FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > What bill would you campaign for?
What bill would you campaign for?
Jump to: Newest in thread
 but each to their own!) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
 
But honestly...I the working week should be reduced, as a whole the UK works now hours than the Europeans.
Shut the shops on Sundays, give longer lunchtime breaks.
People would be less stressed, happier, healthier and would probably live longer  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Oh I choose The Tom Hardy bill please
But honestly...I the working week should be reduced, as a whole the UK works now hours than the Europeans.
Shut the shops on Sundays, give longer lunchtime breaks.
People would be less stressed, happier, healthier and would probably live longer "That’s a great bill concept!  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Oh I choose The Tom Hardy bill please
But honestly...I the working week should be reduced, as a whole the UK works now hours than the Europeans.
Shut the shops on Sundays, give longer lunchtime breaks.
People would be less stressed, happier, healthier and would probably live longer "This
I’m too sleepy, ill and drained to think of my own. When I wake up a bit, I’ll give it a bash | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Easy one for me. Banning the sale of fireworks to general public. Absolute nuisance, dangerous and cause great deal of stress to animals. " Agreed | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Personally for me, that carers are recognised as being employed by the government and given more rights than we currently have. X " I’m with you on this. Carers don’t seem to be recognised enough and they do a fantastic job. I looked after my mum so I understand. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Oh I choose The Tom Hardy bill please
But honestly...I the working week should be reduced, as a whole the UK works now hours than the Europeans.
Shut the shops on Sundays, give longer lunchtime breaks.
People would be less stressed, happier, healthier and would probably live longer
This
I’m too sleepy, ill and drained to think of my own. When I wake up a bit, I’ll give it a bash "Feel better soon x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Oh I choose The Tom Hardy bill please
But honestly...I the working week should be reduced, as a whole the UK works now hours than the Europeans.
Shut the shops on Sundays, give longer lunchtime breaks.
People would be less stressed, happier, healthier and would probably live longer "Exactly, I'm all for that! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Personally for me, that carers are recognised as being employed by the government and given more rights than we currently have. X " Totally! Carers are massively unrecognised in this government’s policies. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Make monday part of the weekend , so less working days and less stress , Take all the people that begging money on the street and put them to clean all the areas in the city , whatever city is , lott lott o things " I’ll approve Mondays. I don’t approve the second. (My thread, just gave myself veto power hahaha ) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Shops should be closed Sundays and bank holidays " Yes, everyone should have time off - what about pubs and restaurants? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would love to see an anti gentrification bill. We need more social housing and to stop pricing people out of their homes and cramming them into other areas making them worse." Hella yeah! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Shops should be closed Sundays and bank holidays " I don't agree with Sundays tbh, I work full time M-F, and am an unpaid carer on Saturdays so if I need to get to a shop Sunday is usually the only day I can get there. Do agree with bank Holidays tho | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Easy one for me. Banning the sale of fireworks to general public. Absolute nuisance, dangerous and cause great deal of stress to animals. " Yes, and I’ve personal experience of death by fireworks so I have an absolute fear and hatred of them actually! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" If you get 5-10-20 years in prison you actually do that time in prison " 100% this | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Our drug laws really need sorting out so I'd legalise all drugs and be done with it " Any issues with legalising them, in your opinion? I’m interested (not casting an opinion). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Money no object ? More Bank Holidays Free child care or at least make it cheaper A 36 hour working week No taxes when buying a house If you get 5-10-20 years in prison you actually do that time in prison " Approved, all but the prison one (think there’s things to sort before that in the justice system and sentencing and understanding of rehabilitation and reform). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would have the banning of processed meals alongside making food tech/cooking compulsory in schools upto age 16. So many out there can't cook from scratch. It could almost reverse the obesity and diabetes trend in this country. I would also reintroduce actual chefs cooking real food in schools and hospitals. How can the body grow and heal when not nourished?" Approved | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"That's all school children attend free put ward bound courses . One week every year. I have seen at first hand what benefits children gain from these weeks away Also mindfulness be on the school curriculum "Outward bound courses for the win! I like these ideas! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"That's all school children attend free put ward bound courses . One week every year. I have seen at first hand what benefits children gain from these weeks away Also mindfulness be on the school curriculum "I loved mine in Northumberland. It cost about £200 I think and we were able to pay in instalments. My eldest sister chose to go to a grammar school and went to Austria. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"A bill that helped children and teenagers to get the emotional support they needed. Possibly via the education system; or GP referral. " Yes! Also transitioning from child to teen to adult services needs sorting. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Make monday part of the weekend , so less working days and less stress , Take all the people that begging money on the street and put them to clean all the areas in the city , whatever city is , lott lott o things I’ll approve Mondays. I don’t approve the second. (My thread, just gave myself veto power hahaha )"Why not ? Some people that begging money , they are 100% healty and good for work .. like that biggest city like , london , birmingham , etc.. will be more clean | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Our drug laws really need sorting out so I'd legalise all drugs and be done with it Any issues with legalising them, in your opinion? I’m interested (not casting an opinion)." Decriminalisation rather than outright legalisation might work better as an interim measure? Some of the things close to my heart are already mentioned. I would vote for quite a few of you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Money no object ? More Bank Holidays Free child care or at least make it cheaper A 36 hour working week No taxes when buying a house If you get 5-10-20 years in prison you actually do that time in prison Approved, all but the prison one (think there’s things to sort before that in the justice system and sentencing and understanding of rehabilitation and reform)." Yeah but if whatever time you got actually meant you done that time maybe people would think twice before doing it, Meet you in the middle, 10 years = 5 years in a basic cell and 5 years rehab, Still in prison but with extras and education | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I would have the banning of processed meals alongside making food tech/cooking compulsory in schools upto age 16. So many out there can't cook from scratch. It could almost reverse the obesity and diabetes trend in this country. I would also reintroduce actual chefs cooking real food in schools and hospitals. How can the body grow and heal when not nourished?" Wow. This is more or less exactly the bill I would have them passed too. Practical skills have been lost by many and this should be school curriculum. Much more than religious studies, history, geography, even English and science should take back seats to practical knowledge. For me this would extend to other things though like wiring a plug etc. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" If you don't clean up after your dogs or found dumping the bag, You get a weeks community service cleaning the steets/parks of litter and dog poo "Oooh yes! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Make monday part of the weekend , so less working days and less stress , Take all the people that begging money on the street and put them to clean all the areas in the city , whatever city is , lott lott o things I’ll approve Mondays. I don’t approve the second. (My thread, just gave myself veto power hahaha )
Why not ?
Some people that begging money , they are 100% healty and good for work .. like that biggest city like , london , birmingham , etc.. will be more clean"Because there’s often more complexity to why someone is begging. Happy to debate on another thread. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Our drug laws really need sorting out so I'd legalise all drugs and be done with it Any issues with legalising them, in your opinion? I’m interested (not casting an opinion)." Of course there will be issues such as addiction. I'm not sure how it would affect the crime rates associated with drugs though. Would they fall as the drugs became more freely available and cheaper or would they rise as more addicts chase their next hit. Also you'd have the health problems that people will suffer later down the line but on the other hand the government would raise a hell of a lot of money in taxes to pump into the nhs. I just think people should be given the option of what recreational substance they choose to take rather than alcohol being the only choice. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Universal benefits need to be seriously looked at. I would rather the tax I pay went on whatever it takes to make sure the people that need it get it. I'd also like to make sure all schools were secular and that education was free until the age of 21." Can you give me an example of who is getting your tax money who you don’t think should be getting it? I agree welfare benefits policies are flawed, I’m not sure if I’d be approving changes that I agree with yet hence the question (in my thread all power to me decision making!! )
I approve the free education. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Our drug laws really need sorting out so I'd legalise all drugs and be done with it Any issues with legalising them, in your opinion? I’m interested (not casting an opinion). Decriminalisation rather than outright legalisation might work better as an interim measure? Some of the things close to my heart are already mentioned. I would vote for quite a few of you. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I’d like to see laws surrounding animal cruelty and the ownership of dogs changed. Animal cruelty to carry harsher sentences Ownership to require registration and mandatory insurance " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Money no object ? More Bank Holidays Free child care or at least make it cheaper A 36 hour working week No taxes when buying a house If you get 5-10-20 years in prison you actually do that time in prison Approved, all but the prison one (think there’s things to sort before that in the justice system and sentencing and understanding of rehabilitation and reform). Yeah but if whatever time you got actually meant you done that time maybe people would think twice before doing it, Meet you in the middle, 10 years = 5 years in a basic cell and 5 years rehab, Still in prison but with extras and education " It’s not meeting me in the middle though, as it’s not my point at all. So no. On hold.  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Free internet and free TV license and bring back the death penalty "All denied. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Our drug laws really need sorting out so I'd legalise all drugs and be done with it Any issues with legalising them, in your opinion? I’m interested (not casting an opinion). Of course there will be issues such as addiction. I'm not sure how it would affect the crime rates associated with drugs though. Would they fall as the drugs became more freely available and cheaper or would they rise as more addicts chase their next hit. Also you'd have the health problems that people will suffer later down the line but on the other hand the government would raise a hell of a lot of money in taxes to pump into the nhs. I just think people should be given the option of what recreational substance they choose to take rather than alcohol being the only choice." I agree with the last sentence, but think decriminalisation until some of the wider issues are worked through. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
lol hahahaa | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"British sign language to be taught in schools " Yes! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Universal benefits need to be seriously looked at. I would rather the tax I pay went on whatever it takes to make sure the people that need it get it. I'd also like to make sure all schools were secular and that education was free until the age of 21. Can you give me an example of who is getting your tax money who you don’t think should be getting it? I agree welfare benefits policies are flawed, I’m not sure if I’d be approving changes that I agree with yet hence the question (in my thread all power to me decision making!! )
I approve the free education."The old couple over the road that live in a 3/4 million pound house and receive winter fuel allowance. They spend the £200 on one crate of very expensive wine every year. I'm sure both you and I could think of more deserving areas that money could be spent. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be. Maybe we wouldn't have got dragged into the illegal Iraq war if we had this then or bring back capital punishment now. "Mmmmm. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Universal benefits need to be seriously looked at. I would rather the tax I pay went on whatever it takes to make sure the people that need it get it. I'd also like to make sure all schools were secular and that education was free until the age of 21. Can you give me an example of who is getting your tax money who you don’t think should be getting it? I agree welfare benefits policies are flawed, I’m not sure if I’d be approving changes that I agree with yet hence the question (in my thread all power to me decision making!! )
I approve the free education.
The old couple over the road that live in a 3/4 million pound house and receive winter fuel allowance. They spend the £200 on one crate of very expensive wine every year. I'm sure both you and I could think of more deserving areas that money could be spent."Well that I can agree with cutting! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be. Maybe we wouldn't have got dragged into the illegal Iraq war if we had this then or bring back capital punishment now.
Mmmmm. "That's the way our democracy is suppose to work, don't you agree then or do you believe in political party dictatorship with your and my MP having to vote the way Corban tells them to? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be. Maybe we wouldn't have got dragged into the illegal Iraq war if we had this then or bring back capital punishment now.
Mmmmm.
That's the way our democracy is suppose to work, don't you agree then or do you believe in political party dictatorship with your and my MP having to vote the way Corban tells them to?"Mmmmmm. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" If you don't clean up after your dogs or found dumping the bag, You get a weeks community service cleaning the steets/parks of litter and dog poo
Oooh yes!"The poo that the guilty person has to pick up, will argue that they are doing their bit for the community by ensuring that there is something for the "real villains" to pick up.  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Our drug laws really need sorting out so I'd legalise all drugs and be done with it Any issues with legalising them, in your opinion? I’m interested (not casting an opinion). Of course there will be issues such as addiction. I'm not sure how it would affect the crime rates associated with drugs though. Would they fall as the drugs became more freely available and cheaper or would they rise as more addicts chase their next hit. Also you'd have the health problems that people will suffer later down the line but on the other hand the government would raise a hell of a lot of money in taxes to pump into the nhs. I just think people should be given the option of what recreational substance they choose to take rather than alcohol being the only choice. I agree with the last sentence, but think decriminalisation until some of the wider issues are worked through. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
" If you don't clean up after your dogs or found dumping the bag, You get a weeks community service cleaning the steets/parks of litter and dog poo
Oooh yes! The poo that the guilty person has to pick up, will argue that they are doing their bit for the community by ensuring that there is something for the "real villains" to pick up. ""real villains" could/should be doing something else if there wasn't poo/litter all over the street/parks at the side of my house etc | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Personally for me, that carers are recognised as being employed by the government and given more rights than we currently have. X " This is what i would choose too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be. Maybe we wouldn't have got dragged into the illegal Iraq war if we had this then or bring back capital punishment now.
Mmmmm.
That's the way our democracy is suppose to work, don't you agree then or do you believe in political party dictatorship with your and my MP having to vote the way Corban tells them to?
Mmmmmm."I'll take you lack of comment as acceptance of my bill, fantastic! Anybody know where Albert Pierrepont's descendents live? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"All parents to be encouraged, maybe by an extra benefit/stay at home payment, for one of them to stay home and raise their children properly until they reach full time education. Those parents to attend parenting workshops with their children to ensure they are not wasting that time watching JK or just plonking their kids in front of the telly. Kids to learn basic manners, life skills, respect, ettiquette and the difference between right and wrong from their parents. Reinforced throughout their growing up by consistently good parenting. Parents not to feel forced by finacial reasons to return to work and place their children in childcare. " That last sentence, yes! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be. Maybe we wouldn't have got dragged into the illegal Iraq war if we had this then or bring back capital punishment now.
Mmmmm.
That's the way our democracy is suppose to work, don't you agree then or do you believe in political party dictatorship with your and my MP having to vote the way Corban tells them to?
Mmmmmm.
I'll take you lack of comment as acceptance of my bill, fantastic! Anybody know where Albert Pierrepont's descendents live? "There was no lack of comment. Just a lack of wanting to discuss with you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be. Maybe we wouldn't have got dragged into the illegal Iraq war if we had this then or bring back capital punishment now.
Mmmmm.
That's the way our democracy is suppose to work, don't you agree then or do you believe in political party dictatorship with your and my MP having to vote the way Corban tells them to?
Mmmmmm.
I'll take you lack of comment as acceptance of my bill, fantastic! Anybody know where Albert Pierrepont's descendents live?
There was no lack of comment. Just a lack of wanting to discuss with you. "Oh and I’d already turned down half your proposal earlier on the thread, and I’ve been skipping repeats. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Oh I choose The Tom Hardy bill please
But honestly...I the working week should be reduced, as a whole the UK works now hours than the Europeans.
Shut the shops on Sundays, give longer lunchtime breaks.
People would be less stressed, happier, healthier and would probably live longer
This
I’m too sleepy, ill and drained to think of my own. When I wake up a bit, I’ll give it a bash "said the actress to the bishop | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If you could initiate a proposal for a bill to be debated by Parliament that would actually be brought into law, what would it be? (Genuinely a little more interested in actual bills rather than ones that suggest you can get your cock sucked or have Tom Hardy date you! but each to their own!)"If I could have a bill guaranteed to be passed into law it’s wouldn’t be a UK bill (I still think we have it easier/better in the uk than in the majority of the rest of the world!) - it’d be a global equality bill! Where whether you have any rights at all as a female doesn’t depend entirely on what culture, country or social class you were born in. Where whether you were likely to survive into adulthood didn’t depend where in the world you were born. And where you were free to choose your sexuality without fear of prejudice or even persecution/death! Now I’d give a hell of a lot for that bill to be passed! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If you could initiate a proposal for a bill to be debated by Parliament that would actually be brought into law, what would it be? (Genuinely a little more interested in actual bills rather than ones that suggest you can get your cock sucked or have Tom Hardy date you! but each to their own!)
If I could have a bill guaranteed to be passed into law it’s wouldn’t be a UK bill (I still think we have it easier/better in the uk than in the majority of the rest of the world!) - it’d be a global equality bill!
Where whether you have any rights at all as a female doesn’t depend entirely on what culture, country or social class you were born in.
Where whether you were likely to survive into adulthood didn’t depend where in the world you were born.
And where you were free to choose your sexuality without fear of prejudice or even persecution/death!
Now I’d give a hell of a lot for that bill to be passed!
"Approved  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be. Maybe we wouldn't have got dragged into the illegal Iraq war if we had this then or bring back capital punishment now.
Mmmmm.
That's the way our democracy is suppose to work, don't you agree then or do you believe in political party dictatorship with your and my MP having to vote the way Corban tells them to?
Mmmmmm.
I'll take you lack of comment as acceptance of my bill, fantastic! Anybody know where Albert Pierrepont's descendents live?
There was no lack of comment. Just a lack of wanting to discuss with you.
Oh and I’d already turned down half your proposal earlier on the thread, and I’ve been skipping repeats. "Can't say I can see that, just mmmmm! Is it democracy without democracy then? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If I had to choose a uk bill - it would be a bill to force holiday companies into equalising their charges instead of making going away in the school holidays at least twice as expensive as term time - making it impossible for many parents to afford to take their kids on holiday! I’d also ban all companies, be they holiday or leisure facilities etc, from charging kids as an adult as young as 11 - many years before they have the capacity to pay for themselves! To me if they’re not old enough to work full time or pay tax, then they shouldn’t be classed as an adult! My kids and I now have far fewer days out due to ‘adult’ pricing! " Great points - approved | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be. Maybe we wouldn't have got dragged into the illegal Iraq war if we had this then or bring back capital punishment now.
Mmmmm.
That's the way our democracy is suppose to work, don't you agree then or do you believe in political party dictatorship with your and my MP having to vote the way Corban tells them to?
Mmmmmm.
I'll take you lack of comment as acceptance of my bill, fantastic! Anybody know where Albert Pierrepont's descendents live?
There was no lack of comment. Just a lack of wanting to discuss with you.
Oh and I’d already turned down half your proposal earlier on the thread, and I’ve been skipping repeats.
Can't say I can see that, just mmmmm!
Is it democracy without democracy then? "Someone else proposed return of capital punishment/death penalty. Fine, denied. I was mmmm re the rest as I’m not convinced referendums are always the best solution. Not that I’m convinced many politicians know ‘owt either. Also it’s Corbyn. My MP is fully engaged with constituents. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd introduce a bill that makes it possible for local community groups to be given land for self-build homes that cannot sold for more than the living wage x 6" We definitely need to sort out housing. Pleased that the Homelessness Reduction Act is now live, but there were too many concessions to get it through still. And still much work to be done. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ban superfluous plastics such as disposable drinking straws and tell retailers to cut down packaging. " Approved! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Banning push chairs from supermarkets" Denied. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd introduce a bill that makes it possible for local community groups to be given land for self-build homes that cannot sold for more than the living wage x 6 We definitely need to sort out housing. Pleased that the Homelessness Reduction Act is now live, but there were too many concessions to get it through still. And still much work to be done. " Such great news. Hopefully councils will use the extra budget wisely. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If I had to choose a uk bill - it would be a bill to force holiday companies into equalising their charges instead of making going away in the school holidays at least twice as expensive as term time - making it impossible for many parents to afford to take their kids on holiday! I’d also ban all companies, be they holiday or leisure facilities etc, from charging kids as an adult as young as 11 - many years before they have the capacity to pay for themselves! To me if they’re not old enough to work full time or pay tax, then they shouldn’t be classed as an adult! My kids and I now have far fewer days out due to ‘adult’ pricing! " Yes! This is a brilliant one. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ban superfluous plastics such as disposable drinking straws and tell retailers to cut down packaging. " Id vote for this. Just seen four peeled onions in a polystyrene tray, sealed in loads of clear plastic. What is this madness? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ban superfluous plastics such as disposable drinking straws and tell retailers to cut down packaging. Id vote for this. Just seen four peeled onions in a polystyrene tray, sealed in loads of clear plastic. What is this madness?" If only nature provided a suitable natural package. Oh wait.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be. Maybe we wouldn't have got dragged into the illegal Iraq war if we had this then or bring back capital punishment now.
Mmmmm.
That's the way our democracy is suppose to work, don't you agree then or do you believe in political party dictatorship with your and my MP having to vote the way Corban tells them to?
Mmmmmm.
I'll take you lack of comment as acceptance of my bill, fantastic! Anybody know where Albert Pierrepont's descendents live?
There was no lack of comment. Just a lack of wanting to discuss with you.
Oh and I’d already turned down half your proposal earlier on the thread, and I’ve been skipping repeats.
Can't say I can see that, just mmmmm!
Is it democracy without democracy then?
Someone else proposed return of capital punishment/death penalty. Fine, denied.
I was mmmm re the rest as I’m not convinced referendums are always the best solution. Not that I’m convinced many politicians know ‘owt either. Also it’s Corbyn.
My MP is fully engaged with constituents. "So having laws which the majority of the people of this country want isn't the best solution!...so it is democracy as long as it's not a democracy then? So, your MP votes the way the majority of their constituents wish then or do they adhere to the party whip, which isn't democracy that's political party dictatorship, as I previously said. We might as well not have a vote!  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Oh man, so many. Get rid of the bedroom tax. Abolish letting fees, which I know is in process. Make London companies who make a certain % of profit, pay the LLW. " Approved | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ban superfluous plastics such as disposable drinking straws and tell retailers to cut down packaging. Id vote for this. Just seen four peeled onions in a polystyrene tray, sealed in loads of clear plastic. What is this madness? If only nature provided a suitable natural package. Oh wait...." My thoughts exactly...... I was going to take a tray to the enquiry desk and ask them that very question............. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Ban superfluous plastics such as disposable drinking straws and tell retailers to cut down packaging. Id vote for this. Just seen four peeled onions in a polystyrene tray, sealed in loads of clear plastic. What is this madness? If only nature provided a suitable natural package. Oh wait...." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be. "That's too simplistic. We don't elect MPs just to be a straight proxy for our views. We elect them to bring their own experience, opinions, knowledge and judgement to the role. If all they have to do is parrot what constituents say, what's the point of them? On the main topic, given people want to bring back the death penalty even though it doesn't work as a deterrent and kills innocent people, I'd respond with a bill that makes it illegal to ever bring it back
And then something on housing. It should be illegal to own multiple properties and leave them empty.
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd introduce a bill that makes it possible for local community groups to be given land for self-build homes that cannot sold for more than the living wage x 6 We definitely need to sort out housing. Pleased that the Homelessness Reduction Act is now live, but there were too many concessions to get it through still. And still much work to be done. Such great news. Hopefully councils will use the extra budget wisely." I think councils will need a huge amount of help in how to best advise and support especially where people are still not priority, but it will be interesting to see how they respond (and how other organisations work in unison) - the fact that there is an imperative to actually discuss someone’s situation and provide ideas is important in terms of customer service and helping people understand what the possibilities or lack of are, rather than just sending away if there’s no duty, but when there aren’t solutions out there still, it’s not going to solve issues per se. The increase from 28 to 56days for the period 'threatened with homelessness' is excellent. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be. Maybe we wouldn't have got dragged into the illegal Iraq war if we had this then or bring back capital punishment now.
Mmmmm.
That's the way our democracy is suppose to work, don't you agree then or do you believe in political party dictatorship with your and my MP having to vote the way Corban tells them to?
Mmmmmm.
I'll take you lack of comment as acceptance of my bill, fantastic! Anybody know where Albert Pierrepont's descendents live?
There was no lack of comment. Just a lack of wanting to discuss with you.
Oh and I’d already turned down half your proposal earlier on the thread, and I’ve been skipping repeats.
Can't say I can see that, just mmmmm!
Is it democracy without democracy then?
Someone else proposed return of capital punishment/death penalty. Fine, denied.
I was mmmm re the rest as I’m not convinced referendums are always the best solution. Not that I’m convinced many politicians know ‘owt either. Also it’s Corbyn.
My MP is fully engaged with constituents.
So having laws which the majority of the people of this country want isn't the best solution!...so it is democracy as long as it's not a democracy then?
So, your MP votes the way the majority of their constituents wish then or do they adhere to the party whip, which isn't democracy that's political party dictatorship, as I previously said.
We might as well not have a vote! "Yawn. You know I’m for democracy. Move on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd introduce a bill that makes it possible for local community groups to be given land for self-build homes that cannot sold for more than the living wage x 6 We definitely need to sort out housing. Pleased that the Homelessness Reduction Act is now live, but there were too many concessions to get it through still. And still much work to be done. Such great news. Hopefully councils will use the extra budget wisely. I think councils will need a huge amount of help in how to best advise and support especially where people are still not priority, but it will be interesting to see how they respond (and how other organisations work in unison) - the fact that there is an imperative to actually discuss someone’s situation and provide ideas is important in terms of customer service and helping people understand what the possibilities or lack of are, rather than just sending away if there’s no duty, but when there aren’t solutions out there still, it’s not going to solve issues per se. The increase from 28 to 56days for the period 'threatened with homelessness' is excellent." I suppose as with any new bill, it takes time to settle. It’s such a positive change though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be.
That's too simplistic. We don't elect MPs just to be a straight proxy for our views. We elect them to bring their own experience, opinions, knowledge and judgement to the role.
If all they have to do is parrot what constituents say, what's the point of them?
On the main topic, given people want to bring back the death penalty even though it doesn't work as a deterrent and kills innocent people, I'd respond with a bill that makes it illegal to ever bring it back
And then something on housing. It should be illegal to own multiple properties and leave them empty.
"Thank you - it’ll fall on deaf ears. Doc just likes to goad me, not listen to sense.
Your bills are all approved!! I thoroughly agree with your post. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"I'd introduce a bill that makes it possible for local community groups to be given land for self-build homes that cannot sold for more than the living wage x 6 We definitely need to sort out housing. Pleased that the Homelessness Reduction Act is now live, but there were too many concessions to get it through still. And still much work to be done. Such great news. Hopefully councils will use the extra budget wisely. I think councils will need a huge amount of help in how to best advise and support especially where people are still not priority, but it will be interesting to see how they respond (and how other organisations work in unison) - the fact that there is an imperative to actually discuss someone’s situation and provide ideas is important in terms of customer service and helping people understand what the possibilities or lack of are, rather than just sending away if there’s no duty, but when there aren’t solutions out there still, it’s not going to solve issues per se. The increase from 28 to 56days for the period 'threatened with homelessness' is excellent. I suppose as with any new bill, it takes time to settle. It’s such a positive change though. " And the fact it came from our Private Member’s tombola process! The way some of these things can get audience in our system is so pot luck it’s terrifying!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Great thread. As well as all the above approved I'd make it illegal to discriminate against disabled people. Including parking spaces." Approved | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be. Maybe we wouldn't have got dragged into the illegal Iraq war if we had this then or bring back capital punishment now.
Mmmmm.
That's the way our democracy is suppose to work, don't you agree then or do you believe in political party dictatorship with your and my MP having to vote the way Corban tells them to?
Mmmmmm.
I'll take you lack of comment as acceptance of my bill, fantastic! Anybody know where Albert Pierrepont's descendents live?
There was no lack of comment. Just a lack of wanting to discuss with you.
Oh and I’d already turned down half your proposal earlier on the thread, and I’ve been skipping repeats.
Can't say I can see that, just mmmmm!
Is it democracy without democracy then?
Someone else proposed return of capital punishment/death penalty. Fine, denied.
I was mmmm re the rest as I’m not convinced referendums are always the best solution. Not that I’m convinced many politicians know ‘owt either. Also it’s Corbyn.
My MP is fully engaged with constituents.
So having laws which the majority of the people of this country want isn't the best solution!...so it is democracy as long as it's not a democracy then?
So, your MP votes the way the majority of their constituents wish then or do they adhere to the party whip, which isn't democracy that's political party dictatorship, as I previously said.
We might as well not have a vote!
Yawn. You know I’m for democracy. Move on. "Used to think so but it seems that you only do as long as you agree what's proposed! That "yawn" speaks volumes! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Freedom of speech with no politicaly correct representation. A jobsworth bill. Those have no common sense only let out on Thursday." See you on thursdays then. I’ll approves that one alone. And I decide who. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be. Maybe we wouldn't have got dragged into the illegal Iraq war if we had this then or bring back capital punishment now.
Mmmmm.
That's the way our democracy is suppose to work, don't you agree then or do you believe in political party dictatorship with your and my MP having to vote the way Corban tells them to?
Mmmmmm.
I'll take you lack of comment as acceptance of my bill, fantastic! Anybody know where Albert Pierrepont's descendents live?
There was no lack of comment. Just a lack of wanting to discuss with you.
Oh and I’d already turned down half your proposal earlier on the thread, and I’ve been skipping repeats.
Can't say I can see that, just mmmmm!
Is it democracy without democracy then?
Someone else proposed return of capital punishment/death penalty. Fine, denied.
I was mmmm re the rest as I’m not convinced referendums are always the best solution. Not that I’m convinced many politicians know ‘owt either. Also it’s Corbyn.
My MP is fully engaged with constituents.
So having laws which the majority of the people of this country want isn't the best solution!...so it is democracy as long as it's not a democracy then?
So, your MP votes the way the majority of their constituents wish then or do they adhere to the party whip, which isn't democracy that's political party dictatorship, as I previously said.
We might as well not have a vote!
Yawn. You know I’m for democracy. Move on.
Used to think so but it seems that you only do as long as you agree what's proposed! That "yawn" speaks volumes!"Doc, you’ve taught me how you operate. I don’t debate with those that can’t. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be. Maybe we wouldn't have got dragged into the illegal Iraq war if we had this then or bring back capital punishment now.
Mmmmm.
That's the way our democracy is suppose to work, don't you agree then or do you believe in political party dictatorship with your and my MP having to vote the way Corban tells them to?
Mmmmmm.
I'll take you lack of comment as acceptance of my bill, fantastic! Anybody know where Albert Pierrepont's descendents live?
There was no lack of comment. Just a lack of wanting to discuss with you.
Oh and I’d already turned down half your proposal earlier on the thread, and I’ve been skipping repeats.
Can't say I can see that, just mmmmm!
Is it democracy without democracy then?
Someone else proposed return of capital punishment/death penalty. Fine, denied.
I was mmmm re the rest as I’m not convinced referendums are always the best solution. Not that I’m convinced many politicians know ‘owt either. Also it’s Corbyn.
My MP is fully engaged with constituents.
So having laws which the majority of the people of this country want isn't the best solution!...so it is democracy as long as it's not a democracy then?
So, your MP votes the way the majority of their constituents wish then or do they adhere to the party whip, which isn't democracy that's political party dictatorship, as I previously said.
We might as well not have a vote!
Yawn. You know I’m for democracy. Move on.
Used to think so but it seems that you only do as long as you agree what's proposed! That "yawn" speaks volumes!
Doc, you’ve taught me how you operate. I don’t debate with those that can’t. "See you on Thursdays. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Raise the natanal speed limit to 1 more suited to modern cars rather than when you needed a man with a flag and raise the amount of points before you get a ban. 12 point you can top up in a day." Should there be repeat testing on a whatever frequency basis? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Can I have more than one? Raise minimum wage and have a minimum living wage for unemployeed people with work placement. Proper structured sexual education in all schools " Living wage yes, and it be reflective of the area eg London living wage And let’s sort out Local housing allowance, benefit cap, and local connection issues and all those idiosyncrasies too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Raise the natanal speed limit to 1 more suited to modern cars rather than when you needed a man with a flag and raise the amount of points before you get a ban. 12 point you can top up in a day. Should there be repeat testing on a whatever frequency basis?" Yes I think there should anything could happen to somebody especially with eye sight. I passed my car test at 17 and it's valled till I'm 65. That's a lot of years for 1 silly test. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Raise the natanal speed limit to 1 more suited to modern cars rather than when you needed a man with a flag and raise the amount of points before you get a ban. 12 point you can top up in a day. Should there be repeat testing on a whatever frequency basis? Yes I think there should anything could happen to somebody especially with eye sight. I passed my car test at 17 and it's valled till I'm 65. That's a lot of years for 1 silly test." Then I approve your bill with a frequent re-test element. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"More funding & recognition for help with substance misuse & harsher punishments for those associated with drug supply/dealing" I’ll approve the former part
I’m not convinced the latter takes into account sometimes the hows and whys people end up in this, and I think there’s better ways of addressing it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be.
That's too simplistic. We don't elect MPs just to be a straight proxy for our views. We elect them to bring their own experience, opinions, knowledge and judgement to the role.
If all they have to do is parrot what constituents say, what's the point of them?
On the main topic, given people want to bring back the death penalty even though it doesn't work as a deterrent and kills innocent people, I'd respond with a bill that makes it illegal to ever bring it back
And then something on housing. It should be illegal to own multiple properties and leave them empty.
"Our democracy is that we elect one from among us to represent and be the voice of our constituencies. Surely the collective majoritive opinion is far better one just one person's view? If that mean we end up with laws that some find unpalatable so be it, as long as they was a majority vote for those laws that's what matters. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Raise the natanal speed limit to 1 more suited to modern cars rather than when you needed a man with a flag and raise the amount of points before you get a ban. 12 point you can top up in a day. Should there be repeat testing on a whatever frequency basis? Yes I think there should anything could happen to somebody especially with eye sight. I passed my car test at 17 and it's valled till I'm 65. That's a lot of years for 1 silly test. Then I approve your bill with a frequent re-test element. " I was 1s a fork lift instructor examiner and on them you have a retest every 3 years. Ok it's a rtitb recommendation but most company's do stick to it. I do think that's a little much but every 5 or 10 years I think would be a much better system.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be.
That's too simplistic. We don't elect MPs just to be a straight proxy for our views. We elect them to bring their own experience, opinions, knowledge and judgement to the role.
If all they have to do is parrot what constituents say, what's the point of them?
On the main topic, given people want to bring back the death penalty even though it doesn't work as a deterrent and kills innocent people, I'd respond with a bill that makes it illegal to ever bring it back
And then something on housing. It should be illegal to own multiple properties and leave them empty.
Our democracy is that we elect one from among us to represent and be the voice of our constituencies.
Surely the collective majoritive opinion is far better one just one person's view? If that mean we end up with laws that some find unpalatable so be it, as long as they was a majority vote for those laws that's what matters. "I pass a bill for better grammar. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Raise the natanal speed limit to 1 more suited to modern cars rather than when you needed a man with a flag and raise the amount of points before you get a ban. 12 point you can top up in a day. Should there be repeat testing on a whatever frequency basis? Yes I think there should anything could happen to somebody especially with eye sight. I passed my car test at 17 and it's valled till I'm 65. That's a lot of years for 1 silly test. Then I approve your bill with a frequent re-test element. I was 1s a fork lift instructor examiner and on them you have a retest every 3 years. Ok it's a rtitb recommendation but most company's do stick to it. I do think that's a little much but every 5 or 10 years I think would be a much better system...." Agreed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Oh can i also propose that all traffic wardens can be legally shot on sight "No. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be.
That's too simplistic. We don't elect MPs just to be a straight proxy for our views. We elect them to bring their own experience, opinions, knowledge and judgement to the role.
If all they have to do is parrot what constituents say, what's the point of them?
On the main topic, given people want to bring back the death penalty even though it doesn't work as a deterrent and kills innocent people, I'd respond with a bill that makes it illegal to ever bring it back
And then something on housing. It should be illegal to own multiple properties and leave them empty.
Our democracy is that we elect one from among us to represent and be the voice of our constituencies.
Surely the collective majoritive opinion is far better one just one person's view? If that mean we end up with laws that some find unpalatable so be it, as long as they was a majority vote for those laws that's what matters.
I pass a bill for better grammar. "Guess I'm doing bird then  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Oh can i also propose that all traffic wardens can be legally shot on sight
No. "Meanie | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Oh can i also propose that all traffic wardens can be legally shot on sight
No.
Meanie "Deal. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be.
That's too simplistic. We don't elect MPs just to be a straight proxy for our views. We elect them to bring their own experience, opinions, knowledge and judgement to the role.
If all they have to do is parrot what constituents say, what's the point of them?
On the main topic, given people want to bring back the death penalty even though it doesn't work as a deterrent and kills innocent people, I'd respond with a bill that makes it illegal to ever bring it back
And then something on housing. It should be illegal to own multiple properties and leave them empty.
Our democracy is that we elect one from among us to represent and be the voice of our constituencies.
Surely the collective majoritive opinion is far better one just one person's view? If that mean we end up with laws that some find unpalatable so be it, as long as they was a majority vote for those laws that's what matters.
I pass a bill for better grammar. "I'd vote for that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be.
That's too simplistic. We don't elect MPs just to be a straight proxy for our views. We elect them to bring their own experience, opinions, knowledge and judgement to the role.
If all they have to do is parrot what constituents say, what's the point of them?
On the main topic, given people want to bring back the death penalty even though it doesn't work as a deterrent and kills innocent people, I'd respond with a bill that makes it illegal to ever bring it back
And then something on housing. It should be illegal to own multiple properties and leave them empty.
Our democracy is that we elect one from among us to represent and be the voice of our constituencies.
Surely the collective majoritive opinion is far better one just one person's view? If that mean we end up with laws that some find unpalatable so be it, as long as they was a majority vote for those laws that's what matters.
I pass a bill for better grammar.
I'd vote for that."And yet. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"That you only get taxed on forty hours,any overtime to be tax free. You give your free time you should get the reward and not the government." That’s an interesting one. On a simple level, yeah! Welcome to my utopia. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be.
That's too simplistic. We don't elect MPs just to be a straight proxy for our views. We elect them to bring their own experience, opinions, knowledge and judgement to the role.
If all they have to do is parrot what constituents say, what's the point of them?
On the main topic, given people want to bring back the death penalty even though it doesn't work as a deterrent and kills innocent people, I'd respond with a bill that makes it illegal to ever bring it back
And then something on housing. It should be illegal to own multiple properties and leave them empty.
Our democracy is that we elect one from among us to represent and be the voice of our constituencies.
Surely the collective majoritive opinion is far better one just one person's view? If that mean we end up with laws that some find unpalatable so be it, as long as they was a majority vote for those laws that's what matters.
I pass a bill for better grammar.
I'd vote for that.
And yet."I'd probably wouldn't be allowed to, being just a mere constituent! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be.
That's too simplistic. We don't elect MPs just to be a straight proxy for our views. We elect them to bring their own experience, opinions, knowledge and judgement to the role.
If all they have to do is parrot what constituents say, what's the point of them?
On the main topic, given people want to bring back the death penalty even though it doesn't work as a deterrent and kills innocent people, I'd respond with a bill that makes it illegal to ever bring it back
And then something on housing. It should be illegal to own multiple properties and leave them empty.
Our democracy is that we elect one from among us to represent and be the voice of our constituencies.
Surely the collective majoritive opinion is far better one just one person's view? If that mean we end up with laws that some find unpalatable so be it, as long as they was a majority vote for those laws that's what matters.
I pass a bill for better grammar.
I'd vote for that.
And yet.
I'd probably wouldn't be allowed to, being just a mere constituent! "Say again with correct grammar? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Raise the natanal speed limit to 1 more suited to modern cars rather than when you needed a man with a flag and raise the amount of points before you get a ban. 12 point you can top up in a day." I know where youre coming from on this one. Although cars are much safer now and can stop much more quickly than 20 years ago, the human beings reaction time hasnt evolved to keep pace. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be.
That's too simplistic. We don't elect MPs just to be a straight proxy for our views. We elect them to bring their own experience, opinions, knowledge and judgement to the role.
If all they have to do is parrot what constituents say, what's the point of them?
On the main topic, given people want to bring back the death penalty even though it doesn't work as a deterrent and kills innocent people, I'd respond with a bill that makes it illegal to ever bring it back
And then something on housing. It should be illegal to own multiple properties and leave them empty.
Our democracy is that we elect one from among us to represent and be the voice of our constituencies.
Surely the collective majoritive opinion is far better one just one person's view? If that mean we end up with laws that some find unpalatable so be it, as long as they was a majority vote for those laws that's what matters.
I pass a bill for better grammar.
I'd vote for that.
And yet.
I'd probably wouldn't be allowed to, being just a mere constituent!
Say again with correct grammar?"See, deep down we're all "fascists" on something! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. " Yes. Let’s do it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"That you only get taxed on forty hours,any overtime to be tax free. You give your free time you should get the reward and not the government." What about those of us who dont get paid overtime and regularly have to work beyond our contracted hours for free? What sort of utopian paradise is this supposed to be? Orff wiv yer 'ead..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be.
That's too simplistic. We don't elect MPs just to be a straight proxy for our views. We elect them to bring their own experience, opinions, knowledge and judgement to the role.
If all they have to do is parrot what constituents say, what's the point of them?
On the main topic, given people want to bring back the death penalty even though it doesn't work as a deterrent and kills innocent people, I'd respond with a bill that makes it illegal to ever bring it back
And then something on housing. It should be illegal to own multiple properties and leave them empty.
Our democracy is that we elect one from among us to represent and be the voice of our constituencies.
Surely the collective majoritive opinion is far better one just one person's view? If that mean we end up with laws that some find unpalatable so be it, as long as they was a majority vote for those laws that's what matters.
I pass a bill for better grammar.
I'd vote for that.
And yet.
I'd probably wouldn't be allowed to, being just a mere constituent!
Say again with correct grammar?
See, deep down we're all "fascists" on something! "I’m not bothered about grammar. Just know you are and was amused that you kept making typos. You can be fascist all on your own. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"That you only get taxed on forty hours,any overtime to be tax free. You give your free time you should get the reward and not the government. What about those of us who dont get paid overtime and regularly have to work beyond our contracted hours for free? What sort of utopian paradise is this supposed to be? Orff wiv yer 'ead..... " Umm. No heads are rolling. You’ll get paid for overtime. My utopia. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. " So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Raise the natanal speed limit to 1 more suited to modern cars rather than when you needed a man with a flag and raise the amount of points before you get a ban. 12 point you can top up in a day. I know where youre coming from on this one. Although cars are much safer now and can stop much more quickly than 20 years ago, the human beings reaction time hasnt evolved to keep pace. " Hence you shouldn't only need to take 1 test for life. Some kind of reaction testing could be included with the test | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly?" Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"That you only get taxed on forty hours,any overtime to be tax free. You give your free time you should get the reward and not the government. What about those of us who dont get paid overtime and regularly have to work beyond our contracted hours for free? What sort of utopian paradise is this supposed to be? Orff wiv yer 'ead..... " Get a better frigging job. I refuse to do overtime even though I'd be well paid for it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Raise the natanal speed limit to 1 more suited to modern cars rather than when you needed a man with a flag and raise the amount of points before you get a ban. 12 point you can top up in a day. I know where youre coming from on this one. Although cars are much safer now and can stop much more quickly than 20 years ago, the human beings reaction time hasnt evolved to keep pace. Hence you shouldn't only need to take 1 test for life. Some kind of reaction testing could be included with the test" Agreed on this one. Re-testing every say, 5 years? Or do you think 10 would be better? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly?" Everybody owns the property. The state allocates it. "From each according to his means, To each according to his need" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Raise the natanal speed limit to 1 more suited to modern cars rather than when you needed a man with a flag and raise the amount of points before you get a ban. 12 point you can top up in a day. I know where youre coming from on this one. Although cars are much safer now and can stop much more quickly than 20 years ago, the human beings reaction time hasnt evolved to keep pace. Hence you shouldn't only need to take 1 test for life. Some kind of reaction testing could be included with the test Agreed on this one. Re-testing every say, 5 years? Or do you think 10 would be better?" I’ve already passed it. Every three. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be.
That's too simplistic. We don't elect MPs just to be a straight proxy for our views. We elect them to bring their own experience, opinions, knowledge and judgement to the role.
If all they have to do is parrot what constituents say, what's the point of them?
On the main topic, given people want to bring back the death penalty even though it doesn't work as a deterrent and kills innocent people, I'd respond with a bill that makes it illegal to ever bring it back
And then something on housing. It should be illegal to own multiple properties and leave them empty.
Our democracy is that we elect one from among us to represent and be the voice of our constituencies.
Surely the collective majoritive opinion is far better one just one person's view? If that mean we end up with laws that some find unpalatable so be it, as long as they was a majority vote for those laws that's what matters.
I pass a bill for better grammar.
I'd vote for that.
And yet.
I'd probably wouldn't be allowed to, being just a mere constituent!
Say again with correct grammar?
See, deep down we're all "fascists" on something!
I’m not bothered about grammar. Just know you are and was amused that you kept making typos. You can be fascist all on your own. "My English and grammar is poor, failed both O-levels, and it doesn't bother me one bit, not like you and true democracy. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue?" The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be.
That's too simplistic. We don't elect MPs just to be a straight proxy for our views. We elect them to bring their own experience, opinions, knowledge and judgement to the role.
If all they have to do is parrot what constituents say, what's the point of them?
On the main topic, given people want to bring back the death penalty even though it doesn't work as a deterrent and kills innocent people, I'd respond with a bill that makes it illegal to ever bring it back
And then something on housing. It should be illegal to own multiple properties and leave them empty.
Our democracy is that we elect one from among us to represent and be the voice of our constituencies.
Surely the collective majoritive opinion is far better one just one person's view? If that mean we end up with laws that some find unpalatable so be it, as long as they was a majority vote for those laws that's what matters.
I pass a bill for better grammar.
I'd vote for that.
And yet.
I'd probably wouldn't be allowed to, being just a mere constituent!
Say again with correct grammar?
See, deep down we're all "fascists" on something!
I’m not bothered about grammar. Just know you are and was amused that you kept making typos. You can be fascist all on your own.
My English and grammar is poor, failed both O-levels, and it doesn't bother me one bit, not like you and true democracy. "You don’t really follow the points that were made do you?
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Everybody owns the property. The state allocates it. "From each according to his means, To each according to his need"" So everyone gets exactly the same house? (Depending on their needs obvs) I want to decide what sort of house I live in and where its built. At the moment, virtually every house in this country is unique. Do you propose we knock them all down and start again, building identical houses throughout the country? Or am I taking your ideal to an extreme? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. " Invest in anything you want, there’s just not the option to invest in housing in my utopia. Jimi’s bill was passed for its greater good. Sorry that curbs your spending joy. Sorry, not sorry. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. " Spend it on something else then. You don't really own land/property anyway, you just look after it for the next generation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Reinvest the money spent on military operations abroad such as the recent airstrikes, into our educational and health system. " Approved | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Fridays to all be bank holidays" We’ve shortened the week already | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Raise the natanal speed limit to 1 more suited to modern cars rather than when you needed a man with a flag and raise the amount of points before you get a ban. 12 point you can top up in a day. I know where youre coming from on this one. Although cars are much safer now and can stop much more quickly than 20 years ago, the human beings reaction time hasnt evolved to keep pace. Hence you shouldn't only need to take 1 test for life. Some kind of reaction testing could be included with the test Agreed on this one. Re-testing every say, 5 years? Or do you think 10 would be better?" Probably 5 and that's only because I've really noticed of late how much my own eyesight has deteriorated. Nothing that stronger bins hasn't put right but I really noticed it from riding my bike as looking as far ahead as possible has saved my life countless times.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be.
That's too simplistic. We don't elect MPs just to be a straight proxy for our views. We elect them to bring their own experience, opinions, knowledge and judgement to the role.
If all they have to do is parrot what constituents say, what's the point of them?
On the main topic, given people want to bring back the death penalty even though it doesn't work as a deterrent and kills innocent people, I'd respond with a bill that makes it illegal to ever bring it back
And then something on housing. It should be illegal to own multiple properties and leave them empty.
Our democracy is that we elect one from among us to represent and be the voice of our constituencies.
Surely the collective majoritive opinion is far better one just one person's view? If that mean we end up with laws that some find unpalatable so be it, as long as they was a majority vote for those laws that's what matters.
I pass a bill for better grammar.
I'd vote for that.
And yet.
I'd probably wouldn't be allowed to, being just a mere constituent!
Say again with correct grammar?
See, deep down we're all "fascists" on something!
I’m not bothered about grammar. Just know you are and was amused that you kept making typos. You can be fascist all on your own.
My English and grammar is poor, failed both O-levels, and it doesn't bother me one bit, not like you and true democracy.
You don’t really follow the points that were made do you?
"You're not very supportive, are you? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. Invest in anything you want, there’s just not the option to invest in housing in my utopia. Jimi’s bill was passed for its greater good. Sorry that curbs your spending joy. Sorry, not sorry." Oh what about us poor sods who are already heavily invested in property | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. Spend it on something else then. You don't really own land/property anyway, you just look after it for the next generation. " How would you like me to spend my hard earned money then? What if i want to leave MY house to MY next generation? Its bollocks like that this that boils my piss. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"There should be either far more referendums or MPs should be forced to consult and vote the way the majority of their constituents want on issues, like our the way our parliamentary system is supposed to be.
That's too simplistic. We don't elect MPs just to be a straight proxy for our views. We elect them to bring their own experience, opinions, knowledge and judgement to the role.
If all they have to do is parrot what constituents say, what's the point of them?
On the main topic, given people want to bring back the death penalty even though it doesn't work as a deterrent and kills innocent people, I'd respond with a bill that makes it illegal to ever bring it back
And then something on housing. It should be illegal to own multiple properties and leave them empty.
Our democracy is that we elect one from among us to represent and be the voice of our constituencies.
Surely the collective majoritive opinion is far better one just one person's view? If that mean we end up with laws that some find unpalatable so be it, as long as they was a majority vote for those laws that's what matters.
I pass a bill for better grammar.
I'd vote for that.
And yet.
I'd probably wouldn't be allowed to, being just a mere constituent!
Say again with correct grammar?
See, deep down we're all "fascists" on something!
I’m not bothered about grammar. Just know you are and was amused that you kept making typos. You can be fascist all on your own.
My English and grammar is poor, failed both O-levels, and it doesn't bother me one bit, not like you and true democracy.
You don’t really follow the points that were made do you?
You're not very supportive, are you? "That’s your opinion. Are you asking for support? If so, on what? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. Spend it on something else then. You don't really own land/property anyway, you just look after it for the next generation. How would you like me to spend my hard earned money then? What if i want to leave MY house to MY next generation? Its bollocks like that this that boils my piss. "Bet it stings on the way out  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. Invest in anything you want, there’s just not the option to invest in housing in my utopia. Jimi’s bill was passed for its greater good. Sorry that curbs your spending joy. Sorry, not sorry. Oh what about us poor sods who are already heavily invested in property "Tough shit on 99% of the working population by the looks of things. Not so much of a utopia now is it..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. Spend it on something else then. You don't really own land/property anyway, you just look after it for the next generation. How would you like me to spend my hard earned money then? What if i want to leave MY house to MY next generation? Its bollocks like that this that boils my piss. "Hush now, it’s self interest versus communal support that boils mine. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. Invest in anything you want, there’s just not the option to invest in housing in my utopia. Jimi’s bill was passed for its greater good. Sorry that curbs your spending joy. Sorry, not sorry. Oh what about us poor sods who are already heavily invested in property
Tough shit on 99% of the working population by the looks of things.
Not so much of a utopia now is it.....
"Fuck that. I'll sell them maybe but no fuckers taking them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. Invest in anything you want, there’s just not the option to invest in housing in my utopia. Jimi’s bill was passed for its greater good. Sorry that curbs your spending joy. Sorry, not sorry. Oh what about us poor sods who are already heavily invested in property
Tough shit on 99% of the working population by the looks of things.
Not so much of a utopia now is it.....
"99% of the working population own a house?! Good god man. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. Invest in anything you want, there’s just not the option to invest in housing in my utopia. Jimi’s bill was passed for its greater good. Sorry that curbs your spending joy. Sorry, not sorry. Oh what about us poor sods who are already heavily invested in property
Tough shit on 99% of the working population by the looks of things.
Not so much of a utopia now is it.....
Fuck that. I'll sell them maybe but no fuckers taking them. "I’ve taken them already. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If you could initiate a proposal for a bill to be debated by Parliament that would actually be brought into law, what would it be? (Genuinely a little more interested in actual bills rather than ones that suggest you can get your cock sucked or have Tom Hardy date you! but each to their own!)"love to have a right to bare arms on your private land if you ask them to leave and they don't shoot the scum | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If you could initiate a proposal for a bill to be debated by Parliament that would actually be brought into law, what would it be? (Genuinely a little more interested in actual bills rather than ones that suggest you can get your cock sucked or have Tom Hardy date you! but each to their own!)love to have a right to bare arms on your private land if you ask them to leave and they don't shoot the scum "Denied. Also you don’t own any land in my utopia. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. Invest in anything you want, there’s just not the option to invest in housing in my utopia. Jimi’s bill was passed for its greater good. Sorry that curbs your spending joy. Sorry, not sorry. Oh what about us poor sods who are already heavily invested in property
Tough shit on 99% of the working population by the looks of things.
Not so much of a utopia now is it.....
Fuck that. I'll sell them maybe but no fuckers taking them.
I’ve taken them already. "You'd better be able to run fast young lady that's my pension your fucking with | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. Spend it on something else then. You don't really own land/property anyway, you just look after it for the next generation. How would you like me to spend my hard earned money then? What if i want to leave MY house to MY next generation? Its bollocks like that this that boils my piss.
Hush now, it’s self interest versus communal support that boils mine."Its self interest to want to invest and safeguard my future and the future of my family? I'm pretty sure I can have self interest AND serve the community at large in many other ways. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. Invest in anything you want, there’s just not the option to invest in housing in my utopia. Jimi’s bill was passed for its greater good. Sorry that curbs your spending joy. Sorry, not sorry. Oh what about us poor sods who are already heavily invested in property
Tough shit on 99% of the working population by the looks of things.
Not so much of a utopia now is it.....
"99%? Most people don't own property anyway, so it makes no difference to them. They either rent it off a landlord, the council or the bank, and most of those who rent it off the bank may own it once they retire, just in time to sell it to pay for their care in old age. So really, it would affect very few people | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. Invest in anything you want, there’s just not the option to invest in housing in my utopia. Jimi’s bill was passed for its greater good. Sorry that curbs your spending joy. Sorry, not sorry. Oh what about us poor sods who are already heavily invested in property
Tough shit on 99% of the working population by the looks of things.
Not so much of a utopia now is it.....
Fuck that. I'll sell them maybe but no fuckers taking them.
I’ve taken them already.
You'd better be able to run fast young lady that's my pension your fucking with "You’ll be well looked after and compensated. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. Invest in anything you want, there’s just not the option to invest in housing in my utopia. Jimi’s bill was passed for its greater good. Sorry that curbs your spending joy. Sorry, not sorry. Oh what about us poor sods who are already heavily invested in property
Tough shit on 99% of the working population by the looks of things.
Not so much of a utopia now is it.....
99% of the working population own a house?!
Good god man."Maybe 99% was a tad exagerated. But Im sure you get my point.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"If you could initiate a proposal for a bill to be debated by Parliament that would actually be brought into law, what would it be? (Genuinely a little more interested in actual bills rather than ones that suggest you can get your cock sucked or have Tom Hardy date you! but each to their own!)love to have a right to bare arms on your private land if you ask them to leave and they don't shoot the scum "That could be very handy with some of the fuckwits I've had as tennents | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. Spend it on something else then. You don't really own land/property anyway, you just look after it for the next generation. How would you like me to spend my hard earned money then? What if i want to leave MY house to MY next generation? Its bollocks like that this that boils my piss.
Hush now, it’s self interest versus communal support that boils mine.
Its self interest to want to invest and safeguard my future and the future of my family?
I'm pretty sure I can have self interest AND serve the community at large in many other ways.
"You’re in my utopia now. The housing situation changed, get on board - everyone is a lot happier. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Any property that’s been stood empty for an inordinate amount of time, should be sold compulsorily and made use of. " All property is owned by all. It’s sorted | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. Invest in anything you want, there’s just not the option to invest in housing in my utopia. Jimi’s bill was passed for its greater good. Sorry that curbs your spending joy. Sorry, not sorry. Oh what about us poor sods who are already heavily invested in property
Tough shit on 99% of the working population by the looks of things.
Not so much of a utopia now is it.....
Fuck that. I'll sell them maybe but no fuckers taking them.
I’ve taken them already.
You'd better be able to run fast young lady that's my pension your fucking with
You’ll be well looked after and compensated."In that case we can be friends again | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. Invest in anything you want, there’s just not the option to invest in housing in my utopia. Jimi’s bill was passed for its greater good. Sorry that curbs your spending joy. Sorry, not sorry. Oh what about us poor sods who are already heavily invested in property
Tough shit on 99% of the working population by the looks of things.
Not so much of a utopia now is it.....
99% of the working population own a house?!
Good god man.
Maybe 99% was a tad exagerated. But Im sure you get my point.... "Yes, and refuted it. Still denied. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
"Abolish private property, to be allocated on a "by need" basis. Rent to be means tested and payable to the state. So no-one is allowed to own their own property, do i understand your Bill correctly? Welcome to utopia. Everyone gets housed though, so what’s the issue? The issue is someone else deciding how I spend/invest my very hard earned cash. Invest in anything you want, there’s just not the option to invest in housing in my utopia. Jimi’s bill was passed for its greater good. Sorry that curbs your spending joy. Sorry, not sorry. Oh what about us poor sods who are already heavily invested in property
Tough shit on 99% of the working population by the looks of things.
Not so much of a utopia now is it.....
99%? Most people don't own property anyway, so it makes no difference to them.
They either rent it off a landlord, the council or the bank, and most of those who rent it off the bank may own it once they retire, just in time to sell it to pay for their care in old age.
So really, it would affect very few people"A few? 40 houses in my street. 38 are privately owned. So, on that statistic, 98% FFS...................  | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) | |||
