You are locked in a a room with two people (they are both the opposite gender to you).... think Saw... the tape plays and it explained the only way you will get out of the room alive is to have a full on sex session with one of the two people.
One has a lovely face but a nasty body.
One has a lovely body but a nasty face.
How do you do?
Or do you have a 3some and focus on the best bits of both.... no that's not an option really! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
I would get to know each of them very well, by frank and full discussion of our hopes and dreams, and then- providing it was OK with everyone concerned - we would make a decision based on personality.
What do you think us fellas are, shallow or summat? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'd be a shallow single guy and go for the one with the lovely body.
Could you kiss the face though?"
Yes. No problem. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder - if i was attracted to the body i would kiss the face, and if i was attrated to the face i could have sex with the body.
I've done both before and would do so again.
Either is better than there being no attraction atall. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I'd be a shallow single guy and go for the one with the lovely body.
Could you kiss the face though?
I shave this one each day... I'd have no bother.
It's nice to hear you help the missus "
Indeed, all heart here, always... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'd be a shallow single guy and go for the one with the lovely body.
Could you kiss the face though?
Yes. No problem. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder - if i was attracted to the body i would kiss the face, and if i was attrated to the face i could have sex with the body.
I've done both before and would do so again.
Either is better than there being no attraction atall."
So why go for the body? Does it hold more % of attraction?
I am not having a dig - I am genuinely curious as I am still trying to work out which I would pick and why. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Never saw saw. I'd do the one with the good face. Somehow to me ... the face is far more an indication of the soul than the body. Most of us go for a face pic not a cock pic... I know .. I know ....mantlepieces n fires etc... but I can't kiss ugly lips ....ugly teeth n ugly tongues..I have to taste that face with mine... Hold on ... NO ORAL ...absolutely no bloody oral ... that would have to be stipulated. Well none for him in any case. He can give but not get. yeah .. and nothin else. No penetration either and no touchin' Full on sex will be defined by me! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'd be a shallow single guy and go for the one with the lovely body.
Could you kiss the face though?
Yes. No problem. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder - if i was attracted to the body i would kiss the face, and if i was attrated to the face i could have sex with the body.
I've done both before and would do so again.
Either is better than there being no attraction atall.
So why go for the body? Does it hold more % of attraction?
I am not having a dig - I am genuinely curious as I am still trying to work out which I would pick and why."
peace and quiet in a locked room ....bliss |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'd be a shallow single guy and go for the one with the lovely body.
Could you kiss the face though?
Yes. No problem. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder - if i was attracted to the body i would kiss the face, and if i was attrated to the face i could have sex with the body.
I've done both before and would do so again.
Either is better than there being no attraction atall.
So why go for the body? Does it hold more % of attraction?
I am not having a dig - I am genuinely curious as I am still trying to work out which I would pick and why."
Didnt really think about it, something just said "that one".
Guess you could ba accused of being shallow either way, but (and we're just talking hypotheticals here...) there are less girls around with really nice bodies than there are pretty girls who are not so "fit" (societies word, not mine), so from a guy point of view, i'd go for the one with the nice body. It's more of a rareity, especially as you get older - bearing in mind that most of the time you will have sex with people who are about the same age as you.
Most of the women my age have been or are married, will have had kids etc and so are less likely on the whole to be as "fit" as they were when they were younger.
Make sense? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Never saw saw. I'd do the one with the good face. Somehow to me ... the face is far more an indication of the soul than the body. Most of us go for a face pic not a cock pic... I know .. I know ....mantlepieces n fires etc... but I can't kiss ugly lips ....ugly teeth n ugly tongues..I have to taste that face with mine... Hold on ... NO ORAL ...absolutely no bloody oral ... that would have to be stipulated. Well none for him in any case. He can give but not get. yeah .. and nothin else. No penetration either and no touchin' Full on sex will be defined by me!"
Then you die in the room lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"You are locked in a a room with two people (they are both the opposite gender to you).... think Saw... the tape plays and it explained the only way you will get out of the room alive is to have a full on sex session with one of the two people.
One has a lovely face but a nasty body.
One has a lovely body but a nasty face.
How do you do?
Or do you have a 3some and focus on the best bits of both.... no that's not an option really!"
Either one of them, makes not a jot of difference. Not looking for a relationship as I simply wish to get out of the room and as them's the rules it's no harm no foul |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I'd be a shallow single guy and go for the one with the lovely body.
Could you kiss the face though?
Yes. No problem. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder - if i was attracted to the body i would kiss the face, and if i was attrated to the face i could have sex with the body.
I've done both before and would do so again.
Either is better than there being no attraction atall.
So why go for the body? Does it hold more % of attraction?
I am not having a dig - I am genuinely curious as I am still trying to work out which I would pick and why.
Didnt really think about it, something just said "that one".
Guess you could ba accused of being shallow either way, but (and we're just talking hypotheticals here...) there are less girls around with really nice bodies than there are pretty girls who are not so "fit" (societies word, not mine), so from a guy point of view, i'd go for the one with the nice body. It's more of a rareity, especially as you get older - bearing in mind that most of the time you will have sex with people who are about the same age as you.
Most of the women my age have been or are married, will have had kids etc and so are less likely on the whole to be as "fit" as they were when they were younger.
Make sense?"
Yep - I was kinda expecting guys to go for bods (generally) and gals to go for faces (generally).... but as you say it is not real and just a guess at best. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"errm just a thought but wouldn't it depend on which one fancies you ????
Assuming then they both fancied...
Maybe a sniff test?
They both smell of steak and kidney pie."
Gravy? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic