FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > £32 million for oxfam

£32 million for oxfam

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *maz. OP   Man  over a year ago

Southampton / iford

British government gave oxfam £32 million last year alone , do you think it reaches the destination is provided for or go to support the rich fat cats on the directors boardsroom ,

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Like a lot of big charities, a good portion of the money donated will never reach the front line.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple  over a year ago

Basingstoke


"British government gave oxfam £32 million last year alone , do you think it reaches the destination is provided for or go to support the rich fat cats on the directors boardsroom , "

69% of it reaches its destination. Other charities have higher % if they don't pay those chuggers to stand in the street and annoy people...

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I gave them most of that buying vinyl from their shops

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

You can buy a lot of sex workers for that!

Shame to see Oxfam getting dragged through the dirt at the moment. They do a lot of good stuff.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *adyJayneWoman  over a year ago

Burnleyish (She/They)

You realise that as a charity they may (or may not) be called directors, but, are actually trustees and as such aren't allowed to be paid for being in that position?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple  over a year ago

Basingstoke


"You can buy a lot of sex workers for that!

Shame to see Oxfam getting dragged through the dirt at the moment. They do a lot of good stuff."

It's always helpful for politician's and journalists that have someone else to condemn. It takes the focus off what scumbags they are. Oxfam has over 5,000 employees and over 20,000 volunteers in their uk subsidiary alone. Shockingly some of those did some of those are cunts.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *maz. OP   Man  over a year ago

Southampton / iford

British Red Cross exe paid £173,000 last year

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *maz. OP   Man  over a year ago

Southampton / iford


"You realise that as a charity they may (or may not) be called directors, but, are actually trustees and as such aren't allowed to be paid for being in that position? "
bieng paid over £125,000 per annum

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"You can buy a lot of sex workers for that!

Shame to see Oxfam getting dragged through the dirt at the moment. They do a lot of good stuff.

It's always helpful for politician's and journalists that have someone else to condemn. It takes the focus off what scumbags they are. Oxfam has over 5,000 employees and over 20,000 volunteers in their uk subsidiary alone. Shockingly some of those did some of those are cunts. "

True

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *adyJayneWoman  over a year ago

Burnleyish (She/They)


" bieng paid over £125,000 per annum"

Executive officers are not trustees and directors. They are the people who run and organise the charity on a daily basis.

Do you really honestly think a charity with an annual income of over 400 million pounds can run purely with noone paid to manage it.

Being paid £125,000 for that role is a fraction of what they would get paid in commercial industry. And rightly so. But you are hardly going to let someone control that much of an organisation and pay them minimum wage are you.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


" bieng paid over £125,000 per annum

Executive officers are not trustees and directors. They are the people who run and organise the charity on a daily basis.

Do you really honestly think a charity with an annual income of over 400 million pounds can run purely with noone paid to manage it.

Being paid £125,000 for that role is a fraction of what they would get paid in commercial industry. And rightly so. But you are hardly going to let someone control that much of an organisation and pay them minimum wage are you. "

Charities are all about making money for good causes. If someone is good at that and capable of getting that kind of money coming into the charity then they are worth paying. It's peanuts compared to the rest of the money flowing in and out and peanuts compared to what they could earn elsewhere! Some less deserving people earn that just for having a directorship in a company and some hold several directorships.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *y Favorite PornstarCouple  over a year ago

Basingstoke


" bieng paid over £125,000 per annum

Executive officers are not trustees and directors. They are the people who run and organise the charity on a daily basis.

Do you really honestly think a charity with an annual income of over 400 million pounds can run purely with noone paid to manage it.

Being paid £125,000 for that role is a fraction of what they would get paid in commercial industry. And rightly so. But you are hardly going to let someone control that much of an organisation and pay them minimum wage are you.

Charities are all about making money for good causes. If someone is good at that and capable of getting that kind of money coming into the charity then they are worth paying. It's peanuts compared to the rest of the money flowing in and out and peanuts compared to what they could earn elsewhere! Some less deserving people earn that just for having a directorship in a company and some hold several directorships."

All in all it's about 8% of turnover (i.e. all the admin costs) which is pretty good. If you were a government department or FTSE 100 company and your admin costs were 8%, you'd be doing well.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *adyJayneWoman  over a year ago

Burnleyish (She/They)


"

Charities are all about making money for good causes. If someone is good at that and capable of getting that kind of money coming into the charity then they are worth paying. It's peanuts compared to the rest of the money flowing in and out and peanuts compared to what they could earn elsewhere! Some less deserving people earn that just for having a directorship in a company and some hold several directorships.

All in all it's about 8% of turnover (i.e. all the admin costs) which is pretty good. If you were a government department or FTSE 100 company and your admin costs were 8%, you'd be doing well. "

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

The people whose lives are saved and made better on a daily basis aren't going to quibble about the bosses wage or any of the 8%.

How many government ministers or ex government ministers hold bullshit directorships and earn a fortune for fuck all?

Moaning about charity bosses earning £125,000 just sounds like not knowing how it works or sour grapes!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By *adyJayneWoman  over a year ago

Burnleyish (She/They)


"The people whose lives are saved and made better on a daily basis aren't going to quibble about the bosses wage or any of the 8%.

How many government ministers or ex government ministers hold bullshit directorships and earn a fortune for fuck all?

Moaning about charity bosses earning £125,000 just sounds like not knowing how it works or sour grapes! "

You'd be surprised at how many people don't contemplate things fully. I know one charity I was involved with. A community project where the manager was easily pulling 60-70 hours a week and there were complaints to the trustees that they were being paid £15,000 per year. Just above minimum wage at the time (based on them doing 40 hours a week, anything over they were doing for the love of the project)

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0311

0