FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Sexual equality

Sexual equality

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

I was having a chat with a friend yesterday about swinging clubs and got onto the difference prices they charge and how it must be technically illegal under the gender equality act.

Can you think of anywhwere else where different prices are charged based on your sex or status and if this did happen elsewhere would it be considered as acceptable.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eal_curves_is_backWoman  over a year ago

London

Private clubs. Underrepresented categories. Debated ad nauseam.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It is more prevalent tham you think.

OAP and student rates are prevalent everywhere.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Private clubs. Underrepresented categories. Debated ad nauseam."

What's your point? If you're bored why post?

People can ask whatever they like within forum rules.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I was having a chat with a friend yesterday about swinging clubs and got onto the difference prices they charge and how it must be technically illegal under the gender equality act.

Can you think of anywhwere else where different prices are charged based on your sex or status and if this did happen elsewhere would it be considered as acceptable."

I don't consider it acceptable. It causes many issues.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

As has been said.

Private members clubs - basically can charge entry as they please

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I was having a chat with a friend yesterday about swinging clubs and got onto the difference prices they charge and how it must be technically illegal under the gender equality act.

Can you think of anywhwere else where different prices are charged based on your sex or status and if this did happen elsewhere would it be considered as acceptable."

Hairdressers for one.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *olieandSlaveCouple  over a year ago

Stafford


"It is more prevalent tham you think.

OAP and student rates are prevalent everywhere. "

Ooh, I wish clubs did student rates, I love a discount

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs"

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

"

So what’s your view on hair salons charging more for women than men?

Or are you not bothered because it works in your favour as a man?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

I dont know because i dont go to a salon. I go tona barbers where there is only 1 price for a haircut. Maybe someone should raise it and ask why

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

When was the last time a regular guy went to the barber and deviated from the...number 2 back n sides and shorter on top.

Women pay more because they expect more, and a damn sight better service than us filthy cave trolls

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

But going off how long my ex used to be in them i think thats a hourly rate charge

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *iversong321Woman  over a year ago

Preston/Merseyside


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

"

Nobody will ever challenge it. As mentioned this has been discussed to death. You may want to do a forum search on the subject as the legalities have been discussed. Private members clubs can give reductions to the category of people they want to attract.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *tonMessCouple  over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish

Night clubs often have ladies entry half price before 10pm.

Hairdressers charge 3 times more for a ladies cut.

Just as it is on this website, men will always outnumber the ladies and couples 10 fold. Clubs have to offer a cheaper entry fee to attract more ladies. Imagine if they didnt

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"When was the last time a regular guy went to the barber and deviated from the...number 2 back n sides and shorter on top.

Women pay more because they expect more, and a damn sight better service than us filthy cave trolls "

Real men go to unisex hair salons, not to barbers

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eal_curves_is_backWoman  over a year ago

London


"Private clubs. Underrepresented categories. Debated ad nauseam.

What's your point? If you're bored why post?

People can ask whatever they like within forum rules."

To refer them to earlier discussions.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onkeymagic50Man  over a year ago

Near the harbour


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs"

This 190%

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs"

Don't clubs limit the amount of men who can enter?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo


"When was the last time a regular guy went to the barber and deviated from the...number 2 back n sides and shorter on top.

Women pay more because they expect more, and a damn sight better service than us filthy cave trolls "

My hair gets more of a seeing to than if Mr Ruggers went to the hairdressers

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo


"Private clubs. Underrepresented categories. Debated ad nauseam.

What's your point? If you're bored why post?

People can ask whatever they like within forum rules.

To refer them to earlier discussions."

They don't have to. The forum would be empty if people can't ask the same question as was asked last year

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I have big boobs I pay more for my bras yes they use more material but it's still unfair why should I pay more for something I want lol xx

Clubs will and can charge what they like so yes it may seem unfair and for some it may seem discrimination. ...easy answer is dont go if you feel aggrieved simple xx

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo


"Night clubs often have ladies entry half price before 10pm.

Hairdressers charge 3 times more for a ladies cut.

Just as it is on this website, men will always outnumber the ladies and couples 10 fold. Clubs have to offer a cheaper entry fee to attract more ladies. Imagine if they didnt "

Do you think the women wouldn't go if they had to pay more?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS  over a year ago

Central

There will come a time when practices such as this are considered abhorrent bit the relics in government who progressed equality left some areas out of equality legislation, i.e. private members clubs, way back in the past.

Something is either acceptable or it isn't and if the way we organize business etc can't survive fair law, then something will eventually alter, so that every part of our culture operates in ways that are deemed acceptable.

Would it be right to charge ethnic minorities more to take the train or play golf? No! Should transgender people have to show their genitals, so that businesses determine what their admission price is? No!

Businesses don't have to wait for legal changes to force them to change, they can formulate systems that are just and fair. In 100 years differential pricing will be intolerable, like women being unable to vote with equality to men was a century ago.

I don't have the business model for these businesses to work but we definitely need to become a more decent society, where we stop discrimination and remove the get-outs that exist for many things that, amongst other things, support bigots.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

"

I don’t regard swingers clubs as primarily social events, and I do believe if the law were to change for swingers parties so that everyone were treated identically, there would be a disproportionate number of single men, similar to ratios to a greedy girls night. We used to organise private house parties. We didn’t charge, but we did not treat genders the same. We only invited men who we knew and liked, where any single lady enquiringly was an automatic yes. Couples landed somewhere in between. So ‘invite only’ is the other way controlling male numbers. Would men prefer that? I guess it would good for the men who got invited.

Mrs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"There will come a time when practices such as this are considered abhorrent bit the relics in government who progressed equality left some areas out of equality legislation, i.e. private members clubs, way back in the past.

Something is either acceptable or it isn't and if the way we organize business etc can't survive fair law, then something will eventually alter, so that every part of our culture operates in ways that are deemed acceptable.

Would it be right to charge ethnic minorities more to take the train or play golf? No! Should transgender people have to show their genitals, so that businesses determine what their admission price is? No!

Businesses don't have to wait for legal changes to force them to change, they can formulate systems that are just and fair. In 100 years differential pricing will be intolerable, like women being unable to vote with equality to men was a century ago.

I don't have the business model for these businesses to work but we definitely need to become a more decent society, where we stop discrimination and remove the get-outs that exist for many things that, amongst other things, support bigots."

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs"

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ust PeachyWoman  over a year ago

Prestonish


"Night clubs often have ladies entry half price before 10pm.

Hairdressers charge 3 times more for a ladies cut.

Just as it is on this website, men will always outnumber the ladies and couples 10 fold. Clubs have to offer a cheaper entry fee to attract more ladies. Imagine if they didnt

Do you think the women wouldn't go if they had to pay more?"

I can only speak for myself here - and yes - I’d still go but a lot less often due to financial restrictions.

Like many of the single fems on here I’m a single parent - and rightly or wrongly simply couldn’t afford to go to clubs more than once every couple of months if I had to pay the same as single guys. I’m guessing it would be the same for many women.

Hence the system would be fairer in effect - but you’d have so few women there that men would stop going too - and many clubs would end up shutting down!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo


"Night clubs often have ladies entry half price before 10pm.

Hairdressers charge 3 times more for a ladies cut.

Just as it is on this website, men will always outnumber the ladies and couples 10 fold. Clubs have to offer a cheaper entry fee to attract more ladies. Imagine if they didnt

Do you think the women wouldn't go if they had to pay more?

I can only speak for myself here - and yes - I’d still go but a lot less often due to financial restrictions.

Like many of the single fems on here I’m a single parent - and rightly or wrongly simply couldn’t afford to go to clubs more than once every couple of months if I had to pay the same as single guys. I’m guessing it would be the same for many women.

Hence the system would be fairer in effect - but you’d have so few women there that men would stop going too - and many clubs would end up shutting down! "

Thanks

So another question, do you think you are being used to attract men who will pay more to get in?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?"

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs"

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *tonMessCouple  over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish


"Night clubs often have ladies entry half price before 10pm.

Hairdressers charge 3 times more for a ladies cut.

Just as it is on this website, men will always outnumber the ladies and couples 10 fold. Clubs have to offer a cheaper entry fee to attract more ladies. Imagine if they didnt

Do you think the women wouldn't go if they had to pay more?"

Im not sure, i think more WILL go if the price is reduced. We like a bargin

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80 "

Serious question, and maybe many would prefer the other alternatives. Would you prefer a first come first serve system? Or would you prefer invite only? Or would you prefer to pay more than women? Those are the 3 possible ways of controlling male numbers. Each has their disadvantages.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs"

I am talking more about the charges.

The reason men seem to be charged more is because they say to limit the amount of men that enter, they do that anyway so the only reason I can see for them to charge more is to subsidise the women.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Night clubs often have ladies entry half price before 10pm.

Hairdressers charge 3 times more for a ladies cut.

Just as it is on this website, men will always outnumber the ladies and couples 10 fold. Clubs have to offer a cheaper entry fee to attract more ladies. Imagine if they didnt

Do you think the women wouldn't go if they had to pay more?

Im not sure, i think more WILL go if the price is reduced. We like a bargin "

Should charge by the volume of hair..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *tonMessCouple  over a year ago

Slough Windsor ish


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80 "

£80 for men? Where charges that much?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *09309309Woman  over a year ago

Dublin


"I was having a chat with a friend yesterday about swinging clubs and got onto the difference prices they charge and how it must be technically illegal under the gender equality act.

Can you think of anywhwere else where different prices are charged based on your sex or status and if this did happen elsewhere would it be considered as acceptable."

Beauty salons

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

"

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80

Serious question, and maybe many would prefer the other alternatives. Would you prefer a first come first serve system? Or would you prefer invite only? Or would you prefer to pay more than women? Those are the 3 possible ways of controlling male numbers. Each has their disadvantages. "

I think private parties have to be invite only, pick and choose both genders for the sake of the party but for Jesus sake charge same prices

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I am talking more about the charges.

The reason men seem to be charged more is because they say to limit the amount of men that enter, they do that anyway so the only reason I can see for them to charge more is to subsidise the women."

Yes so if this is deamed morally wrong for men who have to pay more, and women who are arguably being subsidised to attract men, then we need to look at alternatives to controlling male numbers. So my question is are those alternatives fair or practical. I don’t know.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80

£80 for men? Where charges that much?"

Everywhere mate

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80

Serious question, and maybe many would prefer the other alternatives. Would you prefer a first come first serve system? Or would you prefer invite only? Or would you prefer to pay more than women? Those are the 3 possible ways of controlling male numbers. Each has their disadvantages.

I think private parties have to be invite only, pick and choose both genders for the sake of the party but for Jesus sake charge same prices"

So what about clubs? How would you prefer male numbers to be controlled in clubs?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80

Serious question, and maybe many would prefer the other alternatives. Would you prefer a first come first serve system? Or would you prefer invite only? Or would you prefer to pay more than women? Those are the 3 possible ways of controlling male numbers. Each has their disadvantages.

I think private parties have to be invite only, pick and choose both genders for the sake of the party but for Jesus sake charge same prices

So what about clubs? How would you prefer male numbers to be controlled in clubs?"

Say male guest list is full

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oodnitegirlWoman  over a year ago

Yorkshire

Bit of a skewed point but can I throw sanitary towels in the mix

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80

£80 for men? Where charges that much?

Everywhere mate "

Not true.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Bit of a skewed point but can I throw sanitary towels in the mix "

No

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80

£80 for men? Where charges that much?

Everywhere mate "

We sometimes go to Eurekas with a male friend of ours. My husband and I pay £35 to get in and our friend pays £35 to get in. I guess effectively I’m getting in free, which I suppose isn’t fair. Nobody’s paying £80 though. If my husband and I had to pay £70 for 2 of us we wouldn’t go, or certainly not nearly as often, and I think a lot of couples would take that view. Maybe our friend should have paid £17.50. The question is then, could the club stay open if there were halving a lot of the fees. Secondly that might encourage more men to attend, hense tipping the ratios.

Mrs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lem-H-FandangoMan  over a year ago

salisbury

Vote with your feet.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *opsy RogersWoman  over a year ago

London


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80

£80 for men? Where charges that much?

Everywhere mate "

I’m off to a club tonight. It’s a tenner for ladies, £25 for couples and £40 for men.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Vote with your feet."

But the polling booth tables are really high and I’m just not that bendy.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80

£80 for men? Where charges that much?

Everywhere mate

I’m off to a club tonight. It’s a tenner for ladies, £25 for couples and £40 for men. "

It’s Wednesday that’s why maybe.. what club you going?. La boudoir is £80 if I’m not mistaking

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80

£80 for men? Where charges that much?

Everywhere mate "

And once again, you're talking out of your arse

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Real men go to unisex hair salons, not to barbers "

Allegedly real men use baby lotion to keep the egghead in pristine nick, have beards the like of which would make the mighty Odin quake in fear, have more tattoos than a Maori warchief and love kittens

Not sure you can perm a scalp.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80

Serious question, and maybe many would prefer the other alternatives. Would you prefer a first come first serve system? Or would you prefer invite only? Or would you prefer to pay more than women? Those are the 3 possible ways of controlling male numbers. Each has their disadvantages.

I think private parties have to be invite only, pick and choose both genders for the sake of the party but for Jesus sake charge same prices

So what about clubs? How would you prefer male numbers to be controlled in clubs?

Say male guest list is full "

I think what is needed is 2 types of clubs. Those that do ‘first come first serve’. And those who charge more for men. Then the men who don’t want to pay more can go to the ‘first come first serve’ and risk disappointment. And the men who just want to buy their ticket and have a guaranteed entry can go to the other option.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80

£80 for men? Where charges that much?

Everywhere mate

I’m off to a club tonight. It’s a tenner for ladies, £25 for couples and £40 for men.

It’s Wednesday that’s why maybe.. what club you going?. La boudoir is £80 if I’m not mistaking "

Le Boudoir is an expensive club. There are plenty of cheaper clubs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80

Serious question, and maybe many would prefer the other alternatives. Would you prefer a first come first serve system? Or would you prefer invite only? Or would you prefer to pay more than women? Those are the 3 possible ways of controlling male numbers. Each has their disadvantages.

I think private parties have to be invite only, pick and choose both genders for the sake of the party but for Jesus sake charge same prices

So what about clubs? How would you prefer male numbers to be controlled in clubs?

Say male guest list is full

I think what is needed is 2 types of clubs. Those that do ‘first come first serve’. And those who charge more for men. Then the men who don’t want to pay more can go to the ‘first come first serve’ and risk disappointment. And the men who just want to buy their ticket and have a guaranteed entry can go to the other option. "

And does that sound fair to you?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80

£80 for men? Where charges that much?

Everywhere mate

I’m off to a club tonight. It’s a tenner for ladies, £25 for couples and £40 for men.

It’s Wednesday that’s why maybe.. what club you going?. La boudoir is £80 if I’m not mistaking

Le Boudoir is an expensive club. There are plenty of cheaper clubs"

I’ve been looking at wrong clubs then lol

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80

£80 for men? Where charges that much?

Everywhere mate

And once again, you're talking out of your arse "

Just so you know I’m not going to have a conversation with you until you learn some manners

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs."

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

If they charge more for men then some men will expect a fuck for their money. They should just control it via numbers of guests and turn people away if the quota has been filled that night.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80

£80 for men? Where charges that much?

Everywhere mate

I’m off to a club tonight. It’s a tenner for ladies, £25 for couples and £40 for men.

It’s Wednesday that’s why maybe.. what club you going?. La boudoir is £80 if I’m not mistaking

Le Boudoir is an expensive club. There are plenty of cheaper clubs

I’ve been looking at wrong clubs then lol"

I’m not knocking Le Boudoir, but if you want something a bit more affordable, Eurekas is £35 for men and couples on a Saturday. The reason we like that club is because it’s one of the few that even allow single men on a Saturday night. (How to single men feel about not even being allow in when single women are welcome?)

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If they charge more for men then some men will expect a fuck for their money. They should just control it via numbers of guests and turn people away if the quota has been filled that night. "

Would men be happy to be turned away at the door? That doesn’t sound nice either. That sort of punishes the respectful guys who don’t expect a fuck for their money and just want to pay whatever it costs to guarantee their entry. And there will be some men who will prefer to do that.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win. "

I will pass that on to the swinging club owner although i think its unlikely many guys will want to take them to court lol. It would be interesting to follow it though.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London

As with any institution where the fundamental purpose is to facilitate people fucking, whether it's conventional nightclubs or a swingers club, theres an element of prostitution involved. Women are charged lower prices than men as the clubs essentially make their money providing men with women who are wanting to fuck. As long as there is a supply of such women, men will pay a premium price for that.

It would nice to think it possible to get events not based on that transnational premise, but as long as men wanting casual sex vastly outnumber women wanting the same, it will be very difficult.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win.

I will pass that on to the swinging club owner although i think its unlikely many guys will want to take them to court lol. It would be interesting to follow it though. "

Like conventional nightclubs, they rely on the fact that most blokes attending want a supply of women and realise that differential pricing means they get that and hence won't sue.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win.

I will pass that on to the swinging club owner although i think its unlikely many guys will want to take them to court lol. It would be interesting to follow it though. "

It would indeed be interesting if this were taken to court. I wonder what will happen to swing clubs as we know them today. Would men mind other methods being used to control male numbers? Would they really be happy to queue up outside a club with the risk of being turned away. Or having to book their ticket months in advance whilst women can buy their ticket at the last minute. Would these alternative methods to control male numbers soon be considered discriminatory?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win.

I will pass that on to the swinging club owner although i think its unlikely many guys will want to take them to court lol. It would be interesting to follow it though.

Like conventional nightclubs, they rely on the fact that most blokes attending want a supply of women and realise that differential pricing means they get that and hence won't sue. "

Indeed.

Also many men (in my over 13 year experience) are married and attend the clubs without their partners knowing so it would probably prove difficult to take the club owner to court without their partner knowing.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *opsy RogersWoman  over a year ago

London


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80

£80 for men? Where charges that much?

Everywhere mate

I’m off to a club tonight. It’s a tenner for ladies, £25 for couples and £40 for men.

It’s Wednesday that’s why maybe.. what club you going?. La boudoir is £80 if I’m not mistaking

Le Boudoir is an expensive club. There are plenty of cheaper clubs

I’ve been looking at wrong clubs then lol

I’m not knocking Le Boudoir, but if you want something a bit more affordable, Eurekas is £35 for men and couples on a Saturday. The reason we like that club is because it’s one of the few that even allow single men on a Saturday night. (How to single men feel about not even being allow in when single women are welcome?)"

Wednesday is Mature Mischief night at Liberty Elite, other party nights are more expensive.

I don’t go to clubs on nights that don’t have single men in as I’m straight and playing with the male half of a couple doesn’t usually work.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win.

I will pass that on to the swinging club owner although i think its unlikely many guys will want to take them to court lol. It would be interesting to follow it though.

It would indeed be interesting if this were taken to court. I wonder what will happen to swing clubs as we know them today. Would men mind other methods being used to control male numbers? Would they really be happy to queue up outside a club with the risk of being turned away. Or having to book their ticket months in advance whilst women can buy their ticket at the last minute. Would these alternative methods to control male numbers soon be considered discriminatory? "

All of the examples you give would also be unlawful. Any difference in treatment in provision of goods or services based on sex is, in principle, unlawful.

It would be interesting to see what would happen to clubs were compelled to practice sex equality.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win.

I will pass that on to the swinging club owner although i think its unlikely many guys will want to take them to court lol. It would be interesting to follow it though.

It would indeed be interesting if this were taken to court. I wonder what will happen to swing clubs as we know them today. Would men mind other methods being used to control male numbers? Would they really be happy to queue up outside a club with the risk of being turned away. Or having to book their ticket months in advance whilst women can buy their ticket at the last minute. Would these alternative methods to control male numbers soon be considered discriminatory?

All of the examples you give would also be unlawful. Any difference in treatment in provision of goods or services based on sex is, in principle, unlawful.

It would be interesting to see what would happen to clubs were compelled to practice sex equality. "

So what we are saying is that there is no lawful method to control male numbers in swing clubs? Every method contravenes equal opportunities laws?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *amissCouple  over a year ago

chelmsford


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?"

This I don't agree that men should pay more. We should all pay the same, it's up to the club to control numbers of single men they admit.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win.

I will pass that on to the swinging club owner although i think its unlikely many guys will want to take them to court lol. It would be interesting to follow it though.

It would indeed be interesting if this were taken to court. I wonder what will happen to swing clubs as we know them today. Would men mind other methods being used to control male numbers? Would they really be happy to queue up outside a club with the risk of being turned away. Or having to book their ticket months in advance whilst women can buy their ticket at the last minute. Would these alternative methods to control male numbers soon be considered discriminatory?

All of the examples you give would also be unlawful. Any difference in treatment in provision of goods or services based on sex is, in principle, unlawful.

It would be interesting to see what would happen to clubs were compelled to practice sex equality.

So what we are saying is that there is no lawful method to control male numbers in swing clubs? Every method contravenes equal opportunities laws?

"

Allowing equal number of men and women doesn’t interfere with equal opportunities laws.. please correct me if we have any lawyers here

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win.

I will pass that on to the swinging club owner although i think its unlikely many guys will want to take them to court lol. It would be interesting to follow it though.

It would indeed be interesting if this were taken to court. I wonder what will happen to swing clubs as we know them today. Would men mind other methods being used to control male numbers? Would they really be happy to queue up outside a club with the risk of being turned away. Or having to book their ticket months in advance whilst women can buy their ticket at the last minute. Would these alternative methods to control male numbers soon be considered discriminatory?

All of the examples you give would also be unlawful. Any difference in treatment in provision of goods or services based on sex is, in principle, unlawful.

It would be interesting to see what would happen to clubs were compelled to practice sex equality.

So what we are saying is that there is no lawful method to control male numbers in swing clubs? Every method contravenes equal opportunities laws?

"

Exactly. The phrase "controlling male numbers" is itself discriminatory and, it might be thought, rather dehumanising.

Look at it this way. Far more football fans are male than female. We wouldn't talk about controlling the number of male football fans by charging men higher prices.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *amissCouple  over a year ago

chelmsford


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win.

I will pass that on to the swinging club owner although i think its unlikely many guys will want to take them to court lol. It would be interesting to follow it though.

It would indeed be interesting if this were taken to court. I wonder what will happen to swing clubs as we know them today. Would men mind other methods being used to control male numbers? Would they really be happy to queue up outside a club with the risk of being turned away. Or having to book their ticket months in advance whilst women can buy their ticket at the last minute. Would these alternative methods to control male numbers soon be considered discriminatory?

All of the examples you give would also be unlawful. Any difference in treatment in provision of goods or services based on sex is, in principle, unlawful.

It would be interesting to see what would happen to clubs were compelled to practice sex equality.

So what we are saying is that there is no lawful method to control male numbers in swing clubs? Every method contravenes equal opportunities laws?

"

I would think that any club, swinging or otherwise has the right to refuse admission.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *amissCouple  over a year ago

chelmsford

In the club's we attend whilst on holiday, they clearly state the amount of single guys they allow in. It's their club, so it's up to them who they let in

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win.

I will pass that on to the swinging club owner although i think its unlikely many guys will want to take them to court lol. It would be interesting to follow it though.

It would indeed be interesting if this were taken to court. I wonder what will happen to swing clubs as we know them today. Would men mind other methods being used to control male numbers? Would they really be happy to queue up outside a club with the risk of being turned away. Or having to book their ticket months in advance whilst women can buy their ticket at the last minute. Would these alternative methods to control male numbers soon be considered discriminatory?

All of the examples you give would also be unlawful. Any difference in treatment in provision of goods or services based on sex is, in principle, unlawful.

It would be interesting to see what would happen to clubs were compelled to practice sex equality.

So what we are saying is that there is no lawful method to control male numbers in swing clubs? Every method contravenes equal opportunities laws?

I would think that any club, swinging or otherwise has the right to refuse admission."

It's unlawful to refuse admission on the grounds of sex.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ust PeachyWoman  over a year ago

Prestonish


"Night clubs often have ladies entry half price before 10pm.

Hairdressers charge 3 times more for a ladies cut.

Just as it is on this website, men will always outnumber the ladies and couples 10 fold. Clubs have to offer a cheaper entry fee to attract more ladies. Imagine if they didnt

Do you think the women wouldn't go if they had to pay more?

I can only speak for myself here - and yes - I’d still go but a lot less often due to financial restrictions.

Like many of the single fems on here I’m a single parent - and rightly or wrongly simply couldn’t afford to go to clubs more than once every couple of months if I had to pay the same as single guys. I’m guessing it would be the same for many women.

Hence the system would be fairer in effect - but you’d have so few women there that men would stop going too - and many clubs would end up shutting down!

Thanks

So another question, do you think you are being used to attract men who will pay more to get in?"

Yes - absolutely!!

Single fems are in high demand (with guys and many couples) in clubs the same as they are on fab!

I really can’t see the situation changing unless we have an influx of single fems in swinging! I do think it’s happening slowly - particularly with the younger generation who tend to be less judgemental towards female sexuality- but not nearly enough to satisfy current demand.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"Night clubs often have ladies entry half price before 10pm.

Hairdressers charge 3 times more for a ladies cut.

Just as it is on this website, men will always outnumber the ladies and couples 10 fold. Clubs have to offer a cheaper entry fee to attract more ladies. Imagine if they didnt

Do you think the women wouldn't go if they had to pay more?

I can only speak for myself here - and yes - I’d still go but a lot less often due to financial restrictions.

Like many of the single fems on here I’m a single parent - and rightly or wrongly simply couldn’t afford to go to clubs more than once every couple of months if I had to pay the same as single guys. I’m guessing it would be the same for many women.

Hence the system would be fairer in effect - but you’d have so few women there that men would stop going too - and many clubs would end up shutting down!

Thanks

So another question, do you think you are being used to attract men who will pay more to get in?

Yes - absolutely!!

Single fems are in high demand (with guys and many couples) in clubs the same as they are on fab!

I really can’t see the situation changing unless we have an influx of single fems in swinging! I do think it’s happening slowly - particularly with the younger generation who tend to be less judgemental towards female sexuality- but not nearly enough to satisfy current demand.

"

Indeed.

The uncomfortable truth, is that if you were just paying for access to the club and its facilities, no one would dream of justifying differential pricing, just like no one would dream of justifying it in the case of football matches, where the clientele is also mainly male.

What men are actually paying a premium for is access to sexually available women. The demand for them exceeds supply, hence the price goes up.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win.

I will pass that on to the swinging club owner although i think its unlikely many guys will want to take them to court lol. It would be interesting to follow it though.

It would indeed be interesting if this were taken to court. I wonder what will happen to swing clubs as we know them today. Would men mind other methods being used to control male numbers? Would they really be happy to queue up outside a club with the risk of being turned away. Or having to book their ticket months in advance whilst women can buy their ticket at the last minute. Would these alternative methods to control male numbers soon be considered discriminatory?

All of the examples you give would also be unlawful. Any difference in treatment in provision of goods or services based on sex is, in principle, unlawful.

It would be interesting to see what would happen to clubs were compelled to practice sex equality.

So what we are saying is that there is no lawful method to control male numbers in swing clubs? Every method contravenes equal opportunities laws?

Allowing equal number of men and women doesn’t interfere with equal opportunities laws.. please correct me if we have any lawyers here "

Not sure. I think it’s the methods employed to achieve those equal numbers that are erguably discriminatory. I mean it’s not going to look nice having men getting turned away at the door whilst women and couples get in. And besides many clubs will set ratio that is not 50:50. Eg I think the best male:female ratio for a swing party is 4:3 in favour of men. But I’m being discriminatory by setting gender quotas. I wouldn’t do that in any other walk of life.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win.

I will pass that on to the swinging club owner although i think its unlikely many guys will want to take them to court lol. It would be interesting to follow it though.

It would indeed be interesting if this were taken to court. I wonder what will happen to swing clubs as we know them today. Would men mind other methods being used to control male numbers? Would they really be happy to queue up outside a club with the risk of being turned away. Or having to book their ticket months in advance whilst women can buy their ticket at the last minute. Would these alternative methods to control male numbers soon be considered discriminatory?

All of the examples you give would also be unlawful. Any difference in treatment in provision of goods or services based on sex is, in principle, unlawful.

It would be interesting to see what would happen to clubs were compelled to practice sex equality.

So what we are saying is that there is no lawful method to control male numbers in swing clubs? Every method contravenes equal opportunities laws?

Allowing equal number of men and women doesn’t interfere with equal opportunities laws.. please correct me if we have any lawyers here "

I am a lawyer and it would depend on whether the treatment accorded to a sex was "less favourable" . I think you are right that having a certain number of places available divided equally by sex would not be seen as less favourable treatment.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win.

I will pass that on to the swinging club owner although i think its unlikely many guys will want to take them to court lol. It would be interesting to follow it though.

It would indeed be interesting if this were taken to court. I wonder what will happen to swing clubs as we know them today. Would men mind other methods being used to control male numbers? Would they really be happy to queue up outside a club with the risk of being turned away. Or having to book their ticket months in advance whilst women can buy their ticket at the last minute. Would these alternative methods to control male numbers soon be considered discriminatory?

All of the examples you give would also be unlawful. Any difference in treatment in provision of goods or services based on sex is, in principle, unlawful.

It would be interesting to see what would happen to clubs were compelled to practice sex equality.

So what we are saying is that there is no lawful method to control male numbers in swing clubs? Every method contravenes equal opportunities laws?

Allowing equal number of men and women doesn’t interfere with equal opportunities laws.. please correct me if we have any lawyers here

I am a lawyer and it would depend on whether the treatment accorded to a sex was "less favourable" . I think you are right that having a certain number of places available divided equally by sex would not be seen as less favourable treatment. "

But would the methods adopted to achieve these equal numbers be considered discriminatory?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Its presumably discrimination to allow single ladies into a club on couples night when single men are not allowed?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ifty grades of shadyCouple  over a year ago

Carisbrooke, Isle of Wight

Maybe the Fab supporters fees should adopt a similar policy

Just joking

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *amissCouple  over a year ago

chelmsford


"Its presumably discrimination to allow single ladies into a club on couples night when single men are not allowed?"

I was wondering this too

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win.

I will pass that on to the swinging club owner although i think its unlikely many guys will want to take them to court lol. It would be interesting to follow it though.

It would indeed be interesting if this were taken to court. I wonder what will happen to swing clubs as we know them today. Would men mind other methods being used to control male numbers? Would they really be happy to queue up outside a club with the risk of being turned away. Or having to book their ticket months in advance whilst women can buy their ticket at the last minute. Would these alternative methods to control male numbers soon be considered discriminatory?

All of the examples you give would also be unlawful. Any difference in treatment in provision of goods or services based on sex is, in principle, unlawful.

It would be interesting to see what would happen to clubs were compelled to practice sex equality.

So what we are saying is that there is no lawful method to control male numbers in swing clubs? Every method contravenes equal opportunities laws?

Allowing equal number of men and women doesn’t interfere with equal opportunities laws.. please correct me if we have any lawyers here

I am a lawyer and it would depend on whether the treatment accorded to a sex was "less favourable" . I think you are right that having a certain number of places available divided equally by sex would not be seen as less favourable treatment.

But would the methods adopted to achieve these equal numbers be considered discriminatory?"

If you say there a hundred tickets available and fifty will go to men and fifty to women and the first fifty of both sex who turn up get the tickets, then I don't think that would be less favourable treatment to either sex.

You'd argue that it was akin to say, a ballroom dancing event, the activity is such that an equal number of men and women are required and as long as men and women are admitted on equal terms, there is no discrimination.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"Its presumably discrimination to allow single ladies into a club on couples night when single men are not allowed?"

It is.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *amissCouple  over a year ago

chelmsford


"Its presumably discrimination to allow single ladies into a club on couples night when single men are not allowed?

It is. "

Thank you

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Indeed.

The uncomfortable truth, is that if you were just paying for access to the club and its facilities, no one would dream of justifying differential pricing, just like no one would dream of justifying it in the case of football matches, where the clientele is also mainly male.

What men are actually paying a premium for is access to sexually available women. The demand for them exceeds supply, hence the price goes up. "

That is the bottom line. It's based on men paying for the increased chance of having sex.

Men have always been more likely to pay for sex than women. Clubs just take advantage of this.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"

Indeed.

The uncomfortable truth, is that if you were just paying for access to the club and its facilities, no one would dream of justifying differential pricing, just like no one would dream of justifying it in the case of football matches, where the clientele is also mainly male.

What men are actually paying a premium for is access to sexually available women. The demand for them exceeds supply, hence the price goes up.

That is the bottom line. It's based on men paying for the increased chance of having sex.

Men have always been more likely to pay for sex than women. Clubs just take advantage of this. "

Which is why I don't think clubs would get anywhere trying to argue differential pricing doesn't breach equality law. The differential pricing is actually akin to prostitution.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win.

I will pass that on to the swinging club owner although i think its unlikely many guys will want to take them to court lol. It would be interesting to follow it though.

It would indeed be interesting if this were taken to court. I wonder what will happen to swing clubs as we know them today. Would men mind other methods being used to control male numbers? Would they really be happy to queue up outside a club with the risk of being turned away. Or having to book their ticket months in advance whilst women can buy their ticket at the last minute. Would these alternative methods to control male numbers soon be considered discriminatory?

All of the examples you give would also be unlawful. Any difference in treatment in provision of goods or services based on sex is, in principle, unlawful.

It would be interesting to see what would happen to clubs were compelled to practice sex equality.

So what we are saying is that there is no lawful method to control male numbers in swing clubs? Every method contravenes equal opportunities laws?

Allowing equal number of men and women doesn’t interfere with equal opportunities laws.. please correct me if we have any lawyers here

I am a lawyer and it would depend on whether the treatment accorded to a sex was "less favourable" . I think you are right that having a certain number of places available divided equally by sex would not be seen as less favourable treatment.

But would the methods adopted to achieve these equal numbers be considered discriminatory?

If you say there a hundred tickets available and fifty will go to men and fifty to women and the first fifty of both sex who turn up get the tickets, then I don't think that would be less favourable treatment to either sex.

You'd argue that it was akin to say, a ballroom dancing event, the activity is such that an equal number of men and women are required and as long as men and women are admitted on equal terms, there is no discrimination. "

That’s fine. But would this work in reality? Are men happy to book their tickets well in advance before they get sold out? Or queue up outside a club so they can get in moment the doors open before all the male tickets get sold out. We went to a club with our male friend on a Saturday. We turned up about 9 and there was no worry about our friend getting in. Would he have preferred to have to turned up early and risk not getting in, or have to book his ticket in advance? I don’t know, I’d have to ask him. Knowing him I suspect he would prefer to pay a bit more in order to guarantee his entry and to have the freedom to turn up when it suits him. We have to be very careful what we wish for if sexual discrimination laws are to be applied to the swing scene.

Mrs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win.

I will pass that on to the swinging club owner although i think its unlikely many guys will want to take them to court lol. It would be interesting to follow it though.

It would indeed be interesting if this were taken to court. I wonder what will happen to swing clubs as we know them today. Would men mind other methods being used to control male numbers? Would they really be happy to queue up outside a club with the risk of being turned away. Or having to book their ticket months in advance whilst women can buy their ticket at the last minute. Would these alternative methods to control male numbers soon be considered discriminatory?

All of the examples you give would also be unlawful. Any difference in treatment in provision of goods or services based on sex is, in principle, unlawful.

It would be interesting to see what would happen to clubs were compelled to practice sex equality.

So what we are saying is that there is no lawful method to control male numbers in swing clubs? Every method contravenes equal opportunities laws?

Allowing equal number of men and women doesn’t interfere with equal opportunities laws.. please correct me if we have any lawyers here

I am a lawyer and it would depend on whether the treatment accorded to a sex was "less favourable" . I think you are right that having a certain number of places available divided equally by sex would not be seen as less favourable treatment.

But would the methods adopted to achieve these equal numbers be considered discriminatory?

If you say there a hundred tickets available and fifty will go to men and fifty to women and the first fifty of both sex who turn up get the tickets, then I don't think that would be less favourable treatment to either sex.

You'd argue that it was akin to say, a ballroom dancing event, the activity is such that an equal number of men and women are required and as long as men and women are admitted on equal terms, there is no discrimination.

That’s fine. But would this work in reality? Are men happy to book their tickets well in advance before they get sold out? Or queue up outside a club so they can get in moment the doors open before all the male tickets get sold out. We went to a club with our male friend on a Saturday. We turned up about 9 and there was no worry about our friend getting in. Would he have preferred to have to turned up early and risk not getting in, or have to book his ticket in advance? I don’t know, I’d have to ask him. Knowing him I suspect he would prefer to pay a bit more in order to guarantee his entry and to have the freedom to turn up when it suits him. We have to be very careful what we wish for if sexual discrimination laws are to be applied to the swing scene.

Mrs"

Pragmatically, things are going to carry on pretty much as they always have done as it is unlikely any man will ever sue.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win.

I will pass that on to the swinging club owner although i think its unlikely many guys will want to take them to court lol. It would be interesting to follow it though.

It would indeed be interesting if this were taken to court. I wonder what will happen to swing clubs as we know them today. Would men mind other methods being used to control male numbers? Would they really be happy to queue up outside a club with the risk of being turned away. Or having to book their ticket months in advance whilst women can buy their ticket at the last minute. Would these alternative methods to control male numbers soon be considered discriminatory?

All of the examples you give would also be unlawful. Any difference in treatment in provision of goods or services based on sex is, in principle, unlawful.

It would be interesting to see what would happen to clubs were compelled to practice sex equality.

So what we are saying is that there is no lawful method to control male numbers in swing clubs? Every method contravenes equal opportunities laws?

Allowing equal number of men and women doesn’t interfere with equal opportunities laws.. please correct me if we have any lawyers here

I am a lawyer and it would depend on whether the treatment accorded to a sex was "less favourable" . I think you are right that having a certain number of places available divided equally by sex would not be seen as less favourable treatment.

But would the methods adopted to achieve these equal numbers be considered discriminatory?

If you say there a hundred tickets available and fifty will go to men and fifty to women and the first fifty of both sex who turn up get the tickets, then I don't think that would be less favourable treatment to either sex.

You'd argue that it was akin to say, a ballroom dancing event, the activity is such that an equal number of men and women are required and as long as men and women are admitted on equal terms, there is no discrimination.

That’s fine. But would this work in reality? Are men happy to book their tickets well in advance before they get sold out? Or queue up outside a club so they can get in moment the doors open before all the male tickets get sold out. We went to a club with our male friend on a Saturday. We turned up about 9 and there was no worry about our friend getting in. Would he have preferred to have to turned up early and risk not getting in, or have to book his ticket in advance? I don’t know, I’d have to ask him. Knowing him I suspect he would prefer to pay a bit more in order to guarantee his entry and to have the freedom to turn up when it suits him. We have to be very careful what we wish for if sexual discrimination laws are to be applied to the swing scene.

Mrs

Pragmatically, things are going to carry on pretty much as they always have done as it is unlikely any man will ever sue. "

But if the law did crack down on this, how will the swing scene look. Will men be happier with the new situation? Will swing clubs be just as good? Just talking hypothetically.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

Its not ilegal as they are private members clubs.

Of by "illegal" you mean a criminal offence, no discrimination is illegal as it is not a crime.

It is, however, unlawful for someone offering goods or services to the public or a section of the public to charge differential prices to events based on sex. What that means is that someone could sue in the civil courts and obtain compensation for sex discrimination if they were disadvantaged by it.

The only exceptions to this are

1. If it is a private members club with 25 or fewer members.

2. If a sexs, participation in an activity is disproportionately low, proportionate means can be taken to encourage its participation in that activity .

As virtually every swinging club has more than 25 members, 1 doesn't apply. 2 is what club owners often argue, but I don't think it would succeed if argued in court.

The crux is the phrase "proportionate means". I think a court would be very reluctant to endorse differential pricing in this way as it would open all sorts of floodgates. For example, black people are certainly disproportionately unrepresented amongst football fans. If this argument were right., it would be lawful for clubs to charge black people lower prices for tickets.

Long story short, if a man sued a swingers club he would probably win.

I will pass that on to the swinging club owner although i think its unlikely many guys will want to take them to court lol. It would be interesting to follow it though.

It would indeed be interesting if this were taken to court. I wonder what will happen to swing clubs as we know them today. Would men mind other methods being used to control male numbers? Would they really be happy to queue up outside a club with the risk of being turned away. Or having to book their ticket months in advance whilst women can buy their ticket at the last minute. Would these alternative methods to control male numbers soon be considered discriminatory?

All of the examples you give would also be unlawful. Any difference in treatment in provision of goods or services based on sex is, in principle, unlawful.

It would be interesting to see what would happen to clubs were compelled to practice sex equality.

So what we are saying is that there is no lawful method to control male numbers in swing clubs? Every method contravenes equal opportunities laws?

Allowing equal number of men and women doesn’t interfere with equal opportunities laws.. please correct me if we have any lawyers here

I am a lawyer and it would depend on whether the treatment accorded to a sex was "less favourable" . I think you are right that having a certain number of places available divided equally by sex would not be seen as less favourable treatment.

But would the methods adopted to achieve these equal numbers be considered discriminatory?

If you say there a hundred tickets available and fifty will go to men and fifty to women and the first fifty of both sex who turn up get the tickets, then I don't think that would be less favourable treatment to either sex.

You'd argue that it was akin to say, a ballroom dancing event, the activity is such that an equal number of men and women are required and as long as men and women are admitted on equal terms, there is no discrimination.

That’s fine. But would this work in reality? Are men happy to book their tickets well in advance before they get sold out? Or queue up outside a club so they can get in moment the doors open before all the male tickets get sold out. We went to a club with our male friend on a Saturday. We turned up about 9 and there was no worry about our friend getting in. Would he have preferred to have to turned up early and risk not getting in, or have to book his ticket in advance? I don’t know, I’d have to ask him. Knowing him I suspect he would prefer to pay a bit more in order to guarantee his entry and to have the freedom to turn up when it suits him. We have to be very careful what we wish for if sexual discrimination laws are to be applied to the swing scene.

Mrs

Pragmatically, things are going to carry on pretty much as they always have done as it is unlikely any man will ever sue.

But if the law did crack down on this, how will the swing scene look. Will men be happier with the new situation? Will swing clubs be just as good? Just talking hypothetically. "

The law can't crack down. Discrimination is not a criminal offence. It is up to individuals disadvantaged by the law to bring civil proceedings.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

People who are 'happy' with the status quo often argue that changes wouldn't work in reality because in this instance, sexual equality would likely mean either less women or lots more men.

Clubs need to sell a perceived environment of 'sexual women', if not then the men themselves will stop buying.

The law doesn't care about this inconvenience. Like everything else, clubs will just find another way to make money.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"People who are 'happy' with the status quo often argue that changes wouldn't work in reality because in this instance, sexual equality would likely mean either less women or lots more men.

Clubs need to sell a perceived environment of 'sexual women', if not then the men themselves will stop buying.

The law doesn't care about this inconvenience. Like everything else, clubs will just find another way to make money.

"

I guess the way to ascertain whether the more ethical approach would work is to look at examples of when it’s been done before. I’ve no doubt there must have been clubs where the organisers charged an equal amount and admitted equal numbers of men and women. So this this work? I don’t know. But there’s nothing to stop people setting up their own clubs and taking more ethical approach.

Mrs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Pragmatically, things are going to carry on pretty much as they always have done as it is unlikely any man will ever sue. "

The change is likely to come from other women. Many people who are not necessarily part of swinging would see swinging clubs as being akin to prostitution. Get the women in cheap to attract the men in a place where people go to have sex.

It only takes the press to cotton onto this and start a campaigns before some women take up the flag.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"

Pragmatically, things are going to carry on pretty much as they always have done as it is unlikely any man will ever sue.

The change is likely to come from other women. Many people who are not necessarily part of swinging would see swinging clubs as being akin to prostitution. Get the women in cheap to attract the men in a place where people go to have sex.

It only takes the press to cotton onto this and start a campaigns before some women take up the flag."

That could well happen. You can quite easily spin swinging clubs as that far off brothels and the fact that men may premium prices for access to women would be Exhibit A in that view.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The two genders aren't treated equal hence why women aren't charged as much, same reason why there are so many men on here compared to women.

Promiscuous men are celebrated while promiscuous women are scorned.

Think there should be more done to tackle ACTUAL gender equality than guys moaning about club prices.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Pragmatically, things are going to carry on pretty much as they always have done as it is unlikely any man will ever sue.

The change is likely to come from other women. Many people who are not necessarily part of swinging would see swinging clubs as being akin to prostitution. Get the women in cheap to attract the men in a place where people go to have sex.

It only takes the press to cotton onto this and start a campaigns before some women take up the flag.

That could well happen. You can quite easily spin swinging clubs as that far off brothels and the fact that men may premium prices for access to women would be Exhibit A in that view. "

Well if everybody universally accepts that swingers clubs are brothels and women who attend are prostetutes, then that will very sadly be the end of swingers clubs as we know them

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *entileschiWoman  over a year ago

Norwich

A lot of couples go to clubs and they pay. Not exactly equal I'll grant you, but a friendly, lively club needs a mix of people and provides a great night out. Everyone's a winner.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

This is why I like the private parties and big house party nights... There's a guest list of couples and women and select men who are verified and understand the etiquette of the swinging world. I personally feel far safer as a single woman going to a swingers party than to any vanilla club because of this reason.

If the guys on here realised the types of messages we get sometimes from men and the abuse...then they'd quickly understand why these boundaries are in place xx

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"

The two genders aren't treated equal hence why women aren't charged as much, same reason why there are so many men on here compared to women.

Promiscuous men are celebrated while promiscuous women are scorned.

Think there should be more done to tackle ACTUAL gender equality than guys moaning about club prices."

The argument is that differential pricing is part of that gender in equality. That given that no "respectable" woman would fuck strangers, men have to pay premium prices for access to the few who will.

If there wasn't an atmosphere of the men buying the women more "respectable" women would get involved.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Whereas I understand the pricing is not fair, and I am sceptical about whether the alternatives would be successful. Now that prostitution has been brought up, that makes me even more sceptical about lowering the prices for men. A lot of guys will attend these establishments because they feel it is cheaper than hiring an escort. I flatter myself to say that I am very good at avoiding such men in clubs and I try to only play with those men who, like me, have chosen swinging as a lifestyle choice. I wonder if the more expensive a club is for single men, it will dissuade the guys who are looking for a cheaper option than a prostitute. I mean there’s no point in paying £100 for a club if a prostitute costs the same and is guaranteed sex. Lower the prices and it becomes a more attractive option for men who might otherwise pay for sex.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *amissCouple  over a year ago

chelmsford


"Whereas I understand the pricing is not fair, and I am sceptical about whether the alternatives would be successful. Now that prostitution has been brought up, that makes me even more sceptical about lowering the prices for men. A lot of guys will attend these establishments because they feel it is cheaper than hiring an escort. I flatter myself to say that I am very good at avoiding such men in clubs and I try to only play with those men who, like me, have chosen swinging as a lifestyle choice. I wonder if the more expensive a club is for single men, it will dissuade the guys who are looking for a cheaper option than a prostitute. I mean there’s no point in paying £100 for a club if a prostitute costs the same and is guaranteed sex. Lower the prices and it becomes a more attractive option for men who might otherwise pay for sex. "

Yes, that makes sense. I suppose with any club, some men will be respectful and others feel entitled because they've paid to get in

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"Whereas I understand the pricing is not fair, and I am sceptical about whether the alternatives would be successful. Now that prostitution has been brought up, that makes me even more sceptical about lowering the prices for men. A lot of guys will attend these establishments because they feel it is cheaper than hiring an escort. I flatter myself to say that I am very good at avoiding such men in clubs and I try to only play with those men who, like me, have chosen swinging as a lifestyle choice. I wonder if the more expensive a club is for single men, it will dissuade the guys who are looking for a cheaper option than a prostitute. I mean there’s no point in paying £100 for a club if a prostitute costs the same and is guaranteed sex. Lower the prices and it becomes a more attractive option for men who might otherwise pay for sex. "

You are missing the fact that in swingers club you are actually having sex with women who you are not personally paying for sex. Hence much less social stigma for me. And much less social stigma the less the pricing is akin to sex work.

Put it this way, if a man is looking for paid sex and sees men are charged much more than women, he will see that as him buying women and expecting sex for his money. If prices are the same, it's less likely he will view it that way.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *eal_curves_is_backWoman  over a year ago

London


"Night clubs often have ladies entry half price before 10pm.

Hairdressers charge 3 times more for a ladies cut.

Just as it is on this website, men will always outnumber the ladies and couples 10 fold. Clubs have to offer a cheaper entry fee to attract more ladies. Imagine if they didnt

Do you think the women wouldn't go if they had to pay more?

I can only speak for myself here - and yes - I’d still go but a lot less often due to financial restrictions.

Like many of the single fems on here I’m a single parent - and rightly or wrongly simply couldn’t afford to go to clubs more than once every couple of months if I had to pay the same as single guys. I’m guessing it would be the same for many women.

Hence the system would be fairer in effect - but you’d have so few women there that men would stop going too - and many clubs would end up shutting down!

Thanks

So another question, do you think you are being used to attract men who will pay more to get in?

Yes - absolutely!!

Single fems are in high demand (with guys and many couples) in clubs the same as they are on fab!

I really can’t see the situation changing unless we have an influx of single fems in swinging! I do think it’s happening slowly - particularly with the younger generation who tend to be less judgemental towards female sexuality- but not nearly enough to satisfy current demand.

Indeed.

The uncomfortable truth, is that if you were just paying for access to the club and its facilities, no one would dream of justifying differential pricing, just like no one would dream of justifying it in the case of football matches, where the clientele is also mainly male.

What men are actually paying a premium for is access to sexually available women. The demand for them exceeds supply, hence the price goes up. "

To *potentially* sexually available women. Ask men how many times women said no to them.

By the way, it is the same at parties and spas: women's entry is either free or cheaper than men's. At spas, a lot of women are not even trying to have sex but are still charged less than men.

IMHO, men are welcome to pay for their dreams and misconceptions but once in, it may not be easy for them at all.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Whereas I understand the pricing is not fair, and I am sceptical about whether the alternatives would be successful. Now that prostitution has been brought up, that makes me even more sceptical about lowering the prices for men. A lot of guys will attend these establishments because they feel it is cheaper than hiring an escort. I flatter myself to say that I am very good at avoiding such men in clubs and I try to only play with those men who, like me, have chosen swinging as a lifestyle choice. I wonder if the more expensive a club is for single men, it will dissuade the guys who are looking for a cheaper option than a prostitute. I mean there’s no point in paying £100 for a club if a prostitute costs the same and is guaranteed sex. Lower the prices and it becomes a more attractive option for men who might otherwise pay for sex. "

I agree that the business model of clubs is selling the chance to have sex with the women it has attracted at a reduced price to higher paying men.

That technically isn't prostitution so the women don't have the stigma of being prostitutes and the men wouldn't have the stigma of openly using prostitutes.

My point is that some men would probably pay more for sex in a club environment than a brothel environment in order to avoid the stigma. Making clubs even more expensive just for guys would probably just increase the expectation of definitely having sex.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Whereas I understand the pricing is not fair, and I am sceptical about whether the alternatives would be successful. Now that prostitution has been brought up, that makes me even more sceptical about lowering the prices for men. A lot of guys will attend these establishments because they feel it is cheaper than hiring an escort. I flatter myself to say that I am very good at avoiding such men in clubs and I try to only play with those men who, like me, have chosen swinging as a lifestyle choice. I wonder if the more expensive a club is for single men, it will dissuade the guys who are looking for a cheaper option than a prostitute. I mean there’s no point in paying £100 for a club if a prostitute costs the same and is guaranteed sex. Lower the prices and it becomes a more attractive option for men who might otherwise pay for sex.

You are missing the fact that in swingers club you are actually having sex with women who you are not personally paying for sex. Hence much less social stigma for me. And much less social stigma the less the pricing is akin to sex work.

Put it this way, if a man is looking for paid sex and sees men are charged much more than women, he will see that as him buying women and expecting sex for his money. If prices are the same, it's less likely he will view it that way. "

You beat me to it and said it more succinctly.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

Taken from the cab website...

What is sex discrimination

Sex discrimination is when you are treated unfairly either because you are a man or because you are a woman.

If sex discrimination takes place in any of the following situations it is illegal and you may be able to take action about it:

employment and training education

when providing goods and services, for example, banking, entertainment and transport

housing

any of the activities carried out by public authorities, such as the NHS, government departments, local authorities, the police and prisons

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Taken from the cab website...

What is sex discrimination

Sex discrimination is when you are treated unfairly either because you are a man or because you are a woman.

If sex discrimination takes place in any of the following situations it is illegal and you may be able to take action about it:

employment and training education

when providing goods and services, for example, banking, entertainment and transport

housing

any of the activities carried out by public authorities, such as the NHS, government departments, local authorities, the police and prisons"

Wage inequality has been here for ever. It is effectively illegal. It's wrong. We all know it, but its still here.

It takes time for things to change and this is way down on the list of most peoples priorities.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"As with any institution where the fundamental purpose is to facilitate people fucking, whether it's conventional nightclubs or a swingers club, theres an element of prostitution involved. Women are charged lower prices than men as the clubs essentially make their money providing men with women who are wanting to fuck. As long as there is a supply of such women, men will pay a premium price for that.

It would nice to think it possible to get events not based on that transnational premise, but as long as men wanting casual sex vastly outnumber women wanting the same, it will be very difficult. "

It's the prostitution element that makes it all a bit wrong. Of course women aren't literally there for that but it does boil down to that. They're being used to entice men into the club. Bait.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Whereas I understand the pricing is not fair, and I am sceptical about whether the alternatives would be successful. Now that prostitution has been brought up, that makes me even more sceptical about lowering the prices for men. A lot of guys will attend these establishments because they feel it is cheaper than hiring an escort. I flatter myself to say that I am very good at avoiding such men in clubs and I try to only play with those men who, like me, have chosen swinging as a lifestyle choice. I wonder if the more expensive a club is for single men, it will dissuade the guys who are looking for a cheaper option than a prostitute. I mean there’s no point in paying £100 for a club if a prostitute costs the same and is guaranteed sex. Lower the prices and it becomes a more attractive option for men who might otherwise pay for sex.

You are missing the fact that in swingers club you are actually having sex with women who you are not personally paying for sex. Hence much less social stigma for me. And much less social stigma the less the pricing is akin to sex work.

Put it this way, if a man is looking for paid sex and sees men are charged much more than women, he will see that as him buying women and expecting sex for his money. If prices are the same, it's less likely he will view it that way. "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I personally haven’t come across too much distasteful or entitled behaviour from men in clubs. There is sadly the odd one, but i seen just as much bad behaviour from men who are part of couples and therefore haven’t paid a premium to get in. There worst I’ve seen tend to be in spas, and in the more expensive establishments bad behaviour tends tend be at a minimum. In my experience anyway.

Mrs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ringles0510Woman  over a year ago

Central Borders


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80

Serious question, and maybe many would prefer the other alternatives. Would you prefer a first come first serve system? Or would you prefer invite only? Or would you prefer to pay more than women? Those are the 3 possible ways of controlling male numbers. Each has their disadvantages.

I think private parties have to be invite only, pick and choose both genders for the sake of the party but for Jesus sake charge same prices"

We had a private party a while ago, where we asked £5pp to help cover some of the costs of the flat. One couple made a fuss, because they never pay the same as singles males

They'll not get an invite again x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Golf clubs have done it for years which was fair enough when women could only play on a Tuesday but now they let them play anytime...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I demand sexual equality in the sex you industry!!

If a woman wants a 240v powered magic wand with 10 speed settings and 5 vibration patterns everyone loves it.

But if a dude wants a fuck master doll5000 with pulsating holes and realistic orgasm sounds, it’s seen as a bit weird

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Taken from the cab website...

What is sex discrimination

Sex discrimination is when you are treated unfairly either because you are a man or because you are a woman.

If sex discrimination takes place in any of the following situations it is illegal and you may be able to take action about it:

employment and training education

when providing goods and services, for example, banking, entertainment and transport

housing

any of the activities carried out by public authorities, such as the NHS, government departments, local authorities, the police and prisons"

Since you're so concerned about sexual equality what are you doing to tackle the fact that men often treat women as though they were only put on the planet for the use of men?

Or are you only concerned about sexual equality when it affects you?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

I cant see anywhere where i have advocated the mistreatment of women so your point is a bit moot.

I have raised issues where i work wih regards gender equality with regards to training.

Are you saying because inequality exsists its fine and should jot be challenged?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oxy_minxWoman  over a year ago

Scotland - Aberdeen


"Taken from the cab website...

What is sex discrimination

Sex discrimination is when you are treated unfairly either because you are a man or because you are a woman.

If sex discrimination takes place in any of the following situations it is illegal and you may be able to take action about it:

employment and training education

when providing goods and services, for example, banking, entertainment and transport

housing

any of the activities carried out by public authorities, such as the NHS, government departments, local authorities, the police and prisons

Since you're so concerned about sexual equality what are you doing to tackle the fact that men often treat women as though they were only put on the planet for the use of men?

Or are you only concerned about sexual equality when it affects you? "

It sounds like it

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I think most people agree that the inequality in club fees is not fair. Where there is uncertainty is if anything can realistically be done about it without spoiling the swinging experience for everybody. Where there is a problem there needs to be a solution. So hypothetically speaking what should be done? Increase couples and ladies prices to match single men? Would couples and ladies attend if prices went up? Or maybe decrease men’s prices so all pay the same? How do we then ensure reasonable ratios? Would men prefer to pay less but risk not being admitted on the door once single male numbers are at their max. Or would men prefer to buy their ticket in advance on a first come first serve basis, again risking not getting a ticket and also having by to plan ahead. Might suit some guys. Should male numbers be controlled by ‘invite only’ but charge the same on the door. Single men, what would work best for you? Has anybody ever tried alternative methods to managing ratios, and did it work?

Mrs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo


"

Yes so if this is deamed morally wrong for men who have to pay more, and women who are arguably being subsidised to attract men, then we need to look at alternatives to controlling male numbers. So my question is are those alternatives fair or practical. I don’t know. "

They already do control numbers

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Taken from the cab website...

What is sex discrimination

Sex discrimination is when you are treated unfairly either because you are a man or because you are a woman.

If sex discrimination takes place in any of the following situations it is illegal and you may be able to take action about it:

employment and training education

when providing goods and services, for example, banking, entertainment and transport

housing

any of the activities carried out by public authorities, such as the NHS, government departments, local authorities, the police and prisons

Since you're so concerned about sexual equality what are you doing to tackle the fact that men often treat women as though they were only put on the planet for the use of men?

Or are you only concerned about sexual equality when it affects you? "

Most people are only concerned about inequality when it effects them. Why would you or anyone want to use this as a deflection?

People should not be discouraged from raising problems of inequality because of bigger problems of inequality.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo


"If they charge more for men then some men will expect a fuck for their money. They should just control it via numbers of guests and turn people away if the quota has been filled that night. "

You see this is my thought, the more they have to pay the likely hood that they may expect sex from women who are used to bring those men in

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"I think most people agree that the inequality in club fees is not fair. Where there is uncertainty is if anything can realistically be done about it without spoiling the swinging experience for everybody. Where there is a problem there needs to be a solution. So hypothetically speaking what should be done? Increase couples and ladies prices to match single men? Would couples and ladies attend if prices went up? Or maybe decrease men’s prices so all pay the same? How do we then ensure reasonable ratios? Would men prefer to pay less but risk not being admitted on the door once single male numbers are at their max. Or would men prefer to buy their ticket in advance on a first come first serve basis, again risking not getting a ticket and also having by to plan ahead. Might suit some guys. Should male numbers be controlled by ‘invite only’ but charge the same on the door. Single men, what would work best for you? Has anybody ever tried alternative methods to managing ratios, and did it work?

Mrs"

If everyone had to buy tickets in advance I think you would less likely to get entitled men. Not sure it is sustainable as a business model.

Essentially, the business model of all establishments where people meet with a view to potential sexual activity whether dating sites, nightclubs or swing clubs is based on attracting women as bait for men.

Whether that says something immutable about human sexuality or whether that's all socially constructed is an interesting debate....

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *agermeisterMan  over a year ago

Leeds


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

"

If you want a club full of single men than yeah let's have an equal fee policy.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I think most people agree that the inequality in club fees is not fair. Where there is uncertainty is if anything can realistically be done about it without spoiling the swinging experience for everybody. Where there is a problem there needs to be a solution. So hypothetically speaking what should be done? Increase couples and ladies prices to match single men? Would couples and ladies attend if prices went up? Or maybe decrease men’s prices so all pay the same? How do we then ensure reasonable ratios? Would men prefer to pay less but risk not being admitted on the door once single male numbers are at their max. Or would men prefer to buy their ticket in advance on a first come first serve basis, again risking not getting a ticket and also having by to plan ahead. Might suit some guys. Should male numbers be controlled by ‘invite only’ but charge the same on the door. Single men, what would work best for you? Has anybody ever tried alternative methods to managing ratios, and did it work?

Mrs"

It depends what you mean by the "swinging experience".

Greedy girls nights are very different to couples only nights. They're also a different business model.

Clubs are businesses and business will always find a way if there's profits to be made.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If they charge more for men then some men will expect a fuck for their money. They should just control it via numbers of guests and turn people away if the quota has been filled that night.

You see this is my thought, the more they have to pay the likely hood that they may expect sex from women who are used to bring those men in"

Higher price paid, higher percieved entitlement.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo


"I think most people agree that the inequality in club fees is not fair. Where there is uncertainty is if anything can realistically be done about it

Mrs"

I doubt anything will be done mainly as Clubs are a business. If they can make more money from men who are willing to pay more to enter then it won't change. It would be silly for their business to change that

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo


"

If you want a club full of single men than yeah let's have an equal fee policy."

Only if they don't limit the amount of men allowed in, most seem to

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

If you want a club full of single men than yeah let's have an equal fee policy."

Yes please more choice

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

This is why I'd never go to a club, - hell I still can't get over the fact that some nightclubs in this part of the world actually have V.I.P areas, - that's abhorrent.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I think most people agree that the inequality in club fees is not fair. Where there is uncertainty is if anything can realistically be done about it

Mrs

I doubt anything will be done mainly as Clubs are a business. If they can make more money from men who are willing to pay more to enter then it won't change. It would be silly for their business to change that

"

Agreed. It will only change if clubs are forced to by legal challenge or if women start to resent the idea of being used as bait.

Many women who use clubs may not have considered that they are being used by clubs to profit from men. Some may not like the thought of that.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

The two genders aren't treated equal hence why women aren't charged as much, same reason why there are so many men on here compared to women.

Promiscuous men are celebrated while promiscuous women are scorned.

Think there should be more done to tackle ACTUAL gender equality than guys moaning about club prices."

Well that is ACTUAL gender inequality, plain and simple.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I think there is no hope when it comes to gender equality and discrimination

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago

If you think about it its quite similer to the pit girls etc used to attact men to events.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I cant see anywhere where i have advocated the mistreatment of women so your point is a bit moot.

I have raised issues where i work wih regards gender equality with regards to training.

Are you saying because inequality exsists its fine and should jot be challenged?"

No that's not what I'm saying at all. But for men to be treated equally in terms of club prices women have to be treated equally sexually.

Lower club prices for men means more men but the same amount of ladies, which make it less chance of men getting play time which would be a whole other thread of men complaining because they out number women so much in clubs

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

If you want a club full of single men than yeah let's have an equal fee policy."

This is the point I'm trying to make lol

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I think most people agree that the inequality in club fees is not fair. Where there is uncertainty is if anything can realistically be done about it

Mrs

I doubt anything will be done mainly as Clubs are a business. If they can make more money from men who are willing to pay more to enter then it won't change. It would be silly for their business to change that

Agreed. It will only change if clubs are forced to by legal challenge or if women start to resent the idea of being used as bait.

Many women who use clubs may not have considered that they are being used by clubs to profit from men. Some may not like the thought of that."

I guess for me, I only play with men I know, and I don’t really care if other men consider me as bait. But despite going to a lot of clubs and parties where single men are present, I have no experience of men feeling entitled to have sex with me. Few incidences of bad behaviour though. I’m not defending inequality, but I would be equally concerned if men were turned away at the door because the male quota had been reached. We often attend clubs with a guy. I’d hate to turn up and be told that I can go in but my husband and my friend can’t, because they have maxed on men.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ust PeachyWoman  over a year ago

Prestonish


"

The two genders aren't treated equal hence why women aren't charged as much, same reason why there are so many men on here compared to women.

Promiscuous men are celebrated while promiscuous women are scorned.

Think there should be more done to tackle ACTUAL gender equality than guys moaning about club prices."

Hear hear!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I think most people agree that the inequality in club fees is not fair. Where there is uncertainty is if anything can realistically be done about it

Mrs

I doubt anything will be done mainly as Clubs are a business. If they can make more money from men who are willing to pay more to enter then it won't change. It would be silly for their business to change that

"

There are quite a few not for profit parties though, but the price philosophy is the same - single men pay more. I’m just wondering if anybody who does not for profit parties has charged the same, and did it work.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I think most people agree that the inequality in club fees is not fair. Where there is uncertainty is if anything can realistically be done about it

Mrs

I doubt anything will be done mainly as Clubs are a business. If they can make more money from men who are willing to pay more to enter then it won't change. It would be silly for their business to change that

There are quite a few not for profit parties though, but the price philosophy is the same - single men pay more. I’m just wondering if anybody who does not for profit parties has charged the same, and did it work. "

I’m happy to do it for charity.. come on who’s with me.. same price for all.. equal number of each gender.. winners all around

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *agermeisterMan  over a year ago

Leeds

Women are asked to wear sexy alluring lingerie with heels. How much is that £100-£150?

Blokes wear boxers - £5.99

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Taken om the cab website...

What is sex discrimination

Sex discrimination is when you are treated unfairly either because you are a man or because you are a woman.

If sex discrimination takes place in any of the following situations it is illegal and you may be able to take action about it:

employment and training education

when providing goods and services, for example, banking, entertainment and transport

housing

any of the activities carried out by public authorities, such as the NHS, government departments, local authorities, the police and prisons

Since you're so concerned about sexual equality what are you doing to tackle the fact that men often treat women as though they were only put on the planet for the use of men?

Or are you only concerned about sexual equality when it affects you?

It sounds like it "

it sounds as though the sexes are equal after all :

Equally up for what's cheap or free,

Sod whoever subsidises me

I'm alright Jack/ie !!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo


"

I’m not defending inequality, but I would be equally concerned if men were turned away at the door because the male quota had been reached. We often attend clubs with a guy. I’d hate to turn up and be told that I can go in but my husband and my friend can’t, because they have maxed on men. "

You keep saying that as if that is the only option , there must be others, like charge less and let them book the way you say they do now.

I doubt if as a couple your OH would be refused entry and you allowed in?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Women are asked to wear sexy alluring lingerie with heels. How much is that £100-£150?

Blokes wear boxers - £5.99

"

I don’t even have money to buy boxers

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Women are asked to wear sexy alluring lingerie with heels. How much is that £100-£150?

Blokes wear boxers - £5.99

"

Imho it's unethical to shop at OXFAM in the current climate

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"I think most people agree that the inequality in club fees is not fair. Where there is uncertainty is if anything can realistically be done about it

Mrs

I doubt anything will be done mainly as Clubs are a business. If they can make more money from men who are willing to pay more to enter then it won't change. It would be silly for their business to change that

There are quite a few not for profit parties though, but the price philosophy is the same - single men pay more. I’m just wondering if anybody who does not for profit parties has charged the same, and did it work. "

Really?

When we have done private events and fees were just to cover expenses, everyone would pay the same. Getting, effectively, the men to pay for the women to be there is virtually identical to prostitution.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

So what’s your view on hair salons charging more for women than men?

Or are you not bothered because it works in your favour as a man?"

In general and with some knowledge of the trade, I'd suggest that it's a simple equation based on products x time + plus free psychological advice!!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I’m not defending inequality, but I would be equally concerned if men were turned away at the door because the male quota had been reached. We often attend clubs with a guy. I’d hate to turn up and be told that I can go in but my husband and my friend can’t, because they have maxed on men.

You keep saying that as if that is the only option , there must be others, like charge less and let them book the way you say they do now.

I doubt if as a couple your OH would be refused entry and you allowed in?"

Well I’d have to leave one of my guys outside if we turned up a bit late. But yep, equal pricing but booking in advance is probably the fairest way. Maybe the not for profit parties should consider that. I don’t know if anyone has tried it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 07/03/18 15:40:49]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Only our opinion!

We have been to a few well organised socials were prices have varied between males, females and couples.

At one party they even treated TVs as females and charged as females, so equality there.

If we as a couple walked into social that had a very high proportion of single males we would probably leave.

All in all we can't find fault as the hosts who ran the socials got the price right as it got the mix right.

The price didn't seem to deter males as the organisers had to create a backup list of males.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I think most people agree that the inequality in club fees is not fair. Where there is uncertainty is if anything can realistically be done about it

Mrs

I doubt anything will be done mainly as Clubs are a business. If they can make more money from men who are willing to pay more to enter then it won't change. It would be silly for their business to change that

There are quite a few not for profit parties though, but the price philosophy is the same - single men pay more. I’m just wondering if anybody who does not for profit parties has charged the same, and did it work.

Really?

When we have done private events and fees were just to cover expenses, everyone would pay the same. Getting, effectively, the men to pay for the women to be there is virtually identical to prostitution. "

That’s great. It’s good to know that works. I don’t know why other party organisers don’t do the same. Out of interest how did you manage the ratios?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

So what’s your view on hair salons charging more for women than men?

Or are you not bothered because it works in your favour as a man?"

men has no much hair it takes 20 minutes to get it done while women hair is too much n it takes hours that's why the price is different in a salon

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

So what’s your view on hair salons charging more for women than men?

Or are you not bothered because it works in your favour as a man?men has no much hair it takes 20 minutes to get it done while women hair is too much n it takes hours that's why the price is different in a salon "

Should be charge by the volume of their hair

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If you think about it its quite similer to the pit girls etc used to attact men to events."

What the hell is a "pit girl?" Some sort of human equivalent of a pit pony?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"I think most people agree that the inequality in club fees is not fair. Where there is uncertainty is if anything can realistically be done about it

Mrs

I doubt anything will be done mainly as Clubs are a business. If they can make more money from men who are willing to pay more to enter then it won't change. It would be silly for their business to change that

There are quite a few not for profit parties though, but the price philosophy is the same - single men pay more. I’m just wondering if anybody who does not for profit parties has charged the same, and did it work.

Really?

When we have done private events and fees were just to cover expenses, everyone would pay the same. Getting, effectively, the men to pay for the women to be there is virtually identical to prostitution.

That’s great. It’s good to know that works. I don’t know why other party organisers don’t do the same. Out of interest how did you manage the ratios?"

By inviting people we wanted to attend.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *onkeymagic50Man  over a year ago

Near the harbour


"If you think about it its quite similer to the pit girls etc used to attact men to events.

What the hell is a "pit girl?" Some sort of human equivalent of a pit pony? "

No they the very attractive ladies used to hold the board in f1,boxing,and sadly no more darts ,yes it may be sexist but the darts ladies now selling avon for 18weeks to earn their living which they made each night in the pdc/bdo circuit

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time. I think men and women have to behave the same in order to be treated the same, and when it comes to sex the 2 genders are so different. If the treatment of men and women in swing clubs were identical there would be far more men attending than women, simply because more men want to attend these establishments. So to equalise the numbers men have to be discouraged and women incentivised. And let’s face it, men go to these clubs to meet women. I’m not sure that there are many other walks of life where the unequal gender interest in something dramatically effects the product.

Mrs

I dont see how gender interest dramtically affect the product, Ive always been told by my friends that clubs are more of a social event, where are you are suggeting that the women are there to provide entertainment to the men so the clubs need more women.

Personally i would view them as a social event and somewhere to network if something happened thats nice. I'm not saying i plan to go to a club as I do not at the moment i just wondered where they would stand legally if someone were to take up a legal challange on discrimination grounds.

So what’s your view on hair salons charging more for women than men?

Or are you not bothered because it works in your favour as a man?men has no much hair it takes 20 minutes to get it done while women hair is too much n it takes hours that's why the price is different in a salon "

Exactly. Hairdresser's will charge on the basis of skill, time and expense. Women generally take more time, want more elaborate haircuts and will use more expensive products. That means a higher price. If a man wanted a haircut like that he would be charged the same.

Hence no discrimination.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ranny-CrumpetWoman  over a year ago

The Town by The Cross


"I was having a chat with a friend yesterday about swinging clubs and got onto the difference prices they charge and how it must be technically illegal under the gender equality act.

Can you think of anywhwere else where different prices are charged based on your sex or status and if this did happen elsewhere would it be considered as acceptable."

It's the same price for everyone. Lower prices for women are used as an incentive to attract women to the clubs.Not many blokes want clubs without women. Men are cannon fodder.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I was having a chat with a friend yesterday about swinging clubs and got onto the difference prices they charge and how it must be technically illegal under the gender equality act.

Can you think of anywhwere else where different prices are charged based on your sex or status and if this did happen elsewhere would it be considered as acceptable.

It's the same price for everyone. Lower prices for women are used as an incentive to attract women to the clubs.Not many blokes want clubs without women. Men are cannon fodder. "

Bad men!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Women are asked to wear sexy alluring lingerie with heels. How much is that £100-£150?

Blokes wear boxers - £5.99

"

Or just a towel which the club sometimes provides

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *r TriomanMan  over a year ago

Chippenham Malmesbury area


"It is more prevalent tham you think.

OAP and student rates are prevalent everywhere.

Ooh, I wish clubs did student rates, I love a discount "

You can study my cock; it's a short but very hard course - I'd come for your graduation

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Women are asked to wear sexy alluring lingerie with heels. How much is that £100-£150?

Blokes wear boxers - £5.99

Or just a towel which the club sometimes provides "

Plus with travel and hotel, I usually spend at least £200 for a club trip. So £35 entry or thereabouts for a single man living fairly near a club isn't that bad.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Would you be ok for all women to turn up with hairy legs, pits and pussy? That's equality for you.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Women are asked to wear sexy alluring lingerie with heels. How much is that £100-£150?

Blokes wear boxers - £5.99

Or just a towel which the club sometimes provides

Plus with travel and hotel, I usually spend at least £200 for a club trip. So £35 entry or thereabouts for a single man living fairly near a club isn't that bad. "

And the money spent making ourselves look desirable. Hair removal, moisturiser, make up etc.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo


"

I’m not defending inequality, but I would be equally concerned if men were turned away at the door because the male quota had been reached. We often attend clubs with a guy. I’d hate to turn up and be told that I can go in but my husband and my friend can’t, because they have maxed on men.

You keep saying that as if that is the only option , there must be others, like charge less and let them book the way you say they do now.

I doubt if as a couple your OH would be refused entry and you allowed in?

Well I’d have to leave one of my guys outside if we turned up a bit late. But yep, equal pricing but booking in advance is probably the fairest way. Maybe the not for profit parties should consider that. I don’t know if anyone has tried it. "

I am guessing by that answer that the answer to my question was no your husband wouldn't be refused entry

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo


"Women are asked to wear sexy alluring lingerie with heels. How much is that £100-£150?

Blokes wear boxers - £5.99

Or just a towel which the club sometimes provides

Plus with travel and hotel, I usually spend at least £200 for a club trip. So £35 entry or thereabouts for a single man living fairly near a club isn't that bad. "

What if he doesn't live near to the club and has paid for travel and hotel?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Women are asked to wear sexy alluring lingerie with heels. How much is that £100-£150?

Blokes wear boxers - £5.99

Or just a towel which the club sometimes provides

Plus with travel and hotel, I usually spend at least £200 for a club trip. So £35 entry or thereabouts for a single man living fairly near a club isn't that bad. "

Have you thought that through?

Sexual discrimination is justified because of personal circustances?

Should that be the case with equal pay too?

Why stop there, how about letting personal circumstances determine whether racism or ageism is ok too?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ugby 123Couple  over a year ago
Forum Mod

O o O oo

Blimey, female grooming now being costed

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I was having a chat with a friend yesterday about swinging clubs and got onto the difference prices they charge and how it must be technically illegal under the gender equality act.

Can you think of anywhwere else where different prices are charged based on your sex or status and if this did happen elsewhere would it be considered as acceptable.

I don't consider it acceptable. It causes many issues."

If the prices were the same for either gender then it would cause far more issues and the club scene would quickly become shit to say the least...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *evil_u_knowMan  over a year ago

city


"It’s not possible to treat men and women equally in clubs and still have the appropriate ratios for everyone to have a good time."

I agree, but white couples should be charged a lot, so should white females.

It's not possible to make the parties diverse otherwise.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I’m not defending inequality, but I would be equally concerned if men were turned away at the door because the male quota had been reached. We often attend clubs with a guy. I’d hate to turn up and be told that I can go in but my husband and my friend can’t, because they have maxed on men.

"

Male quota!?! Can't you see that that is sexism?

Surely you mean a singles quota, that's completely legal.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Would you be ok for all women to turn up with hairy legs, pits and pussy? That's equality for you. "

I do turn up for meets with hairy pits to be fair hahaha

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I’m not defending inequality, but I would be equally concerned if men were turned away at the door because the male quota had been reached. We often attend clubs with a guy. I’d hate to turn up and be told that I can go in but my husband and my friend can’t, because they have maxed on men.

You keep saying that as if that is the only option , there must be others, like charge less and let them book the way you say they do now.

I doubt if as a couple your OH would be refused entry and you allowed in?

Well I’d have to leave one of my guys outside if we turned up a bit late. But yep, equal pricing but booking in advance is probably the fairest way. Maybe the not for profit parties should consider that. I don’t know if anyone has tried it. "

Our upcoming event has a simple way round this; just invite couples. Therefore single girls & guys have to couple up to attend. Prices relatively low for everyone considering that it's not for profit and BYOB.

Result; equal amount of men and women inside which everyone wants and no grumbling!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

I agree in all other walks of life equal opportunities is right. However, if equal opportunities were to be applied to swingers clubs, I think that will be the end of swingers clubs as we know it. They will become greedy girls nights.

Mrs

But wouldn't clubs just limit the amount of men that can enter like you did with your parties?

Yes they would. But it’s still not equal opportunities. Women would be unrestricted, and men handpicked. So the genders are still not being treated equally. And that’s not fair on the men who don’t get picked. The only other possibility is first come first serve either on the door or by purchasing a ticket in advance. There will obviously be queues and disappointment for men who don’t get in, or men would have to be buying their ticket way in advance, but probably sounds less discriminatory. Maybe men should be asked how they would prefer the male numbers to be controlled.

Mrs

I guess balancing the numbers and charge same prices would be fair. But it will never happen due to supply and demand.

Girls free

Couples £30

Single men £80 "

Which club do you go to that charges £80 ??

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site) OP     over a year ago


"Would you be ok for all women to turn up with hairy legs, pits and pussy? That's equality for you. "

Of course i would. I dont not take it upon myself to say how a woman should look after their body? What next people not allow in if ghey dont meet a certain body shape?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

  

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Women are asked to wear sexy alluring lingerie with heels. How much is that £100-£150?

Blokes wear boxers - £5.99

Or just a towel which the club sometimes provides

Plus with travel and hotel, I usually spend at least £200 for a club trip. So £35 entry or thereabouts for a single man living fairly near a club isn't that bad.

And the money spent making ourselves look desirable. Hair removal, moisturiser, make up etc.

"

Oh wow, so I'll be expected to subsidise people I've never even met?

If she's a spitter I'll demand a refund!

Prostitution legalised

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

0.3905

0