FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Woman needed
Woman needed
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Well, this was a forum social experiment following the blase responses to the post about the couple loking for a man to use, just to check the double standards here when it comes to women/men. However not being a popular (read" sycophantic) forumite it hardly got any responses.
I change my tack then: kiss, fuck, avoid? and when that fails, what are your Friday/Saturday night plans?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *isaB45Woman
over a year ago
Fabville |
"Well, this was a forum social experiment following the blase responses to the post about the couple loking for a man to use, just to check the double standards here when it comes to women/men. However not being a popular (read" sycophantic) forumite it hardly got any responses.
I change my tack then: kiss, fuck, avoid? and when that fails, what are your Friday/Saturday night plans? "
OP..are you back-peddling because nobody leapt forward favourably in response to your opening message? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Well, this was a forum social experiment following the blase responses to the post about the couple loking for a man to use, just to check the double standards here when it comes to women/men. However not being a popular (read" sycophantic) forumite it hardly got any responses.
I change my tack then: kiss, fuck, avoid? and when that fails, what are your Friday/Saturday night plans? "
Which post looking for a man to use? Depends on who posted it. If it was one of The Clique it would be filled with 'hilarious' comments.
If it was anyone else they'd usually be told off for saying they want to "use" someone. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Well, this was a forum social experiment following the blase responses to the post about the couple loking for a man to use, just to check the double standards here when it comes to women/men. However not being a popular (read" sycophantic) forumite it hardly got any responses.
I change my tack then: kiss, fuck, avoid? and when that fails, what are your Friday/Saturday night plans?
OP..are you back-peddling because nobody leapt forward favourably in response to your opening message?"
My goodness, but people on here are cynical
You'd never catch me being so suspicious |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Well, this was a forum social experiment following the blase responses to the post about the couple loking for a man to use, just to check the double standards here when it comes to women/men. However not being a popular (read" sycophantic) forumite it hardly got any responses.
I change my tack then: kiss, fuck, avoid? and when that fails, what are your Friday/Saturday night plans?
OP..are you back-peddling because nobody leapt forward favourably in response to your opening message?
My goodness, but people on here are cynical
You'd never catch me being so suspicious"
Coughbullshitcough  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
To use hmmmm ya see theres that word again not a fan
Especially with someone you never even spoken with individually ad it seems like your net fishing maybe its me but respect dude where's the respect |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Well, this was a forum social experiment following the blase responses to the post about the couple loking for a man to use, just to check the double standards here when it comes to women/men. However not being a popular (read" sycophantic) forumite it hardly got any responses.
I change my tack then: kiss, fuck, avoid? and when that fails, what are your Friday/Saturday night plans? "
I found the other thread. I think the responses are quite similar but your approach isn't. In that one you talk about other people. In this one you say it's you looking, that alone would affect people's reactions.
https://m.fabswingers.com/forum/lounge/871298 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Well, this was a forum social experiment following the blase responses to the post about the couple loking for a man to use, just to check the double standards here when it comes to women/men. However not being a popular (read" sycophantic) forumite it hardly got any responses.
I change my tack then: kiss, fuck, avoid? and when that fails, what are your Friday/Saturday night plans?
I found the other thread. I think the responses are quite similar but your approach isn't. In that one you talk about other people. In this one you say it's you looking, that alone would affect people's reactions.
https://m.fabswingers.com/forum/lounge/871298"
The principle is exactly the same though in both posts. I just changed the gender in my post just to see what the reaction might be to a couple wanting to "use" a woman, as opposed to a couple wanting to "use" a man. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Well, this was a forum social experiment following the blase responses to the post about the couple loking for a man to use, just to check the double standards here when it comes to women/men. However not being a popular (read" sycophantic) forumite it hardly got any responses.
I change my tack then: kiss, fuck, avoid? and when that fails, what are your Friday/Saturday night plans?
OP..are you back-peddling because nobody leapt forward favourably in response to your opening message?"
Not at all - my original post was fictional. Im not looking for a large-breasted, young woman to use (although that does sound nice!). I just wanted to compare reactions from tge forumites based on gender of the person being used.
It kind of backfired though as I'm not popular (cliquey) enough on the forums to get a reaction! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Looks to me like they both got plenty of flippant response.
Your conclusion to this 'experiment' is?"
Not really. My post here never garnered enough respone either way to draw any conclusions. No matter, not all experiments result in a definitive conclusion. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Well, this was a forum social experiment following the blase responses to the post about the couple loking for a man to use, just to check the double standards here when it comes to women/men. However not being a popular (read" sycophantic) forumite it hardly got any responses.
I change my tack then: kiss, fuck, avoid? and when that fails, what are your Friday/Saturday night plans?
I found the other thread. I think the responses are quite similar but your approach isn't. In that one you talk about other people. In this one you say it's you looking, that alone would affect people's reactions.
https://m.fabswingers.com/forum/lounge/871298
The principle is exactly the same though in both posts. I just changed the gender in my post just to see what the reaction might be to a couple wanting to "use" a woman, as opposed to a couple wanting to "use" a man. "
No it's not. Me saying that woman wants to do something wouldn't illicit the same response as me saying I want to do it. One is hypothetical because you don't know them and one is personal because I'm saying it's me. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Well, this was a forum social experiment following the blase responses to the post about the couple loking for a man to use, just to check the double standards here when it comes to women/men. However not being a popular (read" sycophantic) forumite it hardly got any responses.
I change my tack then: kiss, fuck, avoid? and when that fails, what are your Friday/Saturday night plans?
OP..are you back-peddling because nobody leapt forward favourably in response to your opening message?
Not at all - my original post was fictional. Im not looking for a large-breasted, young woman to use (although that does sound nice!). I just wanted to compare reactions from tge forumites based on gender of the person being used.
It kind of backfired though as I'm not popular (cliquey) enough on the forums to get a reaction! "
It's not really about being popular. It's about writing things people want to respond to.
You'll find the threads that garner most responses are those which ask questions not just make a statement and leave. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course "
What is this cliqueyness that should read ...
Rant over ... and it's not Thursday |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Some did take a note of the single profile somewhere? I cba to scroll.....
I was about to comment something similar.
Side note; I'm starting to get concerned by your ellipses usage... "
Please note my post was fictional, just to emulate the first post about a couple looking for a man to use, only to change the gender. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ea monkeyMan
over a year ago
Manchester (he/him) |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course "
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Well, this was a forum social experiment following the blase responses to the post about the couple loking for a man to use, just to check the double standards here when it comes to women/men. However not being a popular (read" sycophantic) forumite it hardly got any responses.
I change my tack then: kiss, fuck, avoid? and when that fails, what are your Friday/Saturday night plans?
OP..are you back-peddling because nobody leapt forward favourably in response to your opening message?
Not at all - my original post was fictional. Im not looking for a large-breasted, young woman to use (although that does sound nice!). I just wanted to compare reactions from tge forumites based on gender of the person being used.
It kind of backfired though as I'm not popular (cliquey) enough on the forums to get a reaction!
It's not really about being popular. It's about writing things people want to respond to.
You'll find the threads that garner most responses are those which ask questions not just mak
Ae a statement and leave. "
Avoid.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?! "
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Well, this was a forum social experiment following the blase responses to the post about the couple loking for a man to use, just to check the double standards here when it comes to women/men. However not being a popular (read" sycophantic) forumite it hardly got any responses.
I change my tack then: kiss, fuck, avoid? and when that fails, what are your Friday/Saturday night plans?
OP..are you back-peddling because nobody leapt forward favourably in response to your opening message?
Not at all - my original post was fictional. Im not looking for a large-breasted, young woman to use (although that does sound nice!). I just wanted to compare reactions from tge forumites based on gender of the person being used.
It kind of backfired though as I'm not popular (cliquey) enough on the forums to get a reaction!
It's not really about being popular. It's about writing things people want to respond to.
You'll find the threads that garner most responses are those which ask questions not just mak
Ae a statement and leave.
Avoid.."
Or ones where the OP is open to discussing other opinions rather than just dismissing people.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ea monkeyMan
over a year ago
Manchester (he/him) |
"Some did take a note of the single profile somewhere? I cba to scroll.....
I was about to comment something similar.
Side note; I'm starting to get concerned by your ellipses usage...
Please note my post was fictional, just to emulate the first post about a couple looking for a man to use, only to change the gender."
Yes, but anyone looking at your profile would automatically assume that you are lying about 'your wife' and so not respond.
Your experiment was rather flawed.
I tell you what, find yourself a lady, get married, become swingers, then try it again. Let us know what the results are then. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ea monkeyMan
over a year ago
Manchester (he/him) |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here "
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Well, this was a forum social experiment following the blase responses to the post about the couple loking for a man to use, just to check the double standards here when it comes to women/men. However not being a popular (read" sycophantic) forumite it hardly got any responses.
I change my tack then: kiss, fuck, avoid? and when that fails, what are your Friday/Saturday night plans?
I found the other thread. I think the responses are quite similar but your approach isn't. In that one you talk about other people. In this one you say it's you looking, that alone would affect people's reactions.
https://m.fabswingers.com/forum/lounge/871298
The principle is exactly the same though in both posts. I just changed the gender in my post just to see what the reaction might be to a couple wanting to "use" a woman, as opposed to a couple wanting to "use" a man.
No it's not. Me saying that woman wants to do something wouldn't illicit the same response as me saying I want to do it. One is hypothetical because you don't know them and one is personal because I'm saying it's me. "
Youve got it all wrong. The original post was about a MF couple who posted that that they wanted a young, hung man to use. My poat was about a MF "couple" that wants a young, large-breatsed woman to use. Its no different apart from the gender of the person being sought to be used.
I was soleley interested in comparing the reactions to each case based on that gender difference. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
"
Did Aesop write about this clique?? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Well, this was a forum social experiment following the blase responses to the post about the couple loking for a man to use, just to check the double standards here when it comes to women/men. However not being a popular (read" sycophantic) forumite it hardly got any responses.
I change my tack then: kiss, fuck, avoid? and when that fails, what are your Friday/Saturday night plans? "
If you've changed your mind I'll have them....... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
"
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked! "
I know what you mean |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked! "
What did you say? Got distracted by your pics? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
What did you say? Got distracted by your pics?"
Yeah yeah!
For example - I very clearly offered you a bj on the ‘how long’ thread - you totally overlooked it!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
".
Youve got it all wrong. The original post was about a MF couple who posted that that they wanted a young, hung man to use. My poat was about a MF "couple" that wants a young, large-breatsed woman to use. Its no different apart from the gender of the person being sought to be used.
I was soleley interested in comparing the reactions to each case based on that gender difference. "
But in order to do a fair comparison then all other factors need to be the same!
In the first you said you saw a couple looking for a guy to use and what do people think of that. In this one you said that you are your wife want to use a girl and asked for any takers. Can you not see how those are 2 completely different questions? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ea monkeyMan
over a year ago
Manchester (he/him) |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
Did Aesop write about this clique??"
Yes, in the lesser known "Tale of the whiney single man." Its not quite got the 'zip' of the tortoise and the hare but its worth a look for the first recorded mention of "the formidable forum clique". |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
What did you say? Got distracted by your pics?
Yeah yeah!
For example - I very clearly offered you a bj on the ‘how long’ thread - you totally overlooked it!! "
Where's my offer ... I won't overlook  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
Did Aesop write about this clique??
Yes, in the lesser known "Tale of the whiney single man." Its not quite got the 'zip' of the tortoise and the hare but its worth a look for the first recorded mention of "the formidable forum clique". "
Not the infamous FFC ... like the mighty Jabberwock? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
I know what you mean"
Ta! Tbh I can relate to people who join the forums and leave soon afterwards - complaining that they couldn’t get a foot in the door!
If I’m finding it a tad tiresome after 5 years on here - when I view many forumites as friends - it’s hardly surprising that new additions would give up so quickly! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
".
Youve got it all wrong. The original post was about a MF couple who posted that that they wanted a young, hung man to use. My poat was about a MF "couple" that wants a young, large-breatsed woman to use. Its no different apart from the gender of the person being sought to be used.
I was soleley interested in comparing the reactions to each case based on that gender difference.
But in order to do a fair comparison then all other factors need to be the same!
In the first you said you saw a couple looking for a guy to use and what do people think of that. In this one you said that you are your wife want to use a girl and asked for any takers. Can you not see how those are 2 completely different questions? "
Completely different you say? Ok then.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
I know what you mean
Ta! Tbh I can relate to people who join the forums and leave soon afterwards - complaining that they couldn’t get a foot in the door!
If I’m finding it a tad tiresome after 5 years on here - when I view many forumites as friends - it’s hardly surprising that new additions would give up so quickly! "
Maybe I'm just a stubborn persistent bugger |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
What did you say? Got distracted by your pics?
Yeah yeah!
For example - I very clearly offered you a bj on the ‘how long’ thread - you totally overlooked it!!
Where's my offer ... I won't overlook "
Is Red watching or joining in?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
What did you say? Got distracted by your pics?
Yeah yeah!
For example - I very clearly offered you a bj on the ‘how long’ thread - you totally overlooked it!!
Where's my offer ... I won't overlook
Is Red watching or joining in? "
One then the other? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
What did you say? Got distracted by your pics?
Yeah yeah!
For example - I very clearly offered you a bj on the ‘how long’ thread - you totally overlooked it!!
Where's my offer ... I won't overlook
Is Red watching or joining in?
One then the other? "
Yeah ok! See you next Tuesday? X |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
What did you say? Got distracted by your pics?
Yeah yeah!
For example - I very clearly offered you a bj on the ‘how long’ thread - you totally overlooked it!!
Where's my offer ... I won't overlook
Is Red watching or joining in?
One then the other?
Yeah ok! See you next Tuesday? X"
Be still my beating heart  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *uxom redCouple
over a year ago
Shrewsbury |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
What did you say? Got distracted by your pics?
Yeah yeah!
For example - I very clearly offered you a bj on the ‘how long’ thread - you totally overlooked it!!
Where's my offer ... I won't overlook
Is Red watching or joining in?
One then the other?
Yeah ok! See you next Tuesday? X"
I'm busy on Tuesday  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
What did you say? Got distracted by your pics?
Yeah yeah!
For example - I very clearly offered you a bj on the ‘how long’ thread - you totally overlooked it!! "
Faf |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
What did you say? Got distracted by your pics?
Yeah yeah!
For example - I very clearly offered you a bj on the ‘how long’ thread - you totally overlooked it!!
Where's my offer ... I won't overlook
Is Red watching or joining in?
One then the other?
Yeah ok! See you next Tuesday? X
I'm busy on Tuesday "
Thursday? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
What did you say? Got distracted by your pics?
Yeah yeah!
For example - I very clearly offered you a bj on the ‘how long’ thread - you totally overlooked it!!
Faf "
Too late now! My teens are hollering for their dinner! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
What did you say? Got distracted by your pics?
Yeah yeah!
For example - I very clearly offered you a bj on the ‘how long’ thread - you totally overlooked it!!
Where's my offer ... I won't overlook
Is Red watching or joining in?
One then the other?
Yeah ok! See you next Tuesday? X
I'm busy on Tuesday
Thursday? "
Which Red are we talking here ... buxom wants in |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *uxom redCouple
over a year ago
Shrewsbury |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
What did you say? Got distracted by your pics?
Yeah yeah!
For example - I very clearly offered you a bj on the ‘how long’ thread - you totally overlooked it!!
Where's my offer ... I won't overlook
Is Red watching or joining in?
One then the other?
Yeah ok! See you next Tuesday? X
I'm busy on Tuesday
Thursday? "
Yeah I can do then |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
What did you say? Got distracted by your pics?
Yeah yeah!
For example - I very clearly offered you a bj on the ‘how long’ thread - you totally overlooked it!!
Faf
Too late now! My teens are hollering for their dinner! "
Youth before beauty! I understand! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
What did you say? Got distracted by your pics?
Yeah yeah!
For example - I very clearly offered you a bj on the ‘how long’ thread - you totally overlooked it!!
Where's my offer ... I won't overlook
Is Red watching or joining in?
One then the other?
Yeah ok! See you next Tuesday? X
I'm busy on Tuesday
Thursday?
Yeah I can do then "
So right now it’s the three Reds getting it on whilst the guys sit and watch?
This response to Red Monkey too! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
What did you say? Got distracted by your pics?
Yeah yeah!
For example - I very clearly offered you a bj on the ‘how long’ thread - you totally overlooked it!!
Faf
Too late now! My teens are hollering for their dinner!
Youth before beauty! I understand!"
Sod it - they’ll wait! C’mere! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
What did you say? Got distracted by your pics?
Yeah yeah!
For example - I very clearly offered you a bj on the ‘how long’ thread - you totally overlooked it!!
Where's my offer ... I won't overlook
Is Red watching or joining in?
One then the other?
Yeah ok! See you next Tuesday? X
I'm busy on Tuesday
Thursday?
Yeah I can do then
So right now it’s the three Reds getting it on whilst the guys sit and watch?
This response to Red Monkey too! "
Don't remember that part of the bargain  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked!
What did you say? Got distracted by your pics?
Yeah yeah!
For example - I very clearly offered you a bj on the ‘how long’ thread - you totally overlooked it!!
Faf
Too late now! My teens are hollering for their dinner!
Youth before beauty! I understand!
Sod it - they’ll wait! C’mere! "
I don’t mind sharing their dinner before though, bit peckish! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Again with this "clique" word. What it's roots cliqueyness?
Strikes me that there are people who know each other outside the forums who may bounce off each other due to the familiarity
Many times I see people complaining about a "clique" it's because they aren't getting either the attention they crave, or the right attention ... and so have a massive chip on their shoulder .. generalising of course
Pretty much.
Or is that what a member of the clique would say?!
Am I a member? Didn't think I was ... not met any of the regulars here
In my time here, I've constantly heard about this 'clique'. Ironically the vast majority of users have changed in that time, yet the fable persists.
I think for ‘Clique’ just read ‘very regular posters’!
I’ve found that, now I post less than I used to, most of my posts on most threads are totally overlooked!
I’m clearly wearing Harry’s invisibility cloak!
It bothers me a little - but I’m more likely to post less and less than to post far more often to try to garner popularity again!
In all honesty, I think that’s what’s meant by the ‘clique ‘ - those who post very frequently and rarely have posts overlooked! "
That's not what I meant by my post. Perhaps other people think Clique means that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Funnily enough there's no mention of a wife on your profile OP.
You might want to remember that you're posing as a single male before posting forum comments about your wife.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ady LickWoman
over a year ago
Northampton Somewhere |
"I'm surprised you posted this OP.
What surprised you V? "
Surely you realised what sort of reaction you'd get? People have a) probably seen some of your previous posts and b) worked out that, although you have a wife, she's not on here.
It was never going to do you any favours, was it?!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
