FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > when a guy ghosts a woman...
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not telling him she is pregnant with his child is an even worse form of mental abuse I think . Although I like most wouldn't see "Ghosting" as mental abuse . (him)" it's form of abandonment. that is why it's considered abuse. but i suppose you could also look at it this way, if you don't tell the dad then he has no option but to abandon his child. but the child has already been abandoned in a way coz he ghosted to mum and didn't care about her, so this also makes you wonder if he'd do this to his kid anyway. i usually believe in giving people choices but sometimes, if protection is needed, then no i don't think they should know all the facts. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If abuse involved then it's harder for her to keep clear of him and still keep him involved with the child, maybe get support. I think there are agencies around to support her still I hope. Police if she's harassed " there's no laws against ghosting someone.and i get you can't force someone to be a part of somebodys life also. maybe telling him about the baby would make him feel forced to be involved? see it's all confusing... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you want people to make informed opinions then giving them ALL the facts will help . I would like some facts as to say he screwed her once and is now ignoring her isn't mental abuse . Maybe the woman is stalking him now ?. The fact it was only once (if it was) makes the guy out to be ok as he don't want to give the wrong impression . The fact the woman is fixating on a single meet comes across as a "Fatal Attraction" type and he has had a lucky escape . " that's coz you're thinking he was an NSA fuck maybe? but i didn't leave much details in the OP coz this is hypothetical and based off reading someones comment where they joked about leaving a woman to it if she did get pregnant, like lie to her for sex and to protect themselves form an unwanted pregnancy, it just got me thinking especially as i was in a relationship at 17 and has something similar happen to me. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yeah hypothetical isn't my strong suit being male i'm more of a practical hands on sorta guy lol ." that's ok, gerri said something similar that it depended on all the facts exactly. i overthink so hypothetical works well for me. i do think ghosting gives a clear message that that person does not want you in their life and does not even respect you enough to tell you this either. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you want people to make informed opinions then giving them ALL the facts will help . I would like some facts as to say he screwed her once and is now ignoring her isn't mental abuse . Maybe the woman is stalking him now ?. The fact it was only once (if it was) makes the guy out to be ok as he don't want to give the wrong impression . The fact the woman is fixating on a single meet comes across as a "Fatal Attraction" type and he has had a lucky escape . " Tthe woman more than likely has mental issues, obviously reading more in the situation than it is, and is quite clearly getting into stalker terrotitory, which is almost always they she is being "ghosted", is nothing to do with the man.....she should not be on a swingers site if she can't handle rejection....and the fact that she allowed herself to get pregnant in the first class is her own lack of responbability and maturity.....but then this if all hypothetical of course.... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you want people to make informed opinions then giving them ALL the facts will help . I would like some facts as to say he screwed her once and is now ignoring her isn't mental abuse . Maybe the woman is stalking him now ?. The fact it was only once (if it was) makes the guy out to be ok as he don't want to give the wrong impression . The fact the woman is fixating on a single meet comes across as a "Fatal Attraction" type and he has had a lucky escape . Tthe woman more than likely has mental issues, obviously reading more in the situation than it is, and is quite clearly getting into stalker terrotitory, which is almost always they she is being "ghosted", is nothing to do with the man.....she should not be on a swingers site if she can't handle rejection....and the fact that she allowed herself to get pregnant in the first class is her own lack of responbability and maturity.....but then this if all hypothetical of course...." not everything revolves around swinging but swinging answers and opinions are fine too. in factit's quite interesting to see peoples mindsets. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you want people to make informed opinions then giving them ALL the facts will help . I would like some facts as to say he screwed her once and is now ignoring her isn't mental abuse . Maybe the woman is stalking him now ?. The fact it was only once (if it was) makes the guy out to be ok as he don't want to give the wrong impression . The fact the woman is fixating on a single meet comes across as a "Fatal Attraction" type and he has had a lucky escape . that's coz you're thinking he was an NSA fuck maybe? but i didn't leave much details in the OP coz this is hypothetical and based off reading someones comment where they joked about leaving a woman to it if she did get pregnant, like lie to her for sex and to protect themselves form an unwanted pregnancy, it just got me thinking especially as i was in a relationship at 17 and has something similar happen to me." I have had a couple of messages from guys saying they want to impregnate me.....blocked and deleted dude, blocked and deleted?..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes she should. He had the right to know he's going to be a father. Your posts are becoming increasingly more and more anti men. I think it's sad " Dont read them then. No need to jump on your white horse and protect the delicate poor men on here. Or you could always start your own thread championing men. Well OP it's a tricky one. Depends on the ladies situation. Does she need financial support? I believe that a child needs a father, however if he's a knob then no I'd go it alone. Some amazing children are raised by fantastic single parents. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes she should. He had the right to know he's going to be a father. Your posts are becoming increasingly more and more anti men. I think it's sad Dont read them then. No need to jump on your white horse and protect the delicate poor men on here. Or you could always start your own thread championing men. Well OP it's a tricky one. Depends on the ladies situation. Does she need financial support? I believe that a child needs a father, however if he's a knob then no I'd go it alone. Some amazing children are raised by fantastic single parents. " yeah a few needed to know details but i wanted to leave it open to get more opinions and different ones. as a single parent myself i agree we can do it ourselves. my ex is also a single parent and he's great. we kind of do it together actually but not together lol. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I raised two kids from little as a single parent . They both work now and have done since leaving school . They are my greatest achievement in life . The icing on the cake is I raised them at a time when a Single "Male" parent was practically unheard of . HIM " i like how guys get involved with their kids because they want to do that, it's good things changed there. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes she should. He had the right to know he's going to be a father. Your posts are becoming increasingly more and more anti men. I think it's sad " I'd noticed that too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Speaking personally 3sumQueen I'd like some communication! But if there wasn't any and you were pregnant would you think differently? I reckon single parents can manage ok, but it looks hard work to me, and two separated parents Can manage better....different if he's an idiot!" yeah i think most guys would want to know. thing is you have to reason why they'd want to know really and if it's a good idea. all i'm asking on was if the guy had left the womans life did he have the right to know? just was wondering if ignoring a person gave them the right to know anything that happened in the ignored persons life, after all they aren't interested in that person. my abusive ex used his children as a way to control me after i dumped him, he also ghosted me and the kids a lot. just came in and out of our lives whenever he felt like it and expected us to change to suit him and what he wanted. my decent ex never ghosted me, we communicated and so i am perfectly comfortable talking with him about our children about anything. never had any problems with him at all, and he even took on his stepkids like his too so the kids of the douche are sorted too. and yes i'm aware i pick the knobheads, my decent ex it was just luck that he chased me and i let him. i honestly think that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes she should. He had the right to know he's going to be a father. Your posts are becoming increasingly more and more anti men. I think it's sad I'd noticed that too " how is this anti men? hate it when people ruin my topics with bullshit but i wanna know now. it's about women being ghosted primarily so about women for a start and what they should decide and i'm sure loads of women have to deal with this issue also coz ghosting happens a lot and always has done even before internet fuck sites. you're both looking like the MRA tbh. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No it's not anti men 3sumQ and you should cut yourself slack for doing a good job" thanks. i didn't think it was anti-anything. i just gave my opinion and wanted other opinions. don't care if they agree with me or not, i just like seeing what others think, when they're not insulting me and acting like they know me. my green arrow doesn't even show anything anti-men either. i did some small penis humiliation on some guys who wanted that in the forums but they enjoyed it, not like i was doing it coz i hate men. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
""Ghosting" is a vile, spineless action, that's a reflection of today's "disposable society". I've had it done to me, and it was savage, whilst ex partner (she) considers it normal acceptable behaviour, to this day. I've also encountered another partner, whom was a "moment" in time, and when I finished it, advised "she was pregnant", was keeping "it" as a way to "stay in contact with me". Suffice to say, I took legal advice, and tried discussing it with her. She, was changing her mind daily, she eventually decided on abortion, didn't want me at the clinic (took money for appointment) texted when "done" and her behaviour utterly bonkers before, and after. Several years later, she was still stalking me, my related family, and her conduct ended up in court. Turns out she was never pregnant, took her 6 years to admit that... maybe "ghosting" isn't so bad after all ...." shit that's awful, sorry my topic brought that up for you but thanks for sharing coz that's a side that i didn't consider at all. all those years she let you think you'd lost a child and pay for the privilege, that's disgusting. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No it's not anti men 3sumQ and you should cut yourself slack for doing a good job" I agree! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No it's not anti men 3sumQ and you should cut yourself slack for doing a good job I agree! " ,it was a completely cruel thing for your ex to ignore you when you 17 and told him you were pregnant,very cruel! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"No it's not anti men 3sumQ and you should cut yourself slack for doing a good job I agree! ,it was a completely cruel thing for your ex to ignore you when you 17 and told him you were pregnant,very cruel!" thanks. my mum went round to his work and gave him hell. he was married, that's why he ghosted me. i didn't know he was married though, i was seriously very naive as a kid/teen and didn't even know married people cheated. he worked with his stepson though so his wife found out from him that i'd got pregnant when my mum went in ranting. and people will probably think i'm horrible for saying this but i miscarried his baby and am glad. i was upset at the time but when i think about it i could've ended up with no life at 17 and bringing up a kid to someone who didn't even care about it or me. it was bad enough when i got pregnant to my douche ex at 23 and doing that but at least i had more experience of life by then and could cope better. i don't hate men, surprisingly. i fell in love with one recently, i don't hate men at all but i probably should. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes she should. He had the right to know he's going to be a father. Your posts are becoming increasingly more and more anti men. I think it's sad Dont read them then. No need to jump on your white horse and protect the delicate poor men on here. Or you could always start your own thread championing men. Well OP it's a tricky one. Depends on the ladies situation. Does she need financial support? I believe that a child needs a father, however if he's a knob then no I'd go it alone. Some amazing children are raised by fantastic single parents. " Paternal involvement shouldn't just be invited for financial gain He should be informed and given the opportunity to play the part. It's very selfish to automatically exclude because he's not being the man you want him to be. He might still make a fantastic father. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I still reckon it's about responsibility and child's rights to have parents. If he won't pick that up then he's an idiot, especially if he insists he has rights.....I think he has none, whether he's on the certificate or not, if he's not doing his job as a dad. It's not for you for make him do that, but maybe give him the chance" the certificate is a legal document so they do get rights from being on it, even from things like where their child can be educated (seen my sister go through so much shit with her ex husband because of these rights). i never put my first ex on his kids, he didn't care anyway. problem kind of solved. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Post as you wish 3SQ, and don't feel that you have to justify yourself (I don't think you feel that). Interesting subjects and points. " thanks i know i'm fucked up, just not as fucked up as some people think. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The birth cert can give him parental responsibility, which you get automatically, so it's shared between you. How you share it is up to you and him, but you won't if he's an idiot and the child lives with you. Back where we started really!" he basically has to go to court i think if he wants to contest the resident parent, from what i remember with my sister and her flakey ex. he was always threatening court when things didn't go his way. still it was handy not having my bad ex on the certificates of his kids. if he'd ever asked to be put on them i actually would've agreed too for his kids sake but he never did. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nothing fucked up about what you're saying. Sounds ok to me" well you haven't stalked all my forum posts so you wouldn't know. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes she should. He had the right to know he's going to be a father. Your posts are becoming increasingly more and more anti men. I think it's sad I'd noticed that too how is this anti men? hate it when people ruin my topics with bullshit but i wanna know now. it's about women being ghosted primarily so about women for a start and what they should decide and i'm sure loads of women have to deal with this issue also coz ghosting happens a lot and always has done even before internet fuck sites. you're both looking like the MRA tbh." What does MRA stand for? As for my anti-men comment, I meant it more in a way that you've obviously been hurt a lot by men over the years and reading some of your replies on here you've had some shit men in your life but it's nice to see that you've had a decent ex too As for the ghosting, it depends how serious the couple were. A one night stand and he then disappears. Well, that must happen practically every day of the week. A more serious relationship in which he just cuts contact, then he's an arse BUT I still think if she's pregnant and decides to keep the baby that if she can, she at least tells the father or a relative of his that she's pregnant. Being a father and being a partner are two separate things and he may have been an arse as a partner but could be a fantastic father. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes she should. He had the right to know he's going to be a father. Your posts are becoming increasingly more and more anti men. I think it's sad I'd noticed that too how is this anti men? hate it when people ruin my topics with bullshit but i wanna know now. it's about women being ghosted primarily so about women for a start and what they should decide and i'm sure loads of women have to deal with this issue also coz ghosting happens a lot and always has done even before internet fuck sites. you're both looking like the MRA tbh. What does MRA stand for? As for my anti-men comment, I meant it more in a way that you've obviously been hurt a lot by men over the years and reading some of your replies on here you've had some shit men in your life but it's nice to see that you've had a decent ex too As for the ghosting, it depends how serious the couple were. A one night stand and he then disappears. Well, that must happen practically every day of the week. A more serious relationship in which he just cuts contact, then he's an arse BUT I still think if she's pregnant and decides to keep the baby that if she can, she at least tells the father or a relative of his that she's pregnant. Being a father and being a partner are two separate things and he may have been an arse as a partner but could be a fantastic father." MRA = mens rights activists, the ones who turn womens issues into men issues and it's to control women and not to gain rights for men. anti-men doesn't mean that at all, it means you don't like men. i've had a lot of fun this week chatting to them on the forum so don't get where you've both seen me being anti-men everywhere. thanks for the rest of your reply though, that was what i wanted. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes she should. He had the right to know he's going to be a father. Your posts are becoming increasingly more and more anti men. I think it's sad I'd noticed that too how is this anti men? hate it when people ruin my topics with bullshit but i wanna know now. it's about women being ghosted primarily so about women for a start and what they should decide and i'm sure loads of women have to deal with this issue also coz ghosting happens a lot and always has done even before internet fuck sites. you're both looking like the MRA tbh. What does MRA stand for? As for my anti-men comment, I meant it more in a way that you've obviously been hurt a lot by men over the years and reading some of your replies on here you've had some shit men in your life but it's nice to see that you've had a decent ex too As for the ghosting, it depends how serious the couple were. A one night stand and he then disappears. Well, that must happen practically every day of the week. A more serious relationship in which he just cuts contact, then he's an arse BUT I still think if she's pregnant and decides to keep the baby that if she can, she at least tells the father or a relative of his that she's pregnant. Being a father and being a partner are two separate things and he may have been an arse as a partner but could be a fantastic father. MRA = mens rights activists, the ones who turn womens issues into men issues and it's to control women and not to gain rights for men. anti-men doesn't mean that at all, it means you don't like men. i've had a lot of fun this week chatting to them on the forum so don't get where you've both seen me being anti-men everywhere. thanks for the rest of your reply though, that was what i wanted. " Oh god, I'm definitely no men's rights activist | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"actually i'm not sure what you meant by anti-men now, i think it was a dig at me but seeing as you've said otherwise idk. plus the sad face makes me think you wasn't being malicious, but i'm not anti-men. " I wasn't being malicious, I like you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes she should. He had the right to know he's going to be a father. Your posts are becoming increasingly more and more anti men. I think it's sad I'd noticed that too how is this anti men? hate it when people ruin my topics with bullshit but i wanna know now. it's about women being ghosted primarily so about women for a start and what they should decide and i'm sure loads of women have to deal with this issue also coz ghosting happens a lot and always has done even before internet fuck sites. you're both looking like the MRA tbh. What does MRA stand for? As for my anti-men comment, I meant it more in a way that you've obviously been hurt a lot by men over the years and reading some of your replies on here you've had some shit men in your life but it's nice to see that you've had a decent ex too As for the ghosting, it depends how serious the couple were. A one night stand and he then disappears. Well, that must happen practically every day of the week. A more serious relationship in which he just cuts contact, then he's an arse BUT I still think if she's pregnant and decides to keep the baby that if she can, she at least tells the father or a relative of his that she's pregnant. Being a father and being a partner are two separate things and he may have been an arse as a partner but could be a fantastic father. MRA = mens rights activists, the ones who turn womens issues into men issues and it's to control women and not to gain rights for men. anti-men doesn't mean that at all, it means you don't like men. i've had a lot of fun this week chatting to them on the forum so don't get where you've both seen me being anti-men everywhere. thanks for the rest of your reply though, that was what i wanted. Oh god, I'm definitely no men's rights activist " it's a shame really coz MRA should be seen as positive really. they've totally got the wrong people signed up for their causes though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"actually i'm not sure what you meant by anti-men now, i think it was a dig at me but seeing as you've said otherwise idk. plus the sad face makes me think you wasn't being malicious, but i'm not anti-men. I wasn't being malicious, I like you. " ok i'm sorry, the anti-men thing did make me feel like a man hater. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"actually i'm not sure what you meant by anti-men now, i think it was a dig at me but seeing as you've said otherwise idk. plus the sad face makes me think you wasn't being malicious, but i'm not anti-men. I wasn't being malicious, I like you. ok i'm sorry, the anti-men thing did make me feel like a man hater." I didn't take it as anti-men. Can't speak for other guys. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Women must ghost men too though? " yeah, i ghosted all my meets off here now, even the regular ones, i don't owe them anything. but i was just wondering about if a woman got ghosted then found out she was pregnant if she should bother contacting the guy. i mean ghosting is the ultimate form of non-communication and because of that you have no social cues as to whether you should contact that person yourself or not, ghosting mostly suggests there is no point in contacting them as they have no interest in you so i was interested in what other people thought. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"ghosting means he just stops all contact, no interest in her or her well being. well, say the guy fucked her and she got pregnant, she has ways to contact him. do you think she should? i personally think no, coz he don't give a shit and doesn't deserve to be a part of her pregnancy, but wondering what reasoning others would have for their answer to this. i'm sure this situation must arise on here. " of course he should.just because he has no interest In the woman dosent mean he is a bad person and has no morals or no interest in his child . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nothing fucked up about what you're saying. Sounds ok to me well you haven't stalked all my forum posts so you wouldn't know. " Oh ok! I will look out for more then! You're right about court, but should try mediation first and tell him there what he should be doing! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Nothing fucked up about what you're saying. Sounds ok to me well you haven't stalked all my forum posts so you wouldn't know. Oh ok! I will look out for more then! You're right about court, but should try mediation first and tell him there what he should be doing! " don't really, i'm an embarrassment to myself. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"no answers are right or wrong, will just mention that again. it is basically opinions and i wanted to see the reasoning behind peoples opinions too. thanks all." I'm sorry but a woman thinking that she has a right to withhold a child because the guy has no interest in her is completely wrong and not an opinion.....in my opinion . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. " i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"no answers are right or wrong, will just mention that again. it is basically opinions and i wanted to see the reasoning behind peoples opinions too. thanks all. I'm sorry but a woman thinking that she has a right to withhold a child because the guy has no interest in her is completely wrong and not an opinion.....in my opinion ." i've withheld my oldest child from his dad because he never turned up for him when planned. it was causing my son distress and i thought the best alternative was to deny his dad access until he got his shit together (which he never did until my oldest was 17). the above scenario is different to the OP, but after going through that once and seeing what it did to my son it would definitely affect my decision. sometimes we have to act based on experience, sometimes we think hiding things is the most beneficial option. just depends. that's why there is no answer, everyone is going to base their reply on experience. i think so. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Yes she should. He had the right to know he's going to be a father. Your posts are becoming increasingly more and more anti men. I think it's sad I'd noticed that too " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol." this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"no answers are right or wrong, will just mention that again. it is basically opinions and i wanted to see the reasoning behind peoples opinions too. thanks all. I'm sorry but a woman thinking that she has a right to withhold a child because the guy has no interest in her is completely wrong and not an opinion.....in my opinion . i've withheld my oldest child from his dad because he never turned up for him when planned. it was causing my son distress and i thought the best alternative was to deny his dad access until he got his shit together (which he never did until my oldest was 17). the above scenario is different to the OP, but after going through that once and seeing what it did to my son it would definitely affect my decision. sometimes we have to act based on experience, sometimes we think hiding things is the most beneficial option. just depends. that's why there is no answer, everyone is going to base their reply on experience. i think so." Without giving a man the chance to see his child he can't not turn up. You can't know if he's going to want to be part of the child's life if you don't tell him. I wouldn't have told my child they were seeing their dad until he knocked on the door. That way their would be no being let down. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. " Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"no answers are right or wrong, will just mention that again. it is basically opinions and i wanted to see the reasoning behind peoples opinions too. thanks all. I'm sorry but a woman thinking that she has a right to withhold a child because the guy has no interest in her is completely wrong and not an opinion.....in my opinion . i've withheld my oldest child from his dad because he never turned up for him when planned. it was causing my son distress and i thought the best alternative was to deny his dad access until he got his shit together (which he never did until my oldest was 17). the above scenario is different to the OP, but after going through that once and seeing what it did to my son it would definitely affect my decision. sometimes we have to act based on experience, sometimes we think hiding things is the most beneficial option. just depends. that's why there is no answer, everyone is going to base their reply on experience. i think so. Without giving a man the chance to see his child he can't not turn up. You can't know if he's going to want to be part of the child's life if you don't tell him. I wouldn't have told my child they were seeing their dad until he knocked on the door. That way their would be no being let down. " naively, i still am naive sadly but not as stupid now, i used to get him ready thinking his dad would turn up. even more so after he took me to court for access. i agree without giving someone a chance you don't know. sometimes caution might affect your decision, sometimes knowing you can't trust your choices might, all kinds of things can influence. i like how you're getting me thinking though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"no answers are right or wrong, will just mention that again. it is basically opinions and i wanted to see the reasoning behind peoples opinions too. thanks all. I'm sorry but a woman thinking that she has a right to withhold a child because the guy has no interest in her is completely wrong and not an opinion.....in my opinion . i've withheld my oldest child from his dad because he never turned up for him when planned. it was causing my son distress and i thought the best alternative was to deny his dad access until he got his shit together (which he never did until my oldest was 17). the above scenario is different to the OP, but after going through that once and seeing what it did to my son it would definitely affect my decision. sometimes we have to act based on experience, sometimes we think hiding things is the most beneficial option. just depends. that's why there is no answer, everyone is going to base their reply on experience. i think so." I agree with you in regards to some guys being wasters etc and can see your reason for doing so but that is completely different from witholding a child just because the guy dosent like you and that would be 100% wrong no ifs or buts.I must say i agree with others you do seem to have a bit of a chip on your shoulder regarding guys.do you think it could be casual sex and the thought of being used that makes you feel this way? Sorry if that if that is a bit deep oit'sr personel its just iv seen you around the forums for a long time and you seem a decent person and i agree with what you say alot but recently you seem to be hating all guys for some reason. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"no answers are right or wrong, will just mention that again. it is basically opinions and i wanted to see the reasoning behind peoples opinions too. thanks all. I'm sorry but a woman thinking that she has a right to withhold a child because the guy has no interest in her is completely wrong and not an opinion.....in my opinion . i've withheld my oldest child from his dad because he never turned up for him when planned. it was causing my son distress and i thought the best alternative was to deny his dad access until he got his shit together (which he never did until my oldest was 17). the above scenario is different to the OP, but after going through that once and seeing what it did to my son it would definitely affect my decision. sometimes we have to act based on experience, sometimes we think hiding things is the most beneficial option. just depends. that's why there is no answer, everyone is going to base their reply on experience. i think so.I agree with you in regards to some guys being wasters etc and can see your reason for doing so but that is completely different from witholding a child just because the guy dosent like you and that would be 100% wrong no ifs or buts.I must say i agree with others you do seem to have a bit of a chip on your shoulder regarding guys.do you think it could be casual sex and the thought of being used that makes you feel this way? Sorry if that if that is a bit deep oit'sr personel its just iv seen you around the forums for a long time and you seem a decent person and i agree with what you say alot but recently you seem to be hating all guys for some reason." ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. " laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"no answers are right or wrong, will just mention that again. it is basically opinions and i wanted to see the reasoning behind peoples opinions too. thanks all. I'm sorry but a woman thinking that she has a right to withhold a child because the guy has no interest in her is completely wrong and not an opinion.....in my opinion . i've withheld my oldest child from his dad because he never turned up for him when planned. it was causing my son distress and i thought the best alternative was to deny his dad access until he got his shit together (which he never did until my oldest was 17). the above scenario is different to the OP, but after going through that once and seeing what it did to my son it would definitely affect my decision. sometimes we have to act based on experience, sometimes we think hiding things is the most beneficial option. just depends. that's why there is no answer, everyone is going to base their reply on experience. i think so." I can see why you withheld your oldest child from his dad. You gave him the choice to be a dad and he didn't take it. You put your child first. I would have done the same | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"there's no right or wrong answer, thanks both. " There is ........... Its your body and what you do with your body is up to you .. That's how I see it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"no answers are right or wrong, will just mention that again. it is basically opinions and i wanted to see the reasoning behind peoples opinions too. thanks all. I'm sorry but a woman thinking that she has a right to withhold a child because the guy has no interest in her is completely wrong and not an opinion.....in my opinion . i've withheld my oldest child from his dad because he never turned up for him when planned. it was causing my son distress and i thought the best alternative was to deny his dad access until he got his shit together (which he never did until my oldest was 17). the above scenario is different to the OP, but after going through that once and seeing what it did to my son it would definitely affect my decision. sometimes we have to act based on experience, sometimes we think hiding things is the most beneficial option. just depends. that's why there is no answer, everyone is going to base their reply on experience. i think so. I can see why you withheld your oldest child from his dad. You gave him the choice to be a dad and he didn't take it. You put your child first. I would have done the same " thanks, most people do it, not at first but when they see the damage that's being caused they act upon it. i was more pointing out that it's not to do with the guy not being interested in the woman exactly, that's partially why someone might think he wouldn't be interested in his kid with her really. but if you've already chosen one dead beat then something to consider is maybe you chose another one. it's been a good conversation really, i need to think of examples not to do with myself though haha. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"that's not usually true about the stalker thing though, it's sad to see a woman being blamed when she's already been dumped on. sometimes people get too attached and ghost, they're cheating so ghost, or they're just dickheads who don't care and so ghost. i decided to ghost just about everyone i've met on here now coz i don't wanna meet them again. that's how NSA and i get it's ok to do that coz there wasn't really any communication between meets or consistency about when we'd have them so i just fucked them off, true NSA. " So you admit to being mentally/emotionally abusive yourself then? You come across as thinking if a guy ghosts a woman he's an arsehole, must be cheating or some other reason. But then admit to doing the exact same thing yourself? So do you think ghosting is perfectly acceptable or do you think its only done by "dickheads who don't care"? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"that's not usually true about the stalker thing though, it's sad to see a woman being blamed when she's already been dumped on. sometimes people get too attached and ghost, they're cheating so ghost, or they're just dickheads who don't care and so ghost. i decided to ghost just about everyone i've met on here now coz i don't wanna meet them again. that's how NSA and i get it's ok to do that coz there wasn't really any communication between meets or consistency about when we'd have them so i just fucked them off, true NSA. So you admit to being mentally/emotionally abusive yourself then? You come across as thinking if a guy ghosts a woman he's an arsehole, must be cheating or some other reason. But then admit to doing the exact same thing yourself? So do you think ghosting is perfectly acceptable or do you think its only done by "dickheads who don't care"? " well yeah, i saw no commitment or consistency from them at all so i just ghosted them. i think it's fine to do that. that seems to be how NSA is on here going off how i've been treated. and i don't care, they don't care about me so why should i care about them? that is exactly how NSA has been for me, i'm cool with that. not like we ever spoke unless they wanted sexually servicing, i owe them nothing at all. i'm a changed person, used to be nice to anyone, never got the same in return so changed. i changed into the dickhead that everyone else is, yes. took a break then again i've changed now and want more than NSA coz it doesn't suit me. there's nothing wrong with NSA either, it's just not for me any more and any guy interacting with me gets told that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol." Are you male or female? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It's the old adage of one size doesn't fit all. I ghosted someone once. I firmly truly believed it was the best thing to do which would give a clear message in the complex situation. But I watched continuously from afar to see they were ok and it drove me insane!! Yes it can be horrid, but as stated above there's circumstances where it may be the best solution. To assume it's abuse isn't appropriate in all situations." yeah if it's for your own safety i can understand that. here's the thing, it's not called ghosting if you're doing it against an abuser, it's then called no contact. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I don't like the ghost thing it gives me the creeps . If people don't wish to know me I don't wish to know them ." exactly why i sacked off most guys on here, they do it a lot. and i make it clear i don't want NSA now to anyone new i chat to. being just friends is fine too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It's the old adage of one size doesn't fit all. I ghosted someone once. I firmly truly believed it was the best thing to do which would give a clear message in the complex situation. But I watched continuously from afar to see they were ok and it drove me insane!! Yes it can be horrid, but as stated above there's circumstances where it may be the best solution. To assume it's abuse isn't appropriate in all situations. yeah if it's for your own safety i can understand that. here's the thing, it's not called ghosting if you're doing it against an abuser, it's then called no contact." In abusive situations you're quite right to cut contact. What I've learnt is that humans are funny old things though. Sometimes we remain silent in the hope others will make the contact. Sometimes all we can and shoukd do is concentrate in how we behave...it may influence others. If it doesn't....well that's out of our hands sadly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It's the old adage of one size doesn't fit all. I ghosted someone once. I firmly truly believed it was the best thing to do which would give a clear message in the complex situation. But I watched continuously from afar to see they were ok and it drove me insane!! Yes it can be horrid, but as stated above there's circumstances where it may be the best solution. To assume it's abuse isn't appropriate in all situations. yeah if it's for your own safety i can understand that. here's the thing, it's not called ghosting if you're doing it against an abuser, it's then called no contact. In abusive situations you're quite right to cut contact. What I've learnt is that humans are funny old things though. Sometimes we remain silent in the hope others will make the contact. Sometimes all we can and shoukd do is concentrate in how we behave...it may influence others. If it doesn't....well that's out of our hands sadly." that's true. i think when the consistency changes dramatically though we can presume ghosted. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"thanks both. ghosting is also a type of mental abuse, does that change anyones opinion?" I didn't know what ghosting was until you said it...how can cutting off contact with someone who you don't want to speak to anymore mental abuse? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" It's the old adage of one size doesn't fit all. I ghosted someone once. I firmly truly believed it was the best thing to do which would give a clear message in the complex situation. But I watched continuously from afar to see they were ok and it drove me insane!! Yes it can be horrid, but as stated above there's circumstances where it may be the best solution. To assume it's abuse isn't appropriate in all situations. yeah if it's for your own safety i can understand that. here's the thing, it's not called ghosting if you're doing it against an abuser, it's then called no contact. In abusive situations you're quite right to cut contact. What I've learnt is that humans are funny old things though. Sometimes we remain silent in the hope others will make the contact. Sometimes all we can and shoukd do is concentrate in how we behave...it may influence others. If it doesn't....well that's out of our hands sadly. that's true. i think when the consistency changes dramatically though we can presume ghosted." Probably. You have a choice. Make a step towards or simply let things take a course. Careful how they affect you emotionally though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not telling him she is pregnant with his child is an even worse form of mental abuse I think . Although I like most wouldn't see "Ghosting" as mental abuse . (him) it's form of abandonment. that is why it's considered abuse. " I see you answered here. I would say adults should get a grip if they think they are being abused because someone doesn't want to contact them again | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"thanks both. ghosting is also a type of mental abuse, does that change anyones opinion? I didn't know what ghosting was until you said it...how can cutting off contact with someone who you don't want to speak to anymore mental abuse?" it's abandonment of a person who doesn't know they've been abandoned at first. and they can't move on until it's sunk in. ghosting and the silent treatment are forms of emotional abuse because they don't let the other person know what's going on and can keep them in a state of confusion or worry or even thinking they've done something wrong when they haven't. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Don't us guys give you enough to complain about us for, without hypothetical scenarios? We need to up our game, lads... they're getting bored." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"thanks both. ghosting is also a type of mental abuse, does that change anyones opinion? I didn't know what ghosting was until you said it...how can cutting off contact with someone who you don't want to speak to anymore mental abuse? it's abandonment of a person who doesn't know they've been abandoned at first. and they can't move on until it's sunk in. ghosting and the silent treatment are forms of emotional abuse because they don't let the other person know what's going on and can keep them in a state of confusion or worry or even thinking they've done something wrong when they haven't." Surely an Adult can figure that out when they havn't been in touch for a while. Surely the persons pride should kick in and say stuff you I am moving on if you don't want to know me when it is so obvious? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol. Are you male or female?" Would your answear be different if you new which was posting?Would be interesting to hear your thoughts on this. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol." So you don't like the laws of our land. Well tough! If you don't abide by them, then pay the consequences. Thankfully our country permits abortion, otherwise we'd go back to the days of back street abortionists and women's lives in danger. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol. Are you male or female? Would your answear be different if you new which was posting?Would be interesting to hear your thoughts on this." Actually no, which is why i went on to respond as i did. I, many years ago before i gained many life experiences, thought of it as murdering a baby, but soon learned that other factors must be considered. Hence, pro choice. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"thanks both. ghosting is also a type of mental abuse, does that change anyones opinion? I didn't know what ghosting was until you said it...how can cutting off contact with someone who you don't want to speak to anymore mental abuse? it's abandonment of a person who doesn't know they've been abandoned at first. and they can't move on until it's sunk in. ghosting and the silent treatment are forms of emotional abuse because they don't let the other person know what's going on and can keep them in a state of confusion or worry or even thinking they've done something wrong when they haven't. Surely an Adult can figure that out when they havn't been in touch for a while. Surely the persons pride should kick in and say stuff you I am moving on if you don't want to know me when it is so obvious?" if she was having his baby that could make it harder. but yeah they get the message eventually obviously, it;s just while they were waiting to get that messages they were not moving on, possibly worrying something had happened to the person, or wondering what they have done to be ignored? people can mess with their own heads so easily when others start the ball rolling, i think so. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol. So you don't like the laws of our land. Well tough! If you don't abide by them, then pay the consequences. Thankfully our country permits abortion, otherwise we'd go back to the days of back street abortionists and women's lives in danger. " or you could ya know just be responsible then no killing is necessary.contraception has came a long way since the days of back street abortion and yes I do believe alot of laws are bullshit.If me using my own brain, conscience and common sense and you know, just doing what I feel is right instead of following what a load of white guys in suits tell me what to do and think and that makes you think I'm some sort of rouge that lives life on the edge then more fool you to be honast.for instance I bet you have played the happy birthday tune at a kids party before.well guess what, you are a rouge like me who has just broken the law . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol. Are you male or female? Would your answear be different if you new which was posting?Would be interesting to hear your thoughts on this. Actually no, which is why i went on to respond as i did. I, many years ago before i gained many life experiences, thought of it as murdering a baby, but soon learned that other factors must be considered. Hence, pro choice." ok cool which factors are those if you dont mind me asking? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If a guy stops contact just cos sumone has got pregnant. then i wood say no don't contact them as anyone Hoo dus things like that (in my vue) is not fit to be a parent." You can't know that. He may have no feelings towards the mother but love his child. It's part of him too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol. Are you male or female? Would your answear be different if you new which was posting?Would be interesting to hear your thoughts on this. Actually no, which is why i went on to respond as i did. I, many years ago before i gained many life experiences, thought of it as murdering a baby, but soon learned that other factors must be considered. Hence, pro choice.ok cool which factors are those if you dont mind me asking?" One factor is it isn't a sentient being. You're not murdering a human, you're terminating it so it doesn't become a human. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol. So you don't like the laws of our land. Well tough! If you don't abide by them, then pay the consequences. Thankfully our country permits abortion, otherwise we'd go back to the days of back street abortionists and women's lives in danger. or you could ya know just be responsible then no killing is necessary.contraception has came a long way since the days of back street abortion and yes I do believe alot of laws are bullshit.If me using my own brain, conscience and common sense and you know, just doing what I feel is right instead of following what a load of white guys in suits tell me what to do and think and that makes you think I'm some sort of rouge that lives life on the edge then more fool you to be honast.for instance I bet you have played the happy birthday tune at a kids party before.well guess what, you are a rouge like me who has just broken the law ." Obeying laws is not being forced to think in a certain way . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol. Are you male or female? Would your answear be different if you new which was posting?Would be interesting to hear your thoughts on this. Actually no, which is why i went on to respond as i did. I, many years ago before i gained many life experiences, thought of it as murdering a baby, but soon learned that other factors must be considered. Hence, pro choice.ok cool which factors are those if you dont mind me asking?" Medical (physical and psychological), age of the mother ( linked to medical), origin of pregnancy (two of the things we cannot mention on fab), support (lack of). | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol. Are you male or female? Would your answear be different if you new which was posting?Would be interesting to hear your thoughts on this. Actually no, which is why i went on to respond as i did. I, many years ago before i gained many life experiences, thought of it as murdering a baby, but soon learned that other factors must be considered. Hence, pro choice.ok cool which factors are those if you dont mind me asking? Medical (physical and psychological), age of the mother ( linked to medical), origin of pregnancy (two of the things we cannot mention on fab), support (lack of). " Having had an amniocentesis, i had two weeks to think about on what circumstances i would abort my planned and wanted baby. I had decided that if there was evidence my baby would come into this world only to physically suffer and with a limited lifespan, I'd feel compelled to abort. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol. So you don't like the laws of our land. Well tough! If you don't abide by them, then pay the consequences. Thankfully our country permits abortion, otherwise we'd go back to the days of back street abortionists and women's lives in danger. or you could ya know just be responsible then no killing is necessary.contraception has came a long way since the days of back street abortion and yes I do believe alot of laws are bullshit.If me using my own brain, conscience and common sense and you know, just doing what I feel is right instead of following what a load of white guys in suits tell me what to do and think and that makes you think I'm some sort of rouge that lives life on the edge then more fool you to be honast.for instance I bet you have played the happy birthday tune at a kids party before.well guess what, you are a rouge like me who has just broken the law ." it's ok. you can believe it's murder to kill an embryo or featus. it possibly is murder, depends how you look at it. people don't usually make the decision to abort lightly so don't really need guilt tripping over it too. some people who abort believe they are killing their child also. even the law isn't so stupid as to think a feotus/embryo isn't going to become a human but because the responsibility for that potential person is in the hands of those who created it then they also give them the right to terminate that 'child' if they choose to do that. it's legal here and accepted and most people don't make the choice lightly. half of these babies were wanted but were aborted because they have defects that will give them poor quality of life or death anyway. some are aborted because it's not safe for the mother to continue her pregnancy. contraception does fail also, some people just don't think before they have sex. none of them should be punished for enjoying sex i reckon. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol. So you don't like the laws of our land. Well tough! If you don't abide by them, then pay the consequences. Thankfully our country permits abortion, otherwise we'd go back to the days of back street abortionists and women's lives in danger. or you could ya know just be responsible then no killing is necessary.contraception has came a long way since the days of back street abortion and yes I do believe alot of laws are bullshit.If me using my own brain, conscience and common sense and you know, just doing what I feel is right instead of following what a load of white guys in suits tell me what to do and think and that makes you think I'm some sort of rouge that lives life on the edge then more fool you to be honast.for instance I bet you have played the happy birthday tune at a kids party before.well guess what, you are a rouge like me who has just broken the law . Obeying laws is not being forced to think in a certain way . " of course it is.not following a law then gives and forces the impression you must be wrong and not thinking or conforming the "right way", when infact it is far more complicated but ushally reverts back to money or alterier motives. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol. So you don't like the laws of our land. Well tough! If you don't abide by them, then pay the consequences. Thankfully our country permits abortion, otherwise we'd go back to the days of back street abortionists and women's lives in danger. or you could ya know just be responsible then no killing is necessary.contraception has came a long way since the days of back street abortion and yes I do believe alot of laws are bullshit.If me using my own brain, conscience and common sense and you know, just doing what I feel is right instead of following what a load of white guys in suits tell me what to do and think and that makes you think I'm some sort of rouge that lives life on the edge then more fool you to be honast.for instance I bet you have played the happy birthday tune at a kids party before.well guess what, you are a rouge like me who has just broken the law . Obeying laws is not being forced to think in a certain way . of course it is.not following a law then gives and forces the impression you must be wrong and not thinking or conforming the "right way", when infact it is far more complicated but ushally reverts back to money or alterier motives." Of course it's not. It's being urged to act in a certain way but you can still think the law is an ass. Your logic is extremely flawed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol. Are you male or female? Would your answear be different if you new which was posting?Would be interesting to hear your thoughts on this. Actually no, which is why i went on to respond as i did. I, many years ago before i gained many life experiences, thought of it as murdering a baby, but soon learned that other factors must be considered. Hence, pro choice.ok cool which factors are those if you dont mind me asking? Medical (physical and psychological), age of the mother ( linked to medical), origin of pregnancy (two of the things we cannot mention on fab), support (lack of). " reading between the lines then yea I agree with you.I'm thinking more along the lines of non use or failing of contraception. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol. So you don't like the laws of our land. Well tough! If you don't abide by them, then pay the consequences. Thankfully our country permits abortion, otherwise we'd go back to the days of back street abortionists and women's lives in danger. or you could ya know just be responsible then no killing is necessary.contraception has came a long way since the days of back street abortion and yes I do believe alot of laws are bullshit.If me using my own brain, conscience and common sense and you know, just doing what I feel is right instead of following what a load of white guys in suits tell me what to do and think and that makes you think I'm some sort of rouge that lives life on the edge then more fool you to be honast.for instance I bet you have played the happy birthday tune at a kids party before.well guess what, you are a rouge like me who has just broken the law . Obeying laws is not being forced to think in a certain way . of course it is.not following a law then gives and forces the impression you must be wrong and not thinking or conforming the "right way", when infact it is far more complicated but ushally reverts back to money or alterier motives. Of course it's not. It's being urged to act in a certain way but you can still think the law is an ass. Your logic is extremely flawed." its not being urged its being forced,completely diffrent.put it this way.If you were told someone was breaking the law you would "think" they where in the wrong simply because you have been conditioned to do so.on a side note I am enjoying this discussion while skiving at work and being mildly autistic I know I can come across a bit straight to the point and forceing logic to situations that ushally have some sort of etticate behind them so sorry if I come across rude. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"What if the woman tricked the man into getting her pregnant. Like she told him she was on the pill (yes, he should have insisted on condoms but let's pretend for arguments sake he didn't) Would he then have the right to insist she terminates the pregnancy?" Any man can insist just as any woman doesn't have to comply. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol. So you don't like the laws of our land. Well tough! If you don't abide by them, then pay the consequences. Thankfully our country permits abortion, otherwise we'd go back to the days of back street abortionists and women's lives in danger. or you could ya know just be responsible then no killing is necessary.contraception has came a long way since the days of back street abortion and yes I do believe alot of laws are bullshit.If me using my own brain, conscience and common sense and you know, just doing what I feel is right instead of following what a load of white guys in suits tell me what to do and think and that makes you think I'm some sort of rouge that lives life on the edge then more fool you to be honast.for instance I bet you have played the happy birthday tune at a kids party before.well guess what, you are a rouge like me who has just broken the law . Obeying laws is not being forced to think in a certain way . of course it is.not following a law then gives and forces the impression you must be wrong and not thinking or conforming the "right way", when infact it is far more complicated but ushally reverts back to money or alterier motives. Of course it's not. It's being urged to act in a certain way but you can still think the law is an ass. Your logic is extremely flawed. its not being urged its being forced,completely diffrent.put it this way.If you were told someone was breaking the law you would "think" they where in the wrong simply because you have been conditioned to do so.on a side note I am enjoying this discussion while skiving at work and being mildly autistic I know I can come across a bit straight to the point and forceing logic to situations that ushally have some sort of etticate behind them so sorry if I come across rude." The law can be enforced but it is not forced. Stealing is illegal but if you get away with it, how is the law forced upon you? You chose to act against the law. However, if you get caught, you then pay the consequences. What we think of others breaking the law is down to us. Laws change throughout history and culture, so actually, I'm not personally conditioned to think anyone is wrong just cos of the present laws. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol. So you don't like the laws of our land. Well tough! If you don't abide by them, then pay the consequences. Thankfully our country permits abortion, otherwise we'd go back to the days of back street abortionists and women's lives in danger. or you could ya know just be responsible then no killing is necessary.contraception has came a long way since the days of back street abortion and yes I do believe alot of laws are bullshit.If me using my own brain, conscience and common sense and you know, just doing what I feel is right instead of following what a load of white guys in suits tell me what to do and think and that makes you think I'm some sort of rouge that lives life on the edge then more fool you to be honast.for instance I bet you have played the happy birthday tune at a kids party before.well guess what, you are a rouge like me who has just broken the law . it's ok. you can believe it's murder to kill an embryo or featus. it possibly is murder, depends how you look at it. people don't usually make the decision to abort lightly so don't really need guilt tripping over it too. some people who abort believe they are killing their child also. even the law isn't so stupid as to think a feotus/embryo isn't going to become a human but because the responsibility for that potential person is in the hands of those who created it then they also give them the right to terminate that 'child' if they choose to do that. it's legal here and accepted and most people don't make the choice lightly. half of these babies were wanted but were aborted because they have defects that will give them poor quality of life or death anyway. some are aborted because it's not safe for the mother to continue her pregnancy. contraception does fail also, some people just don't think before they have sex. none of them should be punished for enjoying sex i reckon. " yea it's sure isint an easy subject.agree with you on the birth defect bit and i think personally the abortion time scale is too large.dissagree with the failing of contraception.think that is a risk that should be taken when having sex the same as stds. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"yea it's sure isint an easy subject.agree with you on the birth defect bit and i think personally the abortion time scale is too large.dissagree with the failing of contraception. think that is a risk that should be taken when having sex the same as stds." yes there's always a pregnancy risk, i avoided penetrative sex after my 9th pregnancy because i didn't want to take the risk. but when you force someone to continue a pregnancy they don't want to continue with then she loses autonomy over her own body, and we see it important that we have that autonomy and so allowed laws that give us that. that's what it boils down to, women having autonomy over their own body, which then leads to them having control of their own lives. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"yea it's sure isint an easy subject.agree with you on the birth defect bit and i think personally the abortion time scale is too large.dissagree with the failing of contraception. think that is a risk that should be taken when having sex the same as stds. yes there's always a pregnancy risk, i avoided penetrative sex after my 9th pregnancy because i didn't want to take the risk. but when you force someone to continue a pregnancy they don't want to continue with then she loses autonomy over her own body, and we see it important that we have that autonomy and so allowed laws that give us that. that's what it boils down to, women having autonomy over their own body, which then leads to them having control of their own lives." You're a very fertile woman | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"yea it's sure isint an easy subject.agree with you on the birth defect bit and i think personally the abortion time scale is too large.dissagree with the failing of contraception. think that is a risk that should be taken when having sex the same as stds. yes there's always a pregnancy risk, i avoided penetrative sex after my 9th pregnancy because i didn't want to take the risk. but when you force someone to continue a pregnancy they don't want to continue with then she loses autonomy over her own body, and we see it important that we have that autonomy and so allowed laws that give us that. that's what it boils down to, women having autonomy over their own body, which then leads to them having control of their own lives. You're a very fertile woman " dunno, only got caught 9 times out of what must have been thousands of times of having sex. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"As to the baby situation. If she's thinking of keeping it she should tell him. If not, then don't say anything. i can agree with that but then there is the whole is abortion murder or not. but think that's a bit heavy for this time in the morning lol. this basically is a twist on the abortion argument. except this time the child also has rights to consider, making it more confusing. the father has no rights until after the birth as the child is not in his body. i would say both parents have responsibilities but the guy obviously feels none towards the woman, also but his child is not the woman. Whether someone calls abortion murder or not it's not illegal and it's the woman's choice. It doesn't seem fair, not letting the father have a say, but he doesn't have to carry the child and hand it over, after a birth, if she doesn't think she can look after it. laws are written by people genrelly considered liers and thieves so I don't let laws dictate to me which is wrong or right.You do seem to miss the point though.It's not about the guys or girls right to abort its about the right of the human growing inside of the woman which nobody has the right to murder weather a law tells u it's ok or not.just because a woman is irosposible dosent give them the right to kill someone.If that applied to outside the womb I would be a serial killer lol. So you don't like the laws of our land. Well tough! If you don't abide by them, then pay the consequences. Thankfully our country permits abortion, otherwise we'd go back to the days of back street abortionists and women's lives in danger. or you could ya know just be responsible then no killing is necessary.contraception has came a long way since the days of back street abortion and yes I do believe alot of laws are bullshit.If me using my own brain, conscience and common sense and you know, just doing what I feel is right instead of following what a load of white guys in suits tell me what to do and think and that makes you think I'm some sort of rouge that lives life on the edge then more fool you to be honast.for instance I bet you have played the happy birthday tune at a kids party before.well guess what, you are a rouge like me who has just broken the law . Obeying laws is not being forced to think in a certain way . of course it is.not following a law then gives and forces the impression you must be wrong and not thinking or conforming the "right way", when infact it is far more complicated but ushally reverts back to money or alterier motives. Of course it's not. It's being urged to act in a certain way but you can still think the law is an ass. Your logic is extremely flawed. its not being urged its being forced,completely diffrent.put it this way.If you were told someone was breaking the law you would "think" they where in the wrong simply because you have been conditioned to do so.on a side note I am enjoying this discussion while skiving at work and being mildly autistic I know I can come across a bit straight to the point and forceing logic to situations that ushally have some sort of etticate behind them so sorry if I come across rude. The law can be enforced but it is not forced. Stealing is illegal but if you get away with it, how is the law forced upon you? You chose to act against the law. However, if you get caught, you then pay the consequences. What we think of others breaking the law is down to us. Laws change throughout history and culture, so actually, I'm not personally conditioned to think anyone is wrong just cos of the present laws. " prob best to agree to dissagree.mainly because there is a thread about a zombie apocalypse so I'm off there | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"thanks both. ghosting is also a type of mental abuse, does that change anyones opinion? I didn't know what ghosting was until you said it...how can cutting off contact with someone who you don't want to speak to anymore mental abuse? it's abandonment of a person who doesn't know they've been abandoned at first. and they can't move on until it's sunk in. ghosting and the silent treatment are forms of emotional abuse because they don't let the other person know what's going on and can keep them in a state of confusion or worry or even thinking they've done something wrong when they haven't. Surely an Adult can figure that out when they havn't been in touch for a while. Surely the persons pride should kick in and say stuff you I am moving on if you don't want to know me when it is so obvious? if she was having his baby that could make it harder. but yeah they get the message eventually obviously, it;s just while they were waiting to get that messages they were not moving on, possibly worrying something had happened to the person, or wondering what they have done to be ignored? people can mess with their own heads so easily when others start the ball rolling, i think so." I still don't agree it is mental abuse. I think whoever it is leaving didn't have the guts to tell the person or didn't give a shit to tell the person and thats it. Life is hard sometimes. You can't use mental abuse / mental health as a reason for everything. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" its not being urged its being forced,completely diffrent.put it this way.If you were told someone was breaking the law you would "think" they where in the wrong simply because you have been conditioned to do so.on a side note I am enjoying this discussion while skiving at work and being mildly autistic I know I can come across a bit straight to the point and forceing logic to situations that ushally have some sort of etticate behind them so sorry if I come across rude. The law can be enforced but it is not forced. Stealing is illegal but if you get away with it, how is the law forced upon you? You chose to act against the law. However, if you get caught, you then pay the consequences. What we think of others breaking the law is down to us. Laws change throughout history and culture, so actually, I'm not personally conditioned to think anyone is wrong just cos of the present laws. prob best to agree to dissagree.mainly because there is a thread about a zombie apocalypse so I'm off there " I won nerrrr Just kidding | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"thanks both. ghosting is also a type of mental abuse, does that change anyones opinion? I didn't know what ghosting was until you said it...how can cutting off contact with someone who you don't want to speak to anymore mental abuse? it's abandonment of a person who doesn't know they've been abandoned at first. and they can't move on until it's sunk in. ghosting and the silent treatment are forms of emotional abuse because they don't let the other person know what's going on and can keep them in a state of confusion or worry or even thinking they've done something wrong when they haven't. Surely an Adult can figure that out when they havn't been in touch for a while. Surely the persons pride should kick in and say stuff you I am moving on if you don't want to know me when it is so obvious? if she was having his baby that could make it harder. but yeah they get the message eventually obviously, it;s just while they were waiting to get that messages they were not moving on, possibly worrying something had happened to the person, or wondering what they have done to be ignored? people can mess with their own heads so easily when others start the ball rolling, i think so. I still don't agree it is mental abuse. I think whoever it is leaving didn't have the guts to tell the person or didn't give a shit to tell the person and thats it. Life is hard sometimes. You can't use mental abuse / mental health as a reason for everything." I think you have a point with bringing up mental health, as abandonment can trigger mental health issues. I wouldn't call it mental abuse but then i can be quite pedantic | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If a guy stops contact just cos sumone has got pregnant. then i wood say no don't contact them as anyone Hoo dus things like that (in my vue) is not fit to be a parent. You can't know that. He may have no feelings towards the mother but love his child. It's part of him too. " But that's not wot the op sed thoe.... Op sed he stops talking ect cos the woman is pregnant. (unless I've got the rong end hear) So under that note he clearly don't want the kid. Or have i miss red Sumthing ???? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Does he know she's pregnant? was the unborn kid planned? Did they use protection? were there in a relationship or one off? so many questions" I'd say it depends on a lot of factors. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" I think you have a point with bringing up mental health, as abandonment can trigger mental health issues. I wouldn't call it mental abuse but then i can be quite pedantic I am guessing lots of things can trigger mental health...including being told you are being dumped rather than someone chickening out/ can't be bothered telling you." I am guessing lots of things can trigger mental health issues...including being told you are being dumped rather than someone chickening out/ can't be bothered telling you. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"OP Dus the guy go befor or after noing the woman is pregnant ?? Cos this Shorley will makes a difrounce to sum if thay say yes or no. " from my OP i was saying he went before he knew, so seeing as he wasn't interested in the mother to his child would there be any point in contacting him. but you can bring other opinions into it if you like, there is no right or wrong answer to this. we're just playing out scenarios in our heads here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Forgive me as I haven't read through the full thread.....so I don't know if the abortion is the big question here or the fact that someone "ghosting" has spoke and not spoken again for a while. So if the option is still available to speak but the bloke hasn't for a while is this described as ghosting?" the abortion was just adding another layer to this, you can ignore that or use it as part of your reasoning. basically ghosting is giving someone the impression you have no interest in them but without telling them so that they don't know for sure. i do think it's mental abuse when there's some level of commitment implied between people. when no commitment is suggested then it's a non-issue for me personally. sometimes it's actually a part of abusing someone so that you can come back into their life and use them whenever you feel like it, to mess with feelings you know are there on the ghosted persons side. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"thanks both. ghosting is also a type of mental abuse, does that change anyones opinion?" Ghosting and mental abuse are words that depict the sickness of the times. They fell out. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Does he know she's pregnant? was the unborn kid planned? Did they use protection? were there in a relationship or one off? so many questions I'd say it depends on a lot of factors. " true. main factors being one person walked away and disrespected to feelings of the other, making it clear they don't want any actual involvement with them. so do you tell them or not? i also like how someone mentioned they purposely got pregnant to trap someone, this is a really old argument/opinion but an opinion no less. and adds another element to what might be happening. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not telling him she is pregnant with his child is an even worse form of mental abuse I think . Although I like most wouldn't see "Ghosting" as mental abuse . (him)" If he does not know she is pregnant and HE is ghosting HER.....he is not suffering any mental abuse..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not telling him she is pregnant with his child is an even worse form of mental abuse I think . Although I like most wouldn't see "Ghosting" as mental abuse . (him)" If he does not know she is pregnant and HE is ghosting HER.....he is not suffering any mental abuse..... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Forgive me as I haven't read through the full thread.....so I don't know if the abortion is the big question here or the fact that someone "ghosting" has spoke and not spoken again for a while. So if the option is still available to speak but the bloke hasn't for a while is this described as ghosting? the abortion was just adding another layer to this, you can ignore that or use it as part of your reasoning. basically ghosting is giving someone the impression you have no interest in them but without telling them so that they don't know for sure. i do think it's mental abuse when there's some level of commitment implied between people. when no commitment is suggested then it's a non-issue for me personally. sometimes it's actually a part of abusing someone so that you can come back into their life and use them whenever you feel like it, to mess with feelings you know are there on the ghosted persons side." Hmmm I'm not too sure I get it I not great on scenarios...I just think if someone has not cut a person off in all forms of communication. Then it's a two way thing as it's not playing with people's minds..more of assuming they are mind readers. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Forgive me as I haven't read through the full thread.....so I don't know if the abortion is the big question here or the fact that someone "ghosting" has spoke and not spoken again for a while. So if the option is still available to speak but the bloke hasn't for a while is this described as ghosting? the abortion was just adding another layer to this, you can ignore that or use it as part of your reasoning. basically ghosting is giving someone the impression you have no interest in them but without telling them so that they don't know for sure. i do think it's mental abuse when there's some level of commitment implied between people. when no commitment is suggested then it's a non-issue for me personally. sometimes it's actually a part of abusing someone so that you can come back into their life and use them whenever you feel like it, to mess with feelings you know are there on the ghosted persons side. Hmmm I'm not too sure I get it I not great on scenarios...I just think if someone has not cut a person off in all forms of communication. Then it's a two way thing as it's not playing with people's minds..more of assuming they are mind readers. " in abusive relationships it goes deeper than just ghosting. you will have manipulated a person into the infatuation stage, so that they fall for you. you will be doing this intentionally also, knowing you won't follow through from your side to return those feelings but instead will eventually ignore them until you have you use or need for them again. keeping them thinking about your return so they will always be grateful for your return. fucked up people fall for this, sometimes just naive people fall for this also coz they aren't really aware what is going on. but it's used as a form of control of someone just so they can be used. not really the type of ghosting i was on about in my OP, just explaining how it's used in abusive relationships. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Forgive me as I haven't read through the full thread.....so I don't know if the abortion is the big question here or the fact that someone "ghosting" has spoke and not spoken again for a while. So if the option is still available to speak but the bloke hasn't for a while is this described as ghosting? the abortion was just adding another layer to this, you can ignore that or use it as part of your reasoning. basically ghosting is giving someone the impression you have no interest in them but without telling them so that they don't know for sure. i do think it's mental abuse when there's some level of commitment implied between people. when no commitment is suggested then it's a non-issue for me personally. sometimes it's actually a part of abusing someone so that you can come back into their life and use them whenever you feel like it, to mess with feelings you know are there on the ghosted persons side. Hmmm I'm not too sure I get it I not great on scenarios...I just think if someone has not cut a person off in all forms of communication. Then it's a two way thing as it's not playing with people's minds..more of assuming they are mind readers. in abusive relationships it goes deeper than just ghosting. you will have manipulated a person into the infatuation stage, so that they fall for you. you will be doing this intentionally also, knowing you won't follow through from your side to return those feelings but instead will eventually ignore them until you have you use or need for them again. keeping them thinking about your return so they will always be grateful for your return. fucked up people fall for this, sometimes just naive people fall for this also coz they aren't really aware what is going on. but it's used as a form of control of someone just so they can be used. not really the type of ghosting i was on about in my OP, just explaining how it's used in abusive relationships. " Thanks for explaining that...it has given me something to chew over now | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not telling him she is pregnant with his child is an even worse form of mental abuse I think . Although I like most wouldn't see "Ghosting" as mental abuse . (him) If he does not know she is pregnant and HE is ghosting HER.....he is not suffering any mental abuse..... " i'm gonna change mental abuse to controlling the situation now, i think that's more appropriate. so i suppose my question was based on who should take control next; should the person who has been abandoned keep all the control knowing the other person likes to deny them any? i say yes, she retains control over her body and the situation now. and possibly allows him some if he proves himself worthy of allowing their childs needs to be considered. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Forgive me as I haven't read through the full thread.....so I don't know if the abortion is the big question here or the fact that someone "ghosting" has spoke and not spoken again for a while. So if the option is still available to speak but the bloke hasn't for a while is this described as ghosting? the abortion was just adding another layer to this, you can ignore that or use it as part of your reasoning. basically ghosting is giving someone the impression you have no interest in them but without telling them so that they don't know for sure. i do think it's mental abuse when there's some level of commitment implied between people. when no commitment is suggested then it's a non-issue for me personally. sometimes it's actually a part of abusing someone so that you can come back into their life and use them whenever you feel like it, to mess with feelings you know are there on the ghosted persons side. Hmmm I'm not too sure I get it I not great on scenarios...I just think if someone has not cut a person off in all forms of communication. Then it's a two way thing as it's not playing with people's minds..more of assuming they are mind readers. in abusive relationships it goes deeper than just ghosting. you will have manipulated a person into the infatuation stage, so that they fall for you. you will be doing this intentionally also, knowing you won't follow through from your side to return those feelings but instead will eventually ignore them until you have you use or need for them again. keeping them thinking about your return so they will always be grateful for your return. fucked up people fall for this, sometimes just naive people fall for this also coz they aren't really aware what is going on. but it's used as a form of control of someone just so they can be used. not really the type of ghosting i was on about in my OP, just explaining how it's used in abusive relationships. Thanks for explaining that...it has given me something to chew over now " people do it all the time on here with consent coz that's how the level after NSA works. i'm not saying they intentionally create feelings towards those they fuck (as i reckon they don't) but they do keep a low level of 'respectful' interest/friendship maintained so they can use someone when they feel like it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"The woman in question sounds like she has a sense of entitlement to the man's person like he's her property. It bears a hint of a stalker mentality. He's removed himself from the relationship. How is it that her infatuation is his doing? Why is he being demonised as "knowingly making her infatuated" with him? Have they entered into a committed relationship with clearly articulated intentions? " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"[Removed by Cillit Bang at 15/09/17 21:28:17]" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To say a man has no say in a womans decision to have an abortion is very very sad. Its true of course but still sad." From a woman's pov who was told to abort the inconvenient baby, ie he had his say, i ask what is sad about it? I ignored him and became a single parent. It was bloody hard. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To say a man has no say in a womans decision to have an abortion is very very sad. Its true of course but still sad. From a woman's pov who was told to abort the inconvenient baby, ie he had his say, i ask what is sad about it? I ignored him and became a single parent. It was bloody hard." Good for you and your baby. Sad that he wouldn't step up I guess. it's his loss too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To say a man has no say in a womans decision to have an abortion is very very sad. Its true of course but still sad. From a woman's pov who was told to abort the inconvenient baby, ie he had his say, i ask what is sad about it? I ignored him and became a single parent. It was bloody hard. Good for you and your baby. Sad that he wouldn't step up I guess. it's his loss too" How is it his loss? He was and still is a very selfish man. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"To say a man has no say in a womans decision to have an abortion is very very sad. Its true of course but still sad. From a woman's pov who was told to abort the inconvenient baby, ie he had his say, i ask what is sad about it? I ignored him and became a single parent. It was bloody hard." Hi. Well you gave him a chance, so the sadness is partly that he didn't take it I guess, his loss. Hard work for you, I can believe that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I'm going to change it now. What if he thinks he is being ghosted but she is really being ghosted but she thinks he's ghosting him and what's worse their baby decides to ghost everyone cos it feels itself to have had a bad start in life and to be the victim of a couple of ghosters? Anyway - while they are all being caspered and caspering each other like fuck the matrix takes over and that man with the black coat , pale skin and sunglasses pulls the plug out and Barry Cillit Bang shakes his bottle of cleaning fluid and makes it all better. " Post of the thread...evening thought I might have been aided with shooking cerry | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Does he know she's pregnant? was the unborn kid planned? Did they use protection? were there in a relationship or one off? so many questions I'd say it depends on a lot of factors. true. main factors being one person walked away and disrespected to feelings of the other, making it clear they don't want any actual involvement with them. so do you tell them or not? ..." No I wouldn't tell them in this case. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Forgive me as I haven't read through the full thread.....so I don't know if the abortion is the big question here or the fact that someone "ghosting" has spoke and not spoken again for a while. So if the option is still available to speak but the bloke hasn't for a while is this described as ghosting? the abortion was just adding another layer to this, you can ignore that or use it as part of your reasoning. basically ghosting is giving someone the impression you have no interest in them but without telling them so that they don't know for sure. i do think it's mental abuse when there's some level of commitment implied between people. when no commitment is suggested then it's a non-issue for me personally. sometimes it's actually a part of abusing someone so that you can come back into their life and use them whenever you feel like it, to mess with feelings you know are there on the ghosted persons side. Hmmm I'm not too sure I get it I not great on scenarios...I just think if someone has not cut a person off in all forms of communication. Then it's a two way thing as it's not playing with people's minds..more of assuming they are mind readers. in abusive relationships it goes deeper than just ghosting. you will have manipulated a person into the infatuation stage, so that they fall for you. you will be doing this intentionally also, knowing you won't follow through from your side to return those feelings but instead will eventually ignore them until you have you use or need for them again. keeping them thinking about your return so they will always be grateful for your return. fucked up people fall for this, sometimes just naive people fall for this also coz they aren't really aware what is going on. but it's used as a form of control of someone just so they can be used. not really the type of ghosting i was on about in my OP, just explaining how it's used in abusive relationships. " Treat them mean keep them keen... but worse... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |