FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Is the 'sexuality' on your profile correct?
Is the 'sexuality' on your profile correct?
Jump to: Newest in thread
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Is the 'sexuality' information on your profile correct? If not, why not?
Is your sexuality not listed or did you choose the wrong one on purpose? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I don’t even know |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago
Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound |
There wasn't an option for 'Selfish'. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Fab straight should be an option. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
lol,,ask any ts on here if their happy being called a tv |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *lceeWoman
over a year ago
Leeds |
Yeah, mine’s about right. I keep flirting with pansexual but I’m pretty much just bi.
Wait a sec...does that make me Fab bi? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
I chose bi-curious because I'm not completely straight but the site doesn't give enough options.
I'm more bi-playful or hetero-flexible but only in the right circumstances. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I think so.... I've got a cock and it says I'm male I hope. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
You little imp you provoking thus question!
Me thinks no FAB straight guy will ever confess publicly to fancying a sausage every now and then ! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Mmmmmm smoked sausage..... |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Cumberland, Lincolnshire or plain pork? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
No im a lesbian |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *100Man
over a year ago
Essex |
Mine is correct I'm 100% straight but am bi curious not active bi curious but will change it if I get lucky |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Bi lady here xx |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Mine is assuredly correct. Alas, many fab-straight fellas seem to not believe me going by their messages. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *iss SJWoman
over a year ago
Hull |
I did used to have bi curious but got too many messages wanting me to join couples and some where quite persistent as if the curious bit wasn’t even considered. I changed it to straight and decided to keep any curiousness between me and people who I trust and like and who won’t pressure me into anything. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Cumberland, Lincolnshire or plain pork?"
Do bratwurst count as sausages? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *LawMan
over a year ago
Bradford |
Yep. Not that it makes a difference. I dont think people read it. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *eliWoman
over a year ago
. |
Hmmm. I'm bi but right now I'd say I'm more heterosexual but very bi for the right woman? Fuck knows what that is. That isn't even a thing, is it? I'm basically bi.
Yeah, my profile is right. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Mine is assuredly correct. Alas, many fab-straight fellas seem to not believe me going by their messages."
this
i would like to keep my filters open to guys who need a straight wingman or are organising gangbangs etc but my utter 100% straighness does nothing to deter homosexual men from sending unwanted requests....so i have to keep the no single guys filter on |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Yes and no as im mostly gay and only do stuff with women if I'm desperate normally or meeting a couple |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Yeah I have had relationships and am sexually attracted to both sexes. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Cumberland, Lincolnshire or plain pork?
Do bratwurst count as sausages? " mmmmm brotwurst and Frankfurters..... Thanks now I'm hungry haha |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Yes it is.
I tried a woman and it didn't inspire me to try another.
I have no intention of meeting a woman on here for sex. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Yes.. have been attracted to a woman once but not for over 10 years. Totally into men but would never say never.. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
[Removed by poster at 23/02/19 20:21:54] |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Not really I have more of a pansexual orientation than bisexual, however I don’t practise it, and for the last 9 years have only had heterosexual sex. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
To be honest I’d say “heteex”
I don’t fancy men but in certain situations who knows |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Pretty much.
My curiosity fluctuates but it's not currently at a level that would make me change my 'sexuality'. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Damn emoji haha
H e t e r o f l e x |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Yep! She bi curious he's straight |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Yes, seem pointless lying to me |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *rivateparts!Man
over a year ago
Walking down the only road I've ever known! |
That's what it says on my birth certificate. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
I have mine listed as straight, cause when a guy is sucking me off I imagine he is a girl, ortherwise i go floppy. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *itty9899Man
over a year ago
Craggy Island |
I wanted a trysexual... I'll try anything once. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Strictly fanny |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
I changed mine to straight as was sick of couples expecting me to play woth the woman whether i found her attractive or not |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I did used to have bi curious but got too many messages wanting me to join couples and some where quite persistent as if the curious bit wasn’t even considered. I changed it to straight and decided to keep any curiousness between me and people who I trust and like and who won’t pressure me into anything. "
Ditto I feel exactly the same. However, more recently I’ve been fantasising more about the ladies |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It is yes. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *icketysplitsWoman
over a year ago
Way over Yonder, that's where I'm bound |
"I changed mine to straight as was sick of couples expecting me to play woth the woman whether i found her attractive or not"
Mine says straight and I still get those messages. I tell them that I'm happy for her to go down on me as long as I find him attractive but I'm not interested in going down on either of them. They tend not to respond after that. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Yes it’s correct |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Given the volume of 'straight' men that have contacted me, there are many with the wrong descriptor. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *oxy_minxWoman
over a year ago
Scotland - Aberdeen |
Mine is correct as a straight lady here |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Yes I put bi curious because I love sharing my cock orally with wife and hubby there is nothing more sexy when they are both on there knees sharing sucking my cock |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Bi-curious on my profile. In the interests of pleasurable pursuits I am bi-playful.
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Yes |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Yes mine is totally correct. Am fully bi and love the curves on a woman's body especially boobs. Xx |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *an_LexaCouple
over a year ago
Sunderland |
Well bisexual is the best fit option although I guess I would choose pan had it been there instead as I think it’s a much better descriptive.
Lex |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Straight as the profile says, have no interest in pursuing solo sausage. But if I happen to cross swords during play with a couple I won't need therapy to get over it |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I chose bi-curious because I'm not completely straight but the site doesn't give enough options.
I'm more bi-playful or hetero-flexible but only in the right circumstances."
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *eeBee67Man
over a year ago
Masked and Distant |
I've checked.
I've thought about it.
And yes I'm still straight, not fab straight.....Just straight. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Yes, mine is correct, I'm definitely bisexual. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I am only bi on the 29th February |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Probably, I certainly register that certain women are sexually attractive. However I'm not sure enough to actually progress further than admire from afar |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I am only bi on the 29th February"
That's the day I get laid |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Nope. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I am only bi on the 29th February
That's the day I get laid"
You are welcome dude |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Yeah, mine’s about right. I keep flirting with pansexual but I’m pretty much just bi.
Wait a sec...does that make me Fab bi? "
Pansexual would be a good addition but most people won't know what it means.
Some sites have explanations to help people pick the sexuality that they feel fits them best. Or more than 1 tick. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I chose bi-curious because I'm not completely straight but the site doesn't give enough options.
I'm more bi-playful or hetero-flexible but only in the right circumstances."
"Only in the right circumstances" - good point. I find that someone saying they are bi means people assume they will definitely play with everyone. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Nosey cunt aren’t you |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Sam = yes
Lacey = yes
We are telling the truth about our sexuality.
Hope this helps |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I chose bi-curious because I'm not completely straight but the site doesn't give enough options.
I'm more bi-playful or hetero-flexible but only in the right circumstances.
"Only in the right circumstances" - good point. I find that someone saying they are bi means people assume they will definitely play with everyone. "
Thisis what I find too. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Everything contained in our profile is correct apart from our usernames. We really don't see the point of lying about anything on here and when we find out folks have lied to us it's the end of our communication and anything that might have been arranged. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Very correct. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Interesting question, to answer it in full, thanks for asking. Hope this clears up any confusion. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Nosey cunt aren’t you "
Is that a bad thing? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar.
Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders.
I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality.
One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter".
99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes.
I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested.
A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi.
once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing.
I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box.
Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with.
Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label.
If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
apology for the many typos.. I was eager to express that and didn't bother checking for mistakes, of which there are many. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *r.BlondeMan
over a year ago
Chester/Wirral |
No, because Straight has lost it's meaning on here. So mine should be super 100% Straight. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar.
Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders.
I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality.
One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter".
99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes.
I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested.
A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi.
once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing.
I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box.
Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with.
Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label.
If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me."
Nobody gets to label you.
It is what it is. Whatever that may be. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar.
Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders.
I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality.
One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter".
99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes.
I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested.
A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi.
once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing.
I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box.
Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with.
Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label.
If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me.
Nobody gets to label you.
It is what it is. Whatever that may be. "
That's how I feel.
"I am what I am" Popeye
People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *r.BlondeMan
over a year ago
Chester/Wirral |
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar.
Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders.
I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality.
One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter".
99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes.
I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested.
A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi.
once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing.
I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box.
Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with.
Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label.
If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me.
Nobody gets to label you.
It is what it is. Whatever that may be.
That's how I feel.
"I am what I am" Popeye
People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift." You're definitely not Straight so that should go out the window. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar.
Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders.
I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality.
One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter".
99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes.
I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested.
A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi.
once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing.
I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box.
Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with.
Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label.
If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me.
Nobody gets to label you.
It is what it is. Whatever that may be.
That's how I feel.
"I am what I am" Popeye
People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift."
Totally. Choose something that you're most comfortable with. The only people that need any kind of explanation are the ones you like as people through conversation. The observers don't matter. They may be the loudest sometimes but their opinion doesn't mean a thing. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No, because Straight has lost it's meaning on here. So mine should be super 100% Straight. "
A man comfortable with his sexuality wouldn’t need to protest so much. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The more cocks I see on here the straighter I get. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *olgateMan
over a year ago
on the road to nowhere in particular |
"Is the 'sexuality' information on your profile correct? If not, why not?
Is your sexuality not listed or did you choose the wrong one on purpose?"
They didn’t recognise Jedi as a recognised sexuality |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar.
Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders.
I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality.
One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter".
99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes.
I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested.
A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi.
once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing.
I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box.
Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with.
Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label.
If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me.
Nobody gets to label you.
It is what it is. Whatever that may be.
That's how I feel.
"I am what I am" Popeye
People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift.
Totally. Choose something that you're most comfortable with. The only people that need any kind of explanation are the ones you like as people through conversation. The observers don't matter. They may be the loudest sometimes but their opinion doesn't mean a thing. "
But I may upset men and women like Mr.Blonde Give them a false impression and they'll be angry if I slept with them and wasn't 'honest' about it. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *emini ManMan
over a year ago
There and to the left a bit |
My sexuality on here is 100% accurate as I perceive it and I'm actually the only one that can perceive it as such.
Much is made of the need to label on here, and I'm actually in two minds as to whether it really matters - does the phenomenon of "Fab straight" bother me? Not really, as it doesn't impact me at all as I wouldn't meet anyone identifying as straight who contacted me, as personally I figure if they are lying about their sexuality what else are they lying about (their marital status? Their approach to sexual health?).
Does lying about your sexuality as a guy bemuse me? Yes it does, but only because most of the time it's done to get round the filters of those that won't meet bisexual men, without realising that by doing so they're potentially closing the door on a large number that either actively seek bisexual men, or are not bothered by them either way (as evidence for this a survey carried out on here earlier in the week showed that over 80% of people replying were not bothered if a guy is bisexual, and over 30% would go out of their way to do so).
Having said all that, I appreciate there are situations like my good friend Genghis above, where there currently isn't a specific "cap that fits" but am not sure exactly what the answer to that one is, other than perhaps "labels are for tombstones baby" (copyright Yaphet Koto in Live & Let Die) in some instances.
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *r.BlondeMan
over a year ago
Chester/Wirral |
"No, because Straight has lost it's meaning on here. So mine should be super 100% Straight.
A man comfortable with his sexuality wouldn’t need to protest so much. " I'm perfectly comfortable, the gays love me too. I think it's the hair. I'd be getting more action than Liam Neeson if i was that way inclined. You know the delusion on here. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
I've bi-curious on mine, but it's not completely accurate. I'm not curious at all... But I'm also rarely sexually attracted to other women. There's no 'occasionally bi' option |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *olgateMan
over a year ago
on the road to nowhere in particular |
Camden council have just announced that you get a 10% parking discount if you register as gender neutral |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"My sexuality on here is 100% accurate as I perceive it and I'm actually the only one that can perceive it as such.
Much is made of the need to label on here, and I'm actually in two minds as to whether it really matters - does the phenomenon of "Fab straight" bother me? Not really, as it doesn't impact me at all as I wouldn't meet anyone identifying as straight who contacted me, as personally I figure if they are lying about their sexuality what else are they lying about (their marital status? Their approach to sexual health?).
Does lying about your sexuality as a guy bemuse me? Yes it does, but only because most of the time it's done to get round the filters of those that won't meet bisexual men, without realising that by doing so they're potentially closing the door on a large number that either actively seek bisexual men, or are not bothered by them either way (as evidence for this a survey carried out on here earlier in the week showed that over 80% of people replying were not bothered if a guy is bisexual, and over 30% would go out of their way to do so).
Having said all that, I appreciate there are situations like my good friend Genghis above, where there currently isn't a specific "cap that fits" but am not sure exactly what the answer to that one is, other than perhaps "labels are for tombstones baby" (copyright Yaphet Koto in Live & Let Die) in some instances.
"
There is an exception to every rule |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No, because Straight has lost it's meaning on here. So mine should be super 100% Straight.
A man comfortable with his sexuality wouldn’t need to protest so much. I'm perfectly comfortable, the gays love me too. I think it's the hair. I'd be getting more action than Liam Neeson if i was that way inclined. You know the delusion on here. "
Do you wear a T shirt saying ‘100% straight’ when you’re out so the gays no where they stand ? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No, because Straight has lost it's meaning on here. So mine should be super 100% Straight.
A man comfortable with his sexuality wouldn’t need to protest so much. I'm perfectly comfortable, the gays love me too. I think it's the hair. I'd be getting more action than Liam Neeson if i was that way inclined. You know the delusion on here.
Do you wear a T shirt saying ‘100% straight’ when you’re out so the gays no where they stand ? "
I think he has it on right now. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar.
Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders.
I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality.
One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter".
99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes.
I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested.
A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi.
once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing.
I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box.
Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with.
Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label.
If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me.
Nobody gets to label you.
It is what it is. Whatever that may be.
That's how I feel.
"I am what I am" Popeye
People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift.
Totally. Choose something that you're most comfortable with. The only people that need any kind of explanation are the ones you like as people through conversation. The observers don't matter. They may be the loudest sometimes but their opinion doesn't mean a thing.
But I may upset men and women like Mr.Blonde Give them a false impression and they'll be angry if I slept with them and wasn't 'honest' about it. "
You're not dishonest to people you interact with or plan to have sex with. Who cares about the rest.. they've nothing to be angry about if they're not having sex with you. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No, because Straight has lost it's meaning on here. So mine should be super 100% Straight.
A man comfortable with his sexuality wouldn’t need to protest so much. I'm perfectly comfortable, the gays love me too. I think it's the hair. I'd be getting more action than Liam Neeson if i was that way inclined. You know the delusion on here.
Do you wear a T shirt saying ‘100% straight’ when you’re out so the gays no where they stand ?
I think he has it on right now. "
Just choking on my tea |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *r.BlondeMan
over a year ago
Chester/Wirral |
"No, because Straight has lost it's meaning on here. So mine should be super 100% Straight.
A man comfortable with his sexuality wouldn’t need to protest so much. I'm perfectly comfortable, the gays love me too. I think it's the hair. I'd be getting more action than Liam Neeson if i was that way inclined. You know the delusion on here.
Do you wear a T shirt saying ‘100% straight’ when you’re out so the gays no where they stand ? " I went a gay bar once after a club with my friend a bisexual DJ. He said there'd be loads of nice women. Trying to pull a lesbian was like getting blood out of a stone. One said to me "Aren't you butch". I said " Nah, I'm just Straight mate". |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *emini ManMan
over a year ago
There and to the left a bit |
"My sexuality on here is 100% accurate as I perceive it and I'm actually the only one that can perceive it as such.
Much is made of the need to label on here, and I'm actually in two minds as to whether it really matters - does the phenomenon of "Fab straight" bother me? Not really, as it doesn't impact me at all as I wouldn't meet anyone identifying as straight who contacted me, as personally I figure if they are lying about their sexuality what else are they lying about (their marital status? Their approach to sexual health?).
Does lying about your sexuality as a guy bemuse me? Yes it does, but only because most of the time it's done to get round the filters of those that won't meet bisexual men, without realising that by doing so they're potentially closing the door on a large number that either actively seek bisexual men, or are not bothered by them either way (as evidence for this a survey carried out on here earlier in the week showed that over 80% of people replying were not bothered if a guy is bisexual, and over 30% would go out of their way to do so).
Having said all that, I appreciate there are situations like my good friend Genghis above, where there currently isn't a specific "cap that fits" but am not sure exactly what the answer to that one is, other than perhaps "labels are for tombstones baby" (copyright Yaphet Koto in Live & Let Die) in some instances.
There is an exception to every rule "
Bloody big ones sometimes
It does seem to be a Fab specific thing though - you don't go through day to day life advising people of your sexuality - even in a situation where you're likely to get sexual. For instance if I were to go to a club on a non-bi night, it's unlikely I'd be asked my sexuality, or feel the need to express it - people would have no way of knowing.
I express mine on here as I am open to meeting other guys one to one for sex, now I haven't done so to date, but if the right guy were to happen along and all the usual things of connection and chemistry were there, then I'd be open to it, so by identifying as bisexual here, it gives that potential meet a chance to find me, or me them.
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar.
Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders.
I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality.
One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter".
99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes.
I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested.
A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi.
once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing.
I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box.
Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with.
Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label.
If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me.
Nobody gets to label you.
It is what it is. Whatever that may be.
That's how I feel.
"I am what I am" Popeye
People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift.
Totally. Choose something that you're most comfortable with. The only people that need any kind of explanation are the ones you like as people through conversation. The observers don't matter. They may be the loudest sometimes but their opinion doesn't mean a thing.
But I may upset men and women like Mr.Blonde Give them a false impression and they'll be angry if I slept with them and wasn't 'honest' about it.
You're not dishonest to people you interact with or plan to have sex with. Who cares about the rest.. they've nothing to be angry about if they're not having sex with you. "
It may sound odd, but I'd still like them to like me, see me as honest and non deceitful. If I'm commenting on something clearly in the realms of bisexualdom I'm going to constantly called 'Fabstraight' Which if Tame made a joke at me about, given he knows my real nature now. Would be recieved as a joke between 'Friends'. From someone who didn't, it'd just provoke another boring discussion about the dynamics of sexuality. Defending what I am and how I see myself.
"Bi-Annually" Probably sums it up just about right.
Hey Mods! Can I switch my sexuality please? Make a new button, I think I've got one. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *emini ManMan
over a year ago
There and to the left a bit |
"
"Bi-Annually" Probably sums it up just about right.
Hey Mods! Can I switch my sexuality please? Make a new button, I think I've got one. "
Bi-annually or bi-anally??!! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar.
Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders.
I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality.
One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter".
99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes.
I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested.
A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi.
once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing.
I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box.
Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with.
Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label.
If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me.
Nobody gets to label you.
It is what it is. Whatever that may be.
That's how I feel.
"I am what I am" Popeye
People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift.
Totally. Choose something that you're most comfortable with. The only people that need any kind of explanation are the ones you like as people through conversation. The observers don't matter. They may be the loudest sometimes but their opinion doesn't mean a thing.
But I may upset men and women like Mr.Blonde Give them a false impression and they'll be angry if I slept with them and wasn't 'honest' about it.
You're not dishonest to people you interact with or plan to have sex with. Who cares about the rest.. they've nothing to be angry about if they're not having sex with you.
It may sound odd, but I'd still like them to like me, see me as honest and non deceitful. If I'm commenting on something clearly in the realms of bisexualdom I'm going to constantly called 'Fabstraight' Which if Tame made a joke at me about, given he knows my real nature now. Would be recieved as a joke between 'Friends'. From someone who didn't, it'd just provoke another boring discussion about the dynamics of sexuality. Defending what I am and how I see myself.
"Bi-Annually" Probably sums it up just about right.
Hey Mods! Can I switch my sexuality please? Make a new button, I think I've got one. "
Ha ha it's only for you to decide Christ yes make up your own definition and enjoy it. There will always be some bugger trying to get a rise so grab it and own it!! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
"Bi-Annually" Probably sums it up just about right.
Hey Mods! Can I switch my sexuality please? Make a new button, I think I've got one.
Bi-annually or bi-anally??!! "
Ha ha ha trust you!!! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"
"Bi-Annually" Probably sums it up just about right.
Hey Mods! Can I switch my sexuality please? Make a new button, I think I've got one.
Bi-annually or bi-anally??!! "
Both |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Mine wasn't listed so I wrote it in my profile. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Not really ... But it doesn't have bi-comfortable lol |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Mine wasn't listed so I wrote it in my profile. "
OMG That has to be THE longest one I've EVER seen
"I may be gone for some time..." |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Most of my profiles are mostly accurate. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Most of my profiles are mostly accurate. "
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Yes. Straight and never even been curious about another woman |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Mines incorrect now. Was curious now can say sexual.... love it lol |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Mine wasn't listed so I wrote it in my profile.
OMG That has to be THE longest one I've EVER seen
"I may be gone for some time...""
My poor aching brain |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *olgateMan
over a year ago
on the road to nowhere in particular |
"Mine wasn't listed so I wrote it in my profile.
OMG That has to be THE longest one I've EVER seen
"I may be gone for some time...""
War and Peace was a quick read compared to that |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Mine wasn't listed so I wrote it in my profile. "
Wow... couldn't resist a peak but didn't have the staying power to read through it. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"I chose bi-curious because I'm not completely straight but the site doesn't give enough options.
I'm more bi-playful or hetero-flexible but only in the right circumstances."
This is me also - Fi |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar.
Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders.
I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality.
One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter".
99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes.
I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested.
A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi.
once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing.
I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box.
Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with.
Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label.
If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me.
Nobody gets to label you.
It is what it is. Whatever that may be.
That's how I feel.
"I am what I am" Popeye
People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift.
Totally. Choose something that you're most comfortable with. The only people that need any kind of explanation are the ones you like as people through conversation. The observers don't matter. They may be the loudest sometimes but their opinion doesn't mean a thing.
But I may upset men and women like Mr.Blonde Give them a false impression and they'll be angry if I slept with them and wasn't 'honest' about it.
You're not dishonest to people you interact with or plan to have sex with. Who cares about the rest.. they've nothing to be angry about if they're not having sex with you. "
I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar.
Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders.
I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality.
One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter".
99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes.
I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested.
A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi.
once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing.
I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box.
Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with.
Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label.
If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me.
Nobody gets to label you.
It is what it is. Whatever that may be.
That's how I feel.
"I am what I am" Popeye
People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift.
Totally. Choose something that you're most comfortable with. The only people that need any kind of explanation are the ones you like as people through conversation. The observers don't matter. They may be the loudest sometimes but their opinion doesn't mean a thing.
But I may upset men and women like Mr.Blonde Give them a false impression and they'll be angry if I slept with them and wasn't 'honest' about it.
You're not dishonest to people you interact with or plan to have sex with. Who cares about the rest.. they've nothing to be angry about if they're not having sex with you.
I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. "
Amen, I want what I want when I want it |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Mine wasn't listed so I wrote it in my profile. "
Is this profile available on kindle |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Mine is very clear on my profile.. Honesty is best policy |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No. I I dont believe it is. I feel pressurised to conform, so that I can 'fit in' with everyone else round here. Not be mocked for hiding parts of me I would prefer to remain private. Believe it or not, I actually care what people think of me, I want them.to like me for who I am and I don't want to be viewed a deceptive, or a liar.
Given the level of sexuality I'm comfortable with and the acts I've done. There is no question I'm happy to experiment with both genders.
I've asked some people whose opinion I value and respect about this. Told them what I am, what I do and how frequently in do it. Because I trust them to be honest with me and I know they know their stuff when it comes to sexuality.
One person says I'm "Bi-situational" or "Bi-confomist". Another says I'm neither "Bi-sexual", nor Bi-Curious, though she didn't say what she thought I was. Another just said I'm possibly "Person specific" or just "Comfortable enough in myself for it not to matter".
99.9% of my waking life I think, look, act and behave like a masculine, cheeky gent. I identify as a Straight Man. I only find the most convincing of the trans community physically attractive. I can kiss them and fuck them exactly as I would if they were female by birth. Provided they meet the rest of my hidden tickboxes.
I could NEVER kiss a man. The idea makes me uncomfortable and react much the same way any straight man would at the thought of it. I can't fuck men. My body even tell a me so, I flop off instantly if the ideas even suggested.
A tiny part of me has a fetish like attraction to D/s BDSM-Esque Roleplay. It's in this instance and this instance alone that I've been comfy enough to play with my bisexilusl side. Dressed as Cixi.
once a year, or when I feel I deserve a good punishing.
I'd like to know how to label myself so I dont get messages from men who want to suck my cock all night long. From men who want to fuck me right here, right now. From men looking for a boyfriend. From Tv's and transgender that I hate having to decline based on physical attraction alone. From rude couples who assume things about me and treat me like a tool in their sex box.
Most upsetting of all is it puts some people off me, when they've really no idea what I get up to, how often I get up to it, who I get up to it with.
Lots of assumptions by lots of different people. Most of which are incorrect. All because of one fucking label.
If there's a better label that suits me and would make everyone happier, then I'm open to switching it around, because this ones a bit itchy for me.
Nobody gets to label you.
It is what it is. Whatever that may be.
That's how I feel.
"I am what I am" Popeye
People do label, so if they're going to.. I'd rather wear one that paints a clearer picture. I don't want to be left on the shelf because I'm misunderstood. I also don't want to be returned because customer bought the wrong item.. if you catch my drift.
Totally. Choose something that you're most comfortable with. The only people that need any kind of explanation are the ones you like as people through conversation. The observers don't matter. They may be the loudest sometimes but their opinion doesn't mean a thing.
But I may upset men and women like Mr.Blonde Give them a false impression and they'll be angry if I slept with them and wasn't 'honest' about it.
You're not dishonest to people you interact with or plan to have sex with. Who cares about the rest.. they've nothing to be angry about if they're not having sex with you.
I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box. "
I like that idea a lot. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
All present and correct... |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Just checked , yes it is |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *emini ManMan
over a year ago
There and to the left a bit |
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box.
I like that idea a lot."
That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently.
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
I’d prefer mine to say ‘bi-friendly’ or ‘bi-playful ‘ - but that’s not an option!
I’ll never be fully bi - I’d never have a relationship (in that sense) with a woman and it’s very rare I play with a woman without a man present (I like cock far too much)
To me, men are the cake, and a hot woman is the icing on top of it - particularly when her ‘cake’ is fucking me from behind whilst I give her attention!
I thoroughly enjoy having cake at clubs and parties! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Yes |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
I've ticked Bi Sexual
Not sure it's 100% accurate.
I'm past the curious stage, I find some women incredibly attractive.
I'm comfortable in a mixed situation, but have only had a couple of 1:1 encounters with another lady.
I think if Bi Playful was an option I'd have ticked that. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box.
I like that idea a lot.
That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently.
"
Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I’d prefer mine to say ‘bi-friendly’ or ‘bi-playful ‘ - but that’s not an option!
I’ll never be fully bi - I’d never have a relationship (in that sense) with a woman and it’s very rare I play with a woman without a man present (I like cock far too much)
To me, men are the cake, and a hot woman is the icing on top of it - particularly when her ‘cake’ is fucking me from behind whilst I give her attention!
I thoroughly enjoy having cake at clubs and parties! "
I've changed my mind on this a bit. As you say, you wouldn't have a relationship with a woman but you'd play with one.
So I feel the sexuality 'label' on profiles is misleading and unnecessary. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I’d prefer mine to say ‘bi-friendly’ or ‘bi-playful ‘ - but that’s not an option!
I’ll never be fully bi - I’d never have a relationship (in that sense) with a woman and it’s very rare I play with a woman without a man present (I like cock far too much)
To me, men are the cake, and a hot woman is the icing on top of it - particularly when her ‘cake’ is fucking me from behind whilst I give her attention!
I thoroughly enjoy having cake at clubs and parties!
I've changed my mind on this a bit. As you say, you wouldn't have a relationship with a woman but you'd play with one.
So I feel the sexuality 'label' on profiles is misleading and unnecessary. "
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *emini ManMan
over a year ago
There and to the left a bit |
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box.
I like that idea a lot.
That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently.
Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches. "
They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless.
It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches.
Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion.
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box.
I like that idea a lot.
That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently.
Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches.
They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless.
It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches.
Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion.
"
It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest.
Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Yes |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box.
I like that idea a lot.
That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently.
Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches.
They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless.
It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches.
Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion.
It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest.
Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink."
Same for me. I got much more interest from blokes when I identified as straight. It’s one of the big advantages of identifying as bi as well as having a ridiculous profile.Like you I’m predominantly heterosexual too and haven’t practised my bisexuality for 9 years. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box.
I like that idea a lot.
That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently.
Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches.
They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless.
It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches.
Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion.
It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest.
Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink.
Same for me. I got much more interest from blokes when I identified as straight. It’s one of the big advantages of identifying as bi as well as having a ridiculous profile.Like you I’m predominantly heterosexual too and haven’t practised my bisexuality for 9 years."
I love how open and honest you 2 are.
P |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *emini ManMan
over a year ago
There and to the left a bit |
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box.
I like that idea a lot.
That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently.
Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches.
They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless.
It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches.
Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion.
It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest.
Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink.
Same for me. I got much more interest from blokes when I identified as straight. It’s one of the big advantages of identifying as bi as well as having a ridiculous profile.Like you I’m predominantly heterosexual too and haven’t practised my bisexuality for 9 years."
So that's where I'm going wrong!! I get the occasional message from other guys but that's it - so I need to go Fab straight you think? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box.
I like that idea a lot.
That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently.
Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches.
They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless.
It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches.
Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion.
It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest.
Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink.
Same for me. I got much more interest from blokes when I identified as straight. It’s one of the big advantages of identifying as bi as well as having a ridiculous profile.Like you I’m predominantly heterosexual too and haven’t practised my bisexuality for 9 years.
So that's where I'm going wrong!! I get the occasional message from other guys but that's it - so I need to go Fab straight you think? "
Most definately.. Only they tend to be sub bottoms that send you the messages. Wanting instant gratification. Not sure if that's what you're seeking my friend |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box.
I like that idea a lot.
That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently.
Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches.
They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless.
It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches.
Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion.
It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest.
Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink.
Same for me. I got much more interest from blokes when I identified as straight. It’s one of the big advantages of identifying as bi as well as having a ridiculous profile.Like you I’m predominantly heterosexual too and haven’t practised my bisexuality for 9 years."
thanks for sharing that.. it makes me feel less of a wierdo |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Yes |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By *emini ManMan
over a year ago
There and to the left a bit |
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box.
I like that idea a lot.
That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently.
Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches.
They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless.
It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches.
Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion.
It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest.
Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink.
Same for me. I got much more interest from blokes when I identified as straight. It’s one of the big advantages of identifying as bi as well as having a ridiculous profile.Like you I’m predominantly heterosexual too and haven’t practised my bisexuality for 9 years.
thanks for sharing that.. it makes me feel less of a wierdo "
You two carry on I'm going to revoke your membership of the club |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Is the 'sexuality' information on your profile correct? If not, why not?
Is your sexuality not listed or did you choose the wrong one on purpose?"
No because queer isn't an option so had to go with bi
Ms Icebreaker |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box.
I like that idea a lot.
That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently.
Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches.
They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless.
It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches.
Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion.
It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest.
Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink.
Same for me. I got much more interest from blokes when I identified as straight. It’s one of the big advantages of identifying as bi as well as having a ridiculous profile.Like you I’m predominantly heterosexual too and haven’t practised my bisexuality for 9 years.
thanks for sharing that.. it makes me feel less of a wierdo
You two carry on I'm going to revoke your membership of the club "
Can we still be mates though? If not I'll stay bi thanks |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I’m bisexual and proud |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Not that I’ve had an fem fun for ages! Maybe I’ve reverted back to straight |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
[Removed by poster at 25/02/19 18:03:13] |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Yes, I don't see the point in lying |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Not that I’ve had an fem fun for ages! Maybe I’ve reverted back to straight "
I wonder if sexuality expires. If we don't keep up with it, we can't claim to be bi anymore. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Is the 'sexuality' information on your profile correct? If not, why not?
Is your sexuality not listed or did you choose the wrong one on purpose?
No because queer isn't an option so had to go with bi
Ms Icebreaker "
How would you describe queer?
I love that word. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Cumberland, Lincolnshire or plain pork?
Do bratwurst count as sausages? mmmmm brotwurst and Frankfurters..... Thanks now I'm hungry haha "
What about square sausage |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Not that I’ve had an fem fun for ages! Maybe I’ve reverted back to straight
I wonder if sexuality expires. If we don't keep up with it, we can't claim to be bi anymore. "
Sexuality Fluidity? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Not that I’ve had an fem fun for ages! Maybe I’ve reverted back to straight
I wonder if sexuality expires. If we don't keep up with it, we can't claim to be bi anymore.
Sexuality Fluidity?"
That's probably a thing, yes. Different time in life, different friends, different desires. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box.
I like that idea a lot.
That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently.
Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches.
They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless.
It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches.
Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion.
It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest.
Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink.
Same for me. I got much more interest from blokes when I identified as straight. It’s one of the big advantages of identifying as bi as well as having a ridiculous profile.Like you I’m predominantly heterosexual too and haven’t practised my bisexuality for 9 years.
thanks for sharing that.. it makes me feel less of a wierdo
You two carry on I'm going to revoke your membership of the club "
Oh I’ll make an exception for you Bro. Brace |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Not that I’ve had an fem fun for ages! Maybe I’ve reverted back to straight
I wonder if sexuality expires. If we don't keep up with it, we can't claim to be bi anymore. "
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
If it says desperate then yes |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'd prefer the sexuality tick to be removed from profiles. We only need the 'looking for' box.
I like that idea a lot.
That wouldn't be any different than having the sexuality labels there though - men who currently list as straight when they are bisexual, wouldn't list looking for men suddenly for example, so would be the same situation just presented differently.
Fair point but many women and couples are looking for men but don't have them on the 'looking for' list because it takes us off the searches.
They don't - primarily because they do their own searches and contact the single men they want to - but removing the sexuality box would make no difference to that - sexuality would still be "indicated" by whether a guy had "looking for men" ticked so removing the sexuality field would be pointless.
It would also make doing those searches a lot harder for those that do look for bisexual guys as they'd no longer be able to tick the "who is bi-sexual" box when doing those searches.
Agree that the whole topic of sexuality is contentious on here and open to individual interpretation, and whilst that remains the case, there is no easy clear cut answer but removing the sexuality box is certainly not it in my opinion.
It'd clear up my situation a bit, mind you. I always got more interest than I ever wanted from many TV/TS profiles and men, as a Straight profile, than I do as a bisexual profile. Something I find pretty bizarre if I'm honest.
Was treated with far less respect than I am now I'm less clear about my sexuality. Possibly because all the fuck-and-go people are predominantly male and scared off by my need for a mental connection.. which is only really applicable to women. As they are the only group of people I want to get really intimate with, which is why I consider myself 99.9% Straight.. with a kink.
Same for me. I got much more interest from blokes when I identified as straight. It’s one of the big advantages of identifying as bi as well as having a ridiculous profile.Like you I’m predominantly heterosexual too and haven’t practised my bisexuality for 9 years.
thanks for sharing that.. it makes me feel less of a wierdo
You two carry on I'm going to revoke your membership of the club
Oh I’ll make an exception for you Bro. Brace "
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I feel straight at the moment so I'm going with that
I have been with women and had a 4 year relationship with a woman - but a very long time ago - and don't feel the urge for any girly action these days.
Maybe it makes me the female equivalent of Fab Straight |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It’s correct, why lie? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Is the 'sexuality' information on your profile correct? If not, why not?
Is your sexuality not listed or did you choose the wrong one on purpose?
No because queer isn't an option so had to go with bi
Ms Icebreaker
How would you describe queer?
I love that word. " I can't speak for Ms Icebreaker but for me my queerness is defined by the fact that I not only am fluid in my tastes (with regard to gender and sexual orientation) but I accept that that fluidity is an unexceptional state of being. I grew up with a host of sources around me in terms of speculative fiction, fabulous music and great people who made the idea of two genders or fixed categories of sexual orientation irrelevant. SO, like Ms Icebreaker I'm gleefuly queer...
Mr Icebreaker |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Probably 70 percent of men’s are incorrect, or there isn’t a “fab straight” box to tick |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
No im a scousexual |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
Ours - like the rest of our profile - is correct.
We don't see the point of not being entirely honest. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Probably 70 percent of men’s are incorrect, or there isn’t a “fab straight” box to tick "
How did you arrive at this conclusion and where are the facts to back up your findings ? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Is the 'sexuality' information on your profile correct? If not, why not?
Is your sexuality not listed or did you choose the wrong one on purpose?
No because queer isn't an option so had to go with bi
Ms Icebreaker
How would you describe queer?
I love that word. I can't speak for Ms Icebreaker but for me my queerness is defined by the fact that I not only am fluid in my tastes (with regard to gender and sexual orientation) but I accept that that fluidity is an unexceptional state of being. I grew up with a host of sources around me in terms of speculative fiction, fabulous music and great people who made the idea of two genders or fixed categories of sexual orientation irrelevant. SO, like Ms Icebreaker I'm gleefuly queer...
Mr Icebreaker"
I love that!! |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It's been so long I can't remember... |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Deffo correct. 'Straight' ?? |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I guess I'm lucky in the fact that one of the few available choices on here applies to me. I've never been bi-curious and I've known since I first became a sexual being that I was attracted to and could fall in love with both men and women. Though saying that, I'm still not sure where I am on gender fluidity. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Mine should say bi-shitbag
Definitely bi curious and have had small amounts of play with women but always crap out of meeting them because i am so inexperienced |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
yup |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Yes but it depends. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
"Is the 'sexuality' information on your profile correct? If not, why not?
Is your sexuality not listed or did you choose the wrong one on purpose?" mine is as close as I can get it with the limited choices. If just no playful or situational if I could or hetro flexible
As while I enjoy playing with ladies in group situations I've never chased or felt inclined to meet a lady on her own x |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I guess I'm lucky in the fact that one of the few available choices on here applies to me. I've never been bi-curious and I've known since I first became a sexual being that I was attracted to and could fall in love with both men and women. Though saying that, I'm still not sure where I am on gender fluidity."
You could be Pansexual. |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I've been with enough ladies now to know girl on girl isn't really for me, so I'd say straight was accurate as I'd only be looking to meet guys one on one.
|
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Does it actually really matter? Fab seems to tie itself in knots over this ... |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
All sexed out |
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |