So it seems in the last decade that Hollywood has run out if ideas and now just remakes all of our 80s faves ...but which films from the last ten years would have been better if made in the 80s?
I choose Twilight. It could have Wynona Ryder and Christian Slater. Have a great soundtrack and no shit cgi
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
 |
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So it seems in the last decade that Hollywood has run out if ideas and now just remakes all of our 80s faves ...but which films from the last ten years would have been better if made in the 80s?
I choose Twilight. It could have Wynona Ryder and Christian Slater. Have a great soundtrack and no shit cgi
"
Oooooo yes I can see it now!! Ads is going to hate me for this but Harry Potter. Would have done the whole lot of movies in one instead of drawing them out!
Geeky x |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So it seems in the last decade that Hollywood has run out if ideas and now just remakes all of our 80s faves ...but which films from the last ten years would have been better if made in the 80s?
I choose Twilight. It could have Wynona Ryder and Christian Slater. Have a great soundtrack and no shit cgi
Oooooo yes I can see it now!! Ads is going to hate me for this but Harry Potter. Would have done the whole lot of movies in one instead of drawing them out!
Geeky x"
WHAT?!?!?!? What on Earth are you thinking woman? If it was all 1 film you’d have a 16 hour film just to get the bits they already got in the films let alone the bits I’m already annoyed about then taking out have you lost your mind?
Ads |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So it seems in the last decade that Hollywood has run out if ideas and now just remakes all of our 80s faves ...but which films from the last ten years would have been better if made in the 80s?
I choose Twilight. It could have Wynona Ryder and Christian Slater. Have a great soundtrack and no shit cgi
Oooooo yes I can see it now!! Ads is going to hate me for this but Harry Potter. Would have done the whole lot of movies in one instead of drawing them out!
Geeky x
WHAT?!?!?!? What on Earth are you thinking woman? If it was all 1 film you’d have a 16 hour film just to get the bits they already got in the films let alone the bits I’m already annoyed about then taking out have you lost your mind?
Ads"
I just meant condense it down to a two and a half hour film, I’m pretty sure they could have done it, I mean that dancing scene with Harry and hermonie what the fuck was all that about?! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"So it seems in the last decade that Hollywood has run out if ideas and now just remakes all of our 80s faves ...but which films from the last ten years would have been better if made in the 80s?
I choose Twilight. It could have Wynona Ryder and Christian Slater. Have a great soundtrack and no shit cgi
Oooooo yes I can see it now!! Ads is going to hate me for this but Harry Potter. Would have done the whole lot of movies in one instead of drawing them out!
Geeky x
WHAT?!?!?!? What on Earth are you thinking woman? If it was all 1 film you’d have a 16 hour film just to get the bits they already got in the films let alone the bits I’m already annoyed about then taking out have you lost your mind?
Ads
I just meant condense it down to a two and a half hour film, I’m pretty sure they could have done it, I mean that dancing scene with Harry and hermonie what the fuck was all that about?!"
They already took enough out of the films to make them 16 hours long and now you want to take another 13 and 1/2???
Ads |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
