FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Not a word I ever expected to see on this site
Not a word I ever expected to see on this site
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Slag. Used to describe a celebrity.
In this day and age of sexual liberation would you think that it is now an obsolete word?
I looked up the exact definition and it described a woman considered to be promiscuous with a lot of sexual partners.
So by definition it's an offensive term but when does sexually liberated and adventurous become a slag? Or when does someone considered a slag become just a woman who likes a lot of sex with different people (something men have enjoyed label free for ions).
A lot of men who are non swingers might describe me as one. Fair comment, I consider them narrow minded. But for swingers to refer to non swingers as slags is what made me feel uncertain about the use of word on this site.
Its descriptive and makes a point that everyone will make a relative, but is it a fair term now in these days of sexual equality anywhere, not just this site?
Should it ever be used by swingers to be scornful of a woman with a 'reputation' as a slag or is the word as relevant as ever?
Thoughts please.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
""tart" is thrown about more in our area, we had a Rottie by the name of "Stella" and she really was a tart with a heart   "
Well there are lots of similar words but all have the same connotations. Are any of them valid nowadays? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
My personal opinion is that a slag has sex with whoever she wants, actively goes out to seek sex and doesn't care who she has sex with. A similar term is also slapper.
A swinger chooses who she will have sex with especially where one to one or couples are concerned. Even using clubs, parties etc a swinger still chooses who she will have sex with, doesn't necessarily go with the _iew of having sex, unlike a slag and its no big deal if she doesn't whereas a slag might think she didn't have a good night |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Is it bad that I love that word?
Such fun to be had!"
Any word is only bad if its used to belittle or to be condescending in my book. If you can use it with people who accept the badinage then thats on lovel terms and no doubt gets a smart reply. I was meaning as a derogatory term to show disdain. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Slag. Used to describe a celebrity.
In this day and age of sexual liberation would you think that it is now an obsolete word?
I looked up the exact definition and it described a woman considered to be promiscuous with a lot of sexual partners.
So by definition it's an offensive term but when does sexually liberated and adventurous become a slag? Or when does someone considered a slag become just a woman who likes a lot of sex with different people (something men have enjoyed label free for ions).
A lot of men who are non swingers might describe me as one. Fair comment, I consider them narrow minded. But for swingers to refer to non swingers as slags is what made me feel uncertain about the use of word on this site.
Its descriptive and makes a point that everyone will make a relative, but is it a fair term now in these days of sexual equality anywhere, not just this site?
Should it ever be used by swingers to be scornful of a woman with a 'reputation' as a slag or is the word as relevant as ever?
Thoughts please.
"
Sorry posted my reply without fully reading, iv never agreed with the whole men are stud women are whores thing.
Never minded a sexually liberated women. Or judged them. Slag is an outdated term. Still fun in the right situations though! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
Forum Mod |
I hate the word and its not one that I would like used towards me in any situation
Ive always found it to be derogatory and never used by anyone with affection towards anyone else |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *iewMan
over a year ago
Forum Mod Angus & Findhorn |
just no need to use language like that to describe someone else... just no need.
but if it self elevates someone to where they feel they need to be... it says more about them than it does about anything else.
I wish them well and good fortune, they may need it x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"My personal opinion is that a slag has sex with whoever she wants, actively goes out to seek sex and doesn't care who she has sex with. A similar term is also slapper.
A swinger chooses who she will have sex with especially where one to one or couples are concerned. Even using clubs, parties etc a swinger still chooses who she will have sex with, doesn't necessarily go with the _iew of having sex, unlike a slag and its no big deal if she doesn't whereas a slag might think she didn't have a good night"
Not all swingers care who they sleep with either. Same non swingers actively seek out partners and give it due consideration as much as swingers do.
Great point but I don't think all sexually liberated people who seek out the type of sex they want need to become swingers. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I saw the post you are referring to and I thought the use of the word was a bit much tbh. I consider it to be right up the there with c**t. It's not illegal though so horses for courses I guess. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I saw the post you are referring to and I thought the use of the word was a bit much tbh. I consider it to be right up the there with c**t. It's not illegal though so horses for courses I guess."
Im a lover of the english language and its roots and definitions (enjoying the Stephen Fry series) so often look at archaic and no longer used terms which must have gone out of fashion at some point. I feel I might be living in a time where such words will be on the way out as people are becoming more sexually liberated and wondered what others thought.
People can use whatever flowery language they like as long as its an accurate description 
See I'd rather be called a sod than a bugger as sod is more accurate.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
" promiscuous with a lot of sexual partners" if that is the definition then why bother to use it. Taken as read really, on a swinging site, so adds nothing. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
For me the word says more about the person using it than the person they are referring to.
It doesn't form part of my vocabulary in or outside of the swinging world. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
