FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Sexist or humorous
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A lady on Twitter complained about a train manager with Virgin Trains addressing her as Honey when talking to her regarding some issue with the trains. The Virgin Trains reply was to say sorry about that and would she prefer “pet” or “love” in future. Most on Twitter are appalled by their response. Would you take it as them trying but failing to be funny? Should the person from Virgin Trains be sacked?" Sacked?, lose their house, their job and prospects of another and put intolerable pressure on their family for using an outdated term?....seems a little harsh to me even in these strange times. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Should the person be fired? No. But they should be told not to be quite so condescending in the future. I don't like pet names like honey, pet, love, etc. Not because they are sexist, but because they are generally condescending. The fact that he said it the first time isn't even the problem - the fact that he just couldn't help himself with the comeback is, though. Customer service requires a certain degree of respect on both sides, and someone who can't stop themselves from being an ass shouldn't be in a position to speak with the public. Needs some training, I think. " I think it was two separate people involved. The older gentleman train driver called her honey and the person running their Twitter account who asked if she preferred to be called love or pet. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Should the person be fired? No. But they should be told not to be quite so condescending in the future. I don't like pet names like honey, pet, love, etc. Not because they are sexist, but because they are generally condescending. The fact that he said it the first time isn't even the problem - the fact that he just couldn't help himself with the comeback is, though. Customer service requires a certain degree of respect on both sides, and someone who can't stop themselves from being an ass shouldn't be in a position to speak with the public. Needs some training, I think. I think it was two separate people involved. The older gentleman train driver called her honey and the person running their Twitter account who asked if she preferred to be called love or pet." Yeah, sorry, I read it wrong the first time. But my point stands for the second guy. Better training. It's customer service 101. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"That person should not be sacked, the woman just needs to stop being such a whining bitch. Nobody can do anything without someone getting offended and crying about it" He showed her no respect by the sounds of it by the second comment,as someone who is representing a company he should know better. Would he have said that to a man,I very much doubt it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Difficult to be able to fully comment because didn't actually hear the conversation but I bet the person says "honey" all the time without any malice or condescension meant. " Probably the same way some people may make sentences sound as though they’re asking a question without any malice or condescension meant | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"After reading these comments, though, mostly the male ones, I've decided that I'm going to call all guys "pet." It's something that I think would make an interesting social experiment. " try "dear" with a look of pity for the full patronising effect | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't like being called love, honey, darling or any other endearment but I'd never complain about it. However I defend this woman's right to complain if she wishes to and I think that if Virgin had simply apologised instead of tweeting a sarcastic and condescending response this would not be noteworthy." Exactly. I think it was the response from someone representing Virgin Trains which has caused more issues than the original comment. I hate being called dear or love by anyone other than my parents especially in a business environment. I don’t think men would call other men by some term of endearment like that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"After reading these comments, though, mostly the male ones, I've decided that I'm going to call all guys "pet." It's something that I think would make an interesting social experiment. try "dear" with a look of pity for the full patronising effect " I find that when men refer to me as 'girl', calling them 'boy' quickly makes them rethink what they just did. Especially when accompanied with a withering look. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"After reading these comments, though, mostly the male ones, I've decided that I'm going to call all guys "pet." It's something that I think would make an interesting social experiment. try "dear" with a look of pity for the full patronising effect " I'm serious, though. I'm going to do it. Not in a patronising or condescending way. I'm just going to do it matter of factly, and see how guys react. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Difficult to be able to fully comment because didn't actually hear the conversation but I bet the person says "honey" all the time without any malice or condescension meant. Probably the same way some people may make sentences sound as though they’re asking a question without any malice or condescension meant " Hung with my own petard! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wonder if there is anything anyone ever says ever that someone else can find to be offended about..even if it wasn't even said the the offended party. Maybe I'm just too old to be a snowflake " I actually think that people who get offended at other people's offense are just their own perfectly formed little snowflake. It's takes more than one snowflake to mow a blizzard.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I work in a little shop and I do have a habit of calling female customers darling all the time . Not one woman has ever been offended by it . However In today's ' you can't say anything to anyone without them being offended ' age , I do feel Virgin should have been a little more tactful in their response ." They may not have voiced their objection. That doesn't mean they like it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"After reading these comments, though, mostly the male ones, I've decided that I'm going to call all guys "pet." It's something that I think would make an interesting social experiment. try "dear" with a look of pity for the full patronising effect I find that when men refer to me as 'girl', calling them 'boy' quickly makes them rethink what they just did. Especially when accompanied with a withering look." I (mr) say girl when referring to women, and I know lots of women who do the same. It is a common term and not condescending. In context I also say 'lads' when referring to men. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"That person should not be sacked, the woman just needs to stop being such a whining bitch. Nobody can do anything without someone getting offended and crying about it" And there we have it in black and white. This tactic is often used to keep people down. Raise an objection and you then get demonised. She didn't like it so she must be a 'whining bitch' ..... what wonderful words. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"After reading these comments, though, mostly the male ones, I've decided that I'm going to call all guys "pet." It's something that I think would make an interesting social experiment. try "dear" with a look of pity for the full patronising effect I find that when men refer to me as 'girl', calling them 'boy' quickly makes them rethink what they just did. Especially when accompanied with a withering look. I (mr) say girl when referring to women, and I know lots of women who do the same. It is a common term and not condescending. In context I also say 'lads' when referring to men." I find it extremely condescending, especially in a professional environment. If you wouldn't call a 30 year old man a boy, then don't call a 30 year old woman a girl. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I work in a little shop and I do have a habit of calling female customers darling all the time . Not one woman has ever been offended by it . However In today's ' you can't say anything to anyone without them being offended ' age , I do feel Virgin should have been a little more tactful in their response . They may not have voiced their objection. That doesn't mean they like it." Lots of small businesses use Darling, Love etc etc, I prefer hearing that to a sanitised globalised terminology. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"That person should not be sacked, the woman just needs to stop being such a whining bitch. Nobody can do anything without someone getting offended and crying about it" Ah yes. If you don't like being referred to in a certain way and you make a comment about it on twitter, you must be a 'wining bitch'. Lovely. Says an awful lot about you that you'd come to that conclusion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Snowflakes getting offended by fuck all again. Its not offensive or patronising. Its a term of endearment. Im northern and call people love all the time. Get a friggen grip. " Showing endearment means to express love and/or affection towards someone. I don't want random blokes working for the train company to show love and/or affection towards me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Depends on the context. Most of those terms of endearment , honey, sweetheart, babe etc have innocent meaning but depending on how they're said and the subject matter they can be construed as sexist/patronising But really it's subjective, what's patronising to one person isn't necessarily going to be for another person " In her original tweet, the lady making the complaint did mention context. I get the impression the original man who called her honey was quite dismissive of her and then calling her honey just topped it off. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I work in a little shop and I do have a habit of calling female customers darling all the time . Not one woman has ever been offended by it . However In today's ' you can't say anything to anyone without them being offended ' age , I do feel Virgin should have been a little more tactful in their response . They may not have voiced their objection. That doesn't mean they like it. Lots of small businesses use Darling, Love etc etc, I prefer hearing that to a sanitised globalised terminology. " Yes I quite like it too, a bit of character breaking through | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think people need to get over themselves. Would you prefer to be called something sterile and cold like "sir" or "madam"? I like that people address me differently, babe, hun, mate, dude, Chuck, love, pet etc, although I can see that perhaps one or two examples might be a little less welcome in certain situations. I hate the march towards an homogenous society where everyone is treated the same, clinically and with no human warmth or emotion." 'Madam' or 'Ma'am' are perfectly fine ways to address women. I much prefer it to over-familiar terms that are better suited to family, close friends, or even sexual partners. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Snowflakes getting offended by fuck all again. Its not offensive or patronising. Its a term of endearment. Im northern and call people love all the time. Get a friggen grip. " Why does not liking something make someone a snowflake? Does you not liking their dislike make you a snowflake? I think the term snowflake is just the modern attempt at silencing opinions we don't like without having to go through the bother of putting together a coherent and convincing counter-argument. It's sounds so silly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"After reading these comments, though, mostly the male ones, I've decided that I'm going to call all guys "pet." It's something that I think would make an interesting social experiment. try "dear" with a look of pity for the full patronising effect I'm serious, though. I'm going to do it. Not in a patronising or condescending way. I'm just going to do it matter of factly, and see how guys react. " Let us know how it goes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I hate the march towards an homogenous society where everyone is treated the same, clinically and with no human warmth or emotion." I agree and I hate that, too - that is why I dislike being called hun or babe etc. I prefer to be addressed by my name or if it is a more formal environment then "madam" will do nicely | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I find that when men refer to me as 'girl', calling them 'boy' quickly makes them rethink what they just did. Especially when accompanied with a withering look. I (mr) say girl when referring to women, and I know lots of women who do the same. It is a common term and not condescending. In context I also say 'lads' when referring to men. I find it extremely condescending, especially in a professional environment. If you wouldn't call a 30 year old man a boy, then don't call a 30 year old woman a girl." I dont use Girl or Lad in a professional context, Inuse it informally. Lots of these terms are also very strongly linked to dialect. There is a danger with this stamping on genuinly open minded nice people. Pet, Love, Darling etc are used for both sexes in many areas of the cointry and neither are given or received in a condescending way. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Snowflakes getting offended by fuck all again. Its not offensive or patronising. Its a term of endearment. Im northern and call people love all the time. Get a friggen grip. Showing endearment means to express love and/or affection towards someone. I don't want random blokes working for the train company to show love and/or affection towards me." This in a nutshell | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think people need to get over themselves. Would you prefer to be called something sterile and cold like "sir" or "madam"? I like that people address me differently, babe, hun, mate, dude, Chuck, love, pet etc, although I can see that perhaps one or two examples might be a little less welcome in certain situations. I hate the march towards an homogenous society where everyone is treated the same, clinically and with no human warmth or emotion." This really. And no, folk should not be fired over what at most could be construed as misjudged humour. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I find that when men refer to me as 'girl', calling them 'boy' quickly makes them rethink what they just did. Especially when accompanied with a withering look. I (mr) say girl when referring to women, and I know lots of women who do the same. It is a common term and not condescending. In context I also say 'lads' when referring to men. I find it extremely condescending, especially in a professional environment. If you wouldn't call a 30 year old man a boy, then don't call a 30 year old woman a girl. I dont use Girl or Lad in a professional context, Inuse it informally. Lots of these terms are also very strongly linked to dialect. There is a danger with this stamping on genuinly open minded nice people. Pet, Love, Darling etc are used for both sexes in many areas of the cointry and neither are given or received in a condescending way." Yes - as you say context is important. In this situation it's a professional person using the word to a customer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Someone being sacked in connection with either incident definitely not. However it drives me insane the way ppl in the service industry etc address the general public. In Sainsbury’s over the Christmas period I was using the do it yourself tills. The lady overseeing the tills was in her 20s very pleasant and helpful. She addressed everyone that used the tills as sweetheart. She addressed me as sweetheart at least 3 times, it is incredibly irritating. Just why? I’m a stranger we’ve never met and I’m far from her sweetheart as I could possibly be " I HATE giving blood for the same reason. I object strongly to being adressed as 'hun' by most of the nurses. I don't voice my objections for reasons I'll keep to myself and because I think it's important that I give blood but it is so fucking PATRONISING. And to ALL of the posters who want to brand me as a whining bitch or over sensitive i'm neither but i can't be arsed explaining why your poor attitude to others rankles me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"After reading these comments, though, mostly the male ones, I've decided that I'm going to call all guys "pet." It's something that I think would make an interesting social experiment. try "dear" with a look of pity for the full patronising effect I'm serious, though. I'm going to do it. Not in a patronising or condescending way. I'm just going to do it matter of factly, and see how guys react. " My reaction would only be puzzlement at your accent, there are parts of the UK where not being called 'pet' is weird or insulting. This is just a Twitter storm, some holiday replacement employee, with a bit of Christmas cracker joke overdose has attempted humour and just like the cracker jokes failed miserably. The original 'offence' probably a location origin and age group slip up could have been cleared up on the spot without recourse to global broadcast on the internet. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" There is a danger with this stamping on genuinly open minded nice people. Pet, Love, Darling etc are used for both sexes in many areas of the cointry and neither are given or received in a condescending way. Yes - as you say context is important. In this situation it's a professional person using the word to a customer." Also how one person receives it and how the other person meant it can be different. In the Northeast, Pet is a universally used term, and is not condescending. Why does the views of the offended automatically usurp the view of the well meaning deliverer? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There have been numerous funny Twitter exchanges in the past from large retailers/companies which have gone viral and seen as highly entertaining on a social media level... sounds like the Virgin Twitter person was trying the same thing but perhaps picked the wrong tweet to try it with... but no dont think either person should be sacked. " I agree completely I think it was a very poorly attempt at humour. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I haven't read anything about it but their response sound's pretty bad to me!" Doesn't sound like a legit response from HR at Virgin... no company would reply like that in any public form. I smell a rat. If it's genuine then whoever replied like that has already been reprimanded and a formal response on twitter would have already ensued. If not....mmmmm | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I hate the march towards an homogenous society where everyone is treated the same, clinically and with no human warmth or emotion. I agree and I hate that, too - that is why I dislike being called hun or babe etc. I prefer to be addressed by my name or if it is a more formal environment then "madam" will do nicely " I hate being called Madam it's a funny old world | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Depends on the context. Most of those terms of endearment , honey, sweetheart, babe etc have innocent meaning but depending on how they're said and the subject matter they can be construed as sexist/patronising But really it's subjective, what's patronising to one person isn't necessarily going to be for another person In her original tweet, the lady making the complaint did mention context. I get the impression the original man who called her honey was quite dismissive of her and then calling her honey just topped it off. " Ah I've just read the article for myself I wouldn't call it sexist but I wouldn't have reacted well to being dismissed then called honey on top of it. I went to get my car serviced a few months ago and the guy (who was an older man) who saw to me referred to everyone else as Mr/Mrs, Then when asked something about my car refered to as "young lady *my surname* " to his colleague, which I was not impressed about, didn't find it sexist just extremely patronising especially when it would have taken less time to say "miss" like he did to everyone else | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Depends on the context. Most of those terms of endearment , honey, sweetheart, babe etc have innocent meaning but depending on how they're said and the subject matter they can be construed as sexist/patronising But really it's subjective, what's patronising to one person isn't necessarily going to be for another person In her original tweet, the lady making the complaint did mention context. I get the impression the original man who called her honey was quite dismissive of her and then calling her honey just topped it off. Ah I've just read the article for myself I wouldn't call it sexist but I wouldn't have reacted well to being dismissed then called honey on top of it. I went to get my car serviced a few months ago and the guy (who was an older man) who saw to me referred to everyone else as Mr/Mrs, Then when asked something about my car refered to as "young lady *my surname* " to his colleague, which I was not impressed about, didn't find it sexist just extremely patronising especially when it would have taken less time to say "miss" like he did to everyone else " Urgh. I hate 'young lady' as a term of address. I'm always very pleased with myself when I manage not to rage at the blokes who write that in messages to me on swinging/sex sites. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"That person should not be sacked, the woman just needs to stop being such a whining bitch. Nobody can do anything without someone getting offended and crying about it He showed her no respect by the sounds of it by the second comment,as someone who is representing a company he should know better. Would he have said that to a man,I very much doubt it. " If that was said to a man I very much doubt he would complain in the first place, and to then go on to post it on twitter is just looking to take your whiney bullshit to another level. I work in an environment surrounded by women and I get called "darling" and "hun" on a daily basis and think nothing of it, non of the guys at work give it a second thought. The guy on twitter should have been more professional in the matter but was obviously trying to make a joke, maybe not a very funny or appropriate joke but was obviously a joke and the thing about jokes is that they are not to be taken seriously. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"After reading these comments, though, mostly the male ones, I've decided that I'm going to call all guys "pet." It's something that I think would make an interesting social experiment. try "dear" with a look of pity for the full patronising effect I'm serious, though. I'm going to do it. Not in a patronising or condescending way. I'm just going to do it matter of factly, and see how guys react. " Absolutely fine by me. I'd probably think you're being very pleasant, friendly and informal. All good traits in my book. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It would make me smile, but i can accept it's poor form from a company " Yup. I appreciate the humour and think she's being pathetic, but it's not a very professional response to a complaint. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Snowflakes getting offended by fuck all again. Its not offensive or patronising. Its a term of endearment. Im northern and call people love all the time. Get a friggen grip. " The term 'luv' I don't even think it's endearment, it's what we are brought up with, it's what we expect. It's etched into my being. You hear women say it to each other - it's not just a male to female thing. I think it's friendly. I will continue to use it and, should someone take objection to it, I will apologise for it - and then use the term again on the other thousand people that aren't bothered by it in the slightest. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"That person should not be sacked, the woman just needs to stop being such a whining bitch. Nobody can do anything without someone getting offended and crying about it He showed her no respect by the sounds of it by the second comment,as someone who is representing a company he should know better. Would he have said that to a man,I very much doubt it. If that was said to a man I very much doubt he would complain in the first place, and to then go on to post it on twitter is just looking to take your whiney bullshit to another level. I work in an environment surrounded by women and I get called "darling" and "hun" on a daily basis and think nothing of it, non of the guys at work give it a second thought. The guy on twitter should have been more professional in the matter but was obviously trying to make a joke, maybe not a very funny or appropriate joke but was obviously a joke and the thing about jokes is that they are not to be taken seriously. " So... if I call someone a cunt and then claim it was a joke, it's alright because it wasn't supposed to be taken seriously? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I haven't read anything about it but their response sound's pretty bad to me! Doesn't sound like a legit response from HR at Virgin... no company would reply like that in any public form. I smell a rat. If it's genuine then whoever replied like that has already been reprimanded and a formal response on twitter would have already ensued. If not....mmmmm" It was from the Virgin Trains EC official account. The tweet has now been removed and an apology given for any offence that may have been caused. Another Twitter user (male) has said he heard the original conversation and the use of the word honey was not regionally appropriate. I have no idea at which station this exchange took place but it must be somewhere on the East Coast as that was the Virgin Trains Twitter account she addressed her complaint to. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A lady on Twitter complained about a train manager with Virgin Trains addressing her as Honey when talking to her regarding some issue with the trains. The Virgin Trains reply was to say sorry about that and would she prefer “pet” or “love” in future. Most on Twitter are appalled by their response. Would you take it as them trying but failing to be funny? Should the person from Virgin Trains be sacked?" Why is someone always calling for staff to be sacked over absolute nonesense. We can't all be correct about every decision we make every single time. It's especially bad for calling for staff to lose their jobs on the railway. Some people like to be offended for the sake of being offended. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"After reading these comments, though, mostly the male ones, I've decided that I'm going to call all guys "pet." It's something that I think would make an interesting social experiment. try "dear" with a look of pity for the full patronising effect I'm serious, though. I'm going to do it. Not in a patronising or condescending way. I'm just going to do it matter of factly, and see how guys react. My reaction would only be puzzlement at your accent, there are parts of the UK where not being called 'pet' is weird or insulting. This is just a Twitter storm, some holiday replacement employee, with a bit of Christmas cracker joke overdose has attempted humour and just like the cracker jokes failed miserably. The original 'offence' probably a location origin and age group slip up could have been cleared up on the spot without recourse to global broadcast on the internet. " I'm going into this experiment with the assumption that men will not like being called pet by a young woman. Just my guess. As far as this incident goes, I think of it this way: It is fair to not know whether a woman dislikes pet names. Once a woman expresses that dislike, she should have just been addressed by her name or ma'am. But that's not what happened. She was mocked and it was inappropriate. As an example, people often refer to me as Mrs. [Marc's last name]. I then inform them that I didn't take his name, so please call me [my first name]. And they do. Because persisting with a name that is not my own and which I asked not to be called in a business relationship is inappropriate. It happens in the U.S. sometimes, too. Southerners are much more likely to call people by pet names than northerners. I have nicely asked people to please just call me [my first name] in the past. It does not make me over-sensitive, offended, or a snowflake. However, if the company rep mocked me about my request I would wonder why they were so offended by my request in the first place. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Urgh. I hate 'young lady' as a term of address. I'm always very pleased with myself when I manage not to rage at the blokes who write that in messages to me on swinging/sex sites. " I quite agree, you are 30, it should be old woman now.... Runs and hides in the zombie thread where it's safer | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I wonder if there is anything anyone ever says ever that someone else can find to be offended about..even if it wasn't even said the the offended party. Maybe I'm just too old to be a snowflake I actually think that people who get offended at other people's offense are just their own perfectly formed little snowflake. It's takes more than one snowflake to mow a blizzard.... " Today is the day that tolerance died! Words can be used as weapons or with malicious intent of twisted such as fake news. As the Mad Hatter said words can mean whatever we want them to mean. But when colloquial terms of endearment are turned into a cause for complaint and the need to make an issue of their usage to assuage the perceived slight of another then perhaps it's time we all reassessed the things that really matter. People killin People dying Children hurting can you hear them crying... Where is the love? Where is the perspective? If today you call someone mate pet love ducks or anyone of thousands of similar words and they wanted you to lose your job... Do you think you may just change your views.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Sackable? No. In my opinion, the woman has been oversensitive about complaining, but, since she has, Virgin should respond in a way respectfull of the customers thoughts. I would have said sorry that she took it in a negative way, it was intended as a friendly informal term." Exactly. I would not dream of complaining if some train driver called me pet or love or honey or whatever normal term of endearment he uses habitually if he was merely answering me in what was for him a normal polite manner. Intent is everything. If he was being sarcastic and patronising in the first place then that is a different matter. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" If today you call someone mate pet love ducks or anyone of thousands of similar words and they wanted you to lose your job... Do you think you may just change your views.... " The difference is... I wouldn't call people by nicknames in a professional environment, especially if someone is the client/customer. And I definitely wouldn't make a joke about someones completely legitimate complaint to their face. So I wouldn't be facing the prospect of losing my position over something like that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Christ Hine....... talk about point missed. " There was a point? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I think people need to get over themselves. Would you prefer to be called something sterile and cold like "sir" or "madam"? I like that people address me differently, babe, hun, mate, dude, Chuck, love, pet etc, although I can see that perhaps one or two examples might be a little less welcome in certain situations. I hate the march towards an homogenous society where everyone is treated the same, clinically and with no human warmth or emotion." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Snowflakes getting offended by fuck all again. Its not offensive or patronising. Its a term of endearment. Im northern and call people love all the time. Get a friggen grip. Showing endearment means to express love and/or affection towards someone. I don't want random blokes working for the train company to show love and/or affection towards me." I would interpret it as a sign of goodwill when applied to a stranger. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" If today you call someone mate pet love ducks or anyone of thousands of similar words and they wanted you to lose your job... Do you think you may just change your views.... The difference is... I wouldn't call people by nicknames in a professional environment, especially if someone is the client/customer. And I definitely wouldn't make a joke about someones completely legitimate complaint to their face. So I wouldn't be facing the prospect of losing my position over something like that." Exactly. And besides, I explicitly said above that I don't think the guy should lose his job. I do object, however, to this idea that people can't request not to be called something they don't like being called. When I enter into a professional relationship with someone (a company included) I treat them respectfully and I expect the same in return. Especially if I had already requested something not be said to me. And defending such behavior by just saying "snowflakes!" is meaningless and, honestly, lazy argumentation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A term of endearment is all well and good when dealing with someone you know. What really grits my shit is when I, as a customer, is called mate by the person at the end of the phone. I don't find it endearing, I find it unprofessional. Sticking to the basics like Sir/Madam or anything formal when dealing with complete strangers is a minimum. It isn't being a snowflake. It is a lack of common courtesy on behalf of the company. If you pay to see a comedian, you expect to see a joker. If you are paying for a train ticket, you expect to get wherever you are going, not get smart-arse remarks. " I appreciate your comments. They added a new dimension to the thread for me and moved us somewhat toward a discussion that isn't just full of ad hominem | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Depends on the context. Most of those terms of endearment , honey, sweetheart, babe etc have innocent meaning but depending on how they're said and the subject matter they can be construed as sexist/patronising But really it's subjective, what's patronising to one person isn't necessarily going to be for another person In her original tweet, the lady making the complaint did mention context. I get the impression the original man who called her honey was quite dismissive of her and then calling her honey just topped it off. " Yes, that's different - as I mentioned, intent is all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Snowflakes getting offended by fuck all again. Its not offensive or patronising. Its a term of endearment. Im northern and call people love all the time. Get a friggen grip. Showing endearment means to express love and/or affection towards someone. I don't want random blokes working for the train company to show love and/or affection towards me. I would interpret it as a sign of goodwill when applied to a stranger." Even though the complaint was specifically about the drivers dismissive attitude and calling her 'honey' was just the final irritation? Not much goodwill there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" There is a danger with this stamping on genuinly open minded nice people. Pet, Love, Darling etc are used for both sexes in many areas of the cointry and neither are given or received in a condescending way. Yes - as you say context is important. In this situation it's a professional person using the word to a customer. Also how one person receives it and how the other person meant it can be different. In the Northeast, Pet is a universally used term, and is not condescending. Why does the views of the offended automatically usurp the view of the well meaning deliverer?" That is my objection to PC and it's like - it should not in my view. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I hate the march towards an homogenous society where everyone is treated the same, clinically and with no human warmth or emotion. I agree and I hate that, too - that is why I dislike being called hun or babe etc. I prefer to be addressed by my name or if it is a more formal environment then "madam" will do nicely " Yeah, you see I hate 'Madam'!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" If today you call someone mate pet love ducks or anyone of thousands of similar words and they wanted you to lose your job... Do you think you may just change your views.... The difference is... I wouldn't call people by nicknames in a professional environment, especially if someone is the client/customer. And I definitely wouldn't make a joke about someones completely legitimate complaint to their face. So I wouldn't be facing the prospect of losing my position over something like that." Exactly it clearly says in the article that he was being dismissive, so it wasn't actually use as term of endearment | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Snowflakes getting offended by fuck all again. Its not offensive or patronising. Its a term of endearment. Im northern and call people love all the time. Get a friggen grip. Showing endearment means to express love and/or affection towards someone. I don't want random blokes working for the train company to show love and/or affection towards me. I would interpret it as a sign of goodwill when applied to a stranger." Me too, I would rather they were affectionate than being apathetic or hoping I dropped off the platform. And I'm generally fairly people intolerant | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"That person should not be sacked, the woman just needs to stop being such a whining bitch. Nobody can do anything without someone getting offended and crying about it He showed her no respect by the sounds of it by the second comment,as someone who is representing a company he should know better. Would he have said that to a man,I very much doubt it. If that was said to a man I very much doubt he would complain in the first place, and to then go on to post it on twitter is just looking to take your whiney bullshit to another level. I work in an environment surrounded by women and I get called "darling" and "hun" on a daily basis and think nothing of it, non of the guys at work give it a second thought. The guy on twitter should have been more professional in the matter but was obviously trying to make a joke, maybe not a very funny or appropriate joke but was obviously a joke and the thing about jokes is that they are not to be taken seriously. So... if I call someone a cunt and then claim it was a joke, it's alright because it wasn't supposed to be taken seriously?" Yes, it was clearly a joke. I have a gay best friend and we all (including himself) call him fag and its totally fine, but if we were to scream in his face and call him a dumb fucking fag then obviously thats not ok. Why cant feminists ever take a joke? (Triggered) | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"That person should not be sacked, the woman just needs to stop being such a whining bitch. Nobody can do anything without someone getting offended and crying about it He showed her no respect by the sounds of it by the second comment,as someone who is representing a company he should know better. Would he have said that to a man,I very much doubt it. If that was said to a man I very much doubt he would complain in the first place, and to then go on to post it on twitter is just looking to take your whiney bullshit to another level. I work in an environment surrounded by women and I get called "darling" and "hun" on a daily basis and think nothing of it, non of the guys at work give it a second thought. The guy on twitter should have been more professional in the matter but was obviously trying to make a joke, maybe not a very funny or appropriate joke but was obviously a joke and the thing about jokes is that they are not to be taken seriously. So... if I call someone a cunt and then claim it was a joke, it's alright because it wasn't supposed to be taken seriously? Yes, it was clearly a joke. I have a gay best friend and we all (including himself) call him fag and its totally fine, but if we were to scream in his face and call him a dumb fucking fag then obviously thats not ok. Why cant feminists ever take a joke? (Triggered) " Who are you accusing of being a feminist? Or is that a joke as well? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"That person should not be sacked, the woman just needs to stop being such a whining bitch. Nobody can do anything without someone getting offended and crying about it He showed her no respect by the sounds of it by the second comment,as someone who is representing a company he should know better. Would he have said that to a man,I very much doubt it. If that was said to a man I very much doubt he would complain in the first place, and to then go on to post it on twitter is just looking to take your whiney bullshit to another level. I work in an environment surrounded by women and I get called "darling" and "hun" on a daily basis and think nothing of it, non of the guys at work give it a second thought. The guy on twitter should have been more professional in the matter but was obviously trying to make a joke, maybe not a very funny or appropriate joke but was obviously a joke and the thing about jokes is that they are not to be taken seriously. So... if I call someone a cunt and then claim it was a joke, it's alright because it wasn't supposed to be taken seriously? Yes, it was clearly a joke. I have a gay best friend and we all (including himself) call him fag and its totally fine, but if we were to scream in his face and call him a dumb fucking fag then obviously thats not ok. Why cant feminists ever take a joke? (Triggered) " So weird when guys play the feminist card when it has no place in a discussion | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Snowflakes getting offended by fuck all again. Its not offensive or patronising. Its a term of endearment. Im northern and call people love all the time. Get a friggen grip. Showing endearment means to express love and/or affection towards someone. I don't want random blokes working for the train company to show love and/or affection towards me. I would interpret it as a sign of goodwill when applied to a stranger. Even though the complaint was specifically about the drivers dismissive attitude and calling her 'honey' was just the final irritation? Not much goodwill there. " Don't raise your eyebrows at me Missy - read my other posts. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"That person should not be sacked, the woman just needs to stop being such a whining bitch. Nobody can do anything without someone getting offended and crying about it He showed her no respect by the sounds of it by the second comment,as someone who is representing a company he should know better. Would he have said that to a man,I very much doubt it. If that was said to a man I very much doubt he would complain in the first place, and to then go on to post it on twitter is just looking to take your whiney bullshit to another level. I work in an environment surrounded by women and I get called "darling" and "hun" on a daily basis and think nothing of it, non of the guys at work give it a second thought. The guy on twitter should have been more professional in the matter but was obviously trying to make a joke, maybe not a very funny or appropriate joke but was obviously a joke and the thing about jokes is that they are not to be taken seriously. So... if I call someone a cunt and then claim it was a joke, it's alright because it wasn't supposed to be taken seriously? Yes, it was clearly a joke. I have a gay best friend and we all (including himself) call him fag and its totally fine, but if we were to scream in his face and call him a dumb fucking fag then obviously thats not ok. Why cant feminists ever take a joke? (Triggered) So weird when guys play the feminist card when it has no place in a discussion " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"That person should not be sacked, the woman just needs to stop being such a whining bitch. Nobody can do anything without someone getting offended and crying about it He showed her no respect by the sounds of it by the second comment,as someone who is representing a company he should know better. Would he have said that to a man,I very much doubt it. If that was said to a man I very much doubt he would complain in the first place, and to then go on to post it on twitter is just looking to take your whiney bullshit to another level. I work in an environment surrounded by women and I get called "darling" and "hun" on a daily basis and think nothing of it, non of the guys at work give it a second thought. The guy on twitter should have been more professional in the matter but was obviously trying to make a joke, maybe not a very funny or appropriate joke but was obviously a joke and the thing about jokes is that they are not to be taken seriously. So... if I call someone a cunt and then claim it was a joke, it's alright because it wasn't supposed to be taken seriously? Yes, it was clearly a joke. I have a gay best friend and we all (including himself) call him fag and its totally fine, but if we were to scream in his face and call him a dumb fucking fag then obviously thats not ok. Why cant feminists ever take a joke? (Triggered) " How would you or your friend take it if a stranger called him a fag? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All of the 'regional' dialect arguments/points are just a diversion away from any real issue. HE was at work. SHE was a customer. " She didn't like the service she received, and therefore she complained. Her complaint wasn't taken seriously. I'd be pretty pissed in that situation. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All of the 'regional' dialect arguments/points are just a diversion away from any real issue. HE was at work. SHE was a customer. " I have not bothered to look up the story, but if he was a train driver his work does not include talking to customers. And if her complaint was anything other than about his train driving then a dismissive response is all she could expect. Bit like complaining to the postman about the letters you get delivered really. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All of the 'regional' dialect arguments/points are just a diversion away from any real issue. HE was at work. SHE was a customer. I have not bothered to look up the story, but if he was a train driver his work does not include talking to customers. And if her complaint was anything other than about his train driving then a dismissive response is all she could expect. Bit like complaining to the postman about the letters you get delivered really. " You've been representing ducks for too long. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All of the 'regional' dialect arguments/points are just a diversion away from any real issue. HE was at work. SHE was a customer. I have not bothered to look up the story, but if he was a train driver his work does not include talking to customers. And if her complaint was anything other than about his train driving then a dismissive response is all she could expect. Bit like complaining to the postman about the letters you get delivered really. " But if the postman delivering your letters treats you in a way that you don't like, then I believe it's perfectly acceptable to complain about their conduct. Your comparison makes absolutely no sense. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All of the 'regional' dialect arguments/points are just a diversion away from any real issue. HE was at work. SHE was a customer. I have not bothered to look up the story, but if he was a train driver his work does not include talking to customers. And if her complaint was anything other than about his train driving then a dismissive response is all she could expect. Bit like complaining to the postman about the letters you get delivered really. You've been representing ducks for too long. " Ducks have rights too... obviously not equal rights, but rights none the less | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All of the 'regional' dialect arguments/points are just a diversion away from any real issue. HE was at work. SHE was a customer. I have not bothered to look up the story, but if he was a train driver his work does not include talking to customers. And if her complaint was anything other than about his train driving then a dismissive response is all she could expect. Bit like complaining to the postman about the letters you get delivered really. " I had a really rough landing on my last easyjet flight, worst ever I think. The pilot was standing at the end of the plane saying goodbye to passengers and I nearly commented....but decided not to in the end. Do passengers complain to the driver about the way they drive a train lol?? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All of the 'regional' dialect arguments/points are just a diversion away from any real issue. HE was at work. SHE was a customer. I have not bothered to look up the story, but if he was a train driver his work does not include talking to customers. And if her complaint was anything other than about his train driving then a dismissive response is all she could expect. Bit like complaining to the postman about the letters you get delivered really. But if the postman delivering your letters treats you in a way that you don't like, then I believe it's perfectly acceptable to complain about their conduct. Your comparison makes absolutely no sense." Well it depends on the context of a story I can't be bothered to read. If the original complaint was he was dismissive of her complaint AND called her honey in a dismissive way.. then it is relevant because if her complaint had nothing to do with him, and he is not a customer facing employee why shouldn't he be dismissive? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All of the 'regional' dialect arguments/points are just a diversion away from any real issue. HE was at work. SHE was a customer. I have not bothered to look up the story, but if he was a train driver his work does not include talking to customers. And if her complaint was anything other than about his train driving then a dismissive response is all she could expect. Bit like complaining to the postman about the letters you get delivered really. But if the postman delivering your letters treats you in a way that you don't like, then I believe it's perfectly acceptable to complain about their conduct. Your comparison makes absolutely no sense. Well it depends on the context of a story I can't be bothered to read. If the original complaint was he was dismissive of her complaint AND called her honey in a dismissive way.. then it is relevant because if her complaint had nothing to do with him, and he is not a customer facing employee why shouldn't he be dismissive?" She didn't complain to the train driver. She had a conversation with the train driver where he was dismissive and then rude. She complained to Virgin Trains because she didn't like the way she'd been treated by a member of staff. Then the customer services rep made a joke about her complaint rather than treating it seriously. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It was a manager, not the driver. My mistake. It’s interesting reading the responses on Twitter. " Yes, I was about to correct my response above! I read manager in the article I looked for, but still wrote driver for some reason. Think I'm tired. :D | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All of the 'regional' dialect arguments/points are just a diversion away from any real issue. HE was at work. SHE was a customer. I have not bothered to look up the story, but if he was a train driver his work does not include talking to customers. And if her complaint was anything other than about his train driving then a dismissive response is all she could expect. Bit like complaining to the postman about the letters you get delivered really. But if the postman delivering your letters treats you in a way that you don't like, then I believe it's perfectly acceptable to complain about their conduct. Your comparison makes absolutely no sense. Well it depends on the context of a story I can't be bothered to read. If the original complaint was he was dismissive of her complaint AND called her honey in a dismissive way.. then it is relevant because if her complaint had nothing to do with him, and he is not a customer facing employee why shouldn't he be dismissive? She didn't complain to the train driver. She had a conversation with the train driver where he was dismissive and then rude. She complained to Virgin Trains because she didn't like the way she'd been treated by a member of staff. Then the customer services rep made a joke about her complaint rather than treating it seriously." Ah well that puts a wholly different complexion on it from my previous comment. Seriously poor from Virgin! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All of the 'regional' dialect arguments/points are just a diversion away from any real issue. HE was at work. SHE was a customer. I have not bothered to look up the story, but if he was a train driver his work does not include talking to customers. And if her complaint was anything other than about his train driving then a dismissive response is all she could expect. Bit like complaining to the postman about the letters you get delivered really. But if the postman delivering your letters treats you in a way that you don't like, then I believe it's perfectly acceptable to complain about their conduct. Your comparison makes absolutely no sense. Well it depends on the context of a story I can't be bothered to read. If the original complaint was he was dismissive of her complaint AND called her honey in a dismissive way.. then it is relevant because if her complaint had nothing to do with him, and he is not a customer facing employee why shouldn't he be dismissive?" Because regardless if he is customer facing or not, he is representing the company | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All of the 'regional' dialect arguments/points are just a diversion away from any real issue. HE was at work. SHE was a customer. I have not bothered to look up the story, but if he was a train driver his work does not include talking to customers. And if her complaint was anything other than about his train driving then a dismissive response is all she could expect. Bit like complaining to the postman about the letters you get delivered really. But if the postman delivering your letters treats you in a way that you don't like, then I believe it's perfectly acceptable to complain about their conduct. Your comparison makes absolutely no sense. Well it depends on the context of a story I can't be bothered to read. If the original complaint was he was dismissive of her complaint AND called her honey in a dismissive way.. then it is relevant because if her complaint had nothing to do with him, and he is not a customer facing employee why shouldn't he be dismissive? Because regardless if he is customer facing or not, he is representing the company " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"She didn't complain to the train driver. She had a conversation with the train driver where he was dismissive and then rude. She complained to Virgin Trains because she didn't like the way she'd been treated by a member of staff. Then the customer services rep made a joke about her complaint rather than treating it seriously." Still missing the pertinent information... why was she talking to the train driver? Was he right to be dismissive? What did she complain about and how was that framed? The storm in a Twitter cup is all about a flippant remark. This thread asks if the flippant remark was sexist or funny, but nobody knows if the original conversation was about the length of the train drivers cock or if the platform was longer than the train. And my only real interest in this thread is a deep curiosity to what pet sounds like in an American accent | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"She didn't complain to the train driver. She had a conversation with the train driver where he was dismissive and then rude. She complained to Virgin Trains because she didn't like the way she'd been treated by a member of staff. Then the customer services rep made a joke about her complaint rather than treating it seriously. Still missing the pertinent information... why was she talking to the train driver? Was he right to be dismissive? What did she complain about and how was that framed? The storm in a Twitter cup is all about a flippant remark. This thread asks if the flippant remark was sexist or funny, but nobody knows if the original conversation was about the length of the train drivers cock or if the platform was longer than the train. And my only real interest in this thread is a deep curiosity to what pet sounds like in an American accent " My mistake - she was talking to the train manager. She was having a conversation with the train manager about something that had been screwed up. She said that she'd like to make a formal complaint about the screw up, he then dismissed her. She complained on twitter about the service and the language. The twitter customer services rep made a joke about her complaint. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"She didn't complain to the train driver. She had a conversation with the train driver where he was dismissive and then rude. She complained to Virgin Trains because she didn't like the way she'd been treated by a member of staff. Then the customer services rep made a joke about her complaint rather than treating it seriously. Still missing the pertinent information... why was she talking to the train driver? Was he right to be dismissive? What did she complain about and how was that framed? The storm in a Twitter cup is all about a flippant remark. This thread asks if the flippant remark was sexist or funny, but nobody knows if the original conversation was about the length of the train drivers cock or if the platform was longer than the train. And my only real interest in this thread is a deep curiosity to what pet sounds like in an American accent " Like.......... Perd...... Americans talk funny don't they | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"She didn't complain to the train driver. She had a conversation with the train driver where he was dismissive and then rude. She complained to Virgin Trains because she didn't like the way she'd been treated by a member of staff. Then the customer services rep made a joke about her complaint rather than treating it seriously. Still missing the pertinent information... why was she talking to the train driver? Was he right to be dismissive? What did she complain about and how was that framed? The storm in a Twitter cup is all about a flippant remark. This thread asks if the flippant remark was sexist or funny, but nobody knows if the original conversation was about the length of the train drivers cock or if the platform was longer than the train. And my only real interest in this thread is a deep curiosity to what pet sounds like in an American accent " Well, come over to York, then, because I'm starting my experiment today. Soon anybody in York will know exactly who I am because I'm the American calling every man "pet". But don't fret, honey, maybe someone will let you know how soothing it is when they are called it. Maybe it will make it's way all the way to Twitter. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"She sounds exactly like Judge Judy..... " When I'm angry..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"That person should not be sacked, the woman just needs to stop being such a whining bitch. Nobody can do anything without someone getting offended and crying about it He showed her no respect by the sounds of it by the second comment,as someone who is representing a company he should know better. Would he have said that to a man,I very much doubt it. If that was said to a man I very much doubt he would complain in the first place, and to then go on to post it on twitter is just looking to take your whiney bullshit to another level. I work in an environment surrounded by women and I get called "darling" and "hun" on a daily basis and think nothing of it, non of the guys at work give it a second thought. The guy on twitter should have been more professional in the matter but was obviously trying to make a joke, maybe not a very funny or appropriate joke but was obviously a joke and the thing about jokes is that they are not to be taken seriously. " Do we know 100% that he was just trying to make a joke,was he really that stupid to think that it would come across as a joke?! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"She sounds exactly like Judge Judy..... When I'm angry..... " Old York, is almost far enough north east for pet to be the accepted name for anyone older than birth and younger than death. I am so tempted to jump on a virgin train to York (mk 1) and listen out for Judge Judy calling everyone pet So much more fun than learning that some woman who complained to a train conductor, ticket punched, train manager that the passengers all got into one carriage and were unhappy that they had to walk down the train to the other empty carriages. Didn't like that he told her to carry on and complain rather than bring her an empty seat. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Anyway ........ im more concerned about the atrocious ageism in here . It's illegal you know" And don't forget old ducks have unequal rights too.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fuck this new politically correct nanny state we live in. When addressing someone as honey love darling mate geezer sweetheart. It's not condescending or abusive it's merely a term of endearment with no harm meant why for the bloody love of God can't the uptight arse wipes take it as such." Woooohooooo you go girl!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It sounds patronising, and sadly when a man patronises a woman it becomes a sexist comment quickly if she says it is. If that was towards a man from a woman, it would be just patronising. I've been called honey, love, darlin'...sexist now? Nope. " Oh stop being a whiney bitch sweet cheeks. You just need something to make you smile ...... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fuck this new politically correct nanny state we live in. When addressing someone as honey love darling mate geezer sweetheart. It's not condescending or abusive it's merely a term of endearment with no harm meant why for the bloody love of God can't the uptight arse wipes take it as such." Do you really mean that ? Do you really say fuck to P.C. and the respect it can bring to certain groups in society ? Are there NO names that would turn you into an uptight arse wipe or would your outrage be perfectly just ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"With all that goes on in the world, I think its ridiculous people are so easily offended by this. I also think it sad that so many have so little to do with their time that they jump on the bandwagon to complain. I'm a single mum. I was a teen mum and because I have an age gap between my children I regularly face ignorant assumptions. It doesn't offend me. Neither does a pet name or term of endearment. Get a grip people. Argue stuff that matters and wave the female flag for that. Not this" Is it sad that you have so little to do with your time that you came on here to say this about people complaining? No, of course not. People complained. It took seconds/minutes to type it out. Why do with have to label people as "sad" in this way when we are doing the same thing on a different medium? we choose what matters enough to spend our time on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"With all that goes on in the world, I think its ridiculous people are so easily offended by this. I also think it sad that so many have so little to do with their time that they jump on the bandwagon to complain. I'm a single mum. I was a teen mum and because I have an age gap between my children I regularly face ignorant assumptions. It doesn't offend me. Neither does a pet name or term of endearment. Get a grip people. Argue stuff that matters and wave the female flag for that. Not this" That's just it. It does matter. Attitudes matter. Language is powerful. I'm not offended but I don't tolerate it. Other people say that those that don't like it are offended. It's not necessarily so. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"With all that goes on in the world, I think its ridiculous people are so easily offended by this. I also think it sad that so many have so little to do with their time that they jump on the bandwagon to complain. I'm a single mum. I was a teen mum and because I have an age gap between my children I regularly face ignorant assumptions. It doesn't offend me. Neither does a pet name or term of endearment. Get a grip people. Argue stuff that matters and wave the female flag for that. Not this" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fuck this new politically correct nanny state we live in. When addressing someone as honey love darling mate geezer sweetheart. It's not condescending or abusive it's merely a term of endearment with no harm meant why for the bloody love of God can't the uptight arse wipes take it as such." Well said, although I suspect your choice of language will incur the wrath of quite a few "Do Gooders" on here. They seem to want any granule of friendliness removed from conversations between public"Servants" and the poor offended Customer and have everyone acting like robots. I will end this with a quote you will probably appreciate but expect will cause massive offence to those it is aimed at "Get a F*****g Grip " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fuck this new politically correct nanny state we live in. When addressing someone as honey love darling mate geezer sweetheart. It's not condescending or abusive it's merely a term of endearment with no harm meant why for the bloody love of God can't the uptight arse wipes take it as such. Well said, although I suspect your choice of language will incur the wrath of quite a few "Do Gooders" on here. They seem to want any granule of friendliness removed from conversations between public"Servants" and the poor offended Customer and have everyone acting like robots. I will end this with a quote you will probably appreciate but expect will cause massive offence to those it is aimed at "Get a F*****g Grip "" Oh allow me to use your methods it's fabulous. All of you with something to say..... I can't think of a response or anything reasonable so i'll say uhmmmmmmmm pull your pants up.... no no I'll say ..... oh fucks sake hold on to your wig..... no no no .... ermmmmm I know..... Keep hold of your braces!! There...... God you're right it feels amazeballs. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Fuck this new politically correct nanny state we live in. When addressing someone as honey love darling mate geezer sweetheart. It's not condescending or abusive it's merely a term of endearment with no harm meant why for the bloody love of God can't the uptight arse wipes take it as such. Well said, although I suspect your choice of language will incur the wrath of quite a few "Do Gooders" on here. They seem to want any granule of friendliness removed from conversations between public"Servants" and the poor offended Customer and have everyone acting like robots. I will end this with a quote you will probably appreciate but expect will cause massive offence to those it is aimed at "Get a F*****g Grip "" Oh, pet, I fully get your point. No wrath here. Serious question, though...Why censor "Fucking"? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I managed pubs for a few years. To all the people just shouting SNOWFLAKE and POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GONE MAD and WHINING BITCH and such, picture this situation: A customer, male, approaches me, the manager, and complains that his pint is flat. I reply to him "well don't drink it then, princess." Does that sound friendly, affectionate, endearing? How about if he then phones the customer service helpline to complain about the shit beer and unpleasant manager, and the Customer Services representative replies "Aaaaw I'm sorry sweetheart, would you rather he called you Cutie Pie?" Does that sound like an appropriate response to a customer complaint? Yet this same thing happens to a woman and she's a "snowflake" or a "whining bitch" and needs to "get over herself." Get fucked, you fucking pathetic shower of troglodytes. " And Yesssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I managed pubs for a few years. To all the people just shouting SNOWFLAKE and POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GONE MAD and WHINING BITCH and such, picture this situation: A customer, male, approaches me, the manager, and complains that his pint is flat. I reply to him "well don't drink it then, princess." Does that sound friendly, affectionate, endearing? How about if he then phones the customer service helpline to complain about the shit beer and unpleasant manager, and the Customer Services representative replies "Aaaaw I'm sorry sweetheart, would you rather he called you Cutie Pie?" Does that sound like an appropriate response to a customer complaint? Yet this same thing happens to a woman and she's a "snowflake" or a "whining bitch" and needs to "get over herself." Get fucked, you fucking pathetic shower of troglodytes. " Excellent response | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"It sounds patronising, and sadly when a man patronises a woman it becomes a sexist comment quickly if she says it is. If that was towards a man from a woman, it would be just patronising. I've been called honey, love, darlin'...sexist now? Nope. Oh stop being a whiney bitch sweet cheeks. You just need something to make you smile ...... " I read the article, I was laughing my ass off. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... this same thing happens to a woman and she's a "snowflake" or a "whining bitch" and needs to "get over herself." Get fucked, you fucking pathetic shower of troglodytes. " Harsh. Don't generalise | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... this same thing happens to a woman and she's a "snowflake" or a "whining bitch" and needs to "get over herself." Get fucked, you fucking pathetic shower of troglodytes. Harsh. Don't generalise " Alright treacle, calm your tits. Are you on your period or something? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Should the person be fired? No. But they should be told not to be quite so condescending in the future. I don't like pet names like honey, pet, love, etc. Not because they are sexist, but because they are generally condescending. The fact that he said it the first time isn't even the problem - the fact that he just couldn't help himself with the comeback is, though. Customer service requires a certain degree of respect on both sides, and someone who can't stop themselves from being an ass shouldn't be in a position to speak with the public. Needs some training, I think. " Spot on. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Get fucked, you fucking pathetic shower of troglodytes. " It would depend, if the pint was of tap water, or vodka, then I would laugh with you over the fallacious complaint I had made. If it was supposed to contain co2 bubbles I would demand a replacement or refund. Your move... Reading between the lines, train fares went up above the claimed rate of inflation, newspapers scrambled to find dissatisfied customers in light of the fare increase. And this was the best story they could find. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Honestly though, it's nothing. It's a non-story. "Customer receives poor service, complains. Receives poor service again." How the Shitting arsepubes is that newsworthy? It's a non-event cooked up to be something it isn't, in order to make the "pc gone mad/snowfkake" crowd blow steam from their ears and give themselves a stroke, and the "offended on everyone else's behalf" crowd scream about offensiveness until they hyperventilate. And like good little puppets we're doing exactly as we're told. Frankly I'm a little annoyed at myself for reacting with anything other than apathy." I suspect some of us react with more than apathy because we have found ourselves in almost identical situations time and time again. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"... this same thing happens to a woman and she's a "snowflake" or a "whining bitch" and needs to "get over herself." Get fucked, you fucking pathetic shower of troglodytes. Harsh. Don't generalise Alright treacle, calm your tits. Are you on your period or something? " Ouch, do you work for British rail? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"A lady on Twitter complained about a train manager with Virgin Trains addressing her as Honey when talking to her regarding some issue with the trains. The Virgin Trains reply was to say sorry about that and would she prefer “pet” or “love” in future. Most on Twitter are appalled by their response. Would you take it as them trying but failing to be funny? Should the person from Virgin Trains be sacked?" I have to admit to laughing out loud when I read this. Although it may not be appropriate for the staff member to call a customer honey, it's not the end of the world. Virgins response is quite funny and probably trying to show that point. No the worker should not be sacked, how ridiculous. XXX | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going into this experiment with the assumption that men will not like being called pet by a young woman. Just my guess." I seriously doubt many men are going to take offence at a young woman being friendly, polite and informal. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What has happened to "banter" ??!!!" People got sick of being told that they were whingy bitches when they didn't like it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I love that I work in an industry industry that there is no women & no easily offended snowflakes. It's neither, just basic pleanstries and ways of address people. Love, dear, sweetie, darling. Big deal, if that is a major issue for you. You have a good life." No. You have a good life baby cakes. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What has happened to "banter" ??!!!" Apparently a customer who has paid for a service and been treated like a cunt, twice, would rather that their complaint is taken seriously, the situation addressed to solve the issue, and preferably receive an apology from the party at fault rather than have "banter" IT'S POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GONE SENSIBLE! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I love that I work in an industry industry that there is no women & no easily offended snowflakes. It's neither, just basic pleanstries and ways of address people. Love, dear, sweetie, darling. Big deal, if that is a major issue for you. You have a good life." It's nice that boys have industries left where they can still play with their toys. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What has happened to "banter" ??!!! Apparently a customer who has paid for a service and been treated like a cunt, twice, would rather that their complaint is taken seriously, the situation addressed to solve the issue, and preferably receive an apology from the party at fault rather than have "banter" IT'S POLITICAL CORRECTNESS GONE SENSIBLE! " I don't think calling someone Love, Mate etc is wrong, informally or in certain work situations. But I have to agree doing it in a complaint process, when that's what she was complaining about, isn't the right arena for overt informality or bants. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"When I was in the UK women called me "pet" and "Love" all the time. So how is it sexist?" It isn't......!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |