FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Tight vaginas mk2
Tight vaginas mk2
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
"Go.. " The next time I smell of raw meat I'll come see, I imagine the chances of a blowjob or seeing your Fanny will be just as slim as staying away #ISmeltPrettyRank | |||
| |||
| |||
 | |||
"Are we hashtagging now!? " i hashtag #notallmen a lot coz 1) it's an injoke with other fabbers 2) i secretly hope people find the wiki page | |||
| |||
 | |||
"#dyingonitsarse "it's #YesAllWomen in here so nobody is slagging anyone else off. kinda nice. | |||
"#dyingonitsarse
it's #YesAllWomen in here so nobody is slagging anyone else off. kinda nice."should I use my power of invisibility for good or evil?  | |||
| |||
| |||
"#dyingonitsarse
it's #YesAllWomen in here so nobody is slagging anyone else off. kinda nice.
should I use my power of invisibility for good or evil? "Oh evil and shag like the entity. | |||
"I'm still yet to receive an answer from the militant bighole brigade on why I can find plenty of small dicks on statues in Rome and Florence, but none of massive vaginal lips and long vulvas" If you google "statues with big vaginas" you'll see a picture of fireman pulling a guys head out of a huge vagina sculpture | |||
 | |||
"I'm still yet to receive an answer from the militant bighole brigade on why I can find plenty of small dicks on statues in Rome and Florence, but none of massive vaginal lips and long vulvas" I'm pretty sure there aren't any vaginas shown on statues... | |||
"#dyingonitsarse
it's #YesAllWomen in here so nobody is slagging anyone else off. kinda nice.
should I use my power of invisibility for good or evil?
Oh evil and shag like the entity.
"Meh, that sounds like a lot of effort, I was thinking more of closing people's doors or knocking glasses off the table | |||
"Are we hashtagging now!? i hashtag #notallmen a lot coz 1) it's an injoke with other fabbers 2) i secretly hope people find the wiki page" Yes! I've heard of this... | |||
"I'm still yet to receive an answer from the militant bighole brigade on why I can find plenty of small dicks on statues in Rome and Florence, but none of massive vaginal lips and long vulvas If you google "statues with big vaginas" you'll see a picture of fireman pulling a guys head out of a huge vagina sculpture" Modern Art prides it's self on being disgusting. Renaissance art was all about beauty and on sculptures of women, hid fannies entirely, suggesting that they were nice little tight ones, invisible when the woman was stood upright. | |||
"#dyingonitsarse
it's #YesAllWomen in here so nobody is slagging anyone else off. kinda nice.
should I use my power of invisibility for good or evil? "didn't see any hateful comments so just presumed. genuine apology from me. | |||
"#dyingonitsarse
it's #YesAllWomen in here so nobody is slagging anyone else off. kinda nice."until the men joined in
now we get yet another flawed perception | |||
"#dyingonitsarse
it's #YesAllWomen in here so nobody is slagging anyone else off. kinda nice.
until the men joined in
now we get yet another flawed perception"I started the original thread... I am male! | |||
| |||
"I'm still yet to receive an answer from the militant bighole brigade on why I can find plenty of small dicks on statues in Rome and Florence, but none of massive vaginal lips and long vulvas" Try again!
Third time lucky? | |||
"Is it: #NoTallMen or #NotAllMen? Those of us above a certain height need to know " | |||
"Is it: #NoTallMen or #NotAllMen? Those of us above a certain height need to know " | |||
| |||
"I'm still yet to receive an answer from the militant bighole brigade on why I can find plenty of small dicks on statues in Rome and Florence, but none of massive vaginal lips and long vulvas If you google "statues with big vaginas" you'll see a picture of fireman pulling a guys head out of a huge vagina sculpture Modern Art prides it's self on being disgusting. Renaissance art was all about beauty and on sculptures of women, hid fannies entirely, suggesting that they were nice little tight ones, invisible when the woman was stood upright." Have you moved away from shaming fat people, to now shaming those with bigger vaginas!? Get a hobby, dude. | |||
"I literally had a guy crying cos he couldn't go to town on me. Genuine white guy with 10 inch penis, tried fucking him but felt like it was stabbing my last meal. Physically had to hold the base of his dick to stop him going hammer and tongs and he started crying saying how he can never fuck properly. Felt really bad for him, all I could do was wank him into my mouth. " If I had a quid for every time that happened to me... ...id have nothing  | |||
"I literally had a guy crying cos he couldn't go to town on me. Genuine white guy with 10 inch penis, tried fucking him but felt like it was stabbing my last meal. Physically had to hold the base of his dick to stop him going hammer and tongs and he started crying saying how he can never fuck properly. Felt really bad for him, all I could do was wank him into my mouth. " This is a common problem for guys with big dicks. Some on here, I know I couldn't physically take... | |||
"I'm still yet to receive an answer from the militant bighole brigade on why I can find plenty of small dicks on statues in Rome and Florence, but none of massive vaginal lips and long vulvas If you google "statues with big vaginas" you'll see a picture of fireman pulling a guys head out of a huge vagina sculpture Modern Art prides it's self on being disgusting. Renaissance art was all about beauty and on sculptures of women, hid fannies entirely, suggesting that they were nice little tight ones, invisible when the woman was stood upright." You simply don't know much about the female genitalia do you! If the labia minora (inner lips) are not hidden within the labia majora (outer lips), this does not affect the size of vagina (tightness of the hole). | |||
"#dyingonitsarse
it's #YesAllWomen in here so nobody is slagging anyone else off. kinda nice.
until the men joined in
now we get yet another flawed perception
I started the original thread... I am male! "and someone else started this one...and she is female | |||
"#dyingonitsarse
it's #YesAllWomen in here so nobody is slagging anyone else off. kinda nice.
until the men joined in
now we get yet another flawed perception
I started the original thread... I am male!
and someone else started this one...and she is female "Did you just assume their gender  | |||
| |||
"I'm still yet to receive an answer from the militant bighole brigade on why I can find plenty of small dicks on statues in Rome and Florence, but none of massive vaginal lips and long vulvas If you google "statues with big vaginas" you'll see a picture of fireman pulling a guys head out of a huge vagina sculpture Modern Art prides it's self on being disgusting. Renaissance art was all about beauty and on sculptures of women, hid fannies entirely, suggesting that they were nice little tight ones, invisible when the woman was stood upright. You simply don't know much about the female genitalia do you! If the labia minora (inner lips) are not hidden within the labia majora (outer lips), this does not affect the size of vagina (tightness of the hole)." On the really loose one I encountered the outside one was kind of hanging out like a small dick. Whatever it's called, you know the part I mean. | |||
"so let's get down to the real shit now. none of this slagging women off coz they have choices... so why do some guys take rejection as criticism? why can't they accept they are not gonna be attractive to every single woman? why does their dick have to wanted by every single woman looking for sex, even the ones they proclaim are repulsive?" How about we have a laugh instead. It is almost the weekend | |||
"I literally had a guy crying cos he couldn't go to town on me. Genuine white guy with 10 inch penis, tried fucking him but felt like it was stabbing my last meal. Physically had to hold the base of his dick to stop him going hammer and tongs and he started crying saying how he can never fuck properly. Felt really bad for him, all I could do was wank him into my mouth. " I've had a few of them. Got so bad with just 7/8 inches I went to a doctor about it and now waiting for an mri. Big isn't better for some of us. Oh, and girthy can be uncomfortable too, plus I can't open my mouth wide enough to comfortably swallow it, or take it in my arse | |||
"#dyingonitsarse
it's #YesAllWomen in here so nobody is slagging anyone else off. kinda nice.
until the men joined in
now we get yet another flawed perception
I started the original thread... I am male!
and someone else started this one...and she is female
Did you just assume their gender "did you just respond for the fuck of it | |||
"so let's get down to the real shit now. none of this slagging women off coz they have choices... so why do some guys take rejection as criticism? why can't they accept they are not gonna be attractive to every single woman? why does their dick have to wanted by every single woman looking for sex, even the ones they proclaim are repulsive? How about we have a laugh instead. It is almost the weekend" go on then....show us your big wanger pics | |||
"#dyingonitsarse
it's #YesAllWomen in here so nobody is slagging anyone else off. kinda nice.
until the men joined in
now we get yet another flawed perception
I started the original thread... I am male!
and someone else started this one...and she is female
Did you just assume their gender
did you just respond for the fuck of it "Did you just catch on to what I'm doing | |||
"I'm still yet to receive an answer from the militant bighole brigade on why I can find plenty of small dicks on statues in Rome and Florence, but none of massive vaginal lips and long vulvas If you google "statues with big vaginas" you'll see a picture of fireman pulling a guys head out of a huge vagina sculpture Modern Art prides it's self on being disgusting. Renaissance art was all about beauty and on sculptures of women, hid fannies entirely, suggesting that they were nice little tight ones, invisible when the woman was stood upright." My inner labia isn't visible when I stand up and I'm moderately tight. Not little either; my mons pubis is plump. | |||
"so let's get down to the real shit now. none of this slagging women off coz they have choices... so why do some guys take rejection as criticism? why can't they accept they are not gonna be attractive to every single woman? why does their dick have to wanted by every single woman looking for sex, even the ones they proclaim are repulsive? How about we have a laugh instead. It is almost the weekend go on then....show us your big wanger pics "I would but stealing other pictures and passing them as my own is apparently very frowned upon | |||
"I literally had a guy crying cos he couldn't go to town on me. Genuine white guy with 10 inch penis, tried fucking him but felt like it was stabbing my last meal. Physically had to hold the base of his dick to stop him going hammer and tongs and he started crying saying how he can never fuck properly. Felt really bad for him, all I could do was wank him into my mouth. " I've had issues. Normally accidentally hitting the cervix. Had one girl quit, but I swear she had a shorter vag than normal. Anal has been a struggle too. And im not even big | |||
"#dyingonitsarse
it's #YesAllWomen in here so nobody is slagging anyone else off. kinda nice.
until the men joined in
now we get yet another flawed perception
I started the original thread... I am male!
and someone else started this one...and she is female
Did you just assume their gender
did you just respond for the fuck of it "i like the shape of this reply.  | |||
| |||
"I'm still yet to receive an answer from the militant bighole brigade on why I can find plenty of small dicks on statues in Rome and Florence, but none of massive vaginal lips and long vulvas If you google "statues with big vaginas" you'll see a picture of fireman pulling a guys head out of a huge vagina sculpture Modern Art prides it's self on being disgusting. Renaissance art was all about beauty and on sculptures of women, hid fannies entirely, suggesting that they were nice little tight ones, invisible when the woman was stood upright. You simply don't know much about the female genitalia do you! If the labia minora (inner lips) are not hidden within the labia majora (outer lips), this does not affect the size of vagina (tightness of the hole). On the really loose one I encountered the outside one was kind of hanging out like a small dick. Whatever it's called, you know the part I mean." So what? Vaginas come in all different shapes and sizes. Either embrace it or fuck men. | |||
"I'm still yet to receive an answer from the militant bighole brigade on why I can find plenty of small dicks on statues in Rome and Florence, but none of massive vaginal lips and long vulvas If you google "statues with big vaginas" you'll see a picture of fireman pulling a guys head out of a huge vagina sculpture Modern Art prides it's self on being disgusting. Renaissance art was all about beauty and on sculptures of women, hid fannies entirely, suggesting that they were nice little tight ones, invisible when the woman was stood upright. You simply don't know much about the female genitalia do you! If the labia minora (inner lips) are not hidden within the labia majora (outer lips), this does not affect the size of vagina (tightness of the hole). On the really loose one I encountered the outside one was kind of hanging out like a small dick. Whatever it's called, you know the part I mean. So what? Vaginas come in all different shapes and sizes. Either embrace it or fuck men." So why doesnt that standard apply to men? | |||
| |||
"I'm still yet to receive an answer from the militant bighole brigade on why I can find plenty of small dicks on statues in Rome and Florence, but none of massive vaginal lips and long vulvas If you google "statues with big vaginas" you'll see a picture of fireman pulling a guys head out of a huge vagina sculpture Modern Art prides it's self on being disgusting. Renaissance art was all about beauty and on sculptures of women, hid fannies entirely, suggesting that they were nice little tight ones, invisible when the woman was stood upright. You simply don't know much about the female genitalia do you! If the labia minora (inner lips) are not hidden within the labia majora (outer lips), this does not affect the size of vagina (tightness of the hole). On the really loose one I encountered the outside one was kind of hanging out like a small dick. Whatever it's called, you know the part I mean. So what? Vaginas come in all different shapes and sizes. Either embrace it or fuck men. So why doesnt that standard apply to men? " coz your dick has been fetishised. | |||
| |||
"and there you have it. get slagged off for being feminist but when you ask guys a reasonable question and call them out on their poor behaviour it isn't fun and we should change the topic. no wonder this place is a misogynists idea of paradise filled with deluded men who do not respect women. " Who slagged who off? | |||
"and there you have it. get slagged off for being feminist but when you ask guys a reasonable question and call them out on their poor behaviour it isn't fun and we should change the topic. no wonder this place is a misogynists idea of paradise filled with deluded men who do not respect women. Who slagged who off?" in the other topic. feminists were. | |||
"and there you have it. get slagged off for being feminist but when you ask guys a reasonable question and call them out on their poor behaviour it isn't fun and we should change the topic. no wonder this place is a misogynists idea of paradise filled with deluded men who do not respect women. Who slagged who off? in the other topic. feminists were." Oh, soooooo, why have you brought it up in this topic like it just happened? #ImMissingSomething | |||
| |||
| |||
"I'm still yet to receive an answer from the militant bighole brigade on why I can find plenty of small dicks on statues in Rome and Florence, but none of massive vaginal lips and long vulvas If you google "statues with big vaginas" you'll see a picture of fireman pulling a guys head out of a huge vagina sculpture Modern Art prides it's self on being disgusting. Renaissance art was all about beauty and on sculptures of women, hid fannies entirely, suggesting that they were nice little tight ones, invisible when the woman was stood upright. You simply don't know much about the female genitalia do you! If the labia minora (inner lips) are not hidden within the labia majora (outer lips), this does not affect the size of vagina (tightness of the hole). On the really loose one I encountered the outside one was kind of hanging out like a small dick. Whatever it's called, you know the part I mean. So what? Vaginas come in all different shapes and sizes. Either embrace it or fuck men. So why doesnt that standard apply to men? " We do embrace the fact that men have different size and shape dicks. I bet there are more men wanting a tight vagina than women wanting big dicks. The difference is, you can't see how tight a vagina is. | |||
"My only real love in my life so far had a pussy so tight, it was like a warm, lubricated arsehole, with a groomed little landing strip of hair above. Still think about that fanny. "do not be upset if you have a wee tiddler, use your foot i read thats what dwarfs did in snow white and the seven perverts classified 18 | |||
"and there you have it. get slagged off for being feminist but when you ask guys a reasonable question and call them out on their poor behaviour it isn't fun and we should change the topic. no wonder this place is a misogynists idea of paradise filled with deluded men who do not respect women. Who slagged who off? in the other topic. feminists were. Oh, soooooo, why have you brought it up in this topic like it just happened? #ImMissingSomething" no, you're just derailing my comments and ignoring my concerns. | |||
| |||
"Woman: "Haha! That guys dick is too small for me, he has no chance!" Man: "Her fanny is a bit of a mess" Woman: "OMG! Vaginas are all different shapes and sizes, accept it, you sexist pig!" "Do women really say that? Or are you putting words into our mouths? | |||
"The truth is, there are absolutely no standards for women any more and this has made them far less attractive than they were 50-60 years ago. You can be a fat, out of shape woman and demand a gym-fit man as your "equivalent", you can be a waitress and think that you deserve a lawyer, you can have genitalia like a burst rugby ball and demand a perfect penis. Where is the equality in any of this?" accept you hold none of the aces and accept what is offered, be grateful and make the most of it lifes a bitch then you die | |||
"I'm still yet to receive an answer from the militant bighole brigade on why I can find plenty of small dicks on statues in Rome and Florence, but none of massive vaginal lips and long vulvas If you google "statues with big vaginas" you'll see a picture of fireman pulling a guys head out of a huge vagina sculpture Modern Art prides it's self on being disgusting. Renaissance art was all about beauty and on sculptures of women, hid fannies entirely, suggesting that they were nice little tight ones, invisible when the woman was stood upright. You simply don't know much about the female genitalia do you! If the labia minora (inner lips) are not hidden within the labia majora (outer lips), this does not affect the size of vagina (tightness of the hole). On the really loose one I encountered the outside one was kind of hanging out like a small dick. Whatever it's called, you know the part I mean. So what? Vaginas come in all different shapes and sizes. Either embrace it or fuck men. So why doesnt that standard apply to men? We do embrace the fact that men have different size and shape dicks. I bet there are more men wanting a tight vagina than women wanting big dicks. The difference is, you can't see how tight a vagina is. " Very true. But the OPs original question was along the line of, why do you see more women asking for big cocks than men asking for tight vaginas? And it's true, a good portion of women are asking for BBC or BWC or cocks over a certain size. But from what I've seen its very rare for a man to be looking for a woman with a tight vagina (written in their bio) | |||
"The truth is, there are absolutely no standards for women any more and this has made them far less attractive than they were 50-60 years ago. You can be a fat, out of shape woman and demand a gym-fit man as your "equivalent", you can be a waitress and think that you deserve a lawyer, you can have genitalia like a burst rugby ball and demand a perfect penis. Where is the equality in any of this?" I'm equal to my attractive, physically fit, much younger man. Why would you think I'm not, just because I'm fatter, older and not as fit? | |||
"and there you have it. get slagged off for being feminist but when you ask guys a reasonable question and call them out on their poor behaviour it isn't fun and we should change the topic. no wonder this place is a misogynists idea of paradise filled with deluded men who do not respect women. Who slagged who off? in the other topic. feminists were. Oh, soooooo, why have you brought it up in this topic like it just happened? #ImMissingSomething no, you're just derailing my comments and ignoring my concerns." No I'm not derailing anything, I was just asking a question | |||
"Woman: "Haha! That guys dick is too small for me, he has no chance!" Man: "Her fanny is a bit of a mess" Woman: "OMG! Vaginas are all different shapes and sizes, accept it, you sexist pig!"
Do women really say that? Or are you putting words into our mouths?
"we all know what you want him to put in your mouth | |||
"I'm still yet to receive an answer from the militant bighole brigade on why I can find plenty of small dicks on statues in Rome and Florence, but none of massive vaginal lips and long vulvas If you google "statues with big vaginas" you'll see a picture of fireman pulling a guys head out of a huge vagina sculpture Modern Art prides it's self on being disgusting. Renaissance art was all about beauty and on sculptures of women, hid fannies entirely, suggesting that they were nice little tight ones, invisible when the woman was stood upright. You simply don't know much about the female genitalia do you! If the labia minora (inner lips) are not hidden within the labia majora (outer lips), this does not affect the size of vagina (tightness of the hole). On the really loose one I encountered the outside one was kind of hanging out like a small dick. Whatever it's called, you know the part I mean. So what? Vaginas come in all different shapes and sizes. Either embrace it or fuck men. So why doesnt that standard apply to men? We do embrace the fact that men have different size and shape dicks. I bet there are more men wanting a tight vagina than women wanting big dicks. The difference is, you can't see how tight a vagina is. Very true. But the OPs original question was along the line of, why do you see more women asking for big cocks than men asking for tight vaginas? And it's true, a good portion of women are asking for BBC or BWC or cocks over a certain size. But from what I've seen its very rare for a man to be looking for a woman with a tight vagina (written in their bio)" Is that not down to the balance of men and women in the site though? Men know they can't get away with that on here if they want to meet. | |||
"The truth is, there are absolutely no standards for women any more and this has made them far less attractive than they were 50-60 years ago. You can be a fat, out of shape woman and demand a gym-fit man as your "equivalent", you can be a waitress and think that you deserve a lawyer, you can have genitalia like a burst rugby ball and demand a perfect penis. Where is the equality in any of this?" what equality can you apply to people wanting sex? there is literally no discrimination law that would cover this in a country that allows autonomy and personal choice of what you do with your own body. you can say it's double standards or whatever, it's not sexist exactly (i will explain) but you can also blame patriarchy too. literally every single thing about a female or that she can do has been fetishised and only your dick has, and gym fit men it seems. so there you go.you can be a fat woman coz fat women have been fetishised, you can be a waitress and someone will think your uniform looks hot, you can have a fanny that is massive and gaping is a fetish too. men used to get away with being fat, balding, ugly, lecherous to teen woman when they were old and gross (look up peter stringfellow), and you know what that was acceptable. well now your patriarchy has fetishised women on such a mass scale we are attractive to just about anyone and any type of men. it's not a good thing. it's reduced us to sexual objects and not people. which is why you feel comfortable enough to also slag us off coz we are not people are we? i've always had a thick skin, i can observe and judge humans really well so developed one. | |||
"I'm still yet to receive an answer from the militant bighole brigade on why I can find plenty of small dicks on statues in Rome and Florence, but none of massive vaginal lips and long vulvas If you google "statues with big vaginas" you'll see a picture of fireman pulling a guys head out of a huge vagina sculpture Modern Art prides it's self on being disgusting. Renaissance art was all about beauty and on sculptures of women, hid fannies entirely, suggesting that they were nice little tight ones, invisible when the woman was stood upright. You simply don't know much about the female genitalia do you! If the labia minora (inner lips) are not hidden within the labia majora (outer lips), this does not affect the size of vagina (tightness of the hole). On the really loose one I encountered the outside one was kind of hanging out like a small dick. Whatever it's called, you know the part I mean. So what? Vaginas come in all different shapes and sizes. Either embrace it or fuck men. So why doesnt that standard apply to men? We do embrace the fact that men have different size and shape dicks. I bet there are more men wanting a tight vagina than women wanting big dicks. The difference is, you can't see how tight a vagina is. Very true. But the OPs original question was along the line of, why do you see more women asking for big cocks than men asking for tight vaginas? And it's true, a good portion of women are asking for BBC or BWC or cocks over a certain size. But from what I've seen its very rare for a man to be looking for a woman with a tight vagina (written in their bio)" Absolutely true and sometimes I wonder why. Experience has proved it surely matters on how connected you are with a person. No, I'm not white knighting (ladying??) all the guys without huge bits but if you just seek those with bigger ones, you could be missing out on better fun with someone you're more compatible with. Just my opinion and as ive always said, each to their own | |||
"The truth is, there are absolutely no standards for women any more and this has made them far less attractive than they were 50-60 years ago. You can be a fat, out of shape woman and demand a gym-fit man as your "equivalent", you can be a waitress and think that you deserve a lawyer, you can have genitalia like a burst rugby ball and demand a perfect penis. Where is the equality in any of this?" Because in life a woman can go and get what she wants, she doesn't have to settle for whoever will take her
Same as you can avoid all "burst rugby ball" vaginas and look for the tight ones you desire.
That doesn't give you the right to slag off people who you are not interested in | |||
| |||
"I'm still yet to receive an answer from the militant bighole brigade on why I can find plenty of small dicks on statues in Rome and Florence, but none of massive vaginal lips and long vulvas If you google "statues with big vaginas" you'll see a picture of fireman pulling a guys head out of a huge vagina sculpture Modern Art prides it's self on being disgusting. Renaissance art was all about beauty and on sculptures of women, hid fannies entirely, suggesting that they were nice little tight ones, invisible when the woman was stood upright. You simply don't know much about the female genitalia do you! If the labia minora (inner lips) are not hidden within the labia majora (outer lips), this does not affect the size of vagina (tightness of the hole). On the really loose one I encountered the outside one was kind of hanging out like a small dick. Whatever it's called, you know the part I mean. So what? Vaginas come in all different shapes and sizes. Either embrace it or fuck men. So why doesnt that standard apply to men? We do embrace the fact that men have different size and shape dicks. I bet there are more men wanting a tight vagina than women wanting big dicks. The difference is, you can't see how tight a vagina is. Very true. But the OPs original question was along the line of, why do you see more women asking for big cocks than men asking for tight vaginas? And it's true, a good portion of women are asking for BBC or BWC or cocks over a certain size. But from what I've seen its very rare for a man to be looking for a woman with a tight vagina (written in their bio)" A vagina stretches to accommodate a penis. How do we know if we will feel tight for someone's cock? If all men had "Looking for a tight vagina" we wouldn't know if that's us or not. I might feel tight for some men and not for others. What happens is, men fuck not knowing what they are getting and publicly slag off the ones they found loose, or like a punched lasagne. | |||
"I literally had a guy crying cos he couldn't go to town on me. Genuine white guy with 10 inch penis, tried fucking him but felt like it was stabbing my last meal. Physically had to hold the base of his dick to stop him going hammer and tongs and he started crying saying how he can never fuck properly. Felt really bad for him, all I could do was wank him into my mouth. " 10inch is rather rare. Add to this huge girth and the guy may only ever have to shag cows. | |||
"The truth is, there are absolutely no standards for women any more and this has made them far less attractive than they were 50-60 years ago. You can be a fat, out of shape woman and demand a gym-fit man as your "equivalent", you can be a waitress and think that you deserve a lawyer, you can have genitalia like a burst rugby ball and demand a perfect penis. Where is the equality in any of this? Because in life a woman can go and get what she wants, she doesn't have to settle for whoever will take her
Same as you can avoid all "burst rugby ball" vaginas and look for the tight ones you desire.
That doesn't give you the right to slag off people who you are not interested in "I dont necessarily agree with this. I'm sure there's lots of guys out there refusing to go with just anyone. Most men have standards too and preferences. I'd hate for someone just to be with me as he'll settle for whatever he can get. Maybe that's why I'm careful with who I'll meet. I don't have a perfect body but it's not bad after having children. I'd expect someone to like me for who I am, not my body shape. No one is 100% perfect and if I have a belly, I'm sure other people have bits they're not happy with either. Some of us like the actual person and not just the physical stereotype of what someone would class as what was 'physically attractive' 50-60 years ago. Not having a go. Just some of us do have standards and expect others to as well. | |||
"The truth is, there are absolutely no standards for women any more and this has made them far less attractive than they were 50-60 years ago. You can be a fat, out of shape woman and demand a gym-fit man as your "equivalent", you can be a waitress and think that you deserve a lawyer, you can have genitalia like a burst rugby ball and demand a perfect penis. Where is the equality in any of this? Because in life a woman can go and get what she wants, she doesn't have to settle for whoever will take her
Same as you can avoid all "burst rugby ball" vaginas and look for the tight ones you desire.
That doesn't give you the right to slag off people who you are not interested in
I dont necessarily agree with this. I'm sure there's lots of guys out there refusing to go with just anyone.
Most men have standards too and preferences.
I'd hate for someone just to be with me as he'll settle for whatever he can get.
Maybe that's why I'm careful with who I'll meet.
I don't have a perfect body but it's not bad after having children.
I'd expect someone to like me for who I am, not my body shape.
No one is 100% perfect and if I have a belly, I'm sure other people have bits they're not happy with either.
Some of us like the actual person and not just the physical stereotype of what someone would class as what was 'physically attractive' 50-60 years ago.
Not having a go.
Just some of us do have standards and expect others to as well. "quite a high number not all from guys and couples ask to meet me when i know they cannot get a putting blunt a pussy female to meet there and then so i tend to pass these by andd this is a daily occurance only from single guy and couple profiles and quite a few as well | |||
" literally every single thing about a female or that she can do has been fetishised and only your dick has, and gym fit men it seems. so there you go.you can be a fat woman coz fat women have been fetishised, you can be a waitress and someone will think your uniform looks hot, you can have a fanny that is massive and gaping is a fetish too. men used to get away with being fat, balding, ugly, lecherous to teen woman when they were old and gross (look up peter stringfellow), and you know what that was acceptable. well now your patriarchy has fetishised women on such a mass scale we are attractive to just about anyone and any type of men. it's not a good thing. it's reduced us to sexual objects and not people. which is why you feel comfortable enough to also slag us off coz we are not people are we? i've always had a thick skin, i can observe and judge humans really well so developed one." I don't actually disagree with what you say here, but as a militant feminist, you are having your cake and eating it. It is your team that demands obese women are seen as beautiful, that everybody is "equal" etc, it certainly wasn't the patriarchy that fetishised BBW, etc, but feminists, angry that it was always slim conventionally attractive women on bilboards. Like I say, under the "patriarchy" women that are now considered attractive to some, due to them being fetishised were completely ignored/ridiculed during the years when the patriarchy existed, it was YOU guys that started demanding that we all pretend beauty standards don't exist and now you have your wish, as as you say, you are all considered attractive by someone and can claim men that are actually your superiors as your equals. Basically, I agree with whay you've said but disagree with who you think caused it. | |||
| |||
"The truth is, there are absolutely no standards for women any more and this has made them far less attractive than they were 50-60 years ago. You can be a fat, out of shape woman and demand a gym-fit man as your "equivalent", you can be a waitress and think that you deserve a lawyer, you can have genitalia like a burst rugby ball and demand a perfect penis. Where is the equality in any of this? Because in life a woman can go and get what she wants, she doesn't have to settle for whoever will take her
Same as you can avoid all "burst rugby ball" vaginas and look for the tight ones you desire.
That doesn't give you the right to slag off people who you are not interested in
I dont necessarily agree with this. I'm sure there's lots of guys out there refusing to go with just anyone.
Most men have standards too and preferences.
I'd hate for someone just to be with me as he'll settle for whatever he can get.
Maybe that's why I'm careful with who I'll meet.
I don't have a perfect body but it's not bad after having children.
I'd expect someone to like me for who I am, not my body shape.
No one is 100% perfect and if I have a belly, I'm sure other people have bits they're not happy with either.
Some of us like the actual person and not just the physical stereotype of what someone would class as what was 'physically attractive' 50-60 years ago.
Not having a go.
Just some of us do have standards and expect others to as well. "That's what I was trying to get at
I wouldn't just go with anyone for a lay. I'm quite picky and need a connection before anything would happen.
It's why I dont meet women from here....men on the other hand means I get to be the one picking and choosing from incoming messages  | |||
"The truth is, there are absolutely no standards for women any more and this has made them far less attractive than they were 50-60 years ago. You can be a fat, out of shape woman and demand a gym-fit man as your "equivalent", you can be a waitress and think that you deserve a lawyer, you can have genitalia like a burst rugby ball and demand a perfect penis. Where is the equality in any of this? what equality can you apply to people wanting sex? there is literally no discrimination law that would cover this in a country that allows autonomy and personal choice of what you do with your own body. you can say it's double standards or whatever, it's not sexist exactly (i will explain) but you can also blame patriarchy too. literally every single thing about a female or that she can do has been fetishised and only your dick has, and gym fit men it seems. so there you go.you can be a fat woman coz fat women have been fetishised, you can be a waitress and someone will think your uniform looks hot, you can have a fanny that is massive and gaping is a fetish too. men used to get away with being fat, balding, ugly, lecherous to teen woman when they were old and gross (look up peter stringfellow), and you know what that was acceptable. well now your patriarchy has fetishised women on such a mass scale we are attractive to just about anyone and any type of men. it's not a good thing. it's reduced us to sexual objects and not people. which is why you feel comfortable enough to also slag us off coz we are not people are we? i've always had a thick skin, i can observe and judge humans really well so developed one." It's not only about women. Life in general has become very selfish. People are after their own interests. Whether it's a man or a woman, everyone is objectified. | |||
"The truth is, there are absolutely no standards for women any more and this has made them far less attractive than they were 50-60 years ago. You can be a fat, out of shape woman and demand a gym-fit man as your "equivalent", you can be a waitress and think that you deserve a lawyer, you can have genitalia like a burst rugby ball and demand a perfect penis. Where is the equality in any of this? Because in life a woman can go and get what she wants, she doesn't have to settle for whoever will take her
Same as you can avoid all "burst rugby ball" vaginas and look for the tight ones you desire.
That doesn't give you the right to slag off people who you are not interested in
I dont necessarily agree with this. I'm sure there's lots of guys out there refusing to go with just anyone.
Most men have standards too and preferences.
I'd hate for someone just to be with me as he'll settle for whatever he can get.
Maybe that's why I'm careful with who I'll meet.
I don't have a perfect body but it's not bad after having children.
I'd expect someone to like me for who I am, not my body shape.
No one is 100% perfect and if I have a belly, I'm sure other people have bits they're not happy with either.
Some of us like the actual person and not just the physical stereotype of what someone would class as what was 'physically attractive' 50-60 years ago.
Not having a go.
Just some of us do have standards and expect others to as well.
That's what I was trying to get at
I wouldn't just go with anyone for a lay. I'm quite picky and need a connection before anything would happen.
It's why I dont meet women from here....men on the other hand means I get to be the one picking and choosing from incoming messages "Which is exactly what us fat, ugly women do  | |||
"The truth is, there are absolutely no standards for women any more and this has made them far less attractive than they were 50-60 years ago. You can be a fat, out of shape woman and demand a gym-fit man as your "equivalent", you can be a waitress and think that you deserve a lawyer, you can have genitalia like a burst rugby ball and demand a perfect penis. Where is the equality in any of this? Because in life a woman can go and get what she wants, she doesn't have to settle for whoever will take her
Same as you can avoid all "burst rugby ball" vaginas and look for the tight ones you desire.
That doesn't give you the right to slag off people who you are not interested in
I dont necessarily agree with this. I'm sure there's lots of guys out there refusing to go with just anyone.
Most men have standards too and preferences.
I'd hate for someone just to be with me as he'll settle for whatever he can get.
Maybe that's why I'm careful with who I'll meet.
I don't have a perfect body but it's not bad after having children.
I'd expect someone to like me for who I am, not my body shape.
No one is 100% perfect and if I have a belly, I'm sure other people have bits they're not happy with either.
Some of us like the actual person and not just the physical stereotype of what someone would class as what was 'physically attractive' 50-60 years ago.
Not having a go.
Just some of us do have standards and expect others to as well.
That's what I was trying to get at
I wouldn't just go with anyone for a lay. I'm quite picky and need a connection before anything would happen.
It's why I dont meet women from here....men on the other hand means I get to be the one picking and choosing from incoming messages
Which is exactly what us fat, ugly women do "you missed out cake FFS | |||
" Which is exactly what us fat, ugly women do "Not all of us | |||
"Not having a go. Just some of us do have standards and expect others to as well. That's what I was trying to get at
I wouldn't just go with anyone for a lay. I'm quite picky and need a connection before anything would happen.
It's why I dont meet women from here....men on the other hand means I get to be the one picking and choosing from incoming messages
Which is exactly what us fat, ugly women do "Oh shhh you, you're neither
It is sad looking at the awful incoming messages. Some are really pathetic | |||
"I'm just glad some of us aren't superficial. Big, small, fat, slim, black, white, hairy, smooth.... At the end of the day if I like you and you make me laugh and smile, I honestly couldn't give a hoot if you have a big nob or not. Or a tight foof. "This is a nice way of looking at it. Some things I have said may make me come across as superficial, but actually I'm just addressing the shocking double standards that women benefit from. I say 'benefit', but actually it's a hindrance, as there's nothing to strive for... Why work out when fat is beautiful? Why study when you can meet a doctor at the restaurant you wait tables in? Why grooom yourself to look nice when that's a sign of patriarchy oppression? All of this hurts women, none of it helps them. | |||
" Which is exactly what us fat, ugly women do
Not all of us "You don't pick and choose from messages? Do you pick and choose who you want to message instead? Or just use clubs? | |||
"I'm just glad some of us aren't superficial. Big, small, fat, slim, black, white, hairy, smooth.... At the end of the day if I like you and you make me laugh and smile, I honestly couldn't give a hoot if you have a big nob or not. Or a tight foof.
This is a nice way of looking at it. Some things I have said may make me come across as superficial, but actually I'm just addressing the shocking double standards that women benefit from. I say 'benefit', but actually it's a hindrance, as there's nothing to strive for... Why work out when fat is beautiful? Why study when you can meet a doctor at the restaurant you wait tables in? Why grooom yourself to look nice when that's a sign of patriarchy oppression?
All of this hurts women, none of it helps them.
"Oh don't believe for one minute I look at myself and think I'm beautiful. Just ask my other half. And if I get hit on by buff guys asking to meet me then, unfortunately they will never get any response. I'm not that silly to think they'd actually really fancy me when they wouldn't even give me a second glance in the street. Therefore I'm highly unlikely to feel flattered in any way. | |||
" Which is exactly what us fat, ugly women do
Not all of us
You don't pick and choose from messages? Do you pick and choose who you want to message instead? Or just use clubs?"I try and look at what they post, see how they come across. I don't just pick any guys at all. Maybe I'm in the minority. | |||
"I'm just glad some of us aren't superficial. Big, small, fat, slim, black, white, hairy, smooth.... At the end of the day if I like you and you make me laugh and smile, I honestly couldn't give a hoot if you have a big nob or not. Or a tight foof.
This is a nice way of looking at it. Some things I have said may make me come across as superficial, but actually I'm just addressing the shocking double standards that women benefit from. I say 'benefit', but actually it's a hindrance, as there's nothing to strive for... Why work out when fat is beautiful? Why study when you can meet a doctor at the restaurant you wait tables in? Why grooom yourself to look nice when that's a sign of patriarchy oppression?
All of this hurts women, none of it helps them.
"It's not hurting me. I have met 3 doctors over the years, and I've never waited on tables. I'm equal to them in other ways than qualificatio level. | |||
" Which is exactly what us fat, ugly women do
Not all of us
You don't pick and choose from messages? Do you pick and choose who you want to message instead? Or just use clubs?
I try and look at what they post, see how they come across. I don't just pick any guys at all.
Maybe I'm in the minority. "You're still choosing who to meet. | |||
" literally every single thing about a female or that she can do has been fetishised and only your dick has, and gym fit men it seems. so there you go. you can be a fat woman coz fat women have been fetishised, you can be a waitress and someone will think your uniform looks hot, you can have a fanny that is massive and gaping is a fetish too. men used to get away with being fat, balding, ugly, lecherous to teen woman when they were old and gross (look up peter stringfellow), and you know what that was acceptable. well now your patriarchy has fetishised women on such a mass scale we are attractive to just about anyone and any type of men. it's not a good thing. it's reduced us to sexual objects and not people. which is why you feel comfortable enough to also slag us off coz we are not people are we? i've always had a thick skin, i can observe and judge humans really well so developed one. I don't actually disagree with what you say here, but as a militant feminist, you are having your cake and eating it. It is your team that demands obese women are seen as beautiful, that everybody is "equal" etc, it certainly wasn't the patriarchy that fetishised BBW, etc, but feminists, angry that it was always slim conventionally attractive women on bilboards. Like I say, under the "patriarchy" women that are now considered attractive to some, due to them being fetishised were completely ignored/ridiculed during the years when the patriarchy existed, it was YOU guys that started demanding that we all pretend beauty standards don't exist and now you have your wish, as as you say, you are all considered attractive by someone and can claim men that are actually your superiors as your equals. Basically, I agree with whay you've said but disagree with who you think caused it." you need to brush up on feminism. being seen as beautiful is not the BBW community demanding to be seen as attractive to everyone, it's demanding to not be seen as unattractive -and there is a difference between the two. they are not demanding anything other than the right to be physically who they are and without criticism because it is their body and nobody can lay claim to their body or their mind, so they are demanding to be left alone to live their lives without being called ugly. and why wouldn't they? and that is the difference in the other topic. nobody said a guys dick was shit for being small*, even if they had a preference for bigger dicks, yet men who took offence at women who wanted bigger dicks (and therefore felt rejected by these women) were criticised for having big fannnies, ugly fannies, punched fannies (which btw as a feminist i do take offence at violence being used within a term for something considered ugly that a woman owns). the patriarchy always objectifies women. it turns them into slaves, it turns them into things to be owned, it turns them into prizes for 'studs', it turns us into anything that makes us not people in our own right with our own feelings, wants, and desires. and it makes it acceptable for us to be slagged off for what we are or want to be. and in doing so it turns you into objects too. it forces you to become competitive so you can claim your prizes that you 'deserve' for being male. honestly, most of life is bullshit, and once you mature you realise everything being promoted to you is bullshit. all these stupid pressures and ideals being shoved at you, preying on your insecurities, and if you fall for them then you're gonna have a bad time. your not gonna enjoy life, you're not gonna go for what you really want from life, you're gonna find going for others goals hard. coz they're their goals and not yours. you go for the nice fannies, they are around, there's no need to slag off the other fannies though.same for the big women, let the men who like them enjoy them and go for what you want without criticising anyone else for living their dream. | |||
"I'm just glad some of us aren't superficial. Big, small, fat, slim, black, white, hairy, smooth.... At the end of the day if I like you and you make me laugh and smile, I honestly couldn't give a hoot if you have a big nob or not. Or a tight foof.
This is a nice way of looking at it. Some things I have said may make me come across as superficial, but actually I'm just addressing the shocking double standards that women benefit from. I say 'benefit', but actually it's a hindrance, as there's nothing to strive for... Why work out when fat is beautiful? Why study when you can meet a doctor at the restaurant you wait tables in? Why grooom yourself to look nice when that's a sign of patriarchy oppression?
All of this hurts women, none of it helps them.
It's not hurting me. I have met 3 doctors over the years, and I've never waited on tables. I'm equal to them in other ways than qualificatio level. "Which ways are those? | |||
" literally every single thing about a female or that she can do has been fetishised and only your dick has, and gym fit men it seems. so there you go.you can be a fat woman coz fat women have been fetishised, you can be a waitress and someone will think your uniform looks hot, you can have a fanny that is massive and gaping is a fetish too. men used to get away with being fat, balding, ugly, lecherous to teen woman when they were old and gross (look up peter stringfellow), and you know what that was acceptable. well now your patriarchy has fetishised women on such a mass scale we are attractive to just about anyone and any type of men. it's not a good thing. it's reduced us to sexual objects and not people. which is why you feel comfortable enough to also slag us off coz we are not people are we? i've always had a thick skin, i can observe and judge humans really well so developed one. I don't actually disagree with what you say here, but as a militant feminist, you are having your cake and eating it. It is your team that demands obese women are seen as beautiful, that everybody is "equal" etc, it certainly wasn't the patriarchy that fetishised BBW, etc, but feminists, angry that it was always slim conventionally attractive women on bilboards. Like I say, under the "patriarchy" women that are now considered attractive to some, due to them being fetishised were completely ignored/ridiculed during the years when the patriarchy existed, it was YOU guys that started demanding that we all pretend beauty standards don't exist and now you have your wish, as as you say, you are all considered attractive by someone and can claim men that are actually your superiors as your equals. Basically, I agree with whay you've said but disagree with who you think caused it." I agree with the last comment. As usual however, no one is to blame. It's the system. As long as you follow the official procedures, you won't be blamed at work, etc. Even when people die en mass around you. But breach the policy to accommodate an unusual situation and you'll be out in no time. Here, Political Correctness is to blame. Not individuals or groups. People are afraid to say anything lest they offend someone. Of course, we all know who brought this Polit correctness in this subject - The Feminist. Not that I blame them, it's just a fact. However, I still keep to my honest views and relate them without a fear of rebuke - being slim athletic is so much better than overweight. A family is between a man and a woman. There are only 2 genders and anything in between or requiring transition is an anomaly. Be it biological or psychological. ....You get the picture... | |||
" Which is exactly what us fat, ugly women do
Not all of us
You don't pick and choose from messages? Do you pick and choose who you want to message instead? Or just use clubs?
I try and look at what they post, see how they come across. I don't just pick any guys at all.
Maybe I'm in the minority.
You're still choosing who to meet. "But that was my point. Minus the superficial bit. I dont care what your nob looks like and wasn't that the point of the post? Tightness and then a comparison about women picking guys based on size? | |||
" literally every single thing about a female or that she can do has been fetishised and only your dick has, and gym fit men it seems. so there you go. you can be a fat woman coz fat women have been fetishised, you can be a waitress and someone will think your uniform looks hot, you can have a fanny that is massive and gaping is a fetish too. men used to get away with being fat, balding, ugly, lecherous to teen woman when they were old and gross (look up peter stringfellow), and you know what that was acceptable. well now your patriarchy has fetishised women on such a mass scale we are attractive to just about anyone and any type of men. it's not a good thing. it's reduced us to sexual objects and not people. which is why you feel comfortable enough to also slag us off coz we are not people are we? i've always had a thick skin, i can observe and judge humans really well so developed one. I don't actually disagree with what you say here, but as a militant feminist, you are having your cake and eating it. It is your team that demands obese women are seen as beautiful, that everybody is "equal" etc, it certainly wasn't the patriarchy that fetishised BBW, etc, but feminists, angry that it was always slim conventionally attractive women on bilboards. Like I say, under the "patriarchy" women that are now considered attractive to some, due to them being fetishised were completely ignored/ridiculed during the years when the patriarchy existed, it was YOU guys that started demanding that we all pretend beauty standards don't exist and now you have your wish, as as you say, you are all considered attractive by someone and can claim men that are actually your superiors as your equals. Basically, I agree with whay you've said but disagree with who you think caused it. you need to brush up on feminism. being seen as beautiful is not the BBW community demanding to be seen as attractive to everyone, it's demanding to not be seen as unattractive -and there is a difference between the two. they are not demanding anything other than the right to be physically who they are and without criticism because it is their body and nobody can lay claim to their body or their mind, so they are demanding to be left alone to live their lives without being called ugly. and why wouldn't they? and that is the difference in the other topic. nobody said a guys dick was shit for being small*, even if they had a preference for bigger dicks, yet men who took offence at women who wanted bigger dicks (and therefore felt rejected by these women) were criticised for having big fannnies, ugly fannies, punched fannies (which btw as a feminist i do take offence at violence being used within a term for something considered ugly that a woman owns). the patriarchy always objectifies women. it turns them into slaves, it turns them into things to be owned, it turns them into prizes for 'studs', it turns us into anything that makes us not people in our own right with our own feelings, wants, and desires. and it makes it acceptable for us to be slagged off for what we are or want to be. and in doing so it turns you into objects too. it forces you to become competitive so you can claim your prizes that you 'deserve' for being male. honestly, most of life is bullshit, and once you mature you realise everything being promoted to you is bullshit. all these stupid pressures and ideals being shoved at you, preying on your insecurities, and if you fall for them then you're gonna have a bad time. your not gonna enjoy life, you're not gonna go for what you really want from life, you're gonna find going for others goals hard. coz they're their goals and not yours. you go for the nice fannies, they are around, there's no need to slag off the other fannies though.same for the big women, let the men who like them enjoy them and go for what you want without criticising anyone else for living their dream." Well yeah, again, I don't really disagree. I think you emphasize the pressures on women whilst downplaying those on man, but that's natural, I suppose, as you are a woman. Women are forced to be hyper sexualized and men are forced to be salary slaves and rampant consumers to get said women, we're all being fucked. | |||
" literally every single thing about a female or that she can do has been fetishised and only your dick has, and gym fit men it seems. so there you go. you can be a fat woman coz fat women have been fetishised, you can be a waitress and someone will think your uniform looks hot, you can have a fanny that is massive and gaping is a fetish too. men used to get away with being fat, balding, ugly, lecherous to teen woman when they were old and gross (look up peter stringfellow), and you know what that was acceptable. well now your patriarchy has fetishised women on such a mass scale we are attractive to just about anyone and any type of men. it's not a good thing. it's reduced us to sexual objects and not people. which is why you feel comfortable enough to also slag us off coz we are not people are we? i've always had a thick skin, i can observe and judge humans really well so developed one. I don't actually disagree with what you say here, but as a militant feminist, you are having your cake and eating it. It is your team that demands obese women are seen as beautiful, that everybody is "equal" etc, it certainly wasn't the patriarchy that fetishised BBW, etc, but feminists, angry that it was always slim conventionally attractive women on bilboards. Like I say, under the "patriarchy" women that are now considered attractive to some, due to them being fetishised were completely ignored/ridiculed during the years when the patriarchy existed, it was YOU guys that started demanding that we all pretend beauty standards don't exist and now you have your wish, as as you say, you are all considered attractive by someone and can claim men that are actually your superiors as your equals. Basically, I agree with whay you've said but disagree with who you think caused it. you need to brush up on feminism. being seen as beautiful is not the BBW community demanding to be seen as attractive to everyone, it's demanding to not be seen as unattractive -and there is a difference between the two. they are not demanding anything other than the right to be physically who they are and without criticism because it is their body and nobody can lay claim to their body or their mind, so they are demanding to be left alone to live their lives without being called ugly. and why wouldn't they? and that is the difference in the other topic. nobody said a guys dick was shit for being small*, even if they had a preference for bigger dicks, yet men who took offence at women who wanted bigger dicks (and therefore felt rejected by these women) were criticised for having big fannnies, ugly fannies, punched fannies (which btw as a feminist i do take offence at violence being used within a term for something considered ugly that a woman owns). the patriarchy always objectifies women. it turns them into slaves, it turns them into things to be owned, it turns them into prizes for 'studs', it turns us into anything that makes us not people in our own right with our own feelings, wants, and desires. and it makes it acceptable for us to be slagged off for what we are or want to be. and in doing so it turns you into objects too. it forces you to become competitive so you can claim your prizes that you 'deserve' for being male. honestly, most of life is bullshit, and once you mature you realise everything being promoted to you is bullshit. all these stupid pressures and ideals being shoved at you, preying on your insecurities, and if you fall for them then you're gonna have a bad time. your not gonna enjoy life, you're not gonna go for what you really want from life, you're gonna find going for others goals hard. coz they're their goals and not yours. you go for the nice fannies, they are around, there's no need to slag off the other fannies though.same for the big women, let the men who like them enjoy them and go for what you want without criticising anyone else for living their dream." A bit bitter... Why, there's no need. Life is what you make out of it. You don't have to listen to what someone elSe tells you what you have to like or dislike and choose to do. | |||
"I'm just glad some of us aren't superficial. Big, small, fat, slim, black, white, hairy, smooth.... At the end of the day if I like you and you make me laugh and smile, I honestly couldn't give a hoot if you have a big nob or not. Or a tight foof.
This is a nice way of looking at it. Some things I have said may make me come across as superficial, but actually I'm just addressing the shocking double standards that women benefit from. I say 'benefit', but actually it's a hindrance, as there's nothing to strive for... Why work out when fat is beautiful? Why study when you can meet a doctor at the restaurant you wait tables in? Why grooom yourself to look nice when that's a sign of patriarchy oppression?
All of this hurts women, none of it helps them.
It's not hurting me. I have met 3 doctors over the years, and I've never waited on tables. I'm equal to them in other ways than qualificatio level.
Which ways are those?"Sexual appetite (which was the whole point in meeting them and very important), ego, charisma, humour. Those kinds of values that don't involve education, how much they earned, or anything physical. We had interesting, amusing conversation and no one was feeling above anyone else, or below. I've found the least judgemental people to be those I feel are most intelligent. People who don't have a chip on their shoulders about something. They don't see old and fat, they see someone they like spending time with. | |||
| |||
" Here, Political Correctness is to blame. Not individuals or groups. People are afraid to say anything lest they offend someone. Of course, we all know who brought this Polit correctness in this subject - The Feminist. Not that I blame them, it's just a fact. However, I still keep to my honest views and relate them without a fear of rebuke - being slim athletic is so much better than overweight. A family is between a man and a woman. There are only 2 genders and anything in between or requiring transition is an anomaly. Be it biological or psychological. ....You get the picture... " Agreed, the system is hostile to us all and it's creating pockets of extreme politics. Marxists, Feminists, Nationalists and Neo-Nazis, whilst all polar opposites, all share in common the fact that they know something is inherently wrong, it's just none of them know what the reasons are or how to change it (though they think they do) - the truth is, none of us know. | |||
| |||
" Which ways are those? Sexual appetite (which was the whole point in meeting them and very important), ego, charisma, humour. Those kinds of values that don't involve education, how much they earned, or anything physical. We had interesting, amusing conversation and no one was feeling above anyone else, or below. I've found the least judgemental people to be those I feel are most intelligent. People who don't have a chip on their shoulders about something. They don't see old and fat, they see someone they like spending time with. " Chill out, I thought it was obviously that I was joking. | |||
" Which ways are those? Sexual appetite (which was the whole point in meeting them and very important), ego, charisma, humour. Those kinds of values that don't involve education, how much they earned, or anything physical. We had interesting, amusing conversation and no one was feeling above anyone else, or below. I've found the least judgemental people to be those I feel are most intelligent. People who don't have a chip on their shoulders about something. They don't see old and fat, they see someone they like spending time with. Chill out, I thought it was obviously that I was joking." I'm chill (took my medication), you should have used your smileys | |||
"should we have that here" Men parading around with feathers? I think it's a great idea
Although I'll still only like the ones who make me smile  | |||
" literally every single thing about a female or that she can do has been fetishised and only your dick has, and gym fit men it seems. so there you go.you can be a fat woman coz fat women have been fetishised, you can be a waitress and someone will think your uniform looks hot, you can have a fanny that is massive and gaping is a fetish too. men used to get away with being fat, balding, ugly, lecherous to teen woman when they were old and gross (look up peter stringfellow), and you know what that was acceptable. well now your patriarchy has fetishised women on such a mass scale we are attractive to just about anyone and any type of men. it's not a good thing. it's reduced us to sexual objects and not people. which is why you feel comfortable enough to also slag us off coz we are not people are we? i've always had a thick skin, i can observe and judge humans really well so developed one. I don't actually disagree with what you say here, but as a militant feminist, you are having your cake and eating it. It is your team that demands obese women are seen as beautiful, that everybody is "equal" etc, it certainly wasn't the patriarchy that fetishised BBW, etc, but feminists, angry that it was always slim conventionally attractive women on bilboards. Like I say, under the "patriarchy" women that are now considered attractive to some, due to them being fetishised were completely ignored/ridiculed during the years when the patriarchy existed, it was YOU guys that started demanding that we all pretend beauty standards don't exist and now you have your wish, as as you say, you are all considered attractive by someone and can claim men that are actually your superiors as your equals. Basically, I agree with whay you've said but disagree with who you think caused it. I agree with the last comment. As usual however, no one is to blame. It's the system. As long as you follow the official procedures, you won't be blamed at work, etc. Even when people die en mass around you. But breach the policy to accommodate an unusual situation and you'll be out in no time. Here, Political Correctness is to blame. Not individuals or groups. People are afraid to say anything lest they offend someone. Of course, we all know who brought this Polit correctness in this subject - The Feminist. Not that I blame them, it's just a fact. However, I still keep to my honest views and relate them without a fear of rebuke - being slim athletic is so much better than overweight. A family is between a man and a woman. There are only 2 genders and anything in between or requiring transition is an anomaly. Be it biological or psychological. ....You get the picture... " none of your ideals are based on love for people. they are based on patriarchy, tradition, and blocking love: including self love for those outside of the patriarchal system. families are caregivers looking after those who need caring for, what's the actual problem here? somebody needs care and someone else is willing to provide that at their own personal expense. that's love and care for others, why is that bad? you can argue the health semantics for fat vs athletic but end of the day somebody fat out there loves themselves anyway and should do. it's their body to do what they want with it. it's their right to love themselves no matter what anyone else says. self love is important, it makes you less susceptible to abuse. some people do not identify as female or male. what's wrong with that? what is female and male anyway beyond the genitals and chromosomes? you can't even define it because women are always fighting the patriarchy every time it tries to oppress their natural feelings and tries to force them to become 'women', most of us don't wanna be submissive to men or the system. we all have to keep fighting for the rights to be respected that should automatically belong to us coz we live in so called civilised societies. why? | |||
| |||
| |||
 | |||
" If you read this far, I just want to let you know, have a great day, and exercise those keggle muscles "I read near enough both thread's when I woke up,f*ck know's why... Some people are...best keep that too myself | |||
" literally every single thing about a female or that she can do has been fetishised and only your dick has, and gym fit men it seems. so there you go.you can be a fat woman coz fat women have been fetishised, you can be a waitress and someone will think your uniform looks hot, you can have a fanny that is massive and gaping is a fetish too. men used to get away with being fat, balding, ugly, lecherous to teen woman when they were old and gross (look up peter stringfellow), and you know what that was acceptable. well now your patriarchy has fetishised women on such a mass scale we are attractive to just about anyone and any type of men. it's not a good thing. it's reduced us to sexual objects and not people. which is why you feel comfortable enough to also slag us off coz we are not people are we? i've always had a thick skin, i can observe and judge humans really well so developed one. I don't actually disagree with what you say here, but as a militant feminist, you are having your cake and eating it. It is your team that demands obese women are seen as beautiful, that everybody is "equal" etc, it certainly wasn't the patriarchy that fetishised BBW, etc, but feminists, angry that it was always slim conventionally attractive women on bilboards. Like I say, under the "patriarchy" women that are now considered attractive to some, due to them being fetishised were completely ignored/ridiculed during the years when the patriarchy existed, it was YOU guys that started demanding that we all pretend beauty standards don't exist and now you have your wish, as as you say, you are all considered attractive by someone and can claim men that are actually your superiors as your equals. Basically, I agree with whay you've said but disagree with who you think caused it. I agree with the last comment. As usual however, no one is to blame. It's the system. As long as you follow the official procedures, you won't be blamed at work, etc. Even when people die en mass around you. But breach the policy to accommodate an unusual situation and you'll be out in no time. Here, Political Correctness is to blame. Not individuals or groups. People are afraid to say anything lest they offend someone. Of course, we all know who brought this Polit correctness in this subject - The Feminist. Not that I blame them, it's just a fact. However, I still keep to my honest views and relate them without a fear of rebuke - being slim athletic is so much better than overweight. A family is between a man and a woman. There are only 2 genders and anything in between or requiring transition is an anomaly. Be it biological or psychological. ....You get the picture... none of your ideals are based on love for people. they are based on patriarchy, tradition, and blocking love: including self love for those outside of the patriarchal system. families are caregivers looking after those who need caring for, what's the actual problem here? somebody needs care and someone else is willing to provide that at their own personal expense. that's love and care for others, why is that bad? you can argue the health semantics for fat vs athletic but end of the day somebody fat out there loves themselves anyway and should do. it's their body to do what they want with it. it's their right to love themselves no matter what anyone else says. self love is important, it makes you less susceptible to abuse. some people do not identify as female or male. what's wrong with that? what is female and male anyway beyond the genitals and chromosomes? you can't even define it because women are always fighting the patriarchy every time it tries to oppress their natural feelings and tries to force them to become 'women', most of us don't wanna be submissive to men or the system. we all have to keep fighting for the rights to be respected that should automatically belong to us coz we live in so called civilised societies. why? " I can't disagree more with you. Your assessment about my views is outrageously wrong! How can you say that none of my ideals is based on love for others? And what has "patriarchy" has to do with my views? These are my views. I live by them and I express them freely. This is my right and no Political Correctness can stop me. It's hypocritical to claim tolerance about your ideas while refusing to accept the right of others to believe and do as they see fit. But this is exactly what you've just did and what all these militant Feminist and LGBT, Marxist etc do. Coming up with their new ideas and attempting to quash everything that has been in existance for generations before them. As the very minimum - respect for the conservative is a must. You want to be accepted, fair enough. We may never follow your lifestyle, but we don't try to destroy you because you are different. But hey, who are you to try to destroy who we are and impose your unacceptable for us ideas? I do agree with your last paragraph though. That we are forced to fight for rights that should be automatic as we live, supposedly, in civilised societies. Live and let live! Fuck political correctness . | |||
| |||
| |||
| |||
"I'm still yet to receive an answer from the militant bighole brigade on why I can find plenty of small dicks on statues in Rome and Florence, but none of massive vaginal lips and long vulvas If you google "statues with big vaginas" you'll see a picture of fireman pulling a guys head out of a huge vagina sculpture Modern Art prides it's self on being disgusting. Renaissance art was all about beauty and on sculptures of women, hid fannies entirely, suggesting that they were nice little tight ones, invisible when the woman was stood upright. You simply don't know much about the female genitalia do you! If the labia minora (inner lips) are not hidden within the labia majora (outer lips), this does not affect the size of vagina (tightness of the hole). On the really loose one I encountered the outside one was kind of hanging out like a small dick. Whatever it's called, you know the part I mean. So what? Vaginas come in all different shapes and sizes. Either embrace it or fuck men. So why doesnt that standard apply to men? " Embrace the concept not fuck all vaginas. | |||
"Woman: "Haha! That guys dick is too small for me, he has no chance!" Man: "Her fanny is a bit of a mess" Woman: "OMG! Vaginas are all different shapes and sizes, accept it, you sexist pig!" "So immature. Woman's profile: VWE please. Man's profile: No protruding labia minora please. There you go, same standard applied and no insults passed. | |||
"I'm just glad some of us aren't superficial. Big, small, fat, slim, black, white, hairy, smooth.... At the end of the day if I like you and you make me laugh and smile, I honestly couldn't give a hoot if you have a big nob or not. Or a tight foof.
This is a nice way of looking at it. Some things I have said may make me come across as superficial, but actually I'm just addressing the shocking double standards that women benefit from. I say 'benefit', but actually it's a hindrance, as there's nothing to strive for... Why work out when fat is beautiful? Why study when you can meet a doctor at the restaurant you wait tables in? Why grooom yourself to look nice when that's a sign of patriarchy oppression?
All of this hurts women, none of it helps them.
"Let people be themselves ffs. And for all you know that waitress may be at Uni and that fat bird may regularly go to the gym! | |||
" literally every single thing about a female or that she can do has been fetishised and only your dick has, and gym fit men it seems. so there you go.you can be a fat woman coz fat women have been fetishised, you can be a waitress and someone will think your uniform looks hot, you can have a fanny that is massive and gaping is a fetish too. men used to get away with being fat, balding, ugly, lecherous to teen woman when they were old and gross (look up peter stringfellow), and you know what that was acceptable. well now your patriarchy has fetishised women on such a mass scale we are attractive to just about anyone and any type of men. it's not a good thing. it's reduced us to sexual objects and not people. which is why you feel comfortable enough to also slag us off coz we are not people are we? i've always had a thick skin, i can observe and judge humans really well so developed one. I don't actually disagree with what you say here, but as a militant feminist, you are having your cake and eating it. It is your team that demands obese women are seen as beautiful, that everybody is "equal" etc, it certainly wasn't the patriarchy that fetishised BBW, etc, but feminists, angry that it was always slim conventionally attractive women on bilboards. Like I say, under the "patriarchy" women that are now considered attractive to some, due to them being fetishised were completely ignored/ridiculed during the years when the patriarchy existed, it was YOU guys that started demanding that we all pretend beauty standards don't exist and now you have your wish, as as you say, you are all considered attractive by someone and can claim men that are actually your superiors as your equals. Basically, I agree with whay you've said but disagree with who you think caused it. I agree with the last comment. As usual however, no one is to blame. It's the system. As long as you follow the official procedures, you won't be blamed at work, etc. Even when people die en mass around you. But breach the policy to accommodate an unusual situation and you'll be out in no time. Here, Political Correctness is to blame. Not individuals or groups. People are afraid to say anything lest they offend someone. Of course, we all know who brought this Polit correctness in this subject - The Feminist. Not that I blame them, it's just a fact. However, I still keep to my honest views and relate them without a fear of rebuke - being slim athletic is so much better than overweight. A family is between a man and a woman. There are only 2 genders and anything in between or requiring transition is an anomaly. Be it biological or psychological. ....You get the picture... " Wrong. There are biologically two sexes (although occasionally there are hiccups in the chromosomes), but there are more than two genders. A gender is what one identifies themself as. | |||
"I'm just glad some of us aren't superficial. Big, small, fat, slim, black, white, hairy, smooth.... At the end of the day if I like you and you make me laugh and smile, I honestly couldn't give a hoot if you have a big nob or not. Or a tight foof.
This is a nice way of looking at it. Some things I have said may make me come across as superficial, but actually I'm just addressing the shocking double standards that women benefit from. I say 'benefit', but actually it's a hindrance, as there's nothing to strive for... Why work out when fat is beautiful? Why study when you can meet a doctor at the restaurant you wait tables in? Why grooom yourself to look nice when that's a sign of patriarchy oppression?
All of this hurts women, none of it helps them.
It's not hurting me. I have met 3 doctors over the years, and I've never waited on tables. I'm equal to them in other ways than qualificatio level.
Which ways are those?
Sexual appetite (which was the whole point in meeting them and very important), ego, charisma, humour. Those kinds of values that don't involve education, how much they earned, or anything physical. We had interesting, amusing conversation and no one was feeling above anyone else, or below. I've found the least judgemental people to be those I feel are most intelligent. People who don't have a chip on their shoulders about something. They don't see old and fat, they see someone they like spending time with. "One of my most favourite meets was with a health chief exec - good looking, fit, intelligent, kinky, down to earth (the list goes on) and he chased me | |||
" literally every single thing about a female or that she can do has been fetishised and only your dick has, and gym fit men it seems. so there you go.you can be a fat woman coz fat women have been fetishised, you can be a waitress and someone will think your uniform looks hot, you can have a fanny that is massive and gaping is a fetish too. men used to get away with being fat, balding, ugly, lecherous to teen woman when they were old and gross (look up peter stringfellow), and you know what that was acceptable. well now your patriarchy has fetishised women on such a mass scale we are attractive to just about anyone and any type of men. it's not a good thing. it's reduced us to sexual objects and not people. which is why you feel comfortable enough to also slag us off coz we are not people are we? i've always had a thick skin, i can observe and judge humans really well so developed one. I don't actually disagree with what you say here, but as a militant feminist, you are having your cake and eating it. It is your team that demands obese women are seen as beautiful, that everybody is "equal" etc, it certainly wasn't the patriarchy that fetishised BBW, etc, but feminists, angry that it was always slim conventionally attractive women on bilboards. Like I say, under the "patriarchy" women that are now considered attractive to some, due to them being fetishised were completely ignored/ridiculed during the years when the patriarchy existed, it was YOU guys that started demanding that we all pretend beauty standards don't exist and now you have your wish, as as you say, you are all considered attractive by someone and can claim men that are actually your superiors as your equals. Basically, I agree with whay you've said but disagree with who you think caused it. I agree with the last comment. As usual however, no one is to blame. It's the system. As long as you follow the official procedures, you won't be blamed at work, etc. Even when people die en mass around you. But breach the policy to accommodate an unusual situation and you'll be out in no time. Here, Political Correctness is to blame. Not individuals or groups. People are afraid to say anything lest they offend someone. Of course, we all know who brought this Polit correctness in this subject - The Feminist. Not that I blame them, it's just a fact. However, I still keep to my honest views and relate them without a fear of rebuke - being slim athletic is so much better than overweight. A family is between a man and a woman. There are only 2 genders and anything in between or requiring transition is an anomaly. Be it biological or psychological. ....You get the picture... none of your ideals are based on love for people. they are based on patriarchy, tradition, and blocking love: including self love for those outside of the patriarchal system. families are caregivers looking after those who need caring for, what's the actual problem here? somebody needs care and someone else is willing to provide that at their own personal expense. that's love and care for others, why is that bad? you can argue the health semantics for fat vs athletic but end of the day somebody fat out there loves themselves anyway and should do. it's their body to do what they want with it. it's their right to love themselves no matter what anyone else says. self love is important, it makes you less susceptible to abuse. some people do not identify as female or male. what's wrong with that? what is female and male anyway beyond the genitals and chromosomes? you can't even define it because women are always fighting the patriarchy every time it tries to oppress their natural feelings and tries to force them to become 'women', most of us don't wanna be submissive to men or the system. we all have to keep fighting for the rights to be respected that should automatically belong to us coz we live in so called civilised societies. why? " Hey some of us want to be submissive cos it's a pain in the arse being naturally superior all the time | |||
"I'm just glad some of us aren't superficial. Big, small, fat, slim, black, white, hairy, smooth.... At the end of the day if I like you and you make me laugh and smile, I honestly couldn't give a hoot if you have a big nob or not. Or a tight foof.
This is a nice way of looking at it. Some things I have said may make me come across as superficial, but actually I'm just addressing the shocking double standards that women benefit from. I say 'benefit', but actually it's a hindrance, as there's nothing to strive for... Why work out when fat is beautiful? Why study when you can meet a doctor at the restaurant you wait tables in? Why grooom yourself to look nice when that's a sign of patriarchy oppression?
All of this hurts women, none of it helps them.
It's not hurting me. I have met 3 doctors over the years, and I've never waited on tables. I'm equal to them in other ways than qualificatio level.
Which ways are those?
Sexual appetite (which was the whole point in meeting them and very important), ego, charisma, humour. Those kinds of values that don't involve education, how much they earned, or anything physical. We had interesting, amusing conversation and no one was feeling above anyone else, or below. I've found the least judgemental people to be those I feel are most intelligent. People who don't have a chip on their shoulders about something. They don't see old and fat, they see someone they like spending time with.
One of my most favourite meets was with a health chief exec - good looking, fit, intelligent, kinky, down to earth (the list goes on) and he chased me "I had some great sex with a doctor who constantly told me to put on weight, so my bum would get bigger. My own doctor wouldn't have been too happy with him. My punishment for him was to tie him to his bed, with his work ties, and "examine" his prostate until he couldn't take any more, then wank him until he came over my hand, where I carried on with some post orgasm torture. Those were good times | |||
 | |||
"This thread is now all mine, all mine i tell ya. *Insert evil laugh* "I'm right behind you | |||
"This thread is now all mine, all mine i tell ya. *Insert evil laugh*
I'm right behind you "Sounds interesting | |||
"This thread is now all mine, all mine i tell ya. *Insert evil laugh*
I'm right behind you
Sounds interesting "How tight is your vagina? I have moderate squeezing strength (certified). | |||
" literally every single thing about a female or that she can do has been fetishised and only your dick has, and gym fit men it seems. so there you go.you can be a fat woman coz fat women have been fetishised, you can be a waitress and someone will think your uniform looks hot, you can have a fanny that is massive and gaping is a fetish too. men used to get away with being fat, balding, ugly, lecherous to teen woman when they were old and gross (look up peter stringfellow), and you know what that was acceptable. well now your patriarchy has fetishised women on such a mass scale we are attractive to just about anyone and any type of men. it's not a good thing. it's reduced us to sexual objects and not people. which is why you feel comfortable enough to also slag us off coz we are not people are we? i've always had a thick skin, i can observe and judge humans really well so developed one. I don't actually disagree with what you say here, but as a militant feminist, you are having your cake and eating it. It is your team that demands obese women are seen as beautiful, that everybody is "equal" etc, it certainly wasn't the patriarchy that fetishised BBW, etc, but feminists, angry that it was always slim conventionally attractive women on bilboards. Like I say, under the "patriarchy" women that are now considered attractive to some, due to them being fetishised were completely ignored/ridiculed during the years when the patriarchy existed, it was YOU guys that started demanding that we all pretend beauty standards don't exist and now you have your wish, as as you say, you are all considered attractive by someone and can claim men that are actually your superiors as your equals. Basically, I agree with whay you've said but disagree with who you think caused it. I agree with the last comment. As usual however, no one is to blame. It's the system. As long as you follow the official procedures, you won't be blamed at work, etc. Even when people die en mass around you. But breach the policy to accommodate an unusual situation and you'll be out in no time. Here, Political Correctness is to blame. Not individuals or groups. People are afraid to say anything lest they offend someone. Of course, we all know who brought this Polit correctness in this subject - The Feminist. Not that I blame them, it's just a fact. However, I still keep to my honest views and relate them without a fear of rebuke - being slim athletic is so much better than overweight. A family is between a man and a woman. There are only 2 genders and anything in between or requiring transition is an anomaly. Be it biological or psychological. ....You get the picture... none of your ideals are based on love for people. they are based on patriarchy, tradition, and blocking love: including self love for those outside of the patriarchal system. families are caregivers looking after those who need caring for, what's the actual problem here? somebody needs care and someone else is willing to provide that at their own personal expense. that's love and care for others, why is that bad? you can argue the health semantics for fat vs athletic but end of the day somebody fat out there loves themselves anyway and should do. it's their body to do what they want with it. it's their right to love themselves no matter what anyone else says. self love is important, it makes you less susceptible to abuse. some people do not identify as female or male. what's wrong with that? what is female and male anyway beyond the genitals and chromosomes? you can't even define it because women are always fighting the patriarchy every time it tries to oppress their natural feelings and tries to force them to become 'women', most of us don't wanna be submissive to men or the system. we all have to keep fighting for the rights to be respected that should automatically belong to us coz we live in so called civilised societies. why? Hey some of us want to be submissive cos it's a pain in the arse being naturally superior all the time "lol. i just don't want it to be our default setting. | |||
" literally every single thing about a female or that she can do has been fetishised and only your dick has, and gym fit men it seems. so there you go.you can be a fat woman coz fat women have been fetishised, you can be a waitress and someone will think your uniform looks hot, you can have a fanny that is massive and gaping is a fetish too. men used to get away with being fat, balding, ugly, lecherous to teen woman when they were old and gross (look up peter stringfellow), and you know what that was acceptable. well now your patriarchy has fetishised women on such a mass scale we are attractive to just about anyone and any type of men. it's not a good thing. it's reduced us to sexual objects and not people. which is why you feel comfortable enough to also slag us off coz we are not people are we? i've always had a thick skin, i can observe and judge humans really well so developed one. I don't actually disagree with what you say here, but as a militant feminist, you are having your cake and eating it. It is your team that demands obese women are seen as beautiful, that everybody is "equal" etc, it certainly wasn't the patriarchy that fetishised BBW, etc, but feminists, angry that it was always slim conventionally attractive women on bilboards. Like I say, under the "patriarchy" women that are now considered attractive to some, due to them being fetishised were completely ignored/ridiculed during the years when the patriarchy existed, it was YOU guys that started demanding that we all pretend beauty standards don't exist and now you have your wish, as as you say, you are all considered attractive by someone and can claim men that are actually your superiors as your equals. Basically, I agree with whay you've said but disagree with who you think caused it. I agree with the last comment. As usual however, no one is to blame. It's the system. As long as you follow the official procedures, you won't be blamed at work, etc. Even when people die en mass around you. But breach the policy to accommodate an unusual situation and you'll be out in no time. Here, Political Correctness is to blame. Not individuals or groups. People are afraid to say anything lest they offend someone. Of course, we all know who brought this Polit correctness in this subject - The Feminist. Not that I blame them, it's just a fact. However, I still keep to my honest views and relate them without a fear of rebuke - being slim athletic is so much better than overweight. A family is between a man and a woman. There are only 2 genders and anything in between or requiring transition is an anomaly. Be it biological or psychological. ....You get the picture... Wrong. There are biologically two sexes (although occasionally there are hiccups in the chromosomes), but there are more than two genders. A gender is what one identifies themself as." Yeah, my gender is a flying dragon.
Sex= male and female.
Gender = masculine and feminine.
Now name the other hundreds of genders that you have in mind
| |||
"Now name the other hundreds of genders that you have in mind "pedantic me googles words and gender is: Either of the two sexes (male and female), especially when considered with reference to social and cultural differences rather than biological ones. The term is also used more broadly to denote a range of identities that do not correspond to established ideas of male and female. | |||
" literally every single thing about a female or that she can do has been fetishised and only your dick has, and gym fit men it seems. so there you go.you can be a fat woman coz fat women have been fetishised, you can be a waitress and someone will think your uniform looks hot, you can have a fanny that is massive and gaping is a fetish too. men used to get away with being fat, balding, ugly, lecherous to teen woman when they were old and gross (look up peter stringfellow), and you know what that was acceptable. well now your patriarchy has fetishised women on such a mass scale we are attractive to just about anyone and any type of men. it's not a good thing. it's reduced us to sexual objects and not people. which is why you feel comfortable enough to also slag us off coz we are not people are we? i've always had a thick skin, i can observe and judge humans really well so developed one. I don't actually disagree with what you say here, but as a militant feminist, you are having your cake and eating it. It is your team that demands obese women are seen as beautiful, that everybody is "equal" etc, it certainly wasn't the patriarchy that fetishised BBW, etc, but feminists, angry that it was always slim conventionally attractive women on bilboards. Like I say, under the "patriarchy" women that are now considered attractive to some, due to them being fetishised were completely ignored/ridiculed during the years when the patriarchy existed, it was YOU guys that started demanding that we all pretend beauty standards don't exist and now you have your wish, as as you say, you are all considered attractive by someone and can claim men that are actually your superiors as your equals. Basically, I agree with whay you've said but disagree with who you think caused it. I agree with the last comment. As usual however, no one is to blame. It's the system. As long as you follow the official procedures, you won't be blamed at work, etc. Even when people die en mass around you. But breach the policy to accommodate an unusual situation and you'll be out in no time. Here, Political Correctness is to blame. Not individuals or groups. People are afraid to say anything lest they offend someone. Of course, we all know who brought this Polit correctness in this subject - The Feminist. Not that I blame them, it's just a fact. However, I still keep to my honest views and relate them without a fear of rebuke - being slim athletic is so much better than overweight. A family is between a man and a woman. There are only 2 genders and anything in between or requiring transition is an anomaly. Be it biological or psychological. ....You get the picture... Wrong. There are biologically two sexes (although occasionally there are hiccups in the chromosomes), but there are more than two genders. A gender is what one identifies themself as. Yeah, my gender is a flying dragon.
Sex= male and female.
Gender = masculine and feminine.
Now name the other hundreds of genders that you have in mind
"Sex = man xy, woman xx Gender = male, female, both, neither Masculine and feminine are adjectives and can describe characteristics that the "opposite sex" can have and yet still identify with the "same sex". http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/917990-overview#a1 Do you feel a bit silly now? | |||
"This thread is now all mine, all mine i tell ya. *Insert evil laugh*
I'm right behind you
Sounds interesting
How tight is your vagina? I have moderate squeezing strength (certified)."Room for improvement but it's been known to push a cock out | |||
" .... I agree with the last comment. As usual however, no one is to blame. It's the system. As long as you follow the official procedures, you won't be blamed at work, etc. Even when people die en mass around you. But breach the policy to accommodate an unusual situation and you'll be out in no time. Here, Political Correctness is to blame. Not individuals or groups. People are afraid to say anything lest they offend someone. Of course, we all know who brought this Polit correctness in this subject - The Feminist. Not that I blame them, it's just a fact. However, I still keep to my honest views and relate them without a fear of rebuke - being slim athletic is so much better than overweight. A family is between a man and a woman. There are only 2 genders and anything in between or requiring transition is an anomaly. Be it biological or psychological. ....You get the picture... Wrong. There are biologically two sexes (although occasionally there are hiccups in the chromosomes), but there are more than two genders. A gender is what one identifies themself as. Yeah, my gender is a flying dragon.
Sex= male and female.
Gender = masculine and feminine.
Now name the other hundreds of genders that you have in mind
Sex = man xy, woman xx
Gender = male, female, both, neither
Masculine and feminine are adjectives and can describe characteristics that the "opposite sex" can have and yet still identify with the "same sex".
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/917990-overview#a1
Do you feel a bit silly now? "I don't. You? You should. Quoting from a single source out of millions without understanding what you quote is of little use. ... The word sex has its root probably in Middle English which means “section” or “divide”. If we go further back, sex means the number six in Latin. On the other hand, the word gender is derived from Middle English which in turn is derived from Old French which is ultimately derived from the Latin word genus. Genus means “kind” or “type” or “sort”. If we quote from the Medilexicon’s medical dictionary, we find two definitions of sex and gender respectively: Sex is “The biologic character or quality that distinguishes male and female from one another as expressed by analysis of the person’s gonadal (gonad is an organ in animals that produces gametes, especially a testis or ovary), morphologic (internal and external), chromosomal, and hormonal characteristics.” Gender is “The category to which an individual is assigned by self or others, on the basis of sex.” To put it in a nutshell, sex refers to biological differences while gender refers to socio-cultural differences. This will become clearer by way of examples. Sex and gender have different characteristics. Some features related to sex are – while males have testicles, females have ovaries; while males have penis; females have vagina, females get pregnant while males do not; females can breastfeed their babies, males cannot; at the time of birth, males tend to weigh more than their female counterparts; generally, males have deeper voices than females. Some features related to gender are – women have long hair and men short; women contribute more to household chores than men do ; some cultures expect their women to cover their heads when they step out of the house while there is no such injunction for men; up till the twentieth century women were not allowed to vote in a number of countries (UK granted female franchise in 1928) ; some professions, like teaching and nursing, are considered to be more suitable for women while others like, climbing the corporate ladders, are more appropriate for men (women are now breaking these barriers); men are regarded as bread earners and protectors of women in the majority of cultures. ... There are some babies who are born with XO chromosomes (Tuner Syndrome) or XXY chromosomes (Klienfelter’s Syndrome). They are intersex which may have sex organs that appear to be somewhat female or male or both. A lot of times surgeries are performed on such babies right after their births so as to assign a particular sex to them. However, psychologists advise that such surgeries should be postponed till the babies grow up and can decide for themselves which sex they identify with more, male or female, and accordingly go for sex change procedures. Otherwise, they may experience an identity crisis which may lead to depression or even suicides. | |||
" .... I agree with the last comment. As usual however, no one is to blame. It's the system. As long as you follow the official procedures, you won't be blamed at work, etc. Even when people die en mass around you. But breach the policy to accommodate an unusual situation and you'll be out in no time. Here, Political Correctness is to blame. Not individuals or groups. People are afraid to say anything lest they offend someone. Of course, we all know who brought this Polit correctness in this subject - The Feminist. Not that I blame them, it's just a fact. However, I still keep to my honest views and relate them without a fear of rebuke - being slim athletic is so much better than overweight. A family is between a man and a woman. There are only 2 genders and anything in between or requiring transition is an anomaly. Be it biological or psychological. ....You get the picture... Wrong. There are biologically two sexes (although occasionally there are hiccups in the chromosomes), but there are more than two genders. A gender is what one identifies themself as. Yeah, my gender is a flying dragon.
Sex= male and female.
Gender = masculine and feminine.
Now name the other hundreds of genders that you have in mind
Sex = man xy, woman xx
Gender = male, female, both, neither
Masculine and feminine are adjectives and can describe characteristics that the "opposite sex" can have and yet still identify with the "same sex".
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/917990-overview#a1
Do you feel a bit silly now?
I don't. You?
You should. Quoting from a single source out of millions without understanding what you quote is of little use.
...
The word sex has its root probably in Middle English which means “section” or “divide”. If we go further back, sex means the number six in Latin. On the other hand, the word gender is derived from Middle English which in turn is derived from Old French which is ultimately derived from the Latin word genus. Genus means “kind” or “type” or “sort”.
If we quote from the Medilexicon’s medical dictionary, we find two definitions of sex and gender respectively:
Sex is “The biologic character or quality that distinguishes male and female from one another as expressed by analysis of the person’s gonadal (gonad is an organ in animals that produces gametes, especially a testis or ovary), morphologic (internal and external), chromosomal, and hormonal characteristics.”
Gender is “The category to which an individual is assigned by self or others, on the basis of sex.”
To put it in a nutshell, sex refers to biological differences while gender refers to socio-cultural differences. This will become clearer by way of examples. Sex and gender have different characteristics.
Some features related to sex are – while males have testicles, females have ovaries; while males have penis; females have vagina, females get pregnant while males do not; females can breastfeed their babies, males cannot; at the time of birth, males tend to weigh more than their female counterparts; generally, males have deeper voices than females.
Some features related to gender are – women have long hair and men short; women contribute more to household chores than men do ; some cultures expect their women to cover their heads when they step out of the house while there is no such injunction for men; up till the twentieth century women were not allowed to vote in a number of countries (UK granted female franchise in 1928) ; some professions, like teaching and nursing, are considered to be more suitable for women while others like, climbing the corporate ladders, are more appropriate for men (women are now breaking these barriers); men are regarded as bread earners and protectors of women in the majority of cultures.
...
There are some babies who are born with XO chromosomes (Tuner Syndrome) or XXY chromosomes (Klienfelter’s Syndrome). They are intersex which may have sex organs that appear to be somewhat female or male or both. A lot of times surgeries are performed on such babies right after their births so as to assign a particular sex to them. However, psychologists advise that such surgeries should be postponed till the babies grow up and can decide for themselves which sex they identify with more, male or female, and accordingly go for sex change procedures. Otherwise, they may experience an identity crisis which may lead to depression or even suicides."You haven't told me anything i don't know. Nor have you refuted what i put. I simply googled an accessible source rather than look back on my academic sources from lectures and own research. Oh and you mean Turner Syndrome. There is on going research for further chromosomal anomalies. | |||
" .... I agree with the last comment. As usual however, no one is to blame. It's the system. As long as you follow the official procedures, you won't be blamed at work, etc. Even when people die en mass around you. But breach the policy to accommodate an unusual situation and you'll be out in no time. Here, Political Correctness is to blame. Not individuals or groups. People are afraid to say anything lest they offend someone. Of course, we all know who brought this Polit correctness in this subject - The Feminist. Not that I blame them, it's just a fact. However, I still keep to my honest views and relate them without a fear of rebuke - being slim athletic is so much better than overweight. A family is between a man and a woman. There are only 2 genders and anything in between or requiring transition is an anomaly. Be it biological or psychological. ....You get the picture... Wrong. There are biologically two sexes (although occasionally there are hiccups in the chromosomes), but there are more than two genders. A gender is what one identifies themself as. Yeah, my gender is a flying dragon.
Sex= male and female.
Gender = masculine and feminine.
Now name the other hundreds of genders that you have in mind
Sex = man xy, woman xx
Gender = male, female, both, neither
Masculine and feminine are adjectives and can describe characteristics that the "opposite sex" can have and yet still identify with the "same sex".
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/917990-overview#a1
Do you feel a bit silly now?
I don't. You?
You should. Quoting from a single source out of millions without understanding what you quote is of little use.
...
The word sex has its root probably in Middle English which means “section” or “divide”. If we go further back, sex means the number six in Latin. On the other hand, the word gender is derived from Middle English which in turn is derived from Old French which is ultimately derived from the Latin word genus. Genus means “kind” or “type” or “sort”.
If we quote from the Medilexicon’s medical dictionary, we find two definitions of sex and gender respectively:
Sex is “The biologic character or quality that distinguishes male and female from one another as expressed by analysis of the person’s gonadal (gonad is an organ in animals that produces gametes, especially a testis or ovary), morphologic (internal and external), chromosomal, and hormonal characteristics.”
Gender is “The category to which an individual is assigned by self or others, on the basis of sex.”
To put it in a nutshell, sex refers to biological differences while gender refers to socio-cultural differences. This will become clearer by way of examples. Sex and gender have different characteristics.
Some features related to sex are – while males have testicles, females have ovaries; while males have penis; females have vagina, females get pregnant while males do not; females can breastfeed their babies, males cannot; at the time of birth, males tend to weigh more than their female counterparts; generally, males have deeper voices than females.
Some features related to gender are – women have long hair and men short; women contribute more to household chores than men do ; some cultures expect their women to cover their heads when they step out of the house while there is no such injunction for men; up till the twentieth century women were not allowed to vote in a number of countries (UK granted female franchise in 1928) ; some professions, like teaching and nursing, are considered to be more suitable for women while others like, climbing the corporate ladders, are more appropriate for men (women are now breaking these barriers); men are regarded as bread earners and protectors of women in the majority of cultures.
...
There are some babies who are born with XO chromosomes (Tuner Syndrome) or XXY chromosomes (Klienfelter’s Syndrome). They are intersex which may have sex organs that appear to be somewhat female or male or both. A lot of times surgeries are performed on such babies right after their births so as to assign a particular sex to them. However, psychologists advise that such surgeries should be postponed till the babies grow up and can decide for themselves which sex they identify with more, male or female, and accordingly go for sex change procedures. Otherwise, they may experience an identity crisis which may lead to depression or even suicides.
You haven't told me anything i don't know. Nor have you refuted what i put. I simply googled an accessible source rather than look back on my academic sources from lectures and own research.
Oh and you mean Turner Syndrome.
There is on going research for further chromosomal anomalies."And to continue... The reason i didn't include the other chromosomal anomalies in other post was simply because lack of Y = female sex and inclusion of Y no matter how many Xs = male sex. I previously put woman and man to differentiate from gender in a lazy way lol. Don't assume lack of knowledge and understanding due to brevity of posts. | |||
" .... I agree with the last comment. As usual however, no one is to blame. It's the system. As long as you follow the official procedures, you won't be blamed at work, etc. Even when people die en mass around you. But breach the policy to accommodate an unusual situation and you'll be out in no time. Here, Political Correctness is to blame. Not individuals or groups. People are afraid to say anything lest they offend someone. Of course, we all know who brought this Polit correctness in this subject - The Feminist. Not that I blame them, it's just a fact. However, I still keep to my honest views and relate them without a fear of rebuke - being slim athletic is so much better than overweight. A family is between a man and a woman. There are only 2 genders and anything in between or requiring transition is an anomaly. Be it biological or psychological. ....You get the picture... Wrong. There are biologically two sexes (although occasionally there are hiccups in the chromosomes), but there are more than two genders. A gender is what one identifies themself as. Yeah, my gender is a flying dragon.
Sex= male and female.
Gender = masculine and feminine.
Now name the other hundreds of genders that you have in mind
Sex = man xy, woman xx
Gender = male, female, both, neither
Masculine and feminine are adjectives and can describe characteristics that the "opposite sex" can have and yet still identify with the "same sex".
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/917990-overview#a1
Do you feel a bit silly now?
I don't. You?
You should. Quoting from a single source out of millions without understanding what you quote is of little use.
...
The word sex has its root probably in Middle English which means “section” or “divide”. If we go further back, sex means the number six in Latin. On the other hand, the word gender is derived from Middle English which in turn is derived from Old French which is ultimately derived from the Latin word genus. Genus means “kind” or “type” or “sort”.
If we quote from the Medilexicon’s medical dictionary, we find two definitions of sex and gender respectively:
Sex is “The biologic character or quality that distinguishes male and female from one another as expressed by analysis of the person’s gonadal (gonad is an organ in animals that produces gametes, especially a testis or ovary), morphologic (internal and external), chromosomal, and hormonal characteristics.”
Gender is “The category to which an individual is assigned by self or others, on the basis of sex.”
To put it in a nutshell, sex refers to biological differences while gender refers to socio-cultural differences. This will become clearer by way of examples. Sex and gender have different characteristics.
Some features related to sex are – while males have testicles, females have ovaries; while males have penis; females have vagina, females get pregnant while males do not; females can breastfeed their babies, males cannot; at the time of birth, males tend to weigh more than their female counterparts; generally, males have deeper voices than females.
Some features related to gender are – women have long hair and men short; women contribute more to household chores than men do ; some cultures expect their women to cover their heads when they step out of the house while there is no such injunction for men; up till the twentieth century women were not allowed to vote in a number of countries (UK granted female franchise in 1928) ; some professions, like teaching and nursing, are considered to be more suitable for women while others like, climbing the corporate ladders, are more appropriate for men (women are now breaking these barriers); men are regarded as bread earners and protectors of women in the majority of cultures.
...
There are some babies who are born with XO chromosomes (Tuner Syndrome) or XXY chromosomes (Klienfelter’s Syndrome). They are intersex which may have sex organs that appear to be somewhat female or male or both. A lot of times surgeries are performed on such babies right after their births so as to assign a particular sex to them. However, psychologists advise that such surgeries should be postponed till the babies grow up and can decide for themselves which sex they identify with more, male or female, and accordingly go for sex change procedures. Otherwise, they may experience an identity crisis which may lead to depression or even suicides.
You haven't told me anything i don't know. Nor have you refuted what i put. I simply googled an accessible source rather than look back on my academic sources from lectures and own research.
Oh and you mean Turner Syndrome.
There is on going research for further chromosomal anomalies."You must be the first person on Fab to come to the forums expecting to learn something that they never knew before. I never looked at forums in that way, but I can see your point. Anyway, live and let live. I never intended to be confrontational. As per fab's own words "Forums are meant to be fun". I'm enjoying it, hope you too. Regards | |||
" .... I agree with the last comment. As usual however, no one is to blame. It's the system. As long as you follow the official procedures, you won't be blamed at work, etc. Even when people die en mass around you. But breach the policy to accommodate an unusual situation and you'll be out in no time. Here, Political Correctness is to blame. Not individuals or groups. People are afraid to say anything lest they offend someone. Of course, we all know who brought this Polit correctness in this subject - The Feminist. Not that I blame them, it's just a fact. However, I still keep to my honest views and relate them without a fear of rebuke - being slim athletic is so much better than overweight. A family is between a man and a woman. There are only 2 genders and anything in between or requiring transition is an anomaly. Be it biological or psychological. ....You get the picture... Wrong. There are biologically two sexes (although occasionally there are hiccups in the chromosomes), but there are more than two genders. A gender is what one identifies themself as. Yeah, my gender is a flying dragon.
Sex= male and female.
Gender = masculine and feminine.
Now name the other hundreds of genders that you have in mind
Sex = man xy, woman xx
Gender = male, female, both, neither
Masculine and feminine are adjectives and can describe characteristics that the "opposite sex" can have and yet still identify with the "same sex".
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/917990-overview#a1
Do you feel a bit silly now?
I don't. You?
You should. Quoting from a single source out of millions without understanding what you quote is of little use.
...
The word sex has its root probably in Middle English which means “section” or “divide”. If we go further back, sex means the number six in Latin. On the other hand, the word gender is derived from Middle English which in turn is derived from Old French which is ultimately derived from the Latin word genus. Genus means “kind” or “type” or “sort”.
If we quote from the Medilexicon’s medical dictionary, we find two definitions of sex and gender respectively:
Sex is “The biologic character or quality that distinguishes male and female from one another as expressed by analysis of the person’s gonadal (gonad is an organ in animals that produces gametes, especially a testis or ovary), morphologic (internal and external), chromosomal, and hormonal characteristics.”
Gender is “The category to which an individual is assigned by self or others, on the basis of sex.”
To put it in a nutshell, sex refers to biological differences while gender refers to socio-cultural differences. This will become clearer by way of examples. Sex and gender have different characteristics.
Some features related to sex are – while males have testicles, females have ovaries; while males have penis; females have vagina, females get pregnant while males do not; females can breastfeed their babies, males cannot; at the time of birth, males tend to weigh more than their female counterparts; generally, males have deeper voices than females.
Some features related to gender are – women have long hair and men short; women contribute more to household chores than men do ; some cultures expect their women to cover their heads when they step out of the house while there is no such injunction for men; up till the twentieth century women were not allowed to vote in a number of countries (UK granted female franchise in 1928) ; some professions, like teaching and nursing, are considered to be more suitable for women while others like, climbing the corporate ladders, are more appropriate for men (women are now breaking these barriers); men are regarded as bread earners and protectors of women in the majority of cultures.
...
There are some babies who are born with XO chromosomes (Tuner Syndrome) or XXY chromosomes (Klienfelter’s Syndrome). They are intersex which may have sex organs that appear to be somewhat female or male or both. A lot of times surgeries are performed on such babies right after their births so as to assign a particular sex to them. However, psychologists advise that such surgeries should be postponed till the babies grow up and can decide for themselves which sex they identify with more, male or female, and accordingly go for sex change procedures. Otherwise, they may experience an identity crisis which may lead to depression or even suicides.
You haven't told me anything i don't know. Nor have you refuted what i put. I simply googled an accessible source rather than look back on my academic sources from lectures and own research.
Oh and you mean Turner Syndrome.
There is on going research for further chromosomal anomalies.
You must be the first person on Fab to come to the forums expecting to learn something that they never knew before.
I never looked at forums in that way, but I can see your point.
Anyway, live and let live. I never intended to be confrontational. As per fab's own words "Forums are meant to be fun". I'm enjoying it, hope you too.
Regards
"I am. I love debates. | |||
" I'm enjoying it, hope you too. Regards
I am. I love debates. "Great! I like your aggressive style! | |||
" I'm enjoying it, hope you too. Regards
I am. I love debates.
Great! I like your aggressive style!"I'm a pussycat who takes no prisoners | |||
" I'm enjoying it, hope you too. Regards
I am. I love debates.
Great! I like your aggressive style!"I'm a pussycat who takes no prisoners | |||
