FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > the more we progress
the more we progress
Jump to: Newest in thread
 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.  "
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Only 2 minutes 30 till midnight
You could do with a big clock.
I could do with one....oh wait, you said clock  "
Can you please stop making this info something sexual. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *DontExistWoman
over a year ago
•+• Silicon valley. •+• |
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing."
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"Only 2 minutes 30 till midnight
You could do with a big clock.
I could do with one....oh wait, you said clock
Can you please stop making this info something sexual."
Forgot the  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either."
We are our own undoing |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *DontExistWoman
over a year ago
•+• Silicon valley. •+• |
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing "
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good?"
On paper it works. In reality greed and power take over. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *DontExistWoman
over a year ago
•+• Silicon valley. •+• |
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good?
On paper it works. In reality greed and power take over. "
everyone in the giver had to become emotionally dead to create a utopia, and they killed babies who weren't classed as good enough for society. they actually made 2 of each child and killed the least decent one. 
anyway, like you said we'll be dead so i suppose it won't matter.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good?
On paper it works. In reality greed and power take over.
everyone in the giver had to become emotionally dead to create a utopia, and they killed babies who weren't classed as good enough for society. they actually made 2 of each child and killed the least decent one.
anyway, like you said we'll be dead so i suppose it won't matter.
"
In a millennium we will be gone. Everything we have strived for will be obsolete. Why do we keep fighting. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good?
On paper it works. In reality greed and power take over.
everyone in the giver had to become emotionally dead to create a utopia, and they killed babies who weren't classed as good enough for society. they actually made 2 of each child and killed the least decent one.
anyway, like you said we'll be dead so i suppose it won't matter.
"
I think that's the only way that utopia could be created. Our emotions would need to be edited. Look at Invasion of the body snatchers as an example. Perfect world in the sense that _here would be no fighting... But losing what makes us human In order to achieve it. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good?
On paper it works. In reality greed and power take over.
everyone in the giver had to become emotionally dead to create a utopia, and they killed babies who weren't classed as good enough for society. they actually made 2 of each child and killed the least decent one.
anyway, like you said we'll be dead so i suppose it won't matter.
I think that's the only way that utopia could be created. Our emotions would need to be edited. Look at Invasion of the body snatchers as an example. Perfect world in the sense that _here would be no fighting... But losing what makes us human In order to achieve it. "
I think we should stop watching films |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good?
On paper it works. In reality greed and power take over.
everyone in the giver had to become emotionally dead to create a utopia, and they killed babies who weren't classed as good enough for society. they actually made 2 of each child and killed the least decent one.
anyway, like you said we'll be dead so i suppose it won't matter.
In a millennium we will be gone. Everything we have strived for will be obsolete. Why do we keep fighting."
Because we are alive now. In this moment. It is human nature to fight. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good?
On paper it works. In reality greed and power take over.
everyone in the giver had to become emotionally dead to create a utopia, and they killed babies who weren't classed as good enough for society. they actually made 2 of each child and killed the least decent one.
anyway, like you said we'll be dead so i suppose it won't matter.
In a millennium we will be gone. Everything we have strived for will be obsolete. Why do we keep fighting.
Because we are alive now. In this moment. It is human nature to fight. "
We are fighting to achieve our own destruction
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good?
On paper it works. In reality greed and power take over.
everyone in the giver had to become emotionally dead to create a utopia, and they killed babies who weren't classed as good enough for society. they actually made 2 of each child and killed the least decent one.
anyway, like you said we'll be dead so i suppose it won't matter.
I think that's the only way that utopia could be created. Our emotions would need to be edited. Look at Invasion of the body snatchers as an example. Perfect world in the sense that _here would be no fighting... But losing what makes us human In order to achieve it.
I think we should stop watching films "
I agree..... Plays with the mind... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Nah
We'll last another 1000 years, civilisation has been going over 5000 years.
I'll correct that....if people stop having loads of kids and their kids then having loads of kids we'll last another 1000 years.
I think it'll be overpopulation that dismantles the human race.
"The straw that broke the camels back" |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good?
On paper it works. In reality greed and power take over.
everyone in the giver had to become emotionally dead to create a utopia, and they killed babies who weren't classed as good enough for society. they actually made 2 of each child and killed the least decent one.
anyway, like you said we'll be dead so i suppose it won't matter.
In a millennium we will be gone. Everything we have strived for will be obsolete. Why do we keep fighting.
Because we are alive now. In this moment. It is human nature to fight.
We are fighting to achieve our own destruction
"
Another human trait. Arrogance and a belief that we will overcome..... Dare I add ignorance too? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *DontExistWoman
over a year ago
•+• Silicon valley. •+• |
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good?
On paper it works. In reality greed and power take over.
everyone in the giver had to become emotionally dead to create a utopia, and they killed babies who weren't classed as good enough for society. they actually made 2 of each child and killed the least decent one.
anyway, like you said we'll be dead so i suppose it won't matter.
I think that's the only way that utopia could be created. Our emotions would need to be edited. Look at Invasion of the body snatchers as an example. Perfect world in the sense that _here would be no fighting... But losing what makes us human In order to achieve it. "
could go the other way though. if you look at who's running things and how they take emotions out of the equation so they can make the 'best' decisions. and their lack of experiences of others lives takes away their empathy, not sure we could even have empathy without suffering, looking at those people makes me think that. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good?
On paper it works. In reality greed and power take over.
everyone in the giver had to become emotionally dead to create a utopia, and they killed babies who weren't classed as good enough for society. they actually made 2 of each child and killed the least decent one.
anyway, like you said we'll be dead so i suppose it won't matter.
In a millennium we will be gone. Everything we have strived for will be obsolete. Why do we keep fighting.
Because we are alive now. In this moment. It is human nature to fight.
We are fighting to achieve our own destruction
Another human trait. Arrogance and a belief that we will overcome..... Dare I add ignorance too? "
Overcome what? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good?
On paper it works. In reality greed and power take over.
everyone in the giver had to become emotionally dead to create a utopia, and they killed babies who weren't classed as good enough for society. they actually made 2 of each child and killed the least decent one.
anyway, like you said we'll be dead so i suppose it won't matter.
I think that's the only way that utopia could be created. Our emotions would need to be edited. Look at Invasion of the body snatchers as an example. Perfect world in the sense that _here would be no fighting... But losing what makes us human In order to achieve it.
could go the other way though. if you look at who's running things and how they take emotions out of the equation so they can make the 'best' decisions. and their lack of experiences of others lives takes away their empathy, not sure we could even have empathy without suffering, looking at those people makes me think that."
We need emotions to make decisions |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
We are killing mankind by over population and desecrating resources. Supposedly for the good of mankind. Not all mankind though. Once the lower echelons of mankind have been taken out of the equation (the ones who are actually keeping the country on it's toes) _here will be no upper echelons. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good?
On paper it works. In reality greed and power take over.
everyone in the giver had to become emotionally dead to create a utopia, and they killed babies who weren't classed as good enough for society. they actually made 2 of each child and killed the least decent one.
anyway, like you said we'll be dead so i suppose it won't matter.
In a millennium we will be gone. Everything we have strived for will be obsolete. Why do we keep fighting.
Because we are alive now. In this moment. It is human nature to fight.
We are fighting to achieve our own destruction
Another human trait. Arrogance and a belief that we will overcome..... Dare I add ignorance too?
Overcome what? "
Whatever obstacles are thrown at them. Things that they believe could disrupt their 'progress' They don't want to believe it will be to their destruction in the end, so they'll keep plugging. .... It's nearly 4am and I'm just chatting shit now  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *DontExistWoman
over a year ago
•+• Silicon valley. •+• |
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good?
On paper it works. In reality greed and power take over.
everyone in the giver had to become emotionally dead to create a utopia, and they killed babies who weren't classed as good enough for society. they actually made 2 of each child and killed the least decent one.
anyway, like you said we'll be dead so i suppose it won't matter.
I think that's the only way that utopia could be created. Our emotions would need to be edited. Look at Invasion of the body snatchers as an example. Perfect world in the sense that _here would be no fighting... But losing what makes us human In order to achieve it.
could go the other way though. if you look at who's running things and how they take emotions out of the equation so they can make the 'best' decisions. and their lack of experiences of others lives takes away their empathy, not sure we could even have empathy without suffering, looking at those people makes me think that.
We need emotions to make decisions "
this is where i'm in 2 minds really.
logic and rational should be the first way of making decisions. but then, as we are now with feelings like empathy and need, i think often only using logic and rational makes us heartless and decisions can seem cruel. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good?
On paper it works. In reality greed and power take over.
everyone in the giver had to become emotionally dead to create a utopia, and they killed babies who weren't classed as good enough for society. they actually made 2 of each child and killed the least decent one.
anyway, like you said we'll be dead so i suppose it won't matter.
I think that's the only way that utopia could be created. Our emotions would need to be edited. Look at Invasion of the body snatchers as an example. Perfect world in the sense that _here would be no fighting... But losing what makes us human In order to achieve it.
could go the other way though. if you look at who's running things and how they take emotions out of the equation so they can make the 'best' decisions. and their lack of experiences of others lives takes away their empathy, not sure we could even have empathy without suffering, looking at those people makes me think that.
We need emotions to make decisions
this is where i'm in 2 minds really.
logic and rational should be the first way of making decisions. but then, as we are now with feelings like empathy and need, i think often only using logic and rational makes us heartless and decisions can seem cruel."
I can't be heartless and cruel. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good?
On paper it works. In reality greed and power take over.
everyone in the giver had to become emotionally dead to create a utopia, and they killed babies who weren't classed as good enough for society. they actually made 2 of each child and killed the least decent one.
anyway, like you said we'll be dead so i suppose it won't matter.
In a millennium we will be gone. Everything we have strived for will be obsolete. Why do we keep fighting.
Because we are alive now. In this moment. It is human nature to fight.
We are fighting to achieve our own destruction
Another human trait. Arrogance and a belief that we will overcome..... Dare I add ignorance too?
Overcome what?
Whatever obstacles are thrown at them. Things that they believe could disrupt their 'progress' They don't want to believe it will be to their destruction in the end, so they'll keep plugging. .... It's nearly 4am and I'm just chatting shit now "
I'm off my head all legal shitn Paroxetine, Amytriptelene, Lorazepam, so I could have my neck MRI -I couldn't have gone in the tunnel without it. My sister came with me and we went back to hers and had JD and and vodka and . I'm slaughtered |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good?
On paper it works. In reality greed and power take over.
everyone in the giver had to become emotionally dead to create a utopia, and they killed babies who weren't classed as good enough for society. they actually made 2 of each child and killed the least decent one.
anyway, like you said we'll be dead so i suppose it won't matter.
In a millennium we will be gone. Everything we have strived for will be obsolete. Why do we keep fighting.
Because we are alive now. In this moment. It is human nature to fight.
We are fighting to achieve our own destruction
Another human trait. Arrogance and a belief that we will overcome..... Dare I add ignorance too?
Overcome what?
Whatever obstacles are thrown at them. Things that they believe could disrupt their 'progress' They don't want to believe it will be to their destruction in the end, so they'll keep plugging. .... It's nearly 4am and I'm just chatting shit now
I'm off my head all legal shitn Paroxetine, Amytriptelene, Lorazepam, so I could have my neck MRI -I couldn't have gone in the tunnel without it. My sister came with me and we went back to hers and had JD and and vodka and . I'm slaughtered "
Oh bloody hell!! Hahahaha. I bet you are feeling wonderful! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing.
exactly. i think it's maybe easier than toiling fields all day and losing crops and having famines but we have an over abundance of crap now.
and sometimes i really admire science but then i look at the social effects our progress _here has made and think science allows us choices we shouldn't be making.
sorry if that sounds religious coz i'm not advocating that either.
We are our own undoing
possibly.
i watched the film 'the giver' and although the idea of utopia was good it did make it look bad how we attained one. i think most films do that actually. like where are the films where we have a peaceful planet where everyone thrives and it's good?
On paper it works. In reality greed and power take over.
everyone in the giver had to become emotionally dead to create a utopia, and they killed babies who weren't classed as good enough for society. they actually made 2 of each child and killed the least decent one.
anyway, like you said we'll be dead so i suppose it won't matter.
In a millennium we will be gone. Everything we have strived for will be obsolete. Why do we keep fighting.
Because we are alive now. In this moment. It is human nature to fight.
We are fighting to achieve our own destruction
Another human trait. Arrogance and a belief that we will overcome..... Dare I add ignorance too?
Overcome what?
Whatever obstacles are thrown at them. Things that they believe could disrupt their 'progress' They don't want to believe it will be to their destruction in the end, so they'll keep plugging. .... It's nearly 4am and I'm just chatting shit now
I'm off my head all legal shitn Paroxetine, Amytriptelene, Lorazepam, so I could have my neck MRI -I couldn't have gone in the tunnel without it. My sister came with me and we went back to hers and had JD and and vodka and . I'm slaughtered
Oh bloody hell!! Hahahaha. I bet you are feeling wonderful! "
I can't even begin to describe how I feel if I were fucking now he would think he was in heaven lol |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"well seeing as we're all 'busy' (i'm perving billy idol from the 80s here), does anyone know how to view your youtube subscribers?"
I bet my grandson would know. I haven't a clue |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *DontExistWoman
over a year ago
•+• Silicon valley. •+• |
"nvm found it after much clicking and googling how to find it. literally as soon as i asked.
Find what?"
my subscribers. it was nowhere any of the google results said it would be.
noticed i had a load of new ones and fancied a nosey at who they were. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"nvm found it after much clicking and googling how to find it. literally as soon as i asked.
Find what?
my subscribers. it was nowhere any of the google results said it would be.
noticed i had a load of new ones and fancied a nosey at who they were."
Oh I see. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *DontExistWoman
over a year ago
•+• Silicon valley. •+• |
"nvm found it after much clicking and googling how to find it. literally as soon as i asked.
Find what?
my subscribers. it was nowhere any of the google results said it would be.
noticed i had a load of new ones and fancied a nosey at who they were.
Oh I see. "
most of them don't have profile pics anyway coz they're pervs.
right i'm off, goodnight. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By *andsonjohnMan
over a year ago
in the eye of the storm |
"good. coz the civilisations we've created up to now have been shit for many people.
I think that too. We strive to make money, for what? We're all going to die and _here will be nothing."
That's a bleak outlook op and not a view point i subscribe to in the slightest .life for me is a adventure and death is nothing but a great unknown . |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The quicker we get to the end of civilisation
"
This could well be a true statement. But the end of civilisation does not mean the end of the human spieces.
Fuzz |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Nah
We'll last another 1000 years, civilisation has been going over 5000 years.
I'll correct that....if people stop having loads of kids and their kids then having loads of kids we'll last another 1000 years.
I think it'll be overpopulation that dismantles the human race.
"The straw that broke the camels back""
This is why we're trying to progress to be able to colonize space.
Fuzz |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The quicker we get to the end of civilisation
yay bollocks.
I like bollocks. It cleanses the mind "
true but its important not to let it actually affect your judgement.
civilization gave us seed banks a relatively massive step towards perpetuity.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"The quicker we get to the end of civilisation
yay bollocks.
I like bollocks. It cleanses the mind
true but its important not to let it actually affect your judgement.
civilization gave us seed banks a relatively massive step towards perpetuity.
"
I really would love to be able to leap into the future 1000 years, to see how life and Earth is. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The quicker we get to the end of civilisation
yay bollocks.
I like bollocks. It cleanses the mind
true but its important not to let it actually affect your judgement.
civilization gave us seed banks a relatively massive step towards perpetuity.
I really would love to be able to leap into the future 1000 years, to see how life and Earth is. "
"life" is largely the same regardless of situation.
if you want to see 1000 years into the future (sans technology if course) simply go to the poorest parts of the world and see the slums then travel to say london and see the inside of high end clubs/members club restaurants etc.
except for the formalities and partentiallt the choice of narcotics not kuch else will be differnt in 1000 years just as its not that differnt from 1000 years ago now. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Maybe you're going about things in the wrong way.
Maybe monetary wealth is not what life is about. Maybe we should be doing more good than making more money.
Maybe I'm in a priveliged position but I try to do more good the older I get. I have sacrificed a lot of things to achieve this for my family and friends.
Maybe if more people in positions of power did this civilisation wouldn't be so screwed.
These are just my thoughts and could be totally wrong. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"The quicker we get to the end of civilisation
yay bollocks.
I like bollocks. It cleanses the mind
true but its important not to let it actually affect your judgement.
civilization gave us seed banks a relatively massive step towards perpetuity.
I really would love to be able to leap into the future 1000 years, to see how life and Earth is.
"life" is largely the same regardless of situation.
if you want to see 1000 years into the future (sans technology if course) simply go to the poorest parts of the world and see the slums then travel to say london and see the inside of high end clubs/members club restaurants etc.
except for the formalities and partentiallt the choice of narcotics not kuch else will be differnt in 1000 years just as its not that differnt from 1000 years ago now."
Do you think technology will keep progressing. We had nothing 1000 years ago. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The quicker we get to the end of civilisation
yay bollocks.
I like bollocks. It cleanses the mind
true but its important not to let it actually affect your judgement.
civilization gave us seed banks a relatively massive step towards perpetuity.
I really would love to be able to leap into the future 1000 years, to see how life and Earth is.
"life" is largely the same regardless of situation.
if you want to see 1000 years into the future (sans technology if course) simply go to the poorest parts of the world and see the slums then travel to say london and see the inside of high end clubs/members club restaurants etc.
except for the formalities and partentiallt the choice of narcotics not kuch else will be differnt in 1000 years just as its not that differnt from 1000 years ago now.
Do you think technology will keep progressing. We had nothing 1000 years ago. "
we had a lot 1000 years ago.
technology will keep professing but as i say it has little i fluency on day to day life, simply a change in narcotics.
vr/augmented reality likley being the future drug of choice for social situations.
but everything comes down to the same thing.
people work, people earn, people get shitfaced.
be it mead, vodka, designer drugs or technological stimulus.
personally I see things going the brave new world track but generally life itself doesnt change that kuch |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"The quicker we get to the end of civilisation
yay bollocks.
I like bollocks. It cleanses the mind
true but its important not to let it actually affect your judgement.
civilization gave us seed banks a relatively massive step towards perpetuity.
I really would love to be able to leap into the future 1000 years, to see how life and Earth is.
"life" is largely the same regardless of situation.
if you want to see 1000 years into the future (sans technology if course) simply go to the poorest parts of the world and see the slums then travel to say london and see the inside of high end clubs/members club restaurants etc.
except for the formalities and partentiallt the choice of narcotics not kuch else will be differnt in 1000 years just as its not that differnt from 1000 years ago now.
Do you think technology will keep progressing. We had nothing 1000 years ago.
we had a lot 1000 years ago.
technology will keep professing but as i say it has little i fluency on day to day life, simply a change in narcotics.
vr/augmented reality likley being the future drug of choice for social situations.
but everything comes down to the same thing.
people work, people earn, people get shitfaced.
be it mead, vodka, designer drugs or technological stimulus.
personally I see things going the brave new world track but generally life itself doesnt change that kuch"
Hardly seems worth it does it.
|
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The quicker we get to the end of civilisation
yay bollocks.
I like bollocks. It cleanses the mind
true but its important not to let it actually affect your judgement.
civilization gave us seed banks a relatively massive step towards perpetuity.
I really would love to be able to leap into the future 1000 years, to see how life and Earth is.
"life" is largely the same regardless of situation.
if you want to see 1000 years into the future (sans technology if course) simply go to the poorest parts of the world and see the slums then travel to say london and see the inside of high end clubs/members club restaurants etc.
except for the formalities and partentiallt the choice of narcotics not kuch else will be differnt in 1000 years just as its not that differnt from 1000 years ago now.
Do you think technology will keep progressing. We had nothing 1000 years ago.
we had a lot 1000 years ago.
technology will keep professing but as i say it has little i fluency on day to day life, simply a change in narcotics.
vr/augmented reality likley being the future drug of choice for social situations.
but everything comes down to the same thing.
people work, people earn, people get shitfaced.
be it mead, vodka, designer drugs or technological stimulus.
personally I see things going the brave new world track but generally life itself doesnt change that kuch
Hardly seems worth it does it.
"
kidding me?
forget life as being some achievement.
think of the goal of life is to be happy, each moment each day.
and things become simple.
the trick with this philosophy though is is not to become a heroin addict.
personally I go for borderline alcoholic |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"The quicker we get to the end of civilisation
yay bollocks.
I like bollocks. It cleanses the mind
true but its important not to let it actually affect your judgement.
civilization gave us seed banks a relatively massive step towards perpetuity.
I really would love to be able to leap into the future 1000 years, to see how life and Earth is.
"life" is largely the same regardless of situation.
if you want to see 1000 years into the future (sans technology if course) simply go to the poorest parts of the world and see the slums then travel to say london and see the inside of high end clubs/members club restaurants etc.
except for the formalities and partentiallt the choice of narcotics not kuch else will be differnt in 1000 years just as its not that differnt from 1000 years ago now.
Do you think technology will keep progressing. We had nothing 1000 years ago.
we had a lot 1000 years ago.
technology will keep professing but as i say it has little i fluency on day to day life, simply a change in narcotics.
vr/augmented reality likley being the future drug of choice for social situations.
but everything comes down to the same thing.
people work, people earn, people get shitfaced.
be it mead, vodka, designer drugs or technological stimulus.
personally I see things going the brave new world track but generally life itself doesnt change that kuch
Hardly seems worth it does it.
kidding me?
forget life as being some achievement.
think of the goal of life is to be happy, each moment each day.
and things become simple.
the trick with this philosophy though is is not to become a heroin addict.
personally I go for borderline alcoholic"
I've said for a long time I wish I could live each day a little d*unk. Alcohol makes my life so much better, but the come down doesn't. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"The quicker we get to the end of civilisation
yay bollocks.
I like bollocks. It cleanses the mind
true but its important not to let it actually affect your judgement.
civilization gave us seed banks a relatively massive step towards perpetuity.
I really would love to be able to leap into the future 1000 years, to see how life and Earth is.
"life" is largely the same regardless of situation.
if you want to see 1000 years into the future (sans technology if course) simply go to the poorest parts of the world and see the slums then travel to say london and see the inside of high end clubs/members club restaurants etc.
except for the formalities and partentiallt the choice of narcotics not kuch else will be differnt in 1000 years just as its not that differnt from 1000 years ago now.
Do you think technology will keep progressing. We had nothing 1000 years ago.
we had a lot 1000 years ago.
technology will keep professing but as i say it has little i fluency on day to day life, simply a change in narcotics.
vr/augmented reality likley being the future drug of choice for social situations.
but everything comes down to the same thing.
people work, people earn, people get shitfaced.
be it mead, vodka, designer drugs or technological stimulus.
personally I see things going the brave new world track but generally life itself doesnt change that kuch
Hardly seems worth it does it.
kidding me?
forget life as being some achievement.
think of the goal of life is to be happy, each moment each day.
and things become simple.
the trick with this philosophy though is is not to become a heroin addict.
personally I go for borderline alcoholic
I've said for a long time I wish I could live each day a little d*unk. Alcohol makes my life so much better, but the come down doesn't. "
just don't sober up :p
this is easier in a city where you don't have to drive i admit |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
I like the idea that the universe will one day disintegrate into photons, then come together to create another big bang.
We're all light.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9SfAoKxt4bw |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
