 |
By *umpkinMan
over a year ago
near the sounds of the wimborne quarter jack! |
I know not being there to hear all of the evidence doesn`t help but I reckon I would have said not guilty because I would have so much doubt in my mind. I`m thinking that ....
Jacko could well have injected himself
The Doc may well have been under pressure from Jacko and made a simple calculation mistake ......
The Doc may well have not been aware that Jacko may have taken taken the right amount and the Doc injected on top .....
etc. etc.
Having been on a jury for a conspiricy case, I can say it`s not always as cut and dryed as you may think .... and it wouldn`t surprise me if the jury in this case have let their hearts rule either  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
there will be a book and a film made of the trial, more bloody waste of time.
who cares at the end of the day without being nasty.
Only he knows if he did or didn't do it, my _iew he did but not by choice, jacko asked him. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I know not being there to hear all of the evidence doesn`t help but I reckon I would have said not guilty because I would have so much doubt in my mind. I`m thinking that ....
Jacko could well have injected himself
The Doc may well have been under pressure from Jacko and made a simple calculation mistake ......
The Doc may well have not been aware that Jacko may have taken taken the right amount and the Doc injected on top .....
etc. etc.
Having been on a jury for a conspiricy case, I can say it`s not always as cut and dryed as you may think .... and it wouldn`t surprise me if the jury in this case have let their hearts rule either "
It's so easy to let hearts rule in a case like this. It's not clear cut... you are right.
One thing that has spoke volumes for me all along... Conrad Murray brought an operation theatre anaesthetic into the private residence of a patient that did NOT require it because he wasn't about to undertake surgery.
If Conrad administered the fatal dose... Guilty.
If Jacko injected his own fatal dose... Conrad was negligent anyway... he went off to talk to his girlfriend on the phone and left Michael (a clear addict) to it... guilty as sin!
A resuss team are ALWAYS a few minutes away (ie hospital) when that drug is used in theatre.... that man decided to instruct people present at the time of Michaels' death to hide drugs and equipment BEFORE calling 911   |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It was a foregone conclusion that he'd be found guilty regardless of his guilt or blame.
After all, someone has to shoulder the blame for Jackos demise don't they ........  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Malicious? no gross stupidity on both the Drs and Michaels side yes
Must be the saddest case Ive ever heard and i feel for both the families and to some extent the Dr |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
He was just a glorified drug dealer really. Pandering to Jackson's whims, his professional ethics disintegrating as he chased after Jackson's cash.
Apparently the prison guards keep moon walking past him in his cell. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Michael is apparently looking down on (and after) his family now! according to his sister! she didn't care too much for him when he was alive, shame really!
oh and apparently his death was a conspiracy as well......also according to the same sister....
Only in American! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I know not being there to hear all of the evidence doesn`t help but I reckon I would have said not guilty because I would have so much doubt in my mind. I`m thinking that ....
Jacko could well have injected himself
The Doc may well have been under pressure from Jacko and made a simple calculation mistake ......
The Doc may well have not been aware that Jacko may have taken taken the right amount and the Doc injected on top .....
etc. etc.
Having been on a jury for a conspiricy case, I can say it`s not always as cut and dryed as you may think .... and it wouldn`t surprise me if the jury in this case have let their hearts rule either
It's so easy to let hearts rule in a case like this. It's not clear cut... you are right.
One thing that has spoke volumes for me all along... Conrad Murray brought an operation theatre anaesthetic into the private residence of a patient that did NOT require it because he wasn't about to undertake surgery.
If Conrad administered the fatal dose... Guilty.
If Jacko injected his own fatal dose... Conrad was negligent anyway... he went off to talk to his girlfriend on the phone and left Michael (a clear addict) to it... guilty as sin!
A resuss team are ALWAYS a few minutes away (ie hospital) when that drug is used in theatre.... that man decided to instruct people present at the time of Michaels' death to hide drugs and equipment BEFORE calling 911 "
Agreed! I think you've highlighted the most salient points. Hiwever what's sad about all of this is the whole media circus element to it, and the typical lazy approach of news journalists to reduce everything to pantomime characters. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *rummpsMan
over a year ago
thanet |
"It was a foregone conclusion that he'd be found guilty regardless of his guilt or blame.
After all, someone has to shoulder the blame for Jackos demise don't they ........ "
Totally agree. The whole thing has been a charade.
The one thing that sticks in my mind is why would you kill a golden egg laying goose?
_rummps x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
