As someone who is kinda new to this scene I am always in two minds whether or not to nail someone who I have mauled weeks/months previously.
I don’t know if there is a code of practice but one thing I have started to add to my message is that if my message is deleted then I will take that as NOT INTERESTED.
I get annoyed that guys are berating Fabbers who have declined their advances.
Is this an idea that’s been mentioned before? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By *ddibleMan
over a year ago
Exeter Bristol Salisbury |
"As someone who is kinda new to this scene I am always in two minds whether or not to nail someone who I have mauled weeks/months previously.
I don’t know if there is a code of practice but one thing I have started to add to my message is that if my message is deleted then I will take that as NOT INTERESTED.
I get annoyed that guys are berating Fabbers who have declined their advances.
Is this an idea that’s been mentioned before? "
To nail someone you mauled earlier? that's borderline necrophilia  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"As someone who is kinda new to this scene I am always in two minds whether or not to nail someone who I have mauled weeks/months previously.
I don’t know if there is a code of practice but one thing I have started to add to my message is that if my message is deleted then I will take that as NOT INTERESTED.
I get annoyed that guys are berating Fabbers who have declined their advances.
Is this an idea that’s been mentioned before?
To nail someone you mauled earlier? that's borderline necrophilia "
Haha are you sluthunter in disguise |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"As someone who is kinda new to this scene I am always in two minds whether or not to nail someone who I have mauled weeks/months previously.
I don’t know if there is a code of practice but one thing I have started to add to my message is that if my message is deleted then I will take that as NOT INTERESTED.
I get annoyed that guys are berating Fabbers who have declined their advances.
Is this an idea that’s been mentioned before? "
I'm lost, but it doesn't take a lot. Aren't the forums for ppl to just say what they think? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"As someone who is kinda new to this scene I am always in two minds whether or not to nail someone who I have mauled weeks/months previously.
I don’t know if there is a code of practice but one thing I have started to add to my message is that if my message is deleted then I will take that as NOT INTERESTED.
I get annoyed that guys are berating Fabbers who have declined their advances.
Is this an idea that’s been mentioned before? "
So what you're saying is, in essence, exactly what is covered in site FAQ's - in that no reply means 'no thanks' |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I'm guessing you mean mailed not mauled.
If you message again and they say yes, you've done the right thing.
If they don't like being messaged again by someone they previously declined, or ignored, they should have blocked after the first message.
So, diddums to them. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm guessing you mean mailed not mauled.
If you message again and they say yes, you've done the right thing.
If they don't like being messaged again by someone they previously declined, or ignored, they should have blocked after the first message.
So, diddums to them."
If this is acceptable, thank you. I don’t want to be a pest because although I may be attracted to the person I am not desperate. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm guessing you mean mailed not mauled.
If you message again and they say yes, you've done the right thing.
If they don't like being messaged again by someone they previously declined, or ignored, they should have blocked after the first message.
So, diddums to them."
Oh is THAT what he meant? 
I thought ‘ nailing someone he’s mauled before ‘ was another way of saying fucking someone he’s had previously!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I must admit I read this and went 
But I think you meant mail not nail and mailed not mauled?
Leastways, I hope so!
In response- block those that arent interested then you won't inadvertently pester.
I block those that act like fab is Groundhog Day! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm guessing you mean mailed not mauled.
If you message again and they say yes, you've done the right thing.
If they don't like being messaged again by someone they previously declined, or ignored, they should have blocked after the first message.
So, diddums to them.
If this is acceptable, thank you. I don’t want to be a pest because although I may be attracted to the person I am not desperate. "
I accept it. I can't speak for everyone else, especially as they like moaning about getting repeat messages from men they have turned down or ignored.
They only have themselves to blame. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm guessing you mean mailed not mauled.
If you message again and they say yes, you've done the right thing.
If they don't like being messaged again by someone they previously declined, or ignored, they should have blocked after the first message.
So, diddums to them.
Oh is THAT what he meant?
I thought ‘ nailing someone he’s mauled before ‘ was another way of saying fucking someone he’s had previously! "
At first I thought he meant nailing someone he had ripped apart on the forums  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm guessing you mean mailed not mauled.
If you message again and they say yes, you've done the right thing.
If they don't like being messaged again by someone they previously declined, or ignored, they should have blocked after the first message.
So, diddums to them.
Oh is THAT what he meant?
I thought ‘ nailing someone he’s mauled before ‘ was another way of saying fucking someone he’s had previously!
At first I thought he meant nailing someone he had ripped apart on the forums "
I thought it was like a hard dude wanting a forum fight, I got it all wrong by the looks.... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'm guessing you mean mailed not mauled.
If you message again and they say yes, you've done the right thing.
If they don't like being messaged again by someone they previously declined, or ignored, they should have blocked after the first message.
So, diddums to them.
Oh is THAT what he meant?
I thought ‘ nailing someone he’s mauled before ‘ was another way of saying fucking someone he’s had previously!
At first I thought he meant nailing someone he had ripped apart on the forums
I thought it was like a hard dude wanting a forum fight, I got it all wrong by the looks.... "
Funny how we all read the same thing and came up with totally different conclusions! 
(#spellcheckmatters! ) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'm guessing you mean mailed not mauled.
If you message again and they say yes, you've done the right thing.
If they don't like being messaged again by someone they previously declined, or ignored, they should have blocked after the first message.
So, diddums to them.
Oh is THAT what he meant?
I thought ‘ nailing someone he’s mauled before ‘ was another way of saying fucking someone he’s had previously!
At first I thought he meant nailing someone he had ripped apart on the forums
I thought it was like a hard dude wanting a forum fight, I got it all wrong by the looks....
Funny how we all read the same thing and came up with totally different conclusions!
(#spellcheckmatters! ) "
Predictive text is responsible for a lot of the problems in the world... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
