 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Depends what you mean by a no sex meet. I'm generally a soft player until I get to really connect with someone so if you just mean all but not intercourse then yes. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No it's not code. I just don't think it's all about intercourse  "
It’s not all about massage either. Contrary to popular belief, not all men with eretile dysfunction are automatically qualified masseurs either |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, that's what I mean. A long massage, yoni massage, licking, masturbation.....that sort of thing. "
That would be way too intimate for a meet from here in the first instance...
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No it's not code. I just don't think it's all about intercourse
It’s not all about massage either. Contrary to popular belief, not all men with eretile dysfunction are automatically qualified masseurs either "
I am always puzzled by the seeming obsession with massaging on this site... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No it's not code. I just don't think it's all about intercourse "
Agree with you, it's not code but so what if it was. Erectil dysfunction isn't something to scoff about, that's shaming and the only people who should be shamed are the people who scoff at such things!
If both parties are satisfied, then what's the problem?
It's not for everyone, each to their own.
Personally, I don't climax with penetration so I'd be happy. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No it's not code. I just don't think it's all about intercourse
Agree with you, it's not code but so what if it was. Erectil dysfunction isn't something to scoff about, that's shaming and the only people who should be shamed are the people who scoff at such things!
If both parties are satisfied, then what's the problem?
It's not for everyone, each to their own.
Personally, I don't climax with penetration so I'd be happy. "
It’s your opinion that it’s scoffing. Wind your neck in eh. We’re just as entitled to our opinion as you are to not being completely satisfied by penetration, it isn’t worth bursting a blood vessel over  We’ll continue to view said posters comments in the manner in which we choose thanks. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
As you say no sex but still make the woman cum, I guess you mean no penetrative sex but just oral/fingering? Then it's definitely a yes from me. I don't have to get fucked every single time, love a good oral/fingering session. I cum loads from it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"No it's not code. I just don't think it's all about intercourse
Agree with you, it's not code but so what if it was. Erectil dysfunction isn't something to scoff about, that's shaming and the only people who should be shamed are the people who scoff at such things!
If both parties are satisfied, then what's the problem?
It's not for everyone, each to their own.
Personally, I don't climax with penetration so I'd be happy. "
Exactly. When I was seeing my last FB, I had a major issue with ED. She was very understanding, we worked round it and still had a bloody good time. Viagra then turned my sexual life around. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Yeah me and the guy I see regular don't always have sex ..sometimes its over for both of us from just oral ..and sometimes when I see him I know we may not actually have sex |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Thanks for the comments. As stated, everyone is entitled to their own opinion. I was just putting it out there for peoples views. This does not mean I have erectile dysfunction or a small dick, these comments were maybe a little uncalled for. Never mind, there's always some. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No it's not code. I just don't think it's all about intercourse
Agree with you, it's not code but so what if it was. Erectil dysfunction isn't something to scoff about, that's shaming and the only people who should be shamed are the people who scoff at such things!
If both parties are satisfied, then what's the problem?
It's not for everyone, each to their own.
Personally, I don't climax with penetration so I'd be happy.
It’s your opinion that it’s scoffing. Wind your neck in eh. We’re just as entitled to our opinion as you are to not being completely satisfied by penetration, it isn’t worth bursting a blood vessel over We’ll continue to view said posters comments in the manner in which we choose thanks."
No, I won't wind my neck in. Just because someone prefers to not have full penetrative sex does not mean you have the right to jump in and accuse him of having erectil dysfunction or a small penis. That's just being plain nasty!
The op asked if anyone would enjoy such a meet, not "if someone asked for this type of meet, would you think they had a problem"?
All you needed to say is no, not for me like others have said.
shaming people who could have medical issues that can cause this problem is darn right nasty. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"No it's not code. I just don't think it's all about intercourse
Agree with you, it's not code but so what if it was. Erectil dysfunction isn't something to scoff about, that's shaming and the only people who should be shamed are the people who scoff at such things!
If both parties are satisfied, then what's the problem?
It's not for everyone, each to their own.
Personally, I don't climax with penetration so I'd be happy.
It’s your opinion that it’s scoffing. Wind your neck in eh. We’re just as entitled to our opinion as you are to not being completely satisfied by penetration, it isn’t worth bursting a blood vessel over We’ll continue to view said posters comments in the manner in which we choose thanks.
No, I won't wind my neck in. Just because someone prefers to not have full penetrative sex does not mean you have the right to jump in and accuse him of having erectil dysfunction or a small penis. That's just being plain nasty!
The op asked if anyone would enjoy such a meet, not "if someone asked for this type of meet, would you think they had a problem"?
All you needed to say is no, not for me like others have said.
shaming people who could have medical issues that can cause this problem is darn right nasty. "
Because you know of course we don’t speak from experience. Assuming makes an ass out of just you in this case. We have a right to enjoy what we do. There’s a host of chaps out there who can’t get it up for whatever reason, and it’s incumbent on them to disclose that prior to a meet, simple. It’s not about shaming it’s about them being honest about it. So if you will insist on refraining to wind your neck in, at least consider the wider argument, or you risk attempting to be a Roaxanne Pallet style wannabe. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
C