FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Sugar daddies/babies

Sugar daddies/babies

Jump to: Newest in thread

By (user no longer on site) OP over a year ago

Is it another form of prostituting/escorting? Because it is a way of paying for sex in my eyes, so should we report it?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

No.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *inkyLondonpairCouple over a year ago

London

"No."

How does it differ?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ed-monkeyCouple over a year ago

Hailsham

Only if you yourself have been asked to pay or give something material in exchange for a meet

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *anana JoeMan over a year ago

Sheffield

"Is it another form of prostituting/escorting? Because it is a way of paying for sex in my eyes, so should we report it?"

Thats about it as I see it sad really.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *P_80Man over a year ago

Waterford

"No.

How does it differ? "

Two adults consenting in a business transaction.

No one else's concern.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ?

Two adults consenting in a business transaction.

No one else's concern."

totally and butt out of other peoples business what ever works for them works for them

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ? "

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours."

Absolutely.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *inkyLondonpairCouple over a year ago

London

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours."

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *inkyLondonpairCouple over a year ago

London

"No.

How does it differ?

Two adults consenting in a business transaction.

No one else's concern.

totally and butt out of other peoples business what ever works for them works for them"

Absolutely. But consenting adults paying for sex is not permitted on this site.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services. "

Many men spoil women in regular relationships. I think they see it as a relationship in that dynamic.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ed-monkeyCouple over a year ago

Hailsham

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services. "

Only a problem on here if it's a girl wanting payment to be the baby ... or a guy offering to pay for services ... if it's a couple who have that agreement between them and just looking for others to join them ... not a problem

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I find that daddy/baby thing very unnerving, I get squeamish when I read or hear it

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I’ve been offered dinners, drinks, gigs, all sorts on here for a meet. Is that someone paying for sex in a different way?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours."

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I find that daddy/baby thing very unnerving, I get squeamish when I read or hear it"

Daddy dash.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *P_80Man over a year ago

Waterford

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours."

I'd say it's more insecure than stupid that they feel they have to pay for it but yeah, you're right in what you say and if a woman wants to take advantage of that then good luck to her.

As long as the situation is 100% consensual then it's of no one's concern.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I’d love a sugar mommy!

Line up ladies!!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I find that daddy/baby thing very unnerving, I get squeamish when I read or hear it

Daddy dash. "

Doesn't have a ring to it

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I find that daddy/baby thing very unnerving, I get squeamish when I read or hear it"

so do I

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I had a guy that wanted to pay me an allowance to be exclusive to him. I would have seen him with no money involved as we got on but he wanted to spoil me and I guess it was his kink. I couldn’t take it although if would have paid my rent.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *inkyLondonpairCouple over a year ago

London

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

I think it's pretty much a given that the essence of a sugar daddy /baby relationship is that the man provides the woman with money/material goods and the woman provides the man with sex. It's essentially contractual and thus not the same as one party providing the other with gifts without any expectation of an equivalent reward.

As I say, absolutely nothing wrong with that if that is what you are into, but as its clearly sex for payment it's against site rules.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I find that daddy/baby thing very unnerving, I get squeamish when I read or hear it

Daddy dash.

Doesn't have a ring to it"

Lol. I agree. I’d be out the door like a flash if someone started that malarkey

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I find that daddy/baby thing very unnerving, I get squeamish when I read or hear it

so do I "

Context!

The world would run much more smoothly and people would be less offended and appalled if they could let go of the meaning and use of words in and of themselves, but instead looked at things in the context that they are being used.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I find that daddy/baby thing very unnerving, I get squeamish when I read or hear it

so do I

Context!

You will end up banging your head on here unfortunately

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ed-monkeyCouple over a year ago

Hailsham

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

As I say, absolutely nothing wrong with that if that is what you are into, but as its clearly sex for payment it's against site rules. "

I think what I'm trying to say is that if it's a couple on here who have that relationship between them... then that's their thing ... if however they .. or it's a man or girl trying to proposition others on here for payment ... then report

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I find that daddy/baby thing very unnerving, I get squeamish when I read or hear it

so do I

Context!

Why? I can’t get my head around it at all. To me it’s an ultimate no no. Be different if I said everyone who does that is a weirdo. Why can’t people have opinions on things if they’re not being nasty about it?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

As I say, absolutely nothing wrong with that if that is what you are into, but as its clearly sex for payment it's against site rules. "

A true sugar daddy (or mummy) and baby relationship is much more than money/gifts in exchange for sex is it not? There is a supportive side to it too, gifts can and do get given regardless of sex.

If people want to look at it as black and white as that how do you view this...

A few years ago I was flat out broke, my at the time Fwb (then girlfriend, now ex) helped me financially with things. We were also obviously having sex. It's not that difficult to make the direct similarities but in no way was it in exchange for the sex.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

As I say, absolutely nothing wrong with that if that is what you are into, but as its clearly sex for payment it's against site rules.

A true sugar daddy (or mummy) and baby relationship is much more than money/gifts in exchange for sex is it not? There is a supportive side to it too, gifts can and do get given regardless of sex.

If people want to look at it as black and white as that how do you view this...

That’s not the same!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I find that daddy/baby thing very unnerving, I get squeamish when I read or hear it

so do I

Context!

Really,thanks but no thanks,but thanks for your input

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I’ve seen it talked about a lot in the USA, used as a way to pay college fees.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

As I say, absolutely nothing wrong with that if that is what you are into, but as its clearly sex for payment it's against site rules.

A true sugar daddy (or mummy) and baby relationship is much more than money/gifts in exchange for sex is it not? There is a supportive side to it too, gifts can and do get given regardless of sex.

If people want to look at it as black and white as that how do you view this...

That’s not the same! "

There are lots of dynamics though. The guy that I had known for a year wanted to add a power element to it by offering to buy me lingerie/shoes, give me an allowance. I said no but it was his kink and he would have gotten sex with or without gifts. I know a married couples that pays his wife money for different sex acts, it’s all role play and keeps the sex fun for them. He gets lots of bjs that way.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I don't understand it, therefore I don't think I can form an opinion.

Is it more so that it's been labelled/given the name the way it has?

If it didn't have that name would people think differently?

When I was a single here, I had met a well known couple from here a few times. I considered them and still do consider them friends.

They were going away for the weekend and I got an invite. I was broke and couldn't afford the travel expense, so they paid for my ticket. Yes we had some rather delicious time together, but we also chatted, hung out, put the world to rights, ate, laughed, walked.

Did they pay for my services, or were they mates who did what mates do?

A wonderful woman in my life (who we don't and never will have anything sexual between us) paid for my train ticket to hers for my Xmas present the year before last. Was she paying for my friendship?

I personally think it's more about individual interpretation and understanding

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *eliWoman over a year ago

Yes, I think so (not casting any negative aspersions here). Do you actually find many sugar babies looking on here? I somehow doubt it.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

As I say, absolutely nothing wrong with that if that is what you are into, but as its clearly sex for payment it's against site rules.

A true sugar daddy (or mummy) and baby relationship is much more than money/gifts in exchange for sex is it not? There is a supportive side to it too, gifts can and do get given regardless of sex.

If people want to look at it as black and white as that how do you view this...

That’s not the same!

Yeah I get that. It’s the calling someone daddy thing that I don’t like. The whole daddy sex scenario thing.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

As I say, absolutely nothing wrong with that if that is what you are into, but as its clearly sex for payment it's against site rules.

A true sugar daddy (or mummy) and baby relationship is much more than money/gifts in exchange for sex is it not? There is a supportive side to it too, gifts can and do get given regardless of sex.

If people want to look at it as black and white as that how do you view this...

That’s not the same!

Yeah I get that. It’s the calling someone daddy thing that I don’t like. The whole daddy sex scenario thing. "

I have no problem with it in the right scenario. I don’t usually use it but one guy I do because he’s a sexy dad.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

As a father of two girls I find in unnerving, right,that's all I'm saying on the matter, I'm off into the knitting thread

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ed-monkeyCouple over a year ago

Hailsham

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

As I say, absolutely nothing wrong with that if that is what you are into, but as its clearly sex for payment it's against site rules.

A true sugar daddy (or mummy) and baby relationship is much more than money/gifts in exchange for sex is it not? There is a supportive side to it too, gifts can and do get given regardless of sex.

If people want to look at it as black and white as that how do you view this...

That’s not the same!

Yeah I get that. It’s the calling someone daddy thing that I don’t like. The whole daddy sex scenario thing. "

Horses for courses and each to their own

One person's "kink" is another's norm and all that

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"As a father of two girls I find in unnerving, right,that's all I'm saying on the matter, I'm off into the knitting thread "

And that’s fine, it’s not a scene you are part of and you won’t understand it. You don’t have to. I don’t associate the word with a parent.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"I’d love a sugar mommy!

Line up ladies!!

You beat me to it!

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

As I say, absolutely nothing wrong with that if that is what you are into, but as its clearly sex for payment it's against site rules.

A true sugar daddy (or mummy) and baby relationship is much more than money/gifts in exchange for sex is it not? There is a supportive side to it too, gifts can and do get given regardless of sex.

If people want to look at it as black and white as that how do you view this...

That’s not the same!

Yeah I get that. It’s the calling someone daddy thing that I don’t like. The whole daddy sex scenario thing.

Horses for courses and each to their own

One person's "kink" is another's norm and all that

Lots of my friend’s don’t understand that I would like a swinging partner but it’s because I can separate the physical from the emotional within that scenario, bit like not associating certain terms with the obvious.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

As I say, absolutely nothing wrong with that if that is what you are into, but as its clearly sex for payment it's against site rules.

A true sugar daddy (or mummy) and baby relationship is much more than money/gifts in exchange for sex is it not? There is a supportive side to it too, gifts can and do get given regardless of sex.

If people want to look at it as black and white as that how do you view this...

That’s not the same!

Yeah I get that. It’s the calling someone daddy thing that I don’t like. The whole daddy sex scenario thing.

Horses for courses and each to their own

One person's "kink" is another's norm and all that

I agree. I’m not knocking it. Just saying I don’t understand it and it’s not for me and never will be. Just like 2 men together will never be for me. We’re all different thank goodness

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ed-monkeyCouple over a year ago

Hailsham

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

As I say, absolutely nothing wrong with that if that is what you are into, but as its clearly sex for payment it's against site rules.

A true sugar daddy (or mummy) and baby relationship is much more than money/gifts in exchange for sex is it not? There is a supportive side to it too, gifts can and do get given regardless of sex.

If people want to look at it as black and white as that how do you view this...

That’s not the same!

Yeah I get that. It’s the calling someone daddy thing that I don’t like. The whole daddy sex scenario thing.

Horses for courses and each to their own

One person's "kink" is another's norm and all that

I agree. I’m not knocking it. Just saying I don’t understand it and it’s not for me and never will be. Just like 2 men together will never be for me. We’re all different thank goodness

I'm not ... I'm cloned ... call me Dolly ... bah

Or is that a whole other dynamic?

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *inkyLondonpairCouple over a year ago

London

I accept there may be exceptions, but in most cases on here, a woman saying she wants a sugar daddy relationship means she wants paying for sex. It's a code, same as wanting to meet "generous" men

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

As I say, absolutely nothing wrong with that if that is what you are into, but as its clearly sex for payment it's against site rules.

A true sugar daddy (or mummy) and baby relationship is much more than money/gifts in exchange for sex is it not? There is a supportive side to it too, gifts can and do get given regardless of sex.

If people want to look at it as black and white as that how do you view this...

That’s not the same!

Yeah I get that. It’s the calling someone daddy thing that I don’t like. The whole daddy sex scenario thing.

Horses for courses and each to their own

One person's "kink" is another's norm and all that

I agree. I’m not knocking it. Just saying I don’t understand it and it’s not for me and never will be. Just like 2 men together will never be for me. We’re all different thank goodness

I'm not ... I'm cloned ... call me Dolly ... bah

Or is that a whole other dynamic?"

Why do people keep mentioning that word dynamic? It grinds my gears!! Right I'm definitely going into the knitting thread

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ed-monkeyCouple over a year ago

Hailsham

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

As I say, absolutely nothing wrong with that if that is what you are into, but as its clearly sex for payment it's against site rules.

A true sugar daddy (or mummy) and baby relationship is much more than money/gifts in exchange for sex is it not? There is a supportive side to it too, gifts can and do get given regardless of sex.

If people want to look at it as black and white as that how do you view this...

That’s not the same!

Yeah I get that. It’s the calling someone daddy thing that I don’t like. The whole daddy sex scenario thing.

Horses for courses and each to their own

One person's "kink" is another's norm and all that

I agree. I’m not knocking it. Just saying I don’t understand it and it’s not for me and never will be. Just like 2 men together will never be for me. We’re all different thank goodness

I'm not ... I'm cloned ... call me Dolly ... bah

Or is that a whole other dynamic?

Why do people keep mentioning that word dynamic? It grinds my gears!! Right I'm definitely going into the knitting thread"

It's Thursday ... the is a rant thread

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

As I say, absolutely nothing wrong with that if that is what you are into, but as its clearly sex for payment it's against site rules.

A true sugar daddy (or mummy) and baby relationship is much more than money/gifts in exchange for sex is it not? There is a supportive side to it too, gifts can and do get given regardless of sex.

If people want to look at it as black and white as that how do you view this...

That’s not the same!

Yeah I get that. It’s the calling someone daddy thing that I don’t like. The whole daddy sex scenario thing.

Horses for courses and each to their own

One person's "kink" is another's norm and all that

I agree. I’m not knocking it. Just saying I don’t understand it and it’s not for me and never will be. Just like 2 men together will never be for me. We’re all different thank goodness

I'm not ... I'm cloned ... call me Dolly ... bah

Or is that a whole other dynamic?

Why do people keep mentioning that word dynamic? It grinds my gears!! Right I'm definitely going into the knitting thread

It's Thursday ... the is a rant thread

Please go in my knitting thread

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

As I say, absolutely nothing wrong with that if that is what you are into, but as its clearly sex for payment it's against site rules.

A true sugar daddy (or mummy) and baby relationship is much more than money/gifts in exchange for sex is it not? There is a supportive side to it too, gifts can and do get given regardless of sex.

If people want to look at it as black and white as that how do you view this...

That’s not the same!

Yeah I get that. It’s the calling someone daddy thing that I don’t like. The whole daddy sex scenario thing.

Horses for courses and each to their own

One person's "kink" is another's norm and all that

I agree. I’m not knocking it. Just saying I don’t understand it and it’s not for me and never will be. Just like 2 men together will never be for me. We’re all different thank goodness

I'm not ... I'm cloned ... call me Dolly ... bah

Or is that a whole other dynamic?

Why do people keep mentioning that word dynamic? It grinds my gears!! Right I'm definitely going into the knitting thread"

Because there are sooooo many DYNAMICS to everything. Nothing is straightforward

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

As I say, absolutely nothing wrong with that if that is what you are into, but as its clearly sex for payment it's against site rules.

A true sugar daddy (or mummy) and baby relationship is much more than money/gifts in exchange for sex is it not? There is a supportive side to it too, gifts can and do get given regardless of sex.

If people want to look at it as black and white as that how do you view this...

That’s not the same!

Yeah I get that. It’s the calling someone daddy thing that I don’t like. The whole daddy sex scenario thing.

Horses for courses and each to their own

One person's "kink" is another's norm and all that

I agree. I’m not knocking it. Just saying I don’t understand it and it’s not for me and never will be. Just like 2 men together will never be for me. We’re all different thank goodness

I'm not ... I'm cloned ... call me Dolly ... bah

Or is that a whole other dynamic?

Why do people keep mentioning that word dynamic? It grinds my gears!! Right I'm definitely going into the knitting thread

Because there are sooooo many DYNAMICS to everything. Nothing is straightforward "

Ssssssssshhhh no need to shout

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

As I say, absolutely nothing wrong with that if that is what you are into, but as its clearly sex for payment it's against site rules.

A true sugar daddy (or mummy) and baby relationship is much more than money/gifts in exchange for sex is it not? There is a supportive side to it too, gifts can and do get given regardless of sex.

If people want to look at it as black and white as that how do you view this...

That’s not the same!

Yeah I get that. It’s the calling someone daddy thing that I don’t like. The whole daddy sex scenario thing.

Horses for courses and each to their own

One person's "kink" is another's norm and all that

I agree. I’m not knocking it. Just saying I don’t understand it and it’s not for me and never will be. Just like 2 men together will never be for me. We’re all different thank goodness

I'm not ... I'm cloned ... call me Dolly ... bah

Or is that a whole other dynamic?

Why do people keep mentioning that word dynamic? It grinds my gears!! Right I'm definitely going into the knitting thread

Because there are sooooo many DYNAMICS to everything. Nothing is straightforward

Ssssssssshhhh no need to shout

I will come on the knitting thread if you carry on.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours.

But the man is still paying for sexual services.

As I say, absolutely nothing wrong with that if that is what you are into, but as its clearly sex for payment it's against site rules.

A true sugar daddy (or mummy) and baby relationship is much more than money/gifts in exchange for sex is it not? There is a supportive side to it too, gifts can and do get given regardless of sex.

If people want to look at it as black and white as that how do you view this...

That’s not the same!

Yeah I get that. It’s the calling someone daddy thing that I don’t like. The whole daddy sex scenario thing.

Horses for courses and each to their own

One person's "kink" is another's norm and all that

I agree. I’m not knocking it. Just saying I don’t understand it and it’s not for me and never will be. Just like 2 men together will never be for me. We’re all different thank goodness

I'm not ... I'm cloned ... call me Dolly ... bah

Or is that a whole other dynamic?

Why do people keep mentioning that word dynamic? It grinds my gears!! Right I'm definitely going into the knitting thread

Because there are sooooo many DYNAMICS to everything. Nothing is straightforward

Ssssssssshhhh no need to shout

I will come on the knitting thread if you carry on.

Oh please do it's very interesting

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

I am of the mindset that if it isn’t interfering with you then leave it be, however if I saw something that I felt was very wrong then I would maybe report it but here it’s so hard to tell sometimes, I mean I liked being whacked in the fanny sometimes and if I saw a photo of it, how can we work out of its wrong or not?

Unfortunately with using money to pay for sex or buying gifts to pay for sex, it’s been about for years and years, if you report it they will just start another account up. It’s nice you care but I would just block and move on.

Danish x

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

These types of questions always throw up so many judgments.

While this site is not designed for 'business' use if two consenting adults decide to meet on that basis then it is their choice.

People also forget that for some the exchange of money/gifts etc is also a bit of a turn on or even fetish. It doesn't always mean a sign of desperation

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *inkyLondonpairCouple over a year ago

London

"These types of questions always throw up so many judgments.

While this site is not designed for 'business' use if two consenting adults decide to meet on that basis then it is their choice.

People also forget that for some the exchange of money/gifts etc is also a bit of a turn on or even fetish. It doesn't always mean a sign of desperation"

But that's an argument for openly allowing paid sex on the site.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"No.

How does it differ?

It's a power transaction.

And if men are stupid enough to pay for it, women are smart enough to exploit these men. Their concern. Not yours."

if it doesn't affect me and everyone consents then it's not my concern.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By (user no longer on site) over a year ago

"These types of questions always throw up so many judgments.

While this site is not designed for 'business' use if two consenting adults decide to meet on that basis then it is their choice.

People also forget that for some the exchange of money/gifts etc is also a bit of a turn on or even fetish. It doesn't always mean a sign of desperation

But that's an argument for openly allowing paid sex on the site. "
..

No i think its an argument to be accepting that people are adults and may engage in that privately.

I'm not saying people should advertise services and random offering of cash is still not likely to be received well.

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)

By *ugby 123Couple over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo

"Is it another form of prostituting/escorting? Because it is a way of paying for sex in my eyes, so should we report it?"

Yes

Reply privately (thread closed by moderator)