FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Is it "ok"...

Is it "ok"...

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury

To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Surely you only want to turn people down because you’re not attracted to them?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Yes. It is.

You're allowed to say no to anyone for whatever reason you so desire.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I would agree.

If she is legally a woman and post-op, turning her down because of her history is not aceptable in my opinion.

She couldn't help being born in the wrong body.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Feel free to turn them down, we have free choice and whilst your reasons may not be acceptable to some - you still have the choice xx

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ELLONS AND CREAMWoman  over a year ago

stourbridge area

So she was a guy .... but now a woman ?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ittle_brat_evie!!Woman  over a year ago

evesham


"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? "

Is this a p word question?!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It comes down to choice there is no right or wrong with likes and dislikes

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I think it's perfectly acceptable to turn down anyone for any reason whatsoever

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *issBehavingxxWoman  over a year ago

Glasgow


"Yes. It is.

You're allowed to say no to anyone for whatever reason you so desire.

"

^^^ This.

Is it ok to turn someone down because they're bi / straight?

Is it ok to turn someone down because they're bald?

Is it ok to turn someone down because they're black / white / asian?

Is it ok to turn someone down because they're too tall / too short?

Is it ok to turn someone down because they're too fat / too thin?

The list could be endless, and anyone can turn someone down for any reason they want to.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Anyone has the right to turn anyone down for their own reasons.

It's freedom of speech and choice.

Even if we don't agree. It's the same as people who don't like different ethnicities. Race and colour isn't a choice but people are turned down for it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Sigh.

Let's just look at it another way.

How many of you have had long term relationships with boyfriends and girlfriends in your life?

If you have, you can't really understand the trans experience, because most of them find it very difficult, a lot more difficult than you. Is that what you'd call normal?

Is it oh for a lot of straight guys to be horny for a tgirl as long as his mates don't find out?

Sheesh, a guy gets a few knockbacks in here and he's posting threads about how unfair it all is.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? "

Nobody should ever feel that they have to justify attraction or lack of attraction, whatever the reason for it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you?

Is this a p word question?! "

Of course.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you?

Nobody should ever feel that they have to justify attraction or lack of attraction, whatever the reason for it."

But what I'm saying is this, if you fancy the person but then find out they are trans. And you no longer want to meet them, surely your transphobic.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury

This kind of thing.

https://youtu.be/g2KsZHRrFpU

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It's "ok" to turn anyone down.its your life,your body your choice.

I would be more concerned with the fact you need to ask others wether it's ok to spend time with a certain type of person.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *kyblue1878Couple  over a year ago

Southport

Why ask? It's your choice, everybody has their own comfort zones. Political correctness gone mad again. Some people write it's their preference to meet only black or only white. So what.....its a choice, your own opinion. If you're not comfortable and you don't fancy them then don't do it, regardless of gender, colour, or any other differences.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Let's put this question into reverse shall we?

Is it ok to turn a trans man down because he was born into the wrong body and wanted a cock not a pussy?

As previous posters have said it is up to the individual to decide who they do and do not wish to meet.

Myself I would meet a man who used to have a pussy

I would meet a woman who used to have a dick

I would base my decision on what they were like and what they wanted to do sexually.

XXX XXX

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? "

It's probably better than going with a trans woman just to see how she compares with a 'female bodied from birth woman'.Sort of treating her as some kind of experiment.

Having experienced both (in the real world,not so much on fab),I can say that being rejected by a guy who fancied me right up to the moment I told him 'the awful truth' made me a bit sad but didn't make me angry,I didn't hate him for it.But, the other situation P'ed me off a lot more.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East

It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason.

I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason.

I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice."

Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It is a personal choice. OK? Can we get that out of the way? Nobody's saying you have to fancy a trannie.

And breathe, Lisa. I apologise if I get a little tetchy - I have actually felt like screaming at times - but I'm emotionally drained from having to deal with everything since CBB started. But better to do it while it's a hot topic than when everybody's forgotten about it again.

So OK, you've got your rights. Happy now? Let's move on and find some progress.

We've decided it's not wrong to decline a trans woman, or man. But wait, why did you decline them? Just because they're trans? Or just because you didn't fancy them? You have that right, just as I have a right to think you're prejudiced if you did it just because they're trans. Hey, it's my right, stop whinging.

But it's not really right and wrong which matters. I want you to think of how you would feel in their place. Just have some empathy, not indignance that "it's my right" etc etc.

People with facial disfigurements have trouble finding partners, I think you'd agree. You have some sympathy for them, right? Well, it's not the same but it's kinda like that for trans folk. It's as hard to find long term loving partners. You can get the one nighters but love is harder to find than for the general cisgender population, which I think you'll all agree is already tough enough for you.

This week, a female friend and I texted each other at the same time about Andrew getting angry with India and calling her a "dickhead" and a "prick." We both said these are not words men usually use with women. Cow, bitch, cunt, there's no shortage of words men use for women but "dickhead" and "prick" they reserve for men(and don't start giving me that one time your cousin's mate called a woman a prick.) You know this to be true.

In Andrew's subconscious, he was making that distinction between genetic woman and trans woman. That's ok, it's not easy to get over and I don't want to throw the baby out with the bath water. Andrew is generally a good guy and wants to be accepting. He's covering up his subconscious, which we all do, partly because otherwise it's be chaos and partly because we all want to be good people.

But the distinction is still being made in most people's minds. And it's that distinction which causes people to say they don't fancy a trannie.

So please just try to have a little more empathy rather than making it all about your rights. Everybody should have a right to be loved equally.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *amissCouple  over a year ago

chelmsford


"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you?

Nobody should ever feel that they have to justify attraction or lack of attraction, whatever the reason for it.

But what I'm saying is this, if you fancy the person but then find out they are trans. And you no longer want to meet them, surely your transphobic."

No, I don't think so, maybe just unsure of the unknown.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ophieslutTV/TS  over a year ago

Central

It's personal preference but how we communicate a rejection is within our control and most decent people would show sensitivity and empathy towards someone.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ELLONS AND CREAMWoman  over a year ago

stourbridge area

CBB .... ???.... surley your not implying Mr Tumble is transgender ???.....

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I think it's perfectly acceptable to turn down anyone for any reason whatsoever "
.

I concur wholeheartedly

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *alkirkbairnMan  over a year ago

Grangemouth


"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? "

As long as your polite in the manner in which you turn them down then of course you can say no

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *queekyCheesyCouple  over a year ago

newark

Yes or no.. dont give a shit

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hoenixAdAstraWoman  over a year ago

Hiding in the shadows

I think it's perfectly acceptable for someone to turn down another person, for whatever reason they have.

It's called preferences, but I would say that in certain circumstances, using tact, compassion & thinking exactly how you word that turn down would be essential.

Personally if I'm attracted to a person, I'm attracted the person I've met.

Not what they used to look like, or how they used to be, the way they were born.

So yes I'd happily meet a transgender person, if I there was an attraction.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *adame BWoman  over a year ago

C'est moi Boudoir

As established, we all have the right to turn down someone but the reasoning behind it is the part that becomes questionable.

For me, being with someone is based on a group package of looks, interaction, chemistry and morals.

If I was interested up to the point of the person disclosing that they are a fully transitioned male or female, nothing has changed for me and I am still interested.

You haven't hidden behind the word hypothetical but I won't jump to any assumptions. If a person changes their mind after disclosure then they have to examine where that stems from and why. If they can self assess if it's ok to turn the other person down then they can self assess what makes them think like that.

Madame B

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East


"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason.

I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice.

Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest. "

You can call it phobic. That is your right to think so. If it is phobic so what? What I choose doesn't affect anyone does it? I am just answering your question. For the record I don't think it is phobic just my taste.

I find certain Men good looking. I find certain Trans good looking. I just don't wish to have sex with them that is all.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury

Its a bit like white folk who won't fuck other white folk who have had sex with other races say they're not racist, it's a preference...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Its a bit like white folk who won't fuck other white folk who have had sex with other races say they're not racist, it's a preference..."

It's a bit like a women saying no to a man who had sex with a particular woman.

Not sure what you'd call it but It's rife and has no basis in race or gender.

You could argue it's more a case of person A judging person B due to their preference for person C. Not person A having a "phobia" of or judging person C.

But what do I know?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"Its a bit like white folk who won't fuck other white folk who have had sex with other races say they're not racist, it's a preference...

It's a bit like a women saying no to a man who had sex with a particular woman.

Not sure what you'd call it but It's rife and has no basis in race or gender.

You could argue it's more a case of person A judging person B due to their preference for person C. Not person A having a "phobia" of or judging person C.

But what do I know? "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

You can turn down anyone at anytime it's your body and only you get to decide what's done with it

But if you wanted to have sex with them before knowing why deny yourself and them the fun ?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"As established, we all have the right to turn down someone but the reasoning behind it is the part that becomes questionable.

For me, being with someone is based on a group package of looks, interaction, chemistry and morals.

If I was interested up to the point of the person disclosing that they are a fully transitioned male or female, nothing has changed for me and I am still interested.

You haven't hidden behind the word hypothetical but I won't jump to any assumptions. If a person changes their mind after disclosure then they have to examine where that stems from and why. If they can self assess if it's ok to turn the other person down then they can self assess what makes them think like that.

Madame B "

Exactly, I think it’s hard to know until you’re faved with the situation but id liked to think I’d be open to a relationship based on all those things because that’s the most important thing

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *rontier PsychiatristMan  over a year ago

Coventry

By the same argument is it not ok to turn down anyone you don't fancy? Everyone's right to consent is golden, so yes. You don't have to explain your terms for consent to anyone.

What worries me is the voices of some controversial trans women is being used by anti trans voices to scaremonger and demonise all trans women.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Yes. It is.

You're allowed to say no to anyone for whatever reason you so desire.

"

What he said

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *apascouseMan  over a year ago

Liverpool


"Yes. It is.

You're allowed to say no to anyone for whatever reason you so desire.

What he said "

I agree with this everyone is entitled to their own opinion and make their own decisions

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *risky_MareWoman  over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"It's personal preference but how we communicate a rejection is within our control and most decent people would show sensitivity and empathy towards someone."

Yes this. Who we fancy or don't is totally capricious most of the time anyway, and often down to 'that indefinable something', positive or negative.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you?

Nobody should ever feel that they have to justify attraction or lack of attraction, whatever the reason for it

But what I'm saying is this, if you fancy the person but then find out they are trans. And you no longer want to meet them, surely your transphobic."

But you didn't fancy them because you fancied something they are NOT! Just like fancying a delicious chicken sandwich only to discover it's actually a turkey sandwich which you do not like and didn't order. If that makes a person turkeyphobic, so be it. If I pose as a lesbian woman to another woman, make her fall in love with me, then whip out my cock on the day of reckoming, does that make that lesbian a Malephobic misandrist? In fact, doesn't this mean that all orientations of exclusivity are phobic of the gender they do not want to bone? Yes, it does. Deception is not ok. There's no excuse for it. Using pc policies to force people into relationships they don't want is a return to barbarianism and it's a diabolical branch of r-culture and has no milder a stench. Born men identifying as women who feel entitled to other people's bodies without their express desire are still born men believing they are entitled to other people's bodies without their express desire and consent, only they now identify as women. Nobody is entitled to anyone's person, not women, not men, not transmen and not transwomen.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I think it would be wrong to fuck someone you didn't want to. It would be an insult to the person being fucked. Better the fuck-er fucked off and left the fuck-ee to people who weren't bothered they were born a different gender.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"You can turn down anyone at anytime it's your body and only you get to decide what's done with it

But if you wanted to have sex with them before knowing why deny yourself and them the fun ? "

Why deny yourself the vagina you've been looking forward to that they don't have? Or the relationship leading to family and biological children through the uterus they don't have? Why deny yourself that penis you aren't looking forward to?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"Its a bit like white folk who won't fuck other white folk who have had sex with other races say they're not racist, it's a preference...

It's a bit like a women saying no to a man who had sex with a particular woman.

Not sure what you'd call it but It's rife and has no basis in race or gender.

You could argue it's more a case of person A judging person B due to their preference for person C. Not person A having a "phobia" of or judging person C.

But what do I know?

"

The difficulty with applying terms like phobic to sexual desire is that a person's sexuality has generally been seen as an area of total autonomy. Thus, if a straight man refused to work with or drink with gay men, everyone would say he was homophobic. If he refuses to have sex with a gay man, that is fine because he has sexual autonomy. Isn't it the same with transgender people?

The logical conclusion of importing concepts of equal opportunities into sexuality is that, just as someone who refuses to employ someone based on their gender, race, sexuality, transgender status and so on would rightly be seen as prejudiced, anyone refusing to have sex with someone on those grounds would be seen as prejudiced.

This from someone deeply suspicious of the "no blacks and Asians just our preference" brigade. I just think the logical conclusion of asserting that its phobic to refuse people on the grounds of physical characteristics must inevitably be that choice of sexual partners based on any physical grounds becomes illegitimate.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"You can turn down anyone at anytime it's your body and only you get to decide what's done with it

But if you wanted to have sex with them before knowing why deny yourself and them the fun ?

Why deny yourself the vagina you've been looking forward to that they don't have? Or the relationship leading to family and biological children through the uterus they don't have? Why deny yourself that penis you aren't looking forward to? "

You my friend are on the wrong site if you are looking for children

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *sGivesWoodWoman  over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason.

I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice.

Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest. "

How so? Since when have preferences been classed as phobic? We are all allowed choices.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason.

I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice.

Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest.

How so? Since when have preferences been classed as phobic? We are all allowed choices. "

If I "prefer" not to employ, eat with or spend time with transgender people I think it's pretty clear that preference is phobic.

Some preferences are phobic and some aren't. The word "preference" is not a get out of jail free card.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"You can turn down anyone at anytime it's your body and only you get to decide what's done with it

But if you wanted to have sex with them before knowing why deny yourself and them the fun ?

Why deny yourself the vagina you've been looking forward to that they don't have? Or the relationship leading to family and biological children through the uterus they don't have? Why deny yourself that penis you aren't looking forward to?

You my friend are on the wrong site if you are looking for children "

You my friend need to get off the site more if you think this topic and issue only pertains to swingers and people on fabswingers site. And I can only hope that you aren't making a sexual joke involving children. Because I personally don't find that shit funny in the least. If not, apologies.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *loswingersCouple  over a year ago

Gloucester

If the guy who was gonna fuck her finds out she used to be a he , and gets his head messed up about it , then yes it’s fine to say no . He isn’t gonna perform very well , so she would be put out by the meet anyway .

Is it phobic ? Probably , but so what ?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Yes. It is.

You're allowed to say no to anyone for whatever reason you so desire.

^^^ This.

Is it ok to turn someone down because they're bi / straight?

Is it ok to turn someone down because they're bald?

Is it ok to turn someone down because they're black / white / asian?

Is it ok to turn someone down because they're too tall / too short?

Is it ok to turn someone down because they're too fat / too thin?

The list could be endless, and anyone can turn someone down for any reason they want to. "

there u have it?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lkDomWhtSubBiCpleCouple  over a year ago

Somewhere / Everywhere /Kinksville


"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you?

Nobody should ever feel that they have to justify attraction or lack of attraction, whatever the reason for it.

But what I'm saying is this, if you fancy the person but then find out they are trans. And you no longer want to meet them, surely your transphobic."

Do you have to justify to yourself or others why you don’t want to meet? If you don’t you don’t, simples.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

If I found out a woman I was going to sleep with used to be a man. I would change my mind too, I’d buy her a drink and have a chat instead.

BUT this doesn’t mean it’s phobic at all!just my choice.

This word gets thrown around too much these days.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Even if it is transphobic, surely there are more important things to worry about in terms of discrimination

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you?

Nobody should ever feel that they have to justify attraction or lack of attraction, whatever the reason for it.

But what I'm saying is this, if you fancy the person but then find out they are trans. And you no longer want to meet them, surely your transphobic."

Yep. I said I won't fuck black men and got told I'm racist. You have to fuck them.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I would agree.

If she is legally a woman and post-op, turning her down because of her history is not aceptable in my opinion.

She couldn't help being born in the wrong body."

I have turned down trans people (men and women) in the past, but because I didn't fancy them, not because of their gender identity. That's fine, but if you find them attractive and then find out that they're trans and turn them down then that's less ok.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *sGivesWoodWoman  over a year ago

ST. AUSTELL, CORNWALL


"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason.

I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice.

Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest.

How so? Since when have preferences been classed as phobic? We are all allowed choices.

If I "prefer" not to employ, eat with or spend time with transgender people I think it's pretty clear that preference is phobic.

Some preferences are phobic and some aren't. The word "preference" is not a get out of jail free card. "

So that means that we should have sex with people that we don't want to so we aren't classed as phobic?!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

https://giphy.com/gifs/robin-williams-matt-damon-Dvw2lJqlTuJmo

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you?

Nobody should ever feel that they have to justify attraction or lack of attraction, whatever the reason for it

But what I'm saying is this, if you fancy the person but then find out they are trans. And you no longer want to meet them, surely your transphobic.

But you didn't fancy them because you fancied something they are NOT! Just like fancying a delicious chicken sandwich only to discover it's actually a turkey sandwich which you do not like and didn't order. If that makes a person turkeyphobic, so be it. If I pose as a lesbian woman to another woman, make her fall in love with me, then whip out my cock on the day of reckoming, does that make that lesbian a Malephobic misandrist? In fact, doesn't this mean that all orientations of exclusivity are phobic of the gender they do not want to bone? Yes, it does. Deception is not ok. There's no excuse for it. Using pc policies to force people into relationships they don't want is a return to barbarianism and it's a diabolical branch of r-culture and has no milder a stench. Born men identifying as women who feel entitled to other people's bodies without their express desire are still born men believing they are entitled to other people's bodies without their express desire and consent, only they now identify as women. Nobody is entitled to anyone's person, not women, not men, not transmen and not transwomen. "

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"I would agree.

If she is legally a woman and post-op, turning her down because of her history is not aceptable in my opinion.

She couldn't help being born in the wrong body.

I have turned down trans people (men and women) in the past, but because I didn't fancy them, not because of their gender identity. That's fine, but if you find them attractive and then find out that they're trans and turn them down then that's less ok."

So if a person fancies someone but then finds out they're married and turns them down because of it, that's not ok?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"You can turn down anyone at anytime it's your body and only you get to decide what's done with it

But if you wanted to have sex with them before knowing why deny yourself and them the fun ?

Why deny yourself the vagina you've been looking forward to that they don't have? Or the relationship leading to family and biological children through the uterus they don't have? Why deny yourself that penis you aren't looking forward to?

You my friend are on the wrong site if you are looking for children

You my friend need to get off the site more if you think this topic and issue only pertains to swingers and people on fabswingers site. And I can only hope that you aren't making a sexual joke involving children. Because I personally don't find that shit funny in the least. If not, apologies. "

We would never make a sexual joke about children

Our point is this it's a swingers site and he says turn down not, not get into a relationship with you made it into something more than just sex. We come here to talk about swinging nothing else

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hetalkingstoveMan  over a year ago

London


"

So that means that we should have sex with people that we don't want to so we aren't classed as phobic?! "

That's your choice, innit?

Some people think eating meat is seriously unethical. You then have the choice of eating meat and living with their bad opinion of you, or agreeing with them and going veggie.

Same with this issue. If some people think your sexual choices are transphobic or racist, you can live with that or you can think about where those choices come from and whether you think they are completely prejudice free.

No one is going to make anyone have sex with anyone. There's no need to get over dramatic just because someone thinks your morals might be a bit off. It happens all the time to everyone.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *risky_MareWoman  over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"T Nobody is entitled to anyone's person, not women, not men, not transmen and not transwomen. "

Yup, this.

And there is a great deal of water between 'want to fuck' and a phobia.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"I would agree.

If she is legally a woman and post-op, turning her down because of her history is not aceptable in my opinion.

She couldn't help being born in the wrong body.

I have turned down trans people (men and women) in the past, but because I didn't fancy them, not because of their gender identity. That's fine, but if you find them attractive and then find out that they're trans and turn them down then that's less ok.

So if a person fancies someone but then finds out they're married and turns them down because of it, that's not ok?"

Being married is not a gender or even a race. You can be "not married". It's an ethical question, nothing more.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *adame BWoman  over a year ago

C'est moi Boudoir

The opening message and another comment further down by the op stated that it was not because you don't fancy them but purely because the person is transgender.

That makes it not about physical attraction and therefore in my opinion phobic because the attraction is there but because the other person was previously a male or female has now changed their opinion of them and they no longer want to sleep with them.

Yes it's ok to say no to sleeping with that person but yes in my opinion it's transphobic.

Madame B

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

If you find someone attractive regardless if they are black, blue, pink, green, trans, alien....you get my drift then you are attracted to them, if it happened to us then it wouldn’t be an issue because we would still be attracted to her even if she told us about her past. the issue if she used to have a willy etc wouldn’t come into it, just makes more conversation lol!!

We all have a past some more than others and sometimes they make the most interesting people to meet.

Geeky x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lmostthereMan  over a year ago

Southampton


"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? "

Turning her down for what?

Ladies lawn tennis?

Henry VIII at the RSC?

Cravate de notaire on daddy's desk?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason.

I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice.

Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest. "

Pisses me off how people throw “phobic” or “phobia” around. He’s not scared of transgender, he’s just not attracted to them

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason.

I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice.

Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest.

Pisses me off how people throw “phobic” or “phobia” around. He’s not scared of transgender, he’s just not attracted to them"

Hmmm, i think somebody needs to read the op again.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"The opening message and another comment further down by the op stated that it was not because you don't fancy them but purely because the person is transgender.

That makes it not about physical attraction and therefore in my opinion phobic because the attraction is there but because the other person was previously a male or female has now changed their opinion of them and they no longer want to sleep with them.

Yes it's ok to say no to sleeping with that person but yes in my opinion it's transphobic.

Madame B

"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason.

I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice.

Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest.

Pisses me off how people throw “phobic” or “phobia” around. He’s not scared of transgender, he’s just not attracted to them

Hmmm, i think somebody needs to read the op again. "

Are you scared of transgender people? I mean, if you see a transgender person, do you run in fear? Like when an arachnophobic sees a spider?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Is it OK. ...not to read ANY of the posts before I send my own?

Is it OK to feel lazy and not motivated to be interesting or funny or kind or flirty, but still want to chat?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Is it OK. ...not to read ANY of the posts before I send my own?

Is it OK to feel lazy and not motivated to be interesting or funny or kind or flirty, but still want to chat?"

No it’s not ok! Read the thread like everyone else you threadphobic!

I’m not commenting on the second half of your post because I didn’t read it

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I would say it is ok as long as it's due to preference and not prejudice (which there is no way to tell either way) to be its the same as people seeking a certain race or dick size, it's just that person's choice.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

OK. Read most of those. Yawn.

Is it OK not to answer?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"OK. Read most of those. Yawn.

Is it OK not to answer?"

Will you catch me up on what’s been said? I haven’t read most of them

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Hahaha threadphobic. Yahhh. Or maybe I'm threadist?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Hahaha threadphobic. Yahhh. Or maybe I'm threadist?"

Ether way you are a monster!!!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *unandbuckCouple  over a year ago

Sheffield

Of course it's ok. Is the converse, that it's not ok, mean that you have to have sex with them?

Do men have to have sex with men, to ensure they aren't homophobic?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *risky_MareWoman  over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"Of course it's ok. Is the converse, that it's not ok, mean that you have to have sex with them?

Do men have to have sex with men, to ensure they aren't homophobic?"

Of I don't want to fuck my gay friend, am I homophobic?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I think you can turn down anyone for whatever reason you want. It's our choice who we have sex with.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *risky_MareWoman  over a year ago

...Up on the Downs

If.....

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Of course it's ok. Is the converse, that it's not ok, mean that you have to have sex with them?

Do men have to have sex with men, to ensure they aren't homophobic?

Of I don't want to fuck my gay friend, am I homophobic?"

Yes! And if you don’t have sex with me right away, you are heterophobic!

I’m sorry, I don’t make the rules

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Yes. It is.

You're allowed to say no to anyone for whatever reason you so desire.

"

This

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *risky_MareWoman  over a year ago

...Up on the Downs


"Of course it's ok. Is the converse, that it's not ok, mean that you have to have sex with them?

Do men have to have sex with men, to ensure they aren't homophobic?

Of I don't want to fuck my gay friend, am I homophobic?

Yes! And if you don’t have sex with me right away, you are heterophobic!

I’m sorry, I don’t make the rules "

Damn I've been doing it all wrong!! But he was heterophobic anyway, he didn't want to fuck me!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason.

I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice.

Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest.

Pisses me off how people throw “phobic” or “phobia” around. He’s not scared of transgender, he’s just not attracted to them

Hmmm, i think somebody needs to read the op again.

Are you scared of transgender people? I mean, if you see a transgender person, do you run in fear? Like when an arachnophobic sees a spider?"

People have been known to run away from me screaming

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Of course it's ok. Is the converse, that it's not ok, mean that you have to have sex with them?

Do men have to have sex with men, to ensure they aren't homophobic?

Of I don't want to fuck my gay friend, am I homophobic?

Yes! And if you don’t have sex with me right away, you are heterophobic!

I’m sorry, I don’t make the rules

Damn I've been doing it all wrong!! But he was heterophobic anyway, he didn't want to fuck me! "

It’s a viscous cycle

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"You can turn down anyone at anytime it's your body and only you get to decide what's done with it

But if you wanted to have sex with them before knowing why deny yourself and them the fun ?

Why deny yourself the vagina you've been looking forward to that they don't have? Or the relationship leading to family and biological children through the uterus they don't have? Why deny yourself that penis you aren't looking forward to?

You my friend are on the wrong site if you are looking for children

You my friend need to get off the site more if you think this topic and issue only pertains to swingers and people on fabswingers site. And I can only hope that you aren't making a sexual joke involving children. Because I personally don't find that shit funny in the least. If not, apologies.

We would never make a sexual joke about children

Our point is this it's a swingers site and he says turn down not, not get into a relationship with you made it into something more than just sex. We come here to talk about swinging nothing else "

The very definition of swinging involves committed relationships primarily...couples.. So just what are you taking about? Are you saying that those in the swinging scene don't enter into relationships with each other? Aren't you swinging in a relationship? Isn't your profile a couples profile? Right! So why do you think relationships are excluded from the subject of turning down particular genders?? That's your own arbitrary restriction you came up with because it conveniently fits along with your above attempt at wit and sarcasm. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy the wiseass pokes and jokes at each other's expense. It's just that you failed this round. Try again. The subject of rejection includes all forms of relationship, whether purely sexual, matrimonial, or partnership, cohabitation etc. Trust me, this topic was brought to fab from an external reality. It's not a "fab" issue exclusively our even primarily for that matter.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *igdodger13Man  over a year ago

sompting

Unfortunately most tram woman still look like men so I wouldn’t be attracted to them

I know I’ve only see about 6 so a small handful but they have all looked manly

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? "

Yes it's ok.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *arkhorse12345Man  over a year ago

Newcastle

Agreed

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *arkhorse12345Man  over a year ago

Newcastle

[Removed by poster at 11/01/18 22:40:34]

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oiretblancCouple  over a year ago

London

There are so many screwed up men on this website...struggling with their sexual desires and running away from what turns them on!

I am a very sexy and desirable young woman and my pics get fabbed around 300-400 times.

The pics of beautiful trans women get 3000 - 5000 Fabs. So who is doing that I wonder?

I wish I was getting harassed as much!!!

Chanel

xxx

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abulously curiousCouple  over a year ago

manchester

How and y would u need to know?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Who cares whether it is "ok" or not, OP. It is your choice and your business. If 99 out 100 people disagreed or disapproved, again who cares, it is your choice.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If the guy who was gonna fuck her finds out she used to be a he , and gets his head messed up about it , then yes it’s fine to say no . He isn’t gonna perform very well , so she would be put out by the meet anyway .

Is it phobic ? Probably , but so what ?

"

Exactly this.

If someone turns out to be phobic about me then, as far as I'm concerned, that's their issue not mine. If I'm not good enough for someone for whatever reason, then they are not good enough for me either.(and vice versa,of course).

If someone seemed to like me and then changed their mind because of some assumption about the past then at least I don't have to spend time with that person, listening to their 'opinions'.

Its actually quite a good filter and I feel glad that I have so far been able to avoid talking to any of these people. (They do tend to get on my tits a bit, especially with the apparent assumption that I haven't heard all their crap about chromosones and such like, before about a million times).

And another thing,now I've got started, are we to assume that trans women are so desperate that they will go with just about anyone and the guy is doing her a favour? No. We have the right to turn guys down too,for any reason we feel like.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abulously curiousCouple  over a year ago

manchester

Go on the photos and look at ts bet u change ur mind

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East

The thing that has come across more than anything from this thread is you can't freely express a preference without being questioned.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The thing that has come across more than anything from this thread is you can't freely express a preference without being questioned."

I’ve not read the thread, only your comment, just to pre-clarify that ... is there an issue with questions per se, or do you mean that people aren’t asking questions but instead making judgements.

Often people don’t ask clean questions or indeed often people do, but people don’t read them as clean.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It is ok. Anyones reasons whatever they may be are valid. Stock answer i know but it is that for a reason.

I only want to have sex with a woman who was born a woman. My choice.

Sounds a bit "phobic" to be honest.

How so? Since when have preferences been classed as phobic? We are all allowed choices.

If I "prefer" not to employ, eat with or spend time with transgender people I think it's pretty clear that preference is phobic.

Some preferences are phobic and some aren't. The word "preference" is not a get out of jail free card.

So that means that we should have sex with people that we don't want to so we aren't classed as phobic?! "

In a nutshell , some people cant grasp the fact that the world shouldnt bend to their will . If someone struggles with their identity then they should be offered advice and help . but when their problems start being thrown onto other peoples problems aswell such as a man talking to what he thinks is a woman to then be told they were a man , to say they are phobic because they dont want to be with a man ? Really? Its pretty selfish from someone trying to make you go agaisnt your morality so they can get some gratitude . Is this even a legit post or just one for attention?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East


"The thing that has come across more than anything from this thread is you can't freely express a preference without being questioned.

I’ve not read the thread, only your comment, just to pre-clarify that ... is there an issue with questions per se, or do you mean that people aren’t asking questions but instead making judgements.

Often people don’t ask clean questions or indeed often people do, but people don’t read them as clean.

"

I was more or less called trans phobic for my preference of not wanting to have sex with a trans woman and maintaining it is ok for that to be the sole reason. My argument is that is the only reason that I need. It does not mean I am a trans hater or transphobic.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abulously curiousCouple  over a year ago

manchester

But how and y would u know

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *oysvsgirlsMan  over a year ago

farnborough

Surely if you're not attracted to them then your reasons are your own gender realignment aside, if it doesntnfeel right then you have every right to say no thank you very much, as long as you're not a dick about it?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East


"But how and y would u know"

Thats a completely different question. Let's just assume you do know and not complicate things further. Feel free to start a new thread asking your question.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East


"Surely if you're not attracted to them then your reasons are your own gender realignment aside, if it doesntnfeel right then you have every right to say no thank you very much, as long as you're not a dick about it?"

Yeah absolutely. Despite my clearly stated viewpoint I would not be an arse about it.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *abulously curiousCouple  over a year ago

manchester

I'm saying if the girls didn't put ts then u wouldn't know and they don't need to tell u. How do u know along ur sexual travels uve not met one...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East


"I'm saying if the girls didn't put ts then u wouldn't know and they don't need to tell u. How do u know along ur sexual travels uve not met one..."

Yes I know what you mean. But Clems post strongly implies that you do know.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury

I'm not transphobic......but..

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"The thing that has come across more than anything from this thread is you can't freely express a preference without being questioned."

...without being slated for it....

People can call me racist, homophobic, transphobic, whatever they like. I still won't fuck them if I don't want to.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"You can turn down anyone at anytime it's your body and only you get to decide what's done with it

But if you wanted to have sex with them before knowing why deny yourself and them the fun ?

Why deny yourself the vagina you've been looking forward to that they don't have? Or the relationship leading to family and biological children through the uterus they don't have? Why deny yourself that penis you aren't looking forward to?

You my friend are on the wrong site if you are looking for children

You my friend need to get off the site more if you think this topic and issue only pertains to swingers and people on fabswingers site. And I can only hope that you aren't making a sexual joke involving children. Because I personally don't find that shit funny in the least. If not, apologies.

We would never make a sexual joke about children

Our point is this it's a swingers site and he says turn down not, not get into a relationship with you made it into something more than just sex. We come here to talk about swinging nothing else

The very definition of swinging involves committed relationships primarily...couples.. So just what are you taking about? Are you saying that those in the swinging scene don't enter into relationships with each other? Aren't you swinging in a relationship? Isn't your profile a couples profile? Right! So why do you think relationships are excluded from the subject of turning down particular genders?? That's your own arbitrary restriction you came up with because it conveniently fits along with your above attempt at wit and sarcasm. Don't get me wrong, I enjoy the wiseass pokes and jokes at each other's expense. It's just that you failed this round. Try again. The subject of rejection includes all forms of relationship, whether purely sexual, matrimonial, or partnership, cohabitation etc. Trust me, this topic was brought to fab from an external reality. It's not a "fab" issue exclusively our even primarily for that matter. "

You are looking for wit and sarcasm that doesn't exist we don't use subtext our point is quite simple if this is just a question of sex and you wanted to have sex before knowing that she used to be a he then personally we don't think it should change anything

Maybe it's just a case of what we use this site for is different to you so we look at this from different perspectives. But that's the great thing about fab we can all use it for our own purposes and takeaway from it whatever you want

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *unandbuckCouple  over a year ago

Sheffield

Much more importantly.

Is it OK, to damage the already dificult task of getting lgbt people accepted more widely by mainstream society, by throwing about homophobic and transphobic slurs onto people who are accepting, welcoming and suportive, but don't want to have sex with them?

Comments and atittudes like these hinder lgbt acceptance in my opinion.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"Much more importantly.

Is it OK, to damage the already dificult task of getting lgbt people accepted more widely by mainstream society, by throwing about homophobic and transphobic slurs onto people who are accepting, welcoming and suportive, but don't want to have sex with them?

Comments and atittudes like these hinder lgbt acceptance in my opinion."

Accepting, welcoming and supportive?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Reminds me of IT Crowd. "You used to be a man? I thought you said you were from Iran!"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"Reminds me of IT Crowd. "You used to be a man? I thought you said you were from Iran!" "

I posted that link up the top somewhere.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Reminds me of IT Crowd. "You used to be a man? I thought you said you were from Iran!"

I posted that link up the top somewhere. "

Oops busted for not reading the whole thread

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ultry SuccubusTV/TS  over a year ago

London


" This kind of thing.

https://youtu.be/g2KsZHRrFpU"

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"Reminds me of IT Crowd. "You used to be a man? I thought you said you were from Iran!"

I posted that link up the top somewhere.

Oops busted for not reading the whole thread "

No problem

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"Reminds me of IT Crowd. "You used to be a man? I thought you said you were from Iran!"

I posted that link up the top somewhere.

Oops busted for not reading the whole thread "

It's the first post that's important. But seems a lot of people don't read that either!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London

Two points

1. If you are bloke and you get to the stage with a woman where you are both naked and you are ready and willing to fuck her and she tells you she is Trans and then you change your mind, then yes you are prejudiced, given that the only thing stopping you fucking her is your knowledge she is trans.

2. People have a perfect right to not fuck people on the grounds of irrational prejudice. Just as a white person has a perfect right not to socialise with black people because he is irrationally prejudiced against them. Doesn't mean that people can't point out he is racist.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

People have every right to turn down whoever and for what ever reason at any stage no means no doesn't make it right or wrong it's personal choice. Maybe they feel uncomfortable for whatever reason it's not you or anyone's place to judge .

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

In short the answer is a big fat YES ITS OK

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hocoholicWoman  over a year ago

The big D

Free will gives u the right to turn down anyone u want. No one is obliged to meet anyone just for the sake of not offending their sexuality.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

If a trans-person could answer this I would be very much grateful

Would you rather.

A person turns down sex with you because you are trans?

Or

A person had sex with you, even though they didn't want, because they didn't want to offend you?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ultry SuccubusTV/TS  over a year ago

London


"If a trans-person could answer this I would be very much grateful

Would you rather.

A person turns down sex with you because you are trans?

Or

A person had sex with you, even though they didn't want, because they didn't want to offend you?"

I'm very comfortable with the first and won't accept pity fuck.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *unandbuckCouple  over a year ago

Sheffield


"Much more importantly.

Is it OK, to damage the already dificult task of getting lgbt people accepted more widely by mainstream society, by throwing about homophobic and transphobic slurs onto people who are accepting, welcoming and suportive, but don't want to have sex with them?

Comments and atittudes like these hinder lgbt acceptance in my opinion.

Accepting, welcoming and supportive? "

Yes. There's lots of people who are all those things, but don't want sex with trans people.

In my opinion, you are more much interested in poking people with purposely divisive threads than actually helping lgbt acceptance.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

From a relationship standpoint rather than just sex ...

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they already had kids and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were very strictly religious (as in i would be expected to convert) and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they work away 70% of the year and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were trans and that would put me off

OR i could already like someone so much that when they told me any of the above it wouldnt matter

I have personally been like by people until i told them i was involved in swinging and then it put them off

My point is i dont think any of the above makes you "phobic" ... you learn more about someone and you subconciously assess how that fits in with your plan for love and life and it can and will alter your opinion and attraction to them ... or you could already be so attracted to them that any altered perception is acceptable to you

To me "phobic" people are people who just think something different is wrong full stop, they dont want to learn, understand, empathise, accept. Not wanting something for yourself doesnt make you phobic.

Being fully accepting of gay people but not wanting to be gay myself wouldnt make me homophobic so why would being fully accepting of trans people but not wanting to date trans people make me transphobic?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ultry SuccubusTV/TS  over a year ago

London


"

Yes. There's lots of people who are all those things, but don't want sex with trans people.

In my opinion, you are more much interested in poking people with purposely divisive threads than actually helping lgbt acceptance."

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If a trans-person could answer this I would be very much grateful

Would you rather.

A person turns down sex with you because you are trans?

Or

A person had sex with you, even though they didn't want, because they didn't want to offend you?

I'm very comfortable with the first and won't accept pity fuck.

"

What she said

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"From a relationship standpoint rather than just sex ...

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they already had kids and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were very strictly religious (as in i would be expected to convert) and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they work away 70% of the year and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were trans and that would put me off

OR i could already like someone so much that when they told me any of the above it wouldnt matter

I have personally been like by people until i told them i was involved in swinging and then it put them off

My point is i dont think any of the above makes you "phobic" ... you learn more about someone and you subconciously assess how that fits in with your plan for love and life and it can and will alter your opinion and attraction to them ... or you could already be so attracted to them that any altered perception is acceptable to you

To me "phobic" people are people who just think something different is wrong full stop, they dont want to learn, understand, empathise, accept. Not wanting something for yourself doesnt make you phobic.

Being fully accepting of gay people but not wanting to be gay myself wouldnt make me homophobic so why would being fully accepting of trans people but not wanting to date trans people make me transphobic? "

Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice?

I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If a trans-person could answer this I would be very much grateful

Would you rather.

A person turns down sex with you because you are trans?

Or

A person had sex with you, even though they didn't want, because they didn't want to offend you?

I'm very comfortable with the first and won't accept pity fuck.

What she said "

Although more of a pc fuck than pity fuck in this instance

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice?

I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex? "

It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries

I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all

Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations

I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East


" I'm not transphobic......but.."

You are just being an arse about it now bud. You asked a question you got answers.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"

Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice?

I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex?

It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries

I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all

Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations

I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing "

Again, very reasonable, but the situation where you fancy a woman, get to the bedroom, get naked and are all ready to go until she tells you she is transferring. Irrational prejudice?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London

Trans not transferring!

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *infullysweetCouple  over a year ago

Swindon


"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? "

If we being p.c then I guess not. But then if we were all being p.c we wouldn't be able to state our preferences on here. E.g. Couples only (is it the guys fault he can't get a misses) guys with big cocks (not his fault he was born with a tiny cock) girls a certain size (could be medical and not in their control).

At the end of the day we all have the right to say no. It doesn't matter the reason. And I'm sure no one wants a yes purely because they feel like they can't say no.

The creator of this post is looking for petite women with big boobs is that any more or less exceptable than any other preference I think not.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice?

I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex?

It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries

I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all

Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations

I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing

Again, very reasonable, but the situation where you fancy a woman, get to the bedroom, get naked and are all ready to go until she tells you she is transferring. Irrational prejudice? "

I dont think it really matters if its irrational prejudice or not ... if in that moment something is not for you sexually then you have to say sorry not for me

If i was a guy and got in the bedroom naked and a woman told me bareback only am i then allowed to be prejudiced about her sexual health - of course i am

If someone withholds any information to that minute you have been left with no choice but to make a decision on what you already believe / are comfortable with ie "pre judge" and any decision you make has to be ok

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ultry SuccubusTV/TS  over a year ago

London


"

I'm very comfortable with the first and won't accept pity fuck.

What she said

Although more of a pc fuck than pity fuck in this instance "

We got the fabs chat room for that...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"

Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice?

I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex?

It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries

I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all

Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations

I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing

Again, very reasonable, but the situation where you fancy a woman, get to the bedroom, get naked and are all ready to go until she tells you she is transferring. Irrational prejudice?

I dont think it really matters if its irrational prejudice or not ... if in that moment something is not for you sexually then you have to say sorry not for me

If i was a guy and got in the bedroom naked and a woman told me bareback only am i then allowed to be prejudiced about her sexual health - of course i am

If someone withholds any information to that minute you have been left with no choice but to make a decision on what you already believe / are comfortable with ie "pre judge" and any decision you make has to be ok

"

But the bareback thing isn't analogous. A reason for withdrawing there is perfectly rational. A health reason. I suppose a rational reason for refusing a trans person might be the dishonesty but I suspect that would be rare.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ootleCouple  over a year ago

Romford, Essex

Back to the OP’s original question !!!

Of course, it’s OK to turn them down, we all have a right to our own preferences.

But – it’s not OK to turn them or any other person down who’s lifestyle differs from ours with any form of malice or detriment.

We also don’t have the right to pass judgment on others because of gender, color, religion, disability, have a cock or don’t have a cock…….etc, etc.,etc.

Thankfully we are all different and diverse – that’s what makes it such a wonderful world to live in.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East


"From a relationship standpoint rather than just sex ...

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they already had kids and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were very strictly religious (as in i would be expected to convert) and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they work away 70% of the year and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were trans and that would put me off

OR i could already like someone so much that when they told me any of the above it wouldnt matter

I have personally been like by people until i told them i was involved in swinging and then it put them off

My point is i dont think any of the above makes you "phobic" ... you learn more about someone and you subconciously assess how that fits in with your plan for love and life and it can and will alter your opinion and attraction to them ... or you could already be so attracted to them that any altered perception is acceptable to you

To me "phobic" people are people who just think something different is wrong full stop, they dont want to learn, understand, empathise, accept. Not wanting something for yourself doesnt make you phobic.

Being fully accepting of gay people but not wanting to be gay myself wouldnt make me homophobic so why would being fully accepting of trans people but not wanting to date trans people make me transphobic?

Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice?

I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex? "

This is simply rubbish. I am not comfortable with having sex with a man. I am also not comfortable with a man who has transitined to be a woman. It's that simple. No further reasoning is required.

If I find out before getting horizontal I would explain my thoughts and hope the person understood. If I found out after sex I would be annoyed and would consider myself misled. If I never found out then obviously I wouldn't care.

I don't think any of that is unrational.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

You can decide who you want to meet or not.

So long as everyone is honest about who they are and their preferences for a meet in their profile I can't see a problem as the situation can be avoided.

If you approach someone who's clearly stated who they are then it seems odd to then reject them. Equally if someone who is trans approaches someone who hasn't put this preference in their profile then a 'no thanks' can be expected ...

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice?

I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex?

It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries

I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all

Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations

I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing

Again, very reasonable, but the situation where you fancy a woman, get to the bedroom, get naked and are all ready to go until she tells you she is transferring. Irrational prejudice?

I dont think it really matters if its irrational prejudice or not ... if in that moment something is not for you sexually then you have to say sorry not for me

If i was a guy and got in the bedroom naked and a woman told me bareback only am i then allowed to be prejudiced about her sexual health - of course i am

If someone withholds any information to that minute you have been left with no choice but to make a decision on what you already believe / are comfortable with ie "pre judge" and any decision you make has to be ok

But the bareback thing isn't analogous. A reason for withdrawing there is perfectly rational. A health reason. I suppose a rational reason for refusing a trans person might be the dishonesty but I suspect that would be rare. "

Your own insecurity, beliefs and boundaries are also all rational reasona for refusing something you are not familiar with

This probably wont be a popular way to word it but here goes

A trans person believes they have been born into the wrong body and idenify with a gender they were not born with

however in the same way that each religion had a belief which they see to be the "one truth" and yet they are all different ... some people do not have this same believe that trans people do and they are perfectly entitled to it and nobody should be able to tell them they are wrong or the trans person is wrong

As long as their actions towards a trans person are respectful , not derogatory etc there is nothing wrong with having a different view and deciding that both that view point or sexual intimacy with a trans person is not for you

Somewhere along the line i feel like acceptance of what people class to be minority or discriminated against groups seems to have been blurred from "live and let live" to a rhetoric of "you must believe as i believe and think and i think and allow me into every aspect of your life or you are still against me" and i think that is unhelpful

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East


"Back to the OP’s original question !!!

Of course, it’s OK to turn them down, we all have a right to our own preferences.

But – it’s not OK to turn them or any other person down who’s lifestyle differs from ours with any form of malice or detriment.

We also don’t have the right to pass judgment on others because of gender, color, religion, disability, have a cock or don’t have a cock…….etc, etc.,etc.

Thankfully we are all different and diverse – that’s what makes it such a wonderful world to live in.

"

Yup. I would say no thank you, you are not me.

The day I say I am not fucking you cos you are a gay freak is the day someone can call me out for being trans phobic and no sooner.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"From a relationship standpoint rather than just sex ...

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they already had kids and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were very strictly religious (as in i would be expected to convert) and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they work away 70% of the year and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were trans and that would put me off

OR i could already like someone so much that when they told me any of the above it wouldnt matter

I have personally been like by people until i told them i was involved in swinging and then it put them off

My point is i dont think any of the above makes you "phobic" ... you learn more about someone and you subconciously assess how that fits in with your plan for love and life and it can and will alter your opinion and attraction to them ... or you could already be so attracted to them that any altered perception is acceptable to you

To me "phobic" people are people who just think something different is wrong full stop, they dont want to learn, understand, empathise, accept. Not wanting something for yourself doesnt make you phobic.

Being fully accepting of gay people but not wanting to be gay myself wouldnt make me homophobic so why would being fully accepting of trans people but not wanting to date trans people make me transphobic?

Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice?

I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex?

This is simply rubbish. I am not comfortable with having sex with a man. I am also not comfortable with a man who has transitined to be a woman. It's that simple. No further reasoning is required.

If I find out before getting horizontal I would explain my thoughts and hope the person understood. If I found out after sex I would be annoyed and would consider myself misled. If I never found out then obviously I wouldn't care.

I don't think any of that is unrational."

If you wanted to have sex with someone who appeared to you female and the only reason you then don't want to have sex with them is that you discover they are trans, then by definition its your prejudice against trans people that caused that.

Of course its your perfect right to have sex or not have sex with whoever you choose, but let's be honest about our own motivation. As it happens, I also feel ambiguous about having sex with a post op trans woman and I accept that's my prejudice.

We all have prejudices. I just think we should be aware of them.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East


"From a relationship standpoint rather than just sex ...

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they already had kids and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were very strictly religious (as in i would be expected to convert) and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they work away 70% of the year and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were trans and that would put me off

OR i could already like someone so much that when they told me any of the above it wouldnt matter

I have personally been like by people until i told them i was involved in swinging and then it put them off

My point is i dont think any of the above makes you "phobic" ... you learn more about someone and you subconciously assess how that fits in with your plan for love and life and it can and will alter your opinion and attraction to them ... or you could already be so attracted to them that any altered perception is acceptable to you

To me "phobic" people are people who just think something different is wrong full stop, they dont want to learn, understand, empathise, accept. Not wanting something for yourself doesnt make you phobic.

Being fully accepting of gay people but not wanting to be gay myself wouldnt make me homophobic so why would being fully accepting of trans people but not wanting to date trans people make me transphobic?

Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice?

I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex?

This is simply rubbish. I am not comfortable with having sex with a man. I am also not comfortable with a man who has transitined to be a woman. It's that simple. No further reasoning is required.

If I find out before getting horizontal I would explain my thoughts and hope the person understood. If I found out after sex I would be annoyed and would consider myself misled. If I never found out then obviously I wouldn't care.

I don't think any of that is unrational.

If you wanted to have sex with someone who appeared to you female and the only reason you then don't want to have sex with them is that you discover they are trans, then by definition its your prejudice against trans people that caused that.

Of course its your perfect right to have sex or not have sex with whoever you choose, but let's be honest about our own motivation. As it happens, I also feel ambiguous about having sex with a post op trans woman and I accept that's my prejudice.

We all have prejudices. I just think we should be aware of them. "

No. Would you call a straight guy prejudiced against gay men just because he wouldn't fuck them?

I have a rainbow set of friends. Numerous gay gentleman, one who is bi and yes one post op trans. I go drinking with them. I play online games with them. I don't want to shag any of them. Quite frankly I am annoyed some of the responses here have made me feel defensive enough to mention this.

I am fully aware of my prejudices. They total zero.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"From a relationship standpoint rather than just sex ...

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they already had kids and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were very strictly religious (as in i would be expected to convert) and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they work away 70% of the year and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were trans and that would put me off

OR i could already like someone so much that when they told me any of the above it wouldnt matter

I have personally been like by people until i told them i was involved in swinging and then it put them off

My point is i dont think any of the above makes you "phobic" ... you learn more about someone and you subconciously assess how that fits in with your plan for love and life and it can and will alter your opinion and attraction to them ... or you could already be so attracted to them that any altered perception is acceptable to you

To me "phobic" people are people who just think something different is wrong full stop, they dont want to learn, understand, empathise, accept. Not wanting something for yourself doesnt make you phobic.

Being fully accepting of gay people but not wanting to be gay myself wouldnt make me homophobic so why would being fully accepting of trans people but not wanting to date trans people make me transphobic?

Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice?

I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex?

This is simply rubbish. I am not comfortable with having sex with a man. I am also not comfortable with a man who has transitined to be a woman. It's that simple. No further reasoning is required.

If I find out before getting horizontal I would explain my thoughts and hope the person understood. If I found out after sex I would be annoyed and would consider myself misled. If I never found out then obviously I wouldn't care.

I don't think any of that is unrational.

If you wanted to have sex with someone who appeared to you female and the only reason you then don't want to have sex with them is that you discover they are trans, then by definition its your prejudice against trans people that caused that.

Of course its your perfect right to have sex or not have sex with whoever you choose, but let's be honest about our own motivation. As it happens, I also feel ambiguous about having sex with a post op trans woman and I accept that's my prejudice.

We all have prejudices. I just think we should be aware of them.

No. Would you call a straight guy prejudiced against gay men just because he wouldn't fuck them?

I have a rainbow set of friends. Numerous gay gentleman, one who is bi and yes one post op trans. I go drinking with them. I play online games with them. I don't want to shag any of them. Quite frankly I am annoyed some of the responses here have made me feel defensive enough to mention this.

I am fully aware of my prejudices. They total zero."

It's a question of language. If you say "whatever their other qualities I will never have sex with a trans woman " then you are making a pre judgment about their sexual attractiveness based purely on their Trans status. Hence prejudice.

It's possible to be prejudiced against people in some areas and not others. Some one, for example, may be perfectly willing to socialise with black people but won't employ them because he thinks they are all lazy. He'd be prejudiced against black people would he not?

And if we accept we are prejudiced on some way or another it might stop this whole area being discussed in such fraught terms.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"If a trans-person could answer this I would be very much grateful

Would you rather.

A person turns down sex with you because you are trans?

Or

A person had sex with you, even though they didn't want, because they didn't want to offend you?"

The former.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

It's a question of language. If you say "whatever their other qualities I will never have sex with a trans woman " then you are making a pre judgment about their sexual attractiveness based purely on their Trans status. Hence prejudice.

It's possible to be prejudiced against people in some areas and not others. Some one, for example, may be perfectly willing to socialise with black people but won't employ them because he thinks they are all lazy. He'd be prejudiced against black people would he not?

And if we accept we are prejudiced on some way or another it might stop this whole area being discussed in such fraught terms. "

I agree with this to an extent but its the negative connotations attached to the word prejudiced that gets peoples back up

To many in language terms prejudice = phobia when realistically wether we like to admit it we all pre judge situations and people in all walks of life on a daily basis

I think it goes back to my point about what people see as "acceptance" taking a swing from live and let live to you must be fully with me in every aspect of my belief or you are against me ... for many (including myself) live and let live is enough and therefore we don't see any issue with it being our preference or prejudice whatever word you want to use to not take it further than that

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice?

I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex?

It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries

I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all

Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations

I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing

Again, very reasonable, but the situation where you fancy a woman, get to the bedroom, get naked and are all ready to go until she tells you she is transferring. Irrational prejudice? "

Quite frankly,if disclosure hadn't occurred before the point of nakedness in a bedroom,it probably never would.

The point being that I would have found out what the guys likely rection would be and decided for myself whether or not I wanted to proceed. It's not only for the guy to decide,you know.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *adame BWoman  over a year ago

C'est moi Boudoir


"From a relationship standpoint rather than just sex ...

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they already had kids and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were very strictly religious (as in i would be expected to convert) and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they work away 70% of the year and that would put me off

I could like someone right up to the point they told me they were trans and that would put me off

OR i could already like someone so much that when they told me any of the above it wouldnt matter

I have personally been like by people until i told them i was involved in swinging and then it put them off

My point is i dont think any of the above makes you "phobic" ... you learn more about someone and you subconciously assess how that fits in with your plan for love and life and it can and will alter your opinion and attraction to them ... or you could already be so attracted to them that any altered perception is acceptable to you

To me "phobic" people are people who just think something different is wrong full stop, they dont want to learn, understand, empathise, accept. Not wanting something for yourself doesnt make you phobic.

Being fully accepting of gay people but not wanting to be gay myself wouldnt make me homophobic so why would being fully accepting of trans people but not wanting to date trans people make me transphobic?

Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice?

I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex?

This is simply rubbish. I am not comfortable with having sex with a man. I am also not comfortable with a man who has transitined to be a woman. It's that simple. No further reasoning is required.

If I find out before getting horizontal I would explain my thoughts and hope the person understood. If I found out after sex I would be annoyed and would consider myself misled. If I never found out then obviously I wouldn't care.

I don't think any of that is unrational.

If you wanted to have sex with someone who appeared to you female and the only reason you then don't want to have sex with them is that you discover they are trans, then by definition its your prejudice against trans people that caused that.

Of course its your perfect right to have sex or not have sex with whoever you choose, but let's be honest about our own motivation. As it happens, I also feel ambiguous about having sex with a post op trans woman and I accept that's my prejudice.

We all have prejudices. I just think we should be aware of them.

No. Would you call a straight guy prejudiced against gay men just because he wouldn't fuck them?

I have a rainbow set of friends. Numerous gay gentleman, one who is bi and yes one post op trans. I go drinking with them. I play online games with them. I don't want to shag any of them. Quite frankly I am annoyed some of the responses here have made me feel defensive enough to mention this.

I am fully aware of my prejudices. They total zero.

It's a question of language. If you say "whatever their other qualities I will never have sex with a trans woman " then you are making a pre judgment about their sexual attractiveness based purely on their Trans status. Hence prejudice.

It's possible to be prejudiced against people in some areas and not others. Some one, for example, may be perfectly willing to socialise with black people but won't employ them because he thinks they are all lazy. He'd be prejudiced against black people would he not?

And if we accept we are prejudiced on some way or another it might stop this whole area being discussed in such fraught terms. "

Well said

Madame B

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"

Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice?

I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex?

It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries

I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all

Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations

I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing

Again, very reasonable, but the situation where you fancy a woman, get to the bedroom, get naked and are all ready to go until she tells you she is transferring. Irrational prejudice?

Quite frankly,if disclosure hadn't occurred before the point of nakedness in a bedroom,it probably never would.

The point being that I would have found out what the guys likely rection would be and decided for myself whether or not I wanted to proceed. It's not only for the guy to decide,you know."

I appreciate that, but this discussion is specifically about whether men who won't have sex with trans women are phobic. Hence I am posting a situation for a man to change his mind about sex with a woman was because she is trans.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

It's a question of language. If you say "whatever their other qualities I will never have sex with a trans woman " then you are making a pre judgment about their sexual attractiveness based purely on their Trans status. Hence prejudice.

It's possible to be prejudiced against people in some areas and not others. Some one, for example, may be perfectly willing to socialise with black people but won't employ them because he thinks they are all lazy. He'd be prejudiced against black people would he not?

And if we accept we are prejudiced on some way or another it might stop this whole area being discussed in such fraught terms.

I agree with this to an extent but its the negative connotations attached to the word prejudiced that gets peoples back up

To many in language terms prejudice = phobia when realistically wether we like to admit it we all pre judge situations and people in all walks of life on a daily basis

I think it goes back to my point about what people see as "acceptance" taking a swing from live and let live to you must be fully with me in every aspect of my belief or you are against me ... for many (including myself) live and let live is enough and therefore we don't see any issue with it being our preference or prejudice whatever word you want to use to not take it further than that "

I also think with something like the employment example above ... each person can be judged on their own merit and if the black person on your example was a hard worker you can help to dispell that stereotype or prejudice

However there is something different and more difficult about attraction ... i dont know if its chemical or mental or what the reason is but very often it is just there or it is not ... it doesnt follow normal rules and usually cant be controlled ... how many times have you found yourself attracted to someone not your "usual type" or seen someone who should be exactly your type on paper and the sexual chemistry is just not there

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"

It's a question of language. If you say "whatever their other qualities I will never have sex with a trans woman " then you are making a pre judgment about their sexual attractiveness based purely on their Trans status. Hence prejudice.

It's possible to be prejudiced against people in some areas and not others. Some one, for example, may be perfectly willing to socialise with black people but won't employ them because he thinks they are all lazy. He'd be prejudiced against black people would he not?

And if we accept we are prejudiced on some way or another it might stop this whole area being discussed in such fraught terms.

I agree with this to an extent but its the negative connotations attached to the word prejudiced that gets peoples back up

To many in language terms prejudice = phobia when realistically wether we like to admit it we all pre judge situations and people in all walks of life on a daily basis

I think it goes back to my point about what people see as "acceptance" taking a swing from live and let live to you must be fully with me in every aspect of my belief or you are against me ... for many (including myself) live and let live is enough and therefore we don't see any issue with it being our preference or prejudice whatever word you want to use to not take it further than that

I also think with something like the employment example above ... each person can be judged on their own merit and if the black person on your example was a hard worker you can help to dispell that stereotype or prejudice

However there is something different and more difficult about attraction ... i dont know if its chemical or mental or what the reason is but very often it is just there or it is not ... it doesnt follow normal rules and usually cant be controlled ... how many times have you found yourself attracted to someone not your "usual type" or seen someone who should be exactly your type on paper and the sexual chemistry is just not there "

I agree with the latter point, but quite often sexual preference, even we can't control it, derives from irrational prejudice. I don't fancy overweight people for example. That's probably because of various stereotypes about overweight people I have imbibed during my life, hence a prejudice.

Could I change that? Possibly, if I put a lot of effort into considering and examining my views. Will I try to change it? No, because it's not worth it. I hardly have overweight women queuing up to have sex with me, so it's not a major social problem

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

It's sort of self punitive and self selecting. Anyone who shows that they have unkind preferences, won't be touched by many who the phobic person may have found attractive. Their own, what would appear to be, bigotry, makes them the loser.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice?

I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex?

It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries

I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all

Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations

I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing

Again, very reasonable, but the situation where you fancy a woman, get to the bedroom, get naked and are all ready to go until she tells you she is transferring. Irrational prejudice?

Quite frankly,if disclosure hadn't occurred before the point of nakedness in a bedroom,it probably never would.

The point being that I would have found out what the guys likely rection would be and decided for myself whether or not I wanted to proceed. It's not only for the guy to decide,you know.

I appreciate that, but this discussion is specifically about whether men who won't have sex with trans women are phobic. Hence I am posting a situation for a man to change his mind about sex with a woman was because she is trans. "

Well I suppose that is how the discussion progressed but it wasn't quite what the OP asked.The question also specified that he was not referring to tvs but a few have answered as well as me and the consensus seems to be that nobody who is actually affected by this,really minds about another persons preferences and that the preferences themselves do not indicate 'phobia'.As long as everybody treats everybody else respectfully, no one should really object to being turned down for any reason.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East


"It's sort of self punitive and self selecting. Anyone who shows that they have unkind preferences, won't be touched by many who the phobic person may have found attractive. Their own, what would appear to be, bigotry, makes them the loser. "

Preferences cant be labelled kind or unkind.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East


"

Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice?

I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex?

It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries

I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all

Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations

I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing

Again, very reasonable, but the situation where you fancy a woman, get to the bedroom, get naked and are all ready to go until she tells you she is transferring. Irrational prejudice?

Quite frankly,if disclosure hadn't occurred before the point of nakedness in a bedroom,it probably never would.

The point being that I would have found out what the guys likely rection would be and decided for myself whether or not I wanted to proceed. It's not only for the guy to decide,you know.

I appreciate that, but this discussion is specifically about whether men who won't have sex with trans women are phobic. Hence I am posting a situation for a man to change his mind about sex with a woman was because she is trans.

Well I suppose that is how the discussion progressed but it wasn't quite what the OP asked.The question also specified that he was not referring to tvs but a few have answered as well as me and the consensus seems to be that nobody who is actually affected by this,really minds about another persons preferences and that the preferences themselves do not indicate 'phobia'.As long as everybody treats everybody else respectfully, no one should really object to being turned down for any reason."

Totally agree.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It's sort of self punitive and self selecting. Anyone who shows that they have unkind preferences, won't be touched by many who the phobic person may have found attractive. Their own, what would appear to be, bigotry, makes them the loser.

Preferences cant be labelled kind or unkind."

Agree- but I think it depends on how it's said.

"Gingers make me wanna puke" is not the same as "I'm sorry but you're not what I'm looking for".

I know that the thought of fucking me will make some people shudder and I'm ok with that.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"

Very sensible post, but I suppose the point is in a situation where someone is post op and you only know they are trans because they tell you, what reason could there be for not having sex with them other than prejudice?

I appreciate a relationship might be different (you might want children for example) but casual sex?

It might be something you haven't thought about before and are not sure you are comfortable with yet be that for your own insecurities or sexual boundaries

I am not sure how to out this across tactfully so apologies if i offend but at the end of the day it is not a "natural womans body" it is a male body which has been surgically amended to replicate a woman body ... and i think that it is understandable that some people might take a bit of time to come round to that or might never come round to it at all

Is it prejudice? I guess it probably is ... but people seem to forget that prejudice is "pre judging" before you really know and is something we all do in every area of life every day but does not always carry such negative connotations

I dont beleive having a prejudice and being phobic are the same thing

Again, very reasonable, but the situation where you fancy a woman, get to the bedroom, get naked and are all ready to go until she tells you she is transferring. Irrational prejudice?

Quite frankly,if disclosure hadn't occurred before the point of nakedness in a bedroom,it probably never would.

The point being that I would have found out what the guys likely rection would be and decided for myself whether or not I wanted to proceed. It's not only for the guy to decide,you know.

I appreciate that, but this discussion is specifically about whether men who won't have sex with trans women are phobic. Hence I am posting a situation for a man to change his mind about sex with a woman was because she is trans.

Well I suppose that is how the discussion progressed but it wasn't quite what the OP asked.The question also specified that he was not referring to tvs but a few have answered as well as me and the consensus seems to be that nobody who is actually affected by this,really minds about another persons preferences and that the preferences themselves do not indicate 'phobia'.As long as everybody treats everybody else respectfully, no one should really object to being turned down for any reason."

Respect always. x

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *G CoupleCouple  over a year ago

kent

Isn’t a phobia something you cant control?

Without therapy etc etc?

Having a phobia isn’t a bad thing is it?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Isn’t a phobia something you cant control?

Without therapy etc etc?

Having a phobia isn’t a bad thing is it?"

A phobia is irrational and obsessive. Yeah it can be a bad thing

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"It's sort of self punitive and self selecting. Anyone who shows that they have unkind preferences, won't be touched by many who the phobic person may have found attractive. Their own, what would appear to be, bigotry, makes them the loser.

Preferences cant be labelled kind or unkind."

I just did.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East


"It's sort of self punitive and self selecting. Anyone who shows that they have unkind preferences, won't be touched by many who the phobic person may have found attractive. Their own, what would appear to be, bigotry, makes them the loser.

Preferences cant be labelled kind or unkind.

Agree- but I think it depends on how it's said.

"Gingers make me wanna puke" is not the same as "I'm sorry but you're not what I'm looking for".

I know that the thought of fucking me will make some people shudder and I'm ok with that.

"

It does depend yes. I have been answering clems question. I don't go round saying oi you trans woman i wouldn't touch you with a barge pole. Hence it's a preference not a prejudice.

On a lighter note gingers are hot in my experience

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East


"It's sort of self punitive and self selecting. Anyone who shows that they have unkind preferences, won't be touched by many who the phobic person may have found attractive. Their own, what would appear to be, bigotry, makes them the loser.

Preferences cant be labelled kind or unkind.

I just did."

Wrongly

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hubaysiWoman  over a year ago

Leeds


"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you? "

This is a difficult one.

Personally I don’t think it should be an issue if she is now a woman, she has gone through a lot to be one and seriously does it really matter?

However, we are humans, some of us with ‘issues’ about certain things.

At the end of the day it’s up to us who we turn down, its individual choice.

We should, however treat everyone with respect and dignity.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

100% ok

I think if we start telling people they are not allowed to say no to sex with someone because their reason isn't acceptable or whatever, then it would cause a lot of bother

Anyone is allowed to say no to whoever they like for any reason they like or even no reason at all and that is totally fine

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *hingy2Woman  over a year ago

STOKE ON TRENT

It's personal preference.

I know a few that won't go with a fem if shes not a natural born fem

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *inkyLondonpairCouple  over a year ago

London


"It's sort of self punitive and self selecting. Anyone who shows that they have unkind preferences, won't be touched by many who the phobic person may have found attractive. Their own, what would appear to be, bigotry, makes them the loser.

Preferences cant be labelled kind or unkind.

I just did.

Wrongly"

So, re my example above, a bloke prefers not to employ black people because he thinks they are lazy. We can't say that preference is unkind?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East


"To turn down a trans woman because she's a trans woman? Not a transvestite, not a cross dresser but a legal female trans woman. Not because you don't fancy her etc etc, but purely because she was born into the wrong gender body. I don't think so, what say you?

This is a difficult one.

Personally I don’t think it should be an issue if she is now a woman, she has gone through a lot to be one and seriously does it really matter?

However, we are humans, some of us with ‘issues’ about certain things.

At the end of the day it’s up to us who we turn down, its individual choice.

We should, however treat everyone with respect and dignity.

"

The person's gender realignment is their lifestyle and not an issue for anyone else. Plenty of people would have no issue being intimate with them. Some would. I simply fall into the last camp. Plenty of people wouldn't get intimate with me if I was the last man on earth. I don't meet their preferences. That's the way it should be.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *urlesque!Woman  over a year ago

Gloucester

I believe you can turn down anybody at any time for whatever reasons without being phobic - what matters is the way in which you turn them down and if you are using your "reasons" to have a dig rather than politely, respectfully and kindly giving the message you are not (no longer ) interested in meeting.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"Back to the OP’s original question !!!

Of course, it’s OK to turn them down, we all have a right to our own preferences.

But – it’s not OK to turn them or any other person down who’s lifestyle differs from ours with any form of malice or detriment.

We also don’t have the right to pass judgment on others because of gender, color, religion, disability, have a cock or don’t have a cock…….etc, etc.,etc.

Thankfully we are all different and diverse – that’s what makes it such a wonderful world to live in.

"

But its not "a lifestyle"! Its not something to pass judgement on anymore than someone should be prejudiced against for being blind, or deformed. "Trans" isn't a state of mind! Its not a man who gets horny dressing up like an Ann summers model! For many it's not even a choice.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East


"It's sort of self punitive and self selecting. Anyone who shows that they have unkind preferences, won't be touched by many who the phobic person may have found attractive. Their own, what would appear to be, bigotry, makes them the loser.

Preferences cant be labelled kind or unkind.

I just did.

Wrongly

So, re my example above, a bloke prefers not to employ black people because he thinks they are lazy. We can't say that preference is unkind? "

Nope you can't. You could argue he's stereotyping a group of people. He believes he is looking after his business rightly or wrongly. Putting his needs before those of others. He is not being unkind to anyone. The black person who seeks employment and loses out is affected in that he doesnt gain employment. The owner of the business has not acted with the intention of causing that. It is just a consequence of his preference.

Any sexual preference is based on ones own needs. Any prefrence of music is ones own etc etc etc. Kindness is irrelevant.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East


"Back to the OP’s original question !!!

Of course, it’s OK to turn them down, we all have a right to our own preferences.

But – it’s not OK to turn them or any other person down who’s lifestyle differs from ours with any form of malice or detriment.

We also don’t have the right to pass judgment on others because of gender, color, religion, disability, have a cock or don’t have a cock…….etc, etc.,etc.

Thankfully we are all different and diverse – that’s what makes it such a wonderful world to live in.

But its not "a lifestyle"! Its not something to pass judgement on anymore than someone should be prejudiced against for being blind, or deformed. "Trans" isn't a state of mind! Its not a man who gets horny dressing up like an Ann summers model! For many it's not even a choice. "

Correct. And yet that has got bugger all to do with wheter other people wish to have sex with them.

Congrats on missing the point of your own thread entirely lol

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"Back to the OP’s original question !!!

Of course, it’s OK to turn them down, we all have a right to our own preferences.

But – it’s not OK to turn them or any other person down who’s lifestyle differs from ours with any form of malice or detriment.

We also don’t have the right to pass judgment on others because of gender, color, religion, disability, have a cock or don’t have a cock…….etc, etc.,etc.

Thankfully we are all different and diverse – that’s what makes it such a wonderful world to live in.

But its not "a lifestyle"! Its not something to pass judgement on anymore than someone should be prejudiced against for being blind, or deformed. "Trans" isn't a state of mind! Its not a man who gets horny dressing up like an Ann summers model! For many it's not even a choice.

Correct. And yet that has got bugger all to do with wheter other people wish to have sex with them.

Congrats on missing the point of your own thread entirely lol"

I wasn't answering the op..... you can see that in the bit where i didn't quote it... L O L.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Back to the OP’s original question !!!

Of course, it’s OK to turn them down, we all have a right to our own preferences.

But – it’s not OK to turn them or any other person down who’s lifestyle differs from ours with any form of malice or detriment.

We also don’t have the right to pass judgment on others because of gender, color, religion, disability, have a cock or don’t have a cock…….etc, etc.,etc.

Thankfully we are all different and diverse – that’s what makes it such a wonderful world to live in.

But its not "a lifestyle"! Its not something to pass judgement on anymore than someone should be prejudiced against for being blind, or deformed. "Trans" isn't a state of mind! Its not a man who gets horny dressing up like an Ann summers model! For many it's not even a choice. "

Neither is someones skin color,their height,their weight,their accent,whether they wear specs a lifestyle choice but,it is perfectly acceptable to not feel sexually attracted to any of those people.

It is clearly not acceptable to refuse someone employment on some of those grounds but sexual attraction is not something that can be legislated for.

To compel someone to feel, or act on,sexual attraction that they don't feel is tantamount to r**e and is verging on thought policing.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"Back to the OP’s original question !!!

Of course, it’s OK to turn them down, we all have a right to our own preferences.

But – it’s not OK to turn them or any other person down who’s lifestyle differs from ours with any form of malice or detriment.

We also don’t have the right to pass judgment on others because of gender, color, religion, disability, have a cock or don’t have a cock…….etc, etc.,etc.

Thankfully we are all different and diverse – that’s what makes it such a wonderful world to live in.

But its not "a lifestyle"! Its not something to pass judgement on anymore than someone should be prejudiced against for being blind, or deformed. "Trans" isn't a state of mind! Its not a man who gets horny dressing up like an Ann summers model! For many it's not even a choice.

Neither is someones skin color,their height,their weight,their accent,whether they wear specs a lifestyle choice but,it is perfectly acceptable to not feel sexually attracted to any of those people.

It is clearly not acceptable to refuse someone employment on some of those grounds but sexual attraction is not something that can be legislated for.

To compel someone to feel, or act on,sexual attraction that they don't feel is tantamount to r**e and is verging on thought policing."

Yes. But why mention it?

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

 

By *ieman300Man  over a year ago

Best Greggs in Cheshire East


"Back to the OP’s original question !!!

Of course, it’s OK to turn them down, we all have a right to our own preferences.

But – it’s not OK to turn them or any other person down who’s lifestyle differs from ours with any form of malice or detriment.

We also don’t have the right to pass judgment on others because of gender, color, religion, disability, have a cock or don’t have a cock…….etc, etc.,etc.

Thankfully we are all different and diverse – that’s what makes it such a wonderful world to live in.

But its not "a lifestyle"! Its not something to pass judgement on anymore than someone should be prejudiced against for being blind, or deformed. "Trans" isn't a state of mind! Its not a man who gets horny dressing up like an Ann summers model! For many it's not even a choice.

Correct. And yet that has got bugger all to do with wheter other people wish to have sex with them.

Congrats on missing the point of your own thread entirely lol

I wasn't answering the op..... you can see that in the bit where i didn't quote it... L O L."

You specifically targeted their use of the word lifestyle though didn't you. You little tinker.

No one is fooled here fella.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

  

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury

Sometimes it's easy to blame the mirror if you dont like the reflection.

Reply privately (closed, thread got too big)

0.3593

0