FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > What is body shaming?

What is body shaming?

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

If it is a fact or an opinion, is it still shaming?

Is it the intent, or how the person perceives the comment?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Some people body shame to score points, sometimes to curry favour with people who aren't like those being shamed, sometimes to be in with the incrowd, sometimes because they are just insensitive arseholes who have to spout an opinion.

Some people just can't help themselves and take great pleasure from being nasty.

Some threads will descend into body shaming with little provocation, but sometimes people will actively seek to be offended from the most innocent of comments.

Forumites are a fickle crowd.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Its a shame

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *wisted999Man  over a year ago

North Bucks

Some people cry body shaming to shut down genuine discussion.

Some people feign concern about health etc in order to body shame.

It’s pretty easy to spot.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eady and Willing 9Man  over a year ago

Wherever the party is @


"If it is a fact or an opinion, is it still shaming?

Is it the intent, or how the person perceives the comment?"

Think it's always down to how one perceives the comment

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *uzukiNo1Woman  over a year ago

Rhyl

I've seen it a few times by the same bitchy "couple" him or her never know which one is commenting, but him or her do it slyly....pathetic little playground bullys....I crnt stand ppl who think they are above anyone...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Unnecessary

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Some people cry body shaming to shut down genuine discussion.

Some people feign concern about health etc in order to body shame.

It’s pretty easy to spot. "

Is it though? People often assume it's one thing when it may be another. I find it closes debate down.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"I've seen it a few times by the same bitchy "couple" him or her never know which one is commenting, but him or her do it slyly....pathetic little playground bullys....I crnt stand ppl who think they are above anyone..."

I don't mind those types as at least they are open. I'm ok with them having their opinion even if it is different to mine.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

Dragging someone down because of their body where it's not necessary or welcome. Implying things about someone because of their body which aren't necessarily true (like, fat people are stupid and lazy). Trying to stop people feeling good about themselves where it has no impact on you whatsoever.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hetalkingstoveMan  over a year ago

London

Unless you're a doctor, there's just no need to point out any negative aspects of someone else's body.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *uzukiNo1Woman  over a year ago

Rhyl


"I've seen it a few times by the same bitchy "couple" him or her never know which one is commenting, but him or her do it slyly....pathetic little playground bullys....I crnt stand ppl who think they are above anyone...

I don't mind those types as at least they are open. I'm ok with them having their opinion even if it is different to mine. "

Shaming someone because of their body type is not in my personal opinion an opinion, it's just crass and cruel...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"I've seen it a few times by the same bitchy "couple" him or her never know which one is commenting, but him or her do it slyly....pathetic little playground bullys....I crnt stand ppl who think they are above anyone...

I don't mind those types as at least they are open. I'm ok with them having their opinion even if it is different to mine.

Shaming someone because of their body type is not in my personal opinion an opinion, it's just crass and cruel..."

I think it's like having a crap. We all do it, but it's best done where you don't inflict it on others.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I take the piss outta my own body and I own that shit.

Tend not to body shame others (not consciously) and if I have I apologise.

P

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ultry SuccubusTV/TS  over a year ago

London


" Trying to stop people feeling good about themselves where it has no impact on you whatsoever. "

I really like this statement because I saw this a lot in the forum - whether it's really intended or not, that I can't be sure.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ross-eyed MaryMan  over a year ago

Salisbury

Happens soo many times on here with people slating slim women for being skin and bone, or men who arn't Adonis describing themselves as athletic.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


" Trying to stop people feeling good about themselves where it has no impact on you whatsoever.

I really like this statement because I saw this a lot in the forum - whether it's really intended or not, that I can't be sure."

I try to leave a lot of this stuff at "not for me, but you do you".

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If it is a fact or an opinion, is it still shaming?

Is it the intent, or how the person perceives the comment?

Think it's always down to how one perceives the comment "

I think that's a bit of a cop out.

What I mean is does that mean someone can say whatever they like if they claim they didn't mean to offend and then it's the other person's fault for being offended?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I think a lot of the time a word is used to describe an attribute and someone takes offence even when the person who said it didn't mean it in a bad way.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I think a lot of the time a word is used to describe an attribute and someone takes offence even when the person who said it didn't mean it in a bad way.

"

Yes I definitely seeing that where somebody says something meaning it as a term of endearment but it's usually an outdated word that some people find offensive.

On the other hand there are definitely a few people that body shame continually but then just claim it is there opinion.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Someone can be described as fat, thin, short etc etc etc, it's how you say it and why.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Someone can be described as fat, thin, short etc etc etc, it's how you say it and why. "

But I think if in doubt, you should avoid terms that you know some might find offensive.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *a Fee VerteWoman  over a year ago

Limbo


" Trying to stop people feeling good about themselves where it has no impact on you whatsoever.

I really like this statement because I saw this a lot in the forum - whether it's really intended or not, that I can't be sure."

I think, being charitable, it can sometimes be sheer thoughtlessness - people getting swept along in a thread, trying to be funny, trying to get noticed or whatever and therefore not stopping to think about the potentially hurtful or offensive impact of their words. It doesn't help that many body shaming terms are stereotypical and impersonal - to the person putting them out there, who doesn't give it a second thought - but not to those affected.

On the other hand, I don't doubt, from the context of what's said, the way it's said, and the history of the poster concerned, that *some* people take rather too much deliberate delight in being unnecessarily unkind behind the anonymous protection of a screen ... and if ever challenged, cite opinions and preferences, or 'ignorance' to justify their unpleasantness.

I guess a minority never completely lose that playground mentality!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Body shaming is basically a form of bullying, whether it be in person, or online.

It is the act or practice of negatively judging someone based on their physical appearance.

Typically, people are body shamed when they appear overweight or underweight or don’t fit society’s view of “thin and beautiful”.

Our culture loves the ideology of a perfect body, whether it be in print, movies, television, or online, seeing someone who doesn’t fit the mold isn’t considered acceptable to some.

Body shaming can be subtle to very in your face.

Comments like you would be a knockout of you lost or put on weight is a back handed compliment but is a subtle form of body shaming

To the In your face sort of comments. God who would want to be with you fatty.

It is not about opinion to be honest as opinions don't have to be shared specially if they are negative and damaging to individuals.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

There’s a lot that put people who don’t fit their idea of attractiveness stating they’re this or that and shaming them just to get into the person they’re afters good books.

Then there’s the few who are attractive but think that everyone who doesn’t look like them is lazy and doesn’t make an effort. It happens to all ends of the spectrum on here. No need for it, as we’re all attractive to someone x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"There’s a lot that put people who don’t fit their idea of attractiveness stating they’re this or that and shaming them just to get into the person they’re afters good books.

Then there’s the few who are attractive but think that everyone who doesn’t look like them is lazy and doesn’t make an effort. It happens to all ends of the spectrum on here. No need for it, as we’re all attractive to someone x "

Absolutely, well said.

but I do think that recently the type of threads that have been started, are started deliberately sometimes to cause controversy.

Normally with the OP sitting back and watching it happen and not making any further comments.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Rachel Riley is being body shamed for being too thin as she's lost a lot of weight. Davina McCall similar last year when she posted slim pics.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Rachel Riley is being body shamed for being too thin as she's lost a lot of weight. Davina McCall similar last year when she posted slim pics."

Conversely, all this about BBWs daring to use terms that aren't demeaning about themselves. Or, it's not that hard do you know what a vegetable is? Etc forever. Or, if I say anything about it, the guys up my arse in my inbox telling me I'm gorgeous not fat, as if the two are mutually exclusive.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London

Is discussing in the abscract whether some body shapes are generally considered to be more attractive than others body shaming?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Body shaming is where someone points out an aspect of someone’s body that is perceived to be negative and is possibly within that persons control to change.

As an example, look at the beer gut on that guy.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Body shaming is where someone points out an aspect of someone’s body that is perceived to be negative and is possibly within that persons control to change.

As an example, look at the beer gut on that guy.

But why should someones choices attract negative opinions from people

"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Is discussing in the abscract whether some body shapes are generally considered to be more attractive than others body shaming? "

I think they can be, but aren't necessarily.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"Is discussing in the abscract whether some body shapes are generally considered to be more attractive than others body shaming?

I think they can be, but aren't necessarily. "

I think as long as you don't target anyone personally, it's fine.

I'm 52 and bald. I am quite aware I am generally considered a lot less attractive than a young man with hair and I have no difficulty with people mentioning that fact.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Body shaming is where someone points out an aspect of someone’s body that is perceived to be negative and is possibly within that persons control to change.

As an example, look at the beer gut on that guy.

But why should someones choices attract negative opinions from people

"

Because not everyone is a nice person, people do a lot worse in this world than bring attention to some cellulite or a fat arse.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Is discussing in the abscract whether some body shapes are generally considered to be more attractive than others body shaming?

I think they can be, but aren't necessarily.

I think as long as you don't target anyone personally, it's fine.

I'm 52 and bald. I am quite aware I am generally considered a lot less attractive than a young man with hair and I have no difficulty with people mentioning that fact. "

But something like (I'm so sorry I don't mean this) "omg all these fat cows on Fab who do they think they are, eat a vegetable, know you're worth nothing if you're over a size 12..."

... As someone over a size 12, whether it's directed at me or not, I find somewhere between ignorant and hurtful.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Body shaming is where someone points out an aspect of someone’s body that is perceived to be negative and is possibly within that persons control to change.

As an example, look at the beer gut on that guy.

But why should someones choices attract negative opinions from people

Because not everyone is a nice person, people do a lot worse in this world than bring attention to some cellulite or a fat arse. "

Just because genocide exists, doesn't make body shaming acceptable.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"Is discussing in the abscract whether some body shapes are generally considered to be more attractive than others body shaming?

I think they can be, but aren't necessarily.

I think as long as you don't target anyone personally, it's fine.

I'm 52 and bald. I am quite aware I am generally considered a lot less attractive than a young man with hair and I have no difficulty with people mentioning that fact.

But something like (I'm so sorry I don't mean this) "omg all these fat cows on Fab who do they think they are, eat a vegetable, know you're worth nothing if you're over a size 12..."

... As someone over a size 12, whether it's directed at me or not, I find somewhere between ignorant and hurtful. "

Well yes, but stating (assuming it was relevant to a discussion) most men will find a size ten woman more attractive than a size twenty woman. Is there anything wrong with that?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *r.BlondeMan  over a year ago

Chester/Wirral


"Is discussing in the abscract whether some body shapes are generally considered to be more attractive than others body shaming?

I think they can be, but aren't necessarily.

I think as long as you don't target anyone personally, it's fine.

I'm 52 and bald. I am quite aware I am generally considered a lot less attractive than a young man with hair and I have no difficulty with people mentioning that fact.

But something like (I'm so sorry I don't mean this) "omg all these fat cows on Fab who do they think they are, eat a vegetable, know you're worth nothing if you're over a size 12..."

... As someone over a size 12, whether it's directed at me or not, I find somewhere between ignorant and hurtful.

Well yes, but stating (assuming it was relevant to a discussion) most men will find a size ten woman more attractive than a size twenty woman. Is there anything wrong with that? "

No

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Is discussing in the abscract whether some body shapes are generally considered to be more attractive than others body shaming?

I think they can be, but aren't necessarily.

I think as long as you don't target anyone personally, it's fine.

I'm 52 and bald. I am quite aware I am generally considered a lot less attractive than a young man with hair and I have no difficulty with people mentioning that fact.

But something like (I'm so sorry I don't mean this) "omg all these fat cows on Fab who do they think they are, eat a vegetable, know you're worth nothing if you're over a size 12..."

... As someone over a size 12, whether it's directed at me or not, I find somewhere between ignorant and hurtful.

Well yes, but stating (assuming it was relevant to a discussion) most men will find a size ten woman more attractive than a size twenty woman. Is there anything wrong with that? "

I'm hardly the arbiter, but I wouldn't find it offensive.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Body shaming is where someone points out an aspect of someone’s body that is perceived to be negative and is possibly within that persons control to change.

As an example, look at the beer gut on that guy.

But why should someones choices attract negative opinions from people

Because not everyone is a nice person, people do a lot worse in this world than bring attention to some cellulite or a fat arse. "

Ahhh the lot worse defence.

Destroying someone's self worth and confidence in life is just a little inconvenient not a high thing

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Body shaming is where someone points out an aspect of someone’s body that is perceived to be negative and is possibly within that persons control to change.

As an example, look at the beer gut on that guy.

But why should someones choices attract negative opinions from people

Because not everyone is a nice person, people do a lot worse in this world than bring attention to some cellulite or a fat arse.

Just because genocide exists, doesn't make body shaming acceptable. "

I never said it was, I was pointing out that if someone is prepared to murder some one then hurting a random anonymous persons feelings on the internet isn’t going to cause sleepless nights.

People should be nice to each other, but they’re not

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Is discussing in the abscract whether some body shapes are generally considered to be more attractive than others body shaming?

I think they can be, but aren't necessarily.

I think as long as you don't target anyone personally, it's fine.

I'm 52 and bald. I am quite aware I am generally considered a lot less attractive than a young man with hair and I have no difficulty with people mentioning that fact.

But something like (I'm so sorry I don't mean this) "omg all these fat cows on Fab who do they think they are, eat a vegetable, know you're worth nothing if you're over a size 12..."

... As someone over a size 12, whether it's directed at me or not, I find somewhere between ignorant and hurtful.

Well yes, but stating (assuming it was relevant to a discussion) most men will find a size ten woman more attractive than a size twenty woman. Is there anything wrong with that? "

But that's not fact is it. That's just assumption

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Body shaming is where someone points out an aspect of someone’s body that is perceived to be negative and is possibly within that persons control to change.

As an example, look at the beer gut on that guy.

But why should someones choices attract negative opinions from people

Because not everyone is a nice person, people do a lot worse in this world than bring attention to some cellulite or a fat arse.

Ahhh the lot worse defence.

Destroying someone's self worth and confidence in life is just a little inconvenient not a high thing "

Again I’m not defending it but it is what it is

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Body shaming is where someone points out an aspect of someone’s body that is perceived to be negative and is possibly within that persons control to change.

As an example, look at the beer gut on that guy.

But why should someones choices attract negative opinions from people

Because not everyone is a nice person, people do a lot worse in this world than bring attention to some cellulite or a fat arse.

Just because genocide exists, doesn't make body shaming acceptable.

I never said it was, I was pointing out that if someone is prepared to murder some one then hurting a random anonymous persons feelings on the internet isn’t going to cause sleepless nights.

People should be nice to each other, but they’re not "

Rates of murder are infinitely lower than rates of nastiness, and discussing what's acceptable or not is one way we deal with uncomfortable or inappropriate behaviour in a society.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"Is discussing in the abscract whether some body shapes are generally considered to be more attractive than others body shaming?

I think they can be, but aren't necessarily.

I think as long as you don't target anyone personally, it's fine.

I'm 52 and bald. I am quite aware I am generally considered a lot less attractive than a young man with hair and I have no difficulty with people mentioning that fact.

But something like (I'm so sorry I don't mean this) "omg all these fat cows on Fab who do they think they are, eat a vegetable, know you're worth nothing if you're over a size 12..."

... As someone over a size 12, whether it's directed at me or not, I find somewhere between ignorant and hurtful.

Well yes, but stating (assuming it was relevant to a discussion) most men will find a size ten woman more attractive than a size twenty woman. Is there anything wrong with that?

But that's not fact is it. That's just assumption "

No, it's fact. You only have to open your eyes. Have a look at the most fabbed pics for a start.

In any event, even if it's an opinion rather than a fact, the point holds.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

I tend to take any comments speaking for the preferences of an enormous demographic as the limited opinion or experience of the speaker.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"There’s a lot that put people who don’t fit their idea of attractiveness stating they’re this or that and shaming them just to get into the person they’re afters good books.

Then there’s the few who are attractive but think that everyone who doesn’t look like them is lazy and doesn’t make an effort. It happens to all ends of the spectrum on here. No need for it, as we’re all attractive to someone x

Absolutely, well said.

but I do think that recently the type of threads that have been started, are started deliberately sometimes to cause controversy.

Normally with the OP sitting back and watching it happen and not making any further comments. "

Yes I’ve noticed them. I’m learning to bite my tongue a lot x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Is discussing in the abscract whether some body shapes are generally considered to be more attractive than others body shaming?

I think they can be, but aren't necessarily.

I think as long as you don't target anyone personally, it's fine.

I'm 52 and bald. I am quite aware I am generally considered a lot less attractive than a young man with hair and I have no difficulty with people mentioning that fact.

But something like (I'm so sorry I don't mean this) "omg all these fat cows on Fab who do they think they are, eat a vegetable, know you're worth nothing if you're over a size 12..."

... As someone over a size 12, whether it's directed at me or not, I find somewhere between ignorant and hurtful.

Well yes, but stating (assuming it was relevant to a discussion) most men will find a size ten woman more attractive than a size twenty woman. Is there anything wrong with that?

But that's not fact is it. That's just assumption

No, it's fact. You only have to open your eyes. Have a look at the most fabbed pics for a start.

In any event, even if it's an opinion rather than a fact, the point holds. "

As an opinion yes. Anyone is allowed to have an opinion.

And yes there are men that like the fuller figure and there are men that like the slender figure.

And then there are men that just want anyone to shag.

In the long run you don't have to be negative about one group of people just because they are not your type.

Saying you into slimmer women is not body shaming

But if someone points out that all bigger girls would look better slim that is.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Body shaming is where someone points out an aspect of someone’s body that is perceived to be negative and is possibly within that persons control to change.

As an example, look at the beer gut on that guy.

But why should someones choices attract negative opinions from people

Because not everyone is a nice person, people do a lot worse in this world than bring attention to some cellulite or a fat arse.

Just because genocide exists, doesn't make body shaming acceptable.

I never said it was, I was pointing out that if someone is prepared to murder some one then hurting a random anonymous persons feelings on the internet isn’t going to cause sleepless nights.

People should be nice to each other, but they’re not

Rates of murder are infinitely lower than rates of nastiness, and discussing what's acceptable or not is one way we deal with uncomfortable or inappropriate behaviour in a society. "

We are discussing it, but I’m pretty sure when someone makes a disparaging remark they are fully aware of what is and isn’t appropriate behaviour.

The point I am making is that some people will always want to make other people feel bad.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It’s often both...... we are all privy to same health information out there about everything that’s perceived to be unhealthy or healthy. We all then make choices to either adhere or rebuff. I don’t smoke but I don’t comment negatively about those that do. I prefer to live and let live. I am much more likely to “have a word” with someone that shows little respect to others or that are cruel and unkind. Communication can often be misconstrued or interpreted to an individuals requirements both positively or negatively. Opinion is just an individuals thought process/understanding being verbalised. The vocabulary used turns it into the negative, trolling or shaming or into a positive enquiry. Words are powerful.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

My limited view based on Fab is that a lot of men claim to prefer their women slightly overweight. Because any time I mention the gym or weight, I get umpteen messages telling me I shouldn't or even can't lose any. Which is bullshit, of course.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"Body shaming is where someone points out an aspect of someone’s body that is perceived to be negative and is possibly within that persons control to change.

As an example, look at the beer gut on that guy.

But why should someones choices attract negative opinions from people

Because not everyone is a nice person, people do a lot worse in this world than bring attention to some cellulite or a fat arse.

Just because genocide exists, doesn't make body shaming acceptable.

I never said it was, I was pointing out that if someone is prepared to murder some one then hurting a random anonymous persons feelings on the internet isn’t going to cause sleepless nights.

People should be nice to each other, but they’re not

Rates of murder are infinitely lower than rates of nastiness, and discussing what's acceptable or not is one way we deal with uncomfortable or inappropriate behaviour in a society.

We are discussing it, but I’m pretty sure when someone makes a disparaging remark they are fully aware of what is and isn’t appropriate behaviour.

The point I am making is that some people will always want to make other people feel bad. "

Yes, but discussing it means that unkind people see that, for example, they won't find my support in being so.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"It’s often both...... we are all privy to same health information out there about everything that’s perceived to be unhealthy or healthy. We all then make choices to either adhere or rebuff. I don’t smoke but I don’t comment negatively about those that do. I prefer to live and let live. I am much more likely to “have a word” with someone that shows little respect to others or that are cruel and unkind. Communication can often be misconstrued or interpreted to an individuals requirements both positively or negatively. Opinion is just an individuals thought process/understanding being verbalised. The vocabulary used turns it into the negative, trolling or shaming or into a positive enquiry. Words are powerful. "

I think smoking is slightly different. I think people can do what they want with their own bodies. But being around smoking makes me sick. It then becomes about my body.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ollycouple71Couple  over a year ago

manchester


"I've seen it a few times by the same bitchy "couple" him or her never know which one is commenting, but him or her do it slyly....pathetic little playground bullys....I crnt stand ppl who think they are above anyone..."

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"Is discussing in the abscract whether some body shapes are generally considered to be more attractive than others body shaming?

I think they can be, but aren't necessarily.

I think as long as you don't target anyone personally, it's fine.

I'm 52 and bald. I am quite aware I am generally considered a lot less attractive than a young man with hair and I have no difficulty with people mentioning that fact.

But something like (I'm so sorry I don't mean this) "omg all these fat cows on Fab who do they think they are, eat a vegetable, know you're worth nothing if you're over a size 12..."

... As someone over a size 12, whether it's directed at me or not, I find somewhere between ignorant and hurtful.

Well yes, but stating (assuming it was relevant to a discussion) most men will find a size ten woman more attractive than a size twenty woman. Is there anything wrong with that?

But that's not fact is it. That's just assumption

No, it's fact. You only have to open your eyes. Have a look at the most fabbed pics for a start.

In any event, even if it's an opinion rather than a fact, the point holds.

As an opinion yes. Anyone is allowed to have an opinion.

And yes there are men that like the fuller figure and there are men that like the slender figure.

And then there are men that just want anyone to shag.

In the long run you don't have to be negative about one group of people just because they are not your type.

Saying you into slimmer women is not body shaming

But if someone points out that all bigger girls would look better slim that is. "

What I can't be doing with is this idea that if you state something to the effect that in situation A, a person with attribute X is generally more favoured than person with attribute Y, that's somehow disrespectful of person with attribute Y.

There's no excuse for being personally insulting, but equally we shouldn't shy away from reality because we find it uncomfortable.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"My limited view based on Fab is that a lot of men claim to prefer their women slightly overweight. Because any time I mention the gym or weight, I get umpteen messages telling me I shouldn't or even can't lose any. Which is bullshit, of course. "

Basically men on here will tell women any old shit to get a fuck and I think women are well aware of that.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Is discussing in the abscract whether some body shapes are generally considered to be more attractive than others body shaming?

I think they can be, but aren't necessarily.

I think as long as you don't target anyone personally, it's fine.

I'm 52 and bald. I am quite aware I am generally considered a lot less attractive than a young man with hair and I have no difficulty with people mentioning that fact.

But something like (I'm so sorry I don't mean this) "omg all these fat cows on Fab who do they think they are, eat a vegetable, know you're worth nothing if you're over a size 12..."

... As someone over a size 12, whether it's directed at me or not, I find somewhere between ignorant and hurtful.

Well yes, but stating (assuming it was relevant to a discussion) most men will find a size ten woman more attractive than a size twenty woman. Is there anything wrong with that?

But that's not fact is it. That's just assumption

No, it's fact. You only have to open your eyes. Have a look at the most fabbed pics for a start.

In any event, even if it's an opinion rather than a fact, the point holds.

As an opinion yes. Anyone is allowed to have an opinion.

And yes there are men that like the fuller figure and there are men that like the slender figure.

And then there are men that just want anyone to shag.

In the long run you don't have to be negative about one group of people just because they are not your type.

Saying you into slimmer women is not body shaming

But if someone points out that all bigger girls would look better slim that is.

What I can't be doing with is this idea that if you state something to the effect that in situation A, a person with attribute X is generally more favoured than person with attribute Y, that's somehow disrespectful of person with attribute Y.

There's no excuse for being personally insulting, but equally we shouldn't shy away from reality because we find it uncomfortable. "

Why not simply say i prefer slender women, you don't have to then add I don't like big women.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"My limited view based on Fab is that a lot of men claim to prefer their women slightly overweight. Because any time I mention the gym or weight, I get umpteen messages telling me I shouldn't or even can't lose any. Which is bullshit, of course.

Basically men on here will tell women any old shit to get a fuck and I think women are well aware of that. "

Same again some men will some don't.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Body shaming is where someone points out an aspect of someone’s body that is perceived to be negative and is possibly within that persons control to change.

As an example, look at the beer gut on that guy.

But why should someones choices attract negative opinions from people

Because not everyone is a nice person, people do a lot worse in this world than bring attention to some cellulite or a fat arse.

Just because genocide exists, doesn't make body shaming acceptable.

I never said it was, I was pointing out that if someone is prepared to murder some one then hurting a random anonymous persons feelings on the internet isn’t going to cause sleepless nights.

People should be nice to each other, but they’re not

Rates of murder are infinitely lower than rates of nastiness, and discussing what's acceptable or not is one way we deal with uncomfortable or inappropriate behaviour in a society.

We are discussing it, but I’m pretty sure when someone makes a disparaging remark they are fully aware of what is and isn’t appropriate behaviour.

The point I am making is that some people will always want to make other people feel bad.

Yes, but discussing it means that unkind people see that, for example, they won't find my support in being so. "

Sometimes you get groups of people that want to make someone feel bad. Unfortunately the world has bastards in it. That is why we have the police, and sometimes the police has bastards in it too.

Discuss things address them and set out clearly what is appropriate and inappropriate but there will always be a little shit waiting for the opportunity to make you cry.

It is always says more about them than it does about you. What motivates this behaviour, what is their agenda what do they gain.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"My limited view based on Fab is that a lot of men claim to prefer their women slightly overweight. Because any time I mention the gym or weight, I get umpteen messages telling me I shouldn't or even can't lose any. Which is bullshit, of course.

Basically men on here will tell women any old shit to get a fuck and I think women are well aware of that. "

Hence "claim to". I pay it no mind.

Although I have met men, including conventionally attractive and gym rats, who were clearly very much into me when I was bigger than I am now.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"Is discussing in the abscract whether some body shapes are generally considered to be more attractive than others body shaming?

I think they can be, but aren't necessarily.

I think as long as you don't target anyone personally, it's fine.

I'm 52 and bald. I am quite aware I am generally considered a lot less attractive than a young man with hair and I have no difficulty with people mentioning that fact.

But something like (I'm so sorry I don't mean this) "omg all these fat cows on Fab who do they think they are, eat a vegetable, know you're worth nothing if you're over a size 12..."

... As someone over a size 12, whether it's directed at me or not, I find somewhere between ignorant and hurtful.

Well yes, but stating (assuming it was relevant to a discussion) most men will find a size ten woman more attractive than a size twenty woman. Is there anything wrong with that?

But that's not fact is it. That's just assumption

No, it's fact. You only have to open your eyes. Have a look at the most fabbed pics for a start.

In any event, even if it's an opinion rather than a fact, the point holds.

As an opinion yes. Anyone is allowed to have an opinion.

And yes there are men that like the fuller figure and there are men that like the slender figure.

And then there are men that just want anyone to shag.

In the long run you don't have to be negative about one group of people just because they are not your type.

Saying you into slimmer women is not body shaming

But if someone points out that all bigger girls would look better slim that is.

What I can't be doing with is this idea that if you state something to the effect that in situation A, a person with attribute X is generally more favoured than person with attribute Y, that's somehow disrespectful of person with attribute Y.

There's no excuse for being personally insulting, but equally we shouldn't shy away from reality because we find it uncomfortable.

Why not simply say i prefer slender women, you don't have to then add I don't like big women. "

I'm not talking about my personal preference. I'm talking about an issue in the abscract.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

But KLP, your preferences and data points are no more objective than mine. "What men want" is not desperately measurable.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I don't understand all this we shouldn't shy away from reality rubbish.

It has nothing to do with anybody else what somebody's body size is,if you do not like it move along!

there is no need to make comments whether personal or general and anybody hiding behind the fact I'm allowed an opinion!

You are not allowed an opinion on how I choose to describe myself or how anybody else does, you are not allowed to be offensive and hide behind oh well everyone finds slimmer people more attractive.

I think if people minded their own business a little bit more and got on with their own fab life it would be more fun for everybody.

We know the people on the forums that don't like larger people because they make it very clear at any given opportunity and like I said, hide behind oh well it's my opinion but they don't seem to realise these people aren't stupid they are very aware of who these people are who then just claim innocence.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"But KLP, your preferences and data points are no more objective than mine. "What men want" is not desperately measurable. "

We can only base our views on evidence. If we look at representations of women in current UK society designed to be attractive to men, we can see that they generally young and slim.

Hence, it's a reasonable deduction from that that the type of women that most men find most physically attractive is women that are young and slim.

That doesn't mean slim women are more attractive than non slim women in some universal sense, just that in UK society in 2019, that's what the general view is.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

It's not like anyone overweight isn't aware of it. We don't need to be told. Sometimes it just seems spiteful. "You're such a burden it's so unattractive... No I'm not rude, I'm just trying to help... Do you want to die young the way you deserve, fatty?" This is how it comes across sometimes.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

If it’s negative does it have to be said

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *r.BlondeMan  over a year ago

Chester/Wirral


"But KLP, your preferences and data points are no more objective than mine. "What men want" is not desperately measurable.

We can only base our views on evidence. If we look at representations of women in current UK society designed to be attractive to men, we can see that they generally young and slim.

Hence, it's a reasonable deduction from that that the type of women that most men find most physically attractive is women that are young and slim.

That doesn't mean slim women are more attractive than non slim women in some universal sense, just that in UK society in 2019, that's what the general view is. "

You're wasting your time. Common sense is not wanted on the forums.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"But KLP, your preferences and data points are no more objective than mine. "What men want" is not desperately measurable.

We can only base our views on evidence. If we look at representations of women in current UK society designed to be attractive to men, we can see that they generally young and slim.

Hence, it's a reasonable deduction from that that the type of women that most men find most physically attractive is women that are young and slim.

That doesn't mean slim women are more attractive than non slim women in some universal sense, just that in UK society in 2019, that's what the general view is. "

And I've never heard a woman say "I wish I was older and fatter "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"But KLP, your preferences and data points are no more objective than mine. "What men want" is not desperately measurable.

We can only base our views on evidence. If we look at representations of women in current UK society designed to be attractive to men, we can see that they generally young and slim.

Hence, it's a reasonable deduction from that that the type of women that most men find most physically attractive is women that are young and slim.

That doesn't mean slim women are more attractive than non slim women in some universal sense, just that in UK society in 2019, that's what the general view is. "

Confounding factors? Including fashion needs meaning clothing is made to look best on a very tall androgynous slender body?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"But KLP, your preferences and data points are no more objective than mine. "What men want" is not desperately measurable.

We can only base our views on evidence. If we look at representations of women in current UK society designed to be attractive to men, we can see that they generally young and slim.

Hence, it's a reasonable deduction from that that the type of women that most men find most physically attractive is women that are young and slim.

That doesn't mean slim women are more attractive than non slim women in some universal sense, just that in UK society in 2019, that's what the general view is.

Confounding factors? Including fashion needs meaning clothing is made to look best on a very tall androgynous slender body? "

Porn? Fabbed pics on here?

I'm not talking about fashion, I'm talking about images aimed squarely at men. See also selling cars, sports events etc.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"But KLP, your preferences and data points are no more objective than mine. "What men want" is not desperately measurable.

We can only base our views on evidence. If we look at representations of women in current UK society designed to be attractive to men, we can see that they generally young and slim.

Hence, it's a reasonable deduction from that that the type of women that most men find most physically attractive is women that are young and slim.

That doesn't mean slim women are more attractive than non slim women in some universal sense, just that in UK society in 2019, that's what the general view is.

Confounding factors? Including fashion needs meaning clothing is made to look best on a very tall androgynous slender body?

Porn? Fabbed pics on here?

I'm not talking about fashion, I'm talking about images aimed squarely at men. See also selling cars, sports events etc.

"

All these industries are interconnected. It's an interesting question, and media influences on preference and vice versa would be fascinating, but I imagine it'd be a devilishly complicated sociological study.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"But KLP, your preferences and data points are no more objective than mine. "What men want" is not desperately measurable.

We can only base our views on evidence. If we look at representations of women in current UK society designed to be attractive to men, we can see that they generally young and slim.

Hence, it's a reasonable deduction from that that the type of women that most men find most physically attractive is women that are young and slim.

That doesn't mean slim women are more attractive than non slim women in some universal sense, just that in UK society in 2019, that's what the general view is.

Confounding factors? Including fashion needs meaning clothing is made to look best on a very tall androgynous slender body?

Porn? Fabbed pics on here?

I'm not talking about fashion, I'm talking about images aimed squarely at men. See also selling cars, sports events etc.

"

We are all aware of this and that's the point, it doesn't need to be pointed out continually!

And actually I think if you look at the most fabbed pictures a lot of the women are actually fairly curvy.

Also often if you look at the profile or status of said top photo posters that often has a lot to do with it as well.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodnitegirlWoman  over a year ago

Yorkshire

My biggest bugbear that is common on here is people picking on large labia.

A lady can’t help how she is made. I see hundreds of vagina a year and (if one happens to be socially rather than professionally) I consider myself very lucky to be face to face with whatever god blessed her with

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)

Yes, seeking Fabs is another confounding factor.

My most Fabbed pic, by an enormous margin, is one with the least muscle definition and most weight. Does that mean anything? Who knows.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"But KLP, your preferences and data points are no more objective than mine. "What men want" is not desperately measurable.

We can only base our views on evidence. If we look at representations of women in current UK society designed to be attractive to men, we can see that they generally young and slim.

Hence, it's a reasonable deduction from that that the type of women that most men find most physically attractive is women that are young and slim.

That doesn't mean slim women are more attractive than non slim women in some universal sense, just that in UK society in 2019, that's what the general view is.

Confounding factors? Including fashion needs meaning clothing is made to look best on a very tall androgynous slender body?

Porn? Fabbed pics on here?

I'm not talking about fashion, I'm talking about images aimed squarely at men. See also selling cars, sports events etc.

All these industries are interconnected. It's an interesting question, and media influences on preference and vice versa would be fascinating, but I imagine it'd be a devilishly complicated sociological study. "

But my point is not about causation. It may well be that all men are manipulated and brainwashed, but it can't seriously be denied that in the UK in 2019 the type of woman most men find most physically attractive in the abscract are young slim women.

There's no moral judgment in that statement. It's just a statement of obvious fact.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"But KLP, your preferences and data points are no more objective than mine. "What men want" is not desperately measurable.

We can only base our views on evidence. If we look at representations of women in current UK society designed to be attractive to men, we can see that they generally young and slim.

Hence, it's a reasonable deduction from that that the type of women that most men find most physically attractive is women that are young and slim.

That doesn't mean slim women are more attractive than non slim women in some universal sense, just that in UK society in 2019, that's what the general view is.

Confounding factors? Including fashion needs meaning clothing is made to look best on a very tall androgynous slender body?

Porn? Fabbed pics on here?

I'm not talking about fashion, I'm talking about images aimed squarely at men. See also selling cars, sports events etc.

We are all aware of this and that's the point, it doesn't need to be pointed out continually!

And actually I think if you look at the most fabbed pictures a lot of the women are actually fairly curvy.

Also often if you look at the profile or status of said top photo posters that often has a lot to do with it as well. "

People are denying it on this thread.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"But KLP, your preferences and data points are no more objective than mine. "What men want" is not desperately measurable.

We can only base our views on evidence. If we look at representations of women in current UK society designed to be attractive to men, we can see that they generally young and slim.

Hence, it's a reasonable deduction from that that the type of women that most men find most physically attractive is women that are young and slim.

That doesn't mean slim women are more attractive than non slim women in some universal sense, just that in UK society in 2019, that's what the general view is.

Confounding factors? Including fashion needs meaning clothing is made to look best on a very tall androgynous slender body?

Porn? Fabbed pics on here?

I'm not talking about fashion, I'm talking about images aimed squarely at men. See also selling cars, sports events etc.

All these industries are interconnected. It's an interesting question, and media influences on preference and vice versa would be fascinating, but I imagine it'd be a devilishly complicated sociological study.

But my point is not about causation. It may well be that all men are manipulated and brainwashed, but it can't seriously be denied that in the UK in 2019 the type of woman most men find most physically attractive in the abscract are young slim women.

There's no moral judgment in that statement. It's just a statement of obvious fact. "

No, you're using what the media portray as a stand in for what men want. They're not the same thing. You may be correct, I have no idea, but I believe you're defining your terms incorrectly and failing to consider the complexity of the question.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"But KLP, your preferences and data points are no more objective than mine. "What men want" is not desperately measurable.

We can only base our views on evidence. If we look at representations of women in current UK society designed to be attractive to men, we can see that they generally young and slim.

Hence, it's a reasonable deduction from that that the type of women that most men find most physically attractive is women that are young and slim.

That doesn't mean slim women are more attractive than non slim women in some universal sense, just that in UK society in 2019, that's what the general view is.

Confounding factors? Including fashion needs meaning clothing is made to look best on a very tall androgynous slender body?

Porn? Fabbed pics on here?

I'm not talking about fashion, I'm talking about images aimed squarely at men. See also selling cars, sports events etc.

We are all aware of this and that's the point, it doesn't need to be pointed out continually!

And actually I think if you look at the most fabbed pictures a lot of the women are actually fairly curvy.

Also often if you look at the profile or status of said top photo posters that often has a lot to do with it as well.

People are denying it on this thread. "

I don't think you'll find they are!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"But KLP, your preferences and data points are no more objective than mine. "What men want" is not desperately measurable.

We can only base our views on evidence. If we look at representations of women in current UK society designed to be attractive to men, we can see that they generally young and slim.

Hence, it's a reasonable deduction from that that the type of women that most men find most physically attractive is women that are young and slim.

That doesn't mean slim women are more attractive than non slim women in some universal sense, just that in UK society in 2019, that's what the general view is.

Confounding factors? Including fashion needs meaning clothing is made to look best on a very tall androgynous slender body?

Porn? Fabbed pics on here?

I'm not talking about fashion, I'm talking about images aimed squarely at men. See also selling cars, sports events etc.

All these industries are interconnected. It's an interesting question, and media influences on preference and vice versa would be fascinating, but I imagine it'd be a devilishly complicated sociological study.

But my point is not about causation. It may well be that all men are manipulated and brainwashed, but it can't seriously be denied that in the UK in 2019 the type of woman most men find most physically attractive in the abscract are young slim women.

There's no moral judgment in that statement. It's just a statement of obvious fact.

No, you're using what the media portray as a stand in for what men want. They're not the same thing. You may be correct, I have no idea, but I believe you're defining your terms incorrectly and failing to consider the complexity of the question. "

So we have two possible explanations.

1. For god knows how long the media, the Porn industry and everyone else have been trying to sell their products to men with images of women men don't actually find attractive or

2. The images put forward by those industries are ones men find attractive, because why on earth would people trying to sell stuff present it in ways their customers find unattractive.

My moneys on 2.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hetalkingstoveMan  over a year ago

London


"

But my point is not about causation. It may well be that all men are manipulated and brainwashed, but it can't seriously be denied that in the UK in 2019 the type of woman most men find most physically attractive in the abscract are young slim women.

There's no moral judgment in that statement. It's just a statement of obvious fact. "

Let's assume this is true (I'm not sure that it is).

When do you want to be able to say this in a conversation, and why?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"But KLP, your preferences and data points are no more objective than mine. "What men want" is not desperately measurable.

We can only base our views on evidence. If we look at representations of women in current UK society designed to be attractive to men, we can see that they generally young and slim.

Hence, it's a reasonable deduction from that that the type of women that most men find most physically attractive is women that are young and slim.

That doesn't mean slim women are more attractive than non slim women in some universal sense, just that in UK society in 2019, that's what the general view is.

Confounding factors? Including fashion needs meaning clothing is made to look best on a very tall androgynous slender body?

Porn? Fabbed pics on here?

I'm not talking about fashion, I'm talking about images aimed squarely at men. See also selling cars, sports events etc.

All these industries are interconnected. It's an interesting question, and media influences on preference and vice versa would be fascinating, but I imagine it'd be a devilishly complicated sociological study.

But my point is not about causation. It may well be that all men are manipulated and brainwashed, but it can't seriously be denied that in the UK in 2019 the type of woman most men find most physically attractive in the abscract are young slim women.

There's no moral judgment in that statement. It's just a statement of obvious fact.

No, you're using what the media portray as a stand in for what men want. They're not the same thing. You may be correct, I have no idea, but I believe you're defining your terms incorrectly and failing to consider the complexity of the question.

So we have two possible explanations.

1. For god knows how long the media, the Porn industry and everyone else have been trying to sell their products to men with images of women men don't actually find attractive or

2. The images put forward by those industries are ones men find attractive, because why on earth would people trying to sell stuff present it in ways their customers find unattractive.

My moneys on 2."

What I don't understand is why you're so focused on what women look like because the thread is actually about body shaming and this happens to both sexes.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

But my point is not about causation. It may well be that all men are manipulated and brainwashed, but it can't seriously be denied that in the UK in 2019 the type of woman most men find most physically attractive in the abscract are young slim women.

There's no moral judgment in that statement. It's just a statement of obvious fact.

Let's assume this is true (I'm not sure that it is).

When do you want to be able to say this in a conversation, and why?"

Exactly this is what I don't understand about the point because I consider it shaming to say somebody is more attractive than you because they're slimmer. it doesn't need to be said.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"But KLP, your preferences and data points are no more objective than mine. "What men want" is not desperately measurable.

We can only base our views on evidence. If we look at representations of women in current UK society designed to be attractive to men, we can see that they generally young and slim.

Hence, it's a reasonable deduction from that that the type of women that most men find most physically attractive is women that are young and slim.

That doesn't mean slim women are more attractive than non slim women in some universal sense, just that in UK society in 2019, that's what the general view is.

Confounding factors? Including fashion needs meaning clothing is made to look best on a very tall androgynous slender body?

Porn? Fabbed pics on here?

I'm not talking about fashion, I'm talking about images aimed squarely at men. See also selling cars, sports events etc.

All these industries are interconnected. It's an interesting question, and media influences on preference and vice versa would be fascinating, but I imagine it'd be a devilishly complicated sociological study.

But my point is not about causation. It may well be that all men are manipulated and brainwashed, but it can't seriously be denied that in the UK in 2019 the type of woman most men find most physically attractive in the abscract are young slim women.

There's no moral judgment in that statement. It's just a statement of obvious fact.

No, you're using what the media portray as a stand in for what men want. They're not the same thing. You may be correct, I have no idea, but I believe you're defining your terms incorrectly and failing to consider the complexity of the question.

So we have two possible explanations.

1. For god knows how long the media, the Porn industry and everyone else have been trying to sell their products to men with images of women men don't actually find attractive or

2. The images put forward by those industries are ones men find attractive, because why on earth would people trying to sell stuff present it in ways their customers find unattractive.

My moneys on 2."

My money is on, both are gross oversimplification and we don't know.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"

But my point is not about causation. It may well be that all men are manipulated and brainwashed, but it can't seriously be denied that in the UK in 2019 the type of woman most men find most physically attractive in the abscract are young slim women.

There's no moral judgment in that statement. It's just a statement of obvious fact.

Let's assume this is true (I'm not sure that it is).

When do you want to be able to say this in a conversation, and why?"

I don't particularly want to say it. I'm interested in the issue as to whether discussing some physical attributes are generally considered more attractive than others counts as body shaming.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"But KLP, your preferences and data points are no more objective than mine. "What men want" is not desperately measurable.

We can only base our views on evidence. If we look at representations of women in current UK society designed to be attractive to men, we can see that they generally young and slim.

Hence, it's a reasonable deduction from that that the type of women that most men find most physically attractive is women that are young and slim.

That doesn't mean slim women are more attractive than non slim women in some universal sense, just that in UK society in 2019, that's what the general view is.

Confounding factors? Including fashion needs meaning clothing is made to look best on a very tall androgynous slender body?

Porn? Fabbed pics on here?

I'm not talking about fashion, I'm talking about images aimed squarely at men. See also selling cars, sports events etc.

All these industries are interconnected. It's an interesting question, and media influences on preference and vice versa would be fascinating, but I imagine it'd be a devilishly complicated sociological study.

But my point is not about causation. It may well be that all men are manipulated and brainwashed, but it can't seriously be denied that in the UK in 2019 the type of woman most men find most physically attractive in the abscract are young slim women.

There's no moral judgment in that statement. It's just a statement of obvious fact.

No, you're using what the media portray as a stand in for what men want. They're not the same thing. You may be correct, I have no idea, but I believe you're defining your terms incorrectly and failing to consider the complexity of the question.

So we have two possible explanations.

1. For god knows how long the media, the Porn industry and everyone else have been trying to sell their products to men with images of women men don't actually find attractive or

2. The images put forward by those industries are ones men find attractive, because why on earth would people trying to sell stuff present it in ways their customers find unattractive.

My moneys on 2.

My money is on, both are gross oversimplification and we don't know. "

I don't dispute that how attractions and preferences are formed is complicated, but if we are talking brute facts about what the majority male opinion (however formed) is about female attractiveness. I think the evidence is all one way.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It's trying to make someone feel ashamed of their body, be it fat, thin, small cock, small boobs, big labia, small balls, big nose, wonky teeth etc etc.

The people who do it, I feel, have issues of their own.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"But KLP, your preferences and data points are no more objective than mine. "What men want" is not desperately measurable.

We can only base our views on evidence. If we look at representations of women in current UK society designed to be attractive to men, we can see that they generally young and slim.

Hence, it's a reasonable deduction from that that the type of women that most men find most physically attractive is women that are young and slim.

That doesn't mean slim women are more attractive than non slim women in some universal sense, just that in UK society in 2019, that's what the general view is.

Confounding factors? Including fashion needs meaning clothing is made to look best on a very tall androgynous slender body?

Porn? Fabbed pics on here?

I'm not talking about fashion, I'm talking about images aimed squarely at men. See also selling cars, sports events etc.

All these industries are interconnected. It's an interesting question, and media influences on preference and vice versa would be fascinating, but I imagine it'd be a devilishly complicated sociological study.

But my point is not about causation. It may well be that all men are manipulated and brainwashed, but it can't seriously be denied that in the UK in 2019 the type of woman most men find most physically attractive in the abscract are young slim women.

There's no moral judgment in that statement. It's just a statement of obvious fact.

No, you're using what the media portray as a stand in for what men want. They're not the same thing. You may be correct, I have no idea, but I believe you're defining your terms incorrectly and failing to consider the complexity of the question.

So we have two possible explanations.

1. For god knows how long the media, the Porn industry and everyone else have been trying to sell their products to men with images of women men don't actually find attractive or

2. The images put forward by those industries are ones men find attractive, because why on earth would people trying to sell stuff present it in ways their customers find unattractive.

My moneys on 2.

My money is on, both are gross oversimplification and we don't know.

I don't dispute that how attractions and preferences are formed is complicated, but if we are talking brute facts about what the majority male opinion (however formed) is about female attractiveness. I think the evidence is all one way. "

I think you misunderstand the complexity of the question.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It's trying to make someone feel ashamed of their body, be it fat, thin, small cock, small boobs, big labia, small balls, big nose, wonky teeth etc etc.

The people who do it, I feel, have issues of their own. "

Projection

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It's trying to make someone feel ashamed of their body, be it fat, thin, small cock, small boobs, big labia, small balls, big nose, wonky teeth etc etc.

The people who do it, I feel, have issues of their own.

Projection"

And being shamed themselves, or feeling they have been, by feeling left out of the adulations.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Is discussing in the abscract whether some body shapes are generally considered to be more attractive than others body shaming? "

Some people think so - they always jump on such threads to make bitchy comments.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Is discussing in the abscract whether some body shapes are generally considered to be more attractive than others body shaming?

Some people think so - they always jump on such threads to make bitchy comments."

I don't think you'll find that is actually the case. It is often considered on here but if you have a different opinion to somebody else you are being bitchy and again is that aimed at women.

The point is it is not ok to constantly point out that somebody is more attractive simply because they're slim and it seems that it is unacceptable to some that anybody who dares to be offended or to challenge that opinion is wrong or bitching I just don't understand the divisiveness of some of this unless that's the aim.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hetalkingstoveMan  over a year ago

London


"

But my point is not about causation. It may well be that all men are manipulated and brainwashed, but it can't seriously be denied that in the UK in 2019 the type of woman most men find most physically attractive in the abscract are young slim women.

There's no moral judgment in that statement. It's just a statement of obvious fact.

Let's assume this is true (I'm not sure that it is).

When do you want to be able to say this in a conversation, and why?

I don't particularly want to say it. I'm interested in the issue as to whether discussing some physical attributes are generally considered more attractive than others counts as body shaming. "

But why would you need to discuss whether some physical attributes are more attractive than others? What value does that conversation bring?

In a group of friends, talking about what you like - probably there'll be no issue.

With a public audience, this immediately runs into the problem that it's virtually impossible to have a conversation about the way people look without there being associations of value. Especially around women's bodies.

What is or isn't body shaming shouldn't be the question. That's too nebulous. The question should be: what is the value of my comment, and how does that compare to who the audience is and how will they feel upon hearing it.

To state the obvious, there are people who have been bullied and made to feel miserable about their weight their entire lives, and even the stating of facts (or 'facts') such as the one we're discussing here can be another dripdrip of a daily water torture telling them they're lesser beings.

And finally as I'm sure you realise, that you do not have an issue with hearing that bald men are considered less attractive does not mean this can be extrapolated to a universal rule. This is emotional stuff, often very deeply so, not something logical.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman  over a year ago

evesham


"If it is a fact or an opinion, is it still shaming?

Is it the intent, or how the person perceives the comment?"

Is it being communicated in a way that makes people feel bad? If so then that's body shaming.

Not that difficult to work out really.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hetalkingstoveMan  over a year ago

London

(in case I'm accused of putting feelings ahead of free speech or something - the point is to take on the moral responsibility to consider carefully the *value* of your speech, and not just assume it is important - it might well be, but it's worth considering)

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Is discussing in the abscract whether some body shapes are generally considered to be more attractive than others body shaming?

I think they can be, but aren't necessarily.

I think as long as you don't target anyone personally, it's fine.

I'm 52 and bald. I am quite aware I am generally considered a lot less attractive than a young man with hair and I have no difficulty with people mentioning that fact.

But something like (I'm so sorry I don't mean this) "omg all these fat cows on Fab who do they think they are, eat a vegetable, know you're worth nothing if you're over a size 12..."

... As someone over a size 12, whether it's directed at me or not, I find somewhere between ignorant and hurtful.

Well yes, but stating (assuming it was relevant to a discussion) most men will find a size ten woman more attractive than a size twenty woman. Is there anything wrong with that?

But that's not fact is it. That's just assumption

No, it's fact. You only have to open your eyes. Have a look at the most fabbed pics for a start.

In any event, even if it's an opinion rather than a fact, the point holds.

As an opinion yes. Anyone is allowed to have an opinion.

And yes there are men that like the fuller figure and there are men that like the slender figure.

And then there are men that just want anyone to shag.

In the long run you don't have to be negative about one group of people just because they are not your type.

Saying you into slimmer women is not body shaming

But if someone points out that all bigger girls would look better slim that is.

What I can't be doing with is this idea that if you state something to the effect that in situation A, a person with attribute X is generally more favoured than person with attribute Y, that's somehow disrespectful of person with attribute Y.

There's no excuse for being personally insulting, but equally we shouldn't shy away from reality because we find it uncomfortable. "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"

But my point is not about causation. It may well be that all men are manipulated and brainwashed, but it can't seriously be denied that in the UK in 2019 the type of woman most men find most physically attractive in the abscract are young slim women.

There's no moral judgment in that statement. It's just a statement of obvious fact.

Let's assume this is true (I'm not sure that it is).

When do you want to be able to say this in a conversation, and why?

I don't particularly want to say it. I'm interested in the issue as to whether discussing some physical attributes are generally considered more attractive than others counts as body shaming.

But why would you need to discuss whether some physical attributes are more attractive than others? What value does that conversation bring?

In a group of friends, talking about what you like - probably there'll be no issue.

With a public audience, this immediately runs into the problem that it's virtually impossible to have a conversation about the way people look without there being associations of value. Especially around women's bodies.

What is or isn't body shaming shouldn't be the question. That's too nebulous. The question should be: what is the value of my comment, and how does that compare to who the audience is and how will they feel upon hearing it.

To state the obvious, there are people who have been bullied and made to feel miserable about their weight their entire lives, and even the stating of facts (or 'facts') such as the one we're discussing here can be another dripdrip of a daily water torture telling them they're lesser beings.

And finally as I'm sure you realise, that you do not have an issue with hearing that bald men are considered less attractive does not mean this can be extrapolated to a universal rule. This is emotional stuff, often very deeply so, not something logical."

I appreciate all that and obviously no one should deliberately try to offend.

But we are discussing here the definition of an abstract term "body shaming", not someones individual preferences. Hence I find it difficult to understand how we can possibly do that without stating examples of things that may or not be body shaming.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I think intent is key. Constructive criticism over weight , whether over or under weight, is always a delicate matter. It has been exacerbated recently with this victim hood culture and the fat acceptance movement or fat pride. Whoch i think are very irresponsible messages.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It's trying to make someone feel ashamed of their body, be it fat, thin, small cock, small boobs, big labia, small balls, big nose, wonky teeth etc etc.

The people who do it, I feel, have issues of their own.

Projection

And being shamed themselves, or feeling they have been, by feeling left out of the adulations."

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"(in case I'm accused of putting feelings ahead of free speech or something - the point is to take on the moral responsibility to consider carefully the *value* of your speech, and not just assume it is important - it might well be, but it's worth considering) "

In a thread titled "what is body shaping", can I humbly suggest it's difficult to see why discussing whether thing x is body shaming is inappropriate.

Anyone who doesn't want to discuss such issues can ignore the thread.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"(in case I'm accused of putting feelings ahead of free speech or something - the point is to take on the moral responsibility to consider carefully the *value* of your speech, and not just assume it is important - it might well be, but it's worth considering)

In a thread titled "what is body shaping", can I humbly suggest it's difficult to see why discussing whether thing x is body shaming is inappropriate.

Anyone who doesn't want to discuss such issues can ignore the thread. "

You keep trying to suggest that certain people shouldn't post on certain threads but what you actually mean is unless they agree with you they shouldn't.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

But my point is not about causation. It may well be that all men are manipulated and brainwashed, but it can't seriously be denied that in the UK in 2019 the type of woman most men find most physically attractive in the abscract are young slim women.

There's no moral judgment in that statement. It's just a statement of obvious fact.

Let's assume this is true (I'm not sure that it is).

When do you want to be able to say this in a conversation, and why?

I don't particularly want to say it. I'm interested in the issue as to whether discussing some physical attributes are generally considered more attractive than others counts as body shaming.

But why would you need to discuss whether some physical attributes are more attractive than others? What value does that conversation bring?

In a group of friends, talking about what you like - probably there'll be no issue.

With a public audience, this immediately runs into the problem that it's virtually impossible to have a conversation about the way people look without there being associations of value. Especially around women's bodies.

What is or isn't body shaming shouldn't be the question. That's too nebulous. The question should be: what is the value of my comment, and how does that compare to who the audience is and how will they feel upon hearing it.

To state the obvious, there are people who have been bullied and made to feel miserable about their weight their entire lives, and even the stating of facts (or 'facts') such as the one we're discussing here can be another dripdrip of a daily water torture telling them they're lesser beings.

And finally as I'm sure you realise, that you do not have an issue with hearing that bald men are considered less attractive does not mean this can be extrapolated to a universal rule. This is emotional stuff, often very deeply so, not something logical."

I happen to think this is a really important point in the whole debate.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I think intent is key. Constructive criticism over weight , whether over or under weight, is always a delicate matter. It has been exacerbated recently with this victim hood culture and the fat acceptance movement or fat pride. Whoch i think are very irresponsible messages. "

The question is does the person giving the "constructive criticism" have leave to do so.

If a complete stranger in here said you need to lose weight to me my response is that it has nothing to do with them

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It’s the intent behind the delivery of the content.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman  over a year ago

The Town by The Cross


"If it is a fact or an opinion, is it still shaming?

Is it the intent, or how the person perceives the comment?"

If I say you are the largest person here. That's a fact. ( no one would say it unless asked of course )

If I say you are too large to be loved. Large bodies are hideous. No dresses here will fit you fatty; wobble off. That's an insult and shaming.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s the intent behind the delivery of the content.

"

And I think that's why particularly over the internet it's quite subjective because it's hard to know the Intent.

For example if a close friend or family member spoke to me and said they were concerned for my health, I would take that seriously and on board and know that it's because they loved me.

If somebody I don't know over the internet said the same thing I would be really annoyed because it's nothing to do with them and none of their business and again you don't know the Intent.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"I think intent is key. Constructive criticism over weight , whether over or under weight, is always a delicate matter. It has been exacerbated recently with this victim hood culture and the fat acceptance movement or fat pride. Whoch i think are very irresponsible messages.

The question is does the person giving the "constructive criticism" have leave to do so.

If a complete stranger in here said you need to lose weight to me my response is that it has nothing to do with them "

I think intent is less important. If you step on my foot, you've hurt me whether you intended to or not. You need to get off my foot.

Similar here, although murkier. You should be mindful of causing offence, and, where it's possible, ask whether it's really necessary (99% of the time that'd be no), and ask if you're really adding anything new or of value, or just tearing people down.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Perception is a whole different ball game.

I can’t guarantee how I will come across to one specific person, but hopefully with careful wording of the content it will be recieved how it was intended by the majority.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I think the irony here is a thread inquiring into body shaming and it’s inappropriateness can have the effect of raising issues, in such a way, that it can psychologically affect those who suffer the effects of body shaming.

Is it then inappropriate to inquire into it? Or is it just something we need to recognise as we work through it?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"I think the irony here is a thread inquiring into body shaming and it’s inappropriateness can have the effect of raising issues, in such a way, that it can psychologically affect those who suffer the effects of body shaming.

Is it then inappropriate to inquire into it? Or is it just something we need to recognise as we work through it?"

I think it's something where people have to watch themselves and their own weaknesses or triggers. It's not unclear what the nature of the discussion might be.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman  over a year ago

The Town by The Cross


"Rachel Riley is being body shamed for being too thin as she's lost a lot of weight. Davina McCall similar last year when she posted slim pics."

The article I read about Rachel's weight loss and the comments made didn't come across to me as body shaming.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Perception is a whole different ball game.

I can’t guarantee how I will come across to one specific person, but hopefully with careful wording of the content it will be recieved how it was intended by the majority."

I agree that the meaning of my communication, no matter how well intended i think it is, is ultimately measured by the response it gets from others. If it isn’t received the way I intended I have to change the way I communicate.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I think the irony here is a thread inquiring into body shaming and it’s inappropriateness can have the effect of raising issues, in such a way, that it can psychologically affect those who suffer the effects of body shaming.

Is it then inappropriate to inquire into it? Or is it just something we need to recognise as we work through it?

I think it's something where people have to watch themselves and their own weaknesses or triggers. It's not unclear what the nature of the discussion might be. "

Watching ourselves are the watch words there. Awareness of the effects of our words on others is really important in working through such sensitive topics.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It seems that whatever someone says about someone else's personal appearance, somebody will accuse them of body-shaming and get offended on the other person's behalf. It's a fairly recent bandwagon, but it seems to be a popular one, especially amongst those who really should address their own problems.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *naswingdressWoman  over a year ago

Manchester (she/her)


"It seems that whatever someone says about someone else's personal appearance, somebody will accuse them of body-shaming and get offended on the other person's behalf. It's a fairly recent bandwagon, but it seems to be a popular one, especially amongst those who really should address their own problems."

Why can't people keep their views to themselves?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

In the end alot of the time people's opinions on someone are not called for.

Especially when it's negative view

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I THINK body shaming is when someone decides to mock a physical attribute in another. To what purpose I've no idea. If it's to help, then I can't think of a worse way of doing so.

There's all sorts of shaming going on here. Lots of bullying and nasty comments, hopefully mine are reactionary, directed at the bully, after they've had more than enough chances to see the error in their behaviour. If I'm guilty in anyway, I'd like to know, so I'm not inflicting pain onto others, without due cause or unknowingly.

Yes we're all different, but that doesn't give you the right to openly mock someone else for something they can't really change that easily about themselves, or in some cases, not at all.

I think it's a sad reflection of this Forum that a bully can continue to make their sly, snidey and nasty comments. Yet face no repercussions. Yet, those of us who are highly aggravated by the blatant cruelty in such comments, face immideate bans for giving bullies what they dish out. Silence is as good as acceptance, in my opinion.

I'd hoped that Fab would be one of the few places this kind of shit wasn't tolerated. That the open minded, seasoned Forum members and Swingers amongst you wouldn't tolerate that sort of narrow minded behaviour on here.

Yet again, I'm wrong.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I THINK body shaming is when someone decides to mock a physical attribute in another. To what purpose I've no idea. If it's to help, then I can't think of a worse way of doing so.

There's all sorts of shaming going on here. Lots of bullying and nasty comments, hopefully mine are reactionary, directed at the bully, after they've had more than enough chances to see the error in their behaviour. If I'm guilty in anyway, I'd like to know, so I'm not inflicting pain onto others, without due cause or unknowingly.

Yes we're all different, but that doesn't give you the right to openly mock someone else for something they can't really change that easily about themselves, or in some cases, not at all.

I think it's a sad reflection of this Forum that a bully can continue to make their sly, snidey and nasty comments. Yet face no repercussions. Yet, those of us who are highly aggravated by the blatant cruelty in such comments, face immideate bans for giving bullies what they dish out. Silence is as good as acceptance, in my opinion.

I'd hoped that Fab would be one of the few places this kind of shit wasn't tolerated. That the open minded, seasoned Forum members and Swingers amongst you wouldn't tolerate that sort of narrow minded behaviour on here.

Yet again, I'm wrong.

"

*edit* Not just can't or difficult to change themselves, they may not want to, either way it's still wrong to think it's ok to mock them for the size of their stomach, breasts, cock etc.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *.gerri.xTV/TS  over a year ago

North west

What is body shaming

My reaction to my reflection

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It seems that whatever someone says about someone else's personal appearance, somebody will accuse them of body-shaming and get offended on the other person's behalf. It's a fairly recent bandwagon, but it seems to be a popular one, especially amongst those who really should address their own problems."

I’m unsure how to take your comment. Are you saying, people shouldn’t defend others if they think they’re being body shamed. And what are their own problems ?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It seems that whatever someone says about someone else's personal appearance, somebody will accuse them of body-shaming and get offended on the other person's behalf. It's a fairly recent bandwagon, but it seems to be a popular one, especially amongst those who really should address their own problems.

Why can't people keep their views to themselves? "

Because the internet exists.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"It’s the intent behind the delivery of the content.

"

There's a guy who used to post threads about how much he loves fat women. He used to get jumped on for using the word fat. His intent was just that he loves fat women.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s the intent behind the delivery of the content.

There's a guy who used to post threads about how much he loves fat women. He used to get jumped on for using the word fat. His intent was just that he loves fat women."

That’s where perception then kicks in. For all the people that ‘got’ his intent there were others that took offence.

Happened when discussing larger passengers on a plane yesterday ~ some people were having a discussion about it, some took offence.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"It’s the intent behind the delivery of the content.

There's a guy who used to post threads about how much he loves fat women. He used to get jumped on for using the word fat. His intent was just that he loves fat women.

That’s where perception then kicks in. For all the people that ‘got’ his intent there were others that took offence.

Happened when discussing larger passengers on a plane yesterday ~ some people were having a discussion about it, some took offence."

I agree. Hence my OP and wondering.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s the intent behind the delivery of the content.

There's a guy who used to post threads about how much he loves fat women. He used to get jumped on for using the word fat. His intent was just that he loves fat women.

That’s where perception then kicks in. For all the people that ‘got’ his intent there were others that took offence.

Happened when discussing larger passengers on a plane yesterday ~ some people were having a discussion about it, some took offence.

I agree. Hence my OP and wondering. "

It’s an interesting conversation.

There are those whose intent is good but gets misinterpreted (by others perceptions) through a lack of clear communication, poor choice of wording / phrases.

I’ve done this before and as the perpetrator felt awful but it wasn’t my intention to come across that way, I posted in a rush and didn’t fully read through what I had written...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s the intent behind the delivery of the content.

There's a guy who used to post threads about how much he loves fat women. He used to get jumped on for using the word fat. His intent was just that he loves fat women.

That’s where perception then kicks in. For all the people that ‘got’ his intent there were others that took offence.

Happened when discussing larger passengers on a plane yesterday ~ some people were having a discussion about it, some took offence.

I agree. Hence my OP and wondering.

It’s an interesting conversation.

There are those whose intent is good but gets misinterpreted (by others perceptions) through a lack of clear communication, poor choice of wording / phrases.

I’ve done this before and as the perpetrator felt awful but it wasn’t my intention to come across that way, I posted in a rush and didn’t fully read through what I had written... "

You strike me as someone who is big enough to apologise and admit when you're wrong though. We all make mistakes. It takes intelligence, empathy and courage to admit you're at fault.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Ok. Body shaming. Many different forms of shaming. I came across a thing on youtube about flights and overweight people were being 'shamed'. They were talking specifically that bigger people should pay for two seats on a plain. The big people said no, why should they? Then the whole nhs spending on obese people was talked about. I think 'shaming' was probably started by an overweight lefty who likes nothing more than to play victim. They would rather play the victim than gave a serious chat about how obesity is rife and is a drain on nhs resources and other issues.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It’s a term used to prevent you from having an opinion on a persons health

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s the intent behind the delivery of the content.

There's a guy who used to post threads about how much he loves fat women. He used to get jumped on for using the word fat. His intent was just that he loves fat women.

That’s where perception then kicks in. For all the people that ‘got’ his intent there were others that took offence.

Happened when discussing larger passengers on a plane yesterday ~ some people were having a discussion about it, some took offence.

I agree. Hence my OP and wondering.

It’s an interesting conversation.

There are those whose intent is good but gets misinterpreted (by others perceptions) through a lack of clear communication, poor choice of wording / phrases.

I’ve done this before and as the perpetrator felt awful but it wasn’t my intention to come across that way, I posted in a rush and didn’t fully read through what I had written...

You strike me as someone who is big enough to apologise and admit when you're wrong though. We all make mistakes. It takes intelligence, empathy and courage to admit you're at fault. "

Thank you

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ok. Body shaming. Many different forms of shaming. I came across a thing on youtube about flights and overweight people were being 'shamed'. They were talking specifically that bigger people should pay for two seats on a plain. The big people said no, why should they? Then the whole nhs spending on obese people was talked about. I think 'shaming' was probably started by an overweight lefty who likes nothing more than to play victim. They would rather play the victim than gave a serious chat about how obesity is rife and is a drain on nhs resources and other issues. "

What do you advise then? Send everyone to fat camp? What if they enjoy being bigger? What if they can't help being bigger due to a medical condition. They may be a drain on the NHS, but its as much theirs as it is yours. FFS!

I'm sure you, like me, are doing something that's a drain on one of many resources and costing some of us more than we're happy to pay for. Doesn't give you the right to body shame an individual.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ok. Body shaming. Many different forms of shaming. I came across a thing on youtube about flights and overweight people were being 'shamed'. They were talking specifically that bigger people should pay for two seats on a plain. The big people said no, why should they? Then the whole nhs spending on obese people was talked about. I think 'shaming' was probably started by an overweight lefty who likes nothing more than to play victim. They would rather play the victim than gave a serious chat about how obesity is rife and is a drain on nhs resources and other issues. "

Ahhh the whole drain on the NHS statement I wondered when that would crop up.

My BMI was higher when I was in the forces and playing rugby etc than it is now.

As said any risky lifestyle can be a drain on resources but that does not mean people should be shaming anyone.

There is way to much negativity and hate in life as it is. Everyone being a little bit nicer would not be a bad thing

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Someone can be described as fat, thin, short etc etc etc, it's how you say it and why.

But I think if in doubt, you should avoid terms that you know some might find offensive. "

But the way things go, if you call a person by any term, someone is going to be offended by it. You can change fat to big and eventually big will become the derogatory term, skinny to slim and so on.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Someone can be described as fat, thin, short etc etc etc, it's how you say it and why.

But I think if in doubt, you should avoid terms that you know some might find offensive.

But the way things go, if you call a person by any term, someone is going to be offended by it. You can change fat to big and eventually big will become the derogatory term, skinny to slim and so on. "

It's not about describing words I describe myself as fat as I am fat.

It's about shaming someone for being fat etc and using it as an insult

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Ok. Body shaming. Many different forms of shaming. I came across a thing on youtube about flights and overweight people were being 'shamed'. They were talking specifically that bigger people should pay for two seats on a plain. The big people said no, why should they? Then the whole nhs spending on obese people was talked about. I think 'shaming' was probably started by an overweight lefty who likes nothing more than to play victim. They would rather play the victim than gave a serious chat about how obesity is rife and is a drain on nhs resources and other issues. "

I agree it's difficult to have a serious conversation about it without people getting upset/ angry. Diabetes for example causes many serious issues but it can often be avoided by diet changes. Cholesterol may be an issue for some slim people due to their diet. But if doctors mention these types of avoidable issues, some people get angry and say it's body shaming.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ok. Body shaming. Many different forms of shaming. I came across a thing on youtube about flights and overweight people were being 'shamed'. They were talking specifically that bigger people should pay for two seats on a plain. The big people said no, why should they? Then the whole nhs spending on obese people was talked about. I think 'shaming' was probably started by an overweight lefty who likes nothing more than to play victim. They would rather play the victim than gave a serious chat about how obesity is rife and is a drain on nhs resources and other issues.

Ahhh the whole drain on the NHS statement I wondered when that would crop up.

My BMI was higher when I was in the forces and playing rugby etc than it is now.

As said any risky lifestyle can be a drain on resources but that does not mean people should be shaming anyone.

There is way to much negativity and hate in life as it is. Everyone being a little bit nicer would not be a bad thing "

Forces and Fellow-Fab-Fat shame-Fighters - REspect! My BMI was higher in Forces too

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Someone can be described as fat, thin, short etc etc etc, it's how you say it and why.

But I think if in doubt, you should avoid terms that you know some might find offensive.

But the way things go, if you call a person by any term, someone is going to be offended by it. You can change fat to big and eventually big will become the derogatory term, skinny to slim and so on.

It's not about describing words I describe myself as fat as I am fat.

It's about shaming someone for being fat etc and using it as an insult "

If it is a fact or an opinion, is it still shaming?

Is it the intent, or how the person perceives the comment?

So to answer the OP, like yourself I call myself fat, it's a fact, and don't mind if someone used that word to describe me. If someone said "oi, fatty" they are trying to upset me. So then its only shaming if the intent is to hurt someone's feelings rather than just saying out of a group of people I'm the fat one.

I think if it's a fact it's not shaming, when the intent is to cause upset then that is.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Body shaming is such a bullshit term. Why is it only used when describing overweight people? It’s like a defence mechanism used to prevent criticism

I don’t see anyone crying “body shaming” against healthy figures when you have people criticising women in advertising for being too skinny or athletic, or “too perfect”. I never see “body shaming” mentioned when people criticise TV shows for having “unrealistically attractive” people on there.

It’s a phrase that’s mainly used for a certain section of people - overweight.

And that’s why I don’t support the phrase.

Though I also do agree that you shouldn’t make fun of someone because of their appearance. However this phrase gets used even when you aren’t criticising a persons appearance. (Eg saying they need to get in shape for the good of their health, for the benefit of others etc.)

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Body shaming is such a bullshit term. Why is it only used when describing overweight people? It’s like a defence mechanism used to prevent criticism

I don’t see anyone crying “body shaming” against healthy figures when you have people criticising women in advertising for being too skinny or athletic, or “too perfect”. I never see “body shaming” mentioned when people criticise TV shows for having “unrealistically attractive” people on there.

It’s a phrase that’s mainly used for a certain section of people - overweight.

And that’s why I don’t support the phrase.

Though I also do agree that you shouldn’t make fun of someone because of their appearance. However this phrase gets used even when you aren’t criticising a persons appearance. (Eg saying they need to get in shape for the good of their health, for the benefit of others etc.)"

Body shaming, as the name suggests, is shaming someone for their body shape or body type. It is a modern term recently coined and talked about, but body shaming in practice has existed for a very long time.

People have a definite notion of “beauty” which defines standards of skin colour, body dimensions, hair length, or the kind of clothes someone should or should not wear.

People are always too thin, too fat, too tall, too short, too dark, or too fair for the society, and it has repercussions that are not even realised in everyday life.

Body shaming affects mental and physical health in surprising ways- both for the person who is body shaming and the one who is being body shamed.

Your other point when you are saying telling someone to get into shape for their health may not be body shaming if you have the right to say that to someone.

If you are telling someone you don't know to slim down or put weight on that has nothing to do with you

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ok. Body shaming. Many different forms of shaming. I came across a thing on youtube about flights and overweight people were being 'shamed'. They were talking specifically that bigger people should pay for two seats on a plain. The big people said no, why should they? Then the whole nhs spending on obese people was talked about. I think 'shaming' was probably started by an overweight lefty who likes nothing more than to play victim. They would rather play the victim than gave a serious chat about how obesity is rife and is a drain on nhs resources and other issues.

I agree it's difficult to have a serious conversation about it without people getting upset/ angry. Diabetes for example causes many serious issues but it can often be avoided by diet changes. Cholesterol may be an issue for some slim people due to their diet. But if doctors mention these types of avoidable issues, some people get angry and say it's body shaming. "

that discussion should be had with an individual and their doctor not for other people on an internet forum to publicly point out so yes it is body shaming.

I don't know why people feel the need to poke their noses into everybody else's business.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s a term used to prevent you from having an opinion on a persons health"

Absolutely because you have no right to an opinion on somebody else's health!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 19/02/19 20:19:56]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Wow this was a long read.....

Cliff notes - if you say you do not like bbw women it’s body shaming.. keep your mouth shut...

If you say you don’t like bald , short , old fat men... it’s perfectly okay....

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Wow this was a long read.....

Cliff notes - if you say you do not like bbw women it’s body shaming.. keep your mouth shut...

If you say you don’t like bald , short , old fat men... it’s perfectly okay...."

Not at all people can like who they like.

Body shaming is about being negative and insulting to someone because of how they look

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *loswingersCouple  over a year ago

Gloucester


"If it is a fact or an opinion, is it still shaming?

Is it the intent, or how the person perceives the comment?"

In the world away from fab , the real world of talking to people face to face , I am constantly told that taking offence is ‘ the choice ‘ of the person who takes offence to what’s been said or inferred .

And when you think about it , there’s never a truer statement . Yet the world we live in is becoming more and more a world where the world and his wife revel in taking offence on behalf of everyone else . So it’s not just the people who are fat , thin , black , white , trans , gay , or whatever , that take offence to remarks made about them , it’s the white knights and those who make it a point of theirs to be offended too .

If no one took any notice , no one was offended , then the perpetrators would stop , and there would be no more to be offended by . But that will never happen will it ?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ok. Body shaming. Many different forms of shaming. I came across a thing on youtube about flights and overweight people were being 'shamed'. They were talking specifically that bigger people should pay for two seats on a plain. The big people said no, why should they? Then the whole nhs spending on obese people was talked about. I think 'shaming' was probably started by an overweight lefty who likes nothing more than to play victim. They would rather play the victim than gave a serious chat about how obesity is rife and is a drain on nhs resources and other issues.

I agree it's difficult to have a serious conversation about it without people getting upset/ angry. Diabetes for example causes many serious issues but it can often be avoided by diet changes. Cholesterol may be an issue for some slim people due to their diet. But if doctors mention these types of avoidable issues, some people get angry and say it's body shaming.

that discussion should be had with an individual and their doctor not for other people on an internet forum to publicly point out so yes it is body shaming.

I don't know why people feel the need to poke their noses into everybody else's business. "

But ir is a public health crisis. Its not just between "them" and "thier" doctor as it relates to everyone.

The idea is to try and stop it before it reaches them needing a doctor and now having an irreversible condition.

For instance did you think cancer uks campaign trying to raise awareness that after smoking obesity is the biggest cause of cancer is body shaming?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If it is a fact or an opinion, is it still shaming?

Is it the intent, or how the person perceives the comment?

In the world away from fab , the real world of talking to people face to face , I am constantly told that taking offence is ‘ the choice ‘ of the person who takes offence to what’s been said or inferred .

And when you think about it , there’s never a truer statement . Yet the world we live in is becoming more and more a world where the world and his wife revel in taking offence on behalf of everyone else . So it’s not just the people who are fat , thin , black , white , trans , gay , or whatever , that take offence to remarks made about them , it’s the white knights and those who make it a point of theirs to be offended too .

If no one took any notice , no one was offended , then the perpetrators would stop , and there would be no more to be offended by . But that will never happen will it ? "

In the real world , men are given this advice before marriage....

“ Take a look at your future wife’s mother , because that what she will look like in the future “

Should people be offended by this ?

If the mother in question is a bigger person , is this body shaming?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Ok. Body shaming. Many different forms of shaming. I came across a thing on youtube about flights and overweight people were being 'shamed'. They were talking specifically that bigger people should pay for two seats on a plain. The big people said no, why should they? Then the whole nhs spending on obese people was talked about. I think 'shaming' was probably started by an overweight lefty who likes nothing more than to play victim. They would rather play the victim than gave a serious chat about how obesity is rife and is a drain on nhs resources and other issues.

What do you advise then? Send everyone to fat camp? What if they enjoy being bigger? What if they can't help being bigger due to a medical condition. They may be a drain on the NHS, but its as much theirs as it is yours. FFS!

I'm sure you, like me, are doing something that's a drain on one of many resources and costing some of us more than we're happy to pay for. Doesn't give you the right to body shame an individual. "

So by your logic we should tax fat people like we tax smokers?

Say 1% more NI for every % body fat over 30%?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"If it is a fact or an opinion, is it still shaming?

Is it the intent, or how the person perceives the comment?

In the world away from fab , the real world of talking to people face to face , I am constantly told that taking offence is ‘ the choice ‘ of the person who takes offence to what’s been said or inferred .

And when you think about it , there’s never a truer statement . Yet the world we live in is becoming more and more a world where the world and his wife revel in taking offence on behalf of everyone else . So it’s not just the people who are fat , thin , black , white , trans , gay , or whatever , that take offence to remarks made about them , it’s the white knights and those who make it a point of theirs to be offended too .

If no one took any notice , no one was offended , then the perpetrators would stop , and there would be no more to be offended by . But that will never happen will it ? "

Like ignoring bullies. So they get bored and move on to someone else.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If it is a fact or an opinion, is it still shaming?

Is it the intent, or how the person perceives the comment?

In the world away from fab , the real world of talking to people face to face , I am constantly told that taking offence is ‘ the choice ‘ of the person who takes offence to what’s been said or inferred .

And when you think about it , there’s never a truer statement . Yet the world we live in is becoming more and more a world where the world and his wife revel in taking offence on behalf of everyone else . So it’s not just the people who are fat , thin , black , white , trans , gay , or whatever , that take offence to remarks made about them , it’s the white knights and those who make it a point of theirs to be offended too .

If no one took any notice , no one was offended , then the perpetrators would stop , and there would be no more to be offended by . But that will never happen will it ?

In the real world , men are given this advice before marriage....

“ Take a look at your future wife’s mother , because that what she will look like in the future “

Should people be offended by this ?

If the mother in question is a bigger person , is this body shaming? "

I look more like me dad.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *loswingersCouple  over a year ago

Gloucester


"If it is a fact or an opinion, is it still shaming?

Is it the intent, or how the person perceives the comment?

In the world away from fab , the real world of talking to people face to face , I am constantly told that taking offence is ‘ the choice ‘ of the person who takes offence to what’s been said or inferred .

And when you think about it , there’s never a truer statement . Yet the world we live in is becoming more and more a world where the world and his wife revel in taking offence on behalf of everyone else . So it’s not just the people who are fat , thin , black , white , trans , gay , or whatever , that take offence to remarks made about them , it’s the white knights and those who make it a point of theirs to be offended too .

If no one took any notice , no one was offended , then the perpetrators would stop , and there would be no more to be offended by . But that will never happen will it ?

Like ignoring bullies. So they get bored and move on to someone else."

Well more like ignoring bullies and eventually they may stop being bullies .

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abs..Woman  over a year ago

..

Humiliating someone by mocking and criticising them by making comments about their body shape and size. That definitely happens at times on here.

Some people are unable to come up with a constructive opinion or view without resorting to body shaming unfortunately.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *risky_MareWoman  over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"

But my point is not about causation. It may well be that all men are manipulated and brainwashed, but it can't seriously be denied that in the UK in 2019 the type of woman most men find most physically attractive in the abscract are young slim women.

There's no moral judgment in that statement. It's just a statement of obvious fact.

Let's assume this is true (I'm not sure that it is).

When do you want to be able to say this in a conversation, and why?

I don't particularly want to say it. I'm interested in the issue as to whether discussing some physical attributes are generally considered more attractive than others counts as body shaming.

But why would you need to discuss whether some physical attributes are more attractive than others? What value does that conversation bring?

In a group of friends, talking about what you like - probably there'll be no issue.

With a public audience, this immediately runs into the problem that it's virtually impossible to have a conversation about the way people look without there being associations of value. Especially around women's bodies.

What is or isn't body shaming shouldn't be the question. That's too nebulous. The question should be: what is the value of my comment, and how does that compare to who the audience is and how will they feel upon hearing it.

To state the obvious, there are people who have been bullied and made to feel miserable about their weight their entire lives, and even the stating of facts (or 'facts') such as the one we're discussing here can be another dripdrip of a daily water torture telling them they're lesser beings.

And finally as I'm sure you realise, that you do not have an issue with hearing that bald men are considered less attractive does not mean this can be extrapolated to a universal rule. This is emotional stuff, often very deeply so, not something logical."

Well said.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *risky_MareWoman  over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


" Trying to stop people feeling good about themselves where it has no impact on you whatsoever.

I really like this statement because I saw this a lot in the forum - whether it's really intended or not, that I can't be sure.

I think, being charitable, it can sometimes be sheer thoughtlessness - people getting swept along in a thread, trying to be funny, trying to get noticed or whatever and therefore not stopping to think about the potentially hurtful or offensive impact of their words. It doesn't help that many body shaming terms are stereotypical and impersonal - to the person putting them out there, who doesn't give it a second thought - but not to those affected.

On the other hand, I don't doubt, from the context of what's said, the way it's said, and the history of the poster concerned, that *some* people take rather too much deliberate delight in being unnecessarily unkind behind the anonymous protection of a screen ... and if ever challenged, cite opinions and preferences, or 'ignorance' to justify their unpleasantness.

I guess a minority never completely lose that playground mentality!"

Yes, this is so true! Sometimes I believe people who do so are also 'on the spectrum', they have a lack of social awareness and ability and are just ignorant of the way they come across, possibly unable to understand it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I'm irked more by references to punched lasagne and burst kebabs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"I'm irked more by references to punched lasagne and burst kebabs "

No mistaking the intent to hurt there.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *a Fee VerteWoman  over a year ago

Limbo


" Trying to stop people feeling good about themselves where it has no impact on you whatsoever.

I really like this statement because I saw this a lot in the forum - whether it's really intended or not, that I can't be sure.

I think, being charitable, it can sometimes be sheer thoughtlessness - people getting swept along in a thread, trying to be funny, trying to get noticed or whatever and therefore not stopping to think about the potentially hurtful or offensive impact of their words. It doesn't help that many body shaming terms are stereotypical and impersonal - to the person putting them out there, who doesn't give it a second thought - but not to those affected.

On the other hand, I don't doubt, from the context of what's said, the way it's said, and the history of the poster concerned, that *some* people take rather too much deliberate delight in being unnecessarily unkind behind the anonymous protection of a screen ... and if ever challenged, cite opinions and preferences, or 'ignorance' to justify their unpleasantness.

I guess a minority never completely lose that playground mentality!

Yes, this is so true! Sometimes I believe people who do so are also 'on the spectrum', they have a lack of social awareness and ability and are just ignorant of the way they come across, possibly unable to understand it. "

Well of course that's one possible explanation and it stands to reason that in a diverse community some people will indeed fall into that particular category but sadly, I don't think a *genuine* lack of social awareness accounts for most examples of body shaming we see here. In fact, many so called 'higher functioning' people on 'the spectrum' are all too acutely aware of their awkwardness and tendency to make social faux pas and make every effort not to do so, such as taking their time before saying or writing stuff in case it's misinterpreted - or giving up and not contributing at all because they're worried about coming across badly.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Trying to stop people feeling good about themselves where it has no impact on you whatsoever.

I really like this statement because I saw this a lot in the forum - whether it's really intended or not, that I can't be sure.

I think, being charitable, it can sometimes be sheer thoughtlessness - people getting swept along in a thread, trying to be funny, trying to get noticed or whatever and therefore not stopping to think about the potentially hurtful or offensive impact of their words. It doesn't help that many body shaming terms are stereotypical and impersonal - to the person putting them out there, who doesn't give it a second thought - but not to those affected.

On the other hand, I don't doubt, from the context of what's said, the way it's said, and the history of the poster concerned, that *some* people take rather too much deliberate delight in being unnecessarily unkind behind the anonymous protection of a screen ... and if ever challenged, cite opinions and preferences, or 'ignorance' to justify their unpleasantness.

I guess a minority never completely lose that playground mentality!

Yes, this is so true! Sometimes I believe people who do so are also 'on the spectrum', they have a lack of social awareness and ability and are just ignorant of the way they come across, possibly unable to understand it.

Well of course that's one possible explanation and it stands to reason that in a diverse community some people will indeed fall into that particular category but sadly, I don't think a *genuine* lack of social awareness accounts for most examples of body shaming we see here. In fact, many so called 'higher functioning' people on 'the spectrum' are all too acutely aware of their awkwardness and tendency to make social faux pas and make every effort not to do so, such as taking their time before saying or writing stuff in case it's misinterpreted - or giving up and not contributing at all because they're worried about coming across badly."

Tbf "high functioning" is rare for pretty much any such conditions .

But the other way to look at it is is this behaviour actually negative?

Is it wrong objectively for members of a society or species to criticise or ostricise members who negativly afect the group. Or is it simply a beneficial evolved behaviour.

We are for example very overtly negative towards those who are anti-social and socially rewarded for that

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Trying to stop people feeling good about themselves where it has no impact on you whatsoever.

I really like this statement because I saw this a lot in the forum - whether it's really intended or not, that I can't be sure.

I think, being charitable, it can sometimes be sheer thoughtlessness - people getting swept along in a thread, trying to be funny, trying to get noticed or whatever and therefore not stopping to think about the potentially hurtful or offensive impact of their words. It doesn't help that many body shaming terms are stereotypical and impersonal - to the person putting them out there, who doesn't give it a second thought - but not to those affected.

On the other hand, I don't doubt, from the context of what's said, the way it's said, and the history of the poster concerned, that *some* people take rather too much deliberate delight in being unnecessarily unkind behind the anonymous protection of a screen ... and if ever challenged, cite opinions and preferences, or 'ignorance' to justify their unpleasantness.

I guess a minority never completely lose that playground mentality!

Yes, this is so true! Sometimes I believe people who do so are also 'on the spectrum', they have a lack of social awareness and ability and are just ignorant of the way they come across, possibly unable to understand it.

Well of course that's one possible explanation and it stands to reason that in a diverse community some people will indeed fall into that particular category but sadly, I don't think a *genuine* lack of social awareness accounts for most examples of body shaming we see here. In fact, many so called 'higher functioning' people on 'the spectrum' are all too acutely aware of their awkwardness and tendency to make social faux pas and make every effort not to do so, such as taking their time before saying or writing stuff in case it's misinterpreted - or giving up and not contributing at all because they're worried about coming across badly.

Tbf "high functioning" is rare for pretty much any such conditions .

But the other way to look at it is is this behaviour actually negative?

Is it wrong objectively for members of a society or species to criticise or ostricise members who negativly afect the group. Or is it simply a beneficial evolved behaviour.

We are for example very overtly negative towards those who are anti-social and socially rewarded for that"

I haven’t read all this post but if you’re talking about the autistic spectrum, high functioning is definitely not rare.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ryst In IsoldeWoman  over a year ago

your imagination

I haven't read the full thread, admittedly... I started to, but about halfway through it became very clear that most comments were repetitive and the majority focusing on female body weight and the indignation any reference to it brings. While there may be instances and a few people who do throw in body weight comments, there are far, far more threads about cock size, and people willing to make disparaging comments about them... Threads about hairy men that some will love, and others won't like but rather than skip the thread, won't be able to resist telling everyone how much they dislike 'gorillas'.. I've yet to see a thread about the virtues of innie -v- outtie bellybuttons, but no doubt that would become equally contentious, because the simple fact of it is, there are deeply unhappy people who can only feel superior by breaking people down. It's a form of sadism and the easiest one to perpetuate, because it can be done to anyone. The keyboard sadist doesn't need a willing submissive, he or she can simply choose anyone to target and abuse whenever they wish and find their gratification through upsetting their victims, and even more so if they can upset multiple people by using chatrooms or forums. I use the word victims here, because the person or people being targeted are not willing participants. Unlike a physical S&M dynamic, there is no requirement from the keyboard sadist for their target/targets to be willing to submit or be humiliated, their gratification comes from forcing humiliation onto absolutely anyone they choose.

So in the spirit of 'each to their own' and 'everyone has their preferences and kinks', do we simply accept keyboard sadism as a kink, acknowledge it and when someone says something nasty to humiliate someone or a particular body type, just shrug it off as their kink... or, as it's a behaviour being forced on the people being targeted for another's gratification, do we deem it unacceptable and crossing a line?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I haven't read the full thread, admittedly... I started to, but about halfway through it became very clear that most comments were repetitive and the majority focusing on female body weight and the indignation any reference to it brings. While there may be instances and a few people who do throw in body weight comments, there are far, far more threads about cock size, and people willing to make disparaging comments about them... Threads about hairy men that some will love, and others won't like but rather than skip the thread, won't be able to resist telling everyone how much they dislike 'gorillas'.. I've yet to see a thread about the virtues of innie -v- outtie bellybuttons, but no doubt that would become equally contentious, because the simple fact of it is, there are deeply unhappy people who can only feel superior by breaking people down. It's a form of sadism and the easiest one to perpetuate, because it can be done to anyone. The keyboard sadist doesn't need a willing submissive, he or she can simply choose anyone to target and abuse whenever they wish and find their gratification through upsetting their victims, and even more so if they can upset multiple people by using chatrooms or forums. I use the word victims here, because the person or people being targeted are not willing participants. Unlike a physical S&M dynamic, there is no requirement from the keyboard sadist for their target/targets to be willing to submit or be humiliated, their gratification comes from forcing humiliation onto absolutely anyone they choose.

So in the spirit of 'each to their own' and 'everyone has their preferences and kinks', do we simply accept keyboard sadism as a kink, acknowledge it and when someone says something nasty to humiliate someone or a particular body type, just shrug it off as their kink... or, as it's a behaviour being forced on the people being targeted for another's gratification, do we deem it unacceptable and crossing a line? "

Great post

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Trying to stop people feeling good about themselves where it has no impact on you whatsoever.

I really like this statement because I saw this a lot in the forum - whether it's really intended or not, that I can't be sure.

I think, being charitable, it can sometimes be sheer thoughtlessness - people getting swept along in a thread, trying to be funny, trying to get noticed or whatever and therefore not stopping to think about the potentially hurtful or offensive impact of their words. It doesn't help that many body shaming terms are stereotypical and impersonal - to the person putting them out there, who doesn't give it a second thought - but not to those affected.

On the other hand, I don't doubt, from the context of what's said, the way it's said, and the history of the poster concerned, that *some* people take rather too much deliberate delight in being unnecessarily unkind behind the anonymous protection of a screen ... and if ever challenged, cite opinions and preferences, or 'ignorance' to justify their unpleasantness.

I guess a minority never completely lose that playground mentality!

Yes, this is so true! Sometimes I believe people who do so are also 'on the spectrum', they have a lack of social awareness and ability and are just ignorant of the way they come across, possibly unable to understand it.

Well of course that's one possible explanation and it stands to reason that in a diverse community some people will indeed fall into that particular category but sadly, I don't think a *genuine* lack of social awareness accounts for most examples of body shaming we see here. In fact, many so called 'higher functioning' people on 'the spectrum' are all too acutely aware of their awkwardness and tendency to make social faux pas and make every effort not to do so, such as taking their time before saying or writing stuff in case it's misinterpreted - or giving up and not contributing at all because they're worried about coming across badly.

Tbf "high functioning" is rare for pretty much any such conditions .

But the other way to look at it is is this behaviour actually negative?

Is it wrong objectively for members of a society or species to criticise or ostricise members who negativly afect the group. Or is it simply a beneficial evolved behaviour.

We are for example very overtly negative towards those who are anti-social and socially rewarded for that

I haven’t read all this post but if you’re talking about the autistic spectrum, high functioning is definitely not rare. "

We may have a discrepancy in "high functioning" for me a high functioning person with a condition is able to maintain a typical level of normalcy.

Where as maybe you mean a more medical definition where they are high functioning in regards to others of thier condition.

When it comes to Autism iirc its 15% who are able to maintain full time employment in adulthood.

They would be the "high functioning" segment and to me 15% is rare

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Trying to stop people feeling good about themselves where it has no impact on you whatsoever.

I really like this statement because I saw this a lot in the forum - whether it's really intended or not, that I can't be sure.

I think, being charitable, it can sometimes be sheer thoughtlessness - people getting swept along in a thread, trying to be funny, trying to get noticed or whatever and therefore not stopping to think about the potentially hurtful or offensive impact of their words. It doesn't help that many body shaming terms are stereotypical and impersonal - to the person putting them out there, who doesn't give it a second thought - but not to those affected.

On the other hand, I don't doubt, from the context of what's said, the way it's said, and the history of the poster concerned, that *some* people take rather too much deliberate delight in being unnecessarily unkind behind the anonymous protection of a screen ... and if ever challenged, cite opinions and preferences, or 'ignorance' to justify their unpleasantness.

I guess a minority never completely lose that playground mentality!

Yes, this is so true! Sometimes I believe people who do so are also 'on the spectrum', they have a lack of social awareness and ability and are just ignorant of the way they come across, possibly unable to understand it.

Well of course that's one possible explanation and it stands to reason that in a diverse community some people will indeed fall into that particular category but sadly, I don't think a *genuine* lack of social awareness accounts for most examples of body shaming we see here. In fact, many so called 'higher functioning' people on 'the spectrum' are all too acutely aware of their awkwardness and tendency to make social faux pas and make every effort not to do so, such as taking their time before saying or writing stuff in case it's misinterpreted - or giving up and not contributing at all because they're worried about coming across badly.

Tbf "high functioning" is rare for pretty much any such conditions .

But the other way to look at it is is this behaviour actually negative?

Is it wrong objectively for members of a society or species to criticise or ostricise members who negativly afect the group. Or is it simply a beneficial evolved behaviour.

We are for example very overtly negative towards those who are anti-social and socially rewarded for that

I haven’t read all this post but if you’re talking about the autistic spectrum, high functioning is definitely not rare.

We may have a discrepancy in "high functioning" for me a high functioning person with a condition is able to maintain a typical level of normalcy.

Where as maybe you mean a more medical definition where they are high functioning in regards to others of thier condition.

When it comes to Autism iirc its 15% who are able to maintain full time employment in adulthood.

They would be the "high functioning" segment and to me 15% is rare"

Yes I meant high functioning in comparison to others with the same condition.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


". The keyboard sadist doesn't need a willing submissive, "

Just to be a pedantic cunt sadism is a sexual context actually requires it to be non consensual

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Trying to stop people feeling good about themselves where it has no impact on you whatsoever.

I really like this statement because I saw this a lot in the forum - whether it's really intended or not, that I can't be sure.

I think, being charitable, it can sometimes be sheer thoughtlessness - people getting swept along in a thread, trying to be funny, trying to get noticed or whatever and therefore not stopping to think about the potentially hurtful or offensive impact of their words. It doesn't help that many body shaming terms are stereotypical and impersonal - to the person putting them out there, who doesn't give it a second thought - but not to those affected.

On the other hand, I don't doubt, from the context of what's said, the way it's said, and the history of the poster concerned, that *some* people take rather too much deliberate delight in being unnecessarily unkind behind the anonymous protection of a screen ... and if ever challenged, cite opinions and preferences, or 'ignorance' to justify their unpleasantness.

I guess a minority never completely lose that playground mentality!

Yes, this is so true! Sometimes I believe people who do so are also 'on the spectrum', they have a lack of social awareness and ability and are just ignorant of the way they come across, possibly unable to understand it.

Well of course that's one possible explanation and it stands to reason that in a diverse community some people will indeed fall into that particular category but sadly, I don't think a *genuine* lack of social awareness accounts for most examples of body shaming we see here. In fact, many so called 'higher functioning' people on 'the spectrum' are all too acutely aware of their awkwardness and tendency to make social faux pas and make every effort not to do so, such as taking their time before saying or writing stuff in case it's misinterpreted - or giving up and not contributing at all because they're worried about coming across badly.

Tbf "high functioning" is rare for pretty much any such conditions .

But the other way to look at it is is this behaviour actually negative?

Is it wrong objectively for members of a society or species to criticise or ostricise members who negativly afect the group. Or is it simply a beneficial evolved behaviour.

We are for example very overtly negative towards those who are anti-social and socially rewarded for that

I haven’t read all this post but if you’re talking about the autistic spectrum, high functioning is definitely not rare.

We may have a discrepancy in "high functioning" for me a high functioning person with a condition is able to maintain a typical level of normalcy.

Where as maybe you mean a more medical definition where they are high functioning in regards to others of thier condition.

When it comes to Autism iirc its 15% who are able to maintain full time employment in adulthood.

They would be the "high functioning" segment and to me 15% is rare

Yes I meant high functioning in comparison to others with the same condition. "

In that case i dont really know what the qualifier would be for high functioning.

Im happy to change it to to a term you'd prefer but my point was being able to achieve "normalcy" is rare in most neurological conditions.

The vast numbers of normal people who claim or are claimed to be "on the spectrum" just aren't. To the point using them as an argument that bullies are in general autistic is just nonsense

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Trying to stop people feeling good about themselves where it has no impact on you whatsoever.

I really like this statement because I saw this a lot in the forum - whether it's really intended or not, that I can't be sure.

I think, being charitable, it can sometimes be sheer thoughtlessness - people getting swept along in a thread, trying to be funny, trying to get noticed or whatever and therefore not stopping to think about the potentially hurtful or offensive impact of their words. It doesn't help that many body shaming terms are stereotypical and impersonal - to the person putting them out there, who doesn't give it a second thought - but not to those affected.

On the other hand, I don't doubt, from the context of what's said, the way it's said, and the history of the poster concerned, that *some* people take rather too much deliberate delight in being unnecessarily unkind behind the anonymous protection of a screen ... and if ever challenged, cite opinions and preferences, or 'ignorance' to justify their unpleasantness.

I guess a minority never completely lose that playground mentality!

Yes, this is so true! Sometimes I believe people who do so are also 'on the spectrum', they have a lack of social awareness and ability and are just ignorant of the way they come across, possibly unable to understand it.

Well of course that's one possible explanation and it stands to reason that in a diverse community some people will indeed fall into that particular category but sadly, I don't think a *genuine* lack of social awareness accounts for most examples of body shaming we see here. In fact, many so called 'higher functioning' people on 'the spectrum' are all too acutely aware of their awkwardness and tendency to make social faux pas and make every effort not to do so, such as taking their time before saying or writing stuff in case it's misinterpreted - or giving up and not contributing at all because they're worried about coming across badly.

Tbf "high functioning" is rare for pretty much any such conditions .

But the other way to look at it is is this behaviour actually negative?

Is it wrong objectively for members of a society or species to criticise or ostricise members who negativly afect the group. Or is it simply a beneficial evolved behaviour.

We are for example very overtly negative towards those who are anti-social and socially rewarded for that

I haven’t read all this post but if you’re talking about the autistic spectrum, high functioning is definitely not rare.

We may have a discrepancy in "high functioning" for me a high functioning person with a condition is able to maintain a typical level of normalcy.

Where as maybe you mean a more medical definition where they are high functioning in regards to others of thier condition.

When it comes to Autism iirc its 15% who are able to maintain full time employment in adulthood.

They would be the "high functioning" segment and to me 15% is rare

Yes I meant high functioning in comparison to others with the same condition. "

I also think allowances need to be made on here sometimes and people not to be ignorant to the fact that there are autistic people on here. Not long ago someone got totally slated on a post and I could see straight away by what he was saying that he was autistic. I actually messaged a couple of people who were being nasty to him and they then felt bad. He was upset and ended up leaving the site that day. People are too quick to jump on people here.

Another example re “body shaming” was when a man who hadn’t been on the forums long commented “I like a real woman with curves”. He got so much abuse it was unbelievable and he apologised straight away for what he’d said. Any sane person would have surely seen that he hadn’t meant that in a derogatory way but yet they still continued to bully him. He also left fab. I think there are people on here who just look for the slightest thing to be offended by and then just bully people.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ryst In IsoldeWoman  over a year ago

your imagination


". The keyboard sadist doesn't need a willing submissive,

Just to be a pedantic cunt sadism is a sexual context actually requires it to be non consensual "

Within an S&M dynamic it absolutely has to be consensual. Otherwise you're simply abducting and torturing a victim... Which is illegal... And as we are here on a legal and consensual swinging site, my comment only encompasses willing participation between consenting adults. Pedant if you wish, but there is a difference between kink and abuse

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Trying to stop people feeling good about themselves where it has no impact on you whatsoever.

I really like this statement because I saw this a lot in the forum - whether it's really intended or not, that I can't be sure.

I think, being charitable, it can sometimes be sheer thoughtlessness - people getting swept along in a thread, trying to be funny, trying to get noticed or whatever and therefore not stopping to think about the potentially hurtful or offensive impact of their words. It doesn't help that many body shaming terms are stereotypical and impersonal - to the person putting them out there, who doesn't give it a second thought - but not to those affected.

On the other hand, I don't doubt, from the context of what's said, the way it's said, and the history of the poster concerned, that *some* people take rather too much deliberate delight in being unnecessarily unkind behind the anonymous protection of a screen ... and if ever challenged, cite opinions and preferences, or 'ignorance' to justify their unpleasantness.

I guess a minority never completely lose that playground mentality!

Yes, this is so true! Sometimes I believe people who do so are also 'on the spectrum', they have a lack of social awareness and ability and are just ignorant of the way they come across, possibly unable to understand it.

Well of course that's one possible explanation and it stands to reason that in a diverse community some people will indeed fall into that particular category but sadly, I don't think a *genuine* lack of social awareness accounts for most examples of body shaming we see here. In fact, many so called 'higher functioning' people on 'the spectrum' are all too acutely aware of their awkwardness and tendency to make social faux pas and make every effort not to do so, such as taking their time before saying or writing stuff in case it's misinterpreted - or giving up and not contributing at all because they're worried about coming across badly.

Tbf "high functioning" is rare for pretty much any such conditions .

But the other way to look at it is is this behaviour actually negative?

Is it wrong objectively for members of a society or species to criticise or ostricise members who negativly afect the group. Or is it simply a beneficial evolved behaviour.

We are for example very overtly negative towards those who are anti-social and socially rewarded for that

I haven’t read all this post but if you’re talking about the autistic spectrum, high functioning is definitely not rare.

We may have a discrepancy in "high functioning" for me a high functioning person with a condition is able to maintain a typical level of normalcy.

Where as maybe you mean a more medical definition where they are high functioning in regards to others of thier condition.

When it comes to Autism iirc its 15% who are able to maintain full time employment in adulthood.

They would be the "high functioning" segment and to me 15% is rare

Yes I meant high functioning in comparison to others with the same condition.

In that case i dont really know what the qualifier would be for high functioning.

Im happy to change it to to a term you'd prefer but my point was being able to achieve "normalcy" is rare in most neurological conditions.

The vast numbers of normal people who claim or are claimed to be "on the spectrum" just aren't. To the point using them as an argument that bullies are in general autistic is just nonsense"

I agree. People can’t “claim” to be on the spectrum. Autism needs to be officially diagnosed.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *risky_MareWoman  over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


" Trying to stop people feeling good about themselves where it has no impact on you whatsoever.

I really like this statement because I saw this a lot in the forum - whether it's really intended or not, that I can't be sure.

I think, being charitable, it can sometimes be sheer thoughtlessness - people getting swept along in a thread, trying to be funny, trying to get noticed or whatever and therefore not stopping to think about the potentially hurtful or offensive impact of their words. It doesn't help that many body shaming terms are stereotypical and impersonal - to the person putting them out there, who doesn't give it a second thought - but not to those affected.

On the other hand, I don't doubt, from the context of what's said, the way it's said, and the history of the poster concerned, that *some* people take rather too much deliberate delight in being unnecessarily unkind behind the anonymous protection of a screen ... and if ever challenged, cite opinions and preferences, or 'ignorance' to justify their unpleasantness.

I guess a minority never completely lose that playground mentality!

Yes, this is so true! Sometimes I believe people who do so are also 'on the spectrum', they have a lack of social awareness and ability and are just ignorant of the way they come across, possibly unable to understand it.

Well of course that's one possible explanation and it stands to reason that in a diverse community some people will indeed fall into that particular category but sadly, I don't think a *genuine* lack of social awareness accounts for most examples of body shaming we see here. In fact, many so called 'higher functioning' people on 'the spectrum' are all too acutely aware of their awkwardness and tendency to make social faux pas and make every effort not to do so, such as taking their time before saying or writing stuff in case it's misinterpreted - or giving up and not contributing at all because they're worried about coming across badly."

Ah interesting, I didn't know that, I may be wrongly giving too many people the benefit of the doubt then.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Trying to stop people feeling good about themselves where it has no impact on you whatsoever.

I really like this statement because I saw this a lot in the forum - whether it's really intended or not, that I can't be sure.

I think, being charitable, it can sometimes be sheer thoughtlessness - people getting swept along in a thread, trying to be funny, trying to get noticed or whatever and therefore not stopping to think about the potentially hurtful or offensive impact of their words. It doesn't help that many body shaming terms are stereotypical and impersonal - to the person putting them out there, who doesn't give it a second thought - but not to those affected.

On the other hand, I don't doubt, from the context of what's said, the way it's said, and the history of the poster concerned, that *some* people take rather too much deliberate delight in being unnecessarily unkind behind the anonymous protection of a screen ... and if ever challenged, cite opinions and preferences, or 'ignorance' to justify their unpleasantness.

I guess a minority never completely lose that playground mentality!

Yes, this is so true! Sometimes I believe people who do so are also 'on the spectrum', they have a lack of social awareness and ability and are just ignorant of the way they come across, possibly unable to understand it.

Well of course that's one possible explanation and it stands to reason that in a diverse community some people will indeed fall into that particular category but sadly, I don't think a *genuine* lack of social awareness accounts for most examples of body shaming we see here. In fact, many so called 'higher functioning' people on 'the spectrum' are all too acutely aware of their awkwardness and tendency to make social faux pas and make every effort not to do so, such as taking their time before saying or writing stuff in case it's misinterpreted - or giving up and not contributing at all because they're worried about coming across badly.

Tbf "high functioning" is rare for pretty much any such conditions .

But the other way to look at it is is this behaviour actually negative?

Is it wrong objectively for members of a society or species to criticise or ostricise members who negativly afect the group. Or is it simply a beneficial evolved behaviour.

We are for example very overtly negative towards those who are anti-social and socially rewarded for that

I haven’t read all this post but if you’re talking about the autistic spectrum, high functioning is definitely not rare.

We may have a discrepancy in "high functioning" for me a high functioning person with a condition is able to maintain a typical level of normalcy.

Where as maybe you mean a more medical definition where they are high functioning in regards to others of thier condition.

When it comes to Autism iirc its 15% who are able to maintain full time employment in adulthood.

They would be the "high functioning" segment and to me 15% is rare

Yes I meant high functioning in comparison to others with the same condition.

I also think allowances need to be made on here sometimes and people not to be ignorant to the fact that there are autistic people on here. Not long ago someone got totally slated on a post and I could see straight away by what he was saying that he was autistic. I actually messaged a couple of people who were being nasty to him and they then felt bad. He was upset and ended up leaving the site that day. People are too quick to jump on people here.

Another example re “body shaming” was when a man who hadn’t been on the forums long commented “I like a real woman with curves”. He got so much abuse it was unbelievable and he apologised straight away for what he’d said. Any sane person would have surely seen that he hadn’t meant that in a derogatory way but yet they still continued to bully him. He also left fab. I think there are people on here who just look for the slightest thing to be offended by and then just bully people. "

Oh i agree people love to be offended as it lets them be a bully while maintaining the moral high ground.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


". The keyboard sadist doesn't need a willing submissive,

Just to be a pedantic cunt sadism is a sexual context actually requires it to be non consensual

Within an S&M dynamic it absolutely has to be consensual. Otherwise you're simply abducting and torturing a victim... Which is illegal... And as we are here on a legal and consensual swinging site, my comment only encompasses willing participation between consenting adults. Pedant if you wish, but there is a difference between kink and abuse "

Sexual saidism is classified as being non consensual after our good old Marquis de sade, Where we get sadism from.

It was jidt a joke for the other S&M folks on here dont get too caught up in it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *innie The MinxWoman  over a year ago

Under the Duvet


"If it is a fact or an opinion, is it still shaming?

Is it the intent, or how the person perceives the comment?"

Lots of things are facts, but if you are saying them to make someone else feel bad about themselves then that is bodyshaming.

Pointing out what you perceive to be someone else flaws to make yourself feel better is unnecessary and borders on bullying.

If you've got nothing positive to say then keep it to yourself, is probably still good advice.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *risky_MareWoman  over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


" Trying to stop people feeling good about themselves where it has no impact on you whatsoever.

I really like this statement because I saw this a lot in the forum - whether it's really intended or not, that I can't be sure.

I think, being charitable, it can sometimes be sheer thoughtlessness - people getting swept along in a thread, trying to be funny, trying to get noticed or whatever and therefore not stopping to think about the potentially hurtful or offensive impact of their words. It doesn't help that many body shaming terms are stereotypical and impersonal - to the person putting them out there, who doesn't give it a second thought - but not to those affected.

On the other hand, I don't doubt, from the context of what's said, the way it's said, and the history of the poster concerned, that *some* people take rather too much deliberate delight in being unnecessarily unkind behind the anonymous protection of a screen ... and if ever challenged, cite opinions and preferences, or 'ignorance' to justify their unpleasantness.

I guess a minority never completely lose that playground mentality!

Yes, this is so true! Sometimes I believe people who do so are also 'on the spectrum', they have a lack of social awareness and ability and are just ignorant of the way they come across, possibly unable to understand it.

Well of course that's one possible explanation and it stands to reason that in a diverse community some people will indeed fall into that particular category but sadly, I don't think a *genuine* lack of social awareness accounts for most examples of body shaming we see here. In fact, many so called 'higher functioning' people on 'the spectrum' are all too acutely aware of their awkwardness and tendency to make social faux pas and make every effort not to do so, such as taking their time before saying or writing stuff in case it's misinterpreted - or giving up and not contributing at all because they're worried about coming across badly.

Tbf "high functioning" is rare for pretty much any such conditions .

But the other way to look at it is is this behaviour actually negative?

Is it wrong objectively for members of a society or species to criticise or ostricise members who negativly afect the group. Or is it simply a beneficial evolved behaviour.

We are for example very overtly negative towards those who are anti-social and socially rewarded for that

I haven’t read all this post but if you’re talking about the autistic spectrum, high functioning is definitely not rare. "

I was referring to the aspergery end, and many of those are very high functioning, it is more prevalent in the highly intelligent apparently.

Some people are so unspeakably unkind on here at times I was wondering if they could be totally unaware. But maybe it's more narcissistic lack of empathy?

Humour can be cruel, maybe they forget they are not out on the piss with their d*unken mates when they post here?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *igJandTheBlondeCouple  over a year ago

Kings Hill

I think sometimes, genuinely people don’t know they are doing it and tell you something because they believe it is for “your own good”. I used to be fat, nobody would ever have dreamt of telling me I was fat because they think it’s offensive. I lost a shed load of weight and then people started commenting about how I was far too thin and telling me not to lose anymore weight! They seemed to think that because I was super slim I could take it and it was ok to say somebody was thin!

It’s not ok to tell anybody anything unless they are asking and even then, some sense should be employed!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" Trying to stop people feeling good about themselves where it has no impact on you whatsoever.

I really like this statement because I saw this a lot in the forum - whether it's really intended or not, that I can't be sure.

I think, being charitable, it can sometimes be sheer thoughtlessness - people getting swept along in a thread, trying to be funny, trying to get noticed or whatever and therefore not stopping to think about the potentially hurtful or offensive impact of their words. It doesn't help that many body shaming terms are stereotypical and impersonal - to the person putting them out there, who doesn't give it a second thought - but not to those affected.

On the other hand, I don't doubt, from the context of what's said, the way it's said, and the history of the poster concerned, that *some* people take rather too much deliberate delight in being unnecessarily unkind behind the anonymous protection of a screen ... and if ever challenged, cite opinions and preferences, or 'ignorance' to justify their unpleasantness.

I guess a minority never completely lose that playground mentality!

Yes, this is so true! Sometimes I believe people who do so are also 'on the spectrum', they have a lack of social awareness and ability and are just ignorant of the way they come across, possibly unable to understand it.

Well of course that's one possible explanation and it stands to reason that in a diverse community some people will indeed fall into that particular category but sadly, I don't think a *genuine* lack of social awareness accounts for most examples of body shaming we see here. In fact, many so called 'higher functioning' people on 'the spectrum' are all too acutely aware of their awkwardness and tendency to make social faux pas and make every effort not to do so, such as taking their time before saying or writing stuff in case it's misinterpreted - or giving up and not contributing at all because they're worried about coming across badly.

Tbf "high functioning" is rare for pretty much any such conditions .

But the other way to look at it is is this behaviour actually negative?

Is it wrong objectively for members of a society or species to criticise or ostricise members who negativly afect the group. Or is it simply a beneficial evolved behaviour.

We are for example very overtly negative towards those who are anti-social and socially rewarded for that

I haven’t read all this post but if you’re talking about the autistic spectrum, high functioning is definitely not rare.

We may have a discrepancy in "high functioning" for me a high functioning person with a condition is able to maintain a typical level of normalcy.

Where as maybe you mean a more medical definition where they are high functioning in regards to others of thier condition.

When it comes to Autism iirc its 15% who are able to maintain full time employment in adulthood.

They would be the "high functioning" segment and to me 15% is rare

Yes I meant high functioning in comparison to others with the same condition.

I also think allowances need to be made on here sometimes and people not to be ignorant to the fact that there are autistic people on here. Not long ago someone got totally slated on a post and I could see straight away by what he was saying that he was autistic. I actually messaged a couple of people who were being nasty to him and they then felt bad. He was upset and ended up leaving the site that day. People are too quick to jump on people here.

Another example re “body shaming” was when a man who hadn’t been on the forums long commented “I like a real woman with curves”. He got so much abuse it was unbelievable and he apologised straight away for what he’d said. Any sane person would have surely seen that he hadn’t meant that in a derogatory way but yet they still continued to bully him. He also left fab. I think there are people on here who just look for the slightest thing to be offended by and then just bully people.

Oh i agree people love to be offended as it lets them be a bully while maintaining the moral high ground.

"

Exactly that.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *risky_MareWoman  over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"

As i said like most neurologicsl conditions are associated with sub normal inteligence and function not "highly inteligent".

"

It is no myth - the only asperger diagnosed people I know are extremely intelligent, and certainly functional in terms of academic prowess and ability in employment, if not in relationships.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *risky_MareWoman  over a year ago

...Up on the Downs

Logo of jrsocmed

J R Soc Med. 2003 Jan; 96(1): 36–39.

PMCID: PMC539373

PMID: 12519805

Singular scientists

Ioan James, FRS

Author information Copyright and License information Disclaimer

This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.

Asperger people are quite common in the general population, but it is not fully appreciated how many well-known people in the arts and sciences had the Asperger syndrome. When I came across several possibilities—namely Isaac Newton, Henry Cavendish and Albert Einstein—in the course of writing1 about the lives of famous physicists, I consulted Simon Baron-Cohen, the psychiatrist who heads the autism research centre at Cambridge. He agreed that Newton and Einstein seemed fairly certain, judging by accepted criteria; also Cavendish were it not for the lack of information about his childhood...

Etc, etc, etc.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"I think sometimes, genuinely people don’t know they are doing it and tell you something because they believe it is for “your own good”. I used to be fat, nobody would ever have dreamt of telling me I was fat because they think it’s offensive. I lost a shed load of weight and then people started commenting about how I was far too thin and telling me not to lose anymore weight! They seemed to think that because I was super slim I could take it and it was ok to say somebody was thin!

It’s not ok to tell anybody anything unless they are asking and even then, some sense should be employed!"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

  

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


" Trying to stop people feeling good about themselves where it has no impact on you whatsoever.

I really like this statement because I saw this a lot in the forum - whether it's really intended or not, that I can't be sure.

I think, being charitable, it can sometimes be sheer thoughtlessness - people getting swept along in a thread, trying to be funny, trying to get noticed or whatever and therefore not stopping to think about the potentially hurtful or offensive impact of their words. It doesn't help that many body shaming terms are stereotypical and impersonal - to the person putting them out there, who doesn't give it a second thought - but not to those affected.

On the other hand, I don't doubt, from the context of what's said, the way it's said, and the history of the poster concerned, that *some* people take rather too much deliberate delight in being unnecessarily unkind behind the anonymous protection of a screen ... and if ever challenged, cite opinions and preferences, or 'ignorance' to justify their unpleasantness.

I guess a minority never completely lose that playground mentality!

Yes, this is so true! Sometimes I believe people who do so are also 'on the spectrum', they have a lack of social awareness and ability and are just ignorant of the way they come across, possibly unable to understand it.

Well of course that's one possible explanation and it stands to reason that in a diverse community some people will indeed fall into that particular category but sadly, I don't think a *genuine* lack of social awareness accounts for most examples of body shaming we see here. In fact, many so called 'higher functioning' people on 'the spectrum' are all too acutely aware of their awkwardness and tendency to make social faux pas and make every effort not to do so, such as taking their time before saying or writing stuff in case it's misinterpreted - or giving up and not contributing at all because they're worried about coming across badly.

Tbf "high functioning" is rare for pretty much any such conditions .

But the other way to look at it is is this behaviour actually negative?

Is it wrong objectively for members of a society or species to criticise or ostricise members who negativly afect the group. Or is it simply a beneficial evolved behaviour.

We are for example very overtly negative towards those who are anti-social and socially rewarded for that

I haven’t read all this post but if you’re talking about the autistic spectrum, high functioning is definitely not rare.

We may have a discrepancy in "high functioning" for me a high functioning person with a condition is able to maintain a typical level of normalcy.

Where as maybe you mean a more medical definition where they are high functioning in regards to others of thier condition.

When it comes to Autism iirc its 15% who are able to maintain full time employment in adulthood.

They would be the "high functioning" segment and to me 15% is rare

Yes I meant high functioning in comparison to others with the same condition.

I also think allowances need to be made on here sometimes and people not to be ignorant to the fact that there are autistic people on here. Not long ago someone got totally slated on a post and I could see straight away by what he was saying that he was autistic. I actually messaged a couple of people who were being nasty to him and they then felt bad. He was upset and ended up leaving the site that day. People are too quick to jump on people here.

Another example re “body shaming” was when a man who hadn’t been on the forums long commented “I like a real woman with curves”. He got so much abuse it was unbelievable and he apologised straight away for what he’d said. Any sane person would have surely seen that he hadn’t meant that in a derogatory way but yet they still continued to bully him. He also left fab. I think there are people on here who just look for the slightest thing to be offended by and then just bully people. "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

0.3437

0