FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > World Cup 7
World Cup 7
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
Any one want me to call tomorrow's results? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Fiest one to post " I fucked that up ! #storyofmylife | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Fiest one to post " Unlucky, I hope you score next time. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Fisted one to post " Blimey, that's a bit forward 
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Finally a referee isn't interested in Neymars shit" But no booking for the dive? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Finally a referee isn't interested in Neymars shit But no booking for the dive? " His facial expression was harsher than a yellow card | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe" Save for 1958 it always has | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"How was that not a penalty? In the VAR room, are they watching pornography rather than the game?" Because he won the ball | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"How was that not a penalty? In the VAR room, are they watching pornography rather than the game?" All I can think of, is that he may have already lost the ball before the "incident". Looked a penalty, but I'm glad it wasn't given. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe Save for 1958 it always has" Other than the 9 times a south American team won it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"How was that not a penalty? In the VAR room, are they watching pornography rather than the game? Because he won the ball" That's irrelevant | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe Save for 1958 it always has Other than the 9 times a south American team won it" The World Cup has only been won by a south American team on one occasion when the tournament has been held in Europe | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"How was that not a penalty? In the VAR room, are they watching pornography rather than the game? Because he won the ball" Details, details  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe Save for 1958 it always has Other than the 9 times a south American team won it" Sort of. I think he means that only Brazil in 1958, have won the world cup, when it has been held in Europe. Every other world cup that a south American team has won, has been outside Europe. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe Save for 1958 it always has Other than the 9 times a south American team won it Sort of. I think he means that only Brazil in 1958, have won the world cup, when it has been held in Europe. Every other world cup that a south American team has won, has been outside Europe." Well that's an interesting stat but doesn't contradict what i said! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe Save for 1958 it always has Other than the 9 times a south American team won it Sort of. I think he means that only Brazil in 1958, have won the world cup, when it has been held in Europe. Every other world cup that a south American team has won, has been outside Europe. Well that's an interesting stat but doesn't contradict what i said!" It sort of does. If the world cup is held in Europe, it has always stayed in Europe, apart from 1958. Pedantic, I know, but there you go haha. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe Save for 1958 it always has Other than the 9 times a south American team won it Sort of. I think he means that only Brazil in 1958, have won the world cup, when it has been held in Europe. Every other world cup that a south American team has won, has been outside Europe." What are the leading theories on why the south American teams don't do well in Europe? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe Save for 1958 it always has Other than the 9 times a south American team won it Sort of. I think he means that only Brazil in 1958, have won the world cup, when it has been held in Europe. Every other world cup that a south American team has won, has been outside Europe. Well that's an interesting stat but doesn't contradict what i said! It sort of does. If the world cup is held in Europe, it has always stayed in Europe, apart from 1958. Pedantic, I know, but there you go haha." That doesn't work. If a south American team wins the cup, they take the cup to south america for four years. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Is Russia Europe though?" A big part is, including the capital. It's like turkey, crossing multiple continents. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Is Russia Europe though?" Member of uefa so yes | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe Save for 1958 it always has Other than the 9 times a south American team won it Sort of. I think he means that only Brazil in 1958, have won the world cup, when it has been held in Europe. Every other world cup that a south American team has won, has been outside Europe. What are the leading theories on why the south American teams don't do well in Europe? " Until Germany last time out why don't European teams win in south America | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe Save for 1958 it always has Other than the 9 times a south American team won it Sort of. I think he means that only Brazil in 1958, have won the world cup, when it has been held in Europe. Every other world cup that a south American team has won, has been outside Europe. What are the leading theories on why the south American teams don't do well in Europe? Until Germany last time out why don't European teams win in south America" Do they use more local referees? Weather could be a factor too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"How was that not a penalty? In the VAR room, are they watching pornography rather than the game?" when I saw it first I thought the ball had crossed the byline when he was fouled, in which case a goal kick was correct - but I haven't seen it again since. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe Save for 1958 it always has Other than the 9 times a south American team won it Sort of. I think he means that only Brazil in 1958, have won the world cup, when it has been held in Europe. Every other world cup that a south American team has won, has been outside Europe. What are the leading theories on why the south American teams don't do well in Europe? " Germany are the only country to win the world cup when it has been held in South America, and that was only four years ago. I can understand why that was the case maybe 40-50 years ago - what with travel etc. It shouldn't really be much of a factor now, as most decent South American players, play in Europe now anyway (most start off in Russia weirdly enough). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe Save for 1958 it always has Other than the 9 times a south American team won it Sort of. I think he means that only Brazil in 1958, have won the world cup, when it has been held in Europe. Every other world cup that a south American team has won, has been outside Europe. What are the leading theories on why the south American teams don't do well in Europe? " In years gone by I suppose it could have been a temperature thing... But a lot of their players now play here. Traditionally high temperatures are a problem for northern European nations when playing in hot climates... The next world cup could be played in a 40°c ish climate. Doing anything in those temperatures is hard work, let alone playing football. I've worked in 50°c and we did 15 minutes work and then had about the same time to rehydrate in a air conditioned environment before starting again. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe Save for 1958 it always has Other than the 9 times a south American team won it Sort of. I think he means that only Brazil in 1958, have won the world cup, when it has been held in Europe. Every other world cup that a south American team has won, has been outside Europe. Well that's an interesting stat but doesn't contradict what i said! It sort of does. If the world cup is held in Europe, it has always stayed in Europe, apart from 1958. Pedantic, I know, but there you go haha. That doesn't work. If a south American team wins the cup, they take the cup to south america for four years. " Exactly. They "take" it. If a European team wins in Europe, it stays. It is just how people see it. We are both right, but also both wrong haha. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe Save for 1958 it always has Other than the 9 times a south American team won it Sort of. I think he means that only Brazil in 1958, have won the world cup, when it has been held in Europe. Every other world cup that a south American team has won, has been outside Europe. Well that's an interesting stat but doesn't contradict what i said! It sort of does. If the world cup is held in Europe, it has always stayed in Europe, apart from 1958. Pedantic, I know, but there you go haha. That doesn't work. If a south American team wins the cup, they take the cup to south america for four years. Exactly. They "take" it. If a European team wins in Europe, it stays. It is just how people see it. We are both right, but also both wrong haha." 1938 Italy win the cup, 1950 Uruguay win and take the cup to south america. 1958, 1970, 1978, 1986, 1994 and 2002 the cup was relocated from a European winner to south america. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe Save for 1958 it always has Other than the 9 times a south American team won it Sort of. I think he means that only Brazil in 1958, have won the world cup, when it has been held in Europe. Every other world cup that a south American team has won, has been outside Europe. Well that's an interesting stat but doesn't contradict what i said! It sort of does. If the world cup is held in Europe, it has always stayed in Europe, apart from 1958. Pedantic, I know, but there you go haha. That doesn't work. If a south American team wins the cup, they take the cup to south america for four years. Exactly. They "take" it. If a European team wins in Europe, it stays. It is just how people see it. We are both right, but also both wrong haha. 1938 Italy win the cup, 1950 Uruguay win and take the cup to south america. 1958, 1970, 1978, 1986, 1994 and 2002 the cup was relocated from a European winner to south america. " So following that logic it hasn't been 'outside' of Europe since the Italys in 06 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe Save for 1958 it always has Other than the 9 times a south American team won it Sort of. I think he means that only Brazil in 1958, have won the world cup, when it has been held in Europe. Every other world cup that a south American team has won, has been outside Europe. Well that's an interesting stat but doesn't contradict what i said! It sort of does. If the world cup is held in Europe, it has always stayed in Europe, apart from 1958. Pedantic, I know, but there you go haha. That doesn't work. If a south American team wins the cup, they take the cup to south america for four years. Exactly. They "take" it. If a European team wins in Europe, it stays. It is just how people see it. We are both right, but also both wrong haha. 1938 Italy win the cup, 1950 Uruguay win and take the cup to south america. 1958, 1970, 1978, 1986, 1994 and 2002 the cup was relocated from a European winner to south america. So following that logic it hasn't been 'outside' of Europe since the Italys in 06 " Indeed, so this world cup will set a record length of European retentions of the cup. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Had a feeling it would be 2-1 final score" Oi I called it 1st on thread 6 don't steal my moment  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe Save for 1958 it always has Other than the 9 times a south American team won it Sort of. I think he means that only Brazil in 1958, have won the world cup, when it has been held in Europe. Every other world cup that a south American team has won, has been outside Europe. Well that's an interesting stat but doesn't contradict what i said! It sort of does. If the world cup is held in Europe, it has always stayed in Europe, apart from 1958. Pedantic, I know, but there you go haha. That doesn't work. If a south American team wins the cup, they take the cup to south america for four years. Exactly. They "take" it. If a European team wins in Europe, it stays. It is just how people see it. We are both right, but also both wrong haha. 1938 Italy win the cup, 1950 Uruguay win and take the cup to south america. 1958, 1970, 1978, 1986, 1994 and 2002 the cup was relocated from a European winner to south america. So following that logic it hasn't been 'outside' of Europe since the Italys in 06 Indeed, so this world cup will set a record length of European retentions of the cup. " The Italys retained it for 16 years straight | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe Save for 1958 it always has Other than the 9 times a south American team won it Sort of. I think he means that only Brazil in 1958, have won the world cup, when it has been held in Europe. Every other world cup that a south American team has won, has been outside Europe. Well that's an interesting stat but doesn't contradict what i said! It sort of does. If the world cup is held in Europe, it has always stayed in Europe, apart from 1958. Pedantic, I know, but there you go haha. That doesn't work. If a south American team wins the cup, they take the cup to south america for four years. Exactly. They "take" it. If a European team wins in Europe, it stays. It is just how people see it. We are both right, but also both wrong haha. 1938 Italy win the cup, 1950 Uruguay win and take the cup to south america. 1958, 1970, 1978, 1986, 1994 and 2002 the cup was relocated from a European winner to south america. " The original point was that if the world cup is held in Europe, it has always stayed in Europe - apart from in 1958, when it didn't stay in Europe, because Brazil won it, and took it to South America. Your logic, is actually backing my point up. No matter how you dress it up, only Brazil in 1958, have "taken" the world cup, when it has been held in Europe. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Had a feeling it would be 2-1 final scoreOi I called it 1st on thread 6 don't steal my moment "Not by much haha. I will settle for a joint effort, great minds think alike | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Looks like the world cup is staying in Europe Save for 1958 it always has Other than the 9 times a south American team won it Sort of. I think he means that only Brazil in 1958, have won the world cup, when it has been held in Europe. Every other world cup that a south American team has won, has been outside Europe." Both Europe & South America are exactly level as far as Winning in both each others continent (once), & in another continent (once) . After all those years, Europe finally caught up in the last two World Cups. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Is Russia Europe though? A big part is, including the capital. It's like turkey, crossing multiple continents. " All of the venues bar one are in Europe - & that's in the Urals, the Eurasion continental boundary. Is someone trying to claim this as an away World Cup win?
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Agree though. Think Sweden will be a tough match. I'm going for a 0-0 and going out on penalties." Sorry meant tunisia haha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Think england will struggle today if I'm honest. The media and pundits going on about how we got best route to the final and not focusing on one game at a time. England scored a late winner against nigeria, beat Panama the weakest team in the tournament, got beat by Belgium and scraped through against columbia. We havnt scored a goal from open play in last 2 games and didnt look like scoring either in both games. Sweden may not be the best team but i think they will give us a really difficult game and can go either way." I wouldn't take much noticed of what the pundits are saying - it's their job to hype everything up. We did rely on a late winner against Tunisia, but it took Brazil 90 minutes to score against Costa Rica, who are no great shakes either. As for Panama being the weakest team in the tournament - they may well be, but this is the same Panama team that Belgium couldn't score against until the 47th minute. The Belgium game doesn't count - it was the B team. Did you see Slavin Bilic's take on the build up to the Colombia game - it was spot on, and quite funny: 5 days before the game:- "Colombia? Bring it on!!" 2 days before the game:- "In Two days, we will be playing a good Colombian team" . 1 Day before the game:- "Tomorrow, we will be playing Colombia - a very dangerous team going forward" Day of the game:- "OH MY GOD!! IT'S COLOMBIA!!!" We always under-estimate ourselves, and pay too much respect to the opposition. Sweden are average. They were in a very poor group, and they beat an average Swiss team in the last round. They wouldn't have beaten Colombia. This will be a much easier game. (I hope) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Think england will struggle today if I'm honest. The media and pundits going on about how we got best route to the final and not focusing on one game at a time. England scored a late winner against nigeria, beat Panama the weakest team in the tournament, got beat by Belgium and scraped through against columbia. We havnt scored a goal from open play in last 2 games and didnt look like scoring either in both games. Sweden may not be the best team but i think they will give us a really difficult game and can go either way. I wouldn't take much noticed of what the pundits are saying - it's their job to hype everything up. We did rely on a late winner against Tunisia, but it took Brazil 90 minutes to score against Costa Rica, who are no great shakes either. As for Panama being the weakest team in the tournament - they may well be, but this is the same Panama team that Belgium couldn't score against until the 47th minute. The Belgium game doesn't count - it was the B team. Did you see Slavin Bilic's take on the build up to the Colombia game - it was spot on, and quite funny: 5 days before the game:- "Colombia? Bring it on!!" 2 days before the game:- "In Two days, we will be playing a good Colombian team" . 1 Day before the game:- "Tomorrow, we will be playing Colombia - a very dangerous team going forward" Day of the game:- "OH MY GOD!! IT'S COLOMBIA!!!" We always under-estimate ourselves, and pay too much respect to the opposition. Sweden are average. They were in a very poor group, and they beat an average Swiss team in the last round. They wouldn't have beaten Colombia. This will be a much easier game. (I hope)" England underestimate themselves? You having a laugh fella? Hilariously misplaced expectations of winning every major tournament with shit teams and ugly football more like | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Think england will struggle today if I'm honest. The media and pundits going on about how we got best route to the final and not focusing on one game at a time. England scored a late winner against nigeria, beat Panama the weakest team in the tournament, got beat by Belgium and scraped through against columbia. We havnt scored a goal from open play in last 2 games and didnt look like scoring either in both games. Sweden may not be the best team but i think they will give us a really difficult game and can go either way. I wouldn't take much noticed of what the pundits are saying - it's their job to hype everything up. We did rely on a late winner against Tunisia, but it took Brazil 90 minutes to score against Costa Rica, who are no great shakes either. As for Panama being the weakest team in the tournament - they may well be, but this is the same Panama team that Belgium couldn't score against until the 47th minute. The Belgium game doesn't count - it was the B team. Did you see Slavin Bilic's take on the build up to the Colombia game - it was spot on, and quite funny: 5 days before the game:- "Colombia? Bring it on!!" 2 days before the game:- "In Two days, we will be playing a good Colombian team" . 1 Day before the game:- "Tomorrow, we will be playing Colombia - a very dangerous team going forward" Day of the game:- "OH MY GOD!! IT'S COLOMBIA!!!" We always under-estimate ourselves, and pay too much respect to the opposition. Sweden are average. They were in a very poor group, and they beat an average Swiss team in the last round. They wouldn't have beaten Colombia. This will be a much easier game. (I hope) England underestimate themselves? You having a laugh fella? Hilariously misplaced expectations of winning every major tournament with shit teams and ugly football more like" And when was this? When has the England Football team thought "We'll win this". Not in my lifetime. They've gone to tournaments, thinking they had a chance - and why shouldn't they? I think you're getting what the media say, mixed up with the real expectations. This year, we have a relatively easy path to the final, and all of a sudden the media are bigging Sweden up. Sweden? Really? A lot of fans are telling us, how we weren't that good against this team or that team, and we haven't done this for so many years etc etc - Conveniently leaving out that every other team in the tournament has the same issues. When Brazil only beat someone like Costa Rica 2-0, we hear "well they didn't get out of second gear" - Really? Or is that about as good a Brazil are. When we beat someone 6-1, it's "well that team must be rubbish". Yes - we under-estimate ourselves. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Think england will struggle today if I'm honest. The media and pundits going on about how we got best route to the final and not focusing on one game at a time. England scored a late winner against nigeria, beat Panama the weakest team in the tournament, got beat by Belgium and scraped through against columbia. We havnt scored a goal from open play in last 2 games and didnt look like scoring either in both games. Sweden may not be the best team but i think they will give us a really difficult game and can go either way. I wouldn't take much noticed of what the pundits are saying - it's their job to hype everything up. We did rely on a late winner against Tunisia, but it took Brazil 90 minutes to score against Costa Rica, who are no great shakes either. As for Panama being the weakest team in the tournament - they may well be, but this is the same Panama team that Belgium couldn't score against until the 47th minute. The Belgium game doesn't count - it was the B team. Did you see Slavin Bilic's take on the build up to the Colombia game - it was spot on, and quite funny: 5 days before the game:- "Colombia? Bring it on!!" 2 days before the game:- "In Two days, we will be playing a good Colombian team" . 1 Day before the game:- "Tomorrow, we will be playing Colombia - a very dangerous team going forward" Day of the game:- "OH MY GOD!! IT'S COLOMBIA!!!" We always under-estimate ourselves, and pay too much respect to the opposition. Sweden are average. They were in a very poor group, and they beat an average Swiss team in the last round. They wouldn't have beaten Colombia. This will be a much easier game. (I hope) England underestimate themselves? You having a laugh fella? Hilariously misplaced expectations of winning every major tournament with shit teams and ugly football more like" I'd hate to be so bitter & twisted | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Finals:England vs Belgium, but we will not win. This world cup will be the disappointing one than previous completions for us, we will not go ever so close again. By the time of next world cup, this team will be old and we will expect a lot from them which will take to disappointment "I agree with you to a point - We will probably lose in the final (France I think). Thing with England is, is that we are very hard to beat. We usually go out on Penalties - 90, 98, 06. The difference now is, that we have a very very good keeper when it comes to penalties. So maybe it will be different now. This team is still quite young though. We also have to remember that we won the U17 World Cup, the U20 World Cup, and lost in the semi final of the U21 World Cup. We have young players coming through with a tournament mentality, and also they know how to win. Add that to a young manager, then the future is bright. But on the other hand, this could be it - the closest we will ever get. So we should all just enjoy it! Dream the dream!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I am gutted... Brazil is out... ffs... " Me too, - now all we're left with is boring Europe.  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Think england will struggle today if I'm honest. The media and pundits going on about how we got best route to the final and not focusing on one game at a time. England scored a late winner against nigeria, beat Panama the weakest team in the tournament, got beat by Belgium and scraped through against columbia. We havnt scored a goal from open play in last 2 games and didnt look like scoring either in both games. Sweden may not be the best team but i think they will give us a really difficult game and can go either way. I wouldn't take much noticed of what the pundits are saying - it's their job to hype everything up. We did rely on a late winner against Tunisia, but it took Brazil 90 minutes to score against Costa Rica, who are no great shakes either. As for Panama being the weakest team in the tournament - they may well be, but this is the same Panama team that Belgium couldn't score against until the 47th minute. The Belgium game doesn't count - it was the B team. Did you see Slavin Bilic's take on the build up to the Colombia game - it was spot on, and quite funny: 5 days before the game:- "Colombia? Bring it on!!" 2 days before the game:- "In Two days, we will be playing a good Colombian team" . 1 Day before the game:- "Tomorrow, we will be playing Colombia - a very dangerous team going forward" Day of the game:- "OH MY GOD!! IT'S COLOMBIA!!!" We always under-estimate ourselves, and pay too much respect to the opposition. Sweden are average. They were in a very poor group, and they beat an average Swiss team in the last round. They wouldn't have beaten Colombia. This will be a much easier game. (I hope) England underestimate themselves? You having a laugh fella? Hilariously misplaced expectations of winning every major tournament with shit teams and ugly football more like I'd hate to be so bitter & twisted "
I'm an Anglophile through and through
But I still remember the Beckham era | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Whatever the score today it will be a successful tournament in my eyes, Overall its been a very good world cup with some exciting matches, I think the FA should put a serious bid in for the 2030 and get the premier league to back them, The games are shown all over the world, Every live game should have England or UK for 2030 world cup advertisements " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ok I know he’s playing Sterling again , despite the fact that he’s done fuck all in 4 games , but surely we can win this can’t we ? " It's got snoozefest written all over it so far | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Too slow Too nervous Too predictable "Too England | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ok I know he’s playing Sterling again , despite the fact that he’s done fuck all in 4 games , but surely we can win this can’t we ? It's got snoozefest written all over it so far " It’s just so predictable , boring , and uninspiring . It’s been a fantastic World Cup so far , let’s hope this game doesn’t drag it down . It certainly has so far zzzzzzzzz....... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Too slow Too nervous Too predictable
Too England "Precisely, worryingly so. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ok I know he’s playing Sterling again , despite the fact that he’s done fuck all in 4 games , but surely we can win this can’t we ? It's got snoozefest written all over it so far It’s just so predictable , boring , and uninspiring . It’s been a fantastic World Cup so far , let’s hope this game doesn’t drag it down . It certainly has so far zzzzzzzzz......." This game is like a Gareth Southgate waistcoat | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Yesterday we had Premier League, today its the league 1 half of the draw." That’s a major insult to league 1 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I just don’t see the fuss around Deli Alli " His first touch has been atrocious. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Brazil Spain and Germany out whilst one of these two teams will be in the semi-final. Christ." To be fair it makes a mockery of the process involved . Neith of these teams deserves to be here if the truth be known , Sweden just bore the other team to death , and we’ve been almighty lucky with the qualifying group , and the games here in Russia . We’ve only played one decent team , and we lost that , hence why we are playing Sweden today and not Brazil yesterday . To be rewarded for failure is crazy but we are now watching that reward , and aren’t we lucky  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Not sure what they will fill the half time highlight reel with " Renditions of the England band playing BOTH songs they know | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Not sure what they will fill the half time highlight reel with Renditions of the England band playing BOTH songs they know" Fat Les - Vindaloo | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What the fuckety fucking fuck sterling " Southgate is very loyal to his players and very much has an XI in mind but he really must think about dropping Sterling - he works hard. He runs loads, he’s fast but he surely isn’t a second striker | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"They keep defending his position in the team. Does he have photo's of Gareth Southgate involved in a 15 male hooker, CokE fuelled gangbang? How else can he command such loyalty from a manager? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What the fuckety fucking fuck sterling Southgate is very loyal to his players and very much has an XI in mind but he really must think about dropping Sterling - he works hard. He runs loads, he’s fast but he surely isn’t a second striker" He is the king of 6 yard tap ins. I love him in fantasy football but not in this England team | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why the fuck are they trying to defend Sterling ? He is indefensible , I really think I must be watching a different game here . " You're not, I'm as bemused as you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why the fuck are they trying to defend Sterling ? He is indefensible , I really think I must be watching a different game here . " Quarter final and zero assists and zero goals from him. He wouldn't be in the city team on those stats. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why the fuck are they trying to defend Sterling ? He is indefensible , I really think I must be watching a different game here . Quarter final and zero assists and zero goals from him. He wouldn't be in the city team on those stats. " He wouldn’t be in Forest Green Rovers team based on this World Cup . He’s probably the only player who’s value has plummeted as a result of being involved . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Time for Wellbeck. Unleash his footballing genius. " He’s last in the striking pecking order but has a decent record for England - 16 goals in 40 games. Always likely to fire one in the top corner with a part of his body he didn’t know existed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"What the fuckety fucking fuck sterling Southgate is very loyal to his players and very much has an XI in mind but he really must think about dropping Sterling - he works hard. He runs loads, he’s fast but he surely isn’t a second striker" I should mitigate that statement by saying he’ll probably score now!  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Controversial opinion but Sterling has scared the shit out of the swedes so far. His pace has caused them so many problems, even if he can’t find the net he’s making space and winning corners. The more they focus on him the more space the rest of the team get around the area." Loftus-cheek is just as good at that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Why the fuck are they trying to defend Sterling ? He is indefensible , I really think I must be watching a different game here . Quarter final and zero assists and zero goals from him. He wouldn't be in the city team on those stats. " Second half hat trick nailed on | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Controversial opinion but Sterling has scared the shit out of the swedes so far. His pace has caused them so many problems, even if he can’t find the net he’s making space and winning corners. The more they focus on him the more space the rest of the team get around the area." Yeah his overhead kick with his knee would scare any defence . Sheer quality | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Pickford you Fucking Beauty "He’s been amazing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Pickford you Fucking Beauty
He’s been amazing "He's really come through in this tournament | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"When will it end "Next Sunday at around 6:30. With Harry lifting a trophy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"When will it end
Next Sunday at around 6:30. With Harry lifting a trophy "I love you  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Somewhere in a hotel room in Munich Manuel Neuer is sitting in the corner wanking...and crying." double tissues for him then | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think it would be a good idea to bring Harry Kane on for the last ten minutes " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think it would be a good idea to bring Harry Kane on for the last ten minutes "Southgate should kit up for 10 minutes, gotta be perks to the job | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Trippier is having an amazing game, scratch that, an amazing tournament! " Agreed. He's an outstanding talent. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I think it would be a good idea to bring Harry Kane on for the last ten minutes
Southgate should kit up for 10 minutes, gotta be perks to the job "fuck me NO we want to win it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maguire is the stand out player for me so far" He’s been amazing. Pickford, Maguire and Trippier have all amazed me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Maguire is the stand out player for me so far He’s been amazing. Pickford, Maguire and Trippier have all amazed me" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Trippier is having an amazing game, scratch that, an amazing tournament! " Improved 10 fold since the lobotomy | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Hope the semi final is on BBC1" BBC and the ITV's, battle of the Nevilles! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Five minutes?! What on earth? Is Fergie there? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"It's coming home it's coming home footballs coming home xx" When football comes home could it bring a few of those Swedish women with it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Shit, that means I've got to go to the pub on Wednesday as well "Ace that’s a tough job | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"How many babies born will be called Harry and Jordan in 9 months time? " I didn't know she played footie. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"When will it end
Next Sunday at around 6:30. With Harry lifting a trophy " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"When will it end
Next Sunday at around 6:30. With Harry lifting a trophy " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Somewhere in a hotel room in Munich Manuel Neuer is sitting in the corner wanking...and crying." You can't beat a vonderful veeping vank | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
