FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > A woman went to the papers about her swingers lifestyle
A woman went to the papers about her swingers lifestyle
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
 | |||
| |||
"Yeah it was me "Was it awesome Mrscxxx | |||
| |||
"Yeah it was me
Was it awesome
Mrscxxx "I’d say it was a 18/20 tbh | |||
| |||
| |||
 | |||
"As she was from Sydney maybe she was doing a study for the University " | |||
"It's when a guy goes to the papers with his story of; 'I sent out loads of messages and one day somebody responded. They said "no thanks", it was still a response!' That we'll get the full balanced story. Up until that point, the papers will always paint swingers as sex crazed maniacs. Tea" They didn’t portay her like that at all Mrscxxx | |||
"As she was from Sydney maybe she was doing a study for the University "You saw the Story to then Mrscxxx | |||
| |||
"It's when a guy goes to the papers with his story of; 'I sent out loads of messages and one day somebody responded. They said "no thanks", it was still a response!' That we'll get the full balanced story. Up until that point, the papers will always paint swingers as sex crazed maniacs. Tea" | |||
"As she was from Sydney maybe she was doing a study for the University
You saw the Story to then Mrscxxx "Is there a link so we can all read it? | |||
"As she was from Sydney maybe she was doing a study for the University
You saw the Story to then Mrscxxx
Is there a link so we can all read it?"Two posts up  | |||
| |||
"As she was from Sydney maybe she was doing a study for the University
You saw the Story to then Mrscxxx
Is there a link so we can all read it?
Two posts up "Cheers.. Its hardly salacious is it?  | |||
"As she was from Sydney maybe she was doing a study for the University
You saw the Story to then Mrscxxx
Is there a link so we can all read it?
Two posts up
Cheers..
Its hardly salacious is it? " | |||
| |||
""The first time I did it, it was with 10 guys and it felt amazing. Yes, the sex was great but knowing that these guys are here for me and me alone is really empowering." That's a rather presumptuous statement. I'm sure that they're there for themselves. Though, surely her hole must hurt? " I don't think it's particularly presumptuous, whilst they are there for their own gratification to an extent, they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't | |||
""The first time I did it, it was with 10 guys and it felt amazing. Yes, the sex was great but knowing that these guys are here for me and me alone is really empowering." That's a rather presumptuous statement. I'm sure that they're there for themselves. Though, surely her hole must hurt? I don't think it's particularly presumptuous, whilst they are there for their own gratification to an extent, they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't " She's an object, a means to an end. Lets not pretend that they all have an emotional connection/attraction after 5 mins. I'd like to clarify, she evidently deems the men to be the very same, so don't tar me with any "misogynist" labels. It may flatter her ego for a while, though, the truth is likely far from what she expects it to be. | |||
""The first time I did it, it was with 10 guys and it felt amazing. Yes, the sex was great but knowing that these guys are here for me and me alone is really empowering." That's a rather presumptuous statement. I'm sure that they're there for themselves. Though, surely her hole must hurt? I don't think it's particularly presumptuous, whilst they are there for their own gratification to an extent, they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't She's an object, a means to an end. Lets not pretend that they all have an emotional connection/attraction after 5 mins. I'd like to clarify, she evidently deems the men to be the very same, so don't tar me with any "misogynist" labels. It may flatter her ego for a while, though, the truth is likely far from what she expects it to be. " However you want to try and dress it up though (and suggesting she's an object here is wide of the mark whichever way you look at it - given she is the one doing the inviting, taking the initiative and choosing for herself what she does with her body) the fact remains that they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't so there's nothing whatsoever presumptuous in what she's said. | |||
"Wonder if shes on here slept with 18 different men in one night - and claims husband is ok with it Mrscxxx " Good for her  | |||
""The first time I did it, it was with 10 guys and it felt amazing. Yes, the sex was great but knowing that these guys are here for me and me alone is really empowering." That's a rather presumptuous statement. I'm sure that they're there for themselves. Though, surely her hole must hurt? I don't think it's particularly presumptuous, whilst they are there for their own gratification to an extent, they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't She's an object, a means to an end. Lets not pretend that they all have an emotional connection/attraction after 5 mins. I'd like to clarify, she evidently deems the men to be the very same, so don't tar me with any "misogynist" labels. It may flatter her ego for a while, though, the truth is likely far from what she expects it to be. However you want to try and dress it up though (and suggesting she's an object here is wide of the mark whichever way you look at it - given she is the one doing the inviting, taking the initiative and choosing for herself what she does with her body) the fact remains that they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't so there's nothing whatsoever presumptuous in what she's said. " If they are there to have sex with her and then leave, she is an object to them. How hard is that to understand? You may like to take the white knight approach on here so that you don't offend any future meets, though, the truth is the truth. (It's evidently a one off gang bang, they all used one another. She would not be there if the men weren't either) It's not as if the men are anything but objects to her either, she has all of them down as being merely a number. Yes, they would not be there if it were not for her. They would be elsewhere, with someone else. Thus, her idea that she's something special for being di*ked down by well....10 d*cks, is not really something that you should solidify your happiness on. | |||
"https://www.mirror.co.uk/lifestyle/sex-relationships/sex/mum-slept-18-different-men-17246605 Link to one of the articles if anyone is interested And this would appear to be the original: https://www.whimn.com.au/love/intimacy/i-slept-with-18-men-in-one-night-and-my-husband-was-cool-with-it/news-story/c967e5a810cd645e12b7775554e5462b" It'll probably be in the Daily Heil next week with a misspelt headline with random words in caps. | |||
""The first time I did it, it was with 10 guys and it felt amazing. Yes, the sex was great but knowing that these guys are here for me and me alone is really empowering." That's a rather presumptuous statement. I'm sure that they're there for themselves. Though, surely her hole must hurt? I don't think it's particularly presumptuous, whilst they are there for their own gratification to an extent, they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't She's an object, a means to an end. Lets not pretend that they all have an emotional connection/attraction after 5 mins. I'd like to clarify, she evidently deems the men to be the very same, so don't tar me with any "misogynist" labels. It may flatter her ego for a while, though, the truth is likely far from what she expects it to be. " It’s why I could never do a gang bang etc, I would feel worthless and used after. It’s my mindset but I know many guys that usually participate, how they think of such women after. | |||
""The first time I did it, it was with 10 guys and it felt amazing. Yes, the sex was great but knowing that these guys are here for me and me alone is really empowering." That's a rather presumptuous statement. I'm sure that they're there for themselves. Though, surely her hole must hurt? I don't think it's particularly presumptuous, whilst they are there for their own gratification to an extent, they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't She's an object, a means to an end. Lets not pretend that they all have an emotional connection/attraction after 5 mins. I'd like to clarify, she evidently deems the men to be the very same, so don't tar me with any "misogynist" labels. It may flatter her ego for a while, though, the truth is likely far from what she expects it to be. " Oh ffs ...stop trying to turn it into something it clearly isn't.. | |||
""The first time I did it, it was with 10 guys and it felt amazing. Yes, the sex was great but knowing that these guys are here for me and me alone is really empowering." That's a rather presumptuous statement. I'm sure that they're there for themselves. Though, surely her hole must hurt? I don't think it's particularly presumptuous, whilst they are there for their own gratification to an extent, they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't She's an object, a means to an end. Lets not pretend that they all have an emotional connection/attraction after 5 mins. I'd like to clarify, she evidently deems the men to be the very same, so don't tar me with any "misogynist" labels. It may flatter her ego for a while, though, the truth is likely far from what she expects it to be. However you want to try and dress it up though (and suggesting she's an object here is wide of the mark whichever way you look at it - given she is the one doing the inviting, taking the initiative and choosing for herself what she does with her body) the fact remains that they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't so there's nothing whatsoever presumptuous in what she's said. If they are there to have sex with her and then leave, she is an object to them. How hard is that to understand? You may like to take the white knight approach on here so that you don't offend any future meets, though, the truth is the truth. (It's evidently a one off gang bang, they all used one another. She would not be there if the men weren't either) It's not as if the men are anything but objects to her either, she has all of them down as being merely a number. Yes, they would not be there if it were not for her. They would be elsewhere, with someone else. Thus, her idea that she's something special for being di*ked down by well....10 d*cks, is not really something that you should solidify your happiness on." She had fun, her husband had fun, the however many guys had fun, what's the problem about who was what to who, who gives a fuck? This is meant to be about having fun, they did that, socieity sensationalises it, who cares, they had fun. | |||
I've heard it all now. | |||
) thanks for sharing! | |||
""The first time I did it, it was with 10 guys and it felt amazing. Yes, the sex was great but knowing that these guys are here for me and me alone is really empowering." That's a rather presumptuous statement. I'm sure that they're there for themselves. Though, surely her hole must hurt? I don't think it's particularly presumptuous, whilst they are there for their own gratification to an extent, they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't She's an object, a means to an end. Lets not pretend that they all have an emotional connection/attraction after 5 mins. I'd like to clarify, she evidently deems the men to be the very same, so don't tar me with any "misogynist" labels. It may flatter her ego for a while, though, the truth is likely far from what she expects it to be. However you want to try and dress it up though (and suggesting she's an object here is wide of the mark whichever way you look at it - given she is the one doing the inviting, taking the initiative and choosing for herself what she does with her body) the fact remains that they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't so there's nothing whatsoever presumptuous in what she's said. If they are there to have sex with her and then leave, she is an object to them. How hard is that to understand? You may like to take the white knight approach on here so that you don't offend any future meets, though, the truth is the truth. (It's evidently a one off gang bang, they all used one another. She would not be there if the men weren't either) It's not as if the men are anything but objects to her either, she has all of them down as being merely a number. Yes, they would not be there if it were not for her. They would be elsewhere, with someone else. Thus, her idea that she's something special for being di*ked down by well....10 d*cks, is not really something that you should solidify your happiness on. She had fun, her husband had fun, the however many guys had fun, what's the problem about who was what to who, who gives a fuck? This is meant to be about having fun, they did that, socieity sensationalises it, who cares, they had fun." This is my view too, no ones been used they all had a good time. | |||
""The first time I did it, it was with 10 guys and it felt amazing. Yes, the sex was great but knowing that these guys are here for me and me alone is really empowering." That's a rather presumptuous statement. I'm sure that they're there for themselves. Though, surely her hole must hurt? I don't think it's particularly presumptuous, whilst they are there for their own gratification to an extent, they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't She's an object, a means to an end. Lets not pretend that they all have an emotional connection/attraction after 5 mins. I'd like to clarify, she evidently deems the men to be the very same, so don't tar me with any "misogynist" labels. It may flatter her ego for a while, though, the truth is likely far from what she expects it to be. However you want to try and dress it up though (and suggesting she's an object here is wide of the mark whichever way you look at it - given she is the one doing the inviting, taking the initiative and choosing for herself what she does with her body) the fact remains that they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't so there's nothing whatsoever presumptuous in what she's said. If they are there to have sex with her and then leave, she is an object to them. How hard is that to understand? You may like to take the white knight approach on here so that you don't offend any future meets, though, the truth is the truth. (It's evidently a one off gang bang, they all used one another. She would not be there if the men weren't either) It's not as if the men are anything but objects to her either, she has all of them down as being merely a number. Yes, they would not be there if it were not for her. They would be elsewhere, with someone else. Thus, her idea that she's something special for being di*ked down by well....10 d*cks, is not really something that you should solidify your happiness on. She had fun, her husband had fun, the however many guys had fun, what's the problem about who was what to who, who gives a fuck? This is meant to be about having fun, they did that, socieity sensationalises it, who cares, they had fun." I made my point based upon the woman’s own words. You’re reading into my post more than you need to. I never said she was ‘used’ I made it clear that they ALL used one another. Also, I can’t even see anywhere in the article that states the husband participated. “Itold my husband I was going for my hole by text and done so. He didn’t care...” essentially what is written. | |||
""The first time I did it, it was with 10 guys and it felt amazing. Yes, the sex was great but knowing that these guys are here for me and me alone is really empowering." That's a rather presumptuous statement. I'm sure that they're there for themselves. Though, surely her hole must hurt? I don't think it's particularly presumptuous, whilst they are there for their own gratification to an extent, they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't She's an object, a means to an end. Lets not pretend that they all have an emotional connection/attraction after 5 mins. I'd like to clarify, she evidently deems the men to be the very same, so don't tar me with any "misogynist" labels. It may flatter her ego for a while, though, the truth is likely far from what she expects it to be. However you want to try and dress it up though (and suggesting she's an object here is wide of the mark whichever way you look at it - given she is the one doing the inviting, taking the initiative and choosing for herself what she does with her body) the fact remains that they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't so there's nothing whatsoever presumptuous in what she's said. If they are there to have sex with her and then leave, she is an object to them. How hard is that to understand? You may like to take the white knight approach on here so that you don't offend any future meets, though, the truth is the truth. (It's evidently a one off gang bang, they all used one another. She would not be there if the men weren't either) It's not as if the men are anything but objects to her either, she has all of them down as being merely a number. Yes, they would not be there if it were not for her. They would be elsewhere, with someone else. Thus, her idea that she's something special for being di*ked down by well....10 d*cks, is not really something that you should solidify your happiness on. She had fun, her husband had fun, the however many guys had fun, what's the problem about who was what to who, who gives a fuck? This is meant to be about having fun, they did that, socieity sensationalises it, who cares, they had fun. I made my point based upon the woman’s own words. You’re reading into my post more than you need to. I never said she was ‘used’ I made it clear that they ALL used one another. Also, I can’t even see anywhere in the article that states the husband participated. “Itold my husband I was going for my hole by text and done so. He didn’t care...” essentially what is written. " Louise admitted that despite her husband's initial surprise, he was completely supportive of her wishes. "He always felt like I had missed out, going straight from living at home to living with him and not playing the field," she said. "He was really supportive and loved that I was fulfilling a fantasy. "I tell him about my adventures and he gets really turned on hearing what I've been up to. It always leads to amazing sex for the two of us." She added: "My husband loves to watch my facial expressions, he is like a kid in the candy store! He jokes that he is happy to lend out his toys but only if they are returned in the same condition he lent them." That's participation buddy... | |||
""The first time I did it, it was with 10 guys and it felt amazing. Yes, the sex was great but knowing that these guys are here for me and me alone is really empowering." That's a rather presumptuous statement. I'm sure that they're there for themselves. Though, surely her hole must hurt? I don't think it's particularly presumptuous, whilst they are there for their own gratification to an extent, they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't She's an object, a means to an end. Lets not pretend that they all have an emotional connection/attraction after 5 mins. I'd like to clarify, she evidently deems the men to be the very same, so don't tar me with any "misogynist" labels. It may flatter her ego for a while, though, the truth is likely far from what she expects it to be. However you want to try and dress it up though (and suggesting she's an object here is wide of the mark whichever way you look at it - given she is the one doing the inviting, taking the initiative and choosing for herself what she does with her body) the fact remains that they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't so there's nothing whatsoever presumptuous in what she's said. If they are there to have sex with her and then leave, she is an object to them. How hard is that to understand? You may like to take the white knight approach on here so that you don't offend any future meets, though, the truth is the truth. (It's evidently a one off gang bang, they all used one another. She would not be there if the men weren't either) It's not as if the men are anything but objects to her either, she has all of them down as being merely a number. Yes, they would not be there if it were not for her. They would be elsewhere, with someone else. Thus, her idea that she's something special for being di*ked down by well....10 d*cks, is not really something that you should solidify your happiness on." If you choose to throw petty insults about and call me a white knight, rather than someone who uses his brain to voice his genuine opinion, then that is of course your prerogative and I'll leave others, whose opinion I value, to judge me on that. You are however doing exactly what you have accused others of doing elsewhere and misinterpreting what I said in the name of validating your own opinion, now where did I say that either she or they weren't using each other, and if all parties involved are happy with that arrangement then good for them. What I do think you have wrong however is your original statement that she was being presumptuous by making the statement she did - in the particular instance being referred to the guys were there for her and her alone, just as she was there for them, albeit not alone - it was a mutually agreeable thing that they all made themselves available for nothing whatsoever presumptuous in that. As is your wont am sure you'll disagree and come out with further statements to try to back it up but my opinion will remain the same regardless. | |||
""The first time I did it, it was with 10 guys and it felt amazing. Yes, the sex was great but knowing that these guys are here for me and me alone is really empowering." That's a rather presumptuous statement. I'm sure that they're there for themselves. Though, surely her hole must hurt? I don't think it's particularly presumptuous, whilst they are there for their own gratification to an extent, they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't She's an object, a means to an end. Lets not pretend that they all have an emotional connection/attraction after 5 mins. I'd like to clarify, she evidently deems the men to be the very same, so don't tar me with any "misogynist" labels. It may flatter her ego for a while, though, the truth is likely far from what she expects it to be. However you want to try and dress it up though (and suggesting she's an object here is wide of the mark whichever way you look at it - given she is the one doing the inviting, taking the initiative and choosing for herself what she does with her body) the fact remains that they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't so there's nothing whatsoever presumptuous in what she's said. If they are there to have sex with her and then leave, she is an object to them. How hard is that to understand? You may like to take the white knight approach on here so that you don't offend any future meets, though, the truth is the truth. (It's evidently a one off gang bang, they all used one another. She would not be there if the men weren't either) It's not as if the men are anything but objects to her either, she has all of them down as being merely a number. Yes, they would not be there if it were not for her. They would be elsewhere, with someone else. Thus, her idea that she's something special for being di*ked down by well....10 d*cks, is not really something that you should solidify your happiness on. She had fun, her husband had fun, the however many guys had fun, what's the problem about who was what to who, who gives a fuck? This is meant to be about having fun, they did that, socieity sensationalises it, who cares, they had fun. I made my point based upon the woman’s own words. You’re reading into my post more than you need to. I never said she was ‘used’ I made it clear that they ALL used one another. Also, I can’t even see anywhere in the article that states the husband participated. “Itold my husband I was going for my hole by text and done so. He didn’t care...” essentially what is written. Louise admitted that despite her husband's initial surprise, he was completely supportive of her wishes. "He always felt like I had missed out, going straight from living at home to living with him and not playing the field," she said. "He was really supportive and loved that I was fulfilling a fantasy. "I tell him about my adventures and he gets really turned on hearing what I've been up to. It always leads to amazing sex for the two of us." She added: "My husband loves to watch my facial expressions, he is like a kid in the candy store! He jokes that he is happy to lend out his toys but only if they are returned in the same condition he lent them." That's participation buddy..." Participation as a cuckold, there’s nothing stating that he joins in with the action. | |||
""The first time I did it, it was with 10 guys and it felt amazing. Yes, the sex was great but knowing that these guys are here for me and me alone is really empowering." That's a rather presumptuous statement. I'm sure that they're there for themselves. Though, surely her hole must hurt? I don't think it's particularly presumptuous, whilst they are there for their own gratification to an extent, they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't She's an object, a means to an end. Lets not pretend that they all have an emotional connection/attraction after 5 mins. I'd like to clarify, she evidently deems the men to be the very same, so don't tar me with any "misogynist" labels. It may flatter her ego for a while, though, the truth is likely far from what she expects it to be. However you want to try and dress it up though (and suggesting she's an object here is wide of the mark whichever way you look at it - given she is the one doing the inviting, taking the initiative and choosing for herself what she does with her body) the fact remains that they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't so there's nothing whatsoever presumptuous in what she's said. If they are there to have sex with her and then leave, she is an object to them. How hard is that to understand? You may like to take the white knight approach on here so that you don't offend any future meets, though, the truth is the truth. (It's evidently a one off gang bang, they all used one another. She would not be there if the men weren't either) It's not as if the men are anything but objects to her either, she has all of them down as being merely a number. Yes, they would not be there if it were not for her. They would be elsewhere, with someone else. Thus, her idea that she's something special for being di*ked down by well....10 d*cks, is not really something that you should solidify your happiness on. If you choose to throw petty insults about and call me a white knight, rather than someone who uses his brain to voice his genuine opinion, then that is of course your prerogative and I'll leave others, whose opinion I value, to judge me on that. You are however doing exactly what you have accused others of doing elsewhere and misinterpreting what I said in the name of validating your own opinion, now where did I say that either she or they weren't using each other, and if all parties involved are happy with that arrangement then good for them. What I do think you have wrong however is your original statement that she was being presumptuous by making the statement she did - in the particular instance being referred to the guys were there for her and her alone, just as she was there for them, albeit not alone - it was a mutually agreeable thing that they all made themselves available for nothing whatsoever presumptuous in that. As is your wont am sure you'll disagree and come out with further statements to try to back it up but my opinion will remain the same regardless." The second last paragraph is exactly what I’ve been saying to you. You’ve made counter arguments and, now seemingly posted what I’ve said as it being your opinion. Essentially, you agree with me. My reasonings for using the word presumptuous are in that she believes she’s special. She is not. She is an object, as I also stated. I never gave an insult towards you. I merely stated that, you may be hiding your true feelings out of fear that it will stop you getting a meet. I notice most men do this on here, it’s hardly just yourself. We all have to compete and be and be an “ideal”. | |||
""The first time I did it, it was with 10 guys and it felt amazing. Yes, the sex was great but knowing that these guys are here for me and me alone is really empowering." That's a rather presumptuous statement. I'm sure that they're there for themselves. Though, surely her hole must hurt? I don't think it's particularly presumptuous, whilst they are there for their own gratification to an extent, they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't She's an object, a means to an end. Lets not pretend that they all have an emotional connection/attraction after 5 mins. I'd like to clarify, she evidently deems the men to be the very same, so don't tar me with any "misogynist" labels. It may flatter her ego for a while, though, the truth is likely far from what she expects it to be. However you want to try and dress it up though (and suggesting she's an object here is wide of the mark whichever way you look at it - given she is the one doing the inviting, taking the initiative and choosing for herself what she does with her body) the fact remains that they wouldn't be there at all if the lady wasn't so there's nothing whatsoever presumptuous in what she's said. If they are there to have sex with her and then leave, she is an object to them. How hard is that to understand? You may like to take the white knight approach on here so that you don't offend any future meets, though, the truth is the truth. (It's evidently a one off gang bang, they all used one another. She would not be there if the men weren't either) It's not as if the men are anything but objects to her either, she has all of them down as being merely a number. Yes, they would not be there if it were not for her. They would be elsewhere, with someone else. Thus, her idea that she's something special for being di*ked down by well....10 d*cks, is not really something that you should solidify your happiness on. If you choose to throw petty insults about and call me a white knight, rather than someone who uses his brain to voice his genuine opinion, then that is of course your prerogative and I'll leave others, whose opinion I value, to judge me on that. You are however doing exactly what you have accused others of doing elsewhere and misinterpreting what I said in the name of validating your own opinion, now where did I say that either she or they weren't using each other, and if all parties involved are happy with that arrangement then good for them. What I do think you have wrong however is your original statement that she was being presumptuous by making the statement she did - in the particular instance being referred to the guys were there for her and her alone, just as she was there for them, albeit not alone - it was a mutually agreeable thing that they all made themselves available for nothing whatsoever presumptuous in that. As is your wont am sure you'll disagree and come out with further statements to try to back it up but my opinion will remain the same regardless. The second last paragraph is exactly what I’ve been saying to you. You’ve made counter arguments and, now seemingly posted what I’ve said as it being your opinion. Essentially, you agree with me. My reasonings for using the word presumptuous are in that she believes she’s special. She is not. She is an object, as I also stated. I never gave an insult towards you. I merely stated that, you may be hiding your true feelings out of fear that it will stop you getting a meet. I notice most men do this on here, it’s hardly just yourself. We all have to compete and be and be an “ideal”. "
| |||
