 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"When it's 'no strings' is that a problem?
Doubt this site would exist unless there was a healthy demand for no strings fun ??"
You may have missed my point. In your opinion is it a problem being shallow on here? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"When it's 'no strings' is that a problem?
Doubt this site would exist unless there was a healthy demand for no strings fun ??
You may have missed my point. In your opinion is it a problem being shallow on here?"
Depends what you mean by being shallow, lots of ways that can manifest itself? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"When it's 'no strings' is that a problem?
Doubt this site would exist unless there was a healthy demand for no strings fun ??
You may have missed my point. In your opinion is it a problem being shallow on here?"
For some it is, for some it isn't.
For me it is. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"When it's 'no strings' is that a problem?
Doubt this site would exist unless there was a healthy demand for no strings fun ??
You may have missed my point. In your opinion is it a problem being shallow on here?
For some it is, for some it isn't.
For me it is."
Would you have nsa sex with someone that you didn't find physically attractive? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Being shallow is wholly appropriate here. We are in the most part looking for a physical connection and that means we want to be physically attracted to someone.
Obviously personality counts and bonds are formed from chatting and interacting but in most cases the first contact is from viewing pics. If we Dont like what we see we dont message. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
"When it's 'no strings' is that a problem?
Doubt this site would exist unless there was a healthy demand for no strings fun ??
You may have missed my point. In your opinion is it a problem being shallow on here?
For some it is, for some it isn't.
For me it is.
Would you have nsa sex with someone that you didn't find physically attractive?"
I wouldn't have sex with someone I didn't find attractive and I wouldn't class that as shallow either. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
Who's rating?
Not all relationships will be the same nor satisfy all of our needs - but that's not a reason to lie judgmental. Set expectations appropriately. Ongoing casual friends will possibly give something deeper- but some of us want just action that's pleasure, without great bonds.
I can know you sexually, your tastes and help you to feel much better ad well as satisfied - but I'll be a breath of fresh air, as I'm not deeply infiltrated in your life - and vice versa. We can talk about anything but don't need to stray too much. It's potentially shallow, if you want marriage instead. It's simple and straightforward.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
It's not a problem being shallow on here, given how some use the site.
I'd consider myself a little demanding more than shallow though. As just looks for me are not enough.... Even on a site like this  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"When it's 'no strings' is that a problem?
Doubt this site would exist unless there was a healthy demand for no strings fun ??
You may have missed my point. In your opinion is it a problem being shallow on here?
For some it is, for some it isn't.
For me it is.
Would you have nsa sex with someone that you didn't find physically attractive?"
No, and that's not being shallow. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"When it's 'no strings' is that a problem?
Doubt this site would exist unless there was a healthy demand for no strings fun ??
You may have missed my point. In your opinion is it a problem being shallow on here?
For some it is, for some it isn't.
For me it is.
Would you have nsa sex with someone that you didn't find physically attractive?"
No, what would be the point in that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"When it's 'no strings' is that a problem?
Doubt this site would exist unless there was a healthy demand for no strings fun ??
You may have missed my point. In your opinion is it a problem being shallow on here?
For some it is, for some it isn't.
For me it is.
Would you have nsa sex with someone that you didn't find physically attractive?"
No I wouldn't.... Why would anyone do that? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"When it's 'no strings' is that a problem?
I don't think so, no. I wouldn't shag anyone I didn't find attractive. Some might think that's shallow, I don't  "
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"When it's 'no strings' is that a problem?
Doubt this site would exist unless there was a healthy demand for no strings fun ??
You may have missed my point. In your opinion is it a problem being shallow on here?"
I don't think so. Any reason is a good reason not to fuck someone. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I never know quite what people mean when they use the term "shallow" on a swinger/sex site. I mean, does it refer to anyone who doesn't think personality completely trumps physical appearance? Or is it meant in some other way? It would seem to me that the concept of no strings sex would lend itself to people who are more interested in physical attributes than personality (generally speaking, of course. I'm not stating a universal claim, obviously).
In contexts outside of swinging, I never really saw being shallow as specifically relating to appearance, though. I just saw it as anyone who lacked depth, so someone who was one-dimensional about any specific inconsequential attribute, not necessarily a physical one, I would class as shallow. But I get the impression that it's used in the swinging world only to apply to people who care about appearance. I dunno. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I never know quite what people mean when they use the term "shallow" on a swinger/sex site. I mean, does it refer to anyone who doesn't think personality completely trumps physical appearance? Or is it meant in some other way? It would seem to me that the concept of no strings sex would lend itself to people who are more interested in physical attributes than personality (generally speaking, of course. I'm not stating a universal claim, obviously).
In contexts outside of swinging, I never really saw being shallow as specifically relating to appearance, though. I just saw it as anyone who lacked depth, so someone who was one-dimensional about any specific inconsequential attribute, not necessarily a physical one, I would class as shallow. But I get the impression that it's used in the swinging world only to apply to people who care about appearance. I dunno."
Well said |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
