FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > An apology
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"You can't apologise on behalf of others like me who read it wrong. I get where your coming from, after you have collected all the pitch forks up can you send me one please. The earth is finally soft enough to use one. I hope others share the same mature attitude as you have shown and not hold this against a long term, well respected contributor to these forums" | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" " Great contribution | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"You can't apologise on behalf of others like me who read it wrong. I get where your coming from, after you have collected all the pitch forks up can you send me one please. The earth is finally soft enough to use one. I hope others share the same mature attitude as you have shown and not hold this against a long term, well respected contributor to these forums" I went too far, it's that simple. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Give it five minutes and it'll be forgotten about. We've all said something we regret. " I'm not a bad man, truly. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Great contribution " Sums up my thoughts on the apology though | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Great contribution Sums up my thoughts on the apology though" What more am i supposed to do? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"What's wrong with the word? Xx" You mean, when it's used to describe people with mental health problems? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Great contribution Sums up my thoughts on the apology though What more am i supposed to do?" No idea mate. But if people had agreed with you we both know this thread wouldn't exist | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Give it five minutes and it'll be forgotten about. We've all said something we regret. " Tell that to the director of the Guardians of the Galaxy movies | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Great contribution Sums up my thoughts on the apology though What more am i supposed to do? No idea mate. But if people had agreed with you we both know this thread wouldn't exist" I don't post on the forums in order to be agreed with. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind." Well said | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind. Well said " In this situation i think it's the least i can do. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind. Well said In this situation i think it's the least i can do." | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind." “Now, don’t do it again!” | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Ok, lesson learned. Think before you use derogatory language towards people with mental health issues. I wasn't offended, even though I am one of those "nutters" you refer to. It was your reasoning behind people who might need a disabled parking space that you are more ignorant of, in my opinion. " I think OP needs to be given 1000 lines ‘I must think before I use derogatory language towards people with mental health issues’. This way he’ll not forget. Naughty OP. Before anyone gets tetchy I have experience of mental health issues with family so I know it’s a difficult condition to cope with | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind." Looks like the apology has prevented any adverse affect to your chances of getting your nuts in well played sir | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind. Looks like the apology has prevented any adverse affect to your chances of getting your nuts in well played sir " If only it was that simple. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind. Looks like the apology has prevented any adverse affect to your chances of getting your nuts in well played sir If only it was that simple." On the plus side i've ended up with far more views today than usual though that's not necessarily a good thing. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind. Looks like the apology has prevented any adverse affect to your chances of getting your nuts in well played sir If only it was that simple. On the plus side i've ended up with far more views today than usual though that's not necessarily a good thing." | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. " It’s a shame that you think it was only that one thing people were upset about, nor understand actually that even if it were just about the one word that whichever context the OP used that one word was still a slur. But then again, I wouldn’t anticipate everyone to understand it. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. " I made a mistake in my opening post and i hold my hands up to the fact. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. " It would be unfair to class them as ignorant morons and most probably have read the whole thread. People are entitled to be sensitive about certain words, and it is clear the amount of carers/parents of autistic people are on here. The OP has however apologised | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. " ‘Morons’ ? Goodness | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. " Ignorant morons? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind." | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind." Sometimes it pays to do a bit more research into a subject before posting | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. " Sorry but I’m not ignorant, I’ve lived and worked in the world of disabilities for over 20 years so I’m very aware of the difficulties faced by children and adults alike. The apology is ok for using that word. But the ignorance and downright ambivalence shown towards the most needy and vulnerable members of society I don’t forgive. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind. Sometimes it pays to do a bit more research into a subject before posting" Yes, i agree though it has proved invaluable in my own education. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind. Sometimes it pays to do a bit more research into a subject before posting" It does. There were so many who read the opening post and added their thoughts without reading the rest of the thread. But I know, you didn't mean that | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind. Sometimes it pays to do a bit more research into a subject before posting It does. There were so many who read the opening post and added their thoughts without reading the rest of the thread. But I know, you didn't mean that" Who hadn’t read the full thread? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. " I don't think disagreeing with the wording of a post makes anyone an ignorant moron. Using a picture that's stolen from the internet would be a bit moronic. For example. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. I don't think disagreeing with the wording of a post makes anyone an ignorant moron. Using a picture that's stolen from the internet would be a bit moronic. For example. " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind. Sometimes it pays to do a bit more research into a subject before posting It does. There were so many who read the opening post and added their thoughts without reading the rest of the thread. But I know, you didn't mean that Who hadn’t read the full thread? " Individually I can't confirm. I think one person might of admitted to it but proportionally we always see some number do '1,2 miss a few 99 contribute'. Fair enough really | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind. Sometimes it pays to do a bit more research into a subject before posting It does. There were so many who read the opening post and added their thoughts without reading the rest of the thread. But I know, you didn't mean that Who hadn’t read the full thread? Individually I can't confirm. I think one person might of admitted to it but proportionally we always see some number do '1,2 miss a few 99 contribute'. Fair enough really" Ah, you mean the other thread not this one. Gotcha | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. " Such tact and skill and use of language reveals more about yourself and nothing of the people you speak of. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind. Sometimes it pays to do a bit more research into a subject before posting It does. There were so many who read the opening post and added their thoughts without reading the rest of the thread. But I know, you didn't mean that Who hadn’t read the full thread? " Me, I didn't need to. I was told he apologised for his choice of words, but, I take note of the first thing that comes out of a person's mouth; not how they apologise because they realised some people didn't like his choice of words. I didn't need an apology to change my mind about him. It doesn't work that way with me. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. Such tact and skill and use of language reveals more about yourself and nothing of the people you speak of. " | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. Such tact and skill and use of language reveals more about yourself and nothing of the people you speak of. " He's talking about me. He can call me what he wants. I'm not angry or offended. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind. Sometimes it pays to do a bit more research into a subject before posting It does. There were so many who read the opening post and added their thoughts without reading the rest of the thread. But I know, you didn't mean that Who hadn’t read the full thread? Me, I didn't need to. I was told he apologised for his choice of words, but, I take note of the first thing that comes out of a person's mouth; not how they apologise because they realised some people didn't like his choice of words. I didn't need an apology to change my mind about him. It doesn't work that way with me. " I have offered a sincere apology, whether you choose to accept that or not makes little difference. I did not apologise just because some people did not like my choice of words but because information supplied in some of the responses showed that i was in error. You may wish to judge me harshly, it's your call and there's nothing i can do about it more than i've already done. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind. Sometimes it pays to do a bit more research into a subject before posting It does. There were so many who read the opening post and added their thoughts without reading the rest of the thread. But I know, you didn't mean that Who hadn’t read the full thread? Me, I didn't need to. I was told he apologised for his choice of words, but, I take note of the first thing that comes out of a person's mouth; not how they apologise because they realised some people didn't like his choice of words. I didn't need an apology to change my mind about him. It doesn't work that way with me. " Not trying to be pedantic and I think it's a worthy point, perhaps not in this instance (I'm not sure) but the OP didn't use his mouth. He typed it with his fingers. It's so much easier to take things the wrong way when your reading it as you can read it how you chose not how it was ment. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind. Sometimes it pays to do a bit more research into a subject before posting It does. There were so many who read the opening post and added their thoughts without reading the rest of the thread. But I know, you didn't mean that Who hadn’t read the full thread? Me, I didn't need to. I was told he apologised for his choice of words, but, I take note of the first thing that comes out of a person's mouth; not how they apologise because they realised some people didn't like his choice of words. I didn't need an apology to change my mind about him. It doesn't work that way with me. Not trying to be pedantic and I think it's a worthy point, perhaps not in this instance (I'm not sure) but the OP didn't use his mouth. He typed it with his fingers. It's so much easier to take things the wrong way when your reading it as you can read it how you chose not how it was ment. " Good point | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind. Sometimes it pays to do a bit more research into a subject before posting It does. There were so many who read the opening post and added their thoughts without reading the rest of the thread. But I know, you didn't mean that Who hadn’t read the full thread? Me, I didn't need to. I was told he apologised for his choice of words, but, I take note of the first thing that comes out of a person's mouth; not how they apologise because they realised some people didn't like his choice of words. I didn't need an apology to change my mind about him. It doesn't work that way with me. Not trying to be pedantic and I think it's a worthy point, perhaps not in this instance (I'm not sure) but the OP didn't use his mouth. He typed it with his fingers. It's so much easier to take things the wrong way when your reading it as you can read it how you chose not how it was ment. " Exactly this | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I wish to take this opportunity to apologise whole heartedly and inreservedly for some of the content on my previous thread, namely my use of the word 'nutters'. This was ill thought and offensive and i deeply regret it's use. I wish to make it clear that i have nothing against anyone who suffers from disablility of any kind. Sometimes it pays to do a bit more research into a subject before posting It does. There were so many who read the opening post and added their thoughts without reading the rest of the thread. But I know, you didn't mean that Who hadn’t read the full thread? Me, I didn't need to. I was told he apologised for his choice of words, but, I take note of the first thing that comes out of a person's mouth; not how they apologise because they realised some people didn't like his choice of words. I didn't need an apology to change my mind about him. It doesn't work that way with me. Not trying to be pedantic and I think it's a worthy point, perhaps not in this instance (I'm not sure) but the OP didn't use his mouth. He typed it with his fingers. It's so much easier to take things the wrong way when your reading it as you can read it how you chose not how it was ment. " Your fingers tyoe what you would have said. I chose to read it how he wrote it. He may not have meant that he thinks people with mental health issues are nutters on the road. Calling someone a nutter who has mental health issues is a common thing. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. I made a mistake in my opening post and i hold my hands up to the fact." I’ve done the same , more than once . Most people do it and don’t give a shit , they just carry on as normal . After all you’ve only offended a few strangers on an Internet forum , and you’ll probably never see them in real life anyway . What you said was no big deal in the grand scheme of things . I read it that the car users without mental issues were the nutters anyway . But fair play to you for apologising to those who were offended . You can’t please all the people all the time , but you can do your best to please most of them some of the time . And some will never be pleased , other than when they are offended , and you’ve made them happy by giving them something to be offended by ! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. I made a mistake in my opening post and i hold my hands up to the fact. I’ve done the same , more than once . Most people do it and don’t give a shit , they just carry on as normal . After all you’ve only offended a few strangers on an Internet forum , and you’ll probably never see them in real life anyway . What you said was no big deal in the grand scheme of things . I read it that the car users without mental issues were the nutters anyway . But fair play to you for apologising to those who were offended . You can’t please all the people all the time , but you can do your best to please most of them some of the time . And some will never be pleased , other than when they are offended , and you’ve made them happy by giving them something to be offended by !" Thanks, personally i prefer to let things go but there are people who want to hang on to their shit regardless. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. I made a mistake in my opening post and i hold my hands up to the fact. I’ve done the same , more than once . Most people do it and don’t give a shit , they just carry on as normal . After all you’ve only offended a few strangers on an Internet forum , and you’ll probably never see them in real life anyway . What you said was no big deal in the grand scheme of things . I read it that the car users without mental issues were the nutters anyway . But fair play to you for apologising to those who were offended . You can’t please all the people all the time , but you can do your best to please most of them some of the time . And some will never be pleased , other than when they are offended , and you’ve made them happy by giving them something to be offended by !" well said | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. I made a mistake in my opening post and i hold my hands up to the fact. I’ve done the same , more than once . Most people do it and don’t give a shit , they just carry on as normal . After all you’ve only offended a few strangers on an Internet forum , and you’ll probably never see them in real life anyway . What you said was no big deal in the grand scheme of things . I read it that the car users without mental issues were the nutters anyway . But fair play to you for apologising to those who were offended . You can’t please all the people all the time , but you can do your best to please most of them some of the time . And some will never be pleased , other than when they are offended , and you’ve made them happy by giving them something to be offended by ! Thanks, personally i prefer to let things go but there are people who want to hang on to their shit regardless. " I still found it a thought provoking thread and have learnt some things from it, so hopefully we all have | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. I made a mistake in my opening post and i hold my hands up to the fact. I’ve done the same , more than once . Most people do it and don’t give a shit , they just carry on as normal . After all you’ve only offended a few strangers on an Internet forum , and you’ll probably never see them in real life anyway . What you said was no big deal in the grand scheme of things . I read it that the car users without mental issues were the nutters anyway . But fair play to you for apologising to those who were offended . You can’t please all the people all the time , but you can do your best to please most of them some of the time . And some will never be pleased , other than when they are offended , and you’ve made them happy by giving them something to be offended by ! Thanks, personally i prefer to let things go but there are people who want to hang on to their shit regardless. I still found it a thought provoking thread and have learnt some things from it, so hopefully we all have " I have, in more ways than one. In this respect it has been most enlightening. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. I made a mistake in my opening post and i hold my hands up to the fact. I’ve done the same , more than once . Most people do it and don’t give a shit , they just carry on as normal . After all you’ve only offended a few strangers on an Internet forum , and you’ll probably never see them in real life anyway . What you said was no big deal in the grand scheme of things . I read it that the car users without mental issues were the nutters anyway . But fair play to you for apologising to those who were offended . You can’t please all the people all the time , but you can do your best to please most of them some of the time . And some will never be pleased , other than when they are offended , and you’ve made them happy by giving them something to be offended by !" At last! An intelligent forumite who read and interpreted the OP of that thread in the same way I did, and the way the poster meant it. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. I made a mistake in my opening post and i hold my hands up to the fact. I’ve done the same , more than once . Most people do it and don’t give a shit , they just carry on as normal . After all you’ve only offended a few strangers on an Internet forum , and you’ll probably never see them in real life anyway . What you said was no big deal in the grand scheme of things . I read it that the car users without mental issues were the nutters anyway . But fair play to you for apologising to those who were offended . You can’t please all the people all the time , but you can do your best to please most of them some of the time . And some will never be pleased , other than when they are offended , and you’ve made them happy by giving them something to be offended by ! Thanks, personally i prefer to let things go but there are people who want to hang on to their shit regardless. I still found it a thought provoking thread and have learnt some things from it, so hopefully we all have I have, in more ways than one. In this respect it has been most enlightening." | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. Such tact and skill and use of language reveals more about yourself and nothing of the people you speak of. " Well you were in fast with the ready to be offended and condescension weren't you? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Happens to us all from time to time you apologised all u can do now is move on kudos " Will it change his way of thinking, regarding people who can walk using the 2 disabled parking spaces in his local high street? (not a Devil's Advocate remark and said after his apology). It also was someone else who wrote an explanation of what he might have meant, he just apologised for his choice of words. If he-and others-can now see that disabilities aren't solely physical, it may have been a useful thread. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. I made a mistake in my opening post and i hold my hands up to the fact. I’ve done the same , more than once . Most people do it and don’t give a shit , they just carry on as normal . After all you’ve only offended a few strangers on an Internet forum , and you’ll probably never see them in real life anyway . What you said was no big deal in the grand scheme of things . I read it that the car users without mental issues were the nutters anyway . But fair play to you for apologising to those who were offended . You can’t please all the people all the time , but you can do your best to please most of them some of the time . And some will never be pleased , other than when they are offended , and you’ve made them happy by giving them something to be offended by ! At last! An intelligent forumite who read and interpreted the OP of that thread in the same way I did, and the way the poster meant it. " We read it in exactly the same way as you. The phrase was unfortunate, but not intended maliciously. The Op was brassed off at perceiving yet another group who were pressuring the system to give them perks and knowing full well that "mental health problems" being the huge open field that it has now become there was every chance that everybody and his dog would be bidding for a blue badge. Not that the thought police were even ready to consider that. They saw another chance to burn a prole and went for it. Depressing at times on here how you see the same old gang ups take place, with each one of them shouting out how they know someone even "worserer worserer or even worserest" affected then anybody else has quoted. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Oh I think people should calm down and take a chill pill, someone just made a rash comment on the internet!! I have to admit my first thought was 'How bloody unjust if some able bodied bloke with a bit of depression gets a blue badge when someone of 90 who's mobility is compromised cannot......' but of course there are many complex issues involved and with any luck the blue badge giver-outers will remain as strict in their approval criteria as they are at present, and only the genuinely needy in ANY category will get them." Agreed 100% | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. I made a mistake in my opening post and i hold my hands up to the fact. I’ve done the same , more than once . Most people do it and don’t give a shit , they just carry on as normal . After all you’ve only offended a few strangers on an Internet forum , and you’ll probably never see them in real life anyway . What you said was no big deal in the grand scheme of things . I read it that the car users without mental issues were the nutters anyway . But fair play to you for apologising to those who were offended . You can’t please all the people all the time , but you can do your best to please most of them some of the time . And some will never be pleased , other than when they are offended , and you’ve made them happy by giving them something to be offended by ! At last! An intelligent forumite who read and interpreted the OP of that thread in the same way I did, and the way the poster meant it. We read it in exactly the same way as you. The phrase was unfortunate, but not intended maliciously. The Op was brassed off at perceiving yet another group who were pressuring the system to give them perks and knowing full well that "mental health problems" being the huge open field that it has now become there was every chance that everybody and his dog would be bidding for a blue badge. Not that the thought police were even ready to consider that. They saw another chance to burn a prole and went for it. Depressing at times on here how you see the same old gang ups take place, with each one of them shouting out how they know someone even "worserer worserer or even worserest" affected then anybody else has quoted." Some people just read words without any thought of interpretation accounting for colloquialism or regional variation of meaning. A little bigoted, in my opinion, but they seem to enjoy beating their brows on behalf of the world. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If only we could refer to people’s choices of language elsewhere on the site freely. Still, rules are rules. *facepalm*" Good comment I'm overawed that you can see the screen through the tears. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"It's a shame you felt the need to apologise to ignorant morons who didn't read the whole thread and have taken one word out of context. I made a mistake in my opening post and i hold my hands up to the fact. I’ve done the same , more than once . Most people do it and don’t give a shit , they just carry on as normal . After all you’ve only offended a few strangers on an Internet forum , and you’ll probably never see them in real life anyway . What you said was no big deal in the grand scheme of things . I read it that the car users without mental issues were the nutters anyway . But fair play to you for apologising to those who were offended . You can’t please all the people all the time , but you can do your best to please most of them some of the time . And some will never be pleased , other than when they are offended , and you’ve made them happy by giving them something to be offended by ! At last! An intelligent forumite who read and interpreted the OP of that thread in the same way I did, and the way the poster meant it. We read it in exactly the same way as you. The phrase was unfortunate, but not intended maliciously. The Op was brassed off at perceiving yet another group who were pressuring the system to give them perks and knowing full well that "mental health problems" being the huge open field that it has now become there was every chance that everybody and his dog would be bidding for a blue badge. Not that the thought police were even ready to consider that. They saw another chance to burn a prole and went for it. Depressing at times on here how you see the same old gang ups take place, with each one of them shouting out how they know someone even "worserer worserer or even worserest" affected then anybody else has quoted. Some people just read words without any thought of interpretation accounting for colloquialism or regional variation of meaning. A little bigoted, in my opinion, but they seem to enjoy beating their brows on behalf of the world." Others just don’t get it at all. Nor understand what certain words mean. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If only we could refer to people’s choices of language elsewhere on the site freely. Still, rules are rules. *facepalm* Good comment I'm overawed that you can see the screen through the tears. " Of laughter at you? I know, right. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Oh I think people should calm down and take a chill pill, someone just made a rash comment on the internet!! I have to admit my first thought was 'How bloody unjust if some able bodied bloke with a bit of depression gets a blue badge when someone of 90 who's mobility is compromised cannot......' but of course there are many complex issues involved and with any luck the blue badge giver-outers will remain as strict in their approval criteria as they are at present, and only the genuinely needy in ANY category will get them. Agreed 100%" Of course the issue of mental illness is a complex one, this i am now more aware of. However, should a person suffering anxiety or bipolar disorder be able to claim a blue badge whem they're perfectly able bodied? I would think not. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If only we could refer to people’s choices of language elsewhere on the site freely. Still, rules are rules. *facepalm* Good comment I'm overawed that you can see the screen through the tears. Of laughter at you? I know, right. " Your goading of other forum users has been mentioned more than once, by different posters. It's a sign of passive/aggressive bullying. You might want to consider amending your behaviour | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Oh I think people should calm down and take a chill pill, someone just made a rash comment on the internet!! I have to admit my first thought was 'How bloody unjust if some able bodied bloke with a bit of depression gets a blue badge when someone of 90 who's mobility is compromised cannot......' but of course there are many complex issues involved and with any luck the blue badge giver-outers will remain as strict in their approval criteria as they are at present, and only the genuinely needy in ANY category will get them. Agreed 100% Of course the issue of mental illness is a complex one, this i am now more aware of. However, should a person suffering anxiety or bipolar disorder be able to claim a blue badge whem they're perfectly able bodied? I would think not. " The badges aren't just for adults though, they are also for parents of children with disabilities. The thing is that something like a trip to the supermarket can be a very difficult thing for a parent of a severely autistic child, since noise and crowds can trigger bad emotions in them. So the alternative is that these people basically become confined to their houses. So i would support this change because i can see many ways that it will enable parents of child with disabilities to get out more. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Oh I think people should calm down and take a chill pill, someone just made a rash comment on the internet!! I have to admit my first thought was 'How bloody unjust if some able bodied bloke with a bit of depression gets a blue badge when someone of 90 who's mobility is compromised cannot......' but of course there are many complex issues involved and with any luck the blue badge giver-outers will remain as strict in their approval criteria as they are at present, and only the genuinely needy in ANY category will get them. Agreed 100% Of course the issue of mental illness is a complex one, this i am now more aware of. However, should a person suffering anxiety or bipolar disorder be able to claim a blue badge whem they're perfectly able bodied? I would think not. " It will be a nightmare to decide who gets them - I was listening to one news report saying there were people who eg might suffer from anxiety who would be put off going out because they did not think they would be able to park and so become more socially isolated etc, etc, in this case a family struggling with a child with issues....well yes, one can sympathise, but I doubt there are enough spaces to go round and sadly it must remain confined to the most severe and permanent cases I suspect. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Oh I think people should calm down and take a chill pill, someone just made a rash comment on the internet!! I have to admit my first thought was 'How bloody unjust if some able bodied bloke with a bit of depression gets a blue badge when someone of 90 who's mobility is compromised cannot......' but of course there are many complex issues involved and with any luck the blue badge giver-outers will remain as strict in their approval criteria as they are at present, and only the genuinely needy in ANY category will get them. Agreed 100% Of course the issue of mental illness is a complex one, this i am now more aware of. However, should a person suffering anxiety or bipolar disorder be able to claim a blue badge whem they're perfectly able bodied? I would think not. The badges aren't just for adults though, they are also for parents of children with disabilities. The thing is that something like a trip to the supermarket can be a very difficult thing for a parent of a severely autistic child, since noise and crowds can trigger bad emotions in them. So the alternative is that these people basically become confined to their houses. So i would support this change because i can see many ways that it will enable parents of child with disabilities to get out more. " Mind you, they have wide parent and child spaces at most supermarkets already. My brother and I wondered if we could get way using them with my 90 yr old father? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"If only we could refer to people’s choices of language elsewhere on the site freely. Still, rules are rules. *facepalm* Good comment I'm overawed that you can see the screen through the tears. Of laughter at you? I know, right. Your goading of other forum users has been mentioned more than once, by different posters. It's a sign of passive/aggressive bullying. You might want to consider amending your behaviour " Ummm. I’d have a little look at your comment in this thread and the responses from a number of people, and stop projecting on me. I disagree with you, that’s allowed. I reply to your posts, that’s allowed. I’m sorry you take issue with it. Do you not think if I’m a passive aggressive bully then you are as equally guilty? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Oh I think people should calm down and take a chill pill, someone just made a rash comment on the internet!! I have to admit my first thought was 'How bloody unjust if some able bodied bloke with a bit of depression gets a blue badge when someone of 90 who's mobility is compromised cannot......' but of course there are many complex issues involved and with any luck the blue badge giver-outers will remain as strict in their approval criteria as they are at present, and only the genuinely needy in ANY category will get them. Agreed 100% Of course the issue of mental illness is a complex one, this i am now more aware of. However, should a person suffering anxiety or bipolar disorder be able to claim a blue badge whem they're perfectly able bodied? I would think not. The badges aren't just for adults though, they are also for parents of children with disabilities. The thing is that something like a trip to the supermarket can be a very difficult thing for a parent of a severely autistic child, since noise and crowds can trigger bad emotions in them. So the alternative is that these people basically become confined to their houses. So i would support this change because i can see many ways that it will enable parents of child with disabilities to get out more. Mind you, they have wide parent and child spaces at most supermarkets already. My brother and I wondered if we could get way using them with my 90 yr old father? " Good point, maybe supermarkets was a bad example. I'm just aware of how difficult something like a trip outside can be. So I'd like most measures that seek to ease this. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |