a TV programme that just shows how nuts the benefits system is .
Now i have nothing against folk having kids but there should be a limit to the amount of money paid out from the tax payer , so lets say that the child benefit limit is 4 and if you have any more than that you pay for them your selfs . them folk with lots of kids might think twice before they have another , would this be right or wrong to do |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"a TV programme that just shows how nuts the benefits system is .
Now i have nothing against folk having kids but there should be a limit to the amount of money paid out from the tax payer , so lets say that the child benefit limit is 4 and if you have any more than that you pay for them your selfs . them folk with lots of kids might think twice before they have another , would this be right or wrong to do "
You seem to give thes people too much credit, people like that just shit out kid after kid because they are stupid and have unfulfilled lives so fucking is all they got going. No different really to third world countries where they keep having kids despite the inability to care for them.
Capping benefits would A) Increase the amount of kids in an already underfunded foster care system,
B) increase crime rate, as there's a direct correlation between poverty and liklihood of incarceration (which in turn means more taxes paying for prisoners, so the savings on benefits just goes to housing prisoners)
and C) cause more undue suffering for kids that didn't ask for it.
I don't have the right answer but I strongly feel that limiting them to X number of kids isn't the right answer
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"a TV programme that just shows how nuts the benefits system is .
Now i have nothing against folk having kids but there should be a limit to the amount of money paid out from the tax payer , so lets say that the child benefit limit is 4 and if you have any more than that you pay for them your selfs . them folk with lots of kids might think twice before they have another , would this be right or wrong to do
You seem to give thes people too much credit, people like that just shit out kid after kid because they are stupid and have unfulfilled lives so fucking is all they got going. No different really to third world countries where they keep having kids despite the inability to care for them.
Capping benefits would A) Increase the amount of kids in an already underfunded foster care system,
B) increase crime rate, as there's a direct correlation between poverty and liklihood of incarceration (which in turn means more taxes paying for prisoners, so the savings on benefits just goes to housing prisoners)
and C) cause more undue suffering for kids that didn't ask for it.
I don't have the right answer but I strongly feel that limiting them to X number of kids isn't the right answer
"
its already limited |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"a TV programme that just shows how nuts the benefits system is .
Now i have nothing against folk having kids but there should be a limit to the amount of money paid out from the tax payer , so lets say that the child benefit limit is 4 and if you have any more than that you pay for them your selfs . them folk with lots of kids might think twice before they have another , would this be right or wrong to do
You seem to give thes people too much credit, people like that just shit out kid after kid because they are stupid and have unfulfilled lives so fucking is all they got going. No different really to third world countries where they keep having kids despite the inability to care for them.
Capping benefits would A) Increase the amount of kids in an already underfunded foster care system,
B) increase crime rate, as there's a direct correlation between poverty and liklihood of incarceration (which in turn means more taxes paying for prisoners, so the savings on benefits just goes to housing prisoners)
and C) cause more undue suffering for kids that didn't ask for it.
I don't have the right answer but I strongly feel that limiting them to X number of kids isn't the right answer
its already limited"
There's still financial positives for having more children though, as far as I recall. Eligibility for social housing, if you're unemployed you can apply for a higher amount of jobseekers allowance if you have dependants (or you could 5 years ago when I was last unemployed) and I think there's a few others.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"a TV programme that just shows how nuts the benefits system is .
Now i have nothing against folk having kids but there should be a limit to the amount of money paid out from the tax payer , so lets say that the child benefit limit is 4 and if you have any more than that you pay for them your selfs . them folk with lots of kids might think twice before they have another , would this be right or wrong to do "
But they wouldn't think thst.
They would just keep having kids and let them suffer till the state stepped in as it cant just let kids suffer because thier parents arw retards.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"a TV programme that just shows how nuts the benefits system is .
Now i have nothing against folk having kids but there should be a limit to the amount of money paid out from the tax payer , so lets say that the child benefit limit is 4 and if you have any more than that you pay for them your selfs . them folk with lots of kids might think twice before they have another , would this be right or wrong to do
You seem to give thes people too much credit, people like that just shit out kid after kid because they are stupid and have unfulfilled lives so fucking is all they got going. No different really to third world countries where they keep having kids despite the inability to care for them.
Capping benefits would A) Increase the amount of kids in an already underfunded foster care system,
B) increase crime rate, as there's a direct correlation between poverty and liklihood of incarceration (which in turn means more taxes paying for prisoners, so the savings on benefits just goes to housing prisoners)
and C) cause more undue suffering for kids that didn't ask for it.
I don't have the right answer but I strongly feel that limiting them to X number of kids isn't the right answer
its already limited"
Only for kids born after april 2017. So she will be getting it for all of them older than that |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
