 |
By (user no longer on site) OP
over a year ago
|
Well, hopefully not too difficult to repair then....seems a bit of a waste of time to search everyone at the entrance (though of course don't know where he hid the knife)... |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Apparently the damage is limited to two slight scratches to the paint surface with no damage to the canvas ...... caused by 63 yr old homeless guy...  "
Im glad though even the slightest damage devalues it a lot! |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Apparently the damage is limited to two slight scratches to the paint surface with no damage to the canvas ...... caused by 63 yr old homeless guy...
Im glad though even the slightest damage devalues it a lot! "
Yes but in strange way it also adds to the social history of an artwork that would probably never be sold for a monetary value.... many of the worlds greatest art treasure have a back story involving damage or vandalism,,,,,
Tis a shame though,,,  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Apparently the damage is limited to two slight scratches to the paint surface with no damage to the canvas ...... caused by 63 yr old homeless guy...
Im glad though even the slightest damage devalues it a lot!
Yes but in strange way it also adds to the social history of an artwork that would probably never be sold for a monetary value.... many of the worlds greatest art treasure have a back story involving damage or vandalism,,,,,
Tis a shame though,,, "
I know about that but I love to see unspoilt works of art just as they would have been when the painter was in front of them.. thats something special to me |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Apparently the damage is limited to two slight scratches to the paint surface with no damage to the canvas ...... caused by 63 yr old homeless guy...
Im glad though even the slightest damage devalues it a lot!
Yes but in strange way it also adds to the social history of an artwork that would probably never be sold for a monetary value.... many of the worlds greatest art treasure have a back story involving damage or vandalism,,,,,
Tis a shame though,,,
I know about that but I love to see unspoilt works of art just as they would have been when the painter was in front of them.. thats something special to me "
 |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
|
By (user no longer on site)
over a year ago
|
"Apparently the damage is limited to two slight scratches to the paint surface with no damage to the canvas ...... caused by 63 yr old homeless guy...
Im glad though even the slightest damage devalues it a lot!
Yes but in strange way it also adds to the social history of an artwork that would probably never be sold for a monetary value.... many of the worlds greatest art treasure have a back story involving damage or vandalism,,,,,
Tis a shame though,,, "
That's insightful.  |
Reply privately, Reply in forum +quote
or View forums list | |
» Add a new message to this topic
