FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Is it "ok"...
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? " Is this a p word question?! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes. It is. You're allowed to say no to anyone for whatever reason you so desire. " ^^^ This. Is it ok to turn someone down because they're bi / straight? Is it ok to turn someone down because they're bald? Is it ok to turn someone down because they're black / white / asian? Is it ok to turn someone down because they're too tall / too short? Is it ok to turn someone down because they're too fat / too thin? The list could be endless, and anyone can turn someone down for any reason they want to. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? " Nobody should ever feel that they have to justify attraction or lack of attraction, whatever the reason for it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? Is this a p word question?! " Of course. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? Nobody should ever feel that they have to justify attraction or lack of attraction, whatever the reason for it." But what I'm saying is this, if you fancy the person but then find out they are trans. And you no longer want to meet them, surely your transphobic. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? " It's probably better than going with a trans woman just to see how she compares with a 'female bodied from birth woman'.Sort of treating her as some kind of experiment. Having experienced both (in the real world,not so much on fab),I can say that being rejected by a guy who fancied me right up to the moment I told him 'the awful truth' made me a bit sad but didn't make me angry,I didn't hate him for it.But, the other situation P'ed me off a lot more. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason. I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice." Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? Nobody should ever feel that they have to justify attraction or lack of attraction, whatever the reason for it. But what I'm saying is this, if you fancy the person but then find out they are trans. And you no longer want to meet them, surely your transphobic." No, I don't think so, maybe just unsure of the unknown. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think it's perfectly acceptable to turn down anyone for any reason whatsoever " . I concur wholeheartedly | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? " As long as your polite in the manner in which you turn them down then of course you can say no | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason. I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice. Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest. " You can call it phobic. That is your right to think so. If it is phobic so what? What I choose doesn't affect anyone does it? I am just answering your question. For the record I don't think it is phobic just my taste. I find certain Men good looking. I find certain Trans good looking. I just don't wish to have sex with them that is all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its a bit like white folk who won't fuck other white folk who have had sex with other races say they're not racist, it's a preference..." It's a bit like a women saying no to a man who had sex with a particular woman. Not sure what you'd call it but It's rife and has no basis in race or gender. You could argue it's more a case of person A judging person B due to their preference for person C. Not person A having a "phobia" of or judging person C. But what do I know? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its a bit like white folk who won't fuck other white folk who have had sex with other races say they're not racist, it's a preference... It's a bit like a women saying no to a man who had sex with a particular woman. Not sure what you'd call it but It's rife and has no basis in race or gender. You could argue it's more a case of person A judging person B due to their preference for person C. Not person A having a "phobia" of or judging person C. But what do I know? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As established, we all have the right to turn down someone but the reasoning behind it is the part that becomes questionable. For me, being with someone is based on a group package of looks, interaction, chemistry and morals. If I was interested up to the point of the person disclosing that they are a fully transitioned male or female, nothing has changed for me and I am still interested. You haven't hidden behind the word hypothetical but I won't jump to any assumptions. If a person changes their mind after disclosure then they have to examine where that stems from and why. If they can self assess if it's ok to turn the other person down then they can self assess what makes them think like that. Madame B " Exactly, I think it’s hard to know until you’re faved with the situation but id liked to think I’d be open to a relationship based on all those things because that’s the most important thing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes. It is. You're allowed to say no to anyone for whatever reason you so desire. " What he said | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes. It is. You're allowed to say no to anyone for whatever reason you so desire. What he said " I agree with this everyone is entitled to their own opinion and make their own decisions | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's personal preference but how we communicate a rejection is within our control and most decent people would show sensitivity and empathy towards someone." Yes this. Who we fancy or don't is totally capricious most of the time anyway, and often down to 'that indefinable something', positive or negative. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? Nobody should ever feel that they have to justify attraction or lack of attraction, whatever the reason for it But what I'm saying is this, if you fancy the person but then find out they are trans. And you no longer want to meet them, surely your transphobic." But you didn't fancy them because you fancied something they are NOT! Just like fancying a delicious chicken sandwich only to discover it's actually a turkey sandwich which you do not like and didn't order. If that makes a person turkeyphobic, so be it. If I pose as a lesbian woman to another woman, make her fall in love with me, then whip out my cock on the day of reckoming, does that make that lesbian a Malephobic misandrist? In fact, doesn't this mean that all orientations of exclusivity are phobic of the gender they do not want to bone? Yes, it does. Deception is not ok. There's no excuse for it. Using pc policies to force people into relationships they don't want is a return to barbarianism and it's a diabolical branch of r-culture and has no milder a stench. Born men identifying as women who feel entitled to other people's bodies without their express desire are still born men believing they are entitled to other people's bodies without their express desire and consent, only they now identify as women. Nobody is entitled to anyone's person, not women, not men, not transmen and not transwomen. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You can turn down anyone at anytime it's your body and only you get to decide what's done with it But if you wanted to have sex with them before knowing why deny yourself and them the fun ? " Why deny yourself the vagina you've been looking forward to that they don't have? Or the relationship leading to family and biological children through the uterus they don't have? Why deny yourself that penis you aren't looking forward to? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Its a bit like white folk who won't fuck other white folk who have had sex with other races say they're not racist, it's a preference... It's a bit like a women saying no to a man who had sex with a particular woman. Not sure what you'd call it but It's rife and has no basis in race or gender. You could argue it's more a case of person A judging person B due to their preference for person C. Not person A having a "phobia" of or judging person C. But what do I know? " The difficulty with applying terms like phobic to sexual desire is that a person's sexuality has generally been seen as an area of total autonomy. Thus, if a straight man refused to work with or drink with gay men, everyone would say he was homophobic. If he refuses to have sex with a gay man, that is fine because he has sexual autonomy. Isn't it the same with transgender people? The logical conclusion of importing concepts of equal opportunities into sexuality is that, just as someone who refuses to employ someone based on their gender, race, sexuality, transgender status and so on would rightly be seen as prejudiced, anyone refusing to have sex with someone on those grounds would be seen as prejudiced. This from someone deeply suspicious of the "no blacks and Asians just our preference" brigade. I just think the logical conclusion of asserting that its phobic to refuse people on the grounds of physical characteristics must inevitably be that choice of sexual partners based on any physical grounds becomes illegitimate. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You can turn down anyone at anytime it's your body and only you get to decide what's done with it But if you wanted to have sex with them before knowing why deny yourself and them the fun ? Why deny yourself the vagina you've been looking forward to that they don't have? Or the relationship leading to family and biological children through the uterus they don't have? Why deny yourself that penis you aren't looking forward to? " You my friend are on the wrong site if you are looking for children | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason. I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice. Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest. " How so? Since when have preferences been classed as phobic? We are all allowed choices. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason. I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice. Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest. How so? Since when have preferences been classed as phobic? We are all allowed choices. " If I "prefer" not to employ, eat with or spend time with transgender people I think it's pretty clear that preference is phobic. Some preferences are phobic and some aren't. The word "preference" is not a get out of jail free card. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You can turn down anyone at anytime it's your body and only you get to decide what's done with it But if you wanted to have sex with them before knowing why deny yourself and them the fun ? Why deny yourself the vagina you've been looking forward to that they don't have? Or the relationship leading to family and biological children through the uterus they don't have? Why deny yourself that penis you aren't looking forward to? You my friend are on the wrong site if you are looking for children " You my friend need to get off the site more if you think this topic and issue only pertains to swingers and people on fabswingers site. And I can only hope that you aren't making a sexual joke involving children. Because I personally don't find that shit funny in the least. If not, apologies. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes. It is. You're allowed to say no to anyone for whatever reason you so desire. ^^^ This. Is it ok to turn someone down because they're bi / straight? Is it ok to turn someone down because they're bald? Is it ok to turn someone down because they're black / white / asian? Is it ok to turn someone down because they're too tall / too short? Is it ok to turn someone down because they're too fat / too thin? The list could be endless, and anyone can turn someone down for any reason they want to. " there u have it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? Nobody should ever feel that they have to justify attraction or lack of attraction, whatever the reason for it. But what I'm saying is this, if you fancy the person but then find out they are trans. And you no longer want to meet them, surely your transphobic." Do you have to justify to yourself or others why you don’t want to meet? If you don’t you don’t, simples. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? Nobody should ever feel that they have to justify attraction or lack of attraction, whatever the reason for it. But what I'm saying is this, if you fancy the person but then find out they are trans. And you no longer want to meet them, surely your transphobic." Yep. I said I won't fuck black men and got told I'm racist. You have to fuck them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would agree. If she is legally a woman and post-op, turning her down because of her history is not aceptable in my opinion. She couldn't help being born in the wrong body." I have turned down trans people (men and women) in the past, but because I didn't fancy them, not because of their gender identity. That's fine, but if you find them attractive and then find out that they're trans and turn them down then that's less ok. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason. I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice. Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest. How so? Since when have preferences been classed as phobic? We are all allowed choices. If I "prefer" not to employ, eat with or spend time with transgender people I think it's pretty clear that preference is phobic. Some preferences are phobic and some aren't. The word "preference" is not a get out of jail free card. " So that means that we should have sex with people that we don't want to so we aren't classed as phobic?! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? Nobody should ever feel that they have to justify attraction or lack of attraction, whatever the reason for it But what I'm saying is this, if you fancy the person but then find out they are trans. And you no longer want to meet them, surely your transphobic. But you didn't fancy them because you fancied something they are NOT! Just like fancying a delicious chicken sandwich only to discover it's actually a turkey sandwich which you do not like and didn't order. If that makes a person turkeyphobic, so be it. If I pose as a lesbian woman to another woman, make her fall in love with me, then whip out my cock on the day of reckoming, does that make that lesbian a Malephobic misandrist? In fact, doesn't this mean that all orientations of exclusivity are phobic of the gender they do not want to bone? Yes, it does. Deception is not ok. There's no excuse for it. Using pc policies to force people into relationships they don't want is a return to barbarianism and it's a diabolical branch of r-culture and has no milder a stench. Born men identifying as women who feel entitled to other people's bodies without their express desire are still born men believing they are entitled to other people's bodies without their express desire and consent, only they now identify as women. Nobody is entitled to anyone's person, not women, not men, not transmen and not transwomen. " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would agree. If she is legally a woman and post-op, turning her down because of her history is not aceptable in my opinion. She couldn't help being born in the wrong body. I have turned down trans people (men and women) in the past, but because I didn't fancy them, not because of their gender identity. That's fine, but if you find them attractive and then find out that they're trans and turn them down then that's less ok." So if a person fancies someone but then finds out they're married and turns them down because of it, that's not ok? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You can turn down anyone at anytime it's your body and only you get to decide what's done with it But if you wanted to have sex with them before knowing why deny yourself and them the fun ? Why deny yourself the vagina you've been looking forward to that they don't have? Or the relationship leading to family and biological children through the uterus they don't have? Why deny yourself that penis you aren't looking forward to? You my friend are on the wrong site if you are looking for children You my friend need to get off the site more if you think this topic and issue only pertains to swingers and people on fabswingers site. And I can only hope that you aren't making a sexual joke involving children. Because I personally don't find that shit funny in the least. If not, apologies. " We would never make a sexual joke about children Our point is this it's a swingers site and he says turn down not, not get into a relationship with you made it into something more than just sex. We come here to talk about swinging nothing else | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" So that means that we should have sex with people that we don't want to so we aren't classed as phobic?! " That's your choice, innit? Some people think eating meat is seriously unethical. You then have the choice of eating meat and living with their bad opinion of you, or agreeing with them and going veggie. Same with this issue. If some people think your sexual choices are transphobic or racist, you can live with that or you can think about where those choices come from and whether you think they are completely prejudice free. No one is going to make anyone have sex with anyone. There's no need to get over dramatic just because someone thinks your morals might be a bit off. It happens all the time to everyone. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"T Nobody is entitled to anyone's person, not women, not men, not transmen and not transwomen. " Yup, this. And there is a great deal of water between 'want to fuck' and a phobia. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I would agree. If she is legally a woman and post-op, turning her down because of her history is not aceptable in my opinion. She couldn't help being born in the wrong body. I have turned down trans people (men and women) in the past, but because I didn't fancy them, not because of their gender identity. That's fine, but if you find them attractive and then find out that they're trans and turn them down then that's less ok. So if a person fancies someone but then finds out they're married and turns them down because of it, that's not ok?" Being married is not a gender or even a race. You can be "not married". It's an ethical question, nothing more. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? " Turning her down for what? Ladies lawn tennis? Henry VIII at the RSC? Cravate de notaire on daddy's desk? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason. I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice. Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest. " Pisses me off how people throw “phobic” or “phobia” around. He’s not scared of transgender, he’s just not attracted to them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason. I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice. Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest. Pisses me off how people throw “phobic” or “phobia” around. He’s not scared of transgender, he’s just not attracted to them" Hmmm, i think somebody needs to read the op again. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The opening message and another comment further down by the op stated that it was not because you don't fancy them but purely because the person is transgender. That makes it not about physical attraction and therefore in my opinion phobic because the attraction is there but because the other person was previously a male or female has now changed their opinion of them and they no longer want to sleep with them. Yes it's ok to say no to sleeping with that person but yes in my opinion it's transphobic. Madame B " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason. I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice. Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest. Pisses me off how people throw “phobic” or “phobia” around. He’s not scared of transgender, he’s just not attracted to them Hmmm, i think somebody needs to read the op again. " Are you scared of transgender people? I mean, if you see a transgender person, do you run in fear? Like when an arachnophobic sees a spider? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Is it OK. ...not to read ANY of the posts before I send my own? Is it OK to feel lazy and not motivated to be interesting or funny or kind or flirty, but still want to chat?" No it’s not ok! Read the thread like everyone else you threadphobic! I’m not commenting on the second half of your post because I didn’t read it | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OK. Read most of those. Yawn. Is it OK not to answer?" Will you catch me up on what’s been said? I haven’t read most of them | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Hahaha threadphobic. Yahhh. Or maybe I'm threadist?" Ether way you are a monster!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Of course it's ok. Is the converse, that it's not ok, mean that you have to have sex with them? Do men have to have sex with men, to ensure they aren't homophobic?" Of I don't want to fuck my gay friend, am I homophobic? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Of course it's ok. Is the converse, that it's not ok, mean that you have to have sex with them? Do men have to have sex with men, to ensure they aren't homophobic? Of I don't want to fuck my gay friend, am I homophobic?" Yes! And if you don’t have sex with me right away, you are heterophobic! I’m sorry, I don’t make the rules | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes. It is. You're allowed to say no to anyone for whatever reason you so desire. " This | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Of course it's ok. Is the converse, that it's not ok, mean that you have to have sex with them? Do men have to have sex with men, to ensure they aren't homophobic? Of I don't want to fuck my gay friend, am I homophobic? Yes! And if you don’t have sex with me right away, you are heterophobic! I’m sorry, I don’t make the rules " Damn I've been doing it all wrong!! But he was heterophobic anyway, he didn't want to fuck me! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason. I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice. Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest. Pisses me off how people throw “phobic” or “phobia” around. He’s not scared of transgender, he’s just not attracted to them Hmmm, i think somebody needs to read the op again. Are you scared of transgender people? I mean, if you see a transgender person, do you run in fear? Like when an arachnophobic sees a spider?" People have been known to run away from me screaming | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Of course it's ok. Is the converse, that it's not ok, mean that you have to have sex with them? Do men have to have sex with men, to ensure they aren't homophobic? Of I don't want to fuck my gay friend, am I homophobic? Yes! And if you don’t have sex with me right away, you are heterophobic! I’m sorry, I don’t make the rules Damn I've been doing it all wrong!! But he was heterophobic anyway, he didn't want to fuck me! " It’s a viscous cycle | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You can turn down anyone at anytime it's your body and only you get to decide what's done with it But if you wanted to have sex with them before knowing why deny yourself and them the fun ? Why deny yourself the vagina you've been looking forward to that they don't have? Or the relationship leading to family and biological children through the uterus they don't have? Why deny yourself that penis you aren't looking forward to? You my friend are on the wrong site if you are looking for children You my friend need to get off the site more if you think this topic and issue only pertains to swingers and people on fabswingers site. And I can only hope that you aren't making a sexual joke involving children. Because I personally don't find that shit funny in the least. If not, apologies. We would never make a sexual joke about children Our point is this it's a swingers site and he says turn down not, not get into a relationship with you made it into something more than just sex. We come here to talk about swinging nothing else " The very definition of swinging involves committed relationships primarily...couples.. So just what are you taking about? Are you saying that those in the swinging scene don't enter into relationships with each other? Aren't you swinging in a relationship? Isn't your profile a couples profile? Right! So why do you think relationships are excluded from the subject of turning down particular genders?? That's your own arbitrary restriction you came up with because it conveniently fits along with your above attempt at wit and sarcasm. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy the wiseass pokes and jokes at each other's expense. It's just that you failed this round. Try again. The subject of rejection includes all forms of relationship, whether purely sexual, matrimonial, or partnership, cohabitation etc. Trust me, this topic was brought to fab from an external reality. It's not a "fab" issue exclusively our even primarily for that matter. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? " Yes it's ok. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If the guy who was gonna fuck her finds out she used to be a he , and gets his head messed up about it , then yes it’s fine to say no . He isn’t gonna perform very well , so she would be put out by the meet anyway . Is it phobic ? Probably , but so what ? " Exactly this. If someone turns out to be phobic about me then, as far as I'm concerned, that's their issue not mine. If I'm not good enough for someone for whatever reason, then they are not good enough for me either.(and vice versa,of course). If someone seemed to like me and then changed their mind because of some assumption about the past then at least I don't have to spend time with that person, listening to their 'opinions'. Its actually quite a good filter and I feel glad that I have so far been able to avoid talking to any of these people. (They do tend to get on my tits a bit, especially with the apparent assumption that I haven't heard all their crap about chromosones and such like, before about a million times). And another thing,now I've got started, are we to assume that trans women are so desperate that they will go with just about anyone and the guy is doing her a favour? No. We have the right to turn guys down too,for any reason we feel like. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The thing that has come across more than anything from this thread is you can't freely express a preference without being questioned." I’ve not read the thread, only your comment, just to pre-clarify that ... is there an issue with questions per se, or do you mean that people aren’t asking questions but instead making judgements. Often people don’t ask clean questions or indeed often people do, but people don’t read them as clean. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason. I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice. Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest. How so? Since when have preferences been classed as phobic? We are all allowed choices. If I "prefer" not to employ, eat with or spend time with transgender people I think it's pretty clear that preference is phobic. Some preferences are phobic and some aren't. The word "preference" is not a get out of jail free card. So that means that we should have sex with people that we don't want to so we aren't classed as phobic?! " In a nutshell , some people cant grasp the fact that the world shouldnt bend to their will . If someone struggles with their identity then they should be offered advice and help . but when their problems start being thrown onto other peoples problems aswell such as a man talking to what he thinks is a woman to then be told they were a man , to say they are phobic because they dont want to be with a man ? Really? Its pretty selfish from someone trying to make you go agaisnt your morality so they can get some gratitude . Is this even a legit post or just one for attention? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The thing that has come across more than anything from this thread is you can't freely express a preference without being questioned. I’ve not read the thread, only your comment, just to pre-clarify that ... is there an issue with questions per se, or do you mean that people aren’t asking questions but instead making judgements. Often people don’t ask clean questions or indeed often people do, but people don’t read them as clean. " I was more or less called trans phobic for my preference of not wanting to have sex with a trans woman and maintaining it is ok for that to be the sole reason. My argument is that is the only reason that I need. It does not mean I am a trans hater or transphobic. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"But how and y would u know" Thats a completely different question. Let's just assume you do know and not complicate things further. Feel free to start a new thread asking your question. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Surely if you're not attracted to them then your reasons are your own gender realignment aside, if it doesntnfeel right then you have every right to say no thank you very much, as long as you're not a dick about it?" Yeah absolutely. Despite my clearly stated viewpoint I would not be an arse about it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm saying if the girls didn't put ts then u wouldn't know and they don't need to tell u. How do u know along ur sexual travels uve not met one..." Yes I know what you mean. But Clems post strongly implies that you do know. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The thing that has come across more than anything from this thread is you can't freely express a preference without being questioned." ...without being slated for it.... People can call me racist, homophobic, transphobic, whatever they like. I still won't fuck them if I don't want to. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"You can turn down anyone at anytime it's your body and only you get to decide what's done with it But if you wanted to have sex with them before knowing why deny yourself and them the fun ? Why deny yourself the vagina you've been looking forward to that they don't have? Or the relationship leading to family and biological children through the uterus they don't have? Why deny yourself that penis you aren't looking forward to? You my friend are on the wrong site if you are looking for children You my friend need to get off the site more if you think this topic and issue only pertains to swingers and people on fabswingers site. And I can only hope that you aren't making a sexual joke involving children. Because I personally don't find that shit funny in the least. If not, apologies. We would never make a sexual joke about children Our point is this it's a swingers site and he says turn down not, not get into a relationship with you made it into something more than just sex. We come here to talk about swinging nothing else The very definition of swinging involves committed relationships primarily...couples.. So just what are you taking about? Are you saying that those in the swinging scene don't enter into relationships with each other? Aren't you swinging in a relationship? Isn't your profile a couples profile? Right! So why do you think relationships are excluded from the subject of turning down particular genders?? That's your own arbitrary restriction you came up with because it conveniently fits along with your above attempt at wit and sarcasm. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy the wiseass pokes and jokes at each other's expense. It's just that you failed this round. Try again. The subject of rejection includes all forms of relationship, whether purely sexual, matrimonial, or partnership, cohabitation etc. Trust me, this topic was brought to fab from an external reality. It's not a "fab" issue exclusively our even primarily for that matter. " You are looking for wit and sarcasm that doesn't exist we don't use subtext our point is quite simple if this is just a question of sex and you wanted to have sex before knowing that she used to be a he then personally we don't think it should change anything Maybe it's just a case of what we use this site for is different to you so we look at this from different perspectives. But that's the great thing about fab we can all use it for our own purposes and takeaway from it whatever you want | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Much more importantly. Is it OK, to damage the already dificult task of getting lgbt people accepted more widely by mainstream society, by throwing about homophobic and transphobic slurs onto people who are accepting, welcoming and suportive, but don't want to have sex with them? Comments and atittudes like these hinder lgbt acceptance in my opinion." Accepting, welcoming and supportive? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reminds me of IT Crowd. "You used to be a man? I thought you said you were from Iran!" " I posted that link up the top somewhere. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reminds me of IT Crowd. "You used to be a man? I thought you said you were from Iran!" I posted that link up the top somewhere. " Oops busted for not reading the whole thread | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" This kind of thing. https://youtu.be/g2KsZHRrFpU" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reminds me of IT Crowd. "You used to be a man? I thought you said you were from Iran!" I posted that link up the top somewhere. Oops busted for not reading the whole thread " No problem | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Reminds me of IT Crowd. "You used to be a man? I thought you said you were from Iran!" I posted that link up the top somewhere. Oops busted for not reading the whole thread " It's the first post that's important. But seems a lot of people don't read that either! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If a trans-person could answer this I would be very much grateful Would you rather. A person turns down sex with you because you are trans? Or A person had sex with you, even though they didn't want, because they didn't want to offend you?" I'm very comfortable with the first and won't accept pity fuck. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Much more importantly. Is it OK, to damage the already dificult task of getting lgbt people accepted more widely by mainstream society, by throwing about homophobic and transphobic slurs onto people who are accepting, welcoming and suportive, but don't want to have sex with them? Comments and atittudes like these hinder lgbt acceptance in my opinion. Accepting, welcoming and supportive? " Yes. There's lots of people who are all those things, but don't want sex with trans people. In my opinion, you are more much interested in poking people with purposely divisive threads than actually helping lgbt acceptance. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Yes. There's lots of people who are all those things, but don't want sex with trans people. In my opinion, you are more much interested in poking people with purposely divisive threads than actually helping lgbt acceptance." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If a trans-person could answer this I would be very much grateful Would you rather. A person turns down sex with you because you are trans? Or A person had sex with you, even though they didn't want, because they didn't want to offend you? I'm very comfortable with the first and won't accept pity fuck. " What she said | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"From a relationship standpoint rather than just sex ... I could like someone right up to the point they told me they already had kids and that would put me off I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were very strictly religious (as in i would be expected to convert) and that would put me off I could like someone right up to the point they told me they work away 70% of the year and that would put me off I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were trans and that would put me off OR i could already like someone so much that when they told me any of the above it wouldnt matter I have personally been like by people until i told them i was involved in swinging and then it put them off My point is i dont think any of the above makes you "phobic" ... you learn more about someone and you subconciously assess how that fits in with your plan for love and life and it can and will alter your opinion and attraction to them ... or you could already be so attracted to them that any altered perception is acceptable to you To me "phobic" people are people who just think something different is wrong full stop, they dont want to learn, understand, empathise, accept. Not wanting something for yourself doesnt make you phobic. Being fully accepting of gay people but not wanting to be gay myself wouldnt make me homophobic so why would being fully accepting of trans people but not wanting to date trans people make me transphobic? " Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice? I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If a trans-person could answer this I would be very much grateful Would you rather. A person turns down sex with you because you are trans? Or A person had sex with you, even though they didn't want, because they didn't want to offend you? I'm very comfortable with the first and won't accept pity fuck. What she said " Although more of a pc fuck than pity fuck in this instance | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice? I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex? " It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm not transphobic......but.." You are just being an arse about it now bud. You asked a question you got answers. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice? I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex? It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing " Again, very reasonable, but the situation where you fancy a woman, get to the bedroom, get naked and are all ready to go until she tells you she is transferring. Irrational prejudice? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? " If we being p.c then I guess not. But then if we were all being p.c we wouldn't be able to state our preferences on here. E.g. Couples only (is it the guys fault he can't get a misses) guys with big cocks (not his fault he was born with a tiny cock) girls a certain size (could be medical and not in their control). At the end of the day we all have the right to say no. It doesn't matter the reason. And I'm sure no one wants a yes purely because they feel like they can't say no. The creator of this post is looking for petite women with big boobs is that any more or less exceptable than any other preference I think not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice? I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex? It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing Again, very reasonable, but the situation where you fancy a woman, get to the bedroom, get naked and are all ready to go until she tells you she is transferring. Irrational prejudice? " I dont think it really matters if its irrational prejudice or not ... if in that moment something is not for you sexually then you have to say sorry not for me If i was a guy and got in the bedroom naked and a woman told me bareback only am i then allowed to be prejudiced about her sexual health - of course i am If someone withholds any information to that minute you have been left with no choice but to make a decision on what you already believe / are comfortable with ie "pre judge" and any decision you make has to be ok | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I'm very comfortable with the first and won't accept pity fuck. What she said Although more of a pc fuck than pity fuck in this instance " We got the fabs chat room for that... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice? I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex? It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing Again, very reasonable, but the situation where you fancy a woman, get to the bedroom, get naked and are all ready to go until she tells you she is transferring. Irrational prejudice? I dont think it really matters if its irrational prejudice or not ... if in that moment something is not for you sexually then you have to say sorry not for me If i was a guy and got in the bedroom naked and a woman told me bareback only am i then allowed to be prejudiced about her sexual health - of course i am If someone withholds any information to that minute you have been left with no choice but to make a decision on what you already believe / are comfortable with ie "pre judge" and any decision you make has to be ok " But the bareback thing isn't analogous. A reason for withdrawing there is perfectly rational. A health reason. I suppose a rational reason for refusing a trans person might be the dishonesty but I suspect that would be rare. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"From a relationship standpoint rather than just sex ... I could like someone right up to the point they told me they already had kids and that would put me off I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were very strictly religious (as in i would be expected to convert) and that would put me off I could like someone right up to the point they told me they work away 70% of the year and that would put me off I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were trans and that would put me off OR i could already like someone so much that when they told me any of the above it wouldnt matter I have personally been like by people until i told them i was involved in swinging and then it put them off My point is i dont think any of the above makes you "phobic" ... you learn more about someone and you subconciously assess how that fits in with your plan for love and life and it can and will alter your opinion and attraction to them ... or you could already be so attracted to them that any altered perception is acceptable to you To me "phobic" people are people who just think something different is wrong full stop, they dont want to learn, understand, empathise, accept. Not wanting something for yourself doesnt make you phobic. Being fully accepting of gay people but not wanting to be gay myself wouldnt make me homophobic so why would being fully accepting of trans people but not wanting to date trans people make me transphobic? Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice? I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex? " This is simply rubbish. I am not comfortable with having sex with a man. I am also not comfortable with a man who has transitined to be a woman. It's that simple. No further reasoning is required. If I find out before getting horizontal I would explain my thoughts and hope the person understood. If I found out after sex I would be annoyed and would consider myself misled. If I never found out then obviously I wouldn't care. I don't think any of that is unrational. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice? I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex? It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing Again, very reasonable, but the situation where you fancy a woman, get to the bedroom, get naked and are all ready to go until she tells you she is transferring. Irrational prejudice? I dont think it really matters if its irrational prejudice or not ... if in that moment something is not for you sexually then you have to say sorry not for me If i was a guy and got in the bedroom naked and a woman told me bareback only am i then allowed to be prejudiced about her sexual health - of course i am If someone withholds any information to that minute you have been left with no choice but to make a decision on what you already believe / are comfortable with ie "pre judge" and any decision you make has to be ok But the bareback thing isn't analogous. A reason for withdrawing there is perfectly rational. A health reason. I suppose a rational reason for refusing a trans person might be the dishonesty but I suspect that would be rare. " Your own insecurity, beliefs and boundaries are also all rational reasona for refusing something you are not familiar with This probably wont be a popular way to word it but here goes A trans person believes they have been born into the wrong body and idenify with a gender they were not born with however in the same way that each religion had a belief which they see to be the "one truth" and yet they are all different ... some people do not have this same believe that trans people do and they are perfectly entitled to it and nobody should be able to tell them they are wrong or the trans person is wrong As long as their actions towards a trans person are respectful , not derogatory etc there is nothing wrong with having a different view and deciding that both that view point or sexual intimacy with a trans person is not for you Somewhere along the line i feel like acceptance of what people class to be minority or discriminated against groups seems to have been blurred from "live and let live" to a rhetoric of "you must believe as i believe and think and i think and allow me into every aspect of your life or you are still against me" and i think that is unhelpful | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Back to the OP’s original question !!! Of course, it’s OK to turn them down, we all have a right to our own preferences. But – it’s not OK to turn them or any other person down who’s lifestyle differs from ours with any form of malice or detriment. We also don’t have the right to pass judgment on others because of gender, color, religion, disability, have a cock or don’t have a cock…….etc, etc.,etc. Thankfully we are all different and diverse – that’s what makes it such a wonderful world to live in. " Yup. I would say no thank you, you are not me. The day I say I am not fucking you cos you are a gay freak is the day someone can call me out for being trans phobic and no sooner. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"From a relationship standpoint rather than just sex ... I could like someone right up to the point they told me they already had kids and that would put me off I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were very strictly religious (as in i would be expected to convert) and that would put me off I could like someone right up to the point they told me they work away 70% of the year and that would put me off I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were trans and that would put me off OR i could already like someone so much that when they told me any of the above it wouldnt matter I have personally been like by people until i told them i was involved in swinging and then it put them off My point is i dont think any of the above makes you "phobic" ... you learn more about someone and you subconciously assess how that fits in with your plan for love and life and it can and will alter your opinion and attraction to them ... or you could already be so attracted to them that any altered perception is acceptable to you To me "phobic" people are people who just think something different is wrong full stop, they dont want to learn, understand, empathise, accept. Not wanting something for yourself doesnt make you phobic. Being fully accepting of gay people but not wanting to be gay myself wouldnt make me homophobic so why would being fully accepting of trans people but not wanting to date trans people make me transphobic? Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice? I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex? This is simply rubbish. I am not comfortable with having sex with a man. I am also not comfortable with a man who has transitined to be a woman. It's that simple. No further reasoning is required. If I find out before getting horizontal I would explain my thoughts and hope the person understood. If I found out after sex I would be annoyed and would consider myself misled. If I never found out then obviously I wouldn't care. I don't think any of that is unrational." If you wanted to have sex with someone who appeared to you female and the only reason you then don't want to have sex with them is that you discover they are trans, then by definition its your prejudice against trans people that caused that. Of course its your perfect right to have sex or not have sex with whoever you choose, but let's be honest about our own motivation. As it happens, I also feel ambiguous about having sex with a post op trans woman and I accept that's my prejudice. We all have prejudices. I just think we should be aware of them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"From a relationship standpoint rather than just sex ... I could like someone right up to the point they told me they already had kids and that would put me off I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were very strictly religious (as in i would be expected to convert) and that would put me off I could like someone right up to the point they told me they work away 70% of the year and that would put me off I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were trans and that would put me off OR i could already like someone so much that when they told me any of the above it wouldnt matter I have personally been like by people until i told them i was involved in swinging and then it put them off My point is i dont think any of the above makes you "phobic" ... you learn more about someone and you subconciously assess how that fits in with your plan for love and life and it can and will alter your opinion and attraction to them ... or you could already be so attracted to them that any altered perception is acceptable to you To me "phobic" people are people who just think something different is wrong full stop, they dont want to learn, understand, empathise, accept. Not wanting something for yourself doesnt make you phobic. Being fully accepting of gay people but not wanting to be gay myself wouldnt make me homophobic so why would being fully accepting of trans people but not wanting to date trans people make me transphobic? Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice? I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex? This is simply rubbish. I am not comfortable with having sex with a man. I am also not comfortable with a man who has transitined to be a woman. It's that simple. No further reasoning is required. If I find out before getting horizontal I would explain my thoughts and hope the person understood. If I found out after sex I would be annoyed and would consider myself misled. If I never found out then obviously I wouldn't care. I don't think any of that is unrational. If you wanted to have sex with someone who appeared to you female and the only reason you then don't want to have sex with them is that you discover they are trans, then by definition its your prejudice against trans people that caused that. Of course its your perfect right to have sex or not have sex with whoever you choose, but let's be honest about our own motivation. As it happens, I also feel ambiguous about having sex with a post op trans woman and I accept that's my prejudice. We all have prejudices. I just think we should be aware of them. " No. Would you call a straight guy prejudiced against gay men just because he wouldn't fuck them? I have a rainbow set of friends. Numerous gay gentleman, one who is bi and yes one post op trans. I go drinking with them. I play online games with them. I don't want to shag any of them. Quite frankly I am annoyed some of the responses here have made me feel defensive enough to mention this. I am fully aware of my prejudices. They total zero. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"From a relationship standpoint rather than just sex ... I could like someone right up to the point they told me they already had kids and that would put me off I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were very strictly religious (as in i would be expected to convert) and that would put me off I could like someone right up to the point they told me they work away 70% of the year and that would put me off I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were trans and that would put me off OR i could already like someone so much that when they told me any of the above it wouldnt matter I have personally been like by people until i told them i was involved in swinging and then it put them off My point is i dont think any of the above makes you "phobic" ... you learn more about someone and you subconciously assess how that fits in with your plan for love and life and it can and will alter your opinion and attraction to them ... or you could already be so attracted to them that any altered perception is acceptable to you To me "phobic" people are people who just think something different is wrong full stop, they dont want to learn, understand, empathise, accept. Not wanting something for yourself doesnt make you phobic. Being fully accepting of gay people but not wanting to be gay myself wouldnt make me homophobic so why would being fully accepting of trans people but not wanting to date trans people make me transphobic? Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice? I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex? This is simply rubbish. I am not comfortable with having sex with a man. I am also not comfortable with a man who has transitined to be a woman. It's that simple. No further reasoning is required. If I find out before getting horizontal I would explain my thoughts and hope the person understood. If I found out after sex I would be annoyed and would consider myself misled. If I never found out then obviously I wouldn't care. I don't think any of that is unrational. If you wanted to have sex with someone who appeared to you female and the only reason you then don't want to have sex with them is that you discover they are trans, then by definition its your prejudice against trans people that caused that. Of course its your perfect right to have sex or not have sex with whoever you choose, but let's be honest about our own motivation. As it happens, I also feel ambiguous about having sex with a post op trans woman and I accept that's my prejudice. We all have prejudices. I just think we should be aware of them. No. Would you call a straight guy prejudiced against gay men just because he wouldn't fuck them? I have a rainbow set of friends. Numerous gay gentleman, one who is bi and yes one post op trans. I go drinking with them. I play online games with them. I don't want to shag any of them. Quite frankly I am annoyed some of the responses here have made me feel defensive enough to mention this. I am fully aware of my prejudices. They total zero." It's a question of language. If you say "whatever their other qualities I will never have sex with a trans woman " then you are making a pre judgment about their sexual attractiveness based purely on their Trans status. Hence prejudice. It's possible to be prejudiced against people in some areas and not others. Some one, for example, may be perfectly willing to socialise with black people but won't employ them because he thinks they are all lazy. He'd be prejudiced against black people would he not? And if we accept we are prejudiced on some way or another it might stop this whole area being discussed in such fraught terms. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If a trans-person could answer this I would be very much grateful Would you rather. A person turns down sex with you because you are trans? Or A person had sex with you, even though they didn't want, because they didn't want to offend you?" The former. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It's a question of language. If you say "whatever their other qualities I will never have sex with a trans woman " then you are making a pre judgment about their sexual attractiveness based purely on their Trans status. Hence prejudice. It's possible to be prejudiced against people in some areas and not others. Some one, for example, may be perfectly willing to socialise with black people but won't employ them because he thinks they are all lazy. He'd be prejudiced against black people would he not? And if we accept we are prejudiced on some way or another it might stop this whole area being discussed in such fraught terms. " I agree with this to an extent but its the negative connotations attached to the word prejudiced that gets peoples back up To many in language terms prejudice = phobia when realistically wether we like to admit it we all pre judge situations and people in all walks of life on a daily basis I think it goes back to my point about what people see as "acceptance" taking a swing from live and let live to you must be fully with me in every aspect of my belief or you are against me ... for many (including myself) live and let live is enough and therefore we don't see any issue with it being our preference or prejudice whatever word you want to use to not take it further than that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice? I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex? It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing Again, very reasonable, but the situation where you fancy a woman, get to the bedroom, get naked and are all ready to go until she tells you she is transferring. Irrational prejudice? " Quite frankly,if disclosure hadn't occurred before the point of nakedness in a bedroom,it probably never would. The point being that I would have found out what the guys likely rection would be and decided for myself whether or not I wanted to proceed. It's not only for the guy to decide,you know. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"From a relationship standpoint rather than just sex ... I could like someone right up to the point they told me they already had kids and that would put me off I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were very strictly religious (as in i would be expected to convert) and that would put me off I could like someone right up to the point they told me they work away 70% of the year and that would put me off I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were trans and that would put me off OR i could already like someone so much that when they told me any of the above it wouldnt matter I have personally been like by people until i told them i was involved in swinging and then it put them off My point is i dont think any of the above makes you "phobic" ... you learn more about someone and you subconciously assess how that fits in with your plan for love and life and it can and will alter your opinion and attraction to them ... or you could already be so attracted to them that any altered perception is acceptable to you To me "phobic" people are people who just think something different is wrong full stop, they dont want to learn, understand, empathise, accept. Not wanting something for yourself doesnt make you phobic. Being fully accepting of gay people but not wanting to be gay myself wouldnt make me homophobic so why would being fully accepting of trans people but not wanting to date trans people make me transphobic? Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice? I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex? This is simply rubbish. I am not comfortable with having sex with a man. I am also not comfortable with a man who has transitined to be a woman. It's that simple. No further reasoning is required. If I find out before getting horizontal I would explain my thoughts and hope the person understood. If I found out after sex I would be annoyed and would consider myself misled. If I never found out then obviously I wouldn't care. I don't think any of that is unrational. If you wanted to have sex with someone who appeared to you female and the only reason you then don't want to have sex with them is that you discover they are trans, then by definition its your prejudice against trans people that caused that. Of course its your perfect right to have sex or not have sex with whoever you choose, but let's be honest about our own motivation. As it happens, I also feel ambiguous about having sex with a post op trans woman and I accept that's my prejudice. We all have prejudices. I just think we should be aware of them. No. Would you call a straight guy prejudiced against gay men just because he wouldn't fuck them? I have a rainbow set of friends. Numerous gay gentleman, one who is bi and yes one post op trans. I go drinking with them. I play online games with them. I don't want to shag any of them. Quite frankly I am annoyed some of the responses here have made me feel defensive enough to mention this. I am fully aware of my prejudices. They total zero. It's a question of language. If you say "whatever their other qualities I will never have sex with a trans woman " then you are making a pre judgment about their sexual attractiveness based purely on their Trans status. Hence prejudice. It's possible to be prejudiced against people in some areas and not others. Some one, for example, may be perfectly willing to socialise with black people but won't employ them because he thinks they are all lazy. He'd be prejudiced against black people would he not? And if we accept we are prejudiced on some way or another it might stop this whole area being discussed in such fraught terms. " Well said Madame B | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice? I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex? It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing Again, very reasonable, but the situation where you fancy a woman, get to the bedroom, get naked and are all ready to go until she tells you she is transferring. Irrational prejudice? Quite frankly,if disclosure hadn't occurred before the point of nakedness in a bedroom,it probably never would. The point being that I would have found out what the guys likely rection would be and decided for myself whether or not I wanted to proceed. It's not only for the guy to decide,you know." I appreciate that, but this discussion is specifically about whether men who won't have sex with trans women are phobic. Hence I am posting a situation for a man to change his mind about sex with a woman was because she is trans. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It's a question of language. If you say "whatever their other qualities I will never have sex with a trans woman " then you are making a pre judgment about their sexual attractiveness based purely on their Trans status. Hence prejudice. It's possible to be prejudiced against people in some areas and not others. Some one, for example, may be perfectly willing to socialise with black people but won't employ them because he thinks they are all lazy. He'd be prejudiced against black people would he not? And if we accept we are prejudiced on some way or another it might stop this whole area being discussed in such fraught terms. I agree with this to an extent but its the negative connotations attached to the word prejudiced that gets peoples back up To many in language terms prejudice = phobia when realistically wether we like to admit it we all pre judge situations and people in all walks of life on a daily basis I think it goes back to my point about what people see as "acceptance" taking a swing from live and let live to you must be fully with me in every aspect of my belief or you are against me ... for many (including myself) live and let live is enough and therefore we don't see any issue with it being our preference or prejudice whatever word you want to use to not take it further than that " I also think with something like the employment example above ... each person can be judged on their own merit and if the black person on your example was a hard worker you can help to dispell that stereotype or prejudice However there is something different and more difficult about attraction ... i dont know if its chemical or mental or what the reason is but very often it is just there or it is not ... it doesnt follow normal rules and usually cant be controlled ... how many times have you found yourself attracted to someone not your "usual type" or seen someone who should be exactly your type on paper and the sexual chemistry is just not there | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It's a question of language. If you say "whatever their other qualities I will never have sex with a trans woman " then you are making a pre judgment about their sexual attractiveness based purely on their Trans status. Hence prejudice. It's possible to be prejudiced against people in some areas and not others. Some one, for example, may be perfectly willing to socialise with black people but won't employ them because he thinks they are all lazy. He'd be prejudiced against black people would he not? And if we accept we are prejudiced on some way or another it might stop this whole area being discussed in such fraught terms. I agree with this to an extent but its the negative connotations attached to the word prejudiced that gets peoples back up To many in language terms prejudice = phobia when realistically wether we like to admit it we all pre judge situations and people in all walks of life on a daily basis I think it goes back to my point about what people see as "acceptance" taking a swing from live and let live to you must be fully with me in every aspect of my belief or you are against me ... for many (including myself) live and let live is enough and therefore we don't see any issue with it being our preference or prejudice whatever word you want to use to not take it further than that I also think with something like the employment example above ... each person can be judged on their own merit and if the black person on your example was a hard worker you can help to dispell that stereotype or prejudice However there is something different and more difficult about attraction ... i dont know if its chemical or mental or what the reason is but very often it is just there or it is not ... it doesnt follow normal rules and usually cant be controlled ... how many times have you found yourself attracted to someone not your "usual type" or seen someone who should be exactly your type on paper and the sexual chemistry is just not there " I agree with the latter point, but quite often sexual preference, even we can't control it, derives from irrational prejudice. I don't fancy overweight people for example. That's probably because of various stereotypes about overweight people I have imbibed during my life, hence a prejudice. Could I change that? Possibly, if I put a lot of effort into considering and examining my views. Will I try to change it? No, because it's not worth it. I hardly have overweight women queuing up to have sex with me, so it's not a major social problem | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice? I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex? It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing Again, very reasonable, but the situation where you fancy a woman, get to the bedroom, get naked and are all ready to go until she tells you she is transferring. Irrational prejudice? Quite frankly,if disclosure hadn't occurred before the point of nakedness in a bedroom,it probably never would. The point being that I would have found out what the guys likely rection would be and decided for myself whether or not I wanted to proceed. It's not only for the guy to decide,you know. I appreciate that, but this discussion is specifically about whether men who won't have sex with trans women are phobic. Hence I am posting a situation for a man to change his mind about sex with a woman was because she is trans. " Well I suppose that is how the discussion progressed but it wasn't quite what the OP asked.The question also specified that he was not referring to tvs but a few have answered as well as me and the consensus seems to be that nobody who is actually affected by this,really minds about another persons preferences and that the preferences themselves do not indicate 'phobia'.As long as everybody treats everybody else respectfully, no one should really object to being turned down for any reason. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's sort of self punitive and self selecting. Anyone who shows that they have unkind preferences, won't be touched by many who the phobic person may have found attractive. Their own, what would appear to be, bigotry, makes them the loser. " Preferences cant be labelled kind or unkind. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice? I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex? It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing Again, very reasonable, but the situation where you fancy a woman, get to the bedroom, get naked and are all ready to go until she tells you she is transferring. Irrational prejudice? Quite frankly,if disclosure hadn't occurred before the point of nakedness in a bedroom,it probably never would. The point being that I would have found out what the guys likely rection would be and decided for myself whether or not I wanted to proceed. It's not only for the guy to decide,you know. I appreciate that, but this discussion is specifically about whether men who won't have sex with trans women are phobic. Hence I am posting a situation for a man to change his mind about sex with a woman was because she is trans. Well I suppose that is how the discussion progressed but it wasn't quite what the OP asked.The question also specified that he was not referring to tvs but a few have answered as well as me and the consensus seems to be that nobody who is actually affected by this,really minds about another persons preferences and that the preferences themselves do not indicate 'phobia'.As long as everybody treats everybody else respectfully, no one should really object to being turned down for any reason." Totally agree. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's sort of self punitive and self selecting. Anyone who shows that they have unkind preferences, won't be touched by many who the phobic person may have found attractive. Their own, what would appear to be, bigotry, makes them the loser. Preferences cant be labelled kind or unkind." Agree- but I think it depends on how it's said. "Gingers make me wanna puke" is not the same as "I'm sorry but you're not what I'm looking for". I know that the thought of fucking me will make some people shudder and I'm ok with that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice? I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex? It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing Again, very reasonable, but the situation where you fancy a woman, get to the bedroom, get naked and are all ready to go until she tells you she is transferring. Irrational prejudice? Quite frankly,if disclosure hadn't occurred before the point of nakedness in a bedroom,it probably never would. The point being that I would have found out what the guys likely rection would be and decided for myself whether or not I wanted to proceed. It's not only for the guy to decide,you know. I appreciate that, but this discussion is specifically about whether men who won't have sex with trans women are phobic. Hence I am posting a situation for a man to change his mind about sex with a woman was because she is trans. Well I suppose that is how the discussion progressed but it wasn't quite what the OP asked.The question also specified that he was not referring to tvs but a few have answered as well as me and the consensus seems to be that nobody who is actually affected by this,really minds about another persons preferences and that the preferences themselves do not indicate 'phobia'.As long as everybody treats everybody else respectfully, no one should really object to being turned down for any reason." Respect always. x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Isn’t a phobia something you cant control? Without therapy etc etc? Having a phobia isn’t a bad thing is it?" A phobia is irrational and obsessive. Yeah it can be a bad thing | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's sort of self punitive and self selecting. Anyone who shows that they have unkind preferences, won't be touched by many who the phobic person may have found attractive. Their own, what would appear to be, bigotry, makes them the loser. Preferences cant be labelled kind or unkind." I just did. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's sort of self punitive and self selecting. Anyone who shows that they have unkind preferences, won't be touched by many who the phobic person may have found attractive. Their own, what would appear to be, bigotry, makes them the loser. Preferences cant be labelled kind or unkind. Agree- but I think it depends on how it's said. "Gingers make me wanna puke" is not the same as "I'm sorry but you're not what I'm looking for". I know that the thought of fucking me will make some people shudder and I'm ok with that. " It does depend yes. I have been answering clems question. I don't go round saying oi you trans woman i wouldn't touch you with a barge pole. Hence it's a preference not a prejudice. On a lighter note gingers are hot in my experience | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's sort of self punitive and self selecting. Anyone who shows that they have unkind preferences, won't be touched by many who the phobic person may have found attractive. Their own, what would appear to be, bigotry, makes them the loser. Preferences cant be labelled kind or unkind. I just did." Wrongly | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? " This is a difficult one. Personally I don’t think it should be an issue if she is now a woman, she has gone through a lot to be one and seriously does it really matter? However, we are humans, some of us with ‘issues’ about certain things. At the end of the day it’s up to us who we turn down, its individual choice. We should, however treat everyone with respect and dignity. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's sort of self punitive and self selecting. Anyone who shows that they have unkind preferences, won't be touched by many who the phobic person may have found attractive. Their own, what would appear to be, bigotry, makes them the loser. Preferences cant be labelled kind or unkind. I just did. Wrongly" So, re my example above, a bloke prefers not to employ black people because he thinks they are lazy. We can't say that preference is unkind? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? This is a difficult one. Personally I don’t think it should be an issue if she is now a woman, she has gone through a lot to be one and seriously does it really matter? However, we are humans, some of us with ‘issues’ about certain things. At the end of the day it’s up to us who we turn down, its individual choice. We should, however treat everyone with respect and dignity. " The person's gender realignment is their lifestyle and not an issue for anyone else. Plenty of people would have no issue being intimate with them. Some would. I simply fall into the last camp. Plenty of people wouldn't get intimate with me if I was the last man on earth. I don't meet their preferences. That's the way it should be. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Back to the OP’s original question !!! Of course, it’s OK to turn them down, we all have a right to our own preferences. But – it’s not OK to turn them or any other person down who’s lifestyle differs from ours with any form of malice or detriment. We also don’t have the right to pass judgment on others because of gender, color, religion, disability, have a cock or don’t have a cock…….etc, etc.,etc. Thankfully we are all different and diverse – that’s what makes it such a wonderful world to live in. " But its not "a lifestyle"! Its not something to pass judgement on anymore than someone should be prejudiced against for being blind, or deformed. "Trans" isn't a state of mind! Its not a man who gets horny dressing up like an Ann summers model! For many it's not even a choice. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It's sort of self punitive and self selecting. Anyone who shows that they have unkind preferences, won't be touched by many who the phobic person may have found attractive. Their own, what would appear to be, bigotry, makes them the loser. Preferences cant be labelled kind or unkind. I just did. Wrongly So, re my example above, a bloke prefers not to employ black people because he thinks they are lazy. We can't say that preference is unkind? " Nope you can't. You could argue he's stereotyping a group of people. He believes he is looking after his business rightly or wrongly. Putting his needs before those of others. He is not being unkind to anyone. The black person who seeks employment and loses out is affected in that he doesnt gain employment. The owner of the business has not acted with the intention of causing that. It is just a consequence of his preference. Any sexual preference is based on ones own needs. Any prefrence of music is ones own etc etc etc. Kindness is irrelevant. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Back to the OP’s original question !!! Of course, it’s OK to turn them down, we all have a right to our own preferences. But – it’s not OK to turn them or any other person down who’s lifestyle differs from ours with any form of malice or detriment. We also don’t have the right to pass judgment on others because of gender, color, religion, disability, have a cock or don’t have a cock…….etc, etc.,etc. Thankfully we are all different and diverse – that’s what makes it such a wonderful world to live in. But its not "a lifestyle"! Its not something to pass judgement on anymore than someone should be prejudiced against for being blind, or deformed. "Trans" isn't a state of mind! Its not a man who gets horny dressing up like an Ann summers model! For many it's not even a choice. " Correct. And yet that has got bugger all to do with wheter other people wish to have sex with them. Congrats on missing the point of your own thread entirely lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Back to the OP’s original question !!! Of course, it’s OK to turn them down, we all have a right to our own preferences. But – it’s not OK to turn them or any other person down who’s lifestyle differs from ours with any form of malice or detriment. We also don’t have the right to pass judgment on others because of gender, color, religion, disability, have a cock or don’t have a cock…….etc, etc.,etc. Thankfully we are all different and diverse – that’s what makes it such a wonderful world to live in. But its not "a lifestyle"! Its not something to pass judgement on anymore than someone should be prejudiced against for being blind, or deformed. "Trans" isn't a state of mind! Its not a man who gets horny dressing up like an Ann summers model! For many it's not even a choice. Correct. And yet that has got bugger all to do with wheter other people wish to have sex with them. Congrats on missing the point of your own thread entirely lol" I wasn't answering the op..... you can see that in the bit where i didn't quote it... L O L. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Back to the OP’s original question !!! Of course, it’s OK to turn them down, we all have a right to our own preferences. But – it’s not OK to turn them or any other person down who’s lifestyle differs from ours with any form of malice or detriment. We also don’t have the right to pass judgment on others because of gender, color, religion, disability, have a cock or don’t have a cock…….etc, etc.,etc. Thankfully we are all different and diverse – that’s what makes it such a wonderful world to live in. But its not "a lifestyle"! Its not something to pass judgement on anymore than someone should be prejudiced against for being blind, or deformed. "Trans" isn't a state of mind! Its not a man who gets horny dressing up like an Ann summers model! For many it's not even a choice. " Neither is someones skin color,their height,their weight,their accent,whether they wear specs a lifestyle choice but,it is perfectly acceptable to not feel sexually attracted to any of those people. It is clearly not acceptable to refuse someone employment on some of those grounds but sexual attraction is not something that can be legislated for. To compel someone to feel, or act on,sexual attraction that they don't feel is tantamount to r**e and is verging on thought policing. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Back to the OP’s original question !!! Of course, it’s OK to turn them down, we all have a right to our own preferences. But – it’s not OK to turn them or any other person down who’s lifestyle differs from ours with any form of malice or detriment. We also don’t have the right to pass judgment on others because of gender, color, religion, disability, have a cock or don’t have a cock…….etc, etc.,etc. Thankfully we are all different and diverse – that’s what makes it such a wonderful world to live in. But its not "a lifestyle"! Its not something to pass judgement on anymore than someone should be prejudiced against for being blind, or deformed. "Trans" isn't a state of mind! Its not a man who gets horny dressing up like an Ann summers model! For many it's not even a choice. Neither is someones skin color,their height,their weight,their accent,whether they wear specs a lifestyle choice but,it is perfectly acceptable to not feel sexually attracted to any of those people. It is clearly not acceptable to refuse someone employment on some of those grounds but sexual attraction is not something that can be legislated for. To compel someone to feel, or act on,sexual attraction that they don't feel is tantamount to r**e and is verging on thought policing." Yes. But why mention it? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Back to the OP’s original question !!! Of course, it’s OK to turn them down, we all have a right to our own preferences. But – it’s not OK to turn them or any other person down who’s lifestyle differs from ours with any form of malice or detriment. We also don’t have the right to pass judgment on others because of gender, color, religion, disability, have a cock or don’t have a cock…….etc, etc.,etc. Thankfully we are all different and diverse – that’s what makes it such a wonderful world to live in. But its not "a lifestyle"! Its not something to pass judgement on anymore than someone should be prejudiced against for being blind, or deformed. "Trans" isn't a state of mind! Its not a man who gets horny dressing up like an Ann summers model! For many it's not even a choice. Correct. And yet that has got bugger all to do with wheter other people wish to have sex with them. Congrats on missing the point of your own thread entirely lol I wasn't answering the op..... you can see that in the bit where i didn't quote it... L O L." You specifically targeted their use of the word lifestyle though didn't you. You little tinker. No one is fooled here fella. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |