FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > The globalist agenda of Reducing human population by 80 %
The globalist agenda of Reducing human population by 80 %
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
It is estimated that there are around 7 billion people upon the planet. The globalists agenda is that human over population is taking up to much of the earths resources and therefore killing the planet from global warming/ climate change. There plan on saving the planet is to reduce human population numbers from 7 billion to around 500 million.
Steps have already been implemented through the United Nations to implement this plan under United Nations agenda 21 resolution and there sustainable development programme.
The globalists policy on achieving their targets is through sterilisation by vaccination. Microsoft founder Bill Gates (member of the globalist club is a huge fan of depopulation by vaccination so far his vaccination depopulation programme has managed to sterilise paralyse and kill approximately 120 thoudand children in both Africa and India. Ten years ago the cancer rate of people catching camcer was 1 in ten nowadays its 1 in 3. Whats going on ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
This reminds of the Georgia guide stones and their message and mystery origin.Population control is common sense when living on a little blue ball with finite resources.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Seems like a good idea, except that there will be a massive surplus of iPhones and Apple will have to cut the price...."
and that why Bill Gates supports it
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"It wont matter once Brexit happens as we wont be part of the world."
That's if you believe the brexit the people voted for is actually going to happen and we are not going to be manipulated and given a brexit in name already. If Brexit was going to happen it would have happened long ago. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Seems like a good idea, except that there will be a massive surplus of iPhones and Apple will have to cut the price.... and that why Bill Gates supports it"
I think Bill can afford one anyway... But the loss of Windows licence fees will make him glad they get cheaper  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Lmao funniest thing ive heard in a long time...
Simple statistics..
Take the entire human race and pop on one continent... Now give each person 1 house plus enough land to farm on...
Now to put it into some context if we did that, we would barely take up half of alaska... Now take a look at how much is left..and we are burning through resources???
Taken from a comdedian but true..."The governments drop depleated uranium over the planet, set off nuclear bombs in the ocean and what can i do to fix it????
A special lightbulb and a bag for life!!!"
We live in a world where we have a cure for 90% of cancers but its not in production, why? No money it it for pharmaceutical companies.
We live in a world where solar power is cutting edge with batteries to store a charge capable of sustaining 72 hours in one day alone... Not pushed because with it we wouldn't use gas, nuclear power or petrol!
Yet if they are looking at "depopulation" then surely it would make sense to actually push those advances so we would not use so many natural resources |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
This is all very interesting except it's total bollocks. The cancer statistic quoted is nonsense.
Keep up the good work.
https://ourworldindata.org/cancer#are-death-rates-from-cancer-rising |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"Ten years ago the cancer rate of people catching camcer was 1 in ten nowadays its 1 in 3. Whats going on ? "
Cancer isn't something that you catch, and I'm guessing that statistics aren't one of your strong points.
I think I may have, inadvertently, already replied to one of your conspiracy posts, today.
I think that I'll stop wasting my time, now. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
More people are developing cancer because...
1) people are living longer.
2) lifestyle, food, ect
3) pesticides....probably
Ect
Not because of the government.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
This is actually extremely alarming! 
120,000 done for out of 7,000,000,000 - a terrifying 0.017%!!!!
And someone less boring than me can work out how long it will take the population to get to 500,000,000 if 120,000 are vaccinated every 3 months from 7 billion.
Also, and I find this very suspenseful, is that ‘billion’ rhymes with ‘reptilian’ |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"All these strange theories..
Have you been reading the readers digest  "
No the United Nations agenda 21 resolution document under the programme chapter titled sustainable development programme of course the readers digest would have made lighter less worrying reading lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"More people are developing cancer because...
1) people are living longer.
2) lifestyle, food, ect
3) pesticides....probably
Ect
Not because of the government.
"
But who okays these poisonous cancer causing foods and pestacides if not government departments/ bodies themselves ? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *irthandgirthMan
over a year ago
Camberley occasionally doncaster |
"More people are developing cancer because...
1) people are living longer.
2) lifestyle, food, ect
3) pesticides....probably
Ect
Not because of the government.
But who okays these poisonous cancer causing foods and pestacides if not government departments/ bodies themselves ? "
We do (as a population) because we want cheap, long lasting food. Shelf life over everything |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *irthandgirthMan
over a year ago
Camberley occasionally doncaster |
Spike Milligan actually said in the late 60s that we need to reduce the population by 25%...
It was one of his rare serious moments.
Anyway OP. if you were in charge of the reduction what rules would you apply.. how would you decide who lived or died? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *VBethTV/TS
over a year ago
Chester |
I love a good conspiracy theory. I enjoy watching the obviously insane theorists videos. Usually chock full of men (it's always men) saying "FACT" a lot instead of actually providing any real ones.
Also the word sheeple must be used at least once to confirm that they are not in fact deranged but simply far more intelligent than the general population.
To slight misquote Sir Terry Pratchett, people are willing to believe in amazing governmental cover ups. Given governments crap track record in every other area, it's unlikely that any of them are covering up anything that huge!!  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"I’ve said ‘FACT’ twice this evening. The question that needs to be answered is: did I ask them in the gloaming or in the twilight? "
Gloaming. Twilight just make me think of sparkly vampures now
Nita |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
So, you are saying that killing off millions of 3rd world children is going to help feed everyone in America, save the rainforests, reduce plastic consumption?
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
