FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Fabs most thoughtful
Fabs most thoughtful
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
There seems to be a spate of ‘best’ body parts at the moment on the forums, asking for people to rate others various physical attributes.
I think it’s time to draw attention to those forumites that make it have the goods where it really counts; between their ears.
So folks, who makes you think? Who makes the valid and interesting points? Who do you feel uses that most sexy and vital of organs; their brain? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I can think of many that don't but strangely not many that do..."
That’s very true.
There are some who’s opinion I genuinely value, some that I think they have a point sometimes |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I can think of many that don't but strangely not many that do...
That’s very true.
There are some who’s opinion I genuinely value, some that I think they have a point sometimes"
Most are self serving but disguised as caring.. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *tonMessCouple
over a year ago
Slough Windsor ish |
Queen Leviosa... she's one smart cookie for one so young.
Altropos... inspite of her coming across as mad as a box of frogs at times I do enjoy her honesty and think she is cleverer than she's given credit for. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I can think of many that don't but strangely not many that do...
That’s very true.
There are some who’s opinion I genuinely value, some that I think they have a point sometimes
Most are self serving but disguised as caring.."
Obviously I can’t speak from your experiences but that makes me a little sad |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I can think of many that don't but strangely not many that do...
That’s very true.
There are some who’s opinion I genuinely value, some that I think they have a point sometimes
Most are self serving but disguised as caring..
Obviously I can’t speak from your experiences but that makes me a little sad"
Unfortunately the lady has a point. Lots of fakery on here to portray a certain image and sadly quite a few people fail to see through it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *eliWoman
over a year ago
. |
I'll try not be too biased so will include a few I might not agree with very often but they make me think -
Estella
Dubious Oatcakes
SoulfulKinky
BlueEyedGirl
Brokenbrilliance
KinkyLondonpair
Rubidoux
There are others but they are the ones that come to mind. I should have really narrowed it down reading it back. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Nobody will ever replace View.
I was about to say View. He was straight talking, didn't condescend, fair and didn't pontificate."
Yes, I miss his posts |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Queen Leviosa... she's one smart cookie for one so young.
Altropos... inspite of her coming across as mad as a box of frogs at times I do enjoy her honesty and think she is cleverer than she's given credit for."
Ahhh thank you!!!! This has honestly made me smile so much!!!  xx |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"There are quite a few people who can argue, using big words; but few who do it eloquently without condescension. "
This also doesn't mean they are thoughtful or clever  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
EtonMess
F&B
Rubidoux
Dubious Oatcake
Pretty much everyone that has already been mentioned. I’m hopeless with usernames and tend to just recognise their profile pics |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I can think of many that don't but strangely not many that do...
That’s very true.
There are some who’s opinion I genuinely value, some that I think they have a point sometimes
Most are self serving but disguised as caring..
Obviously I can’t speak from your experiences but that makes me a little sad
Unfortunately the lady has a point. Lots of fakery on here to portray a certain image and sadly quite a few people fail to see through it."
There is a degree of fakery on here yes, there’s also a greater than is healthy amount of cynicism. Sometimes people are just trying to be nice, sometimes they’re fawning and self serving. Such is the nature of people and it’s not confined to fab.
I would also say though that whilst sad; they’re not what I was asking |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *andom2chatMan
over a year ago
A Galaxy Far, Far Away & Spain |
Things wot I liked:
HOT BODS - but now they’re just so generic that they blend into the background.
THINKERS. - a hot mind was attractive & I’d wonder at how intelligent their mind was, until I overthunk it & realised they just used big words but talked a lot of pish.
SOULS - they can have a hot bod & a hot mind, but it’s nothing without a beautiful soul to accompany it. I’ve learned that there’s nothing more attractive than a person with a beautiful soul. Not as many of those about & time they made a comeback. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I started to list names, but I knew that I would forget someone. But there are some true diamonds here xxx"
That’s often the problem, that in making lists someone gets left out. I felt though that it’s just as important to recognise those that use their big brains to excite us mentally as well as those who excite us physically |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"There are quite a few people who can argue, using big words; but few who do it eloquently without condescension.
This also doesn't mean they are thoughtful or clever "
The ones I'm talking about seem to be. Obviously, anyone can say anything to try make themselves look good, but, to me, a thoughtful person doesn't snipe. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I'm going on this from an intellectual standpoint. I may not agree with all their views, but respect their ability to make a person see another side to a debate. Two jump out at me. Estella and Dubious Oatcake. I always enjoy reading their comments/posts  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"There are quite a few people who can argue, using big words; but few who do it eloquently without condescension.
This also doesn't mean they are thoughtful or clever
The ones I'm talking about seem to be. Obviously, anyone can say anything to try make themselves look good, but, to me, a thoughtful person doesn't snipe. "
True, but many, many on here do... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"There are quite a few people who can argue, using big words; but few who do it eloquently without condescension.
This also doesn't mean they are thoughtful or clever
The ones I'm talking about seem to be. Obviously, anyone can say anything to try make themselves look good, but, to me, a thoughtful person doesn't snipe. "
I agree with you on that count. I think a thoughtful person argues the facts and debates the points, it’s never about the other person and it’s never personal |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"For me EQ is far more important than IQ.
Well yes but it is also depends on the situation and on what sort of intelligence you have. "
I think it depends on the subject in hand, the two need to be in balance and inform each other |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"For me EQ is far more important than IQ.
Well yes but it is also depends on the situation and on what sort of intelligence you have.
I think it depends on the subject in hand, the two need to be in balance and inform each other"
Certainly but each perspectives might be different but both valid though. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"For me EQ is far more important than IQ.
Well yes but it is also depends on the situation and on what sort of intelligence you have.
I think it depends on the subject in hand, the two need to be in balance and inform each other
Certainly but each perspectives might be different but both valid though. "
Except for the hate of other based on a so called racial superiority. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Everyone on the forums makes me think. Everyone has valid points. "
Each time we read something on here we analyse it and think about it. Some things I move on swiftly from (usually because they give me a brain ache (it's a real thing)). |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"For me EQ is far more important than IQ.
Well yes but it is also depends on the situation and on what sort of intelligence you have.
I think it depends on the subject in hand, the two need to be in balance and inform each other
Certainly but each perspectives might be different but both valid though. "
Yes, and a thoughtful person would understand that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"For me EQ is far more important than IQ.
Well yes but it is also depends on the situation and on what sort of intelligence you have.
I think it depends on the subject in hand, the two need to be in balance and inform each other
Certainly but each perspectives might be different but both valid though.
Yes, and a thoughtful person would understand that. "
Well yes but at the same time, thoughtful persons are first and foremost humans and subjected to the same dissonances and biases. There is always a trigger. As much as a thoughtful person can put himself in someone's else shoes... There are subjects where he/she will not be able to do so. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Intelligence is subjective.
As Mr Einstein once said, “Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
Common human decency is invaluable. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"For me EQ is far more important than IQ.
Well yes but it is also depends on the situation and on what sort of intelligence you have.
I think it depends on the subject in hand, the two need to be in balance and inform each other
Certainly but each perspectives might be different but both valid though.
Yes, and a thoughtful person would understand that.
Well yes but at the same time, thoughtful persons are first and foremost humans and subjected to the same dissonances and biases. There is always a trigger. As much as a thoughtful person can put himself in someone's else shoes... There are subjects where he/she will not be able to do so. "
Absolutely, there is no such thing as an impartial person. We can study and learn and try to look at things from both sides but we will never be impartial. I think this is more leading towards the nature of intelligence and how we quantify it rather than giving recognition to those that actively demonstrate those qualities. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Intelligence is subjective.
As Mr Einstein once said, “Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.”
Common human decency is invaluable. "
Those two statements are different things though, recognising the need for human decency to temper intelligence is different from acknowledging that people have different strengths |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"For me EQ is far more important than IQ.
Well yes but it is also depends on the situation and on what sort of intelligence you have.
I think it depends on the subject in hand, the two need to be in balance and inform each other
Certainly but each perspectives might be different but both valid though.
Yes, and a thoughtful person would understand that.
Well yes but at the same time, thoughtful persons are first and foremost humans and subjected to the same dissonances and biases. There is always a trigger. As much as a thoughtful person can put himself in someone's else shoes... There are subjects where he/she will not be able to do so.
Absolutely, there is no such thing as an impartial person. We can study and learn and try to look at things from both sides but we will never be impartial. I think this is more leading towards the nature of intelligence and how we quantify it rather than giving recognition to those that actively demonstrate those qualities. "
Intelligence is somehow very difficult to quantify. I mean they do with IQ tests but tgere are several layers to intelligence, crystallised and fluid and different type if intelligence which is sometimes impossipble to quantify on a paper version test.
Like music intelligence for instance ir interpersonal intelligence which is what you are refering to I guess |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"For me EQ is far more important than IQ.
Well yes but it is also depends on the situation and on what sort of intelligence you have.
I think it depends on the subject in hand, the two need to be in balance and inform each other
Certainly but each perspectives might be different but both valid though.
Yes, and a thoughtful person would understand that.
Well yes but at the same time, thoughtful persons are first and foremost humans and subjected to the same dissonances and biases. There is always a trigger. As much as a thoughtful person can put himself in someone's else shoes... There are subjects where he/she will not be able to do so.
Absolutely, there is no such thing as an impartial person. We can study and learn and try to look at things from both sides but we will never be impartial. I think this is more leading towards the nature of intelligence and how we quantify it rather than giving recognition to those that actively demonstrate those qualities.
Intelligence is somehow very difficult to quantify. I mean they do with IQ tests but tgere are several layers to intelligence, crystallised and fluid and different type if intelligence which is sometimes impossipble to quantify on a paper version test.
Like music intelligence for instance ir interpersonal intelligence which is what you are refering to I guess "
What is music intelligence? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"For me EQ is far more important than IQ.
Well yes but it is also depends on the situation and on what sort of intelligence you have.
I think it depends on the subject in hand, the two need to be in balance and inform each other
Certainly but each perspectives might be different but both valid though.
Yes, and a thoughtful person would understand that.
Well yes but at the same time, thoughtful persons are first and foremost humans and subjected to the same dissonances and biases. There is always a trigger. As much as a thoughtful person can put himself in someone's else shoes... There are subjects where he/she will not be able to do so.
Absolutely, there is no such thing as an impartial person. We can study and learn and try to look at things from both sides but we will never be impartial. I think this is more leading towards the nature of intelligence and how we quantify it rather than giving recognition to those that actively demonstrate those qualities.
Intelligence is somehow very difficult to quantify. I mean they do with IQ tests but tgere are several layers to intelligence, crystallised and fluid and different type if intelligence which is sometimes impossipble to quantify on a paper version test.
Like music intelligence for instance ir interpersonal intelligence which is what you are refering to I guess "
I don’t think I am talking about interpersonal intelligence, at least not specifically. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"For me EQ is far more important than IQ.
Well yes but it is also depends on the situation and on what sort of intelligence you have.
I think it depends on the subject in hand, the two need to be in balance and inform each other
Certainly but each perspectives might be different but both valid though.
Yes, and a thoughtful person would understand that.
Well yes but at the same time, thoughtful persons are first and foremost humans and subjected to the same dissonances and biases. There is always a trigger. As much as a thoughtful person can put himself in someone's else shoes... There are subjects where he/she will not be able to do so.
Absolutely, there is no such thing as an impartial person. We can study and learn and try to look at things from both sides but we will never be impartial. I think this is more leading towards the nature of intelligence and how we quantify it rather than giving recognition to those that actively demonstrate those qualities.
Intelligence is somehow very difficult to quantify. I mean they do with IQ tests but tgere are several layers to intelligence, crystallised and fluid and different type if intelligence which is sometimes impossipble to quantify on a paper version test.
Like music intelligence for instance ir interpersonal intelligence which is what you are refering to I guess
What is music intelligence? "
Beethoven, Mozart and so on...ppl who are able to produce masterpiece of music.
I know that I certainly wouldn't be able to.
I don't have that kind of intelligence at all.
I have high spatial intelligence, a bit of linguistic intelligence too but that's abt it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"For me EQ is far more important than IQ.
Well yes but it is also depends on the situation and on what sort of intelligence you have.
I think it depends on the subject in hand, the two need to be in balance and inform each other
Certainly but each perspectives might be different but both valid though.
Yes, and a thoughtful person would understand that.
Well yes but at the same time, thoughtful persons are first and foremost humans and subjected to the same dissonances and biases. There is always a trigger. As much as a thoughtful person can put himself in someone's else shoes... There are subjects where he/she will not be able to do so.
Absolutely, there is no such thing as an impartial person. We can study and learn and try to look at things from both sides but we will never be impartial. I think this is more leading towards the nature of intelligence and how we quantify it rather than giving recognition to those that actively demonstrate those qualities.
Intelligence is somehow very difficult to quantify. I mean they do with IQ tests but tgere are several layers to intelligence, crystallised and fluid and different type if intelligence which is sometimes impossipble to quantify on a paper version test.
Like music intelligence for instance ir interpersonal intelligence which is what you are refering to I guess
I don’t think I am talking about interpersonal intelligence, at least not specifically."
To be able to put yourself in someone'else shoes you have to have interpersonal intelligence at some point. EQ must come from linguistic intelligence and interpersonal intelligence. In order to be a good speaker u must be able to read your audience. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"For me EQ is far more important than IQ.
Well yes but it is also depends on the situation and on what sort of intelligence you have.
I think it depends on the subject in hand, the two need to be in balance and inform each other
Certainly but each perspectives might be different but both valid though.
Yes, and a thoughtful person would understand that.
Well yes but at the same time, thoughtful persons are first and foremost humans and subjected to the same dissonances and biases. There is always a trigger. As much as a thoughtful person can put himself in someone's else shoes... There are subjects where he/she will not be able to do so.
Absolutely, there is no such thing as an impartial person. We can study and learn and try to look at things from both sides but we will never be impartial. I think this is more leading towards the nature of intelligence and how we quantify it rather than giving recognition to those that actively demonstrate those qualities.
Intelligence is somehow very difficult to quantify. I mean they do with IQ tests but tgere are several layers to intelligence, crystallised and fluid and different type if intelligence which is sometimes impossipble to quantify on a paper version test.
Like music intelligence for instance ir interpersonal intelligence which is what you are refering to I guess
What is music intelligence?
Beethoven, Mozart and so on...ppl who are able to produce masterpiece of music.
I know that I certainly wouldn't be able to.
I don't have that kind of intelligence at all.
I have high spatial intelligence, a bit of linguistic intelligence too but that's abt it. "
Agree. It must take an incredible mind to create a masterpiece for an entire orchestra. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"For me EQ is far more important than IQ.
Well yes but it is also depends on the situation and on what sort of intelligence you have.
I think it depends on the subject in hand, the two need to be in balance and inform each other
Certainly but each perspectives might be different but both valid though.
Yes, and a thoughtful person would understand that.
Well yes but at the same time, thoughtful persons are first and foremost humans and subjected to the same dissonances and biases. There is always a trigger. As much as a thoughtful person can put himself in someone's else shoes... There are subjects where he/she will not be able to do so.
Absolutely, there is no such thing as an impartial person. We can study and learn and try to look at things from both sides but we will never be impartial. I think this is more leading towards the nature of intelligence and how we quantify it rather than giving recognition to those that actively demonstrate those qualities.
Intelligence is somehow very difficult to quantify. I mean they do with IQ tests but tgere are several layers to intelligence, crystallised and fluid and different type if intelligence which is sometimes impossipble to quantify on a paper version test.
Like music intelligence for instance ir interpersonal intelligence which is what you are refering to I guess
What is music intelligence?
Beethoven, Mozart and so on...ppl who are able to produce masterpiece of music.
I know that I certainly wouldn't be able to.
I don't have that kind of intelligence at all.
I have high spatial intelligence, a bit of linguistic intelligence too but that's abt it.
Agree. It must take an incredible mind to create a masterpiece for an entire orchestra. "
They were winging it! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *igeiaWoman
over a year ago
Bristol |
I think I have told most of the people whose input I appreciate that I do. Quite a few of them have been mentioned already but just in case I haven't told them I would also like to add Bike Monkey, Steel Heels, Lickety Splits and Scarlet Seduction to the list. And Clem Fandango and Lib when they're being a bit serious. I don't always agree with them but they can all make thoughtful points that start me or others off thinking. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *alcon43Woman
over a year ago
Paisley |
I enjoy the forums and I’ve had several private message from forumites.
Several people make interesting points and I do like everyone’s differing points of view. It’s. A good way of learning more about each other. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
