If you had to pay for fab, do you think it would improve the site and experience or make it worse?
I’m on the fence, if you had to pay I believe we would get rid of a lot of fakes and time wasters. However, why should the decent folk be charged for the actions of idiots, thoughts people? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It would make it worse I think since it would be so much smaller. The whole point of the site to me is to make it accessible to everyone, adding a paywall would just make it so that you have a few cliques and that's it. It would basically be an online version of a club you need membership for.
I'd like to see more features though, a proper mobile app has potential |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
At the price of site support now, it'd take those who can't pay away and leave those who consider a fiver nothing for the chance to troll people.
It'd also be a false sense of security: everyone knows a free site will have fakes. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Where cost is involved the expectation level can become a lot greater.
Minimum charge of having to be a site supporter I think would work, no higher than that though. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Some very valid points reference cost and expectation/entitlement. I do like the idea of minimum being a site supporter though, trolls would fall by the wayside or pay for their hobby. "
You can always set your filter to receiving messages only from those who pays (supporters). In that sense, this site has already caters for your suggestion I think. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Some very valid points reference cost and expectation/entitlement. I do like the idea of minimum being a site supporter though, trolls would fall by the wayside or pay for their hobby.
You can always set your filter to receiving messages only from those who pays (supporters). In that sense, this site has already caters for your suggestion I think."
I did not know that! Thank you x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *emini ManMan
over a year ago
There and to the left a bit |
From everything I've heard the pay sites have just as many problems with trolls, time wasters, fakes and ne'er do wells as this place does so it wouldn't make the slightest bit of difference if you had to pay here. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Well Im no fake nor a time waster... I've meet some sexy guys here. Also endured afew awkward socials too! If this was a site that required payment to join then I wouldn't have done |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Where cost is involved the expectation level can become a lot greater.
Minimum charge of having to be a site supporter I think would work, no higher than that though."
I agree, you get that sometimes in clubs. Iv heard a couple of guys and a couple complaining that they paid there money but got no action.
Iv been on sites where its not free and you still get fakes and time wasters, its just the way it is, free or not. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic