FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Naga Munchetty.. unfairly treated.
Naga Munchetty.. unfairly treated.
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Naga said what is a right thinking person would have said let alone any black person the BBC Complaints Commission,nay, the BBC itself is outdated and run by middle-aged white men.the Co-presenter Dan was holding a conversation with Nagar yet was not reprimanded. yes the complaint (one person oh come-on) was about Naga but Dan asked her questions to which she responded. at best she could have been quietly warned.I for one would rather see Naga as a leading politician then any of this current shower. the BBC is a dinosaur stuck in Alf Garnett land |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *elshyXOMan
over a year ago
Newcastle |
Its an utter disgrace & just shows how unscrupulous the BBC is become.
Oneill is far from impartial & had too many close ties to The Spectator, regularly giving right wing media the easy ride
Laura Kuennsberg is basically a Tory mouthpiece & doxxed a labour activist
I dont see how those two people are protected by the BBC for what they say but Naga isnt, especially when Nags was talking from experience, without a predisposed agenda. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I don’t agree with the BBC however the rules are clear. The reporters opinion isn’t what they are paid for, it’s simply to report.
Add the fact is the complaint was specifically about her, and therefore the BBC could only really investigate her (according the their rules)
What I think is a disgrace is that someone felt the need to complain about it in the first place. She made a valid point if you ask me. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Surely the biggest concern is there are still people who say go back home to someone who looks like her?"
..
well yes.. a d*unken bigoted lout you could just about understand..but the Leader of the free world ! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I don’t agree with the BBC however the rules are clear. The reporters opinion isn’t what they are paid for, it’s simply to report.
Add the fact is the complaint was specifically about her, and therefore the BBC could only really investigate her (according the their rules)
What I think is a disgrace is that someone felt the need to complain about it in the first place. She made a valid point if you ask me. "
Rules are rules I agree.. but when you look at the situation it usually not always as black and white as it seems |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It's a fair ruling.
I want unbiased presenters.
Trump seems fair game to let loose on. We have to respect his position.
But one complaint? There should be a limit, say ten complaints then an investigation.
Also on subject, we can't say coloured but can say people of colour. That makes no sense to me.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I don’t agree with the BBC however the rules are clear. The reporters opinion isn’t what they are paid for, it’s simply to report.
Add the fact is the complaint was specifically about her, and therefore the BBC could only really investigate her (according the their rules)
What I think is a disgrace is that someone felt the need to complain about it in the first place. She made a valid point if you ask me.
Rules are rules I agree.. but when you look at the situation it usually not always as black and white as it seems "
I don’t disagree, but isn’t that why it’s investigated?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"It's a fair ruling.
I want unbiased presenters.
Trump seems fair game to let loose on. We have to respect his position.
But one complaint? There should be a limit, say ten complaints then an investigation.
Also on subject, we can't say coloured but can say people of colour. That makes no sense to me.
"
.
as a child colored was the accepted word ..black was offensive we were taught..now its flipped.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *hilloutMan
over a year ago
All over the place! Northwesr, , Southwest |
The BBC has become a very "woke" organisation of late and to see it embroiled in this mess after their constant virtue signalling is amusing to say the least. They've given ammo for liberals to be outraged because one of their own has broken the rules and is being punished for it. The irony is delicious. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Just shows how out of date the BBC is and the licence fee should be scrapped. "
yes indeedy,when did you last see bbc go from one programme straight to another...might as well be advertising |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Just shows how out of date the BBC is and the licence fee should be scrapped. "
Out of date in what way ?
You can't mean because they disagreed with one of their employees abusing their position .... which naga did. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *abs..Woman
over a year ago
.. |
It’s a gross over reaction to the situation on my view. The BBC love to act on the rules ... but only when it suits.
She was asked a question and she responded. A word in her ear at that point would have been enough. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"It’s a gross over reaction to the situation on my view. The BBC love to act on the rules ... but only when it suits.
She was asked a question and she responded. A word in her ear at that point would have been enough. "
I see they are now thinking that the colleague who asked her the Q's led her into it ...... so he may be answerable also. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Don't usually stand up for the BBC as an outdated corporation but I do think there right on this occasion"
you thought wrong. They have sensibly just overturned the decision..which means even they realised they were wrong |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"It’s a gross over reaction to the situation on my view. The BBC love to act on the rules ... but only when it suits.
She was asked a question and she responded. A word in her ear at that point would have been enough. "
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Don't usually stand up for the BBC as an outdated corporation but I do think there right on this occasion
you thought wrong. They have sensibly just overturned the decision..which means even they realised they were wrong"
no just theve caved in to the PC brigade how dare you treat us minority like you whites now retract you're decision BBC just gone down another step |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Don't usually stand up for the BBC as an outdated corporation but I do think there right on this occasion
Why?"
Because she broke there rules he's should have never asked her if she wants to explain then let her come on as a guest not a presenter |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *W ChapMan
over a year ago
Swindon |
Nevermind this bollocking for her, she is a bully, the way she treats other presenters/weather people is a disgrace.
She had 3 pops within an hour at various people including ageist comments. Don't like her at all. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I prefer unbiased presenters on news. I am not fond of people peppering their opinion over reports, even if asked.
I think she should have been sacked.
If an Irish presenter peppered Boris with abuse over the border issue, it wouldnt go down well. I don't think this rude woman should be given any leeway at all just because the issue affects her.
Its a disgrace to the journalists who came before her, remained impartial when their country of origin, or ethnic people were being treated unfairly. Remained impartial and gave us the facts.
If the facts are picked to sway our opinion, that is not the presenters fault, but it is their fault to insult people or pepper reports with opinions.
Anyone who says "A go home" comment deserves to be called out with a harsh opinion, needs to tell me where it stops? when they report on a child sex ring can they insult everyone? Murder is pretty bad, worse than insutling people, can she call them scumbags? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
A big deal over not very much.
Bexit and the climate, important; this wasted energy over one complaint.
Ever watch Points of View?
What a bunch of idiots. Moan, moan moan. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I watched the interview and struggled to find any bad conduct by her. Dan stitched her up by asking her opinion imo. But that aside. The BBC want political reporters to be impartial yet large eared sports commentators can say whatever they like.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ocbigMan
over a year ago
Birmingham |
"Don't usually stand up for the BBC as an outdated corporation but I do think there right on this occasion
you thought wrong. They have sensibly just overturned the decision..which means even they realised they were wrongno just theve caved in to the PC brigade how dare you treat us minority like you whites now retract you're decision BBC just gone down another step "
wow. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ocbigMan
over a year ago
Birmingham |
"I prefer unbiased presenters on news. I am not fond of people peppering their opinion over reports, even if asked.
I think she should have been sacked.
If an Irish presenter peppered Boris with abuse over the border issue, it wouldnt go down well. I don't think this rude woman should be given any leeway at all just because the issue affects her.
Its a disgrace to the journalists who came before her, remained impartial when their country of origin, or ethnic people were being treated unfairly. Remained impartial and gave us the facts.
If the facts are picked to sway our opinion, that is not the presenters fault, but it is their fault to insult people or pepper reports with opinions.
Anyone who says "A go home" comment deserves to be called out with a harsh opinion, needs to tell me where it stops? when they report on a child sex ring can they insult everyone? Murder is pretty bad, worse than insutling people, can she call them scumbags?"
A impartiality...try it sometime, it is difficult. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
