Even though I find it hard to understand why anyone would want to remove their nipple or split their tongue, surely it should be their choice. The tattooist who was given a 40 month sentence for carrying out the work I think was treated a bit harshly. The people he worked on were happy with what he's done so why ruin his life and tie up a prison cell, when money and resources might be better spent locking up actual criminals. What are your thoughts ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
He wasn’t medically trained to do those modifications, The nipples have a lot of vascular parts, so a risk of bleeding infection etc, I think people have every right to have modified bodies but it needs to be done in clinical conditions by trained people for the more extreme ones a tattoo parlour isn’t the ideal place tbh, I feel for the guy and he shouldn’t have got that sentance |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *ilth500Man
over a year ago
Merseyside |
"I think the guys who had his ear removed felt duped by him as to what he was getting into.
He operated outside the law literally. "
then he's not exempt then. hes a criminal same as bank robbers and violent offenders. simples |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *ilth500Man
over a year ago
Merseyside |
"He wasn’t medically trained to do those modifications, The nipples have a lot of vascular parts, so a risk of bleeding infection etc, I think people have every right to have modified bodies but it needs to be done in clinical conditions by trained people for the more extreme ones a tattoo parlour isn’t the ideal place tbh, I feel for the guy and he shouldn’t have got that sentance "
he seriously broke the law . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
