FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Should they let her back in
Should they let her back in
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Hi just wondered if others thought the same as me about letting the woman and her baby back into the UK after she left ...maybe she should ask the relatives of Lee Rigby...your thoughts ??  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Hi just wondered if others thought the same as me about letting the woman and her baby back into the UK after she left ...maybe she should ask the relatives of Lee Rigby...your thoughts ?? "
Nope, shouldn't be allowed back in, you want to join the enemy that is Islamic state feel free but don't expect us to accept you in open arms after you join and commit treason against our country |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Yep I agree ...if they let her have citizenship again ...will the father and all his family have rights here too ? And before you know it . Bang another terrorist cell over here . RIP Lee |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
They have to let her back in. It's the law.
They shouk let her back in.she was a groomed child at the time.
She will have names and info on the real threats to our safety |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I would bet cash she is still active for IS. They need people here to see how Brexit pans out surely.
As if you could walk away from IS so publicly and be all over the news. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"They have to let her back in. It's the law.
They shouk let her back in.she was a groomed child at the time.
She will have names and info on the real threats to our safety "
She wasnt groomed. She said she left to get married because her parents wouldn't let her get married here. She knew what she was doing. Also it's not the law if you have dual nationality. She should have her child taken off her and then left to the wolves |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yep I agree ...if they let her have citizenship again ...will the father and all his family have rights here too ? And before you know it . Bang another terrorist cell over here . RIP Lee "
Ah but he is Belgian so they can go there  but I bet you the Belgians will not be an easy option |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"They have to let her back in. It's the law.
They shouk let her back in.she was a groomed child at the time.
She will have names and info on the real threats to our safety
She wasnt groomed. She said she left to get married because her parents wouldn't let her get married here. She knew what she was doing. Also it's not the law if you have dual nationality. She should have her child taken off her and then left to the wolves"
She was 15 !!!
She was not of age to know, she was groomed.at 15 you you think you know what you are doing but she was groomed .
She is British only. There for she has every right to return.
The right wing will be blowing steam lol
Why take her child off her and punish the child? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *iger4uWoman
over a year ago
In my happy place |
"Yep I agree ...if they let her have citizenship again ...will the father and all his family have rights here too ? And before you know it . Bang another terrorist cell over here . RIP Lee
Ah but he is Belgian so they can go there but I bet you the Belgians will not be an easy option "
Belgium is full of no go areas with mixed nationalities |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"They have to let her back in. It's the law.
They shouk let her back in.she was a groomed child at the time.
She will have names and info on the real threats to our safety
She wasnt groomed. She said she left to get married because her parents wouldn't let her get married here. She knew what she was doing. Also it's not the law if you have dual nationality. She should have her child taken off her and then left to the wolves
She was 15 !!!
She was not of age to know, she was groomed.at 15 you you think you know what you are doing but she was groomed .
She is British only. There for she has every right to return.
The right wing will be blowing steam lol
Why take her child off her and punish the child? "
I’m sure the right wing will be just fine as she’s been denied so.... also “punish the child” do you really think that child’s life will be better with a terrorist / sympathiser? I’d say it was more a blessing than a punishment should the child be taken away.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"They have to let her back in. It's the law.
They shouk let her back in.she was a groomed child at the time.
She will have names and info on the real threats to our safety
She wasnt groomed. She said she left to get married because her parents wouldn't let her get married here. She knew what she was doing. Also it's not the law if you have dual nationality. She should have her child taken off her and then left to the wolves
She was 15 !!!
She was not of age to know, she was groomed.at 15 you you think you know what you are doing but she was groomed .
She is British only. There for she has every right to return.
The right wing will be blowing steam lol
Why take her child off her and punish the child? "
Spoken like a true terrorist sympathiser |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
What always astonishes me about threads like this is that some people care nothing for the rule of law and would be quite happy for the government to act completely arbitrarily.
As long as it doesn't effect them of course. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I think there are more deserving cases that should be allowed priority. "
No one's giving her priority. The government have said obligation to help her to return. The issue is if she makes her way back whether anyone can stop her. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"What always astonishes me about threads like this is that some people care nothing for the rule of law and would be quite happy for the government to act completely arbitrarily.
As long as it doesn't effect them of course. "
There not breaking the law. She qualifies for dual nationality which means the can revoke her citizenship. A law that's been in place long before this happened |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"What always astonishes me about threads like this is that some people care nothing for the rule of law and would be quite happy for the government to act completely arbitrarily.
As long as it doesn't effect them of course.
There not breaking the law. She qualifies for dual nationality which means the can revoke her citizenship. A law that's been in place long before this happened"
Doesn't matter if she qualifies, she has to be a national of another country and Bangladesh says she isn't.
It's political posturing. He knows he will lose in court but he can then blame it on soft Liberal judges and cement his tory leadership credentials. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
They say she's had her citizenship revoked and that she's not allowed to return...but parents can challenge the courts to get it back.
The government will get information out of her either by some deal or threat ... There'll be a new identity for her and she will return no matter what even though we're told she isnt. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"They have to let her back in. It's the law.
They shouk let her back in.she was a groomed child at the time.
She will have names and info on the real threats to our safety "
This. Glad to hear some sense on the topic. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Do you know I'm really torn on this. On one hand they absolutely should not be allowed back in but then is it really fair of Us to lumber her on another country that she's never been to, we wouldn't be happy if it was the other way round.
I think the only option here is that she comes back and face Justice but then I know that's not ideal but I don't really know what else we can do with her. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Do you know I'm really torn on this. On one hand they absolutely should not be allowed back in but then is it really fair of Us to lumber her on another country that she's never been to, we wouldn't be happy if it was the other way round.
I think the only option here is that she comes back and face Justice but then I know that's not ideal but I don't really know what else we can do with her. "
Im not paying for her kid fuck that its all she wants is welfare |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"We've been through all this on several threads,no she shouldn't be allowed back"
There is nothing the conservatives can do to stop her.
The law is she is British
You can moan and groan as much as you want.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"What always astonishes me about threads like this is that some people care nothing for the rule of law and would be quite happy for the government to act completely arbitrarily.
As long as it doesn't effect them of course.
There not breaking the law. She qualifies for dual nationality which means the can revoke her citizenship. A law that's been in place long before this happened
Doesn't matter if she qualifies, she has to be a national of another country and Bangladesh says she isn't.
It's political posturing. He knows he will lose in court but he can then blame it on soft Liberal judges and cement his tory leadership credentials. "
Her mother is believed to be Bangladeshi, which means Shamima Begum is Bangladesh by default until she turns 21 where it will lapse unless an effort is made to retain it, this is why the UK had to act quickly.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"They have to let her back in. It's the law.
They shouk let her back in.she was a groomed child at the time.
She will have names and info on the real threats to our safety
She wasnt groomed. She said she left to get married because her parents wouldn't let her get married here. She knew what she was doing. Also it's not the law if you have dual nationality. She should have her child taken off her and then left to the wolves
She was 15 !!!
She was not of age to know, she was groomed.at 15 you you think you know what you are doing but she was groomed .
She is British only. There for she has every right to return.
The right wing will be blowing steam lol
Why take her child off her and punish the child?
I’m sure the right wing will be just fine as she’s been denied so.... also “punish the child” do you really think that child’s life will be better with a terrorist / sympathiser? I’d say it was more a blessing than a punishment should the child be taken away. "
Exactly this |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"We've been through all this on several threads,no she shouldn't be allowed back
There is nothing the conservatives can do to stop her.
The law is she is British
You can moan and groan as much as you want.
"
Sorry did I come across as moaning,sorry, what I really wanted to say was chop her head off and put it in a barrel |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"We've been through all this on several threads,no she shouldn't be allowed back
There is nothing the conservatives can do to stop her.
The law is she is British
You can moan and groan as much as you want.
Sorry did I come across as moaning,sorry, what I really wanted to say was chop her head off and put it in a barrel"
Well why not , because we know that doesn’t phase her don’t we ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"We've been through all this on several threads,no she shouldn't be allowed back
There is nothing the conservatives can do to stop her.
The law is she is British
You can moan and groan as much as you want.
Sorry did I come across as moaning,sorry, what I really wanted to say was chop her head off and put it in a barrel
Well why not , because we know that doesn’t phase her don’t we ? "
Correct |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
100% no she’s made her bed let her lie in take the baby tho he’ shouldn’t suffer because of her stupid “mistake “ she shows no remomorse and says the Manchester bombimgs were justified. Mrscxxx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Do you know I'm really torn on this. On one hand they absolutely should not be allowed back in but then is it really fair of Us to lumber her on another country that she's never been to, we wouldn't be happy if it was the other way round.
I think the only option here is that she comes back and face Justice but then I know that's not ideal but I don't really know what else we can do with her.
Im not paying for her kid fuck that its all she wants is welfare"
I understand that but actually is it not better to get the child out of Syria and be brought up in a fairly stable country and not carry on where mother and father left off. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
She is a UK citizen and should be returned to the UK and face whatever interrogation is warranted as well as getting the support she may need. This issue is being whipped up in a frenzy, distracting from the Brexit catastrophe that could inflict serious harm to all citizens. Smoke and mirrors in play |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"She is a UK citizen and should be returned to the UK and face whatever interrogation is warranted as well as getting the support she may need. This issue is being whipped up in a frenzy, distracting from the Brexit catastrophe that could inflict serious harm to all citizens. Smoke and mirrors in play"
Absolutely farcical to suggest it’s all a cover up so that the serious harm that Brexit may cause is kept quiet . What a joke !
We will wait and see whether this serious harm materialises , I very much doubt it . In the meantime thank goodness we have some politicians with a sense of justice . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
