any harm as such. I've got two children and I've never raised my hand to them and never will." I was the same. It was part of growing up when I was a kid. My mates were the same. Back then parents would give their kids a clip round the ear in public and no one would bat an eyelid. I even remember my dad talking to the local Bobby who patrolled the neighbourhood, saying to him, if you ever catch my boys getting up to no good, you have my permission to give them a good kick up the backside lol. It's just the way it was back then. Even in school you got the teachers belt if you gave them reason to. Thank god these days are different. I agree I wouldn't lay a hand on my kids when they were young and if any teacher was to lift a belt to them, I would have been down at that school before they knew what hit them. I definitely see a difference in kids attitudes. These days I think kids are more disrespectful from when I was young. Whether being smacked or not was the reason we were more respectful than today's kids, I don't know. I find taking phones, computers and games consoles away was a good enough punishment | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The world is grey and everyone wants black or white it seems..... And that comment my lovely epitomises fab for me. Tis why I (mostly!) avoid the more serious threads now and have less trips to the naughty step You are not a true forumite without a trip to the naughty step. Erm ... a friend told me My old me did my time there . Then I realised it’s best to keep my opinions to myself and the real world. Fab really is a different kettle of fish! Not worth the grief!" I've not ended up in the naughty corner as yet I hold back my opinions on controversial subjects well enough, though I do sometimes slip. I agree, not worth the hassle and too many people are incapable of distinguishing different shades of grey. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The world is grey and everyone wants black or white it seems..... And that comment my lovely epitomises fab for me. Tis why I (mostly!) avoid the more serious threads now and have less trips to the naughty step You are not a true forumite without a trip to the naughty step. Erm ... a friend told me My old me did my time there . Then I realised it’s best to keep my opinions to myself and the real world. Fab really is a different kettle of fish! Not worth the grief! I've not ended up in the naughty corner as yet I hold back my opinions on controversial subjects well enough, though I do sometimes slip. I agree, not worth the hassle and too many people are incapable of distinguishing different shades of grey. " All 50 of them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The world is grey and everyone wants black or white it seems..... And that comment my lovely epitomises fab for me. Tis why I (mostly!) avoid the more serious threads now and have less trips to the naughty step You are not a true forumite without a trip to the naughty step. Erm ... a friend told me My old me did my time there . Then I realised it’s best to keep my opinions to myself and the real world. Fab really is a different kettle of fish! Not worth the grief! I've not ended up in the naughty corner as yet I hold back my opinions on controversial subjects well enough, though I do sometimes slip. I agree, not worth the hassle and too many people are incapable of distinguishing different shades of grey. " Haha. If only I copy and pasted your opinions mwahahahahahahahahahaha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The world is grey and everyone wants black or white it seems..... And that comment my lovely epitomises fab for me. Tis why I (mostly!) avoid the more serious threads now and have less trips to the naughty step You are not a true forumite without a trip to the naughty step. Erm ... a friend told me My old me did my time there . Then I realised it’s best to keep my opinions to myself and the real world. Fab really is a different kettle of fish! Not worth the grief! I've not ended up in the naughty corner as yet I hold back my opinions on controversial subjects well enough, though I do sometimes slip. I agree, not worth the hassle and too many people are incapable of distinguishing different shades of grey. Haha. If only I copy and pasted your opinions mwahahahahahahahahahaha " do it do it do it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I had a good few clips and the occasional shoeing when growing up thoroughly deserved for many although I still protest my innocence for one of them and it never did me any harm I'll give you an incident that happened earlier this year to me I live about a mile or so away from a local council estate with two large fields ideal for walking my dog I was throwing a ball for my dog and noticed two of the ratkids (I would guess they were around 10 or 11) from the estate over by some trees they were throwing apples around as we got closer they started throwing them at us and I of course shouted at them to stop as a few were getting a bit close they responded in the colourful manner of most children these days I thought ok fun and games over called my dog and went to the other field they followed us and having run out of apples to throw the threw bricks instead one hit me and a few hit my dog who started limping I lost my rag and chased them but they bolted they had fractured my dogs leg I found out after taking him to the vets and in all it cost me about £700 I reported it to the police who basically told me when it came down to it,it would be my word against theirs as to what happened and they were sorry that there was nothing they could really do I confronted one of the parents after a bit of searching and was met with the same colourful tone as the rats and on a few occasions since I've seen them at the same field and they always bolt when they see me I can tell you now that if I do ever catch them the very least they will have is a clip and I'm more than happy to have a discussion with their parents or the police if they become involved " Little shits. The parents sound lovely also. I know you're angry and rightly so. I'd be very careful though. You dont want to end up in court on an assault charge. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I had a good few clips and the occasional shoeing when growing up thoroughly deserved for many although I still protest my innocence for one of them and it never did me any harm I'll give you an incident that happened earlier this year to me I live about a mile or so away from a local council estate with two large fields ideal for walking my dog I was throwing a ball for my dog and noticed two of the ratkids (I would guess they were around 10 or 11) from the estate over by some trees they were throwing apples around as we got closer they started throwing them at us and I of course shouted at them to stop as a few were getting a bit close they responded in the colourful manner of most children these days I thought ok fun and games over called my dog and went to the other field they followed us and having run out of apples to throw the threw bricks instead one hit me and a few hit my dog who started limping I lost my rag and chased them but they bolted they had fractured my dogs leg I found out after taking him to the vets and in all it cost me about £700 I reported it to the police who basically told me when it came down to it,it would be my word against theirs as to what happened and they were sorry that there was nothing they could really do I confronted one of the parents after a bit of searching and was met with the same colourful tone as the rats and on a few occasions since I've seen them at the same field and they always bolt when they see me I can tell you now that if I do ever catch them the very least they will have is a clip and I'm more than happy to have a discussion with their parents or the police if they become involved " Jesus it’s one thing giving a ‘clip’ to your own kids... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hell no. I got a good few smacks in my day and never did me any harm. Health and safety and all that shite is killing all the fun we used to have It’s fun to smack kids? It's fun to smack adults in school uniforms " Where do you think it started, back in school being smacked as a naughty teenager. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Iv always said no but recently I saw a father full wack his 10/11 year old very hard around the head. So in that case, yes definitely. " Does not sound too good. Not the same as a smack across the legs or buttocks. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Iv always said no but recently I saw a father full wack his 10/11 year old very hard around the head. So in that case, yes definitely. Does not sound too good. Not the same as a smack across the legs or buttocks." Exactly and that's why I'm not sure it should be criminalised. As you said there is a big difference between a a smack on the hand or across the legs and what I witnessed. I still regret not saying anything. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kids will soon be ruling adults soon " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kids will soon be ruling adults soon " You mean, they don't already ....???!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kids will soon be ruling adults soon " Women dominating men too with their boobs and vaginas....... .....where will it all end..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kids will soon be ruling adults soon Women dominating men too with their boobs and vaginas....... .....where will it all end..... " Arise sir Nippy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kids will soon be ruling adults soon You mean, they don't already ....???!!!" Ok slap ‘em | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kids will soon be ruling adults soon Women dominating men too with their boobs and vaginas....... .....where will it all end..... Arise sir Nippy " Trying to keep it down tbf after a quick look at Mrs's pics..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kids will soon be ruling adults soon You mean, they don't already ....???!!!" Not if your a good parent they won't. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kids will soon be ruling adults soon You mean, they don't already ....???!!! Not if your a good parent they won't. " Depending who they hang out with , I see it all the time first hand . irrespective of class of said parent (s) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kids will soon be ruling adults soon You mean, they don't already ....???!!! Not if your a good parent they won't. Depending who they hang out with , I see it all the time first hand . irrespective of class of said parent (s) " plenty uni kids are cunts not just the fodder | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kids will soon be ruling adults soon You mean, they don't already ....???!!! Not if your a good parent they won't. Depending who they hang out with , I see it all the time first hand . irrespective of class of said parent (s) " Iv bought up my kids without hitting them. They are amazing individuals. Irrespective of who they hung out with they didn't give me any bother or get in any trouble with the police.They left school with qualifications and that's down to me keeping them grounded and communicating with them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kids will soon be ruling adults soon You mean, they don't already ....???!!! Not if your a good parent they won't. Depending who they hang out with , I see it all the time first hand . irrespective of class of said parent (s) Iv bought up my kids without hitting them. They are amazing individuals. Irrespective of who they hung out with they didn't give me any bother or get in any trouble with the police.They left school with qualifications and that's down to me keeping them grounded and communicating with them. " It's great that it all worked out well for you but for many it's not that simple! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hell no. I got a good few smacks in my day and never did me any harm. Health and safety and all that shite is killing all the fun we used to have It’s fun to smack kids? It's fun to smack adults in school uniforms " And how exactly did they discover that they like it?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kids will soon be ruling adults soon You mean, they don't already ....???!!! Not if your a good parent they won't. Depending who they hang out with , I see it all the time first hand . irrespective of class of said parent (s) Iv bought up my kids without hitting them. They are amazing individuals. Irrespective of who they hung out with they didn't give me any bother or get in any trouble with the police.They left school with qualifications and that's down to me keeping them grounded and communicating with them. It's great that it all worked out well for you but for many it's not that simple! " Bringing up kids isn't simple ! As much as there are bad kids there are equally as many bad parent's. Hitting your child is bad parenting. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Pleased you were able to bring your off spring up without any physical chastisement. My concern is the criminalizing of something which for some parents maybe a necessary sanction. The State should not be involved. " Why is physical chastisement sometimes necessary, that's crazy and cruel. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In your opinion......!!" Yes in my opinion which im allowed to give ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I understand that it should never be the first line of discipline, but I do not think it should be criminalised." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Well we all got a smack or two well deserved as kids too and turned out to be decent respectful adults. The world has gone mad enough as it is.. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am assuming that this thread is in response to new laws being made in Scotland. About time too. I don't believe physically assaulting your children is justifiable in any circumstances." I agree and it's interesting how you interchanged smacking which in the context of the thread is about discipline that you changed it to mean assaulting. This is why as I explained earlier that it cannot be be debated unless terms are explained. Far too many assumptions are made by far too many snowflakes often themselves either abused and so equate discipline for abuse or don't have kids and have little experience of raising them. Many assume that there is only one way to discipline. Having raised 4 kids what I will say on this is that kids are different and respond differently to different forms of discipline. What works well for one may not get the same desired effect for another. There are a lot of abused kids in this world and it's not because they got smacked but because they didn't get punished, not disciplined and got away with most anything. Their abuse has been that they were not taught discipline nor respect. They have got everything they asked for, that's also abusive. Some of the cheekiest unrespectful kids I've met are ones who come from parents who haven't disciplined and not been consistent with it. We will reap in later years what we've overlooked now. I was spanked, but never abused or 'hit' or beaten and there is a difference. If you don't know it then I may suggest it's how you were disciplined that demonstrates lack of differentiation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In my own experience, every hotel I've ever stayed in around Europe if there's a child screaming and misbehaving by the pool, in the restaurant or anywhere else, it's invariably a British child. The parents always seem to ignore them and concentrate harder on their smart phones. Is this because the parent won't smack or discipline the child or because they can't?" Both. Hands tied because it's frowned on and fear of some one misguided by calling it beating and abuse. I listened to an interesting radio debate on this a few years ago and on one side was this parent defending their right to use snaking if necessary and on the other and spokes person for some organisation (found out later she had no kids of her own). The later kept using the word abuse and the parent asked them why they insisted on using that word as they were discussing discipline. She just kept saying spanking was physical abuse. The parent then said, well if that is your agenda then you should be looking at the many other types of abuse, like psychological and emotional which is much more damaging long term. She had no real response to that. It's harder to guage on a chart and open to question so not easy to address, where as snaking is the easy target. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am assuming that this thread is in response to new laws being made in Scotland. About time too. I don't believe physically assaulting your children is justifiable in any circumstances. I agree and it's interesting how you interchanged smacking which in the context of the thread is about discipline that you changed it to mean assaulting. This is why as I explained earlier that it cannot be be debated unless terms are explained. Far too many assumptions are made by far too many snowflakes often themselves either abused and so equate discipline for abuse or don't have kids and have little experience of raising them. Many assume that there is only one way to discipline. Having raised 4 kids what I will say on this is that kids are different and respond differently to different forms of discipline. What works well for one may not get the same desired effect for another. There are a lot of abused kids in this world and it's not because they got smacked but because they didn't get punished, not disciplined and got away with most anything. Their abuse has been that they were not taught discipline nor respect. They have got everything they asked for, that's also abusive. Some of the cheekiest unrespectful kids I've met are ones who come from parents who haven't disciplined and not been consistent with it. We will reap in later years what we've overlooked now. I was spanked, but never abused or 'hit' or beaten and there is a difference. If you don't know it then I may suggest it's how you were disciplined that demonstrates lack of differentiation." Spot on | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am assuming that this thread is in response to new laws being made in Scotland. About time too. I don't believe physically assaulting your children is justifiable in any circumstances. I agree and it's interesting how you interchanged smacking which in the context of the thread is about discipline that you changed it to mean assaulting. This is why as I explained earlier that it cannot be be debated unless terms are explained. Far too many assumptions are made by far too many snowflakes often themselves either abused and so equate discipline for abuse or don't have kids and have little experience of raising them. Many assume that there is only one way to discipline. Having raised 4 kids what I will say on this is that kids are different and respond differently to different forms of discipline. What works well for one may not get the same desired effect for another. There are a lot of abused kids in this world and it's not because they got smacked but because they didn't get punished, not disciplined and got away with most anything. Their abuse has been that they were not taught discipline nor respect. They have got everything they asked for, that's also abusive. Some of the cheekiest unrespectful kids I've met are ones who come from parents who haven't disciplined and not been consistent with it. We will reap in later years what we've overlooked now. I was spanked, but never abused or 'hit' or beaten and there is a difference. If you don't know it then I may suggest it's how you were disciplined that demonstrates lack of differentiation." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I am assuming that this thread is in response to new laws being made in Scotland. About time too. I don't believe physically assaulting your children is justifiable in any circumstances. I agree and it's interesting how you interchanged smacking which in the context of the thread is about discipline that you changed it to mean assaulting. This is why as I explained earlier that it cannot be be debated unless terms are explained. Far too many assumptions are made by far too many snowflakes often themselves either abused and so equate discipline for abuse or don't have kids and have little experience of raising them. Many assume that there is only one way to discipline. Having raised 4 kids what I will say on this is that kids are different and respond differently to different forms of discipline. What works well for one may not get the same desired effect for another. There are a lot of abused kids in this world and it's not because they got smacked but because they didn't get punished, not disciplined and got away with most anything. Their abuse has been that they were not taught discipline nor respect. They have got everything they asked for, that's also abusive. Some of the cheekiest unrespectful kids I've met are ones who come from parents who haven't disciplined and not been consistent with it. We will reap in later years what we've overlooked now. I was spanked, but never abused or 'hit' or beaten and there is a difference. If you don't know it then I may suggest it's how you were disciplined that demonstrates lack of differentiation." This ^^^ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I was smacked by my Mother, but when she lost her temper it wouldn't stop until her anger subsides. So I would behave because I was scared, I didn't know how far she may go when she was mad at me. She isn't a terrible person in those days we all got smacked, however we aren't close and I've never forgotten it. Yes, you may think it's ok to smack your children and may thank you for it in the future especially if they believe it helped keep them on the straight and narrow. But others may not, just like me every smack meant I moved away and lost some of the love I had for the woman who gave birth to me and certainly cared and nursed me as a baby. Non of that remembered I just recall mainly the anger now and how scared I was of it. So I don't smack my Lads and hope I'm doing a good job, by using other methods of discipline. " I'm sorry to hear this happened and it goes to highlight a very common misrepresentation. What you have described is what I see as abuse, not discipline. That's bullying and venting ones anger on a weak person who cannot defend themselves which happens a lot. Unfortunately I feel many throw the bath out with the dirty water not able to see that it's the water that is dirty not the bath. The bath will hold fresh clean water and is still suitable for what it was designed for. Just because a child was abused when physically disciplined, doesn't mean that all physical discipline is abusive, nor that they would do the same. Unfortunately this is the approach much of our society takes today with most things. An inability to discern and differentiate, maybe borne out from threats of being falsely reported. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wouldn't "physically discipline" an animal, let alone my own children. It's a lazy way of parenting, give them a smack and they'll be too scared to do it again. I don't want my kids to be scared of me, I've never hit them, and I've managed to raise so far two very well behaved youngsters. Oh and my parents never hit me, so my opinion isn't the result of an abusive upbringing either. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I was smacked by my Mother, but when she lost her temper it wouldn't stop until her anger subsides. So I would behave because I was scared, I didn't know how far she may go when she was mad at me. She isn't a terrible person in those days we all got smacked, however we aren't close and I've never forgotten it. Yes, you may think it's ok to smack your children and may thank you for it in the future especially if they believe it helped keep them on the straight and narrow. But others may not, just like me every smack meant I moved away and lost some of the love I had for the woman who gave birth to me and certainly cared and nursed me as a baby. Non of that remembered I just recall mainly the anger now and how scared I was of it. So I don't smack my Lads and hope I'm doing a good job, by using other methods of discipline. I'm sorry to hear this happened and it goes to highlight a very common misrepresentation. What you have described is what I see as abuse, not discipline. That's bullying and venting ones anger on a weak person who cannot defend themselves which happens a lot. Unfortunately I feel many throw the bath out with the dirty water not able to see that it's the water that is dirty not the bath. The bath will hold fresh clean water and is still suitable for what it was designed for. Just because a child was abused when physically disciplined, doesn't mean that all physical discipline is abusive, nor that they would do the same. Unfortunately this is the approach much of our society takes today with most things. An inability to discern and differentiate, maybe borne out from threats of being falsely reported. " I like you. You speak sense. Never thought I’d say that on here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I was smacked by my Mother, but when she lost her temper it wouldn't stop until her anger subsides. So I would behave because I was scared, I didn't know how far she may go when she was mad at me. She isn't a terrible person in those days we all got smacked, however we aren't close and I've never forgotten it. Yes, you may think it's ok to smack your children and may thank you for it in the future especially if they believe it helped keep them on the straight and narrow. But others may not, just like me every smack meant I moved away and lost some of the love I had for the woman who gave birth to me and certainly cared and nursed me as a baby. Non of that remembered I just recall mainly the anger now and how scared I was of it. So I don't smack my Lads and hope I'm doing a good job, by using other methods of discipline. I'm sorry to hear this happened and it goes to highlight a very common misrepresentation. What you have described is what I see as abuse, not discipline. That's bullying and venting ones anger on a weak person who cannot defend themselves which happens a lot. Unfortunately I feel many throw the bath out with the dirty water not able to see that it's the water that is dirty not the bath. The bath will hold fresh clean water and is still suitable for what it was designed for. Just because a child was abused when physically disciplined, doesn't mean that all physical discipline is abusive, nor that they would do the same. Unfortunately this is the approach much of our society takes today with most things. An inability to discern and differentiate, maybe borne out from threats of being falsely reported. I like you. You speak sense. Never thought I’d say that on here. " you lier | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I was smacked by my Mother, but when she lost her temper it wouldn't stop until her anger subsides. So I would behave because I was scared, I didn't know how far she may go when she was mad at me. She isn't a terrible person in those days we all got smacked, however we aren't close and I've never forgotten it. Yes, you may think it's ok to smack your children and may thank you for it in the future especially if they believe it helped keep them on the straight and narrow. But others may not, just like me every smack meant I moved away and lost some of the love I had for the woman who gave birth to me and certainly cared and nursed me as a baby. Non of that remembered I just recall mainly the anger now and how scared I was of it. So I don't smack my Lads and hope I'm doing a good job, by using other methods of discipline. I'm sorry to hear this happened and it goes to highlight a very common misrepresentation. What you have described is what I see as abuse, not discipline. That's bullying and venting ones anger on a weak person who cannot defend themselves which happens a lot. Unfortunately I feel many throw the bath out with the dirty water not able to see that it's the water that is dirty not the bath. The bath will hold fresh clean water and is still suitable for what it was designed for. Just because a child was abused when physically disciplined, doesn't mean that all physical discipline is abusive, nor that they would do the same. Unfortunately this is the approach much of our society takes today with most things. An inability to discern and differentiate, maybe borne out from threats of being falsely reported. I like you. You speak sense. Never thought I’d say that on here. you lier " Haha. Meaning you???? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I was smacked by my Mother, but when she lost her temper it wouldn't stop until her anger subsides. So I would behave because I was scared, I didn't know how far she may go when she was mad at me. She isn't a terrible person in those days we all got smacked, however we aren't close and I've never forgotten it. Yes, you may think it's ok to smack your children and may thank you for it in the future especially if they believe it helped keep them on the straight and narrow. But others may not, just like me every smack meant I moved away and lost some of the love I had for the woman who gave birth to me and certainly cared and nursed me as a baby. Non of that remembered I just recall mainly the anger now and how scared I was of it. So I don't smack my Lads and hope I'm doing a good job, by using other methods of discipline. I'm sorry to hear this happened and it goes to highlight a very common misrepresentation. What you have described is what I see as abuse, not discipline. That's bullying and venting ones anger on a weak person who cannot defend themselves which happens a lot. Unfortunately I feel many throw the bath out with the dirty water not able to see that it's the water that is dirty not the bath. The bath will hold fresh clean water and is still suitable for what it was designed for. Just because a child was abused when physically disciplined, doesn't mean that all physical discipline is abusive, nor that they would do the same. Unfortunately this is the approach much of our society takes today with most things. An inability to discern and differentiate, maybe borne out from threats of being falsely reported. " I was abused and I clearly see the difference between abuse and physical punishment. The point many abused people make is that where are the lines, who defined the punishment, is it a smack on the back of the hand? Or 10 smacks on the bum? For what should physical discipline be used for? As there are no hardfast rules, it makes it easier for abusers to hide behind the term discipline. So whilst I understand the difference, I seen on this thread many people who have been abused. If we as children knew that it was wrong to hit maybe so many of us wouldn't have had the upbringings we've had. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I was smacked by my Mother, but when she lost her temper it wouldn't stop until her anger subsides. So I would behave because I was scared, I didn't know how far she may go when she was mad at me. She isn't a terrible person in those days we all got smacked, however we aren't close and I've never forgotten it. Yes, you may think it's ok to smack your children and may thank you for it in the future especially if they believe it helped keep them on the straight and narrow. But others may not, just like me every smack meant I moved away and lost some of the love I had for the woman who gave birth to me and certainly cared and nursed me as a baby. Non of that remembered I just recall mainly the anger now and how scared I was of it. So I don't smack my Lads and hope I'm doing a good job, by using other methods of discipline. I'm sorry to hear this happened and it goes to highlight a very common misrepresentation. What you have described is what I see as abuse, not discipline. That's bullying and venting ones anger on a weak person who cannot defend themselves which happens a lot. Unfortunately I feel many throw the bath out with the dirty water not able to see that it's the water that is dirty not the bath. The bath will hold fresh clean water and is still suitable for what it was designed for. Just because a child was abused when physically disciplined, doesn't mean that all physical discipline is abusive, nor that they would do the same. Unfortunately this is the approach much of our society takes today with most things. An inability to discern and differentiate, maybe borne out from threats of being falsely reported. I like you. You speak sense. Never thought I’d say that on here. you lier Haha. Meaning you???? " you tell me all the time im the smartest here | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nowadays its not right, not accepted. Back in the 70's it was normal. I wasn't traumatised, or feared my parents it was a normal, common acceptable thing growing up as a kid. I didn't smack mine but one does wonder..kids seem out of control now, no respect for authority, know their rights and seem to get away with things. And I'm not generalising..its true in a lot of cases. I don't know what the answer is but please don't think all of us who got a smack got traumatised..a smack not a beating or touching inappropriately.. We respected adults, our parents and authority back then, not feared..respected." I remember when choosing to do something that if caught I'd get a smack for (no beating etc) knowing the consequence and excepting it ... didn't hate my parents or authority and never was traumatised but did learn respect and responsibility | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I was smacked by my Mother, but when she lost her temper it wouldn't stop until her anger subsides. So I would behave because I was scared, I didn't know how far she may go when she was mad at me. She isn't a terrible person in those days we all got smacked, however we aren't close and I've never forgotten it. Yes, you may think it's ok to smack your children and may thank you for it in the future especially if they believe it helped keep them on the straight and narrow. But others may not, just like me every smack meant I moved away and lost some of the love I had for the woman who gave birth to me and certainly cared and nursed me as a baby. Non of that remembered I just recall mainly the anger now and how scared I was of it. So I don't smack my Lads and hope I'm doing a good job, by using other methods of discipline. I'm sorry to hear this happened and it goes to highlight a very common misrepresentation. What you have described is what I see as abuse, not discipline. That's bullying and venting ones anger on a weak person who cannot defend themselves which happens a lot. Unfortunately I feel many throw the bath out with the dirty water not able to see that it's the water that is dirty not the bath. The bath will hold fresh clean water and is still suitable for what it was designed for. Just because a child was abused when physically disciplined, doesn't mean that all physical discipline is abusive, nor that they would do the same. Unfortunately this is the approach much of our society takes today with most things. An inability to discern and differentiate, maybe borne out from threats of being falsely reported. I was abused and I clearly see the difference between abuse and physical punishment. The point many abused people make is that where are the lines, who defined the punishment, is it a smack on the back of the hand? Or 10 smacks on the bum? For what should physical discipline be used for? As there are no hardfast rules, it makes it easier for abusers to hide behind the term discipline. So whilst I understand the difference, I seen on this thread many people who have been abused. If we as children knew that it was wrong to hit maybe so many of us wouldn't have had the upbringings we've had." Those are big questions that unfortunately are hard to define in black and white terms and yet many trying to do that like much if today's approach to rules. Trying to fit a square peg into a round hole only creates friction and deforming of the original. Unfortunately what I've seen in more current trends is the increasing rightful parental responsibilities of the majority being removed by some trying to solve minority problem (not to diminish the severity of that minority problem by saying that in any way). We need to be aware that by removing tools that are effective by those who know how to use them because those who abuse them don't know how, then we will and have created other problems. I do not believe for one minute that criminalising spanking will not stop the abusive parenting, but all it will do is cause issues for loving po arents and families who use it correctly and effectively, will criminalise them and those who beat because of other personal issues or inability to control themselves will still continue to abuse and vent themselves on the weaker person in other more physical ways and in emotional. What I see is a blanket law being made that removes any responsibility of the accuser to demonstrate clearly that it was an abusive act and not one done in any form of care and love to teach and ultimately train. On a side note someone mentioned they would physically punish an animal so definitely not their child. Have you watched the animal kingdom. Many examples of physical discipline done in a caring way to teach. On that note I'll now out. It's been a good topic and thank you OP. Shows emmotive subjects can be discussed without beating each other up (sorry couldn't resist) . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" On a side note someone mentioned they would physically punish an animal so definitely not their child. Have you watched the animal kingdom. Many examples of physical discipline done in a caring way to teach. " Some animals also eat their young, so I don't think I'll be taking parenting tips from the animal kingdom | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" On a side note someone mentioned they would physically punish an animal so definitely not their child. Have you watched the animal kingdom. Many examples of physical discipline done in a caring way to teach. Some animals also eat their young, so I don't think I'll be taking parenting tips from the animal kingdom " Interesting deduction. And that's the point I was making earlier. Throw the bath out with the dirty water approach only ends up with an unwashed filthy body. . So if I'm correct, you're equating eating young because its to do with keeping their gene pool safe as a reason that animals don't know how to parent? Anyway hope this thread stays true and doesn't spiral. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think one thread was enough plenty of opinions on first thread" I Agree | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It should not! Soon the children will be controlling the parents and telling them the rules. The parents will just have to sit in the corner and say nothing as the children will have all these rights and wont be told what to do or what not to do. They will do what they want and wont be disiplined in any way. " That isn’t about being physical though is it? That’s about lack of boundaries and guidance, rules etc. Having no boundaries and rules but giving your child a clip around the ear will not give a better behaved child. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It should not! Soon the children will be controlling the parents and telling them the rules. The parents will just have to sit in the corner and say nothing as the children will have all these rights and wont be told what to do or what not to do. They will do what they want and wont be disiplined in any way. That isn’t about being physical though is it? That’s about lack of boundaries and guidance, rules etc. Having no boundaries and rules but giving your child a clip around the ear will not give a better behaved child. " No it won't and I'm anti smacking but I'm also anti criminalising otherwise good parents. But I totally agree with you Babs. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm a dad of 2 girls. When my kids reached 7 years old. I sat them both down and explained a few things. "I don't ever want to smack you, but it you misbehave I will smack you." At this point I smacked the table as hard as I could. "That's how hard I will smack you. I don't want to smack you but if you misbehave I will." I am proud to say I have never smacked my 2 girls. The threat was enough. It's like prison. It should be there as a deterant. Because like prison when it's not a deterant its no longer effective. Parents have to have a deterant and be prepared to use if the situation warrants it. Doesn't have to be a smack. ( Gonna get long sorry.) I once instructed both girls to polish my boots (an hour of military style balling boots.). When they were done they absolutely gleamed. I then told then to throw the boots in the bin. The look of confusion was priceless. They did as asked then asked the key question. We spent all that time cleaning the boots, so why put them in the bin? My answer: " you were being punished because you lied to me. So you learn that lying to your parents is a waste of time. Next time it will be easier and quicker to just tell me the truth won't it." No beating, no smack lesson learned. Smacking should be a weapon of last resort. But if anyone finds that they have to continually smack their child then they really have consider why? Because it's clearly not working. " So just threaten them and treat them badly then? Okay | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Pleased you were able to bring your off spring up without any physical chastisement. My concern is the criminalizing of something which for some parents maybe a necessary sanction. The State should not be involved. " When the smack or similar doesn’t yield desired results .... where to then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wouldn't "physically discipline" an animal, let alone my own children. It's a lazy way of parenting, give them a smack and they'll be too scared to do it again. I don't want my kids to be scared of me, I've never hit them, and I've managed to raise so far two very well behaved youngsters. Oh and my parents never hit me, so my opinion isn't the result of an abusive upbringing either. " Both my parents smacked me, I was never scared of them. My grandfather never hit me, but when he shouted both me and my sister shook. As for smacking kids, last line to be used and never on the head. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Or should it be?" As a child I grew up on the 70's and 80's when there was no such debate and I've grown up to be a responsible adult who got smacked as a child. Moving on...I've found that a smack, depending on the circumstances, has its place as long as you explain to your child why they got smacked. It's when parents start to batter kids or leave bruises/marks on them that you have to be concerned (it's also very illegal). I personally feel that it's fine to smack your child not batter bruise them. I've heard stories of parents calling the police or social services so they have a witness when disciplining their children which is ridiculous. So don't I agree with a smack being illegal | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Or should it be? As a child I grew up on the 70's and 80's when there was no such debate and I've grown up to be a responsible adult who got smacked as a child. Moving on...I've found that a smack, depending on the circumstances, has its place as long as you explain to your child why they got smacked. It's when parents start to batter kids or leave bruises/marks on them that you have to be concerned (it's also very illegal). I personally feel that it's fine to smack your child not batter bruise them. I've heard stories of parents calling the police or social services so they have a witness when disciplining their children which is ridiculous. So don't I agree with a smack being illegal " I too grew up during that time where kids were still smacked in primary school. I feel there needs to be a distinction between beating and bruising and a slap to the leg which can be pretty helpful on rare occasions when dealing with an unruly child. I have noticed that in schools nowadays, the discipline is terrible. The kids are essentially out of control because they know the teachers hands are tied. More teachers gets physically assaulted by kids than the other way around. That can't be right. I don't really know what the solution is. It's not black and white. But I don't agree that smacking should be made illegal. Liberal leftist state nannying has grown to be irritating to me. I don't want the state to make it illegal for me to buy a large soft drink, discipline my child or eat a burger. There seems to be a trend towards eroding personal freedom in the name of the state and I'm not for that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wouldn't "physically discipline" an animal, let alone my own children. It's a lazy way of parenting, give them a smack and they'll be too scared to do it again. I don't want my kids to be scared of me, I've never hit them, and I've managed to raise so far two very well behaved youngsters. Oh and my parents never hit me, so my opinion isn't the result of an abusive upbringing either. " My own wisdom astonishes me at times. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wouldn't "physically discipline" an animal, let alone my own children. It's a lazy way of parenting, give them a smack and they'll be too scared to do it again. I don't want my kids to be scared of me, I've never hit them, and I've managed to raise so far two very well behaved youngsters. Oh and my parents never hit me, so my opinion isn't the result of an abusive upbringing either. My own wisdom astonishes me at times. " It’s probably the best wisdom on this thread | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wouldn't "physically discipline" an animal, let alone my own children. It's a lazy way of parenting, give them a smack and they'll be too scared to do it again. I don't want my kids to be scared of me, I've never hit them, and I've managed to raise so far two very well behaved youngsters. Oh and my parents never hit me, so my opinion isn't the result of an abusive upbringing either. My own wisdom astonishes me at times. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It’s probably the best wisdom on this thread " More accurately, it's the view that most closely matches your own.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It’s probably the best wisdom on this thread More accurately, it's the view that most closely matches your own.. " Yep | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"In my opinion, we tell our children not to hit their friends when they annoy them. So it's hypocrisy to then do the same to them. And saying it never did me any harm isn't a reasonable response, that's the kind of excuses people who beat children use when justifying the bruises their children have, been there. So it's doesn't help children who are in those awful situations. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It’s probably the best wisdom on this thread More accurately, it's the view that most closely matches your own.. " And is also the best wisdom on this thread | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Or should it be? As a child I grew up on the 70's and 80's when there was no such debate and I've grown up to be a responsible adult who got smacked as a child. Moving on...I've found that a smack, depending on the circumstances, has its place as long as you explain to your child why they got smacked. It's when parents start to batter kids or leave bruises/marks on them that you have to be concerned (it's also very illegal). I personally feel that it's fine to smack your child not batter bruise them. I've heard stories of parents calling the police or social services so they have a witness when disciplining their children which is ridiculous. So don't I agree with a smack being illegal I too grew up during that time where kids were still smacked in primary school. I feel there needs to be a distinction between beating and bruising and a slap to the leg which can be pretty helpful on rare occasions when dealing with an unruly child. I have noticed that in schools nowadays, the discipline is terrible. The kids are essentially out of control because they know the teachers hands are tied. More teachers gets physically assaulted by kids than the other way around. That can't be right. I don't really know what the solution is. It's not black and white. But I don't agree that smacking should be made illegal. Liberal leftist state nannying has grown to be irritating to me. I don't want the state to make it illegal for me to buy a large soft drink, discipline my child or eat a burger. There seems to be a trend towards eroding personal freedom in the name of the state and I'm not for that. " That is a poor bit of debating. Comparing assault on a child with something trivial, and which isn't even happening. Taxing sugar filled drinks does not make them illegal. I'm sure you'd quite like the "nanny state" to keep it illegal for people to hit you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It’s probably the best wisdom on this thread More accurately, it's the view that most closely matches your own.. And is also the best wisdom on this thread " I just wish I could get a well thought out response to a sensible point as easily and quickly as a one liner. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Or should it be? As a child I grew up on the 70's and 80's when there was no such debate and I've grown up to be a responsible adult who got smacked as a child. Moving on...I've found that a smack, depending on the circumstances, has its place as long as you explain to your child why they got smacked. It's when parents start to batter kids or leave bruises/marks on them that you have to be concerned (it's also very illegal). I personally feel that it's fine to smack your child not batter bruise them. I've heard stories of parents calling the police or social services so they have a witness when disciplining their children which is ridiculous. So don't I agree with a smack being illegal I too grew up during that time where kids were still smacked in primary school. I feel there needs to be a distinction between beating and bruising and a slap to the leg which can be pretty helpful on rare occasions when dealing with an unruly child. I have noticed that in schools nowadays, the discipline is terrible. The kids are essentially out of control because they know the teachers hands are tied. More teachers gets physically assaulted by kids than the other way around. That can't be right. I don't really know what the solution is. It's not black and white. But I don't agree that smacking should be made illegal. Liberal leftist state nannying has grown to be irritating to me. I don't want the state to make it illegal for me to buy a large soft drink, discipline my child or eat a burger. There seems to be a trend towards eroding personal freedom in the name of the state and I'm not for that. That is a poor bit of debating. Comparing assault on a child with something trivial, and which isn't even happening. Taxing sugar filled drinks does not make them illegal. I'm sure you'd quite like the "nanny state" to keep it illegal for people to hit you? " Actually I didn't compare smacking to drinks, they were mentioned in the same sentence for illustrative purposes. In the USA, where I lived until recently, there were indeed serious moves to make it illegal to sell soft drinks over a certain size. Your attempt to compare children to adults is poorly considered. Children are below the age of criminal responsibility. When adults destroy property, they are sanctioned by the court. When children do the same they are disciplined by parents. Occasionally, a slap to the leg is a superior sanction than others that may be available. That decision should be made on a case by case basis. The point of the drinks and so forth is that it is misguided for the state to attempt to erode the decision making of the individual using endless laws. There has been a trend towards that in recent times. It is not black and white and there are bound to be strong feelings on both sides. We may have different views on it and frankly are unlikely to persuade each other by debating it either. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I simply do not understand how anyone can think assaulting an adult is a crime but assaulting a child is not. " Not a VALID comparison......!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I simply do not understand how anyone can think assaulting an adult is a crime but assaulting a child is not. Not a VALID comparison......!! " Why not? Hitting a person is hitting a person | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I simply do not understand how anyone can think assaulting an adult is a crime but assaulting a child is not. Not a VALID comparison......!! Why not? Hitting a person is hitting a person " Simplistic..... As I said not a valid comparison. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I simply do not understand how anyone can think assaulting an adult is a crime but assaulting a child is not. Not a VALID comparison......!! Why not? Hitting a person is hitting a person " Why not? Slapping a 3 year old on the leg is not the same as punching an adult where more force and harm are involved. When it's necessary to demonstrate to a 3 year old who can't be reasoned with that it's not ok to run into tragic and be killed, I view it as an acceptable price to pay. I have to wonder how many commenters have actually raised children and so can grasp this point. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I have to wonder how many commenters have actually raised children and so can grasp this point. " I raised three as a single parent. Sure, they could frustrate the hell out of you. But I never saw violence as the way to teach them anything. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I have to wonder how many commenters have actually raised children and so can grasp this point. I raised three as a single parent. Sure, they could frustrate the hell out of you. But I never saw violence as the way to teach them anything. " That's your choice. However choice is the key concept here. I object to having my choice taken away by the law. If my kid intends to run into the road I am quite happy to shout, yell, reason, yes, and spank to get my point across. If you don't want to do it, don't do it. Just don't presume to tell me how to parent. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Just don't presume to tell me how to parent." I don't recall telling you to do anything. To suggest so seems unnecessarily defensive. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Just don't presume to tell me how to parent. I don't recall telling you to do anything. To suggest so seems unnecessarily defensive. " That's true, you were not directly, but by seeming to lend support to the notion that it should be illegal, it boils down to effectively the same thing. Or do you believe it should not be illegal - you were just commenting on your personal view - and I misunderstood your intent? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think if you have to physically punish your children to get your point across and make them listen then you're a shitty parent. " That's your opinion. My four children, some of whom are adult nowz would probably disagree with you. There's nothing wrong with the occasional well timed smack on the leg to a very young child in the right circumstances. This is not child battery or beating. The circumstances are rare. But it has a place. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Oh, for heavens sake. The OP asked for an opinion. I offered mine, like everyone else has done. You said it couldn't be drawn from practical experience. I explained it was. At which point you get all defensive. End of. " No. The order of events you claim happened is not accurate. Take a look at the above thread. It's quite clear. 1. I asked how many commenters have practical experience. 2. You replied and said you did and it was frustrating. 3. I replied with my 'don't tell.me how to parent' remark - which actually was not aimed at you and I'm happy to revise it. 4. You accuse me of being defensive. 5. I respond and ask you whether you believe smacking should be illegal. So kindly don't attempt revisionist history in order to further your own self serving agenda. In any case, I am happy to change my previous post to: 'that's your choice. The key point here is choice. I object to having my choice taken away by the law. So please allow me to have the same choice.' You seem to have some challenges distinguishing defensiveness from forthrightness. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why I we talking about kids on a swinging site ?" In a desperate attempt to have just one adult conversation that didn't involve knickers, penises or women getting turned on on bicycles. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why are we talking about kids on a swinging site ?" Because it is a general discussion section of the forum, used to discuss anything within the rules of the forum, with peers and other people who share a common interest. There is a section specifically called swingers for swinging discussions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Kids need discipline. A good smack will sort them out. But I do draw the line to a belt buckle or shoe to a kid. " Is said shoe attached to a foot ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think if you have to physically punish your children to get your point across and make them listen then you're a shitty parent. " Sounds rather judgmental...I would say ! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No, nothing wrong wrong with a clip around the ear lol." Must say not too happy about striking the head. Smack the legs and bottom: no risk of any permanent harm. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I used to get the slipper when I was younger and it never did me any harm That's the only funny face I could pull. But seriously, I don't see the issue. A lot of kids have very little respect nowadays, be it authority, their elders, or just random people. And also we wonder why we have had a surge of knife crime and violence, because no one has smacked some sense into the little shits" I think you'll possibly find that the ones with little respect are often the ones getting a regular beat down from mum and dad. They see violence as the norm at home and take it out into the street with them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I simply do not understand how anyone can think assaulting an adult is a crime but assaulting a child is not. Not a VALID comparison......!! Why not? Hitting a person is hitting a person Why not? Slapping a 3 year old on the leg is not the same as punching an adult where more force and harm are involved. When it's necessary to demonstrate to a 3 year old who can't be reasoned with that it's not ok to run into tragic and be killed, I view it as an acceptable price to pay. I have to wonder how many commenters have actually raised children and so can grasp this point. " You keep using that as an example - is that the only time it’s acceptable? I have a child, I’ve never hit her. I’ve treated her as a human and explained why it was wrong and she’s followed that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I think you'll possibly find that the ones with little respect are often the ones getting a regular beat down from mum and dad. They see violence as the norm at home and take it out into the street with them." You might have a point with children who are beaten regularly (particularly at an older age) but I feel to place the blame of the current knife crime and other things at the door of smacking is wrong. Kids have consistently been smacked for hundreds of years without the recent problem after all. I also feel its wrong to assume that a toddler that has been smacked occasionally will be in danger of taking violence into the streets as a teen. The problem with making smacking illegal is that its a blanket ban. It covers the whole spectrum - and that's what I don't agree with. I agree that education is great and of course I'm not arguing that kids should be beaten if it can be avoided. I just believe that making it illegal, is taking away an important choice from parents (see my post above about dealing with unruly toddler who is determined to break free and run into the road). Another poster make a good point. Making it illegal is not likely to change the behavior of the worst offenders.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I simply do not understand how anyone can think assaulting an adult is a crime but assaulting a child is not. Not a VALID comparison......!! Why not? Hitting a person is hitting a person Why not? Slapping a 3 year old on the leg is not the same as punching an adult where more force and harm are involved. When it's necessary to demonstrate to a 3 year old who can't be reasoned with that it's not ok to run into tragic and be killed, I view it as an acceptable price to pay. I have to wonder how many commenters have actually raised children and so can grasp this point. You keep using that as an example - is that the only time it’s acceptable? I have a child, I’ve never hit her. I’ve treated her as a human and explained why it was wrong and she’s followed that. " I think it's a good example and one of the times I believe it's ok. Kids are different. If you have had a 2 year old that listens to reasoned argument then that's great. Not all 2 year olds respond in the same way. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think if you have to physically punish your children to get your point across and make them listen then you're a shitty parent. Sounds rather judgmental...I would say !" I'd say so too. But I'd rather be judgemental than smack my kids | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think if you have to physically punish your children to get your point across and make them listen then you're a shitty parent. Sounds rather judgmental...I would say ! I'd say so too. But I'd rather be judgemental than smack my kids " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think if you have to physically punish your children to get your point across and make them listen then you're a shitty parent. Sounds rather judgmental...I would say ! I'd say so too. But I'd rather be judgemental than smack my kids " That's your choice. The debate is about whether it should made illegal and so deny people choice. I am sure that you would object if you were told it was compulsory to smack them? Each parent should make their own choice. State interference is not required. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"That's your choice. The debate is about whether it should made illegal and so deny people choice. I am sure that you would object if you were told it was compulsory to smack them? Each parent should make their own choice. State interference is not required. " Exactment......!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I find it hard to believe that any rational adult could think it is acceptable to assault a tot who is 24 months old. " One more time before I just give up on this. The debate is about whether it is right to deny people the CHOICE. Smoking is bad for you. Should it be made illegal? Drinking is bad for you and causes antisocial behavior. Shall that be Illegal too? How about swinging? Many lawmakers would view that as sexual deviance. Shall that be made illegal too? The point is that is dangerous to make too many laws that intrude into private life. OK. Suppose I agree with you. Kids shouldn't smacked. It's bad bad.. Even then, I STILL would believe that parents need to have the CHOICE and so it should not be illegal, because I believe in a free society. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I find it hard to believe that any rational adult could think it is acceptable to assault a tot who is 24 months old. " They don't want to assault their 24 month old though. They just want it to be legal in case they ever decide to, which is totally rational.... right? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And who protects the freedom of the toddler - the freedom to grow up without becoming a victim of domestic violence? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And who protects the freedom of the toddler - the freedom to grow up without becoming a victim of domestic violence? " That's a good point. Children should have that freedom. That is why the dv laws exist. I (and indeed the law) don't classify a parental smack to the leg as domestic violence and I don't think it's unreasonable for parents to use their judgment. Anyways. We are clearly not gonna convince each other so I suggest we agree to disagree. I'm getting tired of this thread so I'll be off. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"never did me any harm taught me right and wrong the little bastards of today just do what they want I wish I could could come back in 30 yrs and see how this country or world is its gonna end up as right fucking mess " Remember - discipline and boundaries for children do not have to be physical. In fact. Non physical ones are more effective. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"im with you little bastards need there fucking arses slapped " Do you have children? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t really understand why any parent would choose to put their hands on their children. Yes it’s difficult and very frustrating at times but you should always do your best by your kids, and losing control isn’t an option. Thankfully it’s not something you see much these days. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Or should it be?" Yes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I find it hard to believe that any rational adult could think it is acceptable to assault a tot who is 24 months old. One more time before I just give up on this. The debate is about whether it is right to deny people the CHOICE. Smoking is bad for you. Should it be made illegal? Drinking is bad for you and causes antisocial behavior. Shall that be Illegal too? How about swinging? Many lawmakers would view that as sexual deviance. Shall that be made illegal too? The point is that is dangerous to make too many laws that intrude into private life. OK. Suppose I agree with you. Kids shouldn't smacked. It's bad bad.. Even then, I STILL would believe that parents need to have the CHOICE and so it should not be illegal, because I believe in a free society. " More specifically a free society with your rules. If a referendum was held and 90% said 'we want smacking outlawed' would you accept that as the will of a free society? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"never did me any harm taught me right and wrong the little bastards of today just do what they want I wish I could could come back in 30 yrs and see how this country or world is its gonna end up as right fucking mess " Clearly it did you a lot of harm if you think violence towards our children is the correct way to discipline them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"And who protects the freedom of the toddler - the freedom to grow up without becoming a victim of domestic violence? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"never did me any harm taught me right and wrong the little bastards of today just do what they want I wish I could could come back in 30 yrs and see how this country or world is its gonna end up as right fucking mess Clearly it did you a lot of harm if you think violence towards our children is the correct way to discipline them." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"never did me any harm taught me right and wrong the little bastards of today just do what they want I wish I could could come back in 30 yrs and see how this country or world is its gonna end up as right fucking mess Remember - discipline and boundaries for children do not have to be physical. In fact. Non physical ones are more effective. " True.... One summer evening my daughter, probably around 6 years old, was out riding on her bike and absolutely refused to come in despite my words. Simple solution: let the air out of her tires !! She came in crying to her Mum..!!! ""My Dad has let the air out of my tires !!""" Only problem was I had to pump them up later on !! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I find it hard to believe that any rational adult could think it is acceptable to assault a tot who is 24 months old. One more time before I just give up on this. The debate is about whether it is right to deny people the CHOICE. Smoking is bad for you. Should it be made illegal? Drinking is bad for you and causes antisocial behavior. Shall that be Illegal too? How about swinging? Many lawmakers would view that as sexual deviance. Shall that be made illegal too? The point is that is dangerous to make too many laws that intrude into private life. OK. Suppose I agree with you. Kids shouldn't smacked. It's bad bad.. Even then, I STILL would believe that parents need to have the CHOICE and so it should not be illegal, because I believe in a free society. More specifically a free society with your rules. If a referendum was held and 90% said 'we want smacking outlawed' would you accept that as the will of a free society?" It's a good point, but I feel it's appropriate to question would it be right to hold a referendum. If you hold a referendum to outlaw swinging and received 90% against, that still doesn't make state interference into private life acceptable. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |