FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Veil Banned!
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i do hope we don't ban it we fought for freedom to then take it away from someone else just doesn't sit right with me" Agreed. But nobody should be able to cover their faces in matters of security. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i do hope we don't ban it we fought for freedom to then take it away from someone else just doesn't sit right with me" Bear in mind. 1. The veil has nothing to do with freedom. there is no compulsion to wear it for muslims and if you ask a knowledgeable muslim they will confirm that. The veil is a male imposed tradition. 2. Those who promote the veil would have no hesitation in imposing it upon you given the opportunity. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i do hope we don't ban it we fought for freedom to then take it away from someone else just doesn't sit right with me Agreed. But nobody should be able to cover their faces in matters of security." agreed too i'm fine with it being removed when security matters thats just common sense in my book | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i do hope we don't ban it we fought for freedom to then take it away from someone else just doesn't sit right with me Bear in mind. 1. The veil has nothing to do with freedom. there is no compulsion to wear it for muslims and if you ask a knowledgeable muslim they will confirm that. The veil is a male imposed tradition. 2. Those who promote the veil would have no hesitation in imposing it upon you given the opportunity." 1. granted it is their choice to wear it not compulsory. oh thats freedom of choice 2. you say that like it would be wrong to impose the wearing of it on me just like i say the imposing of not wearing it on them would be wrong, who is right? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i do hope we don't ban it we fought for freedom to then take it away from someone else just doesn't sit right with me Agreed. But nobody should be able to cover their faces in matters of security. agreed too i'm fine with it being removed when security matters thats just common sense in my book" I'm assuming this already happens at airport security and similar checkpoints? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i do hope we don't ban it we fought for freedom to then take it away from someone else just doesn't sit right with me Bear in mind. 1. The veil has nothing to do with freedom. there is no compulsion to wear it for muslims and if you ask a knowledgeable muslim they will confirm that. The veil is a male imposed tradition. 2. Those who promote the veil would have no hesitation in imposing it upon you given the opportunity. 1. granted it is their choice to wear it not compulsory. oh thats freedom of choice 2. you say that like it would be wrong to impose the wearing of it on me just like i say the imposing of not wearing it on them would be wrong, who is right?" Logically, I have to agree with you, but in practise it does not really work does it. If it did then I could go out with no clothes on in fair weather. Why should I wear clothes just because someone else tells me too. I should be free to be my natural self if I want to. Shouldn't I. oh forget I said anything. you gotta live that to understand how I feel. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i do hope we don't ban it we fought for freedom to then take it away from someone else just doesn't sit right with me Bear in mind. 1. The veil has nothing to do with freedom. there is no compulsion to wear it for muslims and if you ask a knowledgeable muslim they will confirm that. The veil is a male imposed tradition. 2. Those who promote the veil would have no hesitation in imposing it upon you given the opportunity. 1. granted it is their choice to wear it not compulsory. oh thats freedom of choice 2. you say that like it would be wrong to impose the wearing of it on me just like i say the imposing of not wearing it on them would be wrong, who is right? Logically, I have to agree with you, but in practise it does not really work does it. If it did then I could go out with no clothes on in fair weather. Why should I wear clothes just because someone else tells me too. I should be free to be my natural self if I want to. Shouldn't I. oh forget I said anything. you gotta live that to understand how I feel." no i won't forget you have every right to say what you think and feel and i totally agree with you that practicly freedom doesn't work in many many cases i just meant it doesn't sit right with me | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I'm assuming this already happens at airport security and similar checkpoints?" They have a right for a female check in agent/security officer to take them somewhere private so they can lift it up and show their face. When i was on if they got me, there were no special privileges from my end. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"A law has come into force in Belgium banning women from wearing the full Islamic veil in public. The country is the second European Union nation after France to enforce such a ban. Offenders face a fine of 137.5 euros (£121; $197) and up to seven days in jail. Should/Could it happen here?" It should not be banned, but I reserve my right to exhibit my finely honed liberal tolerance and sophisticated political sensitivity by taking a baseball bat to any arsehole of any religion who tries to tell women what to wear in the name of modesty.... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"emm as a muslim, alot of thoughts going through my mind about this subject. but dunno what to write or say, so il just keep it to myself. all i will say though, is that my overall view is that it should not be banned in this country. " You have a right to be heard on here the same as anyone else. Never be afraid to speak, if gives the bigots an ill-deserved victory. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Didnt the killer of the police woman in Bradford a few years back escape back to somalia wearing a burka to get through passport control !" i actually have no idea about that but i'm fairly certain that those that say don't ban it would at the same time agree that in security situations it should be removed without uestion | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"sorry but its not part of great britains culture for women to cover their face and should be banned . i feel great britain is all to quick to cow-tow to other countries ways at detriment of our own . if was to travel to a country where this is part of their culture then id most certainly abide by that and that countries etiquette . so if people wish to visit/live here then they should show the same respect .if i felt that strongly against having to cover my face when in another country then i just wouldnt go to that country. " I am with you on this one... My mum went to Egypt a good few years ago..and to go to some places had to be dressed appropriately... she didnt take offence as it was part of the culture.. Havent they already banned the wearing from schools over here??? Katie. x | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Ban them. If i am expected to remove my crash helmet on security grounds before entering a supermarket or bank why do they allow people to wear full face veils in these places? Are they assuming i am a potential a criminal because i am caucasian christian but a person wearing a veil must be muslim and therefore not a potential criminal?" Not ban them but they should provide the same DECENCY & remove them in banks & other places such as petrol stations compulsay! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"sorry but its not part of great britains culture for women to cover their face and should be banned . i feel great britain is all to quick to cow-tow to other countries ways at detriment of our own . if was to travel to a country where this is part of their culture then id most certainly abide by that and that countries etiquette . so if people wish to visit/live here then they should show the same respect .if i felt that strongly against having to cover my face when in another country then i just wouldnt go to that country. " *Shudders at the thought of trying to squeeze my size 24 frame into too tight cropped top, mini skirt revealing thunder thighs, double muffin top, Ugg boots to make my legs look like a Shetland pony to fit in with the dress code of this nation as seen on every high street*. Be very careful about calling for clothing to be banned. Once a precedent has been set you can't take it back. If anyone thinks such a ban would stop at veils they are misguided: hoodies, sports wear on over 40s, jeggings on anyone over a size 6, Ugg boots on anyone, vertical stripes, white shoes, Jesus sandals, women over 30 wearing anything from Miss Selfridge, New Look et al, low ride jeans on anyone over size 8, any woman displaying a muffin top to be stoned...on second thought, ban it! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" *Shudders at the thought of trying to squeeze my size 24 frame into too tight cropped top, mini skirt revealing thunder thighs, double muffin top, Ugg boots to make my legs look like a Shetland pony to fit in with the dress code of this nation as seen on every high street*. Be very careful about calling for clothing to be banned. Once a precedent has been set you can't take it back. If anyone thinks such a ban would stop at veils they are misguided: hoodies, sports wear on over 40s, jeggings on anyone over a size 6, Ugg boots on anyone, vertical stripes, white shoes, Jesus sandals, women over 30 wearing anything from Miss Selfridge, New Look et al, low ride jeans on anyone over size 8, any woman displaying a muffin top to be stoned...on second thought, ban it! " Really? Now if only George Orwell had d*unk Carlsberg. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The ban on the Burqa and nigabs in France isn't holding up at all.... So I expect any Belgian ban to go the same way." Possibly not... But if Belgium could be followed by the rest of the non Muslim countries.... As someone has mentioned... If I have left my own country and culture... To be a part of your country and culture... Why try to change your culture into mine...?? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"A law has come into force in Belgium banning women from wearing the full Islamic veil in public. The country is the second European Union nation after France to enforce such a ban. Offenders face a fine of 137.5 euros (£121; $197) and up to seven days in jail. Should/Could it happen here? It should not be banned, but I reserve my right to exhibit my finely honed liberal tolerance and sophisticated political sensitivity by taking a baseball bat to any arsehole of any religion who tries to tell women what to wear in the name of modesty...." What about immodesty And i might point out amongst yound muslim woman the burqua tends to be a political choice,not an imposed male one. Bouncy has made the points i wud excellently, freedom is not just about allowing the things you agree with, but the things you dislike and disagree with. i hate fascists, but i disagree with the no platform view i know some people here have.Once we impose censorship on thought,dress, belief we are no longer on the side of freedom. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The ban on the Burqa and nigabs in France isn't holding up at all.... So I expect any Belgian ban to go the same way. Possibly not... But if Belgium could be followed by the rest of the non Muslim countries.... As someone has mentioned... If I have left my own country and culture... To be a part of your country and culture... Why try to change your culture into mine...?? " http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yz2LaJOVAiA Cos we are just so good at integration when we go abroad. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Didnt the killer of the police woman in Bradford a few years back escape back to somalia wearing a burka to get through passport control ! i actually have no idea about that but i'm fairly certain that those that say don't ban it would at the same time agree that in security situations it should be removed without uestion" i agree but purely on security grounds, it should be removed,problem is with facial recognition being used a lot more now and tracking known terrorist or terrorist sympathisers via cctv means it needs to be be removed for most of the time, apart from in there own home of course, after all people wearing hoodies are asked to remove them in many shops now. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"A law has come into force in Belgium banning women from wearing the full Islamic veil in public. The country is the second European Union nation after France to enforce such a ban. Offenders face a fine of 137.5 euros (£121; $197) and up to seven days in jail. Should/Could it happen here?" could it happen here yes why not we have many small minded people in gov and around gov ministers!! should it happen NO what peeps wear or do should not be limited by others unless it causes harm of offence!! i.e. wearing a Nazi outfit to a synagogue is wrong and asking for trouble but wearing a Nazi outfit to a far right march is your right!! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Yes...ban them!!!! No more hubands and parents making girls wear them ! Mistress x" And your knowledge of the fact women are forced to wear them comes from where exactly? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The ban on the Burqa and nigabs in France isn't holding up at all.... So I expect any Belgian ban to go the same way. Possibly not... But if Belgium could be followed by the rest of the non Muslim countries.... As someone has mentioned... If I have left my own country and culture... To be a part of your country and culture... Why try to change your culture into mine...?? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yz2LaJOVAiA Cos we are just so good at integration when we go abroad. " Sorry... I dont have access to Utube on my phone, so correct my assumption that this lengthy videorealisation is intended to specifically categorise the entire british nation... On the other hand, as one who lived in the highly nationalist Alpes Maritimes for 20 years ( Under Jean Marie Le Penn ), learned their language and culture so as to integrate fully into their excellent society... I understand that every nation has a minority of rectal orifii... I however am not one of them... and stand by my previous post... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"I personally dont like them because i dont like talking to people whos faces i cant see, it would be like me talking to them with my head in a news paper, im sure hey would find that rude When im talking to someone i like to see them and their facial exressions, other wise its like talking to a brick wall is banning them taking away peoples basic freedem tho? i have no idea, id like to see them gone tho i have to admit just so when your talking you feel on a equal level with them" I had a new lady introduced to me for my class and she was wearing a full one. I was immediately hit with the old traumatism and panicked thinking about how I was gonna explain that I could not teach her if she was wearing one when she suddenly lifted it. Phew. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"sorry but its not part of great britains culture for women to cover their face and should be banned . i feel great britain is all to quick to cow-tow to other countries ways at detriment of our own . if was to travel to a country where this is part of their culture then id most certainly abide by that and that countries etiquette . so if people wish to visit/live here then they should show the same respect .if i felt that strongly against having to cover my face when in another country then i just wouldnt go to that country. *Shudders at the thought of trying to squeeze my size 24 frame into too tight cropped top, mini skirt revealing thunder thighs, double muffin top, Ugg boots to make my legs look like a Shetland pony to fit in with the dress code of this nation as seen on every high street*. Be very careful about calling for clothing to be banned. Once a precedent has been set you can't take it back. If anyone thinks such a ban would stop at veils they are misguided: hoodies, sports wear on over 40s, jeggings on anyone over a size 6, Ugg boots on anyone, vertical stripes, white shoes, Jesus sandals, women over 30 wearing anything from Miss Selfridge, New Look et al, low ride jeans on anyone over size 8, any woman displaying a muffin top to be stoned...on second thought, ban it! " even nudity. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"A law has come into force in Belgium banning women from wearing the full Islamic veil in public. The country is the second European Union nation after France to enforce such a ban. Offenders face a fine of 137.5 euros (£121; $197) and up to seven days in jail. Should/Could it happen here? It should not be banned, but I reserve my right to exhibit my finely honed liberal tolerance and sophisticated political sensitivity by taking a baseball bat to any arsehole of any religion who tries to tell women what to wear in the name of modesty.... What about immodesty And i might point out amongst yound muslim woman the burqua tends to be a political choice,not an imposed male one. Bouncy has made the points i wud excellently, freedom is not just about allowing the things you agree with, but the things you dislike and disagree with. i hate fascists, but i disagree with the no platform view i know some people here have.Once we impose censorship on thought,dress, belief we are no longer on the side of freedom. " I reitterate, am I allowed to freely roam nude. It is the other extreme from fully covered and in this case should now be allowed. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Yes...ban them!!!! No more hubands and parents making girls wear them ! Mistress x And your knowledge of the fact women are forced to wear them comes from where exactly?" Dunno about hers but mine comes from personal experience with many many families. Friends of mine emigrated from the country where I lived because they received phone calls saying that if their daughters did not wear the veil they would have their throats slit. lovely people. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"i do hope we don't ban it we fought for freedom to then take it away from someone else just doesn't sit right with me Bear in mind. 1. The veil has nothing to do with freedom. there is no compulsion to wear it for muslims and if you ask a knowledgeable muslim they will confirm that. The veil is a male imposed tradition. 2. Those who promote the veil would have no hesitation in imposing it upon you given the opportunity." 100% correct. The women are forced to wear it in most cases, so I'm led to believe. I say ban it, it's not right and it does not sit right in our culture. and then no one can be forced to wear it under threat. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" i dont feel we should be any different to any other country regarding a ban and the topic should maybe put to the populace in open debate or referendum." A referendum?......on what basis? How can you have other religious groups taking part in a refrendum that directly affects another religion? While we are at it should we have a referendum that tries to stop Jews wearing the kippah (skullcap) in public?....or Seikhs wearing the turban? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"emm as a muslim, alot of thoughts going through my mind about this subject. but dunno what to write or say, so il just keep it to myself. all i will say though, is that my overall view is that it should not be banned in this country. " You have a right to your opinion, just like everybody else. We just don't have to reach a warm fuzzy consensus on what is right or wrong, that's all. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Yes...ban them!!!! No more hubands and parents making girls wear them ! Mistress x And your knowledge of the fact women are forced to wear them comes from where exactly?" They are brought up with the expectation of wearing them much the same as other cultures have arranged marriages. or do most toddlers long to be covered up???? I had two children, neither of which have expressed a wish for either being covered or my playing matchmaker. Can I go to their countries and walk around in a sun top and shorts or have a quick snog on the beach? I think not. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Yes...ban them!!!! No more hubands and parents making girls wear them ! Mistress x And your knowledge of the fact women are forced to wear them comes from where exactly?" Answer...personal experience in london as a child, documentaries and radio 4 | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Having worked with many Muslim women in hospital pharmacies in the London area during my previous career, I have to say that they are very often misunderstood and misquoted on their religious beliefs and traditions. Or are we always to presume that men make all the decisions for Muslim women? If so we are presuming wrongly...." I think this. There's a separation problem here. Some women are forced to wear the veil. Some women aren't forced to wear the veil and wear it by choice. This makes the whole thing rather complicated. My friend from Iran told me about how the veil was introduced there. He said it started off slowly, a few highly devout women wearing it, and then suddenly it took over everywhere, like a viral internet video or a fashion craze. The problem became that once a certain number of number were wearing it, you become the odd one out by NOT wearing it. Thus a psychological reinforcement asserts itself. People think the veil has been around for centuries or something, this isn't really true at all. It only arrived in Iran recently. My Solution: A heavy dose of Westernism! Erotic novels, alcohol, dildos, and some books by John Lock, Adam Smith and David Hume, and they'll be alright | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Having worked with many Muslim women in hospital pharmacies in the London area during my previous career, I have to say that they are very often misunderstood and misquoted on their religious beliefs and traditions. Or are we always to presume that men make all the decisions for Muslim women? If so we are presuming wrongly.... I think this. There's a separation problem here. Some women are forced to wear the veil. Some women aren't forced to wear the veil and wear it by choice. This makes the whole thing rather complicated. My friend from Iran told me about how the veil was introduced there. He said it started off slowly, a few highly devout women wearing it, and then suddenly it took over everywhere, like a viral internet video or a fashion craze. The problem became that once a certain number of number were wearing it, you become the odd one out by NOT wearing it. Thus a psychological reinforcement asserts itself. People think the veil has been around for centuries or something, this isn't really true at all. It only arrived in Iran recently. My Solution: A heavy dose of Westernism! Erotic novels, alcohol, dildos, and some books by John Lock, Adam Smith and David Hume, and they'll be alright" Have you ever been to a Moslem country? If not, I recommend that you put a rucsack on your back and go and spend a few months in Pakistan where there are places where the men will execute the women if they learn that they have dared to talk to other men. . There are, it is true, some places where the women are better treated-ie the Ishmaeli communities such as Kharrimabad but, believe me, these places are few and far between. After Pakistan, if you haven't been decapitated by Pashtuns, or shot by Baluchis, , you could then move on to one of the Central Asian republics and find that things are similar there too, perhaps witnessing, as I did, a woman being stoned for daring to drop her veil and smile at a man. Then, providing you don't make the mistake I did and try and intervene, or if you do, that you can run fast enough to avoid the stones they start throwing at you, you could enter the west of China, where most of the people are also Moslem ( such as the Uighurs) and find at last that women are not treated quite so badly ,but discover that is is due to the dim view the Chinese Government take of the oppression of women , rather than to the Moslems being less extreme. After all this, you could read a translation of the Koran, in which Mohammed urges husbands to beat their wives once a week, whether they deserve it or not, just to remind them who is boss. And then after all this, perhaps you might realise that nice, politically correct notions are just that. Notions, with no basis in reality. In regard to your comments regarding the introduction of veils for Moslem women, I should be wary of assuming that just because someone comes from a certain country he or she knows all about its history and culture . Veils have been around for a very long time, as you can learn from reading something about the history of Islam and the regions of the world where it is practiced-or indeed from reading the Arabian Nights. . | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Having worked with many Muslim women in hospital pharmacies in the London area during my previous career, I have to say that they are very often misunderstood and misquoted on their religious beliefs and traditions. Or are we always to presume that men make all the decisions for Muslim women? If so we are presuming wrongly.... I think this. There's a separation problem here. Some women are forced to wear the veil. Some women aren't forced to wear the veil and wear it by choice. This makes the whole thing rather complicated. My friend from Iran told me about how the veil was introduced there. He said it started off slowly, a few highly devout women wearing it, and then suddenly it took over everywhere, like a viral internet video or a fashion craze. The problem became that once a certain number of number were wearing it, you become the odd one out by NOT wearing it. Thus a psychological reinforcement asserts itself. People think the veil has been around for centuries or something, this isn't really true at all. It only arrived in Iran recently. My Solution: A heavy dose of Westernism! Erotic novels, alcohol, dildos, and some books by John Lock, Adam Smith and David Hume, and they'll be alright Have you ever been to a Moslem country? If not, I recommend that you put a rucsack on your back and go and spend a few months in Pakistan where there are places where the men will execute the women if they learn that they have dared to talk to other men. . There are, it is true, some places where the women are better treated-ie the Ishmaeli communities such as Kharrimabad but, believe me, these places are few and far between. After Pakistan, if you haven't been decapitated by Pashtuns, or shot by Baluchis, , you could then move on to one of the Central Asian republics and find that things are similar there too, perhaps witnessing, as I did, a woman being stoned for daring to drop her veil and smile at a man. Then, providing you don't make the mistake I did and try and intervene, or if you do, that you can run fast enough to avoid the stones they start throwing at you, you could enter the west of China, where most of the people are also Moslem ( such as the Uighurs) and find at last that women are not treated quite so badly ,but discover that is is due to the dim view the Chinese Government take of the oppression of women , rather than to the Moslems being less extreme. After all this, you could read a translation of the Koran, in which Mohammed urges husbands to beat their wives once a week, whether they deserve it or not, just to remind them who is boss. And then after all this, perhaps you might realise that nice, politically correct notions are just that. Notions, with no basis in reality. In regard to your comments regarding the introduction of veils for Moslem women, I should be wary of assuming that just because someone comes from a certain country he or she knows all about its history and culture . Veils have been around for a very long time, as you can learn from reading something about the history of Islam and the regions of the world where it is practiced-or indeed from reading the Arabian Nights. . " I'm not being remotely PC. I'm saying that some woman, *do* wear the veil and would wear it no matter what circumstances were. We can't tell those kind of people what to wear or not to wear, as we'd be interfering with their personal choices, their liberty. On the other hand, a lot of women are forced to wear the veil, and in those cases it's against their personal liberty. So; I ask you, how do you distinguish between the two? If it were 100% one or the other, it would be straight forward, but it ain't. I'm wary of introducing a government policy, using cohersion to stop people doing things, seeing as I like to see stuff get done, rather than it be talked about. The best way is the soft way. The police enforce our existing rules. No Muslims get exemption within the country from them. The Great Power of the West is not in its military forces or its powerful governments, it's in our market economy and cultural view of reality. Those are dramatically more powerful than hard power in the long run, against whatever enemy we have. We won the war against Communism by using such methods. Trading with Pakistan, encouraging the enforcement of property right and stamping out corruption introduced by 3rd wave or communist advocates is the fastest way to get what you ultimately want. Once women have the power, money, everything will change. All economic stats back me up on this one. The market empowers women more than any other social group. They represent an arbitrage point on 50% of potential labour. It's not like we were treating women properly at the start of the industrial revolution neither, but by the end of it, everything had changed. This is bigger than any of us. It works slowly, so we must be patient and not make any stupid mistakes by reaching out to utopian visions. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The veil is all about control of women. It is irrelevant as to whether the woman wants to wear it it or not. If she WANTS to wear it then she is just deeper under control. Over a period of 12 months I witnessed the slow conversion of 17-18 year old girl/woman to Islam. It is one of my truly sad memories. She started out as a lively and bubbly person. At the end of the 12 months she was an ignorant middle aged baby factory. I had a conversation with her towards the end of the 12 months. Apparently there is a section in the koran that refers to Allah as being just like the mountains being a peg and holding the world together (paraphrasing heavily). Her Imman took this literally and preached that the mountains were pegs that held the world together. I tried to explain not that he was wrong but that perhaps he was being to literal. I showed her books about plate tectonics and a few other bits and bobs. The following day she came and gave me a note that said she was no longer allowed to talk to me as I was a blasphemer and was attempting to draw her away from the true path. She also won a scholarship to a design school in New York. Fully funded for 6 months. Her Imman refused to let her go as one of her 'uncles' (that was the term she used) could not go with her as she would be lodged in a single sex building and there was no funding for the 'uncle'. I say BAN IT as should everyone who has the slightest empathy for equality of the sexes. For those that argue "we fought for freedom of choice" ..yes we did especially the suffragettes and this evil control device is a slap in the face for these women of old. If the ban doesn't work it is at least a line in the sand that says "NO MORE. YOUR HATEFUL CUSTOMS HAVE NO PLACE HERE". /climbs off soap box " Well said. X | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"The veil is all about control of women. It is irrelevant as to whether the woman wants to wear it it or not. If she WANTS to wear it then she is just deeper under control. Over a period of 12 months I witnessed the slow conversion of 17-18 year old girl/woman to Islam. It is one of my truly sad memories. She started out as a lively and bubbly person. At the end of the 12 months she was an ignorant middle aged baby factory. I had a conversation with her towards the end of the 12 months. Apparently there is a section in the koran that refers to Allah as being just like the mountains being a peg and holding the world together (paraphrasing heavily). Her Imman took this literally and preached that the mountains were pegs that held the world together. I tried to explain not that he was wrong but that perhaps he was being to literal. I showed her books about plate tectonics and a few other bits and bobs. The following day she came and gave me a note that said she was no longer allowed to talk to me as I was a blasphemer and was attempting to draw her away from the true path. She also won a scholarship to a design school in New York. Fully funded for 6 months. Her Imman refused to let her go as one of her 'uncles' (that was the term she used) could not go with her as she would be lodged in a single sex building and there was no funding for the 'uncle'. I say BAN IT as should everyone who has the slightest empathy for equality of the sexes. For those that argue "we fought for freedom of choice" ..yes we did especially the suffragettes and this evil control device is a slap in the face for these women of old. If the ban doesn't work it is at least a line in the sand that says "NO MORE. YOUR HATEFUL CUSTOMS HAVE NO PLACE HERE". /climbs off soap box Well said. X" Absolutely. This country has already accepted shariah law in certain respects. It is insidious and abusing laws on human rights and our own complacency will soon have more power in this country than it should. Think on, if every muslim voted for the same party how would that affect the political climate of this country? Am i racist? Definitely not. Am i paranoid? Don't think so. But i am british, i was born into a christian country and would like my grandchildren to be too. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" "christian country" " lolwut?! You been asleep the last 5 decades? No offence, but the majority of people in the UK right now are definitely not Christians. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"there is a very good illustration in the first part of how words from "the book" have been manipulated. This is so often the case that words are used "out of context" to justify things and how anyone opposing is said to be "on the wrong path". Of course the solution is to follow the main message of the book egro "read meaning study" but such is human nature. The second poster, in my opinion, gives wise words of warning." To me it is irrelevant what the Koran has to say on anything. You stand accountable for your actions whatever your convictions. I hate Communists, but if I went and killed a bunch of them, I am still a murderer whether or not I refer to the works of various Capitalist authors. A 'higher purpose' doesn't absolve our actions of responsibility, it just explains them. IMO, arguing over the interpretations of holy books is a complete waste of time. The majority of Muslims today live in societies which are comparatively as backwards as the Christians in the Dark Ages of medieval Europe. Religion does have a lot to do with this which is why I find it utterly contemptible. The idea that religious people have, that they deserve respect for having their batshit insane notions, is laughable. It pisses me off that people creep around like cats on hot bricks in fear of offending them. There's a vast difference between being tolerant, and kow-towing to somebody's ignorance. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"there is a very good illustration in the first part of how words from "the book" have been manipulated. This is so often the case that words are used "out of context" to justify things and how anyone opposing is said to be "on the wrong path". Of course the solution is to follow the main message of the book egro "read meaning study" but such is human nature. The second poster, in my opinion, gives wise words of warning. To me it is irrelevant what the Koran has to say on anything. You stand accountable for your actions whatever your convictions. I hate Communists, but if I went and killed a bunch of them, I am still a murderer whether or not I refer to the works of various Capitalist authors. A 'higher purpose' doesn't absolve our actions of responsibility, it just explains them. IMO, arguing over the interpretations of holy books is a complete waste of time. The majority of Muslims today live in societies which are comparatively as backwards as the Christians in the Dark Ages of medieval Europe. Religion does have a lot to do with this which is why I find it utterly contemptible. The idea that religious people have, that they deserve respect for having their batshit insane notions, is laughable. It pisses me off that people creep around like cats on hot bricks in fear of offending them. There's a vast difference between being tolerant, and kow-towing to somebody's ignorance." could not agree more. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" "christian country" lolwut?! You been asleep the last 5 decades? No offence, but the majority of people in the UK right now are definitely not Christians." Incorrect. About 90% of the UK population are 'nominally' christian. The latest estimate is that 11% of the current population were born overseas ...but this includes a large number from europe, southern africa, west indies etc. All of whom are Christian. The last reliable data (2001 census) put the number of muslims at 1.5M although at a guess it is likely to have doubled (or even trebled) since then. UK laws are based on christian values (love it or loath it) and to be frank I would rather it stayed that way. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"its the old saying i believe in "when in rome you do as the romans do" so when in the uk or ireland or anywhere else you should do as that country dose or dont go to said country " funny you should use this, it is a good example of our christian based culture as it attributed to Jesus in the synoptic gospels, “Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s” when asked about paying taxes. (Matthew 22:21). | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is it just me who laughs at the inappropriate pictures attached to such serious views? Maybe its a sign that this is a swingers site afterall.... Mistress x" Yeah, it's pretty funny! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is it just me who laughs at the inappropriate pictures attached to such serious views? Maybe its a sign that this is a swingers site afterall.... Mistress x" yup, but just because you are a swinger does not mean you don't want to learn about stuff. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is it just me who laughs at the inappropriate pictures attached to such serious views? Maybe its a sign that this is a swingers site afterall.... Mistress x yup, but just because you are a swinger does not mean you don't want to learn about stuff." I learn every day of my life but when I see some of the posts paired with the pictures it makes me smile. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Is it just me who laughs at the inappropriate pictures attached to such serious views? Maybe its a sign that this is a swingers site afterall.... Mistress x yup, but just because you are a swinger does not mean you don't want to learn about stuff. I learn every day of my life but when I see some of the posts paired with the pictures it makes me smile. " he he, we wouldn't come here if it didn't make us smile. xx | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Have you ever been to a Moslem country? If not, I recommend that you put a rucsack on your back and go and spend a few months in Pakistan where there are places where the men will execute the women if they learn that they have dared to talk to other men. . There are, it is true, some places where the women are better treated-ie the Ishmaeli communities such as Kharrimabad but, believe me, these places are few and far between. After Pakistan, if you haven't been decapitated by Pashtuns, or shot by Baluchis, , you could then move on to one of the Central Asian republics and find that things are similar there too, perhaps witnessing, as I did, a woman being stoned for daring to drop her veil and smile at a man. Then, providing you don't make the mistake I did and try and intervene, or if you do, that you can run fast enough to avoid the stones they start throwing at you, you could enter the west of China, where most of the people are also Moslem ( such as the Uighurs) and find at last that women are not treated quite so badly ,but discover that is is due to the dim view the Chinese Government take of the oppression of women , rather than to the Moslems being less extreme. After all this, you could read a translation of the Koran, in which Mohammed urges husbands to beat their wives once a week, whether they deserve it or not, just to remind them who is boss. And then after all this, perhaps you might realise that nice, politically correct notions are just that. Notions, with no basis in reality. In regard to your comments regarding the introduction of veils for Moslem women, I should be wary of assuming that just because someone comes from a certain country he or she knows all about its history and culture . Veils have been around for a very long time, as you can learn from reading something about the history of Islam and the regions of the world where it is practiced-or indeed from reading the Arabian Nights. " You ask the question have you been to a moslem(sis) country? Out of interst have you. Serious question. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Having worked with many Muslim women in hospital pharmacies in the London area during my previous career, I have to say that they are very often misunderstood and misquoted on their religious beliefs and traditions. Or are we always to presume that men make all the decisions for Muslim women? If so we are presuming wrongly.... I think this. There's a separation problem here. Some women are forced to wear the veil. Some women aren't forced to wear the veil and wear it by choice. This makes the whole thing rather complicated. My friend from Iran told me about how the veil was introduced there. He said it started off slowly, a few highly devout women wearing it, and then suddenly it took over everywhere, like a viral internet video or a fashion craze. The problem became that once a certain number of number were wearing it, you become the odd one out by NOT wearing it. Thus a psychological reinforcement asserts itself. People think the veil has been around for centuries or something, this isn't really true at all. It only arrived in Iran recently. My Solution: A heavy dose of Westernism! Erotic novels, alcohol, dildos, and some books by John Lock, Adam Smith and David Hume, and they'll be alright Have you ever been to a Moslem country? If not, I recommend that you put a rucsack on your back and go and spend a few months in Pakistan where there are places where the men will execute the women if they learn that they have dared to talk to other men. . There are, it is true, some places where the women are better treated-ie the Ishmaeli communities such as Kharrimabad but, believe me, these places are few and far between. After Pakistan, if you haven't been decapitated by Pashtuns, or shot by Baluchis, , you could then move on to one of the Central Asian republics and find that things are similar there too, perhaps witnessing, as I did, a woman being stoned for daring to drop her veil and smile at a man. Then, providing you don't make the mistake I did and try and intervene, or if you do, that you can run fast enough to avoid the stones they start throwing at you, you could enter the west of China, where most of the people are also Moslem ( such as the Uighurs) and find at last that women are not treated quite so badly ,but discover that is is due to the dim view the Chinese Government take of the oppression of women , rather than to the Moslems being less extreme. After all this, you could read a translation of the Koran, in which Mohammed urges husbands to beat their wives once a week, whether they deserve it or not, just to remind them who is boss. And then after all this, perhaps you might realise that nice, politically correct notions are just that. Notions, with no basis in reality. In regard to your comments regarding the introduction of veils for Moslem women, I should be wary of assuming that just because someone comes from a certain country he or she knows all about its history and culture . Veils have been around for a very long time, as you can learn from reading something about the history of Islam and the regions of the world where it is practiced-or indeed from reading the Arabian Nights. . I'm not being remotely PC. I'm saying that some woman, *do* wear the veil and would wear it no matter what circumstances were. We can't tell those kind of people what to wear or not to wear, as we'd be interfering with their personal choices, their liberty. On the other hand, a lot of women are forced to wear the veil, and in those cases it's against their personal liberty. So; I ask you, how do you distinguish between the two? If it were 100% one or the other, it would be straight forward, but it ain't. I'm wary of introducing a government policy, using cohersion to stop people doing things, seeing as I like to see stuff get done, rather than it be talked about. The best way is the soft way. The police enforce our existing rules. No Muslims get exemption within the country from them. The Great Power of the West is not in its military forces or its powerful governments, it's in our market economy and cultural view of reality. Those are dramatically more powerful than hard power in the long run, against whatever enemy we have. We won the war against Communism by using such methods. Trading with Pakistan, encouraging the enforcement of property right and stamping out corruption introduced by 3rd wave or communist advocates is the fastest way to get what you ultimately want. Once women have the power, money, everything will change. All economic stats back me up on this one. The market empowers women more than any other social group. They represent an arbitrage point on 50% of potential labour. It's not like we were treating women properly at the start of the industrial revolution neither, but by the end of it, everything had changed. This is bigger than any of us. It works slowly, so we must be patient and not make any stupid mistakes by reaching out to utopian visions." "If the world is a book then he who has not travelled has read only one page" St. Augustine. You need to see a bit of the world, rather than just read about aspects of it. The vast majority of Moslem women wear veils because they are forced to, which is why the Revolutionary Afghan Womens Association (you won't hear about them on the television or in the newspapers, but I can assure you that they exist) made a point of refusing to wear them even under pain of death. Any traveller in Asia will smile wryly if you talk about 'stamping out corruption' there. Corruption is as much a part of the cultures in Asian countries as drinking beer or wine is in European countries; ask your Iranian friend to tell you what "baksheesh" is. And it wasn't introduced by 'Communists". ( Forgive me for asking, but is it because you are an East European that you have such an obsession with what you perceive to be Communists?) I'm sorry, but this , frankly , is an absurd assertion with absolutely no basis in fact. Corruption in Asia, of which 'baksheesh' is only one manifestation, goes back thousands of years. To imply that 'we' (whom, precisely, do you mean here by the way?) treated women similarly to Moslems, at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution , is, (and again, I'm sorry to have to say it,) also frankly absurd. The position of women, socially and economically in England at that time was infinitely better than it has ever been in an Islamic society.(But nowhere near as good as it had been in Anglo-Saxon England) (Christine Fell, Women in Anglo-Saxon England). Women might not have been able to vote in Britain until the Suffragettes and Suffragists (as well as other social reformers who included communists among their ranks ) campaigned for this, but they could and did own property, could receive an education (if, like boys, their parents had the money), could divorce their husbands (albeit not so easily as husbands could divorce their wives), could pray along side their men, didn't get stoned to death for smiling at men, and could even become monarchs such as Elizabeth1st, Mary of Scotland, and Victoria. Incidentally, I notice that you frequently use the word 'hate' in your posts, and that you place yourself in one of the world's extremist camps. The study of Economics may teach one about economic theories and the way markets work, but it does not teach one about human beings and human societies. The study of History, however, does, and History makes it abundantly clear that hatred and extremism lead to human beings killing and butchering other human beings. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Have you ever been to a Moslem country? If not, I recommend that you put a rucsack on your back and go and spend a few months in Pakistan where there are places where the men will execute the women if they learn that they have dared to talk to other men. . There are, it is true, some places where the women are better treated-ie the Ishmaeli communities such as Kharrimabad but, believe me, these places are few and far between. After Pakistan, if you haven't been decapitated by Pashtuns, or shot by Baluchis, , you could then move on to one of the Central Asian republics and find that things are similar there too, perhaps witnessing, as I did, a woman being stoned for daring to drop her veil and smile at a man. Then, providing you don't make the mistake I did and try and intervene, or if you do, that you can run fast enough to avoid the stones they start throwing at you, you could enter the west of China, where most of the people are also Moslem ( such as the Uighurs) and find at last that women are not treated quite so badly ,but discover that is is due to the dim view the Chinese Government take of the oppression of women , rather than to the Moslems being less extreme. After all this, you could read a translation of the Koran, in which Mohammed urges husbands to beat their wives once a week, whether they deserve it or not, just to remind them who is boss. And then after all this, perhaps you might realise that nice, politically correct notions are just that. Notions, with no basis in reality. In regard to your comments regarding the introduction of veils for Moslem women, I should be wary of assuming that just because someone comes from a certain country he or she knows all about its history and culture . Veils have been around for a very long time, as you can learn from reading something about the history of Islam and the regions of the world where it is practiced-or indeed from reading the Arabian Nights. You ask the question have you been to a moslem(sis) country? Out of interst have you. Serious question. " Er, well I should have thought that what I posted here answers that question for you, but to clarify things for you I have been to Pakistan, Afghanistan, Egypt, Kashmir (both Indian and Pakistani), Turkey, Bangladesh, Uzbekistan, Tadjikstan, and what used to be called Chinese Turkestan-and always as a traveller, not a tourist, ie for more than three months. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Have you ever been to a Moslem country? If not, I recommend that you put a rucsack on your back and go and spend a few months in Pakistan where there are places where the men will execute the women if they learn that they have dared to talk to other men. . There are, it is true, some places where the women are better treated-ie the Ishmaeli communities such as Kharrimabad but, believe me, these places are few and far between. After Pakistan, if you haven't been decapitated by Pashtuns, or shot by Baluchis, , you could then move on to one of the Central Asian republics and find that things are similar there too, perhaps witnessing, as I did, a woman being stoned for daring to drop her veil and smile at a man. Then, providing you don't make the mistake I did and try and intervene, or if you do, that you can run fast enough to avoid the stones they start throwing at you, you could enter the west of China, where most of the people are also Moslem ( such as the Uighurs) and find at last that women are not treated quite so badly ,but discover that is is due to the dim view the Chinese Government take of the oppression of women , rather than to the Moslems being less extreme. After all this, you could read a translation of the Koran, in which Mohammed urges husbands to beat their wives once a week, whether they deserve it or not, just to remind them who is boss. And then after all this, perhaps you might realise that nice, politically correct notions are just that. Notions, with no basis in reality. In regard to your comments regarding the introduction of veils for Moslem women, I should be wary of assuming that just because someone comes from a certain country he or she knows all about its history and culture . Veils have been around for a very long time, as you can learn from reading something about the history of Islam and the regions of the world where it is practiced-or indeed from reading the Arabian Nights. You ask the question have you been to a moslem(sis) country? Out of interst have you. Serious question. " Er, well I should have thought that what I posted here answers that question for you, but to clarify things for you I have been to Pakistan, Afghanistan, Egypt, Kashmir (both Indian and Pakistani), Turkey, Bangladesh, Uzbekistan, Tadjikstan, and what used to be called Chinese Turkestan-and always as a traveller, not a tourist, ie for more than three months. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Can somebosy tell me what benefit banning it would actually have. I mean I've read plenty of crap about preserving "our culture" (whatever that is) but considering our record on colonialism that is more than a tad hypocritical surely? As a nation we should be proud of multi-culturism and accpeting other races and their traditions into our world. So many posts on this thread smack of at best xenophobia and at worst out and out racism. The justification that some are stating of banning it because it is enforced is so ironic it is laughable. The very suggestion of banning clothing for what appears to be no other reason than to make a stand against one religion smacks of something from 1930's Germany rather than a trait of a country that claims to be both libveral and free. " There is no reason at all why we should have to put up with the full veil. The full veil if you have seen it is worn by those people in long black gowns or burkas. Everything is completely covered you cannot see anything of the person at all. This is unacceptable to me and perhaps also to many others in this country, including many moslems. Yes, I know loads, most of them wear long dresses and coats and a scarf but would not dream of covering their face and hands. These people are extremist in their views. They are what is known as "fundamentalist muslims". | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" There is no reason at all why we should have to put up with the full veil. The full veil if you have seen it is worn by those people in long black gowns or burkas. Everything is completely covered you cannot see anything of the person at all. This is unacceptable to me and perhaps also to many others in this country, including many moslems. Yes, I know loads, most of them wear long dresses and coats and a scarf but would not dream of covering their face and hands. These people are extremist in their views. They are what is known as "fundamentalist muslims"." I grew up in Birmingham and live in London, of course I have seen the veil Why is it not acceptable to you though? What effect does it have on your life? How would banning it enhance that? Or is it just a question of prejudice and fear of those that are different to us. out of interest, how do you know that those wearing the veil are fundamentalists? Or do you just think that? For that matter what is a fundamentalist? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" There is no reason at all why we should have to put up with the full veil. The full veil if you have seen it is worn by those people in long black gowns or burkas. Everything is completely covered you cannot see anything of the person at all. This is unacceptable to me and perhaps also to many others in this country, including many moslems. Yes, I know loads, most of them wear long dresses and coats and a scarf but would not dream of covering their face and hands. These people are extremist in their views. They are what is known as "fundamentalist muslims". I grew up in Birmingham and live in London, of course I have seen the veil Why is it not acceptable to you though? What effect does it have on your life? How would banning it enhance that? Or is it just a question of prejudice and fear of those that are different to us. out of interest, how do you know that those wearing the veil are fundamentalists? Or do you just think that? For that matter what is a fundamentalist?" It is not acceptable to me because I know where it can lead. I lived a period of fundamentalist islaam and it bears no resemblance to what islaam could be. It is control of the masses by fear. Islaam like any other belief system promotes choice. It has been manipulated by these extreme people who choose to interpret "the book" as they please and their objective is control. They would see themselves eventually controlled us. Trust me. or don't. Just sharing my experience. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Can somebosy tell me what benefit banning it would actually have. I mean I've read plenty of crap about preserving "our culture" (whatever that is) but considering our record on colonialism that is more than a tad hypocritical surely? As a nation we should be proud of multi-culturism and accpeting other races and their traditions into our world. So many posts on this thread smack of at best xenophobia and at worst out and out racism. The justification that some are stating of banning it because it is enforced is so ironic it is laughable. The very suggestion of banning clothing for what appears to be no other reason than to make a stand against one religion smacks of something from 1930's Germany rather than a trait of a country that claims to be both libveral and free. " As somebody who has travelled extensively, for long periods of time, on every continent in the world except Australasia and new Antarctica, I can hardly be called xenophobic. As somebody who has learnt, through his travels, that no race is superior, or inferior to another, but just different, I can hardly be called a racist either.(And by the way, if you are going to use this word, you should find out what it actually means, rather than what most people think it means;correctly defined , a racist is one who believes in the superiority of one race over another, not for example, one who doesn't want to swing with a man with brown skin because she doesn't find brown skin attractive). I call myself an internationalist. But my travels have led me to the conclusion that although there is room for improvement in this country, as with every other country I have ever visited, I would rather live here than anywhere else in the world. There are many reasons for this, but one of them, is that our culture is a relatively free and tolerant one, and it therefore follows that I do not want people coming here from cultures which are not free and tolerant. And after all the travelling I have done in Moslem countries, no-one can tell me that Moslem societies are free and tolerant. As a traveller I accept that I must respect and abide by the customs of the countries I am travelling in, and that if I can't, I must leave, as I did after witnessing a woman being stoned in Uzbekistan because she had dared to smile at a man. By the same token I expect people who come to my country to respect and abide by our customs, and these include not forcing women to cover their faces and hair, not forcing them to marry men they don't want to ,etc etc. And if they won't respect our customs,then as far as I am concerned, they must leave. Incidentally, if you want an example of racism, go to the Andaman Islands and see how the Indians treat the aboriginals there. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"All very well....but you cannot ask a British Muslim who was born here to leave the country if they don't want to follow traditional British customs....Can you? Lets not get carried away in believing that all Muslims living in Britain migrated here....because there are clearly second and third generation Muslims living amongst us. So that blows that out of the water...." Dunno cant you? I understand that certain muslim countries insist on everyone following their dress code and laws regardless of place of birth | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"But we don't have such Draconian laws here in the UK, and with our diverse cultures we could never realistically bring such laws in. You can't force a British born Muslim woman to comply with our traditional national dress....as we don't have one. " A lot of the problems we're discussing, come from: A: the insularity of islamic groups B: culture clash A is not B and B is not A. B is both our problems and can only be resolved by time. But A could be resolved by developing something like a Special Economic Zone. That is; Long term settlers are to go into a region. Here they will learn, initially at the expense of the State, and then they will pay it back over time, some modules on living in England. An english module, something about basic finances and culture, basic law stuff etc Then; after a couple of weeks to a few months, they are allowed to move freely throughout the country. Canada does something like this in New Brunswick. The main rationale is the language barrier and preventing culture shock. By reducing those two, we have a more integrated society. Just a thought. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" There is no reason at all why we should have to put up with the full veil. The full veil if you have seen it is worn by those people in long black gowns or burkas. Everything is completely covered you cannot see anything of the person at all. This is unacceptable to me and perhaps also to many others in this country, including many moslems. Yes, I know loads, most of them wear long dresses and coats and a scarf but would not dream of covering their face and hands. These people are extremist in their views. They are what is known as "fundamentalist muslims". I grew up in Birmingham and live in London, of course I have seen the veil Why is it not acceptable to you though? What effect does it have on your life? How would banning it enhance that? Or is it just a question of prejudice and fear of those that are different to us. out of interest, how do you know that those wearing the veil are fundamentalists? Or do you just think that? For that matter what is a fundamentalist?" I don't like the veil at all. I'm stuck on exactly what to do about it (since every action has a counter reaction, you want to know the consequences of your actions, and this case is difficult because of that). I think statistically, few wear the veil, but that they stand out so much it often seems like there's more of them. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" You need to see a bit of the world, rather than just read about aspects of it. The vast majority of Moslem women wear veils because they are forced to, which is why the Revolutionary Afghan Womens Association (you won't hear about them on the television or in the newspapers, but I can assure you that they exist) made a point of refusing to wear them even under pain of death. " I hear you, I'm just uncertain whether to believe you. I've heard Muslim women complaining about the veil, I've heard Muslim women being apologists for it. " Any traveller in Asia will smile wryly if you talk about 'stamping out corruption' there. Corruption is as much a part of the cultures in Asian countries as drinking beer or wine is in European countries; ask your Iranian friend to tell you what "baksheesh" is. " I know what it means. " And it wasn't introduced by 'Communists". ( Forgive me for asking, but is it because you are an East European that you have such an obsession with what you perceive to be Communists?) I'm sorry, but this , frankly , is an absurd assertion with absolutely no basis in fact. Corruption in Asia, of which 'baksheesh' is only one manifestation, goes back thousands of years. " You're not understanding my view. There's all kinds of corruption, but the one I was referring to was the kind I call 'naive equality', the anti meritocratic ideals. To me this is a dangerous latent form of corruption, whereas a Communist would view it the other way around no doubt. They do not understand or do not accept that self-interest is the primary motivation of human activity. Another form of corruption is the other way around. i.e. baksheesh This is a naive form of self interest. It is inherently un-meritocratic, and destroys long term productivity in favour of short term gains. i.e. it is speculation, not investment in terms of attitude. " To imply that 'we' (whom, precisely, do you mean here by the way?) treated women similarly to Moslems, at the beginning of the Industrial Revolution , is, (and again, I'm sorry to have to say it,) also frankly absurd. The position of women, socially and economically in England at that time was infinitely better than it has ever been in an Islamic society.(But nowhere near as good as it had been in Anglo-Saxon England) (Christine Fell, Women in Anglo-Saxon England). Women might not have been able to vote in Britain until the Suffragettes and Suffragists (as well as other social reformers who included communists among their ranks ) campaigned for this, but they could and did own property, could receive an education (if, like boys, their parents had the money), could divorce their husbands (albeit not so easily as husbands could divorce their wives), could pray along side their men, didn't get stoned to death for smiling at men, and could even become monarchs such as Elizabeth1st, Mary of Scotland, and Victoria. " Maybe, or maybe not. I'm not going to argue the point, I was saying that there's an parallel between the way, a long time ago, men used to use the Bible a source of inspiration for treating women as inferior, and the attitudes of some Muslims today (some Christians too, but far fewer I think). " Incidentally, I notice that you frequently use the word 'hate' in your posts, and that you place yourself in one of the world's extremist camps. " You need not be concerned about me doing an 'anders'. Do you believe the centre is always the correct position morally, economically and otherwise? I do not. I do hate Communists, I'm not about to apologize for that. Hate is a perfectly normal human reaction to something that causes harm to you, I hate Communists in the same way you hate burning your hand on a stove. Their ideology is harmful, they threw the world out of balance, distorting the equilibrium between the forces of accumulation and distribution, and for this they burnt their own nations and peoples to a cinder. I'm not an archaist, the leviathan Thomas Hobbs refers to is necessary, but so is the occasional stab in the rear to keep it moving along, turning it into a lean machine. That's where organizations like the Tea Party come in. They fulfil a useful role, however much the american liberals despise them. Nor is a small group of radical Marxists a bad thing. How so? If anything the truth is that I'm like a Harper, which is a term from role playing games, where a character joins one side because they are weak, and leaves when they are strong to join the other side. Apologies for the obscure reference, but it makes a great deal of sense if you've heard of the term before. At this moment in time, the Capitalists are on the retreat in the West, the Socialists have become too strong. For every action, there is a reaction, and the successes of Capitalism have led directly to more power for Socialism. It is most ironic. These by the way, are things that are measurable in various ways, it is not dependant purely on my view of the world. " The study of Economics may teach one about economic theories and the way markets work, but it does not teach one about human beings and human societies. The study of History, however, does, and History makes it abundantly clear that hatred and extremism lead to human beings killing and butchering other human beings. " If economics were a computer circuit, it would be the substrate. It affects everything else on top of it. Things like people's opinions, emotions, these transient things. In the long term, they have no real effects on the world. If people's emotions are collectively a voting machine, then economics would be a weighing machine. I'm not saying they are not important, or that they are irrelevant, just that studying human beings as individuals doesn't and cannot give you the bigger picture. (but anthropogenic studies would) Yes 'extremism' does do that for us. But that extremism really comes from the centre, the equilibrium between the forces of Capitalism and Socialism is highly unstable. For a moment we were on a point which suited both economic paradigms, then in the west it slowly tilted towards Socialism, and is containing to slowly pick up the pace. For what it's worth, the exact opposite is occurring in the developing world. Much like a ball on a stick. You hold it steady and it'll rest easy in the centre. But the slightest movement prompts it towards one end or the other, picking up speed as it does so. This always surprises us, and we suddenly wind up in places where we don't see how the path took us there. There's always a thread back, but we sometimes find it hard to believe. Anders is a good example of this. His political views are actually very mainstream. You'd read more extreme comments every day on the pages of the Telegraph or it's counterpart, the Guardian. Read his ideas on document.no (google's cache, they've long been censored on the main site). Not exactly the words of a mass murderer you'll find. There is no smoking gun, which will bedevil the security forces. But, little by little, his perspective slid, until he was suddenly shooting children. There is no great mystery here, despite the shite (the guy is 'insane' etc) being offered up to appease a confused population. Everybody is like this, even you. You're on one side or the other in this war, it comes naturally to humankind to choose Left or Right, Capitalism or Socialism. Lastly; extremism, as you call it. Most people look upon it in horror in peacetime, but totally jump on board in the wartime. The Dresden Bombings and Atomic Bombings are A-Ok from people's perspective then. It's hypocritical, but that's human's for you. I'd be less worried about 'characters' like Anders or even Osama Bin Laden, than I would be large collective forces like Islam or Government and so on. They have dramatically greater potential to do bigger damage. It's just that they are slower moving creatures so we don't notice them creeping up on us. However, and this is really my last thing to say, you should accept I hope that death is a perfectly natural and reasonable thing in this world. Extremism, war, destruction, these are aspects of humanity we'd rather avoid, but they exist for the reason of pure survival. i.e. they are necessary collective instincts, otherwise they wouldn't exist. To be objective, you cannot see the war of the ant colonies as being any different from that of human populations. Humankind is not a 'special case' abstracted from Nature into some kind of vacuum. That is a conceit of the religions and the environmentalists, who can't accept that we are Animals. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Banning peacefully citizens from wearing the hibab because a small number of extremists would use it to mask themselves is not democratical. Those that call for the ban are insecure about their own identity and culture. There is no master Islamic plan to conquer the world and replace decadent Western cultures with a version of Islam that would be abhorrent to any half educated person, Muslim or otherwise. Ask yourself: Do you ever think you will see the legal stoning of a woman, on the streets of Britain, by a mob for something as little as smiling at a man? Remember: I said 'legal'." I tend to agree. I'm sure some Islamists 'think' they have a grand master plan, but they do not. They are just minute actors with a grandiose self of placement in world history. While it would be wrong to ban because it wouldn't work or solve any real problems, I don't like the Burka. Then again, I'm being hypocritical, because I'm quite happy to see half naked girls wandering about the streets yowling like mating cats (because, like everyone here, 'pervert' is the default setting) I understand the angst of Muslims from a hyper-conservative culture when they come in contact with a western city. I fear entire generations of premature ejectulators though. Caused by rapid shower housed frenzies of masturbation when poor Ahmed caught sight of Auntie A'shadieeyah's ankles... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Banning peacefully citizens from wearing the hibab because a small number of extremists would use it to mask themselves is not democratical. Those that call for the ban are insecure about their own identity and culture. There is no master Islamic plan to conquer the world and replace decadent Western cultures with a version of Islam that would be abhorrent to any half educated person, Muslim or otherwise. Ask yourself: Do you ever think you will see the legal stoning of a woman, on the streets of Britain, by a mob for something as little as smiling at a man? Remember: I said 'legal'. I tend to agree. I'm sure some Islamists 'think' they have a grand master plan, but they do not. They are just minute actors with a grandiose self of placement in world history. While it would be wrong to ban because it wouldn't work or solve any real problems, I don't like the Burka. Then again, I'm being hypocritical, because I'm quite happy to see half naked girls wandering about the streets yowling like mating cats (because, like everyone here, 'pervert' is the default setting) I understand the angst of Muslims from a hyper-conservative culture when they come in contact with a western city. I fear entire generations of premature ejectulators though. Caused by rapid shower housed frenzies of masturbation when poor Ahmed caught sight of Auntie A'shadieeyah's ankles... " Don't you believe it. Go to any late night cinema shwing sex films and you'll see entire audiences of repressed muslims agog at the what's on the screen. Any form of extremism lacks one vital power - the power to police one's thoughts, which is why some religions have managed to survive even after horrific extermination programmes (I'm not just referring to Nazi Germany here). On the whole, I believe religion to be a good thing, although I am an atheist myself. It provides a blanket of morality that 99.9% of the human population live by, and happily so. It also provides structure (born, grow, get married (although one gets married in the eyes of God but it's the that state divorces you), have kids, grow old, die, get buried (almost always in a Churchyard unless you're crem'd)). If you remove the constructs religion provides you'll never be 100% certain that each morning you leave your house that you will be alive to return to it in the evening. Mankind has demonstrated it's somewhat childlike ability to descend into chaos when law, order and morality have been dissolved. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" Don't you believe it. Go to any late night cinema shwing sex films and you'll see entire audiences of repressed muslims agog at the what's on the screen. Any form of extremism lacks one vital power - the power to police one's thoughts, which is why some religions have managed to survive even after horrific extermination programmes (I'm not just referring to Nazi Germany here). On the whole, I believe religion to be a good thing, although I am an atheist myself. It provides a blanket of morality that 99.9% of the human population live by, and happily so. It also provides structure (born, grow, get married (although one gets married in the eyes of God but it's the that state divorces you), have kids, grow old, die, get buried (almost always in a Churchyard unless you're crem'd)). If you remove the constructs religion provides you'll never be 100% certain that each morning you leave your house that you will be alive to return to it in the evening. Mankind has demonstrated it's somewhat childlike ability to descend into chaos when law, order and morality have been dissolved." I don't think I can agree that religion is broadly a good thing. It's a complex issue though. It's a bit like saying capitalism or communism is good or bad. Those absolutes have absolutely no meaning on a macro level. I can love or hate things, but a nation cannot hate or love. We persistently have religion in every country in the world. Thus; religion exists for a reason. Then again; we also have murder and rape in every country in the world as well. So; the popularity of something is not evidence here nor there as to whether something is dangerous or beneficial to society. Religion does provide structure. That much is true. But I think, that religion will ultimately be replaced by a different structure in the distant future. (I'm an atheist/agnostic depending on which semantic debate you'd prefer to have...) Put simply; I think religion has a role similar to tribalism or feudalism. A necessary construct in the past, but no longer needed under particular improved circumstances the West finds itself in after the triumphs of capitalism in the last 300 years. That kind of thing is in the far distant future though, it's certainly not tomorrow, and it'll occur in an evolutionary manner, over long periods of time, and not all over the world at once. Religion is cyclical by nature, it is falling in England, but it will rise again, only to fall again, and so on. That doesn't mean it will be always with us. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Banning peacefully citizens from wearing the hibab because a small number of extremists would use it to mask themselves is not democratical. Those that call for the ban are insecure about their own identity and culture. There is no master Islamic plan to conquer the world and replace decadent Western cultures with a version of Islam that would be abhorrent to any half educated person, Muslim or otherwise. Ask yourself: Do you ever think you will see the legal stoning of a woman, on the streets of Britain, by a mob for something as little as smiling at a man? Remember: I said 'legal'." We don't always agree on things Wishy....but top post!! | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"All very well....but you cannot ask a British Muslim who was born here to leave the country if they don't want to follow traditional British customs....Can you? Lets not get carried away in believing that all Muslims living in Britain migrated here....because there are clearly second and third generation Muslims living amongst us. So that blows that out of the water...." No it doesn't. We can insist that the ones who weren't born here and refuse to respect our customs leave. Of course we can't do the same with the ones who were born here, but I wonder how many people who were born in Britain are practicing Moslems. I, for one, do not know what the figures are. I have a good friend who was born here of Pakistani parents and isn't interested in Islam or indeed any religion , but of course that's only one person. It's a shame I can't get him to contribute to this discussion because I know he'd have a lot to say. But he doesn't know his friends are swingers.... | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" No it doesn't. We can insist that the ones who weren't born here and refuse to respect our customs leave. Of course we can't do the same with the ones who were born here, ...." Damn, I was hoping they'd take a few of the white ones from the Jeremy Kyle show with them. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
".... what would happen if everyone chose to cover their faces" I'd see less ugly people? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
".... what would happen if everyone chose to cover their faces I'd see less ugly people?" pmsl, they best hurry up and pass a law then | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"No it doesn't. We can insist that the ones who weren't born here and refuse to respect our customs leave. Of course we can't do the same with the ones who were born here, but I wonder how many people who were born in Britain are practicing Moslems. I, for one, do not know what the figures are. I have a good friend who was born here of Pakistani parents and isn't interested in Islam or indeed any religion , but of course that's only one person. It's a shame I can't get him to contribute to this discussion because I know he'd have a lot to say. But he doesn't know his friends are swingers.... " Like you said....only one person. So are we going to make migrants to the UK conform to the Christian religion while we are at it?, or just customs that you feel are typicially British? What is traditional British dress? What are traditional British customs? Only 15% of British Christians attend church at least once a month....hardly a basis for a traditional religion for a country is it? Totally unworkable....and I think you know that | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"No it doesn't. We can insist that the ones who weren't born here and refuse to respect our customs leave. Of course we can't do the same with the ones who were born here, but I wonder how many people who were born in Britain are practicing Moslems. I, for one, do not know what the figures are. I have a good friend who was born here of Pakistani parents and isn't interested in Islam or indeed any religion , but of course that's only one person. It's a shame I can't get him to contribute to this discussion because I know he'd have a lot to say. But he doesn't know his friends are swingers.... Like you said....only one person. So are we going to make migrants to the UK conform to the Christian religion while we are at it?, or just customs that you feel are typicially British? What is traditional British dress? What are traditional British customs? Only 15% of British Christians attend church at least once a month....hardly a basis for a traditional religion for a country is it? Totally unworkable....and I think you know that " So you are aware of the numbers of people who are born here who practice Islam are you? Then please post the information, together with your source as I should be most interested to read it. "British customs". Well, where shall I start? Let's see. Well for one thing, , we tend to bury our dead or cremate them. The Tibetans on the other hand take their dead bodies to a special place , cut off every piece of flesh and fling it all to vultures and then grind up the bones and mix them with tsampa and fling that to the vultures also. They reserve burial for criminals only, believing that if they are buried, their criminal spirits won't be able to reincarnate. We believe that a person should marry the person he or she selects. The Hindus on the other hand believe that a person's parents should select the person he or she should marry . We tend to believe also that if our noses are full of snot, we should blow them into handkerchiefs, whereas the Chinese believe that blowing one's nose into a handkerchief is disgusting, and that instead people should blow it all out onto the floor. In this connexion, we don't believe that hoicking up every ounce of snot and mucus every morning is essential for the purifying of our bodies and spirits as do the Nepalis, and as a result it is rare to see people every morning snorting and doubling up as they pull strings of mucus from deep down inside them and then toss them onto the ground as they do in every town and village in Nepal. We tend also, to wipe our bums with toilet paper, whereas most inhabitants of the Indian sub-continent prefer to use their left hand and a jug of cold water. Perhaps you are another person who should do a bit of travelling-and I don't mean two weeks in Lanzarote. But I think I know where you're coming from. Like so many other people you believe that when it comes to race and culture people belong to either one of two camps. You belong to one, and you erroneously assume that I belong to the camp which you oppose. But tell me has it not crossed your mind that someone who has travelled as much as I have is unlikely to be in that camp ? Has it not occurred to you that someone who has been to India twenty times, on each occasion for at least three months is unlikely to dislike India and Indians for example? In my opinion, the camp to which you belong is as narrow-minded as the other camp and actually does as much damage to the cause of world harmony as the camp you oppose. British culture exists and is very different to, for example, Indian culture. Pretending that this is not the case, or refusing to accept that there are aspects of each culture which are not only incompatible with each other but sometimes anatagonistic to each other is as bad as believing that one race or culture is superior to another, and, in my opinion, does as much harm. Incidentally, when I was young, and foolish enough to believe that there were only two camps, and to belong to yours, I went to prison for my part in an anti-racist demonstration. I trust that you too put your money where your mouth is and go out onto the streets and fight racism, rather than just being an armchair reformer? | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Perhaps you are another person who should do a bit of travelling-and I don't mean two weeks in Lanzarote. " So not only are the world renowned travel expert of Fab Swingers....but you think you are the only person on here who has travelled?.... Get over yourself. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
" On the whole, I believe religion to be a good thing, although I am an atheist myself. It provides a blanket of morality that 99.9% of the human population live by, and happily so. It also provides structure (born, grow, get married (although one gets married in the eyes of God but it's the that state divorces you), have kids, grow old, die, get buried (almost always in a Churchyard unless you're crem'd)). If you remove the constructs religion provides you'll never be 100% certain that each morning you leave your house that you will be alive to return to it in the evening. Mankind has demonstrated it's somewhat childlike ability to descend into chaos when law, order and morality have been dissolved." I'm confused,last week you said,and I quote 'Ban religion,all of it' | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Perhaps you are another person who should do a bit of travelling-and I don't mean two weeks in Lanzarote. So not only are the world renowned travel expert of Fab Swingers....but you think you are the only person on here who has travelled?.... Get over yourself." Oh dear, like my brother, I seem to have inadvertently bruised your ego. I do apologise. I assure you it wasn't intentional. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Perhaps you are another person who should do a bit of travelling-and I don't mean two weeks in Lanzarote. So not only are the world renowned travel expert of Fab Swingers....but you think you are the only person on here who has travelled?.... Get over yourself. Oh dear, like my brother, I seem to have inadvertently bruised your ego. I do apologise. I assure you it wasn't intentional. " Tell you what, as an expert on Indian travel....the next time I need advice on what rice to have with my Chicken Korma I'll get right onto you. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Perhaps you are another person who should do a bit of travelling-and I don't mean two weeks in Lanzarote. So not only are the world renowned travel expert of Fab Swingers....but you think you are the only person on here who has travelled?.... Get over yourself. Oh dear, like my brother, I seem to have inadvertently bruised your ego. I do apologise. I assure you it wasn't intentional. Tell you what, as an expert on Indian travel....the next time I need advice on what rice to have with my Chicken Korma I'll get right onto you." You'd be better off going to India and asking an Indian-but make sure you ask a rich Moslem. Most Indians are too poor to eat meat and if they are Hindus they usually don't eat meat anyway ( never if they are Brahmins ). Actually my advice to you would be to forget the food and try a drink called bhaang lassi-it'll do you the world of good! Bom Shankar. P.S Chicken Korma is not an Indian dish, it's a British Indian dish. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
| |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |
"Perhaps you are another person who should do a bit of travelling-and I don't mean two weeks in Lanzarote. So not only are the world renowned travel expert of Fab Swingers....but you think you are the only person on here who has travelled?.... Get over yourself. Oh dear, like my brother, I seem to have inadvertently bruised your ego. I do apologise. I assure you it wasn't intentional. Tell you what, as an expert on Indian travel....the next time I need advice on what rice to have with my Chicken Korma I'll get right onto you. You'd be better off going to India and asking an Indian-but make sure you ask a rich Moslem. Most Indians are too poor to eat meat and if they are Hindus they usually don't eat meat anyway ( never if they are Brahmins ). Actually my advice to you would be to forget the food and try a drink called bhaang lassi-it'll do you the world of good! Bom Shankar. P.S Chicken Korma is not an Indian dish, it's a British Indian dish." You see that's the thing about patronising folks....you need to be sure of your facts. Korma is a traditional Mughal dish....goes back centuries in fact. | |||
Reply privately (thread closed by moderator) |