FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Sri Lanka's face covering ban .
Sri Lanka's face covering ban .
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I look at it as a security measure. Fully respect people's right to believe and Wear what they like but to be fair, if all you can see of someone is their eyes, they could be anyone!
If people have to take their motorcycle helmets off for security purposes, why should some women not have to show their face? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Makes no sense and will just create more resentment. These attacks were carried out openly by men dressed as tourists in hotels. Do we ban all tourists or close down all hotels? 0f course not. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Its going to annoy some but it does stop people hiding behind it and the situation is serious over there so make people show their faces or do more children have to die so people can cover up. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *stellaWoman
over a year ago
London |
"Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation."
And here we have a man hypothesising about what women do and don’t know.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation.
And here we have a man hypothesising about what women do and don’t know. "
And here we have a white privileged western woman who thinks her opinions on Islam have any importance  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *c1989Woman
over a year ago
Manchester |
"As has been said the suicide bombers that they have CCTV footage of made no attempt to hide their faces. Banning back packs might be more logical"
I don't think its the bombers they are trying to detect.
Anyone involved can go about undetected by donning a burkha.
There was that incident a while back involving a man disguising himself in a burkha trying to flee a murder conviction so I can certainly see the logic.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *stellaWoman
over a year ago
London |
"Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation.
And here we have a man hypothesising about what women do and don’t know.
And here we have a white privileged western woman who thinks her opinions on Islam have any importance "
And here is a man speculating in retort to a fact and not knowing the difference. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Why are women being punished for the actions of men?
"
It's not just women. Male cross dressers in Sri Lanka are also being banned from wearing burkhas. There are many. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation.
And here we have a man hypothesising about what women do and don’t know.
And here we have a white privileged western woman who thinks her opinions on Islam have any importance
And here is a man speculating in retort to a fact and not knowing the difference. "
It must be a dilemma for you. Do you protest at the Sri Lankan embassy against women being banned from wearing burkhas, or do you protest at the Iranian embassy against the punishment of a woman who defended other women who removed their burkhas because they thought they were a symbol of male oppression and refused to wear them in public. Which bandwagon do you jump on this time? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago
Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound |
"Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation.
And here we have a man hypothesising about what women do and don’t know.
And here we have a white privileged western woman who thinks her opinions on Islam have any importance "
Any yours do? Interesting.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation.
And here we have a man hypothesising about what women do and don’t know.
And here we have a white privileged western woman who thinks her opinions on Islam have any importance
And here is a man speculating in retort to a fact and not knowing the difference.
It must be a dilemma for you. Do you protest at the Sri Lankan embassy against women being banned from wearing burkhas, or do you protest at the Iranian embassy against the punishment of a woman who defended other women who removed their burkhas because they thought they were a symbol of male oppression and refused to wear them in public. Which bandwagon do you jump on this time? "
do a bit of both. Simples |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *stellaWoman
over a year ago
London |
"Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation.
And here we have a man hypothesising about what women do and don’t know.
And here we have a white privileged western woman who thinks her opinions on Islam have any importance
And here is a man speculating in retort to a fact and not knowing the difference.
It must be a dilemma for you. Do you protest at the Sri Lankan embassy against women being banned from wearing burkhas, or do you protest at the Iranian embassy against the punishment of a woman who defended other women who removed their burkhas because they thought they were a symbol of male oppression and refused to wear them in public. Which bandwagon do you jump on this time? "
Why do you jump on the bandwagon of continually telling other people what they do and don’t think? There’s no dilemma here for me, I’ve jumped on no bandwagon, unlike you. I find it infinitely amusing how little you know. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation.
And here we have a man hypothesising about what women do and don’t know.
And here we have a white privileged western woman who thinks her opinions on Islam have any importance
And here is a man speculating in retort to a fact and not knowing the difference.
It must be a dilemma for you. Do you protest at the Sri Lankan embassy against women being banned from wearing burkhas, or do you protest at the Iranian embassy against the punishment of a woman who defended other women who removed their burkhas because they thought they were a symbol of male oppression and refused to wear them in public. Which bandwagon do you jump on this time?
Why do you jump on the bandwagon of continually telling other people what they do and don’t think? There’s no dilemma here for me, I’ve jumped on no bandwagon, unlike you. I find it infinitely amusing how little you know. "
Ah, good cop out. Me, a man brought up in a muslim household knows less about a muslim female's upbringing than you, a privileged white western woman? Yeah, you're the expert sweety   |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *stellaWoman
over a year ago
London |
"Meanwhile in Iran, a prominent female lawyer has been jailed for 38 years and sentenced to 148 lashes after she defended women who removed their headscarves in public. But here in the UK, we have far-left 'feminists' who are trying to claim that wearing this head gear is "liberating" without having the first clue as to the realities of the situation.
And here we have a man hypothesising about what women do and don’t know.
And here we have a white privileged western woman who thinks her opinions on Islam have any importance
And here is a man speculating in retort to a fact and not knowing the difference.
It must be a dilemma for you. Do you protest at the Sri Lankan embassy against women being banned from wearing burkhas, or do you protest at the Iranian embassy against the punishment of a woman who defended other women who removed their burkhas because they thought they were a symbol of male oppression and refused to wear them in public. Which bandwagon do you jump on this time?
Why do you jump on the bandwagon of continually telling other people what they do and don’t think? There’s no dilemma here for me, I’ve jumped on no bandwagon, unlike you. I find it infinitely amusing how little you know.
Ah, good cop out. Me, a man brought up in a muslim household knows less about a muslim female's upbringing than you, a privileged white western woman? Yeah, you're the expert sweety "
Please, keep telling me how much you know about me. Do add in some more terms of endearment like “sweety” to add weight to your point. It’s fabulous. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
