FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Simply sex relationship ...
Simply sex relationship ...
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...  "
How do you mean?
Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?
Think it does for some |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ... "
You mean like a fuck buddy or a friends with benefits? These have been around in the real world for a very long time. Nothing new there. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...
How do you mean?
Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?
Think it does for some "
Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ...    |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...
How do you mean?
Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?
Think it does for some
Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ... "
Isn’t that what a Fuck Buddy is?
I always assume a FWB is more a “friend” that you do other non-sexual things with as well, whereas a FB was just that : a regular fuck with no other strings attached |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...
How do you mean?
Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?
Think it does for some
Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ... "
A fuck buddy then. Plenty do on here. Not for me as I like a friendship also. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...
How do you mean?
Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?
Think it does for some
Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ...
Isn’t that what a Fuck Buddy is?
I always assume a FWB is more a “friend” that you do other non-sexual things with as well, whereas a FB was just that : a regular fuck with no other strings attached "
Yes I think there is a difference between a fb and a fwb as you say. I have been looking for a fwb for a long time without result but still live in hopes. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...
How do you mean?
Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?
Think it does for some
Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ... "
Yes...its called having a fuck buddy..
Where have you been hiding?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...
How do you mean?
Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?
Think it does for some
Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ... "
Yeah - I think this is a fuck buddy your after. No feelings other than passion which go away straight after the deed is done... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...
How do you mean?
Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?
Think it does for some
Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ... "
That's being fuck buddies. And basically that!!
Your not interested in them as a person, just someone to fuck when you need? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...
How do you mean?
Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?
Think it does for some
Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ...
That's being fuck buddies. And basically that!!
Your not interested in them as a person, just someone to fuck when you need? "
Someone to fuck when you need sounds awful though
Very blunt way of phrasing it  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...
How do you mean?
Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?
Think it does for some
Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ...
That's being fuck buddies. And basically that!!
Your not interested in them as a person, just someone to fuck when you need?
Someone to fuck when you need sounds awful though
Very blunt way of phrasing it "
Why dress it up, it is what it is. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...
How do you mean?
Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?
Think it does for some
Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ...
That's being fuck buddies. And basically that!!
Your not interested in them as a person, just someone to fuck when you need?
Someone to fuck when you need sounds awful though
Very blunt way of phrasing it
Why dress it up, it is what it is. "
Exactly! Why pretend its anything else, that's being dishonest about your intentions. Be upfront with what you want and you're more likely to find what you are after. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *arlo82Couple
over a year ago
the gym and random places |
It can and does happen. Sometimes relationships exist more on a physical level and can't be anything more than that. Rare tho as usually 1 person feels more than the other. However when they do work they are ace!! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
If you just want someone to fuck when you're horny, just hope that they are horny at exactly the same time??? Or do you just want someone to satisfy your needs only? Is there anything in it for them? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...
How do you mean?
Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?
Think it does for some
Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ...
That's being fuck buddies. And basically that!!
Your not interested in them as a person, just someone to fuck when you need?
Someone to fuck when you need sounds awful though
Very blunt way of phrasing it "
do you not think women want that from a man too. Although I found men get to wanting more and throw a hissy fit when you have met someone else for sex hence I don't do regular when I'm meeting |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though. "
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Seems a bit robotic to me. Sex is just sex at the end of the day. Its having a little something else with the other person that makes it interesting.  "
Exactly. If it's purely sexual relief you are looking for, a wank is far less complicated. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *VineMan
over a year ago
The right place |
"Seems a bit robotic to me. Sex is just sex at the end of the day. Its having a little something else with the other person that makes it interesting. "
I agree. I prefer there to be a connection. It’s a type of friendship but with the clear understanding that it’s not going to overlap with the rest of your life.
I view it a bit like finding a tennis partner. You turn up, you play, you chat and then you leave. A friendship might develop but it’s in the context of the game. But the better the connection the better you will play together. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book."
Sure, you're free to call it whatever you wish. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.
Sure, you're free to call it whatever you wish."
Thanks, but that isn't the point I was making - the point I was making is that it IS a relationship, whatever you call it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *arlo82Couple
over a year ago
the gym and random places |
"A fuck buddy course it exists. People I would fuck but not be seen dead with in public. Prefer FWB tho cos need to at least like people I bump uglies with."
I couldn't fuck someone I felt like that about. If they're that minging I just couldnt |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.
Sure, you're free to call it whatever you wish.
Thanks, but that isn't the point I was making - the point I was making is that it IS a relationship, whatever you call it."
I do get it. My point was I wouldn't call it a relationship. I'd refer to it simply as an arrangement. It's merely semantics. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Seems a bit robotic to me. Sex is just sex at the end of the day. Its having a little something else with the other person that makes it interesting.
I agree. I prefer there to be a connection. It’s a type of friendship but with the clear understanding that it’s not going to overlap with the rest of your life.
I view it a bit like finding a tennis partner. You turn up, you play, you chat and then you leave. A friendship might develop but it’s in the context of the game. But the better the connection the better you will play together. "
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Seems a bit robotic to me. Sex is just sex at the end of the day. Its having a little something else with the other person that makes it interesting.
I agree. I prefer there to be a connection. It’s a type of friendship but with the clear understanding that it’s not going to overlap with the rest of your life.
I view it a bit like finding a tennis partner. You turn up, you play, you chat and then you leave. A friendship might develop but it’s in the context of the game. But the better the connection the better you will play together.
"
Good description of what I am looking for (and not yet found alas) |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.
Sure, you're free to call it whatever you wish.
Thanks, but that isn't the point I was making - the point I was making is that it IS a relationship, whatever you call it.
I do get it. My point was I wouldn't call it a relationship. I'd refer to it simply as an arrangement. It's merely semantics."
We need to agree to disagree maybe, I do not believe it is solely semantics, I think a lot of people are kidding themselves that they can have an ongoing sexual arrangement without any responsibility. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"These relationships are a myth.....
Women catch feelings to quick
Nah all the decent fellas are already taken."
Exactly, I've had some great fb/fwb relationships without any romantic feelings involved, they were not what I was looking for. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"These relationships are a myth.....
Women catch feelings to quick
Nah all the decent fellas are already taken.
Exactly, I've had some great fb/fwb relationships without any romantic feelings involved, they were not what I was looking for."
Most guys that are decent are married or involved with someone....
The problem I found is women on swinging/sex sites expect the great guys to be single.....
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book."
Exactly this - and I do think many men (can’t speak for the women), don’t think through these obligations when they look for such an arrangement. Then when the other party expects these basic considerations the guy gets pissy and starts complaining about ‘strings’ . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.
Sure, you're free to call it whatever you wish.
Thanks, but that isn't the point I was making - the point I was making is that it IS a relationship, whatever you call it.
I do get it. My point was I wouldn't call it a relationship. I'd refer to it simply as an arrangement. It's merely semantics.
We need to agree to disagree maybe, I do not believe it is solely semantics, I think a lot of people are kidding themselves that they can have an ongoing sexual arrangement without any responsibility."
I guess so.
Even if it was just an arrangement, I'd still expect respect, honesty, and kindness. I expect that from most people in general anyway. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.
Sure, you're free to call it whatever you wish.
Thanks, but that isn't the point I was making - the point I was making is that it IS a relationship, whatever you call it.
I do get it. My point was I wouldn't call it a relationship. I'd refer to it simply as an arrangement. It's merely semantics.
We need to agree to disagree maybe, I do not believe it is solely semantics, I think a lot of people are kidding themselves that they can have an ongoing sexual arrangement without any responsibility.
I guess so.
Even if it was just an arrangement, I'd still expect respect, honesty, and kindness. I expect that from most people in general anyway. "
Me too - sadly nsa can be used as an excuse not to give them. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.
Exactly this - and I do think many men (can’t speak for the women), don’t think through these obligations when they look for such an arrangement. Then when the other party expects these basic considerations the guy gets pissy and starts complaining about ‘strings’ ."
Yup, cheap shot 'get out of jail free' card. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.
Exactly this - and I do think many men (can’t speak for the women), don’t think through these obligations when they look for such an arrangement. Then when the other party expects these basic considerations the guy gets pissy and starts complaining about ‘strings’ .
Yup, cheap shot 'get out of jail free' card."
Yup |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...
How do you mean?
Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?
Think it does for some
Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ... "
yes thats what many people do on here |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.
Sure, you're free to call it whatever you wish.
Thanks, but that isn't the point I was making - the point I was making is that it IS a relationship, whatever you call it.
I do get it. My point was I wouldn't call it a relationship. I'd refer to it simply as an arrangement. It's merely semantics.
We need to agree to disagree maybe, I do not believe it is solely semantics, I think a lot of people are kidding themselves that they can have an ongoing sexual arrangement without any responsibility."
what kind of responsability |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book."
oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.
Exactly this - and I do think many men (can’t speak for the women), don’t think through these obligations when they look for such an arrangement. Then when the other party expects these basic considerations the guy gets pissy and starts complaining about ‘strings’ .
Yup, cheap shot 'get out of jail free' card.
Yup"
Totally agree |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that"
Relationship- noun
The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.
Sure, you're free to call it whatever you wish.
Thanks, but that isn't the point I was making - the point I was making is that it IS a relationship, whatever you call it."
You are correct. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Does this exist in the real world ..? . it sounds too good to be true ...
How do you mean?
Message a woman, turn up, fuck, leave, message when horny again?
Think it does for some
Not so much message a woman turn up I mean meet the same woman on a regular basis nothing more than just sex ... "
Yes, nothing rare about it! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that
Relationship- noun
The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected. "
if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Seems a bit robotic to me. Sex is just sex at the end of the day. Its having a little something else with the other person that makes it interesting.
I agree. I prefer there to be a connection. It’s a type of friendship but with the clear understanding that it’s not going to overlap with the rest of your life.
I view it a bit like finding a tennis partner. You turn up, you play, you chat and then you leave. A friendship might develop but it’s in the context of the game. But the better the connection the better you will play together. "
That sounds perfect. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.
Exactly this - and I do think many men (can’t speak for the women), don’t think through these obligations when they look for such an arrangement. Then when the other party expects these basic considerations the guy gets pissy and starts complaining about ‘strings’ ."
So much this. How can respect and honesty be a 'string'? But some think that way.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that
Relationship- noun
The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected. if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us"
I’m working a flight home tonight. I will form a brief relationship with my passengers to ensure they have the best experience. It can mean many things. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Sex without obligation or commitment, rare but yes. I still want the pleasant company, chemistry thing too though."
Indeed, it isn't sex otherwise. Otherwise its just a fuck. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.
Exactly this - and I do think many men (can’t speak for the women), don’t think through these obligations when they look for such an arrangement. Then when the other party expects these basic considerations the guy gets pissy and starts complaining about ‘strings’ .
So much this. How can respect and honesty be a 'string'? But some think that way. "
It should be a basic thing that happens. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I'm sure it does happen and in theory it sounds like a great option but in reality, and I'm only talking from my own experiences, feelings can and do start to develop. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.
Exactly this - and I do think many men (can’t speak for the women), don’t think through these obligations when they look for such an arrangement. Then when the other party expects these basic considerations the guy gets pissy and starts complaining about ‘strings’ .
So much this. How can respect and honesty be a 'string'? But some think that way. "
i tbink thats where the confusion lies with some. If i say i look for nsa it doesnt really enter into my head that i should consider the fact that some people think that simple basic thing of two humans being together is a string |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.
Exactly this - and I do think many men (can’t speak for the women), don’t think through these obligations when they look for such an arrangement. Then when the other party expects these basic considerations the guy gets pissy and starts complaining about ‘strings’ .
So much this. How can respect and honesty be a 'string'? But some think that way.
It should be a basic thing that happens. "
You're right. If they can't manage something so simple with me, yet they can with others, is that their fault or mine?  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that
Relationship- noun
The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.
if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us"
I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Seems a bit robotic to me. Sex is just sex at the end of the day. Its having a little something else with the other person that makes it interesting.
I agree. I prefer there to be a connection. It’s a type of friendship but with the clear understanding that it’s not going to overlap with the rest of your life.
I view it a bit like finding a tennis partner. You turn up, you play, you chat and then you leave. A friendship might develop but it’s in the context of the game. But the better the connection the better you will play together. "
Not many want connections. Fuck n go. Rare are the ones who actually engage in conversation other than sex.
If you have sex with same person and just that person and not fuck and go then it's sexual relations. In fact any fuck is a relation. Fuck, sex same thing.
Many fuck many here it's a fuck site for singles. Couples it's swinging.
Swinging is for couples to wife swap.
Just have fun op |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that
Relationship- noun
The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.
if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us
I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.
"
Yes, They mean 2 different things in that context. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that
Relationship- noun
The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.
if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us
I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.
Yes, They mean 2 different things in that context. "
Exactly |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that
Relationship- noun
The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected. if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. "
We all are - friends, relations, lovers, working relationships, all kinds, and they all require some kind of correct behaviour from us.
I was going to say if someone doesn't want that they should pay an escort, but even they should be treated with due respect. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that
Relationship- noun
The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.
if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us
I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.
"
i dont even say i have fb relationships i just use the unbrella term of calling them all gentleman friends |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that
Relationship- noun
The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.
if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us
I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.
i dont even say i have fb relationships i just use the unbrella term of calling them all gentleman friends "
Polite and charming. Sounds much better than fuck buddies. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.
Exactly this - and I do think many men (can’t speak for the women), don’t think through these obligations when they look for such an arrangement. Then when the other party expects these basic considerations the guy gets pissy and starts complaining about ‘strings’ .
So much this. How can respect and honesty be a 'string'? But some think that way. "
Yup, and that's why I labour the point at times - because to them, nsa means no relationship of any kind, and so the freedom to act as badly as they choose. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that
Relationship- noun
The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.
if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us
I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.
i dont even say i have fb relationships i just use the unbrella term of calling them all gentleman friends "
Yes, that's nice. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that
Relationship- noun
The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.
if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us
I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.
i dont even say i have fb relationships i just use the unbrella term of calling them all gentleman friends "
I like that much better. I shall endeavour to have gentlemen friends. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that
Relationship- noun
The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.
if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us
I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.
i dont even say i have fb relationships i just use the unbrella term of calling them all gentleman friends
I like that much better. I shall endeavour to have gentlemen friends. "
I may have a gentleman calling tomorrow night. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that
Relationship- noun
The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.
if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us
I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.
i dont even say i have fb relationships i just use the unbrella term of calling them all gentleman friends
I like that much better. I shall endeavour to have gentlemen friends.
I may have a gentleman calling tomorrow night. "
ha. One of my friends we will be chatting away normally but if he wants to come for a shag he always says is her ladyship up to recieving gentlemen callers for an afternoom of tea and discourse sounds much better than can i come and bang the arse of you |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that
Relationship- noun
The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.
if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us
I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.
i dont even say i have fb relationships i just use the unbrella term of calling them all gentleman friends "
I didn't mean you as in you
I just used fb as an example.
I don't have either  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that
Relationship- noun
The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.
if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us
I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.
i dont even say i have fb relationships i just use the unbrella term of calling them all gentleman friends
I like that much better. I shall endeavour to have gentlemen friends.
I may have a gentleman calling tomorrow night. ha. One of my friends we will be chatting away normally but if he wants to come for a shag he always says is her ladyship up to recieving gentlemen callers for an afternoom of tea and discourse sounds much better than can i come and bang the arse of you"
Love it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Yes, I wouldn't necessarily call it a relationship though.
I think all such 'arrangements' are relationships in one sense or another though, and so come with a duty of care. I have had great fb with no strings, but they were respectful, honest, and kind - and that is a minimum requirement for any regular 'human interaction' in my book.oh i just read this. Yes all my gentlemen friends are like this as i am with them but i wouldnt start saying i was in a relationship with them all. To me a relationship is far more than that
Relationship- noun
The way in which two or more concepts, objects, or people are connected, or the state of being connected.
if we use it in that way then im obviously in a hell of a lot of relationships. I guess we will all have our own definitions of what a relationship means to us
I guess it depends how you use the word. I might say I have a fb relationship with x, but I wouldn't say I'm in a relationship with x.
i dont even say i have fb relationships i just use the unbrella term of calling them all gentleman friends
I like that much better. I shall endeavour to have gentlemen friends.
I may have a gentleman calling tomorrow night. ha. One of my friends we will be chatting away normally but if he wants to come for a shag he always says is her ladyship up to recieving gentlemen callers for an afternoom of tea and discourse sounds much better than can i come and bang the arse of you
Love it. "
perfect |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
