FabSwingers.com
 

FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > Sgt. peppers lonely hearts club band.

Sgt. peppers lonely hearts club band.

Jump to: Newest in thread

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury

Are you a fan? And will you be buying an anniversary addition?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Piper at the Gates of Dawn rip off

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"Piper at the Gates of Dawn rip off "

Impossible.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Mothers of invention wannabees

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

No I have an early copy so pointless acquiring one that's been digitally re-mastered if indeed the new release re-mastered

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Are you a fan? And will you be buying an anniversary addition? "

Yes !! One of my favourite shows is LOVE in Las Vegas - thats got lots of that music in it xx

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *yrdwomanWoman  over a year ago

Putting the 'cum' in Eboracum

Tempting, as its my 50th anniversary this year too.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"No I have an early copy so pointless acquiring one that's been digitally re-mastered if indeed the new release re-mastered "

According to an interview i heard the remaster really is something special. One gem of information that is never heard before was that the drums were turned down on the edit to reduce the risk of the needle jumping out of the grooves. This kind of thing has been addressed. The CD pack has loads of extra tracks with it. But it is quite pricey. I also have a 1967 original.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"Are you a fan? And will you be buying an anniversary addition?

Yes !! One of my favourite shows is LOVE in Las Vegas - thats got lots of that music in it xx"

Where does that play?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

I'm very lucky to already have my Dad's copy on vinyl.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"No I have an early copy so pointless acquiring one that's been digitally re-mastered if indeed the new release re-mastered

According to an interview i heard the remaster really is something special. One gem of information that is never heard before was that the drums were turned down on the edit to reduce the risk of the needle jumping out of the grooves. This kind of thing has been addressed. The CD pack has loads of extra tracks with it. But it is quite pricey. I also have a 1967 original."

Although I'm still not tempted ...

I love it for what it's always been to me ..... I can live without hearing a reproduction mastered by people who were not involved in the making of the original

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Haha! And I am currently listening to "She's Leaving Home" as I spotted this thread.

Buy it.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"I'm very lucky to already have my Dad's copy on vinyl. "

same here. ( although mine is my late sister's ) however the anniversary edition does have lots and lots of extras.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"Haha! And I am currently listening to "She's Leaving Home" as I spotted this thread.

Buy it. "

AHHHHHH! Get out of my head!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"No I have an early copy so pointless acquiring one that's been digitally re-mastered if indeed the new release re-mastered

According to an interview i heard the remaster really is something special. One gem of information that is never heard before was that the drums were turned down on the edit to reduce the risk of the needle jumping out of the grooves. This kind of thing has been addressed. The CD pack has loads of extra tracks with it. But it is quite pricey. I also have a 1967 original.

Although I'm still not tempted ...

I love it for what it's always been to me ..... I can live without hearing a reproduction mastered by people who were not involved in the making of the original "

Well he was kind of involved wasn't he.....

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"No I have an early copy so pointless acquiring one that's been digitally re-mastered if indeed the new release re-mastered

According to an interview i heard the remaster really is something special. One gem of information that is never heard before was that the drums were turned down on the edit to reduce the risk of the needle jumping out of the grooves. This kind of thing has been addressed. The CD pack has loads of extra tracks with it. But it is quite pricey. I also have a 1967 original.

Although I'm still not tempted ...

I love it for what it's always been to me ..... I can live without hearing a reproduction mastered by people who were not involved in the making of the original

Well he was kind of involved wasn't he....."

Who?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Haha! And I am currently listening to "She's Leaving Home" as I spotted this thread.

Buy it.

AHHHHHH! Get out of my head! "

I haunt you, Clem.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Not a fan of the Beatles

*backs out of the thread slowly*

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"No I have an early copy so pointless acquiring one that's been digitally re-mastered if indeed the new release re-mastered

According to an interview i heard the remaster really is something special. One gem of information that is never heard before was that the drums were turned down on the edit to reduce the risk of the needle jumping out of the grooves. This kind of thing has been addressed. The CD pack has loads of extra tracks with it. But it is quite pricey. I also have a 1967 original.

Although I'm still not tempted ...

I love it for what it's always been to me ..... I can live without hearing a reproduction mastered by people who were not involved in the making of the original

Well he was kind of involved wasn't he.....

Who? "

Giles Martin.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"No I have an early copy so pointless acquiring one that's been digitally re-mastered if indeed the new release re-mastered

According to an interview i heard the remaster really is something special. One gem of information that is never heard before was that the drums were turned down on the edit to reduce the risk of the needle jumping out of the grooves. This kind of thing has been addressed. The CD pack has loads of extra tracks with it. But it is quite pricey. I also have a 1967 original.

Although I'm still not tempted ...

I love it for what it's always been to me ..... I can live without hearing a reproduction mastered by people who were not involved in the making of the original

Well he was kind of involved wasn't he.....

Who?

Giles Martin. "

Clem he wasn't even born until 2 years after the original album was released.....

You're not going to press my crumble button today....

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"No I have an early copy so pointless acquiring one that's been digitally re-mastered if indeed the new release re-mastered

According to an interview i heard the remaster really is something special. One gem of information that is never heard before was that the drums were turned down on the edit to reduce the risk of the needle jumping out of the grooves. This kind of thing has been addressed. The CD pack has loads of extra tracks with it. But it is quite pricey. I also have a 1967 original.

Although I'm still not tempted ...

I love it for what it's always been to me ..... I can live without hearing a reproduction mastered by people who were not involved in the making of the original

Well he was kind of involved wasn't he.....

Who?

Giles Martin.

Clem he wasn't even born until 2 years after the original album was released.....

You're not going to press my crumble button today.... "

I only said "kind of"

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"No I have an early copy so pointless acquiring one that's been digitally re-mastered if indeed the new release re-mastered

According to an interview i heard the remaster really is something special. One gem of information that is never heard before was that the drums were turned down on the edit to reduce the risk of the needle jumping out of the grooves. This kind of thing has been addressed. The CD pack has loads of extra tracks with it. But it is quite pricey. I also have a 1967 original.

Although I'm still not tempted ...

I love it for what it's always been to me ..... I can live without hearing a reproduction mastered by people who were not involved in the making of the original

Well he was kind of involved wasn't he.....

Who?

Giles Martin.

Clem he wasn't even born until 2 years after the original album was released.....

You're not going to press my crumble button today....

I only said "kind of" "

He wasn't even a sperm in his dads ball-bag

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"No I have an early copy so pointless acquiring one that's been digitally re-mastered if indeed the new release re-mastered

According to an interview i heard the remaster really is something special. One gem of information that is never heard before was that the drums were turned down on the edit to reduce the risk of the needle jumping out of the grooves. This kind of thing has been addressed. The CD pack has loads of extra tracks with it. But it is quite pricey. I also have a 1967 original.

Although I'm still not tempted ...

I love it for what it's always been to me ..... I can live without hearing a reproduction mastered by people who were not involved in the making of the original

Well he was kind of involved wasn't he.....

Who?

Giles Martin.

Clem he wasn't even born until 2 years after the original album was released.....

You're not going to press my crumble button today....

I only said "kind of"

He wasn't even a sperm in his dads ball-bag "

Stop with your "facts" already!

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

Have an original vinyl here but will probably get the anniversary edition too

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *ipswingCouple  over a year ago

portrush

have an early copy and the remastered stereo and the remastered mono ... in cd and vinyl

do i really need another version..

must have a listen

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"Not a fan of the Beatles

*backs out of the thread slowly*"

I cant stand them

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"Not a fan of the Beatles

*backs out of the thread slowly*

I cant stand them"

They weren't for everyone. But then neither was Shakespeare.

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"Have an original vinyl here but will probably get the anniversary edition too"

Cd or vinyl....?

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago

[Removed by poster at 20/05/17 12:25:02]

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"No I have an early copy so pointless acquiring one that's been digitally re-mastered if indeed the new release re-mastered

According to an interview i heard the remaster really is something special. One gem of information that is never heard before was that the drums were turned down on the edit to reduce the risk of the needle jumping out of the grooves. This kind of thing has been addressed. The CD pack has loads of extra tracks with it. But it is quite pricey. I also have a 1967 original.

Although I'm still not tempted ...

I love it for what it's always been to me ..... I can live without hearing a reproduction mastered by people who were not involved in the making of the original

Well he was kind of involved wasn't he.....

Who?

Giles Martin.

Clem he wasn't even born until 2 years after the original album was released.....

You're not going to press my crumble button today....

I only said "kind of"

He wasn't even a sperm in his dads ball-bag

Stop with your "facts" already! "

How about this for a Sox fact,

Giles accountant tells Giles we could make a packet of dosh by exploiting your dads legacy with no disenable input other than letting a computer fuck with the original tapes and we'll throw in some cutting room out-takes to help make the numpties think we're giving them a special edition ....

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

 

By *lem-H-Fandango OP   Man  over a year ago

salisbury


"No I have an early copy so pointless acquiring one that's been digitally re-mastered if indeed the new release re-mastered

According to an interview i heard the remaster really is something special. One gem of information that is never heard before was that the drums were turned down on the edit to reduce the risk of the needle jumping out of the grooves. This kind of thing has been addressed. The CD pack has loads of extra tracks with it. But it is quite pricey. I also have a 1967 original.

Although I'm still not tempted ...

I love it for what it's always been to me ..... I can live without hearing a reproduction mastered by people who were not involved in the making of the original

Well he was kind of involved wasn't he.....

Who?

Giles Martin.

Clem he wasn't even born until 2 years after the original album was released.....

You're not going to press my crumble button today....

I only said "kind of"

He wasn't even a sperm in his dads ball-bag

Stop with your "facts" already!

How about this for a Sox fact,

Giles accountant tells Giles we could make a packet of dosh by exploiting your dads legacy with no disenable input other than letting a computer fuck with the original tapes and we'll throw in some cutting room out-takes to help make the numpties think we're giving them a special edition .... "

That's harsh....... probably true..... but harsh

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

  

By (user no longer on site)  over a year ago


"No I have an early copy so pointless acquiring one that's been digitally re-mastered if indeed the new release re-mastered

According to an interview i heard the remaster really is something special. One gem of information that is never heard before was that the drums were turned down on the edit to reduce the risk of the needle jumping out of the grooves. This kind of thing has been addressed. The CD pack has loads of extra tracks with it. But it is quite pricey. I also have a 1967 original.

Although I'm still not tempted ...

I love it for what it's always been to me ..... I can live without hearing a reproduction mastered by people who were not involved in the making of the original

Well he was kind of involved wasn't he.....

Who?

Giles Martin.

Clem he wasn't even born until 2 years after the original album was released.....

You're not going to press my crumble button today....

I only said "kind of"

He wasn't even a sperm in his dads ball-bag

Stop with your "facts" already!

How about this for a Sox fact,

Giles accountant tells Giles we could make a packet of dosh by exploiting your dads legacy with no disenable input other than letting a computer fuck with the original tapes and we'll throw in some cutting room out-takes to help make the numpties think we're giving them a special edition ....

That's harsh....... probably true..... but harsh "

Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote or View forums list

» Add a new message to this topic

0.0312

0