 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Why arnt criminal teens given the choice any more army or jail got to be better than the crazy pencil pushing nonsence punishments they have now half of them are already weapon trained naturally agressive
Makes more sence than not but nope were run by hug a huddie muppets |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Because the army has a selection process maybe. They can’t accept people with mental health issues which some criminals have. Because it’s a bit unfair to compare being in the army as a punishment worse or the same as being in prison. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
When you were growing up? National service stopped in the 60’s.
We still have a tough security force, we don’t have an army anymore because we don’t have 100k soldiers.
Soldiers are prepared to die for their country, I’d say they were pretty tough.
I know I’d want someone protecting me that had gone through a stringent selection process to become a soldier, not some scrote who would stab you for a bag of spice. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"When you were growing up? National service stopped in the 60’s.
We still have a tough security force, we don’t have an army anymore because we don’t have 100k soldiers.
Soldiers are prepared to die for their country, I’d say they were pretty tough.
I know I’d want someone protecting me that had gone through a stringent selection process to become a soldier, not some scrote who would stab you for a bag of spice. "
I didn't think that there was an official designated number that you had to have an army. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
The only way I believe it would be acceptable for the armed forces to recruit criminals is people who have been arrested for terrorism. Then they would only be used as point men on patrols, any ieds would explode on them. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"When you were growing up? National service stopped in the 60’s.
We still have a tough security force, we don’t have an army anymore because we don’t have 100k soldiers.
Soldiers are prepared to die for their country, I’d say they were pretty tough.
I know I’d want someone protecting me that had gone through a stringent selection process to become a soldier, not some scrote who would stab you for a bag of spice.
I didn't think that there was an official designated number that you had to have an army. "
If you take out Gurkhas and reserves, our army isn’t as big as you’d hope.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"The army wouldn't want them as most are snivelling little shits and wouldn't be able to cope with being disciplined!"
thats the point rather than yro or youth offending teams namby pamby think of the children crap give them a focus and drill discipline into them
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"When you were growing up? National service stopped in the 60’s.
We still have a tough security force, we don’t have an army anymore because we don’t have 100k soldiers.
Soldiers are prepared to die for their country, I’d say they were pretty tough.
I know I’d want someone protecting me that had gone through a stringent selection process to become a soldier, not some scrote who would stab you for a bag of spice. "
die for there mates maybe most i know coulnt give a crap about the flag |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *W ChapMan
over a year ago
Swindon |
"Why arnt criminal teens given the choice any more army or jail got to be better than the crazy pencil pushing nonsence punishments they have now half of them are already weapon trained naturally agressive
Makes more sence than not but nope were run by hug a huddie muppets"
I guess because the army is short of funding and is full? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"When you were growing up? National service stopped in the 60’s.
We still have a tough security force, we don’t have an army anymore because we don’t have 100k soldiers.
Soldiers are prepared to die for their country, I’d say they were pretty tough.
I know I’d want someone protecting me that had gone through a stringent selection process to become a soldier, not some scrote who would stab you for a bag of spice. die for there mates maybe most i know coulnt give a crap about the flag"
also in the 80s many judges gave this offer to people iv 2 good mates took the forces option |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Why arnt criminal teens given the choice any more army or jail got to be better than the crazy pencil pushing nonsence punishments they have now half of them are already weapon trained naturally agressive
Makes more sence than not but nope were run by hug a huddie muppets I guess because the army is short of funding and is full? "
Cheaper than overfilling jails and the many many court appearances |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
You would have had to have committed a pretty serious crime to end up in prison as a teenager. Or a serial offender so I'm not sure how appropriate it would be to offer prison or army options in these cases. Early Intervention however is key so it could possibly be an option for very low level offending. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
