 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
kids ALL have been taken into care she is now preg with her 14 and vows to carry on having kids till social services let her keep one.
what do u think? should she be pinned down a sterelised or left to get on with it? |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
ah no she must be allowed to have the 14th coz everyone knows how 13 is unlucky for some
i think they are future fodder for the Jeremy Kyle show...innit  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
If the law says we cant stop em then fair enough but surely we could stop paying em
Fit enough to produce kids at that rate then fit enough to work surely?
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
Its no good just giving him the snip though,she'd probably just find someone else to knock one out of her.
Theres obviously a mental deficiency there. 
XXXX |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"I think she should be sterilised
It's us tax payers who finish up paying for them, it's not the Kids fault.
And also chop his bloody cock off"
Easiest solution is to limit benefits to say the first 4 children (happy to discuss the actual number)
One well, two ok, three you know what your doing, four that's a few, 5 your on your own as it your chooice to carry on...
This could apply to both, so if he found another woman and started again, he has claimed his 4... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
"I think she should be sterilised
It's us tax payers who finish up paying for them, it's not the Kids fault.
And also chop his bloody cock off
Easiest solution is to limit benefits to say the first 4 children (happy to discuss the actual number)
One well, two ok, three you know what your doing, four that's a few, 5 your on your own as it your chooice to carry on...
This could apply to both, so if he found another woman and started again, he has claimed his 4..."
they are NOT getting benfits for their children they are breeding and then the kids are each one being taking into care. so they are not reciving money, however tax payers are funding foster placments for one child and the effort to get the other 12 adopted. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
definately not right, if you are incapable off looking after your own children and number 1 is removed from you, then sterilisation should take place. the 13 may be fostered but it still costs the country money.
we had 2 and raised them on our wages without assistance only the child benefit.money was tight but we chose to have them then had the chop to stop any increase. |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
