FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Standards - do you lower them
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No, I'm not desperate for a shag. " This | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I prefer people who float my boat not those willing to float any boat" I like this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Aww Op, what happened to your longer op? About lowering your standards in terms of women's looks on here compared to the vanilla world? I don't lower my standards - I like what I like on here and the real world. I don't feel like I have to compromise so maybe it's different for me." Oh dear.. did he bottle it!?! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Aww Op, what happened to your longer op? About lowering your standards in terms of women's looks on here compared to the vanilla world? I don't lower my standards - I like what I like on here and the real world. I don't feel like I have to compromise so maybe it's different for me. Oh dear.. did he bottle it!?! " Yeah and then some bitch had to bring it up. What a bitch. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Aww Op, what happened to your longer op? About lowering your standards in terms of women's looks on here compared to the vanilla world? I don't lower my standards - I like what I like on here and the real world. I don't feel like I have to compromise so maybe it's different for me. Oh dear.. did he bottle it!?! Yeah and then some bitch had to bring it up. What a bitch. " The OP shot himself in the foot then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You can't lower them if you had none to begin with. " Bingo! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I won't fuck anyone who I think thinks he's too good for me. He doesn't deserve my pussy. " Sorry | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No, but luckily I quite enjoy masturbation... " My right hand has standards so won’t touch it anymore but my left hand after years of neglect has lower standards thankfully. It’s just a bit shit at it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I prefer people who float my boat not those willing to float any boat I like this " glad you do I'm not upto everyone's standards but I'm no bus willing to let anybody ride me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Unfortunately yes I have. " Really? That surprises me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Unfortunately yes I have. Really? That surprises me " Yes, me to. No need Spidey! Do not do that again...Ok? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I won't fuck anyone who I think thinks he's too good for me. He doesn't deserve my pussy. Sorry " I'm not | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Unfortunately yes I have. Really? That surprises me Yes, me to. No need Spidey! Do not do that again...Ok?" Absolutely.... Hot to trot... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Surely you just fuck people you’re attracted to, otherwise you might just as well have a wank. " I'd rather have a wank tbh | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Surely you just fuck people you’re attracted to, otherwise you might just as well have a wank. I'd rather have a wank tbh" Seems to be my go to option... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Surely you just fuck people you’re attracted to, otherwise you might just as well have a wank. I'd rather have a wank tbh Seems to be my go to option..." Look at it this way... Its no effort really | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Surely you just fuck people you’re attracted to, otherwise you might just as well have a wank. I'd rather have a wank tbh Seems to be my go to option... Look at it this way... Its no effort really " Who have you been talking too?.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm intrigued to know why some of you lowered your standards" Durrrr sex? Myself only in the sense of what I would and wouldn't date. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"On here I do. If I didn't I would not consider meeting anyone, even the ones who think they are a 10." Brilliant answer | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"On here I do. If I didn't I would not consider meeting anyone, even the ones who think they are a 10. Brilliant answer " Then I would not consider meeting anyone but hey thats me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm intrigued to know why some of you lowered your standards" When we had a night out and we were looking for fun , as long as the people we played with were clean and respectful that was enough . In order to lower standards you have to have high standards to begin with . Ours never were that high . And if you set them really high you don’t end up meeting anyone , and what’s the point of that ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm intrigued to know why some of you lowered your standards When we had a night out and we were looking for fun , as long as the people we played with were clean and respectful that was enough . In order to lower standards you have to have high standards to begin with . Ours never were that high . And if you set them really high you don’t end up meeting anyone , and what’s the point of that ?" Again, just fuck the people you’re attracted to, am I missing something here ?! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm intrigued to know why some of you lowered your standards When we had a night out and we were looking for fun , as long as the people we played with were clean and respectful that was enough . In order to lower standards you have to have high standards to begin with . Ours never were that high . And if you set them really high you don’t end up meeting anyone , and what’s the point of that ? Again, just fuck the people you’re attracted to, am I missing something here ?! " Exactly this . It’s so much more fun to find most people attractive in some way or another than to not find anyone attractive | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm intrigued to know why some of you lowered your standards When we had a night out and we were looking for fun , as long as the people we played with were clean and respectful that was enough . In order to lower standards you have to have high standards to begin with . Ours never were that high . And if you set them really high you don’t end up meeting anyone , and what’s the point of that ? Again, just fuck the people you’re attracted to, am I missing something here ?! Exactly this . It’s so much more fun to find most people attractive in some way or another than to not find anyone attractive " Is essentially another way people on here try to differentiate themselves from the rest of us dirty slappers. "look at me and my incredibly high standards that I won't lower for anyone". As you say, let's not be up our own arses. If we fancy someone and they're up for it, we fuck them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Surely you just fuck people you’re attracted to, otherwise you might just as well have a wank. " well that’s the end of this debate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whats interesting is the people saying no are the same ones usualy having a go at somone for xyz preference and saying "everyone is beautiful" " Do you drop yours then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why would I want to, I like what I like and that’s no different here or anywhere else. I don’t often see someone that tickles my fancy. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't have standards, I have preferences. Big difference. Can I adapt who I'm attracted to? No.. " This | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner." Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. " Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it." I like this guy.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. I like this guy...." I like you too my man. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it." True | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm intrigued to know why some of you lowered your standards" charitable and selfless. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nope, haven't had sex in two years, why would I start now? " No disrespect.... but if you’re not looking for sex... what would you be doing on a swingers site? Not a dig at you.... but you post you haven’t had sex in two years like it’s a badge of honor... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm intrigued to know why some of you lowered your standards" I'm charitable. I like making men feel good about themselves, after pulling a hottie like me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I have preferences on my profile, they are not 100% set in stone. If I met someone slightly out of those lines, and liked them then of course I'm not going to say no. Standards? I only have sex with people I'm attracted to. I certainly wouldn't throw myself at someone, beg them to fuck me just to score points. Is that a standard or having some dignity? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it." Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nope, haven't had sex in two years, why would I start now? No disrespect.... but if you’re not looking for sex... what would you be doing on a swingers site? Not a dig at you.... but you post you haven’t had sex in two years like it’s a badge of honor..." I don’t think she said she didn’t want sex, just not come across anyone that wets her appetite. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? " Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. " Is that saying that the majority of men are a solid 9/10 in every case and are pity fucking their way through fab? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm intrigued to know why some of you lowered your standards" I like sucking cock. I don't really give a shit who's. Also i would never have a homosexual relationship, ergo i lower my standards for sex with men. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. " How do you know what their standards are and what are you using as evidence? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. Is that saying that the majority of men are a solid 9/10 in every case and are pity fucking their way through fab? " No but there isn't a lot of 9/10 women on here. The prospect of NSA sex without investment or groundwork is very appealing to men but not to women. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. How do you know what their standards are and what are you using as evidence?" Their standard is usually whatever their wife looks like. The evidence is the number of "fab single" men.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. How do you know what their standards are and what are you using as evidence?" When I see a Susan Boyle lookalike has just been given a seeing to by some gymrat looking for their first veri it is pretty obvious. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nope, haven't had sex in two years, why would I start now? No disrespect.... but if you’re not looking for sex... what would you be doing on a swingers site? Not a dig at you.... but you post you haven’t had sex in two years like it’s a badge of honor... I don’t think she said she didn’t want sex, just not come across anyone that wets her appetite. " Hey welcome back.... I didn’t realize it was you until I checked out your profile... I thought you and whitey got married and bought a mansion in Hither Green lol..... I get what she is saying....... but it’s like me going to drug/alcohol counseling every week and telling my group... I’m going to party and drink tonight after this meeting.... After awhile people will ask me “ what am I doing at rehab, if I don’t want to stop drinking/drugs “ So I’m asking “ What is she wasting her time on Fab , if she not willing to lower her standards “ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. How do you know what their standards are and what are you using as evidence? When I see a Susan Boyle lookalike has just been given a seeing to by some gymrat looking for their first veri it is pretty obvious. " And that. ^ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nope, haven't had sex in two years, why would I start now? No disrespect.... but if you’re not looking for sex... what would you be doing on a swingers site? Not a dig at you.... but you post you haven’t had sex in two years like it’s a badge of honor..." It's not a badge of honour in the slightest I am dying to have sex, I just can't find someone I want to have sex with! Does that equate to you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. How do you know what their standards are and what are you using as evidence? When I see a Susan Boyle lookalike has just been given a seeing to by some gymrat looking for their first veri it is pretty obvious. " 100% lol I see this all the time | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. How do you know what their standards are and what are you using as evidence? When I see a Susan Boyle lookalike has just been given a seeing to by some gymrat looking for their first veri it is pretty obvious. " Oh you have been reading the can’t find a fwb threads also.... They are comedy gold ..... the real answer to all their questions is what you just wrote... but no one is brave enough to post it... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. How do you know what their standards are and what are you using as evidence? When I see a Susan Boyle lookalike has just been given a seeing to by some gymrat looking for their first veri it is pretty obvious. " How many Susan Boyle lookalikes and gym rats are on here? A lot? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nope, haven't had sex in two years, why would I start now? No disrespect.... but if you’re not looking for sex... what would you be doing on a swingers site? Not a dig at you.... but you post you haven’t had sex in two years like it’s a badge of honor... I don’t think she said she didn’t want sex, just not come across anyone that wets her appetite. Hey welcome back.... I didn’t realize it was you until I checked out your profile... I thought you and whitey got married and bought a mansion in Hither Green lol..... I get what she is saying....... but it’s like me going to drug/alcohol counseling every week and telling my group... I’m going to party and drink tonight after this meeting.... After awhile people will ask me “ what am I doing at rehab, if I don’t want to stop drinking/drugs “ So I’m asking “ What is she wasting her time on Fab , if she not willing to lower her standards “" I won’t meet people just for sex, they have to ignite something inside of me to even get me interested. The odd one does that but not often. I don’t need sex that badly so I can wait as long as it takes also. Oh and the White thing, he was never my type and we were only ever friends. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. How do you know what their standards are and what are you using as evidence? When I see a Susan Boyle lookalike has just been given a seeing to by some gymrat looking for their first veri it is pretty obvious. How many Susan Boyle lookalikes and gym rats are on here? A lot? " Seen a fare few. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Aren't we all being a little judgemental? I look to meet when the urge becomes a surge of lustful energy. That's primarily why I'm here. You are not always going to meet Adonis, but then again I wouldn't say yes to meeting a clone of Jabba The Hutt. But surely if you want to get it on when the mood takes you, there has to be a little bit of compromise along the way? " Of course its judgemental! It's fab! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. How do you know what their standards are and what are you using as evidence? Their standard is usually whatever their wife looks like. The evidence is the number of "fab single" men.... " Does that standard also apply to male half of a fabs couple playing solo on here? Higher, lower or equal to wifey.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Aren't we all being a little judgemental? I look to meet when the urge becomes a surge of lustful energy. That's primarily why I'm here. You are not always going to meet Adonis, but then again I wouldn't say yes to meeting a clone of Jabba The Hutt. But surely if you want to get it on when the mood takes you, there has to be a little bit of compromise along the way? " Absolutely this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. How do you know what their standards are and what are you using as evidence? When I see a Susan Boyle lookalike has just been given a seeing to by some gymrat looking for their first veri it is pretty obvious. How many Susan Boyle lookalikes and gym rats are on here? A lot? Seen a fare few. " Out of how many men? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Whats interesting is the people saying no are the same ones usualy having a go at somone for xyz preference and saying "everyone is beautiful" Do you drop yours then?" Yeah obviously, i mean only way i can drop lower than my first girlfirend is if i start a long distance thing with rose west. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Aren't we all being a little judgemental? I look to meet when the urge becomes a surge of lustful energy. That's primarily why I'm here. You are not always going to meet Adonis, but then again I wouldn't say yes to meeting a clone of Jabba The Hutt. But surely if you want to get it on when the mood takes you, there has to be a little bit of compromise along the way? " Very good post... As my buddy used to say when he would go home with a unattractive woman from the bar... “ Miss America isn’t walking around this bar at 3 am “ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. How do you know what their standards are and what are you using as evidence? Their standard is usually whatever their wife looks like. The evidence is the number of "fab single" men.... Does that standard also apply to male half of a fabs couple playing solo on here? Higher, lower or equal to wifey...." You'd have to check the verifications i guess. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Aren't we all being a little judgemental? I look to meet when the urge becomes a surge of lustful energy. That's primarily why I'm here. You are not always going to meet Adonis, but then again I wouldn't say yes to meeting a clone of Jabba The Hutt. But surely if you want to get it on when the mood takes you, there has to be a little bit of compromise along the way? Very good post... As my buddy used to say when he would go home with a unattractive woman from the bar... “ Miss America isn’t walking around this bar at 3 am “" I love that quote! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. How do you know what their standards are and what are you using as evidence? Their standard is usually whatever their wife looks like. The evidence is the number of "fab single" men.... Does that standard also apply to male half of a fabs couple playing solo on here? Higher, lower or equal to wifey.... You'd have to check the verifications i guess. " That’s not answering my question.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. How do you know what their standards are and what are you using as evidence? When I see a Susan Boyle lookalike has just been given a seeing to by some gymrat looking for their first veri it is pretty obvious. How many Susan Boyle lookalikes and gym rats are on here? A lot? Seen a fare few. Out of how many men? " You know the ratios are really distorted on here with men compared to women. I don't know why you're asking rhetorical questions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. How do you know what their standards are and what are you using as evidence? When I see a Susan Boyle lookalike has just been given a seeing to by some gymrat looking for their first veri it is pretty obvious. How many Susan Boyle lookalikes and gym rats are on here? A lot? Seen a fare few. Out of how many men? You know the ratios are really distorted on here with men compared to women. I don't know why you're asking rhetorical questions." Because you said you had concrete evidence that lots of men are lowering their standards. Your evidence was that gym rats are fucking Susan Boyle lookalikes. What about the rest of the men on here, as the gym rats make up a fraction of the men. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. How do you know what their standards are and what are you using as evidence? When I see a Susan Boyle lookalike has just been given a seeing to by some gymrat looking for their first veri it is pretty obvious. How many Susan Boyle lookalikes and gym rats are on here? A lot? Seen a fare few. Out of how many men? You know the ratios are really distorted on here with men compared to women. I don't know why you're asking rhetorical questions. Because you said you had concrete evidence that lots of men are lowering their standards. Your evidence was that gym rats are fucking Susan Boyle lookalikes. What about the rest of the men on here, as the gym rats make up a fraction of the men. " And that wasn't a rhetorical question. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"[Standards removed by poster at 05/03/19 23:31:28]" Yay!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women don't on here or in real life they don't need to. It's only men that drop standards in terms of attractiveness. You only see women drop standards for a high profile male, if they're a nymphomaniac or doing it to please their partner. Good answer but I don't think all men are like that. I could of met up with quite a few women who I have chatted with online over time.. But I wouldn't meet them, because I wasn't attracted enough to go out of my way to meet them. Yeah not all men but a lot. This site gives concrete evidence if it. Concrete evidence that a lot of men drop their standards? Yeah 100% come on now don't play silly with me. How do you know what their standards are and what are you using as evidence? When I see a Susan Boyle lookalike has just been given a seeing to by some gymrat looking for their first veri it is pretty obvious. How many Susan Boyle lookalikes and gym rats are on here? A lot? Seen a fare few. Out of how many men? You know the ratios are really distorted on here with men compared to women. I don't know why you're asking rhetorical questions. Because you said you had concrete evidence that lots of men are lowering their standards. Your evidence was that gym rats are fucking Susan Boyle lookalikes. What about the rest of the men on here, as the gym rats make up a fraction of the men. " A lot of them men are moaning about not getting replies. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nope, haven't had sex in two years, why would I start now? " Your saving Yourself xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The truth is alot of men will sleep with almost any woman and looks don't come into it. Women don't seem to like to hear this." But all the hundreds of mails begging for sex...... ego | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands of Susan Boyles are getting fucked and loving it. Thousands of Les Dawsons are wanking into their socks and crying. If Susan Boyle is getting fucked (and loving it) by John Cena (who is hating himself), who is the loser? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"With the ratio of men to women on Fab, women can have their pick of men on here.For men unless you’re extremely good looking,big cock,or come across as charismatic you probably have to lower your standards." Maybe they were too high to start with? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands of Susan Boyles are getting fucked and loving it. Thousands of Les Dawsons are wanking into their socks and crying. If Susan Boyle is getting fucked (and loving it) by John Cena (who is hating himself), who is the loser? " Stepping stones most of the time. Women need to be aware. I don't like the idea of them getting used and abused. Although a lot like that on here. It doesn't help them in the long run they become deluded. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands of Susan Boyles are getting fucked and loving it. Thousands of Les Dawsons are wanking into their socks and crying. If Susan Boyle is getting fucked (and loving it) by John Cena (who is hating himself), who is the loser? Stepping stones most of the time. Women need to be aware. I don't like the idea of them getting used and abused. Although a lot like that on here. It doesn't help them in the long run they become deluded. " I do agree it's not good if they're being used and abused or deluded. But if they're riding that hot guy with their eyes wide open (and his are shut!) good for them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not ever! Why would you?" I do think it would be interesting to dose some of the women on here up with a few hundred mg of testosterone for a few months and see how altitudes change | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands of Susan Boyles are getting fucked and loving it. Thousands of Les Dawsons are wanking into their socks and crying. If Susan Boyle is getting fucked (and loving it) by John Cena (who is hating himself), who is the loser? Stepping stones most of the time. Women need to be aware. I don't like the idea of them getting used and abused. Although a lot like that on here. It doesn't help them in the long run they become deluded. I do agree it's not good if they're being used and abused or deluded. But if they're riding that hot guy with their eyes wide open (and his are shut!) good for them. " Yeah men would do the same if the roles were reversed. You can't blame them. They just still need a sense of reality. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not ever! Why would you? I do think it would be interesting to dose some of the women on here up with a few hundred mg of testosterone for a few months and see how altitudes change " what having a cock for a brain you mean? lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands of Susan Boyles are getting fucked and loving it. Thousands of Les Dawsons are wanking into their socks and crying. If Susan Boyle is getting fucked (and loving it) by John Cena (who is hating himself), who is the loser? Stepping stones most of the time. Women need to be aware. I don't like the idea of them getting used and abused. Although a lot like that on here. It doesn't help them in the long run they become deluded. I do agree it's not good if they're being used and abused or deluded. But if they're riding that hot guy with their eyes wide open (and his are shut!) good for them. Yeah men would do the same if the roles were reversed. You can't blame them. They just still need a sense of reality." I hate feeling so deluded all the time | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not ever! Why would you? I do think it would be interesting to dose some of the women on here up with a few hundred mg of testosterone for a few months and see how altitudes change " I wouldn't be on here. I'd be down the gym getting a buff body. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands of Susan Boyles are getting fucked and loving it. Thousands of Les Dawsons are wanking into their socks and crying. If Susan Boyle is getting fucked (and loving it) by John Cena (who is hating himself), who is the loser? Stepping stones most of the time. Women need to be aware. I don't like the idea of them getting used and abused. Although a lot like that on here. It doesn't help them in the long run they become deluded. I do agree it's not good if they're being used and abused or deluded. But if they're riding that hot guy with their eyes wide open (and his are shut!) good for them. Yeah men would do the same if the roles were reversed. You can't blame them. They just still need a sense of reality. I hate feeling so deluded all the time " I don't. I'm actually feeling quite sad for the gym rats I'm turning down because I think I'm too good for them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not ever! Why would you? I do think it would be interesting to dose some of the women on here up with a few hundred mg of testosterone for a few months and see how altitudes change what having a cock for a brain you mean? lol " Pretty much, hormonal drive is very powerful. When sex is a need on par with sleep amd food priorities change | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands of Susan Boyles are getting fucked and loving it. Thousands of Les Dawsons are wanking into their socks and crying. If Susan Boyle is getting fucked (and loving it) by John Cena (who is hating himself), who is the loser? Stepping stones most of the time. Women need to be aware. I don't like the idea of them getting used and abused. Although a lot like that on here. It doesn't help them in the long run they become deluded. I do agree it's not good if they're being used and abused or deluded. But if they're riding that hot guy with their eyes wide open (and his are shut!) good for them. Yeah men would do the same if the roles were reversed. You can't blame them. They just still need a sense of reality. I hate feeling so deluded all the time I don't. I'm actually feeling quite sad for the gym rats I'm turning down because I think I'm too good for them. " Darling, you are too good for them. Who wants a gym rat? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands of Susan Boyles are getting fucked and loving it. Thousands of Les Dawsons are wanking into their socks and crying. If Susan Boyle is getting fucked (and loving it) by John Cena (who is hating himself), who is the loser? Stepping stones most of the time. Women need to be aware. I don't like the idea of them getting used and abused. Although a lot like that on here. It doesn't help them in the long run they become deluded. I do agree it's not good if they're being used and abused or deluded. But if they're riding that hot guy with their eyes wide open (and his are shut!) good for them. Yeah men would do the same if the roles were reversed. You can't blame them. They just still need a sense of reality. I hate feeling so deluded all the time I don't. I'm actually feeling quite sad for the gym rats I'm turning down because I think I'm too good for them. Darling, you are too good for them. Who wants a gym rat? " Susan Boyle | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands of Susan Boyles are getting fucked and loving it. Thousands of Les Dawsons are wanking into their socks and crying. If Susan Boyle is getting fucked (and loving it) by John Cena (who is hating himself), who is the loser? Stepping stones most of the time. Women need to be aware. I don't like the idea of them getting used and abused. Although a lot like that on here. It doesn't help them in the long run they become deluded. " But you just said you fucked 4 women in one night that were only 6 out of 10.. so who's using who? Who's the stepping stone and who's the knight in shining armour? I fear I'm lost in your point.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands of Susan Boyles are getting fucked and loving it. Thousands of Les Dawsons are wanking into their socks and crying. If Susan Boyle is getting fucked (and loving it) by John Cena (who is hating himself), who is the loser? Stepping stones most of the time. Women need to be aware. I don't like the idea of them getting used and abused. Although a lot like that on here. It doesn't help them in the long run they become deluded. I do agree it's not good if they're being used and abused or deluded. But if they're riding that hot guy with their eyes wide open (and his are shut!) good for them. Yeah men would do the same if the roles were reversed. You can't blame them. They just still need a sense of reality. I hate feeling so deluded all the time I don't. I'm actually feeling quite sad for the gym rats I'm turning down because I think I'm too good for them. Darling, you are too good for them. Who wants a gym rat? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands of Susan Boyles are getting fucked and loving it. Thousands of Les Dawsons are wanking into their socks and crying. If Susan Boyle is getting fucked (and loving it) by John Cena (who is hating himself), who is the loser? " Tommy Cooper ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands of Susan Boyles are getting fucked and loving it. Thousands of Les Dawsons are wanking into their socks and crying. If Susan Boyle is getting fucked (and loving it) by John Cena (who is hating himself), who is the loser? Stepping stones most of the time. Women need to be aware. I don't like the idea of them getting used and abused. Although a lot like that on here. It doesn't help them in the long run they become deluded. I do agree it's not good if they're being used and abused or deluded. But if they're riding that hot guy with their eyes wide open (and his are shut!) good for them. Yeah men would do the same if the roles were reversed. You can't blame them. They just still need a sense of reality. I hate feeling so deluded all the time " What do you feel deluded about? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"With the ratio of men to women on Fab, women can have their pick of men on here.For men unless you’re extremely good looking,big cock,or come across as charismatic you probably have to lower your standards. Maybe they were too high to start with?" So should I lower my standards? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands of Susan Boyles are getting fucked and loving it. Thousands of Les Dawsons are wanking into their socks and crying. If Susan Boyle is getting fucked (and loving it) by John Cena (who is hating himself), who is the loser? Stepping stones most of the time. Women need to be aware. I don't like the idea of them getting used and abused. Although a lot like that on here. It doesn't help them in the long run they become deluded. I do agree it's not good if they're being used and abused or deluded. But if they're riding that hot guy with their eyes wide open (and his are shut!) good for them. Yeah men would do the same if the roles were reversed. You can't blame them. They just still need a sense of reality. I hate feeling so deluded all the time What do you feel deluded about?" That I’m so damn ugly and can pull fit men | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"With the ratio of men to women on Fab, women can have their pick of men on here.For men unless you’re extremely good looking,big cock,or come across as charismatic you probably have to lower your standards. Maybe they were too high to start with? So should I lower my standards?" If the 10s ain't biting. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands of Susan Boyles are getting fucked and loving it. Thousands of Les Dawsons are wanking into their socks and crying. If Susan Boyle is getting fucked (and loving it) by John Cena (who is hating himself), who is the loser? Stepping stones most of the time. Women need to be aware. I don't like the idea of them getting used and abused. Although a lot like that on here. It doesn't help them in the long run they become deluded. I do agree it's not good if they're being used and abused or deluded. But if they're riding that hot guy with their eyes wide open (and his are shut!) good for them. Yeah men would do the same if the roles were reversed. You can't blame them. They just still need a sense of reality. I hate feeling so deluded all the time What do you feel deluded about? That I’m so damn ugly and can pull fit men " You have a different perception of deluded to me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands of Susan Boyles are getting fucked and loving it. Thousands of Les Dawsons are wanking into their socks and crying. If Susan Boyle is getting fucked (and loving it) by John Cena (who is hating himself), who is the loser? Stepping stones most of the time. Women need to be aware. I don't like the idea of them getting used and abused. Although a lot like that on here. It doesn't help them in the long run they become deluded. I do agree it's not good if they're being used and abused or deluded. But if they're riding that hot guy with their eyes wide open (and his are shut!) good for them. Yeah men would do the same if the roles were reversed. You can't blame them. They just still need a sense of reality. I hate feeling so deluded all the time What do you feel deluded about? That I’m so damn ugly and can pull fit men You have a different perception of deluded to me. " I was being sarcastic about the deluded comment someone else posted. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"With the ratio of men to women on Fab, women can have their pick of men on here.For men unless you’re extremely good looking,big cock,or come across as charismatic you probably have to lower your standards. Maybe they were too high to start with? So should I lower my standards? If the 10s ain't biting." Always live in hope there’s a 10 for me somewhere | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't get this. If you choose to bump bones with someone then you have decided that they are what you desire. If you didn't desire them then you wouldn't... So this "standards" bollocks makes no sense." Precisely. The reality is there is always going to be someone you theoretically fancy more than the person you are actually having sex with. Thus if you maintain that "standard" you will never have sex. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't get this. If you choose to bump bones with someone then you have decided that they are what you desire. If you didn't desire them then you wouldn't... So this "standards" bollocks makes no sense. Precisely. The reality is there is always going to be someone you theoretically fancy more than the person you are actually having sex with. Thus if you maintain that "standard" you will never have sex. " My thoughts exactly. I don't have a type, so do I have no standards? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't get this. If you choose to bump bones with someone then you have decided that they are what you desire. If you didn't desire them then you wouldn't... So this "standards" bollocks makes no sense. Precisely. The reality is there is always going to be someone you theoretically fancy more than the person you are actually having sex with. Thus if you maintain that "standard" you will never have sex. My thoughts exactly. I don't have a type, so do I have no standards? " "standards" is a stupid word to use in this context, as it implies some kind of moral judgment. As that great sage Adam Ant put it "don't you ever, don't you ever, lower yourself forgetting all your standards" Basically we all have certain physical and/or mental traits we find sexually arousing and we have sex with people who have those traits. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Thousands of Susan Boyles are getting fucked and loving it. Thousands of Les Dawsons are wanking into their socks and crying. If Susan Boyle is getting fucked (and loving it) by John Cena (who is hating himself), who is the loser? Stepping stones most of the time. Women need to be aware. I don't like the idea of them getting used and abused. Although a lot like that on here. It doesn't help them in the long run they become deluded. I do agree it's not good if they're being used and abused or deluded. But if they're riding that hot guy with their eyes wide open (and his are shut!) good for them. Yeah men would do the same if the roles were reversed. You can't blame them. They just still need a sense of reality. I hate feeling so deluded all the time What do you feel deluded about? That I’m so damn ugly and can pull fit men You have a different perception of deluded to me. I was being sarcastic about the deluded comment someone else posted. " Apologies x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't get this. If you choose to bump bones with someone then you have decided that they are what you desire. If you didn't desire them then you wouldn't... So this "standards" bollocks makes no sense. Precisely. The reality is there is always going to be someone you theoretically fancy more than the person you are actually having sex with. Thus if you maintain that "standard" you will never have sex. My thoughts exactly. I don't have a type, so do I have no standards? "standards" is a stupid word to use in this context, as it implies some kind of moral judgment. As that great sage Adam Ant put it "don't you ever, don't you ever, lower yourself forgetting all your standards" Basically we all have certain physical and/or mental traits we find sexually arousing and we have sex with people who have those traits. " I see people on using standards for women mostly for body shape and weight-sometimes adding face to it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't get this. If you choose to bump bones with someone then you have decided that they are what you desire. If you didn't desire them then you wouldn't... So this "standards" bollocks makes no sense. Precisely. The reality is there is always going to be someone you theoretically fancy more than the person you are actually having sex with. Thus if you maintain that "standard" you will never have sex. My thoughts exactly. I don't have a type, so do I have no standards? "standards" is a stupid word to use in this context, as it implies some kind of moral judgment. As that great sage Adam Ant put it "don't you ever, don't you ever, lower yourself forgetting all your standards" Basically we all have certain physical and/or mental traits we find sexually arousing and we have sex with people who have those traits. I see people on using standards for women mostly for body shape and weight-sometimes adding face to it. " And, I'll add, that they will see a body and want to fuck it, without seeing the face or knowing anything about the woman's personality. But, as long as the body is ok, that's ticking the standards box for them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't get this. If you choose to bump bones with someone then you have decided that they are what you desire. If you didn't desire them then you wouldn't... So this "standards" bollocks makes no sense. Precisely. The reality is there is always going to be someone you theoretically fancy more than the person you are actually having sex with. Thus if you maintain that "standard" you will never have sex. My thoughts exactly. I don't have a type, so do I have no standards? "standards" is a stupid word to use in this context, as it implies some kind of moral judgment. As that great sage Adam Ant put it "don't you ever, don't you ever, lower yourself forgetting all your standards" Basically we all have certain physical and/or mental traits we find sexually arousing and we have sex with people who have those traits. " I’ve been trying to say that this whole thread, basically you fuck who you are attracted too, if you’re not attracted to them what’s the point. Standards sounds like a bullshit term to me, where people are trying to put themselves on a pedestal. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't get this. If you choose to bump bones with someone then you have decided that they are what you desire. If you didn't desire them then you wouldn't... So this "standards" bollocks makes no sense. Precisely. The reality is there is always going to be someone you theoretically fancy more than the person you are actually having sex with. Thus if you maintain that "standard" you will never have sex. My thoughts exactly. I don't have a type, so do I have no standards? "standards" is a stupid word to use in this context, as it implies some kind of moral judgment. As that great sage Adam Ant put it "don't you ever, don't you ever, lower yourself forgetting all your standards" Basically we all have certain physical and/or mental traits we find sexually arousing and we have sex with people who have those traits. I see people on using standards for women mostly for body shape and weight-sometimes adding face to it. " I think that's right. The whole concept of "lowering standards" tends to misogyny. A lot of men see a hierarchy of status based on the women you fuck where youth and slimness get top marks. Hence a bloke having sex with someone not young and not slim is seen as lowering his standards. As I've said before I think the reality is, if given the choice, most men would prefer slim young women, but that doesn't mean they don't also fancy women not in those categories. Just less so. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't get this. If you choose to bump bones with someone then you have decided that they are what you desire. If you didn't desire them then you wouldn't... So this "standards" bollocks makes no sense. Precisely. The reality is there is always going to be someone you theoretically fancy more than the person you are actually having sex with. Thus if you maintain that "standard" you will never have sex. My thoughts exactly. I don't have a type, so do I have no standards? "standards" is a stupid word to use in this context, as it implies some kind of moral judgment. As that great sage Adam Ant put it "don't you ever, don't you ever, lower yourself forgetting all your standards" Basically we all have certain physical and/or mental traits we find sexually arousing and we have sex with people who have those traits. I’ve been trying to say that this whole thread, basically you fuck who you are attracted too, if you’re not attracted to them what’s the point. Standards sounds like a bullshit term to me, where people are trying to put themselves on a pedestal." It's fundamentally dehumanising. I apply standards to the food I eat and the books I read, not to the people I fuck. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't get this. If you choose to bump bones with someone then you have decided that they are what you desire. If you didn't desire them then you wouldn't... So this "standards" bollocks makes no sense. Precisely. The reality is there is always going to be someone you theoretically fancy more than the person you are actually having sex with. Thus if you maintain that "standard" you will never have sex. My thoughts exactly. I don't have a type, so do I have no standards? "standards" is a stupid word to use in this context, as it implies some kind of moral judgment. As that great sage Adam Ant put it "don't you ever, don't you ever, lower yourself forgetting all your standards" Basically we all have certain physical and/or mental traits we find sexually arousing and we have sex with people who have those traits. I see people on using standards for women mostly for body shape and weight-sometimes adding face to it. I think that's right. The whole concept of "lowering standards" tends to misogyny. A lot of men see a hierarchy of status based on the women you fuck where youth and slimness get top marks. Hence a bloke having sex with someone not young and not slim is seen as lowering his standards. As I've said before I think the reality is, if given the choice, most men would prefer slim young women, but that doesn't mean they don't also fancy women not in those categories. Just less so. " You mean what someone says on here and what they actually do can be very different?... shocking! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't get this. If you choose to bump bones with someone then you have decided that they are what you desire. If you didn't desire them then you wouldn't... So this "standards" bollocks makes no sense. Precisely. The reality is there is always going to be someone you theoretically fancy more than the person you are actually having sex with. Thus if you maintain that "standard" you will never have sex. My thoughts exactly. I don't have a type, so do I have no standards? "standards" is a stupid word to use in this context, as it implies some kind of moral judgment. As that great sage Adam Ant put it "don't you ever, don't you ever, lower yourself forgetting all your standards" Basically we all have certain physical and/or mental traits we find sexually arousing and we have sex with people who have those traits. I’ve been trying to say that this whole thread, basically you fuck who you are attracted too, if you’re not attracted to them what’s the point. Standards sounds like a bullshit term to me, where people are trying to put themselves on a pedestal. It's fundamentally dehumanising. I apply standards to the food I eat and the books I read, not to the people I fuck. " Totally. I wouldn’t ever say someone wasn’t up to my standard, just that I’m not attracted to them. No one is better or worse than anyone, it smacks of arrogance to think you do. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't get this. If you choose to bump bones with someone then you have decided that they are what you desire. If you didn't desire them then you wouldn't... So this "standards" bollocks makes no sense. Precisely. The reality is there is always going to be someone you theoretically fancy more than the person you are actually having sex with. Thus if you maintain that "standard" you will never have sex. My thoughts exactly. I don't have a type, so do I have no standards? "standards" is a stupid word to use in this context, as it implies some kind of moral judgment. As that great sage Adam Ant put it "don't you ever, don't you ever, lower yourself forgetting all your standards" Basically we all have certain physical and/or mental traits we find sexually arousing and we have sex with people who have those traits. I’ve been trying to say that this whole thread, basically you fuck who you are attracted too, if you’re not attracted to them what’s the point. Standards sounds like a bullshit term to me, where people are trying to put themselves on a pedestal. It's fundamentally dehumanising. I apply standards to the food I eat and the books I read, not to the people I fuck. " Where as I do apply the same to my men as I do to my food and books I read | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't get this. If you choose to bump bones with someone then you have decided that they are what you desire. If you didn't desire them then you wouldn't... So this "standards" bollocks makes no sense. Precisely. The reality is there is always going to be someone you theoretically fancy more than the person you are actually having sex with. Thus if you maintain that "standard" you will never have sex. My thoughts exactly. I don't have a type, so do I have no standards? "standards" is a stupid word to use in this context, as it implies some kind of moral judgment. As that great sage Adam Ant put it "don't you ever, don't you ever, lower yourself forgetting all your standards" Basically we all have certain physical and/or mental traits we find sexually arousing and we have sex with people who have those traits. I see people on using standards for women mostly for body shape and weight-sometimes adding face to it. I think that's right. The whole concept of "lowering standards" tends to misogyny. A lot of men see a hierarchy of status based on the women you fuck where youth and slimness get top marks. Hence a bloke having sex with someone not young and not slim is seen as lowering his standards. As I've said before I think the reality is, if given the choice, most men would prefer slim young women, but that doesn't mean they don't also fancy women not in those categories. Just less so. You mean what someone says on here and what they actually do can be very different?... shocking! " I often think this place would be a lot happier if we all accepted that the person we are shagging has a long list of people they'd rather have sex with. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Totally. I wouldn’t ever say someone wasn’t up to my standard, just that I’m not attracted to them. No one is better or worse than anyone, it smacks of arrogance to think you do. " For the first time ever, I actually agree with you. *doffs cap* | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't get this. If you choose to bump bones with someone then you have decided that they are what you desire. If you didn't desire them then you wouldn't... So this "standards" bollocks makes no sense. Precisely. The reality is there is always going to be someone you theoretically fancy more than the person you are actually having sex with. Thus if you maintain that "standard" you will never have sex. My thoughts exactly. I don't have a type, so do I have no standards? "standards" is a stupid word to use in this context, as it implies some kind of moral judgment. As that great sage Adam Ant put it "don't you ever, don't you ever, lower yourself forgetting all your standards" Basically we all have certain physical and/or mental traits we find sexually arousing and we have sex with people who have those traits. I’ve been trying to say that this whole thread, basically you fuck who you are attracted too, if you’re not attracted to them what’s the point. Standards sounds like a bullshit term to me, where people are trying to put themselves on a pedestal. It's fundamentally dehumanising. I apply standards to the food I eat and the books I read, not to the people I fuck. Where as I do apply the same to my men as I do to my food and books I read " I am afraid I am too much of an old lefty to apply a hierarchy of standards to people. There's people I fancy and people I don't. I don't think the latter are of a lower standard than the former. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't get this. If you choose to bump bones with someone then you have decided that they are what you desire. If you didn't desire them then you wouldn't... So this "standards" bollocks makes no sense. Precisely. The reality is there is always going to be someone you theoretically fancy more than the person you are actually having sex with. Thus if you maintain that "standard" you will never have sex. My thoughts exactly. I don't have a type, so do I have no standards? "standards" is a stupid word to use in this context, as it implies some kind of moral judgment. As that great sage Adam Ant put it "don't you ever, don't you ever, lower yourself forgetting all your standards" Basically we all have certain physical and/or mental traits we find sexually arousing and we have sex with people who have those traits. I see people on using standards for women mostly for body shape and weight-sometimes adding face to it. I think that's right. The whole concept of "lowering standards" tends to misogyny. A lot of men see a hierarchy of status based on the women you fuck where youth and slimness get top marks. Hence a bloke having sex with someone not young and not slim is seen as lowering his standards. As I've said before I think the reality is, if given the choice, most men would prefer slim young women, but that doesn't mean they don't also fancy women not in those categories. Just less so. " Hmmmm I'm not sure I agree just because a person is young and or slim doesn't necessarily make them attractive. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |