FabSwingers.com > Forums > The Lounge > One child families
Jump to: Newest in thread
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I recently seen an article about how our country is becoming over populated and the NHS and schools etc can't cope. They said that a law like China's got, that families should only have one child should be forced to combat the problem. What do you think." Then the native British would be out numbered by immigrants so much quicker | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Id say no more than 3 really or if it helps that if you have over so many kids then you only get state help and housing for the first however many say 3 again and it may stop these 15kid families where the parents never work" I think this is a great idea stops people having kids for cash. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Id say no more than 3 really or if it helps that if you have over so many kids then you only get state help and housing for the first however many say 3 again and it may stop these 15kid families where the parents never work" ok so what happens if a young widow with two kids marries meets and marries a young widower with four kids do two of those kids go without support ?. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I recently seen an article about how our country is becoming over populated and the NHS and schools etc can't cope. They said that a law like China's got, that families should only have one child should be forced to combat the problem. What do you think. Then the native British would be out numbered by immigrants so much quicker " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Id say no more than 3 really or if it helps that if you have over so many kids then you only get state help and housing for the first however many say 3 again and it may stop these 15kid families where the parents never work I think this is a great idea stops people having kids for cash." We have six kids between us, shall we kill 3 of them off?! Ruby | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Id say no more than 3 really or if it helps that if you have over so many kids then you only get state help and housing for the first however many say 3 again and it may stop these 15kid families where the parents never work I think this is a great idea stops people having kids for cash. We have six kids between us, shall we kill 3 of them off?! Ruby " Would you kill off your kids just because they aren't being subsidized by the government? I personally don't think child benefits should exist at all. I bet people would still have kids. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Id say no more than 3 really or if it helps that if you have over so many kids then you only get state help and housing for the first however many say 3 again and it may stop these 15kid families where the parents never workok so what happens if a young widow with two kids marries meets and marries a young widower with four kids do two of those kids go without support ?. " One or both of the parents go to work? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not a bad idea but maybe just having two would be a better idea?" Would that depend on the sex of the child male or female | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not a bad idea but maybe just having two would be a better idea? Would that depend on the sex of the child male or female " not sure how they would police that, if its born the 'wrong sex' what do you do with the child | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not a bad idea but maybe just having two would be a better idea? Would that depend on the sex of the child male or female not sure how they would police that, if its born the 'wrong sex' what do you do with the child " No this was the problem people were aborting their unborn babies if they were the wrong sex. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you can't afford to feed, clothe and house them don't have them. If you have more than 2 you should pay more tax, grossly unfair on the rest of the population funding their education etc!!" working parents pay for their own kids education, a child goes to pre school/school from 3 to 18 now thats 15 years, i have worked all my life and when i retire that will be about 50 years, i think I've paid my share | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Id say no more than 3 really " I chose to have three children but the last pregnancy was unexpectedly twins. Should I have sent one back? Sally | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Id say no more than 3 really or if it helps that if you have over so many kids then you only get state help and housing for the first however many say 3 again and it may stop these 15kid families where the parents never workok so what happens if a young widow with two kids marries meets and marries a young widower with four kids do two of those kids go without support ?. " Nope she wouldnt be able to claim for kids that arent hers | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses" Both can go, in my opinion. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Both can go, in my opinion." Why though? What do you benefit if either go? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Id say no more than 3 really or if it helps that if you have over so many kids then you only get state help and housing for the first however many say 3 again and it may stop these 15kid families where the parents never workok so what happens if a young widow with two kids marries meets and marries a young widower with four kids do two of those kids go without support ?. Nope she wouldnt be able to claim for kids that arent hers " it wouldn't work like that anyway if they did ever bring it in they only paid you for so many kids, it would only apply to people who went over the chosen amount after the law came in | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Both can go, in my opinion. Why though? What do you benefit if either go?" it shouldn't be for personal reasons it should be for reasons that benefit the whole human race. hence why i support euthanasia for the feeble. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Id say no more than 3 really or if it helps that if you have over so many kids then you only get state help and housing for the first however many say 3 again and it may stop these 15kid families where the parents never work I think this is a great idea stops people having kids for cash. We have six kids between us, shall we kill 3 of them off?! Ruby " I didnt say kill off did i just said dont get the benefit for, as it may encourage people to actually work as there is a growing culture who doesnt. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses" Do you not think bankers have worked for their bonuses | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Being an only child is fucking shit Ruby" This. I didn't hate it as a child but as an adult I really feel it. Especially when my dad passed away and with my mum being so ill. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Id say no more than 3 really or if it helps that if you have over so many kids then you only get state help and housing for the first however many say 3 again and it may stop these 15kid families where the parents never work I think this is a great idea stops people having kids for cash. We have six kids between us, shall we kill 3 of them off?! Ruby I didnt say kill off did i just said dont get the benefit for, as it may encourage people to actually work as there is a growing culture who doesnt. " Are you sure? Or have you just watched one of those "benefits britian" programmes on channel 4 and became an expert.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Id say no more than 3 really I chose to have three children but the last pregnancy was unexpectedly twins. Should I have sent one back? Sally " My point too Sally, we have 6 kids between us so must have to kill 3 off We both work and have never claimed any child benefit, not sure why anyone is assuming this would be the case when you have more than 3 kids! Ruby | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"All I've got to say is .... Logans Run ! " logans run was illogical. investing in someone only to kill them off before you got your monies worth. that robot at the end was cool though. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Do you not think bankers have worked for their bonuses " Behave yourself | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Do you not think bankers have worked for their bonuses Behave yourself" Do you not think parents work? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Both can go, in my opinion. Why though? What do you benefit if either go?" Ok, I'll be more specific and less flippant. I think bank bonuses should exist, but within reason. I think child benefits should be based on family income, not on how many kids you have. It's about proportionality. For both cases. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Both can go, in my opinion." Wow. I've never claimed it but god help any working parents that might lose their jobs for a while through no fault of their own!! Ruby | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Id say no more than 3 really or if it helps that if you have over so many kids then you only get state help and housing for the first however many say 3 again and it may stop these 15kid families where the parents never work I think this is a great idea stops people having kids for cash. We have six kids between us, shall we kill 3 of them off?! Ruby I didnt say kill off did i just said dont get the benefit for, as it may encourage people to actually work as there is a growing culture who doesnt. Are you sure? Or have you just watched one of those "benefits britian" programmes on channel 4 and became an expert.." Never watch channel 4 its shite as are those kind of programmes.. nope I read this weird thing called the paper and look at the reports that they do on benefits etc.. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Do you not think bankers have worked for their bonuses " I'm pretty sure bringing up a small person for 18 years entitles me to some money from the Government. It was the princely sum of £10 a week last time I got it. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Id say no more than 3 really or if it helps that if you have over so many kids then you only get state help and housing for the first however many say 3 again and it may stop these 15kid families where the parents never work I think this is a great idea stops people having kids for cash. We have six kids between us, shall we kill 3 of them off?! Ruby I didnt say kill off did i just said dont get the benefit for, as it may encourage people to actually work as there is a growing culture who doesnt. Are you sure? Or have you just watched one of those "benefits britian" programmes on channel 4 and became an expert.. Never watch channel 4 its shite as are those kind of programmes.. nope I read this weird thing called the paper and look at the reports that they do on benefits etc.. " Sounds fun | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Do you not think bankers have worked for their bonuses Behave yourself Do you not think parents work?" depends if they have loads of kids. Then they don't have to. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Do you not think bankers have worked for their bonuses Behave yourself Do you not think parents work? depends if they have loads of kids. Then they don't have to." only if they hit the benefits lottery jackpot and have a disabled one. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Do you not think bankers have worked for their bonuses Behave yourself Do you not think parents work? depends if they have loads of kids. Then they don't have to." I know people with 5 kids who work and people with one kid who dont.. stupid statement | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses" Funny as isn't it. The people who rule our country are to blame for the state of it but no, let's blame people for having too many kids... Earlier on it was another thread about housing. Pisses me off! So many opinionated people on here. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Do you not think bankers have worked for their bonuses Behave yourself Do you not think parents work? depends if they have loads of kids. Then they don't have to. I know people with 5 kids who work and people with one kid who dont.. stupid statement " All depends on if you know how to work the benefits system | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Do you not think bankers have worked for their bonuses I'm pretty sure bringing up a small person for 18 years entitles me to some money from the Government. It was the princely sum of £10 a week last time I got it." its not much more now but when you look at how much i pay per month in tax i feel they are still in a win win situation giving me back a whole £20.70p a week I would happily surrender my child benifit and keep the tax i pay | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Do you not think bankers have worked for their bonuses Behave yourself Do you not think parents work? depends if they have loads of kids. Then they don't have to. only if they hit the benefits lottery jackpot and have a disabled one. " Really?? I have a "disabled one" and I still work. I'd far rather he didn't have his chronic life threatening condition than be raking in all this money you must think I get for having a "disabled one" That's without raising another 2 and paying a mortgage on a single wage I despair at some people | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"China ended it's one child policy in 2015 because there were too many old people with a diminishing workforce able to pay for their care....society has become too top-heavy. I don't know what the answer to overpopulation is, but it's on its way to being a serious global crisis." Probably would have been better if they'd carried on with the policy, worked through the short term top heavy population problem and ended up with a more manageable population size 40 or 50 years down the line. There's a thread in the political forum asking what we're going to do 50 years from now when automation has replaced vast numbers of jobs and there's no work for potentially billions of people. We'd need to stop breeding or totally rethink our whole economic system. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Both can go, in my opinion." And what about the children who will suffer because child benefit is no longer available? Oh I guess the answer is " it's the parents problem " but stuff the kids huh! Sounds all very right wing your statements. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not a bad idea but maybe just having two would be a better idea? Would that depend on the sex of the child male or female " No what difference would that make? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I do think there needs to be a cap on how many children you can receive benefit for. " There's going to be. It's changing to first 2 kids only I believe | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Both can go, in my opinion. And what about the children who will suffer because child benefit is no longer available? Oh I guess the answer is " it's the parents problem " but stuff the kids huh! Sounds all very right wing your statements. " I'm right wing because I don't like child benefits and I'm in favor of limiting CEO bonuses? Ok. I wouldn't have kids if I couldn't afford them. Its as simple as that. I'm all for short to medium range welfare assistance for families in need based on total salary - but no, I don't think the number of kids you have should define the benefits you're entitled to, long-term. I'll go and re-register as a Republican now. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I hate the "if you can't afford them don't have them" attitude, because jobs can't be lost, spouses can't leave or die, kids aren't born with additional needs that cost more. Some people really need to get off their high horse " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I hate the "if you can't afford them don't have them" attitude, because jobs can't be lost, spouses can't leave or die, kids aren't born with additional needs that cost more. Some people really need to get off their high horse " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not a bad idea but maybe just having two would be a better idea? Would that depend on the sex of the child male or female No what difference would that make?" The reason it made a difference in China was boys grow up to look after their parents and girls grow up to help look after their husband's parents, hence baby girls were killed off by parents who didn't want to be left destitute in their old age. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Both can go, in my opinion. And what about the children who will suffer because child benefit is no longer available? Oh I guess the answer is " it's the parents problem " but stuff the kids huh! Sounds all very right wing your statements. " If you can't afford the kids don't have them, simple!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"If you can't afford to feed, clothe and house them don't have them. If you have more than 2 you should pay more tax, grossly unfair on the rest of the population funding their education etc!!" This is true i only had one because thats all i could afford to be honest. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not a bad idea but maybe just having two would be a better idea? Would that depend on the sex of the child male or female No what difference would that make? The reason it made a difference in China was boys grow up to look after their parents and girls grow up to help look after their husband's parents, hence baby girls were killed off by parents who didn't want to be left destitute in their old age." Which is why I don't understand the Cambodian restrictions, as the girl stays with her parents, the boy goes to his wife's parents. So if a family has 3 girls before they have their first son they end up with 6 additional mouths to feed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Both can go, in my opinion. And what about the children who will suffer because child benefit is no longer available? Oh I guess the answer is " it's the parents problem " but stuff the kids huh! Sounds all very right wing your statements. If you can't afford the kids don't have them, simple!!!" Maybe they could afford them when they had them, some peoples situations change | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Both can go, in my opinion. And what about the children who will suffer because child benefit is no longer available? Oh I guess the answer is " it's the parents problem " but stuff the kids huh! Sounds all very right wing your statements. If you can't afford the kids don't have them, simple!!! Maybe they could afford them when they had them, some peoples situations change " Yes of course peoples situations change but there are a few people who just dont think it through properly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not a bad idea but maybe just having two would be a better idea? Would that depend on the sex of the child male or female No what difference would that make? The reason it made a difference in China was boys grow up to look after their parents and girls grow up to help look after their husband's parents, hence baby girls were killed off by parents who didn't want to be left destitute in their old age. Which is why I don't understand the Cambodian restrictions, as the girl stays with her parents, the boy goes to his wife's parents. So if a family has 3 girls before they have their first son they end up with 6 additional mouths to feed." Yeah, can't figure that one out, though it would skew the population towards males, maybe they were aiming for a more physical workforce across the whole country? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Both can go, in my opinion. And what about the children who will suffer because child benefit is no longer available? Oh I guess the answer is " it's the parents problem " but stuff the kids huh! Sounds all very right wing your statements. If you can't afford the kids don't have them, simple!!! Maybe they could afford them when they had them, some peoples situations change " I understand about people's situations change. I'm on about the ones who have kids and have never worked and their parents have never worked. You only have to watch that shit Jeremy Kyle. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Young girls with poor education and minimum wage earners have children so they can get social housing as there is no way they would get one without children. They would be destined to live in HMO's (bedsit land) like single guys have to do who are on low incomes. Having children is seen as the only option to get their own place and increased benefits by alot of young girls/couples." It's not as easy as that. Teenage pregnancy rates are down to 23 per 1,000 conceptions last year compared to 55 per 1,000 in 1971. One of the reasons attributed for this social media shaming teenagers for getting pregnant. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Not a bad idea but maybe just having two would be a better idea? Would that depend on the sex of the child male or female No what difference would that make? The reason it made a difference in China was boys grow up to look after their parents and girls grow up to help look after their husband's parents, hence baby girls were killed off by parents who didn't want to be left destitute in their old age. Which is why I don't understand the Cambodian restrictions, as the girl stays with her parents, the boy goes to his wife's parents. So if a family has 3 girls before they have their first son they end up with 6 additional mouths to feed. Yeah, can't figure that one out, though it would skew the population towards males, maybe they were aiming for a more physical workforce across the whole country?" Not really. They need fewer labourers and more professionals, as those were the ones killed by Khmer Rouge. However there is a large move towards young couples getting their own places. They are definitely trying to move away from being a farming culture. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Do you not think bankers have worked for their bonuses Behave yourself Do you not think parents work? depends if they have loads of kids. Then they don't have to. only if they hit the benefits lottery jackpot and have a disabled one. Really?? I have a "disabled one" and I still work. I'd far rather he didn't have his chronic life threatening condition than be raking in all this money you must think I get for having a "disabled one" That's without raising another 2 and paying a mortgage on a single wage I despair at some people " sarcasm. as a carer, as well as a parent, i'm well aware of the attitudes people have. i am promoting the most unpopular ones as well as the popular offensive ones. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Both can go, in my opinion. And what about the children who will suffer because child benefit is no longer available? Oh I guess the answer is " it's the parents problem " but stuff the kids huh! Sounds all very right wing your statements. If you can't afford the kids don't have them, simple!!! Maybe they could afford them when they had them, some peoples situations change Yes of course peoples situations change but there are a few people who just dont think it through properly." Totally agree but I don't think this subject should be so black and white I don't agree with people who sit on benefits as a life style choice But for some going on benefits isn't an option, if you have had a good job for 25 years and end up losing that job through no fault of your own I don't believe they should cap your benefits depending on how many kids you have, you have paid into the system for 25 years so why should you not get help for all your children under 18 while you look for another job? I don't think it should be a cap that applies to everybody's regardless of you circumstances | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Do you not think bankers have worked for their bonuses Behave yourself Do you not think parents work? depends if they have loads of kids. Then they don't have to. only if they hit the benefits lottery jackpot and have a disabled one. Really?? I have a "disabled one" and I still work. I'd far rather he didn't have his chronic life threatening condition than be raking in all this money you must think I get for having a "disabled one" That's without raising another 2 and paying a mortgage on a single wage I despair at some people sarcasm. as a carer, as well as a parent, i'm well aware of the attitudes people have. i am promoting the most unpopular ones as well as the popular offensive ones." Let's hope so aye else there is no hope if that is your attitude towards families with disabled children | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Both can go, in my opinion. And what about the children who will suffer because child benefit is no longer available? Oh I guess the answer is " it's the parents problem " but stuff the kids huh! Sounds all very right wing your statements. If you can't afford the kids don't have them, simple!!! Maybe they could afford them when they had them, some peoples situations change I understand about people's situations change. I'm on about the ones who have kids and have never worked and their parents have never worked. You only have to watch that shit Jeremy Kyle." I'm to busy working to watch that | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Id say no more than 3 really or if it helps that if you have over so many kids then you only get state help and housing for the first however many say 3 again and it may stop these 15kid families where the parents never work I think this is a great idea stops people having kids for cash. We have six kids between us, shall we kill 3 of them off?! Ruby " So do we! But both work and all kids will be brought up the same and contribute to society... Don't feel like we are causing a problem ... X | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is a great example on how ignorant some people are." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is a great example on how ignorant some people are. " Its just a thread for people who have kids vs people who dont | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Do you not think bankers have worked for their bonuses Behave yourself Do you not think parents work? depends if they have loads of kids. Then they don't have to. only if they hit the benefits lottery jackpot and have a disabled one. Really?? I have a "disabled one" and I still work. I'd far rather he didn't have his chronic life threatening condition than be raking in all this money you must think I get for having a "disabled one" That's without raising another 2 and paying a mortgage on a single wage I despair at some people sarcasm. as a carer, as well as a parent, i'm well aware of the attitudes people have. i am promoting the most unpopular ones as well as the popular offensive ones. Let's hope so aye else there is no hope if that is your attitude towards families with disabled children " puts it in perspective though doesn't it? how is a popular offensive opinion more acceptable than one that isn't? both are offensive. i think you also don't know what sarcasm means. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Both can go, in my opinion. And what about the children who will suffer because child benefit is no longer available? Oh I guess the answer is " it's the parents problem " but stuff the kids huh! Sounds all very right wing your statements. If you can't afford the kids don't have them, simple!!! Maybe they could afford them when they had them, some peoples situations change Yes of course peoples situations change but there are a few people who just dont think it through properly. Totally agree but I don't think this subject should be so black and white I don't agree with people who sit on benefits as a life style choice But for some going on benefits isn't an option, if you have had a good job for 25 years and end up losing that job through no fault of your own I don't believe they should cap your benefits depending on how many kids you have, you have paid into the system for 25 years so why should you not get help for all your children under 18 while you look for another job? I don't think it should be a cap that applies to everybody's regardless of you circumstances " See, I agree with you in principle. But surely there are better, smarter ways of helping people in these (and similar) situations than the current child benefits system? I think there needs to be a rethink about how society gives assistance to those in need. There are better, and fairer, ways. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is a great example on how ignorant some people are. Its just a thread for people who have kids vs people who dont" So because I don't have children you automatically assume which side of this argument I agree with ? Mrs | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is a great example on how ignorant some people are. Its just a thread for people who have kids vs people who dont So because I don't have children you automatically assume which side of this argument I agree with ? Mrs" I think he also wrongly assumes who has kids and who doesnt, or who have lost kids so are entitled to an opinion too | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is a great example on how ignorant some people are. Its just a thread for people who have kids vs people who dont" I think you'll find I have 2 and I don't expect other tax payers to maintain them!!!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is a great example on how ignorant some people are. Its just a thread for people who have kids vs people who dont So because I don't have children you automatically assume which side of this argument I agree with ? Mrs I think he also wrongly assumes who has kids and who doesnt, or who have lost kids so are entitled to an opinion too" I dont know youre life.. so im not intrested in youre opinion | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"This thread is a great example on how ignorant some people are. Its just a thread for people who have kids vs people who dont So because I don't have children you automatically assume which side of this argument I agree with ? Mrs I think he also wrongly assumes who has kids and who doesnt, or who have lost kids so are entitled to an opinion too I dont know youre life.. so im not intrested in youre opinion" Haha you seem to be when you question it, cannot question something that doesnt interest you otherwise you wouldnt even read it.. or was that too logical? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I once read a fantastic short story where once the women where pregnant they had 9 months to choose who in their family would be sacrificed to make way for the new baby. If by the time the baby was born the mother had failed to nominate someone the baby would be sacrificed. I don't know who wrote it but it was bloody good n very thought provoking. PTU xxx " Sounds like a new thread who would you sacrifice. Lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I once read a fantastic short story where once the women where pregnant they had 9 months to choose who in their family would be sacrificed to make way for the new baby. If by the time the baby was born the mother had failed to nominate someone the baby would be sacrificed. I don't know who wrote it but it was bloody good n very thought provoking. PTU xxx Sounds like a new thread who would you sacrifice. Lol" The thought did cross my mind. PTU xxx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Id say no more than 3 really or if it helps that if you have over so many kids then you only get state help and housing for the first however many say 3 again and it may stop these 15kid families where the parents never work I think this is a great idea stops people having kids for cash. We have six kids between us, shall we kill 3 of them off?! Ruby So do we! But both work and all kids will be brought up the same and contribute to society... Don't feel like we are causing a problem ... X " Same here x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ok to put a spanner in the works!. A couple woman well documented in the media have numerous children. One refuses to work and gets a darn site more infact double what I earn in a month she goes on holidays abroad has designer clothes etc and openly admits to having more children to claim more in benefits. The other woman worked as a mechanic gave it up because part time she could t cope with the hours and looking after her 8 kids as it reduces her benefit. Both get houses paid for and get family tax etc It's well documented in the papers and on news they have also been on tv shows to discuss. I work and due to fertility issues can't have kids yet I pay tax which goes to support women like those two. Why is that fair? Why should I pay £400 a month in tax? Why did I have to pay for fertility treatment because through no fault of my own I can't lay on my back think of England and get pregnant. So yes benefits for people like them should be capped. They need to remember a child is a blessing not a god given right to free handouts that others can't have. " You pay £400 a month in tax? Wow you must be on a helishly large wage? Fancy being my girlfriend? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ok to put a spanner in the works!. A couple woman well documented in the media have numerous children. One refuses to work and gets a darn site more infact double what I earn in a month she goes on holidays abroad has designer clothes etc and openly admits to having more children to claim more in benefits. The other woman worked as a mechanic gave it up because part time she could t cope with the hours and looking after her 8 kids as it reduces her benefit. Both get houses paid for and get family tax etc It's well documented in the papers and on news they have also been on tv shows to discuss. I work and due to fertility issues can't have kids yet I pay tax which goes to support women like those two. Why is that fair? Why should I pay £400 a month in tax? Why did I have to pay for fertility treatment because through no fault of my own I can't lay on my back think of England and get pregnant. So yes benefits for people like them should be capped. They need to remember a child is a blessing not a god given right to free handouts that others can't have. You pay £400 a month in tax? Wow you must be on a helishly large wage? Fancy being my girlfriend? " I wish I was on a large wage!! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"More money should be spent on education. Then it's just possible that people wont want to have multiple children to receive benefits. To me it's upsetting that people are that fucking stupid! I know I'll probably get shot for saying this - but I think giving away money for doing nothing should be stopped. Everyone can do something. " More affordable housing should be built for people on minimum wage too so people dont have to have kids to be able to have their own place . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ok to put a spanner in the works!. A couple woman well documented in the media have numerous children. One refuses to work and gets a darn site more infact double what I earn in a month she goes on holidays abroad has designer clothes etc and openly admits to having more children to claim more in benefits. The other woman worked as a mechanic gave it up because part time she could t cope with the hours and looking after her 8 kids as it reduces her benefit. Both get houses paid for and get family tax etc It's well documented in the papers and on news they have also been on tv shows to discuss. I work and due to fertility issues can't have kids yet I pay tax which goes to support women like those two. Why is that fair? Why should I pay £400 a month in tax? Why did I have to pay for fertility treatment because through no fault of my own I can't lay on my back think of England and get pregnant. So yes benefits for people like them should be capped. They need to remember a child is a blessing not a god given right to free handouts that others can't have. You pay £400 a month in tax? Wow you must be on a helishly large wage? Fancy being my girlfriend? " Adopt me | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ok to put a spanner in the works!. A couple woman well documented in the media have numerous children. One refuses to work and gets a darn site more infact double what I earn in a month she goes on holidays abroad has designer clothes etc and openly admits to having more children to claim more in benefits. The other woman worked as a mechanic gave it up because part time she could t cope with the hours and looking after her 8 kids as it reduces her benefit. Both get houses paid for and get family tax etc It's well documented in the papers and on news they have also been on tv shows to discuss. I work and due to fertility issues can't have kids yet I pay tax which goes to support women like those two. Why is that fair? Why should I pay £400 a month in tax? Why did I have to pay for fertility treatment because through no fault of my own I can't lay on my back think of England and get pregnant. So yes benefits for people like them should be capped. They need to remember a child is a blessing not a god given right to free handouts that others can't have. You pay £400 a month in tax? Wow you must be on a helishly large wage? Fancy being my girlfriend? I wish I was on a large wage!! " Me too lol | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"China ended it's one child policy in 2015 because there were too many old people with a diminishing workforce able to pay for their care....society has become too top-heavy. I don't know what the answer to overpopulation is, but it's on its way to being a serious global crisis." China ended this policy,but not for the public reasons you have stated although it is linked to the care of older people . Chinese people really care for their elderly,but after the one child rule (depending where they live,sex of the child,and financial situation)there was a massive shortage of females for a whole generation,and as we all know,females give birth,less females,less births,less workers,the boys take care of the parents,then nothing. It's been changing and family's have being encouraged over the lady decade to try and even it out,the problem isn't just over population.its over populated with males,like FAB. Source - lived in China for 15 years | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"More money should be spent on education. Then it's just possible that people wont want to have multiple children to receive benefits. To me it's upsetting that people are that fucking stupid! I know I'll probably get shot for saying this - but I think giving away money for doing nothing should be stopped. Everyone can do something. More affordable housing should be built for people on minimum wage too so people dont have to have kids to be able to have their own place ." you can get your own place without having kids. things that are needs should not be making profits. and i live in housing that does not make profits so it is possible. it's classed as a charity though, which i think giving people their basic needs should not be charitible, it is a right from being born, and even more so if you're born into s system that does not pay fair wages to all. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ok to put a spanner in the works!. A couple woman well documented in the media have numerous children. One refuses to work and gets a darn site more infact double what I earn in a month she goes on holidays abroad has designer clothes etc and openly admits to having more children to claim more in benefits. The other woman worked as a mechanic gave it up because part time she could t cope with the hours and looking after her 8 kids as it reduces her benefit. Both get houses paid for and get family tax etc It's well documented in the papers and on news they have also been on tv shows to discuss. I work and due to fertility issues can't have kids yet I pay tax which goes to support women like those two. Why is that fair? Why should I pay £400 a month in tax? Why did I have to pay for fertility treatment because through no fault of my own I can't lay on my back think of England and get pregnant. So yes benefits for people like them should be capped. They need to remember a child is a blessing not a god given right to free handouts that others can't have. You pay £400 a month in tax? Wow you must be on a helishly large wage? Fancy being my girlfriend? Adopt me " Ha ha I did used to pay 378 a month till I gave up work last year. I now earn min wage till my new journey starts in the next few months | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I recently seen an article about how our country is becoming over populated and the NHS and schools etc can't cope. They said that a law like China's got, that families should only have one child should be forced to combat the problem. What do you think." I think its a great idea but I only have one child anyway | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Funny as isn't it. The people who rule our country are to blame for the state of it but no, let's blame people for having too many kids... Earlier on it was another thread about housing. Pisses me off! So many opinionated people on here. " Personally though, I don't understand why an already struggling family have more children. It just doesn't appear logical to me. That's not being judgemental, it's being sensible. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"More money should be spent on education. Then it's just possible that people wont want to have multiple children to receive benefits. To me it's upsetting that people are that fucking stupid! I know I'll probably get shot for saying this - but I think giving away money for doing nothing should be stopped. Everyone can do something. More affordable housing should be built for people on minimum wage too so people dont have to have kids to be able to have their own place ." I agree. I'm one of the people on a shitty wage without children who has to rent somewhere I can barely afford. But I would never have children to get housed! This benefit has to stop! I pay a lot of taxes as well and I resent it going to these people | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"China ended it's one child policy in 2015 because there were too many old people with a diminishing workforce able to pay for their care....society has become too top-heavy. I don't know what the answer to overpopulation is, but it's on its way to being a serious global crisis. China ended this policy,but not for the public reasons you have stated although it is linked to the care of older people . Chinese people really care for their elderly,but after the one child rule (depending where they live,sex of the child,and financial situation)there was a massive shortage of females for a whole generation,and as we all know,females give birth,less females,less births,less workers,the boys take care of the parents,then nothing. It's been changing and family's have being encouraged over the lady decade to try and even it out,the problem isn't just over population.its over populated with males,like FAB. Source - lived in China for 15 years" It's two sides of the same coin. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ok to put a spanner in the works!. A couple woman well documented in the media have numerous children. One refuses to work and gets a darn site more infact double what I earn in a month she goes on holidays abroad has designer clothes etc and openly admits to having more children to claim more in benefits. The other woman worked as a mechanic gave it up because part time she could t cope with the hours and looking after her 8 kids as it reduces her benefit. Both get houses paid for and get family tax etc It's well documented in the papers and on news they have also been on tv shows to discuss. I work and due to fertility issues can't have kids yet I pay tax which goes to support women like those two. Why is that fair? Why should I pay £400 a month in tax? Why did I have to pay for fertility treatment because through no fault of my own I can't lay on my back think of England and get pregnant. So yes benefits for people like them should be capped. They need to remember a child is a blessing not a god given right to free handouts that others can't have. You pay £400 a month in tax? Wow you must be on a helishly large wage? Fancy being my girlfriend? Adopt me " You asking ? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"More money should be spent on education. Then it's just possible that people wont want to have multiple children to receive benefits. To me it's upsetting that people are that fucking stupid! I know I'll probably get shot for saying this - but I think giving away money for doing nothing should be stopped. Everyone can do something. More affordable housing should be built for people on minimum wage too so people dont have to have kids to be able to have their own place . you can get your own place without having kids. things that are needs should not be making profits. and i live in housing that does not make profits so it is possible. it's classed as a charity though, which i think giving people their basic needs should not be charitible, it is a right from being born, and even more so if you're born into s system that does not pay fair wages to all." No way can anyone I know on minimum afford their own flat or house ?? They have to live in HMO's as thats all they can afford. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I hate the "if you can't afford them don't have them" attitude, because jobs can't be lost, spouses can't leave or die, kids aren't born with additional needs that cost more. Some people really need to get off their high horse " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Ok to put a spanner in the works!. A couple woman well documented in the media have numerous children. One refuses to work and gets a darn site more infact double what I earn in a month she goes on holidays abroad has designer clothes etc and openly admits to having more children to claim more in benefits. The other woman worked as a mechanic gave it up because part time she could t cope with the hours and looking after her 8 kids as it reduces her benefit. Both get houses paid for and get family tax etc It's well documented in the papers and on news they have also been on tv shows to discuss. I work and due to fertility issues can't have kids yet I pay tax which goes to support women like those two. Why is that fair? Why should I pay £400 a month in tax? Why did I have to pay for fertility treatment because through no fault of my own I can't lay on my back think of England and get pregnant. So yes benefits for people like them should be capped. They need to remember a child is a blessing not a god given right to free handouts that others can't have. You pay £400 a month in tax? Wow you must be on a helishly large wage? Fancy being my girlfriend? Adopt me Ha ha I did used to pay 378 a month till I gave up work last year. I now earn min wage till my new journey starts in the next few months " Tax and NI last month was over 550 quid and (as we we're also talking about aging, unsupportable populations), just been told I now have to pay 50% more into my pension to get 33% less back on retirement. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"More money should be spent on education. Then it's just possible that people wont want to have multiple children to receive benefits. To me it's upsetting that people are that fucking stupid! I know I'll probably get shot for saying this - but I think giving away money for doing nothing should be stopped. Everyone can do something. More affordable housing should be built for people on minimum wage too so people dont have to have kids to be able to have their own place . you can get your own place without having kids. things that are needs should not be making profits. and i live in housing that does not make profits so it is possible. it's classed as a charity though, which i think giving people their basic needs should not be charitible, it is a right from being born, and even more so if you're born into s system that does not pay fair wages to all. No way can anyone I know on minimum afford their own flat or house ?? They have to live in HMO's as thats all they can afford." they can with help from benefits, or like you say HMO. i get help from benefits. when i lived in london i had to house share, but up north it's cheaper because we are less valued up here so house prices can't go up too much as nobody can pay for them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"More money should be spent on education. Then it's just possible that people wont want to have multiple children to receive benefits. To me it's upsetting that people are that fucking stupid! I know I'll probably get shot for saying this - but I think giving away money for doing nothing should be stopped. Everyone can do something. More affordable housing should be built for people on minimum wage too so people dont have to have kids to be able to have their own place . you can get your own place without having kids. things that are needs should not be making profits. and i live in housing that does not make profits so it is possible. it's classed as a charity though, which i think giving people their basic needs should not be charitible, it is a right from being born, and even more so if you're born into s system that does not pay fair wages to all. No way can anyone I know on minimum afford their own flat or house ?? They have to live in HMO's as thats all they can afford. they can with help from benefits, or like you say HMO. i get help from benefits. when i lived in london i had to house share, but up north it's cheaper because we are less valued up here so house prices can't go up too much as nobody can pay for them." Im up north and rent for a flat is minimum £500 a month a little terrace house £600. They cant afford to pay that? Even a bedsit in shared house is about £75- £100 a week and they can hardly afford that. More affordable housing needs to be built for low income earners. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Funny as isn't it. The people who rule our country are to blame for the state of it but no, let's blame people for having too many kids... Earlier on it was another thread about housing. Pisses me off! So many opinionated people on here. Personally though, I don't understand why an already struggling family have more children. It just doesn't appear logical to me. That's not being judgemental, it's being sensible. " because it's actually nice to have children and a big family. the more you have the cheaper it gets to have them as you can pass stuff down to other kids. you're heating a house for 6 people takes the same amount as it would for one person. also, poverty brings you more spare time and gives you less of a sense of worth, having more children gives you a purpose and takes up that spare time. i never wanted any kids, i had 4. now they don't need me i'm on some shitty fuck site bored outta my tits. i'd love to have more kids and more family coz i don't like many people outside of my family. i think most people are fucked up, myself included, but only the people who get me are ok to bother with. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Funny as isn't it. The people who rule our country are to blame for the state of it but no, let's blame people for having too many kids... Earlier on it was another thread about housing. Pisses me off! So many opinionated people on here. Personally though, I don't understand why an already struggling family have more children. It just doesn't appear logical to me. That's not being judgemental, it's being sensible. because it's actually nice to have children and a big family. the more you have the cheaper it gets to have them as you can pass stuff down to other kids. you're heating a house for 6 people takes the same amount as it would for one person. also, poverty brings you more spare time and gives you less of a sense of worth, having more children gives you a purpose and takes up that spare time. i never wanted any kids, i had 4. now they don't need me i'm on some shitty fuck site bored outta my tits. i'd love to have more kids and more family coz i don't like many people outside of my family. i think most people are fucked up, myself included, but only the people who get me are ok to bother with. " I do worry about you sometimes x | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"More money should be spent on education. Then it's just possible that people wont want to have multiple children to receive benefits. To me it's upsetting that people are that fucking stupid! I know I'll probably get shot for saying this - but I think giving away money for doing nothing should be stopped. Everyone can do something. More affordable housing should be built for people on minimum wage too so people dont have to have kids to be able to have their own place . you can get your own place without having kids. things that are needs should not be making profits. and i live in housing that does not make profits so it is possible. it's classed as a charity though, which i think giving people their basic needs should not be charitible, it is a right from being born, and even more so if you're born into s system that does not pay fair wages to all. No way can anyone I know on minimum afford their own flat or house ?? They have to live in HMO's as thats all they can afford. they can with help from benefits, or like you say HMO. i get help from benefits. when i lived in london i had to house share, but up north it's cheaper because we are less valued up here so house prices can't go up too much as nobody can pay for them. Im up north and rent for a flat is minimum £500 a month a little terrace house £600. They cant afford to pay that? Even a bedsit in shared house is about £75- £100 a week and they can hardly afford that. More affordable housing needs to be built for low income earners." my home is cheaper than those. 3 bedroom. like i said it's not run for profit, it's run to house people who need a home. the bedsits across the road from me are less than £50 a week also. and they are run for profit and complete shitholes run by a slumlord. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Both can go, in my opinion. Why though? What do you benefit if either go? Ok, I'll be more specific and less flippant. I think bank bonuses should exist, but within reason. I think child benefits should be based on family income, not on how many kids you have. It's about proportionality. For both cases." Also i think the op wasnt actually about families claiming benefits and more that our countries resources cannot cope with growing population... | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Funny as isn't it. The people who rule our country are to blame for the state of it but no, let's blame people for having too many kids... Earlier on it was another thread about housing. Pisses me off! So many opinionated people on here. Personally though, I don't understand why an already struggling family have more children. It just doesn't appear logical to me. That's not being judgemental, it's being sensible. because it's actually nice to have children and a big family. the more you have the cheaper it gets to have them as you can pass stuff down to other kids. you're heating a house for 6 people takes the same amount as it would for one person. also, poverty brings you more spare time and gives you less of a sense of worth, having more children gives you a purpose and takes up that spare time. i never wanted any kids, i had 4. now they don't need me i'm on some shitty fuck site bored outta my tits. i'd love to have more kids and more family coz i don't like many people outside of my family. i think most people are fucked up, myself included, but only the people who get me are ok to bother with. I do worry about you sometimes x" was brought up in poverty, heard it all, seen it all, seen the best and worst of everyone. and i really don't care. i'll be dead one day, my life is for living and i'm gonna be true to myself and honest with myself. can't wait to be a granny to at least 12 kids, yay. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Funny as isn't it. The people who rule our country are to blame for the state of it but no, let's blame people for having too many kids... Earlier on it was another thread about housing. Pisses me off! So many opinionated people on here. Personally though, I don't understand why an already struggling family have more children. It just doesn't appear logical to me. That's not being judgemental, it's being sensible. because it's actually nice to have children and a big family. the more you have the cheaper it gets to have them as you can pass stuff down to other kids. you're heating a house for 6 people takes the same amount as it would for one person. also, poverty brings you more spare time and gives you less of a sense of worth, having more children gives you a purpose and takes up that spare time. i never wanted any kids, i had 4. now they don't need me i'm on some shitty fuck site bored outta my tits. i'd love to have more kids and more family coz i don't like many people outside of my family. i think most people are fucked up, myself included, but only the people who get me are ok to bother with. I do worry about you sometimes x was brought up in poverty, heard it all, seen it all, seen the best and worst of everyone. and i really don't care. i'll be dead one day, my life is for living and i'm gonna be true to myself and honest with myself. can't wait to be a granny to at least 12 kids, yay." Bless ya xx | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses" Why would they? Private companies can pay thier employees wages however they choose. Should factories stop thier bonus schemes too. Or thier special stock offerings for workers | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Why would they? Private companies can pay thier employees wages however they choose. Should factories stop thier bonus schemes too. Or thier special stock offerings for workers" You could go on for ever with that..I dont care who gets what as i'm only interested in myself benefiting | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Both can go, in my opinion. And what about the children who will suffer because child benefit is no longer available? Oh I guess the answer is " it's the parents problem " but stuff the kids huh! Sounds all very right wing your statements. If you can't afford the kids don't have them, simple!!! Maybe they could afford them when they had them, some peoples situations change Yes of course peoples situations change but there are a few people who just dont think it through properly. Totally agree but I don't think this subject should be so black and white I don't agree with people who sit on benefits as a life style choice But for some going on benefits isn't an option, if you have had a good job for 25 years and end up losing that job through no fault of your own I don't believe they should cap your benefits depending on how many kids you have, you have paid into the system for 25 years so why should you not get help for all your children under 18 while you look for another job? I don't think it should be a cap that applies to everybody's regardless of you circumstances " I dont think anyone would dispute the provision of temporary assistance ... and that kind of thing wouldnt be capped ... what is being capped it the "automatic money per child" system that exists at the moment Someone further up said they raised a child for 18 years why shouldnt they get some money back for it ... i know it might not be much but a tually why should you? Why is having a child seen as a service to the country the government should contribute to? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Young girls with poor education and minimum wage earners have children so they can get social housing as there is no way they would get one without children. They would be destined to live in HMO's (bedsit land) like single guys have to do who are on low incomes. Having children is seen as the only option to get their own place and increased benefits by alot of young girls/couples." That wasn't the case for me then. I was a young mum had my son at 17 stayed why my mum and dad till my son was a year and a half as there was no house for me, plus I still worked and that was 18 Year ago. So your theory doesn't apply to every young girl. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"Young girls with poor education and minimum wage earners have children so they can get social housing as there is no way they would get one without children. They would be destined to live in HMO's (bedsit land) like single guys have to do who are on low incomes. Having children is seen as the only option to get their own place and increased benefits by alot of young girls/couples. That wasn't the case for me then. I was a young mum had my son at 17 stayed why my mum and dad till my son was a year and a half as there was no house for me, plus I still worked and that was 18 Year ago. So your theory doesn't apply to every young girl." Or every council, believe me under my council you do not get a house just because you have a child They are only obligated to make sure you have a roof over you head and round here most pregnant young girls either stay at home or end up in a hostel | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Funny as isn't it. The people who rule our country are to blame for the state of it but no, let's blame people for having too many kids... Earlier on it was another thread about housing. Pisses me off! So many opinionated people on here. Personally though, I don't understand why an already struggling family have more children. It just doesn't appear logical to me. That's not being judgemental, it's being sensible. because it's actually nice to have children and a big family. the more you have the cheaper it gets to have them as you can pass stuff down to other kids. you're heating a house for 6 people takes the same amount as it would for one person. also, poverty brings you more spare time and gives you less of a sense of worth, having more children gives you a purpose and takes up that spare time. i never wanted any kids, i had 4. now they don't need me i'm on some shitty fuck site bored outta my tits. i'd love to have more kids and more family coz i don't like many people outside of my family. i think most people are fucked up, myself included, but only the people who get me are ok to bother with. " To me, that's not sensible though, it's selfish. Having children because you want a big family when you can't afford it just doesn't make sense. I want things because they're nice, but I can't afford them, therefore I don't buy them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Funny as isn't it. The people who rule our country are to blame for the state of it but no, let's blame people for having too many kids... Earlier on it was another thread about housing. Pisses me off! So many opinionated people on here. Personally though, I don't understand why an already struggling family have more children. It just doesn't appear logical to me. That's not being judgemental, it's being sensible. because it's actually nice to have children and a big family. the more you have the cheaper it gets to have them as you can pass stuff down to other kids. you're heating a house for 6 people takes the same amount as it would for one person. also, poverty brings you more spare time and gives you less of a sense of worth, having more children gives you a purpose and takes up that spare time. i never wanted any kids, i had 4. now they don't need me i'm on some shitty fuck site bored outta my tits. i'd love to have more kids and more family coz i don't like many people outside of my family. i think most people are fucked up, myself included, but only the people who get me are ok to bother with. To me, that's not sensible though, it's selfish. Having children because you want a big family when you can't afford it just doesn't make sense. I want things because they're nice, but I can't afford them, therefore I don't buy them. " i was only poor because i'm not selfish though. i didn't have nice things but i have a nice family. i went without for them and was happy to do so. my kids are great, they aren't street rats and i invested quite a lot into them. and time was what i had to invest in them because i was poor. why can't i be selfish also? why can onl ypeople who don't want the poor to have kids be selfish? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" To me, that's not sensible though, it's selfish. Having children because you want a big family when you can't afford it just doesn't make sense. I want things because they're nice, but I can't afford them, therefore I don't buy them. i was only poor because i'm not selfish though. i didn't have nice things but i have a nice family. i went without for them and was happy to do so. my kids are great, they aren't street rats and i invested quite a lot into them. and time was what i had to invest in them because i was poor. why can't i be selfish also? why can onl ypeople who don't want the poor to have kids be selfish?" Because you are not being selfish with your own resources ... you are being selfish with someone elses You say you wish you could have more kids because you are bored now they have grown? Then go use that time ... work, volunteer, find a hobby ... you dont just reproduce for something to pass the time | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Funny as isn't it. The people who rule our country are to blame for the state of it but no, let's blame people for having too many kids... Earlier on it was another thread about housing. Pisses me off! So many opinionated people on here. Personally though, I don't understand why an already struggling family have more children. It just doesn't appear logical to me. That's not being judgemental, it's being sensible. because it's actually nice to have children and a big family. the more you have the cheaper it gets to have them as you can pass stuff down to other kids. you're heating a house for 6 people takes the same amount as it would for one person. also, poverty brings you more spare time and gives you less of a sense of worth, having more children gives you a purpose and takes up that spare time. i never wanted any kids, i had 4. now they don't need me i'm on some shitty fuck site bored outta my tits. i'd love to have more kids and more family coz i don't like many people outside of my family. i think most people are fucked up, myself included, but only the people who get me are ok to bother with. To me, that's not sensible though, it's selfish. Having children because you want a big family when you can't afford it just doesn't make sense. I want things because they're nice, but I can't afford them, therefore I don't buy them. i was only poor because i'm not selfish though. i didn't have nice things but i have a nice family. i went without for them and was happy to do so. my kids are great, they aren't street rats and i invested quite a lot into them. and time was what i had to invest in them because i was poor. why can't i be selfish also? why can onl ypeople who don't want the poor to have kids be selfish?" So you were selfish jad 4 kids had housing benefit and tax credits etc. I cant have kids I now can't afford ivf I also can't afford my own home. So me being selfish can I have some of the tax back you have had from my 25 years working please. Oh and if your kids are having kids the money they are getting. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Funny as isn't it. The people who rule our country are to blame for the state of it but no, let's blame people for having too many kids... Earlier on it was another thread about housing. Pisses me off! So many opinionated people on here. Personally though, I don't understand why an already struggling family have more children. It just doesn't appear logical to me. That's not being judgemental, it's being sensible. because it's actually nice to have children and a big family. the more you have the cheaper it gets to have them as you can pass stuff down to other kids. you're heating a house for 6 people takes the same amount as it would for one person. also, poverty brings you more spare time and gives you less of a sense of worth, having more children gives you a purpose and takes up that spare time. i never wanted any kids, i had 4. now they don't need me i'm on some shitty fuck site bored outta my tits. i'd love to have more kids and more family coz i don't like many people outside of my family. i think most people are fucked up, myself included, but only the people who get me are ok to bother with. To me, that's not sensible though, it's selfish. Having children because you want a big family when you can't afford it just doesn't make sense. I want things because they're nice, but I can't afford them, therefore I don't buy them. " I would have liked more children but I didn't because I couldn't afford too, it was as simple as that. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Funny as isn't it. The people who rule our country are to blame for the state of it but no, let's blame people for having too many kids... Earlier on it was another thread about housing. Pisses me off! So many opinionated people on here. Personally though, I don't understand why an already struggling family have more children. It just doesn't appear logical to me. That's not being judgemental, it's being sensible. because it's actually nice to have children and a big family. the more you have the cheaper it gets to have them as you can pass stuff down to other kids. you're heating a house for 6 people takes the same amount as it would for one person. also, poverty brings you more spare time and gives you less of a sense of worth, having more children gives you a purpose and takes up that spare time. i never wanted any kids, i had 4. now they don't need me i'm on some shitty fuck site bored outta my tits. i'd love to have more kids and more family coz i don't like many people outside of my family. i think most people are fucked up, myself included, but only the people who get me are ok to bother with. To me, that's not sensible though, it's selfish. Having children because you want a big family when you can't afford it just doesn't make sense. I want things because they're nice, but I can't afford them, therefore I don't buy them. I would have liked more children but I didn't because I couldn't afford too, it was as simple as that." I have lots of friends that have this thought process too. I'd love children, but I can't afford them. Even when I was with my last long-term partner, we worked out that we'd need to have more savings before trying. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Funny as isn't it. The people who rule our country are to blame for the state of it but no, let's blame people for having too many kids... Earlier on it was another thread about housing. Pisses me off! So many opinionated people on here. Personally though, I don't understand why an already struggling family have more children. It just doesn't appear logical to me. That's not being judgemental, it's being sensible. because it's actually nice to have children and a big family. the more you have the cheaper it gets to have them as you can pass stuff down to other kids. you're heating a house for 6 people takes the same amount as it would for one person. also, poverty brings you more spare time and gives you less of a sense of worth, having more children gives you a purpose and takes up that spare time. i never wanted any kids, i had 4. now they don't need me i'm on some shitty fuck site bored outta my tits. i'd love to have more kids and more family coz i don't like many people outside of my family. i think most people are fucked up, myself included, but only the people who get me are ok to bother with. To me, that's not sensible though, it's selfish. Having children because you want a big family when you can't afford it just doesn't make sense. I want things because they're nice, but I can't afford them, therefore I don't buy them. I would have liked more children but I didn't because I couldn't afford too, it was as simple as that." I always wanted three kids till I had two then I only wanted one | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Funny as isn't it. The people who rule our country are to blame for the state of it but no, let's blame people for having too many kids... Earlier on it was another thread about housing. Pisses me off! So many opinionated people on here. Personally though, I don't understand why an already struggling family have more children. It just doesn't appear logical to me. That's not being judgemental, it's being sensible. because it's actually nice to have children and a big family. the more you have the cheaper it gets to have them as you can pass stuff down to other kids. you're heating a house for 6 people takes the same amount as it would for one person. also, poverty brings you more spare time and gives you less of a sense of worth, having more children gives you a purpose and takes up that spare time. i never wanted any kids, i had 4. now they don't need me i'm on some shitty fuck site bored outta my tits. i'd love to have more kids and more family coz i don't like many people outside of my family. i think most people are fucked up, myself included, but only the people who get me are ok to bother with. To me, that's not sensible though, it's selfish. Having children because you want a big family when you can't afford it just doesn't make sense. I want things because they're nice, but I can't afford them, therefore I don't buy them. i was only poor because i'm not selfish though. i didn't have nice things but i have a nice family. i went without for them and was happy to do so. my kids are great, they aren't street rats and i invested quite a lot into them. and time was what i had to invest in them because i was poor. why can't i be selfish also? why can onl ypeople who don't want the poor to have kids be selfish? So you were selfish jad 4 kids had housing benefit and tax credits etc. I cant have kids I now can't afford ivf I also can't afford my own home. So me being selfish can I have some of the tax back you have had from my 25 years working please. Oh and if your kids are having kids the money they are getting. " i'm sorry you couldn't have kids of your own but that's really not my fault just because mine could. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Funny as isn't it. The people who rule our country are to blame for the state of it but no, let's blame people for having too many kids... Earlier on it was another thread about housing. Pisses me off! So many opinionated people on here. Personally though, I don't understand why an already struggling family have more children. It just doesn't appear logical to me. That's not being judgemental, it's being sensible. because it's actually nice to have children and a big family. the more you have the cheaper it gets to have them as you can pass stuff down to other kids. you're heating a house for 6 people takes the same amount as it would for one person. also, poverty brings you more spare time and gives you less of a sense of worth, having more children gives you a purpose and takes up that spare time. i never wanted any kids, i had 4. now they don't need me i'm on some shitty fuck site bored outta my tits. i'd love to have more kids and more family coz i don't like many people outside of my family. i think most people are fucked up, myself included, but only the people who get me are ok to bother with. To me, that's not sensible though, it's selfish. Having children because you want a big family when you can't afford it just doesn't make sense. I want things because they're nice, but I can't afford them, therefore I don't buy them. i was only poor because i'm not selfish though. i didn't have nice things but i have a nice family. i went without for them and was happy to do so. my kids are great, they aren't street rats and i invested quite a lot into them. and time was what i had to invest in them because i was poor. why can't i be selfish also? why can onl ypeople who don't want the poor to have kids be selfish? So you were selfish jad 4 kids had housing benefit and tax credits etc. I cant have kids I now can't afford ivf I also can't afford my own home. So me being selfish can I have some of the tax back you have had from my 25 years working please. Oh and if your kids are having kids the money they are getting. i'm sorry you couldn't have kids of your own but that's really not my fault just because mine could. " But then it's not my fault you had kids you couldn't afford (you said you went without) yet my tax goes towards benefits. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" To me, that's not sensible though, it's selfish. Having children because you want a big family when you can't afford it just doesn't make sense. I want things because they're nice, but I can't afford them, therefore I don't buy them. i was only poor because i'm not selfish though. i didn't have nice things but i have a nice family. i went without for them and was happy to do so. my kids are great, they aren't street rats and i invested quite a lot into them. and time was what i had to invest in them because i was poor. why can't i be selfish also? why can onl ypeople who don't want the poor to have kids be selfish? Because you are not being selfish with your own resources ... you are being selfish with someone elses You say you wish you could have more kids because you are bored now they have grown? Then go use that time ... work, volunteer, find a hobby ... you dont just reproduce for something to pass the time " i've never reproduced to pass the time, but my time was better spent when i had kids depending on me. just saying the thought is there sometimes. realistically i don't want a full time responsibility ever again. i've got hobbies, wasting my life is one of them. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I recently seen an article about how our country is becoming over populated and the NHS and schools etc can't cope. They said that a law like China's got, that families should only have one child should be forced to combat the problem. What do you think." You need to stop reading articles | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Funny as isn't it. The people who rule our country are to blame for the state of it but no, let's blame people for having too many kids... Earlier on it was another thread about housing. Pisses me off! So many opinionated people on here. Personally though, I don't understand why an already struggling family have more children. It just doesn't appear logical to me. That's not being judgemental, it's being sensible. because it's actually nice to have children and a big family. the more you have the cheaper it gets to have them as you can pass stuff down to other kids. you're heating a house for 6 people takes the same amount as it would for one person. also, poverty brings you more spare time and gives you less of a sense of worth, having more children gives you a purpose and takes up that spare time. i never wanted any kids, i had 4. now they don't need me i'm on some shitty fuck site bored outta my tits. i'd love to have more kids and more family coz i don't like many people outside of my family. i think most people are fucked up, myself included, but only the people who get me are ok to bother with. To me, that's not sensible though, it's selfish. Having children because you want a big family when you can't afford it just doesn't make sense. I want things because they're nice, but I can't afford them, therefore I don't buy them. i was only poor because i'm not selfish though. i didn't have nice things but i have a nice family. i went without for them and was happy to do so. my kids are great, they aren't street rats and i invested quite a lot into them. and time was what i had to invest in them because i was poor. why can't i be selfish also? why can onl ypeople who don't want the poor to have kids be selfish? So you were selfish jad 4 kids had housing benefit and tax credits etc. I cant have kids I now can't afford ivf I also can't afford my own home. So me being selfish can I have some of the tax back you have had from my 25 years working please. Oh and if your kids are having kids the money they are getting. i'm sorry you couldn't have kids of your own but that's really not my fault just because mine could. But then it's not my fault you had kids you couldn't afford (you said you went without) yet my tax goes towards benefits. " yes, i had them anyway. i don't owe anyone for having them either. although i'm grateful for any help i've had with them. you accepted, that to live and work in this country meant you would contribute taxes, as per the laws of this society, therefore you contributed willingly. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Funny as isn't it. The people who rule our country are to blame for the state of it but no, let's blame people for having too many kids... Earlier on it was another thread about housing. Pisses me off! So many opinionated people on here. Personally though, I don't understand why an already struggling family have more children. It just doesn't appear logical to me. That's not being judgemental, it's being sensible. because it's actually nice to have children and a big family. the more you have the cheaper it gets to have them as you can pass stuff down to other kids. you're heating a house for 6 people takes the same amount as it would for one person. also, poverty brings you more spare time and gives you less of a sense of worth, having more children gives you a purpose and takes up that spare time. i never wanted any kids, i had 4. now they don't need me i'm on some shitty fuck site bored outta my tits. i'd love to have more kids and more family coz i don't like many people outside of my family. i think most people are fucked up, myself included, but only the people who get me are ok to bother with. To me, that's not sensible though, it's selfish. Having children because you want a big family when you can't afford it just doesn't make sense. I want things because they're nice, but I can't afford them, therefore I don't buy them. i was only poor because i'm not selfish though. i didn't have nice things but i have a nice family. i went without for them and was happy to do so. my kids are great, they aren't street rats and i invested quite a lot into them. and time was what i had to invest in them because i was poor. why can't i be selfish also? why can onl ypeople who don't want the poor to have kids be selfish? So you were selfish jad 4 kids had housing benefit and tax credits etc. I cant have kids I now can't afford ivf I also can't afford my own home. So me being selfish can I have some of the tax back you have had from my 25 years working please. Oh and if your kids are having kids the money they are getting. i'm sorry you couldn't have kids of your own but that's really not my fault just because mine could. But then it's not my fault you had kids you couldn't afford (you said you went without) yet my tax goes towards benefits. yes, i had them anyway. i don't owe anyone for having them either. although i'm grateful for any help i've had with them. you accepted, that to live and work in this country meant you would contribute taxes, as per the laws of this society, therefore you contributed willingly. " I was born in this country I had no choice about that. i do NOT pay tax willingly as I especially be grudge paying it for people like you. Who clearly thinks it's ok to have what you really can't afford because the rest of us will pay. What happened to working, saving up and having what you can afford?. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I understand that physical longing to have children and I imagine for some that it doesn't go away just because they have had one or two already. If everyone waited for the economically right time to have children very few would be born. We have more people accessing, or trying to access, fertility treatment because they have waited for that time when they are economically stable enough, have a home etc. They feel aggrieved that they have done the right thing and then can't access all the help they need from the NHS to get pregnant. For everyone that wants a cap I hope you don't need care in your old age as we are already facing a problem. " That's a really good point. For me personally, the possibility of not being able to have children when the time is right, is something I'm willing to risk. I don't know the economic backlash of what a cap on how many children you can claim benefit for would have, but I'd be interested to see. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I understand that physical longing to have children and I imagine for some that it doesn't go away just because they have had one or two already. If everyone waited for the economically right time to have children very few would be born. We have more people accessing, or trying to access, fertility treatment because they have waited for that time when they are economically stable enough, have a home etc. They feel aggrieved that they have done the right thing and then can't access all the help they need from the NHS to get pregnant. For everyone that wants a cap I hope you don't need care in your old age as we are already facing a problem. That's a really good point. For me personally, the possibility of not being able to have children when the time is right, is something I'm willing to risk. I don't know the economic backlash of what a cap on how many children you can claim benefit for would have, but I'd be interested to see. " So it seems you value money more then children? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I just realized this has gotten over 140 posts and hasn't been moved to the politics forum. That's got to be a record?! " The other one is still going strong too. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses" The difference might be that bankers bonuses are paid for by shareholders , child benefits are funded by the tax payer. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I just realized this has gotten over 140 posts and hasn't been moved to the politics forum. That's got to be a record?! " Just because its turned into a slanging match, doesn't mean its a political post. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I just realized this has gotten over 140 posts and hasn't been moved to the politics forum. That's got to be a record?! Just because its turned into a slanging match, doesn't mean its a political post. " True! But I actually think this one has turned into a political discussion. I've seen less political threads get banished. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses The difference might be that bankers bonuses are paid for by shareholders , child benefits are funded by the tax payer. " What about the bailouts that came from out taxes? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I just realized this has gotten over 140 posts and hasn't been moved to the politics forum. That's got to be a record?! Just because its turned into a slanging match, doesn't mean its a political post. True! But I actually think this one has turned into a political discussion. I've seen less political threads get banished." Agreed. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I just realized this has gotten over 140 posts and hasn't been moved to the politics forum. That's got to be a record?! Just because its turned into a slanging match, doesn't mean its a political post. True! But I actually think this one has turned into a political discussion. I've seen less political threads get banished." I thought it was a political subject just from the title. Is the other place for purely party politics? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Do you not think bankers have worked for their bonuses Behave yourself Do you not think parents work? depends if they have loads of kids. Then they don't have to. only if they hit the benefits lottery jackpot and have a disabled one. Really?? I have a "disabled one" and I still work. I'd far rather he didn't have his chronic life threatening condition than be raking in all this money you must think I get for having a "disabled one" That's without raising another 2 and paying a mortgage on a single wage I despair at some people sarcasm. as a carer, as well as a parent, i'm well aware of the attitudes people have. i am promoting the most unpopular ones as well as the popular offensive ones. Let's hope so aye else there is no hope if that is your attitude towards families with disabled children puts it in perspective though doesn't it? how is a popular offensive opinion more acceptable than one that isn't? both are offensive. i think you also don't know what sarcasm means." I know exactly what sarcasm means Look it up | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I just realized this has gotten over 140 posts and hasn't been moved to the politics forum. That's got to be a record?! Just because its turned into a slanging match, doesn't mean its a political post. True! But I actually think this one has turned into a political discussion. I've seen less political threads get banished. I thought it was a political subject just from the title. Is the other place for purely party politics? " The Brexit post is still here too! | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I just realized this has gotten over 140 posts and hasn't been moved to the politics forum. That's got to be a record?! Just because its turned into a slanging match, doesn't mean its a political post. True! But I actually think this one has turned into a political discussion. I've seen less political threads get banished. I thought it was a political subject just from the title. Is the other place for purely party politics? " I think it started out with more theory than policy...but it's become policy. I honestly have no idea what threads are deemed political enough to get sent to the cesspo...I mean "politics forum" | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses The difference might be that bankers bonuses are paid for by shareholders , child benefits are funded by the tax payer. What about the bailouts that came from out taxes? " That was a limited number of retail banks to stop the general public losing their money and stop the economy crashing further ... the 2007 crash was caused by investment banks which are an entirely different kettle of fish ... i work for a retail bank and in a uk market we actually make a loss for the service we provide, are not exessively paid and don't get massive bonuses but unfortunately the media just lumps us all in together under the banner of bankers | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I just realized this has gotten over 140 posts and hasn't been moved to the politics forum. That's got to be a record?! Just because its turned into a slanging match, doesn't mean its a political post. True! But I actually think this one has turned into a political discussion. I've seen less political threads get banished. I thought it was a political subject just from the title. Is the other place for purely party politics? The Brexit post is still here too! " Maybe the mods ae having a night off and we will all wake up to forum bans | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I just realized this has gotten over 140 posts and hasn't been moved to the politics forum. That's got to be a record?! Just because its turned into a slanging match, doesn't mean its a political post. True! But I actually think this one has turned into a political discussion. I've seen less political threads get banished. I thought it was a political subject just from the title. Is the other place for purely party politics? I think it started out with more theory than policy...but it's become policy. I honestly have no idea what threads are deemed political enough to get sent to the cesspo...I mean "politics forum" " | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I just realized this has gotten over 140 posts and hasn't been moved to the politics forum. That's got to be a record?! Just because its turned into a slanging match, doesn't mean its a political post. True! But I actually think this one has turned into a political discussion. I've seen less political threads get banished. I thought it was a political subject just from the title. Is the other place for purely party politics? The Brexit post is still here too! Maybe the mods ae having a night off and we will all wake up to forum bans " They must get tempted sometimes: 'Right, that's it! You're all banned!!!' | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses The difference might be that bankers bonuses are paid for by shareholders , child benefits are funded by the tax payer. What about the bailouts that came from out taxes? " However the bailout money has to be repaid . | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses The difference might be that bankers bonuses are paid for by shareholders , child benefits are funded by the tax payer. What about the bailouts that came from out taxes? That was a limited number of retail banks to stop the general public losing their money and stop the economy crashing further ... the 2007 crash was caused by investment banks which are an entirely different kettle of fish ... i work for a retail bank and in a uk market we actually make a loss for the service we provide, are not exessively paid and don't get massive bonuses but unfortunately the media just lumps us all in together under the banner of bankers " I understand that. I worked in banking many moons ago. I am just countering generalisations with equally glib and nonsensical generalisations. The bonuses don't magically appear from nowhere. They come from charges which trickle down and are paid for by people in ways they don't always recognise. We all pay taxes, including children, through VAT. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Funny as isn't it. The people who rule our country are to blame for the state of it but no, let's blame people for having too many kids... Earlier on it was another thread about housing. Pisses me off! So many opinionated people on here. Personally though, I don't understand why an already struggling family have more children. It just doesn't appear logical to me. That's not being judgemental, it's being sensible. because it's actually nice to have children and a big family. the more you have the cheaper it gets to have them as you can pass stuff down to other kids. you're heating a house for 6 people takes the same amount as it would for one person. also, poverty brings you more spare time and gives you less of a sense of worth, having more children gives you a purpose and takes up that spare time. i never wanted any kids, i had 4. now they don't need me i'm on some shitty fuck site bored outta my tits. i'd love to have more kids and more family coz i don't like many people outside of my family. i think most people are fucked up, myself included, but only the people who get me are ok to bother with. To me, that's not sensible though, it's selfish. Having children because you want a big family when you can't afford it just doesn't make sense. I want things because they're nice, but I can't afford them, therefore I don't buy them. i was only poor because i'm not selfish though. i didn't have nice things but i have a nice family. i went without for them and was happy to do so. my kids are great, they aren't street rats and i invested quite a lot into them. and time was what i had to invest in them because i was poor. why can't i be selfish also? why can onl ypeople who don't want the poor to have kids be selfish? So you were selfish jad 4 kids had housing benefit and tax credits etc. I cant have kids I now can't afford ivf I also can't afford my own home. So me being selfish can I have some of the tax back you have had from my 25 years working please. Oh and if your kids are having kids the money they are getting. i'm sorry you couldn't have kids of your own but that's really not my fault just because mine could. But then it's not my fault you had kids you couldn't afford (you said you went without) yet my tax goes towards benefits. yes, i had them anyway. i don't owe anyone for having them either. although i'm grateful for any help i've had with them. you accepted, that to live and work in this country meant you would contribute taxes, as per the laws of this society, therefore you contributed willingly. I was born in this country I had no choice about that. i do NOT pay tax willingly as I especially be grudge paying it for people like you. Who clearly thinks it's ok to have what you really can't afford because the rest of us will pay. What happened to working, saving up and having what you can afford?. " i was born into the unprivileged, disadvantaged working classes so unfortunately i would never be able to save up for anything. so, rather than deprive myself of what was naturally given to me i took it anyway and coped with the shitty hand dealt to me. you see, when you have nothing you also have nothing to lose when you take a risk. it's fine you begrudge my children though, they don't really care and neither do i. they are here and blissfully unaware yet that people out there begrudge them life. only time i seriously considered having an abortion was when my partner was working but we decided not to there either. we're survivors and i passed that onto 4 healthy kids and proud to do so. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I have middle child syndrome " Would you have preferred to have only child syndrome or youngest child syndrome? | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"I have middle child syndrome Would you have preferred to have only child syndrome or youngest child syndrome? " I'm not sure about that I've never thought about it haha | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There'd be no need to have this discussion if there was a fairer distribution of wealth within our society. But in terms of the side issue of taxes etc why do we pay taxes to keep the likes of Ian Huntley, Yorkshire Ripper,Hindley etc alive??? That money could be better spent on the NHS, social care, schools, Policing....." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"There'd be no need to have this discussion if there was a fairer distribution of wealth within our society. But in terms of the side issue of taxes etc why do we pay taxes to keep the likes of Ian Huntley, Yorkshire Ripper,Hindley etc alive??? That money could be better spent on the NHS, social care, schools, Policing....." | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
" i was born into the unprivileged, disadvantaged working classes so unfortunately i would never be able to save up for anything. so, rather than deprive myself of what was naturally given to me i took it anyway and coped with the shitty hand dealt to me. " Ok im sorry for this in advance but i have to call BS on that right there Life is what you make of it not what you take from it I was born into a the same background , underpriviliged , single parent household , my mum sacrificed all the time just to clothe (spelling? ) and feed us But i worked hard in life , applied myself , still study on top of a full time job now and managed to save up and buy a flat on a single persons wage ... nothing fancy but it is possible Resigning yourself to the fate of your earlier generation is just a cop out | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
"People want child benefits stopped but dont bat an eyelid to bankers bonuses Funny as isn't it. The people who rule our country are to blame for the state of it but no, let's blame people for having too many kids... Earlier on it was another thread about housing. Pisses me off! So many opinionated people on here. Personally though, I don't understand why an already struggling family have more children. It just doesn't appear logical to me. That's not being judgemental, it's being sensible. because it's actually nice to have children and a big family. the more you have the cheaper it gets to have them as you can pass stuff down to other kids. you're heating a house for 6 people takes the same amount as it would for one person. also, poverty brings you more spare time and gives you less of a sense of worth, having more children gives you a purpose and takes up that spare time. i never wanted any kids, i had 4. now they don't need me i'm on some shitty fuck site bored outta my tits. i'd love to have more kids and more family coz i don't like many people outside of my family. i think most people are fucked up, myself included, but only the people who get me are ok to bother with. To me, that's not sensible though, it's selfish. Having children because you want a big family when you can't afford it just doesn't make sense. I want things because they're nice, but I can't afford them, therefore I don't buy them. i was only poor because i'm not selfish though. i didn't have nice things but i have a nice family. i went without for them and was happy to do so. my kids are great, they aren't street rats and i invested quite a lot into them. and time was what i had to invest in them because i was poor. why can't i be selfish also? why can onl ypeople who don't want the poor to have kids be selfish? So you were selfish jad 4 kids had housing benefit and tax credits etc. I cant have kids I now can't afford ivf I also can't afford my own home. So me being selfish can I have some of the tax back you have had from my 25 years working please. Oh and if your kids are having kids the money they are getting. i'm sorry you couldn't have kids of your own but that's really not my fault just because mine could. But then it's not my fault you had kids you couldn't afford (you said you went without) yet my tax goes towards benefits. yes, i had them anyway. i don't owe anyone for having them either. although i'm grateful for any help i've had with them. you accepted, that to live and work in this country meant you would contribute taxes, as per the laws of this society, therefore you contributed willingly. I was born in this country I had no choice about that. i do NOT pay tax willingly as I especially be grudge paying it for people like you. Who clearly thinks it's ok to have what you really can't afford because the rest of us will pay. What happened to working, saving up and having what you can afford?. i was born into the unprivileged, disadvantaged working classes so unfortunately i would never be able to save up for anything. so, rather than deprive myself of what was naturally given to me i took it anyway and coped with the shitty hand dealt to me. you see, when you have nothing you also have nothing to lose when you take a risk. it's fine you begrudge my children though, they don't really care and neither do i. they are here and blissfully unaware yet that people out there begrudge them life. only time i seriously considered having an abortion was when my partner was working but we decided not to there either. we're survivors and i passed that onto 4 healthy kids and proud to do so." Your very good at twisting things. I never once said I begrudge your children I said I wasn't happy paying tax for women who think it's ok to have child after child and get double in benefits what I do working full time. You see no wrong in what you have done, I do and have a totally different view because I was brought up differently. I also was brought up in a middle class family my mum went back to work when I was two months old and I was looked after by grandparents she didn't want to work but had to so bills could be paid to keep a roof over our heads. They got into financial hardship when I was around 6 and lost everything tried to get a council house but other families were a priority so we had to live with my mums mate till they earned enough to change the situation. i don't believe in rewarding people with more money every time they have a child, benefits should be capped to two children if people choose to have more then they get a job and pay themselfs. It seems too many generations of families think it's ok to live on the benefits system and it's not. | |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |
| |||
Reply privately (closed, thread got too big) |