FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > liam neeson
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm too lazy _abio.....what did he say? " It's a subject we aren't allowed to discuss on here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm too lazy _abio.....what did he say? " I sent a message. It’s grim :/ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I thought this was a "Liam Neesons cock is so big.... " thread " He acted like a cock. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm too lazy _abio.....what did he say? I sent a message. It’s grim :/" I wouldn't call it grim. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Liam Neeson has sparked a race row after admitting he had fantasised about killing a black person after someone close to him was r**** The Northern Ireland actor said he walked the streets armed with a weapon hoping he would be approached by a “black b******” after a loved one claimed they were r**** by a black man – so he could kill them. ." Shit... I had read it earlier as him hoping he would run into the actual guy who did it... Which, to be absolutely clear, isn’t exactly much better. But thinking about killing some random person? That’s utterly insane. Like actually insane. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"i don't what he was trying to achieve by saying it.... or the lesson we would all learn by him not doing it.... he wanted to be applauded for not going thru on a grim thought..... well... whoop de do! but.... thanks for sharing liam!!! " I wonder if he's actually done something worse and needed to get it off his chest so he gave us the sanitised version that he thought would make him appear courageous and revolutionary. He's such a hero for not killing a random black person "slow clap". | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Pity as I used to like his films, well some of them. Those films are going in the bin now. " Is there some irony now with your profile name | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Liam Neeson has sparked a race row after admitting he had fantasised about killing a black person after someone close to him was r**** The Northern Ireland actor said he walked the streets armed with a weapon hoping he would be approached by a “black b******” after a loved one claimed they were r**** by a black man – so he could kill them. ." hes so hard | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"He said it in anger. I don't believe for a second he meant it. After all his dear friend was ra*ed!! He's bound to feel anger " You don’t believe for a second he meant what? The comment? Sure, he’s bound to feel anger. But to roam the streets for a whole week with a cosh, with the intention to kill an innocent black men because of the actions of one black man? That’s crazy & behaviour that would’ve needed help in my opinion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"He said it in anger. I don't believe for a second he meant it. After all his dear friend was ra*ed!! He's bound to feel anger You don’t believe for a second he meant what? The comment? Sure, he’s bound to feel anger. But to roam the streets for a whole week with a cosh, with the intention to kill an innocent black men because of the actions of one black man? That’s crazy & behaviour that would’ve needed help in my opinion. " Agreed. No matter how much he felt for his friend or how angry it made him, it's no one else's place other than the law to deal with crime. Never mind going out with the intention of harming a random, most likely innocent, person in retaliation for what happened to his friend. crazy, I was shocked reading about this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm sure it would have wanted to kill a white guy too... I am not a racist anyway but seeing racism in every statement people say is racist and people of colour to are capable of racism. The guy group in Ireland through the height of its troubles unless you have any insight into this and how it affects and change a person mindset jump into a conclusion is not the humane thing to do." So, let me get this straight... Liam Neeson would have roamed the streets of Ireland looking for any random white person to kill if the woman's rapist had been white? BWAHAHAHA, bullshit! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"At least we won’t be subjected to anymore of the TAKEN Film Francise .....there’s always a silver lining. " Absolutely | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All I can think of now is the Key and Peele sketches "My man Liam Neeson"" Fs me too now | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All I can think of now is the Key and Peele sketches "My man Liam Neeson"" HAHAHA, you know what, that's the same thing I keep playing in my head too. "Neesons" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All I can think of now is the Key and Peele sketches "My man Liam Neeson" HAHAHA, you know what, that's the same thing I keep playing in my head too. "Neesons" " https://youtu.be/MpYG1B1d45Q For the Key and Peele fans.. or those who don't know, but want to | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"He said it in anger. I don't believe for a second he meant it. After all his dear friend was ra*ed!! He's bound to feel anger " Someone who sets out to kill a random stranger solely on the basis of their skin colour self-evidently is: a) consumed by racial hate b) consumed by malice aforethought A defence lawyer may argue their behaviour was irrational because they had been disturbed by the actions of a r@pist. But the sentence would still be far harsher than if he had simply gone after the r@pist. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm pretty sure he was trying to give a personal account of how a person can be blinded with rage through traumatic experiences involving a loved one. At no point do I think he was deliberately being racist in the interview, it was a recount of past events in which nobody was (thankfully) hurt as a result, and which he acknowledged was an abhorrent way to react to the situation, or to act in general. My two cents. C" People will always have their opinions. I don’t agree with his thoughts and I’m shocked. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think its pathetic people criticising him. If i was in that situation i'd probably feel the same. I dare say if honest with yourself, many would too. Not all, but many. It's like people critising the German people during WW2. I here people all the time saying that they wouldn't have been complicit like the German people. However it is widely accepted that the majority would have. It's the same here. He also said in the interview that he knows that his reaction was wrong and accepted that on reflection. That's my two bobs worth." You think it’s pathetic due to not having any racial abuse towards yourself. Some things just don’t need to be said | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm pretty sure he was trying to give a personal account of how a person can be blinded with rage through traumatic experiences involving a loved one. At no point do I think he was deliberately being racist in the interview, it was a recount of past events in which nobody was (thankfully) hurt as a result, and which he acknowledged was an abhorrent way to react to the situation, or to act in general. My two cents. C" I needn't post here . You've worded my opinion perfectly | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm pretty sure he was trying to give a personal account of how a person can be blinded with rage through traumatic experiences involving a loved one. At no point do I think he was deliberately being racist in the interview, it was a recount of past events in which nobody was (thankfully) hurt as a result, and which he acknowledged was an abhorrent way to react to the situation, or to act in general. My two cents. C" From what I read he was shocked and in disbelief at his own reaction to the anger he felt. He picked the obvious characteristic that stood out to him and wanted revenge. Had it have been an Irish person, would have have roamed the streets looking for an Irish person? Probably not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"He said it in anger. I don't believe for a second he meant it. After all his dear friend was ra*ed!! He's bound to feel anger " Yes and we weren’t there for the interview. Just reading it from a paper. This is news. I like him. Personally. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"He said it in anger. I don't believe for a second he meant it. After all his dear friend was ra*ed!! He's bound to feel anger Yes and we weren’t there for the interview. Just reading it from a paper. This is news. I like him. Personally. " *isnt news | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think its pathetic people criticising him. If i was in that situation i'd probably feel the same. I dare say if honest with yourself, many would too. Not all, but many. It's like people critising the German people during WW2. I here people all the time saying that they wouldn't have been complicit like the German people. However it is widely accepted that the majority would have. It's the same here. He also said in the interview that he knows that his reaction was wrong and accepted that on reflection. That's my two bobs worth. You think it’s pathetic due to not having any racial abuse towards yourself. Some things just don’t need to be said " That is such an insane comment. Do you think racial abuse is confined to non-white people? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think its pathetic people criticising him. If i was in that situation i'd probably feel the same. I dare say if honest with yourself, many would too. Not all, but many. It's like people critising the German people during WW2. I here people all the time saying that they wouldn't have been complicit like the German people. However it is widely accepted that the majority would have. It's the same here. He also said in the interview that he knows that his reaction was wrong and accepted that on reflection. That's my two bobs worth." You’d want to attack an innocent person for the actions of one person of that race/gender? I find that quite scary. I’ve been attacked by white men twice, I’ve never felt the need to attack an innocent person for their actions. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think its pathetic people criticising him. If i was in that situation i'd probably feel the same. I dare say if honest with yourself, many would too. Not all, but many. It's like people critising the German people during WW2. I here people all the time saying that they wouldn't have been complicit like the German people. However it is widely accepted that the majority would have. It's the same here. He also said in the interview that he knows that his reaction was wrong and accepted that on reflection. That's my two bobs worth. You’d want to attack an innocent person for the actions of one person of that race/gender? I find that quite scary. I’ve been attacked by white men twice, I’ve never felt the need to attack an innocent person for their actions. " I think this is what he was trying to highlight. How people can use one person's actions to justify accusing a whole race or nationality. I've done it myself when my granddaughter came home and said she was hanging around with some local Romanians. I panicked and asked her why. She said it's ok Nan, these are the good ones, not the bad ones. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"He said it in anger. I don't believe for a second he meant it. After all his dear friend was ra*ed!! He's bound to feel anger " Ok let's flip this to put some perspective. Let's say he decided, out of anger, to go out and SCRAPE a black woman! Would people be praising his 'honesty'? If his story was "so I grabbed my ski mask and knife and went out for weeks hoping to find any random black bitch to scrape in revenge, but I didn't find any and oh now I'm so ashamed, I came to my senses"... Exactly! It's reprehensible! So why is it still sexy to want to murder a black person and then "see the light"? We don't praise people for learning that it's wrong to scrape, because you simply shouldn't do that anyway, it's nothing praiseworthy to not scrape. So why is it praiseworthy to not murder an innocent person? It isn't! He's still a racist for even sharing that story hoping to score virtue points for being a reformed cunt. He thought it would make him look tougher hahaha! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think its pathetic people criticising him. If i was in that situation i'd probably feel the same. I dare say if honest with yourself, many would too. Not all, but many. It's like people critising the German people during WW2. I here people all the time saying that they wouldn't have been complicit like the German people. However it is widely accepted that the majority would have. It's the same here. He also said in the interview that he knows that his reaction was wrong and accepted that on reflection. That's my two bobs worth. You’d want to attack an innocent person for the actions of one person of that race/gender? I find that quite scary. I’ve been attacked by white men twice, I’ve never felt the need to attack an innocent person for their actions. I think this is what he was trying to highlight. How people can use one person's actions to justify accusing a whole race or nationality. I've done it myself when my granddaughter came home and said she was hanging around with some local Romanians. I panicked and asked her why. She said it's ok Nan, these are the good ones, not the bad ones. " I’ve never done it. Maybe because I’m an ethnic minority, and I know how it feels to be judged solely on the colour of your skin, negatively. I don’t know. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think its pathetic people criticising him. If i was in that situation i'd probably feel the same. I dare say if honest with yourself, many would too. Not all, but many. It's like people critising the German people during WW2. I here people all the time saying that they wouldn't have been complicit like the German people. However it is widely accepted that the majority would have. It's the same here. He also said in the interview that he knows that his reaction was wrong and accepted that on reflection. That's my two bobs worth. You’d want to attack an innocent person for the actions of one person of that race/gender? I find that quite scary. I’ve been attacked by white men twice, I’ve never felt the need to attack an innocent person for their actions. " That is not what i said. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do wonder if some of the people who are being more forgiving and think he should get a pass would feel the same way if we swooped around some of the words or substituted some of the characteristics....." Ok, so tell us why a person who does something bad and then realises their error, learned from it and changed their ways, shouldn't be given another chance? Should we keep the people we are currently de-radicalising locked up forever? He knows what he did was awful, he's admitted what he did, out of rage, was awful and he's learned from it. I'm not condoning his actions, but he has looked at them and acknowledged the wrongness of them. I wouldn't say I forgive him for what he did, as he may have ended up killing someone, but he's had the balls to acknowledge it and not hide it. Black people aren't innocent of doing this either. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? " Did he have a reason to be walking the street for nearly a week with a cosh hoping a “black b******” would have a go at him, so he could kill them? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think its pathetic people criticising him. If i was in that situation i'd probably feel the same. I dare say if honest with yourself, many would too. Not all, but many. It's like people critising the German people during WW2. I here people all the time saying that they wouldn't have been complicit like the German people. However it is widely accepted that the majority would have. It's the same here. He also said in the interview that he knows that his reaction was wrong and accepted that on reflection. That's my two bobs worth. You’d want to attack an innocent person for the actions of one person of that race/gender? I find that quite scary. I’ve been attacked by white men twice, I’ve never felt the need to attack an innocent person for their actions. That is not what i said. " You said you’d probably feel the same, I assume that’s what you meant. What did you mean exactly? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think its pathetic people criticising him. If i was in that situation i'd probably feel the same. I dare say if honest with yourself, many would too. Not all, but many. It's like people critising the German people during WW2. I here people all the time saying that they wouldn't have been complicit like the German people. However it is widely accepted that the majority would have. It's the same here. He also said in the interview that he knows that his reaction was wrong and accepted that on reflection. That's my two bobs worth. You’d want to attack an innocent person for the actions of one person of that race/gender? I find that quite scary. I’ve been attacked by white men twice, I’ve never felt the need to attack an innocent person for their actions. I think this is what he was trying to highlight. How people can use one person's actions to justify accusing a whole race or nationality. I've done it myself when my granddaughter came home and said she was hanging around with some local Romanians. I panicked and asked her why. She said it's ok Nan, these are the good ones, not the bad ones. I’ve never done it. Maybe because I’m an ethnic minority, and I know how it feels to be judged solely on the colour of your skin, negatively. I don’t know. " I wasn't judging them on skin colour. As far as I know they are white. It was how they are perceived in my area, because of the trouble they bring, I assumed she was hanging around with bad people. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? Did he have a reason to be walking the street for nearly a week with a cosh hoping a “black b******” would have a go at him, so he could kill them? " I didn't ask you you are not the OP! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? " He had reason to be angry... at all random black men? He had reason to KILL any random black man?? If he had said he went out for weeks looking for a random black woman to scRAPE out of anger and revenge, would you say "he had reason to be angry"? NO! So why are you ok with his decision to look for a random innocent black person to MURDER? Are you defending racially motivated murder of innocent people? He had reason to be angry.. at the person who committed the crime, ONLY! I'm sure you wouldn't be saying this if someone wanted to attack and kill a random white woman out of anger.. as a matter of fact, your logic would support the scraper if he did it out of justifiable anger for something a white woman did to him, right? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? " No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? He had reason to be angry... at all random black men? He had reason to KILL any random black man?? If he had said he went out for weeks looking for a random black woman to scRAPE out of anger and revenge, would you say "he had reason to be angry"? NO! So why are you ok with his decision to look for a random innocent black person to MURDER? Are you defending racially motivated murder of innocent people? He had reason to be angry.. at the person who committed the crime, ONLY! I'm sure you wouldn't be saying this if someone wanted to attack and kill a random white woman out of anger.. as a matter of fact, your logic would support the scraper if he did it out of justifiable anger for something a white woman did to him, right? " I didn't ask you either your point is inconsequential as you just don't read. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. " What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? He had reason to be angry... at all random black men? He had reason to KILL any random black man?? If he had said he went out for weeks looking for a random black woman to scRAPE out of anger and revenge, would you say "he had reason to be angry"? NO! So why are you ok with his decision to look for a random innocent black person to MURDER? Are you defending racially motivated murder of innocent people? He had reason to be angry.. at the person who committed the crime, ONLY! I'm sure you wouldn't be saying this if someone wanted to attack and kill a random white woman out of anger.. as a matter of fact, your logic would support the scraper if he did it out of justifiable anger for something a white woman did to him, right? " I think this is what Neeson was trying to highlight. How people can blame a whole race for one person's actions. He owned up to it and felt remorse. Not everyone would do that. I don't know when this happened but it does still happen in this day and age. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? He had reason to be angry... at all random black men? He had reason to KILL any random black man?? If he had said he went out for weeks looking for a random black woman to scRAPE out of anger and revenge, would you say "he had reason to be angry"? NO! So why are you ok with his decision to look for a random innocent black person to MURDER? Are you defending racially motivated murder of innocent people? He had reason to be angry.. at the person who committed the crime, ONLY! I'm sure you wouldn't be saying this if someone wanted to attack and kill a random white woman out of anger.. as a matter of fact, your logic would support the scraper if he did it out of justifiable anger for something a white woman did to him, right? I didn't ask you either your point is inconsequential as you just don't read. " Again, the OP didn't ask you either, so answer the question I asked you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder?" No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. " Where did this incident take place? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? He had reason to be angry... at all random black men? He had reason to KILL any random black man?? If he had said he went out for weeks looking for a random black woman to scRAPE out of anger and revenge, would you say "he had reason to be angry"? NO! So why are you ok with his decision to look for a random innocent black person to MURDER? Are you defending racially motivated murder of innocent people? He had reason to be angry.. at the person who committed the crime, ONLY! I'm sure you wouldn't be saying this if someone wanted to attack and kill a random white woman out of anger.. as a matter of fact, your logic would support the scraper if he did it out of justifiable anger for something a white woman did to him, right? I think this is what Neeson was trying to highlight. How people can blame a whole race for one person's actions. He owned up to it and felt remorse. Not everyone would do that. I don't know when this happened but it does still happen in this day and age." People don't pick up on that though they have an agenda on here its strange they didn't pick up on the fact it was against a man not a woman which is sexist also but that falls by the wayside. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? He had reason to be angry... at all random black men? He had reason to KILL any random black man?? If he had said he went out for weeks looking for a random black woman to scRAPE out of anger and revenge, would you say "he had reason to be angry"? NO! So why are you ok with his decision to look for a random innocent black person to MURDER? Are you defending racially motivated murder of innocent people? He had reason to be angry.. at the person who committed the crime, ONLY! I'm sure you wouldn't be saying this if someone wanted to attack and kill a random white woman out of anger.. as a matter of fact, your logic would support the scraper if he did it out of justifiable anger for something a white woman did to him, right? I think this is what Neeson was trying to highlight. How people can blame a whole race for one person's actions. He owned up to it and felt remorse. Not everyone would do that. I don't know when this happened but it does still happen in this day and age." You didn't answer my questions. Would he have shared this if he had decided to scRAPE a random black woman and then came to his senses? Would you still praise him for owning up to it and feeling remorse? I genuinely want to know your answer to this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place?" Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. " You don't know that though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though." The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. " Yeah, exactly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think its pathetic people criticising him. If i was in that situation i'd probably feel the same. I dare say if honest with yourself, many would too. Not all, but many. It's like people critising the German people during WW2. I here people all the time saying that they wouldn't have been complicit like the German people. However it is widely accepted that the majority would have. It's the same here. He also said in the interview that he knows that his reaction was wrong and accepted that on reflection. That's my two bobs worth. You’d want to attack an innocent person for the actions of one person of that race/gender? I find that quite scary. I’ve been attacked by white men twice, I’ve never felt the need to attack an innocent person for their actions. I think this is what he was trying to highlight. How people can use one person's actions to justify accusing a whole race or nationality. I've done it myself when my granddaughter came home and said she was hanging around with some local Romanians. I panicked and asked her why. She said it's ok Nan, these are the good ones, not the bad ones. I’ve never done it. Maybe because I’m an ethnic minority, and I know how it feels to be judged solely on the colour of your skin, negatively. I don’t know. " Yes and many ethnic minorities accuse all white men of being racist and that white men are still enslaving minorities, just like they were responsible for the slave trade of people from the African continent. Those same people whether deliberately or not refuse to acknowledge that those slaves were enslaved and sold by people of their own race. Racism is not confined to white people. It's about time people stop playing the victim card, take responsibility for themselves and catch a grip. I work in a job that encounters people of all nationalities and i see racism everywhere and from people of all colours. Me? I see people. I see you for you. To me we are one species. Colour of skin, is just that. Colour of your skin. I am an environmentalist and i see us as a species. Just like any other. I respect all and welcome all. When i said i would probably feel the same. I meant his feeling of anger and helplessness of not being able to protect a loved one from the malevolence in this world. I have experienced that. It's heart wrenching. Thinking of how they felt, the fear they experienced, the helplessness when that was happening. It puts you in a place that you just can't believe. Anyway. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. Then why did he say that he asked his friend what race the guy was? If he was so aggrieved, as you claim, why wouldn't he just attack any random man since it was a man who did it? Your whole theory falls flat on its face because he wasn't 'aggrieved' enough to just attack any random man he found, was he? What a reeking sack of cowshit you're trying to sell here, hahaha. " So the Police wouldn't ask that question either when trying to get a description? I think it would help, you know what I mean. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I find it amazing that none of the closet racist supporters of Neeson's actions seem to get it that the WOMAN was the victim here. NOT NEESON! Did he continue to look for her actual scrapist with his particular set of skills? Did he speak out against scrape and continue to support his friend? The whole story stinks of virtue signaling and trying to portray a Mr. tough guy role while simultaneously clandestinely suggesting that scrapers are predominantly black. It's so obvious. " So you ignore my legit question then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. Then why did he say that he asked his friend what race the guy was? If he was so aggrieved, as you claim, why wouldn't he just attack any random man since it was a man who did it? Your whole theory falls flat on its face because he wasn't 'aggrieved' enough to just attack any random man he found, was he? What a reeking sack of cowshit you're trying to sell here, hahaha. So the Police wouldn't ask that question either when trying to get a description? I think it would help, you know what I mean." They do but you can't wave the card if you acknowledge this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. Then why did he say that he asked his friend what race the guy was? If he was so aggrieved, as you claim, why wouldn't he just attack any random man since it was a man who did it? Your whole theory falls flat on its face because he wasn't 'aggrieved' enough to just attack any random man he found, was he? What a reeking sack of cowshit you're trying to sell here, hahaha. So the Police wouldn't ask that question either when trying to get a description? I think it would help, you know what I mean." No I don't because that's not the only thing they would ask. They would get a full description of the actual person, what he was wearing, markings, facial features, hairstyle, accent, complexion, size, height, "you know what I mean?" You really made an ass of yourself with this comment. Exposed! Hah | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. Then why did he say that he asked his friend what race the guy was? If he was so aggrieved, as you claim, why wouldn't he just attack any random man since it was a man who did it? Your whole theory falls flat on its face because he wasn't 'aggrieved' enough to just attack any random man he found, was he? What a reeking sack of cowshit you're trying to sell here, hahaha. So the Police wouldn't ask that question either when trying to get a description? I think it would help, you know what I mean. No I don't because that's not the only thing they would ask. They would get a full description of the actual person, what he was wearing, markings, facial features, hairstyle, accent, complexion, size, height, "you know what I mean?" You really made an ass of yourself with this comment. Exposed! Hah" Race would probably be the first question then other identifiable factors. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. Then why did he say that he asked his friend what race the guy was? If he was so aggrieved, as you claim, why wouldn't he just attack any random man since it was a man who did it? Your whole theory falls flat on its face because he wasn't 'aggrieved' enough to just attack any random man he found, was he? What a reeking sack of cowshit you're trying to sell here, hahaha. So the Police wouldn't ask that question either when trying to get a description? I think it would help, you know what I mean. No I don't because that's not the only thing they would ask. They would get a full description of the actual person, what he was wearing, markings, facial features, hairstyle, accent, complexion, size, height, "you know what I mean?" You really made an ass of yourself with this comment. Exposed! Hah Race would probably be the first question then other identifiable factors. " You've exposed yourself! So other identifiable factors matter? Like gender? Why didn't Liam get angry at men? He could have found a random man, white man, to bludgeon to death. After all, he was 'so aggrieved' that he would take out his anger on anyone who shared identifiable factors with the perp. Please man, just stop at stupid. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. Then why did he say that he asked his friend what race the guy was? If he was so aggrieved, as you claim, why wouldn't he just attack any random man since it was a man who did it? Your whole theory falls flat on its face because he wasn't 'aggrieved' enough to just attack any random man he found, was he? What a reeking sack of cowshit you're trying to sell here, hahaha. So the Police wouldn't ask that question either when trying to get a description? I think it would help, you know what I mean. No I don't because that's not the only thing they would ask. They would get a full description of the actual person, what he was wearing, markings, facial features, hairstyle, accent, complexion, size, height, "you know what I mean?" You really made an ass of yourself with this comment. Exposed! Hah Race would probably be the first question then other identifiable factors. You've exposed yourself! So other identifiable factors matter? Like gender? Why didn't Liam get angry at men? He could have found a random man, white man, to bludgeon to death. After all, he was 'so aggrieved' that he would take out his anger on anyone who shared identifiable factors with the perp. Please man, just stop at stupid. " Love how I'm a racist just for challenging you. That's called reverse racism right there. I've said nothing racist. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. Then why did he say that he asked his friend what race the guy was? If he was so aggrieved, as you claim, why wouldn't he just attack any random man since it was a man who did it? Your whole theory falls flat on its face because he wasn't 'aggrieved' enough to just attack any random man he found, was he? What a reeking sack of cowshit you're trying to sell here, hahaha. So the Police wouldn't ask that question either when trying to get a description? I think it would help, you know what I mean. No I don't because that's not the only thing they would ask. They would get a full description of the actual person, what he was wearing, markings, facial features, hairstyle, accent, complexion, size, height, "you know what I mean?" You really made an ass of yourself with this comment. Exposed! Hah Race would probably be the first question then other identifiable factors. You've exposed yourself! So other identifiable factors matter? Like gender? Why didn't Liam get angry at men? He could have found a random man, white man, to bludgeon to death. After all, he was 'so aggrieved' that he would take out his anger on anyone who shared identifiable factors with the perp. Please man, just stop at stupid. Love how I'm a racist just for challenging you. That's called reverse racism right there. I've said nothing racist." No you haven't or lowered yourself but you are dealing with someone who is abusive and advocates violence who clearly has a racially motivated agenda you are wasting your time replying to him. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lol at the arguing. Cringe! Grown ups too. This really really does show just how immature the forums are. Any excuse for a barny. Who was there with Liam neeson when he thought these thoughts? Who here was there when he got interviewed? Non of you. So why you arguing? You’ve got all your info from the media...and we all know we can trust those guys to tell us the true. I’m not even interested. You all arguing over this is quite stupid. Like who even cares? " Well said .. all we need now is Piers Morgan to throw his opinion into the ring .. hahaha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. Then why did he say that he asked his friend what race the guy was? If he was so aggrieved, as you claim, why wouldn't he just attack any random man since it was a man who did it? Your whole theory falls flat on its face because he wasn't 'aggrieved' enough to just attack any random man he found, was he? What a reeking sack of cowshit you're trying to sell here, hahaha. So the Police wouldn't ask that question either when trying to get a description? I think it would help, you know what I mean. No I don't because that's not the only thing they would ask. They would get a full description of the actual person, what he was wearing, markings, facial features, hairstyle, accent, complexion, size, height, "you know what I mean?" You really made an ass of yourself with this comment. Exposed! Hah Race would probably be the first question then other identifiable factors. You've exposed yourself! So other identifiable factors matter? Like gender? Why didn't Liam get angry at men? He could have found a random man, white man, to bludgeon to death. After all, he was 'so aggrieved' that he would take out his anger on anyone who shared identifiable factors with the perp. Please man, just stop at stupid. Love how I'm a racist just for challenging you. That's called reverse racism right there. I've said nothing racist." Love how I never called you a racist yet you've focused on my race rather than the fact that I'm judging you based on your responses to my arguments, not just because you "disagreed with me". You are making arguments and in judging you based on them. Why does my race matter? I don't care what you race is. I said you've exposed yourself and I indicated that stupidity is at the core of that. So, you've yet again exposed yourself Please leave my race out of my arguments and refrain from ad-hominem attacks and using the 'reverse racism' card! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you have been there yourself!! Yeah you do have bad thoughts when it happens to a loved one. Add to that all the Asian grooming that is going on in the country here...it is easy to look differently to what is or is not "pc" to think....yeah I know there is good and bad in every race...but you be in that moment and you do feel anger and I do get him. Ps I just come back on to say that after having a break from here . .as I seen it on the news and knew the pc brigade would be slagging him off for thoughts that I could understand... I'm going to beat the living shit out of any random trans person if one of them ever does anything to me or my loved ones. I'm sure you can empathise. I could quite understand that you would feel that way if it happened to a loved one of yours!!!" I hope you are as understanding when you walk down a street one day and, without warning, find your head severed at the neck for no reason. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lol at the arguing. Cringe! Grown ups too. This really really does show just how immature the forums are. Any excuse for a barny. Who was there with Liam neeson when he thought these thoughts? Who here was there when he got interviewed? Non of you. So why you arguing? You’ve got all your info from the media...and we all know we can trust those guys to tell us the true. I’m not even interested. You all arguing over this is quite stupid. Like who even cares? " So why are you now arguing? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What he did was terrible but then again this was Ireland in the 1970's, it wasn't exactly the most progressive place, wanting to kill the blacks came as natural as wanting to run out the gays, deny women their rights and kill others over which type of religion they followed. I'm more surprised that people seem shocked a white man in Ireland during this time was racist." Jesus Christ you ignorant person. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. Then why did he say that he asked his friend what race the guy was? If he was so aggrieved, as you claim, why wouldn't he just attack any random man since it was a man who did it? Your whole theory falls flat on its face because he wasn't 'aggrieved' enough to just attack any random man he found, was he? What a reeking sack of cowshit you're trying to sell here, hahaha. So the Police wouldn't ask that question either when trying to get a description? I think it would help, you know what I mean. No I don't because that's not the only thing they would ask. They would get a full description of the actual person, what he was wearing, markings, facial features, hairstyle, accent, complexion, size, height, "you know what I mean?" You really made an ass of yourself with this comment. Exposed! Hah Race would probably be the first question then other identifiable factors. You've exposed yourself! So other identifiable factors matter? Like gender? Why didn't Liam get angry at men? He could have found a random man, white man, to bludgeon to death. After all, he was 'so aggrieved' that he would take out his anger on anyone who shared identifiable factors with the perp. Please man, just stop at stupid. Love how I'm a racist just for challenging you. That's called reverse racism right there. I've said nothing racist. Love how I never called you a racist yet you've focused on my race rather than the fact that I'm judging you based on your responses to my arguments, not just because you "disagreed with me". You are making arguments and in judging you based on them. Why does my race matter? I don't care what you race is. I said you've exposed yourself and I indicated that stupidity is at the core of that. So, you've yet again exposed yourself Please leave my race out of my arguments and refrain from ad-hominem attacks and using the 'reverse racism' card! " You keep saying I've exposed myself. Seems you implied it. Exposed myself as what? I'm just a wannabe investigative journalist. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What he did was terrible but then again this was Ireland in the 1970's, it wasn't exactly the most progressive place, wanting to kill the blacks came as natural as wanting to run out the gays, deny women their rights and kill others over which type of religion they followed. I'm more surprised that people seem shocked a white man in Ireland during this time was racist." . . . well put. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. Then why did he say that he asked his friend what race the guy was? If he was so aggrieved, as you claim, why wouldn't he just attack any random man since it was a man who did it? Your whole theory falls flat on its face because he wasn't 'aggrieved' enough to just attack any random man he found, was he? What a reeking sack of cowshit you're trying to sell here, hahaha. So the Police wouldn't ask that question either when trying to get a description? I think it would help, you know what I mean. No I don't because that's not the only thing they would ask. They would get a full description of the actual person, what he was wearing, markings, facial features, hairstyle, accent, complexion, size, height, "you know what I mean?" You really made an ass of yourself with this comment. Exposed! Hah Race would probably be the first question then other identifiable factors. You've exposed yourself! So other identifiable factors matter? Like gender? Why didn't Liam get angry at men? He could have found a random man, white man, to bludgeon to death. After all, he was 'so aggrieved' that he would take out his anger on anyone who shared identifiable factors with the perp. Please man, just stop at stupid. Love how I'm a racist just for challenging you. That's called reverse racism right there. I've said nothing racist. Love how I never called you a racist yet you've focused on my race rather than the fact that I'm judging you based on your responses to my arguments, not just because you "disagreed with me". You are making arguments and in judging you based on them. Why does my race matter? I don't care what you race is. I said you've exposed yourself and I indicated that stupidity is at the core of that. So, you've yet again exposed yourself Please leave my race out of my arguments and refrain from ad-hominem attacks and using the 'reverse racism' card! You keep saying I've exposed myself. Seems you implied it. Exposed myself as what? I'm just a wannabe investigative journalist." As a hypocrite, if you must ask. Can you stop responding to my race and respond to my arguments? Can you stop using your 'reverse racism' card? Love how I'm a 'reverse racist' just for disagreeing with your hypocrisy! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What he did was terrible but then again this was Ireland in the 1970's, it wasn't exactly the most progressive place, wanting to kill the blacks came as natural as wanting to run out the gays, deny women their rights and kill others over which type of religion they followed. I'm more surprised that people seem shocked a white man in Ireland during this time was racist." Yay! I fucking love a generalisation. You clearly know fuck all about Northern Ireland. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What he did was terrible but then again this was Ireland in the 1970's, it wasn't exactly the most progressive place, wanting to kill the blacks came as natural as wanting to run out the gays, deny women their rights and kill others over which type of religion they followed. I'm more surprised that people seem shocked a white man in Ireland during this time was racist.. . . well put,not quite 'came as natural' part but last paragraph. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lol at the arguing. Cringe! Grown ups too. This really really does show just how immature the forums are. Any excuse for a barny. Who was there with Liam neeson when he thought these thoughts? Who here was there when he got interviewed? Non of you. So why you arguing? You’ve got all your info from the media...and we all know we can trust those guys to tell us the true. I’m not even interested. You all arguing over this is quite stupid. Like who even cares? So why are you now arguing? " Ah you again. Not going to let you. Sorry professor | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I hope you are as understanding when you walk down a street one day and, without warning, find your head severed at the neck for no reason. I would know it had happened would I? But you sound like you would like to do it...and that is based on a view I have on a teal event that did happen. So I would say that speaks volumes on you!" eh? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This all seems rather silly, but that's the 21st century for you" It does doesn’t it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What he did was terrible but then again this was Ireland in the 1970's, it wasn't exactly the most progressive place, wanting to kill the blacks came as natural as wanting to run out the gays, deny women their rights and kill others over which type of religion they followed. I'm more surprised that people seem shocked a white man in Ireland during this time was racist. Yay! I fucking love a generalisation. You clearly know fuck all about Northern Ireland." loads have no idea. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lol at the arguing. Cringe! Grown ups too. This really really does show just how immature the forums are. Any excuse for a barny. Who was there with Liam neeson when he thought these thoughts? Who here was there when he got interviewed? Non of you. So why you arguing? You’ve got all your info from the media...and we all know we can trust those guys to tell us the true. I’m not even interested. You all arguing over this is quite stupid. Like who even cares? So why are you now arguing? Ah you again. Not going to let you. Sorry professor " Aw come on | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Lol at the arguing. Cringe! Grown ups too. This really really does show just how immature the forums are. Any excuse for a barny. Who was there with Liam neeson when he thought these thoughts? Who here was there when he got interviewed? Non of you. So why you arguing? You’ve got all your info from the media...and we all know we can trust those guys to tell us the true. I’m not even interested. You all arguing over this is quite stupid. Like who even cares? So why are you now arguing? Ah you again. Not going to let you. Sorry professor Aw come on " Not today professor, not today... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’ve never liked him as an actor , I now like him even less as a person . This is exactly why humanity will always fight . Why there will always be wars , and why we will never see every race , creed and colour unite as one . " Bloody hell john lennon over here crying theyll never see racial hegemomy hahahahhaha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. Then why did he say that he asked his friend what race the guy was? If he was so aggrieved, as you claim, why wouldn't he just attack any random man since it was a man who did it? Your whole theory falls flat on its face because he wasn't 'aggrieved' enough to just attack any random man he found, was he? What a reeking sack of cowshit you're trying to sell here, hahaha. So the Police wouldn't ask that question either when trying to get a description? I think it would help, you know what I mean. No I don't because that's not the only thing they would ask. They would get a full description of the actual person, what he was wearing, markings, facial features, hairstyle, accent, complexion, size, height, "you know what I mean?" You really made an ass of yourself with this comment. Exposed! Hah Race would probably be the first question then other identifiable factors. You've exposed yourself! So other identifiable factors matter? Like gender? Why didn't Liam get angry at men? He could have found a random man, white man, to bludgeon to death. After all, he was 'so aggrieved' that he would take out his anger on anyone who shared identifiable factors with the perp. Please man, just stop at stupid. Love how I'm a racist just for challenging you. That's called reverse racism right there. I've said nothing racist." Isn’t this playing the race card also? Since he didn’t call you racist. So how did you hop skip and jump to that conclusion? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Loved him in Taken. In fact going to watch it again." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are certain people ignoring the fact that he knows what he did was wrong and he regrets his actions. To say hes racist is utterly ridiculous. Is there a single person on Earth that has done something they shouldn't in their past , and now regret it . We've all done it , . But it was stupid of him to mention it nonetheless " The irony is, if we looked into the past of famous black celebrities we would fine Alot worse, gang rpes, murders, slavery, racism..... yet liam neeson is some shining beacon for all white supremists? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Just out of curiosity has anyone else done this? Felt the need for revenge on someone of the same race that did some wrong.??" Never. And I’ve been attacked by by white men twice, and also an Asian man. As I’ve said before I’ve never felt the need to take my anger out on random people of the same race. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are certain people ignoring the fact that he knows what he did was wrong and he regrets his actions. To say hes racist is utterly ridiculous. Is there a single person on Earth that has done something they shouldn't in their past , and now regret it . We've all done it , . But it was stupid of him to mention it nonetheless " Everybody gives Mother Teresa a run for her money on here. Still love him in Taken. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are certain people ignoring the fact that he knows what he did was wrong and he regrets his actions. To say hes racist is utterly ridiculous. Is there a single person on Earth that has done something they shouldn't in their past , and now regret it . We've all done it , . But it was stupid of him to mention it nonetheless Everybody gives Mother Teresa a run for her money on here. Still love him in Taken. " Do you think he based that character upon his feelings he had shared? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. Then why did he say that he asked his friend what race the guy was? If he was so aggrieved, as you claim, why wouldn't he just attack any random man since it was a man who did it? Your whole theory falls flat on its face because he wasn't 'aggrieved' enough to just attack any random man he found, was he? What a reeking sack of cowshit you're trying to sell here, hahaha. So the Police wouldn't ask that question either when trying to get a description? I think it would help, you know what I mean. No I don't because that's not the only thing they would ask. They would get a full description of the actual person, what he was wearing, markings, facial features, hairstyle, accent, complexion, size, height, "you know what I mean?" You really made an ass of yourself with this comment. Exposed! Hah Race would probably be the first question then other identifiable factors. You've exposed yourself! So other identifiable factors matter? Like gender? Why didn't Liam get angry at men? He could have found a random man, white man, to bludgeon to death. After all, he was 'so aggrieved' that he would take out his anger on anyone who shared identifiable factors with the perp. Please man, just stop at stupid. Love how I'm a racist just for challenging you. That's called reverse racism right there. I've said nothing racist. Love how I never called you a racist yet you've focused on my race rather than the fact that I'm judging you based on your responses to my arguments, not just because you "disagreed with me". You are making arguments and in judging you based on them. Why does my race matter? I don't care what you race is. I said you've exposed yourself and I indicated that stupidity is at the core of that. So, you've yet again exposed yourself Please leave my race out of my arguments and refrain from ad-hominem attacks and using the 'reverse racism' card! You keep saying I've exposed myself. Seems you implied it. Exposed myself as what? I'm just a wannabe investigative journalist. As a hypocrite, if you must ask. Can you stop responding to my race and respond to my arguments? Can you stop using your 'reverse racism' card? Love how I'm a 'reverse racist' just for disagreeing with your hypocrisy! " You said I exposed myself before I said you're being reverse racist. I wasn't hypocritical at all i just said that the Police would ask race as well. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. Then why did he say that he asked his friend what race the guy was? If he was so aggrieved, as you claim, why wouldn't he just attack any random man since it was a man who did it? Your whole theory falls flat on its face because he wasn't 'aggrieved' enough to just attack any random man he found, was he? What a reeking sack of cowshit you're trying to sell here, hahaha. So the Police wouldn't ask that question either when trying to get a description? I think it would help, you know what I mean. No I don't because that's not the only thing they would ask. They would get a full description of the actual person, what he was wearing, markings, facial features, hairstyle, accent, complexion, size, height, "you know what I mean?" You really made an ass of yourself with this comment. Exposed! Hah Race would probably be the first question then other identifiable factors. You've exposed yourself! So other identifiable factors matter? Like gender? Why didn't Liam get angry at men? He could have found a random man, white man, to bludgeon to death. After all, he was 'so aggrieved' that he would take out his anger on anyone who shared identifiable factors with the perp. Please man, just stop at stupid. Love how I'm a racist just for challenging you. That's called reverse racism right there. I've said nothing racist. Isn’t this playing the race card also? Since he didn’t call you racist. So how did you hop skip and jump to that conclusion? " I read between the lines that's all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't agree with is comments but I understood is anger and wanting to inflict pain on the guy that did who wouldn't I definitely would take the law in to my hands eye for a eye for me" But we can all empathise with him finding the guy who attacked the girl but I can't empathise with him looking to fight someone of the same colour skin as the attacker.Which is what he said he wanted to do .So what exactly are people empathising with?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't agree with is comments but I understood is anger and wanting to inflict pain on the guy that did who wouldn't I definitely would take the law in to my hands eye for a eye for me" But he didn’t go out to inflict pain on the guy that did it, did he? He went out with a weapon hoping a black man would have a go at him, so he could kill that black man, because of another black man who r*ped his loved one. I don’t doubt that most of us would be angry at the criminal, that’s normal. But to want to inflict pain on another human unrelated is wrong. Thankfully he was unsuccessful. I still don’t understand why he needs to say “black b*stard” instead of “black man” though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are certain people ignoring the fact that he knows what he did was wrong and he regrets his actions. To say hes racist is utterly ridiculous. Is there a single person on Earth that has done something they shouldn't in their past , and now regret it . We've all done it , . But it was stupid of him to mention it nonetheless Everybody gives Mother Teresa a run for her money on here. Still love him in Taken. " If you do watch Taken today , I will find you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. Then why did he say that he asked his friend what race the guy was? If he was so aggrieved, as you claim, why wouldn't he just attack any random man since it was a man who did it? Your whole theory falls flat on its face because he wasn't 'aggrieved' enough to just attack any random man he found, was he? What a reeking sack of cowshit you're trying to sell here, hahaha. So the Police wouldn't ask that question either when trying to get a description? I think it would help, you know what I mean. No I don't because that's not the only thing they would ask. They would get a full description of the actual person, what he was wearing, markings, facial features, hairstyle, accent, complexion, size, height, "you know what I mean?" You really made an ass of yourself with this comment. Exposed! Hah Race would probably be the first question then other identifiable factors. You've exposed yourself! So other identifiable factors matter? Like gender? Why didn't Liam get angry at men? He could have found a random man, white man, to bludgeon to death. After all, he was 'so aggrieved' that he would take out his anger on anyone who shared identifiable factors with the perp. Please man, just stop at stupid. Love how I'm a racist just for challenging you. That's called reverse racism right there. I've said nothing racist. Isn’t this playing the race card also? Since he didn’t call you racist. So how did you hop skip and jump to that conclusion? I read between the lines that's all. " But surely that could be said for him, yet people are saying he is playing the race card. Why doesn’t that apply to you? Surely assuming someone thinks you’re racist without them actually saying it, is playing the race card. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't agree with is comments but I understood is anger and wanting to inflict pain on the guy that did who wouldn't I definitely would take the law in to my hands eye for a eye for me But he didn’t go out to inflict pain on the guy that did it, did he? He went out with a weapon hoping a black man would have a go at him, so he could kill that black man, because of another black man who r*ped his loved one. I don’t doubt that most of us would be angry at the criminal, that’s normal. But to want to inflict pain on another human unrelated is wrong. Thankfully he was unsuccessful. I still don’t understand why he needs to say “black b*stard” instead of “black man” though." Agreed.. that was particularly the wrong phrase to use | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. Then why did he say that he asked his friend what race the guy was? If he was so aggrieved, as you claim, why wouldn't he just attack any random man since it was a man who did it? Your whole theory falls flat on its face because he wasn't 'aggrieved' enough to just attack any random man he found, was he? What a reeking sack of cowshit you're trying to sell here, hahaha. So the Police wouldn't ask that question either when trying to get a description? I think it would help, you know what I mean. No I don't because that's not the only thing they would ask. They would get a full description of the actual person, what he was wearing, markings, facial features, hairstyle, accent, complexion, size, height, "you know what I mean?" You really made an ass of yourself with this comment. Exposed! Hah Race would probably be the first question then other identifiable factors. You've exposed yourself! So other identifiable factors matter? Like gender? Why didn't Liam get angry at men? He could have found a random man, white man, to bludgeon to death. After all, he was 'so aggrieved' that he would take out his anger on anyone who shared identifiable factors with the perp. Please man, just stop at stupid. Love how I'm a racist just for challenging you. That's called reverse racism right there. I've said nothing racist. Isn’t this playing the race card also? Since he didn’t call you racist. So how did you hop skip and jump to that conclusion? I read between the lines that's all. But surely that could be said for him, yet people are saying he is playing the race card. Why doesn’t that apply to you? Surely assuming someone thinks you’re racist without them actually saying it, is playing the race card. " Seemed pretty crystal to me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. Then why did he say that he asked his friend what race the guy was? If he was so aggrieved, as you claim, why wouldn't he just attack any random man since it was a man who did it? Your whole theory falls flat on its face because he wasn't 'aggrieved' enough to just attack any random man he found, was he? What a reeking sack of cowshit you're trying to sell here, hahaha. So the Police wouldn't ask that question either when trying to get a description? I think it would help, you know what I mean. No I don't because that's not the only thing they would ask. They would get a full description of the actual person, what he was wearing, markings, facial features, hairstyle, accent, complexion, size, height, "you know what I mean?" You really made an ass of yourself with this comment. Exposed! Hah Race would probably be the first question then other identifiable factors. You've exposed yourself! So other identifiable factors matter? Like gender? Why didn't Liam get angry at men? He could have found a random man, white man, to bludgeon to death. After all, he was 'so aggrieved' that he would take out his anger on anyone who shared identifiable factors with the perp. Please man, just stop at stupid. Love how I'm a racist just for challenging you. That's called reverse racism right there. I've said nothing racist. Isn’t this playing the race card also? Since he didn’t call you racist. So how did you hop skip and jump to that conclusion? I read between the lines that's all. But surely that could be said for him, yet people are saying he is playing the race card. Why doesn’t that apply to you? Surely assuming someone thinks you’re racist without them actually saying it, is playing the race card. Seemed pretty crystal to me. " It didn’t to me. So I’d say that’s playing the race card. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't agree with is comments but I understood is anger and wanting to inflict pain on the guy that did who wouldn't I definitely would take the law in to my hands eye for a eye for me But he didn’t go out to inflict pain on the guy that did it, did he? He went out with a weapon hoping a black man would have a go at him, so he could kill that black man, because of another black man who r*ped his loved one. I don’t doubt that most of us would be angry at the criminal, that’s normal. But to want to inflict pain on another human unrelated is wrong. Thankfully he was unsuccessful. I still don’t understand why he needs to say “black b*stard” instead of “black man” though. Agreed.. that was particularly the wrong phrase to use " Wrong on so many levels. I’m surprised nobody has mentioned this and said how wrong it is, or did I miss it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are certain people ignoring the fact that he knows what he did was wrong and he regrets his actions. To say hes racist is utterly ridiculous. Is there a single person on Earth that has done something they shouldn't in their past , and now regret it . We've all done it , . But it was stupid of him to mention it nonetheless Everybody gives Mother Teresa a run for her money on here. Still love him in Taken. If you do watch Taken today , I will find you " Boom boom | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As Jonathon pie said: Liam Neeson in a heartfelt interview stated that an emotional trauma made him feel unjustly prejudiced against black people, but he came to his senses, realised his gross error of judgement, and learned from it. Social Media: Get the pitchforks, guys! Liam Neeson is a racist!" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't agree with is comments but I understood is anger and wanting to inflict pain on the guy that did who wouldn't I definitely would take the law in to my hands eye for a eye for me But he didn’t go out to inflict pain on the guy that did it, did he? He went out with a weapon hoping a black man would have a go at him, so he could kill that black man, because of another black man who r*ped his loved one. I don’t doubt that most of us would be angry at the criminal, that’s normal. But to want to inflict pain on another human unrelated is wrong. Thankfully he was unsuccessful. I still don’t understand why he needs to say “black b*stard” instead of “black man” though." Because the criminal wasn't a Catholic bastard, or a protestant bastard. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't agree with is comments but I understood is anger and wanting to inflict pain on the guy that did who wouldn't I definitely would take the law in to my hands eye for a eye for me But he didn’t go out to inflict pain on the guy that did it, did he? He went out with a weapon hoping a black man would have a go at him, so he could kill that black man, because of another black man who r*ped his loved one. I don’t doubt that most of us would be angry at the criminal, that’s normal. But to want to inflict pain on another human unrelated is wrong. Thankfully he was unsuccessful. I still don’t understand why he needs to say “black b*stard” instead of “black man” though. Because the criminal wasn't a Catholic bastard, or a protestant bastard." He didn’t need to use the word bastard at all, since the random man he was looking for would’ve been innocent of the crime. Any other race put in front of bastard I would’ve said the same thing, let me clarify that before anyone comes on with their whataboutism. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are there any Shag Suck or Chuck threads on the go ??" Chuck | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. Then why did he say that he asked his friend what race the guy was? If he was so aggrieved, as you claim, why wouldn't he just attack any random man since it was a man who did it? Your whole theory falls flat on its face because he wasn't 'aggrieved' enough to just attack any random man he found, was he? What a reeking sack of cowshit you're trying to sell here, hahaha. So the Police wouldn't ask that question either when trying to get a description? I think it would help, you know what I mean. No I don't because that's not the only thing they would ask. They would get a full description of the actual person, what he was wearing, markings, facial features, hairstyle, accent, complexion, size, height, "you know what I mean?" You really made an ass of yourself with this comment. Exposed! Hah Race would probably be the first question then other identifiable factors. You've exposed yourself! So other identifiable factors matter? Like gender? Why didn't Liam get angry at men? He could have found a random man, white man, to bludgeon to death. After all, he was 'so aggrieved' that he would take out his anger on anyone who shared identifiable factors with the perp. Please man, just stop at stupid. Love how I'm a racist just for challenging you. That's called reverse racism right there. I've said nothing racist. Love how I never called you a racist yet you've focused on my race rather than the fact that I'm judging you based on your responses to my arguments, not just because you "disagreed with me". You are making arguments and in judging you based on them. Why does my race matter? I don't care what you race is. I said you've exposed yourself and I indicated that stupidity is at the core of that. So, you've yet again exposed yourself Please leave my race out of my arguments and refrain from ad-hominem attacks and using the 'reverse racism' card! You keep saying I've exposed myself. Seems you implied it. Exposed myself as what? I'm just a wannabe investigative journalist. As a hypocrite, if you must ask. Can you stop responding to my race and respond to my arguments? Can you stop using your 'reverse racism' card? Love how I'm a 'reverse racist' just for disagreeing with your hypocrisy! You said I exposed myself before I said you're being reverse racist." Yes, and what's your point? You exposed yourself twice and I said it twice. "I wasn't hypocritical at all i just said that the Police would ask race as well." Refer to my response to that above. I've given my objective point of view on the discrepancies and resultant hypocrisy in your written comments and who the cap fits, let them wear it. It's up to you to decide in your own personal private moments if there's anything for you to learn personally. No point arguing over subjectivity. Either respond objectively to my objective accusations or do something more fun my friend. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't agree with is comments but I understood is anger and wanting to inflict pain on the guy that did who wouldn't I definitely would take the law in to my hands eye for a eye for me But he didn’t go out to inflict pain on the guy that did it, did he? He went out with a weapon hoping a black man would have a go at him, so he could kill that black man, because of another black man who r*ped his loved one. I don’t doubt that most of us would be angry at the criminal, that’s normal. But to want to inflict pain on another human unrelated is wrong. Thankfully he was unsuccessful. I still don’t understand why he needs to say “black b*stard” instead of “black man” though. Because the criminal wasn't a Catholic bastard, or a protestant bastard." Or a fart bastard or a speccy bastard | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are there any Shag Suck or Chuck threads on the go ?? Chuck " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I meant fat bastard...not fart " I prefer fart bastard | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't agree with is comments but I understood is anger and wanting to inflict pain on the guy that did who wouldn't I definitely would take the law in to my hands eye for a eye for me But he didn’t go out to inflict pain on the guy that did it, did he? He went out with a weapon hoping a black man would have a go at him, so he could kill that black man, because of another black man who r*ped his loved one. I don’t doubt that most of us would be angry at the criminal, that’s normal. But to want to inflict pain on another human unrelated is wrong. Thankfully he was unsuccessful. I still don’t understand why he needs to say “black b*stard” instead of “black man” though. Because the criminal wasn't a Catholic bastard, or a protestant bastard. He didn’t need to use the word bastard at all, since the random man he was looking for would’ve been innocent of the crime. Any other race put in front of bastard I would’ve said the same thing, let me clarify that before anyone comes on with their whataboutism." Probably because he didn't want to show them the respect of calling them a "man". This really isn't rocket science. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" people are talking like every prior fight/oncident they have been in is down to racism.... sure your just not a utter prick who happens to be a different ethnicity? " Why don't you ask Liam Neeson that question? I'm pretty sure when they called me a black bastard and a n***** unprovoked that they were in fact racially motivated to do that. And exactly to the point, I didn't assume that every white person was like that or approved of it. In fact, they came to my aid, just like black people would have come to Neeson and his friend's aid. You don't think racists are utter pricks who happen to be from that race? What about scrapists? Do they just happen to be from a particular race or is their race guilty? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't agree with is comments but I understood is anger and wanting to inflict pain on the guy that did who wouldn't I definitely would take the law in to my hands eye for a eye for me But he didn’t go out to inflict pain on the guy that did it, did he? He went out with a weapon hoping a black man would have a go at him, so he could kill that black man, because of another black man who r*ped his loved one. I don’t doubt that most of us would be angry at the criminal, that’s normal. But to want to inflict pain on another human unrelated is wrong. Thankfully he was unsuccessful. I still don’t understand why he needs to say “black b*stard” instead of “black man” though. Because the criminal wasn't a Catholic bastard, or a protestant bastard. He didn’t need to use the word bastard at all, since the random man he was looking for would’ve been innocent of the crime. Any other race put in front of bastard I would’ve said the same thing, let me clarify that before anyone comes on with their whataboutism. Probably because he didn't want to show them the respect of calling them a "man". This really isn't rocket science. " You do realise he is referring to a random, innocent man who had nothing to do with the r*pe of his loved one? He isn’t referring to the r*pist, if he were, your comment would make sense. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are certain people ignoring the fact that he knows what he did was wrong and he regrets his actions. To say hes racist is utterly ridiculous. Is there a single person on Earth that has done something they shouldn't in their past , and now regret it . We've all done it , . But it was stupid of him to mention it nonetheless Everybody gives Mother Teresa a run for her money on here. Still love him in Taken. If you do watch Taken today , I will find you Boom boom" Ah but do you have a very specific set of skills?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Are there any Shag Suck or Chuck threads on the go ?? Chuck " HAHAHAHA | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't agree with is comments but I understood is anger and wanting to inflict pain on the guy that did who wouldn't I definitely would take the law in to my hands eye for a eye for me But he didn’t go out to inflict pain on the guy that did it, did he? He went out with a weapon hoping a black man would have a go at him, so he could kill that black man, because of another black man who r*ped his loved one. I don’t doubt that most of us would be angry at the criminal, that’s normal. But to want to inflict pain on another human unrelated is wrong. Thankfully he was unsuccessful. I still don’t understand why he needs to say “black b*stard” instead of “black man” though. Because the criminal wasn't a Catholic bastard, or a protestant bastard. He didn’t need to use the word bastard at all, since the random man he was looking for would’ve been innocent of the crime. Any other race put in front of bastard I would’ve said the same thing, let me clarify that before anyone comes on with their whataboutism. Probably because he didn't want to show them the respect of calling them a "man". This really isn't rocket science. " Language is everything and language is powerful. I noticed with those uni students discussing assaulting women on campus recently the media constantly referred to them as boys when quiet clearly they were men. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't agree with is comments but I understood is anger and wanting to inflict pain on the guy that did who wouldn't I definitely would take the law in to my hands eye for a eye for me But he didn’t go out to inflict pain on the guy that did it, did he? He went out with a weapon hoping a black man would have a go at him, so he could kill that black man, because of another black man who r*ped his loved one. I don’t doubt that most of us would be angry at the criminal, that’s normal. But to want to inflict pain on another human unrelated is wrong. Thankfully he was unsuccessful. I still don’t understand why he needs to say “black b*stard” instead of “black man” though. Because the criminal wasn't a Catholic bastard, or a protestant bastard. He didn’t need to use the word bastard at all, since the random man he was looking for would’ve been innocent of the crime. Any other race put in front of bastard I would’ve said the same thing, let me clarify that before anyone comes on with their whataboutism. Probably because he didn't want to show them the respect of calling them a "man". This really isn't rocket science. You do realise he is referring to a random, innocent man who had nothing to do with the r*pe of his loved one? He isn’t referring to the r*pist, if he were, your comment would make sense. " Exactly! Lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't agree with is comments but I understood is anger and wanting to inflict pain on the guy that did who wouldn't I definitely would take the law in to my hands eye for a eye for me But he didn’t go out to inflict pain on the guy that did it, did he? He went out with a weapon hoping a black man would have a go at him, so he could kill that black man, because of another black man who r*ped his loved one. I don’t doubt that most of us would be angry at the criminal, that’s normal. But to want to inflict pain on another human unrelated is wrong. Thankfully he was unsuccessful. I still don’t understand why he needs to say “black b*stard” instead of “black man” though. Because the criminal wasn't a Catholic bastard, or a protestant bastard. He didn’t need to use the word bastard at all, since the random man he was looking for would’ve been innocent of the crime. Any other race put in front of bastard I would’ve said the same thing, let me clarify that before anyone comes on with their whataboutism. Probably because he didn't want to show them the respect of calling them a "man". This really isn't rocket science. Language is everything and language is powerful. I noticed with those uni students discussing assaulting women on campus recently the media constantly referred to them as boys when quiet clearly they were men. " Thats true but some people clearly have an agenda on here some very sad aggressive people unfortunately. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't agree with is comments but I understood is anger and wanting to inflict pain on the guy that did who wouldn't I definitely would take the law in to my hands eye for a eye for me But he didn’t go out to inflict pain on the guy that did it, did he? He went out with a weapon hoping a black man would have a go at him, so he could kill that black man, because of another black man who r*ped his loved one. I don’t doubt that most of us would be angry at the criminal, that’s normal. But to want to inflict pain on another human unrelated is wrong. Thankfully he was unsuccessful. I still don’t understand why he needs to say “black b*stard” instead of “black man” though. Because the criminal wasn't a Catholic bastard, or a protestant bastard. He didn’t need to use the word bastard at all, since the random man he was looking for would’ve been innocent of the crime. Any other race put in front of bastard I would’ve said the same thing, let me clarify that before anyone comes on with their whataboutism. Probably because he didn't want to show them the respect of calling them a "man". This really isn't rocket science. You do realise he is referring to a random, innocent man who had nothing to do with the r*pe of his loved one? He isn’t referring to the r*pist, if he were, your comment would make sense. " You do realise that he clearly wasn't thinking clearly at the time..... jeez He was looking for a target. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" You do realise that he clearly wasn't thinking clearly at the time..... jeez He was looking for a target." “He wasn’t thinking” We’ve addressed that. But the comment was made in the interview, however long ago it was. Was he not thinking then too? Or will you now have to find another excuse to justify his black b*stard comment in regards to an innocent black man that he wanted to kill. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Thats true but some people clearly have an agenda on here some very sad aggressive people unfortunately." You’re right there. People calling each other names and using the overused & quite frankly boring phrase of “you’re using the race card” because someone happens to have a difference of opinion. If only people could debate emotive subjects without getting irate. It seems some aren’t capable. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" You do realise that he clearly wasn't thinking clearly at the time..... jeez He was looking for a target. " People realise but it just doesn't suit some peoples agenda to do so. If you accept the reality you can't use vitriol and aggression to push your agenda as well. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Read it in context and its pretty evident he had reason to be angry! Are you trying to defend a rap1st OP? No, he's not. The point being made is that one person committed a crime and a whole race was found guilty. What are the r*pe crime stats according to race I wonder? No idea. It will differ depending on the demography in each country/city/town. Where did this incident take place? Doesn't say. The thing is, if the attacker had been white, I doubt have been roaming the streets to look for a white person to take out his revenge on. You don't know that though. The odds are if he was so aggrieved at his friend being attacked he probably would have but its a lot harder for people to flash the racist card on here if they believe he would. Then why did he say that he asked his friend what race the guy was? If he was so aggrieved, as you claim, why wouldn't he just attack any random man since it was a man who did it? Your whole theory falls flat on its face because he wasn't 'aggrieved' enough to just attack any random man he found, was he? What a reeking sack of cowshit you're trying to sell here, hahaha. So the Police wouldn't ask that question either when trying to get a description? I think it would help, you know what I mean. No I don't because that's not the only thing they would ask. They would get a full description of the actual person, what he was wearing, markings, facial features, hairstyle, accent, complexion, size, height, "you know what I mean?" You really made an ass of yourself with this comment. Exposed! Hah Race would probably be the first question then other identifiable factors. You've exposed yourself! So other identifiable factors matter? Like gender? Why didn't Liam get angry at men? He could have found a random man, white man, to bludgeon to death. After all, he was 'so aggrieved' that he would take out his anger on anyone who shared identifiable factors with the perp. Please man, just stop at stupid. Love how I'm a racist just for challenging you. That's called reverse racism right there. I've said nothing racist. Isn’t this playing the race card also? Since he didn’t call you racist. So how did you hop skip and jump to that conclusion? I read between the lines that's all. But surely that could be said for him, yet people are saying he is playing the race card. Why doesn’t that apply to you? Surely assuming someone thinks you’re racist without them actually saying it, is playing the race card. Seemed pretty crystal to me. It didn’t to me. So I’d say that’s playing the race card. " Don't you get it? He's allowed to "read between the lines" and others can "seem pretty crystal" to him but if I had done the same thing then it would be "reverse racism". I wonder why? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Don't you get it? He's allowed to "read between the lines" and others can "seem pretty crystal" to him but if I had done the same thing then it would be "reverse racism". I wonder why?" Exactly my point. People were quick to say you were playing the race card (usual response made by people who are unable to debate a point without throwing petty accusations around) but went strangely quiet when someone else was doing the exact same thing on this thread. I wonder why too? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Exactly my point. People were quick to say you were playing the race card (usual response made by people who are unable to debate a point without throwing petty accusations around) but went strangely quiet when someone else was doing the exact same thing on this thread. I wonder why too? " That's because people ARE playing that card in reality. So many people with agendas here quite sad really and rather pathetic but p3eople playing the race card always come out with this lame old excuse to try and deflect. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Exactly my point. People were quick to say you were playing the race card (usual response made by people who are unable to debate a point without throwing petty accusations around) but went strangely quiet when someone else was doing the exact same thing on this thread. I wonder why too? That's because people ARE playing that card in reality. So many people with agendas here quite sad really and rather pathetic but p3eople playing the race card always come out with this lame old excuse to try and deflect." Who’s playing the race card? What I see is people expressing their opinions, and some not being able to do so as well, so they start with petty “race card” accusations, that in my opining is deflecting. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Who’s playing the race card? What I see is people expressing their opinions, and some not being able to do so as well, so they start with petty “race card” accusations, that in my opining is deflecting. " Then you need to take a trip to specsavers but then that would conflict with your agenda seeing things clearly wouldn't it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Then you need to take a trip to specsavers but then that would conflict with your agenda seeing things clearly wouldn't it. " The only “agenda” I sense here is yours. Going around accusing people of using this so called race card, and also claiming anyone who doesn’t share your opinion has an agenda. Is it difficult for you to debate opposing opinions without accusations or something? Funnily enough I had an opticians appointment today, my sight is great. Thanks for your corncers though! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" " Then you need to take a trip to specsavers but then that would conflict with your agenda seeing things clearly wouldn't it. " The only “agenda” I sense here is yours. Going around accusing people of using this so called race card, and also claiming anyone who doesn’t share your opinion has an agenda. Is it difficult for you to debate opposing opinions without accusations or something? Funnily enough I had an opticians appointment today, my sight is great. Thanks for your corncers though! " Its concern! looks like your eyesight really isn't good I would go back and ask for a refund for your fictitious eye test as you can't see what you are typing never mind other people! You are focusing on your agenda I presume that will be your excuse. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |