FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Wife blacked
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is blacked?" Cajun style? Char-grilled? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What is blacked? Cajun style? Char-grilled? " Cajun nice and spicy x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Any chance you could tell us what it means, OP?" She's bin dahn t' pit. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I can guess what it means. " Has to be letting your wife get banged by black blokes one would assume | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I can guess what it means. Has to be letting your wife get banged by black blokes one would assume " Correct | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Any chance you could tell us what it means, OP? She's bin dahn t' pit. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing?" Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock." I get it if the person actually having sex is choosing BBC, in the world of Fab it’s the equivalent of stating body hair or height preferences. But if you’re a man saying you want to see your wife/girlfriend ruined by a group of men who are specifically black, that opens a whole can of psychological worms for me. Are they saying it’s more demeaning for the woman to be fucked by black men? Because if it’s only about cock size (as in, they get off on seeing their partner take various big cocks), then why does skin colour come into it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock. I get it if the person actually having sex is choosing BBC, in the world of Fab it’s the equivalent of stating body hair or height preferences. But if you’re a man saying you want to see your wife/girlfriend ruined by a group of men who are specifically black, that opens a whole can of psychological worms for me. Are they saying it’s more demeaning for the woman to be fucked by black men? Because if it’s only about cock size (as in, they get off on seeing their partner take various big cocks), then why does skin colour come into it?" Who knows | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who enjoys it ? Nothing hotter" you an artist? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing?" The contrast looks better | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? The contrast looks better" I had an ex lover that loved contrasts like colour and size. I don’t get it but that was his thing I guess. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? The contrast looks better I had an ex lover that loved contrasts like colour and size. I don’t get it but that was his thing I guess. " It looks amazing when you take photos and get to edit them later | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock." The big cock thing is a myth don't you know x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock. The big cock thing is a myth don't you know x" It's a statistical fact actually | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock. The big cock thing is a myth don't you know x It's a statistical fact actually" of course there is | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock. The big cock thing is a myth don't you know x It's a statistical fact actuallyof course there is " Congo comes in the top 10 of worlds biggest cocks but South America has more countries in top ten and not all of those are BBC. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock. The big cock thing is a myth don't you know x It's a statistical fact actuallyof course there is Congo comes in the top 10 of worlds biggest cocks but South America has more countries in top ten and not all of those are BBC. " How many were involved in the survey and which countries and over what period of time? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock. The big cock thing is a myth don't you know x It's a statistical fact actually" How do you come to the conclusion it’s a fact. Have would they every know, have they messaged every man on the planet and worked it out ?! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock. The big cock thing is a myth don't you know x It's a statistical fact actuallyof course there is Congo comes in the top 10 of worlds biggest cocks but South America has more countries in top ten and not all of those are BBC. How many were involved in the survey and which countries and over what period of time? " Exactly! I hate statistics because they are not always accurate and this is an example. Some of the biggest ones I’ve seen have been white. Anyway, not into big ones so not my thing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock. The big cock thing is a myth don't you know x It's a statistical fact actuallyof course there is Congo comes in the top 10 of worlds biggest cocks but South America has more countries in top ten and not all of those are BBC. How many were involved in the survey and which countries and over what period of time? " Translation; I don't like the answer so I'm going to try and sabotage the study. Real science works by presenting better data, not just attacking every study you don't like. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock. The big cock thing is a myth don't you know x It's a statistical fact actuallyof course there is Congo comes in the top 10 of worlds biggest cocks but South America has more countries in top ten and not all of those are BBC. How many were involved in the survey and which countries and over what period of time? Exactly! I hate statistics because they are not always accurate and this is an example. Some of the biggest ones I’ve seen have been white. Anyway, not into big ones so not my thing. " Statistics, by definition, state how accurate they are with confidence intervals. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock. The big cock thing is a myth don't you know x It's a statistical fact actually How do you come to the conclusion it’s a fact. Have would they every know, have they messaged every man on the planet and worked it out ?!" Some representative sampling doesn't work then? That'll be news to the scientific community. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t know anyone, ever, that’s had they’re cock measured for a survey and I don’t know anyone who knows anyone that’s had they’re cock measured. So I’d like to know where these facts come from !" Durex funded the research. You realise that the average person will meet 120,000 in their lifetime and there are over 7 billion people on the planet. Why would you expect to know someone in the research? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t know anyone, ever, that’s had they’re cock measured for a survey and I don’t know anyone who knows anyone that’s had they’re cock measured. So I’d like to know where these facts come from !" Word on the street tells me that many well endowed humans are in fact from Devon. Must be the cider (cyder) I thought it put hairs on your chest....must stop drinking the stuff. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t know anyone, ever, that’s had they’re cock measured for a survey and I don’t know anyone who knows anyone that’s had they’re cock measured. So I’d like to know where these facts come from ! Durex funded the research. You realise that the average person will meet 120,000 in their lifetime and there are over 7 billion people on the planet. Why would you expect to know someone in the research? " Is 15,000 a fair sample size of billions of men ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who enjoys it ? Nothing hotter" Def hot. However you fed that post deliberately for effect didn't you? Didn't take long for the thought police/politically correct to pile in. If people wish to explore their fantasies via Fab (provided they aren't dangerous/illegal) why the hell do others have to turn it into a PC event? If the guys with the bbc (or even normal black cock) are happy to service the ladies who want one then who the hell asked everybody else to play referee? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t know anyone, ever, that’s had they’re cock measured for a survey and I don’t know anyone who knows anyone that’s had they’re cock measured. So I’d like to know where these facts come from ! Durex funded the research. You realise that the average person will meet 120,000 in their lifetime and there are over 7 billion people on the planet. Why would you expect to know someone in the research? Is 15,000 a fair sample size of billions of men ?" The fact that other studies can replicate the results say it is. That's how science works. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock. The big cock thing is a myth don't you know x It's a statistical fact actually How do you come to the conclusion it’s a fact. Have would they every know, have they messaged every man on the planet and worked it out ?! Some representative sampling doesn't work then? That'll be news to the scientific community. " You heard it here first. All I know is I wasn’t asked. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t know anyone, ever, that’s had they’re cock measured for a survey and I don’t know anyone who knows anyone that’s had they’re cock measured. So I’d like to know where these facts come from ! Durex funded the research. You realise that the average person will meet 120,000 in their lifetime and there are over 7 billion people on the planet. Why would you expect to know someone in the research? Is 15,000 a fair sample size of billions of men ?" Nip over to any decent statistics site and check on sample sizes. You'd be surprised just how small a number of people need to be sampled to provide pretty accurate data for the UK population for instance. In terms of knowing anyone in a survey: just ask yourself how many surveys get carried out in the UK each year, yet most of us don't know anyone who has been surveyed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t know anyone, ever, that’s had they’re cock measured for a survey and I don’t know anyone who knows anyone that’s had they’re cock measured. So I’d like to know where these facts come from ! Durex funded the research. You realise that the average person will meet 120,000 in their lifetime and there are over 7 billion people on the planet. Why would you expect to know someone in the research? Is 15,000 a fair sample size of billions of men ? Nip over to any decent statistics site and check on sample sizes. You'd be surprised just how small a number of people need to be sampled to provide pretty accurate data for the UK population for instance. In terms of knowing anyone in a survey: just ask yourself how many surveys get carried out in the UK each year, yet most of us don't know anyone who has been surveyed." Exactly right, for instance tv ratings are worked out for the entire nation based on just approx 100k people’s viewing habits. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock. The big cock thing is a myth don't you know x It's a statistical fact actuallyof course there is Congo comes in the top 10 of worlds biggest cocks but South America has more countries in top ten and not all of those are BBC. How many were involved in the survey and which countries and over what period of time? Translation; I don't like the answer so I'm going to try and sabotage the study. Real science works by presenting better data, not just attacking every study you don't like. " I'm not attacking it as the woman above said statistics are quite often inaccurate they don't involve the whole population and in this particular instance how do you do an accurate survey it's a very personal subject? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No one ever says 'wife whited' lol " That would be more my thing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock. The big cock thing is a myth don't you know x It's a statistical fact actuallyof course there is Congo comes in the top 10 of worlds biggest cocks but South America has more countries in top ten and not all of those are BBC. How many were involved in the survey and which countries and over what period of time? Translation; I don't like the answer so I'm going to try and sabotage the study. Real science works by presenting better data, not just attacking every study you don't like. I'm not attacking it as the woman above said statistics are quite often inaccurate they don't involve the whole population and in this particular instance how do you do an accurate survey it's a very personal subject? " That's why data comes with confidence intervals. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No one ever says 'wife whited' lol That would be more my thing " Oh really? 14 August 2017 pic is my kinda thing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t know anyone, ever, that’s had they’re cock measured for a survey and I don’t know anyone who knows anyone that’s had they’re cock measured. So I’d like to know where these facts come from ! Durex funded the research. You realise that the average person will meet 120,000 in their lifetime and there are over 7 billion people on the planet. Why would you expect to know someone in the research? Is 15,000 a fair sample size of billions of men ? Nip over to any decent statistics site and check on sample sizes. You'd be surprised just how small a number of people need to be sampled to provide pretty accurate data for the UK population for instance. In terms of knowing anyone in a survey: just ask yourself how many surveys get carried out in the UK each year, yet most of us don't know anyone who has been surveyed." Cause everyone I know give people with clip boards a wide berth. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
".......... How many were involved in the survey and which countries and over what period of time? Translation; I don't like the answer so I'm going to try and sabotage the study. Real science works by presenting better data, not just attacking every study you don't like. I'm not attacking it as the woman above said statistics are quite often inaccurate they don't involve the whole population and in this particular instance how do you do an accurate survey it's a very personal subject? " I don't wish to spoil your day but you are either attacking the survey or plucking at straws with that bit about statistics not being accurate because they don't involve the whole population. Statistics are inaccurate when the survey isn't properly designed, the sample size is too small or USUALLY when some fake-newser or politician pulls a few results out that favour their point without showing the context they were extracted from. You do not have to survey the entire nation to get a pretty accurate result about a subject. Go and do some basic stats classes. For those who believe in the anonymity of the masses it is quite terrifying just how much can be discovered from quite a small sample size. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them?" I hate reading, it’s like foreplay | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay " you only look at the pics | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics " Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay " Your location is genius bro I need to rethink mine | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them?" No. People who write long posts expect to communicate with people who can work up the effort to do more than look at pics. Thus long posts provide a very valuable filter to eliminate the unwanted. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them?" People are adding, at most, about five sentences, in a medium designed for exchanging the written word. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics " Do they expect me to read their profile now? It all sounds to me like ‘ me me me me me me me me me me me me’ | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort " I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay Your location is genius bro I need to rethink mine " Take your time | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
".......... How many were involved in the survey and which countries and over what period of time? Translation; I don't like the answer so I'm going to try and sabotage the study. Real science works by presenting better data, not just attacking every study you don't like. I'm not attacking it as the woman above said statistics are quite often inaccurate they don't involve the whole population and in this particular instance how do you do an accurate survey it's a very personal subject? I don't wish to spoil your day but you are either attacking the survey or plucking at straws with that bit about statistics not being accurate because they don't involve the whole population. Statistics are inaccurate when the survey isn't properly designed, the sample size is too small or USUALLY when some fake-newser or politician pulls a few results out that favour their point without showing the context they were extracted from. You do not have to survey the entire nation to get a pretty accurate result about a subject. Go and do some basic stats classes. For those who believe in the anonymity of the masses it is quite terrifying just how much can be discovered from quite a small sample size." and it seems you are attacking me attacking the survey which of course I'm not, I just doubt such a worldwide survey exists, I've not heard of it as others havnt and you would think in this life we would be more likely to. Durex did the survey you say so that rules out a large percentage who don't use or wear condoms and another percentage who are allergic to latex it just seems like a statistic that would be wholly inaccurate as a worldwide survey | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? No. People who write long posts expect to communicate with people who can work up the effort to do more than look at pics. Thus long posts provide a very valuable filter to eliminate the unwanted. " You can quickly scroll through and find the magic word to put it in message title #smart | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay Your location is genius bro I need to rethink mine Take your time " I went for your mum's house lol. Possibly bit immature. I'd have married you too but I'm not being the woman | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
".......... How many were involved in the survey and which countries and over what period of time? Translation; I don't like the answer so I'm going to try and sabotage the study. Real science works by presenting better data, not just attacking every study you don't like. I'm not attacking it as the woman above said statistics are quite often inaccurate they don't involve the whole population and in this particular instance how do you do an accurate survey it's a very personal subject? I don't wish to spoil your day but you are either attacking the survey or plucking at straws with that bit about statistics not being accurate because they don't involve the whole population. Statistics are inaccurate when the survey isn't properly designed, the sample size is too small or USUALLY when some fake-newser or politician pulls a few results out that favour their point without showing the context they were extracted from. You do not have to survey the entire nation to get a pretty accurate result about a subject. Go and do some basic stats classes. For those who believe in the anonymity of the masses it is quite terrifying just how much can be discovered from quite a small sample size.and it seems you are attacking me attacking the survey which of course I'm not, I just doubt such a worldwide survey exists, I've not heard of it as others havnt and you would think in this life we would be more likely to. Durex did the survey you say so that rules out a large percentage who don't use or wear condoms and another percentage who are allergic to latex it just seems like a statistic that would be wholly inaccurate as a worldwide survey " Where's the face palm emoji. They didn't stand at the counter of asda and ask all men buying condoms if they could quickly measure their cocks. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay Your location is genius bro I need to rethink mine Take your time I went for your mum's house lol. Possibly bit immature. I'd have married you too but I'm not being the woman " I’ll give you better suggestions | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x" Everyone thinks you're black because of your pictures | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock. The big cock thing is a myth don't you know x It's a statistical fact actuallyof course there is Congo comes in the top 10 of worlds biggest cocks but South America has more countries in top ten and not all of those are BBC. How many were involved in the survey and which countries and over what period of time? Exactly! I hate statistics because they are not always accurate and this is an example. Some of the biggest ones I’ve seen have been white. Anyway, not into big ones so not my thing. Statistics, by definition, state how accurate they are with confidence intervals. " And are notoriously easily manipulated and influenced by whoever funds a study. Although not sure who would fund a study on average cock size compared to race lol What study are you reporting your factual statistics from? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x Everyone thinks you're black because of your pictures " My pictures are olive | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock. The big cock thing is a myth don't you know x It's a statistical fact actuallyof course there is Congo comes in the top 10 of worlds biggest cocks but South America has more countries in top ten and not all of those are BBC. How many were involved in the survey and which countries and over what period of time? Exactly! I hate statistics because they are not always accurate and this is an example. Some of the biggest ones I’ve seen have been white. Anyway, not into big ones so not my thing. Statistics, by definition, state how accurate they are with confidence intervals. And are notoriously easily manipulated and influenced by whoever funds a study. Although not sure who would fund a study on average cock size compared to race lol What study are you reporting your factual statistics from? " Durex. I'm not sure durex have any particular motivation to spread data that shows the average black penis is longer than any other ethnic group. Not sure how politicians could manipulate that data for their own gain? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x Everyone thinks you're black because of your pictures My pictures are olive " I'd say caramel | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x Everyone thinks you're black because of your pictures My pictures are olive " Are you actually not black then? I don't even know haha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
".......... How many were involved in the survey and which countries and over what period of time? Translation; I don't like the answer so I'm going to try and sabotage the study. Real science works by presenting better data, not just attacking every study you don't like. I'm not attacking it as the woman above said statistics are quite often inaccurate they don't involve the whole population and in this particular instance how do you do an accurate survey it's a very personal subject? I don't wish to spoil your day but you are either attacking the survey or plucking at straws with that bit about statistics not being accurate because they don't involve the whole population. Statistics are inaccurate when the survey isn't properly designed, the sample size is too small or USUALLY when some fake-newser or politician pulls a few results out that favour their point without showing the context they were extracted from. You do not have to survey the entire nation to get a pretty accurate result about a subject. Go and do some basic stats classes. For those who believe in the anonymity of the masses it is quite terrifying just how much can be discovered from quite a small sample size.and it seems you are attacking me attacking the survey which of course I'm not, I just doubt such a worldwide survey exists, I've not heard of it as others havnt and you would think in this life we would be more likely to. Durex did the survey you say so that rules out a large percentage who don't use or wear condoms and another percentage who are allergic to latex it just seems like a statistic that would be wholly inaccurate as a worldwide survey Where's the face palm emoji. They didn't stand at the counter of asda and ask all men buying condoms if they could quickly measure their cocks. " Well exactly my point how did they achieve this accurate statistical analysis | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x Everyone thinks you're black because of your pictures My pictures are olive " Aren't olives green? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x Everyone thinks you're black because of your pictures My pictures are olive Are you actually not black then? I don't even know haha " It seems that pictures can be widely manipulated to present false information to the public... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x Everyone thinks you're black because of your pictures My pictures are olive Are you actually not black then? I don't even know haha " No bro, I’m sexy brown | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x Everyone thinks you're black because of your pictures My pictures are olive Are you actually not black then? I don't even know haha It seems that pictures can be widely manipulated to present false information to the public..." Hands down real pics.. I’m just sexy dark ass brown | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x Everyone thinks you're black because of your pictures My pictures are olive Aren't olives green? " Not the sexy mature ones | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x Everyone thinks you're black because of your pictures My pictures are olive Are you actually not black then? I don't even know haha No bro, I’m sexy brown " Doesn't bother me, I don't see colour, only the personality inside. Unless it's a woman then I see tits and ass too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
".......... How...............You do not have to survey the entire nation to get a pretty accurate result about a subject. Go and do some basic stats classes. and it seems you are attacking me attacking the survey which of course I'm not, I just doubt such a worldwide survey exists, I've not heard of it as others havnt and you would think in this life we would be more likely to. Durex did the survey you say so that rules out a large percentage who don't use or wear condoms and another percentage who are allergic to latex it just seems like a statistic that would be wholly inaccurate as a worldwide survey " That last paragraph sums up your problem. 1)The Durex survey is easily found (Google is a clue). BTW I hadn't heard of it either so not hearing about it proves nothing. 2) I didn't say Durex did the survey....a previous poster already posted that! 3) You can pitch as many gut-feeling "What abouts" as you like at a survey. You won't change the results unless you can get hold of its methodology and show there was a flaw in it. 4) Just because Durex did the survey doesn't mean they only asked condom users, we'd need to see the data on that. 5) Even if they did ask only condom users the results would only be inaccurate IF condom users didn't represent a good sampling of the population 6) For those allergic to latex thus excluding them from the survey (assuming point 5 to be true) means that for them to skew the result their numbers somehow weren't normally distributed across the range of penis sizes. A good basic stats course would enlighten you a lot. Unless of course you're in the "don't believe in any kind of expertise" camp, in which case there's no hope. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x Everyone thinks you're black because of your pictures My pictures are olive Are you actually not black then? I don't even know haha No bro, I’m sexy brown Doesn't bother me, I don't see colour, only the personality inside. Unless it's a woman then I see tits and ass too " I prefer pink pussy and pink nipples.. If you know anybody of the said description.. you know where to find me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
".......... How...............You do not have to survey the entire nation to get a pretty accurate result about a subject. Go and do some basic stats classes. and it seems you are attacking me attacking the survey which of course I'm not, I just doubt such a worldwide survey exists, I've not heard of it as others havnt and you would think in this life we would be more likely to. Durex did the survey you say so that rules out a large percentage who don't use or wear condoms and another percentage who are allergic to latex it just seems like a statistic that would be wholly inaccurate as a worldwide survey That last paragraph sums up your problem. 1)The Durex survey is easily found (Google is a clue). BTW I hadn't heard of it either so not hearing about it proves nothing. 2) I didn't say Durex did the survey....a previous poster already posted that! 3) You can pitch as many gut-feeling "What abouts" as you like at a survey. You won't change the results unless you can get hold of its methodology and show there was a flaw in it. 4) Just because Durex did the survey doesn't mean they only asked condom users, we'd need to see the data on that. 5) Even if they did ask only condom users the results would only be inaccurate IF condom users didn't represent a good sampling of the population 6) For those allergic to latex thus excluding them from the survey (assuming point 5 to be true) means that for them to skew the result their numbers somehow weren't normally distributed across the range of penis sizes. A good basic stats course would enlighten you a lot. Unless of course you're in the "don't believe in any kind of expertise" camp, in which case there's no hope. " I'm in the what a load of ballox camp unfortunately for you and where would we be without google eh | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
".......... How...............You do not have to survey the entire nation to get a pretty accurate result about a subject. Go and do some basic stats classes. and it seems you are attacking me attacking the survey which of course I'm not, I just doubt such a worldwide survey exists, I've not heard of it as others havnt and you would think in this life we would be more likely to. Durex did the survey you say so that rules out a large percentage who don't use or wear condoms and another percentage who are allergic to latex it just seems like a statistic that would be wholly inaccurate as a worldwide survey That last paragraph sums up your problem. 1)The Durex survey is easily found (Google is a clue). BTW I hadn't heard of it either so not hearing about it proves nothing. 2) I didn't say Durex did the survey....a previous poster already posted that! 3) You can pitch as many gut-feeling "What abouts" as you like at a survey. You won't change the results unless you can get hold of its methodology and show there was a flaw in it. 4) Just because Durex did the survey doesn't mean they only asked condom users, we'd need to see the data on that. 5) Even if they did ask only condom users the results would only be inaccurate IF condom users didn't represent a good sampling of the population 6) For those allergic to latex thus excluding them from the survey (assuming point 5 to be true) means that for them to skew the result their numbers somehow weren't normally distributed across the range of penis sizes. A good basic stats course would enlighten you a lot. Unless of course you're in the "don't believe in any kind of expertise" camp, in which case there's no hope. " Think it's more they don't like the answer the study gave. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x Everyone thinks you're black because of your pictures My pictures are olive Are you actually not black then? I don't even know haha No bro, I’m sexy brown Doesn't bother me, I don't see colour, only the personality inside. Unless it's a woman then I see tits and ass too I prefer pink pussy and pink nipples.. If you know anybody of the said description.. you know where to find me " Is that the only requirement? Cus there's literally billions of possibles | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them?" Do you want some crayons ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x Everyone thinks you're black because of your pictures My pictures are olive Are you actually not black then? I don't even know haha No bro, I’m sexy brown Doesn't bother me, I don't see colour, only the personality inside. Unless it's a woman then I see tits and ass too I prefer pink pussy and pink nipples.. If you know anybody of the said description.. you know where to find me Is that the only requirement? Cus there's literally billions of possibles" It’s not my final decision.. she has to be slim, sexy, cute, have personality like mine and cook like a chef | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x Everyone thinks you're black because of your pictures My pictures are olive Are you actually not black then? I don't even know haha No bro, I’m sexy brown Doesn't bother me, I don't see colour, only the personality inside. Unless it's a woman then I see tits and ass too I prefer pink pussy and pink nipples.. If you know anybody of the said description.. you know where to find me Is that the only requirement? Cus there's literally billions of possibles It’s not my final decision.. she has to be slim, sexy, cute, have personality like mine and cook like a chef " She has to be annoying ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x Everyone thinks you're black because of your pictures My pictures are olive Are you actually not black then? I don't even know haha No bro, I’m sexy brown Doesn't bother me, I don't see colour, only the personality inside. Unless it's a woman then I see tits and ass too I prefer pink pussy and pink nipples.. If you know anybody of the said description.. you know where to find me " *waves* | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x Everyone thinks you're black because of your pictures My pictures are olive Are you actually not black then? I don't even know haha No bro, I’m sexy brown Doesn't bother me, I don't see colour, only the personality inside. Unless it's a woman then I see tits and ass too I prefer pink pussy and pink nipples.. If you know anybody of the said description.. you know where to find me Is that the only requirement? Cus there's literally billions of possibles It’s not my final decision.. she has to be slim, sexy, cute, have personality like mine and cook like a chef " That’s me out...phew. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
".......... How...............You do not have to survey the entire nation to get a pretty accurate result about a subject. Go and do some basic stats classes. and it seems you are attacking me attacking the survey which of course I'm not, I just doubt such a worldwide survey exists, I've not heard of it as others havnt and you would think in this life we would be more likely to. Durex did the survey you say so that rules out a large percentage who don't use or wear condoms and another percentage who are allergic to latex it just seems like a statistic that would be wholly inaccurate as a worldwide survey That last paragraph sums up your problem. 1)The Durex survey is easily found (Google is a clue). BTW I hadn't heard of it either so not hearing about it proves nothing. 2) I didn't say Durex did the survey....a previous poster already posted that! 3) You can pitch as many gut-feeling "What abouts" as you like at a survey. You won't change the results unless you can get hold of its methodology and show there was a flaw in it. 4) Just because Durex did the survey doesn't mean they only asked condom users, we'd need to see the data on that. 5) Even if they did ask only condom users the results would only be inaccurate IF condom users didn't represent a good sampling of the population 6) For those allergic to latex thus excluding them from the survey (assuming point 5 to be true) means that for them to skew the result their numbers somehow weren't normally distributed across the range of penis sizes. A good basic stats course would enlighten you a lot. Unless of course you're in the "don't believe in any kind of expertise" camp, in which case there's no hope. Think it's more they don't like the answer the study gave. " Was it a study on just all cock sizes or only black ones? I'm trying to find it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The virtue signalling on any thread that has anything to do with race is outstanding. People always trying to look morally superior, and get on there high horse. It is what it is, some couples like to watch the female half getting thrown around a room by a black man, it ent racist, it’s isnt objectifying, or sinister, if it makes u feel “uncomfortable” well congrats you have superb morals ?? ?? but how about just don’t get involved in the thread and bore off. " What an absolutely joyful human being you are. Do we need to explain the concept of a forum to you, or do you have a dictionary in your handbag? You have no idea what ethnicity either of us are, so you’re making a lot of assumptions there. What is it they say about those who make assumptions? Because it fits you perfectly. Now jog on, while the rest of the grownups carry on with their conversation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who enjoys it ? Nothing hotter Def hot. However you fed that post deliberately for effect didn't you? Didn't take long for the thought police/politically correct to pile in. If people wish to explore their fantasies via Fab (provided they aren't dangerous/illegal) why the hell do others have to turn it into a PC event? If the guys with the bbc (or even normal black cock) are happy to service the ladies who want one then who the hell asked everybody else to play referee? " just this.... cant say or do anything these days with out the ol p/c getting there ore in !!!!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing?" Possibly but for a lot of white people who grew up in the '70s, our parents weren't exactly without sin when it came to attitude towards other races. Mixed race relationships were very much frowned upon and some of that has filtered down. There's no doubt about it though, "blacked" is a horrible term and sounds pretty derogatory to me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing?" It's not only demeaning to her, believe me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Who enjoys it ? Nothing hotter Def hot. However you fed that post deliberately for effect didn't you? Didn't take long for the thought police/politically correct to pile in. If people wish to explore their fantasies via Fab (provided they aren't dangerous/illegal) why the hell do others have to turn it into a PC event? If the guys with the bbc (or even normal black cock) are happy to service the ladies who want one then who the hell asked everybody else to play referee? just this.... cant say or do anything these days with out the ol p/c getting there ore in !!!!!!" It's nothing to do with being pc, it's simply a disrespectful reference, you don't need to be a rocket scientist to work that out. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
".......... How...............You do not have to survey the entire nation to get a pretty accurate result about a subject. Go and do some basic stats classes. and it seems you are attacking me attacking the survey which of course I'm not, I just doubt such a worldwide survey exists, I've not heard of it as others havnt and you would think in this life we would be more likely to. Durex did the survey you say so that rules out a large percentage who don't use or wear condoms and another percentage who are allergic to latex it just seems like a statistic that would be wholly inaccurate as a worldwide survey That last paragraph sums up your problem. 1)The Durex survey is easily found (Google is a clue). BTW I hadn't heard of it either so not hearing about it proves nothing. 2) I didn't say Durex did the survey....a previous poster already posted that! 3) You can pitch as many gut-feeling "What abouts" as you like at a survey. You won't change the results unless you can get hold of its methodology and show there was a flaw in it. 4) Just because Durex did the survey doesn't mean they only asked condom users, we'd need to see the data on that. 5) Even if they did ask only condom users the results would only be inaccurate IF condom users didn't represent a good sampling of the population 6) For those allergic to latex thus excluding them from the survey (assuming point 5 to be true) means that for them to skew the result their numbers somehow weren't normally distributed across the range of penis sizes. A good basic stats course would enlighten you a lot. Unless of course you're in the "don't believe in any kind of expertise" camp, in which case there's no hope. Think it's more they don't like the answer the study gave. Was it a study on just all cock sizes or only black ones? I'm trying to find it " omg if you can't find it how can us mere mortals find it, have you looked on bing? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x Everyone thinks you're black because of your pictures My pictures are olive Are you actually not black then? I don't even know haha No bro, I’m sexy brown Doesn't bother me, I don't see colour, only the personality inside. Unless it's a woman then I see tits and ass too I prefer pink pussy and pink nipples.. If you know anybody of the said description.. you know where to find me Is that the only requirement? Cus there's literally billions of possibles It’s not my final decision.. she has to be slim, sexy, cute, have personality like mine and cook like a chef She has to be annoying ?" So rich coming from you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t know anyone, ever, that’s had they’re cock measured for a survey and I don’t know anyone who knows anyone that’s had they’re cock measured. So I’d like to know where these facts come from !" That's a very good point! It's not like they ask people in the middle of a shopping street | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Possibly but for a lot of white people who grew up in the '70s, our parents weren't exactly without sin when it came to attitude towards other races. Mixed race relationships were very much frowned upon and some of that has filtered down. There's no doubt about it though, "blacked" is a horrible term and sounds pretty derogatory to me." Always one it's not derogatory at all | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Possibly but for a lot of white people who grew up in the '70s, our parents weren't exactly without sin when it came to attitude towards other races. Mixed race relationships were very much frowned upon and some of that has filtered down. There's no doubt about it though, "blacked" is a horrible term and sounds pretty derogatory to me." Doesn’t sound too nice to me either. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don’t know anyone, ever, that’s had they’re cock measured for a survey and I don’t know anyone who knows anyone that’s had they’re cock measured. So I’d like to know where these facts come from ! That's a very good point! It's not like they ask people in the middle of a shopping street " durex did survey but only in the middle east and the Congo | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Possibly but for a lot of white people who grew up in the '70s, our parents weren't exactly without sin when it came to attitude towards other races. Mixed race relationships were very much frowned upon and some of that has filtered down. There's no doubt about it though, "blacked" is a horrible term and sounds pretty derogatory to me.Always one it's not derogatory at all " There's a few more than one just on this thread but most have stated it as a matter of opinion and not fact. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Why do people write such long forum posts. Do they expect me to read them? I hate reading, it’s like foreplay you only look at the pics Picture tells a thousand words and all that. Plus it's a lot less effort I couldn’t agree with you more.. if you were a woman I would’ve married you x Everyone thinks you're black because of your pictures My pictures are olive Are you actually not black then? I don't even know haha No bro, I’m sexy brown Doesn't bother me, I don't see colour, only the personality inside. Unless it's a woman then I see tits and ass too I prefer pink pussy and pink nipples.. If you know anybody of the said description.. you know where to find me Is that the only requirement? Cus there's literally billions of possibles It’s not my final decision.. she has to be slim, sexy, cute, have personality like mine and cook like a chef That’s me out...phew. " Haha like you were ever in | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The virtue signalling on any thread that has anything to do with race is outstanding. People always trying to look morally superior, and get on there high horse. It is what it is, some couples like to watch the female half getting thrown around a room by a black man, it ent racist, it’s isnt objectifying, or sinister, if it makes u feel “uncomfortable” well congrats you have superb morals ?? ?? but how about just don’t get involved in the thread and bore off. What an absolutely joyful human being you are. Do we need to explain the concept of a forum to you, or do you have a dictionary in your handbag? You have no idea what ethnicity either of us are, so you’re making a lot of assumptions there. What is it they say about those who make assumptions? Because it fits you perfectly. Now jog on, while the rest of the grownups carry on with their conversation. " Grown ups hahaha. Using racial issues to make yourself look morally superior. I doubt you even realise the contradictions in your posts, embarrassing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The virtue signalling on any thread that has anything to do with race is outstanding. People always trying to look morally superior, and get on there high horse. It is what it is, some couples like to watch the female half getting thrown around a room by a black man, it ent racist, it’s isnt objectifying, or sinister, if it makes u feel “uncomfortable” well congrats you have superb morals ?? ?? but how about just don’t get involved in the thread and bore off. What an absolutely joyful human being you are. Do we need to explain the concept of a forum to you, or do you have a dictionary in your handbag? You have no idea what ethnicity either of us are, so you’re making a lot of assumptions there. What is it they say about those who make assumptions? Because it fits you perfectly. Now jog on, while the rest of the grownups carry on with their conversation. Grown ups hahaha. Using racial issues to make yourself look morally superior. I doubt you even realise the contradictions in your posts, embarrassing " This thread has taken a turn.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The virtue signalling on any thread that has anything to do with race is outstanding. People always trying to look morally superior, and get on there high horse. It is what it is, some couples like to watch the female half getting thrown around a room by a black man, it ent racist, it’s isnt objectifying, or sinister, if it makes u feel “uncomfortable” well congrats you have superb morals ?? ?? but how about just don’t get involved in the thread and bore off. What an absolutely joyful human being you are. Do we need to explain the concept of a forum to you, or do you have a dictionary in your handbag? You have no idea what ethnicity either of us are, so you’re making a lot of assumptions there. What is it they say about those who make assumptions? Because it fits you perfectly. Now jog on, while the rest of the grownups carry on with their conversation. Grown ups hahaha. Using racial issues to make yourself look morally superior. I doubt you even realise the contradictions in your posts, embarrassing " If you feel morally inferior that’s your issue, trying to pass your problems onto other people really isn’t becoming. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The virtue signalling on any thread that has anything to do with race is outstanding. People always trying to look morally superior, and get on there high horse. It is what it is, some couples like to watch the female half getting thrown around a room by a black man, it ent racist, it’s isnt objectifying, or sinister, if it makes u feel “uncomfortable” well congrats you have superb morals ?? ?? but how about just don’t get involved in the thread and bore off. What an absolutely joyful human being you are. Do we need to explain the concept of a forum to you, or do you have a dictionary in your handbag? You have no idea what ethnicity either of us are, so you’re making a lot of assumptions there. What is it they say about those who make assumptions? Because it fits you perfectly. Now jog on, while the rest of the grownups carry on with their conversation. Grown ups hahaha. Using racial issues to make yourself look morally superior. I doubt you even realise the contradictions in your posts, embarrassing " What are you on about now? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The virtue signalling on any thread that has anything to do with race is outstanding. People always trying to look morally superior, and get on there high horse. It is what it is, some couples like to watch the female half getting thrown around a room by a black man, it ent racist, it’s isnt objectifying, or sinister, if it makes u feel “uncomfortable” well congrats you have superb morals ?? ?? but how about just don’t get involved in the thread and bore off. What an absolutely joyful human being you are. Do we need to explain the concept of a forum to you, or do you have a dictionary in your handbag? You have no idea what ethnicity either of us are, so you’re making a lot of assumptions there. What is it they say about those who make assumptions? Because it fits you perfectly. Now jog on, while the rest of the grownups carry on with their conversation. Grown ups hahaha. Using racial issues to make yourself look morally superior. I doubt you even realise the contradictions in your posts, embarrassing If you feel morally inferior that’s your issue, trying to pass your problems onto other people really isn’t becoming. " Haha im clealey not the one with the issues, I’m not the one virtue signalling the life out of it, | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The virtue signalling on any thread that has anything to do with race is outstanding. People always trying to look morally superior, and get on there high horse. It is what it is, some couples like to watch the female half getting thrown around a room by a black man, it ent racist, it’s isnt objectifying, or sinister, if it makes u feel “uncomfortable” well congrats you have superb morals ?? ?? but how about just don’t get involved in the thread and bore off. What an absolutely joyful human being you are. Do we need to explain the concept of a forum to you, or do you have a dictionary in your handbag? You have no idea what ethnicity either of us are, so you’re making a lot of assumptions there. What is it they say about those who make assumptions? Because it fits you perfectly. Now jog on, while the rest of the grownups carry on with their conversation. Grown ups hahaha. Using racial issues to make yourself look morally superior. I doubt you even realise the contradictions in your posts, embarrassing If you feel morally inferior that’s your issue, trying to pass your problems onto other people really isn’t becoming. Haha im clealey not the one with the issues, I’m not the one virtue signalling the life out of it, " The life out of what exactly? If you’re going to pick a fight with someone for no reason you could at least talk sense. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The virtue signalling on any thread that has anything to do with race is outstanding. People always trying to look morally superior, and get on there high horse. It is what it is, some couples like to watch the female half getting thrown around a room by a black man, it ent racist, it’s isnt objectifying, or sinister, if it makes u feel “uncomfortable” well congrats you have superb morals ?? ?? but how about just don’t get involved in the thread and bore off. What an absolutely joyful human being you are. Do we need to explain the concept of a forum to you, or do you have a dictionary in your handbag? You have no idea what ethnicity either of us are, so you’re making a lot of assumptions there. What is it they say about those who make assumptions? Because it fits you perfectly. Now jog on, while the rest of the grownups carry on with their conversation. Grown ups hahaha. Using racial issues to make yourself look morally superior. I doubt you even realise the contradictions in your posts, embarrassing If you feel morally inferior that’s your issue, trying to pass your problems onto other people really isn’t becoming. Haha im clealey not the one with the issues, I’m not the one virtue signalling the life out of it, The life out of what exactly? If you’re going to pick a fight with someone for no reason you could at least talk sense. " I didn’t pick a fight with anybody, I made a genrak point on a forum and u directly confronted me, I don’t know if it’s because your fragile? Sensitive? Who knows. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The virtue signalling on any thread that has anything to do with race is outstanding. People always trying to look morally superior, and get on there high horse. It is what it is, some couples like to watch the female half getting thrown around a room by a black man, it ent racist, it’s isnt objectifying, or sinister, if it makes u feel “uncomfortable” well congrats you have superb morals ?? ?? but how about just don’t get involved in the thread and bore off. What an absolutely joyful human being you are. Do we need to explain the concept of a forum to you, or do you have a dictionary in your handbag? You have no idea what ethnicity either of us are, so you’re making a lot of assumptions there. What is it they say about those who make assumptions? Because it fits you perfectly. Now jog on, while the rest of the grownups carry on with their conversation. Grown ups hahaha. Using racial issues to make yourself look morally superior. I doubt you even realise the contradictions in your posts, embarrassing If you feel morally inferior that’s your issue, trying to pass your problems onto other people really isn’t becoming. Haha im clealey not the one with the issues, I’m not the one virtue signalling the life out of it, The life out of what exactly? If you’re going to pick a fight with someone for no reason you could at least talk sense. I didn’t pick a fight with anybody, I made a genrak point on a forum and u directly confronted me, I don’t know if it’s because your fragile? Sensitive? Who knows. " You quoted me and directed your passive aggressive post at my comments. Again, I’m not sure you understand how this “forum” malarkey works, but I don’t see you being brave enough to try starting with the others who’ve agreed with me. I shared my thoughts and asked some questions, apparently that made you feel morally inferior. You might want to work on that in a less public environment, because you’re only embarrassing yourself here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The virtue signalling on any thread that has anything to do with race is outstanding. People always trying to look morally superior, and get on there high horse. It is what it is, some couples like to watch the female half getting thrown around a room by a black man, it ent racist, it’s isnt objectifying, or sinister, if it makes u feel “uncomfortable” well congrats you have superb morals ?? ?? but how about just don’t get involved in the thread and bore off. What an absolutely joyful human being you are. Do we need to explain the concept of a forum to you, or do you have a dictionary in your handbag? You have no idea what ethnicity either of us are, so you’re making a lot of assumptions there. What is it they say about those who make assumptions? Because it fits you perfectly. Now jog on, while the rest of the grownups carry on with their conversation. Grown ups hahaha. Using racial issues to make yourself look morally superior. I doubt you even realise the contradictions in your posts, embarrassing If you feel morally inferior that’s your issue, trying to pass your problems onto other people really isn’t becoming. Haha im clealey not the one with the issues, I’m not the one virtue signalling the life out of it, The life out of what exactly? If you’re going to pick a fight with someone for no reason you could at least talk sense. I didn’t pick a fight with anybody, I made a genrak point on a forum and u directly confronted me, I don’t know if it’s because your fragile? Sensitive? Who knows. You quoted me and directed your passive aggressive post at my comments. Again, I’m not sure you understand how this “forum” malarkey works, but I don’t see you being brave enough to try starting with the others who’ve agreed with me. I shared my thoughts and asked some questions, apparently that made you feel morally inferior. You might want to work on that in a less public environment, because you’re only embarrassing yourself here. " You are so boring I cba to continue. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The virtue signalling on any thread that has anything to do with race is outstanding. People always trying to look morally superior, and get on there high horse. It is what it is, some couples like to watch the female half getting thrown around a room by a black man, it ent racist, it’s isnt objectifying, or sinister, if it makes u feel “uncomfortable” well congrats you have superb morals ?? ?? but how about just don’t get involved in the thread and bore off. What an absolutely joyful human being you are. Do we need to explain the concept of a forum to you, or do you have a dictionary in your handbag? You have no idea what ethnicity either of us are, so you’re making a lot of assumptions there. What is it they say about those who make assumptions? Because it fits you perfectly. Now jog on, while the rest of the grownups carry on with their conversation. Grown ups hahaha. Using racial issues to make yourself look morally superior. I doubt you even realise the contradictions in your posts, embarrassing If you feel morally inferior that’s your issue, trying to pass your problems onto other people really isn’t becoming. Haha im clealey not the one with the issues, I’m not the one virtue signalling the life out of it, The life out of what exactly? If you’re going to pick a fight with someone for no reason you could at least talk sense. I didn’t pick a fight with anybody, I made a genrak point on a forum and u directly confronted me, I don’t know if it’s because your fragile? Sensitive? Who knows. You quoted me and directed your passive aggressive post at my comments. Again, I’m not sure you understand how this “forum” malarkey works, but I don’t see you being brave enough to try starting with the others who’ve agreed with me. I shared my thoughts and asked some questions, apparently that made you feel morally inferior. You might want to work on that in a less public environment, because you’re only embarrassing yourself here. " behave | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People always trying to look morally superior," Nobody is having to try very hard, in the circumstances. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People always trying to look morally superior, Nobody is having to try very hard, in the circumstances." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing? Have to be honest I've never got the BBC thing, do you not just want a big cock. The big cock thing is a myth don't you know x It's a statistical fact actuallyof course there is Congo comes in the top 10 of worlds biggest cocks but South America has more countries in top ten and not all of those are BBC. How many were involved in the survey and which countries and over what period of time? Translation; I don't like the answer so I'm going to try and sabotage the study. Real science works by presenting better data, not just attacking every study you don't like. " FAKE NEWS! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People always trying to look morally superior, Nobody is having to try very hard, in the circumstances. " Awwww look at the bum chums so cute | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People always trying to look morally superior, Nobody is having to try very hard, in the circumstances. Awwww look at the bum chums so cute " Seriously, I’ve asked once before...what is your problem on this thread? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Awwww look at the bum chums so cute " Doubling down with homophobia. Smooth. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People always trying to look morally superior, Nobody is having to try very hard, in the circumstances. Awwww look at the bum chums so cute " Easy tiger | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"its one of those phrases i absolutely detest....." Yes but you're normally on the more sensible side of the debate. You should throw us a curve ball now and then. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Awwww look at the bum chums so cute Doubling down with homophobia. Smooth." Hows that homophobic? Doughnut | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hows that homophobic? Doughnut " I’m not quite sure how to respond to such a considered, intelligent argument. Such eloquence is truly breathtaking. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Awwww look at the bum chums so cute Doubling down with homophobia. Smooth. Hows that homophobic? Doughnut " Love how you signed off with your name. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Awwww look at the bum chums so cute Doubling down with homophobia. Smooth. Hows that homophobic? Doughnut Love how you signed off with your name. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Awwww look at the bum chums so cute Doubling down with homophobia. Smooth. Hows that homophobic? Doughnut Love how you signed off with your name. " Oh good one | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hows that homophobic? Doughnut I’m not quite sure how to respond to such a considered, intelligent argument. Such eloquence is truly breathtaking." Yeah but it wasn’t an argument, your devaluing what homophobia is, your mates scoring points off of racial issues, really is morally bankrupt. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Awwww look at the bum chums so cute Doubling down with homophobia. Smooth. Hows that homophobic? Doughnut Love how you signed off with your name. Oh good one" My name’s Estella, but I’ll answer to Good One too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hows that homophobic? Doughnut I’m not quite sure how to respond to such a considered, intelligent argument. Such eloquence is truly breathtaking. Yeah but it wasn’t an argument, your devaluing what homophobia is, your mates scoring points off of racial issues, really is morally bankrupt. " Umm. I think you’re failing to understand the meaning of words and shit. It looks awfully laboured, still, a good try - we’ll go with effort and ignore inaccuracy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing?" You are right to feel uncomfortable. It has its roots in racism | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok..." well said | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said " Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” " And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. " You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. " So colloquial | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial " Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. " Well, thank you, if you say so | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. Well, thank you, if you say so " You and your big words... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. Well, thank you, if you say so You and your big words... " Affirmative | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. " I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. " You need to get out more. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more." Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. Well, thank you, if you say so You and your big words... Affirmative " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious." Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. " I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I know it’s each to their own with preferences etc, but this kind of thing makes me uncomfortable. The notion that it makes a difference that the guys involved are all black... I don’t get why skin colour would matter to an observing husband/partner. Surely if you get off on seeing your partner in a gangbang it makes no difference to you what colour the men are? To me it implies that you think it’s somehow more demeaning for her . Unless, is there another aspect to it i’m not seeing?" So much this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. " I’m assuming there was intent attached to it, that’s true, maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, I’m not gonna loose sleep about it that’s for sure. Yes we could speculate on why people choose to use inflated vocab when a more Lehman’s approach would suffice, and again suppose it doesn’t really matter. If somebody is insecure or concerned about there intelligence, weather or not there taken seriously, if other people are listening to them, and using more “complicated” words in order to inject extra confidence into what there saying then more power to them I guess, but when all’s said and done, some blokes like to watch there missus get shagged by a black bloke. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. I’m assuming there was intent attached to it, that’s true, maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, I’m not gonna loose sleep about it that’s for sure. Yes we could speculate on why people choose to use inflated vocab when a more Lehman’s approach would suffice, and again suppose it doesn’t really matter. If somebody is insecure or concerned about there intelligence, weather or not there taken seriously, if other people are listening to them, and using more “complicated” words in order to inject extra confidence into what there saying then more power to them I guess, but when all’s said and done, some blokes like to watch there missus get shagged by a black bloke. " I’m all for education and educating; it’s good to support people. I’d signpost to the correct usage of common homophones or the concept of a layman versus the collapsed financial services firm again, it’s about those dastardly homophones. But conceptually I hear your argument, it’s just it fails to grasp where preferences are rooted, and the nuance and uncomfortable social constructs that a lot of these actually stem from, but that’s often because it requires an analysis of the self that people are not able to grapple with. Glad you’re not losing sleep though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. I’m assuming there was intent attached to it, that’s true, maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, I’m not gonna loose sleep about it that’s for sure. Yes we could speculate on why people choose to use inflated vocab when a more Lehman’s approach would suffice, and again suppose it doesn’t really matter. If somebody is insecure or concerned about there intelligence, weather or not there taken seriously, if other people are listening to them, and using more “complicated” words in order to inject extra confidence into what there saying then more power to them I guess, but when all’s said and done, some blokes like to watch there missus get shagged by a black bloke. I’m all for education and educating; it’s good to support people. I’d signpost to the correct usage of common homophones or the concept of a layman versus the collapsed financial services firm again, it’s about those dastardly homophones. But conceptually I hear your argument, it’s just it fails to grasp where preferences are rooted, and the nuance and uncomfortable social constructs that a lot of these actually stem from, but that’s often because it requires an analysis of the self that people are not able to grapple with. Glad you’re not losing sleep though. " That’s a direct example of trying to shut somebody up by making them look stupid, and over complicating the words they use to make a point, obviously I understand the point you making and that your doing it deliberately, fair enough, this is exactly why young people from underprivileged backgrounds, infact anybody, don’t get heard, don’t have the confidence to speak up, and get overlooked, nobody knows what a homophone is, and if you do know what it is then fair enough, nobody in my local boozer would know, 1 cunt would know and that’s it, and anyway the context of the way I used “layman” was enough, this is why the metropolitan elite, the educated elite, despise the working class, you talk about social constructs, being able to use language as you can should be used with responsibility and not just to win an argument, debate, disagreement against somebody who is not as fineley educated as you appear to be andwouldnt be able to weave words how you can. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. I’m assuming there was intent attached to it, that’s true, maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, I’m not gonna loose sleep about it that’s for sure. Yes we could speculate on why people choose to use inflated vocab when a more Lehman’s approach would suffice, and again suppose it doesn’t really matter. If somebody is insecure or concerned about there intelligence, weather or not there taken seriously, if other people are listening to them, and using more “complicated” words in order to inject extra confidence into what there saying then more power to them I guess, but when all’s said and done, some blokes like to watch there missus get shagged by a black bloke. I’m all for education and educating; it’s good to support people. I’d signpost to the correct usage of common homophones or the concept of a layman versus the collapsed financial services firm again, it’s about those dastardly homophones. But conceptually I hear your argument, it’s just it fails to grasp where preferences are rooted, and the nuance and uncomfortable social constructs that a lot of these actually stem from, but that’s often because it requires an analysis of the self that people are not able to grapple with. Glad you’re not losing sleep though. That’s a direct example of trying to shut somebody up by making them look stupid, and over complicating the words they use to make a point, obviously I understand the point you making and that your doing it deliberately, fair enough, this is exactly why young people from underprivileged backgrounds, infact anybody, don’t get heard, don’t have the confidence to speak up, and get overlooked, nobody knows what a homophone is, and if you do know what it is then fair enough, nobody in my local boozer would know, 1 cunt would know and that’s it, and anyway the context of the way I used “layman” was enough, this is why the metropolitan elite, the educated elite, despise the working class, you talk about social constructs, being able to use language as you can should be used with responsibility and not just to win an argument, debate, disagreement against somebody who is not as fineley educated as you appear to be andwouldnt be able to weave words how you can. " You again appear to be extrapolating and making leaps of assumption. You appear to attack me, when I am not attacking you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. I’m assuming there was intent attached to it, that’s true, maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, I’m not gonna loose sleep about it that’s for sure. Yes we could speculate on why people choose to use inflated vocab when a more Lehman’s approach would suffice, and again suppose it doesn’t really matter. If somebody is insecure or concerned about there intelligence, weather or not there taken seriously, if other people are listening to them, and using more “complicated” words in order to inject extra confidence into what there saying then more power to them I guess, but when all’s said and done, some blokes like to watch there missus get shagged by a black bloke. I’m all for education and educating; it’s good to support people. I’d signpost to the correct usage of common homophones or the concept of a layman versus the collapsed financial services firm again, it’s about those dastardly homophones. But conceptually I hear your argument, it’s just it fails to grasp where preferences are rooted, and the nuance and uncomfortable social constructs that a lot of these actually stem from, but that’s often because it requires an analysis of the self that people are not able to grapple with. Glad you’re not losing sleep though. That’s a direct example of trying to shut somebody up by making them look stupid, and over complicating the words they use to make a point, obviously I understand the point you making and that your doing it deliberately, fair enough, this is exactly why young people from underprivileged backgrounds, infact anybody, don’t get heard, don’t have the confidence to speak up, and get overlooked, nobody knows what a homophone is, and if you do know what it is then fair enough, nobody in my local boozer would know, 1 cunt would know and that’s it, and anyway the context of the way I used “layman” was enough, this is why the metropolitan elite, the educated elite, despise the working class, you talk about social constructs, being able to use language as you can should be used with responsibility and not just to win an argument, debate, disagreement against somebody who is not as fineley educated as you appear to be andwouldnt be able to weave words how you can. You again appear to be extrapolating and making leaps of assumption. You appear to attack me, when I am not attacking you. " Oh come on you know you have, just in a very subtle passive aggressive kind of way, just enough subtleness so that you can say you haven’t, v clever tactic. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. I’m assuming there was intent attached to it, that’s true, maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, I’m not gonna loose sleep about it that’s for sure. Yes we could speculate on why people choose to use inflated vocab when a more Lehman’s approach would suffice, and again suppose it doesn’t really matter. If somebody is insecure or concerned about there intelligence, weather or not there taken seriously, if other people are listening to them, and using more “complicated” words in order to inject extra confidence into what there saying then more power to them I guess, but when all’s said and done, some blokes like to watch there missus get shagged by a black bloke. I’m all for education and educating; it’s good to support people. I’d signpost to the correct usage of common homophones or the concept of a layman versus the collapsed financial services firm again, it’s about those dastardly homophones. But conceptually I hear your argument, it’s just it fails to grasp where preferences are rooted, and the nuance and uncomfortable social constructs that a lot of these actually stem from, but that’s often because it requires an analysis of the self that people are not able to grapple with. Glad you’re not losing sleep though. That’s a direct example of trying to shut somebody up by making them look stupid, and over complicating the words they use to make a point, obviously I understand the point you making and that your doing it deliberately, fair enough, this is exactly why young people from underprivileged backgrounds, infact anybody, don’t get heard, don’t have the confidence to speak up, and get overlooked, nobody knows what a homophone is, and if you do know what it is then fair enough, nobody in my local boozer would know, 1 cunt would know and that’s it, and anyway the context of the way I used “layman” was enough, this is why the metropolitan elite, the educated elite, despise the working class, you talk about social constructs, being able to use language as you can should be used with responsibility and not just to win an argument, debate, disagreement against somebody who is not as fineley educated as you appear to be andwouldnt be able to weave words how you can. You again appear to be extrapolating and making leaps of assumption. You appear to attack me, when I am not attacking you. Oh come on you know you have, just in a very subtle passive aggressive kind of way, just enough subtleness so that you can say you haven’t, v clever tactic. " And yet my intent is not something you can definitively attest to. You can still be wrong. Your digs are outright though. It’s the fascinating thing about defensive posting on here and the huge amount of projection that goes on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. I’m assuming there was intent attached to it, that’s true, maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, I’m not gonna loose sleep about it that’s for sure. Yes we could speculate on why people choose to use inflated vocab when a more Lehman’s approach would suffice, and again suppose it doesn’t really matter. If somebody is insecure or concerned about there intelligence, weather or not there taken seriously, if other people are listening to them, and using more “complicated” words in order to inject extra confidence into what there saying then more power to them I guess, but when all’s said and done, some blokes like to watch there missus get shagged by a black bloke. I’m all for education and educating; it’s good to support people. I’d signpost to the correct usage of common homophones or the concept of a layman versus the collapsed financial services firm again, it’s about those dastardly homophones. But conceptually I hear your argument, it’s just it fails to grasp where preferences are rooted, and the nuance and uncomfortable social constructs that a lot of these actually stem from, but that’s often because it requires an analysis of the self that people are not able to grapple with. Glad you’re not losing sleep though. That’s a direct example of trying to shut somebody up by making them look stupid, and over complicating the words they use to make a point, obviously I understand the point you making and that your doing it deliberately, fair enough, this is exactly why young people from underprivileged backgrounds, infact anybody, don’t get heard, don’t have the confidence to speak up, and get overlooked, nobody knows what a homophone is, and if you do know what it is then fair enough, nobody in my local boozer would know, 1 cunt would know and that’s it, and anyway the context of the way I used “layman” was enough, this is why the metropolitan elite, the educated elite, despise the working class, you talk about social constructs, being able to use language as you can should be used with responsibility and not just to win an argument, debate, disagreement against somebody who is not as fineley educated as you appear to be andwouldnt be able to weave words how you can. You again appear to be extrapolating and making leaps of assumption. You appear to attack me, when I am not attacking you. Oh come on you know you have, just in a very subtle passive aggressive kind of way, just enough subtleness so that you can say you haven’t, v clever tactic. And yet my intent is not something you can definitively attest to. You can still be wrong. Your digs are outright though. It’s the fascinating thing about defensive posting on here and the huge amount of projection that goes on. " Yeah could be wrong, we both know I’m not, but it’s somthing you have worded so I obviously can’t argue that. I’m not projecting, I have “digged” but you haven’t been a punch bag, digs have not been going in one direction, it’s been a sparring session, your subtleness makes it easy for you to be dishonest about your intent, it’s a very politician kind of thing to do. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. I’m assuming there was intent attached to it, that’s true, maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, I’m not gonna loose sleep about it that’s for sure. Yes we could speculate on why people choose to use inflated vocab when a more Lehman’s approach would suffice, and again suppose it doesn’t really matter. If somebody is insecure or concerned about there intelligence, weather or not there taken seriously, if other people are listening to them, and using more “complicated” words in order to inject extra confidence into what there saying then more power to them I guess, but when all’s said and done, some blokes like to watch there missus get shagged by a black bloke. I’m all for education and educating; it’s good to support people. I’d signpost to the correct usage of common homophones or the concept of a layman versus the collapsed financial services firm again, it’s about those dastardly homophones. But conceptually I hear your argument, it’s just it fails to grasp where preferences are rooted, and the nuance and uncomfortable social constructs that a lot of these actually stem from, but that’s often because it requires an analysis of the self that people are not able to grapple with. Glad you’re not losing sleep though. That’s a direct example of trying to shut somebody up by making them look stupid, and over complicating the words they use to make a point, obviously I understand the point you making and that your doing it deliberately, fair enough, this is exactly why young people from underprivileged backgrounds, infact anybody, don’t get heard, don’t have the confidence to speak up, and get overlooked, nobody knows what a homophone is, and if you do know what it is then fair enough, nobody in my local boozer would know, 1 cunt would know and that’s it, and anyway the context of the way I used “layman” was enough, this is why the metropolitan elite, the educated elite, despise the working class, you talk about social constructs, being able to use language as you can should be used with responsibility and not just to win an argument, debate, disagreement against somebody who is not as fineley educated as you appear to be andwouldnt be able to weave words how you can. You again appear to be extrapolating and making leaps of assumption. You appear to attack me, when I am not attacking you. Oh come on you know you have, just in a very subtle passive aggressive kind of way, just enough subtleness so that you can say you haven’t, v clever tactic. And yet my intent is not something you can definitively attest to. You can still be wrong. Your digs are outright though. It’s the fascinating thing about defensive posting on here and the huge amount of projection that goes on. Yeah could be wrong, we both know I’m not, but it’s somthing you have worded so I obviously can’t argue that. I’m not projecting, I have “digged” but you haven’t been a punch bag, digs have not been going in one direction, it’s been a sparring session, your subtleness makes it easy for you to be dishonest about your intent, it’s a very politician kind of thing to do. " I refer you to my earlier point about correct semantic usage. It’s proving elusive for you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. I’m assuming there was intent attached to it, that’s true, maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, I’m not gonna loose sleep about it that’s for sure. Yes we could speculate on why people choose to use inflated vocab when a more Lehman’s approach would suffice, and again suppose it doesn’t really matter. If somebody is insecure or concerned about there intelligence, weather or not there taken seriously, if other people are listening to them, and using more “complicated” words in order to inject extra confidence into what there saying then more power to them I guess, but when all’s said and done, some blokes like to watch there missus get shagged by a black bloke. I’m all for education and educating; it’s good to support people. I’d signpost to the correct usage of common homophones or the concept of a layman versus the collapsed financial services firm again, it’s about those dastardly homophones. But conceptually I hear your argument, it’s just it fails to grasp where preferences are rooted, and the nuance and uncomfortable social constructs that a lot of these actually stem from, but that’s often because it requires an analysis of the self that people are not able to grapple with. Glad you’re not losing sleep though. That’s a direct example of trying to shut somebody up by making them look stupid, and over complicating the words they use to make a point, obviously I understand the point you making and that your doing it deliberately, fair enough, this is exactly why young people from underprivileged backgrounds, infact anybody, don’t get heard, don’t have the confidence to speak up, and get overlooked, nobody knows what a homophone is, and if you do know what it is then fair enough, nobody in my local boozer would know, 1 cunt would know and that’s it, and anyway the context of the way I used “layman” was enough, this is why the metropolitan elite, the educated elite, despise the working class, you talk about social constructs, being able to use language as you can should be used with responsibility and not just to win an argument, debate, disagreement against somebody who is not as fineley educated as you appear to be andwouldnt be able to weave words how you can. You again appear to be extrapolating and making leaps of assumption. You appear to attack me, when I am not attacking you. Oh come on you know you have, just in a very subtle passive aggressive kind of way, just enough subtleness so that you can say you haven’t, v clever tactic. And yet my intent is not something you can definitively attest to. You can still be wrong. Your digs are outright though. It’s the fascinating thing about defensive posting on here and the huge amount of projection that goes on. Yeah could be wrong, we both know I’m not, but it’s somthing you have worded so I obviously can’t argue that. I’m not projecting, I have “digged” but you haven’t been a punch bag, digs have not been going in one direction, it’s been a sparring session, your subtleness makes it easy for you to be dishonest about your intent, it’s a very politician kind of thing to do. I refer you to my earlier point about correct semantic usage. It’s proving elusive for you. " Your clealey not a very honest person, let’s call it a draw, nobody should argue about semantics | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. I’m assuming there was intent attached to it, that’s true, maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, I’m not gonna loose sleep about it that’s for sure. Yes we could speculate on why people choose to use inflated vocab when a more Lehman’s approach would suffice, and again suppose it doesn’t really matter. If somebody is insecure or concerned about there intelligence, weather or not there taken seriously, if other people are listening to them, and using more “complicated” words in order to inject extra confidence into what there saying then more power to them I guess, but when all’s said and done, some blokes like to watch there missus get shagged by a black bloke. I’m all for education and educating; it’s good to support people. I’d signpost to the correct usage of common homophones or the concept of a layman versus the collapsed financial services firm again, it’s about those dastardly homophones. But conceptually I hear your argument, it’s just it fails to grasp where preferences are rooted, and the nuance and uncomfortable social constructs that a lot of these actually stem from, but that’s often because it requires an analysis of the self that people are not able to grapple with. Glad you’re not losing sleep though. That’s a direct example of trying to shut somebody up by making them look stupid, and over complicating the words they use to make a point, obviously I understand the point you making and that your doing it deliberately, fair enough, this is exactly why young people from underprivileged backgrounds, infact anybody, don’t get heard, don’t have the confidence to speak up, and get overlooked, nobody knows what a homophone is, and if you do know what it is then fair enough, nobody in my local boozer would know, 1 cunt would know and that’s it, and anyway the context of the way I used “layman” was enough, this is why the metropolitan elite, the educated elite, despise the working class, you talk about social constructs, being able to use language as you can should be used with responsibility and not just to win an argument, debate, disagreement against somebody who is not as fineley educated as you appear to be andwouldnt be able to weave words how you can. You again appear to be extrapolating and making leaps of assumption. You appear to attack me, when I am not attacking you. Oh come on you know you have, just in a very subtle passive aggressive kind of way, just enough subtleness so that you can say you haven’t, v clever tactic. And yet my intent is not something you can definitively attest to. You can still be wrong. Your digs are outright though. It’s the fascinating thing about defensive posting on here and the huge amount of projection that goes on. Yeah could be wrong, we both know I’m not, but it’s somthing you have worded so I obviously can’t argue that. I’m not projecting, I have “digged” but you haven’t been a punch bag, digs have not been going in one direction, it’s been a sparring session, your subtleness makes it easy for you to be dishonest about your intent, it’s a very politician kind of thing to do. I refer you to my earlier point about correct semantic usage. It’s proving elusive for you. Your clealey not a very honest person, let’s call it a draw, nobody should argue about semantics" Why does my expressing my view with no harm to you warrant me being called dishonest? That would be thrown out of a court of law, it makes no sense. And why would there be a draw, when I’m not fighting or competing for anything? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. I’m assuming there was intent attached to it, that’s true, maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, I’m not gonna loose sleep about it that’s for sure. Yes we could speculate on why people choose to use inflated vocab when a more Lehman’s approach would suffice, and again suppose it doesn’t really matter. If somebody is insecure or concerned about there intelligence, weather or not there taken seriously, if other people are listening to them, and using more “complicated” words in order to inject extra confidence into what there saying then more power to them I guess, but when all’s said and done, some blokes like to watch there missus get shagged by a black bloke. I’m all for education and educating; it’s good to support people. I’d signpost to the correct usage of common homophones or the concept of a layman versus the collapsed financial services firm again, it’s about those dastardly homophones. But conceptually I hear your argument, it’s just it fails to grasp where preferences are rooted, and the nuance and uncomfortable social constructs that a lot of these actually stem from, but that’s often because it requires an analysis of the self that people are not able to grapple with. Glad you’re not losing sleep though. That’s a direct example of trying to shut somebody up by making them look stupid, and over complicating the words they use to make a point, obviously I understand the point you making and that your doing it deliberately, fair enough, this is exactly why young people from underprivileged backgrounds, infact anybody, don’t get heard, don’t have the confidence to speak up, and get overlooked, nobody knows what a homophone is, and if you do know what it is then fair enough, nobody in my local boozer would know, 1 cunt would know and that’s it, and anyway the context of the way I used “layman” was enough, this is why the metropolitan elite, the educated elite, despise the working class, you talk about social constructs, being able to use language as you can should be used with responsibility and not just to win an argument, debate, disagreement against somebody who is not as fineley educated as you appear to be andwouldnt be able to weave words how you can. You again appear to be extrapolating and making leaps of assumption. You appear to attack me, when I am not attacking you. Oh come on you know you have, just in a very subtle passive aggressive kind of way, just enough subtleness so that you can say you haven’t, v clever tactic. And yet my intent is not something you can definitively attest to. You can still be wrong. Your digs are outright though. It’s the fascinating thing about defensive posting on here and the huge amount of projection that goes on. Yeah could be wrong, we both know I’m not, but it’s somthing you have worded so I obviously can’t argue that. I’m not projecting, I have “digged” but you haven’t been a punch bag, digs have not been going in one direction, it’s been a sparring session, your subtleness makes it easy for you to be dishonest about your intent, it’s a very politician kind of thing to do. I refer you to my earlier point about correct semantic usage. It’s proving elusive for you. Your clealey not a very honest person, let’s call it a draw, nobody should argue about semantics Why does my expressing my view with no harm to you warrant me being called dishonest? That would be thrown out of a court of law, it makes no sense. And why would there be a draw, when I’m not fighting or competing for anything?" Got more rabbit then Sainsbury’s you have. Not everything’s a court of law. And call it a draw is just a phrase bab, calm down. I called u dishonest, in regards this thread as obvs I don’t know u from Adam. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. I’m assuming there was intent attached to it, that’s true, maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, I’m not gonna loose sleep about it that’s for sure. Yes we could speculate on why people choose to use inflated vocab when a more Lehman’s approach would suffice, and again suppose it doesn’t really matter. If somebody is insecure or concerned about there intelligence, weather or not there taken seriously, if other people are listening to them, and using more “complicated” words in order to inject extra confidence into what there saying then more power to them I guess, but when all’s said and done, some blokes like to watch there missus get shagged by a black bloke. I’m all for education and educating; it’s good to support people. I’d signpost to the correct usage of common homophones or the concept of a layman versus the collapsed financial services firm again, it’s about those dastardly homophones. But conceptually I hear your argument, it’s just it fails to grasp where preferences are rooted, and the nuance and uncomfortable social constructs that a lot of these actually stem from, but that’s often because it requires an analysis of the self that people are not able to grapple with. Glad you’re not losing sleep though. That’s a direct example of trying to shut somebody up by making them look stupid, and over complicating the words they use to make a point, obviously I understand the point you making and that your doing it deliberately, fair enough, this is exactly why young people from underprivileged backgrounds, infact anybody, don’t get heard, don’t have the confidence to speak up, and get overlooked, nobody knows what a homophone is, and if you do know what it is then fair enough, nobody in my local boozer would know, 1 cunt would know and that’s it, and anyway the context of the way I used “layman” was enough, this is why the metropolitan elite, the educated elite, despise the working class, you talk about social constructs, being able to use language as you can should be used with responsibility and not just to win an argument, debate, disagreement against somebody who is not as fineley educated as you appear to be andwouldnt be able to weave words how you can. You again appear to be extrapolating and making leaps of assumption. You appear to attack me, when I am not attacking you. Oh come on you know you have, just in a very subtle passive aggressive kind of way, just enough subtleness so that you can say you haven’t, v clever tactic. And yet my intent is not something you can definitively attest to. You can still be wrong. Your digs are outright though. It’s the fascinating thing about defensive posting on here and the huge amount of projection that goes on. Yeah could be wrong, we both know I’m not, but it’s somthing you have worded so I obviously can’t argue that. I’m not projecting, I have “digged” but you haven’t been a punch bag, digs have not been going in one direction, it’s been a sparring session, your subtleness makes it easy for you to be dishonest about your intent, it’s a very politician kind of thing to do. I refer you to my earlier point about correct semantic usage. It’s proving elusive for you. Your clealey not a very honest person, let’s call it a draw, nobody should argue about semantics Why does my expressing my view with no harm to you warrant me being called dishonest? That would be thrown out of a court of law, it makes no sense. And why would there be a draw, when I’m not fighting or competing for anything? Got more rabbit then Sainsbury’s you have. Not everything’s a court of law. And call it a draw is just a phrase bab, calm down. I called u dishonest, in regards this thread as obvs I don’t know u from Adam. " I’m perfectly calm. The rest I can’t respond to as it’s a tad nonsensical. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. I’m assuming there was intent attached to it, that’s true, maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, I’m not gonna loose sleep about it that’s for sure. Yes we could speculate on why people choose to use inflated vocab when a more Lehman’s approach would suffice, and again suppose it doesn’t really matter. If somebody is insecure or concerned about there intelligence, weather or not there taken seriously, if other people are listening to them, and using more “complicated” words in order to inject extra confidence into what there saying then more power to them I guess, but when all’s said and done, some blokes like to watch there missus get shagged by a black bloke. I’m all for education and educating; it’s good to support people. I’d signpost to the correct usage of common homophones or the concept of a layman versus the collapsed financial services firm again, it’s about those dastardly homophones. But conceptually I hear your argument, it’s just it fails to grasp where preferences are rooted, and the nuance and uncomfortable social constructs that a lot of these actually stem from, but that’s often because it requires an analysis of the self that people are not able to grapple with. Glad you’re not losing sleep though. That’s a direct example of trying to shut somebody up by making them look stupid, and over complicating the words they use to make a point, obviously I understand the point you making and that your doing it deliberately, fair enough, this is exactly why young people from underprivileged backgrounds, infact anybody, don’t get heard, don’t have the confidence to speak up, and get overlooked, nobody knows what a homophone is, and if you do know what it is then fair enough, nobody in my local boozer would know, 1 cunt would know and that’s it, and anyway the context of the way I used “layman” was enough, this is why the metropolitan elite, the educated elite, despise the working class, you talk about social constructs, being able to use language as you can should be used with responsibility and not just to win an argument, debate, disagreement against somebody who is not as fineley educated as you appear to be andwouldnt be able to weave words how you can. You again appear to be extrapolating and making leaps of assumption. You appear to attack me, when I am not attacking you. Oh come on you know you have, just in a very subtle passive aggressive kind of way, just enough subtleness so that you can say you haven’t, v clever tactic. And yet my intent is not something you can definitively attest to. You can still be wrong. Your digs are outright though. It’s the fascinating thing about defensive posting on here and the huge amount of projection that goes on. Yeah could be wrong, we both know I’m not, but it’s somthing you have worded so I obviously can’t argue that. I’m not projecting, I have “digged” but you haven’t been a punch bag, digs have not been going in one direction, it’s been a sparring session, your subtleness makes it easy for you to be dishonest about your intent, it’s a very politician kind of thing to do. I refer you to my earlier point about correct semantic usage. It’s proving elusive for you. Your clealey not a very honest person, let’s call it a draw, nobody should argue about semantics Why does my expressing my view with no harm to you warrant me being called dishonest? That would be thrown out of a court of law, it makes no sense. And why would there be a draw, when I’m not fighting or competing for anything? Got more rabbit then Sainsbury’s you have. Not everything’s a court of law. And call it a draw is just a phrase bab, calm down. I called u dishonest, in regards this thread as obvs I don’t know u from Adam. I’m perfectly calm. The rest I can’t respond to as it’s a tad nonsensical. " It isn’t but your obviously a human dictionary | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. I’m assuming there was intent attached to it, that’s true, maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, I’m not gonna loose sleep about it that’s for sure. Yes we could speculate on why people choose to use inflated vocab when a more Lehman’s approach would suffice, and again suppose it doesn’t really matter. If somebody is insecure or concerned about there intelligence, weather or not there taken seriously, if other people are listening to them, and using more “complicated” words in order to inject extra confidence into what there saying then more power to them I guess, but when all’s said and done, some blokes like to watch there missus get shagged by a black bloke. I’m all for education and educating; it’s good to support people. I’d signpost to the correct usage of common homophones or the concept of a layman versus the collapsed financial services firm again, it’s about those dastardly homophones. But conceptually I hear your argument, it’s just it fails to grasp where preferences are rooted, and the nuance and uncomfortable social constructs that a lot of these actually stem from, but that’s often because it requires an analysis of the self that people are not able to grapple with. Glad you’re not losing sleep though. That’s a direct example of trying to shut somebody up by making them look stupid, and over complicating the words they use to make a point, obviously I understand the point you making and that your doing it deliberately, fair enough, this is exactly why young people from underprivileged backgrounds, infact anybody, don’t get heard, don’t have the confidence to speak up, and get overlooked, nobody knows what a homophone is, and if you do know what it is then fair enough, nobody in my local boozer would know, 1 cunt would know and that’s it, and anyway the context of the way I used “layman” was enough, this is why the metropolitan elite, the educated elite, despise the working class, you talk about social constructs, being able to use language as you can should be used with responsibility and not just to win an argument, debate, disagreement against somebody who is not as fineley educated as you appear to be andwouldnt be able to weave words how you can. You again appear to be extrapolating and making leaps of assumption. You appear to attack me, when I am not attacking you. Oh come on you know you have, just in a very subtle passive aggressive kind of way, just enough subtleness so that you can say you haven’t, v clever tactic. And yet my intent is not something you can definitively attest to. You can still be wrong. Your digs are outright though. It’s the fascinating thing about defensive posting on here and the huge amount of projection that goes on. Yeah could be wrong, we both know I’m not, but it’s somthing you have worded so I obviously can’t argue that. I’m not projecting, I have “digged” but you haven’t been a punch bag, digs have not been going in one direction, it’s been a sparring session, your subtleness makes it easy for you to be dishonest about your intent, it’s a very politician kind of thing to do. I refer you to my earlier point about correct semantic usage. It’s proving elusive for you. Your clealey not a very honest person, let’s call it a draw, nobody should argue about semantics Why does my expressing my view with no harm to you warrant me being called dishonest? That would be thrown out of a court of law, it makes no sense. And why would there be a draw, when I’m not fighting or competing for anything? Got more rabbit then Sainsbury’s you have. Not everything’s a court of law. And call it a draw is just a phrase bab, calm down. I called u dishonest, in regards this thread as obvs I don’t know u from Adam. I’m perfectly calm. The rest I can’t respond to as it’s a tad nonsensical. It isn’t but your obviously a human dictionary " What a lovely compliment | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. I’m assuming there was intent attached to it, that’s true, maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, I’m not gonna loose sleep about it that’s for sure. Yes we could speculate on why people choose to use inflated vocab when a more Lehman’s approach would suffice, and again suppose it doesn’t really matter. If somebody is insecure or concerned about there intelligence, weather or not there taken seriously, if other people are listening to them, and using more “complicated” words in order to inject extra confidence into what there saying then more power to them I guess, but when all’s said and done, some blokes like to watch there missus get shagged by a black bloke. I’m all for education and educating; it’s good to support people. I’d signpost to the correct usage of common homophones or the concept of a layman versus the collapsed financial services firm again, it’s about those dastardly homophones. But conceptually I hear your argument, it’s just it fails to grasp where preferences are rooted, and the nuance and uncomfortable social constructs that a lot of these actually stem from, but that’s often because it requires an analysis of the self that people are not able to grapple with. Glad you’re not losing sleep though. That’s a direct example of trying to shut somebody up by making them look stupid, and over complicating the words they use to make a point, obviously I understand the point you making and that your doing it deliberately, fair enough, this is exactly why young people from underprivileged backgrounds, infact anybody, don’t get heard, don’t have the confidence to speak up, and get overlooked, nobody knows what a homophone is, and if you do know what it is then fair enough, nobody in my local boozer would know, 1 cunt would know and that’s it, and anyway the context of the way I used “layman” was enough, this is why the metropolitan elite, the educated elite, despise the working class, you talk about social constructs, being able to use language as you can should be used with responsibility and not just to win an argument, debate, disagreement against somebody who is not as fineley educated as you appear to be andwouldnt be able to weave words how you can. You again appear to be extrapolating and making leaps of assumption. You appear to attack me, when I am not attacking you. Oh come on you know you have, just in a very subtle passive aggressive kind of way, just enough subtleness so that you can say you haven’t, v clever tactic. And yet my intent is not something you can definitively attest to. You can still be wrong. Your digs are outright though. It’s the fascinating thing about defensive posting on here and the huge amount of projection that goes on. Yeah could be wrong, we both know I’m not, but it’s somthing you have worded so I obviously can’t argue that. I’m not projecting, I have “digged” but you haven’t been a punch bag, digs have not been going in one direction, it’s been a sparring session, your subtleness makes it easy for you to be dishonest about your intent, it’s a very politician kind of thing to do. I refer you to my earlier point about correct semantic usage. It’s proving elusive for you. Your clealey not a very honest person, let’s call it a draw, nobody should argue about semantics Why does my expressing my view with no harm to you warrant me being called dishonest? That would be thrown out of a court of law, it makes no sense. And why would there be a draw, when I’m not fighting or competing for anything? Got more rabbit then Sainsbury’s you have. Not everything’s a court of law. And call it a draw is just a phrase bab, calm down. I called u dishonest, in regards this thread as obvs I don’t know u from Adam. I’m perfectly calm. The rest I can’t respond to as it’s a tad nonsensical. It isn’t but your obviously a human dictionary What a lovely compliment " It wasn’t an insult if that’s what your implying, I’d love to know the words you do. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. I’m assuming there was intent attached to it, that’s true, maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, I’m not gonna loose sleep about it that’s for sure. Yes we could speculate on why people choose to use inflated vocab when a more Lehman’s approach would suffice, and again suppose it doesn’t really matter. If somebody is insecure or concerned about there intelligence, weather or not there taken seriously, if other people are listening to them, and using more “complicated” words in order to inject extra confidence into what there saying then more power to them I guess, but when all’s said and done, some blokes like to watch there missus get shagged by a black bloke. I’m all for education and educating; it’s good to support people. I’d signpost to the correct usage of common homophones or the concept of a layman versus the collapsed financial services firm again, it’s about those dastardly homophones. But conceptually I hear your argument, it’s just it fails to grasp where preferences are rooted, and the nuance and uncomfortable social constructs that a lot of these actually stem from, but that’s often because it requires an analysis of the self that people are not able to grapple with. Glad you’re not losing sleep though. That’s a direct example of trying to shut somebody up by making them look stupid, and over complicating the words they use to make a point, obviously I understand the point you making and that your doing it deliberately, fair enough, this is exactly why young people from underprivileged backgrounds, infact anybody, don’t get heard, don’t have the confidence to speak up, and get overlooked, nobody knows what a homophone is, and if you do know what it is then fair enough, nobody in my local boozer would know, 1 cunt would know and that’s it, and anyway the context of the way I used “layman” was enough, this is why the metropolitan elite, the educated elite, despise the working class, you talk about social constructs, being able to use language as you can should be used with responsibility and not just to win an argument, debate, disagreement against somebody who is not as fineley educated as you appear to be andwouldnt be able to weave words how you can. You again appear to be extrapolating and making leaps of assumption. You appear to attack me, when I am not attacking you. Oh come on you know you have, just in a very subtle passive aggressive kind of way, just enough subtleness so that you can say you haven’t, v clever tactic. And yet my intent is not something you can definitively attest to. You can still be wrong. Your digs are outright though. It’s the fascinating thing about defensive posting on here and the huge amount of projection that goes on. Yeah could be wrong, we both know I’m not, but it’s somthing you have worded so I obviously can’t argue that. I’m not projecting, I have “digged” but you haven’t been a punch bag, digs have not been going in one direction, it’s been a sparring session, your subtleness makes it easy for you to be dishonest about your intent, it’s a very politician kind of thing to do. I refer you to my earlier point about correct semantic usage. It’s proving elusive for you. Your clealey not a very honest person, let’s call it a draw, nobody should argue about semantics Why does my expressing my view with no harm to you warrant me being called dishonest? That would be thrown out of a court of law, it makes no sense. And why would there be a draw, when I’m not fighting or competing for anything? Got more rabbit then Sainsbury’s you have. Not everything’s a court of law. And call it a draw is just a phrase bab, calm down. I called u dishonest, in regards this thread as obvs I don’t know u from Adam. I’m perfectly calm. The rest I can’t respond to as it’s a tad nonsensical. It isn’t but your obviously a human dictionary What a lovely compliment It wasn’t an insult if that’s what your implying, I’d love to know the words you do. " I genuinely wasn’t implying anything, my gratitude was sincere. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. I’m assuming there was intent attached to it, that’s true, maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, I’m not gonna loose sleep about it that’s for sure. Yes we could speculate on why people choose to use inflated vocab when a more Lehman’s approach would suffice, and again suppose it doesn’t really matter. If somebody is insecure or concerned about there intelligence, weather or not there taken seriously, if other people are listening to them, and using more “complicated” words in order to inject extra confidence into what there saying then more power to them I guess, but when all’s said and done, some blokes like to watch there missus get shagged by a black bloke. I’m all for education and educating; it’s good to support people. I’d signpost to the correct usage of common homophones or the concept of a layman versus the collapsed financial services firm again, it’s about those dastardly homophones. But conceptually I hear your argument, it’s just it fails to grasp where preferences are rooted, and the nuance and uncomfortable social constructs that a lot of these actually stem from, but that’s often because it requires an analysis of the self that people are not able to grapple with. Glad you’re not losing sleep though. That’s a direct example of trying to shut somebody up by making them look stupid, and over complicating the words they use to make a point, obviously I understand the point you making and that your doing it deliberately, fair enough, this is exactly why young people from underprivileged backgrounds, infact anybody, don’t get heard, don’t have the confidence to speak up, and get overlooked, nobody knows what a homophone is, and if you do know what it is then fair enough, nobody in my local boozer would know, 1 cunt would know and that’s it, and anyway the context of the way I used “layman” was enough, this is why the metropolitan elite, the educated elite, despise the working class, you talk about social constructs, being able to use language as you can should be used with responsibility and not just to win an argument, debate, disagreement against somebody who is not as fineley educated as you appear to be andwouldnt be able to weave words how you can. You again appear to be extrapolating and making leaps of assumption. You appear to attack me, when I am not attacking you. Oh come on you know you have, just in a very subtle passive aggressive kind of way, just enough subtleness so that you can say you haven’t, v clever tactic. And yet my intent is not something you can definitively attest to. You can still be wrong. Your digs are outright though. It’s the fascinating thing about defensive posting on here and the huge amount of projection that goes on. Yeah could be wrong, we both know I’m not, but it’s somthing you have worded so I obviously can’t argue that. I’m not projecting, I have “digged” but you haven’t been a punch bag, digs have not been going in one direction, it’s been a sparring session, your subtleness makes it easy for you to be dishonest about your intent, it’s a very politician kind of thing to do. I refer you to my earlier point about correct semantic usage. It’s proving elusive for you. Your clealey not a very honest person, let’s call it a draw, nobody should argue about semantics Why does my expressing my view with no harm to you warrant me being called dishonest? That would be thrown out of a court of law, it makes no sense. And why would there be a draw, when I’m not fighting or competing for anything? Got more rabbit then Sainsbury’s you have. Not everything’s a court of law. And call it a draw is just a phrase bab, calm down. I called u dishonest, in regards this thread as obvs I don’t know u from Adam. I’m perfectly calm. The rest I can’t respond to as it’s a tad nonsensical. It isn’t but your obviously a human dictionary What a lovely compliment It wasn’t an insult if that’s what your implying, I’d love to know the words you do. I genuinely wasn’t implying anything, my gratitude was sincere." Is this turning into sexual tension between us? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended... We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex.... If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand? You’re not their target audience.... Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok...well said Exactly right. Will not stop the virtue signallers though, there far to self important to realise there using issues to make themselves look “morally superior” And yet they are able to use semantics correctly. You can have the last word bab, congrats. Anyway yeah is super hot seeing a bird get smashed by some black cock. So colloquial Awww look you used a big word to now look intellectually superior, and to discredit somebody because they don’t have the vocabulary you have, ent you smart. I always find it rather interesting that people say folk that use 'big' words are trying to look intellectually superior. You need to get out more. Good debating skills. Yes, I’m being facetious. Gotta be intresting topic hasn’t it, somebody finding it “interesting” that people think sometimes people use unnecessarily complicated words to appear intellectually superior, well it’s just not somthing I’d wanna debate. I’m sorry that you find my words unnecessarily complicated. I use the word that is fit for purpose. You’re ascribing an intent to it, that has no factual evidence. Perhaps it’s less about someone purporting to be intellectually superior and more about someone feeling defensive about their own perceived self-flagellation and inadequacy. However, I’d never posit that as an absolute as it could well be a fallacy. I’m assuming there was intent attached to it, that’s true, maybe I’m wrong, maybe I’m right, I’m not gonna loose sleep about it that’s for sure. Yes we could speculate on why people choose to use inflated vocab when a more Lehman’s approach would suffice, and again suppose it doesn’t really matter. If somebody is insecure or concerned about there intelligence, weather or not there taken seriously, if other people are listening to them, and using more “complicated” words in order to inject extra confidence into what there saying then more power to them I guess, but when all’s said and done, some blokes like to watch there missus get shagged by a black bloke. I’m all for education and educating; it’s good to support people. I’d signpost to the correct usage of common homophones or the concept of a layman versus the collapsed financial services firm again, it’s about those dastardly homophones. But conceptually I hear your argument, it’s just it fails to grasp where preferences are rooted, and the nuance and uncomfortable social constructs that a lot of these actually stem from, but that’s often because it requires an analysis of the self that people are not able to grapple with. Glad you’re not losing sleep though. That’s a direct example of trying to shut somebody up by making them look stupid, and over complicating the words they use to make a point, obviously I understand the point you making and that your doing it deliberately, fair enough, this is exactly why young people from underprivileged backgrounds, infact anybody, don’t get heard, don’t have the confidence to speak up, and get overlooked, nobody knows what a homophone is, and if you do know what it is then fair enough, nobody in my local boozer would know, 1 cunt would know and that’s it, and anyway the context of the way I used “layman” was enough, this is why the metropolitan elite, the educated elite, despise the working class, you talk about social constructs, being able to use language as you can should be used with responsibility and not just to win an argument, debate, disagreement against somebody who is not as fineley educated as you appear to be andwouldnt be able to weave words how you can. You again appear to be extrapolating and making leaps of assumption. You appear to attack me, when I am not attacking you. Oh come on you know you have, just in a very subtle passive aggressive kind of way, just enough subtleness so that you can say you haven’t, v clever tactic. And yet my intent is not something you can definitively attest to. You can still be wrong. Your digs are outright though. It’s the fascinating thing about defensive posting on here and the huge amount of projection that goes on. Yeah could be wrong, we both know I’m not, but it’s somthing you have worded so I obviously can’t argue that. I’m not projecting, I have “digged” but you haven’t been a punch bag, digs have not been going in one direction, it’s been a sparring session, your subtleness makes it easy for you to be dishonest about your intent, it’s a very politician kind of thing to do. I refer you to my earlier point about correct semantic usage. It’s proving elusive for you. Your clealey not a very honest person, let’s call it a draw, nobody should argue about semantics Why does my expressing my view with no harm to you warrant me being called dishonest? That would be thrown out of a court of law, it makes no sense. And why would there be a draw, when I’m not fighting or competing for anything? Got more rabbit then Sainsbury’s you have. Not everything’s a court of law. And call it a draw is just a phrase bab, calm down. I called u dishonest, in regards this thread as obvs I don’t know u from Adam. I’m perfectly calm. The rest I can’t respond to as it’s a tad nonsensical. It isn’t but your obviously a human dictionary What a lovely compliment It wasn’t an insult if that’s what your implying, I’d love to know the words you do. I genuinely wasn’t implying anything, my gratitude was sincere. Is this turning into sexual tension between us? " Negatory. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I’m perfectly calm. The rest I can’t respond to as it’s a tad nonsensical. " Please can you snip to the last paragraph, while quoting is useful for context, it does require a huge amount of scrolling, to follow a discussion that has drifted a long way from the OP. Thank you | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Can people stop speaking up for us black men? We have a voice and opinion ...we will voice it ... if we feel offended..." When people speak up for groups that they do not necessarily belong to, that is not in any way implying that they do not believe those people can speak for themselves. When I speak up against sexism or homophobia, it’s not because I think women or homosexuals can’t defend themselves. It’s because I see it as wrong, and I see not speaking out against it as tacitly condoning it. People need to be told that their views are unacceptable by everyone, not just the targets. In this case, I have seen plenty of people of colour in similar threads talking about how offensive they find it to be spoken about in such demeaning terms. It’s not an invention in my head. Your response in those threads was similar to your response here, namely... "We are here for sex with strangers.... we will never meet their families or socialize with them outside of sex...." You have basically said before, you don’t really care what people say if the situation is to your advantage, and you’re getting to fuck someone. I don’t know if that means it’s an angry fuck, or you, personally, simply don’t care. But your personal response is not everyone’s response. More importantly, your response does not indicate that there’s nothing wrong with the language or intent, just that you can tolerate the wrongness to get your dick wet. "If the Op messaged 10 black guys and ask them to black his wife..... What are you trying to understand?" I’m not trying to understand anything, I can see exactly what’s going on. The only confused ones are those in denial. That’s understandable, though; it’s hard to take ownership of and responsibility for one’s own prejudices. "You’re not their target audience...." I’m not UKIP’s target audience, either. Or the BNP’s, or the EDL’s, or any other racist’s target audience. I still recognise the issues, though. "Thank you for your concern but us black guys will be ok..." Again, I don’t doubt your ability to look after yourself, particularly given that you’re clearly in possession of a no-fucks-given (as long as fucks are received) attitude. But the longer troublesome attitudes are tolerated and even encouraged, the deeper they take hold. Plenty of people, unlike you, are not enjoying the resulting treatment that allowing these attitudes to persist has cultivated. In previous threads, some of Fab’s black female membership have told you directly how damaging your exploitation of this attitude is. It’s a shame that you won’t listen. Enjoy the sex. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |